「TIME OF DAY」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(39ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(2) With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph (1) of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision. 例文帳に追加

２　この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph 1 of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision. 例文帳に追加

この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 経済産業省

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from the Disposition of Portfolio Securities, in kind dividends or share splits) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the total amount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (which is, in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to (a) in the case of a Partner, their respective Interest Amount or (b) in the case of a Withdrawing Partner, their respective Interest Amount at the time of the withdrawal of such Withdrawing Partner, to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and(iv) other matters as required to determine the appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [ ]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、組合員及び脱退組合員に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、組合員についてはその持分金額、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時の持分金額の各金額に応じ按分をした上、それぞれ現物により分配することができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券等の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を組合員及び脱退組合員に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

(7) In the case where the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider is the Transferor Company prescribed in Article 135, paragraph (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act, the term "the Transferor Company and the Transferee Company" in Article 136, paragraphs (1) and (3) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Transferee Company," the terms "directors (or, in a company with Committees, executive officers)," "for a period ranging from two weeks before the date of the Shareholders Meeting, etc. set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article," and "the Transfer Agreement concluded under Article 135, paragraph (1) and other" in Article 136-2, paragraph (1) of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "officers," "on the creation day of the contract pertaining to the contract set forth in Article 135, paragraph (1) (hereinafter defined as "Transfer Agreement")," and "the Transfer Agreement and other," respectively; the term "A shareholder or Policyholder of the Transferor Company" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "An Affected Policyholder,", and the term "the time of the adoption of the resolution under Article 136, paragraph (1)" in Article 138 of the New Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-29 of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the time of preparation of the Transfer Agreement." 例文帳に追加

７　特定少額短期保険業者が新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十五条第三項に規定する移転会社である場合においては、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条第一項及び第三項中「移転会社及び移転先会社」とあるのは「移転先会社」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十六条の二第一項中「取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役）」とあるのは「役員」と、「前条第一項の株主総会等の会日の二週間前」とあるのは「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書（以下この節において「移転契約書」という。）の作成日」と、「第百三十五条第一項の契約に係る契約書その他の」とあるのは「移転契約書その他の」と、同条第二項中「移転会社の株主又は保険契約者」とあるのは「移転対象契約者」と、新保険業法第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する新保険業法第百三十八条中「第百三十六条第一項の決議があった時」とあるのは「移転契約書を作成した時」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 32-3 In the event that the following items have been provided in a written agreement either with a labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace concerned (in the case that such labor union is organized), or with a person representing a majority of the workers (in the case that such labor union is not organized), the employer may, with respect to a worker for whom the starting and ending time for work is left to the worker's own decision pursuant to rules of employment or the equivalent, and regardless of the provisions of Article 32, have such a worker work in excess of the working hours set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 32 in a week and may have such a worker work in excess of the working hours set forth in paragraph (2) of that Article in a day, to the extent that the average working hours per week during a period provided in the above-mentioned written agreement as the settlement period (of which conditions are defined in item (ii) below) does not exceed the working hours set forth in paragraph (1) of Article 32: 例文帳に追加

第三十二条の三　使用者は、就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより、その労働者に係る始業及び終業の時刻をその労働者の決定にゆだねることとした労働者については、当該事業場の労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がある場合においてはその労働組合、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がない場合においては労働者の過半数を代表する者との書面による協定により、次に掲げる事項を定めたときは、その協定で第二号の清算期間として定められた期間を平均し一週間当たりの労働時間が第三十二条第一項の労働時間を超えない範囲内において、同条の規定にかかわらず、一週間において同項の労働時間又は一日において同条第二項の労働時間を超えて、労働させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I reported this issue at the informal gathering with Cabinet ministers as well. As exemplified by documents that universities are required to submit to the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT), documents which various institutions are required to submit not only to the FSA but also to other government offices have substantially increased over the past decade. I will give you an example as a doctor: back in the day, few documents had to be prepared upon medical examination, but nowadays we have to write documents in detail. To go to the extreme, we could say that we spend more time writing documents than examining patients. This defeats the purpose. 例文帳に追加

そのことも閣僚懇で申し上げまして、各他の役所もここ10年間、例えば、文部科学省が大学に書類を求めるように、色々な機関に提出を求める書類が物凄く増えています。私も医者ですけれども、本当にお医者さんが患者さんを診たら、昔は書類なんかそんなに出さなくても良かったけど、（今は）もう細かく書類を書けと言って、極端な話、患者さんを診る時間よりも書類を書く時間の方が長いような感じがありまして、本末転倒でございます。 - 金融庁

You see, we are examining the matter in various administrative respects now, which actually led to a little incident the other day where I have told off my staff for the first time since I took office. In the light of the oversight and inspection authority that we have, I said, "As the government is paying, which means using taxpayers' money, you, in the position of the staff, must assume a stricter attitude in what you do." 例文帳に追加

何で合意にするのか、まだ、私は日米間のそういう合意の着弾点も聞いておりませんから。日米合意ですから、双方がちゃんと合意しなければいけないわけで、私は、そのことを鳩山総理はよく分かっておられると思いますよ。とにかく、「ホワイトハウスと総理との間で、この沖縄の問題の基本的なことをきちんと合意していくべきだ」ということを、私は、前から総理に申し上げています。「単純な、純軍事技術的な観点から沖縄の問題を取り上げるべきではない」ということを申し上げているのですけれども、総理も「そうだ」ということを私には言っておられますから、そのようにきちんとおやりになるだろうと思っています。 - 金融庁

Article 106 (1) In cases where either a person sentenced to imprisonment with work or a person sentenced to imprisonment without work has served the period of time for parole qualification pursuant to the provisions of Article 28 of the Penal Code (including the cases where it is applied by replacing the terms pursuant to Article 21 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons), Article 58 of the Juvenile Code, or Article 22 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons, and falls under cases specified by a Ministry of Justice Ordinance, such as being placed in an open-type institution pursuant to the provision of paragraph (2) of Article 88, if it is deemed necessary that the sentenced person, for smooth re-entry to society, go outside the penal institution to settle important personal matters such as securement of his/her residence and employer following release, visit people relevant to his/her rehabilitation and to the guardianship thereof, or acquire other useful experience for life in society following his/her release, then the warden of the penal institution may permit him/her a day leave or a furlough for a definite period within seven days without an escort of staff members of the penal institution. However, the furlough shall be limited to the cases where a sentenced person has been serving for not less than six months. 例文帳に追加

第百六条　刑事施設の長は、刑法第二十八条（国際受刑者移送法第二十一条において読み替えて適用する場合を含む。）、少年法第五十八条又は国際受刑者移送法第二十二条の規定により仮釈放を許すことができる期間を経過した懲役受刑者又は禁錮受刑者が、第八十八条第二項の規定により開放的施設において処遇を受けていることその他の法務省令で定める事由に該当する場合において、その円滑な社会復帰を図るため、刑事施設の外において、その者が、釈放後の住居又は就業先の確保その他の一身上の重要な用務を行い、更生保護に関係のある者を訪問し、その他その釈放後の社会生活に有用な体験をする必要があると認めるときは、刑事施設の職員の同行なしに、外出し、又は七日以内の期間を定めて外泊することを許すことができる。ただし、外泊については、その受刑者に係る刑が六月以上執行されている場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百十九条　会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項（剰余金の配当等に関する責任）の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条（株主に対する求償権の制限等）の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条（買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任）の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項（欠損が生じた場合の責任）の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) A Bank, etc. (meaning a Bank, etc. as defined by Article 4(5) of the Banking Act after the revision by Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act"); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) which, at the time when this Act comes into effect, holds shares (limited to voting shares) or equity (hereinafter shares or equity are collectively referred to as "Shares, etc.") of which the number or amount exceeds fifty hundredths of the total number of the issued shares (limited to voting shares) or the total amount of contribution (hereinafter the total number of issued shares and the total amount of contribution are collectively referred to as "Issued Shares, etc.") of a company falling under any of the categories listed in Article 16-4(1)(ii) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by Article 2 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act") or Article 11 of the Foreign Exchange Bank Act after the revision by Article 3 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Foreign Exchange Bank Act"); the same shall apply in the following paragraph) shall notify to that effect to the Minister of Finance within three months from the day when the Act comes into effect (hereinafter referred to as the "Effective Date"). 例文帳に追加

第二条　この法律の施行の際現に一の銀行等（第一条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第四条第五項に規定する銀行等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）が新銀行法第十六条の四第一項第二号（第二条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条又は第三条の規定による改正後の外国為替銀行法（以下「新外国為替銀行法」という。）第十一条において準用する場合を含む。次項において同じ。）に掲げる会社の発行済株式（議決権のあるものに限る。）の総数又は出資の総額（以下「発行済株式等」という。）の百分の五十を超える数又は額の株式（議決権のあるものに限る。）又は持分（以下「株式等」という。）を所有しているものは、当該銀行等は、この法律の施行の日（以下「施行日」という。）から起算して三月以内にその旨を大蔵大臣に届け出なければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) With regard to workers in the business referred to in paragraph (1) who have been given the right to decide the starting and finishing time of work pursuant to the rules of employment or the equivalent, when an employer has stipulated the following items in a written agreement either with the labor union organized by a majority of the workers at the workplace concerned where such a labor union exists or with a person representing a majority of the workers at a workplace where no such labor union exists, notwithstanding the provisions of the paragraph (1), the employer may have a worker work in excess of 44 hours in a week or in excess of 8 hours in a day, provided the average working hours per week for the period prescribed in the said agreement as the settlement period stipulated in item (ii) below do not exceed 44 hours: 例文帳に追加

３　使用者は、就業規則その他これに準ずるものにより、その労働者に係る始業及び終業の時刻をその労働者の決定にゆだねることとした労働者については、当該事業場の労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がある場合においてはその労働組合、労働者の過半数で組織する労働組合がない場合においては労働者の過半数を代表する者との書面による協定により、次に掲げる事項を定めたときは、その協定で第二号の清算期間として定められた期間を平均し一週間当たりの労働時間が四十四時間を超えない範囲内において、第一項に規定する事業については同項の規定にかかわらず、一週間において四十四時間又は一日において八時間を超えて、労働させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(11) Where the obligation to obtain permission from the Minister of Finance has been imposed pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of Article 21 in regard to outward direct investment that shall be notified pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, a resident who makes the outward direct investment shall not be required to give notification, notwithstanding the provision of paragraph 1. In this case, when a notification pursuant to the said paragraph has already been given in regard to the outward direct investment, the notification (limited to those pertaining to outward direct investment (excluding those for which a notice of acceptance of the recommendation of discontinuance has been given pursuant to the provision of paragraph 6 and those of which discontinuation has been ordered pursuant to the provision of paragraph 9) which has not been actually made at the time of imposition of the obligation to obtain permission pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of the said article) shall be deemed to be an application pertaining to permission that the resident was obliged to obtain pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of the said article, which was filed on the day of the notification, and when a recommendation pursuant to the provision of paragraph 4, a notice pursuant to the provision of paragraph 6 (limited to those accepting the change of the content) or an order pursuant to paragraph 9 (limited to those pertaining to the change of the content) has been made in regard to outward direct investment pertaining to the notification, the recommendation, notice or order shall be deemed to have not been made. 例文帳に追加

１１　第一項の規定により届け出なければならないとされる対外直接投資について第二十一条第一項又は第二項の規定により財務大臣の許可を受ける義務が課された場合には、当該対外直接投資を行う居住者は、第一項の規定にかかわらず、その届出をすることを要しない。この場合において、当該対外直接投資について既に同項の規定による届出がされているときは、当該届出（同条第一項又は第二項の規定により許可を受ける義務が課された際現に行つていない対外直接投資（第六項の規定により中止の勧告を応諾する旨の通知がされたもの及び第九項の規定により中止を命ぜられたものを除く。）に係るものに限る。）については、これを当該届出のあつた日にされた同条第一項又は第二項の規定により受ける義務を課された許可に係る申請とみなし、当該届出に係る対外直接投資について第四項の規定による勧告、第六項の規定による通知（内容の変更を応諾する旨のものに限る。）又は第九項の規定による命令（内容の変更に係るものに限る。）があつたときは、当該勧告、通知又は命令については、これをなかつたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Any party seeking to recover upon a petition, a claim, counterclaim or cross-claim or against whom a petition, claim, cross-claim or counterclaim is asserted may, at any time after the issues are joined, move with supporting affidavit, depositions or admissions of parties, for a summary judgment in his favor as to all or any part thereof. The motion shall be served at least ten days before the time specified for the hearing. The adverse party may file with the Bureau and serve opposing affidavits at least three days prior to the day of hearing. After the hearing, the judgment sought shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.例文帳に追加

申請，主張，反訴又は交差請求について有利な判決を求めている者，又は申請，主張，交差請求又は反訴を提起されている者は，争点が決定された後はいつでも，裏付となる宣誓供述書，証言録取書又は当事者の自白を添えて，これらの全部又は一部について自己に有利な略式判決を求める申立をすることができる。当該申立は，聴聞のために指定された時期の遅くても10日前に送達しなければならない。相手方当事者は，聴聞期日の遅くても3日前までに，反対する宣誓供述書を局に送達することができる。聴聞後，当該訴答，証言録取書及びファイル上の自白が，宣誓供述書とともに，重要な事実について真正の争点がないこと及び法律問題としての判決を得る資格が申立人にあることを示した場合は，求められている判決を直ちに言い渡さなければならない。 - 特許庁

(2) Where a fire chief or fire station chief is requested to give consent pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph, if the plan for the building is not in violation of the provisions of any Acts or any order or prefectural/municipal ordinance thereunder (if a fire chief or fire station chief is requested to give consent in cases where a building official or designated confirmation and inspection body makes a confirmation pursuant to the provisions of Article 6, paragraph (4) or Article 6-2, paragraph (1) of the Building Standards Act (including cases where these provisions are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 87, paragraph (1) of said Act) for the construction, major repair (meaning a major repair as set forth in Article 2, item (xiv) of said Act), major remodeling (meaning major remodeling as set forth in Article 2, item (xv) of said Act) of a building set forth in Article 6-3, paragraph (1), item (i) or item (ii) of said Act or for a change of intended purpose of such building, or makes a confirmation for the construction of a building as set forth in Article 6-3, paragraph (1), item (iii) of said Act, the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning the building standards specified by Cabinet Order as set forth in Article 6, paragraph (1) of said Act as applied by replacing the relevant terms and phrases pursuant to the provision of Article 6-3, paragraph (1) of said Act shall be excluded), the fire chief or fire station chief shall give consent within three days from the day on which he/she was requested to give consent in the case falling under Article 6, paragraph (1), item (iv) of said Act or within seven days from the day on which he/she was requested to give consent in other cases, and give notice to the administrative agency or person delegated thereby or the designated confirmation and inspection body to that effect. In this case, the fire chief or fire station chief, when he/she finds any grounds on which he/she cannot give consent, shall give notice to the administrative agency or person delegated thereby or the designated confirmation and inspection body to that effect by such time limit. 例文帳に追加

２　消防長又は消防署長は、前項の規定によつて同意を求められた場合において、当該建築物の計画が法律又はこれに基づく命令若しくは条例の規定（建築基準法第六条第四項又は第六条の二第一項（同法第八十七条第一項の規定によりこれらの規定を準用する場合を含む。）の規定により建築主事又は指定確認検査機関が同法第六条の三第一項第一号若しくは第二号に掲げる建築物の建築、大規模の修繕（同法第二条第十四号の大規模の修繕をいう。）、大規模の模様替（同法第二条第十五号の大規模の模様替をいう。）若しくは用途の変更又は同項第三号に掲げる建築物の建築について確認する場合において同意を求められたときは、同項の規定により読み替えて適用される同法第六条第一項の政令で定める建築基準法令の規定を除く。）で建築物の防火に関するものに違反しないものであるときは、同法第六条第一項第四号に係る場合にあつては、同意を求められた日から三日以内に、その他の場合にあつては、同意を求められた日から七日以内に同意を与えて、その旨を当該行政庁若しくはその委任を受けた者又は指定確認検査機関に通知しなければならない。この場合において、消防長又は消防署長は、同意することができない事由があると認めるときは、これらの期限内に、その事由を当該行政庁若しくはその委任を受けた者又は指定確認検査機関に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 15 Those acts prescribed in the Commercial Code or Act on Special Measures for the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the Former Act which were or should have been performed before the Effective Date by the incorporators, directors, representative director, company auditors, accounting auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company under the Former Act in existence at the time when this Act enters into force shall be deemed as those acts prescribed in the relevant provisions of the Commercial Code or Act on Special Measures for the Commercial Code as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the Current Act which were or should have been performed by the incorporators, directors, representative director, company auditors, accounting auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company under the Current Act on the day when the original acts were or should have been performed, except when the present Supplementary Provisions specify otherwise. 例文帳に追加

第十五条　この法律の施行の際現に存する旧法の規定による相互会社の発起人、取締役、代表取締役、監査役、会計監査人又は清算人が施行日前にした又はするべきであった旧法において準用する商法又は商法特例法に規定する行為については、この附則に別段の定めがあるものを除くほか、当該行為をした又はするべきであった日に、それぞれ新法の規定による相互会社の発起人、取締役、代表取締役、監査役、会計監査人又は清算人がした又はするべきであった新法において準用する商法又は商法特例法の相当の規定に規定する行為とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

However, banks based on unconventional business models such as Seven Bank and Sony Bank were founded at the same time as the establishment of the Incubator Bank of Japan, and I have received a report from the administrative authority that it was not particularly premature to provide them with a license given that Seven Bank and Sony Bank are still functioning properly to this day. That said, Mr. Takenaka was Minister of State and a Diet member at the time; given that Mr. Kimura served as a consultant to FSA and issued a license while Mr. Takenaka served as Minister, he cannot evade moral responsibility, as I stated last week. As the Chief Cabinet Secretary had mentioned that further inquiries should be conducted by the Minister, Senior Vice Minister, and Parliamentary Secretary of the FSA, we will heed this very seriously and tackle this issue accordingly. 例文帳に追加

ただし、設立の時は、この前申し上げましたように、セブン銀行だとかソニー銀行だという普通のビジネスモデルとは違う銀行が同じ時期に、同時に設立されましたし、今もセブン銀行、ソニー銀行というのは、きちっと機能を生かしておりますので、そこのところは特別早かったということはないというようなことは、報告を事務当局から受けていますけれども、私がこの前言いましたように、私は竹中平蔵さんというのは（当時の）国務大臣でございまして、なおかつ国会議員もしておられたわけでございますから、なおかつ自分のときに金融庁の顧問、そして自分が大臣のときに免許を出したわけでございますから、道義的責任は免れないということをこの前私は申し上げましたが、そのことはきちっと認識をいたしておりますし、また官房長官も、（再検証は）この（金融庁の）政務三役にというような発言があったようでございますが、そのことも大変重たく視野に入れつつ、きちっと今後とも対処していきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Article 271-5 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 271-3, paragraph (1), A Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights pertaining to voting rights held by a Bank, Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to one that conducts Securities-Related Business), trust company, or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance who has notified the Prime Minister of a Reference date, where the purpose of holding such voting rights is not for controlling the business activities of the Insurance Company or Insurance Holding Company that has issued the shares relating to that voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Act) shall be submitted to the Prime Minister by stating matters that relate to the status of holding that voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the fifteenth day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二百七十一条の五　銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を行う者に限る。）、信託会社その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である保険会社又は保険持株会社の事業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る保険議決権保有届出書は、第二百七十一条の三第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となった基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であって、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) A person who has engaged in Bank Agency Service as defined by Article 2(14) of the Banking Act after the revision (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") by Article 1 (hereinafter referred to as the "Bank Agency Service") at the time when this Act comes into effect (excluding a person who is deemed to obtain a permission under Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act on Effective Date under the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article of the Supplementary Provisions) may continue to engage in Bank Agency Service within three months from the Effective Date (or, in the case where a disposition of disapproving the application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act or where abolition of Banking Business is ordered under Article 52-56(1) of the New Banking Act as applied by replacing certain terms under the provision of the following paragraph, until the day on which that disposition or order of the abolition is given), notwithstanding the provision of Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act. In the cases where said person filed an application for permission referred to in Article 52-36(1) of the New Banking Act during said period, even after said period has elapsed, the same shall apply until the disposition of granting or disapproving permission is given. 例文帳に追加

第二条　この法律の施行の際現に第一条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第二条第十四項に規定する銀行代理業（以下「銀行代理業」という。）を営んでいる者（次条第一項の規定により施行日において新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可を受けたものとみなされた者を除く。）は、施行日から起算して三月間（当該期間内に新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の許可に係る申請について不許可の処分があったとき、又は次項の規定により読み替えて適用する新銀行法第五十二条の五十六第一項の規定により銀行代理業の廃止を命じられたときは、当該処分のあった日又は当該廃止を命じられた日までの間）は、新銀行法第五十二条の三十六第一項の規定にかかわらず、引き続き銀行代理業を営むことができる。その者がその期間内に同項の許可の申請をした場合において、その期間を経過したときは、その申請について許可又は不許可の処分があるまでの間も、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners who have made contributions with respect to a Portfolio Investment to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities in respect of such Portfolio Investment (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from a Disposition of, in kind dividends with respect to or share splits of Portfolio Securities) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Participating Interested Partners in respect of such Portfolio Investment their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the totalamount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests (provided that, for a Withdrawing Partner, the distribution shall be based on its Percentage Interest at the time of its withdrawal), to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and (iv) other matters as required for determination of appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding interests equal to [ ]% or more of the total Percentage Interests of the Limited Partners who have made contributions to the Portfolio Investment. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、あるポートフォリオ投資に係る投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象組合員等に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、対象持分割合（但し、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時を基準とする。）に応じ按分をした割合により、それぞれ現物により分配するとができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を対象組合員等に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした有限責任組合員の対象持割合の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する持分を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項の規定に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

(a) If an applicant fails to prosecute his application within the required time as provided in these Regulations, the application shall be deemed withdrawn. (b) The time for reply may be extended only for good and sufficient cause, and for a reasonable time specified. Any request for such extension must be filed on or before the day on which action by the applicant is due. The Examiner may grant a maximum of two extensions, provided that the aggregate period granted inclusive of the initial period allowed to file the response, shall not exceed six months from mailing date of the official action requiring such response. (c) Prosecution of an application to save it from withdrawal must include such complete and proper action as the condition of the case may require. Any amendment not responsive to the last official action shall not operate to save the application from being deemed withdrawn. (d) When action by the applicant is a bona fide attempt to advance the case to final action, and is substantially a complete response to the Examiner’s action, but consideration of some matter or compliance with some requirements has been inadvertently omitted, opportunity to explain and supply the omission may be given before the question of withdrawal is considered. (e) Prompt ratification or filing of a correctly signed copy may be accepted in case of an unsigned or improperly signed paper.例文帳に追加

(a)出願人が本規則に規定する期間内に出願を遂行しなかった場合は，当該出願は，取り下げられたものとみなされる。 (b)応答期間は，適切かつ十分な理由がある場合に限り，かつ，指定された合理的な期間にわたり，延長することができる。当該延長の請求は，出願人による応答の期限が到来する日以前にしなければならない。審査官は，最大2回まで延長を認めることができるが，ただし，応答書を提出するために認められた当初期間を含む合計期間は，当該応答を求める庁の処分書の郵送日から6月を超えないものとする。 (c)出願が取り下げられたとみなされないようにするための出願の遂行には，当該事案の事情から必要とされる完全かつ適切な行為を含むものとする。庁による最終処分に応答していない補正は，当該出願を取り下げたとみなされることを防ぐことができない。 (d)出願人による行為が，事案を最終処分に進めるための善意の試みであり，審査官の処分に対する実質的には完全な応答であるにも拘らず，ある事項の検討又はある要件の遵守を不注意により怠っている場合は，取下の問題を検討する前に，当該不作為を説明し，埋め合わせる機会を与えることができる。 (e)署名が脱落した又は署名が不適切な文書の場合においては，正しく署名された写しの速やかな追認又は提出が認められる。 - 特許庁

Article 52-4 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 52-2(1), a Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights pertaining to voting rights held by a Bank, Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to one that conducts Securities-Related Business), trust company (limited to one that has obtained a license set forth in Article 3 or Article 53(1) of the Trust Business Act) or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance who has notified the Prime Minister of a Reference Date, where the purpose of holding such voting rights is not for controlling the business activities of the Bank or Bank Holding Company that has issued the shares relating to that voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article) shall be submitted to the Prime Minister stating matters that relate to the status of holding that voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the fifteenth day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の四　銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を営む者に限る。）、信託会社（信託業法第三条又は第五十三条第一項の免許を受けたものに限る。）その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である銀行又は銀行持株会社の営業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情をして内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る銀行議決権保有届出書は、第五十二条の二第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となつた基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であつて、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 52-4 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 52-2-11, paragraph (1), among Banks, Financial Instruments Specialists (limited to those that engage in Securities Services), trust companies (limited to those that have obtained a license set forth in Article 3 or Article 53, paragraph (1) of the Trust Business Act) and any other persons specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance, where those who have notified the Prime Minister of a Reference Date hold voting rights for a purpose other than to control the business activities of the Bank or Bank Holding Company that has issued the shares related to said voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Article), their Written Notices of Voting Rights Held in the Bank shall be submitted to the Prime Minister stating matters that relate to the holding status of those voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the 15th day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の四　銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を営む者に限る。）、信託会社（信託業法第三条又は第五十三条第一項の免許を受けたものに限る。）その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である銀行又は銀行持株会社の営業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る銀行議決権保有届出書は、第五十二条の二の十一第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となつた基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であつて、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I take it that you are asking about the proposed amendment to the Insurance Business Act that has been passed to the current session for continued deliberation. I assume that you are questioning the appropriateness of a mutual aid business of a public interest corporation or the arrangement in which a mutual aid business of a given public interest corporation is to be supervised by the former competent authorities, with an implication that the FSA should be responsible for supervision. Well, the fact is that the respective authorities, having the experience of supervising public interest corporations for a long time, are well-versed with specifics of their operation. On the subject of this Act, I believe that I named several examples the other day, such as the Japan Medical Association, which has always been supervised by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare since the Meiji era, including the years of supervision by its predecessor, the Health and Medical Bureau of the Ministry of Internal Affairs. While circumstances vary from authority to authority, they know very extensively about internal affairs of those corporations and have exercised thorough supervision and, in that sense, have a set of knowledge of their operation and other information accumulated in the course of the work of supervision in the past, which accordingly makes them presumably capable of delivering more fine-tuned supervision than the FSA would be. Since the most important thing is policyholder protection, we believe that, from such a perspective, having the former authorities supervise them is an appropriate way to go. It is also in comprehensive consideration of overall circumstances, including the fact that this exemption of the Act is a provisional step, that we find it appropriate to have the former authorities continue to supervise those corporations. 例文帳に追加

継続審議となっている保険業法の改正案のことだと思いますけれども、公益法人の共済事業あるいは旧主務官庁が監督することになっていますが、それはいかがなものかと、金融庁として監督すべきではないかという質問かと思いますけれども、公益法人というのは、それぞれの官庁が長い間、公益法人の監督をしてきたわけでございますから、その業務に関しては、各監督官庁が事情をよく知っており、この法律については、幾つかこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、例えば、日本医師会は確か明治以来、厚生省、当時の内務省衛生局が、ずっと監督官庁でございまして、各省色々ありますけれども、内部のことを非常によく知っており、各主務官庁がきめ細かい監督を行っていますから、そういった意味で、その業務に関する知見やこれまでの監督について蓄積している情報がございますので、金融庁に比べてより細かな監督を行うことができると考えられまして、契約者保護ということが一番大事ではございますが、そういった観点から（旧主務官庁が監督することが）適当というふうに考えております。そして、この法律の特例は当分の間という措置でございますので、そういったことを総合的に勘案して、引き続き旧主務官庁が監督することが適切だと考えております。 - 金融庁

(5) If the General Partner makes a distribution in kind pursuant to paragraph (3) of this Article, the General Partner shall request the Partners who are entitled to such distribution in kind to elect to either (A) receive the Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind or (B) request to the General Partner the disposition of all or part of such Portfolio Securities and to receive the proceeds of such disposition, no later than [_] days prior to the Reference Date. With respect to any Partners who communicate their intention to receive the proceeds of disposition in accordance with (B) within [_] days from such request, the General Partner shall deliver such disposition proceeds by the date of the distribution in kind after the disposition of the Portfolio Securities at such time and price as the General Partners determines in its discretion (provided that, as a general rule, such price shall be the closing price (or an equivalent price) on any day during the period from the date such communication has been made through the date of distribution in kind). In any other case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities in kind. The expenses incurred in connection with the General Partner’s disposition of Portfolio Securities pursuant to this paragraph shall be borne by the Partners who desire such disposition. 例文帳に追加

5. 無限責任組合員は、本条第3 項に基づき現物による分配を行う場合、現物分配基準日の少なくとも［ ］日前までに、当該現物分配の対象である組合員に対し、(A)分配の対象となる投資証券等を現物で受け取る方法、又は(B)当該投資証券等の全部若しくは一部の処分を無限責任組合員に依頼し、当該処分に係る処分代金を受け取る方法のいずれかを選択するよう申し出るものとする。無限責任組合員は、かかる申出から［ ］日以内に(B)の方法による処分代金の受領を希望する旨の連絡があった組合員については、無限責任組合員がその裁量により判断する時期及び価格（但し、当該連絡のあった日から現物分配を行う日までの任意の日における最終価格又はこれに準ずる価格を原則とする。）によって当該投資証券等を処分の上、現物分配を行う日にその処分代金を交付するものとし、その他の場合については、当該投資証券等の現物を交付するものとする。本項に基づく無限責任組合員による投資証券等の処分に関して発生した費用は処分を希望した組合員が負担する。 - 経済産業省

(a) The application shall relate to one invention only or to a group of inventions forming a single general inventive concept. (Sec. 38.1, IP CODE) (b) If several independent inventions which do not form a single general inventive concept are claimed in one application, the Director may require that the application be restricted to a single invention. A later application filed for an invention divided out shall be considered as having been filed on the same day as the first application: Provided that the later application is filed within four months after the requirement to divide becomes final, or within such additional time, not exceeding four months, as may be granted. Provided further, That each divisional application shall not go beyond the disclosure in the initial application. (Sec. 38.2, IP CODE)例文帳に追加

(a)出願は，1の発明又は単一の発明概念を形成する1群の発明についてのみ行う。(IP法第38条(38.1)) (b)単一の発明概念を形成しない複数の独立した発明が1の出願においてクレームされている場合は，局長は，当該出願を単一の発明に限定するよう要求することができる。分割した発明についてなされる後の出願は，最初の出願と同一の日に出願されたものとみなす。ただし，分割の要求が確定した後4月以内又は4月を超えない範囲で認められる追加期間内に後の出願がなされることを条件とする。更に，各分割出願が当初の出願における開示の範囲を超えないことを条件とする。(IP法第38条(38.2)) - 特許庁

(1) Regarding service of documents in proceedings before the Patent Office, the provisions of the Law on Service in Administrative 77 Procedures [Verwaltungszustellungsgesetz] shall apply, subject to the following: Procedures [Verwaltungszustellungsgesetz] shall apply, subject to the following: If acceptance of service by registered letter is refused without such grounds as are provided by law, service shall nevertheless be deemed to have been effected; 2. Service to an addressee who resides abroad and who has not, contrary to the requirement of Section 25, appointed a German representative may be effected by registered letter mailed from a post office. The same shall apply to addressees who are themselves German representatives within the terms of Section 25(2). Section 184(2), sentences 1 and 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis; 3. For the purposes of service upon holders of certificates of representation (Section 177 of the Patent Attorney Regulations [Patentanwaltsordnung]), Section 5(4) of the Law on Service in Administrative Procedures shall apply mutatis mutandis; 4. Documents may be served on addressees for whom a mail box has been installed at the Patent Office also by depositing the documents in the mail box of the addressee. A written statement regarding the deposit shall be made in the files of the case. The time of the deposit shall be recorded on the document. Service shall be deemed to have been effected on the third day after deposit in the mail box. 例文帳に追加

(1) 特許庁及び連邦特許裁判所に対する手続における書類の送達については，次の事項に従うことを条件として，行政訴訟における送達に関する法律の規定が適用される。1. 書留郵便による送達の受取が，法律によって定められている理由なしに拒絶された場合でも，送達は行われたものとみなされる2. 国外に居住しており，かつ，第 25条の要件に反して，ドイツにおける代理人を指名していない名宛人に対する送達は，郵便局から郵送される書留郵便をもって行うことができる。この規定は，名宛人であって，同人自身が第 25条(2)の意味においてドイツにおける代理人である者に対しても適用される。民事訴訟法第 184条(2)第 1文及び第 4文が準用される。 4. 特許庁に郵便私書箱が設置されている名宛人に対しては，書類の送達は，その郵便私書箱に投函することによっても行うことができる。投函に関する書面陳述が，その事件のファイルにおいて行われる。書類には，投函の日時が記録されなければならない。送達は，郵便私書箱への投函から 3日目に行われたものとみなされる。 4. 特許庁に郵便私書箱が設置されている名宛人に対しては，書類の送達は，その郵便私書箱に投函することによっても行うことができる。投函に関する書面陳述が，その事件のファイルにおいて行われる。書類には，投函の日時が記録されなければならない。送達は，郵便私書箱への投函から 3日目に行われたものとみなされる。 - 特許庁

Without limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make regulations: requiring persons to give statutory declarations in relation to applications under the Act or regulations, or in relation to proceedings under the Act (other than court proceedings); and making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and providing for the refund, in the whole or part of a fee paid under the Act; and providing for the waiver, in whole or part, of a fee that would otherwise be payable under the Act; and making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and empowering the Registrar to require a person to inform the Registrar, within the period prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the person wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act; and empowering the Registrar to require a person who wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act to appear on a day, and at a place and time, specified by the Registrar; and providing for the contents of design applications in which one or more designs are disclosed, including, but not limited to, requirements as to common ownership of the designs; and empowering the Registrar to direct an applicant for registration or publication of a design to do such things as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the requirements of the regulations for filing and: providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within the period specified in the regulations; and providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and providing for appeals against decisions of the Registrar made under the regulations; and making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and making transitional or consequential provisions as necessary or convenient because of the repeal of the Designs Act 1906 and the enactment of this Act; and provide for regulations under the Designs Act 1906 to continue to have effect (with any prescribed alterations) for specified purposes of this Act; and providing for things to be done for the purposes of this Act or the regulations by means of electronic equipment or communication; and empowering the Registrar to prepare, publish and sell such documents relating to designs as the Registrar thinks fit; and making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents. 例文帳に追加

(1)を制限することなく，同項は次の諸規則を制定する権限を含む。ある者に対し，本法若しくは規則に基づく申請に関して，又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関して，制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を提出するよう要求すること，及び未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害を理由に，宣言の作成又は行為の実行ができない者の代理として，本法に基づいて，宣言の作成又は行為の実行のために，かつ，それに関して規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき納付した手数料の全部又は一部における返還についての規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき別途納付すべき手数料の全部又は一部における請求権の放棄についての規定を制定すること，及び誤記又は明白な誤りを訂正するため又はその他の目的で，登録簿への記入の補正のために，かつ，その補正に関連して規定を制定すること，及びある者に対し，本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望するか否かを所定の期間内に登録官に通知するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望する者に，登録官が指定した日時及び場所に出頭するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び意匠の共通所有権についての要件を含むがそれに限らず，1又は2以上の意匠が開示される意匠出願の内容を定めること，及び意匠の登録又は公告を求める出願人に対し，出願が提出及び次についての規則の要件に従うようにするために必要な事柄を行うよう指示する権限を，登録官に付与すること，規則が指定する期間内に指示が守られない場合に出願が失効することについて規定すること，及びかく失効した出願の回復について定めること，及び規則に基づいて行った登録官の決定に対する上訴について定めること，及び手続を開始することができる又はその他の事柄をなすことができる期間を定める規定を含め，本法に基づく手続における所定の裁判所の実務及び手続のために，かつ，それに関連して規定を制定すること，及び当該期間の延長について定めること，及び1906年意匠法の廃止及び本法の施行を理由に，必要な又は便宜な経過規定又は派生規定を作成すること，及び本法の明記された目的のために引き続き有効であるように(所定の変更を加えて)，1906年意匠法に基づく規則を制定すること，及び本法又は規則の適用上，電子装置又は通信の方法によって行われるべき事柄についての規則を制定すること，及び登録官に対し，登録官が適切と考える意匠に関する書類を準備する，公告する及び販売する権限を付与すること，及び書類の廃棄のため及びそれに関する規定を作成すること - 特許庁

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. 例文帳に追加

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

(10) Where a person who has submitted a written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer national government bonds has, after submission, changed the name or address initially stated in the said written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer national government bonds, the person shall, no later than the day preceding the day on which the person is to receive, for the first time since the date of change, payment of interest on the book-entry transfer national government bonds for which the person made entries or records under the book-entry transfer system through the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. or qualified foreign intermediary to which the person submitted the said written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer national government bonds, submit a written application stating the person's new name or address and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, to the district director prescribed in paragraph (1)(i)(a), via the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. (in the case where the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. is a specified account management institution, submission shall be made via the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. and a specified book-entry transfer institution; in the case where the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. is a specified indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via [1] the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. (in the case where the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer national government bonds through another specified indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. and such other specified indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer national government bonds), [2] the specified account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer national government bonds, and [3] a specified book-entry transfer institution; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or via the said qualified foreign intermediary (in the case where the said qualified foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said qualified foreign intermediary (in the case where the said qualified foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer national government bonds through another foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said qualified foreign intermediary and such other foreign further indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer national government bonds) and the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer national government bonds) and the specified book-entry transfer institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer national government bonds. In this case, where the person has failed to submit the said written application, the provision of paragraph (1) shall not apply to interest on the said book-entry transfer national government bonds to be received by the person on or after the day on which the change has been made. 例文帳に追加

１０　振替国債非課税適用申告書を提出した者が、その提出後、当該振替国債非課税適用申告書に記載した氏名若しくは名称又は住所の変更をした場合には、その者は、その変更をした日以後最初に当該振替国債非課税適用申告書を提出した特定振替機関等又は適格外国仲介業者から振替記載等を受けている振替国債の利子の支払を受けるべき日の前日までに、その変更をした後のその者の氏名又は名称及び住所その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した申告書を、当該特定振替機関等（当該特定振替機関等が特定口座管理機関である場合には当該特定振替機関等及び特定振替機関とし、当該特定振替機関等が特定間接口座管理機関である場合には当該特定振替機関等（当該特定振替機関等が他の特定間接口座管理機関から当該振替国債の振替記載等を受ける場合には、当該特定振替機関等及び当該振替国債の振替記載等に係る他の特定間接口座管理機関）及び当該振替国債の振替記載等に係る特定口座管理機関並びに特定振替機関とする。以下この項において同じ。）を経由し、又は当該適格外国仲介業者（当該適格外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該適格外国仲介業者（当該適格外国仲介業者が他の外国再間接口座管理機関から当該振替国債の振替記載等を受ける場合には、当該適格外国仲介業者及び当該振替国債の振替記載等に係る他の外国再間接口座管理機関）及び当該振替国債の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）及び当該振替国債の振替記載等に係る特定振替機関等を経由して第一項第一号イに規定する税務署長に提出しなければならない。この場合において、当該申告書を提出しなかつたときは、その該当することとなつた日以後に支払を受ける当該振替国債の利子については、同項の規定は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(11) Where a person who submitted a written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer local government bonds has, after submission, changed the name or address initially stated in the said written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer local government bonds, the person shall, no later than the day preceding the day on which the person is to receive, for the first time since the date of change, payment of interest on the book-entry transfer local government bonds for which the person made entries or records under the book-entry transfer system through the specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. or qualified foreign intermediary to which the person submitted the said written application for tax exemption of book-entry transfer local government bonds, submit a written application stating the person's new name or address and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance, to the district director prescribed in paragraph (1)(ii)(a), via the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. (in the case where the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. is a specified account management institution, submission shall be made via the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. and a specified book-entry transfer institution; in the case where the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. is a specified indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via [1] the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. (in the case where the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer local government bonds through another specified indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said specified book-entry transfer institution, etc. and such other specified indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer local government bonds), [2] the specified account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer local government bonds, and [3] a specified book-entry transfer institution; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) and the person who pays the said interest, or via [1] the said qualified foreign intermediary (in the case where the said qualified foreign intermediary is a foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said qualified foreign intermediary (in the case where the said qualified foreign intermediary makes entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer local government bonds through another foreign further indirect account management institution, submission shall be made via the said qualified foreign intermediary and such other foreign further indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer local government bonds) and the foreign indirect account management institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer local government bonds), [2] the specified book-entry transfer institution pertaining to the entries or records under the book-entry transfer system regarding the said book-entry transfer local government bonds, and [3] the person who pays the said interest. In this case, where the person has failed to submit the said written application, the provision of paragraph (1) shall not apply to interest on the said book-entry transfer local government bonds to be received by the person on or after the day on which the change has been made. 例文帳に追加

１１　振替地方債非課税適用申告書を提出した者が、その提出後、当該振替地方債非課税適用申告書に記載した氏名若しくは名称又は住所の変更をした場合には、その者は、その変更をした日以後最初に当該振替地方債非課税適用申告書を提出した特定振替機関等又は適格外国仲介業者から振替記載等を受けている振替地方債の利子の支払を受けるべき日の前日までに、その変更をした後のその者の氏名又は名称及び住所その他の財務省令で定める事項を記載した申告書を、当該特定振替機関等（当該特定振替機関等が特定口座管理機関である場合には当該特定振替機関等及び特定振替機関とし、当該特定振替機関等が特定間接口座管理機関である場合には当該特定振替機関等（当該特定振替機関等が他の特定間接口座管理機関から当該振替地方債の振替記載等を受ける場合には、当該特定振替機関等及び当該振替地方債の振替記載等に係る他の特定間接口座管理機関）及び当該振替地方債の振替記載等に係る特定口座管理機関並びに特定振替機関とする。以下この項において同じ。）及び当該利子の支払をする者を経由し、又は当該適格外国仲介業者（当該適格外国仲介業者が外国再間接口座管理機関である場合には、当該適格外国仲介業者（当該適格外国仲介業者が他の外国再間接口座管理機関から当該振替地方債の振替記載等を受ける場合には、当該適格外国仲介業者及び当該振替地方債の振替記載等に係る他の外国再間接口座管理機関）及び当該振替地方債の振替記載等に係る外国間接口座管理機関）及び当該振替地方債の振替記載等に係る特定振替機関等並びに当該利子の支払をする者を経由して第一項第二号イに規定する税務署長に提出しなければならない。この場合において、当該申告書を提出しなかつたときは、その該当することとなつた日以後に支払を受ける当該振替地方債の利子については、同項の規定は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 212 (1) A person who pays a nonresident, in Japan, domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-2 to (xii) (in the case where the nonresident falls under the category listed in Article 164(1)(iv) (Nonresidents Having No Permanent Establishments in Japan): limited to domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-3 to (xii), and excluding that specified by a Cabinet Order) or a person who pays a foreign corporation, in Japan, domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-2 to (vii) or (ix) to (xii) (in the case where the foreign corporation falls under the category listed in Article 141(iv) of the Corporation Tax Act (Foreign Corporations Having No Permanent Establishments in Japan): limited to domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-3 to (vii) or (ix) to (xii), and excluding the one that falls under the provision of Article 180(1) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Domestic Source Income Received by Foreign Corporations Having Permanent Establishments in Japan) or Article 180-2(1) or (2) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Interest, etc. on Trust Property) and that specified by a Cabinet Order) shall, at the time of payment, collect income tax with respect to the said domestic source income, and pay it to the State no later than the tenth day of the month following the month that includes the date of collection. 例文帳に追加

第二百十二条　非居住者に対し国内において第百六十一条第一号の二から第十二号まで（国内源泉所得）に掲げる国内源泉所得（その非居住者が第百六十四条第一項第四号（国内に恒久的施設を有しない非居住者）に掲げる者である場合には第百六十一条第一号の三から第十二号までに掲げるものに限るものとし、政令で定めるものを除く。）の支払をする者又は外国法人に対し国内において同条第一号の二から第七号まで若しくは第九号から第十二号までに掲げる国内源泉所得（その外国法人が法人税法第百四十一条第四号（国内に恒久的施設を有しない外国法人）に掲げる者である場合には第百六十一条第一号の三から第七号まで又は第九号から第十二号までに掲げるものに限るものとし、第百八十条第一項（国内に恒久的施設を有する外国法人の受ける国内源泉所得に係る課税の特例）又は第百八十条の二第一項若しくは第二項（信託財産に係る利子等の課税の特例）の規定に該当するもの及び政令で定めるものを除く。）の支払をする者は、その支払の際、これらの国内源泉所得について所得税を徴収し、その徴収の日の属する月の翌月十日までに、これを国に納付しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively. 例文帳に追加

２　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書（以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。）について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書（第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム