「中・一」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(66ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

第六十五条　第十一条の規定の施行前に旧ガス事業法第三十九条の十七又は第三十九条の十八の規定による届出をした者は、新ガス事業法第三十九条の五の規定による届出をしたものとみなす。この場合において、これらの者についての新ガス事業法第三十九条の四、第三十九条の十第一項、第三十九条の十二、第三十九条の十四及び第三十九条の十八第二号の規定の適用については、新ガス事業法第三十九条の四中「同条の規定による届出に係る型式（以下単に「届出に係る型式」という。）」とあるのは「通商産業省関係の基準・認証制度等の整理及び合理化に関する法律（平成十一年法律第百二十一号）第十一条の規定による改正前のガス事業法第三十九条の十七又は第三十九条の十八の規定による届出に係る構造のガス用品の属する型式（以下単に「届出に係る構造のガス用品の属する型式」という。）」と、新ガス事業法第三十九条の十第一項、第三十九条の十二、第三十九条の十四及び第三十九条の十八第二号中「届出に係る型式」とあるのは「届出に係る構造のガス用品の属する型式」とする。例文帳に追加

Article 65 A person who has given a notification under Article 39-17 or Article 39-18 of the Old Gas Business Act prior to the enforcement of Article 11 shall be deemed to have given a notification under Article 39-5 of the New Gas Business Act. In this case, with regard to the application of the provisions of Article 39-4, Article 39-10, paragraph 1, Article 39-12, Article 39-14, and Article 39-18, item 2 of the New Gas Business Act to such a person, the phrase "the model to which the notification given under the said Article pertained (hereinafter simply referred to as the "Model to Which Notification Pertained")" in Article 39-4 of the New Gas Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the model by which the Gas Equipment with the structure to which the notification given under Article 39-17 or Article 39-18 of the Gas Business Act prior to the revision by Article 11 of the Act on Consolidation and Streamlining of Standards and Certification Systems Relating to the Ministry of International Trade and Industry (Act No. 121 of 1999) pertained is categorized (hereinafter simply referred to as the "Model by which the Gas Equipment with the Structure Pertaining to Notification Is Categorized")" and the phrase "Model Pertaining to Notification" in Article 39-10, paragraph 1, Article 39-12, Article 39-14, and Article 39-18, item 2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Model by which the Gas Equipment with the Structure Pertaining to Notification Is Categorized."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　私的独占の禁止及び公正取引の確保に関する法律第八条の二（排除措置）、第二十条（不公正な取引方法に係る排除措置）、第二十五条（無過失損害賠償責任）、第二十六条（損害賠償請求権の裁判上の主張の制限、消滅時効）及び第八章第二節（手続）（第四十六条、第四十九条第三項から第五項まで、第五十条、第五十一条、第五十三条、第五十五条第二項、第五項及び第六項、第五十九条第二項、第六十五条、第六十七条、第六十九条第三項、第七十条の二第四項、第七十条の九から第七十条の十一まで並びに第七十条の十二第一項を除く。）の規定の適用については、前項に規定する違反行為は同法第十九条（不公正な取引方法の禁止）の規定に違反する行為（事業者団体が事業者に当該行為に該当する行為をさせるようにする場合にあつては、同法第八条第一項第五号（事業者団体による不公正な取引方法の禁止）の不公正な取引方法に該当する行為）と、排除命令は排除措置命令とみなす。この場合において、同法第四十九条第一項（排除措置命令）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「違反行為を排除し、又は違反行為が排除されたことを確保するために必要な措置」とあるのは「その行為の差止め若しくはその行為が再び行われることを防止するために必要な事項又はこれらの実施に関連する公示その他必要な事項」と、同条第二項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同条第六項中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、「六十日」とあるのは「三十日」と、同法第七十条の十五（事件記録の閲覧・謄写又は排除措置命令書等の謄抄本の交付）中「排除措置命令書」とあるのは「排除命令書」と、同法第七十条の二十一（行政手続法の適用除外）中「第三章」とあるのは「第三章（第十三条第一項及び第三節を除く。）」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) Violation as provided for in the preceding Paragraph shall be deemed as violation of Article 19 (Prohibition of unfair trade practices) of the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade (in the case where trade associations induce entrepreneurs to employ such acts as falls under the said violation, such acts as falls under unfair trade practices as provided for in the Article 8 (1) (v) of the said Act (Prohibition of unfair trade practices by trade associations)), and a cease and desist order under this Act shall be deemed as a cease and desist order under the Act on Prohibition of Private Monopolization and Maintenance of Fair Trade, for the purpose of applying the provisions of Article 8-2 (Elimination measures against trade associations), Article 20 (Elimination measures against unfair trade practices), Article 25 (Absolute liability), Article 26 (Restriction on exercise of the right to claim for damages in court, prescription) and provisions of Section 2 (Procedures) of Chapter VIII (Excluding Article 46, Article 49 (3) through (5) inclusive, Article 50, Article 51, Article 53, Article 55 (2), (5) and (6), Article 59 (2), Article 65, Article 67, Article 69 (3), Article 70-2 (4), Article 70-9 through 70-11 inclusive, and Article 70-12 (1)). In this case, in Article 49 (1), the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the written (cease and desist) order"; and the term "the measures necessary to eliminate the violation or to ensure that the violation is eliminated" shall be replaced with "the matters necessary to cease such an act, or to prevent the resurgence of the said act, or to take any other matters including public notice of the matters relating to the implementation of such measures"; in paragraph (2) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "a written cease and desist order"; in Paragraph (6) of the said Article, the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order," and the term "sixty days" shall be replaced with "thirty days"; in Article 70-15 the term "the written cease and desist order" shall be replaced with "the cease and desist order"; and in Article 70-21, the term "Chapter III" shall be replaced with "Chapter III (Excluding Article 13 (1) and Section 3).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

アメリカはああいう自由な国でもございますし、非常に民主主義、私はアメリカという国は、非常に変化が激しくて、そして非常に多様な国だと思います。多様な価値観がある国だと思いますよ。ですから、規制改革をして、本当にこの20年、30年、特に金融に関しては、ウォール街を中心に金融工学の発達もございましたし、世界の金余りというのがある、それも非常にアメリカに集中してきたということもございまして、新しい分野を開くといいますか、それはアメリカ人らしいフロンティア精神、よく言えばフロンティア精神、しかし、それがご存じのように、一つの企業だけではリスクテイクできなくなっていく、ご存じのようにリーマン・ブラザーズという投資銀行が崩壊、破綻したわけですね。それがご存じのように、もう非常に世界の金融ショック、世界の経済の中心がやはり何といってもアメリカでしたから、もうだから、そのために、しかしご存じのように、結局は納税者にそのツケを持ってくるのかと。例文帳に追加

The U.S. is a free country, and I also see the U.S. as a country of extremely fast changes and also of an extreme diversity – a country of diverse values, indeed. Those qualities pushed the U.S. to embark on regulatory reforms that led to, notably in the area of financial services, advances in financial engineering in the last 20 to 30 years that were most prominent on Wall Street. Helped also by the fact that global investment money, of which there was so much, was just poured into the U.S., Americans explored a new field by exerting their characteristic frontier spirit. However, things escalated to the point where it became impossible for companies to take risk on their own, resulting in, as you know, the failure and bankruptcy of the Lehman Brothers investment bank. This brought about the global financial crisis because the world's economic center was, all in all, the U.S. The question is whether the cost is going to be passed on to taxpayers in the end.  - 金融庁

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。例文帳に追加

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well.  - 金融庁

次に、ご質問の趣旨はもう一つの側面、すなわち今回合意された14のプリンシプルを、あたかもこれがルールであるかのように解釈をして、これに基づいて何か不利益処分がなされるのではないか、その結果として、このプリンシプルについて金商法あるいは内部統制で懸念されたような問題を生じさせるのではないかということでございますけれども、これは金曜日（18日）に発表させていただいた内容の中にも入っていたと思いますけれども、プリンシプルは、業者の側で自主的に改善努力をする際の拠り所になる、あるいはベスト・プラクティスの拠り所となるものであって、合意されたプリンシプルのみに基づいて当局、金融庁が不利益処分を行うことはないということは明言しているわけであります。例文帳に追加

Now, I will turn to your question: is there not concern that the 14 principles agreed upon this time will be interpreted as rules that may be used as a basis for taking administrative disciplinary action? Will they not thus prompt financial service providers to overreact, like in the cases of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act and the rules on the internal control report system? As we made clear in our press release last Friday (April 18), these principles should be used as a reference for financial service providers to make voluntary improvement efforts or adopt best practices, and the FSA will not take disciplinary action solely on the basis of the principles.  - 金融庁

こういった収益状況の背景としては、これも先般もお話ししたところでございますけれども、第一に、サブプライムの関連を含む証券化商品等に関して、損失額自体は減少してきていますけれども、国際的な市場の緊張が続く中で我が国の金融機関についても損失が引き続き発生しているということ、第二に、原油・原材料価格の高騰等を背景に景気の下振れリスクが高まっており、不良債権処理をはじめとする与信関係費用が増加しているということ、そして第三に、預貸ビジネス、あるいは手数料ビジネスといった本業における収益力が伸び悩んでいるという状況にあること、こういったことが背景にあると思っております。例文帳に追加

These results came about against the background of - I also talked about this recently - firstly, the losses that are still arising at Japanese financial institutions amid the continued tensions in the global markets, although the amount of losses is declining. Secondly, an increase in credit-related expenses, such as the cost of disposing of non-performing loans, that was caused by growing downside risks for the economy due to the surge in the prices of crude oil and raw materials. And thirdly, the weakness of the growth in their core businesses, such as lending and fee income businesses.  - 金融庁

それに対しまして、再三申していますように、サブプライム・ローンの問題そのものでは日本の金融機関は痛んでいないものの、その一方でサブプライムを契機として世界経済が厳しくなる中で日本の実体経済に陰りが見え、それが金融機関に波及するということで、若干順序などが違うのかなと考えておりますが、まずは米国当局が現状をどう捉えているのか、例えばGSE（政府支援機関）の問題であったり地方銀行の問題であったり、最新の情勢を踏まえて、当局としてどんな判断を考えているのかきちんと情報収集や確認を行いたいと思っています。例文帳に追加

Meanwhile, as I have said over and over again, Japanese financial institutions have escaped damage from the subprime mortgage problem itself, while they have been affected by the weakening of the Japanese economy caused by the increasingly severe condition of the global economy; thus, the sequences of events in the two countries seem to be somewhat different. First, I would like to gather information and ascertain how the U.S. authorities assess the current situation -- for example, how they assess the problems of the GSEs (government-sponsored enterprises) and regional banks in light of the most up-to-date data.  - 金融庁

これはもう非常に、私も何回も（国会の質問が）当たりましたし、私は何回も言いますように、金融庁は政策金融・政府系金融は扱っておりませんから、ご存じのように中小企業であれば経済産業省、それから住宅については住宅金融支援機構、これは要するに旧住宅金融金庫、これは国土交通省ですし、それから農林水産（業）、これは非常に政策金融の強い分野ですけれども、これは農林水産省ですから、そんなところと、当然利子の補給、それは金融庁だって当然民間金融（の所管官庁）でございますから、原資は基本的に人から預かっている預金ですから、それに若干の利子をつけてお返しをするというのが民間金融機関の原則ですから、それはきちんと大事な人から預かった金は、基本的に民間金融機関の貸出原資でございますから、それは利子をつけないとか、そういうことはそう一律にはできません。例文帳に追加

I took questions in the Diet over and over again, and as I repeatedly said, the FSA does not handle policy-based finance or have jurisdiction over government-affiliated financial institutions. As you know, policy-based finance for SMEs is handled by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, while a housing financing scheme of Japan Housing Finance Agency, which was formerly known as Housing Loan Corporation, is under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism. Policy-based finance for agriculture, forestry and fisheries, which are fields where policy-based finance play a very large role, is handled by the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. Financial institutions under the jurisdiction of the FSA should not be treated in the same way as financing schemes under the jurisdiction of those ministries. Basically, the financial source of private financial institutions is deposits and their basic premise is that they repay deposits with interest. Therefore, we cannot universally require them to provide no-interest loans.  - 金融庁

私は、各論につきましては、金融庁を預からせていただいている人間として、国権の最高機関は国会でございまして、唯一の立法機関でございますから、その中の政党が色々全能・全知を傾けてつくられた二重ローン問題に対する対策案だと確信いたしておりますから、私は今の立場から、各党案について、コメントするのは控えさせていただきたいと思っておりますけれども、今さっきご指摘の企業再生支援機構は、色々ございますが、これは適時適切に、常識的にきちんと支援をされていくということが非常に大事ですから、そういったことを含めて、国会審議が始まれば、きちんとやっていきたいと思っております。例文帳に追加

As the Minister who oversees the FSA, I would like to refrain from making comments on the specifics of the three parties' plans. I am convinced that the parties, as players in the Diet, which is the highest organ of state power and the sole legislative organ, have formulated their plans for dealing with the double loan problem by fully exercising their capabilities and wisdom. As for Enterprise Turnaround Initiative Corporation of Japan, which you mentioned in your question, it is important that this corporation provide appropriate support in a timely manner based on common sense, so when the Diet deliberation has started, I will appropriately handle this matter with that in mind.  - 金融庁

私にとりましては、あるいは日本にとりましては、今回の危機は「100年に一度」ではなくて、「10年で2度目」でございます。ご案内のように、我が国は、1990年代の末に深刻な金融危機を経験したわけでございまして、私に言わせれば、日本にとっては、前回の危機の方がより深刻であったと思います。前回の危機は、日本自身が作ったバブルでございますし、銀行がそのバブルの生成に深く関与していたということでございます。錯綜した債権・債務関係が生じ、その中には「飛ばし」と呼ばれるような形もございました。不良債権問題というのは、借り手の側から見れば過剰債務問題ということでもございました。こういうことで、いわば内生的に発生した危機、内生的な危機であったと思います。例文帳に追加

For me, or for Japan, this is the second crisis in a decade, rather than a once in a century crisis. As you know, Japan experienced a serious financial crisis in the late 1990s, and in my opinion, the previous crisis was more serious than the current one. The previous crisis resulted from the economic bubble created by Japan itself. Banks were deeply involved in the creation of the bubble. Complicated webs of credit-debt relationship, including an arrangement called “tobashi,” were formed. From the viewpoint of borrowers, the bad-loan problem was a problem of excessive debts. In this sense, that crisis was an internally-generated one.  - 金融庁

新長官に伺います。危機後の金融規制をめぐる国際的な議論というのが、本格的に始まっていると思います。ＦＳＢ（金融安定理事会）の中でも、日本の金融庁がステアリングコミッティ（運営委員会）で、そういう委員の位置を占めまして、積極的に新しい規制環境作りに関与していくのだと思いますが、例えば、その具体例の一つとして、新しい自己資本規制のあり方とか、または可変的な引当てといった問題、ダイナミック・プロビジョンとか、そういういろいろな個別のテーマが出ておりますが、三國谷長官として、日本はどのようなことを主張していくのか、どう貢献していくのかというご見解を伺えればと思います。例文帳に追加

I have a question for Mr. Mikuniya. International debate about post-crisis financial regulation has started in earnest. At the FSB (Financial Stability Board), I expect that Japan, as a member of the Steering Committee, will actively participate in efforts to create a new regulatory environment. As examples of such efforts, various specific themes have been proposed, including the introduction of a new capital adequacy requirement and dynamic provisioning. What points do you think Japan should argue for and how do you think it should make contributions to the debate?  - 金融庁

この手の枠組みと申しましょうか、取組みというのはそれほど新規のものではなくて、例えば、ご案内のとおり我が国は世界に先駆けて昨年の３月末からバーゼル II を実施に移したわけでございますが、そのバーゼル II 実施に先立って、例えば我が国の３メガバンクが進出をしている国の監督当局、すなわち世界の主要なマーケットの監督当局が東京に集まって、スーパーヴァイザリー・カレッジということで、３メガバンクそれぞれの銀行のリスク管理の状況等について、我が金融庁が中心的な参加者でありますけれども、他の主要国の監督当局の方々も一緒に集まってモニターをしたということもございました。例文帳に追加

A framework or approach like this is nothing new. For example, before the implementation of the Basel II framework - as you know, Japan was the first in the world to put it into force at the end of March last year - the supervisory authorities of the countries in which Japan's three megabanks are operating, namely, the supervisory authorities of the world's major markets, gathered in Tokyo for a "supervisory college" meeting. On that occasion, the foreign supervisory authorities, together with the FSA, monitored the three megabanks' risk management status.  - 金融庁

それからこの12兆円すべてが使われるということでも必ずしもないかもしれませんが、仮に一つの前提としてすべての預金取扱金融機関のうち半分くらいの金融機関がこれを使うというふうに前提をいたしますと、その半分の金融機関について自己資本で4パーセンテージ・ポイント上昇するということでありますし、それからティア1の自己資本、中核的自己資本について、今の半数の金融機関という前提で考えるとこれが1.5倍になるというくらいの規模でございまして、そういう意味で、先ほど申し上げましたような相当な大きなボラティリティがあっても対応できるような規模にしたということでございます。例文帳に追加

Assuming that the whole of the 12 trillion yen is used - although the full amount may not necessarily be used - to recapitalize half of all deposit-taking financial institutions in Japan, their ratio of Tier 1 core capital would rise by 4 percentage points. The amount of Tier 1 capital at those financial institutions will increase by 50%. Thus, the quota has been increased to an amount sufficient to deal with a fairly high level of volatility.  - 金融庁

この寄稿の中には、意見にわたる部分、個人的見解にわたる部分も含まれておりますけれども、金融庁としての概ねのコンセンサスとしても、例えば、個別金融機関ごとのビジネスモデルの違いによるリスク・プロファイルの違いを的確に把握することなく、あるいは適切な資産価値評価というものを十分に重視せずに、つまり、自己資本比率を計算する際の分母の部分、分母のリスクアセットの計算の正確性ということに十分に力点を置かずに、一律に自己資本の水準を引き上げる議論というものに対しては注意が必要であるという認識を持っているということが言えるかと思います。例文帳に追加

Although this article included some personal opinions of my own, there is a consensus within the FSA, for example on the idea that it is necessary to remain cautious about the argument that the required capital adequacy level should be raised universally without accurately identifying the differences in business models and risk profiles between individual financial institutions or paying adequate attention to an appropriate assessment of asset value, namely without putting sufficient emphasis on the accuracy of the risk asset amount, which constitutes the denominator of the calculation formula of the capital adequacy ratio.  - 金融庁

従来の、ねずみの通行途中での足の行く手の障害となることを狙い定めた、粘着シートや粘着材底面塗付のハウス乃至ボックス型では捕獲を完全ならしめられず、叉、捕獲できた場合の後処理にて、ねずみの死に損ないの有り様を直視してしまうわずらわしさ、実際にねずみを水などに、手で押さえながら突っ込ませ、ちっ息死させねばならない手間を省き、以上の難点を払拭させることが可能な、いわば袋小路的要素で、ねずみの行く手を阻み、逃げられる可能性をも封じ込み、同時に、ちっ息死させることにより、最後は目に触れず、それ以上人の力、水の力を貸り、殺す手間まで省け容易に、双方向からと、２匹以上一挙に捕獲・処理できることを提供する。例文帳に追加

This attack board choking box for capturing rats is provided by setting and fixing an adhesive board (2) which is prepared by pasting an adhesive (3) on a skeleton (4) at the central part of a box (1) without pasting the adhesive on the bottom as in conventional house- or box-type ones. - 特許庁

反応槽内の気相部分における各モノマーの臨界温度、臨界圧力、およびそれぞれの組成比からＰｅｎｇ−Ｒｏｂｉｎｓｏｎ式を用いて算出した臨界定数の換算温度が０．９５以上、換算圧力が０．８０以上の条件下で行なわれる、バッチ式共重合法による含フッ素エラストマーの製造方法であって、一般式：Ｒｆ・Ｉｘ（ただし、式中、Ｒｆは炭素数１〜１６の飽和もしくは不飽和のフルオロ炭化水素基またはクロロフルオロ炭化水素基であり、ｘはＲｆの結合手の数であって、１以上４以下の整数である）の存在下に、少なくとも１種のフルオロオレフィンを含むエチレン性不飽和化合物を共重合させる。例文帳に追加

Ethylenic unsaturated compounds containing at least one kind of fluoro-olefin are copolymerized in the presence of general formula: Rf×I_x (wherein, Rf is a 1-16C saturated or unsaturated fluorohydrocarbon group or chlorofluorohydrocarbon group; x is the number of the bonding arms of Rf and an integer of not less than 1 and not more than 4). - 特許庁

日本では冷媒フロンの替わりにイソブタンを使用。可燃性ガスのイソブタンは、漏れると発火する危険性があるため、安全性を確保するための様々な工夫を行ってきました。従来溶接していた冷却器の配管は、イソブタンの漏洩を防ぐため繋ぎ目を無くしました。更に、１枚のガラス管に入れていた霜取りヒーターを二重のガラス管の中に入れることによって、表面温度をイソブタンの発火点より低く抑え発火を防ぐなど、高い技術力を駆使しノンフロン化に成功したのです。他の冷凍空調機器では、コンビニにおけるショーケースでも、二酸化炭素を冷媒としたノンフロン製品が実用化されており、また、自動販売機にも、ノンフロン・省エネ機があります。これらのノンフロン機器は、まだ一部が実用化されたばかりでその普及はこれからですが、国の補助を用い、ノンフロンの施設や設備の技術開発や導入等の促進がされています。例文帳に追加

In Japan, isobutane is used as a refrigerant instead of fluorocarbon refrigerants. Isobutane is flammable, and so there are many precautions taken to prevent accidents. For instance, refrigerator piping which used to be welded, has been changed to a seamless pipe to prevent gas leakages. Moreover, defroster heaters, which used to be in singlelayer tubes, are now in double-layer tubes, so that surface temperatures never get higher than the combustion point. These forward technologies support the use of nonfluorocarbon. For other refrigeration equipment, such as convenience store show cases, non-fluorocarbon products using carbon dioxide are already in practical use. Also, non-fluorocarbon, energy-efficient automatic vending machines are now in use on the street all over this country. Most of these non-fluorocarbon equipment are recently put in practical use, so they are not wide-spread yet. However, the government is promoting the technical development and installation of non-fluorocarbon facilities and equipment with financial incentives.  - 経済産業省

一方、大学側について見れば、研究開発成果を社会に還元していくことが求められる中で、自校から創出された大学発ベンチャーに対し、資金面の支援を行う場合も想定される。資金面の支援のあり方には様々な形態が考えられるが、出資については、現行の国立大学法人法において、その対象が承認ＴＬＯ以外は認められていない。このような状況を踏まえ、国立大学から大学発ベンチャーへの支援の多様化を図るために、出資の解禁についても検討を行うことが適当である。また、これをより実効的なものとするためには、大学発ベンチャーのビジネスプランや事業価値の評価、各種リスク管理等、大学として出資を適切に判断・実行できるような環境整備も併せて検討する必要がある。例文帳に追加

Some of the universities, which are expected to use the achievements of their research and development for society, might offer financial support to ventures founded by their researchers and students. Financial aid could be provided in a variety of forms. But national universities are prohibited by the current National University Corporation Act from making equity investments, except in approved technology licensing organizations (TLOs). In order to provide national universities with more support options, it would be advisable to consider whether they should also be allowed to have equity in such ventures. To make such schemes more effective, it is also necessary to consider what arrangements should be made to help universities examine a venture’s plan of business and assess its value, manage types of risk, etc., to make a good judgment before making investment.  - 経済産業省

検査内容別の違反事例をみると、平成 15 年の食品衛生法改正に基づき、食品中に残留する農薬、飼料添加物及び動物用医薬品（以下「農薬等」という。）について、一定の量を超えて農薬等が残留する食品の販売等を原則禁止するという新しい制度（以下「ポジティブリスト制度」という。）が平成 18 年 5月 29 日から施行されたことから、残留農薬に係る違反事例（表 8-①）が 455件（28.8％：違反延べ件数（1,580 件）に対する割合）と最も多く、次いで冷凍食品等の微生物規格に係る違反事例（表 8-②）297 件（18.8％）、指定外添加物の使用や使用基準違反等の添加物に係る違反事例（表 8-③） 259 件（16.2％）、残留動物用医薬品に係る違反事例（表 8-④）246 件（15.6％）、有害・有毒物質に係る違反事例（表 8-⑤）242 件（15.3％）の順となっている。例文帳に追加

Based on the 2003 revisions to the Food Sanitation Law, a new system (hereinafter referred to as the “Positive List system”) came into force on May 29, 2006. The Positive List system deals with agricultural chemicals, feed additives and veterinary drugs (hereinafter referred to as “agricultural chemicals, etc.”) which are residual in food products. It prohibits, in principle, the sale, etc. of food products with residual agricultural chemicals, etc. in excess of a certain defined level. Consequently, violations related to residual agricultural chemicals (Table 8-1) were most common at 455 instances (28.8%: ratio to the gross number of violations (1,580)). This was followed by the 297 (18.8%) violations related to microbiological criteria for frozen foods (Table 8-2); the 259 (16.2%) violations related to additives, such as the use of undesignated additives and noncompliance with the standards for use (Table 8-3); the 246 (15.6%) violations related to residual veterinary drugs (Table 8-4); and the 242 (15.3%) violations related to hazardous or toxic substances (Table 8-5). - 厚生労働省

４． 発生前の段階からの情報収集・情報提供体制の構築や収集した情報の公開、発生時の対応を一層強化することが必要であり、このため、厚生労働省のみならず、国立感染症研究所（感染症情報センターやインフルエンザウイルス研究センターを中心に）や、検疫所などの機関、地方自治体の保健所や地方衛生研究所を含めた感染症対策に関わる危機管理を専門に担う組織や人員体制の大幅な強化、人材の育成を進めるとともに、関係機関のあり方や相互の役割分担、関係の明確化等が必要である。特に国立感染症研究所については、米国ＣＤＣ（疾病予防管理センター）を始め各国の感染症を担当する機関を参考にして、より良い組織や人員体制を構築すべきである。例文帳に追加

4. It is necessary to further strengthen countermeasures at the onset of an outbreak, and to develop a system to collect/ provide /communicate/disclose information in the pre-pandemic phase. For this purpose, it is essential to strengthen the institutional capacity and human resources of the Ministry and the National Institute of Infectious Diseases (NIID; the Infectious Diseases Surveillance Center and the Influenza Virus Research Center, in particular), quarantine stations, public health centers and prefectural/city institutes of public health (hereafter, the Institutes). The government needs to significantly improve risk management skills specialized in infectious diseases through strengthening staff structures and individual capacities at these institutions. It is also necessary to determine future roles and the division of labor to clarify relationships among relevant institutions and organizations mentioned above. Particularly, the NIID should be better organized and staffed by reference to the US Centers for Disease Control (US-CDC) and other international organizations in charge of infectious diseases. - 厚生労働省

このようなリンクを張られた原告らが、上記中国法人及び当該法人の日本の代理店である被告による上記行為は原告らの名誉及び信用を毀損する共同不法行為を構成するとともに、原告会社との関係では不正競争防止法第２条第１項第１４号所定の不正競争行為に該当するなどとして、被告に対し、損害賠償等を求めた事案がある。この点、裁判所は、被告が、中国法人において本件ウェブページを作成するに当たり、少なくともそのためのデータや資料を提供するなどして、これに関与していたものであり、ひいては同法人が本件表示行為をするに当たって関与したものと認めるのが相当であり、被告は、本件表示行為について、原告会社との関係で社会的信用を害する虚偽の事実を流布するものであるとして、不正競争防止法第2条第1項第14号の不正競争行為であることを認め、原告個人との関係で名誉・信用毀損、氏名権侵害を認めて、同法人と共同不法行為責任を負うものというべきであるなどとして請求の一部を認めた（大阪地裁平成 19年7月26日判決）。例文帳に追加

Further, the dissemination of false information detrimental to the reputation of another person's business may also constitute an unfair competition (Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the same). In a case where the Plaintiffs (the Company (party P1) and its director (party P2)) filed a claim for compensation of damages etc. against the defendant (a Chinese company (party D1) and its agent in Japan (party D2)) on the ground that the D1, which was P1's competitor, indicated on D1's Japanese website as if P1 were an Japanese agent of the D1 and a link was set from D1's website to P1's website. Plaintiff alleged that the aforementioned acts committed by D1 and D2 disparaged P1's reputation and therefore constitute a joint tort. Further, such acts also amounts to unfair competition against P1 as defined in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (the "UCPA"). The court partially accepted the Plaintiffs' claim on the ground that D2 had at least provided data and materials for creating D1's website and D2 was also involved not only in creating such website but also in misrepresenting P1 in D1's website, thereby disseminating false information detrimental to the P1's reputation as referred to in Article 2 Paragraph 1 Item 14 of the ULPA. It was held that D1 and D2 are jointly liable to P2 for libel, defamation and infringement of name rights (Osaka District Court, July 26, 2007).  - 経済産業省

また、そういった意味で、非常に金融が実体経済以上にふくらむ、それがなおかつ、一つの金融機関のリスクの中で、リスクはもうおさまらなくなった、リーマン・ショックなんか典型ですね。国全体の経済、あるいは世界全体の経済に広範な影響を与えるというようなことでございますから、そういった中で、1929年はそれぞれの経済がブロック化しまして、それが第二次世界大戦の遠因だという方もおられますけれども、その辺の苦しい反省を踏まえて、Ｇ８、Ｇ20ということで、何とか英知を集めて、今度のバーゼルもまとまったし、今度はぜひ、これがソウルサミットでまとまっていただきたいと思いますけれども、世界の経済のグローバル化と同時に、やっぱり人類は1929年の後の世界大恐慌よりは、少し学習をしたと私は思っていますし、そういうことも視野に入れつつ、企業を支える金融、あるいは円の円滑化、あるいはリスク管理をきちっとやるというようなことは、これは原則でございますし、なおかつ金融業というのは、この前も申しましたように、基本的には信頼関係でございますから、顧客の方だとか、あるいは金融機関に関する信頼がないと、金融機関というのはうまく機能しないというのはもう皆様方、専門家でございますからよくご存じでございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、非常に難しい時代の金融の舵取りでございます。世界が今非常に金融も変動しておりまして、しかし、そういったときでも、皆様の知恵もかりながら、国民の声もかりながら、そして日本一国の経済ではございませんから、まさに非常に経済のグローバル化、アメリカの経済も中国の経済も、まさに結びついているわけでございますから、そういったことも視野に入れつつ、しっかり責任を果たしていきたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

In this context, the financial sector has ballooned more than the real economy, and risks can no longer be contained within the risks of one financial institution. The Lehman Brothers shockwave was a typical example of this. It has a broad impact on the national economy and the global economy. Back in 1929, economies were organized into economic blocks, which became a remote cause of the Second World War according to some people. Having learned a bitter lesson from the War, G8 and G20 mobilized their wisdom and reached a consensus on Basel III as well. I am looking forward to seeing an accord reached on Basel III at the upcoming Seoul Summit. I believe that the human race has learned a few lessons since the Great Depression after 1929 in conjunction with the globalization of economies around the world. With this in mind, the general rule is to facilitate the financial sector that supports companies, as well as the yen, and properly execute risk management. As relationship of trust is fundamental to financial businesses, financial institutions do not function properly if customers lack confidence in financial institutions, as you are well aware. Taking this into account, we are steering the financial sector at an extremely difficult time. Even at times like this when the financial sector is undergoing dramatic change on a global scale, we are committed to fulfilling our responsibilities properly while seeking your wisdom and people’s opinions, bearing in mind that Japan’s economy is not isolated but interlinked with American and Chinese economies as well due to globalization.  - 金融庁

そういったことを踏まえて、日本は1997年から始まった、あるいはその2年前から始まった住専で、非常に厳しい、痛い目といいますか、あるいはぎりぎりのところまで行きましたので、その苦しい経験を踏まえて、日本は、銀行に関して、破綻法制、あるいは一旦破綻した銀行がどのように再生するかということの法制が世界で一番整備されている国だと思っております。そんなことを踏まえて、金融機関の金融危機の再発防止、あるいは金融システムの強化に向けて、今回のG20、財務大臣・中央銀行総裁会議の場においても引き続き、今少し私が駄弁を弄しましたけれども、そういった経験を踏まえて健全で強い金融機関が必要ですし、健全な金融機関がなければ、持続可能な企業経営あるいは自由主義社会はある意味で成り立たないわけでございます。やはりその辺のバランスというのが大変大事でございます。そういった立場をきちっと主張しつつ、国際的に協調して取り組んでまいりたいと思っております。例文帳に追加

Japan was struck very hard and pushed to the brink by the financial crisis, which started in 1997, and the jusen problem, which started two years earlier than that. Based on this bitter experience, Japan has established the world's most advanced legal framework regarding the failure of banks and the rehabilitation of failed banks, I believe. In light of that, we will continue to engage in international cooperation at the forthcoming meeting of the G20 Finance Ministers and Central Bank Governors with a view to preventing the recurrence of a financial crisis and strengthening the financial system. Without sound financial institutions, sustainable corporate management would be impossible and a liberal society would be unable to function. Pursuing the right balance in that respect is very important. We will engage in international cooperation while firmly arguing our cases.  - 金融庁

第十三条の四　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は、銀行が行う特定預金等契約（特定預金等（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動によりその元本について損失が生ずるおそれがある預金又は定期積金等として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。）の受入れを内容とする契約をいう。以下同じ。）の締結について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の業務」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）、第三十七条の四及び第三十七条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 13-4 The provisions of Subsection 5 of Section 1 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 34-2(6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3(5) and (6) inclusive (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Subsection 1 of Section 2 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (' Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, and Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) shall apply mutatis mutandis to conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning contracts on acceptance of Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning those that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as deposits or Installment Savings, etc. with the risk of a principal loss caused by fluctuations pertaining to the interest rate, currency value, quotations on a financial instruments market prescribed in Article 2(14) of that Act, or any other index); the same shall apply hereinafter) by a Bank. In this case, the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Financial Instruments Business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Business of Concluding Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding the provisions in Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in each item of Article 2(8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as Prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the phrase "; provided" in Article 37-3(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. prescribed in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided,"; the phrase "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" in Article 39(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including that person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Customers,"; the phrase "make up for" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "make up, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., for,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in items (ii) and (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the term "Securities, etc." in those items shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "make an addition to" in item (ii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., to,"; the term "make an addition to" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., to,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "that is a potential cause of,"; the phrase "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2(4), and Article 43-4" in Article 45(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to delivery of a document set forth in paragraph (1) and excluding items (ii) and (vi) of that paragraph and paragraph (3)), Article 37-4 and Article 37-6,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十二条の四十五の二　金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Subsection 1 of Section 2 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6(1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6 (4) and Article 37-6(5)(Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding Article 37-6(3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the terms "intends to conclude" in Article 37-3(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conducts agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of,"; the term "; provided" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc." in Article 37-3(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2(16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2(15) of the Banking Act) is acting,"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount designated by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for financial instruments transaction (referred to as "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When he/she has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "sales and purchase or any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance or other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) and (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from Such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of a dispute" in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may become a cause of dispute,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三百条の二　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動により損失が生ずるおそれ（当該保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払うこととなる保険料の合計額が、当該保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得することとなる保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回ることとなるおそれをいう。）がある保険契約として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介を行うことを内容とする契約の締結について、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は保険会社等、外国保険会社等、保険募集人又は保険仲立人が行う特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定保険契約等」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介の業務」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約（保険業法第三百条の二に規定する特定保険契約をいう。以下同じ。）又は顧客のために特定保険契約の締結の媒介」と、同法第三十七条第二項中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「締結しようとするとき、又は特定保険契約の締結の代理若しくは媒介を行うとき」と、「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは「次に掲げる事項その他保険業法第三百条第一項第一号に規定する保険契約の契約条項のうち重要な事項」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「特定保険契約等を締結する保険会社等（保険業法第二条の二第一項に規定する保険会社等をいう。）、外国保険会社等（同法第二条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。）又は保険仲立人（同条第二十五項に規定する保険仲立人をいう。）」と、同項第五号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同法第三十八条第一項中「使用人」とあるのは「使用人（保険募集人（保険業法第二条第二十三項に規定する保険募集人をいう。）を除く。第三十九条第三項において同じ。）」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「損失」とあるのは「損失（当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより顧客の支払う保険料の合計額が当該特定保険契約が締結されることにより当該顧客の取得する保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を上回る場合における当該保険料の合計額から当該保険金、返戻金その他の給付金の合計額を控除した金額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定保険契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定保険契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定保険契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十条第一号中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定保険契約等の締結」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項各号に掲げる事項に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 300-2 The provision of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investor) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provision) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract (meaning an insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as entailing the risk of loss due to any change in interest rates, currency values, financial instruments market prices as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (14) of that Act or any other indicator (meaning the risk that the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the insurance contract may exceed the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) effected by an Insurance Company, etc. or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or a contract stipulating any specific act as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract; the provision of Section 2, Subsection 1 of the same Chapter (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business for Persons Who Engage in Type 1 Financial Instruments Transaction Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name-Lending and Prohibition of Administration of Company Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6 (Cancellation by a Written Statement), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso of Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Loss Compensation, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy, etc.), and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured) (General Rules)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract by an Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., Insurance Solicitor or Insurance Broker and related act as an agent or intermediary. In this case, the terms "financial instruments transaction contract" and "financial instruments transaction business" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract, etc.," and "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, or any related act as an agent or intermediary," respectively; in Article 34 of that Act, the term "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effecting a specified insurance contract (meaning a specified insurance contract provided in Article 300-2 of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or acting as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract"; in Article 37, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "carrying out Financial Instruments and Exchange Activities" shall be deemed to be replaced with "concluding specified insurance contracts"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract" shall be deemed to be replaced with "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract or acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding a specified insurance contract" and the term "the following matters" with "the following matters and any other important matter stipulated by an insurance contract provided in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Company, etc. (meaning an Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (meaning a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of that Act) or Insurance Broker (meaning an Insurance Broker as defined in paragraph (25) of the same Article) concluding a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (v) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business carried out" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract concluded"; in Article 38, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "employee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee (excluding an Insurance Solicitor as defined in Article 2, paragraph (23) of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in Article 39, paragraph (3))"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract", the term "securities or derivative transaction (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this Article)" with "specified insurance contract," the term "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including said person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" with "the customer," the term "loss" with "loss (meaning, where the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the specified insurance contract exceeds the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract, the total amount of premium payment subtracted by the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," and the term "to supplement" with "to supplement, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract," the term "securities, etc." with "specified insurance contract," and the term "to add to" with "to add to, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act, the term "determined by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause" shall be deemed to be replaced with "a potential cause"; in Article 40, item (i) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business" with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act, the term "Article 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4) and Article 43-4" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 37-3 (as far as any of the matters listed in the items of Article 37-3, paragraph (1) is concerned, excluding Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3)) and 37-4"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

ただし、これからは私のコメントですが、税制でございますが、できるだけ今度の成長分野でも金融機関そのものの成長ということをうたっておりますし、できるだけ証券はじめ、証券税制についてもできるだけいろいろな金融が活発化することが非常に大事でございますが、それに与える税制の影響も非常に大きいわけでございますが、同時に税制というのは私も長い間税制の実務を与党のときにやらせていただきましたが、簡素・公平・中立というのもございまして、そういったことを踏まえつつ、特にこういう分野は昔から一般的に金持ち優遇税制だと、こういうご批判を受ける部分でもございますけれども、しかし同時に金融の活性化、経済の活性化をどういうふうにきちっと、民主国家でございますから、そしてなおかつ各国がリーマンショックの後それぞれの経済あるいは金融、財政政策、非常にある意味でいろいろな問題点を持ちながら各国、この前の大きな問題を抱えながら国際協調をしていこうというようなところでございますし、各国にはそれぞれの経済のやっぱり歴史と伝統もあるわけでございますから、そういったことも勘案しつつ、きちっと最終的にはいろんな人の意見を聞きながら判断をさせていただきたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

I might add my personal comment, though – the action plan for the New Growth Strategy, which we developed recently, advocates growth of financial institutions themselves and it is therefore quite critical for various financial segments, including securities, to have as many trading activities as possible, which makes any potential impact on them from taxation quite significant. At the same time, there are the principles of simplicity, fairness and neutrality in taxation that we should bear in mind as I realize, from many years of my involvement in the area of taxation when I was with the ruling party, that this is the kind of area in taxation that is traditionally prone to general criticism as a tax break for the rich. That being the case, in the context of a growing consensus on international cooperation between nations – each of which has its own economic, financial, and fiscal policies and is faced with its own challenges in the wake of the Lehman crisis, and is also founded on its own economic, historical, and traditional qualities – we are hoping to ultimately make a decision on how to add more vitality to financial and economic activities, bearing in mind the points that I have just made and incorporating, as a democratic nation, inputs from various people.  - 金融庁

このように、近年、企業に雇用される人々の意識が一般的にはリスク回避的になり、開業希望率が減少していることと、第2章で述べたような、近年の労働市場の変化等との関係については、〔1〕1990年代まで大企業を中心とする年功賃金制が「日本的雇用慣行」として定着していると認識され、人々の予想する将来賃金が上昇してきたこと、〔2〕1990年代のデフレ経済の悪影響がまず自営業等の小規模な企業から破産・廃業の増加等の形で現れ、人々の予想する自営業の所得が顕著に低下しリスクが顕著に増加したこと、〔3〕大企業の被雇用者に本格的な雇用調整が及んだのは1990年代後半であったことから、将来の予想賃金が低下するにはかなり時間がかかったこと、〔4〕定年退職後の収入については、「日本的雇用慣行」の下でも不安定性があることが早くから認識され、また、1990年代に企業が中高齢層のリストラを進め高齢者の転職市場は厳しい状況が続き、50歳代の賃金については大企業でも比較的早くから調整が進んだことから、中高齢者にとっては転職と比較して開業することの機会費用が下がった可能性があること、また、この年代の人々はバブル崩壊による持ち家価格の低下等の影響を被ることが比較的少なかったこと等が指摘できる。例文帳に追加

People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices. - 経済産業省

第五十二条の二の五　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五から第三十七条の七まで（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付、書面による解除、指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は、外国銀行代理銀行（第五十二条の二第一項の認可を受け、又は同条第二項の規定による届出をして外国銀行代理業務を営んでいる銀行をいう。以下同じ。）が行う外国銀行代理業務に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「締結の勧誘又は締結」とあるのは「締結の勧誘又は締結の代理若しくは媒介」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、「を過去に当該特定投資家との間で締結」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を過去に当該特定投資家との間で」と、「を締結する」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同法第三十四条の二第五項第二号及び第三十四条の三第四項第二号中「締結する」とあるのは「締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同条第二項第四号イ中「と対象契約」とあるのは「による代理若しくは媒介により対象契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「外国銀行代理銀行（銀行法第五十二条の二の五に規定する外国銀行代理銀行をいう。）の所属外国銀行（同法第五十二条の二第一項に規定する所属外国銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と、「締結した」とあるのは「締結の代理若しくは媒介をした」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 52-2-5 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Customer Other Than a Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person Who is a Customer Other than a Professional Investor will be Deemed to be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Section 2, Subsection 1 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business Activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business Activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) (Delivery of Documents Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Articles 37-5 to 37-7 inclusive (Delivery of Documents Pertaining to the Receipt of a Security Deposit, Cancellation by Means of a Document, Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) of that Article (Prohibition on Compensation for Losses, etc.) and Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediation for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to the Foreign Bank Agency Services provided by a Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning a Bank which provides the Foreign Bank Agency Services after obtaining the authorization under Article 52-2, paragraph (1) or giving a notification under paragraph (2) of that Article; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the terms "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction," "Financial Instruments Business," and "soliciting to conclude, or concluding" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," and "soliciting to conclude or providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion" respectively, the term "Acts of Financial Instruments Transactions" in these provisions (excluding Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrases "a contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer," "and has never concluded a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "concluding" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act," "and has never provided agency or intermediation for Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" respectively, the term "conclude" in Article 34-2, paragraph (5), item (ii) and Article 34-3, paragraph (4), item (ii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provide agency or intermediation for the conclusion of," the phrase "Subject Contract with" in Article 34-3, paragraph (2), item (iv), sub-item (a) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Subject Contract through agency or intermediation by," the phrases "wishes to conclude" and "deliver to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provides agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" and "in addition to delivering to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance, provide information on the contents of contracts pertaining to the Deposits, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning the Depositors, etc. defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph)" respectively, the term "a Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Foreign Bank (meaning the Principal Foreign Bank defined in Article 52-2, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act) of the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank defined in Article 52-2-5 of that Act)," the phrase "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in cases where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or a financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "the customer" and "make up, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrase "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of," the phrases "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4), and Article 43-4" and "concluded" in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to the delivery of documents under paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) shall be excluded) and Article 37-4" and "provided agency or intermediation for the conclusion thereof" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

特に、富裕層の隆盛で日本食に対する関心が広がるアジアを中心とした海外市場の開拓に向けて、①国内においては、海外の市場ニーズを的確に捉え、販路開拓に必要なネットワークを構築する人材や情報等といったボトルネックを克服し、大手商社と比して小回りの利く規模で地域の産品の価値を発信、販売する「新たな商社機能」を有するいわば「地域商社」が、食料バリューチェーン全体の管理を担う主体として生産と流通を結びつけること、②国境措置については、我が国農林水産物・食品の輸出を拡大するため、政府間の検疫協議の加速化に取り組むなど、戦略的対応を図ること、③海外市場においては、消費者接点となる日本食レストランを切り口とした日本食や日本食材市場の裾野拡大や、地域ブランド等の知的財産及び技術流出の防止等を通じ、一過性でない我が国農産物の常連客を作ること、が重要である。例文帳に追加

For the exploitation of overseas markets, mainly in Asia where interest in Japanese food is increasing based on the prosperity of the wealthy class in particular, it is important (1) as internal activities, to overcome bottlenecks such as human resources, information, etc. in order to appropriately identify overseas market needs and construct a network necessary for sales channel development as well as to let a type of “local trading companies” that have “new trade company capabilities” to provide information on the unique value of local products and sell them in a more appropriate size and adaptable manner than major trading companies to make production and distribution connected as entities responsible for the management of the entire food value chain; (2) as cross-boundary activities, to adopt strategic measures, including the acceleration of intergovernmental discussions on quarantine in order to increase the export of agricultural fishery, and food products from Japan; and (3) as activities in overseas markets, to secure loyal non-transient customers of Japanese agricultural products through the expansion of markets for Japanese food and food materials and the prevention of the leakage of intellectual properties such as local brands, making good use of Japanese restaurants that are the point of contact with customers. - 経済産業省

5. 我々は、一次産品価格の潜在的な過度の変動の影響についての懸念を議論し、我々の代理に対し、国際機関と協働して、根底にある動きと、こうした趨勢が消費国と生産国双方に与える課題について我々に報告し、可能性のある対応策の検討を求めた。我々は、この変動が食糧安全保障に与える影響に留意しつつ、途上国の農業セクターへの長期的な投資の必要性を改めて表明した。我々は、石油データイニシアティブ共同機構（JODI oil）の質、適時性及び信頼性を高めるための IEF、IEA 及び OPEC による中間報告を歓迎し、最終報告で詳述されるこれらの提言を実施するための戦略について更に取り組むことを求める。1 月 24 日にリヤドで開催されたシンポジウムに基づき、我々は、IEF が 2011 年 2 月 22 日の次の会合において、産消対話を改善するための具体的な戦略を提供することを奨励する。首脳の要請を受け、我々は、IMF 及びIEF 並びに IEA、GECF 及び OPEC に対し、石油の価格変動に関する G20 の作業をガスと石炭に拡大するための具体的な提言を2011 年 10 月までに策定することを求める。我々は、次回会合において、以下の報告を議論することを期待している：価格報告機関に関する IEF、IEA、OPEC 及び IOSCO の報告、現在関連する国際機関によって作業が行われている食糧安全保障に関する中間報告、及び、特に、透明性を強化し、市場の濫用に対処するための商品デリバティブ市場の規制・監督に関する IOSCO の提言及びFSB の次のステップの検討。例文帳に追加

5. We discussed concerns about consequences of potential excessive commodity price volatility and asked our deputies to work with international organizations and to report back to us on the underlying drivers and the challenges posed by these trends for both consumers and producers and consider possible actions. Keeping in mind the impact of this volatility on food security, we reiterated the need for long-term investment in the agricultural sector in developing countries. We welcomed the interim report by the IEF, IEA and OPEC to improve the quality, timeliness and reliability of the Joint Organization Data Initiative Oil (JODI oil) and call for further work on strategies to implement these recommendations to be detailed in their final report. Building on the Riyadh symposium held on January 24th, we encourage the IEF to provide concrete strategies to improve the producer-consumer dialogue at its next meeting on February 22nd 2011. Following our Leaders' request, we call on the IMF and IEF, as well as IEA, GECF and OPEC, to develop by October 2011 concrete recommendations to extend the G20's work on oil price volatility to gas and coal. We look forward to discussing at our next meeting the report of IEF, IEA, OPEC and IOSCO on price reporting agencies as well as the interim report on food security currently being undertaken by the relevant international organizations, and IOSCO's recommendations, and the FSB's consideration of next steps, on regulation and supervision of commodity derivatives markets notably to strengthen transparency and address market abuses.  - 財務省

第十三条の四　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の七（指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は、銀行が行う特定預金等契約（特定預金等（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動によりその元本について損失が生ずるおそれがある預金又は定期積金等として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。）の受入れを内容とする契約をいう。以下同じ。）の締結について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の業務」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）、第三十七条の四及び第三十七条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 13-4 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) inclusive (Cases Where a Juridical Person Who Is a Customer Other Than a Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Section 2, Subsection 1 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business Activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Concurrent Business Activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition on Name Lending, Prohibition on Administration of Corporate Bonds), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulations on Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Documents Prior to the Conclusion of a Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Documents Pertaining to the Receipt of Security Deposits), Article 37-7 (Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.) and Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition on Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured, Limitation on the Purchase and Sale, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning contracts on acceptance of Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning those that are specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as deposits or Installment Savings, etc. with the risk of a principal loss caused by fluctuations pertaining to the interest rate, currency value, quotations on a financial instruments market prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (14) of that Act, or any other index); the same shall apply hereinafter) by a Bank. In this case, the term "Contract for a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Financial Instruments Services" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Concluding Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the term "Act of Executing a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding the provisions of Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "contract to conduct the Act of Financial Instruments Transactions (meaning an act listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as Prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the phrase "; provided" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc. in advance, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the phrase "purchase and sale or other transaction of Securities (excluding a purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as the "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "customer (in cases where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts the purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who establishes a trust under a trust contract, including such person who establishes the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Customers"; the phrase "make up for" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "make up for, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the term "Securities, etc." in those items shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "make an addition to" in item (ii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "make an addition to" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc."; the phrase "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of"; the phrase "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4), and Article 43-4" in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to delivery of a document set forth in paragraph (1) and excluding items (ii) and (vi) of that paragraph and paragraph (3)), Article 37-4 and Article 37-6"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム