「that was」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(965ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 251 (1) In cases where the beneficial interest pertaining to a Specific Purpose Trust has been divided into multiple classes of beneficial interest with different features under an Asset Trust Securitization Plan, if any damages are likely to be caused to holders of Beneficiary Certificates representing a certain class of beneficial interest as a result of a resolution at a Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting (limited to a resolution for approval set forth in Article 269(1)(i), the resolution set forth in Article 273(1), Article 274(1), or Article 276(1), or a resolution for approval set forth in Article 275(1)), approval shall be obtained at a meeting of the Beneficiary Certificate Holders pertaining to the relevant class of beneficial interest (hereinafter referred to as a "Class Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting") (in cases where there are two or more classes of beneficial interest for which damages are likely to be caused as a result of the resolution of the Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting, the approval of each Class Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting composed of the Beneficiary Certificate Holders categorized by the class of such two or more classes of beneficial interest), in addition to the resolution that was made at the Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meeting. 例文帳に追加

第二百五十一条　資産信託流動化計画において特定目的信託に係る受益権を内容の異なる数種の受益権に分割した場合において、権利者集会の決議（第二百六十九条第一項第一号の承諾の決議、第二百七十三条第一項、第二百七十四条第一項及び第二百七十六条第一項の決議並びに第二百七十五条第一項の承認の決議に限る。）が、ある種類の受益権を表示する受益証券の権利者に損害を及ぼすおそれがあるときは、権利者集会の決議のほかに、当該種類の受益権に係る受益証券の権利者の集会（以下「種類権利者集会」という。）の承認（権利者集会の決議が損害を及ぼすおそれのある受益権の種類が二以上ある場合には、当該二以上の種類別に区分された受益権に係る受益証券の権利者を構成員とする各種類権利者集会の承認）を受けなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iv) A Recycling Deposit, etc. in cases where there are no requests for payment within the time period of twenty years (hereinafter referred to in this item as the "Time Limit") from the date on which a Vehicle for which the Recycling Deposit, etc. was deposited last received the issuance of a vehicle inspection certificate or the return of a vehicle inspection certificate (referring to the return of vehicle inspection certificate pursuant to the provisions of the Road Transport Vehicle Act, Article 62, Paragraph 2 (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 67, Paragraph 4 of the same Act); the same shall apply hereinafter) pursuant to the provisions of Article 76, Paragraph 1 (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Paragraph 3 of the same article), Paragraph 4, or Paragraph 6 for Recycling, etc. deposit or information management deposit pertaining to Parts Specified for Recycling, etc. (excluding the Recycling Deposit, etc. listed in the preceding three items and in cases where the owner of the Vehicle notifies the Deposit Management Entity of the fact that the Vehicle will continue to be used even after the Time Limit as specified by ordinance of the competent minister). 例文帳に追加

四　再資源化預託金等が預託されている自動車が最後に自動車検査証の交付又は自動車検査証の返付（道路運送車両法第六十二条第二項（同法第六十七条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による自動車検査証の返付をいう。以下同じ。）を受けた日から起算して二十年を経過する日（以下この号において「期限日」という。）までの間に当該自動車に係る特定再資源化等物品に係る再資源化等預託金又は情報管理預託金について第七十六条第一項（同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。次号において同じ。）、第四項及び第六項の規定による払渡しの請求がない場合における当該再資源化預託金等（前三号に掲げるもの及び当該自動車の所有者が主務省令で定めるところにより期限日以後においても当該自動車を継続して使用する旨を資金管理法人に通知した場合における当該再資源化預託金等を除く。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 23-4 When, during the period on or after the day on which a Shelf Registration was made but before the day on which the Shelf Registration ceases to be effective, documents of the same kind as the Reference Documents referenced in the Shelf Registration Statement under paragraph (2) of the preceding Article are newly submitted, or there occurs any other circumstance which, as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, requires amendment of descriptions in the Shelf Registration Statement and documents attached thereto (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Shelf Registration Documents" in this Article) for the public interest or protection of investors, the person having made the Shelf Registration (hereinafter referred to as the "Shelf Registration Holder") shall submit an Amended Shelf Registration Statement to the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. This shall also apply to cases where despite the lack of new submission of such documents or such circumstance, the Shelf Registration Holder finds that any description in the Shelf Registration Documents should be amended. In this case, however, the Shelf Registration Holder may not make any amendment to increase the Planned Amount of Issue, change the Planned Issue Period or change other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の四　発行登録を行つた日以後当該発行登録がその効力を失うこととなる日前において、発行登録書において前条第二項の規定により参照すべき旨記載されている参照書類と同種の書類が新たに提出されたときその他当該発行登録に係る発行登録書及びその添付書類（以下この条において「発行登録書類」という。）に記載された事項につき公益又は投資者保護のためその内容を訂正する必要があるものとして内閣府令で定める事情があるときは、当該発行登録をした者（以下「発行登録者」という。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより訂正発行登録書を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。当該事情がない場合において、発行登録者が当該発行登録書類のうちに訂正を必要とするものがあると認めたときも、同様とする。この場合においては、発行予定額の増額、発行予定期間の変更その他の内閣府令で定める事項を変更するための訂正を行うことはできない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Where the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business have received a notification pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, when he/she finds it necessary to examine whether or not the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification falls under the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. that is likely to cause any of the following situations (limited to the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. with a non-resident whose state is a member state of a multilateral treaty or other international agreement on the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc., which is specified by Cabinet Order and to which Japan has acceded (hereinafter referred to as the "Treaty, etc." in this paragraph), and which is free from the obligations pursuant to the Treaty, etc. in regard to removal of restrictions on the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc., and the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. with a non-resident whose state is a state other than member states to the Treaty, etc. which would be free from the obligations if the state was a member state of the Treaty, etc. (referred to as the "Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to National Security, etc." in paragraphs 4 and 5)), he/she may extend the period in which the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification shall not be conducted up to four months from the day of acceptance of the notification. 例文帳に追加

３　財務大臣及び事業所管大臣は、第一項の規定による届出があつた場合において、当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等が次に掲げるいずれかの事態を生ずるおそれがある技術導入契約の締結等（我が国が加盟する技術導入契約の締結等に関する多数国間の条約その他の国際約束で政令で定めるもの（以下この項において「条約等」という。）の加盟国の非居住者との間でされる技術導入契約の締結等で技術導入契約の締結等に関する制限の除去について当該条約等に基づく義務がないもの及び当該条約等の加盟国以外の国の非居住者との間でされる技術導入契約の締結等でその国が当該条約等の加盟国であるものとした場合に当該義務がないこととなるものに限る。次項及び第五項において「国の安全等に係る技術導入契約の締結等」という。）に該当しないかどうかを審査する必要があると認めるときは、当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等をしてはならない期間を、当該届出を受理した日から起算して四月間に限り、延長することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 37-6-2 A Community Gas Utility shall not supply gas to meet general demand under supply conditions other than those set out in general supply provisions approved under Article 17, paragraph 1 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 1 of the next Article (or, if notification of revision has been given pursuant to Article 17, paragraph 4 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 1 of the next Article, the revised provisions; if revision has been made pursuant to Article 18, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 1 of the next Article, the revised provisions) or those set out in Optional Supply Provisions for which notification was given pursuant to Article 17, paragraph 7 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph 1 of the next Article; provided, however, that this shall not apply when a Community Gas Utility has reached an agreement on a Large-Volume Supply of Specified Gas (which means a supply via pipelines of gas generated at a Specified Gas Generating Facility specified by a Cabinet Order to meet a certain volume of demand from gas users, which satisfies the requirements specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) with the recipient of gas supply, or has obtained approval from the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry because of special circumstances. 例文帳に追加

第三十七条の六の二　簡易ガス事業者は、次条第一項において準用する第十七条第一項の認可を受けた供給約款（次条第一項において準用する第十七条第四項の規定による変更の届出があつたときは、変更後の供給約款）（次条第一項において準用する第十八条第二項の規定による変更があつたときは、変更後の供給約款）又は次条第一項において準用する第十七条第七項の規定による届出をした選択約款以外の供給条件により、一般の需要に応じガスを供給してはならない。ただし、特定ガス大口供給（特定ガス発生設備のうち政令で定めるものにおいて発生させたガスの供給であつてガスの使用者の一定数量以上の需要に応じて行う導管によるもののうち、経済産業省令で定める要件に該当するものをいう。）を行う場合においてその供給の相手方と合意したとき、又は特別の事情がある場合において経済産業大臣の認可を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The taxed amount of a dividend, etc. before deduction prescribed in paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) shall be, out of the amount of a dividend of surplus, etc. which an affiliated foreign company related to a resident prescribed in Article 40-5(1) of the Act received from a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to the said resident during the period of two years or less preceding the day on which an event listed in item (iii) of the said paragraph occurred (such amount of a dividend of surplus, etc. shall include the amount specified in item (ii) of the said paragraph) and which shall not be deducted for calculating the amount of taxable retained income under the provisions of Article 25-21(2) pertaining to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (including the amount which shall not be included in the taxed amount of a dividend, etc. prescribed in Article 40-5(1) of the Act that was calculated for the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or the preceding paragraph), the part which corresponds to the shares, etc. for considering the claims of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. indirectly held by the said resident via the said affiliated foreign company (such part shall exclude the amount already appropriated for the application of the provisions of Article 40-5(1) of the Act). 例文帳に追加

４　第一項及び第二項に規定する控除未済課税済配当等の額とは、法第四十条の五第一項に規定する居住者に係る外国関係会社が同項第三号に掲げる事実が生じた日前二年以内の期間において当該居住者に係る特定外国子会社等から受けた剰余金の配当等の額（同項第二号に定める金額を含む。）で当該特定外国子会社等に係る第二十五条の二十一第二項の規定による課税対象留保金額の計算上控除されないもの（当該特定外国子会社等に係る第二項又は前項の規定により算定した法第四十条の五第一項に規定する課税済配当等の額に含まれないものを含む。）のうち、当該居住者の当該外国関係会社を通じて保有する当該特定外国子会社等の請求権勘案間接保有株式等に対応する部分の金額（既に法第四十条の五第一項の規定の適用に充てられた部分の金額を除く。）をいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 113-2 The act of transferring to the public the ownership of the original or a reproduction of a work (excluding a reproduction of cinematographic works, including, in the case of a work reproduced in a cinematographic work, a reproduction of a cinematographic work; the same shall apply below in this Article), a sound or visual recording of a performance or a reproduction of a phonogram by a person who, at the time of acquiring ownership of said original or reproduction of a work, sound or visual recording of a performance or reproduction of a phonogram did not know, and was not negligent in not knowing, that such original or reproduction of a work, sound or visual recording of a performance or reproduction of a phonogram did not fall under any of the items of Article 26-2, paragraph (2), Article 95-2, paragraph (3) or Article 97-2, paragraph (2), respectively, shall be deemed to not constitute an act of infringement on the rights provided for in Article 26-2, paragraph (1), Article 95-2, paragraph (1) or Article 97-2, paragraph (1), as the case may be. 例文帳に追加

第百十三条の二　著作物の原作品若しくは複製物（映画の著作物の複製物（映画の著作物において複製されている著作物にあつては、当該映画の著作物の複製物を含む。）を除く。以下この条において同じ。）、実演の録音物若しくは録画物又はレコードの複製物の譲渡を受けた時において、当該著作物の原作品若しくは複製物、実演の録音物若しくは録画物又はレコードの複製物がそれぞれ第二十六条の二第二項各号、第九十五条の二第三項各号又は第九十七条の二第二項各号のいずれにも該当しないものであることを知らず、かつ、知らないことにつき過失がない者が当該著作物の原作品若しくは複製物、実演の録音物若しくは録画物又はレコードの複製物を公衆に譲渡する行為は、第二十六条の二第一項、第九十五条の二第一項又は第九十七条の二第一項に規定する権利を侵害する行為でないものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 41-2 (1) The captain of Specified Ship (meaning the Tanker carried more than 2,000 tons of Oil in bulk or the General Ship with the gross tonnage of not less than 100 tons. Hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter and in item 6 of Article 48) which intends to enter a port in Japan (for the General Ship, the entrance to the Specified Sea Areas is included. The same shall apply hereinafter) from a port in a region other than Japan shall notify the Minister of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism in advance of the name of the said Specified Ship, the port of registry, the existence or non existence of Contract on Insurance or Other Financial Security for Tanker Oil Pollution Damage or Contract on Insurance or Other Financial Security for General Ship Oil Pollution Damage prescribed in this Act pertaining to the said Specified Ship (hereinafter referred to simply as "Contract on Insurance or Other Financial Security" in this Chapter) and other matters prescribed in an ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism (hereinafter referred to as "Information about Contract on Insurance or Other Financial Security").The same shall apply if the captain intends to change the Information about Contract on Insurance or Other Financial Security that was notified. 例文帳に追加

第四十一条の二　本邦以外の地域の港から本邦内の港に入港（一般船舶にあつては、特定海域への入域を含む。以下同じ。）をしようとする特定船舶（二千トンを超えるばら積みの油の輸送の用に供しているタンカー又は総トン数が百トン以上の一般船舶をいう。以下この章及び第四十八条第六号において同じ。）の船長は、第三項に規定する場合を除き、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、あらかじめ、当該特定船舶の名称、船籍港、当該特定船舶に係るこの法律で定めるタンカー油濁損害賠償保障契約又は一般船舶油濁損害賠償等保障契約（以下この章において単に「保障契約」という。）の締結の有無その他の国土交通省令で定める事項（以下「保障契約情報」という。）を国土交通大臣に通報しなければならない。通報した保障契約情報を変更しようとするときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-5, paragraph (1) of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act after the revision by the Act for Partial Revision of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Act (said Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Act") due to its relevance to a business type specified by the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (3) of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order (said Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Order") or a country set forth in appended table 1 as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc. 例文帳に追加

第三条　この命令の施行の際現に旧法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令（以下「新令」という。）第三条第三項に規定する大蔵大臣及び事業所管大臣が定める業種又は同条第四項に規定する別表第一に掲げる国に該当するため外国為替及び外国貿易管理法の一部を改正する法律による改正後の外国為替及び外国貿易法（以下「新法」という。）第五十五条の五第一項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The rule change regarding the capital adequacy ratio was recently decided and announced and is now in the public comment process. The partial introduction of flexibility into the capital adequacy ratio regulation reflects circumstances specific to Japan, as exemplified by Japanese banks’ relatively large exposure to stocks. Behind the increasing volatility of Japanese stock prices are foreign investment funds’ activities, as a result of which we are now witnessing seemingly irrational events, such as the average PBR (price-to-book ratio) for stocks listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange dropping below one. Meanwhile, valuation losses on securities holdings are required to be deducted from the Tier 1 capital in the calculation of the capital adequacy ratio. We have concluded that for the management of the Japanese economy, it is essential to prevent foreign investment funds’ activities from significantly affecting and undermining the financial intermediary function of Japanese deposit-taking financial institutions, so we have decided on this as an extraordinary measure. 例文帳に追加

先般決定し公表し、現在パブリックコメントにかかっているということだと思いますが、自己資本比率規制の一部弾力化については、我が国にやや特有の事情と申しましょうか、典型的には我が国の銀行が株式へのエクスポージャーが相対的に大きい、その中で、我が国の株式市場において株価が非常にボラティリティが高くなってきている、その背景には海外の投資ファンド等の動きがある、ということで、結果的に、例えば東京証券取引所でPBR（株価純資産倍率）の平均値が1を下回るといったような、必ずしも合理的には理解しにくいような、そういう事態が出てきている、他方で有価証券の評価損というものが自己資本比率の計算上、ティア1（基本的項目）から控除されるという仕組みになっておりますので、その海外の投資ファンドの動きによって我が国の預金取扱金融機関の金融仲介能力というものが大きく振り回されて、仲介能力が損なわれるという、ここの因果関係をどこかで遮断するということが、我が国の経済全体の運営の上で必要性が極めて高いということで取られた臨時の措置ということでございます。 - 金融庁

Also, an agreement on Basel III is to be shaped in the upcoming Seoul Summit in November 2010. In the lead up to the Summit, the question of what to do with the quantitative and qualitative capital enhancement targets of international banks has become a major topic of discussion on an international scale. Substantial progress is being made to reach an agreement on this topic. In regards to liquidity regulations on, for example, how much leverage is allowed, nations are close to agreeing on the rough outline, although no consensus has been reached yet on the exact figures. The financial reform legislation, that is, the Dodd-Frank Act, was established in the United States in such a key moment. The detailed provisions and department and government ordinances are to be drafted in the days ahead. I believe I have been able to exchange opinions candidly on their macroeconomic impact and their effects on the financial intermediary functions, as well as the financial and economic climate. 例文帳に追加

また、今、バーゼルIIIが今度11月のソウルサミットでかなり合意に近いところまでに今なっておりますが、そういった時期を受けて、国際的な銀行における自己資本の質と量との強化の目標をどうするのかということが大きな国際的話題でございますが、これは大分話が煮詰まってきておりますし、また流動性規制につきましても、例えばレバレッジといいますか、どれくらいきかせるのか等々、具体的な数字にまでは至っておりませんけれども、かなりこれは大筋に近づいておりますので、そういったところにおいてアメリカの金融規制改革法、いわゆるドッド・フランクさんですね。（アメリカの法律の多くは）下院議員と上院議員の名前をつけるそうでございますが、ドッド・フランク法が成立いたしまして。今からご存じのように細部、省令、政令をつくるということでございましたが、こういったことがマクロ経済に与える影響、あるいは金融仲介機能に与える影響、それから金融・経済情勢について率直な意見の交換をすることができたというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

The Office shall revoke the trade mark in a proceeding started at the request of a third person - if the trade mark has not been properly used within the continuous period of 5 years for goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered, and there are no proper reasons for non-use; the use which commenced or which was resumed following 5 years of non-use of the trade mark within three months preceding the filing of the request for revocation shall be disregarded where the preparations for the commencement or the resumption of the use occurred only after the proprietor becomes aware that a request for revocation of the trade mark might be filed; if by the consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor the trade mark has become the common name in the trade for products or services for which it is registered; if the trade mark after the date of its registration in consequence of the use made of it by the proprietor or with his consent in respect of the goods or services for which it is registered, the trade mark is liable to mislead the public, particularly as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of those goods or services. 例文帳に追加

庁は，次の何れかの場合，第三者の請求に基づき開始された手続において商標登録の取消決定を行うことができる。登録商標がその対象とする商品又はサービスについて過去5年内に適正に使用されておらずかつかかる不使用について正当な理由が存在しないこと。登録商標の不使用が5年間継続した後で取消請求の提起される前3月内に開始され又は再開された使用は，当該使用の開始若しくは再開の準備が当該登録商標の取消請求がなされるであろうことを商標所有者が知った後に始めてなされた場合は，なかったものとみなされる。登録商標の所有者による履行若しくは不履行の結果として，当該商標がその登録における対象である製品若しくはサービスについての一般名称となっている場合。登録日後に商標がその対象である商品若しくはサービスについて所有者により又は所有者の同意の下に使用された結果として，特にそれら商品若しくはサービスの性質，品質又は原産地に関して，公衆の誤解を生じさせる虞が生じていること。 - 特許庁

(1) If within four years after filing date of application or within three years after the date when the notification regarding the grant of a patent was published, the patented invention has not been used or has been used in an insufficient amount in the Republic of Latvia, any person may submit to the administrative court an application with a request to provide a permit (compulsory licence) to it to use the patented invention in conformity with this Law and court judgement. This provision shall not be applied if the proprietor of the patent proves to the court that there have been substantiated reasons for the failure to use or insufficient use of the invention.例文帳に追加

(1) 出願日から4年以内又は特許付与に関する通知が公告された日から3年以内に特許発明がラトビア共和国において実施されなかったか又は十分に実施されなかった場合は，何人も，本法及び裁判所の判決に従って当該特許発明を実施する許可(強制ライセンス)を自己に付与すべき旨の請求を伴う申請を行政裁判所に対して行うことができる。特許所有者が当該発明を実施しなかったこと又は十分に実施しなかったことについて根拠のある理由が存在することを裁判所に証明した場合は，この規定は適用されない。(2) 生物工学的発明の特許所有者が，植物品種に係る先の権利を侵害することなしには当該発明を実施することができない場合は，当該人は，前記の権利により保護されている当該植物品種の実施のための強制ライセンスを申請して，裁判所が定める補償金を当該植物の品種の所有者に支払うことができる。当該ライセンスが付与された場合は，植物品種の所有者は，保護されている発明の実施に係る根拠のある要件を伴うクロスライセンスを受ける資格を有する。 - 特許庁

(3) In determining the state of the art, any information relating to an invention is not taken into consideration, provided that a corresponding request is submitted, if such information is disclosed by a person who is entitled to the patent pursuant to § 12 of this Act or another person with the knowledge of the said person within twelve months before the filing date of the first patent application or registration application of a utility model containing the invention in the Republic of Estonia or abroad. The request shall be filed together with the patent application or not later than two months before the publication of the patent application pursuant to § 24. If another person acquired the information unlawfully or the information was published unlawfully or without the knowledge of the person who has the right to apply for the patent, the request may be filed in the course of the examination of the patent application orin case the patent is contested. Evidence supporting the request shall be appended to the request. 例文帳に追加

(3) 技術水準を決定する場合に，その旨の請求が提出されたときは，ある発明に関する情報を考慮に入れないものとする。ただし，前記の発明を含む最初の特許出願又は実用新案登録出願のエストニア共和国又は外国における出願日前12月以内に，第12条により特許についての権利を有する者によって，又は当該人が認識していることを前提として他人によって，当該情報が開示されていることを条件とする。前記の請求は，特許出願と同時に又は第24条による特許出願公開の少なくとも2月前に行わなければならない。他人が当該情報を不法に取得したか又は当該情報が不法に公表されたか若しくは特許出願権を有する者が公表を認識していなかったときは，請求は，特許出願の審査の過程で又は特許について係争が生じたときに行うことができる。請求書には，それを裏付ける証拠を添付しなければならない。 - 特許庁

i) An application filed by a person granted a permission or an approval of business commencement of said designated fishery (including a person granted a permission or an approval of business commencement based on the application of the following item and still granted the permission or the approval of business commencement of said designated fishery on the expiration date of the valid period of said permission, if the commercialization of the new technology concerned conforms to the standard established by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries based on the recognition that the new technology allows the same level of fishery production as that of the persons granted permissions based on the applications of this item and if the expiration date of the valid period of the permission of said designated fishery is before the last day of the period during which an application for a permission or an approval of business commencement should be filed pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article), with respect to the same boat as the boat pertaining to said permission or approval of business commencement owing to the arrival of the expiration date of the valid period of the permission of said designated fishery (the valid period of the permission of the designated fishery pertaining to an approval of business commencement in the case of a person who is or was granted said approval of business commencement) (or applications filed with respect to the same mother ship and self-navigating boats as the mother ship and self-navigating boats pertaining to said permission or approval of business commencement, to constitute one complete fleet consisting of a mother ship and self-navigating boats, in the case of mother ship type fishery 例文帳に追加

一　現に当該指定漁業の許可又は起業の認可を受けている者（次号の申請に基づく許可又は起業の認可を受けている者にあつては、新技術の企業化により現にこの号の申請に基づく許可を受けている者と同程度の漁業生産を確保することが可能となつたものとして農林水産省令で定める基準に適合するものに限り、当該指定漁業の許可の有効期間の満了日が前条第一項の規定により公示した許可又は起業の認可を申請すべき期間の末日以前である場合にあつては、当該許可の有効期間の満了日において当該指定漁業の許可又は起業の認可を受けていた者を含む。）が当該指定漁業の許可の有効期間（起業の認可を受けており又は受けていた者にあつては、当該起業の認可に係る指定漁業の許可の有効期間）の満了日の到来のため当該許可又は起業の認可に係る船舶と同一の船舶についてした申請（母船式漁業にあつては、同一の船団に属する母船及び独航船等の全部について、当該許可又は起業の認可に係る母船又は独航船等と同一の母船又は独航船等についてした申請） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) When calculating the amount listed in Article 39-15(1)(i) with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), if there is any amount to be included in deductible expenses in the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of Article 33 and Article 42 to Article 53 of the Corporation Tax Act and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 67-12(2) and Article 67-13(2) of the Act, whose provisions shall be applicable under the provisions of the said item, the said amount shall be included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of adjusted income for the relevant business year, only when detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses are attached to a final return form; provided, however, that when a final return form has not been submitted or a final return form has been submitted without detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses, the district director shall, when he/she finds that there was any compelling reason therefor, apply the provisions of the main clause of this paragraph, only when the said detailed statements have been submitted. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項の規定により特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額に係る第三十九条の十五第一項第一号に掲げる金額の計算をする場合において、同号の規定によりその例に準ずるものとされる法人税法第三十三条及び第四十二条から第五十三条までの規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十七条の十二第二項及び第六十七条の十三第二項の規定により当該各事業年度において損金の額に算入されることとなる金額があるときは、確定申告書に、当該金額の損金算入に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、当該金額を当該各事業年度の調整所得金額の計算上、損金の額に算入する。ただし、税務署長は、確定申告書の提出がなかつた場合又は当該損金算入に関する明細書の添付がない確定申告書の提出があつた場合において、その提出又は添付がなかつたことについてやむを得ない事情があると認めるときは、当該明細書の提出があつた場合に限り、この項本文の規定を適用することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act may deem that the amount obtained by adding the amount of income calculated, with regard to the amount of income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning corporate income taxes of the state of the head office of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (where there are two or more laws and regulations concerning the said corporate income taxes, pursuant to the provisions of the principal ones; hereinafter referred to as the "laws and regulations of the state of the head office" in this paragraph), (where the provisions of Article 66-4(1) or Article 68-88(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction between the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. and the said domestic corporation, the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions), and the sum of the amount listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income and then deducting therefrom the amount listed in item (xiii) and item (xiv) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income (where the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office proves to be a loss, the said amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the sum of the said amount of loss and the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount from the sum of the amounts listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount) shall be the amount calculated in accordance with the standards specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 66-6(2)(ii) of the Act: 例文帳に追加

２　法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人は、前項の規定にかかわらず、特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、当該特定外国子会社等の本店所在地国の法人所得税に関する法令（当該法人所得税に関する法令が二以上ある場合には、そのうち主たる法人所得税に関する法令をいう。以下この項において「本店所在地国の法令」という。）の規定により計算した所得の金額（当該特定外国子会社等と当該内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十六条の四第一項又は第六十八条の八十八第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した場合に算出される所得の金額）に当該所得の金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額から当該所得の金額に係る第十三号及び第十四号に掲げる金額の合計額を控除した残額（本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した金額が欠損の金額となる場合には、当該計算した金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額から当該欠損の金額に当該計算した金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額を控除した残額）をもつて法第六十六条の六第二項第二号に規定する政令で定める基準により計算した金額とすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(i) The method which uses, as the amount of consideration for a foreign affiliated transaction, the amount calculated by deeming that the income, which arises from a business pertaining to a foreign affiliated transaction set forth in Article 68-88(6) of the Act for the business year including the date on which the said foreign affiliated transaction was conducted, based on financial statements containing the consolidated status of property and profits and losses of a corporate group which includes the said consolidated corporation and a foreign affiliated person (meaning a foreign affiliated person prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) pertaining to the said foreign affiliated transaction conducted by the said consolidated corporation (where the income arising from the said business is not recorded separately from the income arising from other businesses in the said financial statements, the income arising from businesses including the said business; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), or for any other period equivalent thereto, is to be attributed to such persons, in accordance with the factors sufficient to estimate the amount of expenses or the value of fixed assets that such persons have spent or used for conducting the said foreign affiliated transaction (where the amount of expenses or the value of fixed assets spent or used for the said business is not recorded separately from the amount of expenses or the value of fixed assets spent or used for other businesses in the said financial statements, the amount of expenses or the value of fixed assets spent or used for businesses including the said business) or any other levels of such persons' contribution to the said income 例文帳に追加

一　法第六十八条の八十八第六項の連結法人及び当該連結法人の同項の国外関連取引に係る国外関連者（同条第一項に規定する国外関連者をいう。）の属する企業集団の財産及び損益の状況を連結して記載した計算書類による当該国外関連取引が行われた日を含む事業年度又はこれに準ずる期間の当該国外関連取引に係る事業に係る所得（当該計算書類において当該事業に係る所得が他の事業に係る所得と区分されていない場合には、当該事業を含む事業に係る所得とする。以下この号において同じ。）が、これらの者が支出した当該国外関連取引に係る事業に係る費用の額、使用した固定資産の価額（当該計算書類において当該事業に係る費用の額又は固定資産の価額が他の事業に係る費用の額又は固定資産の価額と区分されていない場合には、当該事業を含む事業に係る費用の額又は固定資産の価額とする。）その他これらの者が当該所得の発生に寄与した程度を推測するに足りる要因に応じてこれらの者に帰属するものとして計算した金額をもつて当該国外関連取引の対価の額とする方法 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

i) The amount of income or loss calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsections 2 to 10 of the Corporation Tax Act (excluding Article 23, Article 26(1) to (4), Article 28, Article 38 to Article 41, Article 55(3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Article 61-11 to Article 61-13 of the said Act) and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 66-4(3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of paragraph 68-88(1) or Article 66-4(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction with a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90(1) of the Act (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with the said consolidated corporation) or a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act that is related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc., the amount of income or loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions 例文帳に追加

一　当該各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、法人税法第二編第一章第一節第二款から第十款まで（同法第二十三条、第二十六条第一項から第四項まで、第二十八条、第三十八条から第四十一条まで、第五十五条第三項、第五十七条、第五十八条、第五十九条及び第六十一条の十一から第六十一条の十三までを除く。）の規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第五十七条の十、第六十一条の四、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十六条の四第三項、第六十七条の十二及び第六十七条の十三の規定（以下この号において「本邦法令の規定」という。）の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額（当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十八条の九十第一項各号に掲げる連結法人（当該連結法人との間に連結完全支配関係がある他の連結法人を含む。）又は法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十八条の八十八第一項又は第六十六条の四第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本邦法令の規定の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

i) The amount of income or loss calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsection 2 to Subsection 9 (excluding Article 23, Article 26, paragraphs (1) to (4), Article 28, Articles 38 to 41, Article 55, paragraph (3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Articles 61-11 to 61-13 of the Corporation Tax Act), and Subsection 11 of said Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Articles 65-7 to 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7, paragraph (1) of the Act), Article 66-4, paragraph (3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of Article 68-88, paragraph (1) or Article 66-4, paragraph (1) of the Act is applied to a transaction with a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90, paragraph (1) of the Act (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with said consolidated corporation) or a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6, paragraph (1) of the Act that is the domestic corporation of said specified foreign subsidiary, etc., the amount of income or loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions 例文帳に追加

一　当該各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、法人税法第二編第一章第一節第二款から第九款まで（同法第二十三条、第二十六条第一項から第四項まで、第二十八条、第三十八条から第四十一条まで、第五十五条第三項、第五十七条、第五十八条、第五十九条及び第六十一条の十一から第六十一条の十三までを除く。）及び第十一款の規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第五十七条の十、第六十一条の四、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十六条の四第三項、第六十七条の十二及び第六十七条の十三の規定（以下この号において「本邦法令の規定」という。）の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額（当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十八条の九十第一項各号に掲げる連結法人（当該連結法人との間に連結完全支配関係がある他の連結法人を含む。）又は法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十八条の八十八第一項又は第六十六条の四第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本邦法令の規定の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 306-2 The amount of income tax to be deducted pursuant to the provision of Article 180-2(3) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Interest, etc. on Trust Property) of the Act shall, when a foreign corporation collects income tax pursuant to the provisions of Article 181 (Withholding Liability Regarding Interest Income and Dividend Income) or Article 212 (Withholding Liability Regarding Income of Nonresidents or Corporations) of the Act with regard to distribution of profit prescribed in Article 180-2(3) of the Act (limited to one that corresponds to the accounting period for distribution of profit that includes the day on which the said income tax was paid; in the case where the trust property concerning such payment pertains to a securities investment trust established for the purpose of allowing beneficial rights thereof to be acquired by the trustee of another securities investment trust, which is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance prescribed in Article 300(2) (Credit for Income Tax Paid with respect to Trust Property), it shall refer to distribution of profit from a securities investment trust other than a bond investment trust which is established for the purpose of managing the trust property for making an investment in the beneficial rights of the relevant securities investment trust and for which the offering of beneficial rights upon establishment has been conducted through the public offering prescribed in Article 2(1)(xv)-3 (Definitions)), be deducted from the amount of income tax to be collected and paid. 例文帳に追加

第三百六条の二　法第百八十条の二第三項（信託財産に係る利子等の課税の特例）の規定により控除する所得税の額は、外国法人が同項に規定する収益の分配（当該所得税の納付をした日の属する収益の分配の計算期間に対応するものに限るものとし、当該納付に係る信託財産がその受益権を他の証券投資信託の受託者に取得させることを目的とする証券投資信託で第三百条第二項（信託財産について納付した所得税額の控除）に規定する財務省令で定めるものに係るものである場合には、信託財産を当該証券投資信託の受益権に対する投資として運用することを目的とする公社債投資信託以外の証券投資信託でその設定に係る受益権の募集が法第二条第一項第十五号の三（定義）に規定する公募により行われたものの収益の分配とする。）につき法第百八十一条（利子所得及び配当所得に係る源泉徴収義務）又は第二百十二条（非居住者又は法人の所得に係る源泉徴収義務）の規定により所得税を徴収する際、その徴収して納付すべき所得税の額から控除するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively. 例文帳に追加

２　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書（以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。）について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書（第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The Registrar shall refer to an examiner every application in respect of which a complete specification has been filed and if satisfied on the report of the examiner that- the nature of the invention or the manner in which it is to be performed is not particularly described and ascertained in the complete specification, or the application, specification and drawings have not been prepared in the prescribed manner, or the title of the specification does not sufficiently indicate the subject-matter of the invention, or the statement of claim does not sufficiently define the invention, or where a complete specification has been left after a provisional specification, the invention particularly described in the complete specification is not substantially the same as that which is described in the provisional specification, or the invention as described and claimed is prima facie not a manner of new manufacture or improvement, or the specification relates to more than one invention, or in the case of an application claiming priority under section 78A, the specification describes and claims an invention substantially larger than or substantially different from the invention disclosed in the specification field with the application made outside Bangladesh by virtue of which priority is claimed, or in the case of an application for a patent of addition under section 15A, the invention describe and claimed in the specification is not an improvement or modification of that described and claimed in the original specification, he may refuse to accept the application or require that the application, specification or drawings be amended before he proceeds with the application; and in the later case the application shall, if the Registrar so directs, bear date as from the time when the requirement is complied with: Provided that, when a specification comprises more than one invention, the application shall, if the Registrar or the applicant so requires, be restricted to one invention and the other inventions may he made the subject-matter of fresh applications; and any such fresh application shall be proceeded with as a substantive application, but the Registrar may, in his discretion, direct that any such fresh application made before the acceptance of the original application shall bear the date of the original application or such later date as he may fix, and the fresh application shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to have been made on the date which it bears in accordance with such direction: Provided further that where a complete specification is left after a provisional specification, the Registrar may, if the applicant so requests, cancel the provisional specification and direct that the application shall be deemed to have been made on the date on which the complete specification was left, and proceed with the application accordingly. 例文帳に追加

登録官は、完全な明細書が提出されたあらゆる出願につき審査官へ付託するものとし、次に掲げる(a)から(h)の各号に該当する旨が審査官報告書において報告される場合、登録官は、出願の受理を拒否すること、又は、出願審査を行う前に、願書、明細書若しくは図面の補正を求めることができ、後者の場合、登録官がそのように命ずるとき、出願の日付は当該補正の要件が満たされた日とする。発明の本質又は実施方法が、完全な明細書中に具体的に記述されておらず、確認されないとき。願書、明細書及び図面が所定の方式で作成されていないとき。明細書の名称は発明の要旨を十分に示していないとき。請求項の記載は発明を十分に定義していないとき。又は、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、完全な明細書に具体的に記載された発明が仮明細書の記載と本質的に同一ではないとき。記載され請求されている発明が一見して新規の製造又は改良の方法ではない。明細書が2 以上の発明に係わるものであるとき。又は、第78A 条により優先権を主張する出願の場合、優先権主張の基礎とされているバングラデシュ国外で行われた出願において提出された明細書で開示されている発明より本質的に広い、又は本質的に異なる発明が明細書に記載され請求されているとき。又は、第15A 条による特許追加出願の場合、明細書に記載され請求される発明が原明細書に記載され請求される発明の改良又は修正ではないとき。ただし、明細書が2 以上の発明から成る場合、当該出願は、登録官又は出願人がそのように求めるとき、1 発明に限定されるものとし、その他の発明は新規出願の対象とすることができる。当該新規出願は実質的な出願として手続きを進め、原出願が受理される前に行われるこのような新規出願につき、原出願の日又は自己が定めるそれ以降の日付を付すよう登録官は自己の裁量において指示することができ、当該新規出願は、本法の適用上、当該指示に従い付与された日付に出願されたものとみなされる。ただし、さらに、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、登録官は、出願人がそのように求めれば、仮明細書を取り消し、出願は完全な明細書が提出された日付に行われたとみなすよう命じることができ、そのように当該出願の手続きを進めることができる。 - 特許庁

(7) Article 27-8(1) to (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Tender Offer Report. In this case, the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the part "there occurs any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3)) or in the important matters to be stated in a Tender Offer Notification, or any other circumstance specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Tender Offer Notification, during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted but before the last day of the Tender Offer Period" and the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made is fixed by the Method of Proportional Distribution set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2) during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted" and "amendment report," respectively; the term "amendment" and the parts "the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with the provisions of this Section" and "the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the amendment violates Article 27-6(1)" in Article 27-8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report," "the delivery and other settlement methods stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with Article 27-13(4) (excluding 27-13(4)(i)) and Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)" and "the result of calculation for deciding the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made stated in the amendment contravenes the method of proportional distribution specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)"; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the term "disposition under paragraph (3)"; and the part "the last day of the Tender Offer Period (including the period to be extended under paragraph (8); the same shall apply in paragraph (7)) (or, in the cases of the disposition resulting in the submission of an amendment report after the last day of the Tender Offer Period, after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day), and the disposition under the preceding paragraph may not be given after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day." in Article 27-8(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition under paragraph (3) and the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22(7)" and "the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period," respectively. 例文帳に追加

７　第二十七条の八第一項から第五項までの規定は、公開買付報告書について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の八第一項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第二項中「当該公開買付期間の末日までの間において、買付条件等の変更（第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。）その他の公開買付届出書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更その他当該公開買付届出書の内容を訂正すべき内閣府令で定める事情がある」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定するあん分比例方式により買付け等をする上場株券等の数が確定した」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第三項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、「買付条件等がこの節の規定」とあるのは「買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第四項（第一号を除く。）及び第二十七条の十三第五項の規定」と、「買付条件等の変更が第二十七条の六第一項の規定」とあるのは「買付け等をする上場株券等の数の計算の結果が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定する内閣府令で定めるあん分比例方式」と、同条第四項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第五項中「第三項の規定による処分」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第七項において準用する第三項及び前項の規定による処分」と、「末日（当該末日後に提出される訂正届出書に係る処分にあつては、当該末日の翌日から起算して五年を経過した日）後は、することができないものとし、前項の規定による処分は、当該末日」とあるのは「末日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Among devices claimed in an application for a utility model registration containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are disclosed in the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings (in the case where the Earlier Application was a written application in foreign language prescribed in Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) originally attached to the application of the Earlier Application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the Earlier Application contains a priority claim under the preceding paragraph or Article 41(1) of the Patent Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 11(1) of this Act), excluding any device disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the Earlier Application is based), the said application for a utility model registration shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the Earlier Application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 3, the main clause of Article 3-2, Article 7(1) to (3), Article 30(1) to (3) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 11(1), Article 17, Articles 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 26, Articles 39(3) and (4) and 72 of the Patent Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), Article 29 of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959) and Articles 33-2(3) and 33-3(3) (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act ) of the Trademark Act. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う実用新案登録出願に係る考案のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が特許法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案（当該先の出願が前項若しくは同法第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は同法第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された考案を除く。）についての第三条、第三条の二本文、前条第一項から第三項まで、第十一条第一項において準用する同法第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第十七条、第二十六条において準用する同法第六十九条第二項第二号、同法第七十九条、同法第八十一条及び同法第八十二条第一項並びに同法第三十九条第三項及び第四項並びに第七十二条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第三項及び第三十三条の三第三項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該実用新案登録出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a resident listed in the items of Article 40-4(1) of the Act may deem that the amount obtained by adding the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning corporate income taxes in the state of the head office of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (meaning taxes to be imposed based on the amount of the company's income in the state of the head office or in a state or territory other than the state of the head office or by local entities in such state or territory including the state of the head office (including taxes listed in the items of Article 141(2) of the Order for Enforcement of the Corporation Tax Act to be imposed in such state or territory or by local entities of such state or territory) and taxes equivalent to incidental taxes to be imposed incidentally as prescribed in Article 2(xlv) of the Corporation Tax Act (excluding interest tax) and other taxes similar to the tax equivalent to the said incidental taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section) (where there are two or more laws and regulations concerning the said corporate income taxes, pursuant to the provisions of the principal ones; hereinafter referred to as the "laws and regulations of the state of the head office" in this paragraph), with regard to the income of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year (where the provisions of Article 66-4(1) or Article 68-88(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction between the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. and a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act that relates to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc., the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in those provisions), and the sum of the amounts listed in Article 39-15(2)(i) to (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income and then deducting therefrom the sum of the amounts listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) of the said paragraph pertaining to the said calculated amount of income (where the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office proves to be a loss, the said amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the sum of the said amount of loss and the amounts listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) of the said paragraph pertaining to the said calculated amount from the sum of the amounts listed in item (i) to item (xiii) of the said paragraph pertaining to the said calculated amount) shall be the amount calculated in accordance with the standards specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 40-4(2)(ii) of the Act. 例文帳に追加

２　法第四十条の四第一項各号に掲げる居住者は、前項の規定にかかわらず、特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、当該特定外国子会社等の本店所在地国の法人所得税（本店所在地国若しくは本店所在地国以外の国若しくは地域又はこれらの国若しくは地域の地方公共団体により法人の所得を課税標準として課される税（これらの国若しくは地域又はこれらの国若しくは地域の地方公共団体により課される法人税法施行令第百四十一条第二項各号に掲げる税を含む。）及びこれに附帯して課される法人税法第二条第四十五号に規定する附帯税（利子税を除く。）に相当する税その他当該附帯税に相当する税に類する税をいう。以下この節において同じ。）に関する法令（当該法人所得税に関する法令が二以上ある場合には、そのうち主たる法人所得税に関する法令をいう。以下この項において「本店所在地国の法令」という。）の規定により計算した所得の金額（当該特定外国子会社等と当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十六条の四第一項又は第六十八条の八十八第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した場合に算出される所得の金額）に当該所得の金額に係る第三十九条の十五第二項第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額から当該所得の金額に係る同項第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を控除した残額（本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した金額が欠損の金額となる場合には、当該計算した金額に係る同項第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額から当該欠損の金額に当該計算した金額に係る同項第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額を控除した残額）をもつて法第四十条の四第二項第二号に規定する政令で定める基準により計算した金額とすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90(1) of the Act may deem that the amount obtained by adding the amount of income calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning corporate income taxes of the state of the head office of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (where there are two or more laws and regulations concerning the said corporate income taxes, pursuant to the provisions of the principal ones; hereinafter referred to as the "laws and regulations of the state of the head office" in this paragraph), (where the provisions of Article 68-88(1) or Article 66-4(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction between the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. and the said consolidated corporation (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with the said consolidated corporation) or domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act, the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in the said paragraph), and the sum of the amount listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income and then deducting therefrom the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income (where the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office proves to be a loss, the said amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the sum of the said amount of loss and the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount from the sum of the amounts listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount) shall be the amount calculated in accordance with the standards specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 68-90(2)(ii) of the Act; provided, however, that this shall apply only when the said other consolidated corporations are not subject to the provisions of the preceding paragraph with regard to the said calculated amount pertaining to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc.: 例文帳に追加

２　法第六十八条の九十第一項各号に掲げる連結法人は、前項の規定にかかわらず、特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、当該特定外国子会社等の本店所在地国の法人所得税に関する法令（当該法人所得税に関する法令が二以上ある場合には、そのうち主たる法人所得税に関する法令をいう。以下この項において「本店所在地国の法令」という。）の規定により計算した所得の金額（当該特定外国子会社等と当該連結法人（当該連結法人との間に連結完全支配関係がある他の連結法人を含む。）又は法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十八条の八十八第一項又は第六十六条の四第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引が同項に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した場合に算出される所得の金額）に当該所得の金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額から当該所得の金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を控除した残額（本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した金額が欠損の金額となる場合には、当該計算した金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額から当該欠損の金額に当該計算した金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額を控除した残額）をもつて法第六十八条の九十第二項第二号に規定する政令で定める基準により計算した金額とすることができる。ただし、当該他の連結法人が当該特定外国子会社等に係る当該計算した金額につき前項の規定の適用を受けない場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well. 例文帳に追加

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁

Article 1-2-13 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation (referring to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation set forth in Article 265-37, paragraph (1); the same shall apply hereafter in this Article, as well as in the following Article and Article 1-2-15 of the Supplementary Provisions) was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) by 31 March 2003 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Specified Members" in Article 1-2-15, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing unexpected disruptions in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the total amount of such costs exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the activities to be specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Specified Activities" in the following paragraph, the following Article and Article 1-2-15 of the Supplementary Provisions) within the amount prescribed by the budget. 例文帳に追加

第一条の二の十三　政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構（第二百六十五条の三十七第一項に規定する生命保険契約者保護機構をいう。以下この条、次条及び附則第一条の二の十五において同じ。）がその会員（平成十五年三月三十一日までに第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。附則第一条の二の十五第一項において「特定会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に不測の混乱を生じさせるおそれがあると認める場合（当該費用の合計額が政令で定める額を超えた場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（政令で定める業務（次項、次条及び附則第一条の二の十五において「特定業務」という。）に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1-2-14 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2009 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Members under Special Provisions" in paragraph (3) of the following Article) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing serious consequences in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the sum total of the amount of outstanding debts of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation as of the date specified by a Cabinet Order and the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of additional debts to be incurred if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation should have to finance such costs through borrowings exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order taking into consideration the long-term balance of payments of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the Specified Activities) within the amount prescribed by the budget. 例文帳に追加

第一条の二の十四　政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構がその会員（平成十八年四月一日から平成二十一年三月三十一日までの間に第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。次条第三項において「特例会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に極めて重大な支障が生じるおそれがあると認める場合（政令で定める日における当該生命保険契約者保護機構の借入残高に、当該生命保険契約者保護機構が当該費用を借入れにより賄うとした場合の当該借入れの額として政令で定める額を加えた額が当該生命保険契約者保護機構の長期的な収支を勘案して政令で定める額を超える場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（特定業務に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iii) in the case where an officer or employee of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange has acquired the shares of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange (limited to those conducted according to a certain plan, without depending on an individual investment decision, on an on-going basis, for which each officer or employee contributes less than one million yen at a time) jointly with another officer or employee of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange (when said Incorporated Commodity Exchange has acquired the shares other than those acquired based on the provisions of Article 156, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act [including cases where it is applied by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 165, paragraph (3) of the same Act], limited to the case where the acquisition was consigned to a Financial Instruments Business Operator [which means the Financial Instruments Business Operator prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) (limited to one who is engaged in the Type I Financial Instruments Business prescribed in Article 28, paragraph (1) of the same Act); the same shall apply in the following Article and the Appended Table 4]), voting rights pertaining to the shares of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange acquired or held by a person who has deposited the shares of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange which conducted said acquisition (excluding those that are deemed to be the voting rights personally acquired or held by said person who has deposited the shares, pursuant to the provisions of Article 86, paragraph (3) [limited to the part pertaining to item (i)] of the Act); 例文帳に追加

三　株式会社商品取引所の役員又は従業員が当該株式会社商品取引所の他の役員又は従業員と共同して当該株式会社商品取引所の株式の取得（一定の計画に従い、個別の投資判断に基づかず、継続的に行われ、各役員又は従業員の一回当たりの拠出金額が百万円に満たないものに限る。）をした場合（当該株式会社商品取引所が会社法第百五十六条第一項（同法第百六十五条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合を含む。）の規定に基づき取得した株式以外の株式を取得したときは、金融商品取引業者（金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第二条第九項に規定する金融商品取引業者（同法第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者に限る。）をいう。次条及び別表第四において同じ。）に委託して行った場合に限る。）において当該取得をした株式会社商品取引所の株式を信託された者が取得し、又は所有する当該株式会社商品取引所の株式に係る議決権（法第八十六条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定により当該信託された者が自ら取得し、又は保有する議決権とみなされるものを除く。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 249 When a Settlor Company of an Investment Trust or a person who was a Settlor Company of an Investment Trust, a Trust Company, etc., an administrator of the registry of beneficial interest holders, an issuer of the Beneficiary Certificates of a Foreign Investment Trust, an Investment Corporation's organizer(s), Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment, Supervisory Officers at Establishment, corporate officer(s), supervisory officers, accounting auditor(s) or a member to perform the duties thereof, executive liquidator(s), liquidation supervisors, Executive Liquidator's Agent, person to perform duties on behalf of a corporate officer(s), supervisory officers, executive liquidator(s) or liquidation supervisors appointed by a provisional disposition order under Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Remedies Act, person to temporarily perform the duties on behalf of an officer as prescribed in Article 228, paragraph (1), item (v), person to temporarily perform the duties on behalf of an executive liquidator or liquidation supervisor prescribed in Article 228, paragraph (2), item (iii), person to temporarily perform the duties of an accounting auditor as prescribed in Article 233, paragraph (1), item (iii), inspector, Supervisor, Investigator, administrator of Investment Corporation Bonds, manager of the Investment Corporation Bonds to succeed to the administration of the Investment Corporation Bonds, Representative Creditor of an Investment Corporation or Resolution Administrator, Administrative Agent, Asset Management Company, or Asset Custody Company falls under any of the following items, such person shall be punished by a non-penal fine of not more than one million yen; provided, however, that this shall not apply when such acts should be made subject to criminal punishment: 例文帳に追加

第二百四十九条　投資信託委託会社若しくは投資信託委託会社であつた者、信託会社等、受益権原簿管理人、外国投資信託の受益証券の発行者、投資法人の設立企画人、設立時執行役員、設立時監督役員、執行役員、監督役員、会計監査人若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、清算執行人、清算監督人、清算執行人代理、民事保全法第五十六条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された執行役員、監督役員、清算執行人若しくは清算監督人の職務を代行する者、第二百二十八条第一項第五号に規定する一時役員の職務を行うべき者、同条第二項第三号に規定する一時清算執行人若しくは清算監督人の職務を行うべき者、第二百三十三条第一項第三号に規定する一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者、検査役、監督委員、調査委員、投資法人債管理者、事務を承継する投資法人債管理者、代表投資法人債権者若しくは決議執行者、一般事務受託者、資産運用会社又は資産保管会社は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、百万円以下の過料に処する。ただし、その行為について刑を科すべきときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

i) The amount of income or amount of a loss calculated, with regard to the amount of income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsections 2 to 10 of the Corporation Tax Act (excluding Article 23, Article 26(1) to (4), Article 28, Article 38 to Article 41, Article 55(3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Article 61-11 to Article 61-13 of the said Act) and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 66-4(3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of paragraph 66-4(1) or Article 68-88(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction with a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc., the amount of income or amount of a loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions 例文帳に追加

一　当該各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、法人税法第二編第一章第一節第二款から第十款まで（同法第二十三条、第二十六条第一項から第四項まで、第二十八条、第三十八条から第四十一条まで、第五十五条第三項、第五十七条、第五十八条、第五十九条及び第六十一条の十一から第六十一条の十三までを除く。）の規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第五十七条の十、第六十一条の四、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十六条の四第三項、第六十七条の十二及び第六十七条の十三の規定（以下この号において「本邦法令の規定」という。）の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額（当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十六条の四第一項又は第六十八条の八十八第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本邦法令の規定の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

i) The amount of income or amount of a loss calculated, with regard to the amount of income of a specified foreign subsidiary, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsection 2 to Subsection 9 (excluding Article 23, Article 26, paragraphs (1) to (4), Article 28, Articles 38 to 41, Article 55, paragraph (3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Articles 61-11 to 61-13 of the Corporation Tax Act), and Subsection 11 of said Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Articles 65-7 to 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7, paragraph (1) of the Act), Article 66-4, paragraph (3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of Article 66-4, paragraph (1) or Article 68-88, paragraph (1) of the Act is applied to a transaction with a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6, paragraph (1) of the Act related to said specified foreign subsidiary, etc., the amount of income or amount of a loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions 例文帳に追加

一　当該各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、法人税法第二編第一章第一節第二款から第九款まで（同法第二十三条、第二十六条第一項から第四項まで、第二十八条、第三十八条から第四十一条まで、第五十五条第三項、第五十七条、第五十八条、第五十九条及び第六十一条の十一から第六十一条の十三までを除く。）及び第十一款の規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第五十七条の十、第六十一条の四、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十六条の四第三項、第六十七条の十二及び第六十七条の十三の規定（以下この号において「本邦法令の規定」という。）の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額（当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十六条の四第一項又は第六十八条の八十八第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本邦法令の規定の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. 例文帳に追加

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

Another matter I would like to mention is the stability of the financial system. This is a global issue, with currencies around the world in a very unstable condition due to the Greek shock and the Irish crisis. In that respect, a certain degree of agreement was recently reached at the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and at wider forums, such as the G20 summit in Seoul and G-8. However, there are still some issues over which differences remain. In light of the increasingly important role of the financial sector, I feel the growing importance of international initiatives concerning financial regulation. In the future, in order to prevent the recurrence of a financial crisis and to strengthen the financial system, Japan will continue to actively participate in international debates on a broad range of tasks agreed on at the G20 summit. Although Japan slipped to No. 3 in terms of the size of GDP, it is still among the top three as an economic power. Since the Lehman shock in particular, Japan’s position in the global economy has become increasingly important at a time when Asia is achieving remarkable economic development. Therefore, Japan will actively participate in such debates. 例文帳に追加

それから、もう一点がまさに金融システムの安定でございまして、これはもう世界的な話でございまして、ギリシャ・ショックあるいはアイルランド危機の問題を見ても、非常に通貨というものが世界全体で今まだ、非常に不安定な状態でございます。そういった意味で、先般バーゼル銀行監督委員会、あるいはそれを包含しての、11月のソウルサミット、Ｇ8、Ｇ20である程度合意ができたわけでございますけれども、まだ詰めていないところもございますので、そういったところを勘案して、益々金融は極めて重要な役割を果たしていることに鑑みて、金融規制に関する国際的な取り組みが益々重要になってきたというふうに私自身も実感するわけでございます。今後とも金融危機再発防止、それから金融システムの強化に向けて、Ｇ20サミットで合意された幅広い課題に対する国際的な論議に、引き続き積極的に日本国としても、（GDPが世界第）3番目になったというようなお話もございますけれども、世界で2番目、3番目の経済力を有している国でございますし、特にリーマン・ショックの後も、アジアの経済的な進展が著しいという時代において、大変日本が置かれた経済における国際的な地位の重要性というのは、ある意味で重要になってきていると、こう思うわけでございますから、そういったところで積極的に参画をしてまいりたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Where the decision on the objection under Section 64 has not been made within six months from the date of filing, and where, after the expiry of this time limit, the person filing the objection has filed a request for decision, the appeal from a decision of the Trade Mark Section or Trade Mark Division is directly admissible, in derogation of subsection (1), sentence 1, if the decision on the objection is not made within a period of two months from the receipt of the request. If the person raising the objection is opposed by another party to the proceedings, sentence 1 shall be applicable provided that the period of six months after the objection was raised is replaced by a period of 10 months. If the other party has also raised an objection, the other party must give his consent to the appeal under sentence 2. The written declaration of consent shall be attached to the appeal. If the other party does not also lodge an appeal within one month after service of the appeal under subsection (4), sentence 2, his objection is deemed to have been withdrawn. The remaining periods of time under sentences 1 and 2 shall be interrupted if the proceedings are suspended or if, on request of a party to the proceedings, an extension of time has been granted. The remaining periods of time under sentences 1 and 2 shall recommence to run after the suspension of the proceedings has been terminated or the extension of time granted has expired. After a decision on the objection has been issued, an appeal under sentences 1 and 2 shall no longer be admissible. 例文帳に追加

第64条の規定に基づく不服申立に関する決定がその申立の日から6月以内に行われない場合，及び不服申立をした者がこの期間の満了後に決定の請求を行った場合には，商標課又は商標部門の決定に対する抗告は，不服申立に関する決定がその請求の受理から2月以内に行われないときは，[1]の第1文の規定は適用されず，直ちに認められる。不服申立をした者に対して，当該手続の他の当事者が対抗している場合には，第1文は，不服申立がなされた日から6月の期間を10月の期間と置き替えるという条件で適用されるものとする。手続における他の当事者も不服申立をしている場合には，当該他の当事者は，第2文に基づく抗告に対し同意しなければならない。書面による同意の宣言を抗告に添付しなければならない。手続における他の当事者が，[4]の第2文の規定に基づく抗告状の送達後1月以内に，抗告を提起しない場合は，その者がした不服申立は取り下げられたものとみなされる。第1文及び第2文の規定に基づく残存期間は，手続が中止されている場合又は手続における当事者の1人の請求により期間の延長が認められている場合は，進行が中断される。第1文及び第2文に規定する残存期間は，中止が終了した後又は与えられた期間が満了した後に進行を再開する。不服申立に関する決定が行われた後には，第1文及び第2文の規定に基づく抗告はもはや行うことができない。 - 特許庁

The following acts do not constitute infringement of the exclusive right of the proprietor of a patent: 1) the use of the patented invention on board of ships of other states (within the hull, machinery, rigging, radio-navigation equipment or other equipment) if such ships are temporarily or accidentally in the waters of the Republic of Estonia and the invention is used solely for the purposes of the ship; 2) the use of the patented invention within the construction or auxiliary equipment of aircraft or land vehicles of other countries, or in the operation of the vehicles or equipment if such vehicles are temporarily or accidentally in the Republic of Estonia; 3) the use of the patented invention in testing related to the invention itself; 4) the single preparation of a medicinal product containing the patented invention on the basis of a prescription in a pharmacy and the use of such medicinal product; (27.10.1999 entered into force 01.01.2000 - RT I 1999, 84, 764) 5) the private non-commercial use of the patented invention if such use does not harm the interests of the proprietor of the patent; (27.10.1999 entered into force 01.01.2000 - RT I 1999, 84, 764) 6) the use, distribution, sale or offer for sale in the Republic of Estonia of the patented invention by the proprietor of the patent or with the proprietor’s consent; 7) the propagation or multiplication of biological material placed on the market by the proprietor of the patent or with the proprietor’s consent, where the multiplication or propagation necessarily results from the application for which the biological material was marketed, provided that the biological material obtained is not subsequently used for other propagation or multiplication. (27.10.1999 entered into force 01.01.2000 - RT I 1999, 84, 764) 例文帳に追加

次に掲げる行為は，特許所有者の排他権に対する侵害を構成しない。 1) エストニア共和国の領水に他国の船舶が一時的又は偶発的に入った場合で，かつ，発明の実施が専らその船舶の必要のためである場合に，その船舶内で(船体，機械，装具，無線航海装置その他の装置において)その特許発明を実施すること 2) エストニア共和国に他国の航空機又は車両が一時的に又は偶発的に入った場合に，その航空機又は車両の構造若しくは付属装置又は当該の輸送手段若しくはその装置の操作に関して特許発明を実施すること 3) 発明特許をその発明自体に関する試験のために実施すること 4) 特許発明を含む医薬品を処方箋に従って薬局で個別に調合すること及び当該医薬品を使用すること (1999年10月27日。2000年1月1日施行－RT I 1999, 84, 764) 5) 特許発明を私的に非営業的に実施すること。ただし，当該実施が特許所有者の利益を害さないことを条件とする。 (1999年10月27日。2000年1月1日施行－RT I 1999, 84, 764) 6) エストニア共和国における発明特許の使用，頒布，販売又は販売の申出であって，特許所有者により又は特許所有者の承諾を得て行われるもの 7) 特許所有者により又は特許所有者の承諾を得て市場に出された生物材料に係る繁殖又は増殖であって，当該繁殖又は増殖が，当該生物材料をその販売目的とされた用途で利用した結果必然的に生じるものである場合。ただし，取得された生物材料がその後，他の繁殖又は増殖のために使用されないことを条件とする。 (1999年10月27日。2000年1月1日施行－RT I 1999, 84, 764) - 特許庁

People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices.例文帳に追加