「Is Required」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(591ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Toyota Boshoku Corporation, Toyota Motor Corporation and Toray Industries Inc., which have been undertaking joint development endeavors focused on the theme of "making all parts of the car interior from plant-derived materials", are selling a new type of car in which bioplastics have been used for approximately 60% of the surface area of the car interior, by using plant-derived polyester for the surface materials, polyol derived from castor oil for the seat cushion pads, and kenaf fiber and polylactic acid as the base materials for the door trim ornaments. The use of materials such as kenaf and polyol derived from castor oil is also spreading to the products of other vehicle manufacturers, and bioplastics are already becoming established as materials that fulfill the functions required of automotive components.例文帳に追加

「車室空間のオール植物化」をテーマに共同開発を続けてきたトヨタ紡織(株)、トヨタ自動車(株)、東レ(株)は、表皮材に植物由来ポリエステルを、シートクッションパッドにひまし油由来ポリオールを、ドアトリムオーナメント基材にケナフ繊維及びポリ乳酸を活用することで、室内表面積の約60％にバイオプラスチックを導入した新型車を販売している。ひまし油由来ポリオールやケナフ等の活用は、他の自動車メーカーの製品にも広まってきており、バイオプラスチックは既に自動車部品に求められる機能を果たす素材としての位置付けを確立しつつある。 - 経済産業省

However, as this independent commitment of industry sectors has limitations, the Japanese government is now in the process of implementing the following commitments, with the objectives of resolving issues involving rights holders and companies: (i) Making a request to a counterparty government authority, so as to seek improvement for solving issues related to legal systems and the operation thereof; (ii) Providing assistance in support of enhancement of competence of a counterparty government authority, as may be required for such authority to properly grant rights and efficiently denounce infringements; (iii) Providing information related to intellectual property systems and regulatory systems relevant thereto, and handling damage accrued from counterfeit products, in relation to the country where the infringement took place; strengthening the sharing of information through public-private sector cooperation; (iv) Advancing the securing of consistency in the operation of legal systems, under the international framework; and (v) Advancing activities in a third party nation, through cooperation between Japan and the U.S. and cooperation between Japan and Europe.例文帳に追加

しかし、このような産業界独自の取組にも限界があり、権利者・企業が有する課題解決のため、政府は以下のような取組を行っているところである。① 法制度や運用の問題を改善するための相手国政府機関への要請② 適切な権利付与や効果的な摘発のための相手国政府機関の能力の向上支援③ 侵害発生国の知的財産・取締制度や模倣被害対応等に関する情報提供や現地での官民連携などによる情報共有の強化④ 国際的な枠組みによる法制度運用等の整合性強化⑤ 日米や日欧連携などによる第三国での活動強化 - 経済産業省

Under the final rule, if (i) an issuer determines that, based on its reasonable country of origin inquiry, its necessary conflict minerals did not originate in the Covered Countries or did come from recycled or scrap sources, or (ii) based on its reasonable country of origin inquiry, the issuer has no reason to believe that its conflict minerals may have originated in the Covered Countries or the issuer reasonably believes that its conflict minerals are from recycled or scrap sources, the issuer is not required to exercise due diligence on its conflict minerals’ source or chain of custody or file a Conflict Minerals Report with respect to such conflict minerals.例文帳に追加

最終規則のもとでは、(i)合理的な原産国調査に基づいて、必要な紛争鉱物が対象国を原産国としない、または再生利用品、もしくはスクラップ起源であると発行人が判断した、または(ii)合理的な原産国調査に基づいて、その紛争鉱物が対象国を原産国とする可能性があると確信する理由が発行人にない、またはその紛争鉱物が再生利用品もしくはスクラップ起源であると合理的に確信している場合には、その発行人はその紛争鉱物の起源または加工・流通過程に関してデュー・ディリジェンスを実行すること、またはかかる紛争鉱物に関して紛争鉱物報告書を提出することを義務付けられていない。 - 経済産業省

An issuer with products that are “DRC conflict undeterminable” is required to exercise due diligence on the source and chain of custody of its conflict minerals and submit a Conflict Minerals Report describing its due diligence; the steps it has taken or will take, if any, since the end of the period covered in its most recent prior Conflict Minerals Report to mitigate the risk that its necessary conflict minerals benefit armed groups, including any steps to improve its due diligence; the country of origin of the conflict minerals, if known; the facilities used to process the conflict minerals, if known; and the efforts to determine the mine or location of origin with the greatest possible specificity, if applicable.例文帳に追加

「DRCコンフリクト判定不能｣の製品を有する発行人は、紛争鉱物の起源と加工・流通過程に関するデュー・ディリジェンスを実行し、そのデュー・ディリジェンス；デュー・ディリジェンスを改善するための措置を含めて、それ以前に提出した最も新しい紛争鉱物報告書で取り上げられた期間の終了以来、自社の必要な紛争鉱物が武装集団に利益をもたらすリスクを軽減するために取った、またはこれから取る予定の措置が存在するならば、わかっている限りでそれらの措置；判明しているならば紛争鉱物の原産国；判明しているならば紛争鉱物の加工に使用された施設；該当するならば可能な限り最大の具体性をもって原産鉱山または原産地を決定しようとする努力について記述した紛争鉱物報告書を提出するよう求められる。 - 経済産業省

(a) If any conflict minerals, as defined by paragraph (d)(3) of this item, are necessary to the functionality or production of a product manufactured by the registrant or contracted by the registrant to be manufactured and are required to be reported in the calendar year covered by the specialized disclosure report, the registrant must conduct in good faith a reasonable country of origin inquiry regarding those conflict minerals that is reasonably designed to determine whether any of the conflict minerals originated in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country, as defined by paragraph (d)(1) of this item, or are from recycled or scrap sources, as defined by paragraph (d)(6) of this item.例文帳に追加

(a)登録者は、登録者によって製造された、または登録者によって製造委託契約が結ばれた製品の機能または生産のために本項目のパラグラフ(d)(3)に定義された紛争鉱物が必要であり、特定開示報告書の対象となる暦年に報告することが求められるならば、その紛争鉱物がコンゴ民主共和国もしくは本項目のパラグラフ(d)(1)に定義された周辺国を原産国とするかどうか、または本項目のパラグラフ(d)(6)に定義された再生利用品もしくはスクラップ起源であるかどうかを判断するために合理的にデザインされた、その紛争鉱物に関する合理的な原産国調査を誠実に実行しなければならない。 - 経済産業省

If, as a result of that due diligence, the registrant determines that its conflict minerals did not originate in the Democratic Republic of the Congo or an adjoining country or the registrant determines that its conflict minerals did come from recycled or scrap sources, a Conflict Minerals Report is not required, but the registrant must disclose its determination and briefly describe, in the body of its specialized disclosure report under a separate heading entitled “Conflict Minerals Disclosure,” the reasonable country of origin inquiry and the due diligence efforts it undertook in making its determination and the results of the inquiry and due diligence efforts it performed.例文帳に追加

そのデュー・ディリジェンスの結果、紛争鉱物がコンゴ民主共和国もしくはその周辺国を原産国としない、またはその紛争鉱物が再生利用品もしくはスクラップ起源であると登録者が判断する場合、紛争鉱物報告書の提出は求められないが、登録者は、特定開示報告書の本文に「紛争鉱物の開示」という見出しの独立した部分を設けて、そこにその判断を開示し、その判断を下すために実行した合理的な原産国調査とデュー・ディリジェンスの努力、およびその調査とデュー・ディリジェンスの努力の結果を簡単に説明しなければならない。 - 経済産業省

Tokyo District Court Judgment, May 26, 1977 (p.51 of Hanrei Jiho No. 832) "Judging from the fact that the use of the land constitutes an indispensable basis of the daily life of Y and his family. the bid is reasonably sufficient, even considering that the land has Y.s leasehold rights. In this context, X demanded Y to vacate the land immediately after X won the bid without negotiating with Y at all . it is assumed that, in this auction case, despite the fact that X had announced that the land is accompanied by the leasehold in accordance with which the lessee is supposed to own a building thereon, which could be perfected against the winning bidder, X was trying to obtain a huge amount of profits by winning the bid at an extremely low price, taking advantage of the lack of registry required for perfection of such leasehold. Considering the circumstances with respect to Y as recognized in the foregoing, X.s demand of the removal of and vacation of the building on the land shall not be accepted on the ground that it is an abuse of right." 例文帳に追加

東京地裁昭和５２年５月２６日判決・判例時報８３２号５１頁「本件土地の使用はYおよびその一家の生活の基盤として欠くべからざるものであること《中略》競売価格は本件土地にYの貸借権が設定されているものとして扱っても十分見合う金額であること、Xは右土地を競落するや直ちにYに本件土地の明渡を求め、話し合いには一切応じない態度を堅持していたこと《中略》これらの事実よりすれば、Xは右競売事件において本件土地に競落人に対抗しうる建物所有の目的の賃借権がある旨広告されていたが、その賃借権がたまたま対抗力に必要な登記を欠いていたことを奇貨として、極めて低廉な価額で競落したうえ巨額な利益をえようとしているものと推認できるので、前示認定のようなY側の事情等をも考慮すると、Xの本件建物収去・土地明渡の請求は権利の濫用として許されないものといわなければならない。」 - 経済産業省

Article 5 (1) The Issuer of Securities who intends to make a notification for Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities (excluding a Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities to be made with regard to Regulated Securities (meaning Securities specified by a Cabinet Order as those for which information that will have material influence on investors' Investment Decisions is information on assets investment or other similar business conducted by the Issuer of the Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and paragraph (5) of this Article and Article 24); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) under paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article shall submit a statement containing descriptions on the following matters to the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, if the Issuer is a company (including a foreign company; the same shall apply hereinafter, except in Article 50-2(9) and Article 156-3(2)(iii)) (including the cases where the company is to be established by issuance of said Securities (excluding Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph to paragraph (4))); provided, however, that, in cases where it is necessary to make the Public Offering of Securities before deciding their Issue Price or in other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, the statement may be submitted without stating the Issue Price or other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance among the matters required to be stated under item (i) below: 例文帳に追加

第五条　前条第一項又は第二項の規定による有価証券の募集又は売出し（特定有価証券（その投資者の投資判断に重要な影響を及ぼす情報がその発行者が行う資産の運用その他これに類似する事業に関する情報である有価証券として政令で定めるものをいう。以下この項及び第五項並びに第二十四条において同じ。）に係る有価証券の募集及び売出しを除く。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に係る届出をしようとする発行者は、その者が会社（外国会社を含む。第五十条の二第九項及び第百五十六条の三第二項第三号を除き、以下同じ。）である場合（当該有価証券（特定有価証券を除く。以下この項から第四項までにおいて同じ。）の発行により会社を設立する場合を含む。）においては、内閣府令で定めるところにより、次に掲げる事項を記載した届出書を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券の発行価格の決定前に募集をする必要がある場合その他の内閣府令で定める場合には、第一号のうち発行価格その他の内閣府令で定める事項を記載しないで提出することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) A national public officer who is subject to the Special Act on Wages, etc. of Personnel Working in National Enterprises Managing National Forest (Act No. 141 of 1954; referred to as "Special Wage Act" hereinafter in this Article) (excluding a national public officer who is not required to work full-time or does not hold an official post with part-time working hours prescribed in Article 81-5 paragraph 1 of the National Public Service Act (Act No. 120 of 1947), the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon obtaining an approval of the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries or a person to whom the Minister, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, delegates the authority prescribed in Article 4 of the Special Wage Act (hereinafter referred to as "the Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, etc."), take leave in order to take care of a person who is a spouse, a parent, a child, or a parent of a spouse of said national public officer and who, due to injury, sickness, or physical or mental disability, has difficulty in leading his/her daily life for a period specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare provided for in Article 2 item (iii) (referred to as a "Family Member in Care-requiring Condition" hereinafter in this Article). 例文帳に追加

３　国有林野事業を行う国の経営する企業に勤務する職員の給与等に関する特例法（昭和二十九年法律第百四十一号。以下この条において「給特法」という。）の適用を受ける国家公務員（国家公務員法（昭和二十二年法律第百二十号）第八十一条の五第一項に規定する短時間勤務の官職を占める者以外の常時勤務することを要しない国家公務員を除く。以下この条において同じ。）は、給特法第四条に規定する農林水産大臣又は政令の定めるところによりその委任を受けた者（以下「農林水産大臣等」という。）の承認を受けて、当該国家公務員の配偶者、父母、子又は配偶者の父母であって負傷、疾病又は身体上若しくは精神上の障害により第二条第三号の厚生労働省令で定める期間にわたり日常生活を営むのに支障があるもの（以下この条において「要介護家族」という。）の介護をするため、休業をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provision of Article 31 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the development activities-related construction after the change falls under the construction specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism under said Article; the provision of Article 32 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where it is intended to make changes to matters relating to public facilities that are related to development activities or to public facilities that will be established as a result of the relevant development activities or the relevant development activities-related construction, or cases where it is intended to make changes to matters concerning development activities pertaining to the consultation with persons specified by Cabinet Order under said Article and are prescribed by Cabinet Order; the provisions of Article 33, Article 34 and the immediately preceding Article and Article 41 shall apply mutatis mutandis to permission pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1); the provision of Article 34-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the State or the Prefectures, etc. is required to receive the permission under the said paragraph pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1); and the provision of Article 47 paragraph (1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to permission pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) and notification pursuant to the provision of paragraph (3). In this case, the term "matters listed below" in Article 47 paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the date of permission for change or notification and matters listed in items (ii) through (vi) and pertaining to the relevant change". 例文帳に追加

４　第三十一条の規定は変更後の開発行為に関する工事が同条の国土交通省令で定める工事に該当する場合について、第三十二条の規定は開発行為に関係がある公共施設若しくは当該開発行為若しくは当該開発行為に関する工事により設置される公共施設に関する事項の変更をしようとする場合又は同条の政令で定める者との協議に係る開発行為に関する事項であつて政令で定めるものの変更をしようとする場合について、第三十三条、第三十四条、前条及び第四十一条の規定は第一項の規定による許可について、第三十四条の二の規定は第一項の規定により国又は都道府県等が同項の許可を受けなければならない場合について、第四十七条第一項の規定は第一項の規定による許可及び第三項の規定による届出について準用する。この場合において、第四十七条第一項中「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは、「変更の許可又は届出の年月日及び第二号から第六号までに掲げる事項のうち当該変更に係る事項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In the City Bus case the Tokyo District Court July 25, 2001 ruled that "whether or not Article 46, Item 4 is applicable should depend on whether the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or the reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. In order to determine this, circumstances such as the formalities, the contents, the manner and method of use of the publication should be objectively examined." In light of these criteria, the judgment further held that "the Defendant's book is a publication edited for the purpose of explaining to children various types of vehicles running on the street by using their photographs. It provides an explanation on the exterior and role of each of the 24 types of vehicles in total. This book is edited from the viewpoint of pre-school education in that children are expected to develop their observation skills as well as curiosity, which will in the future become a basis for learning. The method of inserting the picture in the cover page and page 14 is not unnatural in light of the purpose of this publication. Considering that the viewers of this book will have the impression that the photograph of the bus is placed on various pages as an the example of the diverse vehicles referred to in the body text of the book, the act of selling a book which includes a photograph of the bus with the plaintiff's work shall not fall under the relevant criteria as previously descirbed; the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or such reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. Therefore, such act does not fulfill the conditions required under Article 46, Item 4 of the Copyright Law. 例文帳に追加

前掲東京地裁平成１３年７月２５日判決は、「法４６条４号に該当するか否かについては、著作物を利用した書籍等の体裁及び内容、著作物の利用態様、利用目的などを客観的に考慮して、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する例外的な場合に当たるといえるか否か検討すべきことになる。」とし、「被告書籍は、幼児向けに、写真を用いて、町を走る各種自動車を解説する目的で作られた書籍であり、合計２４種類の自動車について、その外観及び役割などが説明されていること、各種自動車の写真を幼児が見ることを通じて、観察力を養い、勉強の基礎になる好奇心を高めるとの幼児教育的観点から監修されていると解されること、表紙及び本文１４頁の掲載方法は、右の目的に照らして、格別不自然な態様とはいえないので、本件書籍を見る者は、本文で紹介されている各種自動車の一例として、本件バスが掲載されているとの印象を受けると考えられること等の事情を総合すると、原告作品が描かれた本件バスの写真を被告書籍に掲載し、これを販売することは、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する行為には、該当しないというべきである。」として著作権法第46条第４号の要件を充たさないとした。 - 経済産業省

Article 198 (1) The provision of Article 8 (No Use of Name, etc. which is likely to be mistaken for a company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the use of a trade name or name which is likely to be mistaken for a Foreign Mutual Company; the provision of Article 9 (Liability of Company Permitting Others to Use Its Trade Name) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the name of a Foreign Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter III, Section 1 (Employees of a Company) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the employees of a Foreign Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter III, Section 2 (excluding Article 18) (Commercial Agents of the Companies) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a person acting as an agent or intermediary in a transaction for a Foreign Mutual Company; the provisions of Part I, Chapter IV (excluding Article 24) (Non Competition after Assignment of Business) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Foreign Mutual Company has assigned its business or acquired any business or operation; and the provisions of Article 54, Article 54-2 and Article 54-3, paragraphs (1) and (4) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the books and other materials of a Foreign Mutual Company. In this case, any technical change in interpretation required shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百九十八条　会社法第八条（会社と誤認させる名称等の使用の禁止）の規定は外国相互会社であると誤認されるおそれのある商号又は名称の使用について、同法第九条（自己の商号の使用を他人に許諾した会社の責任）の規定は外国相互会社の名称について、同法第一編第三章第一節（会社の使用人）の規定は外国相互会社の使用人について、同章第二節（第十八条を除く。）（会社の代理商）の規定は外国相互会社のために取引の代理又は媒介をする者について、同編第四章（第二十四条を除く。）（事業の譲渡をした場合の競業の禁止等）の規定は外国相互会社が事業を譲渡し、又は事業若しくは営業を譲り受けた場合について、第五十四条、第五十四条の二並びに第五十四条の三第一項及び第四項の規定は外国相互会社の帳簿その他の資料について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) In the case where a Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations which has prepared an authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan intends to issue a resolution on a change to a Fishery Right Exercise Rule or a Piscary Exercise Rule as provided in paragraph (1) of this Article at a general meeting (including a representatives' meeting), to conform to the contents of the matter provided in Article 4, paragraph (2), item (iii) of this Act in order to make the members of the Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations comply with the contents of the authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 50 of the Aquatic Industry Cooperative Association Act (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 52, paragraph (6) of the same Act which is then applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 92, paragraph (3) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply elsewhere in this paragraph) applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 92 of the same Act, the Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations shall not be required to issue a resolution pursuant to the provisions of Article 50 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 92 of the same Act, if the consent of all of the member Fisheries Cooperative Associations respectively, directly or indirectly consisting of the specific members (hereinafter referred to as "Specific Members' Associations") is obtained pursuant to ordinance of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 例文帳に追加

４　認定漁場改善計画を作成した漁業協同組合連合会が、認定漁場改善計画の内容を遵守させるために、総会（総代会を含む。）で、第四条第二項第三号に掲げる事項の内容に適合するように行う第一項に規定する漁業権行使規則又は入漁権行使規則の変更の議決を行おうとする場合において、特定組合員を直接又は間接の構成員とする会員たる漁業協同組合（以下「特定組合員所属組合」という。）のすべての同意を農林水産省令で定めるところにより得ているときは、水産業協同組合法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十条（同法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十二条第六項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定にかかわらず、同法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十条の規定による議決によることを要しないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of the preceding two paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to a company which is required to submit Annual Securities Reports under Article 24(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24(5) (including a company which submitted Annual Securities Reports under Article 23-3(4)) and is specified by a Cabinet Order. In this case, the term "specified by a Cabinet Order (" in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified by a Cabinet Order (limited to the Issuer of Regulated Securities (meaning Regulated Securities as defined in Article 5(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph);"; the term "if its business year" in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "if the Specified Period (meaning Specified Period as defined in Article 24(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24(5); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) designated for the Securities"; the term "of its business years" in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Specified Period"; the term "the Corporate Group to which the company belongs" in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "asset investment or other similar businesses conducted by the company"; the term "financial conditions of the company" in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "financial conditions of asset investment or other similar businesses conducted by the company"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　前二項の規定は、第二十四条第五項において準用する同条第一項の規定による有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない会社（第二十三条の三第四項の規定により当該有価証券報告書を提出した会社を含む。）のうち政令で定めるものについて準用する。この場合において、第一項中「政令で定めるもの（」とあるのは「政令で定めるもの（特定有価証券（第五条第一項に規定する特定有価証券をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の発行者に限る。」と、「その事業年度」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券に係る特定期間（第二十四条第五項において準用する同条第一項に規定する特定期間をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「当該事業年度の期間」とあるのは「当該特定期間」と、「当該会社の属する企業集団」とあるのは「当該会社が行う資産の運用その他これに類似する事業に係る資産」と、「当該会社の経理」とあるのは「当該会社が行う資産の運用その他これに類似する事業に係る資産の経理」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(12) In cases where a company required to submit Quarterly Securities Reports under paragraph (1) (limited to cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)(including a company submitting Quarterly Securities Reports under paragraph (2) (limited to cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3))) submits, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, documents containing descriptions on part of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance under paragraph (1) (limited to documents prepared based on laws and regulations or rules of a Financial Instruments Exchange (including those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as being similar to such rules); such documents are hereinafter referred to as "Documents Substituting Part of a Quarterly Securities Report" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) together with a Quarterly Securities Report to the Prime Minister, with regard to the application of paragraph (1) to cases approved by the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those where the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired, the term "other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors" in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (excluding matters stated in Documents Substituting Part of a Quarterly Securities Report as defined in paragraph (12))." 例文帳に追加

１２　第一項（第三項において準用する場合に限る。以下この条において同じ。）の規定により四半期報告書を提出しなければならない会社（第二項（第三項において準用する場合に限る。）の規定により四半期報告書を提出する会社を含む。）が、内閣府令で定めるところにより、第一項に規定する内閣府令で定める事項の一部を記載した書面（法令又は金融商品取引所の規則（これに類するものとして内閣府令で定めるものを含む。）に基づいて作成された書面に限る。以下この項及び次項において「四半期代替書面」という。）を四半期報告書と併せて内閣総理大臣に提出する場合において、公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けた場合における第一項の適用については、同項中「内閣府令で定める事項」とあるのは、「内閣府令で定める事項（第十二項に規定する四半期代替書面に記載された事項を除く。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-2 (1) As for Shares, bonds with share option and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Share Certificates, etc." in this Chapter and Article 27-30-11 (excluding Article 27-30-11(4))) for which their Issuer is required to submit Annual Securities Reports, Purchase, etc. (meaning purchase or other type of acceptance of transfer for value of Share Certificates, etc. and including acts specified by a Cabinet Order as being similar to such acceptance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section) of them shall be made by means of a Tender Offer, if the Purchase, etc. is made by a person other than the Issuer and falls under any of the categories listed in the following items; provided, however, that this shall not apply to Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc. conducted as exercise of share option by the holder thereof, Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc. from Persons in Special Relationship with the person conducting Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc.(limited to such persons specified in item (i) of paragraph (7) and specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) or other Purchase, etc. of Share Certificates, etc. so specified by a Cabinet Order: 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の二　その株券、新株予約権付社債券その他の有価証券で政令で定めるもの（以下この章及び第二十七条の三十の十一（第四項を除く。）において「株券等」という。）について有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない発行者の株券等につき、当該発行者以外の者が行う買付け等（株券等の買付けその他の有償の譲受けをいい、これに類するものとして政令で定めるものを含む。以下この節において同じ。）であつて次のいずれかに該当するものは、公開買付けによらなければならない。ただし、新株予約権を有する者が当該新株予約権を行使することにより行う株券等の買付け等及び株券等の買付け等を行う者がその者の特別関係者（第七項第一号に掲げる者のうち内閣府令で定めるものに限る。）から行う株券等の買付け等その他政令で定める株券等の買付け等は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vi) Where domestic source income specified in each item of Article 180(1) of the Act for the category of corporation listed in the relevant item is paid to the corporation's head office or other office, place of business or any other place equivalent thereto located outside Japan, the corporation is expected to, for the purpose of filing a proper return pursuant to the provisions of the Corporation Tax Act with regard to the relevant domestic source income, notify the corporation's office, place of business or any other place equivalent thereto prescribed in Article 17(i) (Place for Tax Payment of Foreign Corporations) of the said Act (in the case where there are two or more such places, the principal one; hereinafter referred to as the "office, etc. at the place for tax payment" in this item, paragraph (1)(ii) of the next Article, and Article 306(1)(i) (Procedures Required Where Foreign Corporations No Longer Satisfy the Requirements under the Special Provisions for Taxation, etc.)) of the type, amount, the basis of calculation of the amount, date of payment and any other necessary matters of the said domestic source income, and record these matters in its books at the said office, etc. at the place for tax payment, without fail, on every occasion that it receives the said domestic source income. 例文帳に追加

六　法第百八十条第一項各号に掲げる法人の区分に応じ当該各号に定める国内源泉所得がその法人の国外にある本店又は事務所、事業所その他これらに準ずるものにあてて支払われる場合には、当該国内源泉所得について法人税法の規定による申告を適正に行うため、その法人が、当該国内源泉所得の支払を受ける都度、その法人の同法第十七条第一号（外国法人の納税地）に規定する事務所、事業所その他これらに準ずるもの（これらが二以上あるときは、そのうち主たるもの。以下この号、次条第一項第二号及び第三百六条第一項第一号（外国法人が課税の特例の要件に該当しなくなつた場合の手続等）において「納税地にある事務所等」という。）に対して当該国内源泉所得の種類、金額、計算の基礎、支払年月日その他必要な事項を通知し、かつ、当該納税地にある事務所等においてこれらの事項をその帳簿に記録することが確実であると見込まれること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vii) Where domestic source income specified in each item of Article 214(1) of the Act for the category of person listed in the relevant item is paid to the nonresident's domicile, residence, or office, place of business or any other place equivalent thereto located outside Japan, the nonresident is expected to, for the purpose of filing a proper return pursuant to the provision of the Act with regard to the relevant domestic source income, notify the office, place of business or any other place equivalent thereto pertaining to the business conducted by the nonresident in Japan (in the case where there are two or more such places, the principal one; hereinafter referred to as the "office, etc. located in Japan" in this item, paragraph (1)(ii) of the next Article, and Article 333(1)(i) (Procedures Required Where Nonresidents No Longer Satisfy the Requirements for Eligibility for Exemption from Withholding at Source)) of the type, amount, the basis of calculation of the amount, date of payment and any other necessary matters concerning the said domestic source income, and record these matters in his/her books at the said office, etc. located in Japan, without fail, on every occasion that he/she receives the domestic source income. 例文帳に追加

七　法第二百十四条第一項各号に掲げる者の区分に応じ当該各号に定める国内源泉所得がその者の国外にある住所、居所又は事務所、事業所その他これらに準ずるものにあてて支払われる場合には、当該国内源泉所得について法の規定による申告を適正に行うため、その者が、当該国内源泉所得の支払を受ける都度、その者の国内において行う事業に係る事務所、事業所その他これらに準ずるもの（これらが二以上あるときは、そのうち主たるもの。以下この号、次条第一項第二号及び第三百三十三条第一項第一号（非居住者が源泉徴収の免除の要件に該当しなくなつた場合の手続等）において「国内にある事務所等」という。）に対して当該国内源泉所得の種類、金額、計算の基礎、支払年月日その他必要な事項を通知し、かつ、当該国内にある事務所等においてこれらの事項をその帳簿に記録することが確実であると見込まれること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The rule change regarding the capital adequacy ratio was recently decided and announced and is now in the public comment process. The partial introduction of flexibility into the capital adequacy ratio regulation reflects circumstances specific to Japan, as exemplified by Japanese banks’ relatively large exposure to stocks. Behind the increasing volatility of Japanese stock prices are foreign investment funds’ activities, as a result of which we are now witnessing seemingly irrational events, such as the average PBR (price-to-book ratio) for stocks listed on the Tokyo Stock Exchange dropping below one. Meanwhile, valuation losses on securities holdings are required to be deducted from the Tier 1 capital in the calculation of the capital adequacy ratio. We have concluded that for the management of the Japanese economy, it is essential to prevent foreign investment funds’ activities from significantly affecting and undermining the financial intermediary function of Japanese deposit-taking financial institutions, so we have decided on this as an extraordinary measure. 例文帳に追加

先般決定し公表し、現在パブリックコメントにかかっているということだと思いますが、自己資本比率規制の一部弾力化については、我が国にやや特有の事情と申しましょうか、典型的には我が国の銀行が株式へのエクスポージャーが相対的に大きい、その中で、我が国の株式市場において株価が非常にボラティリティが高くなってきている、その背景には海外の投資ファンド等の動きがある、ということで、結果的に、例えば東京証券取引所でPBR（株価純資産倍率）の平均値が1を下回るといったような、必ずしも合理的には理解しにくいような、そういう事態が出てきている、他方で有価証券の評価損というものが自己資本比率の計算上、ティア1（基本的項目）から控除されるという仕組みになっておりますので、その海外の投資ファンドの動きによって我が国の預金取扱金融機関の金融仲介能力というものが大きく振り回されて、仲介能力が損なわれるという、ここの因果関係をどこかで遮断するということが、我が国の経済全体の運営の上で必要性が極めて高いということで取られた臨時の措置ということでございます。 - 金融庁

In this context, if we are to proceed with postponing the expiration of the Act, we will properly request various organizations to submit data or conduct interviews with them. When I served as Parliamentary Vice-Minister of International Trade and Industry twenty years ago, I was in charge of SMEs as required as the Parliamentary Vice-Minister of International Trade and Industry appointed from the House of Representatives back then for one year and three months under (former) Minister of International Trade and Industry Eiichi Nakao. Based on such experience, I have been told by SMEs how extremely helpful the Act has been. I may have also told you previously that according to what I have been informed by bureaucrats, a megabank attended a gathering of various financial institutions-a gathering of shinkin banks and credit unions at one of the financial bureaus-for the first time ever since the establishment of the Act. In that sense, my intuition as a politician is that the Act is proving to be extremely effective against the backdrop of the strong yen at this stage when we are considering the possibility of postponing its expiration. 例文帳に追加

ですから、そういった意味では、当然延長ということであれば、きちんと色々な団体からデータも出す、あるいはお話を聞かせていただくということもしますけれども、我々やはり感覚的に、20年前、私、通産政務次官をしていまして、中小企業担当の、あれは衆議院から行った通産政務次官は当時中小企業担当でしたから、1年3か月、中尾栄一（元）通産大臣のもとでやらせていただきました。そんなことで、中小企業からの非常に助かっているという声を聞きますし、また、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、色々な金融の集まり、ある財務局での信用金庫・信用組合の集まりに、この法律ができて初めてメガバンクが来たという話も、これはきちんと官僚機構から聞いていますから、そういう意味では、私は非常に今の時代、データがあるかないかと言われたら今からそれをやるのですけれども、政治家の勘として、こういった円高の中でやはりこれは、まさに延長を視野に入れている今の段階で、非常によく効果をあらわしているなというふうに私は思っております。 - 金融庁

The name shall be removed from the Register of Professional Representatives of any person who: is deceased or subject to an incapacity under Article 69; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 63, no longer fulfills the conditions required by Article 60 and or may no longer rely on the provisions of an international convention or on reciprocity under paragraph 2 of that Article; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 is no longer resident in Belgium or in a Member State of the European Communities or has been prohibited or placed under guardianship; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 has been removed ex officio from the list of professional representatives before the European Patent Office for one of the reasons listed in Rule 102 to of the Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents or for having been subject to a disciplinary measure taken under Article 134 of that Convention; at the time of the request for entry or of a request for amendment of the entry, intentionally submitted documents or made declarations the content of which did not correspond to reality; has been convicted or has been subject to a prohibition referred to in Article 60; has committed a serious offense in the exercise of his patent representation activities before the Office. 例文帳に追加

次に掲げる者は職業的代理人登録簿から抹消される。死亡した者，又は第69条の規定による無能力者となった者，第63条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，もはや第60条及びの条件を満たしていない者，又は国際条約の規定若しくは第60条の下での相互主義に依存することができない者，第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，もはやベルギー若しくは欧州共同体の居住者ではない者，又は禁止され若しくは保護の下におかれるようになった者，第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，欧州特許の付与に関する条約についての施行規則の中の規則第102(a)から(c)までに掲げる理由の1つに基づき，又は同条約第134条(c)の下でとられた制裁措置に服させられたという理由で，職権により欧州特許庁に対する職業的代理人名簿から抹消された者，登録請求又は登録補正請求のとき，故意に真実ではない文書又は申立を提出した者，有罪の判決を受け，又は第60条にいう禁止に服させられた者，庁に対する特許代理人としての職務の遂行において，重大な罪を犯した者。 - 特許庁

A warrant issued under this section may authorize persons, including the registered proprietor or his or her designated representative, to accompany and assist any member of the Garda Siochana in executing the warrant or in collating any inventory or other evidence. A person who-- obstructs or interferes with a person acting under the authority of a warrant issued under this section, is found in, on or at the premises or place specified in the warrant by a member of the Garda Siochana acting as aforesaid and who fails or refuses to give the member his or her name and address when required to do so or gives a name or address that is false or misleading, obstructs the exercise of an authority conferred by a warrant under this section, or fails or refuses to give information to a member of the Garda Siochana when requested to do so under this section, shall be guilty of an offence and shall be liable on summary conviction to a fine not exceeding .1,905 (￡1,500), or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months, or both.例文帳に追加

本条に基づき発行される令状は，関係意匠の登録所有者又はその指定する代理人を含め令状により授権された国家警察の職員以外の者に，令状の執行又は一覧その他の証拠の照合において当該職員に随伴し，補佐する権限を与えることができる。次の何れかの行為を行った者は有罪であり，1,905ユーロ(1,500ポンド)を超えない罰金若しくは12月を超えない禁固，又はその両者を科せられる。本条に基づき発行された令状による権限を行使する者に対する妨害若しくは干渉本条による令状に基づき行為する国家警察の職員によってそこに特定された施設又は場所で発見され，要求されたにも拘らず自己の氏名と住所を当該国家警察職員に対して告げず又は虚偽の氏名若しくは住所を告げること本条に基づく令状により付与された権限の行使の妨害，又は本条に基づき要求されたにも拘らず，国家警察職員に情報を提供しないか又は提供することを拒絶すること - 特許庁

Article 1105, paragraph 1 of NAFTA provides an obligation to accord fair and equitable treatment “in accordance with international law.” However, in the Pope and Talbot case it was held that because NAFTA was entered into for the purpose of building a closer economic relationship between the three countries of North America, there is not only an obligation to provide treatment consistent with the minimum standard under international law, but also obligations in addition to such minimum standard. In addition, in the S.D. Myers case it was held that a breach of other provisions under NAFTA automatically establishes a breach of general treatment obligations. Criticisms regarding the interpretation of this provision were raised mainly in the U.S. With a view to posing limitations on the expansive reading of this obligation, the NAFTA Free Trade Commission, in response to such criticisms, published “Notes of Interpretation of Certain Chapter 11 Provisions” on August 1, 2001 confirming that general treatment obligations do not exceed that which is required by the customary international law minimum standard for treatment of aliens, and a breach of another provision of NAFTA, or of a separate international agreement, does not establish that there has been a breach of the general treatment obligations.例文帳に追加

なお、NAFTA 第1105条第１項は、「国際法に従って」公正衡平待遇を与える義務を規定しているが、Pope and Talbot 事件で、NAFTAが北米三国間により一層強固な経済関係を築く目的で締結されたものであることなどから一般国際法上の義務のみでなく、これに付加的なものであるとの判断が下されたこと、また、S.D.Myers事件ではNAFTA 上のこの他の規定に違反している場合、必然的に一般待遇義務にも違反するとの判断が下されたことから、米国を中心にこの規定の解釈について批判の声があがり、これを受ける形で2001年８ 月１ 日にNAFTA 自由貿易委員会（NAFTA FreeTrade Commission）は、公正衡平待遇義務は慣習国際法上の最低基準を付与するものであり、それ以上の待遇を求めるものではないこと、NAFTA 上又は他の国際協定の公正衡平待遇義務以外の義務違反があったことによって、公正衡平待遇義務違反があったこととはならないことを確認する覚書（Notes of Interpretationof Certain Chapter 11Provisions）を公表し、この義務の範囲に制限をかけた。 - 経済産業省

(3) If the ratio between the amount of the insurance benefits pertaining to employment injury provided for in the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (excluding the lump sum compensation for surviving family paid in case of Article 16-6, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a disease caused as a result of having been engaged in a specific job or occupation for a long period which is specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (limited to the persons specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for each type of the businesses specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, taking into consideration of the service period in respect of such business, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as the "insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease" in this paragraph and in Article 20, paragraph (1)), and the insurance benefits pertaining to persons deemed as entitled to receive the insurance benefit pursuant to the provision of Article 36, paragraph (1) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "insured of Class III special enrollment")) in respect of any business falling under any of the following items during each insurance year of three consecutive insurance years and in respect of which business three years or more have passed, since the establishment of the insurance relation of industrial accident insurance, as of March 31 of the last insurance year of such consecutive three insurance years (hereinafter referred to as the "reference date" in this paragraph), the payment of which has been made during such consecutive three insurance years (or, in case of insurance benefits paid as pension or otherwise specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the amount thereof shall be calculated pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; the same shall apply in Article 20, paragraph (1)), plus the amount of the payments made as the services listed in Article 29, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act which pertain to employment injury and which are specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (or, in case of payments other than those paid as lump sum payments, the amount thereof shall be calculated pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) on one hand, and the amount obtained by multiplying the aggregate of the amount of the general insurance premiums (or, in case of the businesses set forth in paragraph (1), item (i), the amount of the portion corresponding to the industrial accident insurance rate prescribed in the preceding paragraph (or, if such rate has been increased or decreased pursuant to the provision of such paragraph, such increased or decreased rate)) after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the off-the-job injury rate (meaning the rate prescribed by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare by taking into consideration of the injury rate pertaining to commuting injury and the amount of the costs required for the benefit for second medical examination, etc. during the past three years in respect of all businesses to which the Industrial Accident Insurance Act is applied, and other circumstances; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and in Article 20, paragraph (1)) plus the amount of the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the special enrollment off-the-job injury rate (meaning the off-the-job injury rate after deducting the rate determined by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 13; the same shall apply in each item of Article 20, paragraph (1) and in Article 20, paragraph (2)), by the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare by taking into consideration of the costs required for the insurance benefits paid as pension concerning employment injury, the costs required for the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease, and other circumstances (in Article 20, paragraph (1), item (i) referred to as the "Class I adjustment rate") on the other hand, exceeds eighty-five one-hundredth (85/100), or is seventy-five one-hundredth (75/100) or less, then the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may acknowledge the rate calculated by increasing or decreasing the industrial accident insurance rate prescribed in the preceding paragraph in respect of such business less the off-the-job injury rate, by the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare within the scope of forty one-hundredth (40/100), as the industrial accident insurance rate for the insurance year two years following the insurance year in which the reference date of such business is included. 例文帳に追加

３　厚生労働大臣は、連続する三保険年度中の各保険年度において次の各号のいずれかに該当する事業であつて当該連続する三保険年度中の最後の保険年度に属する三月三十一日（以下この項において「基準日」という。）において労災保険に係る保険関係が成立した後三年以上経過したものについての当該連続する三保険年度の間における労災保険法の規定による業務災害に関する保険給付（労災保険法第十六条の六第一項第二号の場合に支給される遺族補償一時金、特定の業務に長期間従事することにより発生する疾病であつて厚生労働省令で定めるものにかかつた者（厚生労働省令で定める事業の種類ごとに、当該事業における就労期間等を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める者に限る。）に係る保険給付（以下この項及び第二十条第一項において「特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付」という。）及び労災保険法第三十六条第一項の規定により保険給付を受けることができることとされた者（以下「第三種特別加入者」という。）に係る保険給付を除く。）の額（年金たる保険給付その他厚生労働省令で定める保険給付については、その額は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定するものとする。第二十条第一項において同じ。）に労災保険法第二十九条第一項第二号に掲げる事業として支給が行われた給付金のうち業務災害に係るもので厚生労働省令で定めるものの額（一時金として支給された給付金以外のものについては、その額は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定するものとする。）を加えた額と一般保険料の額（第一項第一号の事業については、前項の規定による労災保険率（その率がこの項の規定により引き上げ又は引き下げられたときは、その引き上げ又は引き下げられた率）に応ずる部分の額）から非業務災害率（労災保険法の適用を受けるすべての事業の過去三年間の通勤災害に係る災害率及び二次健康診断等給付に要した費用の額その他の事情を考慮して厚生労働大臣の定める率をいう。以下この項及び第二十条第一項において同じ。）に応ずる部分の額を減じた額に第一種特別加入保険料の額から特別加入非業務災害率（非業務災害率から第十三条の厚生労働大臣の定める率を減じた率をいう。第二十条第一項各号及び第二項において同じ。）に応ずる部分の額を減じた額を加えた額に業務災害に関する年金たる保険給付に要する費用、特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付に要する費用その他の事情を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める率（第二十条第一項第一号において「第一種調整率」という。）を乗じて得た額との割合が百分の八十五を超え、又は百分の七十五以下である場合には、当該事業についての前項の規定による労災保険率から非業務災害率を減じた率を百分の四十の範囲内において厚生労働省令で定める率だけ引き上げ又は引き下げた率に非業務災害率を加えた率を、当該事業についての基準日の属する保険年度の次の次の保険年度の労災保険率とすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The conformity to item 1 of the preceding paragraph shall be determined by the method specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; provided however, that the specified measuring instruments affixed with an indication set forth in Article 84, paragraph 1 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 89, paragraph 4; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) (with regard to specified measuring instruments specified by the Cabinet Order set forth in Article 50, paragraph 1 for which a period specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry for each specified measuring instrument has passed from the time the indication set forth in Article 84, paragraph 1 was affixed thereto, limited to those with an indication set forth in Article 50, paragraph 1 for which a period specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry has not passed from the time the indication set forth in the same paragraph was affixed thereto) shall be, at the time of a verification test, deemed to be conforming to technical standards (excluding those regarding performance specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry as those that are required to be separately provided for as to the conformity thereto on an individual basis) specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry set forth in the same paragraph. 例文帳に追加

２　前項第一号に適合するかどうかは、経済産業省令で定める方法により定めるものとする。ただし、第八十四条第一項（第八十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の表示が付された特定計量器（第五十条第一項の政令で定める特定計量器であって第八十四条第一項の表示が付されてから特定計量器ごとに経済産業省令で定める期間を経過したものにあっては、第五十条第一項の表示が付され、かつ、同項の表示が付されてから経済産業省令で定める期間を経過していないものに限る。）は、その検定に際しては、同号の経済産業省令で定める技術上の基準（性能に関するものであってこれに適合するかどうかを個々に定める必要があるものとして経済産業省令で定めるものを除く。）に適合するものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 51-2 (1) A Municipality, when a person as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare due to an extenuating income condition or other circumstances among those who are an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, receives Designated Facility Service, etc., Designated Community-Based Service, or Designated In-Home Service (herein referred to as "Specified Long-Term Care Service" in this Article and the following Article, paragraph (1)) as listed below, shall pay to said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care (herein referred to as "Specified Person Admitted to a Facility" in this Article and the following Article, paragraph (1)) an Allowance for Long-Term Care Service to a Person Admitted to a Specified Facility for the expenses required to provide meals and residence or stay (hereinafter referred to as "Residence, etc.") at a Facility Covered by Long-Term Care Insurance, Designated Community-Based Service Provider, or Designated In-Home Service Provider that provides said Specified Long-Term Care Service (herein referred to as "Specified Facility, etc., for Insured Long-Term Care" in this Article), however, provided that this provision shall not apply when said Specified Person Admitted to a Facility that is issued a designation pursuant to the provisions of Article 37, paragraph (1) receives Specified Long-Term Care Service other than the type pertaining to said designation: 例文帳に追加

第五十一条の二　市町村は、要介護被保険者のうち所得の状況その他の事情をしん酌して厚生労働省令で定めるものが、次に掲げる指定施設サービス等、指定地域密着型サービス又は指定居宅サービス（以下この条及び次条第一項において「特定介護サービス」という。）を受けたときは、当該要介護被保険者（以下この条及び次条第一項において「特定入所者」という。）に対し、当該特定介護サービスを行う介護保険施設、指定地域密着型サービス事業者又は指定居宅サービス事業者（以下この条において「特定介護保険施設等」という。）における食事の提供に要した費用及び居住又は滞在（以下「居住等」という。）に要した費用について、特定入所者介護サービス費を支給する。ただし、当該特定入所者が、第三十七条第一項の規定による指定を受けている場合において、当該指定に係る種類以外の特定介護サービスを受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 6 (1) In the case where a Fisheries Cooperative Association that has prepared an authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan intends to issue a resolution on a change (excluding a change to a matter relevant to the qualification of any person having the right to operate a fishery provided in paragraph (1) of Article 8 of the Fishery Act; the same shall apply in paragraph (4)) to the Fishery Right Exercise Rule or Piscary Exercise Rule (referring to the Fishery Right Exercise Rule or Piscary Exercise Rule of the same paragraph) at a general meeting (including a sectional meeting of the general meeting and a representatives' meeting) in conformance with the contents of Article 4, paragraph (2), item (iii), in order to make the members of the association comply with the contents of the authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan, the Fisheries Cooperative Association shall not be required to issue a resolution pursuant to the provisions of Article 50 of the Aquatic Industry Cooperative Association Act (Act No. 242 of 1948) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (6) of Article 52 of the same Act; the same shall apply elsewhere in this paragraph) or paragraph (6) of Article 51-2 of the same Act, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 50 or paragraph (6) of Article 51-2 of the same Act, if the consent in writing of not fewer than two-thirds of the members having the right to operate the fishery covered by said fishery right or common of piscary (hereinafter referred to as "the specific members") is obtained pursuant to ordinance of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 例文帳に追加

第六条　認定漁場改善計画を作成した漁業協同組合が、認定漁場改善計画の内容を遵守させるために、総会（総会の部会及び総代会を含む。）で、第四条第二項第三号に掲げる事項の内容に適合するように行う漁業権行使規則又は入漁権行使規則（漁業法第八条第一項の漁業権行使規則又は入漁権行使規則をいう。）の変更（同項に規定する漁業を営む権利を有する者の資格に関する事項の変更を除く。第四項において同じ。）の議決を行おうとする場合において、当該漁業権又は入漁権の内容たる漁業を営む権利を有する組合員（以下「特定組合員」という。）の三分の二以上の書面による同意を農林水産省令で定めるところにより得ているときは、水産業協同組合法（昭和二十三年法律第二百四十二号）第五十条（同法第五十二条第六項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）又は第五十一条の二第六項の規定にかかわらず、同法第五十条又は第五十一条の二第六項の規定による議決によることを要しないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) In the cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as cases where the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired, a foreign company required to submit Annual Securities Reports under paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph to paragraph (13)) (including foreign companies which have submitted Annual Securities Reports under Article 23-3(4); hereinafter referred as to "Reporting Foreign Company") may submit, instead of Annual Securities Reports to be submitted under paragraph (1) and the documents to be attached thereto under paragraph (6) (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Annual Securities Reports, etc." in this Article), documents which are prepared in English and are similar to Annual Securities Reports, etc. Disclosed in a Foreign State (meaning the state of having been made available for public inspection based on laws and regulations under the foreign state (including the rules provided for by the operator of a Foreign Financial Instruments Market or other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance); the same shall apply hereinafter in Articles 24-4-7(6) and 24-5(7)) (such documents are hereinafter referred to as "Foreign Company Reports" in this Chapter). 例文帳に追加

８　第一項（第五項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項から第十三項までにおいて同じ。）の規定により有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない外国会社（第二十三条の三第四項の規定により有価証券報告書を提出したものを含む。以下「報告書提出外国会社」という。）は、公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定める場合には、第一項の規定による有価証券報告書及び第六項の規定によりこれに添付しなければならない書類（以下この条において「有価証券報告書等」という。）に代えて、外国において開示（当該外国の法令（外国金融商品市場を開設する者その他の内閣府令で定める者の規則を含む。）に基づいて当該外国において公衆の縦覧に供されることをいう。第二十四条の四の七第六項及び第二十四条の五第七項において同じ。）が行われている有価証券報告書等に類する書類であつて英語で記載されたもの（以下この章において「外国会社報告書」という。）を提出することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(14) In cases where a company required to submit Annual Securities Reports under paragraph (1) (limited to cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) submits, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, documents containing descriptions on part of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance under paragraph (1) (limited to documents prepared based on laws and regulations or rules of a Financial Instruments Exchange (including those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as being similar to such rules); such documents are hereinafter referred to as "Documents Substituting Part of an Annual Securities Report" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) together with an Annual Securities Report to the Prime Minister, with regard to the application of paragraphs (1) and (2) to cases approved by the Prime Minister as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those where the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired, the term "other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors" in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (excluding matters stated in Documents Substituting Part of an Annual Securities Report defined in paragraph (14))"; and the term "among the matters set forth in the main clause of Article 5(1)" in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "among the matters set forth in the main clause of Article 5(1) (excluding matters stated in Documents Substituting Part of an Annual Securities Report defined in paragraph (14))." 例文帳に追加

１４　第一項（第五項において準用する場合に限る。以下この条において同じ。）の規定により有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない会社が、内閣府令で定めるところにより、第一項に規定する内閣府令で定める事項の一部を記載した書面（法令又は金融商品取引所の規則（これに類するものとして内閣府令で定めるものを含む。）に基づいて作成された書面に限る。以下この項及び次項において「報告書代替書面」という。）を有価証券報告書と併せて内閣総理大臣に提出する場合において、公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けた場合における第一項及び第二項の規定の適用については、第一項中「内閣府令で定める事項」とあるのは「内閣府令で定める事項（第十四項に規定する報告書代替書面に記載された事項を除く。）」と、第二項中「同項本文に規定する事項」とあるのは「同項本文に規定する事項（第十四項に規定する報告書代替書面に記載された事項を除く。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-2 (1) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to Annual Securities Reports and documents attached thereto. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of said statement or said other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Annual Securities Report and documents attached thereto, or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of an Annual Securities Report and documents attached thereto for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Annual Securities Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Annual Securities Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; and the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の二　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は、有価証券報告書及びその添付書類について準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「有価証券報告書及びその添付書類」と、「届出者」とあるのは「有価証券報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「有価証券報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「有価証券報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは、「訂正報告書の提出」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-4-3 (1) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Confirmation Letter. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of said statement or said other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Confirmation Letter, or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Confirmation Letter for the public interest or protection of investors"; the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Confirmation Letter" and "an amendment Confirmation Letter," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Confirmation Letter" and "an amendment Confirmation Letter," respectively: the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement"; and the part "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Confirmation Letter" and "to submit an amendment Confirmation Letter," respectively; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の四の三　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は、確認書について準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「確認書」と、「届出者」とあるのは「確認書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正確認書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「確認書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正確認書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「確認書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正確認書の提出」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-4-5 (1) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an Internal Control Report and documents attached thereto. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of said statement or said other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Internal Control Report and document attached thereto, or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of an Internal Control Report and documents attached thereto for the public interest or protection of investors"; the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Internal Control Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Internal Control Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and the part "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Internal Control Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の四の五　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は、内部統制報告書及びその添付書類について準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「内部統制報告書及びその添付書類」と、「届出者」とあるのは「内部統制報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「内部統制報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「内部統制報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(13) In cases where a company required to submit Semiannual Securities Reports under paragraph (1) (limited to cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and following paragraph) submits, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, documents containing descriptions on part of the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance under paragraph (1) (limited to documents prepared based on laws and regulations or rules of a Financial Instruments Exchange (including those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as being similar to such rules); such documents are hereinafter referred to as "Documents Substituting Part of a Semiannual Securities Report" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) together with a Semiannual Securities Report to the Prime Minister, with regard to the application of paragraph (1) and (2) to cases approved by the Prime Minister pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those where the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired, the term "other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors" in paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (excluding matters stated in Documents Substituting Part of a Semiannual Securities Report as defined in paragraph (13))"; and the term "the matters set forth in the preceding paragraph" in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the matters set forth in the preceding paragraph (excluding matters stated in Documents Substituting Part of a Semiannual Securities Report as defined in paragraph (13))." 例文帳に追加

１３　第一項（第三項において準用する場合に限る。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定により半期報告書を提出しなければならない会社が、内閣府令で定めるところにより、第一項に規定する内閣府令で定める事項の一部を記載した書面（法令又は金融商品取引所の規則（これに類するものとして内閣府令で定めるものを含む。）に基づいて作成された書面に限る。以下この項及び次項において「半期代替書面」という。）を半期報告書と併せて内閣総理大臣に提出する場合において、公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けた場合における第一項及び第二項の規定の適用については、第一項中「内閣府令で定める事項」とあるのは「内閣府令で定める事項（第十三項に規定する半期代替書面に記載された事項を除く。）」と、第二項中「同項に規定する事項」とあるのは「同項に規定する事項（第十三項に規定する半期代替書面に記載された事項を除く。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Status Report of Parent Company, etc. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of said statement or said other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Status Report of Parent Company, etc. (meaning Status Report of Parent Company, etc. as provided for in Article 24-7(1); the same shall apply hereinafter), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Status Report of Parent Company, etc. for the public interest or protection of investors"; the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Status Report of Parent Company, etc." and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Status Report of Parent Company, etc." and "an amendment report," respectively: the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement"; and the part "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Status Report of Parent Company, etc." and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は、親会社等状況報告書について準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「親会社等状況報告書（第二十四条の七第一項に規定する親会社等状況報告書をいう。以下同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「親会社等状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「親会社等状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「親会社等状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-25 (1) A person who is required to submit a Report of Possession of Large Volume shall, if, after the day when the person has come to be a Large Volume Holder, the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. (meaning the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. set forth in Article 27-23(4); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter) has increased or decreased by 1% or more (excluding the case where said increase or decrease does not result in increase or decrease in the Total Number of Share Certificates, etc. Held by said person; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter), or where there arises any other matters specified by a Cabinet Order as changes in important matters to be contained in the Report of Possession of Large Volume, submit to the Prime Minister a report on the changed matters (hereinafter referred to as a "Change Report") within five days from the change, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided, however, that this shall not apply to a Change Report that reports a decrease of 1% or more in the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc., in which case a Change Report reporting that the Holding Ratio of Share Certificates, etc. are 5% or less has already been submitted or to other cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の二十五　大量保有報告書を提出すべき者は、大量保有者となつた日の後に、株券等保有割合（第二十七条の二十三第四項に規定する株券等保有割合をいう。以下この章において同じ。）が百分の一以上増加し又は減少した場合（保有株券等の総数の増加又は減少を伴わない場合を除く。以下この章において同じ。）その他の大量保有報告書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更として政令で定めるものがあつた場合は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、その日から五日以内に、当該変更に係る事項に関する報告書（以下「変更報告書」という。）を内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、株券等保有割合が百分の一以上減少したことによる変更報告書で当該変更報告書に記載された株券等保有割合が百分の五以下であるものを既に提出している場合その他の内閣府令で定める場合については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) When the Prime Minister is required to issue a decision under paragraph (1) (limited to the decision pertaining to Article 178(1)(ii)) or a decision under the preceding paragraph, if he/she needs to issue one or more decisions (hereinafter referred to as the "New Decision" in this paragraph) in relation to the Ongoing Disclosure Documents for the same Business Year Subject to Disclosure as the Business Year Subject to Disclosure for the Ongoing Disclosure Documents pertaining to the one or more decisions already issued under paragraph (1) or the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as the "Prior Decision" in this paragraph), he/she shall, with regard to said New Decision, issue an order to pay to the national treasury an administrative monetary penalty equivalent to the amount derived by the following: deducting the amount specified in item (ii) from the amount specified in item (i), and then prorating such amount after deduction in proportion to the Surcharge Amount Calculated for Respective Decision in relation to the fact pertaining to the respective New Decision pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, in lieu of the amount set forth in Article 172-2(1) or (2) or the preceding paragraph; provided, however, that when the amount listed in item (i) does not exceed the amount listed in item (ii), he/she may not issue an administrative monetary penalty payment order under Article 172-2(1) or (2) or the preceding paragraph: 例文帳に追加

３　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の決定（第百七十八条第一項第二号に係るものに限る。）又は前項の決定をしなければならない場合において、既に第一項又は前項の規定によりなされた一以上の決定（以下この項において「既決定」という。）に係る継続開示書類と同一の記載対象事業年度に係る継続開示書類について一以上の決定（以下この項において「新決定」という。）をしなければならないときは、当該新決定について、第百七十二条の二第一項若しくは第二項又は前項の規定による額に代えて、第一号に掲げる額から第二号に掲げる額を控除した額を内閣府令で定めるところによりそれぞれの新決定に係る事実について個別決定ごとの算出額に応じて按分して得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命ずる旨の決定をしなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる額が第二号に掲げる額を超えないときは、同条第一項若しくは第二項又は前項の規定による課徴金の納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(viii) a document evidencing that a splitting company in absorption-type company split has given the public notice and the notices under Article 789, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act (excluding item (iii), and including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793, paragraph (2) of said Act) (in cases where, in addition to public notice in an official gazette, a public notice by publication in a daily newspaper that publishes matters on current affairs or by method of electronic public notices pursuant to the provision of Article 789, paragraph (3) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 793, paragraph (2) of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), that the public notice was given by such method (in the cases excluding where separate notices are not required to be given pursuant to the provision of Article 789, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act, that the public notice and the notices were given)), and, if any creditor has raised an objection, a document evidencing that the company has made a payment or provided equivalent security to such creditor or has entrusted equivalent property for the purpose of making such creditor receive the payment, or that there is no risk of harm to such creditor by such absorption-type company split; and 例文帳に追加

八　吸収分割会社において会社法第七百八十九条第二項（第三号を除き、同法第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による公告及び催告（同法第七百八十九条第三項（同法第七百九十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この号において同じ。）の規定により公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によつてした場合にあつては、これらの方法による公告（同法第七百八十九条第三項の規定により各別の催告をすることを要しない場合以外の場合にあつては、当該公告及び催告））をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該吸収分割をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(viii) a document evidencing that a splitting company in incorporation-type company split has given the public notice and the notices under Article 810, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act (excluding item (iii), and including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813, paragraph (2) of said Act) (in cases where, in addition to public notice in an official gazette, a public notice has been given by publication in a daily newspaper that publishes matters on current affairs or by means of electronic public notices pursuant to the provision of Article 810, paragraph (3) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 813, paragraph (2) of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), that the public notice was given by such method (in the cases excluding where separate notices are not required to be given pursuant to the provision of Article 810, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act, that the public notice and the notices were given)), and, if any creditor has raised an objection, a document evidencing that the company has made a payment or provided equivalent security to such creditor or has entrusted equivalent property for the purpose of making such creditor receive the payment, or that there is no risk of harm to such creditor by such incorporation-type company split; and 例文帳に追加

八　新設分割会社において会社法第八百十条第二項（第三号を除き、同法第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による公告及び催告（同法第八百十条第三項（同法第八百十三条第二項において準用する場合を含む。以下この号において同じ。）の規定により公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によつてした場合にあつては、これらの方法による公告（同法第八百十条第三項の規定により各別の催告をすることを要しない場合以外の場合にあつては、当該公告及び催告））をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該新設分割をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

1. In cases where the travel does not include any travel between Japan (meaning Japan as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1), item (iv) of the Act on Travel Expenses of National Public Servants (Act No. 114 of 1950); the same shall apply hereinafter) and a foreign state (meaning territories other than the territory of Japan (including international waters); the same shall apply hereinafter), the amount specified by the Supreme Court as the amount of transportation expenses normally required to travel the distance between the place where the principal building of the summary court that has jurisdiction over the location of the general venue of the party, etc. is located and the place where the principal building of the summary court that has jurisdiction over the place where the party, etc. appears, on the basis of such distance (if these places are the same, the amount specified by the Supreme Court); provided, however, that the amount of transportation expenses actually paid shall apply when the party, etc. submits documents such as receipts, train tickets, airline boarding pass stubs, and the like, which clearly indicate that the travel used an ordinary route and means and that the amount actually paid exceeds the amount specified by the Supreme Court; 例文帳に追加

（１）　旅行が本邦（国家公務員等の旅費に関する法律（昭和二十五年法律第百十四号）第二条第一項第四号に規定する本邦をいう。以下同じ。）と外国（本邦以外の領域（公海を含む。）をいう。以下同じ。）との間のものを含まない場合においては、当事者等の普通裁判籍の所在地を管轄する簡易裁判所の主たる庁舎の所在する場所と出頭した場所を管轄する簡易裁判所の主たる庁舎の所在する場所との間の距離を基準として、その距離を旅行するときに通常要する交通費の額として最高裁判所が定める額（これらの場所が同一となるときは、最高裁判所が定める額）。ただし、旅行が通常の経路及び方法によるものであること並びに現に支払つた交通費の額が当該最高裁判所が定める額を超えることを明らかにする領収書、乗車券、航空機の搭乗券の控え等の文書が提出されたときは、現に支払つた交通費の額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Article 55(3) to (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to an order under the provisions of paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (6) of said Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judicial decision on the petition set forth in paragraph (1) or in paragraph (5) of said Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, the provisions of paragraph (7) of said Article shall apply mutatis mutandis to an order under the provisions of paragraph (5) of said Article as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, the provisions of paragraph (8) and paragraph (9) of said Article and Article 55-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to an order under the provisions of paragraph (1) (excluding an order granting the temporary restraining order or the temporary restraining order to give public notice set forth in Article 55(1)(i)), the provisions of Article 55(10) shall apply mutatis mutandis to expenses required for the petition set forth in paragraph (1) or execution of an order under the provisions of said paragraph (excluding an order granting the temporary restraining order or the temporary restraining order to give public notice set forth in paragraph (1)(i) of said Article), the provisions of Article 83-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the case where an order under the provisions of paragraph (1) (limited to an order granting the temporary restraining order and the temporary restraining order to give public notice set forth in Article 55(1)(iii)) has been executed. In this case, the phrase "possessor other than the obligor" in Article 55(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "possessor who is neither the obligor nor the owner of real property." 例文帳に追加

５　第五十五条第三項から第五項までの規定は第一項の規定による決定について、同条第六項の規定は第一項又はこの項において準用する同条第五項の申立てについての裁判について、同条第七項の規定はこの項において準用する同条第五項の規定による決定について、同条第八項及び第九項並びに第五十五条の二の規定は第一項の規定による決定（第五十五条第一項第一号に掲げる保全処分又は公示保全処分を命ずるものを除く。）について、第五十五条第十項の規定は第一項の申立て又は同項の規定による決定（同条第一項第一号に掲げる保全処分又は公示保全処分を命ずるものを除く。）の執行に要した費用について、第八十三条の二の規定は第一項の規定による決定（第五十五条第一項第三号に掲げる保全処分及び公示保全処分を命ずるものに限る。）の執行がされた場合について準用する。この場合において、第五十五条第三項中「債務者以外の占有者」とあるのは、「債務者及び不動産の所有者以外の占有者」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 19 (1) The Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry shall designate a business operator engaged in business in which the business operator authorizes the use of specified trademarks, trade names or other indications, specify the manner of selling goods or providing services and give guidance continuously on management, pursuant to a standard form contract that provides for the matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry with regard to the conditions of energy use in factories, etc. which belong to a business operator that participates in said business (hereinafter referred to as a "franchisee") (this type of business shall hereinafter be referred to as "chain business" and this type of business operator shall hereinafter be referred to as a "chain business operator"), for which the total energy consumption for a given business year in all factories, etc. which belong to said chain business operator and all factories, etc. pertaining to said chain business which belong to said franchisee as calculated pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order under Article 7, paragraph (2) is beyond the level specified by a Cabinet Order under paragraph (1) of the same Article, as a business operator especially required to promote the rational use of energy. 例文帳に追加

第十九条　経済産業大臣は、定型的な約款による契約に基づき、特定の商標、商号その他の表示を使用させ、商品の販売又は役務の提供に関する方法を指定し、かつ、継続的に経営に関する指導を行う事業であつて、当該約款に、当該事業に加盟する者（以下「加盟者」という。）が設置している工場等におけるエネルギーの使用の条件に関する事項であつて経済産業省令で定めるものに係る定めがあるもの（以下「連鎖化事業」という。）を行う者（以下「連鎖化事業者」という。）のうち、当該連鎖化事業者が設置しているすべての工場等及び当該加盟者が設置している当該連鎖化事業に係るすべての工場等における第七条第二項の政令で定めるところにより算定したエネルギーの年度の使用量の合計量が同条第一項の政令で定める数値以上であるものをエネルギーの使用の合理化を特に推進する必要がある者として指定するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Where an invention which is the subject of any patent has, before the date of the patent, been duly recorded in a document by, or tried by or on behalf of, the officers or authorities administering any department of Government (such invention not having been communicated directly or indirectly by the applicant or patentee), such officers or authorities, or such of their agents, contractors, or others, as may be authorised in writing by them, may, after giving notice to the applicant or patentee, make, use or exercise the invention so recorded or tried for the service of the Government, free of any royalty or other payment to the applicant or patentee, notwithstanding the existence of the patent. If, in the opinion of such officers or authorities, the disclosure to the applicant or patentee, as the case may be, of the document recording the invention, or the evidence of the trial thereof, if required, would be detrimental to the public interest, it may be made confidentially to counsel on behalf of the applicant or patentee, or to any independent expert mutually agreed upon. 例文帳に追加

いずれの特許の対象である発明も、特許付与日以前に、政府部門を管理する職員又は当局により、又はそれに代わって書面に適式に記録され、又は審理された(当該発明は、出願人又は特許権者から直接的であると間接的であるとを問わず開示されていない)場合、特許の存在にもかかわらず、当該職員若しくは当局又は代理人、請負人若しくは自ら書面で授権するその他の者は、出願人又は特許権者に通知を出した後、出願人又は特許権者に使用料等の支払いを行うことなく、そのように記録され又は審理された発明を政府の公務のため生産、使用又は実施することができる。その発明を記録する書類又は審理の証拠を出願人又は特許権者(場合に応じ)へ要請に応じ開示することが公共の利益を害すると当該職員又は当局が思料する場合、出願人若しくは特許権者を代理する弁護士、又は相互に合意する独立の専門家に対し内密に開示することができる。 - 特許庁

(5) For the purposes of section 86(3) and (6), where an English translation of the application or any amendment of the application is required, the translation -- (a) shall exclude the request and abstract unless -- (i) the applicant expressly requests the Registrar to proceed earlier than the expiry of the period prescribed in paragraph (1); and (ii) the application has not been published in accordance with the Patent Co-operation Treaty; (b) shall include any textual matter in the drawings in a form which complies with rule 49.5(d) of the Regulations under the Patent Co-operation Treaty; (c) where a title has been established by the International Searching Authority under rule 37.2 of the Regulations under the Patent Co-operation Treaty which differs from the title included in the application as originally filed, shall include the former title in place of the latter; and (d) may exclude any textual matter contained in a sequence listing forming part of the description if such textual matter complies with rule 12.1(d) of the Regulations under the Patent Co-operation Treaty and the description complies with rule 5.2(b) of those Regulations.例文帳に追加

(5) 第86条(3)及び(6)の適用上，出願又は出願の補正書の英語翻訳文が要求される場合において，当該翻訳文には， (a) (i) 出願人が登録官に対し，(1)に定める期間の満了よりも早期に手続を開始することを明確に請求しており，かつ (ii) 出願が特許協力条約に従って公開されていない場合， を除いて，当該請求及び要約を含めないものとし， (b) 特許協力条約に基づく規則の第49規則5(d)に従った様式による図面中の字句部分を含めるものとし， (c) 特許協力条約に基づく規則の第37規則2に基づいて国際調査機関が原出願に記載された名称とは異なる名称を設定した場合は，当該新名称の代わりに旧名称を含めるものとし，かつ (d) 説明の一部を形成する配列一覧に含まれる字句部分については，当該字句部分が特許協力条約に基づく規則の第12規則1(d)を遵守し，かつ，当該説明が同規則の第5規則2(b)を遵守する場合は，これを除外することができる。 - 特許庁

If a person sells, or exposes for sale, or has in his possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacturer any goods or things to which a false trademark or a false trade description is applied or which, being required under section 108 to have applied to them an indication of the country or place in which they were made or produced or the name and address of the manufacturer or producer or the person for whom the goods are manufactured or produced are without the indication so require, he shall, unless the proves (a) that, having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence against this section, he had at the time of the commission of the alleged offence no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description or that any offence had been committed in respect of the goods; and (b) that, on demand by or on behalf of the prosecutor he gave all the information in his power with respect to the person from whom he obtained such goods or things; or (c) that otherwise he acted innocently, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 (two) years, or with fine, or with both, and in case of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 3 (three) years, or with fine, or with both. 例文帳に追加

不正な商標若しくは虚偽の商品表示を付して、又は、第108条の規定により付すことが求められる製造若しくは生産される国若しくは地域、又は製造者若しくは生産者又は商品がその者のために製造若しくは生産される者の名称及び住所を表示することなく、商品又は物品を販売する者、又は販売用の展示を行う者、又は販売目的、取引若しくは製造の目的で所持する者は、次に掲げる事項が証明されない限り、2年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科、再犯若しくは累犯はいずれの場合も3年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科する。(a)本条に定める侵害に対して合理的なすべての予防措置を講じており、侵害があったとされる時点で、当該商標若しくは商品表示の真実性を疑う、又は当該商品に関して何らかの違反があったことを疑う、どのような理由もなかったこと。(b)検察官の要求に応じて、又は検察官のために、当該商品又は物品の入手先である者について自己の権限が及ぶ限りすべての情報を提供したこと。(c)その他の点においても正直に行動したこと。 - 特許庁

(3) If the employment insurance rate has been modified pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1), with regard to the application of Article 19 of the New Collection Act to the business operators who are required to submit the notification pursuant to the same Article, paragraph (1) or (2) during the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007 (excluding the business operators in respect of which the cause of the submission of the notification pursuant to the same Article, paragraph (1) or (2) occurs on and after the date of modification) and to the business operators who are required to pay the labor insurance premiums pursuant to the same Article, paragraph (3) in the same year (excluding the business operators in respect of which the cause of the payment of the labor insurance premiums pursuant to the same paragraph occurs on and after the date of modification), the term "every insurance year the declaration form...the following" in the same Article, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the declaration form...the following", the term "the following insurance year" with "the insurance year following the insurance year starting on April 1, 2006", the term "the midst of an insurance year" with "the midst of such insurance year", the term "within 50 days" with "within the number of days calculated by adding to 50 days the number of days from the first day of such insurance year to the day preceding the date of modification prescribed by Article 53-2, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Revising a Portion of the Employment Insurance Act, etc. (Act No. 30 of 2007) (hereinafter referred to as the "date of modification" in this Article)", the term "employed during such insurance year" with "employed during the insurance year starting on April 1, 2006", the term "in case of establishment or extinction of the insurance relation in the midst of an insurance year" with "in case of establishment of the insurance relation in the midst of an insurance year or extinction of the insurance relation in the midst of the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007", the term "during such insurance year" with "during the insurance year in which such insurance relation is established or becomes extinct", the term "the general insurance premiums...and...for such insurance year" in item (ii)(a) of the same paragraph with "the general insurance premiums...and...for the insurance year starting on April 1, 2006", the term "and...for such insurance year" in item (ii)(c) of the same paragraph with "and...for the insurance year starting on April 1, 2006", the term "for such insurance year" in item (iii) of the same paragraph with "for the insurance year starting on April 1, 2006", and the term "within 50 days" in the same Article, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "within the number of days calculated by adding to 50 days the number of days from the first day of such insurance year to the day preceding the date of modification", and the term "the following insurance year" in the same Article, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the insurance year following the insurance year starting on April 1, 2006", the term "within 50 days" with "within the number of days calculated by adding to 50 days the number of days from the first day of the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007 to the day preceding the date of modification". 例文帳に追加

３　第一項の雇用保険率の変更があった場合において、平成十九年四月一日から始まる保険年度において新徴収法第十九条第一項又は第二項の規定により申告書を提出すべき事業主（変更日以後に同条第一項又は第二項の規定により申告書を提出すべき事由が生じた事業主を除く。）及び同条第三項の規定により労働保険料を納付すべき事業主（変更日以後に同項の規定により労働保険料を納付すべき事由が生じた事業主を除く。）に係る同条の規定の適用については、同条第一項中「保険年度ごとに、次に」とあるのは「次に」と、「次の保険年度」とあるのは「平成十八年四月一日から始まる保険年度の次の保険年度」と、「保険年度の中途」とあるのは「その保険年度の中途」と、「五十日以内」とあるのは「五十日にその保険年度の初日から雇用保険法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十九年法律第三十号）附則第五十三条の二第二項に規定する変更日（以下この条において「変更日」という。）の前日までの日数を加えた日数以内」と、「その保険年度に使用した」とあるのは「平成十八年四月一日から始まる保険年度に使用した」と、「消滅したもの」とあるのは「平成十九年四月一日から始まる保険年度の中途に保険関係が消滅したもの」と、「その保険年度において」とあるのは「当該保険関係が成立し、又は消滅した保険年度において」と、「一般保険料及びその保険年度」とあるのは「一般保険料及び平成十八年四月一日から始まる保険年度」と、「並びにその保険年度」とあるのは「並びに平成十八年四月一日から始まる保険年度」と、「、その保険年度における」とあるのは「、平成十八年四月一日から始まる保険年度における」と、同条第二項中「五十日以内」とあるのは「五十日にその保険年度の初日から変更日の前日までの日数を加えた日数以内」と、同条第三項中「次の保険年度」とあるのは「平成十八年四月一日から始まる保険年度の次の保険年度」と、「五十日以内」とあるのは「五十日に平成十九年四月一日から始まる保険年度の初日から変更日の前日までの日数を加えた日数以内」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム