「Never」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(241ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

We, the Japanese people, acting through our duly elected representatives in the National Diet, determined that we shall secure for ourselves and our posterity the fruits of peaceful cooperation with all nations and the blessings of liberty throughout this land, and resolved that never again shall we be visited with the horrors of war through the action of government, do proclaim that sovereign power resides with the people and do firmly establish this Constitution. Government is a sacred trust of the people, the authority for which is derived from the people, the powers of which are exercised by the representatives of the people, and the benefits of which are enjoyed by the people. This is a universal principle of mankind upon which this Constitution is founded. We reject and revoke all constitutions, laws, ordinances, and rescripts in conflict herewith. 例文帳に追加

日本国民は、正当に選挙された国会における代表者を通じて行動し、われらとわれらの子孫のために、諸国民との協和による成果と、わが国全土にわたつて自由のもたらす恵沢を確保し、政府の行為によつて再び戦争の惨禍が起ることのないやうにすることを決意し、ここに主権が国民に存することを宣言し、この憲法を確定する。そもそも国政は、国民の厳粛な信託によるものであつて、その権威は国民に由来し、その権力は国民の代表者がこれを行使し、その福利は国民がこれを享受する。これは人類普遍の原理であり、この憲法は、かかる原理に基くものである。われらは、これに反する一切の憲法、法令及び詔勅を排除する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 34 When a Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc. (meaning Financial Instruments Business Operators or Registered Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) has received an application for a contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2(8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer (hereinafter such contract shall be referred to as a "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction") from a Professional Investor (limited to those listed in Article 2(31)(iv)), and has never concluded a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction belonging to those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor, he/she shall notify said Professional Investor that said Professional Investor may make a request under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article by the time of concluding a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction pertaining to said application. 例文帳に追加

第三十四条　金融商品取引業者等（金融商品取引業者又は登録金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）は、顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約（以下「金融商品取引契約」という。）の申込みを特定投資家（同条第三十一項第四号に掲げる者に限る。）から受けた場合であつて、当該申込みに係る金融商品取引契約と同じ金融商品取引契約の種類として内閣府令で定めるもの（以下この款において「契約の種類」という。）に属する金融商品取引契約を過去に当該特定投資家との間で締結したことがない場合には、当該申込みに係る金融商品取引契約を締結するまでに、当該特定投資家に対し、当該特定投資家が次条第一項の規定による申出ができる旨を告知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 50-2 Where the examiner intends to give a notice of reasons for refusal for a patent application under the preceding Article, and these reasons for refusal are the same as the reasons for refusal stated in the previous notice under the preceding Article (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 159(2) (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 174(1)) and Article 163(2)) with regard to another patent application (limited to the case where both patent applications are deemed to have been filed simultaneously by applying the provision of Article 44(2) to either or both of them) (excluding such a notice of reasons for refusal of which the applicant of the patent application could have never known the content prior to the filing of a request for examination of the patent application), the examiner shall also give a notice to that effect. 例文帳に追加

第五十条の二　審査官は、前条の規定により特許出願について拒絶の理由を通知しようとする場合において、当該拒絶の理由が、他の特許出願（当該特許出願と当該他の特許出願の少なくともいずれか一方に第四十四条第二項の規定が適用されたことにより当該特許出願と同時にされたこととなつているものに限る。）についての前条（第百五十九条第二項（第百七十四条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第百六十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による通知（当該特許出願についての出願審査の請求前に当該特許出願の出願人がその内容を知り得る状態になかつたものを除く。）に係る拒絶の理由と同一であるときは、その旨を併せて通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 112-2 (1) Where the original patentee of the patent right which was deemed to have been extinguished under Article 112(4) or 112(5), or which was deemed never to have existed under Article 112(6), was unable to pay the patent fees and the patent surcharge under paragraphs (4) to (6) of Article 112 within the time limit for late payment of the patent fees under Article 112(1), due to reasons not attributable to the original patentee, the original patentee may make a late payment of the patent fees and the surcharge within 14 days (where overseas resident, within two months) from the date on which the reasons ceased to exist, but not later than six months following the expiration of the said time limit. 例文帳に追加

第百十二条の二　前条第四項若しくは第五項の規定により消滅したものとみなされた特許権又は同条第六項の規定により初めから存在しなかつたものとみなされた特許権の原特許権者は、その責めに帰することができない理由により同条第一項の規定により特許料を追納することができる期間内に同条第四項から第六項までに規定する特許料及び割増特許料を納付することができなかつたときは、その理由がなくなつた日から十四日（在外者にあつては、二月）以内でその期間の経過後六月以内に限り、その特許料及び割増特許料を追納することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 33-2 (1) Where the original holder of a utility model right which was deemed to have been extinguished under Article 33(4), or which was deemed never to have existed under Article 33(5), was unable to pay the registration fees and the registration surcharge under Article 33(4) or (5) within the time limit for late payment of the registration fees under Article 33(1), due to reasons not attributable to him/her, he/she may make a late payment of the registration fees and the surcharge within 14 days (in the case of an overseas resident, within two months) from the date on which the reasons ceased to exist, but not later than six months following the expiration of the said time limit. 例文帳に追加

第三十三条の二　前条第四項の規定により消滅したものとみなされた実用新案権又は同条第五項の規定により初めから存在しなかつたものとみなされた実用新案権の原実用新案権者は、その責めに帰することができない理由により同条第一項の規定により登録料を追納することができる期間内に同条第四項又は第五項に規定する登録料及び割増登録料を納付することができなかつたときは、その理由がなくなつた日から十四日（在外者にあつては、二月）以内でその期間の経過後六月以内に限り、その登録料及び割増登録料を追納することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

However, only those close to the shogun who came from the Royal Family or the court noble class were devoted to Onmyodo, whereas, the Regent Hojo clan was indifferent and, from Bando hachi Heishi (the Taira clan in Eastern Japan) to the class of warriors originating from all regions throughout the country who later became known as 'kokujin' (people of the country) serving under the Hojo clan were not interested in prestige of the Imperial Court nor were they in the habit of consulting onmyoji on the code of conduct, onmyoji never acquired the power of spiritual influence to trample on the entire samurai class, limiting their visibility to within the powerless Imperial Court as well as the world of kugyo and court nobles. 例文帳に追加

ただ、皇族・公家出身の将軍近辺のみ陰陽道に熱心なのであって、実権を持っていた執権の北条一族は必ずしも陰陽道にこだわりを持っておらず、配下のいわゆる関東八平氏から全国の地域地盤に由来する後に「国人」と呼ばれるようになった武士層に至るまで、朝廷代々の格式を意識したり陰陽師に行動規範を諮る習慣はなかったため、総じて陰陽師は武家社会全般を蹂躙するような精神的影響力を持つことはなく、もっぱら傀儡である皇族・公家出身将軍と、実権を失った朝廷や公卿・公家世界においてのみ、その存在感を示すにとどまった。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

However, after World War II, based on the criticisms by people like Naoshige TSUCHIDA, the theory is no longer held as true for the following reasons: Until the early Insei period (the period ruled by the retired Emperor), even if there were differences in strength of authority between the Sessho/Kanpaku and the Emperor, political decisions were made through a consultation of both sides, and there was never a time in which the Sessho and/or Kanpaku arbitrarily took the initiative in political affairs; and orders that related to state politics were issued based on the chain of command through senshi and daijokanpu (official documents issued by the Daijokan and the Grand Council of State) even during the golden days of the regency, and it was revealed that kudashibumi and migosho documents issued by the Mandokoro were only effective for private or internal problems of the sessho and kanpaku themselves. 例文帳に追加

だが、戦後に入ると土田直鎮らによる批判などがあり、現在では院政初期までは摂政・関白と天皇との間に力関係の差はあっても、両者の協議によって政治判断が行われており、摂政・関白が専断的に政務を取った時期は存在しなかったこと、国政に関する命令は摂関政治全盛期でも宣旨・太政官符による命令系統が機能しており、政所下文及び御教書はあくまで摂政・関白個人の私的あるいは宣旨・太政官符内部の問題に対してのみ有効な命令文書であったことが明らかとされており、この説は成り立たないと考えられている。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

In "Jukkinsho" Section 7-27, the young Kiyomori was described as a person who 'thought it was a joke if someone did something quite unreasonable,' 'gently smiled to be kind to someone who did something that was not funny at all, and also never raised his voice to scorn someone as being useless even when that person had made a terrible mistake', 'let young attendants who served him during a cold winter sleep at the bottom of his clothes and let them sleep well if they overslept, by quietly getting out of the bed,' and 'respected a servant of the lowest rank as a person in front of the servant's family or acquaintances, and that servant was truly pleased as it was a great honor.' 例文帳に追加

『十訓抄』7-27には、若い頃の清盛について「人がとんでもない不都合な振る舞いをしても、冗談と思うことにした」「やったことがちっともおかしくなくても、相手への労わりとしてにこやかに笑い、とんでもない誤りをしても、役立たずと声を荒げることはない」「冬の寒い時に身辺に奉仕する幼い従者を自分の衣の裾の方に寝かせ、彼らが朝寝坊をしていたらそっと床から抜け出して存分に寝かせてやった」「最下層の召使いでも、彼の家族や知り合いの見ている前では一人前の人物として扱ったので、その者は大変な面目と感じて心から喜んだ」という逸話が記されている。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

It can also be assumed that Nobunaga could never divorce Nohime due to a dispute with the Saito clan led by Dosan's opposing older brother Yoshitatsu SAITO, because it was essential for Nobunaga to keep Nohime as his lawful wife, for he received the letter from Dosan in which Dosan appointed his son-in-law Nobunaga as successor of Mino Province, and in addition, it can be understood that Nohime did not die of sickness or some other reasons before the Capture of Mino Province, in view of the fact that Nohime encouraged the attack on Mino Province for she was the daughter of Dosan and was linked by blood to the Akechi clan, a branch of the Toki clan (however, she wouldn't be linked by blood to the Toki clan if Yoshitatsu was actually the son of Dosan), which could give her husband Nobunaga a good reason to be the legitimate successor of Mino Province, and also that the high-ranking officials of Mino Province were treated the same way as those of Owari Province. 例文帳に追加

また婿である信長を美濃国の後継者と定めた道三の国譲状がある以上は、濃姫を正室としておくことが信長にとっても必用不可欠であった事もあり、その道三と対立した、兄・斎藤義龍筋の斎藤氏との諍いにより離縁して実家に返したという可能性は考えられず、美濃攻略を推し進めて行った背景には道三息女であり、また土岐氏の傍流明智氏の血を引く濃姫の（義龍が道三実子であった場合、土岐氏と血縁関係はない事になる）、婿である信長こそ正統な美濃の後継者であるという大義名分があったためという推測も成り立つこと、美濃攻略後に美濃衆が尾張衆と同様に待遇されていることからも、濃姫が美濃攻略前に病気などで亡くなったという可能性もないと思われる。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Having quoted the saying, "never invite suspicions needlessly," I find that idea to be quite natural as a course of action to gain higher trust and as a possible future issue. All in all, it’s common sense that an advisor is a high position in the FSA as a matter of course. What I consider constitutes a basic philosophy of conservatism is not to "help the weak and crush the strong," but rather to "help the weak and have the strong assume responsibility," which is an idea that the PNP supports. I believe that those in a position to lead others should exercise strict oversight that the public can feel satisfied with, be it in the capacity of a publicly-elected Diet member or Minister for Financial Services, in comprehensive consideration of ethics, morals, commonsense or, in some countries, religions, before law. 例文帳に追加

今後の課題としてそんなことも当然、「瓜田に沓を納れず、李下に冠を正さず」といったわけでございますから、そこら辺はやっぱり世の中の常識と申しますか、信頼性の向上と申しますか、私はきちっと、顧問といえば当然金融庁の上の方ですが、国民新党も「弱きを助け強気をくじく」でなくて、「弱きを助け強きに責任を持たせる」というのが、私は保守の基本理念だと思いますから、上に立つ人はおのずと法律というものもございますが、同時に法律以前に倫理だとか、道徳だとか、一般の常識だとか、あるいは国によっては宗教だというのもあるわけですから、そんなことを総合的に勘案して、選挙で選ばれた国会議員として、金融庁の大臣としてきちっと国民の納得できることを、厳正な監督をやっていかねばならないというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

You have used the term “pay-off” quite frequently in reference to the Incubator Bank of Japan, but the fact is that no burden has been incurred yet by depositors at this time. Depositors might ultimately incur a burden in the form of a loss. Given that there is no burden yet, it may be better to refrain from using the term “pay-off” readily, as depositors may feel unsettled-do you agree? At least the DICJ has never used the term “pay-off”. “Pay-off,” which involves cutting off deposits, has not been executed with respect to depositors even though the media is taking the liberty of using the term “pay-off.” Depending on the situation, if the Bank's business is transferred successfully, depositors might end up not having to incur any burden. What are your thoughts on this? 例文帳に追加

振興銀行なのですけれども、大臣は非常に頻繁に「ペイオフ」という言葉をお使いになるのですけれども、「ペイオフを発動した」とおっしゃるのですけれども、現実に今、預金者に負担はまだかかっていないわけですよね。預金者に負担が、ロスがかかるかもしれないわけですよね、最終的に。でも、（負担が）かかってはいない以上、安直に「ペイオフ発動」とかというお言葉を使うのはお控えになった方がよろしいかと思うのですけれども、預金者は同様するのではないかと思うのですけれども、いかがでしょうか。預金保険機構は少なくとも一回も「ペイオフ」という言葉は使っていません。マスコミが勝手に「ペイオフ」という言葉を使っているのですけれども、まだペイオフという、預金者に預金を切り捨てることが発動されていないし、場合によっては、事業譲渡がうまくいけば預金者に負担がかからないで終わる可能性だってあるわけですよね。その点いかがでしょうか。 - 金融庁

Banning exchanges of senior personnel is not the ultimate goal. As I already said, the "no-return rule" is a means to ensure that financial administration is flexibly conducted with a high level of professionalism and in line with its objectives. Therefore, it is important to take into consideration other factors that contribute to those objectives as well. I believe that the independence, neutrality and professionalism of financial administration are important elements that should never be ignored, so I think that measures that help to maintain these elements should be actively adopted. This is what I meant when I said earlier that the "no-return rule" will remain important, and attention should continue to be paid to that point. 例文帳に追加

そこの大きな狙いというものは、幹部級の交流をしないということそのものが最終目標ではなくて、先ほど来申し上げているように、金融行政が、その政策目標に忠実に、しかも機動的に、高い専門性を発揮しつつ、きちんと遂行される、そのための一つの工夫なわけですから、その目的に照らしたときに、ほかの様々なサポートをしてくれる要因と一緒に考えていくということが大事なのであって、私は、この金融行政の独立性・中立性・専門性、これは決して否定されてはいけない重要な要素であると思っておりますので、この点に資するための工夫はどんどんやっていったら良いと思いますし、先ほど、プリンシプル・ベースとしての「ノーリターンルール」というものについては、引き続き重要な心構えであって、今後とも留意すべきだと申し上げたのは、そういう意味でございます。 - 金融庁

Where the purpose of a remittance is stated in the written remittance request (including report by the customer) and careful confirmation is determined to be unnecessary based on other information, it is also permissible to confirm the purpose of the remittance. However, where it is difficult to understand the purpose of the remittance as remittance data from the customer lacks information necessary to confirm the purpose of the remittance, it is necessary to confirm the purpose by such methods as checking with information understood from the status of past transactions with the customer. On the other hand, in the case of a new customer with whom a Remittance Handling Financial Institution, etc. has never conducted any transaction, it is necessary to confirm the attributes of the customer to determine whether careful confirmation is necessary. 例文帳に追加

送金依頼書に送金目的が記載されており（顧客からの申告を含む。）、他の情報から慎重な確認が不要と判断できるものについては、当該送金目的を確認することで差し支えないが、顧客からの送金データに送金目的を確認するための必要な情報が欠落し、その把握が困難な場合には、当該顧客との過去の取引状況等から把握している情報と照合する等の方法により、確認を行う必要がある。他方、過去の取引実績がない一見の顧客の場合には、当該顧客の属性を確認し、慎重な確認が必要か判断を行う必要がある。 - 財務省

(7) An application for a declaration of invalidity of the registration of a trade mark on the ground that there is an earlier trade mark in relation to which the conditions set out in section 8 (3) or (4) apply (a) shall not be made after the expiry of 5 years from 1st July 2004 or the date of completion of the registration procedure, whichever is the later, unless the applicant for the declaration shows that — (i) the registration of the later trade mark was applied for in bad faith; or (ii) the later trade mark was never used; and (b) shall not be granted if the registration of the later trade mark was applied for before the earlier trade mark became well known in Singapore, unless the applicant for the declaration shows that the registration of the later trade mark was applied for in bad faith.例文帳に追加

(7)第8条(3)若しくは(4)に定める条件が適用される先の商標があるという理由による，商標の登録無効の宣言の請求は，(a)2004年7月1日以降5年間又は登録手続の完了日から5年間のいずれかのうち遅い日以降には，提出することができない。ただし，宣言の請求人が次を示した場合はその限りではない。(i)後の商標の登録が悪意で出願されたこと，又は (ii)後の商標が使用されたことがないこと，並びに (b)後の商標が，先の商標がシンガポールで周知商標になる前に出願された場合は認められない。ただし，宣言の請求人が後の商標が悪意で出願されたことを示すことができる場合はその限りではない。 - 特許庁

A rejection by the Examiner is never to be taken literally. An applicant should remember that the Examiner may not be actually rejecting his invention. The Examiner may in fact be quite prepared to admit the invention over the references to the prior art. He may be merely rejecting the applicant’s claims, that is, the way in which the applicant has expressed his invention. An Examiner will frequently make a blanket rejection on some reference to the prior art just to be helpful to the applicant - just to give the applicant a chance to explain away some reference and make a change in his claims to avoid it, rather than to wait until the patent is granted and is involved in a litigation, when it may be too late to make the explanation.例文帳に追加

審査官による拒絶は，決して文字通りに解釈してはならない。出願人は，審査官がその発明を実際に拒絶しようとしているのではないかもしれないことを忘れてはならない。実際のところ審査官は，先行技術を参照して発明を承認する用意を概ねしている可能性がある。審査官は，出願人のクレーム，すなわち，出願人による発明の表現方法を拒絶しているのみかもしれない。 審査官は，出願人の助けになるように，先行技術を参照して包括的に拒絶することがよくある。これは，出願人にとって特許付与後に訴訟になれば，釈明することが手遅れになることがあるので，それを待たせるよりはむしろ，引例を回避するために釈明し，かつ，拒絶を回避するためにクレームを変更する機会を与えようとしているのである。 - 特許庁

Where the examiner intends to give a notice of reasons for refusal for a patent application under the preceding Article, and these reasons for refusal are the same as the reasons for refusal stated in the previous notice under the preceding Article (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 159(2) (including its application mutatis mutandis under Article 174(1)) and Article 163 (2)) with regard to another patent application (limited to the case where both patent applications are deemed to have been filed simultaneously by applying the provision of Article 44(2) to either or both of them) (excluding such a notice of reasons for refusal of which the applicant of the patent application could have never known the content prior to the filing of a request for examination of the patent application), the examiner shall also give a notice to that effect. 例文帳に追加

審査官は、前条の規定により特許出願について拒絶の理由を通知しようとする場合において、当該拒絶の理由が、他の特許出願(当該特許出願と当該他の特許出願の少なくともいずれか一方に第四十四条第二項の規定が適用されたことにより当該特許出願と同時にされたこととなつているものに限る。)についての前条(第百五十九条第二項(第百七十四条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)及び第百六十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による通知(当該特許出願についての出願審査の請求前に当該特許出願の出願人がその内容を知り得る状態になかつたものを除く。)に係る拒絶の理由と同一であるときは、その旨を併せて通知しなければならない。 - 特許庁

In Japan, isobutane is used as a refrigerant instead of fluorocarbon refrigerants. Isobutane is flammable, and so there are many precautions taken to prevent accidents. For instance, refrigerator piping which used to be welded, has been changed to a seamless pipe to prevent gas leakages. Moreover, defroster heaters, which used to be in singlelayer tubes, are now in double-layer tubes, so that surface temperatures never get higher than the combustion point. These forward technologies support the use of nonfluorocarbon. For other refrigeration equipment, such as convenience store show cases, non-fluorocarbon products using carbon dioxide are already in practical use. Also, non-fluorocarbon, energy-efficient automatic vending machines are now in use on the street all over this country. Most of these non-fluorocarbon equipment are recently put in practical use, so they are not wide-spread yet. However, the government is promoting the technical development and installation of non-fluorocarbon facilities and equipment with financial incentives. 例文帳に追加

日本では冷媒フロンの替わりにイソブタンを使用。可燃性ガスのイソブタンは、漏れると発火する危険性があるため、安全性を確保するための様々な工夫を行ってきました。従来溶接していた冷却器の配管は、イソブタンの漏洩を防ぐため繋ぎ目を無くしました。更に、１枚のガラス管に入れていた霜取りヒーターを二重のガラス管の中に入れることによって、表面温度をイソブタンの発火点より低く抑え発火を防ぐなど、高い技術力を駆使しノンフロン化に成功したのです。他の冷凍空調機器では、コンビニにおけるショーケースでも、二酸化炭素を冷媒としたノンフロン製品が実用化されており、また、自動販売機にも、ノンフロン・省エネ機があります。これらのノンフロン機器は、まだ一部が実用化されたばかりでその普及はこれからですが、国の補助を用い、ノンフロンの施設や設備の技術開発や導入等の促進がされています。 - 経済産業省

Are we to say that we are never intentionally to do wrong, or that in one way we ought and in another way we ought not to do wrong, or is doing wrong always evil and dishonorable, as I was just now saying, and as has been already acknowledged by us? Are all our former admissions which were made within a few days to be thrown away? And have we, at our age, been earnestly discoursing with one another all our life long only to discover that we are no better than children? Or, in spite of the opinion of the many, and in spite of consequences whether better or worse, shall we insist on the truth of what was then said, that injustice is always an evil and dishonour to him who acts unjustly? Shall we say so or not? Yes. 例文帳に追加

僕たちの主張というのは、僕たちは決して自分から間違ったことをしないというものか、あるいは、間違ったことをやるべき時とやってはいけない時があるというものか、どっちなんだろうか。言い換えると、間違ったことは常に悪くて不名誉なことなのかどうか、ということだ。昔こういうことを議論していて、僕たちはこの点で意見の一致を見たね。それとも、その意見はわずかな日数でもって捨てられてしまったのかね。僕たちは、こんなに年寄りで、しかもお互い長いことあんなに真剣に議論していながら、発見したのは、僕たちが子供と何の変わりもないということに過ぎなかったのか。それとも、多くの人の意見があっても、あるいは結果の善し悪しにかかわらず、僕たちは、不正は常に悪いことであり、不正な行動は不名誉をもたらすものだと主張するのだろうか。僕たちはそうすべきなのか。その通りだ。 - Plato『クリトン』

The different views should be consecutively numbered. Letters and figures of reference must be carefully formed. They should, if possible, measure at least 32 millimeters in height, so that they may bear reduction to 10.6 millimeters; and they may be much larger when there is sufficient room. They must be so placed in the close and complex parts of drawings as not to interfere with a thorough comprehension of the same, and therefore should rarely cross or mingle with the lines. When necessarily grouped around a certain part, they should be placed at a little distance where there is available space, and connected by lines with the parts to which they refer. They should not be placed upon shaded surfaces, but when it is difficult to avoid this, blank space must be left in the shading where the letter occurs, so that it shall appear perfectly distinct and separate from the work. If the same part of an invention appears in more than one view of the drawing, it must always be represented by the same character, and the same character must never be used to designate different parts.例文帳に追加

異なる図には連続番号を付す。参照文字及び数字は，記入方法に注意しなければならない。高さは，なるべく32mm以上とし，10.6mmへの縮小に耐えられるようにする。十分な余地があるときは，これより大幅に大きくしてもよい。参照文字及び数字は，図面の密接したかつ複雑な部分の完全な理解を妨げないように配置するものとし，従って線と交差又は交錯することが殆どないようにする。一定の部分の周囲にまとめて表示する必要がある場合は，余地があるときは若干の距離をおいて配置し，参照する部分と線で結ぶ。陰影が施された面には配置しないものとするが，これを避けるのが難しい場合は，文字が入る陰影の部分を白抜きにして，図面とは別の独立した部分であることがわかるようにする。発明の同一部分を複数の図に表示する場合は，同一の部分は常に同一の文字で示さなければならず，その同一の文字を別の部分を指定するのに使用してはならない。 - 特許庁

(a) Photographs are not normally considered to be proper drawings. Photographs are acceptable for obtaining a filing date and generally considered to be informal drawings. Photographs are only acceptable where they come within the special categories as set forth in the paragraph below. Photolitographs of photographs are never acceptable. (b) The Office is willing to accept black and white photographs or photomicrographs (not photolitographs or other reproduction of photographs made by using screens) printed on sensitized paper in lieu of India ink drawings, to illustrate the inventions which are incapable of being accurately or adequately depicted by India ink drawings restricted to the following categories: crystalline structures, metallurgical microstructures, textile fabrics, grain structures and ornamental effects. The photographs or photomicrographs must show the invention more clearly than they can be done by the India ink drawings and otherwise comply with the rules concerning such drawings. (c) Such photographs to be acceptable must be made on photographic paper having the following characteristics which are generally recognized in the photographic trade: paper with a surface described as smooth, tint, white, or be photographs mounted on a proper sized Bristol board.例文帳に追加

(a)写真は，通常は適正な図面とはみなされない。写真は，出願日を取得する目的では受理されるが，一般に非公式の図面とみなされる。写真は，次項に記載する特別な範疇に該当する場合にのみ受理される。写真現像用の原版は，絶対に受理されない。 (b)庁は，墨による図面では正確に又は十分に描写することができない発明を例示するために，墨による図面の代わりに，感光紙に焼き付けた白黒の写真，又は(写真平版又はその他スクリーン印刷による写真の複製でない)顕微鏡写真を受理することが可能であるが，次の範疇のものに限定する。結晶構造，金属組織，織物地等，粒状構造及び装飾効果。写真又は顕微鏡写真は，墨による図面よりも発明を明瞭に示さなければならず，また，当該図面に関する規則に従うものとする。 (c)当該写真が受理されるためには，写真業界で一般に認められている次の特性を有する印画紙，すなわち表面が滑らかで，白無地の印画紙に焼き付けた写真，又は適切な寸法のブリストル紙を台紙にした写真でなければならない。 - 特許庁

The judgment for the Mark Lester case states that "A person who selected to engage in an occupation such as an actor may be considered as having given comprehensive consent to the disclosure of his/her name and image to public. Therefore, so far as such person is concerned, there would be much less need for protection of the aforementioned personal moral rights. Further, considering that gaining popularity is the essence of such an occupation, a person like an actor normally wishes to have his/her name and images widely disclosed to public and thus he/she will not, unlike ordinary people, generally suffer mental damages due to the disclosure of his/her name and images. Therefore, the actor etc. is entitled to claim for compensation of damages on the ground of his/her mental suffering due to the unauthorized utilization of his/her name or images only where the method, manner or purpose of utilization is detrimental to his/her occupational reputation, fame, and public image or where any other special circumstances exist (for example, where the actor sticks to the belief that his name or images should never utilized for product advertisements)." This case held that the portrait rights and privacy rights of celebrities are limited to a considerable extent. 例文帳に追加

マークレスター事件判決は、「俳優等の職業を選択した者は、もともと自己の氏名や肖像が大衆の前に公開されることを包括的に許諾したものであって、右のような人格的利益の保護は大幅に制限されると解し得る余地があるからである。それだけでなく、人気を重視するこれらの職業にあっては、自己の氏名や肖像が広く一般大衆に公開されることを希望若しくは意欲しているのが通常であって、それが公開されたからといって、一般市井人のように精神的苦痛を感じない場合が多いとも考えられる。以上のことから、俳優等が自己の氏名や肖像の権限なき使用により精神的苦痛を被ったことを理由として損害賠償を求め得るのは、その使用の方法、態様、目的等からみて、彼の俳優等としての評価、名声、印象等を毀損若しくは低下させるような場合、その他特段の事情が存する場合（例えば、自己の氏名や肖像を商品宣伝に利用させないことを信念としているような場合）に限定されるものというべきである。」として、著名人の場合には、肖像権・プライバシー権が一般人よりも大きく制限されることを認めた。 - 経済産業省

Our teacher dedicated his life to the study requiring great pains; as to "Koshi-den", at the end of the Bunka era (1804-1818), he began to write the draft, and by the early Bunsei era (1818-1830), about 12 volumes had been completed; however, by that time, he had also gradually gained an insight into the study and understood the teachings of the master of Suzunoya (Norinaga MOTOORI), then he realized that this world was the product of our great gods of Japan, so he decided to suspend "Koshi-den" temporarily, and first explore and read through all the past annotations of the histories of our country as well as those of India and Europe to use new knowledge to his advantage in writing "Koshi-den"; therefore, since the middle of the Bunsei era, he intensly studied foreign literature and culture mainly, and during a period of over 20 years, he completed almost all his works, which he left for us, including "Sekiken Taiko-den" (Japanese Early History); although he was never satisfied with his works, his students, of course, including myself, with a feeling of gratitude, thought that our master had succeeded in completing most his researches and studies, and were concerned about the delay in completing "Koshi-den" and because of our master's age, we repeatedly begged him to restart the writing, then thankfully at about the 10th year of the Tenpo era (1839), he restarted; however, he was requested to write on linguistic methods so he began to write "Goju Ongi" (Pronunciation and Meaning of 50 Kana) and suspended "Koshi-den" again; after a year, he was banished to Akita Province by order of the former bakufu (Japanese feudal government headed by a shogun), fortunately since Akita was his hometown and there were many relatives of his, besides the former load treated him very kindly, they relieved him off poor living, although under those conditions, he had no time to finish the remaining works; he was always concerned about those unfinished works, and after only a few years, he became sick and regrettably died. 例文帳に追加

生涯苦心致され候中にも、古史伝は最初文化の末頃より草稿取り掛かり、文政の始め頃に、成文一二巻程は、ざっと稿本成り候ところ、段々見識博くあいなり、殊に故鈴屋大人の御遺教をも相伺れ候て、いよいよ以って、世界悉く我が皇大神達の御鎔造（ツクリカタメ）なされたる事を感得致され候に付、古史伝は先ず差し置き、赤縣州を始め、印度及び西洋の古伝をも悉く皆探索網羅して、其の上にて、充分に古史の註解をと存し込まれ候て、文政の半ば頃より、専ら外国の学に困苦致され、凡そ廿余年も歳月を過ごされ候て、赤縣太古傳を初め、即ち今此れある丈の著述は出来候へ共、中々もって先人の心底に叶ひ候事には此れ無く候へ共、大抵は見当も付き候に依っては、私を始め門人の中の所存にも、段々時節後れ、先人も老年に成られ候に付き、先ず先ず外国の所は大抵にして差し置かれ、古史伝の清撰をしきりて、相願い催促致し候て、天保10年頃より、漸々と其の方にも趣かれ候所、言語規則の書之無きに付き、余儀なく五十音義の撰にかかり、凡そ一ヵ年ほど打ち過ぎられ候所、旧幕府の命に依って秋田へ放逐、尤も同所は本国の事、親族共も少なからず、第一旧君侯より厚く恩遇も之有りて会計の辛苦は薄らぎ候へ共、著述致す可き遑なく、此処両三年心配致され候内に病を発し入幽致され候次第にて残念至極にて御座候。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Article 52-2-5 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Customer Other Than a Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person Who is a Customer Other than a Professional Investor will be Deemed to be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Section 2, Subsection 1 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business Activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business Activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) (Delivery of Documents Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Articles 37-5 to 37-7 inclusive (Delivery of Documents Pertaining to the Receipt of a Security Deposit, Cancellation by Means of a Document, Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) of that Article (Prohibition on Compensation for Losses, etc.) and Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediation for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to the Foreign Bank Agency Services provided by a Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning a Bank which provides the Foreign Bank Agency Services after obtaining the authorization under Article 52-2, paragraph (1) or giving a notification under paragraph (2) of that Article; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the terms "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction," "Financial Instruments Business," and "soliciting to conclude, or concluding" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," and "soliciting to conclude or providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion" respectively, the term "Acts of Financial Instruments Transactions" in these provisions (excluding Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrases "a contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer," "and has never concluded a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "concluding" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act," "and has never provided agency or intermediation for Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" respectively, the term "conclude" in Article 34-2, paragraph (5), item (ii) and Article 34-3, paragraph (4), item (ii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provide agency or intermediation for the conclusion of," the phrase "Subject Contract with" in Article 34-3, paragraph (2), item (iv), sub-item (a) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Subject Contract through agency or intermediation by," the phrases "wishes to conclude" and "deliver to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provides agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" and "in addition to delivering to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance, provide information on the contents of contracts pertaining to the Deposits, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning the Depositors, etc. defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph)" respectively, the term "a Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Foreign Bank (meaning the Principal Foreign Bank defined in Article 52-2, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act) of the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank defined in Article 52-2-5 of that Act)," the phrase "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in cases where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or a financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "the customer" and "make up, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrase "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of," the phrases "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4), and Article 43-4" and "concluded" in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to the delivery of documents under paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) shall be excluded) and Article 37-4" and "provided agency or intermediation for the conclusion thereof" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の二の五　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五から第三十七条の七まで（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付、書面による解除、指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は、外国銀行代理銀行（第五十二条の二第一項の認可を受け、又は同条第二項の規定による届出をして外国銀行代理業務を営んでいる銀行をいう。以下同じ。）が行う外国銀行代理業務に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「締結の勧誘又は締結」とあるのは「締結の勧誘又は締結の代理若しくは媒介」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、「を過去に当該特定投資家との間で締結」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を過去に当該特定投資家との間で」と、「を締結する」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同法第三十四条の二第五項第二号及び第三十四条の三第四項第二号中「締結する」とあるのは「締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同条第二項第四号イ中「と対象契約」とあるのは「による代理若しくは媒介により対象契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「外国銀行代理銀行（銀行法第五十二条の二の五に規定する外国銀行代理銀行をいう。）の所属外国銀行（同法第五十二条の二第一項に規定する所属外国銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と、「締結した」とあるのは「締結の代理若しくは媒介をした」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム