「にしきちょう３ちょうめ」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(32ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(2) 登録官は，当該付託書及び陳述書の写しを，当該出願を遂行するにあたってのすべての名義人又は場合により自己がライセンスを受ける権原を有すると主張するすべての者(ただし，何れの場合にも付託を行う者を除く)に対して送付する。当該送付を受けた者が当該期間及び当該条件においてライセンスを許諾又は受諾することに合意しない場合は，その者は，当該写しを送付する登録官の書簡の日付から2月以内に，当該異議申立の理由を詳細に記載した特許様式3による反対陳述書を提出するものとし，登録官は，当該付託を行う者に対し，当該反対陳述書の写しを送付する。例文帳に追加

(2) The Registrar shall send a copy of the reference and statement to every person in whose name the application is to proceed or, as the case may be, every person claiming to be entitled to be granted a licence, in either case not being the person who makes the reference, and if any recipient does not agree to grant or accept a licence for such period and upon such terms, he shall, within 2 months from the date of the Registrar’s letter forwarding such copies to him, file a counter-statement on Patents Form 3 setting out fully the grounds of his opposition and the Registrar shall send a copy of the counter-statement to the person making the reference. - 特許庁

ご案内のとおり、早期健全化法に基づく公的資本増強行に対しては、公的資金の返済財源を確保するための方策等を盛り込んだ、経営健全化計画というものを策定していただいているわけですが、その履行状況について報告を求め、これを公表することにより、金融機関自身による自己規正を促すという対応を基本としております。計画未達に対しましては、ガイドラインで「当期利益の実績が健全化計画に比べて、「3割以上下振れ」などの要件に該当した場合には、下振れの理由等について報告を徴求し、精査した上で業務改善命令の発動を検討する」というふうにされているわけであります。例文帳に追加

As you know, we require that banks, whose capital base has been strengthened through the injection of public funds under the Act concerning Emergency Measures for Early Strengthening of Financial Functions, draw up management enhancement plans that include measures to secure the financial resources necessary for the repayment of public funds. Our basic approach is to encourage financial institutions to exercise self-discipline by requiring the submission of reports on the implementation of such plans and by disclosing the results. According to the guidelines concerning management enhancement plans, if a financial institution fails to meet targets included in its plan - for example, if its net profit is more than 30% lower than the target - the FSA will demand the submission of a report explaining reasons for the shortfall and other matters and consider the possibility of issuing a business improvement order based on close examination of the report.  - 金融庁

第五十二条の五　内閣総理大臣は、第五十二条の二第一項、第五十二条の三第一項若しくは第三項又は前条第一項若しくは第二項の規定により提出書類の提出を受けた場合において、当該提出書類に形式上の不備があり、又は当該提出書類に記載すべき事項のうち重要なものの記載が不十分であると認めるときは、当該提出書類の提出をした者に対し、訂正報告書の提出を命ずることができる。この場合においては、行政手続法（平成五年法律第八十八号）第十三条第一項（不利益処分をしようとする場合の手続）の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 52-5 In the case where Documents Required have been submitted pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-2(1), Article 52-3(1) or (3) or paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article, the Prime Minister may, when he/she finds that there is a deficiency in form in that Documents Required or that the statement of the important matters states insufficiently matters that should be stated in that Documents Required, order the person who has submitted that Documents Required to submit a correction report. In this case, a hearing shall be carried out irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements under Article 13(1) (Procedures Prerequisite for Adverse Dispositions) of the Administrative Procedure Act (Act No. 88 of 1993).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十二条の五　内閣総理大臣は、第五十二条の二の十一第一項、第五十二条の三第一項若しくは第三項又は前条第一項若しくは第二項の規定により提出書類の提出を受けた場合において、当該提出書類に形式上の不備があり、又は当該提出書類に記載すべき事項のうち重要なものの記載が不十分であると認めるときは、当該提出書類の提出をした者に対し、訂正報告書の提出を命ずることができる。この場合においては、行政手続法（平成五年法律第八十八号）第十三条第一項（不利益処分をしようとする場合の手続）の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 52-5 In the case where Required Documents have been submitted pursuant to the provisions of Article 52-2-11, paragraph (1), Article 52-3, paragraph (1) or (3) or paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article, the Prime Minister may, when he/she finds that there is a deficiency in form in those Required Documents or that the statement of the important matters states insufficiently matters that should be stated in those Required Documents, order the person who has submitted those Required Documents to submit a amendment report. In this case, a hearing shall be carried out irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements under Article 13, paragraph (1) (Procedures Prerequisite for Adverse Dispositions) of the Administrative Procedure Act (Act No. 88 of 1993).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百七十一条の六　内閣総理大臣は、第二百七十一条の三第一項、第二百七十一条の四第一項若しくは第三項又は前条第一項若しくは第二項の規定により提出書類の提出を受けた場合において、当該提出書類に形式上の不備があり、又は当該提出書類に記載すべき事項のうち重要なものの記載が不十分であると認めるときは、当該提出書類の提出をした者に対し、訂正報告書の提出を命ずることができる。この場合においては、行政手続法（平成五年法律第八十八号）第十三条第一項（不利益処分をしようとする場合の手続）の規定による意見陳述のための手続の区分にかかわらず、聴聞を行わなければならない。例文帳に追加

Article 271-6 In the case where Documents Required have been submitted pursuant to the provisions of Article 271-3, paragraph (1), Article 271-4, paragraph (1) or (3), or paragraph (1) or (2) of the preceding Article, the Prime Minister may, when he/she finds that there is a formal deficiency in that Documents Required or that the statement of the important matters among the matters that should be stated in that Documents Required is insufficient, order the person who has submitted that Documents Required to submit a correction report. In this case, a hearing shall be carried out irrespective of the categories of procedures for hearing statements under Article 13, paragraph (1) (Procedures Prerequisite for Adverse Dispositions) of the Administrative Procedure Act (Act No. 88 of 1993).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一　行政機関等（内閣府、宮内庁並びに内閣府設置法（平成十一年法律第八十九号）第四十九条第一項及び第二項に規定する機関並びに国家行政組織法（昭和二十三年法律第百二十号）第三条第二項に規定する機関並びに総務省設置法（平成十一年法律第九十一号）第四条第十九号イからハまでに規定する法人で政令で定めるものをいう。以下同じ。）の業務に関する苦情の相談に応じて、総務大臣の定めるところに従い、申出人に必要な助言をし、及び総務省又は当該関係行政機関等にその苦情を通知すること。例文帳に追加

(i) In response to a filing of complaint against the operations of administrative organs (herein referred to as Cabinet Office, Imperial Household Agency and the organs prescribed in Article 49, paragraph (1) and (2) of the Act for Establishment of the Cabinet Office (Act No. 89 of 1999) and the organs prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (2) of National Government Organization Act (Act No. 120 of 1948) and the public corporations specified in the Cabinet Order among those which are mentioned in from Article 4, item (xix) (a) to (c) of the Act for Establishment of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (Act No. 91 of 1999). Hereinafter referred to as same as this), to give necessary advice to the complainant and to inform the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications or the administrative organs and the like concerned of the complaint in accordance with the instruction of the Minister for Internal Affairs and Communications.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　第百七十八条の規定により読み替えて適用する会社法第五百条（債務の弁済の制限）の規定並びに同法第四百七十六条（清算株式会社の能力）、第二編第九章第一節第二款（清算株式会社の機関）、第四百九十二条（財産目録等の作成等）、同節第四款（第五百条を除く。）（債務の弁済等）、第五百八条（帳簿資料の保存）、同章第二節（第五百十条、第五百十一条及び第五百十四条を除く。）（特別清算）、第七編第三章第一節（総則）及び第三節（特別清算の手続に関する特則）並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、その性質上許されないものを除き、第一項の規定による日本にある外国保険会社等の財産についての清算について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provision of Article 500 (Restrictions on Performance of Obligations) of the Companies Act as applied with relevant changes in interpretation pursuant to the provision of Article 178, and the provisions of Article 476 (Capacity of Liquidating Stock Companies), Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1, Subsection 2 (Structures for Liquidating Stock Companies), Article 492 (Preparation of Inventory of Property), Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1, Subsection 4 (excluding Article 500) (Performance of Obligations), Article 508 (Retention of Accounting Materials), Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Articles 510, 511 and 514) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (General Provisions) and 3 (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure) and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of the property of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan under paragraph (1), unless their specific characters forbid such application. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三百五十八条第二項、第三項及び第五項から第七項まで（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合の検査役及びその報告があった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十八条第三項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 358(2), (3), and (5) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector of Execution of Inspector), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an inspector where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed or to cases where the inspectors report has been given. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 358(3) and (7) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "the shareholders" in Article 358(7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 359(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "shareholders" in Article 359(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私は、事務方から聞いているところによりますと、日本振興銀行に対して、直近の21年3月期を基準日とする検査のほかに、過去、今さっき（申し上げた）ように19年３月期及び17年3月期を基準日とする前回及び前々回検査を実施しておりますが、上記検査の結果、同行は、前回及び前々回検査の検査基準日において、財務状況に関しては資産超過の状況にあったものと認識しておりますが、また業務運営に関しても、直近検査に認められたような行政処分につながる重大な法令違反や体制の不備等はなかったものと認識をしておりますが、私が何回も申しましたように、途中から無理な業容の拡大や経営陣による、率直に言えば無理な経営拡大を急ぎ過ぎたといいますか、最初は私も先週言いましたように、最初の1回目の検査のときには、非常に中小企業を対象とした新しいビジネスモデルだというようなことでやっておられたけれども、それからリーマン・ショックも重なったということもあるのかもしれませんけれども、非常に無理な業容の拡大を行い、当時の木村剛会長のもとで、非常にこの方は能力のある方で、しかし、悪く言えばワンマン経営だったというふうなことを漏れ聞いておりますけれども、業容拡大に非常に走ったということが、今日の結果を招いたのではないかなというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

According to what I have heard from the administrative staff, the Incubator Bank of Japan was inspected twice before the latest inspection for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, as I just mentioned: the previous inspection was for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 and the one before that was for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. My understanding is that as at the end of the fiscal year subject to each of the previous two inspections, the Bank’s financial position was assets in excess of liabilities according to the results of these inspections. Also, my understanding is that there were no material violations of laws and regulations, inadequacies in systems or other such problems in its business operations that would lead to administrative actions as found in the latest inspection. As I have repeatedly stated, at the time of the first inspection, the Bank engaged in operations allegedly based on a new business model targeted at small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The Lehman Brothers shockwave that struck at the time may have been one of the factors. That said, then-Chairman Takeshi Kimura is an extremely capable person, who, according to what I have been told, had an authoritarian management style, so I suspect overambitious business expansions gave rise to the present outcome.  - 金融庁

第十条　同意基本計画（第五条第二項第四号に掲げる事項が定められているものに限る。）において定められた同項第三号に規定する区域（以下「同意企業立地重点促進区域」という。）の存する市町村は、同意企業立地重点促進区域における製造業等（工場立地法第二条第三項に規定する製造業等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）に係る工場又は事業場の緑地（同法第四条第一項第一号に規定する緑地をいう。以下この条において同じ。）及び環境施設（同法第四条第一項第一号に規定する環境施設をいう。以下この条において同じ。）のそれぞれの面積の敷地面積に対する割合に関する事項（以下この条において「緑地面積率等」という。）について、条例で、次項の基準の範囲内において、同法第四条第一項の規定により公表され、又は同法第四条の二第一項の規定により定められた準則に代えて適用すべき準則を定めることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 10 (1) Municipalities having a zone prescribed in Article 5, paragraph (2), item (iii) that is designated in the agreed basic plan (limited to one that provides for matters listed in Article 5, paragraph (2), item (iv)) (hereinafter such zone shall be referred to as the "agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities") may establish applicable rules, in lieu of rules that have been publicized as prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1) of the Factory Location Act or rules that have been established as prescribed in Article 4-2, paragraph (1) of the same Act, in Municipal Ordinances, within the scope of the standards set forth in the following paragraph, with regard to matters concerning the ratio against the total site area of factories or workplaces pertaining to manufacturing industries, etc. (meaning manufacturing industries, etc. prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (3) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of respective areas of green spaces (meaning green spaces prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and environmental facilities (meaning environmental facilities prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) therein (hereinafter such matters shall be referred to as "green space-area ratios etc." in this Article) in the agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　労働衛生専門官は、第五十六条第一項の許可、第五十七条の三第四項の規定による勧告、第五十七条の四第一項の規定による指示、第六十五条の規定による作業環境測定についての専門技術的事項、安全衛生改善計画及び届出に関する事務並びに労働災害の原因の調査その他特に専門的知識を必要とする事務で、衛生に係るものをつかさどるほか、事業者、労働者その他の関係者に対し、労働者の健康障害を防止するため必要な事項及び労働者の健康の保持増進を図るため必要な事項について指導及び援助を行う。例文帳に追加

(3) The Expert Officer in Industrial Health shall administer affairs related to the permission prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 56, the recommendation pursuant to the provision of paragraph (4) of Article 57-3, the instruction pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 57-4, matters on expertise for the work environment measurement pursuant to the provision of Article 65, the safety and health improvement plan and the notification, and affairs related to health on investigation of causes of industrial accidents and other matters requiring the high expert knowledge, as well as perform to give guidance and assistance to employers and workers and those concerned on the matters necessary for preventing workers' health impairment, and preserving and promoting the health of workers.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

決済手段等に関する我が国の特徴、我が国においては、昭和４８年の全銀システム稼動以来、その利便性から金融機関の口座引落し、口座振込等が資金決済に広く利用されてきており、小切手を主要な決済手段としている欧米主要国と事情を異にしている。例えば、小切手による支払いに比し、金融機関の口座振込では、翌日に履行される振込の指図を破綻時に取り消すことができない等の特徴がある。また、口座引落しが主要な決済方法である我が国では、翌日以降の引落しに備えてあらかじめ決済資金を預金口座に預け入れておく場合が多い。預金の保護、金融機関の破綻処理手続に関する各国での法制の違いにより決済機能の安定性に差異が生じていることも考えられる。例えば、米国では預金債権に優先権が付与されているのに対し、我が国ではこうした措置はない。また、米国では金融機関の倒産法制は一般の倒産法制とは異なっており、倒産手続開始後も債権実行の取扱いが柔軟であるが、我が国では金融機関の倒産法制にこのような点で一般と異なる制度は用意されていない。以上の点を踏まえれば、特例措置終了後3における決済機能の安定確保のためには、決済機能のセーフティネットの状況を点検したうえ、他国の例にとらわれず、我が国の実態に即した方策が検討されて然るべきであり、したがって必要があればさらなる安定確保のための措置を講じることが適当である。例文帳に追加

Therefore, it is necessary to consider the appropriate measures in light of the situation in Japan, not necessarily modelled after the examples of other countries.  - 金融庁

私もそれは確かに一理突いた予想だなということを、色々な人の話、金融庁の事務方、あるいは色々な金融機関の方々の話を総合すると、今、第3次補正予算でどれぐらいの額のものが出てくるのかなということを見ておられるということもありますから、そんなことも含めて、もうすぐに結論が出ることですけれども、私の立場としては、できるだけ（改正）金融機能強化法、何度も申しますように、これは震災特例でございますから、できるだけ東北地方を中心とした金融機関がこれを活用して頂いて、地域における金融仲介機能の強化、それから預金者が安心していられるということを担った特例でございますから、そういうためにも、ぜひ復旧・復興を急げるように、確実になるように、それから金融機関の安心・安全、それは当然貸付を受けている中小零細企業の安心・安全にもつながるわけでございますから、そういったことを今考えさせて頂いております。例文帳に追加

From what I hear from various people, including the FSA staff and officials of financial institutions, I think that such expectations are reasonable, as attention is focusing on the size of the third supplementary budget. While a conclusion will be reached on matters like that soon, for my part, I hope that financial institutions in the Tohoku region will make full use of the Revised Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which has been enacted as an extraordinary measure to deal with the impact of the earthquake, as I have repeatedly mentioned. This Act is intended to strengthen regional financial intermediary functions and reassure depositors, so we are considering measures that will promote quick restoration and reconstruction, and will help to ensure the safety of financial institutions and borrowing SMEs and give them reassurance.  - 金融庁

２　鉄道賃及び船賃は旅行区間の路程に応ずる旅客運賃（はしけ賃及びさん橋賃を含むものとし、運賃に等級を設ける線路又は船舶による旅行の場合には、運賃の等級を三階級に区分するものについては中級以下で裁判所が相当と認める等級の、運賃の等級を二階級に区分するものについては裁判所が相当と認める等級の運賃）、急行料金（特別急行列車を運行する線路のある区間の旅行で片道百キロメートル以上のものには特別急行料金、普通急行列車又は準急行列車を運行する線路のある区間の旅行で片道五十キロメートル以上のものには普通急行料金又は準急行料金）並びに裁判所が支給を相当と認める特別車両料金及び特別船室料金並びに座席指定料金（座席指定料金を徴する普通急行列車を運行する線路のある区間の旅行で片道百キロメートル以上のもの又は座席指定料金を徴する船舶を運行する航路のある区間の旅行の場合の座席指定料金に限る。）によつて、路程賃は最高裁判所が定める額の範囲内において裁判所が定める額によつて、航空賃は現に支払つた旅客運賃によつて、それぞれ算定する。例文帳に追加

(2) Railway fare and ship fare (including a lighterage and pierage) shall be calculated respectively as comprising [1] passenger fare (in the case of travel by a route or a ship for which there are fare classes, if the fare is categorized into three classes, the second- or third-class fare as considered reasonable by the court, and if the fare is categorized into two classes, the fare of the class as considered reasonable by the court) corresponding to the distance of the span traveled, [2] express charge (a limited express charge for travel of 100 kilometers or more one way between points where there is a railway on which a limited express train runs; an ordinary express charge or semi-express charge for travel of fewer than 100 kilometers and 50 kilometers or more one way between points where there is a railway on which an ordinary express train or semi-express train runs), [3] special compartment charge or special cabin charge, if the payment of which is considered reasonable by the court, and [4] seat reservation charge (limited to a seat reservation charge in the case of travel of 100 kilometers or more one way between points where there is a railway on which an ordinary express train requiring a seat reservation charge runs, or travel by ship between points where there is a route on which a ship requiring a seat reservation charge runs); a distance fare shall be calculated as the amount determined by the court within the range specified by the Supreme Court; and an airfare shall be calculated by the passenger fare actually paid.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

このように、近年、企業に雇用される人々の意識が一般的にはリスク回避的になり、開業希望率が減少していることと、第2章で述べたような、近年の労働市場の変化等との関係については、〔1〕1990年代まで大企業を中心とする年功賃金制が「日本的雇用慣行」として定着していると認識され、人々の予想する将来賃金が上昇してきたこと、〔2〕1990年代のデフレ経済の悪影響がまず自営業等の小規模な企業から破産・廃業の増加等の形で現れ、人々の予想する自営業の所得が顕著に低下しリスクが顕著に増加したこと、〔3〕大企業の被雇用者に本格的な雇用調整が及んだのは1990年代後半であったことから、将来の予想賃金が低下するにはかなり時間がかかったこと、〔4〕定年退職後の収入については、「日本的雇用慣行」の下でも不安定性があることが早くから認識され、また、1990年代に企業が中高齢層のリストラを進め高齢者の転職市場は厳しい状況が続き、50歳代の賃金については大企業でも比較的早くから調整が進んだことから、中高齢者にとっては転職と比較して開業することの機会費用が下がった可能性があること、また、この年代の人々はバブル崩壊による持ち家価格の低下等の影響を被ることが比較的少なかったこと等が指摘できる。例文帳に追加

People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices. - 経済産業省

３　前項の規定にかかわらず、第二十九条第一項若しくは第三十条第一項の規定により介護給付費等の支給を受けて又は身体障害者福祉法第十八条第二項若しくは知的障害者福祉法第十六条第一項の規定により入所措置が採られて障害者支援施設、のぞみの園又は第五条第一項若しくは第五項の厚生労働省令で定める施設に入所している障害者及び生活保護法（昭和二十五年法律第百四十四号）第三十条第一項ただし書の規定により入所している障害者（以下この項において「特定施設入所障害者」と総称する。）については、その者が障害者支援施設、のぞみの園、第五条第一項若しくは第五項の厚生労働省令で定める施設又は同法第三十条第一項ただし書に規定する施設（以下「特定施設」という。）への入所前に有した居住地（継続して二以上の特定施設に入所している特定施設入所障害者（以下この項において「継続入所障害者」という。）については、最初に入所した特定施設への入所前に有した居住地）の市町村が、支給決定を行うものとする。ただし、特定施設への入所前に居住地を有しないか、又は明らかでなかった特定施設入所障害者については、入所前におけるその者の所在地（継続入所障害者については、最初に入所した特定施設の入所前に有した所在地）の市町村が、支給決定を行うものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) Notwithstanding the provision of the preceding paragraph, for the persons with disabilities who receive payment pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 29 or paragraph 1 of Article 30, or who live in, the support facilities for the persons with disabilities Nozominosono, or the facilities prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of paragraph 1 or paragraph 5 of Article 5 after receiving placement measure pursuant to the provision of paragraph 2 of Article 19 of Act for the welfare of Persons with Physical Disabilities or paragraph 1, Article 16 of Act for the welfare of persons with intellectual disabilities; or who live in such facilities pursuant to the provision of proviso of paragraph 1 of Article 30 of Public Assistance Act(Act No. 144 of 1950) (hereafter collectively referred to as "persons with disabilities entered placement in specified facilities" in this paragraph), the municipality where such persons had domiciles before entering the support facilities for persons with disabilities, Nozominosono, the facilities prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in paragraph 1 or paragraph 5 of Article 5, or the facilities prescribed in proviso of paragraph 1 of Article 30 of the same Act (hereinafter referred to as "specified facilities") shall make grant decision; for persons with disabilities entered placement in specified facilities and have entered successively not less than two facilities (hereinafter referred to as "persons with disabilities entered placement successively" in this paragraph), the municipalities where the first facilities which such persons with disabilities entered placement are located shall make grant decision. Provided, however, for the persons with disabilities entered placement in specified facilities who did not have their domiciles before their placement or their domiciles were not clear, the municipality where they had location at the time of placement (for persons with disabilities entered placement successively: domiciles they had before they entered the first specified facility) shall make grant decision.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十六条　市町村は、保険料を滞納している第一号被保険者である要介護被保険者等（原子爆弾被爆者に対する援護に関する法律（平成六年法律第百十七号）による一般疾病医療費の支給その他厚生労働省令で定める医療に関する給付を受けることができるものを除く。）が、当該保険料の納期限から厚生労働省令で定める期間が経過するまでの間に当該保険料を納付しない場合においては、当該保険料の滞納につき災害その他の政令で定める特別の事情があると認める場合を除き、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該要介護被保険者等に対し被保険者証の提出を求め、当該被保険者証に、第四十一条第六項、第四十二条の二第六項、第四十六条第四項、第四十八条第四項、第五十一条の二第四項、第五十三条第四項、第五十四条の二第六項、第五十八条第四項及び第六十一条の二第四項の規定を適用しない旨の記載（以下この条及び次条第三項において「支払方法変更の記載」という。）をするものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 66 (1) A Municipality, in a case when an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., that is a Primary Insured Person that is a person delinquent in payment of an insurance premium (except for those who can receive a medical allowance for general disease pursuant to the Act for Medical Measures for the Victims of the Atomic Bomb (Act No. 117 of 1994) and other benefits for medical care as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare) fails to pay said insurance premium from the payment due date of said insurance premium until the expiry of the period as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, except for a case when it is determined that there is a special circumstance for said delinquency of insurance premium payment such as a disaster or other special circumstances provided by a Cabinet Order, shall request said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., to submit the Certificate of Insured Person, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, and enter on said Certificate of Insured Person that the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (6), Article 42-2, paragraph (6), Article 46, paragraph (4), Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 51-2, paragraph (4), Article 53, paragraph (4), Article 54-2, paragraph (6), Article 58, paragraph (4) and Article 61-2, paragraph (4) shall not apply (herein referred to as "Entry of Change of Payment Method" in this Article and paragraph (3) of the following Article).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

法第百三十二条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明する 書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。一組織変更の理由及び内容を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が外国人である場合当該役員の住民票の 写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が法人である場合当該役員の登記事項証 明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓 約する書面 ハ組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の役員が外国人又は法人でない場合当該役員の 住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しな い旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しない ことを誓約する書面 三組織変更計画を承認した会員総会の議事録 四直前事業年度の決算関係書類等 五現に存する純資産額を証する書面 六法第百二十九条第一項の規定により組織変更時発行株式を発行するときは、次に掲 げる書面 イ組織変更時発行株式の引受けの申込みを証する書面 ロ金銭を出資の目的とするときは、法第百三十一条の三第一項の規定による払込み があったことを証する書面 ハ金銭以外の財産を出資の目的とするときは、次に掲げる書面 （１） 検査役が選任されたときは、検査役の調査報告を記載した書面及びその附 属書類 （２） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第三号に掲 げる場合には、有価証券の市場価格を証する書面 （３） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第四号に掲 げる場合には、同号に規定する証明を記載した書面及びその附属書類 （４） 法第百三十一条の六において準用する会社法第二百七条第九項第五号に掲 げる場合には、同号の金銭債権について記載された会計帳簿 ニ検査役の報告に関する裁判があったときは、その謄本 七法第百二十四条第二項の規定による公告及び催告をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債 権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しくは当 該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該組 織変更をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書類 九主要な株主の氏名、住所又は居所、国籍及び職業（株主が法人その他の団体である 場合には、その商号又は名称、本店又は主たる事務所の所在の場所及び営んでいる事 業の内容）並びに保有する議決権の数を記載した書面例文帳に追加

The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 132, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as follows (in the case of certifications issued by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document containing the reasons for and contents of entity conversion; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a foreign national: a Copy of the Residence Certificate, etc. of said officer, the curriculum vitae, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (a) to (k) of the Act; (b) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document containing the history thereof, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (l) of the Act; (c) in the case where an officer of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after - 80 - Entity Conversion is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a Copy of the Residence Certificate, etc. of said officer, the curriculum vitae, a certificate of a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 (a) or (b) of the Act, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) to (k) of the same item; (iii) minutes of a general meeting of the members which approved the entity conversion plan; (iv) Settlement Related Documents, etc. for the most recent business year; (v) a document proving the amount of the existing net assets; (vi) when issuing Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion pursuant to the provisions of Article 129, paragraph 1 of the Act, the following documents: (a) a document proving an application to subscribe for the Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion; (b) when making money the object of the contribution, a document stating that payment was made pursuant to the provisions of Article 131-3, paragraph 1 of the Act; (c) when making property other than money the object of the contribution, the following documents: 1. when an inspector has been appointed: a document containing the investigation report by said inspector and its annexed documents; 2. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 3 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: a document proving the market price of the Securities; 3. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 4 of the Company Act - 81 - as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: a document containing the certification prescribed in the same item and its annexed documents; 4. in the case set forth in Article 207, paragraph 9, item 5 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 131-6 of the Act: the account book stating the monetary claim set forth in the same item; (d) when there has been a court judgment on a report by an inspector: a transcript of said judgment; (vii) a document that states that a public notice or a notification under Article 124, paragraph 2 of the Act has been given; and when a creditor has made an objection, documents that state that the liabilities have been repaid or a reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor or reasonable property has been deposited in trust for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said entity conversion is not likely to harm said creditor;(viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees; (ix) a document that contains major shareholders’ names, addresses or residences, nationalities and occupations (in the case where a shareholder is a juridical person or other organization, its trade name or name, the location of its head office or principal office, and the contents of its business), and the number of voting rights they hold.  - 経済産業省

３　職員は、職員団体を結成し、若しくは結成せず、又はこれに加入し、若しくは加入しないことができる。ただし、重要な行政上の決定を行う職員、重要な行政上の決定に参画する管理的地位にある職員、職員の任免に関して直接の権限を持つ監督的地位にある職員、職員の任免、分限、懲戒若しくは服務、職員の給与その他の勤務条件又は職員団体との関係についての当局の計画及び方針に関する機密の事項に接し、そのためにその職務上の義務と責任とが職員団体の構成員としての誠意と責任とに直接に抵触すると認められる監督的地位にある職員その他職員団体との関係において当局の立場に立つて遂行すべき職務を担当する職員（以下「管理職員等」という。）と管理職員等以外の職員とは、同一の職員団体を組織することができず、管理職員等と管理職員等以外の職員とが組織する団体は、この法律にいう「職員団体」ではない。例文帳に追加

(3) Officials may organize or refrain from organizing, or may join or refrain from joining an employee organization. However, officials making important administrative decisions, holding managerial positions who participate in making the aforementioned decisions, holding supervisory positions with direct authority on the appointment and dismissal of officials, or those holding supervisory positions with access to confidential matters related to plans and policies of the proper authorities on appointment and dismissal, change in employment status, disciplinary action or service discipline, remuneration and other working conditions of officials, or on their relations with employee organizations, whose obligations and responsibilities in the course of their duties are thus found to directly conflict with the sincerity and responsibilities as members of employee organizations, and other officials taking charge of duties which, in their relations with employee organizations, should be performed from the standpoint of the proper authorities (hereinafter referred to collectively as "managerial personnel, etc.") shall not form the same employee organization as officials other than managerial personnel, etc., and, further, an organization formed jointly by managerial personnel, etc. and by the officials other than managerial personnel, etc., is not the employee organization referred to in this Act.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

異議申立人は，次を条件として，ファクシミリ又は写真複写等，原本以外の様式で異議申立書を提出することができる。 (a)当該ファックス，写真複写その他の様式が本規則の要件を遵守しており，かつ，異議申立書又は宣誓された異議申立書の提出期間又はその延長期間内に提出されること (b)宣誓された異議申立書の原本が，当該ファックス，写真複写その他の様式の提出から1月以内に提出されること (c)宣誓された異議申立書の原本が，異議申立の対象としての標章を公告するIPO公報の発行日から起算して最大4月の期間内に提出されること。すべての場合において，宣誓された異議申立書の原本が提出された場合にのみ，答弁書催告状が出願人に送付される。例文帳に追加

The party filing the opposition may submit an opposition in a form other than the original such as a facsimile copy or photocopy provided: (1) that such fax, photocopy or other form complies with the requirements of these Regulations and is filed within the period to file the notice of opposition or the verified opposition, or any extension thereof, (2) that the original copy of the verified opposition is filed within one month from submission of the fax, photocopy or other form and, (3) that the original copy of the verified opposition is filed within the maximum period of four months counted from the date of release of the IPO Gazette publishing the mark being opposed. In all cases, the notice to answer shall be sent to the applicant only upon the filing of the original copy of the verified opposition. - 特許庁

2つ目の理由とは、合理的な原産国調査を経て、自らの必要な紛争鉱物が対象国を原産国とする可能性があり、再生利用品、もしくはスクラップ起源でない可能性があると確信する理由があるという結論に基づいて第3ステップへと進み、その後に義務付けられたデュー・ディリジェンスを実行した結果として集められた情報では、その紛争鉱物の原産国、その紛争鉱物がそれらの国々における武装集団の資金源となっていた、またはこれらに利益をもたらしていたか否か、またはその紛争鉱物が再生利用品、もしくはスクラップ起源であったか否かを明確化できなかったというものである。例文帳に追加

second, they proceeded to step three based upon the conclusion, after their reasonable country of origin inquiry, that they had a reason to believe that their necessary conflict minerals may have originated in the Covered Countries and may not have come from recycled or scrap sources and the information they gathered as a result of their subsequently required exercise of due diligence failed to clarify the conflict minerals’ country of origin, whether the conflict minerals financed or benefited armed groups in those countries, or whether the conflict minerals came from recycled or scrap sources. - 経済産業省

博覧会優先権は，出願されている標章が付された商品又はサービスが公式の又は公認の博覧会において展示された日から存在するものとみなすが，ただし，次の事項が履行されていることを条件とする: 出願が，商品又はサービスの最初の展示日から6月以内に行われること, 出願が，同一の標章及び展示された商品又はサービスと同一のものを対象としていること, 優先権が，出願日から2月以内に，展示の日付及び博覧会が開催される国名を表示して主張されること, 出願人が，出願日から3月以内に，所定の優先権手数料を納付し，かつ，博覧会職員から交付され，出願した標章が付されていた商品又はサービスの展示日を証明する書類を提出すること例文帳に追加

The right of exhibition priority shall be deemed to exist as from the date of display of the goods or services bearing the mark applied for at an official or officially recognized exhibition, provided that: the application is filed within six months following the date of the first display of the goods or services; the application relates to the same mark and the same displayed goods or services; priority is claimed within two months from the filing date of the application with a mention of the date of display and the country in which the exhibition was held; within three months following the filing date of the application, the applicant pays the prescribed priority fee and submits a document issued by the exhibition officials certifying the date of display of the goods or services bearing the mark applied for.  - 特許庁

４　会社法第百十六条第三項、第四項、第六項及び第七項（反対株主の株式買取請求）、第百十七条第二項から第六項まで（株式の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資社員による優先出資買取請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百十六条第三項及び第七項中「第一項各号の行為」とあるのは「資産流動化計画の変更」と、同条第三項中「当該行為が効力を生ずる日」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百五十三条第二項に規定する計画変更決議の日」と、「同項各号に定める株式の」とあるのは「その」と、「当該行為を」とあるのは「当該資産流動化計画の変更を」と、同法第百十七条第二項、第五項及び第六項中「株式の」とあるのは「優先出資の」と、同項中「、株券」とあるのは「、優先出資証券」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 116(3), (4), (6), and (7) (Dissenting Shareholders' Share Purchase Demand), Article 117(2) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Price of Shares), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of a Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Demands for the Purchase of Preferred Equity made by the Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "act in any item of paragraph (1)" in Article 116(3) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "change to the Asset Securitization Plan," the phrases "the day when such act becomes effective," "of the shares provided for in each item of that paragraph," and "such act" in Article 116(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day of the Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 153(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," "thereof," and "changes to the Asset Securitization Plan," respectively, the phrases "of the shares" in Article 117(2) and (6) of the Companies Act and "for such shares" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Preferred Equity," the term "share certificates" in Article 117(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Securities," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十一条の二　法第二十一条第三項に規定する政令で定める金融機関は、銀行、長期信用銀行、信用金庫、信用金庫連合会、農林中央金庫、株式会社商工組合中央金庫、保険会社（保険業法（平成七年法律第百五号）第二条第二項に規定する保険会社及び同条第七項に規定する外国保険会社等をいう。）及び金融商品取引業者（金融商品取引法第二条第九項に規定する金融商品取引業者であつて、同法第二十八条第一項第一号に掲げる行為を業として行う者に限る。）とする。例文帳に追加

Article 11-2 (1) Financial institutions specified by Cabinet Order as prescribed in Article 21, paragraph (3) of the Act shall be banks, long-term credit banks, credit associations, federations of credit associations, Norinchukin Bank, Shokochukin Bank Limited, insurance corporations (meaning insurance corporations prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act (Act No. 105 of 1995) and foreign insurance corporations, etc. prescribed in paragraph (7) of the said Article) and financial instruments business operators (limited to financial instruments business operators prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act who conduct acts listed in Article 28, paragraph (1), item (i) of the said Act in the course of trade).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一つ一つの先物取引、あるいは取引所に非常にやはり人類の産業革命、あるいは産業革命以前からの非常に古い必要な、経済活動で必須なものが多いわけですから、そういった意味で非常に色々な企業団体、あるいは社会にきちんとビルトインされていまして、そういった意味で、大臣にならせていただいた当初は、「そう簡単な話ではない」というふうに私も思っていましたけれども、おかげさまで昨日、3省庁副大臣の打合せが行われ、総合的な取引所について、規制・監督を一元化するという方向で、共通認識が得られてきているところと聞いております。例文帳に追加

Most types of futures trading and most exchanges have a very long tradition dating back to or beyond the Industrial Revolution as economic activity and as a place for the activity, and they are indispensable.　They involve various corporations and organizations and are built into our society.　Therefore, when I became the Minister for Financial Services, I thought that establishing a comprehensive exchange would not be an easy task.　However, at yesterday's meeting of the senior vice ministers, I hear that they moved closer to a consensus on the need to integrate the regulatory and supervisory powers concerning the planned comprehensive exchange.  - 金融庁

第三条　使用が廃止された有害物質使用特定施設（水質汚濁防止法（昭和四十五年法律第百三十八号）第二条第二項に規定する特定施設（次項において単に「特定施設」という。）であって、同条第二項第一号に規定する物質（特定有害物質であるものに限る。）をその施設において製造し、使用し、又は処理するものをいう。以下同じ。）に係る工場又は事業場の敷地であった土地の所有者、管理者又は占有者（以下「所有者等」という。）であって、当該有害物質使用特定施設を設置していたもの又は次項の規定により都道府県知事から通知を受けたものは、環境省令で定めるところにより、当該土地の土壌の特定有害物質による汚染の状況について、環境大臣が指定する者に環境省令で定める方法により調査させて、その結果を都道府県知事に報告しなければならない。ただし、環境省令で定めるところにより、当該土地について予定されている利用の方法からみて土壌の特定有害物質による汚染により人の健康に係る被害が生ずるおそれがない旨の都道府県知事の確認を受けたときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 3 (1) Any person who is the owner, manager, or occupier (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner, etc.") of the site of a plant or workplace pertaining to a Specified Facility (hereinafter referring to a Specified Facility provided in paragraph (2) of Article 2 of the Water Pollution Control Act (Act No. 138 of 1970) (referred to as "Specified Facility" in the following paragraph) and in which any of the substances listed in item (i) of paragraph (2) of the said Article (limited to Designated Hazardous Substances), the use of which has been abolished, and who has installed the Specified Facility or has received a notification by the prefectural governor pursuant to the following paragraph, shall have a person designated by the Minister of Environment conduct an investigation of the situation of contamination of the soil of the land by Designated Hazardous Substances in the manner provided in the Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, and shall report its results to the governor. However, the forgoing requirement shall not apply to any person who has received confirmation by the governor, as provided in the Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, that there are no threats on the said site for its scheduled use that no harmful effects on human health will be caused by the soil contamination by Designated Hazardous Substances.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三百六条第三項から第七項まで（株主総会の招集手続等に関する検査役の選任）及び第三百七条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の申立てがあった場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百六条第四項及び第七項中「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第三百七条第一項第一号、第二項及び第三項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 306(3) to (7) inclusive (Election of Inspector on Calling Procedures of Shareholders Meeting), Article 307 (Determination by the Court of the Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the petition set forth in the preceding paragraph has been filed. In this case, the term "the Stock Company" in Article 306(4) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Specific Purpose Company," the term "a shareholders meeting" in Article 307(1)(i), (2), and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a general meeting of members," the term "the shareholders" in Article 307(1)(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一　事業が終了した日から三箇月を経過した日前における労災保険法の規定による業務災害に関する保険給付（労災保険法第十六条の六第一項第二号の場合に支給される遺族補償一時金及び特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付を除く。）の額に第十二条第三項の厚生労働省令で定める給付金の額を加えた額と一般保険料に係る確定保険料の額（同条第一項第一号の事業については、労災保険率に応ずる部分の額。次号において同じ。）から非業務災害率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額に第一種特別加入保険料に係る確定保険料の額から特別加入非業務災害率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額を加えた額に第一種調整率を乗じて得た額との割合が百分の八十五を超え、又は百分の七十五以下であつて、その割合がその日以後において変動せず、又は厚生労働省令で定める範囲を超えて変動しないと認められるとき。例文帳に追加

(i) If the ratio between the amount of the insurance benefits concerning employment injury provided for in the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (excluding the lump sum compensation for surviving family paid in case of Article 16-6, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act and the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease) prior to the day on which three months have elapsed from the day the business is terminated, plus the amount of the benefits specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 12, paragraph (3) on one hand, and the amount of final insurance premiums pertaining to the general insurance premiums (or, in case of the businesses set forth in the same Article, paragraph (1), item (i), the amount of the portion corresponding to the industrial accident insurance rate; the same shall apply in the following item) after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the off-the-job injury rate, plus the amount of final insurance premiums pertaining to the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the special enrollment off-the-job injury rate, multiplied by the Class I adjustment rate on the other hand, exceeds eighty-five one-hundredth (85/100), or is seventy-five one-hundredth (75/100) or less, and such ratio does not change on and after such date, or such ratio is deemed as not changing beyond the scope specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; or  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　第二十七条の三第四項並びに第二十七条の八第一項から第六項までの規定は、公開買付報告書について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の三第四項中「発行者（当該公開買付届出書を提出した日において、既に当該発行者の株券等に係る公開買付届出書の提出をしている者がある場合には、当該提出をしている者を含む。）」とあるのは「発行者」と、第二十七条の八第一項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第二項中「当該公開買付期間の末日までの間において、買付条件等の変更（第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。）その他の公開買付届出書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更その他当該公開買付届出書の内容を訂正すべき内閣府令で定める事情がある」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第五項に規定するあん分比例方式により買付け等をする株券等の数が確定した」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第三項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、「買付条件等がこの節の規定」とあるのは「買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済が第二十七条の十三第四項及び第五項の規定」と、「買付条件等の変更が第二十七条の六第一項の規定」とあるのは「買付け等をする株券等の数の計算の結果が第二十七条の十三第五項に規定する内閣府令で定めるあん分比例方式」と、同条第四項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第五項中「第三項の規定による処分」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する第三項及び前項の規定による処分」と、「末日（当該末日後に提出される訂正届出書に係る処分にあつては、当該末日の翌日から起算して五年を経過した日）後は、することができないものとし、前項の規定による処分は、当該末日」とあるのは「末日」と、同条第六項中「第一項から第四項まで」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する第一項から第四項まで」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) Article 27-3(4) and Article 27-8(1) to (6) inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Tender Offer Report. In this case, the part "the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. to which the Tender Offer is made (and the person who has already submitted a Tender Offer Notification with regard to any Share Certificates, etc. issued by the Issuer as of the day on which the Tender Offer Notification is submitted, if any)" in Article 27-3(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Issuer"; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the part "there occurs any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3)) or in the important matters to be stated in a Tender Offer Notification, or any other circumstance specified for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Tender Offer Notification," "submitted but before the last day of the Tender Offer Period" and the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made is fixed by the Method of Proportional Distribution set forth in Article 27-13(5)," "submitted" and "amendment report"; the terms "amendment," "the Terms of Purchase, etc.," "the provisions of this Section," "the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc.," and "violates Article 27-6(1)" in Article 27-8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report," "delivery and other settlement methods," "Article 27-13(4) and (5)," "the result of calculation for deciding the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made," and "contravenes the method of proportional distribution specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 27-13(5)," respectively; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the parts "disposition under paragraph (3)" and "the last day of the Tender Offer Period (including the period to be extended under paragraph (8); the same shall apply in paragraph (7)) (or, in the cases of the disposition resulting in the submission of an amendment report after the last day of the Tender Offer Period, after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day), and the disposition under the preceding paragraph may not be given after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day." in Article 27-8(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition under paragraph (3) and the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)" and "the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period," respectively; and the terms "amendment" and "paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report" and "paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)," respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第一条の二の十四　政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構がその会員（平成十八年四月一日から平成二十一年三月三十一日までの間に第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。次条第三項において「特例会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に極めて重大な支障が生じるおそれがあると認める場合（政令で定める日における当該生命保険契約者保護機構の借入残高に、当該生命保険契約者保護機構が当該費用を借入れにより賄うとした場合の当該借入れの額として政令で定める額を加えた額が当該生命保険契約者保護機構の長期的な収支を勘案して政令で定める額を超える場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（特定業務に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。例文帳に追加

Article 1-2-14 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2009 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Members under Special Provisions" in paragraph (3) of the following Article) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing serious consequences in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the sum total of the amount of outstanding debts of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation as of the date specified by a Cabinet Order and the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of additional debts to be incurred if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation should have to finance such costs through borrowings exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order taking into consideration the long-term balance of payments of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the Specified Activities) within the amount prescribed by the budget.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

本発明のリアコンバージョンレンズＲＣＬは、マスターレンズＭＬとカメラ本体との間に接続可能で、マスターレンズＭＬの焦点距離に対して全系の焦点距離を長くするリアコンバージョンレンズであって、レンズ系の部分が、物体側から順に、物体側よりも像側に強い絶対値の屈折力をもつ正の第1レンズＬ１１３と、物体側よりも像側に強い絶対値の屈折力をもつ負の第2レンズＬ１１４と、像側よりも物体側に強い絶対値の屈折力をもつ正の第3レンズＬ１１５と、像側よりも物体側に強い絶対値の屈折力をもつ負の第4レンズＬ１１６と、正の第５レンズ成分Ｌ１１７，Ｌ１１８とを有し、以下の条件式を満たすことを特徴とする。例文帳に追加

The rear conversion lens RCL is connected between a master lens ML and a camera main body, and makes the focal distance of a total system long to the focal distance of the master lens ML. - 特許庁

第百十九条　会社法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項（剰余金の配当等に関する責任）の規定は第百十七条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十三条（株主に対する求償権の制限等）の規定は特定目的会社の社員について、同法第四百六十四条（買取請求に応じて株式を取得した場合の責任）の規定は第百五十三条の規定による請求に応じた特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、同法第四百六十五条第二項（欠損が生じた場合の責任）の規定は前条の規定による特定目的会社の取締役の責任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第四百六十二条第二項及び第三項中「業務執行者」とあるのは「同条に規定する取締役」と、同項中「前条第一項各号に掲げる行為の時における分配可能額」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条第一項又は第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同法第四百六十三条第一項中「第四百六十一条第一項各号に掲げる行為」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十四条の規定による利益の配当又は中間配当」と、「金銭等の帳簿価額の総額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、「当該行為がその効力を生じた日における分配可能額」とあるのは「同条第一項又は資産流動化法第百十五条第三項に規定する額」と、同条第二項中「金銭等の帳簿価額」とあるのは「配当金の額又は分配金の額」と、同法第四百六十四条第一項中「当該支払の日における分配可能額」とあるのは「当該支払が属する事業年度（その事業年度の直前の事業年度が最終事業年度でないときは、その事業年度の直前の事業年度）に係る資産流動化法第百十四条第一項の額」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 119 (1) The provisions of Article 462(2) and (3) (Liability Related to Dividends of Surplus) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the directors of a Specific Purpose Company pursuant to Article 117 of this Act, Article 463 (Restrictions on Remedy Over Against Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the members of a Specific Purpose Company, Article 464 (Liability Where Shares Are Acquired in Response to Demand for Purchase) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company who has responded to a request under Article 153 of this Act and Article 465(2) (Liability in Cases of Damage) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liability of the director of a Specific Purpose Company under the preceding Article. In this case, the term "Executing Persons" in Article 462(2) and (3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "director prescribed in that Article," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the time of the act listed in each item of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article" in Article 462(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount provided in Article 114(1) or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "the acts listed in each item of Article 461(1)," "the total book value of the Monies, Etc.," and "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such act takes effect" in Article 463(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the distribution of profits or Payment of Interim Dividends under the provisions of Article 114 of the Asset Securitization Act," "the amount of Dividends or the amount of Distribution," and "the amount prescribed in paragraph (1) of that Article or Article 115(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "the book value of the Monies, etc." in Article 463(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of Cash Dividends or the amount of Cash Distributions," the phrase "the Distributable Amount as at the day when such payment is made" in Article 464(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount set forth in Article 114(1) of the Asset Securitization Act pertaining to the business year that contains such payment (in cases where the business year immediately preceding such business year is not the most recent business year, the business year immediately preceding such business year)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

二　前号に該当する場合を除き、事業が終了した日から九箇月を経過した日前における労災保険法の規定による業務災害に関する保険給付（労災保険法第十六条の六第一項第二号の場合に支給される遺族補償一時金及び特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付を除く。）の額に第十二条第三項の厚生労働省令で定める給付金の額を加えた額と一般保険料に係る確定保険料の額から非業務災害率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額に第一種特別加入保険料に係る確定保険料の額から特別加入非業務災害率に応ずる部分の額を減じた額を加えた額に第二種調整率（業務災害に関する年金たる保険給付に要する費用、特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付に要する費用、有期事業に係る業務災害に関する保険給付で当該事業が終了した日から九箇月を経過した日以後におけるものに要する費用その他の事情を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める率をいう。）を乗じて得た額との割合が百分の八十五を超え、又は百分の七十五以下であるとき。例文帳に追加

(ii) Except for the cases falling under the preceding item, if the ratio between the amount of the insurance benefits concerning employment injury provided for in the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (excluding the lump sum compensation for surviving family paid in case of Article 16-6, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act and the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease) paid prior to the day on which 9 months have elapsed from the day the business is terminated, plus the amount of the benefits specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 12, paragraph (3) on one hand, and the amount of final insurance premiums pertaining to the general insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the off-the-job injury rate, plus the amount of final insurance premiums concerning the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the special enrollment off-the-job injury rate, multiplied by the Class II adjustment rate (meaning the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare by taking into consideration of the costs required for the insurance benefits paid as pension concerning employment injury, the costs required for the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease, the costs required for the insurance benefits concerning employment injury pertaining to businesses with a definite term paid on and after the day nine months have elapsed from the day the business is terminated, and other circumstances) on the other hand, exceeds eighty-five one-hundredth (85/100), or is seventy-five one-hundredth (75/100) or less.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一般式（１）：Ｒ^1Ｓｉ（ＯＲ^2）_3（１）（式中、Ｒ^1は少なくとも１つのエポキシ基を有する炭素数１〜８の炭化水素基、または少なくとも１つのエポキシ基を有する芳香族炭化水素基を表し、Ｒ^2は水素原子、炭素数１〜８の炭化水素基、または芳香族炭化水素基を表す）で示されるエポキシ基含有アルコキシシラン類（ａ１）およびエポキシ基を有しない金属アルコキシド類（ａ２）を｛（ａ２）のモル数｝／｛（ａ１）のモル数と（ａ２）のモル数との合計｝（モル比）が０．８以下となるように含有する混合物を、固体触媒を用いて加水分解、縮合させることによって得られる実質的にシラノール基を含まないエポキシ基含有シルセスキオキサン（Ａ）ならびにエポキシ樹脂用硬化剤（Ｂ）を必須成分として含有することを特徴とする硬化性樹脂組成物。例文帳に追加

To provide a curable composition comprising a silsesquioxane compound that removes defects of extremely poor stability of a conventional silsesquioxane containing a residual alkoxy group and a curable composition containing the same, is cured by ultraviolet light and contains substantially no silanol group. - 特許庁

(a) 商標が，スロバキア共和国の領域において，商標登録の対象である商品又はサービスについて，継続して5年間適正に使用されていない場合。商標の所有者が別段の証明を行わないとき又は不使用に正当な理由がないときは，商標は，スロバキア共和国の領域において継続して5年間使用されていないとみなされる。5年間の不使用及び商標の取消請求に引き続いて商標の使用が開始され又は再開された場合は，庁は，商標を取り消さないものとする。5年間の商標不使用に引き続いて取消請求に先立つ3月以内に開始され又は再開された使用は，商標の取消請求がなされる可能性があることを所有者が認識した後に使用の開始又は再開の準備がなされたときは無視される。例文帳に追加

a) if the trade mark has not been properly used for goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered within the continuous period of five years in the territory of the Slovak Republic; unless proved otherwise by the proprietor of the trade mark or there are no legitimate reasons for non-use, the trade mark shall be considered not used in the territory of the Slovak Republic within the continuous period of five years. The Office shall not revoke the trade mark, if the use of the trade mark commenced or was resumed following five years of non use and filing the request for revocation of the trade mark; the use which commenced or which was resumed following five years of non-use of the trade mark within three months preceding the filing of the request for revocation shall be disregarded where the preparations for the commencement or the resumption of the use occurred only after the proprietor becomes aware that a request for revocation of the trade mark might be filed;territory of the Slovak Republic within the continuous period of five years. The Office shall not revoke the trade mark, if the use of the trade mark commenced or was resumed following five years of non use and filing the request for revocation of the trade mark; the use which commenced or which was resumed following five years of non-use of the trade mark within three months preceding the filing of the request for revocation shall be disregarded where the preparations for the commencement or the resumption of the use occurred only after the proprietor becomes aware that a request for revocation of the trade mark might be filed; - 特許庁

第八十三条の三　第七十五条の二第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の三から第七十五条の十二までの規定は、前条の規定による指定、指定コンサルタント試験機関及びコンサルタント試験事務について準用する。この場合において、第七十五条の二第三項及び第七十五条の十二中「都道府県労働局長」とあるのは「厚生労働大臣」と、第七十五条の二第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「第八十三条の二」と、第七十五条の四第二項中「第七十五条の六第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の五第一項中「免許を受ける者として必要な知識及び能力を有するかどうかの判定」とあるのは「労働安全コンサルタント試験又は労働衛生コンサルタント試験の問題の作成及び採点」と、同条及び第七十五条の八中「免許試験員」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験員」と、第七十五条の五第四項中「次条第一項に規定する試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と、第七十五条の六第一項中「規程（以下この条及び第七十五条の十一第二項第四号において「試験事務規程」という。）」とあるのは「規程」と、同条第二項及び第三項並びに第七十五条の十一第二項第四号中「試験事務規程」とあるのは「コンサルタント試験事務の実施に関する規程」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 83-3 The provisions of paragraph (2) and (3) of Article 75-2, and of Article 75-3 through Article 75-12 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the work of the designated consultant examination institutions and consultant examination affairs provided for in the preceding article. In this case, "the Director of the Prefectural Labor Bureau" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 and Article 75-12 shall be read as "the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare"; "paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) of Article 75-2 read as "Article 83-2"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6" in paragraph (2) of Article 75-4 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of consultant examination affairs "; "giving a decision as to whether the applicant has knowledge and capability necessary for a license holder" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-5 as "formulating and marking examination questions for industrial safety consultant examinations and industrial health consultant examinations"; "license examiner" in the same article and Article 75-8 as "consultant examiner"; "the examination affair rules provided for in paragraph (1) of the following Article" in paragraph (4) of Article 75-5 as "the procedure rules concerning the implementation of the consultant examination affairs "; "examination affairs (hereinafter in this Article and Article 75-11, paragraph (2), item (iv) referred to as the ' examination affair rules')" in paragraph (1) of Article 75-6 as "procedure rules"; "the examination affair rules" in paragraphs 2 and 3 of the same Article and item (iv) of paragraph (2) of Article 75-11 as "the procedure rules relating to the implementation of consultant examination affairs".  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百二条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第六号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第六号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十四条（第六号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定は、会員金融商品取引所の組織変更の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第六号中「組織変更をする会社の株主等若しくは社員等」とあるのは「組織変更をする会員金融商品取引所の会員等（会員、理事長、理事、監事又は清算人をいう。）」と、「組織変更後の会社の株主等、社員等」とあるのは「組織変更後株式会社金融商品取引所の株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。）」と、同法第九百三十七条第三項中「各会社の本店」とあるのは「金融商品取引所の本店及び支店並びに主たる事務所及び従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 102 (1) The provisions of Articles 828(1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vi)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vi)), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (vi)), Article 835(1), Articles 836 to 839 inclusive, Article 846 and Article 937(3) (limited to the part pertaining to item (i)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of Entity Conversion of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. or members, etc. of the company implementing entity conversion" in Article 828(2)(vi) of the that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Member, etc. (meaning members, president, board members, auditors or liquidators) of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange implementing entity conversion"; and the term "shareholders, etc., members, etc. of the company after Entity Conversion" in that item of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholders, etc. (meaning shareholders, directors or liquidators (with regard to a company with board of company auditors, meaning shareholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators; and with regard to a company with committees, meaning shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators)) of a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange after Entity Conversion,"; the term "the head office of each company" in Article 937(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office and branch offices of and the principal office and secondary offices of the Financial Instruments Exchange,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　第百七十八条の規定により読み替えて適用する会社法第五百条（債務の弁済の制限）の規定並びに同法第四百七十六条（清算株式会社の能力）、第二編第九章第一節第二款（清算株式会社の機関）、第四百九十二条（財産目録等の作成等）、同節第四款（第五百条を除く。）（債務の弁済等）、第五百八条（帳簿資料の保存）、同章第二節（第五百十条、第五百十一条及び第五百十四条を除く。）（特別清算）、第七編第三章第一節（総則）及び第三節（特別清算の手続に関する特則）並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、その性質上許されないものを除き、第一項の規定による免許特定法人及び引受社員の財産についての清算について準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provision of Article 500 (Restrictions on Performance of Obligations) of the Companies Act as applied with relevant changes in interpretation pursuant to the provision of Article 178, and the provisions of Article 476 (Capacity of Liquidating Stock Companies), Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1, Subsection 2 (Structures for Liquidating Stock Companies), Article 492 (Preparation of Inventory of Property), Part II, Chapter IX, Section 1, Subsection 4 (excluding Article 500) (Performance of Obligations), Article 508 (Retention of Accounting Materials), Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Articles 510, 511 and 514) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (General Provisions) and 3 (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure) and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of the property of a Licensed Specified Juridical Person and its Underwriting Members under paragraph (1), unless their specific characters forbid such application. In this case, any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３ 前二項に規定する場合において、新設合併に係る費用があるときは、当該費用のうち 新設合併対価として考慮すべきものをも新設合併対価として考慮するものとする。新設合併対象財産に全部の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所における新設合併の直前の帳簿 価額を付すべき場合において、新設合併設立会員商品取引所の出資金、加入金、資本剰余 金、法定準備金及び利益剰余金についても全部の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所における新 設合併の直前の出資金、加入金、資本剰余金、法定準備金及び利益剰余金を引き継ぐべき ときは、新設合併設立会員商品取引所の次の各号に掲げる額は、当該各号に定める額とす る。一設立時出資金額新設合併の直前の各新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の出資金の額の 合計額 二設立時加入金額新設合併の直前の各新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の加入金の額の 合計額 三設立時資本剰余金額新設合併の直前の各新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の資本剰余 金の額の合計額 四設立時法定準備金額新設合併の直前の各新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の法定準備 金の額の合計額 五設立時利益剰余金額新設合併の直前の各新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の利益剰余 金の額の合計額例文帳に追加

(3) In cases prescribed by the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where there are expenses pertaining to the Incorporation-Type Merger, the portion of said expenses related to the Incorporation-Type Merger shall also be included as a consideration of the Incorporation-Type Merger. In the case of assigning a book value immediately prior to an Incorporation-Type Merger for all the Member Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger to the Property Subject to the Incorporation-Type Merger, where the contributions, membership fees, capital surplus, statutory capital, and accumulated profit of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger shall inherit the contributions, membership fees, capital surplus, statutory capital, and accumulated profit of all Member Commodity Exchanges Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger immediately prior to the Incorporation-Type Merger, the amounts set forth in the following items of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger shall be the amounts specified in such items, respectively: (i) the Amount of Contributions at Establishment: the sum total of the amounts of the contributions of each Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger immediately prior to the Incorporation-Type Merger; (ii) the Amount of Membership Fees at Establishment: the sum total of the amounts of membership fees of each Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger immediately prior to the Incorporation-Type Merger; (iii) the Amount of Capital Surplus at Establishment: the sum total of the amounts of capital surplus of each Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger immediately prior to the Incorporation-Type Merger; (iv) the Amount of Statutory Capital at Establishment: the sum total of the amounts of statutory capital of each Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger immediately prior to the Incorporation-Type Merger; (v) the Amount of Accumulated Profit at Establishment: the sum total of the amounts of accumulated profit of each Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger immediately prior to the Incorporation-Type Merger.  - 経済産業省

第百八十四条　会社法第二編第九章第二節（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百四十一条を除く。）（特別清算）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条並びに第八百九十八条第一項第二号及び第五項を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）並びに第九百三十八条第一項から第五項まで（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算相互会社について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十二条第一項（調査命令）中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員若しくは三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者」と、同法第五百三十二条第二項（監督委員の報酬等）中「債権又は清算株式会社の株式」とあるのは「債権」と、同法第五百三十六条第三項（事業の譲渡の制限等）中「第七章（第四百六十七条第一項第五号を除く。）」とあるのは「保険業法第六十二条の二」と、同法第五百六十二条（清算人の調査結果等の債権者集会に対する報告）中「第四百九十二条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十七において準用する第四百九十二条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 184 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) and Article 541) (Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Lawsuits over Special Liquidations), Part VII, Chapter III, Sections 1 (excluding Article 868, paragraphs (2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to 874 inclusive) (General Provisions) and 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 880, and Article 898, paragraphs (1), (2) and (5)) (Special Provisions on Special Liquidation Procedure), and Article 938, paragraphs (1) to (5) inclusive (Commissioned Registration by Judgment Concerning Special Liquidations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Liquidation Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the voting rights held by all of the shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of the past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) (Order to investigate) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of the Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation)"; the term "assigned claims owed by the Liquidating Stock Company or shares in" in Article 532, paragraph (2) (Remunerations of Supervisors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "acquire any claim against"; the term "Chapter VII (excluding Article 467, paragraph (1), item (v))" in Article 536, paragraph (3) (Restrictions on Assignment of Business) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 62-2 of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 492, paragraph (1)" in Article 562 (Report to Creditors' Meeting of Outcome of Investigations by Liquidators) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 492, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-17 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。例文帳に追加

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well.  - 金融庁

７　第二十七条の八第一項から第五項までの規定は、公開買付報告書について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の八第一項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第二項中「当該公開買付期間の末日までの間において、買付条件等の変更（第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。）その他の公開買付届出書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更その他当該公開買付届出書の内容を訂正すべき内閣府令で定める事情がある」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定するあん分比例方式により買付け等をする上場株券等の数が確定した」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第三項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、「買付条件等がこの節の規定」とあるのは「買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第四項（第一号を除く。）及び第二十七条の十三第五項の規定」と、「買付条件等の変更が第二十七条の六第一項の規定」とあるのは「買付け等をする上場株券等の数の計算の結果が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定する内閣府令で定めるあん分比例方式」と、同条第四項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第五項中「第三項の規定による処分」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第七項において準用する第三項及び前項の規定による処分」と、「末日（当該末日後に提出される訂正届出書に係る処分にあつては、当該末日の翌日から起算して五年を経過した日）後は、することができないものとし、前項の規定による処分は、当該末日」とあるのは「末日」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(7) Article 27-8(1) to (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Tender Offer Report. In this case, the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the part "there occurs any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3)) or in the important matters to be stated in a Tender Offer Notification, or any other circumstance specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Tender Offer Notification, during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted but before the last day of the Tender Offer Period" and the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made is fixed by the Method of Proportional Distribution set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2) during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted" and "amendment report," respectively; the term "amendment" and the parts "the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with the provisions of this Section" and "the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the amendment violates Article 27-6(1)" in Article 27-8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report," "the delivery and other settlement methods stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with Article 27-13(4) (excluding 27-13(4)(i)) and Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)" and "the result of calculation for deciding the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made stated in the amendment contravenes the method of proportional distribution specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)"; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the term "disposition under paragraph (3)"; and the part "the last day of the Tender Offer Period (including the period to be extended under paragraph (8); the same shall apply in paragraph (7)) (or, in the cases of the disposition resulting in the submission of an amendment report after the last day of the Tender Offer Period, after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day), and the disposition under the preceding paragraph may not be given after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day." in Article 27-8(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition under paragraph (3) and the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22(7)" and "the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period," respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３ 会員等は、第一項の規定による委託者等の書面による同意に代えて、第六項で定める ところにより、当該委託者等の承諾を得て、当該委託者等の同意を電子情報処理組織を 使用する方法その他の情報通信の技術を利用する方法であって次に掲げるもの（以下こ の条において「電磁的方法」という。）により得ることができる。この場合において、 当該会員等は、当該委託者等の書面による同意を得たものとみなす。 一電子情報処理組織を使用する方法のうちイ又はロに掲げるもの イ会員等の使用に係る電子計算機と委託者等の使用に係る電子計算機とを接続する 電気通信回線を通じて送信し、受信者の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファ イルに記録する方法 ロ会員等の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに記録された当該委託者等 の同意に関する事項を電気通信回線を通じて委託者等の閲覧に供し、当該会員等 の使用に係る電子計算機に備えられたファイルに当該委託者等の同意に関する事 項を記録する方法 二磁気ディスクその他これに準ずる方法により一定の事項を確実に記録しておくこと ができる物をもって調製するファイルに委託者等の同意に関する事項を記録したもの を得る方法例文帳に追加

(3) A Member, etc. may, in lieu of the written consent of a Customer, etc. under paragraph 1, obtain the consent of said Customer, etc. by a method using an electronic data processing system or a method using other information communications technology which are listed as follows (hereinafter referred to as an "Electromagnetic Device" in this Article) by obtaining an acceptance from said Customer, etc., pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 6. In this case, said Member, etc. is deemed to have obtained the written consent of said Customer, etc.: (i) among methods for using an electronic data processing system, those listed in (a) or (b); (a) a method to transmit information through a telecommunications line that - 60 - connects a computer used by a Member, etc. and a computer used by a Customer, etc. and to record it in a file on a computer used by the receiver; (b) a method for providing matters concerning the consent of said Customer, etc. recorded in a file on a computer used by a Member, etc. for the inspection of Customers, etc. through a telecommunications line, and for recording matters concerning the consent of said Customer, etc. in a file on a computer used by said Member, etc.; (ii) a method for obtaining the record of matters concerning the consent of a Customer, etc. from a file on a magnetic disk or an equivalent method that can record certain matters securely.  - 経済産業省

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百八十条の十五　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条、第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項、第三百七十二条第三項並びに第三百七十三条を除く。）（運営）の規定は清算人会設置相互会社の清算人会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十四第八項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 180-15 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5), Article 372, paragraph (3), and Article 373) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operations of the board of liquidators of a Mutual Company with a board of liquidators; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence ), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or general representative, where the company has a General Meeting)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as set forth in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraph (2) (Omission of report to board of directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180-14, paragraph (8) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム