1016万例文収録!

「章立」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(11ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > 章立に関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

章立の部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 551



例文

(2)第73条又は第74条に言及する不法行為の申て開始以前に、登録の無効を理由に問題の商標に関して登録簿の補正を求める申請が審判機関に対して既に正式に行われて係属中であった場合、治安判事は前述の申請が処理されるまで当該告訴の手続きを中止し、原告が自己の標の登録を信頼する限りにおいて補正を求める申請の結果に準拠して被告に対する告訴を裁決する。例文帳に追加

(2) Where before the institution of a complaint of an offence referred to in section 73 or 74, any application for the rectification of the Register concerning the trademark in question on the ground of invalidity of the registration thereof has already been properly made to and is pending before the Tribunal, the Magistrate shall stay the further proceedings in the prosecution pending the disposal of the application 59 aforesaid and shall determine the charge against the accused in conformity with the result of the application for rectification in so far as the complainant relies upon the registration of his mark.  - 特許庁

後者の観点からは本第1節で述べた知的資産の活用の推進が特に求められるが、前者の観点からはEPAを通じた、関税撤廃、貿易・投資の円滑化、投資ルールや知的財産保護に関する域内制度の整備、民間と現地政府との間の紛争解決制度の確、経済協力政策、国際金融政策等により、東アジアにおけるサービス・リンク・コストを十分に低下させ、日系企業の事業活動の選択肢の幅を広げていくことが必要となる。例文帳に追加

From the latter’s perspective, promoting the use of intellectual assets mentioned in Section 1 of this chapter is especially necessary. From the former standpoint, however, there will be a need to sufficiently lower the service link cost in East Asia and expand the range of options of business activities of Japanese corporations by eliminating tariffs, facilitating trade and investment, establishing an intraregional system for investment rules and intellectual property protection, establishing a dispute settlement system between the private sector and local governments, and implementing economic cooperation policies and international finance policies through EPAs. - 経済産業省

第1でも紹介したMori and Sasaki(2007)では、2005年まで延長推計したアジア国際産業連関表を用いてアジア各国の所得がどの地域の最終需要に依存しているかを見ているが、NIEs・ASEAN等は中国等の域内経済への依存度を幾分高めている一方で、製品の加工組拠点として機能することが多い中国は、近年、米国を含めた域外経済への依存度を高めているとの結果が得られている(第1-1-12図参照)。例文帳に追加

Mori and Sasaki (2007), introduced in Chapter 1, examined final demand of which region that income of Asian countries is depending on, using Asia's international input-output table until2005. On the other hand, in recent years, in China—whichoften processes the assembly base of many products—the degree of dependence on economies of areas outside the region, including the United States, has increased (see Figure 1-1-12). - 経済産業省

第三部給付に関する規定第一日本国の給付に関する規定第十四条日本国の老齢給付及び遺族給付に係る通算1 日本国の法令による老齢給付及び遺族給付を受ける権利の取得のための要件を満たすために十分な保険期間を有しない者について、この条の規定に基づいてこれらの給付を受ける権利を確するため、日本国の実施機関は、日本国の法令による保険期間と重複しない限りにおいて、ハンガリーの法令による保険期間を考慮する 。例文帳に追加

10PART IIIPROVISIONS CONCERNING BENEFITSChapter 1Provisions concerning Japanese BenefitsArticle 14Totalization for Japanese Old-age Benefitsand Survivors’ Benefits1 . Where a person does not have sufficient periods ofcoverage to fulfill the requirement for entitlement to oldagebenefits and survivorsbenefits under the legislationof Japan, the competent institution of Japan shall takeinto account, for the purpose of establishing entitlementto those benefits under this Article, the periods ofcoverage under the legislation of Hungary insofar as theydo not coincide with the periods of coverage under thelegislation of Japan . - 厚生労働省

例文

第二ハンガリーの給付に関する規定第十八条通算1 ハンガリーの法令が給付を受ける権利を確するために一定の保険期間を満たすことを要件として定めている場合において、完全給付のための十分な保険期間を有しない者については、ハンガリーの実施機関は、日本国の法令による保険期間とハンガリーの法令による保険期間とが重複しないことを条件として、18日本国の法令による保険期間をハンガリーの法令による保険期間として考慮する 。例文帳に追加

Chapter 2Provisions concerning Hungarian BenefitsArticle 18Totalization1 . Where the legislation of Hungary requires to fulfillcertain periods of coverage for establishing entitlement toa benefit and a person does not have sufficient periods ofcoverage for a full benefit, the competent institution ofHungary shall take into account the periods of coveragecompleted under the legislation of Japan as if theseperiods of coverage were completed under legislation ofHungary, provided that such periods of coverage do notoverlap . - 厚生労働省


例文

第百三十二条の四 裁判所は、予告通知者又は前条第一項の返答をした被予告通知者の申てにより、当該予告通知に係る訴えが提起された場合の証に必要であることが明らかな証拠となるべきものについて、申人がこれを自ら収集することが困難であると認められるときは、その予告通知又は返答の相手方(以下このにおいて単に「相手方」という。)の意見を聴いて、訴えの提起前に、その収集に係る次に掲げる処分をすることができる。ただし、その収集に要すべき時間又は嘱託を受けるべき者の負担が不相当なものとなることその他の事情により、相当でないと認めるときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 132-4 (1) When a petition is filed by an advance noticer or a recipient of advance notice who made a response set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article and it is found that the petitioner has difficulty collecting by him/herself any material as evidence that would be obviously necessary for showing proof should the action pertaining to the advance notice actually be filed, the court, before the filing of the action, may make any of the following dispositions pertaining to such collection of evidence, after hearing opinions of the party to whom the advance notice has been given or the response has been made (hereinafter simply referred to as the "opposite party" in this Chapter); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the court finds it inappropriate to do so on the grounds that the time required for the collection or the burden borne by a person to be commissioned for the collection would be unreasonable:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十一条の二 第四十条(退職年金等積金中間申告書の記載事項)及び第四十一条(退職年金等積金確定申告書の記載事項)の規定は、法第百四十五条の五(申告及び納付)において準用する法第二編第二第三節(内国法人の退職年金等積金に対する法人税の申告及び納付)の規定を適用する場合について準用する。この場合において、第四十条第一項第二号及び第四十一条第一項第二号中「代表者の氏名」とあるのは、「代表者の氏名及び国内において行う事業又は国内にある資産の経営又は管理の責任者の氏名」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 61-2 The provisions of Article 40 (Matters to Be Entered in Interim Return Forms for Retirement Pension Funds) and Article 41 (Matters to Be Entered in Final Return Forms for Retirement Pension Funds) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case of applying the provisions of Part II, Chapter II, Section 3 (Filing of Returns and Payment of a Domestic Corporation's Corporation Tax on Retirement Pension Funds) of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 145-5 (Filing of Returns and Payment) of the Act. In this case, the term "The name of its representative" in Article 40, paragraph (1), item (ii) and Article 41, paragraph (1), item (ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "The name of its representative and the name of the person responsible for the operation or management of its business in Japan or its assets in Japan."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) 有価約因の有無を問わず,国内標に関する所有の個人的権利若しくは財産権又は保証の権利を設定し,変更し又は移転する生存者間の証書 (ii) (i)にいう権利に関する分割の証書,会社の証書,贈与財産の証書及び放棄の証書 (iii) (ii)にいう証書が予め記録されていない場合には,その証書の存在を確する判決記録された証書の無効,失効,取消,撤廃又は廃止を確する判決は,それらが関係する証書の記録の余白に記載しなければならない。更に,本条にいう判決を受けることを目的とした法的請求を記録することができる。この場合,判決の記録の効力は,その法的請求の記録の日に遡及して生ずる。 (iv) 適法な遺言書を残さない相続を証する遺言書及び証書並びにこれらに関連する判決第50条例文帳に追加

(1) deeds inter vivos, whether for valuable consideration or not, constituting, modifying or transferring personal or property rights of possession or guarantee rights in respect of national marks; (2)deeds of partition, company deeds, deed of settlement, deeds of release relative to the rights referred to in the preceding item; (3) judgments establishing the existence of the acts referred to in the preceding items, where such acts have not been previously registered. Judgments establishing the invalidity, annulment, termination, rescission, revocation of a registered act must be noted in the margin of the registration of the act to which they refer. Furthermore, judicial claims to obtain the judgments referred to in this Article may be registered; in such case, the effects of the registration of the judgment shall be retroactive to the date of registration of the judicial claim; (4) wills and acts proving the intestate succession and the judgments relative thereto. - 特許庁

対内直接投資の規模を拡大するための取組としては、第3第2節で見たように、①地域を含めた我が国の地優位性の活用と対外的な情報発信、②規制の見直し等を通じた投資環境の一層の整備、③M&Aに関する法整備が必要である。①については、単に事業活動コストを引き下げるのではなく、優れた人材、整備された情報インフラ等をいかした地優位性を確していくことが重要である。②については、サービス業において実質的な参入障壁となっているような規制が一部残存しており、これらの見直しによって、特に医療・福祉サービス分野、公共サービス分野への外資企業の新規参入が期待される。また、③については、M&Aに関する阻害要因の克服などにより、クロスボーダーM&Aの加速が期待される。例文帳に追加

As reviewed in Section 2, Chapter III, arrangement of the following environment is required in Japan as a part of the measures to expand the scale of internal direct investments: (i) utilization of location advantages including local areas and the dissemination of investment information abroad; (ii) further improvement of Japan’s investment environment by, for example, reviewing regulations; and (iii) development of legal system for M&A. As for measures to address (i), establishing a location advantage is important by making the use of superior human resources and well-developed information infrastructure rather than simply reducing business activity costs. As for (ii) regulations that hinder market entry in the service business still remain, therefore, reexamination of such regulations are expected to help foreign companies newly enter into particular fields, such as medicine and welfare, education, and human resources business,. Lastly, for (iii), cross-border M&As are expected to accelerate by overcoming hindering factors. - 経済産業省

例文

2 特許法第六条から第九条まで、第十一条から第十六条まで、第十七条第三項及び第四項、第十八条から第二十四条まで並びに第百九十四条(手続)の規定は、商標登録出願、防護標登録出願、請求その他商標登録又は防護標登録に関する手続に準用する。この場合において、同法第六条第一項第一号中「出願審査の請求」とあるのは「登録異議の申て」と、同法第七条第四項中「相手方が請求した審判又は再審」とあるのは「その商標権若しくは防護標登録に基づく権利に係る登録異議の申て又は相手方が請求した審判若しくは再審」と、同法第九条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項若しくは第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第十四条中「拒絶査定不服審判」とあるのは「商標法第四十四条第一項又は第四十五条第一項の審判」と、同法第十七条第三項中「二 手続がこの法律又はこの法律に基づく命令で定める方式に違反しているとき。」とあるのは「二 手続がこの法律又はこの法律に基づく命令で定める方式に違反しているとき。二の二 手続について商標法第四十条第二項の規定による登録料又は同法第四十一条の二第二項の規定により更新登録の申請と同時に納付すべき登録料(商標法第四十三条第一項又は第二項の規定により納付すべき割増登録料を含む。)を納付しないとき。」と、同法第十八条の二第一項中「できないもの」とあるのは「できないもの(商標法第五条の二第一項各号(同法第六十八条第一項において準用する場合を含む。)に該当するものを除く。)」と、同法第二十三条第一項及び第二十四条中「審判」とあるのは「登録異議の申てについての審理及び決定、審判」と、同法第百九十四条第一項中「審判」とあるのは「登録異議の申て、審判」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) Articles 6 to 9, 11 to 16, 17(3) and 17(4), 18 to 24 and 194 (procedures) of the Patent Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for trademark registration, an application for defensive mark registration, any petitions or any other procedures pertaining to trademark registration or defensive mark registration. In this case, the portion "file a request for the examination of an application" in Article 6(1)(i) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "file an opposition to registration," the portion "an adverse party files a petition for a trial or retrial" in Article 7(4) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an opposition to registration in relation to the trademark right or the right based on defensive mark registration is filed or a trial or retrial is filed by an adverse party," the portion "trial against an examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 9 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," the portion "trial against an examiner's decision of refusal" in Article 14 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trial under Article 44(1) or 45(1) of the Trademark Act," the portion "(ii) where the procedures do not comply with the formal requirements provided by this Act or an order thereunder" in Article 17(3) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "(ii) where the procedures do not comply with the formal requirements provided by this Act or an order thereunder; (ii)-2 where, pertaining to the procedures, the registration fee under Article 40(2) of the Trademark Act or the registration fee (including the registration surcharge due and payable pursuant to Article 43(1) or 43(2) of the Trademark Act) payable at the time of application for registration of renewal pursuant to Article 41-2(2) of the Trademark Act is not paid," the portion "not amendable" in Article 18-2(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "not amendable (except cases filing under any of the items in Article 5-2(1) of the Trademark Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 68(1) of the Trademark Act))," the term "trial" in Article 23(1) and 24 of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "examination and decision on an opposition to registration, trial" and the term "trial" in Article 194(1) of the Patent Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "opposition to registration, trial."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第二条 会社(株式会社及び合同会社をいう。以下同じ。)は、会社法第五編第三及び第五の規定による分割(吸収分割又は新設分割をいう。以下同じ。)をするときは、次に掲げる労働者に対し、通知期限日までに、当該分割に関し、当該会社が当該労働者との間で締結している労働契約を当該分割に係る承継会社等(吸収分割にあっては同法第七百五十七条に規定する吸収分割承継会社、新設分割にあっては同法第七百六十三条に規定する新設分割設会社をいう。以下同じ。)が承継する旨の分割契約等(吸収分割にあっては吸収分割契約(同法第七百五十七条の吸収分割契約をいう。以下同じ。)、新設分割にあっては新設分割計画(同法第七百六十二条第一項の新設分割計画をいう。以下同じ。)をいう。以下同じ。)における定めの有無、第四条第三項に規定する異議申出期限日その他厚生労働省令で定める事項を書面により通知しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 2 (1) When conducting a split (hereinafter referred to as "absorption-type split " or "incorporation-type split "; the same shall apply hereinafter) pursuant to the provisions of Part 5, Chapters III and V of the Companies Act, a company (this shall mean a stock company or a limited liability company; the same shall apply hereinafter) shall, on or before the notice deadline date notify the following workers in writing of whether or not there are any provisions in the split contract, etc. (absorption-type split contract (absorption-type split contract as provided in Article 757 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), in the cases of absorption-type split; and incorporation-type split plan (incorporation-type split plan as provided in Article 762, paragraph 1 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), in the cases of incorporation-type split; the same shall apply hereinafter) concerned to the effect that the successor company, etc. (successor company in absorption-type split , in the cases of absorption- type split provided in Article 757 of the Act; and incorporated company in incorporation-type split , in the cases of incorporation-type split provided in Article 763 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) will succeed to the labor contracts that the company and workers concerned have entered into, and of the deadline date for filing an objection provided in Article 4, paragraph 3, and any other matters provided by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百十一条 裁判所は、債権届出期間の経過後一般調査期間の開始前において、再生債務者等の申てがあったときは、簡易再生の決定(再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ない旨の決定をいう。以下同じ。)をする。この場合において、再生債務者等の申ては、届出再生債権者の総債権について裁判所が評価した額の五分の三以上に当たる債権を有する届出再生債権者が、書面により、再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案について同意し、かつ、第四第三節に定める再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ないことについて同意している場合に限り、することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 211 (1) If, after the period for filing proofs of claims has expired and before the ordinary period for investigation has started, a petition is filed by the rehabilitation debtor, etc., the court shall make an order of simplified rehabilitation (meaning an order to the effect that proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims shall not be performed; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the rehabilitation debtor, etc. may file a petition only where a holder of filed rehabilitation claim who holds a claim that accounts for three-fifths or more of the value, as determined by the court, of total claims held by holders of filed rehabilitation claims has, in writing, consented to a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. and also consented to not performing the proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims provided for in Chapter IV, Section 3.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百十七条 裁判所は、債権届出期間の経過後一般調査期間の開始前において、再生債務者等の申てがあったときは、同意再生の決定(再生債権の調査及び確定の手続並びに再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案の決議を経ない旨の決定をいう。以下同じ。)をする。この場合において、再生債務者等の申ては、すべての届出再生債権者が、書面により、再生債務者等が提出した再生計画案について同意し、かつ、第四第三節に定める再生債権の調査及び確定の手続を経ないことについて同意している場合に限り、することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 217 (1) If, after the period for filing proofs of claims has expired but before the ordinary period for investigation has started, a petition is filed by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. the court shall make an order of consensual rehabilitation (meaning an order to the effect that proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims and a procedure for adopting a resolution on a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. shall not be performed; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the rehabilitation debtor, etc. may file a petition only where all holders of filed rehabilitation claims have, in writing, consented to a proposed rehabilitation plan submitted by the rehabilitation debtor, etc. and also consented to not performing the proceedings for investigation and determination of rehabilitation claims provided for in Chapter IV, Section 3.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十八条 委託者保護会員制法人(新法第二百六十九条第四項に規定する委託者保護会員制法人をいう。以下同じ。)の発起人又は会員になろうとする者(附則第十四条第二項の規定により新法第百九十条から第百九十四条までの規定の例による許可を受けた者に限る。)は、施行日前においても、新法第六第二節の規定の例により、定款の作成、創総会の開催その他委託者保護会員制法人の設に必要な行為及び委託者保護会員制法人への加入に必要な行為をすることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 18 (1) A person (limited to a person who has obtained a license in accordance with the provisions of Articles 190 to 194 inclusive of the New Act, pursuant to the provisions of Article 14, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions) who intends to become a founder or a member of a Consignor Protection Membership Corporation (which refers to a Consignor Protection Membership Corporation prescribed in Article 269, paragraph (4) of the New Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) may create articles of incorporation, hold an organizational meeting, and carry out other acts necessary for establishing the Consignor Protection Membership Corporation and any acts necessary for joining the Consignor Protection Membership Corporation, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter VI, Section 2 of the New Act, even prior to the Effective Date.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

その文の中にも、総理大臣談話として、後で発表されると思いますが、昨年6月の内閣発足以来、国民新党との連政権の下ということがございましたので、閣僚懇で私から国民新党として、4年前に私が参議院に通ったときに、「民主党・新緑風会・国民新党・日本」という統一会派を組ませて頂きまして、野党の時代、そして2年前の総選挙で本当に歴史的な政権交代を民主党と国民新党、一緒になって経験したことに、政治家としても貴重な経験をさせて頂いて、山あり谷ありであったけれども、しっかり支えていったこと、民主党にも色々お力添えを頂いたり、色々あったわけでございますから、連政党(である国民新党)の副代表としてきちっと民主党の総裁以下、大臣にお礼を申し上げておきました。例文帳に追加

As will be mentioned in a statement to be issued by the Prime Minister, we have tackled various policy challenges since the inauguration of the cabinet in June last year in the governing coalition of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and the People's New Party.At the informal meeting of cabinet ministers, I, as deputy leader of the People's New Party, expressed my gratitude to the DPJ's President and my cabinet colleagues for our collaboration.Four years ago, when I won a seat in the House of Councillors, I formed an opposition parliamentary group that brought together the DPJ, Shin-Ryokufukai, the People's New Party and New Party Nippon. And then, in a general election that was held two years ago, the DPJ and the People's New Party worked together to achieve a historic change of government.I have had valuable experiences as a politician, and there were ups and downs, but our party and the DPJ have supported each other.  - 金融庁

(4) 利害関係人は商標が登録された日から 5年間または要求提出日前 5年以内に利用されていない商標登録の取消を特許庁に申してることができる。申しては、登録証で指定された商品のすべてまたは一部に対して行うことができ、審判委員会によって受理日から 6月以内に審理がされるものとする。 登録された商品またはその包装における商標の使用は、商標利用とみなされるものとする。宣伝広告、発行物、正式社用便箋、標での商標使用、またはカザフスタン共和国内で開催される展示会での商品展示に関連する商標使用は商標利用であるとみなすことができる。 利用のない商標の登録を取り消すかどうかの決定は、商標利用の不履行は商標権者には制御不能の原因によるものであるということを示す、商標権者の提出した証拠を考慮して行うものとする。例文帳に追加

(4) Any interested party may file with Kazpatent a request for the cancellation of the registration of the trademark where the trademark has not been exploited in the five years following the date of registration thereof or in the five years preceding the filing date of the request. The request may relate to all or a part of goods specified in the certificate and shall be considered by the Board of Appeal within six months following the date of its receipt. The use of a trademark on goods for which it is registered and (or) on the packaging thereof shall be deemed to constitute exploitation of the trademark. The use of the trademark in advertising, in printed publications, on official headed paper, on signs or in connection with the display of goods at exhibitions that take place in the Republic of Kazakhstan may be considered as the exploitation thereof. The decision on whether or not to cancel the registration of the trademark for want of exploitation may be subject to the consideration of proof submitted by the owner to show that the failure to exploit the trademark is due to factors beyond his control. - 特許庁

(2) 次の者は違反行為の責めを負う。 (a) 登録商標ではない標について,それが登録商標である旨の表示を行う者 (b) 1つの登録商標として独して登録された部分ではない,登録商標の一部分について,それが独して登録されている旨の表示を行う者,又は (c) 登録商標が登録されていない商品について登録商標が登録されている旨の表示を行う者,又は (d) その商標の登録が,登録簿に登録された条件又は制約を考慮し,その登録でその権利が付与されない状況において,商標を排他的に使用する権利を与える旨の表示を行う者 刑罰は、K200.00以下の罰金。例文帳に追加

(2) A person who makes a representation to the effect - (a) with respect to a mark, not being a registered trade mark - that it is registered trade mark; or (b) with respect to a part of a registered trade mark, not being a part separately registered as a trade mark - that it is so registered; or (c) that a registered trade mark is registered in respect of goods in respect of which it is not registered; or (d) that the registration of a trade mark gives a right to the exclusive use of the trade mark in circumstances in which, having regard to conditions or limitations entered on the Register, the registration does not give that right, is guilty of an offence. Penalty: A fine not exceeding K200.00. - 特許庁

1 委託者保護会員制法人(新法第二百六十九条第四項に規定する委託者保護会員制法人をいう。以下同じ。)の発起人又は会員になろうとする者(附則第十四条第二項の規定により新法第百九十条から第百九十四条までの規定の例による許可を受けた者に限る。)は、施行日前においても、新法第六第二節の規定の例により、定款の作成、創総会の開催その他委託者保護会員制法人の設に必要な行為及び委託者保護会員制法人への加入に必要な行為をすることができる。例文帳に追加

(1) A person (limited to a person who has obtained a license in accordance with the provisions of Articles 190 to 194 inclusive of the New Act, pursuant to the provisions of Article 14, paragraph 2 of the Supplementary Provisions) who intends to become a founder or a member of a Consignor Protection Membership Corporation (which refers to a Consignor Protection Membership Corporation prescribed in Article 269, paragraph 4 of the New Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) may create articles of incorporation, hold an organizational general meeting, and carry out other acts necessary for establishing the Consignor Protection Membership Corporation and any acts necessary for joining the Consignor Protection Membership Corporation, in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 6, Section 2 of the New Act, even prior to the Effective Date.  - 経済産業省

第百八十一条の二 会社法第二編第九第一節第四款(債務の弁済等)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百九十九条第一項(債権者に対する公告等)中「第四百七十五条各号」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条各号」と、同法第五百条第二項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 181-2 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1, Subsection 4 (Performance of Obligations), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "the items of Article 475" in Article 499, paragraph (1) (Public Notices to Creditors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180, item (i) or (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "court" in Article 500, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Prime Minister"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一 第七条の四第一項の規定による判断の基準となるべき事項の策定、同条第二項に規定する当該事項の改定、第七条の五に規定する指導及び助言、第七条の六の規定による報告の受理、第七条の七第一項に規定する勧告、同条第二項の規定による公表並びに同条第三項の規定による命令並びに第三十九条の規定による報告の徴収及び第四十条の規定による入検査(第四の規定を施行するために行うものに限る。)に関する事項 当該指定容器包装利用事業者が容器包装を用いて行う事業を所管する大臣例文帳に追加

(i) Matters related to formulation of the standards of judgment pursuant to the provision of Article 7-4, paragraph 1, revision of the standards prescribed in paragraph 2 of the same article, guidance and advice prescribed in Article 7-5, acceptance of report pursuant to the provision of Article 7-6, recommendation prescribed in Article 7-7, paragraph 1, publication pursuant to the provision of paragraph 2 of the same article and order pursuant to paragraph 3 of the same article, and collection of report pursuant to the provision of Article 39 and on-site inspection pursuant to the provision of Article 40: Minister who has jurisdiction over business conducted by the Designated Container/Packaging User by using containers and packaging  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百三十二条の三 予告通知を受けた者(以下このにおいて「被予告通知者」という。)は、予告通知者に対し、その予告通知の書面に記載された前条第三項の請求の要旨及び紛争の要点に対する答弁の要旨を記載した書面でその予告通知に対する返答をしたときは、予告通知者に対し、その予告通知がされた日から四月以内に限り、訴えの提起前に、訴えを提起された場合の主張又は証を準備するために必要であることが明らかな事項について、相当の期間を定めて、書面で回答するよう、書面で照会をすることができる。この場合においては、同条第一項ただし書及び同条第二項の規定を準用する。例文帳に追加

Article 132-3 (1) When a person who has received the advance notice (hereinafter referred to as a "recipient of advance notice" in this Chapter) has made a response to the advance notice by providing the advance noticer with a document stating the gist of his/her answers regarding the gist of the claim and the points of the dispute set forth in paragraph (3) of the preceding Article that are stated in the document of the advance notice, the recipient of advance notice, within four months after the day on which the advance notice has been given, may specify a reasonable period and make an inquiry by means of a document to the advance noticer in order to request him/her to make a response by means of a document, before the filing of the action, with regard to the matters that would be obviously necessary for preparing allegations or proof should the action actually be filed. In this case, the provisions of the proviso to paragraph (1) of said Article and paragraph (2) of said Article shall apply mutatis mutandis.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三百二十九条 事業者は、電気機械器具の充電部分(電熱器の発熱体の部分、抵抗溶接機の電極の部分等電気機械器具の使用の目的により露出することがやむを得ない充電部分を除く。)で、労働者が作業中又は通行の際に、接触(導電体を介する接触を含む。以下このにおいて同じ。)し、又は接近することにより感電の危険を生ずるおそれのあるものについては、感電を防止するための囲い又は絶縁覆いを設けなければならない。ただし、配電盤室、変電室等区画された場所で、事業者が第三十六条第四号の業務に就いている者(以下「電気取扱者」という。)以外の者の入りを禁止したところに設置し、又は電柱上、塔上等隔離された場所で、電気取扱者以外の者が接近するおそれのないところに設置する電気機械器具については、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 329 The employer shall, as regards live parts of electric machine and appliance (excluding the portions of electric machine and appliance which are inevitable to be exposed for the purpose of their use such as heating unit of electric heaters, the welding rods of resistance welding machines) which is liable to cause danger of electric shocks to workers when they contact (including contact via an electric conductor; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter) or come in proximity to these parts during work or passage, install enclosures or insulating covers in order to prevent electric shocks. However, this shall not apply to the electric machine and appliance which are installed in an enclosed place such as a switchboard room and substation room where the employer prohibited persons other than those who are engaged in the work set forth in item (iv) of Article 36 (hereinafter referred to as "electrician") from entering, or installed on detached place such as a pole and a tower where there is no possibility that persons other than electrician will come in proximity to them.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

7 国土交通大臣は、第四(第五十四条第一項及び第四項、第一節第二款、第六十八条第一項及び第四項並びに第七十一条第一項及び第五項を除く。)の規定の施行に必要な限度において、政令で定めるところにより、特定貨物輸送事業者、特定旅客輸送事業者若しくは特定航空輸送事業者(以下この項において単に「特定輸送事業者」という。)に対し、貨物若しくは旅客の輸送に係る業務の状況に関し報告させ、又はその職員に、特定輸送事業者の事務所その他の事業場、輸送用機械器具の所在する場所若しくは輸送用機械器具にち入り、輸送用機械器具、帳簿、書類その他の物件を検査させることができる。例文帳に追加

(7) To the extent necessary for the enforcement of Chapter IV (excluding Article 54, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4), Section 1, Subsection 2, Article 68, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4), and Article 71, paragraph (1) and paragraph (5)), the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism may, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, cause specified freight carriers, specified passenger carriers or specified air carriers (hereinafter simply referred to as "specified carriers" in this paragraph) to report the status of their business concerning freight or passenger transportation, or cause officials of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism to enter specified carriers' offices or other workplaces, the sites where their transportation machinery and equipment are located, or the transportation machinery and equipment and inspect the transportation machinery and equipment, books, documents and other objects.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

非識別的商標の登録可能性非識別的商標は登録することができない局長は,次に掲げるものを登録してはならない。商標でない標識識別性を有さない商標商標(証明標である商標を除く)であって,商品又はサービスの種類,品質,用途,価格,原産地,商品生産若しくはサービス提供の時期,又はその他の特徴を指定するために業として用いられる標識又は表示のみによって構成されているもの商標であって,現行の言語において又は善意の確した商慣行において,慣習的になっている標識又は表示のみによって構成されているもの例文帳に追加

Registrability of non-distinctive trademarks Non-distinctive trade mark not registrable The Commissioner must not register a sign that is not a trade mark: a trade mark that has no distinctive character: a trade mark (unless the trade mark is a certification trade mark) that consists only of signs or indications that may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, time of production of goods or of rendering of services, or other characteristics of goods or services: a trade mark that consists only of signs or indications that have become customary in the current language or in the bona fide and established practices of trade. - 特許庁

4 第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二第二節(第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。)(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定は、発起人、設時取締役又は設時監査役の責任を追及する訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き株式を有する株主(第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。)」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員(資産流動化法第二十六条に規定する優先出資社員をいう。)」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 97(3) and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5), and Article 851) (Action for Pursing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action pursuing the liability of an incorporator, a Director at Incorporation, or a Company Auditor at Incorporation. In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation as set forth in Article 189(2)) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member (meaning a preferred equity member as defined in Article 26 of the Asset Securitization Act) who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3 主務大臣は、第三第一節(第七条第一項及び第五項、第七条の二第一項、第七条の三第一項、第七条の四第一項及び第三項、第八条第一項、第十三条第一項、第十七条第一項及び第三項並びに第十九条第一項及び第四項を除く。)の規定の施行に必要な限度において、政令で定めるところにより、特定事業者又は特定連鎖化事業者に対し、その設置している工場等(特定連鎖化事業者にあつては、当該特定連鎖化事業者が行う連鎖化事業の加盟者が設置している当該連鎖化事業に係る工場等を含む。)における業務の状況に関し報告させ、又はその職員に、当該工場等にち入り、エネルギーを消費する設備、帳簿、書類その他の物件を検査させることができる。ただし、当該特定連鎖化事業者が行う連鎖化事業の加盟者が設置している当該連鎖化事業に係る工場等にち入る場合においては、あらかじめ、当該加盟者の承諾を得なければならない。例文帳に追加

(3) To the extent necessary for the enforcement of Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 7, paragraphs (1) and (5), Article 7-2, paragraph (1), Article 7-3, paragraph (1), Article 7-4, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 8, paragraph (1), Article 13, paragraph (1), Article 17, paragraphs (1) and (3) and Article 19, paragraphs (1) and (4)), the competent minister may, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, cause specified business operators or specified chain business operators to report the status of their business in their factories, etc. (or, for specified chain Business Operators, Factories, etc. including those pertaining to said Chain Business which belong to a franchisee of the chain business conducted by said specified chain business operators), or cause officials of the competent ministry to enter the factories, etc. and inspect energy-consuming facilities, books, documents and other objects; provided, however, that when the officials enter said factories, etc. pertaining to said chain business which belong to a franchisee of the chain business conducted by said specified chain business operator, they shall obtain the consent of said franchisee in advance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4 会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで、第二編第九第二節第二款から第十款まで(第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百三十六条第三項を除く。)、第七編第二第四節並びに第三第一節(第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。)及び第三節(第八百七十九条、第八百八十条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条第二項を除く。)並びに第九百三十八条(第六項を除く。)の規定は、清算投資法人の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十一条中「第四百九十二条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第三項」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式(自己株式を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の数の株式を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の三(これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の投資口を六箇月(これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する投資主」と、同法第五百二十三条及び第五百二十六条第一項中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十四条中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十五条第一項中「清算人は」とあるのは「清算執行人は」と、「清算人代理」とあるのは「清算執行人代理」と、同法第五百三十条第一項中「清算人及び監査役並びに支配人その他の使用人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人並びに一般事務受託者、資産運用会社及び資産保管会社」と、同法第五百四十二条第一項中「設時取締役、設時監査役、第四百二十三条第一項に規定する役員等又は清算人」とあるのは「設時執行役員、設時監督役員、投資法人法第百十五条の六第一項に規定する役員等、清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百六十二条中「第四百九十二条第一項に規定する清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人」と、「同項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第一項」と、同法第九百三十八条第一項中「本店(第三号に掲げる場合であって特別清算の結了により特別清算終結の決定がされたときにあっては、本店及び支店)」とあるのは「本店」と、同条第二項第一号中「第四百七十九条第四項において準用する第三百四十六条第二項又は第四百八十三条第六項において準用する第三百五十一条第二項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十三条第二項において読み替えて準用する投資法人法第百八条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 512 through Article 518, the provisions of Subsection 2 through Subsection 10 of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) through Article 536, paragraph (3)), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4, the provisions of Chapter III, Section 1 of that Part (excluding Article 870, paragraph (2) through paragraph (5) and Article 870 through Article 874), the provisions of Section 3 of that Chapter (excluding Article 879, Article 880, Article 882, paragraph (2), and Article 896, paragraph (2)), and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation. In this case, the term "paragraph (3) of Article 492" in Article 521 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 155, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Investors who have held, for a consecutive period of the past six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity," the term "liquidators" in Article 523 and Article 526, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors," the term "liquidators" in Article 524 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) or liquidation supervisors," the terms "liquidators" and "liquidators' agent" in Article 525, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidators" and "executive liquidators' agent" respectively, the phrase "liquidators and Company Auditors of a Liquidating Stock Company and employees, including managers," in Article 530, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation as well as the Administrative Agent, Asset Management Company, and Asset Custody Company," the phrase "directors upon incorporation, Company Auditors upon incorporation, Qualified Officers provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 423 or liquidators" in Article 542, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment, Supervisory Officers at Establishment, Officers, etc. specified in Article 115-6, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act, executive liquidator(s), or liquidation supervisors," the phrases "the liquidators provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 492" and "that paragraph" in Article 562 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the executive liquidator(s)" and "Article 155, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "the head office (or, in cases set forth in item (iii), if a ruling to conclude special liquidation is made due to completion of a special liquidation, the head office and branch office(s))" in Article 938, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office," the phrase "Article 351(2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 346(2) or Article 483(6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)" in Article 938, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 108, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 153, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十条 被害者(配偶者からの身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫(被害者の生命又は身体に対し害を加える旨を告知してする脅迫をいう。以下このにおいて同じ。)を受けた者に限る。以下このにおいて同じ。)が、配偶者からの身体に対する暴力を受けた者である場合にあっては配偶者からの更なる身体に対する暴力(配偶者からの身体に対する暴力を受けた後に、被害者が離婚をし、又はその婚姻が取り消された場合にあっては、当該配偶者であった者から引き続き受ける身体に対する暴力。第十二条第一項第二号において同じ。)により、配偶者からの生命等に対する脅迫を受けた者である場合にあっては配偶者から受ける身体に対する暴力(配偶者からの生命等に対する脅迫を受けた後に、被害者が離婚をし、又はその婚姻が取り消された場合にあっては、当該配偶者であった者から引き続き受ける身体に対する暴力。同号において同じ。)により、その生命又は身体に重大な危害を受けるおそれが大きいときは、裁判所は、被害者の申てにより、その生命又は身体に危害が加えられることを防止するため、当該配偶者(配偶者からの身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫を受けた後に、被害者が離婚をし、又はその婚姻が取り消された場合にあっては、当該配偶者であった者。以下この条、同項第三号及び第四号並びに第十八条第一項において同じ。)に対し、次の各号に掲げる事項を命ずるものとする。ただし、第二号に掲げる事項については、申ての時において被害者及び当該配偶者が生活の本拠を共にする場合に限る。例文帳に追加

Article 10 (1) In cases where a victim (limited to a victim who has been subjected to bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. (intimidation through announcing an intention to inflict harm on the life or body of a victim; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter) by a spouse; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter) who has been subjected to bodily harm by a spouse is highly likely to receive serious harm on his/her life or body due to renewed bodily harm by the spouse (including cases where subsequent to being subjected to bodily harm by the spouse, the victim has obtained a divorce or annulment of the marriage but continues to be subjected to bodily harm by the former spouse; the same shall apply in Article 12, paragraph 1, item 2) or where a victim who has been subjected to life-threatening intimidation, etc. by a spouse is highly likely to receive serious harm on his/her life or body due to bodily harm by the spouse (including cases where subsequent to being subjected to life-threatening intimidation, etc. by the spouse, the victim has obtained a divorce or annulment of the marriage but continues to be subjected to bodily harm by the former spouse; the same shall apply in the same item), the court shall, upon a petition from the victim, find against the spouse (including the former spouse in cases where subsequent to being subjected to bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. by the spouse, the victim has obtained a divorce or annulment of the marriage; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 12, paragraph 1, items 3 and 4, and Article 18, paragraph 1) and order the matters listed below the following items in order to prevent harm to the victim's life or body. The matters listed in item 2, however, shall only be applied to cases where the victim and the spouse in question are still living together at the time of the petition:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 第四の規定の適用を受ける特定独行政法人等の労働関係に関する法律(昭和二十三年法律第二百五十七号)第二条第四号の職員に対する同法第三十七条第一項第一号の規定の適用については、同号中「第三条第二項から第四項まで、第三条の二」とあるのは「第三条第二項から第四項まで(職務に係る倫理の保持に関する事務を除く。)」と、「第十七条、第十七条の二」とあるのは「第十七条(職員の職務に係る倫理の保持に関して行われるものを除く。)」と、「第八十四条第二項、第八十四条の二」とあるのは「第八十四条第二項(国家公務員倫理法(平成十一年法律第百二十九号)又はこれに基づく命令(同法第五条第三項の規定に基づく訓令及び同条第四項の規定に基づく規則を含む。)に違反する行為に関して行われるものを除く。)」と、「第百条第四項」とあるのは「第百条第四項(第十七条の二の規定により権限の委任を受けた国家公務員倫理審査会が行う調査に係るものを除く。)」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) In the application of the provision of item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 37 of the Act on Labor Relationship of Specified Incorporated Administrative Agency, etc. (Act No. 257 of 1948) to the officials set forth in item 4 of Article 2 of the same Act to whom the provisions of Chapter IV of this Act are applied, the term "from paragraph 2 of Article 3 to paragraph 4 of Article 3-2," the term "Article 17, Article 17-2," the term "paragraph 2 of Article 84, Article 84-2" and the term "paragraph 4 of Article 100" in item 1 of paragraph 1 of Article 37 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "from paragraph 2 to paragraph 4 of Article 3 (excluding matters concerning the maintenance of ethics pertaining to the duties of officials)," "Article 17 (excluding matters concerning the maintenance of ethics pertaining to the duties of officials)," "paragraph 2 of Article 84 (excluding what is conducted concerning acts that violate the National Public Service Ethics Act (Act No. 129 of 1999) or orders pursuant to this Act (including official directives pursuant to the provision of paragraph 3 of Article 5 of the same Act and regulations pursuant to the provision of paragraph 4 of the same Article))," and "paragraph 4 of Article 100 (excluding what is pertaining to investigations conducted by the National Public Service Ethics Board, to which the authority is delegated pursuant to the provision of Article 17-2)," respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第七十四条 自動車登録ファイルへの登録又は自動車検査証の交付(当該自動車についての前条第一項に規定する最初の自動車登録ファイルへの登録又は最初の自動車検査証の交付に限る。)を受けようとする者は、国土交通大臣等(国土交通大臣若しくはその権限の委任を受けた地方運輸局長、運輸監理部長若しくは運輸支局長又は軽自動車検査協会(道路運送車両法第五の二の規定により設された軽自動車検査協会をいう。以下同じ。)をいう。以下同じ。)に対して、当該自動車の所有者が資金管理法人に対し当該自動車に係る再資源化預託金等を預託したことを証する書面(以下「預託証明書」という。)を提示しなければならない。ただし、その者が、資金管理法人に委託して当該預託証明書に相当するものとして政令で定める通知を同法第七条第四項に規定する登録情報処理機関(次項において単に「登録情報処理機関」という。)に対して行ったときは、当該預託証明書を国土交通大臣等に提示したものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 74 (1) When a person who intends to have a Vehicle registered in the Vehicle registration file or to have a vehicle inspection certificate delivered (restricted to the registration of Vehicles in the initial Vehicle registration file or to delivery of the initial vehicle inspection certification as prescribed in Paragraph 1), he/she shall submit a written statement to the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, etc. (the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism or the Head of the Regional Transport Agency mandated with the authority of the Minister, the Head of the Transport Surveillance Section or the Head of the Transport Branch Office or the Light Vehicle Inspection Association (indicating the Light Vehicle Inspection Association set up by the provisions of Chapter 5-2 of the Road Transport Vehicle Act, the same shall apply hereinafter), the same shall apply hereinafter) attesting to the fact that the owner of the Vehicle has deposited the Recycling Deposit, etc. relating to the Vehicle (hereinafter referred to as "Certification of Deposit") with the Deposit Management Entity; However, when the person notifies a Registration Information Processing Organization (referred to in the next paragraph simply as "Registration Information Processing Organization") as prescribed in Article 7, Paragraph 4 of the same Act, said notification being specified by Cabinet Order as corresponding to the Certification of Deposit entrusted to the Deposit Management Entity, said Certification of Deposit shall be deemed to be submitted to the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism, etc.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4 第四十三条の二から第四十五条まで、第四十六条(第一項第六号を除く。)、第四十六条の二、第五十三条の二、第五十三条の三、第五十四条第一項及び第五十五条の二から第五十六条の二までの規定は、防護標登録に係る登録異議の申て及び審判に準用する。この場合において、第四十三条の二第一号及び第四十六条第一項第一号中「第三条、第四条第一項、第七条の二第一項、第八条第一項、第二項若しくは第五項、第五十一条第二項(第五十二条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。)、第五十三条第二項」とあるのは「第六十四条」と、同項第五号中「その登録商標が第四条第一項第一号から第三号まで、第五号、第七号又は第十六号に掲げる商標に該当するものとなつているとき」とあるのは「その商標登録が第六十四条の規定に違反することとなつたとき」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Articles 43-2 to 45, 46 (except paragraph (1)(vi)), 46-2, 53-2, 53-3, 54(1) and 55-2 to 56-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to an opposition to registration and a trial pertaining to defensive mark registration. In this case, the term "Articles 3, 4(1), 7-2(1), 8(1), 8(2), 8(5), 51(2) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 52-2(2)), 53(2)" in Articles 43-2(i) and 46(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 64" and the term "where ... the registered trademark has become a trademark that falls under any of Articles 4(1)(i) to 4(1)(iii), 4(1)(v), 4(1)(vii) and 4(1)(xvi)" in Article 46(1)(v) shall be deemed to be replaced with "where ... the trademark registration becomes in violation of Article 64."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

218.2本の規定に基づく訴訟においては, (a)著作権は,被告が当該著作物その他の対象物に著作権が存続しているか否かについて争わない場合は,当該訴訟が関連する当該著作物その他の対象物に存続しているものと推定する。 (b)著作権の存続が証される場合において,原告が当該著作権の権利者であることを主張し,かつ,被告がその主張について争わないときは,原告が当該著作権の権利者であるものと推定する。 (c)被告が,善意ではなく,訴訟に関連する著作物その他の対象物に著作権が存続しているか否かについて又はその著作物その他の対象物における著作権の権利者の問題について争い,それによって手続に不必要な費用又は遅延を生じさせる場合は,裁判所は,訴訟に関する被告のための費用は認められないこと及び被告が相手方に生じさせる費用は被告が相手方に支払うことを指示することができる。例文帳に追加

218.2. In an action under this Chapter: (a) Copyright shall be presumed to subsist in the work or other subject matter to which the action relates if the defendant does not put in issue the question whether copyright subsists in the work or other subject matter; and (b) Where the subsistence of the copyright is established, the plaintiff shall be presumed to be the owner of the copyright if he claims to be the owner of the copyright and the defendant does not put in issue the question of his ownership. (c) Where the defendant, without good faith, puts in issue the questions of whether copyright subsists in a work or other subject matter to which the action relates, or the ownership of copyright in such work or subject matter, thereby occasioning unnecessary costs or delay in the proceedings, the court may direct that any costs to the defendant in respect of the action shall not be allowed by him and that any costs occasioned by the defendant to other parties shall be paid by him to such other parties. - 特許庁

4 会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで(他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止)、第二編第九第二節第二款から第十款まで(第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。)(裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了)、第七編第二第四節(特別清算に関する訴え)、同編第三第一節(第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。)(総則)、同第三節(第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。)(特別清算の手続に関する特則)及び第九百三十八条(第六項を除く。)(特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式(自己株式を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の数の株式を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員(社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員(社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。)の議決権の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の議決権を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資(自己特定出資を除く。)の総口数の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資(自己優先出資を除く。)の百分の三(これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合)以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間)前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十条の十四 会社法第二編第一第八節(第五十二条第二項第二号を除く。)(発起人等の責任)及び第百三条第二項(発起人の責任等)の規定は、相互会社の発起人、設時取締役又は設時監査役の責任について準用する。この場合において、同法第五十二条第二項(出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の責任)中「(第二十八条第一号の財産を給付した者又は同条第二号の財産の譲渡人を除く。第二号において同じ。)」とあるのは「(保険業法第二十四条第一項第一号の財産の譲渡人を除く。)」と、同項第一号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第二十四条第一項第一号」と、同条第三項中「第三十三条第十項第三号」とあるのは「保険業法第二十四条第二項において準用する第三十三条第十項第三号」と、同法第百三条第二項中「第五十七条第一項の募集をした場合において、当該募集」とあるのは「保険業法第二十七条又は第三十条の六第一項の募集」と、「前項」とあるのは「第五十二条第二項(第二号を除く。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 30-14 The provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 8 (excluding Article 52, paragraph (2), item (ii)) (Liability of Incorporators) and Article 103, paragraph (2) (Liabilities of Incorporators) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liabilities of incorporators, directors at incorporation or auditors at incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "(in this paragraph and in item (ii) excluding those who contributed in kind under Article 28, item (i) or the assignor of the properties under item (ii) of the same Article)" in Article 52, paragraph (2) (Liability for Insufficiency of Value of Properties Contributed) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "(excluding the assignor of the properties under Article 24, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act)"; the term "Article 28, item (i) or (ii)" in Article 52, paragraph (2), item (i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 24, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "Article 33, paragraph (10), item (iii)" in Article 52, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33, paragraph (10), item (iii) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act;" and in Article 103, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "In cases where the solicitation under Article 57, paragraph (1) is carried out," shall be deemed to be deleted, and the terms "such solicitation" and "the preceding paragraph" shall be deemed to be replaced with "solicitation under Article 27 or Article 30-6, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 52, paragraph (2) (excluding item (ii))," respectively; any technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 会社法第四編第三(第七百十五条及び第七百四十条第三項を除く。)(社債権者集会)、第七編第二第七節(社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え)、第八百六十八条第三項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十四条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、相互会社が社債を発行する場合について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項(社債権者集会の決議の執行)中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の七第一項から第三項までの規定並びに同法第六十一条の七第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項(債権者の異議手続の特則)中「第四百四十九条、第六百二十七条、第六百三十五条、第六百七十条、第七百七十九条(第七百八十一条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)、第七百八十九条(第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)、第七百九十九条(第八百二条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)又は第八百十条(第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。)」とあるのは「保険業法第五十七条第四項において準用する同法第十七条(第一項ただし書を除く。)の規定並びに同法第八十八条及び第百六十五条の十七(同法第百六十五条の二十において準用する場合を含む。)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715 and Article 740, paragraph (3)) (Bondholders' Meeting), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Payment, etc by Bond-Issuing Company.), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (x) to (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company issues bonds. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "under Article 705, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737, paragraph (2) (Execution of Resolutions of Bondholders' Meetings) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "of Article 61-7, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of the Insurance Business Act, and the provisions of Articles 708 and 709 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61-7, paragraph (8) of that Act"; and the term "the provisions of Article 449, Article 627, Article 635, Article 670, Article 779 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 781), Article 789 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 793), Article 799 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 802) or Article 810 (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 813)" in Article 740, paragraph (1) (Special provisions on objection procedures for creditors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 57, paragraph (4) of that Act, and Articles 88 and 165-17 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 165-20 of that Act) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

7 附則第二条第一項又は第四項の規定により引き続き特定保険業を行う特定保険業者が保険契約の移転を行う場合においては、当該特定保険業者を少額短期保険業者とみなして、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第二編第七第一節の規定(これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。)を適用する。この場合において、同条において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条第一項及び第三項中「移転会社及び移転先会社」とあるのは「移転先会社」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条の二第一項中「取締役(委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役)」とあるのは「役員(法人でない社団又は財団の代表者又は管理人を含む。)」と、「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書(以下この節において「移転契約書」という。)の作成日」と、「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書その他の」とあるのは「移転契約書その他の」と、同条第二項中「移転会社の株主又は保険契約者」とあるのは「移転対象契約者」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十八条中「第百三十六条第一項の決議があった時」とあるのは「移転契約書を作成した時」と、新保険業法第三百三十三条第一項中「発起人、設時取締役、設時執行役、設時監査役、取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役」とあるのは「発起人、役員(法人でない社団又は財団の代表者又は管理人を含む。)」とする。例文帳に追加

(7) When the Specified Insurer who continuously carries on the specified insurance business executes transfer of the insurance contract pursuant to the provision of Article 2, paragraph (1) or (4) of the Supplementary Provisions, such Specified Insurer shall be deemed as a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, the provisions of Part II, Chapter VII, Section 1 of the New Insurance Business Act (including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall be applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act. In this case, the term "Transferor Company and Transferee Company" in Article 136, paragraphs (1) and (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 272-29 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Transferee Company," the terms "The directors (or in a company with Committees, executive officers)" and "two weeks before of the date of Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 136-2, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the officers (including representative persons or administrators of an association or foundation that is not a juridical person)" and "the date of preparation of the Transfer Agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) (hereinafter referred to as "Transfer Agreement" in this Section)," respectively; the term "the Transfer Agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) and other" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Transfer Agreement and other," the term "A shareholder or Policyholder of the Transferor Company" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Affected Policyholders," the term "the time of the adoption of the resolution under Article 136, paragraph (1)" in Article 138 of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the time of the creation of Transfer Agreement," the term "the incorporator, the director at the incorporation, the executive officer at the incorporation, the company auditor at the incorporation, the director, the executive officer, the accounting advisor or the member who is supposed to carry out such duties and the company auditor" in Article 333, paragraph (1) in the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the officer"; any technical change in interpretation required shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の二十一 会社法第二編第四第八節第二款(運営)の規定は相互会社の監査役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百九十四条第二項(同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。)の規定による許可の申てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百九十四条第二項(議事録)中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、同条第三項中「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第四項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-21 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 8, Subsection 2 (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of company auditors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 394, paragraph (2) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 394, paragraph (3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 394, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)"; the term "and to the cases where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 394, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be deleted; and the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 394, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

6 会社法第二編第四第十節第三款(委員会の運営)の規定は委員会設置会社の委員会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第四百十三条第三項(同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。)の規定による許可の申てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第三項(議事録)中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、同条第四項中「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第五項中「又はその親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「又はその保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 10, Subsection 3 (Operation of Committees) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the Committees of a company with Committees; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 413, paragraph (3) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 413, paragraph (4); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 413, paragraph (3) (Minutes) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative"; the term "and where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 413, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be deleted;" and the term "or its Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 413, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or its de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3 会社法第七百九十一条(第一項第一号及び第三項を除く。)(吸収分割又は株式交換に関する書面等の備置き及び閲覧等)の規定は組織変更株式交換を伴う組織変更をする相互会社について、同法第三百九条第二項(各号を除く。)(株主総会の決議)、第三百二十四条第二項(各号を除く。)(種類株主総会の決議)及び第五編第五第二節第二款第一目(第七百九十五条第四項第一号及び第二号、第七百九十六条第三項第一号ロ、第七百九十九条第一項第一号及び第二号、第八百条並びに第八百一条第一項、第二項、第三項第一号及び第二号並びに第五項を除く。)(株式会社の手続)の規定は組織変更株式交換完全親会社について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第七百九十八条第二項の規定による申てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provision of Article 791 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (3)) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Documents, etc. Related to Absorption-Type Split or Share Exchange) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a converting Mutual Company carrying out a share exchange on Entity Conversion; the provisions of Article 309, paragraph (2) (excluding all items) (Resolution of Shareholders Meetings), Article 324, paragraph (2) (excluding all items (Resolution of Class Meetings) and Part V, Chapter V, Section 2, Subsection 2, Division 1 (excluding Article 795, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii), Article 796, paragraph (3), item (i), (b), Article 799, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii), Article 800, Article 801, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 801, paragraph (3), items (i) and (ii), and Article 801, paragraph (5)) (Procedures for Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Wholly Owning Parent Company for Share Exchange on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 798, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4 会社法第八百十一条(第一項第一号を除く。)(新設分割又は株式移転に関する書面等の備置き及び閲覧等)の規定は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更をする相互会社について、同法第二百十九条第一項(第八号に係る部分に限る。)、第二項及び第三項(株券の提出に関する公告等)、第二百二十条(株券の提出をすることができない場合)、第二百九十三条第一項(第七号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項から第四項まで(新株予約権証券の提出に関する公告等)、第三百九条第二項(各号を除く。)及び第三項(第三号に係る部分に限る。)(株主総会の決議)、第三百二十四条第二項(各号を除く。)及び第三項(第二号に係る部分に限る。)(種類株主総会の決議)並びに第五編第五第三節第一款第一目(第八百三条第一項第一号及び第二号、第八百五条、第八百八条第一項第一号及び第二号並びに第三項第一号及び第二号、第八百十条第一項第一号及び第二号、第八百十一条第一項第一号及び第三項並びに第八百十二条を除く。)(株式会社の手続)の規定は第一項第九号の株式会社について、同法第八百十五条第三項(第三号に係る部分に限る。)、第四項及び第六項(新設合併契約等に関する書面等の備置き及び閲覧等)の規定は組織変更株式移転設完全親会社について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provision of Article 811 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) (Keeping and Inspection , etc. of Documents, etc. Regarding Incorporation-Type Company Split or Share Transfer) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a converting Mutual Company carrying out a share transfer on Entity Conversion; the provisions of Article 219, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (viii)), (2) and (3) (Public Notice in Relation to Submission of Share Certificate), Article 220 (Cases Where Share Certificates Cannot be Submitted), Article 293, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (vii)) and (2) to (4) inclusive (Public Notice in Relation to Submission of Share Option Certificate), Article 309, paragraph (2) (excluding the items) and (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iii)) (Resolution of Shareholders Meetings), Article 324, paragraph (2) (excluding the items) and (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Resolution of Class Meetings), and Part V, Chapter V, Section 3, Subsection 1, Division 1 (excluding Article 803, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii), Article 805, Article 808, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii), Article 808, paragraph (3), items (i) and (ii), Article 810, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii), Article 811, paragraph (1), item (i), Article 811, paragraph (3), and Article 812) (Procedures for Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Stock Company set forth in paragraph (1), item (ix); and the provisions of Article 815, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iii)), (4) and (6) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Documents, etc. Regarding Consolidation-Type Merger Agreement, etc.) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Wholly Owning Parent Company Formed by Share Transfer on Entity Conversion. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十条の十五 会社法第二編第四第五節第二款(第三百六十七条、第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項、第三百七十二条第三項並びに第三百七十三条を除く。)(運営)の規定は清算人会設置相互会社の清算人会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第二項(議事録等)中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項(取締役会への報告の省略)中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十四第八項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 180-15 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5), Article 372, paragraph (3), and Article 373) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operations of the board of liquidators of a Mutual Company with a board of liquidators; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence ), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or general representative, where the company has a General Meeting)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as set forth in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraph (2) (Omission of report to board of directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180-14, paragraph (8) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一 当該各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、法人税法第二編第一第一節第二款から第十款まで(同法第二十三条、第二十六条第一項から第四項まで、第二十八条、第三十八条から第四十一条まで、第五十五条第三項、第五十七条、第五十八条、第五十九条及び第六十一条の十一から第六十一条の十三までを除く。)の規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第五十七条の十、第六十一条の四、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで(法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。)、第六十六条の四第三項、第六十七条の十二及び第六十七条の十三の規定(以下この号において「本邦法令の規定」という。)の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額(当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十六条の四第一項又は第六十八条の八十八第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独企業間価格で行われたものとして本邦法令の規定の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額)例文帳に追加

i) The amount of income or amount of a loss calculated, with regard to the amount of income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsections 2 to 10 of the Corporation Tax Act (excluding Article 23, Article 26(1) to (4), Article 28, Article 38 to Article 41, Article 55(3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Article 61-11 to Article 61-13 of the said Act) and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 66-4(3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of paragraph 66-4(1) or Article 68-88(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction with a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc., the amount of income or amount of a loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一 当該各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、法人税法第二編第一第一節第二款から第十款まで(同法第二十三条、第二十六条第一項から第四項まで、第二十八条、第三十八条から第四十一条まで、第五十五条第三項、第五十七条、第五十八条、第五十九条及び第六十一条の十一から第六十一条の十三までを除く。)の規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第五十七条の十、第六十一条の四、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで(法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。)、第六十六条の四第三項、第六十七条の十二及び第六十七条の十三の規定(以下この号において「本邦法令の規定」という。)の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額(当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十八条の九十第一項各号に掲げる連結法人(当該連結法人との間に連結完全支配関係がある他の連結法人を含む。)又は法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十八条の八十八第一項又は第六十六条の四第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独企業間価格で行われたものとして本邦法令の規定の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額)例文帳に追加

i) The amount of income or loss calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsections 2 to 10 of the Corporation Tax Act (excluding Article 23, Article 26(1) to (4), Article 28, Article 38 to Article 41, Article 55(3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Article 61-11 to Article 61-13 of the said Act) and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 66-4(3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of paragraph 68-88(1) or Article 66-4(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction with a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90(1) of the Act (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with the said consolidated corporation) or a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act that is related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc., the amount of income or loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一 当該各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、法人税法第二編第一第一節第二款から第九款まで(同法第二十三条、第二十六条第一項から第四項まで、第二十八条、第三十八条から第四十一条まで、第五十五条第三項、第五十七条、第五十八条、第五十九条及び第六十一条の十一から第六十一条の十三までを除く。)及び第十一款の規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第五十七条の十、第六十一条の四、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで(法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。)、第六十六条の四第三項、第六十七条の十二及び第六十七条の十三の規定(以下この号において「本邦法令の規定」という。)の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額(当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十六条の四第一項又は第六十八条の八十八第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独企業間価格で行われたものとして本邦法令の規定の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額)例文帳に追加

i) The amount of income or amount of a loss calculated, with regard to the amount of income of a specified foreign subsidiary, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsection 2 to Subsection 9 (excluding Article 23, Article 26, paragraphs (1) to (4), Article 28, Articles 38 to 41, Article 55, paragraph (3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Articles 61-11 to 61-13 of the Corporation Tax Act), and Subsection 11 of said Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Articles 65-7 to 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7, paragraph (1) of the Act), Article 66-4, paragraph (3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of Article 66-4, paragraph (1) or Article 68-88, paragraph (1) of the Act is applied to a transaction with a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6, paragraph (1) of the Act related to said specified foreign subsidiary, etc., the amount of income or amount of a loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一 当該各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、法人税法第二編第一第一節第二款から第九款まで(同法第二十三条、第二十六条第一項から第四項まで、第二十八条、第三十八条から第四十一条まで、第五十五条第三項、第五十七条、第五十八条、第五十九条及び第六十一条の十一から第六十一条の十三までを除く。)及び第十一款の規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第五十七条の十、第六十一条の四、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで(法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。)、第六十六条の四第三項、第六十七条の十二及び第六十七条の十三の規定(以下この号において「本邦法令の規定」という。)の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額(当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十八条の九十第一項各号に掲げる連結法人(当該連結法人との間に連結完全支配関係がある他の連結法人を含む。)又は法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十八条の八十八第一項又は第六十六条の四第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独企業間価格で行われたものとして本邦法令の規定の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額)例文帳に追加

i) The amount of income or loss calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsection 2 to Subsection 9 (excluding Article 23, Article 26, paragraphs (1) to (4), Article 28, Articles 38 to 41, Article 55, paragraph (3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Articles 61-11 to 61-13 of the Corporation Tax Act), and Subsection 11 of said Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Articles 65-7 to 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7, paragraph (1) of the Act), Article 66-4, paragraph (3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of Article 68-88, paragraph (1) or Article 66-4, paragraph (1) of the Act is applied to a transaction with a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90, paragraph (1) of the Act (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with said consolidated corporation) or a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6, paragraph (1) of the Act that is the domestic corporation of said specified foreign subsidiary, etc., the amount of income or loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4)没収が有罪判決について命令された場合、裁判所は、有罪を宣告された者に、没収が命じられたいかなる物品についても廃棄又は裁判所が適切と考えるその他の処分を命ずることができる。本法第73条に定める違反に係る被疑者が次に掲げる事項を証した場合、裁判所は訴追を取り下げることができる。(a)自己の事業の通常の過程において、他の者に代わり、商標若しくは商品表示を付するために、又は(場合に応じ)、商標の制作用若しくは当該制作に使用される金型、版、機器、板材又はその他の器具を製作するために、当該他の者に雇用されていること。(b)容疑の対象となる事件において、そのように雇用されていた事実、及び、かかる商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の販売によって決まる利益若しくは手数料のを得る手段としての当該商品若しくは役務又はその他の物品に関与していなかったこと。(c)容疑の対象となった違反を犯さないよう合理的予防措置を講じていたこと。(d)違反行為を実行したとされる時点において、当該商標又は商品表示の真実性を疑う理由があったこと。(e)検察官により、又は検察官に代わって行われた要求に応じて、当該標又は表示をその者のために付した者に関し、自らの権能が及ぶすべての情報を提出したこと。例文帳に追加

(4) When forfeiture is directed on a conviction the Court, before whom the person convicted, may order any forfeited article to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Court thinks fit. Where a person is accused of an offence under section 73 of this Act and proves. (a) that in the ordinary course of his business he is employed on behalf of other persons to apply trademarks or trade descriptions, or, as the case may be, to make dies, blocks, machines, plates, or other instruments for making, or being used in making, trademarks; (b) that in the case which is the subject of the charge he was so employed, 58 and was not interested in the goods or service or other thing by way of profit or commission dependent on the sale of such goods or services or other things, as the case may be; (c) that the took reasonable precautions against committing the offence charged; (d) that he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, on reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description; and (e) that on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons on whose behalf the mark or description was applied; the Court may discharge the person from the complaint.  - 特許庁

2 会社法第四編第三(第七百十五条を除く。)(社債権者集会)、第七編第二第七節(社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え)、第八百六十八条第三項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十四条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券、特定社債管理者、特定社債原簿又は特定社債権者集会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「特定社債発行会社」と、「無記名社債」とあるのは「無記名特定社債」と、「代表社債権者」とあるのは「代表特定社債権者」と、同法第七百十六条中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法又は資産流動化計画」と、同法第七百二十条第五項中「電子公告」とあるのは「電子公告(資産流動化法第百九十四条第一項第三号に規定する電子公告をいう。)」と、同法第七百二十一条中「社債権者集会参考書類」とあるのは「特定社債権者集会参考書類」と、同法第七百二十四条第二項第一号中「第七百六条第一項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項各号」と、同項第二号中「第七百六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項」と、同法第七百二十九条第一項中「第七百七条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第八項において準用する第七百七条」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項から第三項まで並びに同条第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項中「第四百四十九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十一条」と、同条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と、同法第七百四十一条第三項中「第七百五条第一項(第七百三十七条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項(資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百三十七条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715) (Bondholders' Meeting), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Action Seeking Rescission of Performance, etc. of a Bond-issuing Company), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x) to item (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, Specified Bond Administrators, Specified Bonds registries, and Specified Bondholders Meetings in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the terms "Bond-issuing Company," "bearer bonds," and "representative bondholder" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," "Specified Bonds in bearer form," and "representative Specified Bondholder," the phrase "this Act" in Article 716 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act or the Asset Securitization Plan," the term "electromagnetic public notice" in Article 720(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Electronic Public Notice (meaning electronic public notice as prescribed in Article 194(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "Bondholders' Meeting Reference Documents" in Article 721 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Reference Documents for a Specified Bondholders Meeting," the phrase "each item of Article 706(1)" in Article 724(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 706" in Article 724(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 707" in Article 729(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 707 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 676" in Article 733(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 705, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) to (3) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act and the provisions of Article 708 and Article 709 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 449" in Article 740(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111 of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 740(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 705 (including cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 737)" in Article 741(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 737(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十六 会社法第二編第四第五節第二款(第三百六十七条並びに第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項を除く。)(運営)の規定は相互会社の取締役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの条において読み替えて準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百七十一条第二項(議事録等)中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項及び第三項(取締役会への報告の省略)中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十三第二項」と、同条第三項中「第四百十七条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第五項において準用する第四百十七条第四項」と、同法第三百七十三条第一項及び第二項(特別取締役による取締役会の決議)中「第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十四第四項第一号及び第二号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-16 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, and Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5)) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of directors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article with relevant changes in interpretation. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraphs (2) and (3) (Omission of Report to Board of Directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-13, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 417, paragraph (4)" in Article 372, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 417, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-30, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 362, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii)" in Article 373, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Resolution of board of directors by special directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-14, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第九十六条の四 会社法第二百七条(金銭以外の財産の出資)、第二百十二条(第一項第一号を除く。)(不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任)、第二百十三条(第一項第一号及び第三号を除く。)(出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十四条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(不服申ての制限)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定は第九十二条第三号に掲げる事項を定めた場合について、同法第七編第二第二節(株式会社における責任追及等の訴え)の規定はこの条において準用する同法第二百十二条(第一項第一号を除く。)の規定による支払を求める訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七条第十項第一号中「取締役」とあるのは「保険業法第八十六条第一項に規定する組織変更をする相互会社の取締役」と、同法第二百十二条第一項第二号中「第二百九条」とあるのは「保険業法第九十六条の二」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「同法第九十二条第三号」と、同条第二項中「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「保険業法第九十二条第三号」と、「申込み又は第二百五条の契約」とあるのは「申込み」と、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「株式を有する株主(組織変更の効力発生日から六箇月(これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間。以下この項において同じ。)を経過していないときは、六箇月前から当該組織変更の効力発生日まで引き続いて社員であった者であって、当該組織変更の効力発生日から引き続いて株式を有する株主)」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 96-4 The provisions of Article 207 (Contribution of Property Other than Monies), Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) (Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount to Be Paid in), Article 213 (excluding paragraph (1), items (i) and (iii)) (Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property contributed), Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to any stipulation for the matters listed in Article 92, item (iii); and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for payment under Article 212 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i)) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "director" in Article 207, paragraph (10), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director of the converting Mutual Company set forth in Article 86, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 209" and "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" in Article 207, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 96-2 of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 92, item (iii) of that Act," respectively; the terms "Article 199, paragraph (1), item (iii)" and "application for subscription for shares for subscription or his/her manifestation of intention relating to the contract provided for in Article 205" in Article 212, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 92, item (iii) of the Insurance Business Act" and "application," respectively; and the term "shareholders having the shares" in Article 847, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholders having the shares (or, where six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) have not lapsed since the Effective Date of an Entity Conversion, persons who had been members from six months prior until the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion and have been holding the shares without interruption since the Effective Date of the Entity Conversion)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第三百条の二 金融商品取引法第三第一節第五款(第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで(特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合)並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項(特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合)を除く。)(特定投資家)及び第四十五条(第三号及び第四号を除く。)(雑則)の規定は保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等又は保険仲人が行う特定保険契約(金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動により損失が生ずるおそれ(当該保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払うこととなる保険料の合計額が、当該保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得することとなる保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回ることとなるおそれをいう。)がある保険契約として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。)又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介を行うことを内容とする契約の締結について、同第二節第一款(第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで(第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等)、第三十七条第一項第二号(広告等の規制)、第三十七条の二(取引態様の事前明示義務)、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項(契約締結前の書面の交付)、第三十七条の五(保証金の受領に係る書面の交付)、第三十七条の六(書面による解除)、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二(禁止行為)、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項(損失補てん等の禁止)、第四十条の二(最良執行方針等)並びに第四十条の三(分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止)を除く。)(通則)の規定は保険会社等、外国保険会社等、保険募集人又は保険仲人が行う特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定保険契約等」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介の業務」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為(第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。)」とあるのは「特定保険契約(保険業法第三百条の二に規定する特定保険契約をいう。以下同じ。)又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介」と、同法第三十七条第二項中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「締結しようとするとき、又は特定保険契約の締結の代理若しくは媒介を行うとき」と、「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは「次に掲げる事項その他保険業法第三百条第一項第一号に規定する保険契約の契約条項のうち重要な事項」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「特定保険契約等を締結する保険会社等(保険業法第二条の二第一項に規定する保険会社等をいう。)、外国保険会社等(同法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。)又は保険仲人(同条第二十五項に規定する保険仲人をいう。)」と、同項第五号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十八条第一項中「使用人」とあるのは「使用人(保険募集人(保険業法第二条第二十三項に規定する保険募集人をいう。)を除く。第三十九条第三項において同じ。)」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引(買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。)又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。)」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引(以下この条において「有価証券等」という。)」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、「顧客(信託会社等(信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。)が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。)」とあるのは「顧客」と、「損失」とあるのは「損失(当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払う保険料の合計額が当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得する保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回る場合における当該保険料の合計額から当該保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を控除した金額をいう。以下この条において同じ。)」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十条第一号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約等の締結」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三(第一項各号に掲げる事項に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。)及び第三十七条の四」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 300-2 The provision of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investor) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provision) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract (meaning an insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as entailing the risk of loss due to any change in interest rates, currency values, financial instruments market prices as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (14) of that Act or any other indicator (meaning the risk that the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the insurance contract may exceed the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) effected by an Insurance Company, etc. or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or a contract stipulating any specific act as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract; the provision of Section 2, Subsection 1 of the same Chapter (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business for Persons Who Engage in Type 1 Financial Instruments Transaction Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name-Lending and Prohibition of Administration of Company Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6 (Cancellation by a Written Statement), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso of Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Loss Compensation, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy, etc.), and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured) (General Rules)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract by an Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., Insurance Solicitor or Insurance Broker and related act as an agent or intermediary. In this case, the terms "financial instruments transaction contract" and "financial instruments transaction business" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract, etc.," and "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, or any related act as an agent or intermediary," respectively; in Article 34 of that Act, the term "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effecting a specified insurance contract (meaning a specified insurance contract provided in Article 300-2 of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or acting as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract"; in Article 37, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "carrying out Financial Instruments and Exchange Activities" shall be deemed to be replaced with "concluding specified insurance contracts"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract" shall be deemed to be replaced with "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract or acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding a specified insurance contract" and the term "the following matters" with "the following matters and any other important matter stipulated by an insurance contract provided in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Company, etc. (meaning an Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (meaning a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of that Act) or Insurance Broker (meaning an Insurance Broker as defined in paragraph (25) of the same Article) concluding a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (v) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business carried out" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract concluded"; in Article 38, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "employee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee (excluding an Insurance Solicitor as defined in Article 2, paragraph (23) of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in Article 39, paragraph (3))"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract", the term "securities or derivative transaction (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this Article)" with "specified insurance contract," the term "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including said person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" with "the customer," the term "loss" with "loss (meaning, where the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the specified insurance contract exceeds the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract, the total amount of premium payment subtracted by the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," and the term "to supplement" with "to supplement, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract," the term "securities, etc." with "specified insurance contract," and the term "to add to" with "to add to, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act, the term "determined by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause" shall be deemed to be replaced with "a potential cause"; in Article 40, item (i) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business" with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act, the term "Article 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4) and Article 43-4" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 37-3 (as far as any of the matters listed in the items of Article 37-3, paragraph (1) is concerned, excluding Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3)) and 37-4"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

索引トップ用語の索引



  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright © Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, All Right reserved.
  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS