「DAMAGES」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(89ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(2) When a Commodity Exchange received approval pursuant to the provisions of the preceding paragraph, special clearing funds (limited to those deposited by a member who became a Clearing Participant of said Commodity Exchange as a Commodity Clearing Organization as on the Effective Date, and except for those to be allocated for damages, for which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions) which have been deposited with said Commodity Exchange pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, paragraph 3 of the Old Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed to be clearing deposits deposited with said Commodity Exchange as a Commodity Clearing Organization pursuant to the provisions of Article 180, paragraph 1 of the New Act. 例文帳に追加

２ 商品取引所が前項の規定による承認を受けたときは、この法律の施行の際現に旧法第八十一条第三項の規定により当該商品取引所に預託されている特別清算負担金（施行日において商品取引清算機関としての当該商品取引所の清算参加者となった会員が預託しているものに限り、附則第九条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる損害の賠償に充てるべきものを除く。）は、新法第百八十条第一項の規定により商品取引清算機関としての当該商品取引所に預託されている清算預託金とみなす。 - 経済産業省

Article 2 (1) The term "Whistleblowing" as used in this Act shall mean whistleblowing made by a worker (which shall mean worker as provided for in Article 9 of the Labor Standards Act (Act No. 49 of 1947); the same shall apply hereinafter), without a purpose of obtaining an wrongful gain, a purpose of causing damages to others, or any other wrongful purpose, about Reportable Fact that has been occurred, is being occurred or is about to be occurred by "Business Operator" (which shall mean any of the following business operators (which shall mean juridical person, other organization and individual who operates a business)), or such persons as officer, employee or agent in the workplace where the worker is occupied in performing the Business Operator's business activities, to the said Business Operator or the person designated by the said Business Operator in advance (hereinafter referred to as "Business Operator, etc."), to an Administrative Organ with the authority to impose disposition (which shall mean an order, rescission, and other acts involving the exercise of public authority; the same shall apply hereinafter) or recommendation, etc. (which shall mean a recommendation and other acts which are not disposition; the same shall apply hereinafter) upon the said Reportable Fact, or to any person who are recognized to be necessary to do whistleblowing to the said Reportable Fact in order to prevent the occurrence thereof or the spread of damage caused thereby (including person who suffers or might suffer damage from the said Reportable Fact, but excluding any person who might cause damages to the competitive position or any other legitimate interests of the Business Operator; the same shall apply in Item (iii) of the following Article.). 例文帳に追加

第二条　この法律において「公益通報」とは、労働者（労働基準法（昭和二十二年法律第四十九号）第九条に規定する労働者をいう。以下同じ。）が、不正の利益を得る目的、他人に損害を加える目的その他の不正の目的でなく、その労務提供先（次のいずれかに掲げる事業者（法人その他の団体及び事業を行う個人をいう。以下同じ。）をいう。以下同じ。）又は当該労務提供先の事業に従事する場合におけるその役員、従業員、代理人その他の者について通報対象事実が生じ、又はまさに生じようとしている旨を、当該労務提供先若しくは当該労務提供先があらかじめ定めた者（以下「労務提供先等」という。）、当該通報対象事実について処分（命令、取消しその他公権力の行使に当たる行為をいう。以下同じ。）若しくは勧告等（勧告その他処分に当たらない行為をいう。以下同じ。）をする権限を有する行政機関又はその者に対し当該通報対象事実を通報することがその発生若しくはこれによる被害の拡大を防止するために必要であると認められる者（当該通報対象事実により被害を受け又は受けるおそれがある者を含み、当該労務提供先の競争上の地位その他正当な利益を害するおそれがある者を除く。次条第三号において同じ。）に通報することをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 9-7-5 (1) The provisions of Part 2, Chapter X, Section 1, Subsection 1 (excluding Article 650, paragraph (1) and Article 664) (General Provisions on Casualty Insurance) of the Commercial Code shall apply mutatis mutandis to mutual aid contracts concluded by a business cooperative or a minor business cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or a fire mutual aid cooperative (hereinafter referred to as "a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities" in this Article) whereby mutual aid premiums are received by promising to compensate for damages that may be caused by certain accidental incidents; the provisions of Subsection 2 (Fire Insurance) of the same Section shall apply mutatis mutandis to fire mutual aid contracts concluded by a fire mutual aid cooperative; the provisions of Subsection 3 (Cargo Insurance) of the same Section shall apply mutatis mutandis to mutual aid contracts concluded by a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities (excluding a fire mutual aid cooperative) whereby mutual aid premiums are received by promising to compensate for damages to cargos that may be caused by certain accidental incidents; and the provisions of Section 2 (excluding the provisions pertaining to Article 664 among the provisions on application mutatis mutandis set forth in Article 683, paragraph (1)) (Life Insurance) of the same Chapter shall apply mutatis mutandis to mutual aid contracts concluded by a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities (excluding a fire mutual aid cooperative) whereby mutual aid premiums are received by promising to pay a certain amount of money with regard to the survival or death of a person (including a physical condition where said person has been diagnosed by a doctor to have no more than a certain period left to live). 例文帳に追加

第九条の七の五　商法第二編第十章第一節第一款（第六百五十条第一項及び第六百六十四条を除く。）（損害保険の総則）の規定は共済事業を行う事業協同組合若しくは事業協同小組合又は火災共済協同組合（以下この条において「共済事業を行う協同組合」という。）が締結する一定の偶然の事故によつて生ずることのある損害をてん補することを約し共済掛金を収受する共済契約について、同節第二款（火災保険）の規定は火災共済協同組合が締結する火災共済契約について、同節第三款（運送保険）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合（火災共済協同組合を除く。）が締結する一定の偶然の事故によつて生ずることのある運送品の損害をてん補することを約し共済掛金を収受する共済契約について、同章第二節（第六百八十三条第一項に掲げる準用規定のうち第六百六十四条に係る規定を除く。）（生命保険）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合（火災共済協同組合を除く。）が締結する人の生存又は死亡（当該人の余命が一定の期間以内であると医師により診断された身体の状態を含む。）に関し一定の金額を支払うことを約し共済掛金を収受する共済契約について、それぞれ準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 114 (1) In the case where the copyright holder, the holder of the right of publication or the holder of the neighboring rights (in this paragraph referred to below as "the copyright holder, etc.") asserts against a person who intentionally or negligently infringes upon the holder's copyright, right of publication or neighboring rights, as the case may be, a claim for compensation for damages sustained by said holder as a result of such infringement, and such infringer has transferred the ownership of the object made by way of such an act of infringement or has made a public transmission (including, in the case of an automatic public transmission, by making transmittable) constituting such an act of infringement, then the amount obtained by multiplying [(a)] the number of objects the ownership of which has been so transferred or the number of reproductions of works or performance, etc. made as a result of reception by the public of such public transmissions (in this paragraph referred to below as "the reception reproductions"), as the case may be (such number is in this paragraph referred to below as "the number transferred, etc."), by [(b)] the per unit profit of the objects (including reception reproductions) that the copyright holder, etc. could have sold had there been no such act of infringement, can be regarded as the amount of damages suffered by such copyright holder, etc., but only within the limit of the copyright holder's ability to sell or take other [similar] actions with respect to said objects. However, when there exist circumstances under which the copyright holder, etc. could not have sold such objects in such number corresponding, in whole or in part, to the number transferred, etc., then the amount corresponding to such number shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第百十四条　著作権者、出版権者又は著作隣接権者（以下この項において「著作権者等」という。）が故意又は過失により自己の著作権、出版権又は著作隣接権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為によつて作成された物を譲渡し、又はその侵害の行為を組成する公衆送信（自動公衆送信の場合にあつては、送信可能化を含む。）を行つたときは、その譲渡した物の数量又はその公衆送信が公衆によつて受信されることにより作成された著作物若しくは実演等の複製物（以下この項において「受信複製物」という。）の数量（以下この項において「譲渡等数量」という。）に、著作権者等がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物（受信複製物を含む。）の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、著作権者等の当該物に係る販売その他の行為を行う能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、著作権者等が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡等数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を著作権者等が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In an action for passing off arising out of the use by the defendant of a registered trade mark of which he is the registered proprietor or a registered user, being a trade mark substantially identical with, or deceptively similar to, the trade mark of the plaintiff, damages shall not be awarded against the defendant if he satisfies the court - (a) that at the time he commenced to use the trade mark he was unaware and had no reasonable means of ascertaining that the trade mark of the plaintiff was in use; and (b) that when he became aware of the existence and nature of the plaintiff’s trade mark he immediately ceased to use the trade mark in relation to goods in relation to which it was used by the plaintiff.例文帳に追加

原告の当該商標と商標がほぼ同一である，若しくは誤認混同を生じるほど類似しており，被告人による登録商標の使用によって生ずる登録商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者であるとの詐称通用に対する訴訟において，次の点について裁判所の心証を得た場合，損害賠償は被告人に対して認容されないものとする。 (a) 当該商標の使用を開始した当時において，被告人は原告の当該商標が使用されていたことに気付いておらず，またそれを確認する合理的手段を有していなかったこと，及び (b) 原告の商標の存在及び性質を認識し，直ちに，原告により使用されていた商品について当該商標の使用を停止したこと。 - 特許庁

The fact that the information about a licensing contract, as provided for in Paragraph 6 of this Article, is not recorded in the Register or is not published, does not constitute grounds for opposing the validity of a trademark pursuant to the provisions of Article 31 or 32 of this Law, or for applying the restrictions for non-use of a trademark as provided by Article 23, Paragraph 3 (in such cases Article 23, Paragraph 6 shall apply), or for opposing the right of a licensee to intervene in an action for trademark infringement initiated by the owner of the mark under the provisions of Article 28, Paragraph 2, or for opposing the right of a licensee to receive compensation for the damages caused by unlawful use of the licensed trademark.例文帳に追加

ライセンス許諾契約に関して(6)に定めた情報が，登録簿に記録されておらず又は公告されていないという事実は，第31条若しくは第32条の規定に従い，商標の有効性に関して異議申立をすること，又は商標の不使用に関して，第23条 (3)に定めた限定の適用を求めること(そのような場合は，第23条 (6)を適用するものとする)，又は商標所有者により第28条 (2)の規定に基づいて開始された商標侵害訴訟に使用権者が参加する権利に対して異議申立をすること，又はライセンスが付与された商標についての不法使用によって生じた損害について，使用権者がその賠償を受ける権利に対して異議申立をすることの理由にはならない。 - 特許庁

Article 160 (1) A person who has violated the provisions of the preceding Article shall be liable for the damages suffered by any person who conducted, or entrusted another person with, sales and purchase of the Securities in a Financial Instruments Exchange Market, Market Transactions of Derivatives, sales and purchase of Securities in an Over-the-Counter Securities Market or sales and purchase of Tradable Securities (hereinafter referred to "Sales and Purchase of Securities, etc. in a Financial Instruments Exchange Market, etc." in this paragraph) for the Financial Instruments, Financial Indicators or Options whose prices, Agreed Figures or amounts of compensations were formed by said violation, at the so-formed prices, Agreed Figures or amounts of compensations, from the Sales and Purchase of Securities, etc. in a Financial Instruments Exchange Market, etc. or the entrustment thereof. 例文帳に追加

第百六十条　前条の規定に違反した者は、当該違反行為により形成された金融商品、金融指標若しくはオプションに係る価格、約定数値若しくは対価の額により、当該金融商品、金融指標若しくはオプションについて、取引所金融商品市場における有価証券の売買、市場デリバティブ取引、店頭売買有価証券市場における有価証券の売買若しくは取扱有価証券の売買（以下この項において「取引所金融商品市場等における有価証券の売買等」という。）をし、又はその委託をした者が当該取引所金融商品市場等における有価証券の売買等又は委託につき受けた損害を賠償する責任を負う。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) Articles 101, 104 to 105-2, 105-4 to 105-7 and 168(3) to 168(6) of this Act and Articles 719 and 724 (tort) of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the exercise of the right to claim compensation under paragraph (1). In this case, where a person having the right to claim compensation has become aware of the fact that the invention claimed in the patent application had been worked and of the person who had worked the invention prior to the registration establishing a patent right, the term "the time when the victim or the statutory representative thereof became aware of such damages and the perpetrator therefor" in Article 724 of the Civil Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "the date of the registration establishing a patent right." 例文帳に追加

５　第百一条、第百四条から第百五条の二まで、第百五条の四から第百五条の七まで及び第百六十八条第三項から第六項まで並びに民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第七百十九条及び第七百二十四条（不法行為）の規定は、第一項の規定による請求権を行使する場合に準用する。この場合において、当該請求権を有する者が特許権の設定の登録前に当該特許出願に係る発明の実施の事実及びその実施をした者を知つたときは、同条中「被害者又はその法定代理人が損害及び加害者を知った時」とあるのは、「特許権の設定の登録の日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) If any person, by circular, advertisement or otherwise, threatens any other person with proceedings for infringement of a registered design, a person aggrieved thereby may, whether the person making the threats is or is not entitled to or interested in a registered design, or an application for the registration of a design, institute proceedings against him and obtain a declaration to the effect that such threats are unjustifiable and an interdict against the continuance of such threats, and may recover such damages, if any, as he has sustained thereby, unless the person making the threats proves that the acts in respect of which the proceedings are threatened, constitute or, if performed, would constitute an infringement of a registered design which is not shown by the plaintiff to be invalid:例文帳に追加

(1) ある者が，回状，広告その他により，登録意匠の侵害に係る訴訟手続を提起することをもって他人を脅迫する場合，これにより被害を受ける者は，脅迫する者が登録意匠又は意匠登録出願について権利を有するか否か又は利害関係を有するか否かを問わず，当該脅迫者に対して訴訟手続を提起してかかる脅迫が不当である旨の宣言及びかかる脅迫の継続に対する差止命令を得ることができ，かつ，損害を被った場合は損害賠償を得ることができるが，他方，脅迫する者が，訴訟手続の提起をもってする脅迫の対象となっている行為は，原告が無効であることを証明していない登録意匠の侵害になること又はかかる行為が行われたら侵害になるであろうことを証明する場合はこの限りでない。 - 特許庁

Where by virtue of a transaction, instrument or event to which section 43 applies a person becomes the proprietor or one of the proprietors or an exclusive licensee of a patent and the patent is subsequently infringed, the court or the Registrar shall not award him damages or order that he be given an account of the profits in respect of such a subsequent infringement occurring before the transaction, instrument or event is registered unless -- (a) the transaction, instrument or event is registered within the period of 6 months beginning with its date; or (b) the court or the Registrar is satisfied that it was not practicable to register the transaction, instrument or event before the end of that period and that it was registered as soon as practicable thereafter.例文帳に追加

第43条が適用される取引，証書又は事件によりある者が特許の所有者若しくは複数所有者の1又は排他的実施権者となり，かつ，当該特許がその後に侵害された場合は，裁判所又は登録官は，その者に対して，当該取引，証書又は事件が登録される前に生じた当該後の侵害に関して，損害賠償を裁定してはならず，又は利益の返還を受けられる旨を命じてはならない。ただし，次の場合は，この限りでない。 (a) 当該取引，証書若しくは事件が，その日から開始する6月の期間内に登録された場合，又は (b) 裁判所若しくは登録官が当該取引，証書若しくは事件を前記期間の終了前に登録することは実効不能であったこと，かつ，その後遅滞なく登録されたことを認める場合 - 特許庁

(9) The provisions of Article 829 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Absence of a New Share Issue, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xiii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Articles 836 to 838 inclusive (Order to Provide Security; Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(e)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of non-issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

９　会社法第八百二十九条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（新株発行等の不存在の確認の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十三号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十八条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）及び第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ホに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の不存在の確認の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provisions of Article 829 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Absence of a New Share Issue, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xiii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Articles 836 to 838 inclusive (Order to Provide Security; Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated) and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(e)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of non-issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

７　会社法第八百二十九条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（新株発行等の不存在の確認の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十三号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十八条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ホに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の不存在の確認の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1 The purpose of this Act is to protect the interests of consumers, and thereby contribute to the stabilization of and the improvement in the general welfare and life of the citizens and to the sound development of the national economy, in consideration of the discrepancy in quality and quantity of information and the negotiating power between consumers and business operators, by permitting a rescission of manifestation of intentions to offer or accept contracts made by consumers when they misunderstood or are distressed by certain acts of business operators, and nullifying any clauses, in part or in whole, that exempt the business operators from their liability for damages or otherwise that unfairly harm the interests of consumers, in addition to providing a right to qualified consumer organization to demand an injunction against business operators, etc. for the purpose of preventing the occurrence of or the spreading of damage to other consumers. 例文帳に追加

第一条　この法律は、消費者と事業者との間の情報の質及び量並びに交渉力の格差にかんがみ、事業者の一定の行為により消費者が誤認し、又は困惑した場合について契約の申込み又はその承諾の意思表示を取り消すことができることとするとともに、事業者の損害賠償の責任を免除する条項その他の消費者の利益を不当に害することとなる条項の全部又は一部を無効とするほか、消費者の被害の発生又は拡大を防止するため適格消費者団体が事業者等に対し差止請求をすることができることとすることにより、消費者の利益の擁護を図り、もって国民生活の安定向上と国民経済の健全な発展に寄与することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Uji-shi planned to develop a medical examination system for babies by utilizing data in the basic resident register of which Uji-City was in charge. For this purpose, the development business was consigned by Uji-City to a private company, which further consigned the same to another company all the way down. Then, a part-time employee of the consignee (three-step consignments between Uji-City) made unauthorized copies of the data in the basic resident register and sold them to name-list distributors, who further resold them to other distributors. With respect to this matter, three inhabitants in Uji-City claimed that they had suffered mental damage due to the aforementioned leakage of data and filed an action against Uji-City with the Kyoto District Court, demanding compensation of damages for mental sufferings and attorney's fee. The Court finally ruled that Uji-City is liable for invasion of privacy rights and ordered Uji-City to pay 15,000 yen (10,000 yen as compensation for mental sufferings and 5,000 yen as attorney's fee) for each person. 例文帳に追加

宇治市がその管理に係る住民基本台帳のデータを使用して乳幼児検診システムを開発することを企図し、その開発業務を民間業者に委託したところ、再々委託先のアルバイトの従業員が上記データを不正にコピーしてこれを名簿販売業者に販売し、同業者が更に上記データを他に販売するなどをしたことに関して、宇治市の住民３人が、上記データの流出により精神的苦痛を被ったと主張して、宇治市に対し、損害賠償金（慰謝料及び弁護士費用）の支払を求めた事案において、プライバシー権侵害に基づく宇治市の不法行為責任を認め、損害賠償として１人当たり１万5000円（慰謝料１万円及び弁護士費用５０００円）の支払を命じた。 - 経済産業省

In the case of an actual infringement of software patent rights, assuming the exercise of rights is approved, there would be a large range of difference in the level of advantages conferred on the patent holder and on the whole of society and the disadvantages incurred by the rights infringer and by the whole of society. This difference would depend on such factors as: X) the method of exercising rights (injunction claims, compensatory damages claims, restitution of unjust enrichment claims, claims for the recovery of confidence, etc.) Y) the target object of the exercise of rights (usage, status of use, nature of the software where the proprietary technology subject to such exercise of right is employed) Z) the status of use and feasibility of the patent (the existence or extent of the patent holder's profit) The advantages and disadvantages resulting from permitting or preventing such exercise of rights will be weighed upon consideration of these factors. 例文帳に追加

ソフトウェアに係る特許の侵害が生じている場合においては、ｉ）権利行使の方法（差止請求・損害賠償請求・不当利得返還請求・信頼回復措置請求等）ｉｉ）権利行使の対象物（権利行使の対象となる特許技術が用いられているソフトウェアの用途・利用状況・性質）ｉｉｉ）特許の利用状況及び利用可能性（特許権者の利益の有無・多寡）等の要素如何によって、当該権利行使を認めることによって特許権者が得る利益及び社会全体に与える利益と権利行使の相手方及び社会全体に与える不利益の程度が大きく異なることから、これらの要素を勘案して権利行使を認める場合・認めない場合のそれぞれの利益・不利益について比較考量が行われることとなる。 - 経済産業省

I was Minister for Financial Services, while Minister Yosano had the experience of serving as the Minister for International Trade and Industry. Minister Yosano strongly requested that two of us be allowed to join the debate at that time, when the Kan cabinet was in office, and as Mr. Kaieda, who was Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry at that time, agreed to that, we joined the debate on the draft of the scheme halfway through it. Therefore, I have certain knowledge about this matter. In relation to the support for Tokyo Electric Power, what kind of cooperation the company seeks from stakeholders and how stakeholders, including financial institutions, respond are matters to be determined through consultations between private business operators, so my understanding is that the Financial Services Agency is not in a position to make comments. In any case, regarding the compensation issue, it is important to pay damages compensation in a prompt and appropriate manner, and another important thing is, as you know, to avoid causing unnecessary, unexpected adverse effects on the stability of the financial and capital markets, on the principal premise that stable electricity supply should be ensured. We will continue to carefully monitor market developments. 例文帳に追加

そのときの経過から私はある程度知っておりますけれども、東京電力に対する支援については、東京電力がステークホルダーに対してどのような協力を求めるか、それに対して金融機関を含むステークホルダーがどのように対応するかについては、民間事業者間で話し合われるべき事柄で、当局としてはお答えする立場にはないと認識しておりまして、いずれにいたしましても、東京電力の賠償問題については、迅速かつ適切な損害賠償の実施や、それからもう一個大事な点は、ご存じのように、電力の安定供給を確保することを大前提としつつ、金融・資本市場の安定に不要・不測の悪影響を生じさせないことが重要であり、引き続き市場の動向に注視してまいりたいと思っております。 - 金融庁

Where a person, by means of circulars, advertisements or otherwise, threatens a person with an action or proceeding for infringement of a trade mark which is registered, or alleged by the first mentioned person to be registered, or with some other like proceeding, a person aggrieved may, whether the person making the threats is or is not the registered proprietor or the registered user of the trade mark, bring a suit against the first mentioned person and may obtain a declaration to the effect that the threats are unjustifiable, and an injunction against the continuance of the threats and may recover such damages (if any) as he has sustained, unless the first mentioned person satisfies the court that the trade mark is registered and that the acts in respect of which the proceedings were threatened, constitute, or, if done, would constitute, an infringement of the trade mark. 例文帳に追加

何人かが，登録商標又はその者が登録されるべきと主張する商標について，回状，広告又はその他の方法により，侵害訴訟若しくは手続又はそれと同様の他の手続を取ると他人を脅迫したときは，被害者は，脅迫者がその商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者であるか否かを問わず，これに対して訴訟を提起し，脅迫が不当なものである旨の宣告及びその脅迫の続行に対する差止命令を得ることができ，かつ，その者が受けた(若しある場合)損害を回収することができる。ただし，最初に述べた者が，当該商標は登録を受けたものであること，及び訴訟をすると脅迫した行為の対象は商標侵害を構成しており，又はその行為がされるときは商標侵害を構成する筈であることを裁判所に納得させた場合は，この限りでない。 - 特許庁

(2) The resolution for approval under the preceding paragraph shall be made by at least a two-thirds majority of the votes of Preferred Equity Members attending the general meeting, where those Preferred Equity Members who are in attendance hold the majority of the total number of units of issued Preferred Equity pertaining to Preferred Equity Members who are likely to incur damages as a result of the changes to the articles of incorporation as referred to in that paragraph (in cases where said resolution is to be made at each general meeting for Preferred Equity Members who hold Preferred Equity which is categorized into two or more classes, the total number of units of issued Preferred Equity pertaining to Preferred Equity Members who are the members of the relevant general meeting of each such class). In this case, it shall not be precluded for the articles of incorporation to provide to the effect that the assent of at least a certain number of Preferred Equity Members is required, nor shall it be precluded for them to provide any other conditions in addition to the relevant conditions for a resolution. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による承認の決議は、同項の定款の変更が損害を及ぼすおそれのある優先出資社員に係る発行済優先出資の総口数（当該決議が二以上の種類別に区分された優先出資に係る優先出資社員を構成員とする各総会において行われる場合には、当該種類別の各総会の構成員たる優先出資社員に係る発行済優先出資の口数）の過半数に当たる優先出資を有する優先出資社員が出席し、かつ、その議決権の三分の二以上に当たる多数をもって行わなければならない。この場合においては、当該決議の要件に加えて、一定の数以上の優先出資社員の賛成を要する旨その他の要件を定款で定めることを妨げない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

i) Principal of a home loan claim that will become due by the time when an order of confirmation of the rehabilitation plan becomes final and binding (excluding one that will not become due by that time if the rehabilitation debtor does not forfeit the benefit of time) and agreed interest on home loan (meaning an interest at an agreed interest rate under the home loan contract; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to be accrued from such principal after an order of confirmation of the rehabilitation plan becomes final and binding, as well as interest on a home loan claim to be accrued and any damages for default to be incurred by the time when an order of confirmation of the rehabilitation plan becomes final and binding: These claims shall be paid in full within the payment period specified in a rehabilitation plan (excluding special clauses on home loan) (or within five years after an order of confirmation of the rehabilitation plan becomes final and binding if said period exceeds five years; referred to as the "general period for payment" in paragraph (3) 例文帳に追加

一　再生計画認可の決定の確定時までに弁済期が到来する住宅資金貸付債権の元本（再生債務者が期限の利益を喪失しなかったとすれば弁済期が到来しないものを除く。）及びこれに対する再生計画認可の決定の確定後の住宅約定利息（住宅資金貸付契約において定められた約定利率による利息をいう。以下この条において同じ。）並びに再生計画認可の決定の確定時までに生ずる住宅資金貸付債権の利息及び不履行による損害賠償　その全額を、再生計画（住宅資金特別条項を除く。）で定める弁済期間（当該期間が五年を超える場合にあっては、再生計画認可の決定の確定から五年。第三項において「一般弁済期間」という。）内に支払うこと。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The Tokyo High Court judgment of March 31, 2005 upheld the original decision ruling that the service provider had infringed the right to make the copyrighted work transmittable and that there is a concrete and realistic risk that that automatic public transmission services will, by nature, trigger certain types of copyright infringements by its users, which would be foreseeable for the service provider operating such service, who consequently induces such infringements. Moreover, where the service provider may procure certain economic benefits from operating such service, the service provider will be held responsible for the infringement, because such provider has caused damages from actions which are under his/her own control. In this case, it is natural that such service provider should be held liable for such infringement, in other words he/she would himself/herself be regarded as the infringer. 例文帳に追加

東京高裁平成１７年３月３１日判決は、当該サービスが、その性質上、具体的かつ現実的な蓋然性をもってサービス利用者による特定の類型の違法な著作権侵害行為を惹起するものであり、サービス提供者がそのことを予想しつつ当該サービスを提供して、そのような侵害行為を誘発し、しかもそれについてのサービス提供者の管理があり、サービス提供者がこれにより何らかの経済的利益を得る余地があるとみられる事実があるときは、サービス提供者はまさに自らコントロール可能な行為により侵害の結果を招いている者として、その責任を問われるべきことは当然であり、サービス提供者を侵害の主体と認めることができる、と述べて、サービス提供者を著作物の送信可能化権及び自動公衆送信権の侵害主体であると認定した原審の判断を支持した。 - 経済産業省

A person (the "Defendant") repeatedly created links to some newspaper articles containing major commercial headlines without the permission of the newspaper company. Then, he posted illegal copies of such newspaper articles and an index thereto on his website. Furthermore, the Defendant not only converted them for personal use but also distributed the newspaper articles indexed via a link to 20,000 registered users of his website so that they can access it on the website. In a suit seeking compensation for damages against the Defendant, the court admitted the claim on the ground that the Defendant illegally competed with the newspaper company in a socially unacceptable manner (Yomiuri on-line case, judgment of High Court (Intellectual Properties Division), October 6, 2005). 例文帳に追加

新聞社に無断で、営利の目的をもって、かつ、反復継続して、しかも、ニュース報道における記事見出しが作成されて間もないいわば情報の鮮度が高い時期に、ニュース報道における記事見出し及び記事に依拠して、特段の労力を要することもなくこれらをデッドコピーないし実質的にデッドコピーしてリンク見出しを作成し、これらを自らのウェブサイト上のリンク見出し表示部分のみならず、２万サイト程度にも及ぶ設置登録ユーザーのウェブサイト上のリンク見出し表示部分に表示させるなど、実質的にリンク見出しを配信している場合には、新聞社の見出しに関する業務と競合する面があることも否定できず、社会的に許容される限度を超えたものとして、実質的に配信した者に対して、損害賠償請求を認められた事例がある（読売オンライン事件：知財高裁平成17年10月６日判決）。 - 経済産業省

(1) Where a person, by means of circulars, advertisements or otherwise, threatens a person with an action or proceeding for infringement of a trade mark which is registered, or alleged by the first-mentioned person to be registered, or some other like proceeding, a person aggrieved may, whether the person making the threats is or is not the registered proprietor or the registered user of the trade mark - (a) bring any action against the first-mentioned person; and (b) obtain a declaration to effect that the threats are unjustifiable and an injunction against the continuance of the threats; and (c) recover such damages (if any) as he has sustained, unless the first-mentioned person satisfies the court that the trade mark is registered and that the acts in respect of which the proceedings were threatened constitute, or, if done, would constitute, an infringement of the trade mark.例文帳に追加

(1) ある者が，回覧物若しくは公告その他の方法で，登録されている若しくは登録されていると最初に言及する者により主張される商標の侵害訴訟若しくは法的手続きで，又は他の何らかの類似法的手続きで人を脅す場合，被害者は，脅しをかけている者が当該商標の登録所有者又は登録使用者であるか否かにかかわらず，次に掲げる各号を行うことができる。 (a) 最初に言及する者に対して訴訟を起こすこと (b)脅しは不当であるという旨の宣言，及び，その脅しを続けることへの差止命令を取得すること，並びに (c) (該当する場合)自らが被った損害を回復すること。但し，最初に言及する者が，当該商標は登録されており，かつ，その法的手続きが脅かされた行為は当該商標の侵害をなす，又は脅かされれば侵害となるであろうことを裁判所に納得させた場合を除く。 - 特許庁

Article 21-3 Article 20 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the right to claim damages under the preceding Article. In this case, the terms "Article 18," "the Securities Registration Statement or the Prospectus" and "three years" in Article 20 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21-2," "any of the documents specified in the items of Article 25(1) (excluding Article 25(1)(v) and (ix))" and "two years," respectively; and the part "seven years (excluding, where an order for suspension has been given under Article 10(1) or Article 11(1), the period from the day when the order was given to the day when the order was canceled) from the time when the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2) for Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities comes into effect or the delivery of the Prospectus is made" in Article 20 also shall be deemed to be replaced with "five years from the time when the document is submitted." 例文帳に追加

第二十一条の三　第二十条の規定は、前条の規定による賠償の請求権について準用する。この場合において、第二十条中「第十八条」とあるのは「第二十一条の二」と、「有価証券届出書若しくは目論見書」とあるのは「第二十五条第一項各号（第五号及び第九号を除く。）に掲げる書類」と、「三年間」とあるのは「二年間」と、「当該有価証券の募集若しくは売出しに係る第四条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による届出がその効力を生じた時又は当該目論見書の交付があつた時から七年間（第十条第一項又は第十一条第一項の規定による停止命令があつた場合には、当該停止命令があつた日からその解除があつた日までの期間は、算入しない。）」とあるのは「当該書類が提出された時から五年間」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 275-2 (1) Where, with regard to an action to make a claim for payment of money, the defendant does not deny the facts alleged by the plaintiff at oral argument or does not advance any allegations or evidence, the court, when it finds it appropriate while taking into consideration the defendant's financial resources and any other circumstances concerned, after hearing opinions of the plaintiff, may make an order to the effect that the defendant should make a payment of money pertaining to said claim, while stipulating in the order a provision concerning the period for payment of the money pertaining to said claim or a provision authorizing installment payment with regard to such payment of money, both of which shall be within five years from the expiration of the period set forth in paragraph (3), or simultaneously stipulating a provision to the effect that if the defendant has made a payment pursuant to the provision concerning the period or has made a payment without losing, pursuant to the provision of the following paragraph, the benefit of time under the provision authorizing installment payment, he/she shall be exempted from the obligation to pay any delay damages accrued after the filing of the action. 例文帳に追加

第二百七十五条の二　金銭の支払の請求を目的とする訴えについては、裁判所は、被告が口頭弁論において原告の主張した事実を争わず、その他何らの防御の方法をも提出しない場合において、被告の資力その他の事情を考慮して相当であると認めるときは、原告の意見を聴いて、第三項の期間の経過時から五年を超えない範囲内において、当該請求に係る金銭の支払について、その時期の定め若しくは分割払の定めをし、又はこれと併せて、その時期の定めに従い支払をしたとき、若しくはその分割払の定めによる期限の利益を次項の規定による定めにより失うことなく支払をしたときは訴え提起後の遅延損害金の支払義務を免除する旨の定めをして、当該請求に係る金銭の支払を命ずる決定をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Tokyo District Court judgment dated June 14, 2005 (p.135 of Hanrei Jiho No. 1917) states that, "However, the actual method of use of self-identifying information is diverse varies, for analysis of whether or not it should constitute an infringement of rights and remedies thereto, the interests of both parties must be specifically balanced in view of the conflicting interests such as the freedom of expression and commercial activities, and so emphasis should not be placed too much on the predominance of moral rights. More specifically, the contents and nature, the purpose and method of use of self-identifying information, and the significance of damages incurred by the individuals there from should be comprehensively examined." This case argues that, for determining whether or not the publicity rights have been infringed, such publicity rights should be specifically balanced with a broader range of rights, not limited to the freedom of expression, while the King Crimson Case focused solely on the "freedom of expression" as the only conflicting interest. 例文帳に追加

東京地裁平成１７年６月１４日判決・判時１９１７号１３５頁は、「しかしながら、実際に生じ得る個人の同一性に関する情報の使用の態様は千差万別であるから、権利侵害の成否及びその救済方法の検討に当たっては、人格権の支配権たる性格を過度に強調することなく、表現の自由や経済活動の自由などの対立利益をも考慮した個別的利益衡量が不可欠であり、使用された個人の同一性に関する情報の内容・性質、使用目的、使用態様、これにより個人に与える損害の程度等を総合的に勘案して判断する必要があるものと解される。」と述べ、パブリシティ権侵害の成否の判断において、キングクリムゾン高裁判決が「表現の自由」のみを対立利益としていたのに対し、表現の自由の場合に限定しない、より一般的な個別的な利益衡量が必要であることを認めている。 - 経済産業省

Sec.169 False Designations of Origin; False Description or Representation 169.1. Any person who, on or in connection with any goods or services, or any container for goods, uses in commerce any word, term, name, symbol, or device, or any combination thereof, or any false designation of origin, false or misleading description of fact, or false or misleading representation of fact, which: (a) Is likely to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive as to the affiliation, connection, or association of such person with another person, or as to the origin, sponsorship, or approval of his or her goods, services, or commercial activities by another person; or (b) In commercial advertising or promotion, misrepresents the nature, characteristics, qualities, or geographic origin of his or her or another person’s goods, services, or commercial activities, shall be liable to a civil action for damages and injunction provided in Sections 156 and 157 of this Act by any person who believes that he or she is or likely to be damaged by such act.例文帳に追加

第169条 原産地の虚偽表示；虚偽の説明又は表現 169.1商品，サ－ビス若しくは商品の容器に又はそれらに関連して，単語，術語，名称，記号，図案，それらの組合せ，原産地の虚偽表示，又は事実に関する虚偽の若しくは誤認を生じさせる記述若しくは表現であって次に該当するものを商業上使用する者は，その使用によって損害を受ける虞がある者による，第156条及び第157条に規定する損害賠償及び差止のための民事訴訟において，責任を負わなければならない。 (a)自己の他人との関係若しくは関連性について，又は原産地，保証若しくは自己の商品，サ－ビス若しくは商業活動の他人による承認について，混同を生じさせ，誤認を生じさせ又は欺瞞する虞があるもの (b)商業上の広告又は販売促進において，自己の又は他人の商品，サ－ビス又は商業活動の性質，特性，質又は原産地を偽って説明するもの - 特許庁

Before delivery on sale of any articles to which a registered design has been applied, the proprietor shall- (if exact representations or specimens were not furnished on the application for registration), furnish to the Registrar the prescribed number of exact representations or specimens of the design; and, if he fails to do so, the Registrar may erase his name from the register, and thereupon the copyright in the design shall cease; and cause each such article to be marked with the prescribed mark, or with the prescribed words or figures, denoting that the design is registered; and, if he fails to do so, the proprietor shall not be entitled to recover any penalty or damages in respect of any infringement of his copyright in the design unless he shows that he took all proper steps to ensure the marking of the article, or unless he shows that the infringement took place after the person guilty thereof knew or had received notice of the existence of the copyright in the design. 例文帳に追加

販売により登録意匠を付した物品を引き渡す前に、意匠権者は次に掲げる各号を行う。(正確な表示又は見本が登録出願時に提出されていなかった場合)登録官に対し当該意匠の正確な表示又は見本の所定数を提出する。意匠権者がそれを怠った場合、登録官は登録簿からその名称を抹消するとともにその意匠権を停止する。当該物品の各々に、意匠が登録されていることを示す所定の標章又は所定の語又は形状を貼付させる。意匠権者がこれを怠った場合、意匠権者は意匠権の侵害に係る違約金又は損害賠償金を回収する権利を有しない。ただし、当該物品への標示を確実にするためあらゆる適切な手順を履践したことを証明する場合、又は、当該侵害はその罪責を負う者が意匠権の存在を知ったか、その通知を受領した後に発生したことを証明する場合を除く。 - 特許庁

(3) For the Contract on Insurance or Other Financial Security, the amount of insurance to cover the damage of the Owner of General Ship listed in item 1 of paragraph 1 (The damage to the Owner of General Ship other than listed in the respective items of the said paragraph may be included.) or the amount for which the performance of the obligations of damages is secured shall not be less than the Amount of Limit of Liability in the case where the said Owner of General Ship can limit the liability pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, Article 3 of the Act on Limitation of Liability for each General Ship pertaining to the Contract (Hereinafter referred in this Article as "the Amount of Limit of Liability") and the amount of insurance to cover the damage of the Owner of General Ship listed in item 2 of paragraph 1 or the amount for which the payment of cost required for removing the said general ship or taking other measures is secured shall not be less than the amount equivalent to the Amount of Limit of Liability for each General Ship pertaining to the Contract. 例文帳に追加

３　保障契約は、当該契約において一般船舶所有者等の第一項第一号に掲げる損害（同項各号に掲げる損害以外の一般船舶所有者等に生ずる損害を含むことができる。）をてん補するための保険金額又は賠償の義務の履行が担保されている額が、当該契約に係る一般船舶ごとに、責任制限法第三条第一項の規定に基づき当該一般船舶所有者等がその責任を制限することができる場合における責任の限度額（以下この条において「責任限度額」という。）に満たないものであつてはならず、かつ、当該契約において一般船舶所有者等の第一項第二号に掲げる損害をてん補するための保険金額又は当該一般船舶の撤去その他の措置に要する費用の支払が担保されている額が、当該契約に係る一般船舶ごとに、責任限度額に相当する額に満たないものであつてはならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 7 (1) When a prefectural governor finds that the existence of land falling under the criteria set forth by the Cabinet Order for the categories of land that causes harmful effects on human health or involves a threat of such effects, due to soil contamination by any Designated Hazardous Substance, he/she may order the Owner, etc. to take an action for removal of such contamination, prevention of dispersion of such contamination, or any other necessary measures (hereinafter referred to as an "Action for Removal, etc.") only to the extent necessary to prevent such damages, fixing a reasonable period of time; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where it is clear that a person other than the Owner, etc. of the said site has caused the contamination, and where it is appropriate to cause the person (hereinafter, including his successor by inheritance, merger, or split) to take an Action for Removal, etc. and the Owner, etc. has no objection to such action. 例文帳に追加

第七条　都道府県知事は、土壌の特定有害物質による汚染により、人の健康に係る被害が生じ、又は生ずるおそれがあるものとして政令で定める基準に該当する指定区域内の土地があると認めるときは、政令で定めるところにより、その被害を防止するため必要な限度において、当該土地の所有者等に対し、相当の期限を定めて、当該汚染の除去、当該汚染の拡散の防止その他必要な措置（以下「汚染の除去等の措置」という。）を講ずべきことを命ずることができる。ただし、当該土地の所有者等以外の者の行為によって当該土地の土壌の特定有害物質による汚染が生じたことが明らかな場合であって、その行為をした者（相続、合併又は分割によりその地位を承継した者を含む。以下同じ。）に汚染の除去等の措置を講じさせることが相当であると認められ、かつ、これを講じさせることについて当該土地の所有者等に異議がないときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Before delivery on sale of any articles to which a registered design has been applied, the proprietor shall- (a) (if exact representations or specimens were not furnished on the application for registration) furnish to the Controller the prescribed number of exact representations or specimens of the design; and, if he fails to do so, the Controller may, after giving notice thereof to the proprietor, erase his name from the register and thereupon the copyright in the design shall cease; and (b) cause each such article to be marked with the prescribed mark, or with the prescribed words or figures denoting that the design is registered; and, if he fails to do so, the proprietor shall not be entitled to recover any penalty or damages in respect of any infringement of his copyright in the design unless he shows that he took all proper steps to ensure the marking of the article, or unless he shows that the infringement took place after the person guilty thereof knew or had received notice of the existence of the copyright in the design.例文帳に追加

登録意匠が適用された物品の販売による引渡し前に，意匠所有者は，次に掲げる事項をする。(a) (登録出願時に正確な表示又は見本が提出されなかったときは)，所定数の意匠の正確な表示又は見本を長官に提供する。意匠所有者がその提供を怠るときは，長官は，意匠所有者にその旨を通知の後，その者の名称を登録簿から抹消し，その結果意匠権は停止する。及び (b) 前記物品の各個に，所定の標章又は所定の文字若しくは図形を表示させて，当該意匠が登録されていることを示す。その表示を怠るときは，意匠所有者は，自己の意匠権の侵害に関する罰金又は賠償金を回収する権利を有さない。ただし，当該物品の表示を確保するため適正な方策をすべて講じたことを意匠所有者が証明する場合，又は侵害の発生は侵害者が当該意匠の意匠権の存在を知った後若しくはその存在の通知を受けた後であったことを意匠所有者が証明する場合は，この限りでない。 - 特許庁

Any person who has applied for protection for any design in the United Kingdom or any of other convention countries or group of countries or countries which are members of inter-governmental organizations, or his legal representative or assignee shall, either alone or jointly with any other person, be entitled to claim that the registration of the said design under this Act shall be in priority to other applicants and shall have the same date as the date of the application in the United Kingdom or any of such other convention countries or group of countries or countries which are members of inter-governmental organizations, as the case may be: Provided that- (a) the application is made within six months from the application for protection in the United Kingdom or any of such other convention countries or group of countries or countries which are members of inter-governmental organizations, as the case may be; and (b) nothing in this section shall entitle the proprietor of the design to recover damages for piracy of design happening prior to the actual date on which the design is registered in India.例文帳に追加

連合王国，又はその他の条約国若しくは国家群，又は政府間機関の構成国である国の何れかにおいて意匠保護を出願している者，又はその法律上の代表者若しくは譲受人は，単独か他人との共同かを問わず，本法による前記意匠の登録が他の出願人に優先し，かつ，場合に応じて，連合王国，又はその他の条約国若しくは国家群，又は政府間機関の構成国である国の何れかにおける出願と同一日付を有する旨を主張する権利を有する。ただし，次に掲げる事項を前提とする。(a) 当該出願が，連合王国，又は場合に応じてその他の条約国若しくは国家群，又は政府間機関の構成国である国の何れかにおける意匠保護の出願から6月以内にされること (b) 本条における何れの事項も，当該意匠がインドにおいて実際に登録される日より前に発生した盗用に対する賠償金を回収する権利を意匠所有者に付与するものではないこと - 特許庁

Article 847 (1) A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more) may demand the Stock Company, in writing or by any other method prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, to file an action for pursuing the liability of an incorporator, Director at Incorporation, Company Auditor at Incorporation, Officer, etc. (meaning the Officer, etc. prescribed in Article 423(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or liquidator, an action seeking the return of the benefits set forth in Article 120(3) or an action seeking payment under the provisions of Article 212(1) or Article 285(1) (hereinafter referred to as an "Action for Pursuing Liability, etc." in this Section); provided, however, that this shall not apply in cases where the purpose of the Action for Pursuing Liability, etc. is to seek unlawful gains of such shareholder or a third party or to inflict damages on such Stock Company. 例文帳に追加

第八百四十七条　六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）は、株式会社に対し、書面その他の法務省令で定める方法により、発起人、設立時取締役、設立時監査役、役員等（第四百二十三条第一項に規定する役員等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）若しくは清算人の責任を追及する訴え、第百二十条第三項の利益の返還を求める訴え又は第二百十二条第一項若しくは第二百八十五条第一項の規定による支払を求める訴え（以下この節において「責任追及等の訴え」という。）の提起を請求することができる。ただし、責任追及等の訴えが当該株主若しくは第三者の不正な利益を図り又は当該株式会社に損害を加えることを目的とする場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (d)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a reduction of the reserve for redemption of funds. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、基金償却積立金の取崩しの無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 112 The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (v)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836 to Article 839 inclusive (Order to Provide Security, Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments etc., Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment, Effect of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(d)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the reduction to the Amount of Specified Capital or the Amount of Preferred Capital. In this case, the phrase "a Shareholder, etc." in Article 828(2)(v) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members, director, company auditor, liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十二条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第五号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ニに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定資本金の額又は優先資本金の額の減少の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第五号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役、清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where an entry under subsection (2) is made in respect of a patent -- (a) any person shall, at any time after the entry is made, be entitled as of right to a licence under the patent on such terms as may be settled by agreement or, in default of agreement, by the Registrar on the application of the proprietor of the patent or the person requiring the licence; (b) the Registrar may, on the application of the holder of any licence granted under the patent before the entry was made, order the licence to be exchanged for a licence of right on terms so settled; (c) if, in proceedings for infringement of the patent, the defendant undertakes to take a licence on such terms, no injunction shall be granted against him and the amount (if any) recoverable against him by way of damages shall not exceed twice the amount which would have been payable by him as licensee if such a licence on those terms had been granted before the earliest infringement; and (d) the renewal fee payable in respect of the patent after the date of the entry shall be half the fee which would be payable if the entry had not been made.例文帳に追加

(3) (2)に基づく記入が特許に関して行われた場合は， (a) 当該特許に基づくライセンスについては，当該記入が行われた後はいつでも，合意により定めるか，又は合意のないときは登録官が当該特許の所有者若しくは当該ライセンスを必要とする者の申請に基づいて定める条件により，何人もこれを受ける権原を当然の権利として有し， (b) 登録官は，当該記入をする前に当該特許に基づいてライセンスを許諾された所有者による申請により，当該ライセンスを前記のように定められた条件による実施許諾用意のライセンスに代えるべき旨を命ずることができ， (c) 当該特許の侵害手続において，被告が前記のような条件に基づくライセンスを受けると約束した場合は，被告に対する差止命令は認められず，かつ，被告から回収することができる損害賠償(もしあれば)の額は，当該ライセンスが前記の条件で最先の侵害より前に付与されたならば被告が実施権者として支払うべきであった額の2倍を超えてはならず，かつ (d) 当該特許に関し当該記入の日後に納付するべき更新手数料は，当該記入が行われなかったとした場合に納付するべき手数料の半額とする。 - 特許庁

(6) The provisions of Article 69, Article 70, Article 80, and Article 81, paragraph (1) and Article 81, paragraph (5) (Execution of Duty by Several Trustees, Appointment of Trustee Representatives, Duty of Care, and Advance Payment of Costs and Compensation of a Trustee) of the Corporate Rehabilitation Act and the provisions of Article 78 (Liability for Damages with regard to Acts of Representative Persons) of the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation shall apply mutatis mutandis to Insurance Administrators and the Company Being Managed, respectively. In this case, the term "permission of a court" in Article 69, paragraph (1) of the Corporate Rehabilitation Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "approval of the Prime Minister," the term "trustee representatives" in Article 70 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrator Representatives," the term "permission of a court" in paragraph (2) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Approval of the Prime Minister," the term "court" in Article 81, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the term "trustee representatives" in paragraph (5) in that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrator Representatives," and the term "representative directors and other representative persons" in Article 78 of the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Administrators." 例文帳に追加

６　会社更生法第六十九条、第七十条、第八十条並びに第八十一条第一項及び第五項（数人の管財人の職務執行、管財人代理の選任、注意義務並びに費用の前払及び報酬）の規定は保険管理人について、一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律第七十八条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）の規定は被管理会社について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、会社更生法第六十九条第一項中「裁判所の許可」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣の承認」と、同法第七十条中「管財人代理」とあるのは「保険管理人代理」と、同条第二項中「裁判所の許可」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣の承認」と、同法第八十一条第一項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同条第五項中「管財人代理」とあるのは「保険管理人代理」と、一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律第七十八条中「代表理事その他の代表者」とあるのは「保険管理人」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 34 (1) Where the holder of a breeder's right or of an exclusive exploitation right claims, against a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed his/her breeder's right or exclusive exploitation right, compensation for damages caused to him/her by the infringement, if the person has transferred the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which is the component of the act of infringement, the amount of damage suffered by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may be presumed, within the limit attainable by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right in consideration of his/her capability to exploit such propagating material, harvested material or processed products, to be the amount given by multiplying the quantity of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products transferred by the person (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "transferred quantity") by the profit per unit of the propagating material, the harvested material or the processed products which would have been sold by the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right if there had been no such an act of infringement. However, if there exists any circumstance under which the holder of the breeder's right or the holder of the exclusive exploitation right may not be able to sell the transferred quantity in whole or in part, the amount corresponding to the quantity which would not have been sold due to such a circumstance shall be deducted. 例文帳に追加

第三十四条　育成者権者又は専用利用権者が故意又は過失により自己の育成者権又は専用利用権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した種苗、収穫物又は加工品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した種苗、収穫物又は加工品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、育成者権者又は専用利用権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた種苗、収穫物又は加工品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、育成者権者又は専用利用権者の利用の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、育成者権者又は専用利用権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を育成者権者又は専用利用権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Further, the dissemination of false information detrimental to the reputation of another person's business may also constitute an unfair competition (Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the same). In a case where the Plaintiffs (the Company (party P1) and its director (party P2)) filed a claim for compensation of damages etc. against the defendant (a Chinese company (party D1) and its agent in Japan (party D2)) on the ground that the D1, which was P1's competitor, indicated on D1's Japanese website as if P1 were an Japanese agent of the D1 and a link was set from D1's website to P1's website. Plaintiff alleged that the aforementioned acts committed by D1 and D2 disparaged P1's reputation and therefore constitute a joint tort. Further, such acts also amounts to unfair competition against P1 as defined in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (the "UCPA"). The court partially accepted the Plaintiffs' claim on the ground that D2 had at least provided data and materials for creating D1's website and D2 was also involved not only in creating such website but also in misrepresenting P1 in D1's website, thereby disseminating false information detrimental to the P1's reputation as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the ULPA. It was held that D1 and D2 are jointly liable to P2 for libel, defamation and infringement of name rights (Osaka District Court, July 26, 2007). 例文帳に追加

このようなリンクを張られた原告らが、上記中国法人及び当該法人の日本の代理店である被告による上記行為は原告らの名誉及び信用を毀損する共同不法行為を構成するとともに、原告会社との関係では不正競争防止法第２条第１項第１４号所定の不正競争行為に該当するなどとして、被告に対し、損害賠償等を求めた事案がある。この点、裁判所は、被告が、中国法人において本件ウェブページを作成するに当たり、少なくともそのためのデータや資料を提供するなどして、これに関与していたものであり、ひいては同法人が本件表示行為をするに当たって関与したものと認めるのが相当であり、被告は、本件表示行為について、原告会社との関係で社会的信用を害する虚偽の事実を流布するものであるとして、不正競争防止法第2条第1項第14号の不正競争行為であることを認め、原告個人との関係で名誉・信用毀損、氏名権侵害を認めて、同法人と共同不法行為責任を負うものというべきであるなどとして請求の一部を認めた（大阪地裁平成 19年7月26日判決）。 - 経済産業省

(1) Where any person has applied for protection of any trade mark in a Convention country or prescribed foreign country, such person or his legal representative or assignee, after furnishing a declaration within the prescribed time indicating the date of the application and the country in which it was made, shall in respect of the application for registration of his trade mark, be entitled to a right of priority and such application in Malaysia shall have the same date as the date of the application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be, subject to the following: (a) that the application for registration is made within six months from the date of application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and where an application for protection is made in more than one Convention country or prescribed foreign country, the period of six months referred to herein shall be reckoned from the date on which the earlier or earliest of those applications is made; (b) that the applicant shall be either a national or resident of, or a body corporate incorporated under the laws of, the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and (c) that nothing in this section shall entitle the proprietor of a trade mark to recover damages for infringements or any happening prior to the date on which the application for protection of the trade mark is made in Malaysia.例文帳に追加

(1) 何人かがある条約国又は所定の外国において商標の保護出願をした場合は，その者若しくはその者の法律上の代表者又は譲受人は，当該出願の出願日及び出願を行った国を明記した書面を所定期間内に提出した後，自己の商標に関する当該登録出願に関して優先権を享受する権限を有し，当該商標のマレーシアでの登録出願について，前記条約国又は場合により所定の外国における保護出願日と同一の出願日が付与されるものとする。ただし，次に従うことを条件とする。 (a) 登録出願が，当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国での保護出願の日から6月以内に行われること。保護出願が2以上の条約国又は所定の外国でなされた場合は，前記の6月の期間は，それら複数出願中の最先のものがなされた日から起算するものとする。 (b) 出願人が，当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国の国民若しくは住民又は法律に基づき設立された一般法人であること，及び (c) 本条の如何なる規定も，当該商標の保護出願がマレーシアで行われた日より前に生じた当該商標の侵害行為その他の事由による損害について賠償を求める権利を当該商標の所有者に与えるものではないこと - 特許庁

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十条の十五　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 to Article 839 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(a)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the incorporation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "Shareholder, etc. (meaning a shareholder, director or liquidator (or, for a Company with Company Auditors, it means a shareholder, director, company auditor or liquidator, and for a Company with Committees, it means a shareholder, director, executive officer or liquidator); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 6 (1) Clearing margins (limited to those for transactions carried out based on a Commodity Exchange member's own account and except for those to be allocated for damages, for which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions) which have been deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 79, paragraph (1) of the Former Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed to be clearing margins (limited to those which a Member, etc. set forth in item (i) of the same paragraph deposits for Transactions on a Commodity Market carried out based on his/her own account in the case set forth in the same item) which are deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph (1) of the New Act in the case where said clearing margins are for transactions for which settlement is made by the method set forth in Article 105, item (i) of the New Act, and as clearing margins (limited to those, in the case set forth in item (i) of the same paragraph, which are deposited for Transactions on a Commodity Market carried out based on a Member, etc.'s own account set forth in (a) of the same item in the case set forth in (a) of the same item, and those, in the case set forth in item (ii) of the same paragraph, which are deposited for Commodity Clearing Transactions which a Member, etc. set forth in item (a) of the same item deposits with a Clearing Participant based on his/her own account in the case set forth in (a) of the same item) which are deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 179, paragraph (1) of the New Act in the case where said clearing margins are for transactions for which settlement is made by the method set forth in Article 105, item (ii) of the New Act. 例文帳に追加

第六条　この法律の施行の際現に旧法第七十九条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（商品取引所の会員の自己の計算による取引についてのものに限り、附則第九条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる損害の賠償に充てるべきものを除く。）は、当該取引証拠金が新法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法による決済が行われる取引についてのものである場合にあっては新法第百三条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（同項第一号に掲げる場合において同号の会員等が自己の計算において行う商品市場における取引について預託すべきものに限る。）と、当該取引証拠金が新法第百五条第二号に掲げる方法による決済が行われる取引についてのものである場合にあっては新法第百七十九条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（同項第一号に掲げる場合にあっては同号イに掲げる場合において同号イの会員等が自己の計算において行う商品市場における取引について預託すべきものに、同項第二号に掲げる場合にあっては同号イに掲げる場合において同号イの会員等が自己の計算において清算参加者に委託した商品清算取引について預託すべきものに限る。）とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) Clearing margins (limited to those for transactions carried out based on a Commodity Exchange member’s own account and except for those to be allocated for damages, for which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions) which have been deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 79, paragraph 1 of the Old Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed to be clearing margins (limited to those which a Member, etc. set forth in item 1 of the same paragraph deposits for Transactions on a Commodity Market carried out based on his/her own account in the case set forth in the same item) which are deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph 1 of the New Act in the case where said clearing margins are for transactions for which settlement is made by the method set forth in Article 105, item 1 of the New Act, and as clearing margins (limited to those, in the case set forth in item 1 of the same paragraph, which are deposited for Transactions on a Commodity Market carried out based on a Member, etc.’s own account set forth in (a) of the same item in the case set forth in (a) of the same item, and those, in the case set forth in item 2 of the same paragraph, which are deposited for Commodity Clearing Transactions which a Member, etc. set forth in item (a) of the same item deposits with a Clearing Participant based on his/her own account in the case set forth in (a) of the same item) which are deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 179, paragraph 1 of the New Act in the case where said clearing margins are for transactions for which settlement is made by the method set forth in Article 105, item 2 of the New Act. 例文帳に追加

１ この法律の施行の際現に旧法第七十九条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（商品取引所の会員の自己の計算による取引についてのものに限り、附則第九条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる損害の賠償に充てるべきものを除く。）は、当該取引証拠金が新法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法による決済が行われる取引についてのものである場合にあっては新法第百三条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（同項第一号に掲げる場合において同号の会員等が自己の計算において行う商品市場における取引について預託すべきものに限る。）と、当該取引証拠金が新法第百五条第二号に掲げる方法による決済が行われる取引についてのものである場合にあっては新法第百七十九条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（同項第一号に掲げる場合にあっては同号イに掲げる場合において同号イの会員等が自己の計算において行う商品市場における取引について預託すべきものに、同項第二号に掲げる場合にあっては同号イに掲げる場合において同号イの会員等が自己の計算において清算参加者に委託した商品清算取引について預託すべきものに限る。）とみなす。 - 経済産業省

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム