「さいみちょう」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(600ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

法第百六十八条第二項の主務省令で定める書類は、次に掲げるもの（官公署が証明す る書類の場合には、許可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。一登記事項証明書 二直前事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属証明書 三業務開始後三年間における収支の見込みを記載した書面 四主要株主（総株主の議決権（法第八十六条第一項に規定する議決権をいう。以下 この号において同じ。）の百分の十以上の議決権を保有している株主をいう。以下同 じ。）の氏名又は商号若しくは名称、住所又は所在地及びその保有する議決権の数を 記載した書面 五 親法人等（商品取引清算機関の総株主の議決権（前号に規定する議決権をいう。） の過半数を保有している法人その他の団体をいう。）及び子法人等（商品取引清算機 - 139 - 関が総株主等（令第七条第一項第三号 に規定する総株主等をいう。）の議決権（令 第七条第一項第三号 に規定する議決権をいう。）の過半数を保有している法人その 他の団体をいう。）の概要を記載した書面 六法第十五条第二項第一号ハからホまで又はリのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約 する書面 七次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ役員が外国人である場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第 十五条第二項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ役員が法人である場合当該役員の登記事項証明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法 第十五条第二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓約する書面 ハ役員が外国人又は法人でない場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者 が法第十五条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しない旨の官公署の証明書並びにその 者が同号ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 九創立総会を開催した場合には、創立総会の議事録 十清算参加者の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載 した書面 十一清算参加者が許可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の 純資産額に関する調書 十二商品取引債務引受業において電子情報処理組織を使用する場合には、当該電子情 報処理組織の概要、設置場所、容量及び保守の方法並びに当該電子情報処理組織に 異常が発生した場合の対処方法を記載した書類 十三その他法第百六十九条第一項に掲げる基準に適合しているかどうかについての 認定の参考となるべき事項を記載した書面例文帳に追加

The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 168, paragraph 2 of the Act shall be as follows (in the case of a certification issued by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a certificate of the registered matters of the company; (ii) the accounting documents, etc. for the most recent business year and related detailed certifications; (iii) a document stating the estimated income for the three years after the commencement of the business; (iv) a document stating the name or trade name of the major shareholder (which means a shareholder holding 10 percent or more of the voting rights [which means a voting right prescribed in Article 86, paragraph 1 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] of total shareholders; hereinafter the same shall apply), the address or location and the number of voting rights that the major shareholder holds;(v) a document giving a description of a parent juridical person, etc. (which means a juridical person or other organization that holds the majority of voting rights [which is a voting right as prescribed in the preceding item] of the total shareholders of a Commodity Clearing Organization) and subsidiary juridical person(s), etc. (which means a juridical person or other organization that holds the majority of the voting rights [which means the voting rights prescribed in Article 7, paragraph 1, item 3 of the Ordinance] of the total shareholders, etc. [which means the total shareholders, etc. prescribed in Article 7, paragraph 1, item 3 of the Ordinance] of a Commodity Clearing Organization); (vi) a sworn, written document stating that the Commodity Clearing Organization is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (e) or (i) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act;(vii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in the case where an officer is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act;(b) in the case where an officer is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act;(c) in the case where an officer is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b); and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts and the status of the assignment of such employees; (ix) in the case where an organizational general meeting is held, the minutes of the organizational general meeting; (x) a document stating the names or trade names of Clearing Participants, and the addresses of the principal offices or head offices; (xi) records prepared by Clearing Participants according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the filing of the application and pertaining to such persons’ net assets; (xii) in the case where an electronic data processing system is used for the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts, a document giving a description, installation location, capacity, and maintenance system of said electronic data processing system, and the process for responding in the event of the failure of said electronic data processing system; (xiii) other documents stating the matters to be referenced for approval as to whether the organization conforms to the standards set forth in Article 169, paragraph 1 of the Act.  - 経済産業省

第百七十一条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）（合併の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第七百九十一条（第一項第一号及び第三項を除く。）（吸収分割又は株式交換に関する書面等の備置き及び閲覧等）の規定は組織変更株式交換を伴う組織変更をする相互会社について、同法第三百九条第二項（各号を除く。）（株主総会の決議）、第三百二十四条第二項（各号を除く。）（種類株主総会の決議）及び第五編第五章第二節第二款第一目（第七百九十五条第四項第一号及び第二号、第七百九十六条第三項第一号ロ、第七百九十九条第一項第一号及び第二号、第八百条並びに第八百一条第一項、第二項、第三項第一号及び第二号並びに第五項を除く。）（株式会社の手続）の規定は組織変更株式交換完全親会社について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第七百九十八条第二項の規定による申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provision of Article 791 (excluding paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (3)) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Documents, etc. Related to Absorption-Type Split or Share Exchange) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a converting Mutual Company carrying out a share exchange on Entity Conversion; the provisions of Article 309, paragraph (2) (excluding all items) (Resolution of Shareholders Meetings), Article 324, paragraph (2) (excluding all items (Resolution of Class Meetings) and Part V, Chapter V, Section 2, Subsection 2, Division 1 (excluding Article 795, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii), Article 796, paragraph (3), item (i), (b), Article 799, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii), Article 800, Article 801, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 801, paragraph (3), items (i) and (ii), and Article 801, paragraph (5)) (Procedures for Stock Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Wholly Owning Parent Company for Share Exchange on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 798, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　非居住者又は外国法人が、平成十年四月一日から平成二十年三月三十一日までの間に発行された一般民間国外債の利子の支払を受ける場合において、その支払を受けるべき利子につきこの項の規定の適用を受けようとする旨、その者の氏名又は名称及び国外にある住所若しくは居所又は本店若しくは主たる事務所の所在地その他財務省令で定める事項を記載した申告書（以下この条において「非課税適用申告書」という。）を、その支払を受ける際、その利子の支払をする者（当該利子の支払が支払の取扱者で政令で定めるもの（以下この項、第七項及び第十一項において「支払の取扱者」という。）を通じて行われる場合には、当該支払の取扱者及び利子の支払をする者）を経由してその支払をする者の当該利子に係る所得税法第十七条の規定による納税地（同法第十八条第二項の規定による指定があつた場合には、その指定をされた納税地）の所轄税務署長に提出したときは、その支払を受ける利子については、所得税を課さない。ただし、当該利子のうち、国内に恒久的施設を有する非居住者が支払を受けるものでその者の国内において行う事業に帰せられるものその他の政令で定めるものについては、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

(4) Where a nonresident or foreign corporation receives payment of interest on general foreign-issued company bonds issued during the period from April 1, 1998, to March 31, 2008, and the nonresident or foreign corporation has submitted, upon receiving payment of interest, a written application stating that he/she or it seeks the application of the provision of this paragraph with respect to the interest receivable, as well as his/her or its name and his/her domicile or residence or the location of its head office or principal office, each of which is located outside Japan, and any other matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance (hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "written application for tax exemption"), via the person who pays the interest (in the case where the said interest is paid via a person in charge of handling payment specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph, paragraph (7) and paragraph (11) as a "person in charge of handling payment"), submission shall be made via the said person in charge of handling payment and the person who pays the interest), to the competent district director having jurisdiction over the place for tax payment pursuant to the provision of Article 17 of the Income Tax Act which pertains to the person who makes payment in terms of the said interest (in the case where another place has been designated pursuant to the provision of Article 18(2) of the said Act: the designated place for tax payment), income tax shall not be imposed on the interest to be received; provided, however, that this shall not apply to such interest to be paid to a nonresident having permanent establishments in Japan, which is attributed to a business conducted by such nonresident or which is otherwise specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

4. 国際通貨システム（IMS）はその強じんさを示してきたものの、脆弱性は残っており、システミックな安定性を確保し、秩序のある調整を促進し、悪影響を及ぼすような資本移動の変動、準備通貨を持つ先進国が過度の変動を監視することを含む、為替レートの無秩序な動き、為替レートの継続した不均衡を回避するため、IMS を改善する必要性が高まっている。今日、我々は、IMS の機能の強化に向けた作業プログラムに合意した。IMSの機能強化は、以下を通じて目指される：不安定性をもたらす可能性のある資本移動への対処に関する、好ましくない結果をもたらしうることに留意しつつも、マクロ健全性措置を含む一貫した手法や措置、資金セーフティ・ネットや SDR の役割といった論点を含む、ショックを予防し、対処する能力を強化するための国際的な流動性の管理。これにはまた、為替レートについての諸論点と IMF のサーベイランスの強化に関する議論が求められる。我々は、4 月の次回会合において、以下の報告を議論することを期待している：IMSの強化に関する IMF からの報告、新興・途上国における現地の資本市場や国内通貨の借入れを強化する行動に関する経験に基づく世界銀行と RDBs による報告。加えて、我々は、資本移動に関する OECD の作業及び UNCTAD 等、他の関連する国際機関の貢献を得ることができる。例文帳に追加

4. The international monetary system (IMS) has proven resilient, but vulnerabilities remain, which raise the need to improve it in order to ensure systemic stability, promote orderly adjustment, and avoid disruptive fluctuations in capital flows, disorderly movements in exchange rates? including advanced economies with reserve currencies being vigilant against excess volatility ? and persistent misalignement of exchange rates. Today we agreed on a work program aimed at strengthening the functioning of the IMS, including through coherent approaches and measures to deal with potentially destabilizing capital flows, among which macro-prudential measures, mindful of possible drawbacks; and management of global liquidity to strengthen our capacity to prevent and deal with shocks, including issues such as Financial Safety Nets and the role of the SDR. This will also require discussions on exchange rates issues and on the strengthening of IMF surveillance. We look forward to discussing at our next meeting in April a report from the IMF on the strengthening of the IMS and reports by the World Bank and the RDBs building on experiences, on actions to strengthen local capital markets and domestic currency borrowing in emerging and developing economies. In addition, we will benefit from the work of OECD on capital flows, and from the contributions of other relevant international organizations, such as UNCTAD.  - 財務省

法第百五十五条第二項の主務省令で定める書類は、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応 じ、当該各号に定めるものとする。 一変更の申請が商品市場の開設に係る場合次に掲げる書面 イ変更の理由を記載した書面 ロ新旧条文の対照表 ハ会員総会又は株主総会の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 ニ新たに開設しようとする商品市場ごとに当該商品市場を開設しようとする商品取 引所の会員等であって当該商品市場において取引をしようとするもの及び当該商品 取引所の会員等になろうとする者であって当該商品市場において取引をしようとす るもの（会員商品取引所にあっては、その出資の全額の払込みが終了した者に限る。） の合計数が二十人以上であることを証する書面 ホニに規定する会員等及び会員等になろうとする者のうち、会員商品取引所の会員 及び会員になろうとする者にあっては当該商品市場について法第三十条第一項各 号のいずれかに該当することを誓約する書面、株式会社商品取引所の取引参加者及 び取引参加者になろうとする者にあっては法第八十二条第一項第一号イからハま で又は同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当することを誓約する書面 ヘニに規定する会員等及び会員等になろうとする者の過半数の者が当該商品市場に ついて法第十条第二項各号並びに第二十八条第一項第五号イ及びロに定める者に 該当することを誓約する書面 ト当該商品取引所の会員等になろうとする者であって当該商品市場において取引を しようとするものが法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも該当しな いことを誓約する書面 チ新たに開設しようとする一以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる 方法により決済を行う場合にあっては、認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号 により作成したニに規定する会員等及び会員等になろうとする者の純資産額に関す る調書 リ新たに開設しようとする商品市場における開設後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見 込みを記載した書面 ル二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数として商品市場を開設しようとする場合に あっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通していることを 明らかにすることができる書面 二変更の申請が商品市場における上場商品若しくは上場商品指数の範囲の変更（廃止 又は範囲の縮小を除く。以下この号において同じ。）又は取引の種類の変更に係る場 合次に掲げる書面 イ変更の理由を記載した書面 ハ会員総会又は株主総会の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 ニ当該変更に係る商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を 行っている場合であって、当該商品市場において取引をする会員等の純資産額の最 低額を変更した場合にあっては、認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により 作成した会員等の純資産額に関する調書 ホ当該変更に係る商品市場における変更後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見込みを記 載した書面 ヘ上場商品の範囲の変更の場合にあっては、二以上の上場商品構成物品を一の商品 市場で取引をすることが適当である旨を明らかにすることができる書面 ト二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数とする上場商品指数の範囲の変更の場合に あっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通している旨を明 らかにすることができる書面例文帳に追加

The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 155, paragraph 2 of the Act shall be as listed in the corresponding categories set forth in the following items and as specified in such items, respectively: (i) in the case where the application for amendment pertains to the establishment of a Commodity Market, the documents set forth in the following: (a) a document recording the reasons for the amendment; (b) a comparative table of the prior and amended article provisions; (c) minutes of a general meeting of Members or a general meeting of shareholders or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for approval have been followed; (d) a document certifying that the total number of persons who are Members, etc. of the Commodity Exchange intending to establish a Commodity Market for each Commodity Market which is planned to be newly established and who intend to start transactions on such Commodity Market, and who intend to become Members, etc. of said Commodity Exchange intending to start transactions on such Commodity Market (with regard to a Member Commodity Exchange, limited to persons who have completed payment of the full amount of the contribution) are 20 or more; (e) among persons who are or intend to become Members, etc. prescribed in (d), with regard to a person who is or intends to become a member of a Member Commodity Exchange, a sworn, written statement that such person is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act regarding said Commodity Market; with regard to a person who is or intends to become a trading participant of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, a sworn, written statement that such person is subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph; (f) a sworn, written document stating that the majority of persons who are or intend to become Members, etc. prescribed in (d) are subject to such persons as specified in the respective items of Article 10, paragraph 2, and Article 28, paragraph 1, item 5, (a) and (b) of the Act, with regard to such Commodity Market; (g) a sworn, written document stating that the person who intends to become a - 134 - Member, etc. of said Commodity Exchange and intends to start transactions on said Commodity Market is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; (h) in the case of carrying out settlements by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act at one or more Commodity Markets which are planned to be newly established, a record prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of filing the application and pertaining to the amount of the net assets of a person who is or intends to become a Member, etc. as prescribed in (d); (i) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the opening on a Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (j) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed Commodity, a document stating that it is appropriate to trade Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (k) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another; (ii) in the case where the application for amendment is pertaining to a change to the scope of a Listed Commodity or Listed Commodity Index on a Commodity Market (excluding the abolishment or narrowing of such scope; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) or a change to the type of transaction, the documents set forth in the following: (a) a document recording the reasons for the amendment; (b) a comparative table of the prior and amended article provisions; (c) minutes of a general meeting of Members or a general meeting of shareholders or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for approval have been followed; (d) in cases where making a settlement on a Commodity Market pertaining to said amendment by a method set forth in Article 105, item 1 of the Act and where changing the minimum amount of the net assets of Members, etc. who trade on said Commodity Market, a record pertaining to the amount of the net assets of Members, etc., which is prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the filing of the application; (e) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the amendment on the Commodity Market pertaining to said amendment; (f) in the case of changing the scope of a Listed Commodity, a document stating that it is appropriate that two or more Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. are traded on a single Commodity Market; (g) in the case of changing the scope of a Listed Commodity Index which sets two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices are common to one another;  - 経済産業省

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十七条　日本銀行は、金融機関（銀行その他の預金等（預金保険法（昭和四十六年法律第三十四号）第二条第二項に規定する預金等及び貯金をいう。）の受入れ及び為替取引を業として行う者をいう。以下同じ。）その他の金融業を営む者であって政令で定めるもの（以下「金融機関等」という。）において電子情報処理組織の故障その他の偶発的な事由により予見し難い支払資金の一時的な不足が生じた場合であって、その不足する支払資金が直ちに確保されなければ当該金融機関等の業務の遂行に著しい支障が生じるおそれがある場合において、金融機関の間における資金決済の円滑の確保を図るために必要があると認めるときは、第三十三条第一項の規定にかかわらず、当該金融機関等に対し、政令で定める期間を限度として、担保を徴求することなくその不足する支払資金に相当する金額の資金の貸付けを行うことができる。例文帳に追加

Article 37 (1) Irrespective of the provisions of Article 33, paragraph 1, the Bank of Japan may provide financial institutions (banks and other institutions engaged in the business of taking deposits, etc. [deposits and others prescribed in Article 2, paragraph 2 of the Deposit Insurance Act {Act No. 34 of 1971} and other deposits for savings] and in funds transfers in the course of trade; the same shall apply hereinafter) and other financial business entities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter collectively referred to as "financial institutions, etc.") with uncollateralized loans the amount of which is equivalent to the shortage of funds for a period no longer than the length of time prescribed by a Cabinet Order, when the relevant financial institutions, etc. unexpectedly experience a temporary shortage of funds necessary for payment due to accidental causes, including failures in electronic data processing systems, whereby their business operations may be seriously hampered if the shortage is not recovered swiftly, provided that the Bank finds the advance is necessary to secure smooth settlement of funds among financial institutions.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第九条　第一号若しくは第三号に掲げる疾病にかかり、若しくはその疑いがあり、第一号若しくは第三号に掲げる異常があり、又はへい死した獣畜（と畜場法（昭和二十八年法律第百十四号）第三条第一項に規定する獣畜及び厚生労働省令で定めるその他の物をいう。以下同じ。）の肉、骨、乳、臓器及び血液又は第二号若しくは第三号に掲げる疾病にかかり、若しくはその疑いがあり、第二号若しくは第三号に掲げる異常があり、又はへい死した家きん（食鳥処理の事業の規制及び食鳥検査に関する法律（平成二年法律第七十号）第二条第一号に規定する食鳥及び厚生労働省令で定めるその他の物をいう。以下同じ。）の肉、骨及び臓器は、厚生労働省令で定める場合を除き、これを食品として販売し、又は食品として販売の用に供するために、採取し、加工し、使用し、調理し、貯蔵し、若しくは陳列してはならない。ただし、へい死した獣畜又は家きんの肉、骨及び臓器であつて、当該職員が、人の健康を損なうおそれがなく飲食に適すると認めたものは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 9 (1) The meat, bones, milk, organs, and blood of livestock (meaning livestock prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Slaughterhouse Act (Act No. 114 of 1953) and others specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; the same shall apply hereinafter) which have or are suspected to have any of the diseases listed in item (i) or item (iii), have any of the disorders listed in item (i) or item (iii), or have died, or the meat, bones, and organs of poultry (meaning poultry prescribed in Article 2, item (i) of the Poultry Slaughtering Business Control and Poultry Meat Inspection Act (Act No. 70 of 1990) and others specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; the same shall apply hereinafter) which have or are suspected to have any of the diseases listed in item (ii) or item (iii), have any of the disorders listed in item (ii) or item (iii), or have died shall not be sold as food, or be collected, processed, used, cooked, stored, or displayed as food for the purpose of marketing, except for cases specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the meat, bones, and organs of dead livestock or poultry which the ministry officials find as involving no risk to human health and as being edible.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百五十六条の十五　内閣総理大臣は、金融商品債務引受業の適正かつ確実な遂行のため必要があると認めるときは、金融商品取引清算機関若しくは当該金融商品取引清算機関から業務の委託を受けた者に対し、当該金融商品取引清算機関の業務若しくは財産に関して報告若しくは資料の提出を命じ、又は当該職員に、金融商品取引清算機関若しくは当該金融商品取引清算機関から業務の委託を受けた者の営業所又は事務所に立ち入り、当該金融商品取引清算機関若しくは当該金融商品取引清算機関から業務の委託を受けた者の業務若しくは財産の状況若しくは帳簿書類その他の物件の検査（当該金融商品取引清算機関から業務の委託を受けた者にあつては、当該金融商品取引清算機関の業務若しくは財産に関し必要なものに限る。）をさせ、若しくは関係者に質問（当該金融商品取引清算機関から業務の委託を受けた者の関係者にあつては、当該金融商品取引清算機関の業務若しくは財産に関し必要なものに限る。）をさせることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 156-15 When the Prime Minister finds it necessary for appropriate and certain provision of Financial Instruments Obligation Assumption Service, he/she may order a Financial Instruments Clearing Organization or a person who has been entrusted with business from said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization to submit reports or materials concerning the business or property of said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization, or have the officials enter the business office or office of a Financial Instruments Clearing Organization or a person who has been entrusted with business from said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization to inspect the status of the business or property, or the books and documents or other articles of said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization or the person who has been entrusted with business from said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization (with regard to the person who has been entrusted with business from said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization, the inspection shall be limited to what is necessary to understand the status of the business entrusted from, or the property of, said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization) or question the person concerned (with regard to the person concerned for the person who has been entrusted with business from said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization, the questioning shall be limited to what is necessary to understand the status of the business entrusted from, or the property of, said Financial Instruments Clearing Organization).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　財務大臣及び事業所管大臣は、第一項の規定による届出があつた場合において、当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等が次に掲げるいずれかの事態を生ずるおそれがある技術導入契約の締結等（我が国が加盟する技術導入契約の締結等に関する多数国間の条約その他の国際約束で政令で定めるもの（以下この項において「条約等」という。）の加盟国の非居住者との間でされる技術導入契約の締結等で技術導入契約の締結等に関する制限の除去について当該条約等に基づく義務がないもの及び当該条約等の加盟国以外の国の非居住者との間でされる技術導入契約の締結等でその国が当該条約等の加盟国であるものとした場合に当該義務がないこととなるものに限る。次項及び第五項において「国の安全等に係る技術導入契約の締結等」という。）に該当しないかどうかを審査する必要があると認めるときは、当該届出に係る技術導入契約の締結等をしてはならない期間を、当該届出を受理した日から起算して四月間に限り、延長することができる。例文帳に追加

(3) Where the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business have received a notification pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, when he/she finds it necessary to examine whether or not the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification falls under the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. that is likely to cause any of the following situations (limited to the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. with a non-resident whose state is a member state of a multilateral treaty or other international agreement on the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc., which is specified by Cabinet Order and to which Japan has acceded (hereinafter referred to as the "Treaty, etc." in this paragraph), and which is free from the obligations pursuant to the Treaty, etc. in regard to removal of restrictions on the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc., and the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. with a non-resident whose state is a state other than member states to the Treaty, etc. which would be free from the obligations if the state was a member state of the Treaty, etc. (referred to as the "Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to National Security, etc." in paragraphs 4 and 5)), he/she may extend the period in which the Conclusion of a Technology Introduction Contract, etc. pertaining to the notification shall not be conducted up to four months from the day of acceptance of the notification.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第八十三条　第二十八条第三項（第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する特許法第七十一条第三項において、第四十三条の八（第六十条の二第一項及び第六十八条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）若しくは第五十六条第一項（第六十八条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）において、第六十一条（第六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する同法第百七十四条第二項において、第六十二条第一項（第六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する意匠法第五十八条第二項において、又は第六十二条第二項（第六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する同法第五十八条第三項において、それぞれ準用する特許法第百五十一条において準用する民事訴訟法第二百七条第一項の規定により宣誓した者が特許庁又はその嘱託を受けた裁判所に対し虚偽の陳述をしたときは、十万円以下の過料に処する。例文帳に追加

Article 83 Where a person who has taken an oath under Article 207(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 151 of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 71(3) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 28(3) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 68(3) of this Act) of this Act, Article 43-8 (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 60-2(1) and 68(4) of this Act) or Article 56(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 68(4) of this Act), Article 174(2) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 61 (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 68(5) of this Act), Article 58(2) of the Design Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 62(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 68(5) of this Act), or Article 58(3) of the Design Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 62(2) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 68(5) of this Act) has made a false statement before the Patent Office or a court commissioned thereby, the said person shall be liable to a non-penal fine not exceeding 100,000 yen.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

外国銀行など預金口座名義をアルファベット名しか登録できないなど情報システム等に制約がある場合における預金口座名義の登録についてはこの限りではない。また、情報システム等の制約により、アルファベット名での預金口座名義の登録ができない場合においては、非居住者等預金口座の名義人情報を全預金口座名義情報から悉皆調査により抽出して、電磁的な方法により検索できるリストを作成し、告示により資産凍結等経済制裁対象者が追加される等、規制の対象が拡大、変更された場合に、該当する預金口座がないことを照合することができれば、必ずしも当該情報システム等の見直しを求めるものではない。この場合において、当該リストの非居住者等預金口座の名義人情報の追加等については、適時適切に行う必要があることから、当該リストの管理手順等について事務規定を定める必要がある。例文帳に追加

This shall not apply to registration of deposit account names in cases where there are constraints on the information system, etc., for example, where deposit account names can be registered only in the Latin alphabet at foreign banks, etc. In addition, where deposit account names cannot be registered in the Latin alphabet due to constraints in the information system, etc., the institution is not necessarily required to review the information system, etc. if it is possible to check that there is no relevant deposit account at the institution in cases where those subject to regulations are expanded and changed (for example, where those subject to economic sanctions such as asset freeze are added by a public notice) by extracting information about holders of Non-Residents’ Deposit Accounts, etc. from information about all deposit account names through complete enumeration and preparing a list that is searchable by an electromagnetic means. In this case, it is necessary to set the provisions on administrative work with regard to management procedures, etc. of the list as it is necessary to make additions, etc. to the information about holders of Non-Residents’ Deposit Accounts, etc. in the list in a timely and appropriate manner.  - 財務省

1989年10月1日の直前に有効な第43条に特定される抵触が，1989年10月1日前にされたカナダ特許出願(以下「先の出願」と称する)と，その日以後にされたカナダ特許出願(以下「後の出願」と称する)との間に存在し，かつ (a) 後の出願が，カナダが締約国である特許に関する条約又は協定に定める条件に従って保護を受ける権利を有する者であって，同一発明を記載した特許出願を条約，協定又は法律によりカナダ国民に同様な保護を与える他の国において若しくはその国に対して先に正規にした者により行われ， (b) 後の出願が，その先に正規にされた出願の後12月以内に行われ，(c) 後の出願の出願人が，その先に正規にされた出願に基づいて該当出願につき優先権主張を行い，また (d) 先の出願が当該先に正規にされた出願の後に行われた場合は， 先の発明日を有する出願人が特許を受けることができるものとし，これらの出願は，1989年10月1日の直前に有効な第43条に従って取り扱い，かつ，処理しなければならない。例文帳に追加

Where a conflict, as defined in section 43 as it read immediately before October 1, 1989, exists between an application for a patent in Canada filed before October 1, 1989 (the “earlier application”) and an application for a patent in Canada filed on or after that date (the “later application”) and (a) the later application is filed by a person who is entitled to protection under the terms of any treaty or convention relating to patents to which Canada is a party and who has previously regularly filed in or for any other country that by treaty, convention or law affords similar protection to citizens of Canada an application for a patent describing the same invention, (b) the later application is filed within twelve months after the filing of the previously regularly filed application, (c) the applicant in the later application has made a request for priority in respect of that application on the basis of the previously regularly filed application, and (d) the earlier application is filed after the filing of the previously regularly filed application, the applicant having the earlier date of invention shall be entitled to a patent and the applications shall be dealt with and disposed of in accordance with section 43, as it read immediately before October 1, 1989.  - 特許庁

政府はその申請を検討するものとし、審査の後、次に掲げる各号のすべてが満たされる場合、申請に記載される主張が正しく、かつ申請人がバングラデシュ国内において特許品又は特許で保護された工程を製造又は実施する準備がありそのようにできる立場にあり、かつ特許権者が合理的な条件で実施権を付与することを拒否するとき、本条の規定を条件として、かつ特許権者が特許品又は特許で保護された工程がバングラデシュ国内において適切な範囲で製造又は実施されることを証明しない限り、又はその品又は工程がそのように製造又は実施されない十分な理由を示さない限り、政府は次に掲げる命令を発することができる。次のいずれかにより、当該特許を取り消す。直ちに、又は命令に明記する合理的な期間内に、特許品又は特許で保護された工程がバングラデシュ国内において適切な範囲で製造又は実施されることが政府の確信を得る程度に立証されない限り、当該期間の後に。申請人に対し実施許諾を付与するよう、特許権者に命令し、申請人の独占的使用許諾とするか否かは政府の指示に従うものとする。例文帳に追加

The Government shall consider the application, and, if after inquiry it is satisfied- that the allegations contained therein are correct; and that the applicant is prepared, and is in a position, to manufacture or carry on the patented article or process in Bangladesh; and that the patentee refuses to grant a license on reasonable terms, then, subject to the provisions of this section, and unless the patentee proves that the patented article or process is manufactured or carried on to an adequate extent in Bangladesh, or gives satisfactory reasons why the article or process is not so manufactured or carried on, the Government may make an order26 revoking the patent either- forthwith; or after such reasonable interval as may be specified in the order, unless in the meantime it is shown to its satisfaction that the patented article or process is manufactured or carried on within Bangladesh to an adequate extent; or ordering the patentee to grant a license to the applicant which may be a license exclusive to him or otherwise as the Government may direct.  - 特許庁

第百十九条　会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項（剰余金の配当等に関する責任）の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条（株主に対する求償権の制限等）の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条（買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任）の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項（欠損が生じた場合の責任）の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十四条　会社法第二編第九章第二節（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百四十一条を除く。）（特別清算）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条並びに第八百九十八条第一項第二号及び第五項を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十二条第一項（調査命令）中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員若しくは三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者」と、同法第五百三十二条第二項（監督委員の報酬等）中「債権又は清算株式会社の株式」とあるのは「債権」と、同法第五百三十六条第三項（事業の譲渡の制限等）中「第七章（第四百六十七条第一項第五号を除く。）」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条の二」と、同法第五百六十二条（清算人の調査結果等の債権者集会に対する報告）中「第四百九十二条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十七において準用する第四百九十二条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 184 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) and Article 541) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Lawsuits over Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (excluding Article 868, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to 874 inclusive) (General Provisions) and 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 880, and Article 898, paragraphs (1), (2) and (5)) (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure), and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the voting rights held by all of the shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) (Order to investigate) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of the Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation)"; the term "assigned claims owed by the Liquidating Stock Company or shares in" in Article 532, paragraph (2) (Remunerations of Supervisors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "acquire any claim against"; the term "Chapter VII (excluding Article 467, paragraph (1), item (v))" in Article 536, paragraph (3) (Restrictions on Assignment of Business) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 62-2 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 492, paragraph (1)" in Article 562 (Report to Creditors' Meeting of Outcome of Investigations by Liquidators) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 492, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-17 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

８　会社法第百四十二条第一項及び第二項（指定買取人による買取りの通知）の規定は指定買取人について、同法第百四十三条第二項（譲渡等承認請求の撤回）の規定は第四項第一号ハ又は第二号ハの請求をした譲渡等承認請求者について、同法第百四十四条第一項から第六項まで（売買価格の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第六号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百四十二条第一項の規定による通知があった場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百四十二条第一項中「第百四十条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第百四十四条第一項及び第四項から第六項までの規定中「対象株式」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項に規定する特定出資」と、「第百四十条第一項第二号」とあるのは「第百四十二条第一項第二号」と、同条第一項、第二項及び第六項中「株式会社」とあるのは「指定買取人」と、同条第五項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第六項中「第百四十一条第二項」とあるのは「第百四十二条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 142(1) and (2) (Designated Purchaser's Notice to Purchase) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Designated Purchaser, the provisions of Article 143(2) (Withdrawal of Requests for Approval of Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Requester for Approval of Transfer who makes the request set forth in paragraph (4)(i)(c) or paragraph (4)(ii)(c), and the provisions of Article 144(1) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Sale Price), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (vi)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a notice has been given under the provisions of Article 142(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Article 140(4)" in Article 142(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act," the terms "per share" and "Stock Company" in Article 142(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit" and "Specific Purpose Company," respectively, the terms "Subject Shares" and "Article 140(1)(ii)" in Article 144(1) and (4) to (6) inclusive of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity prescribed in Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 142(1)(ii)," respectively, the term "Stock Company" in Article 144(1), (2), and (6) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Designated Purchaser," the term "per share" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit," the term "Article 141(2)" in Article 144(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 142(2)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

前二条の規定を適用することにより会員資本を計算することができない場合又は計算す ることが適切でない場合において、吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の次の各号に掲げる額は、 当該各号に定める額とする。 一吸収合併後出資金額次に掲げる額の合計額 イ吸収合併直前出資金額 ロ 会員払込出資変動額（（１）に掲げる額から（２）に掲げる額を減じて得た額（当 該額が零未満である場合にあっては、零）をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の 範囲内で、吸収合併存続会員商品取引所が吸収合併契約の定めに従い定めた額（零 以上の額に限る。）（１） 吸収合併対象純資産額（吸収合併対象財産（資産に限る。）に付すべき価 額から吸収合併対象財産（負債に限る。）に付すべき価額を減じて得た額をいう。）（２） 吸収合併存続会員商品取引所における吸収合併直前の吸収合併対価の帳簿 価額（吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の出資以外の吸収合併対価が存しない場合 にあっては、零）二吸収合併後加入金額次に掲げる額の合計額 イ吸収合併直前加入金額 ロ会員払込出資変動額が零以上の額であるときは、当該会員払込出資変動額から前 号ロに掲げる額を減じて得た額の範囲内で、吸収合併存続会員商品取引所が吸収 合併契約の定めに従い定めた額（零以上の額に限る。） 三吸収合併後資本剰余金額イ及びロに掲げる額の合計額からハに掲げる額を減じて 得た額 イ吸収合併直前資本剰余金額 ロ会員払込出資変動額 ハ第一号ロ及び前号ロに掲げる額の合計額 四吸収合併後法定準備金額吸収合併直前法定準備金額 五吸収合併後利益剰余金額次に掲げる額の合計額 イ吸収合併直前利益剰余金額 ロ吸収合併対象純資産額が零未満であるときは、吸収合併対象純資産額例文帳に追加

When the Members’ capital is not calculated by applying the provisions of the preceding two Articles or when it is not appropriate to calculate the Members’ capital by such method, the amount set forth in the following items of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger shall be the amount specified in such items, respectively: (i) the Amount of Contributions subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger: the sum total of the amounts set forth in the following: (a) the Amount of Contributions immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger; (b) the amount (limited to an amount of zero or greater) determined by a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of the Absorption-Type Merger contract within the scope of the changes to the contributions paid by Members (which means the amount [in the case where such amount is less than zero, using zero as the amount] obtained by deducting the amount set forth in 2. below, from the amount set forth in 1.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article): 1. the amount of net assets subject to the Absorption-Type Merger (the amount calculated by deducting the value placed on the Property subject to the Absorption-Type Merger [limited to liabilities] from the value placed on the Property subject to the Absorption-Type Merger [limited to assets]); 2. the book value of the consideration for the Absorption-Type Merger immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger at the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger (in the case where the Consideration of an Absorption-Type merger other than the contributions of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger does not exist, the book value is zero); (ii) the Membership Fees subsequent to an Absorption-Type Merger: the sum total of the amounts set forth in the following: (a) the Membership Fees immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger; (b)in the case where changes to the contributions paid by Members is zero or greater, the amount (limited to an amount of zero or greater) determined by the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of an Absorption-Type Merger contract within the scope of the amount obtained by deducting the amount set forth in (b) of the preceding item from said changes of contributions paid by Members; (iii) the Capital Surplus subsequent to an Absorption-Type Merger: the amount obtained by deducting the amount set forth in (c) below, from the sum total of the amounts set forth in (a) and (b): (a) the Capital Surplus immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger; (b) changes to the contributions paid by Members; (c) the sum total of the amounts set forth in item 1, (b) and in the preceding item, (b); (iv) the Amount of Statutory Capital subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger: the Amount of Statutory Capital immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger; (v) the Amount of Accumulated Profit subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger: the sum total of the amounts set forth in the following: (a) the Amount of Accumulated Profit immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger; (b) in the case where net assets subject to an Absorption-Type Merger are less than zero, the net assets subject to the Absorption-Type Merger.  - 経済産業省

第八十三条の三　第七十五条の二第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の三から第七十五条の十二までの規定は、前条の規定による指定、指定コンサルタント試験機関及びコンサルタント試験事務について準用する。この場合において、第七十五条の二第三項及び第七十五条の十二中「都道府県労働局長」とあるのは「厚生労働大臣」と、第七十五条の二第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「第八十三条の二」と、第七十五条の四第二項中「第七十五条の六第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の五第一項中「免許を受ける者として必要な知識及び能力を有するかどうかの判定」とあるのは「労働安全コンサルタント試験又は労働衛生コンサルタント試験の問題の作成及び採点」と、同条及び第七十五条の八中「免許試験員」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験員」と、第七十五条の五第四項中「次条第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の六第一項中「規程（以下この条及び第七十五条の十一第二項第四号において「試験事務規程」という。）」とあるのは「規程」と、同条第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の十一第二項第四号中「試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 83-3 The provisions of paragraph (2) and (3) of Article 75-2, and of Article 75-3 through Article 75-12 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the work of the designated consultant examination institutions and consultant examination affairs provided for in the preceding article. In this case, "the Director of the Prefectural Labor Bureau" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 and Article 75-12 shall be read as "the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare"; "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 read as "Article 83-2"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6" in paragraph (2) of Article 75-4 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of consultant examination affairs "; "giving a decision as to whether the applicant has knowledge and capability necessary for a license holder" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-5 as "formulating and marking examination questions for industrial safety consultant examinations and industrial health consultant examinations"; "license examiner" in the same article and Article 75-8 as "consultant examiner"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of the following Article" in paragraph (4) of Article 75-5 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of the consultant examination affairs "; "examination affairs (hereinafter in this Article and Article 75-11, paragraph (2), item (iv) referred to as the ' examination affair rules')" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6 as "procedure rules"; "the examination affair rules" in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the same Article and item (iv) of paragraph (2) of Article 75-11 as "the procedure rules relating to the implementation of consultant examination affairs".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。例文帳に追加

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business.  - 金融庁

権利者であって，その発明についての非権利者によって出願がされたもの，又は窃取による被害者は，特許出願人に対し，特許付与を受ける権利を同人に譲渡するよう要求することができる。出願が既に特許を生じさせている場合は，権利者は，特許所有者が同人にその特許を譲渡するよう要求することができる。この権利は，第 4文及び第 5文に従うことを条件として，特許付与の公告(第 58条(1))から 2年以内に，訴訟によって主張することができる。被害者が窃取(第21条(1)3.)に基づく異議申立を提起しているときは，当該被害者は，その異議申立手続に関する最終的決着から 1年以内において訴訟を提起することができる。第 3文及び第 4文は，特許所有者が，特許の取得にあたって善意で行動していなかったときは適用されない。1. 特許の対象である製品を生産し，提供し，市販し若しくは使用し，又は当該目的のためにこれらの製品を輸入し若しくは保持すること 2. 特許の対象である方法を使用すること，又は特許所有者の同意を得ないでその方法を使用することが禁止されていることを当該第三者が知っているか若しくはそれが状況からみて明らかである場合に，本法の施行領域内での使用のために，その方法を提供すること3. 特許の対象である方法によって直接に得られた製品を提供し，市販し若しくは使用し，又は当該目的のために輸入し若しくは保持すること例文帳に追加

An entitled person whose invention has been applied for by a person not entitled to do so, or a person injured by usurpation, may demand that the patent applicant surrenders to him the right to the grant of a patent. If the application has already resulted in a patent, the entitled person may demand that the patentee assigns the patent to him. This right may only be asserted, subject to sentences 4 and 5, by legal action within two years of publication of the grant of the patent (Section 58(1)). Should the injured person have filed an opposition on the grounds of usurpation (Section 21(1), no. 3), said injured person may bring the legal action within one year of the final conclusion of the opposition proceedings. The third and fourth sentences shall not apply if the patentee did not act in good faith when obtaining the patent.A patent shall have the effect that the patentee alone shall be authorized to use the patented invention within the applicable laws. A third party not having the consent of the patentee shall be prohibited 1. from making, offering, putting on the market or using a product which is the subject matter of the patent, or from importing or possessing said product for such purposes; 2. from using a process which is the subject matter of the patent, or, when said third party knows or it is obvious from the circumstances that use of the process without the consent of the patentee is prohibited, from offering the process for use within the territory to which this Act applies; 3. from offering, putting on the market or using or importing or possessing for such purposes the product produced directly by a process which is the subject matter of the patent.  - 特許庁

第三十一条の二　監視化学物質、第二種特定化学物質、第四条第四項（第四条の二第九項において読み替えて準用する場合及び第五条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公示された化学物質、第三条第一項第五号若しくは第四条の二第四項の確認に係る新規化学物質又は附則第二条第四項の規定により通商産業大臣が公示した同条第一項に規定する既存化学物質名簿に記載されている化学物質（以下「報告対象物質」という。）の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者は、その製造又は輸入した報告対象物質について、第四条第七項に規定する試験の項目又は第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項若しくは第二十五条の三第一項に規定する有害性の調査の項目に係る試験を行つた場合（当該試験を行つたと同等の知見（公然と知られていないものに限る。）が得られた場合を含む。）であつて、報告対象物質が次に掲げる性状を有することを示す知見として厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるものが得られたときは、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、その旨及び当該知見の内容を厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣に報告しなければならない。ただし、第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項又は第二十五条の三第一項の規定による指示に係る有害性の調査により当該知見が得られた場合において、これらの規定によりその内容を報告するときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 31-2 (1) A person operating the business of manufacturing or importing any monitoring chemical substance, any Class II Specified Chemical Substance, any chemical substance that has been publicly notified pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of Article 4 (including the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of Article 4-2 and the cases in which it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of Article 5-2), any new chemical substance to which the confirmation under item (v) of paragraph (1) of Article 3 or paragraph (4) of Article 4-2 pertains, or any chemical substance listed in the List of Existing Chemical Substances prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 2 of the Supplementary Provisions that has been publicly notified by the Minister of International Trade and Industry pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "substance subject to reporting") shall, when he/she has conducted tests pertaining to the items to be tested prescribed in paragraph (7) of Article 4 or pertaining to the studies of hazardous properties prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 5-4, paragraph (1) of Article 24, or paragraph (1) of Article 25-3 (including the cases in which knowledge equivalent to that which would be obtained from said tests [limited to knowledge that is not publicly known] has been obtained) with regard to the substance subject to reporting he/she has manufactured or imported and if he/she has obtained, as a result thereof, knowledge specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment as one indicating that the substance subject to reporting possesses the following properties, report to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment to that effect and the details of said knowledge, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where said person has obtained said knowledge as a result of a study of hazardous properties to which an instruction under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 5-4, paragraph (1) of Article 24, or paragraph (1) of Article 25-3 pertains and is reporting the details of said knowledge pursuant to these provisions:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　職員が、任命権者の要請に応じ特別職に属する国家公務員、地方公務員又は公庫の予算及び決算に関する法律（昭和二十六年法律第九十九号）第一条に規定する公庫その他その業務が国の事務若しくは事業と密接な関連を有する法人のうち人事院規則で定めるものに使用される者（以下この項において「特別職国家公務員等」という。）となるため退職し、引き続き特別職国家公務員等として在職した後、引き続いて当該退職を前提として職員として採用された場合（一の特別職国家公務員等として在職した後、引き続き一以上の特別職国家公務員等として在職し、引き続いて当該退職を前提として職員として採用された場合を含む。）において、当該退職までの引き続く職員としての在職期間（当該退職前に同様の退職（以下この項において「先の退職」という。）、特別職国家公務員等としての在職及び職員としての採用がある場合には、当該先の退職までの引き続く職員としての在職期間を含む。以下この項において「要請に応じた退職前の在職期間」という。）中に前項各号のいずれかに該当したときは、これに対し同項に規定する懲戒処分を行うことができる。職員が、第八十一条の四第一項又は第八十一条の五第一項の規定により採用された場合において、定年退職者等となつた日までの引き続く職員としての在職期間（要請に応じた退職前の在職期間を含む。）又は第八十一条の四第一項若しくは第八十一条の五第一項の規定によりかつて採用されて職員として在職していた期間中に前項各号のいずれかに該当したときも、同様とする。例文帳に追加

(2) When an official leaves government position, upon the request of an appointer to be a national public servant in the special service, a local public officer, or an employee of a public financial corporation as provided for in Article 1 of the Act on Budget and Settlement of Public Financial Corporations (Act No. 99 of 1951), or any other juridical person provided for by rules of the National Personnel Authority among those whose business is related closely to national affairs or undertakings (hereinafter referred to as "a national public servant in the special service, etc." in this paragraph), and then, after holding office without interruption as a national public servant in the special service, etc., is employed without interruption as an official on premise of the said leaving of government position (including the case of an official who holds one or more offices without interruption as a national public servant in the special service, etc. after holding another office as a national public servant in the special service, etc., and then is employed as an official on the premise of the said leaving of government position), in the cases where, during the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the said leaving of government position (in the case of an official who leaves government position similarly (hereinafter referred to as "the previous leaving of government position" in this paragraph) before the said leaving of government position, holds office as a national public servant in the special service, etc., and is employed as an official, including the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the previous leaving of government position, hereinafter referred to as "the period of holding office before leaving of government position responding to the request" in this paragraph), he/she falls under any of the items in the preceding paragraph, any of the disciplinary actions provided for in the same paragraph may be taken. When an official who is employed pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 81-4 or paragraph 1 of Article 81-5 falls under any of the items of the preceding paragraph during the continuous period of holding office as an official up to the day when he/she has become a person who has mandatorily retired, etc. (including the period of holding office before leaving of government position responding to the request), or the period that he/she has held office as an official after the employment pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 of Article 81-4 or paragraph 1 of Article 81-5, the same shall apply as well.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

重視していることは、もう今さっきの話にもございましたように、リーマン・ショックの後、G8、それからG20にありまして、中国、インド、ブラジル、そういったところも加わっていただきますし、G8だけではもう世界の経済をカバーでき得ないというような実態が皆さん方よくお分かりのようにあるわけでございまして、色々な、バーゼルIIIだって、G20でまさに中国、インド、ブラジル、そういった今、非常に発展の速度の速い人口の多い国といいますか、そういったことがまさに世界の大きな力を持って参加してきたわけでございますから、中国は日本の隣でございますし、日本から言えばここ3年間としては、輸出輸入ナンバーワンは中国になっていると思いますし、中国からとっても、輸出のナンバーワンはアメリカ、2番目がEU、3番目は日本でございますからね、大変、日本と中国というのは戦略的互恵関係にあるということもございますし、そういった意味で、特に金融の問題については、もうご存じのように非常に金融はグローバル化したというか、まさに瞬時に金融の影響というのは世界経済に影響を及ぼすわけでございますから、アメリカの国債を一番たくさん持っているのは中国でございまして、2番目が日本でございますし。まさに中国というのは８、９％の、リーマン・ショックのときに一旦落ちましたけれども、また60兆円ぐらいの財政出動をして、中国の景気が非常にいいということを皆さん方はよくお分かりだと思いますけれども、しかし、どうも少しバブル気味だというようなご意見もございますので、そこら辺も中国人民銀行の行長さん、バーナンキさんにしても、アメリカに適する人でございますが、それに温家宝首相をはじめ、国務院の経済担当の副総理がおられまして、そういった方が中心でやるわけでございますが、当然銀行監督あるいは証券の監督、保険の監督といった（金融当局の）方もお会いをさせていただく等、色々な私も非常に期待をさせていただいております。例文帳に追加

My focus will be on the post-global-financial-crisis G8 and G20 including China, India and Brazil, as mentioned earlier. The reality is that G8 alone can no longer cover the global economy. There is also Basel III. Populous countries undergoing extremely rapid development such as China, India and Brazil have joined G20 with significant power. China, being Japan’s neighbor, has been the Japan’s biggest import and export partner in the past three years. For China, Japan is the third biggest export destination, behind the United States and EU, ranked first and second, respectively, so Japan and China are in a strategic, mutually beneficial relationship. In that sense, especially when it comes to the issue of finance, the financial sector is extremely globalized; the impact of the financial sector on the global economy is instant. China is the leading holder of U.S. Treasury securities, followed by Japan. With some 60 trillion yen of public spending, China is booming, as you may be well aware, although some people have suggested that a bubble may be forming.  - 金融庁

２　会社法第三十三条第二項から第十一項まで（第十項第二号を除く。）（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第七項及び第八項中「第二十八条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項各号」と、同項中「設立時発行株式」とあるのは「設立時発行特定出資」と、同条第十項中「前各項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十八条第一項及び同条第二項において準用する第三十三条第二項から第九項まで」と、同項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号及び第二号」と、同項第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号又は第二号」と、同条第十一項第二号中「第二十八条第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第二号」と、同項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十一条第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 33(2) to (11) inclusive (excluding paragraph (10)(ii)) (Election of Inspector of Matters Specified or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a case as set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "each item of Article 28" in Article 33(7) and (8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "each item of Article 16(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33(8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Issued at Incorporation," the term "the preceding nine paragraphs" in paragraph (10) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33(2) to (9) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18(1) of the Asset Securitization Act and pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) and (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) or (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(11)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "paragraph (1) of Article 38" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and the term "item (ii), paragraph (2) of such Article" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第四百五条から第四百九条まで（監査委員会による調査、取締役会への報告義務、監査委員による執行役等の行為の差止め、委員会設置会社と執行役又は取締役との間の訴えにおける会社の代表等、報酬委員会による報酬の決定の方法等）の規定は、委員会設置会社の委員会又は委員について準用する。この場合において、同法第四百八条第一項中「第四百二十条第三項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項の規定並びに第三百五十三条及び第三百六十四条」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十二において準用する第四百二十条第三項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」と、同条第三項中「第四百二十条第三項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十二において準用する第四百二十条第三項において準用する第三百四十九条第四項」と、同項第一号中「第八百四十七条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十七において準用する第八百四十七条第一項」と、同項第二号中「第八百四十九条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十七において準用する第八百四十九条第三項」と、「第八百五十条第二項」とあるのは「同法第五十三条の三十七において準用する第八百五十条第二項」と、同法第四百九条第二項中「第四百四条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の二十八第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 405 to 409 inclusive (Investigations by Audit Committees, Duty to Report to Board of Directors, Enjoinment of Acts of Executive Officers, etc. by Audit Committee Members, Representation of Company in Actions between Company with Committees and Executive Officers or Directors, Methods for Decisions on Remuneration by Compensation Committee) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Committees or committee members of a company with Committees. In this case, the term "provisions of Article 349, paragraph (4) applied mutatis mutandis under Article 420, paragraph (3), and the provisions of Article 353 and Article 364" in Article 408, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provision of Article 349, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 420, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-32 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 349, paragraph (4) applied mutatis mutandis under Article 420, paragraph (3)" in Article 408, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 349, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 420, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-32 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 847, paragraph (1)" in Article 408, paragraph (3), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 847, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-37 of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "Article 849, paragraph (3)" and "Article 850, paragraph (2)" in Article 408, paragraph (3), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 849, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-37 of the Insurance Business Act" and "Article 850, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-37 of the Insurance Business Act," respectively; and the term "Article 404, paragraph (3)" in Article 409, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-28, paragraph (3) of the Insurance Business Act;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

法第百四十五条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明す る書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。 一合併の理由を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人である場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二 項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が法人 である場合当該役員の登記事項証明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第 二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓約する書面 ハ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人又は法人でない場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五 条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しない旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号 ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 三会員等の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載した 書面、会員が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第三十条第一項各号のいずれかに該当す ることを誓約する書面又は取引参加者が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第八十二条第 一項第一号イからハまで若しくは同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当する ことを誓約する書面、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面並びに申請に係る商品取引所が開設しようとする一 以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を行う場合には 認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純資産額に関す る調書 四合併を行う各商品取引所の合併総会（会員商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条 第四項、第百四十四条の二第二項又は第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会をいい、 株式会社商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条の六第一項、第百四十四条の十三 第一項、会社法第七百八十三条第一項、第七百九十五条第一項又は第八百四条第一 項の株主総会をいう。）の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 五合併を行う各商品取引所の財産及び収支の状況を知ることができる書面（会員商品 取引所にあっては最終事業年度の決算関係書類等、株式会社商品取引所にあっては 最終事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属明細書）六法第百四十四条第五項、第百四十四条の二第三項及び第百四十四条の三第五項に おいて準用する法第百二十四条第二項、第百四十四条の十第二項（第百四十四条の 十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会社法第七百八十九条第二項 、第七百九十九 条第二項又は第八百十条第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第百二十四条第三項、 第百四十四条の十第三項（第百四十四条の十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会 社法第七百八十九条第三項、第七百九十九条第三項又は第八百十条第三項の規定に より公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によっ てした場合にあっては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた 債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しく は当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は - 112 - 当該合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 七合併により消滅する商品取引所の開設している商品市場における取引に関する業務 の承継の方法を記載した書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書面（合併後の商品取引所が株式会社商品取引所であ る場合に限る。九開設しようとする商品市場における合併後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見込みを記 載した書面 十合併に際して上場商品に係る商品市場を開設しようとする場合にあっては、上場商 品構成物品を一の商品市場で取引をすることが適当である旨を明らかにすることが できる書面 十一合併に際して二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数として商品市場を開設しよう とする場合にあっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通し ていることを明らかにすることができる書面例文帳に追加

The documents specified by an ordinance set forth in Article 145, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as listed in the following (in case of documents certified by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document recording the reasons for the merger; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act; (b) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act; (c) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b) of the Act; and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval; (iv) minutes of the general meeting of shareholders approving the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of Members prescribed in Article 144, paragraph 4, Article 144-2, paragraph 2, or Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of shareholders prescribed in Article 144-6, paragraph 1 and Article 144-13, paragraph 1 of the Act, and Article 783, paragraph 1, Article 795, paragraph 1, or Article 804, paragraph 1 of the Company Act) of each Commodity Exchange which carries out the merger, or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for the merger have been followed; (v) a document stating the status of the property, income and expenditure of each Commodity Exchange that carries out the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, the settlement related statements, etc. of the preceding business year; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the financial documents, etc. of the preceding business year and detailed statements thereof); (vi) in the case where a public notice or demand (in cases where the public notice is made through an official gazette, a daily newspaper which publishes matters of current events, or an Electronic Public Notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 3 or Article 144-10, paragraph 3 of the Act [including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17), or Article 789, paragraph 3; Article 799, paragraph 3; or Article 810, paragraph 3 of the Company Act, a public notice by such method) is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5; Article 144-2, paragraph 3; and Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act, or Article 144-10, paragraph 2 of the Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act); Article 789, paragraph 2; Article 799, paragraph 2; or Article 810, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; and in cases where a creditor has made an objection, a document certifying that the liabilities have been paid or reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor, reasonable property has been deposited for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said merger is not likely to harm said creditor; (vii) a document stating a method for business succession pertaining to transactions on a Commodity Market which has been opened by a Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of a merger; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees (limited to a case where a Commodity Exchange subsequent to a merger becomes an Incorporated Commodity Exchange); (ix) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the merger on the Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (x) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed - 113 - Commodity at the time of a merger, a document stating that it is appropriate to conduct transactions of Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (xi) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market at the time of a merger by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another.  - 経済産業省