| 意味 | 例文 |
...all this timeの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 1018件
I have jurisdiction over private financial institutions, so the FSA has put into force the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, so as to ensure that finance firmly supports recovery efforts. Unusually for a financial act, this act provides a framework under which Deposit Insurance Corporation takes over non-performing loans that are held by Shinkin banks and credit cooperatives after the passage of a certain period of time. Therefore, this act naturally calls on the managers of financial institutions to build up capital based on their own judgment. We enacted the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, with the support of all political parties and groups, and also drew up the Guidelines of Workout for Restructuring Debt Owed by Individual Debtors. In addition, prefectural industrial reconstruction organizations and Rehabilitation Support Organization for Companies Damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake were established in order to resolve the double loan problem, which has become a major issue in the Diet. Many members of the latter organization's secretariat come from the FSA. In that sense, I believe that the FSA is making every possible effort toward restoration and recovery. The FSA will continue to do its utmost to support the recovery of the disaster-stricken areas through such activities as encouraging the active and effective use of various recovery support measures. At the same time, I would like to stress that financial institutions have provided very vigorous cooperation. 例文帳に追加
特に私の場合は民間の金融機関を所掌しているわけでございますから、金融庁といたしましても、復興に向けた(取組みを)金融がしっかり下支えするべく、震災特例を設けた金融機能強化法、これは私は金融立法としては異例なことだと思っておりますが、信用金庫、信用組合を含め、しばらく経っても不良債権が残っていれば、預金保険機構で請け負いましょうという枠組みの法律でございますから、そういった意味では、当然、自己資本もしっかり経営者の判断で積んでいただきたいということも言っておりますので、そういった意味では、私はまさに震災特例の金融機能強化法を国会の全会派のご協力をいただきまして作らせていただきましたし、また、「個人債務者の私的整理(に関する)ガイドライン」、それから産業復興機構、東日本大震災(事業者)再生支援機構、これは国会で大きく問題が起きた二重ローンの問題、これは実は事務局(職員)の多くは金融庁から行かせていただいておりまして、そういったことで金融庁としては全力を挙げて復旧復興に努めさせていただいているつもりでございますが、各種の復興支援策の積極的かつ効果的な活用を促すなど、引き続き、被災地の復興支援に全力で取り組んでまいりたいと思うと同時に、ぜひ強調したいのは、金融機関も今回非常によく協力していただけたと思っております。 - 金融庁
Article 52-14 (1) The Prime Minister may, when and to the extent that he/she finds it particularly necessary for ensuring sound and appropriate management of the business of a Bank in light of the status of business or property (in the case that the Major Shareholder of Bank is a company or any other juridical person, it shall include the status of property of Subsidiary Companies of that Major Shareholder of the Bank or any other companies that have a special relationship specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with that Major Shareholder of Bank) of the Major Shareholder of Bank (limited to a person who holds more than five hundredths of the Voting Rights Held by All of the Shareholders of the Bank; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), request the Major Shareholder of Bank to submit an improvement plan for securing the soundness in management of the Bank or order amendment of the submitted improvement plan by designating matters for which measures should be taken and the time limit therefor, or may order, within the limit necessary, measures necessary for the purpose of supervision. 例文帳に追加
第五十二条の十四 内閣総理大臣は、銀行主要株主(銀行の総株主の議決権の百分の五十を超える議決権の保有者に限る。以下この条において同じ。)の業務又は財産の状況(銀行主要株主が会社その他の法人である場合にあつては、当該銀行主要株主の子会社その他の当該銀行主要株主と内閣府令で定める特殊の関係のある会社の財産の状況を含む。)に照らして、当該銀行の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保するため特に必要があると認めるときは、その必要の限度において、当該銀行主要株主に対し、措置を講ずべき事項及び期限を示して、当該銀行の経営の健全性を確保するための改善計画の提出を求め、若しくは提出された改善計画の変更を命じ、又はその必要の限度において監督上必要な措置を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Our teacher dedicated his life to the study requiring great pains; as to "Koshi-den", at the end of the Bunka era (1804-1818), he began to write the draft, and by the early Bunsei era (1818-1830), about 12 volumes had been completed; however, by that time, he had also gradually gained an insight into the study and understood the teachings of the master of Suzunoya (Norinaga MOTOORI), then he realized that this world was the product of our great gods of Japan, so he decided to suspend "Koshi-den" temporarily, and first explore and read through all the past annotations of the histories of our country as well as those of India and Europe to use new knowledge to his advantage in writing "Koshi-den"; therefore, since the middle of the Bunsei era, he intensly studied foreign literature and culture mainly, and during a period of over 20 years, he completed almost all his works, which he left for us, including "Sekiken Taiko-den" (Japanese Early History); although he was never satisfied with his works, his students, of course, including myself, with a feeling of gratitude, thought that our master had succeeded in completing most his researches and studies, and were concerned about the delay in completing "Koshi-den" and because of our master's age, we repeatedly begged him to restart the writing, then thankfully at about the 10th year of the Tenpo era (1839), he restarted; however, he was requested to write on linguistic methods so he began to write "Goju Ongi" (Pronunciation and Meaning of 50 Kana) and suspended "Koshi-den" again; after a year, he was banished to Akita Province by order of the former bakufu (Japanese feudal government headed by a shogun), fortunately since Akita was his hometown and there were many relatives of his, besides the former load treated him very kindly, they relieved him off poor living, although under those conditions, he had no time to finish the remaining works; he was always concerned about those unfinished works, and after only a few years, he became sick and regrettably died. 例文帳に追加
生涯苦心致され候中にも、古史伝は最初文化の末頃より草稿取り掛かり、文政の始め頃に、成文一二巻程は、ざっと稿本成り候ところ、段々見識博くあいなり、殊に故鈴屋大人の御遺教をも相伺れ候て、いよいよ以って、世界悉く我が皇大神達の御鎔造(ツクリカタメ)なされたる事を感得致され候に付、古史伝は先ず差し置き、赤縣州を始め、印度及び西洋の古伝をも悉く皆探索網羅して、其の上にて、充分に古史の註解をと存し込まれ候て、文政の半ば頃より、専ら外国の学に困苦致され、凡そ廿余年も歳月を過ごされ候て、赤縣太古傳を初め、即ち今此れある丈の著述は出来候へ共、中々もって先人の心底に叶ひ候事には此れ無く候へ共、大抵は見当も付き候に依っては、私を始め門人の中の所存にも、段々時節後れ、先人も老年に成られ候に付き、先ず先ず外国の所は大抵にして差し置かれ、古史伝の清撰をしきりて、相願い催促致し候て、天保10年頃より、漸々と其の方にも趣かれ候所、言語規則の書之無きに付き、余儀なく五十音義の撰にかかり、凡そ一ヵ年ほど打ち過ぎられ候所、旧幕府の命に依って秋田へ放逐、尤も同所は本国の事、親族共も少なからず、第一旧君侯より厚く恩遇も之有りて会計の辛苦は薄らぎ候へ共、著述致す可き遑なく、此処両三年心配致され候内に病を発し入幽致され候次第にて残念至極にて御座候。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス
(5) If the General Partner makes a distribution in kind pursuant to paragraph (3) of this Article, the General Partner shall request the Partners who are entitled to such distribution in kind to elect to either (A) receive the Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind or (B) request to the General Partner the disposition of all or part of such Portfolio Securities and to receive the proceeds of such disposition, no later than [_] days prior to the Reference Date. With respect to any Partners who communicate their intention to receive the proceeds of disposition in accordance with (B) within [_] days from such request, the General Partner shall deliver such disposition proceeds by the date of the distribution in kind after the disposition of the Portfolio Securities at such time and price as the General Partners determines in its discretion (provided that, as a general rule, such price shall be the closing price (or an equivalent price) on any day during the period from the date such communication has been made through the date of distribution in kind). In any other case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities in kind. The expenses incurred in connection with the General Partner’s disposition of Portfolio Securities pursuant to this paragraph shall be borne by the Partners who desire such disposition. 例文帳に追加
5. 無限責任組合員は、本条第3 項に基づき現物による分配を行う場合、現物分配基準日の少なくとも[ ]日前までに、当該現物分配の対象である組合員に対し、(A)分配の対象となる投資証券等を現物で受け取る方法、又は(B)当該投資証券等の全部若しくは一部の処分を無限責任組合員に依頼し、当該処分に係る処分代金を受け取る方法のいずれかを選択するよう申し出るものとする。無限責任組合員は、かかる申出から[ ]日以内に(B)の方法による処分代金の受領を希望する旨の連絡があった組合員については、無限責任組合員がその裁量により判断する時期及び価格(但し、当該連絡のあった日から現物分配を行う日までの任意の日における最終価格又はこれに準ずる価格を原則とする。)によって当該投資証券等を処分の上、現物分配を行う日にその処分代金を交付するものとし、その他の場合については、当該投資証券等の現物を交付するものとする。本項に基づく無限責任組合員による投資証券等の処分に関して発生した費用は処分を希望した組合員が負担する。 - 経済産業省
In that sense and others, striking a balance between all those factors is critical – while peace of mind and security do matter in financial services, adhering excessively to such qualities could, as I have just pointed out, result in a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection and thus create impediments to the growth of truly healthy companies or the growth of a healthy economy, which is why the financial sector is so vital. This time around, I reaffirmed in talks with people like Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Zhou Xiaochuan that harmony or a balance between those factors is extremely important. Having spoken with financial regulators in both the U.S. and China, I am now even more convinced of this idea. In any case, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) is aware of the importance of paying proper attention to any impact of the new requirements on the current situation and corporate reform efforts in Japan – a point that applies to not only Japan but also the G20 nations that each have their own lay of the land – while they will, put simply, contribute to a higher level of soundness of Japan's financial system over the medium to long term. From this viewpoint, I do see that Japan's argument has increasingly received global approval to a considerable extent, while I am committed to continuing to advocate Japan's position in a proactive and resolute fashion. 例文帳に追加
そういった意味で、そこら辺がまさにバランスでございまして、金融というのは安心だとか、あるいは非常に大丈夫だということと同時に、それがまた極端に行き過ぎますと、今度は今さっき言いましたように、貸し渋り、貸しはがしが起きて、本当に健全な企業の発展、あるいは健全な経済の発展の、逆に言うと阻害要因にもなるわけですから、そういった意味で金融業というのは大変重要でございますが、そこら辺の調和、バランスというのが非常に私は大事だということを、今度はバーナンキさん、あるいは周小川さんとも話を通じて再確認させていただいたわけでございますし、アメリカでも金融規制当局の方、中国でも金融規制当局の方とも話をしまして、そういった感を一層させていただいたわけでございまして、いずれにいたしましても、金融庁といたしましては、新規制が簡単に言えば、中長期的に我が国の金融システムを健全性の向上に資するものとなる一方、我が国の実情、それぞれの我が国の実情や経営改革に対する影響を配慮するということは、我が国のみならずG20はそれぞれの国の実情があるわけですから、そういうことにきちっと配慮する必要が重要だというふうに思っておりました。こういった観点から、引き続き積極的に日本の立場、かなり世界的に受け入れられてきたというふうに私は認識いたしておりますけれども、しっかり主張してまいりたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁
Article 49 (1) With regard to those Agreements, contracts and other concerted activities (hereinafter referred to as "Concerted Activities" in this Article) listed in the items of Article 12-3 of the Former Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19 of the Act on Foreign Insurance Business Operators to be repealed under Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act")) which have been entered into by the time when this Act enters into force by those Insurance Companies Licensed under the Former Act which shall be deemed to have obtained the non-life insurance business license set forth in Article 3, paragraph (5) of the Current Act pursuant to the provision of Article 3 of the Supplementary Provisions and those foreign insurance business operators prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Former Foreign Insurance Operators Act (hereinafter referred to as "Non-Life Insurance Companies, etc. Licensed under the Former Act" in this Article) which shall be deemed to have obtained the foreign non-life insurance business license set forth in Article 185, paragraph (5) of the Current Act pursuant to the provision of Article 72 of the Supplementary Provisions, with other Non-Life Insurance Companies, etc. Licensed under the Former Act, the provisions of Article 12-3 to 12-7 inclusive of the Former Act (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 19 of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act) (including the penal provisions pertaining thereto) shall remain in force for a period of two years counting from the Effective Date, provided that all of the Non-Life Insurance Companies, etc. Licensed under the Former Act involved in the Concerted Activities have notified the Minister of Finance pursuant to the provisions of the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance within three months from the Effective Date. 例文帳に追加
第四十九条 附則第三条の規定により新法第三条第五項の損害保険業免許を受けたものとみなされる旧法の免許を受けた保険会社及び附則第七十二条の規定により新法第百八十五条第五項の外国損害保険業免許を受けたものとみなされる附則第二条の規定による廃止前の外国保険事業者に関する法律(以下「旧外国保険事業者法」という。)第二条第一項に規定する外国保険事業者(以下この条において「旧法の免許を受けた損害保険会社等」という。)がこの法律の施行の際現に他の旧法の免許を受けた損害保険会社等と行っている旧法第十二条ノ三各号(旧外国保険事業者法第十九条において準用する場合を含む。)に掲げる協定、契約その他の共同行為(以下この条において「共同行為」という。)については、当該共同行為に係るすべての旧法の免許を受けた損害保険会社等が施行日から起算して三月以内に大蔵省令で定めるところにより大蔵大臣に届出をした場合に限り、施行日から起算して二年を経過する日までの間は、旧法第十二条ノ三から第十二条ノ七まで(旧外国保険事業者法第十九条において準用する場合を含む。)の規定(これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。)は、なおその効力を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
By way of a summing-up, I express my deep gratitude for the generous assistance that all of you gave me. What left me with a particular impression was our inevitable choice to use – for the first time after the Second World War – the payoff program in relation to the Incubator Bank of Japan, as you know. Despite the fact that it was the first such case after the Second World War, the depositors responded in a very calm fashion. The payoff program is up and running as we speak, and I am grateful that we have been able to implement it in a tranquil fashion. To tell the truth, it was personally a heart-rending experience as I recognize the tremendous inconvenience being caused to those with more than 10 million yen plus its interest in deposit. However, the Deposit Insurance Corporation is currently dealing with the former management to properly look into its criminal and civil responsibilities and other matters. While it is still an ongoing case, this payoff implementation left me with a particularly immense impression among what happened in my three months in office of the Minister for Financial Services. 例文帳に追加
振り返らせていただきますと、大変、皆様方にもお世話になりましてありがとうございます。印象に残ることは、ご存じのように、戦後初めて日本振興銀行でペイオフを実施せざるを得なかったということでございます。預金者の皆様方に大変冷静な対応をしていただき、戦後初めてのことでございましたが、ペイオフは今、実行中でございますけれども、粛々整々と行わせていただいたことを、本当に私としては、ある意味で1,000万円プラス利子を超える方には、実際の話、大変ご迷惑もかかるわけでございますから、断腸の思いがあったのも事実でございますけれども、しかしながら、今、前の経営陣に対して、預金保険機構は刑事上・民事上の責任を含めてきちんと再生中でございます。まだ進行中でございますけれども、やはりペイオフをさせていただけたことが、この3カ月間ではございましたけれども、非常に金融担当大臣としては残っております。 - 金融庁
(2) The purchase under the preceding paragraph shall be made in such a way that the Right to Insurance Claim, etc. under the preceding paragraph is purchased based on the request of the creditor pertaining to the Right to Insurance Claim, etc., within the period during which all payments pertaining to the insurance contract are suspended, at the amount of the insurance claim of the Covered Insurance Contract and of other benefits, multiplied by the rate specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance by taking into consideration what is the kind of that Covered Insurance Contract, the expected interest rate, other content, the time when the insured event pertaining to that request took place, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase Amount"); provided, however, that the Participating Corporation shall, in the case that it called for the Right to Insurance Claim, etc. pertaining to the purchase and when the amount which was collected from the calling deducted by the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance as the cost of said purchase exceeds the Purchase Amount pertaining to said purchase, pay this excess amount to the creditor pertaining to said Right to Insurance Claim, etc. 例文帳に追加
2 前項の買取りは、保険契約に係る支払のすべてを停止している期間内に、前項の保険金請求権等を、その保険金請求権等に係る債権者の請求に基づいて、補償対象契約の保険金その他の給付金の額に当該補償対象契約の種類、予定利率その他の内容、当該請求に係る保険事故が発生した時期等を勘案して内閣府令・財務省令で定める率を乗じて得た額(以下「買取額」という。)で買い取ることにより行うものとする。ただし、加入機構は、その買取りに係る保険金請求権等の回収をした場合において、当該回収によって得た金額から当該買取りに要した費用として内閣府令・財務省令で定めるものの額を控除した金額が、当該買取りに係る買取額を超えるときは、その超える部分の金額を当該保険金請求権等に係る債権者に対して支払うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Article 271-15 (1) The Prime Minister may, when and to the extent that he/she finds it particularly necessary to protect Policyholders, etc. by ensuring sound and appropriate management of the business of a Insurance Company in light of the status of business or property (in the case that the Major Shareholder of Insurance Company is a company or any other juridical person, it shall include the status of property of Subsidiary Companies of that Major Shareholder of the Insurance Company or any other companies that have a special relationship as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance with that Major Shareholder of Insurance Company) of the Major Shareholder of Insurance Company (limited to a person who holds more than five hundredths of the Voting Rights Held by All of the Shareholders of the Insurance Company; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), request the Major Shareholder of Insurance Company to submit an improvement plan for securing the soundness in management of the Insurance Company or order amendment of the submitted improvement plan by designating matters for which measures should be taken and the time limit therefore, or may order, to the extent necessary, measures necessary for the purpose of supervision. 例文帳に追加
第二百七十一条の十五 内閣総理大臣は、保険主要株主(保険会社の総株主の議決権の百分の五十を超える議決権の保有者に限る。以下この条において同じ。)の業務又は財産の状況(保険主要株主が会社その他の法人である場合にあっては、当該保険主要株主の子会社その他の当該保険主要株主と内閣府令で定める特殊の関係のある会社の財産の状況を含む。)に照らして、当該保険会社の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保し、保険契約者等の保護を図るため特に必要があると認めるときは、その必要の限度において、当該保険主要株主に対し、措置を講ずべき事項及び期限を示して、当該保険会社の経営の健全性を確保するための改善計画の提出を求め、若しくは提出された改善計画の変更を命じ、又はその必要の限度において監督上必要な措置を命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from the Disposition of Portfolio Securities, in kind dividends or share splits) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the total amount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (which is, in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to (a) in the case of a Partner, their respective Interest Amount or (b) in the case of a Withdrawing Partner, their respective Interest Amount at the time of the withdrawal of such Withdrawing Partner, to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and(iv) other matters as required to determine the appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [ ]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加
3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、投資証券等(投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。)を現物で分配することが組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合(かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。)、組合員及び脱退組合員に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用(もしあれば)及び公租公課(もしあれば)の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬(もしあれば)の額(成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額)を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、組合員についてはその持分金額、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時の持分金額の各金額に応じ按分をした上、それぞれ現物により分配することができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券等の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を組合員及び脱退組合員に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の[ ]分の[ ]以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省
I have been informed that all of Takefuji's loans are personal loans, of which approximately 10% are for individuals running their own businesses. I might also add that even after corporate rehabilitation procedures commence, borrowers should continue making repayments on agreed-on terms. I indeed commented on borrowers in my previous press conference but, at this point in time, I cannot make any clear reference as to any impact on SMEs, micro-enterprises and so on, except that, from the viewpoint of providing smooth financing for individuals, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) did request government-affiliated financial institutions and private financial institutions nationwide, through competent authorities and financial organizations, to respond attentively to any requests for financing consultation and other matters brought from Takefuji customers and anyone else with concerns. Having been requested by the FSA, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry is in the process of taking relevant steps, including setting up special sections to serve SMEs, in response to Takefuji's filing for corporate reorganization proceedings. 例文帳に追加
武富士の貸付はすべて個人向け貸付でありまして、大体約1割ぐらいが自営業を営んでいる個人であるというふうに聞いております。また、会社更生手続が開始されても、借り手においては、約定どおり返済を行っていただくことになるということでございまして、私もこの前ぶら下がり(取材)で借り手の方のことを申し上げましたが、現時点では、中小・零細企業等への影響については確たることは申し上げられないけれども、いずれにしても、金融庁といたしましては、関係省庁や金融関係団体を通じて、政府系金融機関及び全国の民間金融機関に関して、個人向け金融の円滑化の観点から、当社の利用者等からの融資の相談等にきめ細かく対応するように要請を行ったところでございまして、当庁からの要請を受けて、経済産業省においては、武富士の会社更生手続開始の申し立ての影響を受けて、中小企業者を対象として特別窓口を設置する等の措置を講じていただいておるところでございます。 - 金融庁
(1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.例文帳に追加
(1) 商標又はその出願は,2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は,当事者間の契約条件により,また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い,かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い,管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は,民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって,商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが,他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って,それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり,被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は,参加者は,当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は,参加者は,商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に,自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して,当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は,すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁
(2) When a trust company, a foreign trust company or a person registered under Article 50-2(1) of the Trust Business Act engages in the business of the Sales and Purchase, etc. of Trust Beneficial Rights in the course of trade under the provision of the preceding paragraph, these persons shall be deemed to be Financial Instruments Business Operators, and the provisions of Article 34 to Article 34-5 inclusive, Article 36, Article 36-2(1) (limited to cases where a person registered under Article 50-2(1) of the Trust Business Act conducts the Sales and Purchase, etc. of Trust Beneficial Rights in the course of trade), Article 36-3, Article 37 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)), Article 37-2, Article 37-3 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)), Article 37-4, Article 37-6, Article 38, Article 39, Article 40, Article 45(i) and (ii), Article 47 to Article 47-3 inclusive, Article 51, Article 52(1) and (2), Article 56-2(1), Article 190 and Article 194-5(2) (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied. In this case, the term "any of the following items" in Article 52(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "item (vi) or (ix)"; the term "rescind its registration under Article 29, rescind its authorization under Article 30(1), or order suspension of all or part of its business by specifying a period not exceeding six months" in said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "order suspension of all or part of its business by specifying a period not exceeding six months"; and the term "was found to fall under any of (a) to (g) of said item at the time of registration under Article 29, or came to fall under any of item (vi) or item (viii) to (x) of the preceding paragraph," in Article 52(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "or came to fall under item (vi) or (ix) of the preceding paragraph". 例文帳に追加
2 信託会社、外国信託会社又は信託業法第五十条の二第一項の登録を受けた者が前項の規定により信託受益権の売買等を業として行う場合においては、これらの者を金融商品取引業者とみなして、第三十四条から第三十四条の五まで、第三十六条、第三十六条の二第一項(同法第五十条の二第一項の登録を受けた者が信託受益権の売買等を業として行う場合に限る。)、第三十六条の三、第三十七条(第一項第二号を除く。)、第三十七条の二、第三十七条の三(第一項第二号を除く。)、第三十七条の四、第三十七条の六、第三十八条、第三十九条、第四十条、第四十五条第一号及び第二号、第四十七条から第四十七条の三まで、第五十一条、第五十二条第一項及び第二項、第五十六条の二第一項、第百九十条並びに第百九十四条の五第二項の規定(これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。)を適用する。この場合において、第五十二条第一項中「次の各号のいずれか」とあるのは「第六号又は第九号」と、「当該金融商品取引業者の第二十九条の登録を取り消し、第三十条第一項の認可を取り消し、又は六月以内の期間を定めて」とあるのは「六月以内の期間を定めて」と、同条第二項中「第二十九条の登録当時既に同号イからトまでのいずれかに該当していたことが判明したとき、又は前項第六号若しくは第八号から第十号までのいずれか」とあるのは「又は前項第六号若しくは第九号」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
(4) When forfeiture is directed on a conviction the Court, before whom the person convicted, may order any forfeited article to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Court thinks fit. Where a person is accused of an offence under section 73 of this Act and proves. (a) that in the ordinary course of his business he is employed on behalf of other persons to apply trademarks or trade descriptions, or, as the case may be, to make dies, blocks, machines, plates, or other instruments for making, or being used in making, trademarks; (b) that in the case which is the subject of the charge he was so employed, 58 and was not interested in the goods or service or other thing by way of profit or commission dependent on the sale of such goods or services or other things, as the case may be; (c) that the took reasonable precautions against committing the offence charged; (d) that he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, on reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description; and (e) that on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons on whose behalf the mark or description was applied; the Court may discharge the person from the complaint. 例文帳に追加
(4)没収が有罪判決について命令された場合、裁判所は、有罪を宣告された者に、没収が命じられたいかなる物品についても廃棄又は裁判所が適切と考えるその他の処分を命ずることができる。本法第73条に定める違反に係る被疑者が次に掲げる事項を立証した場合、裁判所は訴追を取り下げることができる。(a)自己の事業の通常の過程において、他の者に代わり、商標若しくは商品表示を付するために、又は(場合に応じ)、商標の制作用若しくは当該制作に使用される金型、版、機器、板材又はその他の器具を製作するために、当該他の者に雇用されていること。(b)容疑の対象となる事件において、そのように雇用されていた事実、及び、かかる商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の販売によって決まる利益若しくは手数料のを得る手段としての当該商品若しくは役務又はその他の物品に関与していなかったこと。(c)容疑の対象となった違反を犯さないよう合理的予防措置を講じていたこと。(d)違反行為を実行したとされる時点において、当該商標又は商品表示の真実性を疑う理由があったこと。(e)検察官により、又は検察官に代わって行われた要求に応じて、当該標章又は表示をその者のために付した者に関し、自らの権能が及ぶすべての情報を提出したこと。 - 特許庁
Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
第四十一条 会社法第二百九十六条(株主総会の招集)、第二百九十八条(第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。)(株主総会の招集の決定)、第二百九十九条(第二項各号を除く。)(株主総会の招集の通知)、第三百条から第三百二条まで(招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで(取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議)、第三百十八条(第五項を除く。)(議事録)、第三百十九条(第四項を除く。)(株主総会の決議の省略)及び第三百二十条(株主総会への報告の省略)の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。)の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間(当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主(前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。)」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主(当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。)の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
Two policemen testified that about eight o'clock on the night of Thursday they had noticed the prisoner slip into the gate of Nina San Croix's residence and go down to the side of the house, where he was admitted; that his appearance and seeming haste had attracted their attention; that they had concluded that it was some clandestine amour, and out of curiosity had both slipped down to the house and endeavored to find a position from which they could see into the room, but were unable to do so, and were about to go back to the street when they heard a woman's voice cry out in, great anger: "I know that you love her and that you want to get rid of me, but you shall not do it! You murdered him, but you shall not murder me! I have all the evidence to convict you of murdering him! The Archbishop will have it to- morrow! They shall hang you! Do you hear me? They shall hang you for this murder!" that thereupon one of the policemen proposed that they should break into the house and see what was wrong, but the other had urged that it was only the usual lovers' quarrel and if they should interfere they would find nothing upon which a charge could be based and would only be laughed at by the chief; that they had waited and listened for a time, but hearing nothing further had gone back to the street and contented themselves with keeping a strict watch on the house. 例文帳に追加
警官二人は次のように証言した。木曜日夜八時くらいに、ニーナ・サン・クロワの住居に被告人がやってきて、入り口から家の横手まで侵入し、家に招き入れられたのを見かけた。その外見やそわそわした挙動から、これは怪しいと思った。その時は、被告人が女主人の秘密の愛人なんだろうと思い、好奇心も手伝って、自分たちが屋敷に入り、なんとか部屋の中を見れるよう努力した。しかし中を見ることはできず、大通りに戻ろうとしたところ、女主人が大声で誰かをののしっている声が聞こえてきた。「あの女が好きだって事、私をのけ者にしたいんだって事は分かってるわ。でもね、言うとおりにしてもらいますから! あなたは私の夫を殺した! でも、私は殺されるいわれはないわ! 夫殺しの証拠はすべてそろっているのよ。大司教様には明日お見せします。あなたは縛り首間違いなしよ! いいこと? 夫殺しは縛り首よ!」これを聞いた警官の一人は、家の中に踏み込んでなにが起こっているのか確かめなければならないと同僚に言った。だが、もう一人は単なる痴話喧嘩にすぎんと言い、もし踏み込んだとしても逮捕できるような事はなにも発見できない、署長に笑われるのがオチだと主張した。二人はしばらくその場所にとどまって耳を澄ましていたが、もうなにも聞こえてはこなかった。それで大通りに戻り、屋敷を厳重に見張ることにした。 - Melville Davisson Post『罪体』
The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion. 例文帳に追加
平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1%、それから生命保険だと6%ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6%、損保1%ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。 - 金融庁
(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加
6 会社法第六十七条(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号を除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十三条第四項(創立総会の決議)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)及び第八十一条(第四項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定(同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。)中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主(創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。)」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間(当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人)又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役(保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)若しくは設立時監査役(同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| 意味 | 例文 |
| Copyright(C) 2026 金融庁 All Rights Reserved. |
| ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
| Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved. |
| Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved. |
| 本サービスで使用している「Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス」はWikipediaの日本語文を独立行政法人情報通信研究機構が英訳したものを、Creative Comons Attribution-Share-Alike License 3.0による利用許諾のもと使用しております。詳細はhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ および http://alaginrc.nict.go.jp/WikiCorpus/ をご覧下さい。 |
原題:”The Corpus Delicti” 邦題:『罪体』 | This work has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. This applies worldwide. SOGO_e-text_library責任編集。Copyright(C)2006 by SOGO_e-text_library この版権表示を残すかぎりにおいて、商業利用を含む複製・再配布が自由に認められます。プロジェクト杉田玄白正式参加テキスト。 |
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
