「"Is an"」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(501ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

If in any particular case the Registrar is satisfied that the failure to give, make or file any notice, application or other document within any period of time specified in the Act or these Rules for such giving, making or filing was wholly or mainly attributable to a failure or undue delay in the postal services in Brunei Darussalam, the Registrar may, if he thinks fit, extend the period so that it ends on the day of the receipt by the addressee of the notice, application or other document (or, if the day of such receipt is an excluded day, on the first following day which is not an excluded day), upon such notice to other parties and upon such terms as he may direct. 例文帳に追加

法律又は本規則において付与，作成又は提出を行うよう定められている期間内に，通知，出願又はその他の書類の付与，作成又は提出が，完全に又は主に，ブルネイ・ダムラサール国における郵便業務の不履行又は過度の遅延に起因していると登録官が認める特段の場合には，登録官は，適切であると考える場合において，他方の当事者へその通知を行うことにより，及び登録官が指示した条件のもとに，通知，出願又はその他の書類にある宛先で受領する日(又は，当該受領が非就業日の場合は翌日)が終了となるよう期間を延長できる。 - 特許庁

(5) Where it is established that the representative as indicated in the request is an industrial design qualified person recorded in the Register of Representatives, who however is not authorized by a power of attorney drawn up in accordance with Art. 8(2) and (4), or a person who is not recorded in the register as per item 1, or a patent specialist as per Art. 8(2) lacking the prescribed power of attorney, the formal examiner invites the applicant or his representative to remedy the deficiencies within the term as per paragraph (3). If deficiencies are not eliminated in cases of obligatory representation as per Art. 5(2) of the Law on Industrial Designs, the formal examiner takes a decision to discontinue the proceedings. Where the applicant has his permanent residence or principal place of business in the Republic of Bulgaria, the proceedings go on, correspondence being addressed to the applicant. 例文帳に追加

(5) 願書に表示された代理人が代理人登録簿に記録された工業意匠有資格者であるが第8条(2)及び(4)に基づいて作成された委任状により委任を受けていない者であること，第1項目による登録簿に記録されていない者であること又は所定の委任状を有さない第8条(2)にいう特許専門家であることが証明される場合は，方式審査官は，出願人又は代理人に対し，(3)にいう期間内に瑕疵を補正するよう促す。意匠法第5条(2)にいう義務的代理の場合に瑕疵が除去されない場合は，方式審査官は，手続停止の決定を行う。出願人がブルガリア共和国に恒久的住居又は主たる営業所を有する場合は，手続は継続し，通信は出願人に宛てられる。 - 特許庁

An optical information reproducing device that reproduces data by irradiating an optical disc, which is an information recording medium, with laser light, the optical information reproducing device comprising: rotating device which rotates the optical disc, and detecting device which detects a data error, wherein, data is reproduced by rotating the optical disc by means of the said rotating device at the maximum rotational speed in the beginning; data is reproduced by reducing the rotational speed by means of the said rotating device each time when the said detecting device detects a data error in reproducing data; data is reproduced by rotating the optical disc at the unchanged rotational speed when the said detecting device doesn’t detect a data error. 例文帳に追加

情報記録媒体である光ディスクにレーザ光を照射してデータの再生を行う光学的情報再生装置において、 光ディスクを回転させる回転手段と、 データエラーが生じたことを検知する検知手段とを備え、 初期設定では前記回転手段により最大回転数で前記光ディスクを回転させながらデータの再生を行い，データの再生を行っている途中で前記検知手段によりデータエラーを検知する度に前記回転手段により回転数を低下させてデータの再生を行い、前記検知手段によりデータエラーを検知しないときは、そのままの回転数で前記光ディスクを回転させてデータの再生を行うことを特徴とする光学的情報記録再生装置。 - 特許庁

An optical information reproducing device (2) that reproduces data by irradiating an optical disc (1), which is an information recording medium, with laser light, the optical information reproducing device comprising: rotating device (4) which rotates the optical disc, and detecting device (3) which detects a data error, wherein, data is reproduced by rotating the optical disc by means of the said rotating device at the maximum rotational speed in the beginning (see page 33, line 1-9);data is reproduced by reducing the rotational speed by means of the said rotating device each time when the said detecting device detects a data error (in the case the predetermined value of error corrections is 1 (one)) in reproducing data (see page 33, line 15 - page 34, line 2); data is reproduced by rotating the optical disc at the unchanged rotational speed when the said detecting device doesn’t detect a data error (in the case the predetermined value of error corrections is 1 (one)). 例文帳に追加

情報記録媒体である光ディスク(1)にレーザ光を照射してデータの再生を行う光学的情報再生装置(2)において、データエラーが生じたことを検知する検知手段(3)とを備え、初期設定では回転手段により最大回転数で光ディスクを回転させながらデータの再生を行い（第33頁第1－9行参照）、データの再生を行っている途中で前記検知手段によりデータエラーを検知する度に（誤り訂正回数の所定値が１である場合）回転手段により回転数を低下させてデータの再生を行い（第33頁第15行－第34頁第2行）、検知手段によりデータエラーを検知しないときは、そのままの回転数で光ディスクを回転させてデータの再生を行う（誤り訂正回数の所定値が１である場合）ことを特徴とする光学的情報記録再生装置。 - 特許庁

-No mark or part of a mark shall be registered as a trademark- (a) which comprises or consists of any scandalous or obscene matter; or (b) the use of which would be contrary to any law for the time being in force; or (c) the use of which would be likely to deceive or cause confusion; or (d) which contains any matter likely to hurt the religious susceptibilities of any class of the citizens of Bangladesh; (e) which is identical with, or is an imitation of, or contains as a element, an armorial bearing, flag or other emblem, a name or abbreviation or initials of the name of, or official sign or hallmark adopted by, any state or international organization created by an international convention, charter or other instruments, unless authorized by the competent authority of that state or organization; or (f) which would otherwise be disentitled to protection in a court; (g) the application is made in bad intention and faith. 例文帳に追加

次に掲げる標章又は標章の一部は商標として登録されない。(a)恥ずべき又は節度を欠く事項が含まれる標章(b)標章の使用がそのとき施行されている法令に反するもの(c)標章の使用が誤認、混同を引き起こすおそれがあるもの(d)バングラデシュ国民のいかなる階級であれ宗教的感受性を傷付けるおそれがある内容を含む標章(e)国家又は、国際条約、憲章若しくはその他の法律文書によって創設された国際組織の紋章、旗又はその他の記章、それらの名称又は名称の略称若しくは頭文字、それらが採用する公的標識又は印章と同一若しくは模倣又は要素として含む標章。ただし、その国家又は組織の所轄当局が認めるものを除く。(f)その他に、裁判所で保護を受けることができない標章(g)出願が不正の目的で信義に反して行われる標章 - 特許庁

The optical information recording medium 1A is an optical disk obtained by successively stacking at least a mask layer 3 and a reflecting layer 4 on a light transmissive substrate 2A, 2C.例文帳に追加

光透過性の基板２Ａ，２Ｃ上に、少なくともマスク層３と反射層４とを順次積層して成る光情報記録媒体１Ａであって、前記マスク層が、前記基板側から入射する再生用レーザ光が連続照射される照射部分の温度が消色温度以上になった場合には、前記照射部分の一部分の光透過率は高くなって光スポット径を実質的に縮小して前記再生用レーザ光を前記反射層側へ出射して前記反射層側からの戻り光を前記基板側へ出射することにより情報信号を再生するディスク超解像機能を有するサーモクロミック材料から成る光ディスクにおいて、前記サーモクロミック材料中に、このサーモクロミック材料の消色温度よりも低い融点を有する有機結晶性物質を含むようにする。 - 特許庁

A granular cathode active substance is composed of a compound metal oxide which can dope and dedope an M^1 ion (M^1 is an alkaline metal element) and an M_3 containing compound (M^3 is a third B group element) which is mounted on a surface of the oxide as particles or in a layer.例文帳に追加

Ｍ^1（Ｍ^1はアルカリ金属元素）イオンをドープ・脱ドープできる複合金属酸化物および該酸化物の表面に粒子として、または層状に載置されるＭ^3含有化合物（Ｍ^3は第３Ｂ族元素）からなる粒状の正極活物質であり、該正極活物質は、その表面に、Ｍ^1（Ｍ^1は前記）、Ｍ^2（Ｍ^2はＭｎ、Ｆｅ、ＣｏおよびＮｉから選ばれる）、Ｍ^3（Ｍ^3は前記）およびＯを有し、該表面におけるＭ^3原子数（モル）とＭ^2原子数（モル）のモル比（Ｍ^3／Ｍ^2）をＡとし、該正極活物質のＢＥＴ比表面積をＳ（ｍ^2／ｇ）としたとき、ＡおよびＳが以下の式（１）を満たす正極活物質を含有する正極と、 負極と、 セパレータと、 非水電解液と、を有する非水電解液二次電池。 - 特許庁

In Japan as well, then-Deputy Governor Yutaka Yamaguchi of the Bank of Japan pointed out regarding the current financial system wherein globalization and diffusion of IT are progressing, that the depth and ample liquidity of markets created by technological innovation and globalization in normal times could be immediately lost in times of a financial crisis accompanied by enormous stress, and there is an inherent risk that it would further amplify the crisis.He also added, “Under such circumstances, we should not suppress, by regulation, the development of technology and innovation in the market. Rather, we should strive to provide a supportive market infrastructure, including regulation and supervision, market practices, disclosure, and accounting methods, in a broad context and to make it more robust. The systematic improvement of market infrastructure will contribute to reducing the risk of financial crises, which is the most serious uncertainty.” 13例文帳に追加

また、我が国においても、日本銀行の山口副総裁（当時）は、グローバル化・IT化の進む現在の金融システムに対して、「技術革新とグローバル化によって平時にもたらされている市場の厚みあるいは潤沢な流動性は、大きなストレスを受ける金融危機時には瞬時に失われ、そのことが危機を増幅させるリスクを孕んでいる。」と指摘した上で、「こうした状況の中で我々がまず為すべきことは、規制によって技術の展開や市場の革新を抑え込もうとすることではなく、規制・監督、市場慣行、ディスクロージャー、会計制度等々が含まれる広い意味での市場インフラを整備し頑健なものにしていくことであり、これらを体系的に改善していくことは金融危機のリスクという不確実性の最たるものを減らすことに貢献する。」と指摘している13。 - 経済産業省

In regard to provisions prohibiting reverse-engineering, the Fair Trade Commission issued a document entitled "Views on Software Licensing Agreements, etc. under the Antimonopoly Act . An Interim Report of the Study Group on Software and the Competition Policy." Specifically, provisions prohibiting reverse-engineering are considered invalid due to their deleterious effect on competition in the market under the following circumstances: (1) where it is necessary to obtain interface information concerning the applicable software in order to develop hardware or software which is compatible with the platform software such as operating systems; (2) the licensor has not provided the interface information; and (3) the performance of reverse-engineering by the licensee is an essential and unavoidable measure in order to develop software and hardware for the applicable software. 例文帳に追加

なお、リバースエンジニアリングを禁止する条項については、公正取引委員会より「ソフトウェアライセンス契約等に関する独占禁止法上の考え方―ソフトウェアと独占禁止法に関する研究会中間報告書―」が公表されており、具体的には、オペレーティングシステムなど、プラットフォーム機能を持つソフトウェアとインターオペラビリティを持つソフトウェアやハードウェアを開発するためには、①当該ソフトウェアのインターフェース情報が必要であり、②ライセンサがインターフェース情報を提供しておらず、③ライセンシーにとって，リバースエンジニアリングを行うことが、当該ソフトウェア向けにソフトウェアやハードウェアを開発するために必要不可欠な手段となっているような場合に、市場における公正な競争を阻害するおそれがある場合が該当する可能性がある。 - 経済産業省

Elements or ideas mentioned below must be examined for reaching agreement on modality, and Japan believes that many WTO Members, including Japan, have a strong interest in discussing these elements and ideas. Understandably, some elements or ideas might be advantageous for some Members, whilst being disadvantageous for others. What matters most, however, is an overall balance in the outcome of the negotiations and the negotiations should aim at a comprehensive package without a priori exclusion of products, as agreed upon in the Doha Declaration. Needless to say negotiations should proceed, giving due consideration to the situation surrounding individual products. 例文帳に追加

以下の項目は、モダリティ合意を図る際に検討が不可欠な項目であり、我が国を含め多くの国が関心を有しているものであると信じる。ある項目はある国に不利な内容である一方、別の国には有利になることもあり、また別の項目はある国に有利な内容である一方、別の国には不利になることもあろう。いずれにせよ、全体のバランスが重要であり、ドーハ閣僚宣言の合意を踏まえ、交渉対象品目はあらかじめ例外を設けず、包括的な交渉とすることが必要不可欠である。但し、各個別品目を取り巻く状況にも配慮しながら交渉を進めることは当然である。 - 経済産業省

Sanshu Seika Co., Ltd. (220 employees), of Kasukabe City in Saitama Prefecture, is a company that manufactures rice crackers. It is an enterprise that prioritizes a bottom-up management approach whereby on-site employees are the core of implemented improvement activities. On-site employees formed an IT Committee and developed a traceability system for rice cracker ingredients as an internally-led initiative. Sanshu Seika was among the first in the industry to adopt this system and they are advancing with IT management. Furthermore, Sanshu Seika promotes company-wide sharing of information in order to realize bottom-up management, a corporate culture that has taken root. Sanshu Seika has 12 committees including the IT Committee as its internal, cross-organizational structure. It absorbs the opinions of people on site and promotes improvement activities across the entire company.例文帳に追加

埼玉県春日部市の三州製菓株式会社（従業員220名）は米菓の製造を営む会社であるが、現場の従業員が中心となって改善活動に取り組むボトムアップ経営を重視しており、現場の社員が「IT委員会」を構成し、米菓の原材料のトレーサビリティシステムを自社主導で開発し、同システムを業界内でいち早く導入する等IT経営を進めている。また、ボトムアップ経営を実現するために、全社的な情報の共有を推進しており、企業風土としても根付いている。同社は、社内に部署横断的な組織としてIT委員会を含めて12の委員会を設け、現場の声を吸い上げて改善活動を全社的に推進している。 - 経済産業省

Article 13 (1) Concerning research results related to technologies of an incorporated administrative agency (referring to an Incorporated Administrative Agency as stipulated in Article 2, paragraph 1 of the Act on General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agencies) (Act No.103 of 1999) that is an entity conducting work related to testing and research (hereinafter referred to as a "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency"), a person who has received assignment of patent right or the right to receive a patent related to said research result owned by a Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency, and who is engaged in the operation of transferring said research results (hereinafter "Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agency Technology Transfer Operations") to private business operators who intend to utilize those research results, through assignment, establishment of exclusive licenses of patent rights obtained based on said patent right itself or right to receive said patent or otherwise, may apply to the Minister having jurisdiction over said Research and Development Incorporated Administrative Agencies and receive an accreditation to the effect that the operation of that person conforms to all of the following items. 例文帳に追加

第十三条　独立行政法人（独立行政法人通則法（平成十一年法律第百三号）第二条第一項に規定する独立行政法人をいう。）であって試験研究に関する業務を行うものとして政令で定めるもの（以下「試験研究独立行政法人」という。）における技術に関する研究成果について、当該研究成果に係る試験研究独立行政法人が保有する特許権又は特許を受ける権利の譲渡を受け、当該特許権又は当該特許を受ける権利に基づいて取得した特許権についての譲渡、専用実施権の設定その他の行為により、当該研究成果の活用を行おうとする民間事業者に対し移転する事業（以下「試験研究独立行政法人技術移転事業」という。）を行う者は、当該試験研究独立行政法人を所管する大臣に申請して、その事業が次の各号のいずれにも適合している旨の認定を受けることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1 The purpose of this Act is, with regard to the oceans, to stipulate the basic principles, to clarify the responsibilities of the State, the local governments, business operators and the citizens as well as to formulate the basic plan with regard to the oceans and other basic matters with regard to the measures on the oceans, by establishing the Headquarters for Ocean Policy in order to promote measures with regard to the oceans comprehensively and systematically, through contributing to the sound development of the economy and society of our State and to improve the stability of the lives of citizenry as well as to contribute to the coexistence of the oceans and mankind, in consideration of the fact that the oceans, occupying broad portion of the globe, is an indispensable factor for maintaining the lives of the living beings including mankind, and the fact that it is important to realize a new oceanic State in harmonization of the peaceful and positive development and use of the oceans with the conservation of the marine environment, under the international cooperation, as our State surrounded by the oceans, based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other international agreements as well as on the international efforts on the realization of the sustainable development and use of the oceans. 例文帳に追加

第一条　この法律は、地球の広範な部分を占める海洋が人類をはじめとする生物の生命を維持する上で不可欠な要素であるとともに、海に囲まれた我が国において、海洋法に関する国際連合条約その他の国際約束に基づき、並びに海洋の持続可能な開発及び利用を実現するための国際的な取組の中で、我が国が国際的協調の下に、海洋の平和的かつ積極的な開発及び利用と海洋環境の保全との調和を図る新たな海洋立国を実現することが重要であることにかんがみ、海洋に関し、基本理念を定め、国、地方公共団体、事業者及び国民の責務を明らかにし、並びに海洋に関する基本的な計画の策定その他海洋に関する施策の基本となる事項を定めるとともに、総合海洋政策本部を設置することにより、海洋に関する施策を総合的かつ計画的に推進し、もって我が国の経済社会の健全な発展及び国民生活の安定向上を図るとともに、海洋と人類の共生に貢献することを目的とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 203 (1) In cases where an Officer or official of a Financial Instruments Business Operator (in cases where said Financial Instruments Business Operator is a foreign juridical person, an Officer refers to a Representative Person in Japan and an Officer who is stationed at a business office or office established in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), an Officer or official of an Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association, Public Interest Corporation-Type Financial Instruments Firms Association prescribed in Article 78(2), or Financial Instruments Exchange (an Officer includes a provisional director, provisional auditor, and provisional executive officer), or a representative person (including, in cases where there is an office in Japan, an Officer stationed at said office) or official in Japan of a Foreign Financial Instruments Exchange has accepted, requested or promised bribes with regard to his/her duties (in the case of an Officer or official of a Financial Instruments Business Operator, limited to duties pertaining to businesses of a Financial Instruments Business Operator that received entrustment of an Investor Protection Funds under the provisions of Article 79-50(1)), he/she shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than five years. 例文帳に追加

第二百三条　金融商品取引業者の役員（当該金融商品取引業者が外国法人である場合には、国内における代表者及び国内に設ける営業所又は事務所に駐在する役員。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは職員、認可金融商品取引業協会若しくは第七十八条第二項に規定する公益法人金融商品取引業協会若しくは金融商品取引所の役員（仮理事及び仮監事並びに仮取締役、仮執行役及び仮監査役を含む。）若しくは職員又は外国金融商品取引所の国内における代表者（国内に事務所がある場合にあつては、当該事務所に駐在する役員を含む。）若しくは職員が、その職務（金融商品取引業者の役員若しくは職員にあつては、第七十九条の五十第一項の規定により投資者保護基金の委託を受けた金融商品取引業者の業務に係る職務に限る。）に関して、賄賂を収受し、又はその要求若しくは約束をしたときは、五年以下の懲役に処する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 54 (1) The provisions of Article 5, Article 9, Article 11, Article 13, Article 14, and Article 16 through Article 18 shall apply mutatis mutandis to business related to Investment Trusts Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor carried out by a Trust Company, etc. and Article 26 shall apply mutatis mutandis pursuant to Investment Trusts Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor. In this case, the term "instructions on investment" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "investments," the phrase "may not instruct the Trust Company, etc. that is the trustee of the Investment Trust Property (hereinafter referred to as the 'Trustee Company') to acquire" in Article 9 shall be deemed to be replaced with "may not acquire," the phrases "other Investment Trust Property for which the Settlor Company of an Investment Trust gives instructions on investment (in cases where the Settlor Company of an Investment Trust is an Asset Management Company, an Investment Corporation investing assets shall be included; the same shall apply in the following item)" in Article 13, paragraph (1), item (ii), "other Investment Trust Property" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "other trust property," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十四条　第五条、第九条、第十一条、第十三条、第十四条及び第十六条から第十八条までの規定は信託会社等の行う委託者非指図型投資信託に係る業務について、第二十六条の規定は委託者非指図型投資信託について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「運用の指図」とあるのは「運用」と、第九条中「取得することを当該投資信託財産の受託者である信託会社等（以下「受託会社」という。）に指図してはならない」とあるのは「取得してはならない」と、第十三条第一項第二号中「他の投資信託財産（当該投資信託委託会社が資産運用会社である場合にあつては、資産の運用を行う投資法人を含む。次号において同じ。）」とあり、及び同項第三号中「他の投資信託財産」とあるのは「他の信託財産」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 124, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Record Date, Article 125 of that Act (excluding paragraph (3), item (iii)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Investors' registry, and the provisions of Article 126 and Article 596, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the notice or demand made to the Investors. In this case, the phrase "its head office (or, in cases where there is an Administrator of Shareholder Registry, at its business office)" in Article 125, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the business office of the Administrator of the Investors' Registry, etc. as prescribed in Article 166, paragraph (2), item (viii) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "the court" in Article 125, paragraph (4) and paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the term "any item of paragraph (3)" in Article 125, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with " paragraph (3), item (i), item (ii), item (iv), and item (v)," the phrase "Article 299(1) (including the case where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 325)" in Article 126, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第百二十四条第二項及び第三項の規定は基準日について、同法第百二十五条（第三項第三号を除く。）の規定は投資主名簿について、同法第百二十六条並びに第百九十六条第一項及び第二項の規定は投資主に対してする通知又は催告について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百二十五条第一項中「その本店（株主名簿管理人がある場合にあっては、その営業所）」とあるのは「投資法人法第百六十六条第二項第八号に規定する投資主名簿等管理人の営業所」と、同条第四項及び第五項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同項中「第三項各号」とあるのは「第三項第一号、第二号、第四号又は第五号」と、同法第百二十六条第五項中「第二百九十九条第一項（第三百二十五条において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 32-9 (1) A specified manufacturer, etc., in acquiring the owner information pertaining to the specified maintenance products that he/she manufactured or imported (if such specified manufacturer, etc. is a person who has acquired the whole of the business pertaining to the specified maintenance products from another specified manufacturer, etc. or is an heir (the heir selected to succeed to the business by the unanimous agreement of all other heirs, in cases where there are two or more heirs) in cases where an inheritance, merger or split occurred (limited to those cases that cause the succession of the whole of the business pertaining to the specified maintenance products; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and Article 32-11, paragraph (2)), or a juridical person surviving a merger or a juridical person incorporated by a merger or a juridical person succeeding to the whole of the business by a split (hereinafter referred to as "successor" in the following paragraph), the specified maintenance products manufactured or imported by the person who has transferred the whole of the business or the decedent, the juridical person ceasing to exist by the merger or the juridical person that has split shall be included; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section) shall make the following matters public in advance; provided, however, that this shall not apply in cases where the provisions of the following paragraph apply: 例文帳に追加

第三十二条の九　特定製造事業者等は、その製造又は輸入に係る特定保守製品（その者が、他の特定製造事業者等からその特定保守製品に係る事業の全部を譲り受けた者又は他の特定製造事業者等について相続、合併若しくは分割（その特定保守製品に係る事業の全部を承継するものに限る。以下この条及び第三十二条の十一第二項において同じ。）があつた場合における相続人（相続人が二人以上ある場合において、その全員の同意により事業を承継すべき相続人を選定したときは、その者）、合併後存続する法人若しくは合併により設立された法人若しくは分割によりその事業の全部を承継した法人（次項において「承継人」という。）であるときは、その事業の全部を譲り渡した者又は被相続人、合併により消滅した法人若しくは分割をした法人の製造又は輸入に係る特定保守製品を含む。以下この節において同じ。）に係る所有者情報を取得するに当たつては、あらかじめ、次の事項を公表しなければならない。ただし、次項の規定の適用を受ける場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As for responsibility, protection of deposits (fixed-amount protection) and assignment of responsibility are basically unrelated. Nevertheless, as I stated last week, Mr. Kimura became a consultant to FSA when Mr. Takenaka served as Minister for Financial Services and filed an application form for the Incubator Bank of Japan after he resigned from the post and established the Bank while Mr. Takenaka was in office. Given that banking businesses are licensed businesses, and financial businesses are highly public in nature, this is an extremely serious matter as a nation. Sound and robust financial businesses are necessary for sound companies as well as for sound management and economy. As financial businesses are licensed businesses that are not to be taken lightly, it is extremely regrettable that it failed in about six and a half years. As I stated before, now that the DICJ has full control of the Bank, we intend to pursue its criminal and/or civil liability in an appropriate manner according to law. 例文帳に追加

そしてまた、責任についてはどうかということでございますが、預金の保護（定額保護）と責任追及とは基本的には関係のないことでございますが、しかし、私が先週も申し上げましたように、これは竹中平蔵さんのときに、金融庁の顧問に木村剛さんがなられて、やめた後、日本振興銀行の設立のお願い書を出して、そして、竹中平蔵さんのときに銀行の設立が、これはもうよくご存じのように、銀行業というのは免許業で、（金融業は）公共性の強いものでございますから、国家としても大変重たいものであり、健全な企業、あるいは健全な経営・経済のためには、非常に健全で強力な金融業が必要であるということは、もう皆さんよくお分かりでございます。（金融業は）免許業でございまして、重たいものでございますから、そういった意味でも、私はこういったことが６年半ぐらいで破綻をしたということは大変遺憾なことだと、残念なことだと思っていますが、私がこの前申しましたように、今預金保険機構が全部経営権を握っているわけでございますから、法に沿って刑事上の責任、あるいは民事上の責任をきちっと追及していこうと思っております。 - 金融庁

Of course, I intend to do so. This is a matter of political leadership. Trade in agricultural goods has existed since the Meiji period; the rice market was opened in the Edo period. It is said that the first futures trading was conducted in Osaka. Grain trading has a very long history and tradition and it has been promoted by the former Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries as part of the agricultural policy. Trading in crude oil and other mineral resources has been promoted as part of the trade and commerce policy. For my part, I served as parliamentary secretary for international trade and industry 20 years ago. However, regarding financial products, which account for most of the trading, futures trading is under the jurisdiction of the FSA. I am well aware that ministerial sectionalism has existed until now. The reality is that individual ministries have been operating on the basis of sectionalism. In this respect, we must exercise political leadership. Under the current economic strategy, it is an important task to strengthen the Tokyo market’s international competitiveness and enhance its position from a broad perspective, so the three relevant ministers will discuss this matter and take necessary actions. 例文帳に追加

当然ですね。これは政治主導でございまして、農産品と申しますか、その取引については明治時代から（存在し）、米の相場を始めたのは江戸時代であると。それから一番古い先物取引は、大阪で始まったという話もあるわけでございます。穀物の取引というのは大変古い歴史と伝統がありまして、それは昔で言う農商務省、農林省がきちっと農業政策の一環としてやっており、それから、原油をはじめ鉱物資源につきましては、私も20年前、通産政務次官をしましたので、これはまた通商政策の一環としてやっているということです。しかし、一番大きな金融取引等々につきましては、（その）先物取引は金融庁の所管でございますから、これはやはり各省縦割りというのが今まであったことは、もう私も重々知っておりますし、また各省は、縦割りの中で来たというのが現実でございまして、そこはまさに私は政治主導の必要があるというふうに思っておりますので、きちっと3大臣で話をして、大所高所に立ってきちっと国際競争力もこれは大事なときでございまして、東京のマーケットそのものの地位を高めるということも、今の経済戦略の中で大事な課題でもございますから、やっていきたいというふうに強く思っております。 - 金融庁

Tokyo District Court Judgment, May 26, 1977 (p.51 of Hanrei Jiho No. 832) "Judging from the fact that the use of the land constitutes an indispensable basis of the daily life of Y and his family. the bid is reasonably sufficient, even considering that the land has Y.s leasehold rights. In this context, X demanded Y to vacate the land immediately after X won the bid without negotiating with Y at all . it is assumed that, in this auction case, despite the fact that X had announced that the land is accompanied by the leasehold in accordance with which the lessee is supposed to own a building thereon, which could be perfected against the winning bidder, X was trying to obtain a huge amount of profits by winning the bid at an extremely low price, taking advantage of the lack of registry required for perfection of such leasehold. Considering the circumstances with respect to Y as recognized in the foregoing, X.s demand of the removal of and vacation of the building on the land shall not be accepted on the ground that it is an abuse of right." 例文帳に追加

東京地裁昭和５２年５月２６日判決・判例時報８３２号５１頁「本件土地の使用はYおよびその一家の生活の基盤として欠くべからざるものであること《中略》競売価格は本件土地にYの貸借権が設定されているものとして扱っても十分見合う金額であること、Xは右土地を競落するや直ちにYに本件土地の明渡を求め、話し合いには一切応じない態度を堅持していたこと《中略》これらの事実よりすれば、Xは右競売事件において本件土地に競落人に対抗しうる建物所有の目的の賃借権がある旨広告されていたが、その賃借権がたまたま対抗力に必要な登記を欠いていたことを奇貨として、極めて低廉な価額で競落したうえ巨額な利益をえようとしているものと推認できるので、前示認定のようなY側の事情等をも考慮すると、Xの本件建物収去・土地明渡の請求は権利の濫用として許されないものといわなければならない。」 - 経済産業省

(vi) A person who holds voting rights in an Insurance Company, etc. (including a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) who is deemed to hold at least twenty hundredths of all shareholders' voting rights in the Insurance Company, etc., in terms of the number of voting rights held by said person in the Insurance Company, etc. (for a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items, the number specified in the relevant item) and the number of voting rights held in the same Insurance Company, etc. by his/her Joint Holder(s) (referring to any other holder(s) of voting rights in the Insurance Company, etc. (including those falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding times) who has (have) agreed with said person on concerted action in acquiring or transferring the shares pertaining to the voting rights, or in exercising the voting and other rights as shareholders of that Insurance Company, etc. (excluding, where the person who holds the voting rights is a company falling under the category listed in item (ii), any Company, etc. to be consolidated in the financial statements and other documents of said company; excluding, where the person who holds the voting rights is a Company, etc. falling under the category prescribed in item (iii) or (iv), any other Company, etc. in the Group of Companies, etc. to which said Company, etc. belongs; and excluding, where the person who holds the voting rights is an individual falling under the category listed in the preceding item, any Company, etc. in which the individual has majority voting rights; but including any person who has a special relationship as specified by a Cabinet Order with the person who holds the voting rights)) (for a Joint Holder falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items, the number prescribed in the relevant item), taken together (the total number thus calculated is hereinafter referred to as the "Number of Voting Rights Jointly Held" in this item): the Number of Voting Rights Jointly Held. 例文帳に追加

六　保険会社等の議決権の保有者（前各号に掲げる者を含む。以下この号において同じ。）のうち、その保有する当該保険会社等の議決権の数（当該議決権の保有者が前各号に掲げる者であるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める数）とその共同保有者（保険会社等の議決権の保有者が、当該保険会社等の議決権の他の保有者（前各号に掲げる者を含む。）と共同して当該議決権に係る株式を取得し、若しくは譲渡し、又は当該保険会社等の株主としての議決権その他の権利を行使することを合意している場合における当該他の保有者（当該議決権の保有者が第二号に掲げる会社である場合においては当該会社の計算書類その他の書類に連結される会社等を、当該議決権の保有者が第三号又は第四号に掲げる会社等である場合においては当該会社等が属する会社等集団に属する当該会社等以外の会社等を、当該議決権の保有者が前号に掲げる個人である場合においては当該個人がその議決権の過半数の保有者である会社等を除き、当該議決権の保有者と政令で定める特別な関係を有する者を含む。）をいう。）の保有する当該保険会社等の議決権の数（当該共同保有者が前各号に掲げる者であるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める数）を合算した数（以下この号において「共同保有議決権数」という。）が当該保険会社等の総株主の議決権の百分の二十以上の数である者　共同保有議決権数 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53 (1) A Municipality, when a person that receives support in his or her home is an Insured Person that has been issued a Certification of Needed Support (herein referred to as "Insured In-Home Person Requiring Support") receives from a person designated by a prefectural governor (herein referred to as "Designated Provider of a Preventive Service to Long-Term Care") a Preventive Service of Long-Term Care provided by a provider that performs Preventive Service of Long-Term Care Business pertaining to said designation (herein referred to as "Designated Preventive Service of Long-Term Care") (limited to a case when said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Support has notified a Municipality in advance pursuant to the provisions of Article 58, paragraph (4) concerning the receipt of a Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care as prescribed in paragraph (1) of the same Article, when said Designated Preventive Service of Long-Term Care is subject to said Designated Support for Prevention of Long-Term Care or when provided by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare), shall pay to said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Support an Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service for the expenses required for said Designated Preventive Service of Long-Term Care (except for the expenses required to purchase Specified Equipment for Preventive Long-Term Care Covered by Public Aid, excluding the expenses necessary to provide meals, residence, and other necessary expenses for daily life as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare with regard to the expenses required for Outpatient Preventive Long-Term Care, Outpatient Rehabilitation for Preventive Long-Term Care, a Short-Term Admission for Daily Preventive Long-Term Care, and Short-Term Admission for Recuperation for Preventive Long-Term Care, Daily Preventive Long-Term Care Admitted to a Specified Facility), provided however, that this provision shall not apply to a case when said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Support that has been designated pursuant to the provisions of Article 37, paragraph (1) receives Preventive Service of Long-Term Care other than the type pertaining to said designation. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条　市町村は、要支援認定を受けた被保険者のうち居宅において支援を受けるもの（以下「居宅要支援被保険者」という。）が、都道府県知事が指定する者（以下「指定介護予防サービス事業者」という。）から当該指定に係る介護予防サービス事業を行う事業所により行われる介護予防サービス（以下「指定介護予防サービス」という。）を受けたとき（当該居宅要支援被保険者が、第五十八条第四項の規定により同条第一項に規定する指定介護予防支援を受けることにつきあらかじめ市町村に届け出ている場合であって、当該指定介護予防サービスが当該指定介護予防支援の対象となっているときその他の厚生労働省令で定めるときに限る。）は、当該居宅要支援被保険者に対し、当該指定介護予防サービスに要した費用（特定介護予防福祉用具の購入に要した費用を除き、介護予防通所介護、介護予防通所リハビリテーション、介護予防短期入所生活介護、介護予防短期入所療養介護及び介護予防特定施設入居者生活介護に要した費用については、食事の提供に要する費用、滞在に要する費用その他の日常生活に要する費用として厚生労働省令で定める費用を除く。以下この条において同じ。）について、介護予防サービス費を支給する。ただし、当該居宅要支援被保険者が、第三十七条第一項の規定による指定を受けている場合において、当該指定に係る種類以外の介護予防サービスを受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 172-2 (1) When an Issuer has submitted an Annual Securities Reports, etc. containing a misstatement on important matters (which means the Annual Securities Report and documents attached thereto prescribed in Article 24(1) or (3) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24(5) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) and pursuant to Article 27) and Article 24(6) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27), or Amendments prescribed in Article 7, Article 9(1) or Article 10(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-2(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27); hereinafter the same shall apply in Article 178(5) and Article 185-7(2) and (3)), the Prime Minister shall, in accordance with the procedures prescribed in the following Section, order said Issuer to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount listed in item (i) (when the amount listed in item (ii) exceeds the amount listed in item (i), the amount listed in item (ii)); provided, however, that in cases where the period of a business year of an Issuer (if said Issuer is an Issuer of the Regulated Securities prescribed in Article 24(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27), the Specified Period pertaining to the Regulated Securities set forth in Article 24(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24(5); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and Article 185-7(19)) is not one year, the Prime Minister shall order said Issuer to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount obtained by the following: dividing the number of months of said business year by 12, and then multiplying such number by the above amount: 例文帳に追加

第百七十二条の二　発行者が、重要な事項につき虚偽の記載がある有価証券報告書等（第二十四条第一項若しくは第三項（これらの規定を同条第五項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）及び第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）及び第二十四条第六項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による有価証券報告書及びその添付書類又は第二十四条の二第一項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する第七条、第九条第一項若しくは第十条第一項の規定による訂正報告書をいう。第百七十八条第五項並びに第百八十五条の七第二項及び第三項において同じ。）を提出したときは、内閣総理大臣は、次節に定める手続に従い、当該発行者に対し、第一号に掲げる額（第二号に掲げる額が第一号に掲げる額を超えるときは、第二号に掲げる額）に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命じなければならない。ただし、発行者の事業年度（当該発行者が第二十四条第一項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する特定有価証券の発行者である場合には、当該特定有価証券に係る第二十四条第五項において準用する同条第一項に規定する特定期間。以下この項及び第百八十五条の七第十九項において同じ。）が一年である場合以外の場合においては、当該額に当該事業年度の月数を十二で除して得た数を乗じて得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命じなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 131 With regard to airworthiness, noise level, engine emissions and aircrew qualification for the following aircraft, any certification, license, or other act, as well as any qualification certificate or other document thereof made by any foreign state to which the nationality of the said aircraft belongs (including any contracting state in cases where there is an agreement under Article 83-2 of the Convention on International Civil Aviation between the said foreign state and any contracting state in which the owner of the said aircraft has the address), shall be regarded as aircraft registration certificate under Article 6, airworthiness certification under Article 10 paragraph (1), airworthiness certificate under paragraph (7) of the same article, competence certification under Article 22, competence certificate under Article 23, aviation medical certification under Article 31 paragraph (1), and aviation medical certificate under paragraph (2) of the same article, aviation English proficiency certification under Article 33 paragraph (1), or instrument flight certification under Article 34 paragraph (1), pursuant to the provision of Ordinances of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, with regard to application of the provisions of Article 11 paragraph (1) or (2), Article 28 paragraph (1) or (2), Article 33 paragraph (1), Article 34 paragraph (1), Article 59, Articles 65 through 67, Article 92 paragraph (1), Article 134 paragraph (1), Article 143, or Article 150. 例文帳に追加

第百三十一条　次に掲げる航空機の耐空性、騒音及び発動機の排出物並びに航空機乗組員の資格について当該航空機が国籍を有する外国（当該外国と当該航空機の使用者が住所を有する締約国との間に国際民間航空条約第八十三条の二の協定がある場合にあつては、当該締約国を含む。）が行つた証明、免許その他の行為及びこれらに係る資格証書その他の文書は、第十一条第一項若しくは第二項、第二十八条第一項若しくは第二項、第三十三条第一項、第三十四条第一項、第五十九条、第六十五条から第六十七条まで、第九十二条第一項、第百三十四条第一項、第百四十三条又は第百五十条の規定の適用については、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、第六条の航空機登録証明書、第十条第一項の規定による耐空証明、同条第七項の耐空証明書、第二十二条の規定による技能証明、第二十三条の技能証明書、第三十一条第一項の規定による航空身体検査証明、同条第二項の航空身体検査証明書、第三十三条第一項の規定による航空英語能力証明又は第三十四条第一項の規定による計器飛行証明とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 184-13 For the purpose of the application of Article 29-2, in the case where another patent application or a utility model registration application as provided in Article 29-2 is an international patent application or an International utility model registration application under Article 48-3(2) of the Utility Model Act, the term "another patent application or a utility model registration application " under Article 29-2 of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "another patent application or utility model registration application (excluding a patent application in foreign language under Article 184-4(1) or a utility model registration application in foreign language under Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 184-4(3) of this Act or Article 48-4(3) of the Utility Model Act)," the term "the laying open of the patent application or" shall be deemed to be replaced with "laying open of the patent application," the term "published" shall be deemed to be replaced with "published or where international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 184-4(1)of this Act or Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act." 例文帳に追加

第百八十四条の十三　第二十九条の二に規定する他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願が国際特許出願又は実用新案法第四十八条の三第二項の国際実用新案登録出願である場合における第二十九条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて」とあるのは「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願（第百八十四条の四第三項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願又は同法第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願を除く。）であつて」と、「出願公開又は」とあるのは「出願公開、」と、「発行が」とあるのは「発行又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開が」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) For the purpose of application of paragraphs (1) to (3) of Article 41and 42(1), in the case where the earlier application under Article 41(1) of this Act is an international patent application or an international utility model registration application under Article 48-3(2) of the Utility Model Act, the term "the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration and drawings originally attached to the application" in Articles 41(1) and 41(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims or drawings of an international application as of the international application date under Article 184-4(1) of this Act or Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act,"; the term "the description, scope of claims for patent or utility model registration and drawings originally attached to the application in the earlier application " in Article 41(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims or drawings of an international application of the earlier application as of the International Application Date under Article 184-4(1) of this Act or Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act,"; the term "the laying open of the patent application relating to" in Article 41(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the international publication under Article 21 of the patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 relating to,"; and the term "when one year and three months from the filing date has lapsed" in Article 42(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "at the later of the time of the National Processing Standard Time under Article 184-4 (4) of this Act or Article 48-4(4) of the Utility Model Act or the time when one year and three months has lapsed from the International Application Date under Article 184-4 (1) of this Act or Article 48-4 (1) of the Utility Model Act". 例文帳に追加

４　第四十一条第一項の先の出願が国際特許出願又は実用新案法第四十八条の三第二項の国際実用新案登録出願である場合における第四十一条第一項から第三項まで及び第四十二条第一項の規定の適用については、第四十一条第一項及び第二項中「願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」と、同条第三項中「先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「先の出願の第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」と、「について出願公開」とあるのは「について千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開」と、第四十二条第一項中「その出願の日から一年三月を経過した時」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第四項若しくは実用新案法第四十八条の四第四項の国内処理基準時又は第百八十四条の四第一項若しくは同法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日から一年三月を経過した時のいずれか遅い時」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 48-9 For the purpose of the application of Article 3-2, in the case where another application for a utility model registration or patent application as provided in Article 3-2 is an International Utility Model Registration Application or an International Patent Application under Article 184-3(2) of the Patent Act, the term "another application for a utility model registration or for a patent" under Article 3-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "another application for a utility model registration or for a patent (excluding a Utility Model Registration Application in Foreign Language under Article 48-4(1) of this Act or a Patent Application in Foreign Language under Article 184-4(1) of the Patent Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 48-4(3) of this Act or Article 184-4(3) of the Patent Act," the term "the respective Article or for which" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the respective Article, for which," the term "the publication of the patent application has been effected" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the publication of the patent application has been effected, or international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the written application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 48-4(1) of this Act or Article 184-4(1) of the Patent Act." 例文帳に追加

第四十八条の九　第三条の二に規定する他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願が国際実用新案登録出願又は特許法第百八十四条の三第二項の国際特許出願である場合における第三条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて」とあるのは「他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願（第四十八条の四第三項又は特許法第百八十四条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願又は同法第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願を除く。）であつて」と、「発行又は」とあるのは「発行、」と、「若しくは出願公開」とあるのは「若しくは出願公開又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第四十八条の四第一項又は同法第百八十四条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) For the purpose of application of Articles 8(1) to (3) and 9(1), in the case where the earlier application under Article 8(1) of this Act is an International Utility Model Registration Application or an International Patent Application under Article 184-3(2) of the Patent Act, the term "the description or scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent, or drawings originally attached to the application" in Articles 8(1) and (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 48-4(1) of this Act or Article 184-4(1) of the Patent Act," the term "the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings originally attached to the application of the Earlier Application" in Article 8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims or drawings of an international application of the Earlier Application as of the International Application Date under Article 48-4(1) of this Act or Article 184-4(1) of the Patent Act," the term "the laying open of" in Article 8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970," and the term "when one year and three months has lapsed from the filing date" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "at the time of the National Processing Standard Time under Article 48-4(4) of this Act or Article 184-4(4) of the Patent Act or the time when one year and three months has lapsed from the International Application Date under Article 48-4(1) of this Act or Article 184-4(1) of the Patent Act, whichever the later." 例文帳に追加

４　第八条第一項の先の出願が国際実用新案登録出願又は特許法第百八十四条の三第二項の国際特許出願である場合における第八条第一項から第三項まで及び第九条第一項の規定の適用については、第八条第一項及び第二項中「願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第四十八条の四第一項又は特許法第百八十四条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」と、同条第三項中「先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「先の出願の第四十八条の四第一項又は特許法第百八十四条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」と、「出願公開」とあるのは「千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開」と、第九条第一項中「その出願の日から一年三月を経過した時」とあるのは「第四十八条の四第四項若しくは特許法第百八十四条の四第四項の国内処理基準時又は第四十八条の四第一項若しくは同法第百八十四条の四第一項の国際出願日から一年三月を経過した時のいずれか遅い時」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vi) A person who holds voting rights of a Bank (including a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), where the total number of voting rights of that Bank held by that person (in the case of a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items, the number specified in each item) and those held by his/her Joint Holder(s) (meaning another person (including a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items) who holds voting rights of the Bank and has agreed with that person on joint acquisition or transfer of shares relating to the Bank's voting rights or on joint exercise of the voting rights or other right as shareholders of that Bank (excluding a Company, etc. which is consolidated in the financial statements or other documents of that company where that holder of those voting rights is a company falling under the category listed in item (ii), a Company, etc. other than that company belonging to the Group of Companies, etc. to which that person belongs where that holder of voting rights is a Company, etc. falling under the category prescribed in item (iii) or (iv), a Company, etc. whose majority voting rights are held by that person where a holder of those voting rights is an individual falling under the category listed in the preceding item, but including a person who has a special relationship with said person specified by a Cabinet Order with the holder of those voting rights)) (in the case of a Joint Holder falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items, the number prescribed in each item) (the total number of voting rights is hereinafter referred to as "The Number of Voting Rights Jointly Held" in this item) is equal to or more than twenty hundredths of the Voting Rights Held by All of the Shareholders, etc. of the Bank: The Number of Voting Rights Jointly Held 例文帳に追加

六　銀行の議決権の保有者（前各号に掲げる者を含む。以下この号において同じ。）のうち、その保有する当該銀行の議決権の数（当該議決権の保有者が前各号に掲げる者であるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める数）とその共同保有者（銀行の議決権の保有者が、当該銀行の議決権の他の保有者（前各号に掲げる者を含む。）と共同して当該議決権に係る株式を取得し、若しくは譲渡し、又は当該銀行の株主としての議決権その他の権利を行使することを合意している場合における当該他の保有者（当該議決権の保有者が第二号に掲げる会社である場合においては当該会社の計算書類その他の書類に連結される会社等を、当該議決権の保有者が第三号又は第四号に掲げる会社等である場合においては当該会社等が属する会社等集団に属する当該会社等以外の会社等を、当該議決権の保有者が前号に掲げる個人である場合においては当該個人がその議決権の過半数の保有者である会社等を除き、当該議決権の保有者と政令で定める特別な関係を有する者を含む。）をいう。）の保有する当該銀行の議決権の数（当該共同保有者が前各号に掲げる者であるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める数）を合算した数（以下この号において「共同保有議決権数」という。）が当該銀行の総株主の議決権の百分の二十以上の数である者　共同保有議決権数 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As you know, DPJ President and Prime Minister Kan and (PNP) Chief Kamei had a leader meeting the day following the day Prime Minister Kan assumed office, I believe, during which a decision to form a coalition was made. As I happened to be the Secretary General back then, I was also present at this meeting to witness, as I have explained, President Kan and Chief Kamei reach an agreement on creating an alternative to the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which had been set up for the previous three-party coalition to coordinate their policies. This has not been done because everyone got a little busy in preparation for the election, as I have just talked about. Another point is that members of the PNP, being one of the parties in the coalition, have naturally raised voices requesting strongly that views of the party be reflected in the coalition. It is therefore not so much about the ceiling debate, although there are, of course, voices raised on the subject of ceilings, as it is simply natural that a coalition government should need to coordinate policies. That is what I reminded Prime Minister Kan of today, and he responded by saying that it is a matter of fact and telling Policy Research Committee Chair and Minister of State Gemba to create a proper system for it. While I did have a talk with Mr. Gemba later on, this is an issue between parties and I am sure that it will accordingly be handled properly, as it should be, by the Chief, or Secretary General or Policy Research Committee Chair of our party. 例文帳に追加

それはご存じのように、菅代表、総理と亀井（国民新党）代表との話し合いでも、これは総理大臣になった次の日でしたか、党首会談をやりましたね。そして、連立を組むということに決定したわけでございますが、そのとき私はたまたま幹事長でしたから、党首会談に同席させていただいておりまして、そのときも今さっき言いましたように、それまでは3党でしたから、基本政策閣僚会議というのが3党の政策のすり合わせでございましたが、そういったものにかわるものをつくろうということを菅代表と亀井代表と合意しておりまして、そういった意味で、これは今さっき話したような選挙で少しみんなお互いに忙しくなりましたので、やっておりませんし、また我が党内のこれはいろいろ当然連立政権でございますから、党内の意見も連立政権与党として反映したいという強い当然意見がございますので、そこら辺を踏まえてシーリングということよりも、シーリングにも当然意見があると思いますが、連立政権ですから、当然政策のすり合わせというのは、これは当然のことでございますから、そのことを改めて今日菅総裁に申し上げて、菅総理からも当然のことだし、きちっと玄葉政調会長、国務大臣にそのことをきちっとシステムをつくるようにということで、玄葉さんとあと話しましたけれども、党と党との話でもございますから、当然党首、あるいは幹事長、政調会長が我が党におりますから、そこら辺できちっとやっていこうといくというふうに思っていますよ。 - 金融庁

I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations. 例文帳に追加

継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁

According to what I have heard from the administrative staff, the Incubator Bank of Japan was inspected twice before the latest inspection for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, as I just mentioned: the previous inspection was for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 and the one before that was for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. My understanding is that as at the end of the fiscal year subject to each of the previous two inspections, the Bank’s financial position was assets in excess of liabilities according to the results of these inspections. Also, my understanding is that there were no material violations of laws and regulations, inadequacies in systems or other such problems in its business operations that would lead to administrative actions as found in the latest inspection. As I have repeatedly stated, at the time of the first inspection, the Bank engaged in operations allegedly based on a new business model targeted at small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The Lehman Brothers shockwave that struck at the time may have been one of the factors. That said, then-Chairman Takeshi Kimura is an extremely capable person, who, according to what I have been told, had an authoritarian management style, so I suspect overambitious business expansions gave rise to the present outcome. 例文帳に追加

私は、事務方から聞いているところによりますと、日本振興銀行に対して、直近の21年3月期を基準日とする検査のほかに、過去、今さっき（申し上げた）ように19年３月期及び17年3月期を基準日とする前回及び前々回検査を実施しておりますが、上記検査の結果、同行は、前回及び前々回検査の検査基準日において、財務状況に関しては資産超過の状況にあったものと認識しておりますが、また業務運営に関しても、直近検査に認められたような行政処分につながる重大な法令違反や体制の不備等はなかったものと認識をしておりますが、私が何回も申しましたように、途中から無理な業容の拡大や経営陣による、率直に言えば無理な経営拡大を急ぎ過ぎたといいますか、最初は私も先週言いましたように、最初の1回目の検査のときには、非常に中小企業を対象とした新しいビジネスモデルだというようなことでやっておられたけれども、それからリーマン・ショックも重なったということもあるのかもしれませんけれども、非常に無理な業容の拡大を行い、当時の木村剛会長のもとで、非常にこの方は能力のある方で、しかし、悪く言えばワンマン経営だったというふうなことを漏れ聞いておりますけれども、業容拡大に非常に走ったということが、今日の結果を招いたのではないかなというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

I will look into the fine details later, but basically, government offices are financed by taxes, and have authority based on the Constitution and laws, as a matter of course. The Cabinet is formed as a result of election by the people; then the Prime Minister comes forth, who appoints the Minister for Financial Services according to the Constitution. As this is an extremely democratic government office, it is common sense from my point of view to properly keep or publicly disclose the minutes regarding financial regulation and supervision which have a huge impact in ordinary circumstances as a basic rule, given that an executive branch of government is basically in the public domain. From what I have heard, minutes of seven or eight meetings were disclosed to the public after it was said that this would be done initially, but information on the progress in the interim was not disclosed at all. I think this is extremely odd in view of the rules of the executive branch of government. Basically, from the viewpoint of common sense, it is odd as a government in an open democratic nation that there are no minutes, especially on such a matter that has later had a significant impact on banking regulation and supervision, given the rules of government offices. 例文帳に追加

私、より細かいことまでは後から勉強しますけれども、基本的にお役所というのは税金で成り立っておりまして、当然憲法、法律による権限がございまして、当然国民の選挙によって内閣ができて、総理大臣が出てきて、その総理大臣は憲法に従って金融担当大臣を任命するわけですから、これは極めて民主的な役所であるわけですから、私の常識としては、基本的にやはり行政というのは公のことですから、普通であれば非常に影響の大きい金融行政というのはきちんとやはり議事録を残す、あるいはきちんと皆様方に公表するということが基本的なルールだと思っておりますけれども、何か聞いたところによると、最初だけやりますといって、7、8回（議事録の公表を）やったのですか、途中の経過は一切公表しなかったという話を聞きますし、私自身、非常にこれは何か行政のルールとして大変おかしいことだなというふうに私は思っておりまして、もう一回きちんと、法律的な話等々はまた詰めて、私は法律家ではございませんけれども、基本的にごく常識的に考えて、本当に役所のルールとして、開かれた民主主義国家における政府として、ましてや非常に後から銀行行政に関して大きな影響を与えた話でございますから、私は（議事録がないという事は）いかがなものかなと思っております。 - 金融庁

(i) providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within a time specified in the regulations; and (ii) providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and (k) empowering the Commissioner to hear and determine the question whether a person is an interested person for the purpose of doing any act permitted to be done under this Act by an interested person; and (m) providing for appeals against decisions of the Commissioner made under the regulations; and (n) making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and (p) requiring persons to make statutory declarations in relation to patent applications or patents or in proceedings under this Act (not being court proceedings); and (q) making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and (r) for the control of the professional conduct of registered patent attorneys and the practice of the profession and, for that purpose, making provision for and in relation to all or any of the following: 例文帳に追加

(i) 規則に定められた期間内に，前記の指示に応じない場合は，その出願が失効する旨を規定すること，及び (ii) そのように失効した出願の回復について規定すること，及び (k) 局長に，ある者が，本法に基づき利害関係人が実行することが許可されている行為の実行の目的で利害関係人であるか否かの問題を聴聞し，決定する権限を付与すること，及び (m) 局長の決定に対し，規則に基づいてされる上訴について規定すること，及び (n) 本法に基づく訴訟に関し，所定の裁判所の実務及び手続についての及びそれに関連する規定を制定すること。これには，訴訟を開始することができる又はそれ以外のことを実行することができる期間について規定し，かつ当該期間の延長について定める規定を含む。及び(p) 特許出願又は特許又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関し，ある者に制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を要求すること，及び (q) 未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害のために宣言を行い又は行為を実行することができない者の代理として，本法に基づき宣言を行い又は行為を実行することについての及びそれに関連する規定を制定すること，及び (r) 登録特許弁護士の職業行動及び当該職業の業務を規制するために，及びその目的のために，次の事項の全部又は一部についての及びそれに関連する規定を制定すること - 特許庁

(2) Additionally, state of the art shall also be deemed to be the content of the following patent applications with earlier relevant filing dates which have been made available to the public only on or after the date relevant for the priority of the later application: 1. national applications as originally filed with the Patent Office; 2. European applications as originally filed with the competent authority where protection is sought for the Federal Republic of Germany and if the designation fee for the Federal Republic of Germany has been paid in accordance with Article 79(2) of the European Patent Convention, and if it is an application for a regular European patent based on an international application (Article 153(2) EPC) that fulfills the conditions set out in Article 153(5) of the European Patent Convention; (Article 153(2) EPC) that fulfills the conditions set out in Article 153(5) of the European Patent Convention; international applications under the Patent Cooperation Treaty as originally filed with the receiving office when the Patent Office has been designated for the application. When the earlier date relevant for priority of an application is based on a claim to priority of a prior application, the first sentence of subsection (2) shall be applicable only to the extent that the content of the application to be considered in accordance therewith does not go beyond the content of the prior application. Patent applications under no. 1 of the first sentence of subsection (2), which are the subject of an order under Section 50(1) or (4) of this Act, shall be considered to have been made available to the public upon expiry of the eighteenth month following their filing. (3) The provisions of subsections (1) and (2) shall not exclude from patentability any substance or substance mixture included in the state of the art when such is intended for use in a process cited in Section 2a(1), no. 2, and its use for such a process is not included in the state of the art. 例文帳に追加

(2) 更に，先の優先日を有する次の特許出願の内容であって，後の出願の優先日以後に初めて公衆も利用に供されたものも，技術水準とみなされる。1. ドイツ特許庁に最初になされた国内出願2. 所轄当局に最初になされた欧州出願であって，その出願においてドイツ連邦共和国における保護が求められ，かつ，その出願に関してドイツ連邦共和国についての指定手数料が欧州特許条約第 79条(2)に従って納付されているもの，及び国際出願に基づく正規の欧州特許出願(欧州特許条約第 153条(2))であって，欧州特許条約第 153条(5)に規定された条件を満たしているもの3. 受理官庁に最初になされた特許協力条約に基づく国際出願であって，その出願についてドイツ特許庁が指定官庁であるもの 出願の優先権に関する先の基準日が先の出願に係る優先権の主張に基づくものである場合は，(2)第 1文は，それに従って考慮される出願の内容が先の出願の内容を超えていない範囲に限り適用する。(2)第 1文 1.に基づく特許出願であって，それに対して第 50条(1)又は(4)に基づく命令が出されたものは，その提出後 18月が経過したときに，公衆の利用に供されたものとみなされる。 - 特許庁

For the purpose of the application of Article 29bis, in the case where another patent application or a utility model registration application as provided in Article 29bis is an International Patent Application or an International utility model registration application under Article 48ter (2) of the Utility Model Act, the term "another patent application or a utility model registration application" under Article 29bis of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "another patent application or utility model registration application (excluding a patent application in Foreign Language under Article 184quater (1) or a utility model registration application in foreign language under Article 48quater (1) of the Utility Model Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 184quater (3) of this Act or Article 48quater (3) of the Utility Model Act)," the term "the laying open of the patent application or" shall be deemed to be replaced with "laying open of the patent application," the term "published" shall be deemed to be replaced with "published or where international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 184quater (1) of this Act or Article 48quater (1) of the Utility Model Act. 例文帳に追加

第二十九条の二に規定する他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願が国際特許出願又は実用新案法第四十八条の三第二項の国際実用新案登録出願である場合における第二十九条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて」とあるのは「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願(第百八十四条の四第三項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願又は同法第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願を除く。)であつて」と、「出願公開又は」とあるのは「出願公開、」と、「発行が」とあるのは「発行又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開が」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。 - 特許庁

For the purpose of the application of Article 3bis, in the case where another application for a utility model registration or patent application as provided in Article 3bis is an International Utility Model Registration Application or an International Patent Application under Article 184ter (2) of the Patent Act, the term "another application for a utility model registration or for a patent" under Article 3bis shall be deemed to be replaced with "another application for a utility model registration or for a patent (excluding a Utility Model Registration Application in Foreign Language under Article 48quater (1) of this Act or a Patent Application in Foreign Language under Article 184quater (1) of the Patent Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 48quater (3) of this Act or Article 184quater (3) of the Patent Act," the term "the respective Article or for which" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the respective Article, for which," the term "the publication of the patent application has been effected" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the publication of the patent application has been effected, or international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the written application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 48quater (1) of this Act or Article 184quater (1) of the Patent Act. 例文帳に追加

第三条の二に規定する他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願が国際実用新案登録出願又は特許法第百八十四条の三第二項の国際特許出願である場合における第三条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願であつて」とあるのは「他の実用新案登録出願又は特許出願(第四十八条の四第三項又は特許法第百八十四条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願又は同法第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願を除く。)であつて」と、「発行又は」とあるのは「発行、」と、「若しくは出願公開」とあるのは「若しくは出願公開又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第四十八条の四第一項又は同法第百八十四条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。 - 特許庁

(3) Each member of the Advisory Board shall be an officer or employee of a Limited Partner who is nominated by the Limited Partner (or if the Limited Partner is an individual, the Limited Partner) that has an initial Capital Commitment in the amount of [__] yen or more. If there are any justifiable grounds, the General Partner may (i) refuse to appoint a person nominated by a Limited Partner as a member of the Advisory Board or (ii) dismiss any member of the Advisory Board; provided that in the case of (ii) above, the General Partner shall give to all the other members of the Advisory Board a prior written notice of its intention to dismiss such member and, if [___]% or more of such other members disagree on the dismissal within [__] days after the receipt of such notice by such other members, the member shall not be dismissed. If a member of the Advisory Board resigns, is dismissed or dies, only the Limited Partner who nominated such member may nominate a successor member. If a Limited Partner becomes a Defaulting Limited Partner, such Limited Partner will lose the right to nominate a member of the Advisory Board and the member nominated by such Limited Partner shall automatically be deemed to be dismissed. The members of the Advisory Board as of the Effective Date shall be those listed in Exhibit [__] attached hereto. 例文帳に追加

3. 諮問委員会の委員は、当初の出資約束金額が金［ ］円以上である有限責任組合員が指名する自己の役員又は従業員とする（当該有限責任組合員が個人の場合には当該有限責任組合員とする。）。無限責任組合員は、正当な理由がある場合、(ⅰ)当該有限責任組合員が指名した者が諮問委員会の委員に就任することを拒否することができ、また、(ⅱ)諮問委員会の委員を解任することができる。但し、(ⅱ)の場合には、無限責任組合員は、他の全ての諮問委員会の委員に対して解任を行う意思があることを事前に書面により通知するものとし、当該通知の到達の日から［ ］日以内に、かかる解任につき当該他の委員の［ ］分の［ ］以上の反対があった場合には、かかる解任は行われないものとする。諮問委員会の委員が辞任し若しくは解任され又は死亡した場合、当該委員を指名した有限責任組合員のみが後任の委員を指名することができる。有限責任組合員が不履行有限責任組合員となった場合、当該有限責任組合員は諮問委員会の委員を指名する権利を失い、当該有限責任組合員が指名した委員は当然に解任されたものとみなす。なお、効力発生日における諮問委員会の委員は、本契約添付別紙［ ］に記載の者とする。 - 経済産業省

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（資産流動化法第七十六条第一項（資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively. 例文帳に追加

２　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書（以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。）について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書（第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-23 (1) A holder of the Target Securities (including the Securities listed in Article 2(1)(xix) indicating the Options pertaining to said Target Securities (limited to the Options which cause a person who has exercised said Options to acquire a position as a buyer in the sales or purchase of the Target Securities pertaining to said Options) and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order as those which indicate the rights pertaining to said Target Securities) whose issuer is a juridical person which is an issuer (with regard to the Securities specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, a person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Chapter and Article 27-30-11(4), except for Article 27-30(2)) of share certificates, bonds with share option and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Securities Related to Share Certificates" in this paragraph) that are listed on a Financial Instruments Exchange (including the Securities Related to Share Certificates specified by a Cabinet Order as those of which the state of distribution can be regarded as being equivalent to said Securities) (such Securities shall be hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Share Certificates, etc." in this Chapter and Article 27-30-11(4)), and whose Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. pertaining to said Share Certificates, etc. exceeds 5% (such holder shall be hereinafter referred to as a "Large Volume Holder" in this Chapter) shall, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, submit to the Prime Minister a report that contains the matters related to the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc., matters related to the funds for the acquisition, purposes of holding and any other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance (such report shall be hereinafter referred to as "Reports of Possession of Large Volume"), within five days from the date on which such person has come to be a Large Volume Holder (Sundays and other holidays specified by a Cabinet Order shall not be included for the purpose of counting days; the same shall apply in Article 27-25(1) and Article 27-26); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where there is no increase in the total number of the Share Certificates, etc. held set forth in paragraph (4) or to any other case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の二十三　株券、新株予約権付社債券その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この項において「株券関連有価証券」という。）で金融商品取引所に上場されているもの（流通状況がこれに準ずるものとして政令で定める株券関連有価証券を含む。）の発行者である法人が発行者（内閣府令で定める有価証券については、内閣府令で定める者。第二十七条の三十第二項を除き、以下この章及び第二十七条の三十の十一第四項において同じ。）である対象有価証券（当該対象有価証券に係るオプション（当該オプションの行使により当該行使をした者が当該オプションに係る対象有価証券の売買において買主としての地位を取得するものに限る。）を表示する第二条第一項第十九号に掲げる有価証券その他の当該対象有価証券に係る権利を表示するものとして政令で定めるものを含む。以下この章及び第二十七条の三十の十一第四項において「株券等」という。）の保有者で当該株券等に係るその株券等保有割合が百分の五を超えるもの（以下この章において「大量保有者」という。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、株券等保有割合に関する事項、取得資金に関する事項、保有の目的その他の内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書（以下「大量保有報告書」という。）を大量保有者となつた日から五日（日曜日その他政令で定める休日の日数は、算入しない。第二十七条の二十五第一項及び第二十七条の二十六において同じ。）以内に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、第四項に規定する保有株券等の総数に増加がない場合その他の内閣府令で定める場合については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger is an Incorporated Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in item 2 and item 3 of Article 142 of the Act (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof); (ii) when the whole or part of the shares of stock, etc. (which means shares of stock, etc. prescribed in Article 142, item 2 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) issued for a member of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are shares of stock of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the provisions of the articles of incorporation of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; (iii) the following matters concerning the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger: (a) the contents of accounting documents, etc. pertaining to the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the contents of a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. (which means extraordinary accounting documents, etc. set forth in Article 2, paragraph 3, item 13 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) as deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in (c)) as an extraordinary closing day (which means an extraordinary closing day prescribed in Article 441, paragraph 1 of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 1 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (vi) when there were changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、吸収合併存続商品取引所が株式会社 商品取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。一法第百四十二条第二号及び三号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該定めがない場合 にあっては、当該定めがないこと）の相当性に関する事項 二吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等（法第百四十二条第二 号に規定する株式等をいう。以下同じ。）の全部又は一部が吸収合併存続株式会社商 品取引所の株式であるときは、当該吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の定款の定め 三吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る計算書類等の内容（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸 収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表の内容）ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日。ハにおいて同じ。）後の日を臨時決算日（会社法第四百 四十一条第一項に規定する臨時決算日をいう。以下同じ。）（二以上の臨時決算日 がある場合にあっては、最も遅いもの）とする臨時計算書類等（会社法施行規則 第二条第三項第十三号の臨時計算書類等をいう。以下同じ。）があるときは、当該 臨時計算書類等の内容 ハ最終事業年度の末日後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収 合併存続株式会社商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたと きは、その内容（法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併 の効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっ - 87 - ては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。）四 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。）において最終事業年 度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立 の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品 取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四 十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生ずる日までの間に新 たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末 日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。）五吸収合併が効力を生ずる日以後における吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の債務 （法第百四十四条第五項において準用する法第百二十四条第一項の規定により吸収 合併について異議を述べることができる債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。）の履 行の見込みの有無に関する事項 六法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に変更 が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger is an Incorporated Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 143, paragraph 1, item 6 and item 7 of the Act; (ii) the following matters concerning another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding clearing corporations and Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item): (a) accounting documents or an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year, and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet (in the case where the final business year does not exist, a balance sheet as on the day of the - 94 - establishment of another Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. as deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) as an extraordinary closing day (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to a clearing corporation or Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act (including the case where it is applied - 95 - mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act); (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (excluding liabilities inherited from another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger on and after the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vi) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の三第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、新設合併設立商品取引所が株式 会社商品取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。 一法第百四十三条第一項第六号及び第七号に掲げる事項についての定めの相当性に関 する事項 二他の新設合併消滅商品取引所（清算株式会社及び清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下 この号において同じ。）についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る計算書類等又は財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表と ともに作成された損益計算書（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合 併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表）の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅商 品取引所の成立の日）後の日を臨時決算日（二以上の臨時決算日がある場合にあ っては、最も遅いもの）とする臨時計算書類等があるときは、当該臨時計算書類 等の内容 ハ他の新設合併消滅商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない 場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処 分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の財産の状況に 重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の三第四項 の会員総会の日の十日前の日後新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日まで の間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終 事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。） 三 他の新設合併消滅商品取引所（清算株式会社又は清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が 会社法第四百九十二条第一項（法第七十七条第一項において準用する場合を含む。） の規定により作成した貸借対照表 四当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下この号におい て同じ。）において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、当該 新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担 その他の当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が 生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後 新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存する こととなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に 限る。） 五新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日以後における当該新設合併設立株式会 社商品取引所の債務（他の新設合併消滅商品取引所から承継する債務を除く。）の履 行の見込みに関する事項 六法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に 変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加