「やくじょうきんり」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(172ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

第二百四十一条　内閣総理大臣は、保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等の業務若しくは財産の状況に照らしてその保険業の継続が困難であると認めるとき、又はその業務（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本における業務。以下この条から第二百五十五条の二までにおいて同じ。）の運営が著しく不適切でありその保険業の継続が保険契約者等の保護に欠ける事態を招くおそれがあると認めるときは、当該保険会社等又は外国保険会社等に対し、業務の全部若しくは一部の停止、合併、保険契約の移転（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本における保険契約の移転）若しくは当該保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等の株式の他の保険会社等、外国保険会社等若しくは保険持株会社等による取得（第二百四十七条第一項、第二百五十六条から第二百五十八条まで、第二百七十条の三の二第四項及び第五項並びに第二百七十条の四第四項及び第五項において「合併等」という。）の協議その他必要な措置を命じ、又は保険管理人による業務及び財産（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本に所在する財産。次条及び第二百四十六条の二から第二百四十七条の二までにおいて同じ。）の管理を命ずる処分をすることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 241 (1) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds that the continuation of an Insurance Business will be difficult in light of the state of the business or property of an Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or when he/she finds that the operation of that business (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., business in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article to Article 255-2 inclusive) is extremely inappropriate and that there is a risk that the continuation of that Insurance Business could bring about a situation that lacks protection for Insurance Policyholders, etc., order the whole or partial suspension of business, a merger, a transfer of insurance contracts (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., the transfer of insurance contracts in Japan) or agreement for the acquisition of the shares of that Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., by another Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or Insurance Holding Company, etc. (referred to as "Merger, etc." in Article 247, paragraph (1); Article 256 to Article 258 inclusive; Article 270-3-2, paragraph (4) and Article 270-3-2, paragraph (5); and Article 270-4, Article 270-4, paragraph (4) and Article 270-4, paragraph (5)) or any other necessary measure against that Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or make a disposition ordering the business and property management (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., property located in Japan. The same shall apply in the following Article and Article 246-2 to Article 247-2 inclusive.) by an Insurance Administrator.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

二　価額決定日において当該有価証券が公開買付け等（金融商品取引法第二十七条の二第六項（同法第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する公開買付け及びこれに相当する外国の法令に基づく制度をいう。以下この号及び第六十条の二において同じ。）の対象であるときは、当該価額決定日における当該公開買付け等に係る契約における当該有価証券の価格例文帳に追加

(ii) when said Securities are subject to Tender Offer, etc. (which means the Tender Offer prescribed in Article 27-2, paragraph (6) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2, paragraph (2) of the same Act) and any equivalent system based on laws and regulations in a foreign state; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item and Article 60-2) as on the Value Determination Day, the price of said Securities at the time of drawing up a contract pertaining to said Tender Offer, etc. as on said Value Determination Day.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

稲作栽培で灌漑用水は稲の成育増収を計る上では施肥に次ぐ大切な管理事項で、これの対応の適否で雑草、病害に影響し農薬多用の原因となる、従来の農業用水は川を堰き止め、常に用水路に水を流し各自が自由に灌漑していた、近年治水の観点から堰体を撤去しポンプ揚水に変わった、施設管理費・電力費・設備償却費の減少を計るため揚水は日時を定めている、農家はこの時間帯に対応しなければならない、近年農家は収入の関係でほとんどが兼業農家でありこの止水作業が時間の関係で困難になり最適管理が出来ない、利水の経費を少しでも減らし米作のコストダウンを計らねばならない。例文帳に追加

To provide an automatic water-stopping device for saving useless water and time, and decreasing the cost of the device by solving a problem such that it is difficult to stop water optimally, since a water-stopping time zone is usually a working time after feeding water to paddies. - 特許庁

２　第十九条の規定により第五条の認証がその効力を失い、かつ、当該認証がその効力を失った日に認証紛争解決手続が実施されていた紛争がある場合において、当該認証紛争解決手続の実施の依頼をした当該紛争の当事者が第十七条第三項若しくは第十八条第二項の規定による通知を受けた日又は第十九条各号に規定する事由があったことを知った日のいずれか早い日（認証紛争解決事業者の死亡により第五条の認証がその効力を失った場合にあっては、その死亡の事実を知った日）から一月以内に当該認証紛争解決手続の目的となった請求について訴えを提起したときも、前項と同様とする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provision of the preceding paragraph shall also apply in cases where the certification under Article 5 becomes invalid in accordance with Article 19 during the period when the certified dispute resolution procedure was being carried out for a dispute, and the party to the dispute that made the request for certified dispute resolution brings a suit for the demand disputed through the certified dispute resolution procedure, within one month from the date on which the party received the notification under Article 17, Paragraph 3, or Article 18, Paragraph 2, or became aware of a fact that falls under any of the items of Article 19, whichever comes earlier (or the date on which the party became aware of the death of the certified dispute resolution business operator in cases where the cause of invalidation of the certification under Article 5 is the death of the certified dispute resolution business operator).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十九条　法務大臣は、要請国から、条約に基づき、国内受刑者（日本国において懲役刑若しくは禁錮刑又は国際受刑者移送法（平成十四年法律第六十六号）第二条第二号　に定める共助刑の執行として拘禁されている者をいう。以下同じ。）に係る受刑者証人移送の要請があつた場合において、第二条第一号若しくは第二号又は次の各号（第三条第一項ただし書の規定により法務大臣が共助の要請の受理を行う場合にあつては、第二条第一号若しくは第二号、第四条第一号又は次の各号）のいずれにも該当せず、かつ、要請に応ずることが相当であると認めるときは、国内受刑者を移送する期間を定めて、当該受刑者証人移送の決定をするものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 19 (1) When the requesting country, in accordance with a treaty, requests the transfer of a sentenced inmate for testimony regarding a domestic sentenced inmate (hereinafter refers to a person who is confined in Japan for execution of a sentence of imprisonment with or without work, or of an assistance punishment set forth in item (ii) of Article 2 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (Act No. 66 of 2002)), the Minister of Justice shall make a decision of transfer of the sentenced inmate for testimony with a fixed period for transfer of the domestic sentenced inmate, if neither item (i) nor (ii) of Article 2, nor any of the following (with respect to cases where the Minister of Justice receives a request for assistance in accordance with the proviso of paragraph (1) of Article 3, neither item (i) nor (ii) of Article 2, item (i) of Article 4, nor any of the following) applies, and where the Minister of Justice deems it appropriate to honor the request:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

洛西バスターミナル-国道9号-西本願寺前-京都駅八条口-国道1号-京都南IC-名神高速道路-京滋バイパス-第二京阪道路-枚方東インターチェンジ-国道307号-京阪枚方市駅北口-国道1号-摂津南インターチェンジ-近畿自動車道-中国自動車道-山陽自動車道-広島IC-国道54号祇園新道-中筋駅-広島バスセンター-中広出入口-広島高速4号線-沼田出入口(広島高速4号線)-五日市インターチェンジ-山陽自動車道-大竹インターチェンジ-大竹IC入口-国道2号-岩国駅前-国道2号-岩国インターチェンジ-山陽自動車道-玖珂インターチェンジ-熊毛インターチェンジ-徳山東インターチェンジ-国道2号-徳山駅前例文帳に追加

Rakusei Bus Terminal – National Highway 9 – Nishi-honganji-mae – Hachijo Exit of Kyoto Station – National Highway 1 – Kyoto-minami Interchange – Meishin Expressway – Keiji Bypass – Daini Keihan-doro – Hirakata-higashi Interchange – National Highway 307 – North Exit of Hirakata City Station of Keihan Line – National Highway 1 – Settsu-minami Interchange – Kinki Expressway – Chugoku Expressway – Sanyo Expressway – Hiroshima Interchange – National Highway 54 Gion-shinmichi – Nakasuji Station – Hiroshima Bus Center – Nakahiro Entrance/Exit – Hiroshima Expressway 4 – Numata Entrance/Exit of Hiroshima Expressway – Itsukaichi Interchange – Sanyo Expressway – Otake Interchange – Otake Interchange Entrance – National Highway 2 – Iwakuni Station – National Highway 2 – Iwakuni Interchange – Sanyo Expressway – Kuga Interchange – Kumage Interchange – Tokuyama-higashi Interchange – National Highway 2 – Tokuyama Station  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

１の規定にかかわらず、合衆国の市民又は合衆国の法令に基づいて合衆国における永住を適法に認められた外国人である個人は、次の(a)から(c)までに掲げる要件を満たす場合に限り、合衆国の居住者とされる。(a)当該個人が、１の規定により日本国の居住者に該当する者でないこと。(b)当該個人が、合衆国内に実質的に所在し、又は恒久的住居若しくは常用の住居を有すること。(c)当該個人が、日本国と合衆国以外の国との間の二重課税の回避のための条約又は協定の適用上当該合衆国以外の国の居住者とされる者でないこと。例文帳に追加

Notwithstanding the provisions of paragraph 1, an individual who is a United States citizen or an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence in the United States under the laws of the United States shall be regarded as a resident of the United States only if the individual: (a) is not a resident of Japan under paragraph 1; (b) has a substantial presence, permanent home or habitual abode in the United States; and (c) for the purposes of a convention or agreement for the avoidance of double taxation between Japan and a state other than the United States, is not a resident of that state.  - 財務省

第八条　厚生労働大臣は、特定の国若しくは地域において採取され、製造され、加工され、調理され、若しくは貯蔵され、又は特定の者により採取され、製造され、加工され、調理され、若しくは貯蔵される特定の食品又は添加物について、第二十六条第一項から第三項まで又は第二十八条第一項の規定による検査の結果次に掲げる食品又は添加物に該当するものが相当数発見されたこと、生産地における食品衛生上の管理の状況その他の厚生労働省令で定める事由からみて次に掲げる食品又は添加物に該当するものが相当程度含まれるおそれがあると認められる場合において、人の健康を損なうおそれの程度その他の厚生労働省令で定める事項を勘案して、当該特定の食品又は添加物に起因する食品衛生上の危害の発生を防止するため特に必要があると認めるときは、薬事・食品衛生審議会の意見を聴いて、当該特定の食品又は添加物を販売し、又は販売の用に供するために、採取し、製造し、輸入し、加工し、使用し、若しくは調理することを禁止することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 8 (1) Regarding specific food or additives which are collected, produced, processed, cooked, or stored in a specific country or region, or which are collected, produced, processed, cooked, or stored by a specific person, in the case where, as a result of inspections under Article 26, paragraphs (1) to (3), or Article 28, paragraph (1), a considerable number of articles falling under the following food or additives are found, or it is found that articles falling under the following food or additives are likely to be included to a considerable extent, judging from the conditions of food sanitation management at a production site or on other grounds specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may prohibit the sales of said specific food or additives, or the collection, production, import, processing, use, or cooking of said specific food or additives for the purpose of marketing, by hearing the opinions of the Pharmaceutical Affairs and Food Sanitation Council, when he/she finds it particularly necessary to prevent food sanitation hazards resulting from said specific food or additives, considering the level of the risk to human health and other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　第八十九条第一項本文及び第二項の規定は、前項の吸収合併の場合について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「組織変更をする相互会社」とあるのは「吸収合併消滅相互会社」と、「効力発生日」とあるのは「第百六十四条第一項第九号の日」と、「組織変更計画」とあるのは「同項の吸収合併契約」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of the main clause of Article 89, paragraph (1) and Article 89, paragraph (2) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the absorption-type merger set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the terms "converting Mutual Company," "Effective Date" and "entity conversion plan" in paragraph (1) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Absorbed Mutual Company," "date set forth in Article 164, paragraph (1), item (ix)" and "absorption-type merger agreement set forth in Article 164, paragraph (1)," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百六十五条　前条第一項各号に掲げる非居住者の当該各号に掲げる国内源泉所得について課する所得税（以下この節において「総合課税に係る所得税」という。）の課税標準及び所得税の額は、当該各号に掲げる国内源泉所得について、政令で定めるところにより、前編第一章から第四章まで（居住者に係る所得税の課税標準、税額等の計算）（第七十三条から第七十七条まで（医療費控除等）、第七十九条（障害者控除）、第八十一条から第八十五条まで（寡婦（寡夫）控除等）及び第九十五条（外国税額控除）を除く。）の規定に準じて計算した金額とする。例文帳に追加

Article 165 The tax base and tax amount of income tax imposed on a nonresident listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article with respect to domestic source income listed in the relevant item (hereinafter referred to as "income tax in the case of comprehensive taxation" in this Section) shall be the amount calculated with respect to the domestic source income listed in the relevant item pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order and in accordance with the provisions Part II, Chapter I to Chapter IV (Calculation of Tax Base, Tax Amount, etc. of Income Tax in the case of Residents) (excluding Article 73 to Article 77 (Medical Expenses Deduction, etc.), Article 79 (Exemption for Persons with Disabilities), Article 81 to Article 85 (Exemption for Widows (Widowers), etc.), and Article 95 (Credit for Foreign Tax)).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百六十二条の二　内閣総理大臣は、金融商品取引所に上場されている株券又は店頭売買有価証券に該当する株券（以下この条において「上場等株券」という。）の発行者である会社が行う会社法第百五十六条第一項（同法第百六十三条及び第百六十五条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合を含む。）若しくは第百九十九条第一項（処分する自己株式を引き受ける者を募集しようとする場合に限る。）の規定又はこれらに相当する外国の法令の規定（当該会社が外国会社である場合に限る。）による上場等株券の売買若しくはその委託等、信託会社等が信託契約に基づいて上場等株券の発行者である会社の計算において行うこれらの取引の委託等又は金融商品取引業者若しくは取引所取引許可業者が行うこれらの取引の受託等その他の内閣府令で定めるものについて、取引所金融商品市場又は店頭売買有価証券市場における上場等株券の相場を操縦する行為を防止するため、上場等株券の取引の公正の確保のため必要かつ適当であると認める事項を内閣府令で定めることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 162-2 With regard to sales and purchase of share certificates listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange or shares certificates falling under the category of Over-the-Counter Traded Securities (hereinafter these shares are collectively referred to as "Listed or Over-the-Counter Traded Shares" in this Article) or Entrustment, etc. thereof to be conducted by the company having issued these Listed or Over-the-Counter Traded Shares under Article 156(1) of the Companies Act (including the cases where it is applied by replacing certain terms under the provisions of Article 163 or Article 165(3) of said Act) or Article 199(1) of said Act (limited to cases where the company intends to solicit persons to subscribe for treasury shares it disposes of) or laws and regulations of a foreign state equivalent to these provisions (limited to cases where the company is a foreign company), Entrustment, etc. of these transactions to be conducted by a Trust Company, etc. based on a trust contract and for the account of the company having issued these Listed or Over-the-Counter Traded Shares, Accepting an Entrustment, etc. of these transaction by a Financial Instruments Business Operator or Authorized Transaction-at-Exchange Operator, or other acts prescribed by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, the Prime Minister, for the purpose of preventing manipulation of prices of Listed or Over-the-Counter Traded Shares in a Financial Instruments Exchange Market or Over-the-Counter Securities Market, may stipulate the matters in a Cabinet Office Ordinance which are found to be necessary and appropriate to secure the fairness in transactions of Listed or Over-the-Counter Trade Shares.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

総督は次の事項に関し規則を制定することができる: (a) 特許出願の様式及び記載事項 (b) 特許登録簿及びその索引の様式に関する事項 (c) 特許権に関する譲渡，移転，権利の部分放棄，判決又はその他の書類の登録に関する事項 (d) 本法律により発行する証明書の様式及びその記載事項 (e) 本法律又は本法律に基づいて制定された規則に従って特許出願の提出若しくは他の手続を取ることに関し，又は長官若しくは特許庁において雇用された者により提供される役務若しくは施設の利用に関し課される手数料又はその決定方法に関する事項 (f) 特許出願を維持するため若しくは特許付与により得られた権利を維持するための手数料又はその決定方法に関する事項 (g) 時期及び方法を含む所定の手数料の納付，かかる手数料の追納の場合に課する追加手数料，並びに既に納付した手数料の全部又は一部を還付する場合の状況に関する事項 (h) カナダと他の国との間に存在する条約，協定，取決め又は約定の条件の実施に関する事項 (i) 本法律中の如何なる規定にも拘らず，随時の改正，修正及び変更を含めて，1970年6月19日にワシントンで作成され，カナダが締約国である特許協力条約の実施に関する事項 (j) 特許代理人登録簿における個人及び事務所の名称の記入，維持，抹消に関する事項。これには登録簿に個人又は事務所の名称を記入し維持する前にその個人又は事務所が満たさなければならない資格及び条件に関する事項を含む。 (j.1) 第8.1条に基づく書類，情報又は手数料の提出に関する事項。これには次のものを含む。 (i) 同条に基づいて電子的又は他の方式で提出することができる書類，情報又は手数料 (ii) かかる提出をすることのできる者及びこれに類する者，及び (iii) 長官が受領したとみなす時点 (j.2) 第8.2条に基づいて書類又は情報を記入又は記録することに関する事項 (j.3) 特許出願を取り下げる方法を規定する事項，及び第10条(4)及び(5)の適用上，優先権主張若しくは特許出願の取下をその日以前に行うべき日又はその日を決定する方法を規定する事項 (j.4) 次のものを含む優先権主張に関する事項 (i) 優先権主張をすべき期間 (ii) 第28.4条(2)にいう事項を長官に届け出る方式及び期間 (iii) 優先権主張を支持するために提出すべき書類，及び (iv) 優先権主張の取下 (j.5) 第35条(1)に基づいて出願審査の請求及びその所定の手数料の納付をすべき時期に関する事項 (j.6) 第38.1条の適用上，生物材料の寄託に関する事項 (j.7) 特許出願の一部として提出された明細書又は図面の補正の方法に関する事項 (j.8) 状況により正当化されると長官が納得した場合は，所定の条件に従うことを条件として，本法律により又はそれに基づいて何らかの事柄をするために定められた時期を延長する権限を長官に付与することに関する事項 (k) 本法律の何れかの条項に従って規定すべきその他の事項を規定することに関する事項，及び (l) 本法律の目的を達成するため，又は長官及びその他の特許庁の職員が本法律を適切に施行するのを確保するために必要な一般的事項例文帳に追加

The Governor in Council may make rules or regulations (a) respecting the form and contents of applications for patents; (b) respecting the form of the Register of Patents and of the indexes thereto; (c) respecting the registration of assignments, transmissions, disclaimers, judgments or other documents relating to any patent; (d) respecting the form and contents of any certificate issued pursuant to this Act; (e) prescribing the fees or the manner of determining the fees that may be charged in respect of the filing of applications for patents or the taking of other proceedings under this Act or under any rule or regulation made pursuant to this Act, or in respect of any services or the use of any facilities provided thereunder by the Commissioner or any person employed in the Patent Office; (f) prescribing the fees or the manner of determining the fees that shall be paid to maintain in effect an application for a patent or to maintain the rights accorded by a patent; (g) respecting the payment of any prescribed fees including the time when and the manner in which such fees shall be paid, the additional fees that may be charged for the late payment of such fees and the circumstances in which any fees previously paid may be refunded in whole or in part; (h) for carrying into effect the terms of any treaty, convention, arrangement or engagement that subsists between Canada and any other country; (i) for carrying into effect, notwithstanding anything in this Act, the Patent Cooperation Treaty done at Washington on June 19, 1970, including any amendments, modifications and revisions made from time to time to which Canada is a party; (j) respecting the entry on, the maintenance of and the removal from the register of patent agents of the names of persons and firms, including the qualifications that must be met and the conditions that must be fulfilled by a person or firm before the name of the person or firm is entered thereon and to maintain the name of the person or firm on the register; (j.1) respecting the submission of documents, information or fees under section 8.1, including (i) the documents, information or fees that may be submitted in electronic or other form under that section, (ii) the persons or classes of persons by whom they may be submitted, and (iii) the time at which they are deemed to be received by the Commissioner; (j.2) respecting the entering or recording of any document or information under section 8.2; (j.3) prescribing the manner in which an application for a patent may be withdrawn and, for the purposes of subsections 10(4) and (5), prescribing the date, or the manner of determining the date, on or before which a request for priority or an application for a patent must be withdrawn; (j.4) respecting requests for priority, including (i) the period within which priority must be requested, (ii) the manner in which and period within which the Commissioner must be informed of the matters referred to in subsection 28.4(2), (iii) the documentation that must be filed in support of requests for priority, and (iv) the withdrawal of requests for priority; (j.5) respecting the time within which requests for examination must be made and prescribed fees must be paid under subsection 35(1); (j.6) respecting the deposit of biological material for the purposes of section 38.1; (j.7) respecting the manner in which amendments may be made to specifications or drawings furnished as part of an application for a patent; (j.8) authorizing the Commissioner to extend, subject to any prescribed terms and conditions, the time fixed by or under this Act for doing anything where the Commissioner is satisfied that the circumstances justify the extension; (k) prescribing any other matter that by any provision of this Act is to be prescribed; and (l) generally, for carrying into effect the objects and purposes of this Act or for ensuring the due administration thereof by the Commissioner and other officers and employees of the Patent Office.  - 特許庁

次に掲げる標章又は標章の一部は商標として登録されない。(a)恥ずべき又は節度を欠く事項が含まれる標章(b)標章の使用がそのとき施行されている法令に反するもの(c)標章の使用が誤認、混同を引き起こすおそれがあるもの(d)バングラデシュ国民のいかなる階級であれ宗教的感受性を傷付けるおそれがある内容を含む標章(e)国家又は、国際条約、憲章若しくはその他の法律文書によって創設された国際組織の紋章、旗又はその他の記章、それらの名称又は名称の略称若しくは頭文字、それらが採用する公的標識又は印章と同一若しくは模倣又は要素として含む標章。ただし、その国家又は組織の所轄当局が認めるものを除く。(f)その他に、裁判所で保護を受けることができない標章(g)出願が不正の目的で信義に反して行われる標章例文帳に追加

-No mark or part of a mark shall be registered as a trademark- (a) which comprises or consists of any scandalous or obscene matter; or (b) the use of which would be contrary to any law for the time being in force; or (c) the use of which would be likely to deceive or cause confusion; or (d) which contains any matter likely to hurt the religious susceptibilities of any class of the citizens of Bangladesh; (e) which is identical with, or is an imitation of, or contains as a element, an armorial bearing, flag or other emblem, a name or abbreviation or initials of the name of, or official sign or hallmark adopted by, any state or international organization created by an international convention, charter or other instruments, unless authorized by the competent authority of that state or organization; or (f) which would otherwise be disentitled to protection in a court; (g) the application is made in bad intention and faith.  - 特許庁

先発明主義自体は、TRIPS 協定に違反するものではないが、世界中で米国だけが採用している制度であり、⒜先発明者の出現で事後的に特許権者の地位が覆されることがありうる点で確実性、予見可能性がないこと、⒝先発明者決定手続に長期間を要するとともに多大のコストがかかること、⒞インターフェアレンス等の先発明者決定手続を第三者が開始させるための制度がないことから、複数の者が独立に同一の発明を行い、かつ、特許が付与された場合には、第三者はそれぞれの特許権者にロイヤリティを重複的に支払わなければならない状況が生じうる点で公正を欠くこと等の問題がある。例文帳に追加

The United States is the only country in the world to maintain a first-to-invent system. While this principle is not in violation of the TRIPS Agreement, the first-toinvent system is problematic because: (a) the validity of a patent is neither predictable nor secure since the status of a current patent holder may be negated afterwards by the claim of the first inventor; (b) a lengthy period of time and an enormous amount of money are often required to determine who the first inventor is; and, (c) there is no system for a third party to start proceedings to determine the first inventor, such as an interference. If multiple applicants created similar inventions independently and obtained patents for them respectively, a third party would be required to pay royalties to all such inventors in an overlapping manner, which would be unfair for the third party. - 経済産業省

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

文書のタイトルは「『平成20年岩手・宮城内陸地震』にかかる災害に対する金融上の措置について」ということでございまして、主だった内容を申し上げますと、一つには、「預金証書、通帳等を紛失した場合でも預金者であることを確認して払戻しに応じること」、二つ目に、「事情によっては定期預金、定期積金等の期限前払戻しに応じること、またこれを担保とする貸付にも応じること」、三つ目に、「災害の状況、応急資金の需要等を勘案して、融資相談所の開設、審査手続きの簡便化、貸出の迅速化、貸出金の返済猶予など、被災者の方々の便宜を考慮した適時的確な措置を講じること」という内容でございます。例文帳に追加

The requests were issued under the title "Regarding Anti-Disaster Financial Measures Concerning the 2008 the Iwate-Miyagi Inland Earthquake." They included requests that financial institutions allow depositors who have lost deposit certificates and passbooks to withdraw deposits after confirming their identity, and that they accept premature cancellations of time deposits and the like depending on the circumstances of depositors and provide loans with such deposits as collateral. There was also a request that, in consideration of the damage done by the earthquake and emergency fund needs, financial institutions promptly take appropriate measures to accommodate the earthquake victims, such as opening an office for consultations concerning loans, simplifying loan screening procedures, speeding up the provision of loans and accepting debt moratorium.  - 金融庁

３　第百三十一条第一項、第百三十一条の二第一項本文、第百三十二条第一項及び第二項、第百三十三条、第百三十三条の二、第百三十四条第一項、第三項及び第四項、第百三十五条、第百三十六条第一項及び第二項、第百三十七条第二項、第百三十八条、第百三十九条（第六号を除く。）、第百四十条から第百四十四条まで、第百四十四条の二第一項及び第三項から第五項まで、第百四十五条第二項から第五項まで、第百四十六条、第百四十七条第一項及び第二項、第百五十条第一項から第五項まで、第百五十一条から第百五十四条まで、第百五十五条第一項、第百五十七条並びに第百六十九条第三項、第四項及び第六項の規定は、第一項の判定に準用する。この場合において、第百三十五条中「審決」とあるのは「決定」と、第百四十五条第二項中「前項に規定する審判以外の審判」とあるのは「判定の審理」と、同条第五項ただし書中「公の秩序又は善良の風俗を害するおそれがあるとき」とあるのは「審判長が必要があると認めるとき」と、第百五十一条中「第百四十七条」とあるのは「第百四十七条第一項及び第二項」と、第百五十五条第一項中「審決が確定するまで」とあるのは「判定の謄本が送達されるまで」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) Articles 131(1), the main clause of 131-2(1), 132(1) and (2), 133, 133-2, 134(1), (3) and (4), 135, 136(1) and (2), 137(2), 138, 139 (excluding (vi)), 140 to 144, 144-2(1) and (3) to (5), 145(2) to (5), 146, 147(1) and (2), 150(1) to (5), 151 to 154, 155(1), 157 and 169(3), (4) and (6) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the advisory opinion under paragraph (1). In this case, the term "trial decision" in Article 135 shall be deemed to be replaced with "ruling", the term "trial other than the trial under the preceding paragraph" in Article 145(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "proceedings for advisory opinion", the term "where public order or morality is liable to be injured thereby" in the proviso to Article 145(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "where the chief trial examiner considers it necessary", the term "Article 147" in Article 151 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 147(1) and (2)", the term "before a trial decision becomes final and binding" in Article 155(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "before the certified copy of the written advisory opinion is served".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

１０ 第七項第三号又は第八項第三号の承認を受けようとする商品取引員は、次に掲げる 事項を記載した承認申請書に契約書の写し又はこれに準ずる書類を添付して、主務大臣 に提出しなければならない。 一商号 二許可年月日又は許可更新年月日 三期限前弁済等の額（外貨建てである場合にあっては、期限前弁済等の額及びその円 換算額）四現在及び期限前弁済等を行った後の短期劣後債務又は長期劣後債務の額（外貨建て である場合にあっては、短期劣後債務又は長期劣後債務の額及びその円換算額）五期限前弁済等を行う理由 六期限前弁済等の予定日 七十分な純資産額規制比率（法第二百十一条第一項に規定する純資産額規制比率をい う。以下同じ。）を維持するための資本金調達その他の具体的措置の内容 八期限前弁済等を行った後の純資産額規制比率の推定値例文帳に追加

(10) When a Futures Commission Merchant intends to receive approval under paragraph 7, item 3 or paragraph 8, item 3, he/she shall submit a written application for approval including the following matters to the competent ministry with a copy of contract or an equivalent document attached to it: (i) trade name; (ii) the date of receiving permission or the date of the renewal of permission; (iii) the amount of the Payment before Maturity, etc. (in the case where the amount is denominated in a foreign currency, the amount of the Payment before Maturity, etc. and the amount thereof in Japanese Yen); (iv) the amount of the current short-term subordinated debts or long-term subordinated debts and those after making the Payment before Maturity, etc. (in the case where the amount is denominated in foreign currency, the amount of the short-term subordinated debts or long-term subordinated debts and the amount thereof in Japanese Yen); (v) the reasons for the Payment before Maturity, etc.; (vi) the scheduled date of the Payment before Maturity, etc.; (vii) the financing methods and other concrete measures for maintaining the sufficient Net Assets Regulation Ratio (which means the Net Assets Regulation Ratio prescribed in Article 211, paragraph 1 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter); (viii) the estimated Net Assets Regulation Ratio after making the Payment before - 56 - Maturity, etc.  - 経済産業省

２９　地方公務員法第六条第一項に規定する任命権者又はその委任を受けた者（地方教育行政の組織及び運営に関する法律第三十七条第一項に規定する県費負担教職員については、市町村の教育委員会）は、小学校就学の始期に達するまでの子を養育する地方公務員法第四条第一項に規定する職員であって第十九条第一項の規定を適用するとしたならば同項各号のいずれにも該当しないものが当該子を養育するために請求した場合において、公務の運営に支障がないと認めるときは、深夜において勤務しないことを承認しなければならない。例文帳に追加

(29) An appointer or a person to whom the appointer delegates the authority prescribed in Article 6 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act (or the municipal board of education with regard to the educational personnel whose wages are paid by a prefectural government prescribed in Article 37 paragraph 1 of the Act on the Organization and Operation of Local Educational Administration) shall, in cases where an employee prescribed in Article 4 paragraph 1 of the Local Public Service Act who is taking care of a child before the time of commencement of elementary school and does not fall under any of the items of Article 19 paragraph 1 when the provisions above apply to him or her, makes a request in order to take care of said child, approve the employee's not working at Late-Night as long as no impediment is found to the operation of public duties.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　第九十条の二及び第九十一条の規定は設立企画人が創立総会を招集する場合について、会社法第六十八条第五項から第七項まで、第七十二条第一項本文、第七十三条第一項及び第四項、第七十四条から第八十三条まで並びに第九十三条第二項及び第三項の規定は投資法人の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条、第八百三十一条、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項、第八百三十七条、第八百三十八条、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）の規定は投資法人の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十一条第一項中「二月前までに当該日を公告し、当該日の二週間」とあるのは「二週間」と、同法第六十八条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「投資法人法第六十七条第一項第十六号又は第七十一条第四項第一号」と、同条第七項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第一項」と、同法第七十三条第四項中「第六十七条第一項第二号」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項第二号」と、同法第七十四条第四項及び第七十六条第二項中「第六十八条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第八十条中「第六十七条及び第六十八条」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第四項において準用する投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第八十一条第四項及び第八十二条第四項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第九十三条第二項及び第三項中「設立時取締役」とあるのは「設立時執行役員及び設立時監督役員」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第七十三条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 90-2 and Article 91 of this Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the organizer(s) call an Organizational Meeting; the provisions of Article 68, paragraph (5) through paragraph (7), the main clause of Article 72, paragraph (1), Article 73, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4), Article 74 through Article 83, and Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation; and the provisions of Article 830, Article 831, Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Article 836, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 837, Article 838, Article 846, and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to sub-item (g) of item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of absence or an invalidation of a resolution adopted at an Organizational Meeting of an Investment Corporation or an action seeking rescission of such resolution. In this case, the phrase "shall give public notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two months prior to that date, and shall send notice thereof in writing to the Investors more than two weeks prior to that date" in Article 91, paragraph (1) of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall send notice of the date of the Investors' meeting no later than two weeks prior to that date," the phrase "item (v) of Article 27, or item (i) of Article 59(3)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 67, paragraph (1), item (xvi) or Article 71, paragraph (4), item (i) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 68, paragraph (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 67(1)" in Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 68(3)" in Article 74, paragraph (4) and Article 76, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 67 and Article 68" in Article 80 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 73, paragraph (4) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "the court" in Article 81, paragraph (4) and Article 82, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the phrase "The Directors at Incorporation" in Article 93, paragraph (2) and paragraph (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment and Supervisory Officers at Establishment," the terms "the preceding paragraph" in Article 93, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act and "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 73, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第八十三条第二項第二号及び第三項並びに第百六十一条第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について破産事件、再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「破産事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての破産手続開始の申立ては、親法人の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について破産事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての破産手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。例文帳に追加

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 83(2)(ii) and (3) and Article 161(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a bankruptcy case, rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "bankruptcy case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a bankruptcy case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　内閣総理大臣は、引受社員の日本における業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保し、日本における保険契約者等の保護を図るため特に必要があると認めるときは、その必要の限度において、当該引受社員の属する免許特定法人又は当該引受社員から日本における業務の委託を受けた者（当該引受社員及び総代理店を除く。次項並びに次条第二項及び第三項において「免許特定法人等から業務の委託を受けた者」という。）に対し、当該免許特定法人又は引受社員の日本における業務又は財産の状況に関し参考となるべき報告又は資料の提出を求めることができる。例文帳に追加

(2) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds it Particularly necessary to protect Policyholders, etc. in Japan by ensuring the sound and appropriate management of Underwriting Members in Japan, request the Licensed Specified Juridical Person to which the Underwriting Members belong or subcontractor of the Underwriting Members with their business in Japan (other than the Underwriting Members or General Agent; referred to as "Subcontractor of Licensed Specified Juridical Person, etc." in the following paragraph, and paragraphs (2) and (3) of the following Article) to submit a report or materials that should serve as a reference concerning the situation of the business or property of the Licensed Specified Juridical Person or Underwriting Members in Japan, within the limit necessary.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　報酬委員会は、第五十三条の十五において準用する会社法第三百六十一条第一項の規定並びに第五十三条の十七において準用する同法第三百七十九条第一項及び第二項の規定にかかわらず、執行役等の個人別の報酬等（報酬、賞与その他の職務執行の対価として相互会社から受ける財産上の利益をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の内容を決定する。執行役が委員会設置会社の支配人その他の使用人を兼ねているときは、当該支配人その他の使用人の報酬等の内容についても、同様とする。例文帳に追加

(3) Notwithstanding the provision of Article 361, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-15, and the provisions of Article 379, paragraphs (1) and (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-17, the compensation committee shall determine the contents of remunerations, etc. (referring to the property considerations received from the Mutual Company in exchange for execution of duties, such as remunerations and bonuses; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) for individual executive officers, etc. Where an executive officer acts concurrently as a manager or any other employee of the company with Committees, the same shall apply to the contents of remunerations, etc. for such manager or other employee.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　第九十七条第三項及び会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第二項及び第五項並びに第八百五十一条を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は、第百十七条の規定による同条に規定する特定目的会社の取締役の責任を追及する訴え並びに前条の規定及び前項において準用する同法第四百六十四条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任を追及する訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項中「六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「特定社員又は六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き優先出資を有する優先出資社員」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員又は優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 97(3) of this Act and the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847(2), Article 849(2) and (5) and Article 851) (Action for Pursuing the Liability, etc. of a Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking liability filed against the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the provisions of Article 117 and to an action seeking liability filed against the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the provisions of the preceding Article and Article 464 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the preceding paragraph. In this case, the phrase "A shareholder (excluding a Holder of Shares Less than One Unit who is unable to exercise right pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189(2)) having the shares consecutively for the preceding six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such period or more)" in Article 847(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A Specified Equity Member or a Preferred Equity Member who has held Preferred Equity continuously for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period or longer)," the term "shareholder" in Article 847(3) to (5) inclusive and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

前掲東京地裁平成１３年７月２５日判決は、「法４６条４号に該当するか否かについては、著作物を利用した書籍等の体裁及び内容、著作物の利用態様、利用目的などを客観的に考慮して、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する例外的な場合に当たるといえるか否か検討すべきことになる。」とし、「被告書籍は、幼児向けに、写真を用いて、町を走る各種自動車を解説する目的で作られた書籍であり、合計２４種類の自動車について、その外観及び役割などが説明されていること、各種自動車の写真を幼児が見ることを通じて、観察力を養い、勉強の基礎になる好奇心を高めるとの幼児教育的観点から監修されていると解されること、表紙及び本文１４頁の掲載方法は、右の目的に照らして、格別不自然な態様とはいえないので、本件書籍を見る者は、本文で紹介されている各種自動車の一例として、本件バスが掲載されているとの印象を受けると考えられること等の事情を総合すると、原告作品が描かれた本件バスの写真を被告書籍に掲載し、これを販売することは、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する行為には、該当しないというべきである。」として著作権法第46条第４号の要件を充たさないとした。例文帳に追加

In the City Bus case the Tokyo District Court July 25, 2001 ruled that "whether or not Article 46, Item 4 is applicable should depend on whether the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or the reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. In order to determine this, circumstances such as the formalities, the contents, the manner and method of use of the publication should be objectively examined." In light of these criteria, the judgment further held that "the Defendant's book is a publication edited for the purpose of explaining to children various types of vehicles running on the street by using their photographs. It provides an explanation on the exterior and role of each of the 24 types of vehicles in total. This book is edited from the viewpoint of pre-school education in that children are expected to develop their observation skills as well as curiosity, which will in the future become a basis for learning. The method of inserting the picture in the cover page and page 14 is not unnatural in light of the purpose of this publication. Considering that the viewers of this book will have the impression that the photograph of the bus is placed on various pages as an the example of the diverse vehicles referred to in the body text of the book, the act of selling a book which includes a photograph of the bus with the plaintiff's work shall not fall under the relevant criteria as previously descirbed; the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or such reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. Therefore, such act does not fulfill the conditions required under Article 46, Item 4 of the Copyright Law.  - 経済産業省

(1) 本法の規定に従うことを条件として， (a) 何らかの事項の登録簿への不記載若しくは登録簿からの脱漏，十分な理由なしに登録簿になされた記載，誤って登録簿に残存している記載又は登録簿の記載における過誤又は瑕疵に不服を有する者から所定の方式による申立があったときは，裁判所は，その適当と考えるところに従い，登録簿への記載，記載の削除又は記載の変更を命じることができる。 (b) 本条に基づく手続において，裁判所は，登録簿の更正に関し決定することが必要又は便宜である問題の決定を行なうことができる。 (c) 登録官は，ある登録商標の登録，譲渡又は移転に関して詐欺行為があった場合，又は公共の利益になると判断する場合は，自ら本条に基づく申立を裁判所に対して行うことができる。 (d) 登録簿の更正の命令において，裁判所は，更正通知が所定の方式で登録官に送達されるべきことを命じるものとし，登録官は，当該通知の受領により，相応に登録簿の更正を行う。例文帳に追加

(1) Subject to the provisions of this Act . (a) the Court may, on the application in the prescribed manner of any person aggrieved by the non-insertion in or omission from the Register of any entry or by any entry made in the Register without sufficient cause or by any entry wrongfully remaining in the Register, or by any error or defect in any entry in the Register, make such order for making, expunging or varying such entry as it thinks fit; (b) the Court may in any proceeding under this section decide any question that may be necessary or expedient to decide in connection with the rectification of the Register; (c) in case of fraud in the registration, assignment or transmission of a registered trade mark or if in his opinion it is in the public interest to do so, the Registrar may himself apply to the Court under this section; (d) an order of the Court rectifying the Register shall direct that notice of the rectification be served on the Registrar in the prescribed manner and the Registrar shall upon receipt of the notice rectify the Register accordingly. - 特許庁

６　法第六十八条の八十八第二項第一号ハに規定する政令で定める通常の利益率は、国外関連取引に係る棚卸資産と同種又は類似の棚卸資産を、購入（非関連者からの購入に限る。）、製造その他の行為により取得した者（以下この項及び次項第三号において「販売者」という。）が当該同種又は類似の棚卸資産を非関連者に対して販売した取引（以下この項において「比較対象取引」という。）に係る当該販売者の売上総利益の額（当該比較対象取引に係る棚卸資産の販売による収入金額の合計額から当該比較対象取引に係る棚卸資産の原価の額の合計額を控除した金額をいう。）の当該原価の額の合計額に対する割合とする。ただし、比較対象取引と当該国外関連取引とが売手の果たす機能その他において差異がある場合には、その差異により生ずる割合の差につき必要な調整を加えた後の割合とする。例文帳に追加

(6) The normal profit margin specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 68-88(2)(i)(c) of the Act shall be the ratio of the amount of gross profits gained by a person who acquired the same or similar inventory assets as those for a foreign affiliated transaction through the purchase (limited to a purchase from a non-affiliated person), manufacture or any other acts (hereinafter such person shall be referred to as a "seller" in this paragraph and item (iii) of the next paragraph) through a transaction to sell the said same or similar inventory assets to a non-affiliated person (hereinafter referred to as a "comparison purpose transaction" in this paragraph) (such gross profits shall mean the amount obtained by deducting the sum of the costs of the said inventory assets for a comparison purpose transaction from the total revenue arising from the sale of the said inventory assets for a comparison purpose transaction) against the sum of the said costs; provided, however, that where functions performed by the selling side or any other matters differ between a comparison purpose transaction and the said foreign affiliated transaction, such normal profit margin shall be the ratio after making a necessary adjustment for the differences in ratios caused by such disparity.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百二十五条　破産債権の調査において、破産債権の額又は優先的破産債権、劣後的破産債権若しくは約定劣後破産債権であるかどうかの別（以下この条及び第百二十七条第一項において「額等」という。）について破産管財人が認めず、又は届出をした破産債権者が異議を述べた場合には、当該破産債権（以下「異議等のある破産債権」という。）を有する破産債権者は、その額等の確定のために、当該破産管財人及び当該異議を述べた届出をした破産債権者（以下この款において「異議者等」という。）の全員を相手方として、裁判所に、その額等についての査定の申立て（以下「破産債権査定申立て」という。）をすることができる。ただし、第百二十七条第一項並びに第百二十九条第一項及び第二項の場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 125 (1) Where, in an investigation of bankruptcy claims, a bankruptcy trustee has disapproved the amount of a bankruptcy claim or the type of the claim, namely, preferred bankruptcy claim, subordinate bankruptcy claim or consensually-subordinated bankruptcy claim (hereinafter referred to as the "amount, etc." in this Article and Article 127(1)) or an objection has been made by any holder(s) of filed bankruptcy claim with regard to these matters, the holder(s) of filed bankruptcy claim who holds the bankruptcy claim in question (thereinafter referred to as the "denied/disputed bankruptcy claim"), in order to determine the amount and type of the claim, may file a petition to the court, against said bankruptcy trustee as well as said holder(s) of filed bankruptcy claim who made the objection (hereinafter referred to as the "denying/disputing party" in this Subsection), for assessment of the amount, etc. of the claim (hereinafter referred to as a "petition for bankruptcy claim assessment"); provided, however, that this shall not apply in the case referred to in Article 127(1) and Article 129(1) and (2).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百三十条　内閣総理大臣は、免許特定法人又は引受社員の業務又は財産の状況に照らして、引受社員の日本における業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保し、日本における保険契約者等の保護を図るため必要があると認めるときは、当該免許特定法人又は引受社員に対し、措置を講ずべき事項及び期限を示して、当該引受社員の日本における業務の運営の健全性を確保するための改善計画の提出を求め、若しくは提出された改善計画の変更を命じ、又はその必要の限度において、期限を付して引受社員の日本における業務の全部若しくは一部の停止を命じ、若しくは財産の供託その他監督上必要な措置を命ずることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 230 (1) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds it necessary to protect Policyholders, etc. in Japan by ensuring the sound and appropriate management in Japan of Underwriting Members in light of the situation of the business or property of the Licensed Specified Juridical Person or Underwriting Members, request the Licensed Specified Juridical Person or Underwriting Members to submit an improvement program to ensure the soundness of the business of the Underwriting Members in Japan by identifying matters for which measures should be taken as well as a time limit or order the modification of the submitted improvement program, or, within the limit necessary, order the full or Partial suspension of the business in Japan with a time limit or order the deposit of property or other measures necessary for supervision.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第七百九十一条（第一項第一号及び第三項を除く。）（吸収分割又は株式交換に関する書面等の備置き及び閲覧等）の規定は組織変更株式交換を伴う組織変更をする相互会社について、同法第三百九条第二項（各号を除く。）（株主総会の決議）、第三百二十四条第二項（各号を除く。）（種類株主総会の決議）及び第五編第五章第二節第二款第一目（第七百九十五条第四項第一号及び第二号、第七百九十六条第三項第一号ロ、第七百九十九条第一項第一号及び第二号、第八百条並びに第八百一条第一項、第二項、第三項第一号及び第二号並びに第五項を除く。）（株式会社の手続）の規定は組織変更株式交換完全親会社について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第七百九十八条第二項の規定による申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provision of Article 791 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (3)) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Documents, etc. Related to Absorption-Type Split or Share Exchange) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a converting Mutual Company carrying out a share exchange on Entity Conversion; the provisions of Article 309, paragraph (2) (excluding all items) (Resolution of Shareholders Meetings), Article 324, paragraph (2) (excluding all items (Resolution of Class Meetings) and Part V, Chapter V, Section 2, Subsection 2, Division 1 (excluding Article 795, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii), Article 796, paragraph (3), item (i), (b), Article 799, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii), Article 800, Article 801, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 801, paragraph (3), items (i) and (ii), and Article 801, paragraph (5)) (Procedures for Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Wholly Owning Parent Company for Share Exchange on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 798, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十四条の十三　第二十九条の二に規定する他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願が国際特許出願又は実用新案法第四十八条の三第二項の国際実用新案登録出願である場合における第二十九条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて」とあるのは「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願（第百八十四条の四第三項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願又は同法第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願を除く。）であつて」と、「出願公開又は」とあるのは「出願公開、」と、「発行が」とあるのは「発行又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開が」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。例文帳に追加

Article 184-13 For the purpose of the application of Article 29-2, in the case where another patent application or a utility model registration application as provided in Article 29-2 is an international patent application or an International utility model registration application under Article 48-3(2) of the Utility Model Act, the term "another patent application or a utility model registration application " under Article 29-2 of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "another patent application or utility model registration application (excluding a patent application in foreign language under Article 184-4(1) or a utility model registration application in foreign language under Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 184-4(3) of this Act or Article 48-4(3) of the Utility Model Act)," the term "the laying open of the patent application or" shall be deemed to be replaced with "laying open of the patent application," the term "published" shall be deemed to be replaced with "published or where international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 184-4(1)of this Act or Article 48-4(1) of the Utility Model Act."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百七十二条の二十五　内閣総理大臣は、少額短期保険業者の業務若しくは財産又は少額短期保険業者及びその子会社等の財産の状況に照らして、当該少額短期保険業者の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保し、保険契約者等の保護を図るため必要があると認めるときは、当該少額短期保険業者に対し、措置を講ずべき事項及び期限を示して、経営の健全性を確保するための改善計画の提出を求め、又は提出された改善計画の変更を命じ、その他監督上必要な措置を命ずることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 272-25 (1) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds it necessary, in light of the status of the business or property of a Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider or the status of the property of its Subsidiary Company, etc., to protect Policyholders, etc. by ensuring the sound and appropriate management of the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, request the Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider to submit an improvement program for ensuring the soundness of its management by specifying matters for which measures should be taken as well as a time limit or order the modification of the submitted improvement program, or order necessary measures for the purpose of supervision.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　内閣総理大臣は、外国保険会社等の日本における業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保し、日本における保険契約者等の保護を図るため特に必要があると認めるときは、その必要の限度において、当該外国保険会社等の特殊関係者（第百九十四条に規定する特殊関係者をいう。次項及び次条において同じ。）又は当該外国保険会社等から日本における業務の委託を受けた者（前項の保険の引受けの代理をする者を除く。次項において同じ。）に対し、当該外国保険会社等の日本における業務又は財産の状況に関し参考となるべき報告又は資料の提出を求めることができる。例文帳に追加

(2) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds it particularly necessary to protect Policyholders, etc. in Japan by ensuring the sound and appropriate management in Japan of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc., request any Special Person Concerned of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (meaning the Special Person Concerned prescribed in Article 194; the same shall apply in the following paragraph and the following Article) or subcontractor in Japan from the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (except for the person acting as an agent for the underwriting of insurance set forth in the preceding paragraph; the same shall apply in the next paragraph), to submit reports or materials that would be helpful to understand the status of the business in Japan or property of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc., within the limit necessary.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十九条の二に規定する他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願が国際特許出願又は実用新案法第四十八条の三第二項の国際実用新案登録出願である場合における第二十九条の二の規定の適用については、同条中「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願であつて」とあるのは「他の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願(第百八十四条の四第三項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第三項の規定により取り下げられたものとみなされた第百八十四条の四第一項の外国語特許出願又は同法第四十八条の四第一項の外国語実用新案登録出願を除く。)であつて」と、「出願公開又は」とあるのは「出願公開、」と、「発行が」とあるのは「発行又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開が」と、「願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第百八十四条の四第一項又は実用新案法第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」とする。例文帳に追加

For the purpose of the application of Article 29bis, in the case where another patent application or a utility model registration application as provided in Article 29bis is an International Patent Application or an International utility model registration application under Article 48ter (2) of the Utility Model Act, the term "another patent application or a utility model registration application" under Article 29bis of this Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "another patent application or utility model registration application (excluding a patent application in Foreign Language under Article 184quater (1) or a utility model registration application in foreign language under Article 48quater (1) of the Utility Model Act which has been deemed to have been withdrawn in accordance with Article 184quater (3) of this Act or Article 48quater (3) of the Utility Model Act)," the term "the laying open of the patent application or" shall be deemed to be replaced with "laying open of the patent application," the term "published" shall be deemed to be replaced with "published or where international publication under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970 has been effected," and the term "the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims, or drawings of an international application as of the International Application Date under Article 184quater (1) of this Act or Article 48quater (1) of the Utility Model Act.  - 特許庁

３　外国語実用新案登録出願についての第八条第三項の規定の適用については、同項中「実用新案登録出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面」とあるのは「第四十八条の四第一項の国際出願日における国際出願の明細書、請求の範囲又は図面」と、「実用新案掲載公報の発行が」とあるのは「実用新案掲載公報の発行又は千九百七十年六月十九日にワシントンで作成された特許協力条約第二十一条に規定する国際公開が」とする。例文帳に追加

(3) For the purpose of application of Article 8(3) to a Utility Model Registration Application in a Foreign Language, the term "in the description, scope of claims or drawings originally attached to the application in an application for a utility model registration containing a priority claim under paragraph (1)" in Article 8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the description, scope of claims or drawings of an international application containing a priority claim under paragraph (1) as of the International Application Date under Article 48-4(1)," the term "the Utility Model Bulletin pertaining to the said application for a utility model registration was issued" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Utility Model Bulletin pertaining to the said application for a utility model registration was issued or the international publication was effected under Article 21 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty signed in Washington on June 19, 1970."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph (2)(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百七十一条　第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更を行う場合において、これを承諾する決議を行う権利者集会に先立ってその変更に反対する旨を受託信託会社等に対し書面をもって通知し、かつ、当該権利者集会において反対した受益証券の権利者は、当該受託信託会社等に対し、自己の有する受益権を当該変更がなければ当該受益権が有すべき公正な価格をもって買い取るべき旨を請求することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 271 (1) In cases where a change is made to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)), a Beneficiary Certificate Holder who notifies the Fiduciary Trust Company, etc. of his/her dissent to the change prior to the Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting where the resolution to approve the change is to be adopted and who dissents to said change at said Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting may demand that said Fiduciary Trust Company, etc. purchase his/her beneficial interest at a fair price which would have been given for said beneficial interest if the relevant change had not been made.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第九十三条　会社法第三百九十八条第一項及び第二項（定時株主総会における会計監査人の意見の陳述）の規定は特定目的会社の会計監査人について、同法第三百九十九条第一項（会計監査人の報酬等の決定に関する監査役の関与）の規定は特定目的会社の会計監査人及び一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百九十八条第一項中「第三百九十六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第九十一条第一項」と、「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同項及び同条第二項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 93 The provisions of Article 398(1) and (2) (Statement of Opinions at Annual Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the accounting auditors of a Specific Purpose Company, and Article 399(1) (Involvement of Company Auditors in Decision on Remuneration for Accounting Auditors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the accounting auditors and the persons who temporarily perform the duties of accounting auditors of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the terms "Article 396(1)" and "laws and regulations or the articles of incorporation" in Article 398(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91(1) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, or the articles of incorporation," and the term "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 398(1) and (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "annual general meeting of members."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

168.3特に，如何なる場合においても不正競争に対する保護の範囲を制限することなく，次に該当する者は，不正競争の罪を犯したものとみなす。 (a)自己の販売する商品の商品自体，その商品を入れる容器の包装紙又はそれらに付す図案若しくは語その他の外観上の特徴に，当該商品が実際の製造者若しくは販売者以外の者の商品であると購入者に思わせるように影響する虞がある他の製造者若しくは販売者の商品の概略の外観を与え，又はそのような目的をもって公衆を欺瞞し，かつ，他人からその者の正当な取引を詐取し，後の販売者から当該商品を詐取し，若しくは販売店から当該商品の販売に携わる販売者を詐取するような外観を自己の商品に与える者 (b)ある特定のサ－ビスを提供している他人のそのサ－ビスを自己が提供しているものと公衆に誤って信用させることを意図した術策，策略その他の手段を用いる者 (c)取引の場において虚偽の陳述をし，又は他人の商品，事業若しくはサ－ビスの信用を傷付けることを意図するような性質の善意に反するその他の行為を行う者例文帳に追加

168.3. In particular, and without in any way limiting the scope of protection against unfair competition, the following shall be deemed guilty of unfair competition: (a) Any person, who is selling his goods and gives them the general appearance of goods of another manufacturer or dealer, either as to the goods themselves or in the wrapping of the packages in which they are contained, or the devices or words thereon, or in any other feature of their appearance, which would be likely to influence purchasers to believe that the goods offered are those of a manufacturer or dealer, other than the actual manufacturer or dealer, or who otherwise clothes the goods with such appearance as shall deceive the public and defraud another of his legitimate trade, or any subsequent vendor of such goods or any agent of any vendor engaged in selling such goods with a like purpose; (b) Any person who by any artifice, or device, or who employs any other means calculated to induce the false belief that such person is offering the services of another who has identified such services in the mind of the public; or (c) Any person who shall make any false statement in the course of trade or who shall commit any other act contrary to good faith of a nature calculated to discredit the goods, business or services of another. - 特許庁

第四十六条　社員総数の千分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員若しくは千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、第三十九条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者又は三名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代は、取締役に対し、一定の事項（総代会において決議をすることができる事項に限る。）を総代会の目的とすることを請求することができる。この場合において、その請求は、総代会の日の八週間（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前までにしなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 46 (1) Members representing at least one thousandth (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or one thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 39, paragraph (1)), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation), or three (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives may demand the directors to include certain items (limited to matters on which the General Meeting may adopt a resolution) in the agenda for the General Meeting. In this case, the demand shall be submitted no later than eight weeks (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) prior to the date of the General Meeting.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百七十一条の二十九　内閣総理大臣は、保険持株会社の業務又は保険持株会社及びその子会社等の財産の状況に照らして、当該保険持株会社の子会社である保険会社の業務の健全かつ適切な運営を確保し、保険契約者等の保護を図るため必要があると認めるときは、当該保険持株会社に対し、措置を講ずべき事項及び期限を示して、当該保険会社の経営の健全性を確保するための改善計画の提出を求め、若しくは提出された改善計画の変更を命じ、又はその必要の限度において監督上必要な措置を命ずることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 271-29 (1) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds it necessary to protect Policyholders, etc. by ensuring the soundness in management of the subsidiary Insurance Company of an Insurance Holding Company in light of the condition of the business or property of the Insurance Holding Company and its Subsidiary, etc., request the Insurance Holding Company to submit an improvement plan for securing soundness in management of the Insurance Company by designating matters for which measures should be taken and the time limit thereof, or may order, to the extent necessary, measures necessary for the purpose of supervision.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.), and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph 2(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百十八条　この法律の施行の際現に旧外国保険事業者法第三条第一項の大蔵大臣の免許を受けている外国生命保険事業者の役員又は使用人は、施行日から起算して六月を経過する日（当該六月を経過する日までに新法第二百七十九条第一項から第三項までの規定による登録の拒否の処分があったときは、当該処分のあった日）までの間は、新法第二百七十五条の規定にかかわらず、保険募集を行うことができる。その者が当該期間内に新法第二百七十七条の登録の申請をした場合において、当該期間を経過したときは、当該申請について登録又は登録の拒否の処分があるまでの間も、同様とする。例文帳に追加

Article 118 (1) The officers or employees of a foreign life insurance business operator that have obtained the license of the Minister of Finance set forth in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Former Foreign Insurance Business Operators Act by the time this Act enters into force may, notwithstanding the provision of Article 275 of the Current Act, carry out Insurance Solicitation activity for a period of six months counting from the Effective Date (or until the date, within such six months, of any disposition refusing the registration under Article 279, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive of the Current Act). The same shall apply where said period has elapsed even though such persons have applied for the registration set forth in Article 277 of the Current Act within said period, until such time as the registration or the disposition refusing the registration is made, with regard to the application.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一　組織再編成により吸収合併消滅会社（会社法第七百四十九条第一項第一号に規定する吸収合併消滅会社をいう。）又は株式交換完全子会社（同法第七百六十八条第一項第一号に規定する株式交換完全子会社をいう。）となる会社その他政令で定める会社（第四条第一項第二号イにおいて「組織再編成対象会社」という。）が発行者である株券（新株予約権証券その他の政令で定める有価証券を含む。）の所有者（以下「組織再編成対象会社株主等」という。）が多数の者である場合として政令で定める場合（組織再編成対象会社株主等が適格機関投資家のみである場合を除く。）例文帳に追加

(i) in cases where, as specified by a Cabinet Order, there are a number of holders of shares (including share option certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) issued by a company that, through a Reorganization, becomes a Company Absorbed in an Absorption-Type Merger (meaning the Company Absorbed in an Absorption-Type Merger as defined in Article 749(1)(i) of the Companies Act), or a Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in a Share Exchange (meaning the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in a Share Exchange as defined in Article 768(1)(i) of said Act), or by any other kind of company specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as the "Reorganized Company" in Article 4(1)(ii)(a)) (such holders are hereinafter referred to as "Shareholders, etc. of the Reorganized Company")(excluding the cases where the Shareholders, etc. of the Reorganized Company consist exclusively of Qualified Institutional Investors);  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム