「was made」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(131ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

The disclosure of information contained in the application during the twelve months preceding the filing date or the priority date of the application shall not prejudice the applicant on the ground of lack of novelty if such disclosure was made by: (a) The Inventor; (b) A foreign patent office, the Bureau or the Office, and the information was contained (a) in another application filed by the inventor and should not have been disclosed by the office, or (b) in an application filed without the knowledge or consent of the inventor by a third party which obtained the information directly or indirectly from the inventor; or (c) A third party which obtained the information directly or indirectly from the inventor.例文帳に追加

出願の出願日又は優先日の前12月の間における当該出願に含まれている情報の開示は，それが次の場合に該当するときは，新規性の欠如を理由として出願人を害さないものとする。 (a)発明者によるものである場合 (b)外国の特許庁，又は局若しくは庁によってなされた場合であって，当該情報が，(a)発明者がした別の出願に記載され，当該官庁によって開示されるべきではなかったとき，又は(b)発明者から直接又は間接にこれを得た第三者により当該発明者の認識又は同意なく行われた出願に記載されているとき，又は (c)発明者から直接又は間接に当該情報を得た第三者によってなされた場合 (a)の適用上，「発明者」は，当該出願の出願日において特許を受ける権利を有していた者をもいう。 (IP法第25条) - 特許庁

Subsequently, Japan decided — in light of the situation in the United States, the schedule of the Massachusetts state legislature, and the apparently positive attitude of the country — to observe the US actions. No progress was made, however, leading Japan and the EU to jointly request the establishment of a WTO panel in September 1998. This panel was established in October, but subsequent litigation within the United States (described below) declared the law unconstitutional and void, so Japan and the EU took procedures to suspend the panel in February 1999. On February 11, 2000, the authority of the panel lapsed because Article 12.12 of the Dispute Settlement Understanding (DSU) voids panels that have been suspended for more than twelve months.例文帳に追加

その後、米国の国内事情、マサチューセッツ州議会日程等に配慮し、しばらくの間、米国の前向きな対応を見守っていたものの、事態の実質的な進展が図られなかったため、1998年９月にEU と共同歩調により、米国に対してパネル設置要請を行い、10月にはパネルの設置が決定した。しかしながら、その後、米国内での合衆国憲法との整合性についての国内裁判手続の中（後述）で、マサチューセッツ州法は、効力停止の状態とされたことから、我が国は、1999年２月にEU とともにパネルの検討の停止の手続をとったところ、本件パネルは、紛争解決了解（DSU）第12条12項の規定が、12ヶ月を超えてパネルが停止された際にはパネル設置の根拠を失う旨を定めていることから、2000年２月11日に消滅した。 - 経済産業省

The following characteristics are made evident through the study of other months, in addition to November: (A) The production level of specific electronic parts rapidly deteriorated in October 2011,when the inundation of industrial estates started and the recovery of the production is still slow ( 50%compared with the same month a year ago, even as of March 2012); (B) The production of transportation machinery deteriorated more rapidly in October 2011 than the production of HDDs or electric products, but its production rapidly recovered recently*61 (as of March 2012, the production of the overall transportation machinery recovered to +14.7% compared with the same month a year ago, while that of HDDs and electric products showed 9.9% and 7.9%, respectively). (C) The level of production of some items, such as televisions and textile products (hereinafter referred to as "items subject to product adjustment"), was originally low due to the product cycles and other factors that are not directly associated with the floods. The magnitude of decline of these items was large compared with the same month a year ago.例文帳に追加

昨年11 月以外の月についても確認すると、①工業団地への浸水が始まった昨年10 月になって急速に特定電子部品の生産水準が悪化し、直近でも生産水準の回復が遅れている（今年3 月でも未だに前年同月比▲50%台）こと、②輸送用機械の方がHDD や電気製品よりも昨年10 月に突然急速に悪化し、直近では急速に生産を回復している*61（今年3 月の生産が、HDDは前年同月比▲ 9.9%・電気製品▲ 7.9%に対し、輸送用機械全体では同+14.7%まで回復）こと、③テレビや繊維製品等幾つかの品目（以下、生産調整品目という。）では、生産循環など洪水とは直接関係のない要因で既に洪水前から生産水準が低く、前年同月比のマイナス幅が大きかったことが特徴として確認できる。 - 経済産業省

Uji-shi planned to develop a medical examination system for babies by utilizing data in the basic resident register of which Uji-City was in charge. For this purpose, the development business was consigned by Uji-City to a private company, which further consigned the same to another company all the way down. Then, a part-time employee of the consignee (three-step consignments between Uji-City) made unauthorized copies of the data in the basic resident register and sold them to name-list distributors, who further resold them to other distributors. With respect to this matter, three inhabitants in Uji-City claimed that they had suffered mental damage due to the aforementioned leakage of data and filed an action against Uji-City with the Kyoto District Court, demanding compensation of damages for mental sufferings and attorney's fee. The Court finally ruled that Uji-City is liable for invasion of privacy rights and ordered Uji-City to pay 15,000 yen (10,000 yen as compensation for mental sufferings and 5,000 yen as attorney's fee) for each person. 例文帳に追加

宇治市がその管理に係る住民基本台帳のデータを使用して乳幼児検診システムを開発することを企図し、その開発業務を民間業者に委託したところ、再々委託先のアルバイトの従業員が上記データを不正にコピーしてこれを名簿販売業者に販売し、同業者が更に上記データを他に販売するなどをしたことに関して、宇治市の住民３人が、上記データの流出により精神的苦痛を被ったと主張して、宇治市に対し、損害賠償金（慰謝料及び弁護士費用）の支払を求めた事案において、プライバシー権侵害に基づく宇治市の不法行為責任を認め、損害賠償として１人当たり１万5000円（慰謝料１万円及び弁護士費用５０００円）の支払を命じた。 - 経済産業省

Judicial precedents finding liability for damages mostly concern cases where transactions were made in financial products or a long time has passed between the conclusion of the contract and the plaintiff's claim for damages. Judicial precedents in (ii) above are cases which ruled that a party had the right to terminate a contract, all concerning real estate transaction. These judicial precedents holds that a supplementary duty exists associated with the conclusion of a sales contract; which obligates the potential Vendor to inform the potential buyer of Important Matters, such as information about the surrounding environment, and as this is important information in deciding whether to conclude the sales contract, the buyer may terminate the sales contract where the Vendor has failed to perform his duty. In many cases where a buyer cannot use information property because no information about its operating environment was provided at the time the contract was concluded, the buyer may terminate the contract and demand a refund of the purchase price. 例文帳に追加

①の裁判例は、金融商品の取引や、契約締結後に長い期間が経過していた場合であり、損害賠償によるトラブル解決が求められたケースであったと考えられる。一方、②の裁判例はいずれも不動産取引のケースであって、契約締結前に売主が買主に周辺環境等の重要事項を提供することは、売買契約の締結に際しての当然の付随義務であり、これが売買契約を締結するか否かを決する上において重要な事柄である以上、当該義務違反をもって買主は売買契約の解除をなし得る、としたものである。動作環境が契約締結時に提供されなかったために、情報財が使用できないようなケースについては、買主は②の契約を解除して、支払済みの対価の返還を求めることが多いものと解される。 - 経済産業省

In particular, as the streamlining of clinical trials, etc., require detailed reviews, a "Working Group Regarding the Streamlining of Clinical Trials, etc." was established, and reviews centered on the three main items of cost, speed, and quality were conducted. Although steady overall improvements were seen due to efforts made by the relevant parties thus far, it was shown that there are issues that still need to be resolved in order for Japan to receive a certain level of recognition in terms of an environment to implement clinical trials from a global perspective, and uniform evaluation indicators need to be established for these items, etc. (refer to Attachment 2 "Working Group Investigation Results Regarding the Streamlining of Clinical Trials").例文帳に追加

特に、治験の効率化等についてはより詳細な検討を要することから「治験の効率化等 に関するワーキンググループ」を設置し、コスト、スピード、質の主要な3つの事項を中心に検討が行われ、これまでの関係者の取組みにより全体として着実な改善がみられたものの、我が国が治験を実施する環境として世界的な視点から一定の評価を得るためにはまだ解決すべき課題があること、及びそれらの事項について一定の評価指標を定める必要があること等の評価及び課題が示された（添付資料2 「治験の効率化等に関する ワーキンググループ検討結果」参照）。 - 厚生労働省

Are we to say that we are never intentionally to do wrong, or that in one way we ought and in another way we ought not to do wrong, or is doing wrong always evil and dishonorable, as I was just now saying, and as has been already acknowledged by us? Are all our former admissions which were made within a few days to be thrown away? And have we, at our age, been earnestly discoursing with one another all our life long only to discover that we are no better than children? Or, in spite of the opinion of the many, and in spite of consequences whether better or worse, shall we insist on the truth of what was then said, that injustice is always an evil and dishonour to him who acts unjustly? Shall we say so or not? Yes. 例文帳に追加

僕たちの主張というのは、僕たちは決して自分から間違ったことをしないというものか、あるいは、間違ったことをやるべき時とやってはいけない時があるというものか、どっちなんだろうか。言い換えると、間違ったことは常に悪くて不名誉なことなのかどうか、ということだ。昔こういうことを議論していて、僕たちはこの点で意見の一致を見たね。それとも、その意見はわずかな日数でもって捨てられてしまったのかね。僕たちは、こんなに年寄りで、しかもお互い長いことあんなに真剣に議論していながら、発見したのは、僕たちが子供と何の変わりもないということに過ぎなかったのか。それとも、多くの人の意見があっても、あるいは結果の善し悪しにかかわらず、僕たちは、不正は常に悪いことであり、不正な行動は不名誉をもたらすものだと主張するのだろうか。僕たちはそうすべきなのか。その通りだ。 - Plato『クリトン』

Where a person accused of an offence under section 103 proves - (a) that in the ordinary course of his business he is employed on behalf of other persons to apply trade marks or trade descriptions, or as the case may be, to make dies, blocks, machines, plates, or other instruments for making, or being used in making, trade marks; and (b) that in the case which is the subject of the charge he was so employed, and was not interested in the goods or other thing by way of profit or commission dependent on the sale of such goods or providing of services, as the case may be; and (c) that, having taken all reasonable precautions against committing the offence charged, he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trade mark or trade description; and (d) that, on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons on whose behalf the trade mark or trade description was applied, he shall be acquitted. 例文帳に追加

103条違反で告訴された者が，次に掲げることを立証したときは，無罪とする。 (a) その者が他人に雇用された者であって，自己の通常の業務上他人のために商標若しくは取引表示を使用し，又は場合に応じて商標を作成し若しくは商標の作成のために使用される打型，版木，機械，板金，若しくはその他の器具を製作したこと (b) 告訴の対象となっている事件において，自己が他人に雇用された者であり，かつ，違反に係る商品の販売又は場合に応じてサービスの提供による利潤若しくは歩合を得ることによってその商品又はその他の物に利害関係を有するものではないこと (c) 告訴された違反を防止するために一切の合理的な措置を講じ，違反とされることを行ったとき，商標又は取引表示が真正なものであることを疑う理由がなかったこと，及び (d) その者の代わりに商標又は取引表示が使用された当人に関して一切の情報を，自己の権限で，告訴人の要求により若しくは告訴人のために，提供したこと - 特許庁

(1) A registered trademark may be taken off the Register in respect of any of the goods or services, in respect of which it is registered on application made in the prescribed manner by any person aggrieved to the High Court Division or the Registrar, on the ground either- (a) that the trademark was registered without any bona-fide intention on the part of the applicant for registration that it should be used in relation to those goods or services, as the case may be, by him or, in a case to which the provisions of section 41 apply, by the company concerned, and that there has in fact, been no bona-fide use of the trademark, in relation to those goods or services by any proprietor thereof for the time being up to a date one month before the date of the 35 application; or (b) that up to a date one month before the date of the application, a continuous period of 5 (five) years or longer elapsed during which the trademark was registered and during which there was no bona-fide use thereof in relation to those goods or services by any proprietor thereof for the time being (2) The Tribunal shall not refuse an application submitted under sub-section (1) except where- (a) the applicant has been permitted under section 10 to register an identical or nearly resembling trademark in respect of the goods or services; or (b) where the Tribunal is of opinion that there has been, before the relevant date or during the relevant period, bona-fide use of the trademark by any proprietor thereof for the time being in relation to goods or services. 例文帳に追加

(1)登録商標は、不服を申し立てる何人によっても、次に掲げるいずれかの理由により、高等裁判所又は登録官に対して所定の方式で申請が行われると、登録されている商品又は役務について登録簿から削除することができる。(a)当該商標は当該商品又は役務(場合に応じ)につき出願人本人により又は第41条の規定が適用される場合は当該会社により使用されるべきとの登録出願人の誠実かつ真正の意図によらずして登録されたものであり、申請日1月以前までに、それらの商品又は役務に関する商標の所有者による当該商標の誠実かつ真正な使用が実際に存しないとき。(b)申請日1月前までに、当該商標が登録されて連続5年以上が経過しており、その間に現に当該商標を所有する者によるそれらの商品又は役務に関する当該商標の誠実かつ真正な使用がないとき。 - 特許庁

(ii) in the case where the Tender Offer Purchaser makes Purchase, etc. of the Share Certificates, etc. using a method different from the method of proportional distribution stated in the Tender Offer Notification: the amount calculated by multiplying the difference between the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages under the preceding paragraph if the Tender Offer Purchaser uses the method of proportional distribution and the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. was actually made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages (in cases where the Tender Offer Purchaser did not make Purchase, etc. of any of Share Certificates, etc. from the person entitled to claim damages, the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages if the method of proportional distribution is used) by the difference between the Tender Offer Price (or the price paid by the Tender Offeror as specified in Article 27-17(2) in the case where paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is also applicable, the favorable price referred to in the preceding item in the case where the preceding item is also applicable, or the more favorable one between them in the case where both Article 27-17(1) and the preceding item are also applicable) and the market price of the Share Certificates, etc. at the time when the damages are claimed under the preceding paragraph (or estimated disposal price in the case where there is no market price for the Share Certificates, etc., or disposal price in the case where the Share Certificates, etc. was disposed of before the damages is claimed). 例文帳に追加

二　当該公開買付けをした者が公開買付届出書に記載されたあん分比例方式と異なる方式で株券等の買付け等をした場合　当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に前項の規定による請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数から当該公開買付けをした者が当該請求権者から買付け等をした株券等の数を控除した数（当該請求権者から買付け等をしなかつた場合には、当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に当該請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数とする。）に公開買付価格（前条第一項に該当する場合にあつては同条第二項に規定する公開買付者が支払つた価格、前号に掲げる場合に該当する場合にあつては同号に定める有利な価格とし、そのいずれにも該当する場合にあつてはそのいずれか有利な価格とする。）から前項の規定による損害賠償を請求する時における当該株券等の市場価格（市場価格がないときはその時における処分推定価格とし、当該請求時前に当該株券等を処分した場合においてはその処分価格とする。）を控除した金額を乗じた額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(11) Where the obligation to obtain permission from the Minister of Finance has been imposed pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of Article 21 in regard to outward direct investment that shall be notified pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, a resident who makes the outward direct investment shall not be required to give notification, notwithstanding the provision of paragraph 1. In this case, when a notification pursuant to the said paragraph has already been given in regard to the outward direct investment, the notification (limited to those pertaining to outward direct investment (excluding those for which a notice of acceptance of the recommendation of discontinuance has been given pursuant to the provision of paragraph 6 and those of which discontinuation has been ordered pursuant to the provision of paragraph 9) which has not been actually made at the time of imposition of the obligation to obtain permission pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of the said article) shall be deemed to be an application pertaining to permission that the resident was obliged to obtain pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of the said article, which was filed on the day of the notification, and when a recommendation pursuant to the provision of paragraph 4, a notice pursuant to the provision of paragraph 6 (limited to those accepting the change of the content) or an order pursuant to paragraph 9 (limited to those pertaining to the change of the content) has been made in regard to outward direct investment pertaining to the notification, the recommendation, notice or order shall be deemed to have not been made. 例文帳に追加

１１　第一項の規定により届け出なければならないとされる対外直接投資について第二十一条第一項又は第二項の規定により財務大臣の許可を受ける義務が課された場合には、当該対外直接投資を行う居住者は、第一項の規定にかかわらず、その届出をすることを要しない。この場合において、当該対外直接投資について既に同項の規定による届出がされているときは、当該届出（同条第一項又は第二項の規定により許可を受ける義務が課された際現に行つていない対外直接投資（第六項の規定により中止の勧告を応諾する旨の通知がされたもの及び第九項の規定により中止を命ぜられたものを除く。）に係るものに限る。）については、これを当該届出のあつた日にされた同条第一項又は第二項の規定により受ける義務を課された許可に係る申請とみなし、当該届出に係る対外直接投資について第四項の規定による勧告、第六項の規定による通知（内容の変更を応諾する旨のものに限る。）又は第九項の規定による命令（内容の変更に係るものに限る。）があつたときは、当該勧告、通知又は命令については、これをなかつたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) With respect to the application of the provisions of item (i) of the preceding paragraph, in the case where payment has been made for two or more dividends of surplus, etc. whose base dates for the payment are included in the base business year, with regard to a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to a consolidated corporation prescribed in Article 68-92(1) of the Act (where payment was made for the said two or more dividends of surplus, etc. on a day within a consolidated business year or business year preceding the applicable consolidated business year pertaining to the base business year for the said dividends of surplus, etc. (hereinafter such paid dividends of surplus, etc. shall be referred to as "specified dividends of surplus, etc." in this paragraph), excluding the said two or more dividends of surplus) (including the cases where payment has been made for specified dividends of surplus, etc. and payment has not been made for dividends of surplus, etc. whose base dates for the payment are included in the said base business year, up to the day on which six months have elapsed after the final day of the base business year for the said specified dividends of surplus, etc.); the amount specified in item (i) of the preceding paragraph shall be the amount obtained by multiplying the excess amount when the amount listed in item (i) exceeds the amount listed in item (ii) by the ratio prescribed in item (i) of the said paragraph and then deducting therefrom the amounts listed in item (iii) and item (iv): 例文帳に追加

３　法第六十八条の九十二第一項に規定する連結法人に係る特定外国子会社等につき基準事業年度の期間内の日をその支払に係る基準日とする二以上の剰余金の配当等（当該二以上の剰余金の配当等が当該剰余金の配当等に係る基準事業年度に係る適用連結事業年度前の連結事業年度又は事業年度の期間内の日に支払われた剰余金の配当等（以下この項において「特定剰余金配当等」という。）である場合の当該二以上の剰余金の配当等を除く。）の支払があつた場合（特定剰余金配当等の支払があつた場合において、当該特定剰余金配当等に係る基準事業年度終了の日から六月を経過する日までに当該基準事業年度の期間内の日をその支払に係る基準日とする剰余金の配当等の支払がないときを含む。）における前項第一号の規定の適用については、同号に定める金額は、第一号に掲げる金額が第二号に掲げる金額を超えることとなる場合の当該超える部分の金額に同項第一号に規定する割合を乗じて計算した金額から第三号及び第四号に掲げる金額を控除した残額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 5 (1) The Heads of Ministries and Agencies etc. shall, when there is a demand under the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 1 and paragraph 2, perform the necessary investigation if it is possible to impose disciplinary actions based on the National Public Service Act and the Local Public Service Act, upon the employees involved in said bid rigging etc. Such action shall mean dismissal, suspension of duties, a cut in salary, or warning and other sanctions in the case of specified corporations (excluding specified incorporated administrative agencies - meaning incorporated administrative agencies (stipulated under Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Act on General Rules for Incorporated Administrative Agencies (Act No. 103 of 1999); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) and excluding specified local incorporated administrative agencies - meaning specified local incorporated administrative agencies (stipulated under Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Act on Local Incorporated Administrative Agencies (Act No. 118 of 2003); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph). Provided, however, that the Heads of Ministries and Agencies, heads of specified incorporated administrative agencies or heads of specified local incorporated administrative agencies, in cases where they do not have the appointive power of the said employees (including cases where the appointive power of the said employees was assigned), it shall suffice if the notification was made to the person with appointive power (including the person who was assigned the appointive power of the said employees; hereinafter referred to as "appointer") to the effect that the demand under the provisions of Article 3, paragraph 1 or paragraph 2, was received. 例文帳に追加

第五条　各省各庁の長等は、第三条第一項又は第二項の規定による求めがあったときは、当該入札談合等関与行為を行った職員に対して懲戒処分（特定法人（特定独立行政法人（独立行政法人通則法（平成十一年法律第百三号）第二条第二項に規定する特定独立行政法人をいう。以下この項において同じ。）及び特定地方独立行政法人（地方独立行政法人法（平成十五年法律第百十八号）第二条第二項に規定する特定地方独立行政法人をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を除く。）にあっては、免職、停職、減給又は戒告の処分その他の制裁）をすることができるか否かについて必要な調査を行わなければならない。ただし、当該求めを受けた各省各庁の長、地方公共団体の長、特定独立行政法人の長又は特定地方独立行政法人の理事長が、当該職員の任命権を有しない場合（当該職員の任命権を委任した場合を含む。）は、当該職員の任命権を有する者（当該職員の任命権の委任を受けた者を含む。以下「任命権者」という。）に対し、第三条第一項又は第二項の規定による求めがあった旨を通知すれば足りる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(12) In the case where there is any taxed amount of retained income prescribed in Article 66-8(1) of the Act (including the amount deemed to be the taxed amount of retained income pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the said Article) that was included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of income for the relevant business year of a domestic corporation prescribed in Article 66-8(1) of the Act, pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph, in the business year of the domestic corporation including the day on which any of the events listed in the items of the said paragraph occurred with regard to a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to the said domestic corporation, or an affiliated foreign company related to the said domestic corporation, when the said taxed amount of retained income included in deductible expenses includes the amount of foreign corporation tax on the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said domestic corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, and which consists of taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 69(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, or that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said domestic corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, and which consists of individually taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 81-15(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said domestic corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said taxable retained income or the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said domestic corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said individually taxable retained income shall be deemed to have been reduced on the final day of the relevant business year. In this case, the provisions of Article 69(10) of the said Act shall apply by replacing the terms in the said paragraph as follows: the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8), and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 66-7(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Domestic Corporations) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" the term "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (" shall be deemed to be replaced with "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (in the case where the reduction is deemed to have been made pursuant to the provisions of Article 39-18(12) (Calculation, etc. of Foreign Corporation Tax on Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc.) of the Order for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation; or" the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article, and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 68-91(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Individually Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Consolidated Corporations) of the said Act, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said domestic corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" and the term "paragraph (1) to paragraph (3) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 81-15(1) to (3)." 例文帳に追加

１２　法第六十六条の八第一項に規定する内国法人に係る特定外国子会社等又は当該内国法人に係る外国関係会社につき同項各号に掲げる事実が生じた日を含む当該内国法人の事業年度において同項の規定により当該内国法人の当該事業年度の所得の金額の計算上損金の額に算入された同項に規定する課税済留保金額（同条第二項及び第三項の規定により当該課税済留保金額とみなされたものを含む。）がある場合において、その損金の額に算入された当該課税済留保金額のうちに法第六十六条の七第一項の規定により当該内国法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第六十九条第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているとき、又は法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定により当該内国法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第八十一条の十五第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているときは、当該計算の基礎となつた当該内国法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額又は当該計算の基礎となつた当該内国法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額は、当該事業年度終了の日において減額されたものとみなす。この場合において、同法第六十九条第十項中「うち第八項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち第八項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び租税特別措置法第六十六条の七第一項（内国法人における特定外国子会社等の課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「減額された場合（」とあるのは「減額された場合（租税特別措置法施行令第三十九条の十八第十二項（特定外国子会社等の課税対象留保金額に係る外国法人税額の計算等）の規定により減額されたものとみなされた場合又は」と、「うち同条第八項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち同条第八項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び同法第六十八条の九十一第一項（連結法人における特定外国子会社等の個別課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該内国法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「同条第一項から第三項まで」とあるのは「第八十一条の十五第一項から第三項まで」として、同項の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(12) In the case where there is any individually taxed amount of retained income prescribed in Article 68-92(1) of the Act (including the amount deemed to be the individually taxed amount of retained income pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the said Article) that was included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of consolidated income for the relevant consolidated business year of a consolidated corporation prescribed in Article 68-92(1) of the Act, pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph, in the consolidated business year of the consolidated corporation including the day on which any of the events listed in the items of the said paragraph occurred with regard to a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to the said domestic corporation, or an affiliated foreign company related to the said consolidated corporation, when the said individually taxed amount of retained income included in deductible expenses includes the amount of foreign corporation tax on the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, and which consists of individually taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 81-15(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, or that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, and which consists of taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 69(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said individually taxable retained income or the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said taxable retained income shall be deemed to have been reduced on the final day of the relevant consolidated business year. In this case, the provisions of Article 81-15(10) of the said Act shall apply by replacing the terms in the said paragraph as follows: the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8), and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 68-91(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Individually Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Consolidated Corporations) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" the term "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (" shall be deemed to be replaced with "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (in the case where the reduction is deemed to have been made pursuant to the provisions of Article 39-118(12) (Calculation, etc. of Foreign Corporation Tax on Individually Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc.) of the Order for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, or;" the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article, and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 66-7(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Domestic Corporations) of the said Act, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" and the term "paragraph (1) to paragraph (3) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 69(1) to (3)." 例文帳に追加

１２　法第六十八条の九十二第一項に規定する連結法人に係る特定外国子会社等又は当該連結法人に係る外国関係会社につき同項各号に掲げる事実が生じた日を含む当該連結法人の連結事業年度において同項の規定により当該連結法人の当該連結事業年度の連結所得の金額の計算上損金の額に算入された同項に規定する個別課税済留保金額（同条第二項及び第三項の規定により当該個別課税済留保金額とみなされたものを含む。）がある場合において、その損金の額に算入された当該個別課税済留保金額のうちに法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定により当該連結法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第八十一条の十五第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているとき、又は法第六十六条の七第一項の規定により当該連結法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第六十九条第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているときは、当該計算の基礎となつた当該連結法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額又は当該計算の基礎となつた当該連結法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額は、当該連結事業年度終了の日において減額されたものとみなす。この場合において、同法第八十一条の十五第十項中「うち第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び租税特別措置法第六十八条の九十一第一項（連結法人における特定外国子会社等の個別課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「減額された場合（」とあるのは「減額された場合（租税特別措置法施行令第三十九条の百十八第十二項（特定外国子会社等の個別課税対象留保金額に係る外国法人税額の計算等）の規定により減額されたものとみなされた場合又は」と、「うち同条第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち同条第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び同法第六十六条の七第一項（内国法人における特定外国子会社等の課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「同条第一項から第三項まで」とあるのは「第六十九条第一項から第三項まで」として、同項の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 23-3 (1) The Issuer of Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned may, if he/she satisfies requirements specified in Article 5(4) and the total issue price or the total distribution amount of the Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Amount of Issue") is 100 million yen or more, register Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities by submitting a document which, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, state the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, including the period in which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Issue Period"), the kind of the Securities, the Planned Amount of Issue or the maximum amount of issue or distribution, and names of principal Financial Instruments Business Operators and/or Registered Financial Institutions which plan to underwrite the Securities (such document is hereinafter referred to as a "Shelf Registration Statement") to the Prime Minister; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors defined in Article 23-13(1) (limited to Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(1) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities) or where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation for Small Number of Investors defined in Article 23-13(3) (limited to Solicitation for Small Number of Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(3) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities). 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の三　有価証券の募集又は売出しを予定している当該有価証券の発行者で、第五条第四項に規定する者に該当するものは、当該募集又は売出しを予定している有価証券の発行価額又は売出価額の総額（以下「発行予定額」という。）が一億円以上の場合においては、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該募集又は売出しを予定している期間（以下「発行予定期間」という。）、当該有価証券の種類及び発行予定額又は発行若しくは売出しの限度額、当該有価証券について引受けを予定する金融商品取引業者又は登録金融機関のうち主たるものの名称その他の事項で公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定めるものを記載した書類（以下「発行登録書」という。）を内閣総理大臣に提出して、当該有価証券の募集又は売出しを登録することができる。ただし、その有価証券発行勧誘等が第二十三条の十三第一項に規定する適格機関投資家向け勧誘（同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。）に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し（当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。）及びその有価証券発行勧誘等が同条第三項に規定する少人数向け勧誘（同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。）に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し（当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。）を予定している場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) In the case that an entrepreneur is ordered to pay a surcharge pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1, the term "ten percent" appearing in paragraph 1 shall be "eight percent," the term "three percent" shall be "two point four percent", the term "two percent" shall be "one point six percent", the term "four percent" in the preceding paragraph shall be "three point two percent", the term "one point two percent" shall be "one percent", and the term "one percent" shall be "zero point eight percent" if the said entrepreneur had discontinued the relevant violation (limited to cases where the period of implementation pertaining to the violation is less than two years, except for cases that fall under the next paragraph) by the day one month prior to the date when the measure listed in item 4 of paragraph 1 of Article 47 or the measure as provided for in paragraph 1 of Article 102 was first made in relation to the case pertaining to the said violation (hereinafter referred to as "investigation start date" in this Article) (if the said measure is not made, the day one month prior to the date when the said entrepreneur received the notice pertaining to the said violation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 5 of Article 49, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 6 of Article 50 after deemed replacement (hereinafter referred to as "advance notice" in next paragraph and paragraph 7). 例文帳に追加

５　第一項の規定により課徴金の納付を命ずる場合において、当該事業者が、当該違反行為に係る事件について第四十七条第一項第四号に掲げる処分又は第百二条第一項に規定する処分が最初に行われた日（以下この条において「調査開始日」という。）の一月前の日（当該処分が行われなかつたときは、当該事業者が当該違反行為について第五十条第六項において読み替えて準用する第四十九条第五項の規定による通知（次項及び第七項において「事前通知」という。）を受けた日の一月前の日）までに当該違反行為をやめた者（次項に該当する場合を除き、当該違反行為に係る実行期間が二年未満である場合に限る。）であるときは、第一項中「百分の十」とあるのは「百分の八」と、「百分の三」とあるのは「百分の二・四」と、「百分の二」とあるのは「百分の一・六」と、前項中「百分の四」とあるのは「百分の三・二」と、「百分の一・二」とあるのは「百分の一」と、「百分の一」とあるのは「百分の〇・八」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 23-4 When, during the period on or after the day on which a Shelf Registration was made but before the day on which the Shelf Registration ceases to be effective, documents of the same kind as the Reference Documents referenced in the Shelf Registration Statement under paragraph (2) of the preceding Article are newly submitted, or there occurs any other circumstance which, as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, requires amendment of descriptions in the Shelf Registration Statement and documents attached thereto (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Shelf Registration Documents" in this Article) for the public interest or protection of investors, the person having made the Shelf Registration (hereinafter referred to as the "Shelf Registration Holder") shall submit an Amended Shelf Registration Statement to the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. This shall also apply to cases where despite the lack of new submission of such documents or such circumstance, the Shelf Registration Holder finds that any description in the Shelf Registration Documents should be amended. In this case, however, the Shelf Registration Holder may not make any amendment to increase the Planned Amount of Issue, change the Planned Issue Period or change other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の四　発行登録を行つた日以後当該発行登録がその効力を失うこととなる日前において、発行登録書において前条第二項の規定により参照すべき旨記載されている参照書類と同種の書類が新たに提出されたときその他当該発行登録に係る発行登録書及びその添付書類（以下この条において「発行登録書類」という。）に記載された事項につき公益又は投資者保護のためその内容を訂正する必要があるものとして内閣府令で定める事情があるときは、当該発行登録をした者（以下「発行登録者」という。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより訂正発行登録書を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。当該事情がない場合において、発行登録者が当該発行登録書類のうちに訂正を必要とするものがあると認めたときも、同様とする。この場合においては、発行予定額の増額、発行予定期間の変更その他の内閣府令で定める事項を変更するための訂正を行うことはできない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-2 (1) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to Annual Securities Reports and documents attached thereto. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of said statement or said other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Annual Securities Report and documents attached thereto, or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of an Annual Securities Report and documents attached thereto for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Annual Securities Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Annual Securities Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; and the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の二　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は、有価証券報告書及びその添付書類について準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「有価証券報告書及びその添付書類」と、「届出者」とあるのは「有価証券報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「有価証券報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「有価証券報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは、「訂正報告書の提出」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-4-3 (1) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Confirmation Letter. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of said statement or said other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Confirmation Letter, or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Confirmation Letter for the public interest or protection of investors"; the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Confirmation Letter" and "an amendment Confirmation Letter," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Confirmation Letter" and "an amendment Confirmation Letter," respectively: the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement"; and the part "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Confirmation Letter" and "to submit an amendment Confirmation Letter," respectively; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の四の三　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は、確認書について準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「確認書」と、「届出者」とあるのは「確認書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正確認書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「確認書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正確認書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「確認書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正確認書の提出」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-4-5 (1) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an Internal Control Report and documents attached thereto. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of said statement or said other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Internal Control Report and document attached thereto, or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of an Internal Control Report and documents attached thereto for the public interest or protection of investors"; the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Internal Control Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Internal Control Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and the part "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Internal Control Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の四の五　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は、内部統制報告書及びその添付書類について準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「内部統制報告書及びその添付書類」と、「届出者」とあるのは「内部統制報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「内部統制報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「内部統制報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Status Report of Parent Company, etc. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of said statement or said other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Status Report of Parent Company, etc. (meaning Status Report of Parent Company, etc. as provided for in Article 24-7(1); the same shall apply hereinafter), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Status Report of Parent Company, etc. for the public interest or protection of investors"; the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Status Report of Parent Company, etc." and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Status Report of Parent Company, etc." and "an amendment report," respectively: the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement"; and the part "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Status Report of Parent Company, etc." and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は、親会社等状況報告書について準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「親会社等状況報告書（第二十四条の七第一項に規定する親会社等状況報告書をいう。以下同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「親会社等状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「親会社等状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「親会社等状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-5, paragraph (1) of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act after the revision by the Act for Partial Revision of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Act (said Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Act") due to its relevance to a business type specified by the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (3) of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order (said Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Order") or a country set forth in appended table 1 as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc. 例文帳に追加

第三条　この命令の施行の際現に旧法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令（以下「新令」という。）第三条第三項に規定する大蔵大臣及び事業所管大臣が定める業種又は同条第四項に規定する別表第一に掲げる国に該当するため外国為替及び外国貿易管理法の一部を改正する法律による改正後の外国為替及び外国貿易法（以下「新法」という。）第五十五条の五第一項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Detention of goods bearing infringing sign If the chief executive considers that any imported goods that are in the control of the Customs may be goods to which a notice accepted under section 139 relates, those goods must be detained in the custody of the chief executive or any customs officer until the chief executive is served with an order made in proceedings under section 152 that the notice be discharged; or the chief executive is served with an order made in proceedings under section 152 that the goods be released; or any proceedings under section 153 in respect of those goods (including any appeal) are determined by a decision that the goods are not goods on or in physical relation to which an infringing sign is used that have been imported other than for private and domestic use; or any proceedings under section 153 in respect of those goods, including any appeal, are abandoned; or 10 working days have elapsed since notice was served under section 147 and the chief executive has not been served with notice of proceedings brought under section 153 by a person other than the importer or consignee.例文帳に追加

税関長が，税関の管理下にある輸入商品が第139条に基づいて受理された通知に関係する商品である可能性があると判断した場合は，それらの商品は，次に掲げる時まで，税関長又は税関職員の保管の下に留置されなければならない。税関長が，第152条に基づく手続において出された命令であって，通知は取り消されるべきであるとするものの送達を受ける時，又は税関長が，第152条に基づく手続において出された命令であって，商品の留置は解除されるべきであるとするものの送達を受ける時，又はそれらの商品に関する第153条に基づく法的手続(上訴を含む)が，個人としての及び家庭での使用以外の目的で輸入された商品が，侵害標識が商品上に又は商品との物質的関係において使用されている商品ではない旨の判決によって決定される時，又はそれらの商品に関する第153条に基づく法的手続が，上訴を含め，放棄される時，又は第147条に基づく通知が送達されてから10就業日が経過し，かつ，税関長が，輸入者又は荷受人以外によって第153条に基づいて提起された手続についての通知の送達を受けていない時 - 特許庁

Where an officer of customs has formed an opinion that any goods that have been imported and are under customs control may be goods to which a notice accepted under paragraph of section 82 relates, those goods shall forthwith be detained by him until ? the Controller of Customs has been served with an order made in proceedings under section 87 that the notice be discharged; the Controller of Customs has been served with an order made in proceedings under section 87 that the goods be released; any proceedings under section 87 (including any appeal) have been determined by a decision that the goods are not infringing goods; any proceedings under section 87 (including any appeal) have been abandoned; or 10 days have elapsed since notice was served under section 85 and the Controller of Customs has not been served with notice of proceedings brought under section 87 by any person other than the importer or consignee, whereupon the goods shall, subject to this section, be released to the person entitled to them. 例文帳に追加

税関職員が輸入され税関の管理下にある商品が第82条に基づいて受理された通知に関わる商品である可能性があるとの意見を有する場合，これら商品は速やかに税関職員によって次にいたるまで差押えられる。税関長が，第87条に基づく手続において発せられた当該通知を無効にする命令の通達を受けた，税関長が，第87条に基づく手続において発せられた当該商品を引き渡す命令の通達を受けた，当該商品が侵害商品でないという決定により第87条に基づく手続(全ての上訴を含む)が決定された，第87条に基づく何れかの手続(全ての上訴を含む)が放棄された，又は，第85条に基づき通知が送達されてから10日経過し，当該輸入者又は荷受人以外の者より第87条に基づき提起された手続の通知が税関長に対して通知されていない。これらに至った場合，当該商品は，本条に従うことを条件として，その権利を有する者に引き渡される。 - 特許庁

It is a document that lodged a very outright criticism against the fact that excessive competition policies implemented by Mr. Koizumi, or Mr. Takenaka, led to a considerable loss of Japan's social stability, including the so-called safety nets. As Policy Research Committee Chair (of the PNP), I wrote that point at the very beginning of the six items in the common policy platform, which was put together in the run-up to the election, and I also articulated in writing that even after the change of government, Mr. Koizumi's excessive competition policies had substantially damaged various social safety nets or regional economies. Further still, the three-party agreement spelled out that the per-household income level dropped by one million yen in the course of ten years during which the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) was in power. While I may not use expressions as sharp as those of (PNP) Chief Kamei, I am still intending to take a firm stance, keeping in mind the original intention behind the change of government, in addition to the points I've just made. 例文帳に追加

これは、民主党、当時社民党、国民新党でございまして、どちらにも小泉さん、あるいは竹中さんの行われた過度の競争政策によって、日本のいわゆるセーフティネットをはじめ、非常に社会の安定性が失われたということを、本当に真っ向から批判した文書でございまして、たまたま私は（国民新党の）政調会長でございましたから、選挙の前の6日間の当面の共通政策6つの中でも一番最初にそのことが書いてありまして、なおかつ政権が交代した後もそのことをきちっと小泉さんの過度の競争政策と申しますか、それが非常に社会のいろいろなセーフティネット、あるいは地域の経済、そういったことを傷めたということを明記してありますし、なおかつ当時自由民主党の政権でしたか、10年間で1世帯当たり100万円の所得が減ったということもきちっと3党合意には明記してありますし、そういったことを踏まえて、私も亀井（国民新党）党首ほど表現は厳しくはないかと思いますけれども、きちっとそういった原点を踏まえて政権交代の原点を踏まえてしっかりやっていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

This article refers to an invention claimed in a patent application that is identical to an invention or device (excluding an invention or device made by the inventor of the invention claimed in the said patent application) disclosed in the description, scope of claims, or drawings (in the case of a foreign-language application under Article 36bis (2), foreign language documents as provided in Article 36bis (1)) originally attached to another patent application or registration application of a utility model filed prior to the date that the said patent application was filed and published after the said patent application was filed in the patent gazette under Article 66 (3) of the Patent Act (hereinafter referred to as “gazette containing the patent”) or in the utility model bulletin under Article 14 (3) of the utility Model Act (Act No.123 of 1959) (hereinafter referred to as “utility model bulletin”) describing matters provided for in each of the paragraph s of the respective Article or the publication of the patent application. In this case, a patent shall not be granted for the invention notwithstanding Article 29 (1). 例文帳に追加

特許出願に係る発明が当該特許出願の日前の他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であって当該特許出願後に第六十六条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した特許公報(以下「特許掲載公報」という)の発行若しくは出願公開又は実用新案法(昭和三十四年法律第百二十三号)第十四条第三項の規定により同項各号に掲げる事項を掲載した実用新案公報(以下「実用新案掲載公報」という)の発行がされたものの願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面(第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願にあっては、同条第一項の外国語書面)に記載された発明又は考案(その発明又は考案をした者が当該特許出願に係る発明の発明者と同一の者である場合におけるその発明又は考案を除く)と同一であるときは、その発明については、前条第一項の規定にかかわらず、特許を受けることができない。 - 特許庁

Publication of a design registration in pursuance of section 18, second sentence, of the Designs Act shall include: the name or company name of the proprietor of the design and the proprietor's mailing address, the name or company name of an agent and the agent's mailing address, if the applicant is represented by an agent, reproductions illustrating the design, product specification, the class or classes in which the product is categorized under the Locarno Agreement of international classification of industrial designs, cf. Appendix 1, application number and application date, registration number, priority date and information on the country in which the original application was filed and the number of the application, if priority has been granted pursuant to section 16 of the Designs Act, priority date and information on the exhibition at which the design was displayed, if priority has been granted in pursuance of section 16of the Designs Act, the name of the designer, including the design group or company, and the designer's mailing address, if a request is being made for registration of one or more designers in the design register, cf. section 13of the Designs Act, information, if applicable, on a model of the design which may have been filed, and information to the effect that the design is registered in color, if this is the case. 例文帳に追加

意匠法第18条第2文の規定による意匠登録の公告には，次に掲げる事項を含めなければならない。意匠の所有者の名称又は会社名及び当該所有者の郵便宛先，出願人が代理人によって代理されている場合は，当該代理人の名称又は会社名及び当該代理人の郵便宛先，意匠を表す複製，製品明細，意匠の国際分類に関するロカルノ協定に基づいて分類された製品に係わるクラス(附則1参照)，出願番号及び出願日，登録番号，意匠法第16条(1)から(3)までの規定に従って優先権が与えられている場合は，優先日並びに元の出願がされた国及び出願番号に関する情報，意匠法第16条(4)の規定に従って優先権が与えられている場合は，優先日及びその意匠が展示された博覧会に関する情報，意匠登録簿に1又は2以上のデザイナーを登録するよう請求されている場合は(意匠法第13条(4)参照)，デザインに係わるグループ又は会社を含むデザイナーの名称及びデザイナーの郵便宛先，該当する場合は，提出されているひな形に関する情報，該当する場合は，意匠が色彩を付して登録されている旨の情報。 - 特許庁

(4) When forfeiture is directed on a conviction the Court, before whom the person convicted, may order any forfeited article to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Court thinks fit. Where a person is accused of an offence under section 73 of this Act and proves. (a) that in the ordinary course of his business he is employed on behalf of other persons to apply trademarks or trade descriptions, or, as the case may be, to make dies, blocks, machines, plates, or other instruments for making, or being used in making, trademarks; (b) that in the case which is the subject of the charge he was so employed, 58 and was not interested in the goods or service or other thing by way of profit or commission dependent on the sale of such goods or services or other things, as the case may be; (c) that the took reasonable precautions against committing the offence charged; (d) that he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, on reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description; and (e) that on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons on whose behalf the mark or description was applied; the Court may discharge the person from the complaint. 例文帳に追加

(4)没収が有罪判決について命令された場合、裁判所は、有罪を宣告された者に、没収が命じられたいかなる物品についても廃棄又は裁判所が適切と考えるその他の処分を命ずることができる。本法第73条に定める違反に係る被疑者が次に掲げる事項を立証した場合、裁判所は訴追を取り下げることができる。(a)自己の事業の通常の過程において、他の者に代わり、商標若しくは商品表示を付するために、又は(場合に応じ)、商標の制作用若しくは当該制作に使用される金型、版、機器、板材又はその他の器具を製作するために、当該他の者に雇用されていること。(b)容疑の対象となる事件において、そのように雇用されていた事実、及び、かかる商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の販売によって決まる利益若しくは手数料のを得る手段としての当該商品若しくは役務又はその他の物品に関与していなかったこと。(c)容疑の対象となった違反を犯さないよう合理的予防措置を講じていたこと。(d)違反行為を実行したとされる時点において、当該商標又は商品表示の真実性を疑う理由があったこと。(e)検察官により、又は検察官に代わって行われた要求に応じて、当該標章又は表示をその者のために付した者に関し、自らの権能が及ぶすべての情報を提出したこと。 - 特許庁

(12) A person listed in any of items (xxiii) and (xxiv) of paragraph (1) (limited to a Non-resident) and a person listed in any of items (xxv) and (xxvi) of that paragraph shall designate a person whose head office or principal office is located in Japan or who has a domicile in Japan and has the authority to represent said person with regard to any and all acts relating to a notification as prescribed in Article 23-13, paragraph (1) of the Act or to the delivery of documents as prescribed in Article 23-13, paragraph (2) of the Act pertaining to Securities acquired by said person (limited to Securities for which the Solicitation of Offers to Acquire fell under the cases listed in Article 2, paragraph (3), item (i) of the Act at the time of the issuance thereof, and was made to Qualified Institutional Investors excluded from being the counterparty to said Solicitation of Offers to Acquire pursuant to the provisions of the provisions of that item, or Securities for which Solicitation of Offers to Acquire fell under the cases listed in sub-item (a), item (ii) of that paragraph or Article 2-2, paragraph (4), item (ii), sub-item (a) of the Act at the time of the issuance thereof). 例文帳に追加

１２　第一項第二十三号及び第二十四号に掲げる者（非居住者に限る。）並びに同項第二十五号及び第二十六号に掲げる者は、本邦内に本店若しくは主たる事務所の所在地又は住所を有する者であって、当該者が取得した有価証券（その発行の際にその取得勧誘が法第二条第三項第一号に掲げる場合に該当する場合における同号の規定により当該取得勧誘の相手方から除かれる適格機関投資家を相手方として行うもの又は同項第二号イ若しくは法第二条の二第四項第二号イに掲げる場合に該当するものであった有価証券に限る。）に係る法第二十三条の十三第一項の規定による告知及び同条第二項の規定による書面の交付に関する一切の行為につき、当該者を代理する権限を有するものを定めなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The purchase under the preceding paragraph shall be made in such a way that the Right to Insurance Claim, etc. under the preceding paragraph is purchased based on the request of the creditor pertaining to the Right to Insurance Claim, etc., within the period during which all payments pertaining to the insurance contract are suspended, at the amount of the insurance claim of the Covered Insurance Contract and of other benefits, multiplied by the rate specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance by taking into consideration what is the kind of that Covered Insurance Contract, the expected interest rate, other content, the time when the insured event pertaining to that request took place, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase Amount"); provided, however, that the Participating Corporation shall, in the case that it called for the Right to Insurance Claim, etc. pertaining to the purchase and when the amount which was collected from the calling deducted by the amount specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance as the cost of said purchase exceeds the Purchase Amount pertaining to said purchase, pay this excess amount to the creditor pertaining to said Right to Insurance Claim, etc. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の買取りは、保険契約に係る支払のすべてを停止している期間内に、前項の保険金請求権等を、その保険金請求権等に係る債権者の請求に基づいて、補償対象契約の保険金その他の給付金の額に当該補償対象契約の種類、予定利率その他の内容、当該請求に係る保険事故が発生した時期等を勘案して内閣府令・財務省令で定める率を乗じて得た額（以下「買取額」という。）で買い取ることにより行うものとする。ただし、加入機構は、その買取りに係る保険金請求権等の回収をした場合において、当該回収によって得た金額から当該買取りに要した費用として内閣府令・財務省令で定めるものの額を控除した金額が、当該買取りに係る買取額を超えるときは、その超える部分の金額を当該保険金請求権等に係る債権者に対して支払うものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 147 The provisions of Article 137 to the preceding Article (Request for Examination of Documentary Evidence, etc.; Attaching of Translation, etc.; Period for Submission of Copy of Documentary Evidence; Method of Filing Petition for Order to Submit Document, etc.; Retention of Presented Document; Record of Examination of Evidence by Authorized Judge, etc.; Method of Submission, etc. of Document; Handling in Cases where Request for Examination of Documentary Evidence was Made for Transcription of Audio Tape, etc.; Clear Indication of Reason in Cases of Denying Authenticity of Creation of Document; and Record, etc. pertaining to Document, etc. to be Used for Comparison of Handwriting, etc.) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the objects prescribed in Article 231 (Application Mutatis Mutandis to Objects Equivalent to Documents) of the Code, except as otherwise provided. 例文帳に追加

第百四十七条　第百三十七条から前条まで（書証の申出等、訳文の添付等、書証の写しの提出期間、文書提出命令の申立ての方式等、提示文書の保管、受命裁判官等の証拠調べの調書、文書の提出等の方法、録音テープ等の反訳文書の書証の申出があった場合の取扱い、文書の成立を否認する場合における理由の明示及び筆跡等の対照の用に供すべき文書等に係る調書等）の規定は、特別の定めがある場合を除き、法第二百三十一条（文書に準ずる物件への準用）に規定する物件について準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 2 (1) With regard to the use plan prescribed in the provision of Article 8, paragraph (1) of the Act on Special Measures for the Promotion of New Energy Use, etc. (hereinafter referred to as the "Act") which pertains to the new energy use, etc. listed in Article 1, item (i), item (iii), item (viii) to item (x), item (xii) or item (xv) of the Order for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures for the Promotion of New Energy Use, etc. prior to the revision by this Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Order"), for which an application was filed pursuant to the provision of Article 8, paragraph (1) of the Act prior to the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order and a disposition of certification or non-certification had not been made at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable to the competent minister's disposition concerning said application. 例文帳に追加

第二条　この政令の施行の日前にこの政令による改正前の新エネルギー利用等の促進に関する特別措置法施行令（以下「旧令」という。）第一条第一号、第三号、第八号から第十号まで、第十二号又は第十五号に掲げる新エネルギー利用等に係る新エネルギー利用等の促進に関する特別措置法（以下「法」という。）第八条第一項の規定により認定の申請がされた同項の利用計画であって、この政令の施行の際認定をするかどうかの処分がされていないものについての主務大臣の認定については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vii) In the case that the patented invention is an employee invention made by University, etc. Researcher and the right to obtain a patent related to said patented invention was succeeded by a person who received approval set forth in Article 4, paragraph 1 of the Act on the Promotion of Technology Transfer from Universities to Private Industry (including a person who received approval of changes pursuant to the provisions of Article 5, paragraph 1 of the same Act,; hereinafter in this Article and in Supplementary Provisions Article 3 referred to as "Accredited TLO"), the person that establishes said University or College of Technology, or Inter-University Research Institutes which has succeeded the right to obtain said patent from said Accredited TLO. 例文帳に追加

七　その特許発明が大学等研究者がした職務発明である場合であって、当該特許発明に係る特許を受ける権利が大学等における技術に関する研究成果の民間事業者への移転の促進に関する法律第四条第一項の承認を受けた者（同法第五条第一項の変更の承認を受けた者を含む。以下この条及び附則第三条において「承認事業者」という。）に承継されていた場合において、当該承認事業者から当該特許を受ける権利を承継した当該大学若しくは高等専門学校を設置する者又は大学共同利用機関法人 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a report (hereinafter referred to in this article as "Report on Implementing Collection after Delivery") pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, Paragraph 3, Paragraph 7, Paragraph 10 or Paragraph 13 is to be made by the entity (hereinafter referred to in this article simply as "Person Taking Delivery") taking delivery of the End-of-Life Vehicles reported on in the Report on Implementing Delivery within a period of time specified by ordinance of the competent minister after the report (in the report pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, Paragraph 9 or Paragraph 11, this does not apply to delivery to Scrap Dealers of Whole Dismantled Vehicles. Hereinafter referred to in this article as "Report on Implementing Delivery") pursuant to the provisions of Article 81, Paragraph 2, Paragraph 4, Paragraph 6, Paragraph 8, Paragraph 9, Paragraph 11 or Paragraph 12 was received, the Information Management Entity shall notify the person making the Report on Implementing Delivery to this effect without delay. 例文帳に追加

２　情報管理センターは、第八十一条第二項、第四項、第六項、第八項、第九項、第十一項又は第十二項の規定による報告（同条第九項又は第十一項の規定による報告にあっては、解体自動車全部利用者への引渡しに係るものを除く。以下この条において「引渡実施報告」という。）を受けた後主務省令で定める期間内に、当該引渡実施報告により報告された使用済自動車等の引渡しを受ける者（以下この条において単に「引渡しを受ける者」という。）が行うべき同条第三項、第七項、第十項又は第十三項の規定による報告（以下この条において「引渡後引取実施報告」という。）を受けないときは、遅滞なく、その旨を当該引渡実施報告を行った者に通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where a contractual deposit of the amount of distribution to a bankruptcy claim set forth in item (iii) or item (iv) of paragraph (1) is made pursuant to the provision of these items, if the bankruptcy creditor or holder of a right of separate satisfaction (including a holder of a quasi-right of separate satisfaction) who holds said bankruptcy claim was unable to participate in the procedure for a final distribution by reason of the failure to conform to the provision of Article 198(2) or show proof of the matter prescribed in paragraph (3) of said Article (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5) of said Article), a bankruptcy trustee shall make a final distribution of such amount of distribution deposited by contract to other bankruptcy creditors. 例文帳に追加

３　第一項第三号又は第四号の規定により当該各号に掲げる破産債権に対する配当額を寄託した場合において、当該破産債権を有する破産債権者又は別除権者（準別除権者を含む。）が第百九十八条第二項の規定に適合しなかったこと又は同条第三項（同条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する事項につき証明をしなかったことにより最後配当の手続に参加することができなかったときは、破産管財人は、その寄託した配当額の最後配当を他の破産債権者に対してしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provision of the preceding paragraph shall also apply in cases where the certification under Article 5 becomes invalid in accordance with Article 19 during the period when the certified dispute resolution procedure was being carried out for a dispute, and the party to the dispute that made the request for certified dispute resolution brings a suit for the demand disputed through the certified dispute resolution procedure, within one month from the date on which the party received the notification under Article 17, Paragraph 3, or Article 18, Paragraph 2, or became aware of a fact that falls under any of the items of Article 19, whichever comes earlier (or the date on which the party became aware of the death of the certified dispute resolution business operator in cases where the cause of invalidation of the certification under Article 5 is the death of the certified dispute resolution business operator). 例文帳に追加

２　第十九条の規定により第五条の認証がその効力を失い、かつ、当該認証がその効力を失った日に認証紛争解決手続が実施されていた紛争がある場合において、当該認証紛争解決手続の実施の依頼をした当該紛争の当事者が第十七条第三項若しくは第十八条第二項の規定による通知を受けた日又は第十九条各号に規定する事由があったことを知った日のいずれか早い日（認証紛争解決事業者の死亡により第五条の認証がその効力を失った場合にあっては、その死亡の事実を知った日）から一月以内に当該認証紛争解決手続の目的となった請求について訴えを提起したときも、前項と同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 228 (1) Where a trustee has distributed trust property to a beneficiary, if any deficit (meaning the amount obtained by deducting the amount of assets on the balance sheet from the amount of liabilities on the same in cases where the amount of liabilities exceeds the amount of assets; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) occurs as of the time set forth in Article 222, paragraph (4), when it first comes after the day on which said delivery was made, the persons listed in the following items shall have the joint and several liability specified in the respective items (in the case of the beneficiary set forth in item (ii), the joint and several liability up to the amount of each delivery actually received); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the trustee has proved that the trustee did not fail to exercise due care in performing trustee's duties: 例文帳に追加

第二百二十八条　受託者が受益者に対する信託財産に係る給付をした場合において、当該給付をした日後最初に到来する第二百二十二条第四項の時期に欠損額（貸借対照表上の負債の額が資産の額を上回る場合において、当該負債の額から当該資産の額を控除して得た額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）が生じたときは、次の各号に掲げる者は、連帯して（第二号に掲げる受益者にあっては、現に受けた個別の給付額の限度で連帯して）、当該各号に定める義務を負う。ただし、受託者がその職務を行うについて注意を怠らなかったことを証明した場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 79-58 (1) When an individual who is a General Customer has received a payment set forth in Article 79-56(1) pertaining to Claims Subject to Compensation that he/she holds against a Recognized Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to those pertaining to Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the provision of the Income Tax Act (Act No. 33 of 1965) and other laws and regulations concerning income tax shall apply by deeming that Securities pertaining to Claims Subject to Compensation (limited to part of said Claims Subject to Compensation which said Fund acquired by said payment) pertaining to said payment was transferred from said individual to the Fund which made said payment by the amount paid at the time of receipt of the payment. 例文帳に追加

第七十九条の五十八　一般顧客である個人が、認定金融商品取引業者に対して有する補償対象債権（有価証券に係るものに限る。以下この項において同じ。）に係る第七十九条の五十六第一項の支払を受けたときは、その支払を受けた時に、その支払を受けた金額により、当該個人から当該支払をした基金に対し当該支払に係る補償対象債権（当該補償対象債権のうち当該支払をしたことにより当該基金が取得した部分に限る。）に係る有価証券の譲渡があつたものとみなして、所得税法（昭和四十年法律第三十三号）その他の所得税に関する法令の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) In the case where the whole of the area of the fishing ground for the demarcated fishery covered by a specific demarcated fishery right publicly notified pursuant to the provision of paragraph (5), Article 11 is waters where no specific demarcated fishery right for said demarcated fishery existed for one year before the date of said public notice (the date of the public notice of change, in the case where said public notice of change was made pursuant to the provision of the same paragraph for the area of the fishing ground pertaining to said demarcated fishery), the Fisheries Cooperative Association or the corresponding Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations which does not operate the fishery covered by said specific demarcated fishery right is qualified for the license of the demarcated fishery covered by said specific demarcated fishery right, only if the association or the federation falls under the following, notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph (1) and paragraph (2). 例文帳に追加

６　第十一条第五項の規定により公示された特定区画漁業権の内容たる区画漁業に係る漁場の区域の全部が当該公示の日（当該区画漁業に係る漁場の区域について同項の規定による変更の公示がされた場合には、当該公示の日）以前一年間に当該区画漁業を内容とする特定区画漁業権の存しなかつた水面である場合における当該特定区画漁業権の内容たる区画漁業の免許については、地元地区の全部又は一部をその地区内に含む漁業協同組合又はその漁業協同組合を会員とする漁業協同組合連合会であつて当該特定区画漁業権の内容たる漁業を営まないものは、第一項及び第二項の規定にかかわらず、次に掲げるものに限り、適格性を有する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 8 The provisions of the Family Registration Act (Act No. 224 of 1947), Article 102 shall apply mutatis mutandis to notification of acquisition of nationality in cases where Japanese nationality was acquired pursuant to the provision of the supplementary provisions, Article 2, paragraph (1), Article 4, paragraph (1), or Article 5, paragraph (1). In such cases, the term "the date of that acquisition" in said Act, Article 102, paragraph (1) shall be read "the date of that acquisition (in cases of application of the provision of the supplementary provisions, Article 2, paragraph (3), proviso of the Act partially revising the Nationality Act (Act No. 88 of 2008), the date of notification pursuant to the provision of the same Article, paragraph (1) (in cases where said notification shall be deemed to have been made pursuant to the provision of the same Act, Supplemental Provisions, Article 3, paragraph (1), the date of enforcement of said Act))." 例文帳に追加

第八条　戸籍法（昭和二十二年法律第二百二十四号）第百二条の規定は、附則第二条第一項、第四条第一項又は第五条第一項の規定により日本の国籍を取得した場合の国籍取得の届出について準用する。この場合において、同法第百二条第一項中「その取得の日」とあるのは、「その取得の日（国籍法の一部を改正する法律（平成二十年法律第八十八号）附則第二条第三項ただし書の規定の適用がある場合にあつては、同条第一項の規定による届出の日（同法附則第三条第一項の規定により当該届出をしたものとみなされる場合にあつては、同法の施行の日））」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) It shall fly to overhead the first place of landing (hereinafter referred to as "destination") (in the case where an air navigation radio facility or a point is specified as an approach point to the destination, it shall be overhead that point, also applicable to Articles hereafter) in accordance with the applicable flight plan, following the routes in the flight plan that was approved pursuant to the provisions of Article 97 (1) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as "approved route"). However, if there is temporary deviation from the approved route based on the instruction received from air traffic control provider prior to the communication equipment failure (hereinafter referred to as "instruction prior to failure"), return to the approved route at the nearest reporting point (if the instruction prior to failure made clear the point where it returns to the approved route, then the applicable point), and fly according to the applicable approved route. 例文帳に追加

イ　法第九十七条第一項の承認を受けた飛行計画による航路（以下「承認を受けた航路」という。）に従つて、当該飛行計画による最初の着陸地（以下「目的地」という。）の上空（目的地へ進入する地点として特定の航空保安無線施設又は地点が指示されている場合は、その上空。以下この条において同じ。）まで飛行すること。ただし、通信機が故障する以前に管制業務を行う機関より受けた指示（以下「故障前の指示」という。）により、承認を受けた航路から一時的に逸脱している場合は、最寄りの位置通報点（故障前の指示により、承認を受けた航路に戻る地点が明らかにされている場合は、当該地点）において、承認を受けた航路に戻り、その後、当該承認を受けた航路に沿つて飛行すること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 20 A General Gas Utility shall not supply gas to meet general demand in its service area under supply conditions other than those set out in general supply provisions approved under Article 17, paragraph 1 (or, if notification of revision has been given pursuant to paragraph 4 of the said Article, the revised general supply provisions; if revision has been made pursuant to Article 18, paragraph 2, the revised general supply provisions) or those set out in Optional Supply Provisions for which notification was given pursuant to Article 17, paragraph 7; provided, however, that this shall not apply when a General Gas Utility has reached an agreement on a Large-Volume Supply with the recipient of gas supply, or has obtained approval from the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry because of special circumstances. 例文帳に追加

第二十条　一般ガス事業者は、第十七条第一項の認可を受けた供給約款（同条第四項の規定による変更の届出があつたときは、変更後の供給約款）（第十八条第二項の規定による変更があつたときは、変更後の供給約款）又は第十七条第七項の規定による届出をした選択約款以外の供給条件により、その供給区域における一般の需要に応じガスを供給してはならない。ただし、大口供給を行う場合においてその供給の相手方と合意したとき、又は特別の事情がある場合において経済産業大臣の認可を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where a disposition is to be made with respect to an application for approval of model under Article 39-8, paragraph 1 or Article 39-13-3 of the Old Gas Business Act which has been filed by a person who passed the examination conducted under Article 39-9 of the Old Gas Business Act prior to the enforcement of Article 11, by submitting, within ten days from the date of enforcement of Article 11, a document proving that the person passed the examination, or an application for approval of model under Article 39-8, paragraph 1 or Article 39-13-3 of the Old Gas Business Act which has been filed by a person who applied for an examination, to which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the preceding paragraph, by submitting, within ten days from the day when the person was deemed to have passed the examination, a document proving that the person passed the examination, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable. 例文帳に追加

３　第十一条の規定の施行前にされた旧ガス事業法第三十九条の九の試験について合格とされた者が第十一条の規定の施行の日から十日以内にその試験に合格したことを証する書面を添えてする旧ガス事業法第三十九条の八第一項若しくは第三十九条の十三の三の規定の例による型式の承認の申請又は前項の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされた試験の申請をした者であって当該試験に合格とされたものがその合格とされた日から十日以内にその試験に合格したことを証する書面を添えてする旧ガス事業法第三十九条の八第一項若しくは第三十九条の十三の三の規定の例による型式の承認の申請についての処分については、なお従前の例による。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) Where a foreign corporation has, as a result of a specified split-off-type company split prescribed in Article 68-3(2) of the Act which was implemented by a domestic corporation to which the said corporation issued old shares (meaning shares that were held by the said corporation), been provided with shares of a specified foreign parent corporation prescribed in the said paragraph, the provisions of Article 188(1)(xvii) of the Order for Enforcement of the Corporation Tax Act shall not apply to the calculation made, with regard to the amount of the said foreign corporation's income categorized as domestic source income prescribed in Article 142 of the Corporation Tax Act, in accordance with the provisions of Article 61-2(4) of the said Act whose terms are replaced under the provisions of the said paragraph. 例文帳に追加

５　外国法人が旧株（当該外国法人が有していた株式をいう。）を発行した内国法人の行つた法第六十八条の三第二項に規定する特定分割型分割により同項に規定する特定外国親法人の株式の交付を受けた場合において、当該外国法人の法人税法第百四十二条に規定する国内源泉所得に係る所得の金額につき、同項の規定により読み替えられた同法第六十一条の二第四項の規定に準じて計算するときは、法人税法施行令第百八十八条第一項第十七号の規定は、適用しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム