1016万例文収録!

「ひつぎょく」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(426ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > ひつぎょくに関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

ひつぎょくの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 21310



例文

第五十二条の二の五 金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款(第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで(特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合)並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項(特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合)を除く。)(特定投資家)、同章第二節第一款(第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで(第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等)、第三十七条第一項第二号(広告等の規制)、第三十七条の二(取引態様の事前明示義務)、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項(契約締結前の書面の交付)、第三十七条の五から第三十七条の七まで(保証金の受領に係る書面の交付、書面による解除、指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等)、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二(禁止行為)、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項(損失補てん等の禁止)並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで(最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務)を除く。)(通則)及び第四十五条(第三号及び第四号を除く。)(雑則)の規定は、外国銀行代理銀行(第五十二条の二第一項の認可を受け、又は同条第二項の規定による届出をして外国銀行代理業務を営んでいる銀行をいう。以下同じ。)が行う外国銀行代理業務に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「締結の勧誘又は締結」とあるのは「締結の勧誘又は締結の代理若しくは媒介」と、これらの規定(同法第三十四条の規定を除く。)中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為(第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。)を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、「を過去に当該特定投資家との間で締結」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を過去に当該特定投資家との間で」と、「を締結する」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同法第三十四条の二第五項第二号及び第三十四条の三第四項第二号中「締結する」とあるのは「締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同条第二項第四号イ中「と対象契約」とあるのは「による代理若しくは媒介により対象契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等(銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「外国銀行代理銀行(銀行法第五十二条の二の五に規定する外国銀行代理銀行をいう。)の所属外国銀行(同法第五十二条の二第一項に規定する所属外国銀行をいう。)」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引(買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。)又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。)」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券等」という。)」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客(信託会社等(信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。)が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三(第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。)及び第三十七条の四」と、「締結した」とあるのは「締結の代理若しくは媒介をした」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 52-2-5 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Customer Other Than a Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person Who is a Customer Other than a Professional Investor will be Deemed to be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Section 2, Subsection 1 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business Activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business Activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) (Delivery of Documents Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Articles 37-5 to 37-7 inclusive (Delivery of Documents Pertaining to the Receipt of a Security Deposit, Cancellation by Means of a Document, Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) of that Article (Prohibition on Compensation for Losses, etc.) and Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediation for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to the Foreign Bank Agency Services provided by a Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning a Bank which provides the Foreign Bank Agency Services after obtaining the authorization under Article 52-2, paragraph (1) or giving a notification under paragraph (2) of that Article; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the terms "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction," "Financial Instruments Business," and "soliciting to conclude, or concluding" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," and "soliciting to conclude or providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion" respectively, the term "Acts of Financial Instruments Transactions" in these provisions (excluding Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrases "a contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer," "and has never concluded a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "concluding" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act," "and has never provided agency or intermediation for Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" respectively, the term "conclude" in Article 34-2, paragraph (5), item (ii) and Article 34-3, paragraph (4), item (ii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provide agency or intermediation for the conclusion of," the phrase "Subject Contract with" in Article 34-3, paragraph (2), item (iv), sub-item (a) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Subject Contract through agency or intermediation by," the phrases "wishes to conclude" and "deliver to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provides agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" and "in addition to delivering to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance, provide information on the contents of contracts pertaining to the Deposits, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning the Depositors, etc. defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph)" respectively, the term "a Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Foreign Bank (meaning the Principal Foreign Bank defined in Article 52-2, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act) of the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank defined in Article 52-2-5 of that Act)," the phrase "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in cases where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or a financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "the customer" and "make up, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrase "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of," the phrases "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4), and Article 43-4" and "concluded" in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to the delivery of documents under paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) shall be excluded) and Article 37-4" and "provided agency or intermediation for the conclusion thereof" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七十一条 会社法第七百七十七条(新株予約権買取請求)、第七百七十八条(新株予約権の価格の決定等)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、組織変更をする株式会社が新株予約権を発行している場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第七百七十八条第一項、第二項及び第四項中「組織変更後持分会社」とあるのは「組織変更後相互会社(保険業法第六十九条第四項第一号に規定する組織変更後相互会社をいう。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 71 The provisions of Article 777 (Demand for Purchase of Share Options), Article 778 (Determination on Value of Share Options, etc.), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where the converting Stock Company has issued share options. In this case, the term "converted membership company" in Article 778, paragraph (1), Article 778, paragraph (2), and Article 778, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Converted Mutual Company (referring to a Converted Mutual Company as defined in Article 69, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十三条の八 発行登録者、有価証券の売出しをする者、引受人、金融商品取引業者又は登録金融機関は、発行登録によりあらかじめその募集又は売出しが登録されている有価証券については、当該発行登録がその効力を生じており、かつ、当該有価証券の募集又は売出しごとにその発行価額又は売出価額の総額、発行条件又は売出条件その他の事項で公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定めるものを記載した書類(以下「発行登録追補書類」という。)が内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣に提出されていなければ、これを募集又は売出しにより取得させ、又は売り付けてはならない。ただし、有価証券の募集又は売出しごとの発行価額又は売出価額の総額が一億円未満の有価証券の募集又は売出しで内閣府令で定めるものについては、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 23-8 (1) The Issuer, a person who engages in Secondary Distribution of Securities, an Underwriter, a Financial Instruments Business Operator or a Registered Financial Institution shall not have another person acquire Securities for which the Shelf Registration has been made for their Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions, or sell such Securities to another person, through Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions, unless the Shelf Registration has already come into effect and, for each Public Offering or Secondary Distribution, a document which states the total issue price or total distribution amount, conditions of issuance or distribution of the Securities or other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (hereinafter referred to as "Shelf Registration Supplements") has been submitted to the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided however, that this shall not apply to Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance if the total issue price or total distribution amount of each Public Offering or Secondary Distribution is less than 100 million.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十四条 第五条、第九条、第十一条、第十三条、第十四条及び第十六条から第十八条までの規定は信託会社等の行う委託者非指図型投資信託に係る業務について、第二十六条の規定は委託者非指図型投資信託について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「運用の指図」とあるのは「運用」と、第九条中「取得することを当該投資信託財産の受託者である信託会社等(以下「受託会社」という。)に指図してはならない」とあるのは「取得してはならない」と、第十三条第一項第二号中「他の投資信託財産(当該投資信託委託会社が資産運用会社である場合にあつては、資産の運用を行う投資法人を含む。次号において同じ。)」とあり、及び同項第三号中「他の投資信託財産」とあるのは「他の信託財産」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 54 (1) The provisions of Article 5, Article 9, Article 11, Article 13, Article 14, and Article 16 through Article 18 shall apply mutatis mutandis to business related to Investment Trusts Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor carried out by a Trust Company, etc. and Article 26 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Investment Trusts Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor. In this case, the term "instructions on investment" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "investments," the phrase "may not instruct the Trust Company, etc. that is the trustee of the Investment Trust Property (hereinafter referred to as the 'Trustee Company') to acquire" in Article 9 shall be deemed to be replaced with "may not acquire," the phrases "other Investment Trust Property for which the Settlor Company of an Investment Trust gives instructions on investment (in cases where the Settlor Company of an Investment Trust is an Asset Management Company, an Investment Corporation investing assets shall be included; the same shall apply in the following item)" in Article 13, paragraph (1), item (ii), "other Investment Trust Property" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "other trust property," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第十一条 内閣総理大臣は、有価証券届出書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載がある場合において、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、当該有価証券届出書又はその届出者がこれを提出した日から一年以内に提出する第五条第一項に規定する届出書若しくは第二十三条の三第一項に規定する発行登録書若しくは第二十三条の八第一項に規定する発行登録追補書類について、届出者に対し、公益又は投資者保護のため相当と認められる期間、その届出の効力若しくは当該発行登録書若しくは当該発行登録追補書類に係る発行登録の効力の停止を命じ、又は第八条第一項(第二十三条の五第一項において準用する場合を含む。)に規定する期間を延長することができる。この場合においては、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 11 (1) In cases where a Securities Registration Statement contains any fake statements on important matters, when the Prime Minister finds it necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, he/she may, with regard to said Securities Registration Statement, or other statements submitted under Article 5(1), Shelf Registration Statements submitted under Article 23-3(1) or Shelf Registration Supplements submitted under Article 23-8(1) by the person who submitted said Securities Registration Statement during the period within one year from the day when the person submitted said Securities Registration Statement, order the suspension of effect of the notification or of the Shelf Registration pertaining to the Shelf Registration Statement or the Shelf Registration Supplements, or extend the period stipulated in Article 8(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23-5(1)), for the period that he/she considers appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors. In this case, a hearing shall be held irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム


例文

3 前二項の特別の利害関係とは、公認会計士又は監査法人が同項の規定により貸借対照表、損益計算書その他の財務計算に関する書類及び内部統制報告書を提出する者との間に有する公認会計士法第二十四条(同法第十六条の二第六項において準用する場合を含む。)、第二十四条の二(同法第十六条の二第六項及び第三十四条の十一の二において準用する場合を含む。)、第二十四条の三(同法第十六条の二第六項において準用する場合を含む。)又は第三十四条の十一第一項に規定する関係及び公認会計士又は監査法人がその者に対し株主若しくは出資者として有する関係又はその者の事業若しくは財産経理に関して有する関係で、内閣総理大臣が公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めて内閣府令で定めるものをいう。例文帳に追加

(3) The special interests referred to in the preceding two paragraphs shall mean those which the Prime Minister specifies in a Cabinet Office Ordinance as he/she finds necessary and proper for the public interest or protection of investors, from among the relationships which a certified public accountant or audit firm has in connection with a person submitting a balance sheet, profit and loss statement or other statements on finance and accounting and an Internal Control Report under said two paragraphs, as set forth in Article 24 of the Certified Public Accountants Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-2(6) of said Act), Article 24-2 of the same Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-2(6) and Article 34-11-2 of said Act), Article 24-3 of said Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 16-2(6) of said Act) or Article 34-11(1) of the same Act, and the relationships as a shareholder or an Equity Investor which a certified public accountant or audit firm has in connection with said person, or the relationships which a certified public accountant or audit firm has in connection with said person's business or property accounting.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十一条の十一 総務大臣は、協会又は第二十一条の三第一項の規定による登録を受けた法人が、検定対象機械器具等についての試験又は個別検定を行う機能の全部又は一部を喪失したことにより、当該試験又は個別検定に関する業務を行うことが困難となつた場合において、特別の必要があると認めるときは、型式承認を受けようとする者の申請に基づき検定対象機械器具等についての試験を行い、又は型式承認を受けた者で個別検定を受けようとするものの申請に基づき検定対象機械器具等の個別検定を行うことができる。例文帳に追加

Article 21-11 (1) Where the Institute or a juridical person registered under the provision of Article 21-3, paragraph (1) is no longer, in whole or in part, capable of conducting a test or lot inspection of a machine or tool, etc. subject to inspection and it has become difficult for the Institute or juridical person to conduct the operations for such test or lot inspection, the Minister of Internal Affairs and Communications may, when he/she finds it particularly necessary, conduct the test of a machine or tool, etc. subject to inspection based on an application from a person who intends to obtain model approval, or conduct a lot inspection of a machine or tool, etc. subject to inspection based on an application from a person who has obtained model approval and intends to undergo a lot inspection.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十七条 厚生労働大臣は、特定の国若しくは地域において製造され、又は特定の者により製造される特定の器具又は容器包装について、第二十六条第一項から第三項まで又は第二十八条第一項の規定による検査の結果次に掲げる器具又は容器包装に該当するものが相当数発見されたこと、製造地における食品衛生上の管理の状況その他の厚生労働省令で定める事由からみて次に掲げる器具又は容器包装に該当するものが相当程度含まれるおそれがあると認められる場合において、人の健康を損なうおそれの程度その他の厚生労働省令で定める事項を勘案して、当該特定の器具又は容器包装に起因する食品衛生上の危害の発生を防止するため特に必要があると認めるときは、薬事・食品衛生審議会の意見を聴いて、当該特定の器具又は容器包装を販売し、販売の用に供するために製造し、若しくは輸入し、又は営業上使用することを禁止することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 17 (1) Regarding specific apparatus or containers and packaging which are produced in a specific country or region, or are produced by a specific person, in the case where, as a result of inspections under Article 26, paragraphs (1) to (3), or Article 28, paragraph (1), a considerable number of articles falling under the following apparatus or containers and packaging are found, or it is found that articles falling under the following apparatus or containers and packaging are likely to be included to a considerable extent, judging from the conditions of food sanitation management at a production site or on other grounds specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may prohibit the sales of said specific apparatus or containers and packaging, the production or import of said specific apparatus or containers and packaging for the purpose of marketing, or the use of said specific apparatus or containers and packaging in business, by hearing the opinions of the Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council, when he/she finds it particularly necessary to prevent the food sanitation hazards resulting from said specific apparatus or containers and packaging, considering the level of the risk to human health and other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五条 前条第一項又は第二項の規定による有価証券の募集又は売出し(特定有価証券(その投資者の投資判断に重要な影響を及ぼす情報がその発行者が行う資産の運用その他これに類似する事業に関する情報である有価証券として政令で定めるものをいう。以下この項及び第五項並びに第二十四条において同じ。)に係る有価証券の募集及び売出しを除く。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)に係る届出をしようとする発行者は、その者が会社(外国会社を含む。第五十条の二第九項及び第百五十六条の三第二項第三号を除き、以下同じ。)である場合(当該有価証券(特定有価証券を除く。以下この項から第四項までにおいて同じ。)の発行により会社を設立する場合を含む。)においては、内閣府令で定めるところにより、次に掲げる事項を記載した届出書を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券の発行価格の決定前に募集をする必要がある場合その他の内閣府令で定める場合には、第一号のうち発行価格その他の内閣府令で定める事項を記載しないで提出することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 5 (1) The Issuer of Securities who intends to make a notification for Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities (excluding a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities to be made with regard to Regulated Securities (meaning Securities specified by a Cabinet Order as those for which information that will have material influence on investors' Investment Decisions is information on assets investment or other similar business conducted by the Issuer of the Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and paragraph (5) of this Article and Article 24); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) under paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article shall submit a statement containing descriptions on the following matters to the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, if the Issuer is a company (including a foreign company; the same shall apply hereinafter, except in Article 50-2(9) and Article 156-3(2)(iii)) (including the cases where the company is to be established by issuance of said Securities (excluding Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph to paragraph (4))); provided, however, that, in cases where it is necessary to make the Public Offering of Securities before deciding their Issue Price or in other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, the statement may be submitted without stating the Issue Price or other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance among the matters required to be stated under item (i) below:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

(2) 当該規則においては,(1)の一般原則を害することなく,特に,次に掲げる事項の全部又は一部について定めることができる。 (a) 書類の送達を含む本法律に基づく手続(裁判所における手続又はそれに関連する事項を除く。)を規制すること (b) 商標の登録に関する商品又はサービスを分類すること (c) 商標又はその他の書類を複製し又はそれらの複製を要求すること (d) 大臣が適当と認める方法で商標又はその他の書類の写しを公開し,かつ販売又は配布すること及びそれらを規制すること (e) 本法の適用上必要とされる事項又は事柄に関して納付すべき手数料を定めること[法律A881による置換] (ea) 代理人の登録及び資格を規制すること[法律A881による挿入] (f) 本法に明示的に規定されているか否かを問わず,ただし,本法の何れの規定にも違反しないように,各商標局において実行される商標業務に関する事項を一般的に規制すること例文帳に追加

(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of subsection (1), such regulations may provide for all or any of the following: (a) to regulate the practice (other than that relating to proceedings before the Court or connected therewith) under this Act including service of documents; (b) to classify goods or services for the purpose of registration of trade marks; (c) to make or require duplication of trade marks or other documents; (d) to secure and regulate the publishing and selling or distributing in such manner as the Minister may think fit of copies of trade marks and other documents; (e) to prescribe the fees to be paid in respect of any matter or thing required for the purposes of this Act; [Subs. Act A881] (ea) to provide for the registration and qualifications of agents; [Ins. Act A881] (f) to regulate generally on matters pertaining to the business of trade marks carried on in any trade marks office whether or not specially prescribed under this Act but so as not to be inconsistent with any of the provisions of this Act. - 特許庁

例文

第百八十三条 商業登記法(昭和三十八年法律第百二十五号)第一条の三から第五条まで(登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥)、第七条から第十五条まで(登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記)、第十七条から第二十七条まで(登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止)、第三十三条(商号の登記の抹消)、第三十四条(会社の商号の登記)、第四十四条、第四十五条(会社の支配人の登記)、第四十六条(第四項を除く。)(添付書面の通則)、第四十七条第一項(設立の登記)、第四十八条から第五十五条まで(支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記)、第六十四条(株主名簿管理人の設置による変更の登記)、第七十一条(解散の登記)、第七十三条から第七十五条まで(清算人の登記、清算人に関する変更の登記、清算結了の登記)及び第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで(更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任)の規定は、特定目的会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十五条中「第五十条まで(第九十五条、第百十一条及び第百十八条において準用する場合を含む。)」とあるのは「第五十条まで」と、「第五十一条第一項及び第二項、第五十二条、第七十八条第一項及び第三項、第八十二条第二項及び第三項、第八十三条、第八十七条第一項及び第二項、第八十八条、第九十一条第一項及び第二項、第九十二条、第百三十二条並びに」とあるのは「第百三十二条及び」と、同法第二十四条第七号中「書面若しくは第三十条第二項若しくは第三十一条第二項に規定する譲渡人の承諾書」とあるのは「書面」と、同法第三十四条第一項中「会社の登記簿」とあるのは「特定目的会社登記簿」と、同法第四十八条第二項中「会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律(以下「資産流動化法」という。)第二十二条第四項において準用する会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」と、同法第五十四条第一項中「取締役、監査役、代表取締役又は特別取締役(委員会設置会社にあつては、取締役、委員、執行役又は代表執行役)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は代表取締役」と、同条第二項第三号中「会社法第三百三十三条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十一条第一項」と、「同法第三百三十七条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十三条第一項」と、同法第五十五条第一項中「会社法第三百四十六条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十六条第四項」と、同法第七十一条第三項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第一号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第一号」と、「同法第四百八十三条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十一条第四項」と、同法第七十三条第二項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第二号又は第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第二号又は第三号」と、同条第三項及び同法第七十四条第一項中「会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」と、同法第七十五条中「会社法第五百七条第三項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第五百七条第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 183 (1) The provisions of Article 1-3 to Article 5 inclusive (Registry Office; Delegation of Affairs; Suspension of Affairs; Registrar; Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to Article 15 inclusive (Prohibition on Carrying Out of Registries and Other Documents; Loss and Restoration of Registries; Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc.; Issuance of Certificate of Registered Matters; Issuance of Documents Specifying Extract of Matters Registered; Inspection of Annexed Documents; Certificate of Seal Impression; Certification of Matters Required for Verification of Measures to Identify the Creator of Electromagnetic Records and Other Matters; Fees; Registration Upon Application by Party; Registration upon Commission), Article 17 to Article 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration; Document to Be Attached to Written Application; Electromagnetic Records to be Attached to Written Application; Submission of Seal Impression; Acceptance of Applications; Receipt; Order of Registration; Identity Confirmation by Registrar; Dismissal of Application; Registration to Be Made After Lapse of Period for Filing Action; Change in Administrative Zone, etc.; Prohibition on Registration of Identical Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Cancellation of Registration of Trade Name), Article 34 (Registration of Trade Name of Company), Article 44 and Article 45 (Registration of Company's Manager), Article 46 (excluding paragraph (4)) (General Rules on Documents to be Attached), Article 47(1) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to Article 55 inclusive (Registration to Be Made at Location of Branch Office; Registration of Relocation of Head Office; Registration of Change of Directors and Other Officers; Registration of Change of Person Who is to Temporarily Perform Duties of Accounting Auditors), Article 64 (Registration of Change Due to Share Option Issue), Article 71 (Registration of Dissolution), Article 73 to Article 75 inclusive (Registration of Liquidator; Registration of Change Related to Liquidator; Registration of Completion of Liquidation), and Article 132 to Article 148 inclusive (Correction; Application for Cancellation; Ex Officio Cancellation; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Procedure Act; Exclusion from Application of the Act on Access Information Held by Administrative Organs; Exclusion from the Application of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs; Request for Review; Handling of Request for Review Case; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Appeal Act; Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "to Article 50 inclusive (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95, Article 111 and Article 118)" and "Article 51, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 52, Article 78, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 82, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 83, Article 87, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 88, Article 91, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 92, Article 132" in Article 15 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "to Article 50 inclusive" and "Article 132," respectively, the phrase "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent or a transferor's written approval prescribed in Article 30, paragraph (2) or Article 31, paragraph (2)" in Article 24(vii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent," the term "company registry" in Article 34(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company Registry," the phrase "the items of Article 930, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act" in Article 48(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 930(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22(4) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the 'Asset Securitization Act')," the phrase ", representative director or special director (in the case of a company with committees, a director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer)" in Article 54(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or representative director," the phrases "Article 333, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" and "Article 337, paragraph (1) of said Act" in Article 54(2)(iii) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 71(1) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 73(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 346, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 55(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Companies Act" and "Article 483, paragraph (4) of said Act" in Article 71(3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(i) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 171(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (ii) or (iii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(ii) or (iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 928, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(3) and Article 74(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 928(1)(ii) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 507, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act" in Article 75 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 507(3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

そういった意味で、そこら辺がまさにバランスでございまして、金融というのは安心だとか、あるいは非常に大丈夫だということと同時に、それがまた極端に行き過ぎますと、今度は今さっき言いましたように、貸し渋り、貸しはがしが起きて、本当に健全な企業の発展、あるいは健全な経済の発展の、逆に言うと阻害要因にもなるわけですから、そういった意味で金融業というのは大変重要でございますが、そこら辺の調和、バランスというのが非常に私は大事だということを、今度はバーナンキさん、あるいは周小川さんとも話を通じて再確認させていただいたわけでございますし、アメリカでも金融規制当局の方、中国でも金融規制当局の方とも話をしまして、そういった感を一層させていただいたわけでございまして、いずれにいたしましても、金融庁といたしましては、新規制が簡単に言えば、中長期的に我が国の金融システムを健全性の向上に資するものとなる一方、我が国の実情、それぞれの我が国の実情や経営改革に対する影響を配慮するということは、我が国のみならずG20はそれぞれの国の実情があるわけですから、そういうことにきちっと配慮する必要が重要だというふうに思っておりました。こういった観点から、引き続き積極的に日本の立場、かなり世界的に受け入れられてきたというふうに私は認識いたしておりますけれども、しっかり主張してまいりたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

In that sense and others, striking a balance between all those factors is criticalwhile peace of mind and security do matter in financial services, adhering excessively to such qualities could, as I have just pointed out, result in a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection and thus create impediments to the growth of truly healthy companies or the growth of a healthy economy, which is why the financial sector is so vital. This time around, I reaffirmed in talks with people like Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Zhou Xiaochuan that harmony or a balance between those factors is extremely important. Having spoken with financial regulators in both the U.S. and China, I am now even more convinced of this idea. In any case, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) is aware of the importance of paying proper attention to any impact of the new requirements on the current situation and corporate reform efforts in Japan – a point that applies to not only Japan but also the G20 nations that each have their own lay of the landwhile they will, put simply, contribute to a higher level of soundness of Japan's financial system over the medium to long term. From this viewpoint, I do see that Japan's argument has increasingly received global approval to a considerable extent, while I am committed to continuing to advocate Japan's position in a proactive and resolute fashion.  - 金融庁

日本銀行はご存じのように非常に独立性が高いですね。法律の改正、日銀性の独立性を高める改正、私は政調会の副会長ぐらいでございましたが、山崎拓さんが政調会長のときにつくった法律でございまして、私も力仕事をさせていただいた記憶がございますが、やはり日本銀行は独立性というのがございますから。しかし、そうはいっても金融政策で政府と日銀というのはやっぱり密接な連絡をとってやる必要がございますが、日本銀行は日本銀行で独立性を持って、基本的にインフレを抑えるということが日本銀行の本来的な任務なのですね。今日本はデフレでございまして、デフレから脱却するということは極めて難しいことだというふうに今、かなり国際的な認識も高まっているようですが、銀行の健全性について、当然金融庁は常に注視しておく、銀行というのは総理大臣の免許事業でございますから、ましてや今さっきも言ったように、非常に経済の中核でございますから、そういった意味で銀行がこういった日銀の制度を使用して経済を活性化に貢献するということを私はいいことだと思っていますね。期待しています。例文帳に追加

As you may be aware, the BOJ is extremely independent. Nevertheless, the government and the BOJ need to communicate closely with each other in implementing monetary policies. The BOJ’s primary mission is, basically, to curb inflation while exercising its independence. At present, Japan is experiencing deflation, and the international community is becoming increasingly aware that it would be extremely difficult to break away from deflation. The soundness of banks will constantly be under the surveillance of the FSA, as a matter of course. Banks are businesses licensed by the Prime Minister, not to mention that they form the core of the economy, so in that sense, it is good that banks are making contributions to stimulate the economy by using the BOJ’s system. I hope they do a good job.  - 金融庁

第百六条 刑事施設の長は、刑法第二十八条(国際受刑者移送法第二十一条において読み替えて適用する場合を含む。)、少年法第五十八条又は国際受刑者移送法第二十二条の規定により仮釈放を許すことができる期間を経過した懲役受刑者又は禁錮受刑者が、第八十八条第二項の規定により開放的施設において処遇を受けていることその他の法務省令で定める事由に該当する場合において、その円滑な社会復帰を図るため、刑事施設の外において、その者が、釈放後の住居又は就業先の確保その他の一身上の重要な用務を行い、更生保護に関係のある者を訪問し、その他その釈放後の社会生活に有用な体験をする必要があると認めるときは、刑事施設の職員の同行なしに、外出し、又は七日以内の期間を定めて外泊することを許すことができる。ただし、外泊については、その受刑者に係る刑が六月以上執行されている場合に限る。例文帳に追加

Article 106 (1) In cases where either a person sentenced to imprisonment with work or a person sentenced to imprisonment without work has served the period of time for parole qualification pursuant to the provisions of Article 28 of the Penal Code (including the cases where it is applied by replacing the terms pursuant to Article 21 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons), Article 58 of the Juvenile Code, or Article 22 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons, and falls under cases specified by a Ministry of Justice Ordinance, such as being placed in an open-type institution pursuant to the provision of paragraph (2) of Article 88, if it is deemed necessary that the sentenced person, for smooth re-entry to society, go outside the penal institution to settle important personal matters such as securement of his/her residence and employer following release, visit people relevant to his/her rehabilitation and to the guardianship thereof, or acquire other useful experience for life in society following his/her release, then the warden of the penal institution may permit him/her a day leave or a furlough for a definite period within seven days without an escort of staff members of the penal institution. However, the furlough shall be limited to the cases where a sentenced person has been serving for not less than six months.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十四条の七 第二十四条第一項の規定により有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない会社(同項第一号又は第二号に掲げる有価証券の発行者であるものに限る。第四項、次条第五項及び第二十七条の三十の十において「提出子会社」という。)の議決権の過半数を所有している会社その他の当該有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない会社と密接な関係を有するものとして政令で定めるもの(第二十四条第一項(同条第五項において準用する場合を含む。第四項各号において同じ。)の規定により有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない会社(第二十三条の三第四項の規定により有価証券報告書を提出した会社その他内閣府令で定めるものを含む。)を除く。以下この条並びに次条第二項、第四項及び第五項において「親会社等」という。)は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該親会社等の事業年度(当該親会社等が特定有価証券の発行者である場合には、内閣府令で定める期間。以下この項及び次項において同じ。)ごとに、当該親会社等の株式を所有する者に関する事項その他の公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書(以下「親会社等状況報告書」という。)を、当該事業年度経過後三月以内(当該親会社等が外国会社である場合には、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして政令で定める期間内)に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、親会社等状況報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして政令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 24-7 (1) A company which holds the majority of voting rights of another company being required to submit Annual Securities Reports under Article 24(1) (limited to those which have issued Securities listed in Article 24(1)(i) or (ii); such a company is referred to as "Subsidiary Company Submitting Annual Securities Reports" in paragraph (4) of this Article, paragraph (5) of the following Article and Article 27-30-10) or otherwise has a close relationship as specified by a Cabinet Order with another company being required to submit Annual Securities Reports (excluding companies which are required to submit Annual Securities Reports under Article 24(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24(5); the same shall apply in the items of paragraph (4) of this Article) (including those which submitted Annual Securities Reports under Article 23-3(4) or specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance); hereinafter referred to as a "Parent Company, etc." in this Article and paragraph (2) of the following Article, (4) and (5)) shall submit a report which, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, specifies matters pertaining to persons who hold shares of the Parent Company, etc. and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors for each business year of the Parent Company, etc. (or the period specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in cases where the Parent Company, etc. is the Issuer of Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) (hereinafter referred to as the "Status Report of Parent Company, etc.") to the Prime Minister within three months after the end of each business year (or, in cases where the Parent Company, etc. is a foreign company, within the period specified by a Cabinet Order as the period necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order that even if the company does not submit Status Report of Parent Company, etc., the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 会社法第百二十条第二項から第五項まで(株主の権利の行使に関する利益の供与)の規定は前項の場合について、同法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百二十条第三項の利益の返還を求める訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百二十条第三項及び第四項中「第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項」と、同条第五項中「総株主」とあるのは「総社員」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項(責任追及等の訴え)中「株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「社員である者」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 120, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive (Giving Benefits on Exercise of Shareholder's Right) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case set forth in the preceding paragraph; and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), and Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Responsibility, etc. in Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the return of benefits under Article 120, paragraph (3) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, respectively. In this case, the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 120, paragraphs (3) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "all shareholders" in Article 120, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; the term "shareholder who has been holding shares (other than a holder of share less than one unit who may not exercise his/her rights pursuant to the provision of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2))" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Responsibility, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who has been a member"; and the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

そういうことの中で、倒産、自主閉業という状態が進んでいることに対して、金融庁としてちゃんとした対応をしたいということで返済猶予等を含めての対策を私が今出していることについてぜひご理解をいただきたいという話を私はしたのですが、会長も「よく分かります」ということで、それでは、ぜひ11月の臨時国会に、法律名はまだ決めていないけれども、そういう立法に向けて、今、取りかかっているので、銀行サイドのそうした銀行の実務を踏まえて、どうしたら良い法律になっていくかということについてのご意見と知恵をいただきたいという話をしたら、「ぜひぜひ」ということでありまして、話が早いので、「では、来週からやりましょう」という話で、うちのほうのいろいろな都合からも、「では、水曜からやりましょうか」という話になりまして、うちの副大臣、政務官のところに全銀(協)のほうで、これは第二地銀以上ですが、その代表の方といいますか、そういう方にお出でいただくということで、会長の方から、「私どもの方から、では、何人か行かせますから、よく状況を聞いていただき、我々の考え方も聞いていただいて」ということで、「ぜひお願いします」ということで、来週の水曜日から、副大臣にもすぐ「こちらからも対応してやれよ」ということを指示いたしました。例文帳に追加

Although the FSA has made efforts since last year to restore the state of its inspection and supervision to what it should be by revising the direction of its guidance, the lender-borrower relationship is, unfortunately, not in an ideal state.  - 金融庁

第二十一条の十 特定排出者から、エネルギーの使用の合理化に関する法律(昭和五十四年法律第四十九号)第十五条第一項(同法第十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)、第二十条第三項、第五十六条第一項(同法第六十九条及び第七十一条第六項において準用する場合を含む。)又は第六十三条第一項の規定による報告があったときは、第二十一条の二から前条まで、第四十五条及び第四十七条の規定の適用については、当該報告のうち二酸化炭素の排出量に係る事項に関する部分は、エネルギー(同法第二条第一項に規定するエネルギーをいう。)の使用に伴って発生する二酸化炭素の排出量についての第二十一条の二第一項の規定による報告とみなす。この場合において、同項中「当該事業所に係る事業を所管する大臣(以下「事業所管大臣」という。)」とあり、第二十一条の三第一項、第三項、第四項及び第六項、第二十一条の四第一項、第三項及び第四項、第二十一条の五第四項、第二十一条の八第一項、第二項及び第五項、第四十五条第一項及び第二項並びに第四十七条第一項中「事業所管大臣」とあり、第二十一条の五第二項及び第二十一条の八第四項中「当該事業所管大臣」とあり、並びに第二十一条の五第三項中「関係事業所管大臣」とあるのは、同法第十五条第一項(同法第十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による報告については「エネルギーの使用の合理化に関する法律第十一条第一項(同法第十二条の三第一項において準用する場合を含む。)に規定する主務大臣」と、同法第二十条第三項の規定による報告については「エネルギーの使用の合理化に関する法律第二十条第三項に規定する主務大臣」と、同法第五十六条第一項(同法第六十九条及び第七十一条第六項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による報告については「国土交通大臣」と、同法第六十三条第一項の規定による報告については「エネルギーの使用の合理化に関する法律第六十三条第一項に規定する主務大臣」とするほか、第二十一条の二から前条まで、第四十五条及び第四十七条の規定の適用に関し必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 21-10 If a report has been submitted by a specified emitter as prescribed in Article 15, Paragraph 1 of the Act on Rationalization of Energy Use (Act No. 49 of 1979) (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, Paragraph 1 of that law), or in Article 20, Paragraph 3; Article 56, Paragraph 1 (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 69 or Article 71, Paragraph 6 of that law); or Article 63, Paragraph 1 of that law, then with regard to application of the provisions of Articles 21-2 through 21-9, Article 45, and Article 47, the portions of that report regarding matters pertaining to carbon dioxide emissions shall be deemed as reports pursuant to Article 21-2, Paragraph (1) regarding carbon dioxide emissions produced in conjunction with the use of energy (referring to energy as prescribed in Article 2, Paragraph (1) of that law). In this case, the words "minister who has jurisdiction over the area of business pertaining to the place of business in question (hereinafter referred to as 'minister having jurisdiction over the business in question')" in Article 21-2, Paragraph (1), the words "minister having jurisdiction over the business in question" in Article 21-3, Paragraphs (1), (3), (4), and (6), Article 21-4, Paragraphs (1), (3) and (4), Article 21-5, Paragraph (4), Article 21-8, Paragraphs (1), (2) and (5), Article 45, Paragraphs (1) and (2), and Article 47, Paragraph (1), the words "that minister having jurisdiction over the business in question" in Article 21-5, Paragraph (2) and Article 21-8, Paragraph (4), and the words "that minister having jurisdiction over relevant businesses" in Article 21-5, Paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with the words "competent minister" as prescribed in Article 11, Paragraph (1) of the Act on Rationalization of Energy Use (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 12-3, Paragraph (1) of that law) with regard to reporting under Article 15, Paragraph 1 of that law (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18, Paragraph 1 of that law); with the words "competent minister" as prescribed in Article 20, Paragraph 3 of the Act on Rationalization of Energy Use with regard to reporting under Article 20, Paragraph 3 of that law; with the words "Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism" with regard to reporting under Article 56, Paragraph 1 of that law (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 69 and Article 71, Paragraph 6 of that law); or with the words "competent minister" as prescribed in Article 63, Paragraph 1 of the Act on Rationalization of Energy Use with regard to reporting under Article 63, Paragraph 1 of that law; and other necessary technical matters with regard to application of the provisions of Articles 21-2 through 21-9, Article 45, and Article 47 shall be specified by Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

当然ですね。これは政治主導でございまして、農産品と申しますか、その取引については明治時代から(存在し)、米の相場を始めたのは江戸時代であると。それから一番古い先物取引は、大阪で始まったという話もあるわけでございます。穀物の取引というのは大変古い歴史と伝統がありまして、それは昔で言う農商務省、農林省がきちっと農業政策の一環としてやっており、それから、原油をはじめ鉱物資源につきましては、私も20年前、通産政務次官をしましたので、これはまた通商政策の一環としてやっているということです。しかし、一番大きな金融取引等々につきましては、(その)先物取引は金融庁の所管でございますから、これはやはり各省縦割りというのが今まであったことは、もう私も重々知っておりますし、また各省は、縦割りの中で来たというのが現実でございまして、そこはまさに私は政治主導の必要があるというふうに思っておりますので、きちっと3大臣で話をして、大所高所に立ってきちっと国際競争力もこれは大事なときでございまして、東京のマーケットそのものの地位を高めるということも、今の経済戦略の中で大事な課題でもございますから、やっていきたいというふうに強く思っております。例文帳に追加

Of course, I intend to do so. This is a matter of political leadership. Trade in agricultural goods has existed since the Meiji period; the rice market was opened in the Edo period. It is said that the first futures trading was conducted in Osaka. Grain trading has a very long history and tradition and it has been promoted by the former Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries as part of the agricultural policy. Trading in crude oil and other mineral resources has been promoted as part of the trade and commerce policy. For my part, I served as parliamentary secretary for international trade and industry 20 years ago. However, regarding financial products, which account for most of the trading, futures trading is under the jurisdiction of the FSA. I am well aware that ministerial sectionalism has existed until now. The reality is that individual ministries have been operating on the basis of sectionalism. In this respect, we must exercise political leadership. Under the current economic strategy, it is an important task to strengthen the Tokyo market’s international competitiveness and enhance its position from a broad perspective, so the three relevant ministers will discuss this matter and take necessary actions.  - 金融庁

第四十九条 会社法第二百九十六条(株主総会の招集)、第二百九十八条(第二項及び第三項を除く。)(株主総会の招集の決定)、第二百九十九条(第二項各号を除く。)(株主総会の招集の通知)、第三百条(招集手続の省略)、第三百十一条(書面による議決権の行使)、第三百十二条(電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで(取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議)及び第三百十八条(第五項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定(同法第二百九十八条第一項(各号を除く。)及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。)中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項(各号を除く。)及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間(当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 会社法第四編第三章(第七百十五条及び第七百四十条第三項を除く。)(社債権者集会)、第七編第二章第七節(社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え)、第八百六十八条第三項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十四条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、相互会社が社債を発行する場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項(社債権者集会の決議の執行)中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の七第一項から第三項までの規定並びに同法第六十一条の七第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項(債権者の異議手続の特則)中「第四百四十九条、第六百二十七条、第六百三十五条、第六百七十条、第七百七十九条(第七百八十一条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)、第七百八十九条(第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)、第七百九十九条(第八百二条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)又は第八百十条(第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)」とあるのは「保険業法第五十七条第四項において準用する同法第十七条(第一項ただし書を除く。)の規定並びに同法第八十八条及び第百六十五条の十七(同法第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715 and Article 740, paragraph (3)) (Bondholders' Meeting), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Payment, etc by Bond-Issuing Company.), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (x) to (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company issues bonds. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "under Article 705, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737, paragraph (2) (Execution of Resolutions of Bondholders' Meetings) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "of Article 61-7, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of the Insurance Business Act, and the provisions of Articles 708 and 709 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-7, paragraph (8) of that Act"; and the term "the provisions of Article 449, Article 627, Article 635, Article 670, Article 779 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 781), Article 789 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 793), Article 799 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 802) or Article 810 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 813)" in Article 740, paragraph (1) (Special provisions on objection procedures for creditors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57, paragraph (4) of that Act, and Articles 88 and 165-17 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20 of that Act) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3 第百五十七条第二項、第百五十八条第二項、第百六十条及び前条第一項並びに行政不服審査法第十四条第三項及び第四項、第十五条第一項、第二項及び第四項、第二十一条、第三十四条第一項、第二項及び第六項、第三十五条から第三十七条まで、第三十九条、第四十条第一項から第五項まで、第四十一条第一項、第四十二条、第四十三条第一項及び第二項並びに第五十五条の規定は、再審査の申請について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十四条第二項中「審査請求人の申立てにより又は職権で」とあるのは「職権で」と、同法第四十二条第三項中「掲示し、かつ、その旨を官報その他の公報又は新聞紙に少なくとも一回掲載して」とあるのは「掲示して」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 157, paragraph (2) of Article 158, Article 160, and paragraph (1) of the preceding Article of this Act, and the provisions of paragraphs (3) and (4) of Article 14, paragraphs (1), (2), and (4) of Article 15, Article 21, paragraphs (1), (2), and (6) of Article 34, Articles 35 to 37 inclusive, Article 39, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive under Article 40, paragraph (1) of Article 41, Article 42, paragraphs (1) and (2) of Article 43, and Article 55 of the Administrative Appeal Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the reclaim for review. In this case, the phrase "upon request of the applicant of the request for review or ex officio" in paragraph (2) of Article 34 under said Act shall be read as "ex officio" ; the phrase "by both posting the notice on a bulletin board and publishing in the official gazette or other official bulletin or in a newspaper at least once" in paragraph (3) of Article 42 under said Act shall be read as "by posting the notice on a bulletin board," and additional technicalities requiring alternative readings shall be provided for by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

5 第一項から前項までの規定は、当該有価証券が特定有価証券である場合について準用する。この場合において、第一項中「有価証券の募集及び売出しを除く」とあるのは「有価証券の募集又は売出しに限る」と、「当該有価証券(特定有価証券を除く。以下この項から第四項までにおいて同じ。)」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券」と、同項第二号中「当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団(当該会社及び当該会社が他の会社の議決権の過半数を所有していることその他の当該会社と密接な関係を有する者として内閣府令で定める要件に該当する者(内閣府令で定める会社その他の団体に限る。)の集団をいう。以下同じ。)及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業」とあるのは「当該会社が行う資産の運用その他これに類似する事業に係る資産の経理の状況その他資産」と、第二項中「有価証券の募集又は売出しのうち」とあるのは「特定有価証券に係る有価証券の募集又は売出しのうち」と、同項第一号中「有価証券の」とあるのは「特定有価証券の」と、同項第二号中「有価証券の募集又は売出し」とあるのは「特定有価証券に係る有価証券の募集又は売出し」と、同項第三号中「同項本文」とあるのは「第二十四条第五項において準用する同条第一項本文」と、「第二十四条の四の七第一項若しくは第二項」とあるのは「第二十四条の四の七第三項において準用する同条第一項若しくは第二項」と、「第二十四条の四の七第一項に規定する事項」とあるのは「第二十四条の四の七第三項において準用する同条第一項に規定する事項」と、「第二十四条の五第一項に規定する事項」とあるのは「第二十四条の五第三項において準用する同条第一項に規定する事項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of paragraph (1) to the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the Securities for which the notification set forth in paragraph (1) is made are Regulated Securities. In this case, the terms "excluding a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities" and "said Securities (excluding Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph to paragraph (iv))" in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "limited to a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities" and "said Securities," respectively; the terms "Trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group (meaning the group consisting of the company and other persons (limited to companies or other organizations specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) who satisfies the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those for being regarded as having a close relationship with the company, including the requirement that the company holds the majority of voting rights of the person who is a company; the same shall apply hereinafter) to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Financial conditions of asset investment or other similar businesses conducted by the company, other important matters concerning the company's assets"; the term "a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities" in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Regulated Securities"; the term "Securities falling under any of the categories" in item (i) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Regulated Securities falling under any of the categories of Securities"; the term "Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Regulated Securities"; the term "the main clause of Article 24(1)," "Article 24-4-7(1) or (2)," "the matters set forth in Article 24-4-7(1)" and "the matters set forth in Article 24-5(1)" in item (iii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the main clause of Article 24(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24(5)," "Article 24-4-7(1) or (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-7(3)," "the matters set forth in Article 24-4-7(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-7(3)" and "the matters set forth in Article 24-5(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-5(3) "; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

国内において,ある特許(以下「第2特許」という)により保護される発明が,先の出願に基づいて付与された又は先の優先権を有する他の特許(以下「第1特許」という)を侵害することなく実施することができない場合は,第2特許の所有者がその発明を実施するために必要とする範囲で,次の条件に従うことを条件として,第2特許の所有者に強制ライセンスを許諾することができる。 (a)第2特許に係わる発明が,第1特許と連関して相当な経済的重要性を有する重要な技術の進歩を生じさせること (b)第1特許の所有者が,合理的な条件で第2特許に係わる発明を使用するクロスライセンスを受ける権利を与えられること (c)第1特許について付与されたライセンスは,第2特許とともに譲渡する場合を除いて,譲渡することができないこと (d)IP法第95条(合理的な商業上の条件でライセンスを得る要件),第96条(半導体技術に係わる特許の強制ライセンス許諾),第98条(申請の様式及び内容),第99条(審理の通知)並びに第100条(強制ライセンスの条件)の条件によること例文帳に追加

If the invention protected by a patent, hereafter referred to as the “second patent”, within the country cannot be worked without infringing another patent, hereafter referred to as the “first patent”, granted on a prior application or benefiting from an earlier priority, a compulsory license may be granted to the owner of the second patent to the extent necessary for the working of his invention, subject to the following conditions: (a) The invention claimed in the second patent involves an important technical advance of considerable economic significance in relation to the first patent; (b) The owner of the first patent shall be entitled to a cross-license on reasonable terms to use the invention claimed in the second patent; (c) The use authorized in respect of the first patent shall be non-assignable except with the assignment of the second patent; and (d) The terms and conditions of Section 95 (Requirement to obtain a license on reasonable commercial terms), Section 96 (Compulsory Licensing of patents involving semi-conductor technology), Section 98 (Form and Contents of Petition), Section 99 (Notice of Hearing), and Section 100 (Terms and Conditions of Compulsory License) of the IP Code. - 特許庁

第五十三条の十五 会社法第三百五十条(代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任)、第三百五十二条(取締役の職務を代行する者の権限)、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで(表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務)、第三百五十八条(第一項第二号を除く。)(業務の執行に関する検査役の選任)、第三百五十九条(裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定)、第三百六十条第一項(株主による取締役の行為の差止め)、第三百六十一条(取締役の報酬等)及び第三百六十五条第二項(競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限)の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項(株式会社の代表)並びに第三百五十一条(代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申立ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項(第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続いて社員である者(総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の総代)」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十三条の十一 内閣総理大臣は、発行登録書及びその添付書類、第二十三条の四、第二十三条の九第一項若しくは前条第一項(同条第五項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定による訂正発行登録書又は発行登録追補書類及びその添付書類並びにこれらの書類に係る参照書類のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載がある場合において、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、当該発行登録書及びその添付書類、当該訂正発行登録書若しくは当該発行登録追補書類及びその添付書類(以下この条において「発行登録書類等」という。)又は当該発行登録書類等の提出者がこれを提出した日から一年以内に提出する第五条第一項に規定する届出書若しくは発行登録書若しくは発行登録追補書類について、これらの書類の提出者に対し、公益又は投資者保護のため相当と認められる期間、当該発行登録書類等に係る発行登録の効力、当該届出書に係る届出の効力若しくは当該発行登録書若しくは当該発行登録追補書類に係る発行登録の効力の停止を命じ、又は第八条第一項(第二十三条の五第一項において準用する場合を含む。)に規定する期間を延長することができる。この場合においては、行政手続法第十三条第一項の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 23-11 (1) In cases where a Shelf Registration Statement or the documents attached thereto, an Amended Shelf Registration Statement submitted under Article 23-4, Article 23-9(1) or paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23-10(5)), or Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached thereto, or Reference Documents referenced in any of the foregoing, contains any fake statements on important matters, if the Prime Minister finds it necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, he/she may, with regard to the Shelf Registration Statement or the documents attached thereto, or the Amended Shelf Registration Statement, or the Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached thereto (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Shelf Registration Documents" in this Article) or statements submitted under Article 5(1), other Shelf Registration Statements or other Shelf Registration Supplements submitted by the person who submitted the Shelf Registration Documents during the period within one year from the day when the person submitted the Shelf Registration Documents, order the suspension of effect of the Shelf Registration pertaining to the Shelf Registration Documents, the suspension of effect of the notification pertaining to the statements under Article 5(1) or the suspension of effect of the Shelf Registration pertaining to the other Shelf Registration Statements, or other Shelf Registration Supplements, or extend the period stipulated in Article 8(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23-5(1)), for the period that he/she considers appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors. In this case, a hearing shall be held irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements of opinion under Article 13(1) of the Administrative Procedure Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

そういったことを踏まえて、日本は1997年から始まった、あるいはその2年前から始まった住専で、非常に厳しい、痛い目といいますか、あるいはぎりぎりのところまで行きましたので、その苦しい経験を踏まえて、日本は、銀行に関して、破綻法制、あるいは一旦破綻した銀行がどのように再生するかということの法制が世界で一番整備されている国だと思っております。そんなことを踏まえて、金融機関の金融危機の再発防止、あるいは金融システムの強化に向けて、今回のG20、財務大臣・中央銀行総裁会議の場においても引き続き、今少し私が駄弁を弄しましたけれども、そういった経験を踏まえて健全で強い金融機関が必要ですし、健全な金融機関がなければ、持続可能な企業経営あるいは自由主義社会はある意味で成り立たないわけでございます。やはりその辺のバランスというのが大変大事でございます。そういった立場をきちっと主張しつつ、国際的に協調して取り組んでまいりたいと思っております。例文帳に追加

Japan was struck very hard and pushed to the brink by the financial crisis, which started in 1997, and the jusen problem, which started two years earlier than that. Based on this bitter experience, Japan has established the world's most advanced legal framework regarding the failure of banks and the rehabilitation of failed banks, I believe. In light of that, we will continue to engage in international cooperation at the forthcoming meeting of the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors with a view to preventing the recurrence of a financial crisis and strengthening the financial system. Without sound financial institutions, sustainable corporate management would be impossible and a liberal society would be unable to function. Pursuing the right balance in that respect is very important. We will engage in international cooperation while firmly arguing our cases.  - 金融庁

第百八十四条 会社法第二編第九章第二節(第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百四十一条を除く。)(特別清算)、第七編第二章第四節(特別清算に関する訴え)、同編第三章第一節(第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。)(総則)及び第三節(第八百七十九条、第八百八十条並びに第八百九十八条第一項第二号及び第五項を除く。)(特別清算の手続に関する特則)並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで(特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十二条第一項(調査命令)中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式(自己株式を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の数の株式を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員若しくは三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続いて社員である者」と、同法第五百三十二条第二項(監督委員の報酬等)中「債権又は清算株式会社の株式」とあるのは「債権」と、同法第五百三十六条第三項(事業の譲渡の制限等)中「第七章(第四百六十七条第一項第五号を除く。)」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条の二」と、同法第五百六十二条(清算人の調査結果等の債権者集会に対する報告)中「第四百九十二条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十七において準用する第四百九十二条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 184 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) and Article 541) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Lawsuits over Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (excluding Article 868, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to 874 inclusive) (General Provisions) and 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 880, and Article 898, paragraphs (1), (2) and (5)) (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure), and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the voting rights held by all of the shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) (Order to investigate) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of the Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation)"; the term "assigned claims owed by the Liquidating Stock Company or shares in" in Article 532, paragraph (2) (Remunerations of Supervisors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "acquire any claim against"; the term "Chapter VII (excluding Article 467, paragraph (1), item (v))" in Article 536, paragraph (3) (Restrictions on Assignment of Business) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 62-2 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 492, paragraph (1)" in Article 562 (Report to Creditors' Meeting of Outcome of Investigations by Liquidators) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 492, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-17 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十三条の四 金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款(第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで(特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合)並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項(特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合)を除く。)(特定投資家)、同章第二節第一款(第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで(第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等)、第三十七条第一項第二号(広告等の規制)、第三十七条の二(取引態様の事前明示義務)、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項(契約締結前の書面の交付)、第三十七条の五(保証金の受領に係る書面の交付)、第三十七条の七(指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等)、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二(禁止行為)、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項(損失補てん等の禁止)並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで(最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務)を除く。)(通則)及び第四十五条(第三号及び第四号を除く。)(雑則)の規定は、銀行が行う特定預金等契約(特定預金等(金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動によりその元本について損失が生ずるおそれがある預金又は定期積金等として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。)の受入れを内容とする契約をいう。以下同じ。)の締結について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の業務」と、これらの規定(同法第三十四条の規定を除く。)中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為(第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。)を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等(銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。)の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引(買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。)又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。)」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券等」という。)」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客(信託会社等(信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。)が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三(第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。)、第三十七条の四及び第三十七条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 13-4 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) inclusive (Cases Where a Juridical Person Who Is a Customer Other Than a Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Section 2, Subsection 1 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business Activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Concurrent Business Activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition on Name Lending, Prohibition on Administration of Corporate Bonds), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulations on Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Documents Prior to the Conclusion of a Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Documents Pertaining to the Receipt of Security Deposits), Article 37-7 (Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.) and Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition on Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured, Limitation on the Purchase and Sale, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning contracts on acceptance of Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning those that are specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as deposits or Installment Savings, etc. with the risk of a principal loss caused by fluctuations pertaining to the interest rate, currency value, quotations on a financial instruments market prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (14) of that Act, or any other index); the same shall apply hereinafter) by a Bank. In this case, the term "Contract for a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Financial Instruments Services" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Concluding Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the term "Act of Executing a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding the provisions of Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "contract to conduct the Act of Financial Instruments Transactions (meaning an act listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as Prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the phrase "; provided" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc. in advance, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the phrase "purchase and sale or other transaction of Securities (excluding a purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as the "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "customer (in cases where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts the purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who establishes a trust under a trust contract, including such person who establishes the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Customers"; the phrase "make up for" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "make up for, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the term "Securities, etc." in those items shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "make an addition to" in item (ii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "make an addition to" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of"; the phrase "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4), and Article 43-4" in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to delivery of a document set forth in paragraph (1) and excluding items (ii) and (vi) of that paragraph and paragraph (3)), Article 37-4 and Article 37-6"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 会社法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人(保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項(同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

6 第四十四条の二(第三項後段を除く。)及び第七十三条から前条までの規定は、保険契約者総代会について準用する。この場合において、第四十四条の二第三項前段において準用する会社法第三百十条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十四条の二第一項」と、同条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第七十四条第三項において準用する第六十八条第三項」と、同条第七項中「株主(前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。)」とあるのは「保険契約者又は社員」と、第七十四条第三項中「第七十四条から第七十六条まで」とあるのは「第七十五条及び第七十六条」と、同項及び同条第四項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「総代」と、同条第三項において準用する同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「総代、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、総代、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 44-2 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (3)) and Article 73 to the preceding Article inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of Policyholders. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 310, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the first sentence of Article 44-2, paragraph (3) and the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 310, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 44-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 299, paragraph (3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 68, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders or members"; the term "Article 74 to 76 inclusive" in Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 75 and 76"; the term "Policyholder" in Article 74, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representatives, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, general representatives, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

今般、同法の期限の延長期間を1年としたのは、法制当時よりも現在の経済状況は2年前のリーマン・ショック直後の中小企業金融円滑化法は1年程度の法律としていたのでありますが、現在の経済情勢は2年前のまさにトヨタ自動車の売り上げが4割減ったという、私の地元九州・福岡県は愛知県に次いで2番目に大きな自動車100万台以上生産しておりますけれども、トヨタだ日産だというのが本当に軒並み派遣切りをしまして、そのことを私はもろに感じたわけでございますが、そういった中、この法律を施行させて頂いたわけでございますけれども、同時に資本主義社会、自由主義社会においては、法によって借り手のモラルハザードという金融規律の低下が懸念されている。やっぱりそこは、当然、自由主義社会で大事なことでございまして、やっぱり借りたお金は利子をつけて返すということは原則でございますから、その影響も注視する必要があると思っております。例文帳に追加

When the SME Financing Facilitation Act was established just after the Lehman shock two years ago, it was given the duration of roughly one year. With Toyota suffering a 40 percent drop in car sales two years agomy home prefecture, Fukuoka, Kyushu, produces more than one million cars and is the second largest car-producing prefecture after Aichione after another of the car makers, including Toyota and Nissan, fired temporary workers. It was under those circumstances that we launched this Act, but, at the same time, it is also true that in the context of a capitalist society and a free society, there is a concern that the Act might result in financial discipline deteriorating in the form of moral hazard on the part of borrowers. As it is, indeed, naturally an important factor in a free society, and the basic rule in borrowing money is to pay it back with interest, I do think it necessary to heed any impact of the Act.  - 金融庁

2 第四十八条第二項及び第三項、第五十条の二、第五十三条、第五十五条から第五十七条まで、第五十九条、第六十二条の三並びに第六十六条から第六十八条の三まで並びに会社法第三百六十一条、第四百二十四条、第四百三十条、第五百九十九条及び第六百条の規定は会員商品取引所の清算人について、同法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)の規定は会員商品取引所の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第六十六条第一項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、業務報告書及び剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表及び事務報告書」と、同法第四百二十四条中「前条第一項」とあるのは「商品取引所法第五十三条第一項」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 48, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 50-2, Article 53, Articles 55 to 57 inclusive, Article 59, Article 62-3 and Articles 66 to 68-3 inclusive of this Act and Article 361, Article 424, Article 430, Article 599 and Article 600 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidators of a Member Commodity Exchange, and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5) and Article 851) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for pursuing the responsibilities of the liquidators of a Member Commodity Exchange. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, profit and loss statement, business report and proposed appropriation of surplus or proposed appropriation of loss" in Article 66, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property, a balance sheet and business report," the term "paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 424 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act," the term "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance" in Article 847, paragraphs (1) and (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an ordinance of the competent ministry" and any other technical replacement shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 第四十八条第二項及び第三項、第五十条の二、第五十三条、第五十五条から第五十七条まで、第五十九条、第六十二条の三並びに第六十六条から第六十八条の三まで並びに会社法第三百六十一条、第四百二十四条、第四百三十条、第五百九十九条及び第六百条の規定は会員商品取引所の清算人について、同法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)の規定は会員商品取引所の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第六十六条第一項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、業務報告書及び剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表及び事務報告書」と、同法第四百二十四条中「前条第一項」とあるのは「商品取引所法第五十三条第一項」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 48, paragraphs 2 and 3, Article 50-2, Article 53, Articles 55 to 57 inclusive, Article 59, Article 62-3 and Articles 66 to 68-3 inclusive of this Act and Article 361, Article 424, Article 430, Article 599 and Article 600 of the Company Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidators of a Member Commodity Exchange, and the provisions of Part 7, Chapter 2, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph 2, Article 849, paragraph 2, item 2 and paragraph 5 and Article 851) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for pursuing the responsibilities of the liquidators of a Member Commodity Exchange. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, profit and loss statement, business report and proposed appropriation of surplus or proposed appropriation of loss" in Article 66, paragraph 1 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property, a balance sheet and business report," the term "paragraph 1 of the preceding Article" in Article 424 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act," the term "an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance" in Article 847, paragraphs 1 and 4 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an ordinance of the competent ministry" and any other technical replacement shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 経済産業省

第四十一条 会社法第二百九十六条(株主総会の招集)、第二百九十八条(第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。)(株主総会の招集の決定)、第二百九十九条(第二項各号を除く。)(株主総会の招集の通知)、第三百条から第三百二条まで(招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで(取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議)、第三百十八条(第五項を除く。)(議事録)、第三百十九条(第四項を除く。)(株主総会の決議の省略)及び第三百二十条(株主総会への報告の省略)の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。)の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間(当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主(前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。)」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主(当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。)の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 国家公安委員会又は海上保安庁長官は、公共の安全の維持又は海上の安全の維持のため特に必要があると認めるときは、政令で定めるところにより、第十一条の二第一項、第十二条の二第三項若しくは第五項(これらの規定を第二十二条の六第二項、第四十三条の二十五第二項、第五十条の三第二項及び第五十一条の二十三第二項において準用する場合を含む。)、第十二条の三第一項、第二十一条の二第二項、第二十二条の七第一項、第四十三条の十八第二項、第四十三条の二十六第一項、第四十八条第二項、第五十条の四第一項、第五十一条の十六第四項若しくは第五十一条の二十四第一項の規定の運用に関し経済産業大臣に、第五十七条第二項、第五十七条の二第二項において準用する第十二条の二第三項若しくは第五項若しくは第五十七条の三第一項の規定の運用に関し文部科学大臣に、第三十五条第二項、第四十三条の二第二項において準用する第十二条の二第三項若しくは第五項若しくは第四十三条の三第一項の規定の運用に関し原子炉設置者に係るものにあつては第二十三条第一項各号に掲げる原子炉の区分に応じ当該各号に定める大臣に、外国原子力船運航者に係るものにあつては国土交通大臣に、又は第六十条第二項の規定の運用に関し同条第一項に規定する主務大臣に、それぞれ意見を述べることができる。例文帳に追加

(2) When the National Public Safety Commission or the Commandant of the Japan Coast Guard finds it particularly necessary for maintaining public safety or for maintaining maritime safety, said Commission or Commandant may, pursuant to the provision of the Cabinet Order, state their opinion to the Minister of METI for matters related to the enforcement of the provision of Article 11-2 (1), Article 12-2 (3) or (5) (including the cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22-6 (2), Article 43-25 (2), Article 50-3 (2) and Article 51-23 (2)), Article 12-3 (1), Article 21-2 (2), Article 22-7 (1), Article 43-18 (2), Article 43-26 (1), Article 48 (2), Article 50-4 (1), Article 51-16 (4) or Article 51-24 (1); to the Minister of MEXT for matters related to the enforcement of the provision of Article 57 (2), Article 12-2 (3) or (5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57-2 (2), or Article 57-3 (1); to the minister provided respectively in those items Article 23 (1) in accordance with the classifications for reactors listed in the items of Article 23 (1) for matters related to the enforcement of the provision of Article 35 (2), Article 12-2 (3) or (5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 43-2 (2), or Article 43-3 (1) and pertaining to reactor establishers, or to the Minister of MLIT for matters related to such provisions that pertain to operators of foreign nuclear vessels; or to the competent minister provided in Article 60 (1) for matters related to the enforcement of the provision of paragraph (2) of said Article.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十一条 登録外国適合性評価機関(電気通信事業法第五十二条第一項の総務省令で定める技術基準に適合している旨の認定を行う者として同法第八十六条第一項の総務省令で定める事業の区分と同一の区分ごとに登録を受けている者に限る。以下この条において同じ。)が端末機器(同法第五十三条第一項に規定する端末機器をいい、当該登録を受けている区分に係るものに限る。次項において同じ。)について技術基準適合認定(同条第一項に規定する技術基準適合認定をいう。以下この項において同じ。)を行った場合には、当該技術基準適合認定を登録認定機関(同条第一項に規定する登録認定機関をいう。以下この条において同じ。)がした技術基準適合認定と、当該登録外国適合性評価機関による技術基準適合認定を受けた者を登録認定機関による技術基準適合認定を受けた者とそれぞれみなして、同法第五十三条第二項、第五十四条、第五十五条第一項、第六十二条第一項、第百六十六条第二項並びに第百六十七条第一項、第二項及び第五項の規定(これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。)を適用する。この場合において、同法第五十三条第二項中「登録認定機関」とあるのは「特定機器に係る適合性評価手続の結果の外国との相互承認の実施に関する法律(平成十三年法律第百十一号)第三十一条第一項前段に規定する登録外国適合性評価機関」と、「付さなければならない」とあるのは「付すことができる」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 31 (1) When a registered foreign conformity assessment body (limited to those who have been registered in each of the same classifications of business specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications set forth in Article 86 paragraph (1) of the Telecommunications Business Act as a person to approve conformity with the technical standards specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications set forth in Article 52 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) issues a technical standards conformity approval (technical standards conformity approval prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph) in respect of the terminal equipment (terminal equipment prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act, provided that such terminal equipment pertains to the classification in which the registered conformity assessment body has been registered; the same shall apply in paragraph (2)), the provisions of Article 53 paragraph (2), Article 54, Article 55 paragraph (1), Article 62 paragraph (1), Article 166 paragraph (2) and Article 167 paragraph (1), paragraph (2) and paragraph (5) (including the penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied by regarding the technical standards conformity approval as a technical standards conformity approval issued by a registered approval body (registered approval body prescribed in Article 53 paragraph (1) of the same act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and the person who has obtained the technical standards conformity approval from the registered foreign conformity assessment body as a person who has obtained a technical standards conformity approval from a registered approval body. In this case, the term "registered approval body" and the term "shall affix" in Article 53 paragraph (2) of the same act shall be deemed to be replaced with "registered foreign conformity assessment body prescribed in the first sentence in Article 31 paragraph (1) of the Act for Implementation of the Mutual Recognition between Japan and Foreign States in Relation to Results of Conformity Assessment Procedures of Specified Equipment (Act No. 111, 2001)" and "may affix," respectively. Other necessary technical replacement shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の三十七 会社法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節(第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。)(株式会社の役員の解任の訴え)及び同法第九百三十七条第一項(第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項(責任追及等の訴え)中「株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号(株式会社の役員の解任の訴え)中「総株主(次に掲げる株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の社員(特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員)で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者(総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名(これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数)以上の総代)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十三条の三 有価証券の募集又は売出しを予定している当該有価証券の発行者で、第五条第四項に規定する者に該当するものは、当該募集又は売出しを予定している有価証券の発行価額又は売出価額の総額(以下「発行予定額」という。)が一億円以上の場合においては、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該募集又は売出しを予定している期間(以下「発行予定期間」という。)、当該有価証券の種類及び発行予定額又は発行若しくは売出しの限度額、当該有価証券について引受けを予定する金融商品取引業者又は登録金融機関のうち主たるものの名称その他の事項で公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定めるものを記載した書類(以下「発行登録書」という。)を内閣総理大臣に提出して、当該有価証券の募集又は売出しを登録することができる。ただし、その有価証券発行勧誘等が第二十三条の十三第一項に規定する適格機関投資家向け勧誘(同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。)に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し(当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。)及びその有価証券発行勧誘等が同条第三項に規定する少人数向け勧誘(同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。)に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し(当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。)を予定している場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 23-3 (1) The Issuer of Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned may, if he/she satisfies requirements specified in Article 5(4) and the total issue price or the total distribution amount of the Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Amount of Issue") is 100 million yen or more, register Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities by submitting a document which, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, state the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, including the period in which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Issue Period"), the kind of the Securities, the Planned Amount of Issue or the maximum amount of issue or distribution, and names of principal Financial Instruments Business Operators and/or Registered Financial Institutions which plan to underwrite the Securities (such document is hereinafter referred to as a "Shelf Registration Statement") to the Prime Minister; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors defined in Article 23-13(1) (limited to Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(1) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities) or where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation for Small Number of Investors defined in Article 23-13(3) (limited to Solicitation for Small Number of Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(3) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百二条の十一 商業登記法第二条から第五条まで、第七条から第十五条まで、第十七条から第二十三条の二まで、第二十四条(第十五号及び第十六号を除く。)、第二十五条から第二十七条まで、第四十七条第一項、第四十八条から第五十三条まで及び第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで並びに会社法第九百三十七条第一項(第一号イに係る部分に限る。)の規定は、自主規制法人に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、商業登記法第十七条第二項第一号中「商号及び本店」とあるのは「名称及び主たる事務所」と、同法第四十八条、第四十九条第一項、第五十条第二項及び第四項並びに第百三十八条第一項及び第二項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第十七条第三項及び第二十条第三項中「会社の支店」とあるのは「自主規制法人の従たる事務所」と、同法第二十五条第三項、第四十八条第一項、第四十九条第一項及び第三項、第五十条第一項から第三項まで、第五十一条第一項、第五十三条並びに第百三十八条第一項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同法第四十八条第二項中「会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「金融商品取引法第百二条の九第二項各号」と、同法第五十三条中「新所在地における登記においては」とあるのは「新所在地において金融商品取引法第百二条の九第二項各号に掲げる事項を登記する場合には」と、会社法第九百三十七条第一項中「本店(第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって第九百三十条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、本店及び当該登記に係る支店)」とあるのは「主たる事務所及び従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 102-11 The provisions of Articles 2 to 5 inclusive, Articles 7 to 15 inclusive, Articles 17 to 23-2 inclusive, Article 24 (excluding items (xv) and (xvi)), Articles 25 to 27 inclusive, Article 47(1), Articles 48 to 53 inclusive, and Articles 132 to 148 inclusive of the Commercial Registration Act, and Article 937(1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (i)(a)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to registrations regarding Self-Regulation Organizations. In this case, the term "trade name and the head office" in Article 17(2)(i) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "name and the principal office,"; and the term "the branch office" in Article 48, Article 49(1), Article 50(2) and (4), and Article 138(1) and (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the secondary office,"; the term "the branch office of the company" in Article 17(3) and Article 20(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the secondary office of the Self-Regulation Organization,"; the term "the head office" in Article 25(3), Article 48(1), Article 49(1) and (3), Article 50(1) to (3) inclusive, Article 51(1), Article 53 and Article 138(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office,"; the term "the respective item of Article 930(2) of the Companies Act" in Article 48(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the respective item of Article 102-9(2) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act,"; the term "in the case of registration in the district of the new location" in Article 53 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "in the case of registration of the matters listed in the respective item of Article 102-9(2) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act in the district of the new location,"; the term "the head office (in the case prescribed in item (i)(g) where the matters listed in the respective item of Article 930(2) have been registered according to said resolution, the head office, and the branch office pertaining to said registration)" in Article 937(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office and secondary office"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第九十条 商業登記法(昭和三十八年法律第百二十五号)第二条から第五条まで、第七条から第十五条まで、第十七条から第二十三条の二まで、第二十四条(第十五号及び第十六号を除く。)、第二十五条から第二十七条まで、第四十七条第一項、第四十八条から第五十三条まで及び第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで並びに会社法第九百三十七条第一項(第一号イに係る部分に限る。)の規定は、金融商品会員制法人に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、商業登記法第十七条第二項第一号中「商号及び本店」とあるのは「名称及び主たる事務所」と、同法第四十八条、第四十九条第一項、第五十条第二項及び第四項並びに第百三十八条第一項及び第二項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第十七条第三項及び第二十条第三項中「会社の支店」とあるのは「金融商品会員制法人の従たる事務所」と、同法第二十五条第三項、第四十八条第一項、第四十九条第一項及び第三項、第五十条第一項から第三項まで、第五十一条第一項、第五十三条並びに第百三十八条第一項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同法第四十八条第二項中「会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「金融商品取引法第八十九条の二第二項各号」と、同法第五十三条中「新所在地における登記においては」とあるのは「新所在地において金融商品取引法第八十九条の二第二項各号に掲げる事項を登記する場合には」と、会社法第九百三十七条第一項中「本店(第一号トに規定する場合であって当該決議によって第九百三十条第二項各号に掲げる事項についての登記がされているときにあっては、本店及び当該登記に係る支店)」とあるのは「主たる事務所及び従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 90 The provisions of Articles 2 to 5 inclusive, Articles 7 to 15 inclusive, Articles 17 to 23-2 inclusive, Article 24 (excluding items (xv) and (xvi)), Articles 25 to 27 inclusive, Article 47(1), Articles 48 to 53 inclusive, and Articles 132 to 148 inclusive of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963), and Article 937(1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (i)(a)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to registrations regarding Financial Instruments Membership Corporations. In this case, the term "trade name and the head office" in Article 17(2)(i) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "name and the principal office," and the term "the branch office" in Article 48, Article 49(1), Article 50(2) and (4), and Article 138(1) and (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the secondary office,"; the term "the branch office of the company" in Article 17(3) and Article 20(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the secondary office of the Financial Instruments Membership Corporation,"; the term "the head office" in Article 25(3), Article 48(1), Article 49(1) and (3), Article 50(1) to (3) inclusive, Article 51(1), Article 53 and Article 138(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office,"; the term "the respective item of Article 930(2) of the Companies Act" in Article 48(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the respective item of Article 89-2(2) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act,"; the term "in the case of registration in the district of new location" in Article 53 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "in the case of registration of the matters listed in the respective item of Article 89-2(2) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act in the district of the new location,"; the term "the head office (in the case prescribed in item (i)(g) where the matters listed in the respective item of Article 930(2) have been registered according to said resolution, the head office, and the branch office pertaining to said registration)" in Article 937(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office and secondary office", and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

スウィープ口座とは預金口座の決済機能を維持しつつ資金の効率的運用を図るため、口座残高が一定額を超えた場合に超過額を自動的に安全性及び換金性の高い金融商品(MMF等)の購入に充てるサービス、預金保険により保護される金額を超える資金が自動的に振り替えられるようにすれば、預金保険制度で保護されない資金を破綻に伴うリスクから遮断することが可能である。しかしながら、現に提供されているサービスについては振替頻度が毎営業日でない等、決済機能を保護するためのものと位置付けることは適当ではない。証券総合口座とは有価証券投資に充てられる資金以外の余資を安全性及び換金性の高い投資信託(MRF)で自動運用するサービスを提供する口座をいう。必要に応じ、即日中の払い出しのみならず、クレジットカード決済等にも利用することができることから、金融機関の預金口座に代替する決済機能を有するものとされている。ただし、MRFが安全性の高いものであるとはいえ、元本保証商品ではないことから、決済機能の安定確保策に位置付けることは適当ではない。早期発見・早期是正を基本とし、金融機関が破綻した場合に債務超過の程度が極力小さい段階で迅速に処理することができれば、決済等の金融機能に与える影響を最小限に止めることができるとの考え方が示されており、金融機関破綻時の決済機能の安定確保においてもこの考え方が基本であることについては、ここで改めて確認しておきたい。例文帳に追加

Such action will minimise the effect on the orderly functioning of the institution, including the payment and settlement functions.  - 金融庁

第百五十二条 商業登記法第七十九条、第八十条(第二号、第六号、第九号及び第十号を除く。)、第八十一条(第三号、第六号、第九号及び第十号を除く。)、第八十二条及び第八十三条の規定は、第百三十九条第二項第一号に掲げる場合における合併による会員商品取引所の登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第七十九条中「商号及び本店」とあるのは「名称及び主たる事務所」と、同法第八十条第四号中「資本金の額」とあるのは「出資の総額」と、同条第五号及び同法第八十一条第五号中「本店」とあるのは「事務所」と、同法第八十条第七号中「吸収合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「吸収合併をする会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と、同法第八十一条中「次の書面」とあるのは「次の書面及び代表権を有する者の資格を証する書面」と、同条第七号中「新設合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と、同法第八十二条第二項から第四項まで及び第八十三条中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 152 (1) The provisions of Article 79, Article 80 (excluding items (ii), (vi), (ix) and (x)), Article 81 (excluding items (iii), (vi), (ix) and (x)), Article 82 and Article 83 of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of the Member Commodity Exchanges upon a merger in the case set forth in Article 139, paragraph (2), item (i). In this case, the phrase "trade name and the head office" in Article 79 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "name and the principal office," the phrase "amount of stated capital" in Article 80, item (iv) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total amount of contribution," the term "head office" in item (v) of the same Article and Article 81, item (v) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office," the phrase "when a company dissolved in an absorption-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in Article 80, item (vii) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning a merger of a Member Commodity Exchange implementing an Absorption-Type Merger," the phrase "the following documents" in Article 81 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replace with "the following documents and a document proving the qualification of the person having the representation power," the phrase "when a company dissolved in a consolidation-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in item (vii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning a merger of a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger," the term "the head office" in Article 82, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive and Article 83 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office" and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年3月まで、法律上は(記載が)あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら(預金者の方に対して)大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。例文帳に追加

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-offscheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-offscheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if thepay-offscheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business.  - 金融庁

1 商業登記法第七十九条、第八十条(第二号、第六号、第九号及び第十号を除く。)、第八十一条(第三号、第六号、第九号及び第十号を除く。)、第八十二条及び第八十三条の規定は、第百三十九条第二項第一号に掲げる場合における合併による会員商品取引所の登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第七十九条中「商号及び本店」とあるのは「名称及び主たる事務所」と、同法第八十条第四号中「資本金の額」とあるのは「出資の総額」と、同条第五号 及び同法第八十一条第五号中「本店」とあるのは「事務所」と、同法第八十条第七号中「吸収合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「吸収合併をする会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と、同法第八十一条中「次の書面」とあるのは「次の書面及び代表権を有する者の資格を証する書面」と、同条第七号中「新設合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と、同法第八十二条第二項から第四項まで及び第八十三条中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(1) The provisions of Article 79, Article 80 (excluding items 2, 6, 9 and 10), Article 81 (excluding items 3, 6, 9 and 10), Article 82 and Article 83 of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of the Member Commodity Exchanges upon a merger in the case set forth in Article 139, paragraph 2, item 1. In this case, the phrase "trade name and the head office" in Article 79 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "name and the principal office," the phrase "amount of stated capital" in Article 80, item 4 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total amount of contribution," the term "head office" in item 5 of the same Article and Article 81, item 5 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office," the phrase "when a company dissolved in an absorption-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in Article 80, item 7 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning a merger of a Member Commodity Exchange implementing an Absorption-Type Merger," the phrase "the following documents" in Article 81 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replace with "the following documents and a document proving the qualification of the person having the representation power," the phrase "when a company dissolved in an incorporation-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in item 7 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning a merger of a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger," the term "the head office" in Article 82, paragraphs 2 to 4 inclusive and Article 83 of th same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the principal office" and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 経済産業省

第三十四条の二十三 会社法第二百七条(第九項第一号を除く。)、第六百四条第三項、第六百二十条、第六百二十三条第一項、第六百二十五条から第六百三十六条まで、第六百六十条、第六百六十一条及び第六百六十五条の規定は、有限責任監査法人について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「法務省令」とあるのは「内閣府令」と、同法第二百七条第一項中「第百九十九条第一項第三号に掲げる事項を」とあるのは「金銭以外の財産を出資の目的として」と、「同号」とあるのは「当該金銭以外」と、同条第七項及び第九項第二号から第五号までの規定中「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「金銭以外の財産」と、同条第八項中「募集株式の引受人」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、「その募集株式の引受けの申込み又は第二百五条の契約に係る意思表示」とあるのは「出資の申込み」と、同条第十項第一号中「取締役、会計参与、監査役若しくは執行役」とあるのは「社員」と、「支配人その他の使用人」とあるのは「使用人」と、同項第二号中「募集株式の引受人」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六百四条第三項中「前項」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する前項」と、同法第六百三十一条第一項中「事業年度」とあるのは「会計年度」と、同法第六百三十二条第一項中「第六百二十四条第一項」とあるのは「公認会計士法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する第六百二十四条第一項」と、同条第二項中「が、第六百二十四条第一項前段」とあるのは「が、公認会計士法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する第六百二十四条第一項前段」と、「は、第六百二十四条第一項前段」とあるのは「は、同法第三十四条の二十二第一項において準用する第六百二十四条第一項前段」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 34-23 (1) The provisions of Article 207 (excluding paragraph (9)(i)), Article 604(3), Article 620, Article 623(1), Articles 625 to 636 inclusive, Article 660, Article 661 and Article 665 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to limited liability audit corporations. In this case, the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Cabinet Office Ordinance," the phrase "the matters listed in Article 199(1)(iii)" in Article 207(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "property other than money as the object of capital contribution," the phrase "provided for in that item" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "other than money," the phrase "provided for in Article 199(1)(iii)" in paragraph (7) and paragraph (9)(ii) to (v) inclusive of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of property other than money," the term "subscriber for Shares for Subscription" in paragraph (8) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who intends to become a partner," the phrase "his/her applications for subscription for Shares for Subscription, or his/her manifestation of intention relating to the contract provided for in Article 205" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "his/her offer for capital contribution," the phrase "director, an accounting advisor, a company auditor or executive officer," in paragraph (10)(i) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "partner," the phrase "employee including a manager" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee," the term "subscriber for Shares for Subscription" in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who intends to become a partner," the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 604(3) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the term "business year" in Article 631(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "fiscal year," the term "Article 624(1)" in Article 632(1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 624(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," the phrase "a demand is made under the provisions of the first sentence of Article 624(1)" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a demand is made under the provisions of the first sentence of Article 624(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," and the phrase "the demand under the first sentence of Article 624(1)" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the demand under the first sentence of Article 624(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 34-22(1) of the Certified Public Accountants Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十九条 組合の解散及び清算については、会社法第四百七十五条(第一号及び第三号を除く。)、第四百七十六条、第四百七十八条第二項及び第四項、第四百七十九条第一項及び第二項(各号列記以外の部分に限る。)、第四百八十一条、第四百八十三条第四項及び第五項、第四百八十四条、第四百八十五条、第四百八十九条第四項及び第五項、第四百九十二条第一項から第三項まで、第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで、第五百七条(株式会社の清算)、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百六十九条、第八百七十条(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十四条(第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十五条並びに第八百七十六条(非訟)並びに非訟事件手続法(明治三十一年法律第十四号)第四十条(検査をすべき者の選任の裁判)の規定を、組合の清算人については、第三十五条の三、第三十五条の四、第三十六条の二、第三十六条の三第一項及び第二項、第三十六条の五から第三十八条の四まで(第三十六条の七第四項を除く。)、第四十条(第一項、第十一項及び第十三項を除く。)、第四十七条第二項から第四項まで、第四十八条並びに第五十三条の二並びに会社法第三百五十七条第一項、同法第三百六十条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する同条第一項並びに同法第三百六十一条、第三百八十一条第二項、第三百八十二条、第三百八十三条第一項本文、第二項及び第三項、第三百八十四条から第三百八十六条まで並びに第五百八条の規定を、組合の清算人の責任を追及する訴えについては、同法第七編第二章第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項第二号及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除き、監査権限限定組合にあつては、監査役に係る部分を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定を、監査権限限定組合の清算人については、同法第三百五十三条、第三百六十条第一項及び第三百六十四条の規定を準用する。この場合において、第四十条第二項中「財産目録、貸借対照表、損益計算書、剰余金処分案又は損失処理案」とあるのは「財産目録、貸借対照表」と、「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同条第三項、第五項から第十項まで並びに第十二項第一号及び第三号中「事業報告書」とあるのは「事務報告書」と、同法第三百八十二条中「取締役(取締役会設置会社にあっては、取締役会)」とあるのは「清算人会」と、同法第四百七十九条第二項各号列記以外の部分中「次に掲げる株主」とあるのは「総組合員の五分の一以上の同意を得た組合員」と、同法第三百八十四条、第四百九十二条第一項、第五百七条第一項並びに第八百四十七条第一項及び第四項中「法務省令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第四百九十九条第一項中「官報に公告し」とあるのは「公告し」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 69 (1) With regard to the dissolution and liquidation of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)), Article 476, Article 478, paragraph (2) and paragraph (4), Article 479, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portions other than those listed in the respective items), Article 481, Article 483, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 484, Article 485, Article 489, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5), Article 492, paragraphs (1) to (3), Articles 499 to 503, Article 507 (Liquidation of a Stock Company), Article 868, paragraph (1), Article 869, Article 870 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)), Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (iv)), Article 874 (limited to the portions pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)), Article 875, and Article 876 (Non-Contentious Cases) of the Companies Act and Article 40 (Judicial Decision for Appointment of a Person to Conduct Inspections) of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedure Act (Act No. 14 of 1898) shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Article 35-3, Article 35-4, Article 36-2, Article 36-3, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Articles 36-5 to 38-4 (excluding Article 36-7, paragraph (4)), Article 40 (excluding paragraph (1), paragraph (11), and paragraph (13)), Article 47, paragraphs (2) to (4), Article 48, and Article 53-2 of this Act, the provisions of Article 357, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act, paragraph (1) of the same Article as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 360, paragraph (3) of the same Act, and the provisions of Article 361, Article 381, paragraph (2), Article 382, the main clause of Article 383, paragraph (1), Article 383, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3), Articles 384 to 386, and Article 508 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; with regard to an action to pursue the liability of a liquidator of a cooperative, the provisions of Part 7, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (2), item (ii) and paragraph (5), and Article 851, and excluding the portions pertaining to the company auditors in the case of a cooperative limiting the audit authority)(Action to Pursue the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis; and with regard to a liquidator of a cooperative limiting the audit authority, the provisions of Article 353, Article 360, paragraph (1) and Article 364 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "an inventory of property, a balance sheet, a profit and loss statement, and a plan for the appropriation of surplus or a plan for the disposal of losses" in Article 40, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "an inventory of property and a balance sheet," the term "a business report" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "an affairs written report," the term "business report" in paragraph (3), paragraphs (5) to (10), and paragraph (12), item (i) and item (iii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "affairs written report," the term "the directors (or, for a Company with Board of Directors, to the board of directors)" in Article 382 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the board of liquidators," the term "the following shareholders" in the portions of Article 479, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act other than those listed in the respective items shall be deemed to be "a member who has obtained the consent of or more one-fifth of all partner," the term "Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice" in Article 384, Article 492, paragraph (1), Article 507, paragraph (1), and Article 847, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) of the same Act shall be deemed to be "ordinance of the competent ministry," the phrase "give public notice in the official gazette" in Article 499, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "give public notice," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 商業登記法第七十九条、第八十条(第六号、第九号及び第十号を除く。)及び第八十一条から第八十三条までの規定は、第百三十九条第二項第二号に掲げる場合における合併による会員商品取引所及び株式会社商品取引所の登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第七十九条中「商号及び本店」とあるのは「名称又は商号及び主たる事務所又は本店」と、同法第八十条第五号中「本店」とあるのは「事務所」と、同条第七号中「吸収合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と、同法第八十一条第五号中「本店」とあるのは「本店又は事務所」と、同条第七号中「新設合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 79, Article 80 (excluding items (vi), (ix) and (x)) and Articles 81 to 83 inclusive of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of the Member Commodity Exchange and Incorporated Commodity Exchange upon a merger in the case set forth in Article 139, paragraph (2), item (ii). In this case, the phrase "trade name and the head office" in Article 79 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "name and the principal office or the head office," "head office" in Article 80, item (v) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office," the phrase "when a company dissolved in an absorption-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in item (vii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning merger of a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger," the term "head office" in Article 81, item (v) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "head office or office," the phrase "when a company dissolved in a consolidation-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in item (vii) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning a merger of a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger" and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

2 商業登記法第七十九条、第八十条(第六号、第九号及び第十号を除く。)及び第八十一条から第八十三条までの規定は、第百三十九条第二項第二号に掲げる場合における合併による会員商品取引所及び株式会社商品取引所の登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第七十九条中「商号及び本店」とあるのは「名称又は商号及び主たる事務所又は本店」と、同法第八十条第五号中「本店」とあるのは「事務所」と、同条第七号中「吸収合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と、同法第八十一条第五号中「本店」とあるのは「本店又は事務所」と、同条第七号中「新設合併消滅会社が持分会社であるときは、総社員の同意(定款に別段の定めがある場合にあつては、その定めによる手続)があつたことを証する書面」とあるのは「新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の合併会員総会の議事録」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 79, Article 80 (excluding items 6, 9 and 10) and Articles 81 to 83 inclusive of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of the Member Commodity Exchange and Incorporated Commodity Exchange upon a merger in the case set forth in Article 139, paragraph 2, item 2. In this case, the phrase "trade name and the head office" in Article 79 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "name and the principal office or the head office," "head office" in Article 80, item 5 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office," the phrase "when a company dissolved in an absorption-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in item 7 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning merger of a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger," the term "head office" in Article 81, item 5 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "head office or office," the phrase "when a company dissolved in an incorporation-type merger is a mochibun kaisha, a document proving the consent of all members (if special provisions exist in the articles of incorporation, the procedure under such provisions)" in item 7 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "minutes of a general meeting of members concerning a merger of a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger" and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 経済産業省

索引トップ用語の索引



  
Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS