「...cases of」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(304ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Furthermore in cases where serious product accidents have occurred due to defects in the consumer products other than specified products or where serious danger has occurred to the lives or bodies of general consumers or the occurrence of such danger is considered to be imminent, when the competent minister finds it particularly necessary to prevent the occurrence and increase of such danger, to the extent necessary, he/she may order the person engaging in the manufacture or import of said consumer products to recall the consumer products manufactured or imported by said person and to otherwise take measures necessary to prevent the occurrence and increase of serious danger to the lives or bodies of general consumers due to said consumer products, except where the competent minister may give an order to take necessary measures in accordance with the provisions of Article 32 or other acts specified by a Cabinet Order (Article 39). 例文帳に追加

また、特定製品以外の消費生活用製品の欠陥により、重大製品事故が生じた場合その他一般消費者の生命又は身体について重大な危害が発生し、又は発生する急迫した危険がある場合において、当該危害の発生及び拡大を防止するため特に必要があると認めるときは、法第３２条の規定又は政令で定める他の法律の規定に基づき必要な措置をとるべきことを命ずることができる場合を除き、必要な限度において、当該消費生活用製品の製造又は輸入の事業を行う者に対し、その製造又は輸入に係る当該消費生活用製品の回収を図ることその他当該消費生活用製品による一般消費者の生命又は身体に対する重大な危害の発生及び拡大を防止するために必要な措置をとるべきことを命ずることができる。（法第３９条） - 経済産業省

The Tokyo High Court judgment dated February 24, 1999, a major judicial precedent ("King Crimson Case") states that, where a name or image of a celebrity is utilized in speech or publication, "the introduction etc. of a celebrity unavoidably brings with it his/her power to attract customers. Since it is impossible to introduce him/her free of influence of his/her power to attract customers' attention. Therefore, a person is regarded as utilizing a celebrity's power to attract customer only if the sole purpose and effect of such utilization is solely focused on the procurement of the economic benefit or value derived from his/her power to attract customers. If such person simply introduces a celebrity or does something similar thereto, aware of his/her power to attract customers, such person shall not be considered as having utilized such power." This judgment held that such person shall not be regarded as having infringed the publicity rights except in cases such person "solely" utilized the celebrity's power to attract customers. 例文帳に追加

その代表的な裁判例である東京高裁平成１１年２月２４日判決（以下「キングクリムゾン高裁判決」という。）は、言論、出版において、著名人の氏名・肖像が利用される場合に、「著名人の紹介等は必然的に当該著名人の顧客吸引力を反映することになり、紹介等から右顧客吸引力の影響を遮断することはできないから、著名人の顧客吸引力を利用する行為であるというためには、右行為が専ら著名人の顧客吸引力に着目しその経済的利益ないし価値を利用するものであることが必要であり、単に著名人の顧客吸引力を承知の上で紹介等をしたというだけでは当該著名人の顧客吸引力を利用したということはできない」として、「専ら」顧客吸引力の価値を利用したといえない場合には、パブリシティ権侵害を否定する立場に立っている。 - 経済産業省

Article 5 (1) Among living marine resources other than specified living marine resources, the governor of each prefecture may designate, etc. living marine resources by Prefectural Ordinance as living marine resources to be preserved and controlled in the area of the sea designated by Prefectural Ordinance (hereinafter referred to as "the designated area of the sea") by deciding the prefectural catch limit (meaning the maximum annual limit for gathering or catching each type of living marine resources in the designated area of the sea by persons other than those operating a designated fishery, etc. and those provided by Cabinet Order set forth in item (vi) of paragraph (2) of Article 3; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter referred to as "Class I designated living marine resources") or may designate, etc. living marine resources by Prefectural Ordinance as living marine resources to be preserved and controlled, by deciding the prefectural limit for fishing effort (meaning the maximum limit of the total annual fishing effort for the prefecture (the amount of fishing work (excluding work by persons who operate a designated fishery, etc.) carried out for gathering or catching each type of living marine resources, with this amount being expressed as a number of fishing days and by any other index provided in Prefectural Regulations for each mode of gathering or catching related to that type of living marine resources; hereinafter the same shall apply) for each type of living marine resources and for the mode of gathering or catching to which each such type is subject, and in cases where each type of living marine resources are controlled based on the prefectural fishing effort within designated areas of the sea or designated periods of time in relation to a mode of gathering or catching, this shall mean the maximum limit of the total annual fishing effort for the prefecture for each such mode of gathering or catching each type of living marine resources, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as "Class II designated living marine resources"), and when the governor designates Class I and Class II designated living marine resources, he/she shall prescribe the following matters in the Prefectural Plan: 例文帳に追加

第五条　都道府県の知事は、特定海洋生物資源でない海洋生物資源のうち、都道府県の条例で定める海域（以下「指定海域」という。）において、都道府県漁獲限度量（指定海域において、指定漁業等を営む者及び第三条第二項第六号の政令で定める者以外の者が採捕することができる海洋生物資源の種類ごとの年間の数量の最高限度をいう。以下同じ。）を決定すること等により保存及び管理を行う海洋生物資源として都道府県の条例で定める海洋生物資源（以下「第一種指定海洋生物資源」という。）又は都道府県漁獲努力限度量（指定海域において、海洋生物資源の種類ごとにその対象となる採捕の種類並びに当該採捕の種類に係る海域及び期間を定めて都道府県漁獲努力量（海洋生物資源を採捕するために行われる漁ろう作業（指定漁業等を営む者に係るものを除く。）の量であって、採捕の種類別に操業日数その他の都道府県の規則で定める指標によって示されるものをいう。以下同じ。）による管理を行う場合の海洋生物資源の種類ごとの当該採捕の種類に係る年間の都道府県漁獲努力量の合計の最高限度をいう。以下同じ。）を決定すること等により保存及び管理を行う海洋生物資源として都道府県の条例で定める海洋生物資源（以下「第二種指定海洋生物資源」という。）について、都道府県計画において、次に掲げる事項を定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

It is important that individual financial institutions successively implement measures such as recognizing losses, raising funds if they face a capital shortfall and separating distressed assets from their balance sheets, so as to reduce the risk of additional losses arising in the future. Indeed, such measures are actually underway at the moment. Furthermore, governments have unveiled public sector initiatives and policy measures in order to prepare for cases in which private sector entities find it difficult to do these things on their own 例文帳に追加

各金融機関において、損失をきちんと認識をし、その結果として自己資本が足りないということであればそれぞれ資本調達を行い、また、将来に向けて追加的な損失が発生しにくくなるように不良資産を切り離していくと、こういった取組みの積み重ねが重要であり、現在そういった取組みが進行している、かつ、民間当事者だけでそのオペレーションが行いきれないということに備えて各国の公的な取組み、政策面の取組みも打ち出されているということであろうかと思います - 金融庁

a. Business processes relating to a business or operation dealing with high-risk transactions. Examples include business locations or business operations that have a high-risk business likely to result in a misstatement in significant components of the financial statements (for example, businesses that have financial and/or derivatives transactions, or those that have inventory with volatile pricing), or those engaged in transactions that require complex accounting treatment. In such cases, business processes relating to the business or business operation should be examined to determine whether they should be in the scope. 例文帳に追加

ａ．リスクが大きい取引を行っている事業又は業務に係る業務プロセス例えば､財務報告の重要な事項の虚偽記載に結びつきやすい事業上のリスクを有する事業又は業務(例えば、金融取引やデリバティブ取引を行っている事業又は業務や価格変動の激しい棚卸資産を抱えている事業又は業務など)や、複雑な会計処理が必要な取引を行っている事業又は業務を行っている場合には、当該事業又は業務に係る業務プロセスは、追加的に評価対象に含めることを検討する。 - 金融庁

(i) In cases where a discretionary investment business operator concurrently undertakes services unrelated to discretionary investment business and where it receives remuneration related to discretionary investment business and fees related to other services collectively under the same contract, the business operator must separately specify the remuneration related to discretionary investment business and the fees related to other services with regard to the “matters concerning fees, remuneration or any other consideration payable by the customer with regard to said Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction,” as specified under Article 37-3(1)(iv) of the FIEA. 例文帳に追加

① 投資一任業者が投資一任業に係る業務以外の業務を行う場合で、投資一任業に係る業務の報酬と当該業務以外の業務に係る手数料等を同一契約において一体として徴収するときは、金商法第37条の３第１項第４号の「当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価に関する事項」には、投資一任に係る業務に対する報酬の額と当該業務以外の業務に対する手数料等の額との区分を明確にすること。 - 金融庁

(ii) With regard to a document which contains a statement given before a public prosecutor, when the person who has made that statement is unable to testify at the trial or in the trial preparation, owing to death, mental or physical disorder, being non est or out of the country, or when the person has given testimony at the trial or trial preparation that conflicts or substantially differs from a previous statement; provided, however, that this shall be limited to cases where the previous statement was made under circumstances that afford a statement more credible than the testimony given at the trial or in the trial preparation. 例文帳に追加

二　検察官の面前における供述を録取した書面については、その供述者が死亡、精神若しくは身体の故障、所在不明若しくは国外にいるため公判準備若しくは公判期日において供述することができないとき、又は公判準備若しくは公判期日において前の供述と相反するか若しくは実質的に異つた供述をしたとき。但し、公判準備又は公判期日における供述よりも前の供述を信用すべき特別の情況の存するときに限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) When a purchase offer is made, a bankruptcy trustee, after the period set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article has expired, shall notify the court to the effect that he/she will sell the property set forth in Article 186(3)(i) to the applicant for purchase. In this case, if two or more purchase offers are made, a bankruptcy trustee shall notify to the effect that he/she will sell the property to the applicant for purchase who has made the purchase offer with the highest offered purchase price (in cases where there are two or more purchase offers with the highest offered purchase price, the applicant for purchase who has made the first offer). 例文帳に追加

８　破産管財人は、買受けの申出があったときは、前条第一項の期間が経過した後、裁判所に対し、第百八十六条第三項第一号の財産を買受希望者に売却する旨の届出をしなければならない。この場合において、買受けの申出が複数あったときは、最高の買受けの申出の額に係る買受希望者（最高の買受けの申出の額に係る買受けの申出が複数あった場合にあっては、そのうち最も先にされたものに係る買受希望者）に売却する旨の届出をしなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In the Prospectus required under the preceding paragraph, according to the categories specified in the following items, the matters specified in the respective items shall be stated; provided, however, that in cases where the statement required under the main clause of Article 5(1) has been submitted without stating the Issue Price or other matters so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance among the matters required to be stated under item Article 5(1)(i) (hereinafter referred to as "Issue Price, etc." in this paragraph and Article 15(5)) under the proviso to Article 5(1), Issue Price, etc. shall not be required to be stated in the Prospectus, if it falls under the category specified in item (i) below: 例文帳に追加

２　前項の目論見書は、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める事項に関する内容を記載しなければならない。ただし、第一号に掲げる場合の目論見書については、第五条第一項ただし書の規定により同項第一号のうち発行価格その他の内閣府令で定める事項（以下この項及び第十五条第五項において「発行価格等」という。）を記載しないで第五条第一項本文の規定による届出書を提出した場合には、当該発行価格等を記載することを要しない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(xi) Companies specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as those exploring new business fields or conducting new business activities found to contribute considerably to the improvement of management (limited to cases where the total voting rights held in the company by the Bank Holding Company and its Subsidiary Companies other than those falling under the categories listed in the preceding item and specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance (such excluded companies shall be referred to as "Specified Subsidiary Companies" in Article 52-24, paragraph (7)) does not exceed the Maximum Threshold for Voting Rights Held prescribed in Article 52-24, paragraph (1)); 例文帳に追加

十一　新たな事業分野を開拓する会社又は経営の向上に相当程度寄与すると認められる新たな事業活動を行う会社として内閣府令で定める会社（当該会社の議決権を、銀行持株会社又はその子会社のうち前号に掲げる会社で内閣府令で定めるもの（第五十二条の二十四第七項において「特定子会社」という。）以外の子会社が、合算して、同条第一項に規定する基準議決権数を超えて保有していないものに限る。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In particular, when we see the survey conducted concerning each region, there are many cases where the problem is already serious in the two types of local communities; that is, 17 Although the expression "shopping refugee" is frequently used in some news media, because the word "refugee" is often used to indicate "those who have left a land (from political or religious reasons) to take refuge, the expression "people with limited access to shopping facilities" is used in this report to denote, in a wide sense, those who are in some difficult situation. 例文帳に追加

特に、地域毎に行われた調査を見てみると、農村部（図表10）と都市郊外（図表 11）の二類型の地域で問題が深刻化している場合が多い。ただし、その二つでは状況が若干異なる。②農村部の状況まず、農村部では、過疎化がかなりの程度まで進展しているため、近隣型の商店報道等では「買い物難民」と呼ばれることが多いが、「難民」は「（政治的・宗教的事情から）ある土地を離れて避難する人々」を指すことが多いため、当報告書ではより広義に困難な状況にある人を意味する「弱者」を用いている。 - 経済産業省

Article 20 Where a local public entity specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications has, pursuant to the provision of Article 6 of the Local Tax Act (Act No. 226 of 1950), exempted a business operator who has established facilities for a specified business specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications in an agreed cluster zone, in accordance with the approved plan for establishing new business facilities (limited to a business operator who conducts a business in designated cluster industries specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications) from paying real property acquisition tax for acquiring houses to be used for said facilities or the site thereof or fixed asset taxes for houses or structures to be used for said facilities or the site thereof, or has imposed unequal taxation related to such local taxes, and when these measures are found to fall under cases specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the base amount of income of said local public entity for each fiscal year under Article 14 of the Local Allocation Tax Act (Act No. 211 of 1950) shall be the amount obtained by deducting the partial amount of income decreases of said local public entity for said each fiscal year (for decreases due to those measures concerning fixed asset tax, limited to decreases for three years after the first fiscal year in which said measures were taken), calculated as specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, from the original base amount of income under the same Article of said local public entity for each said fiscal year (where those measures are taken on or after the date specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, for the fiscal year following each said fiscal year in which each of the income decreases occurred), notwithstanding the provision of the same Article. 例文帳に追加

第二十条　地方税法（昭和二十五年法律第二百二十六号）第六条の規定により、総務省令で定める地方公共団体が、承認企業立地計画に従って特定事業のための施設のうち総務省令で定めるものを同意集積区域内に設置した事業者（指定集積業種であって総務省令で定めるものに属する事業を行う者に限る。）について、当該施設の用に供する家屋若しくはその敷地である土地の取得に対する不動産取得税若しくは当該施設の用に供する家屋若しくは構築物若しくはこれらの敷地である土地に対する固定資産税を課さなかった場合又はこれらの地方税に係る不均一の課税をした場合において、これらの措置が総務省令で定める場合に該当するものと認められるときは、地方交付税法（昭和二十五年法律第二百十一号）第十四条の規定による当該地方公共団体の各年度における基準財政収入額は、同条の規定にかかわらず、当該地方公共団体の当該各年度分の減収額（固定資産税に関するこれらの措置による減収額にあっては、これらの措置がされた最初の年度以降三箇年度におけるものに限る。）のうち総務省令で定めるところにより算定した額を同条の規定による当該地方公共団体の当該各年度（これらの措置が総務省令で定める日以後において行われたときは、当該減収額について当該各年度の翌年度）における基準財政収入額となるべき額から控除した額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

It is indispensable to understand the Necessary Information in order to confirm that a remittance is not an outgoing remittance subject to economic sanctions such as asset freeze. However, it is necessary to keep in mind that where a Remittance Handling Financial Institution, etc. conducts customer management through understanding, etc. of the status of customers’ transactions and the content of routine remittances, when it is difficult to understand the Necessary Information at the time of receiving a request for a remittance from a customer via a Phone Line, etc. as remittance data from the customer lacks some of the Necessary Information, it is possible to confirm that the remittance is not an outgoing remittance subject to economic sanctions such as asset freeze, by checking the remittance data from the customer with data understood through customer management in lieu of understanding the Necessary Information. However, when a remittance falls under cases Where There Is a Doubt about the Truth of the Necessary Information, etc., the Remittance Handling Financial Institution, etc. must request the customer to present materials that give reasons for the remittance, such as a sales contract, an import permit, and a bill of lading, and confirm that the remittance is not an outgoing remittance subject to economic sanctions such as asset freeze. 例文帳に追加

資産凍結等経済制裁対象の仕向送金ではないことを確認するため、必要情報の把握は不可欠であるが、顧客の取引状況や経常的な送金内容の把握等による顧客管理を行っている場合において、電話回線等を経由して顧客から送金を受け付けた際に顧客からの送金データに必要情報の一部が欠落しその把握が困難なときは、当該必要情報の把握に代えて、顧客からの送金データと顧客管理により把握しているデータとを照合することにより、資産凍結等経済制裁対象の仕向送金ではないことの確認ができることに留意する必要がある。ただし、当該送金が必要情報の真偽に疑いがある場合等に該当するときは、売買契約書、輸入許可書又は船荷証券等送金の理由となる資料の提示等を求め、資産凍結等経済制裁対象の仕向送金ではないことの確認を行う必要がある。 - 財務省

(2) When a Member Commodity Exchange implements an Absorption-Type Merger (a merger of a Commodity Exchange with another Commodity Exchange where a Commodity Exchange surviving the merger [hereinafter referred to as the "Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger" in this Section] succeeds to all of the rights and obligations of the Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of the merger [hereinafter referred to as the "Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger" in this Section]; the same shall apply hereinafter) or a Consolidation-Type Merger (a merger between two or more Commodity Exchanges where a Commodity Exchange established by the merger [hereinafter referred to as the "Commodity Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger" in this Section] succeeds to all of the rights and obligations of the Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of the merger [hereinafter referred to as the "Commodity Exchange Dissolved in a Consolidation-Type Merger" in this Section]; the same shall apply hereinafter), the Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger or the Commodity Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger shall be an entity prescribed in the following items for the categories of cases set forth respectively therein: 例文帳に追加

２　会員商品取引所が吸収合併（商品取引所が他の商品取引所とする合併であつて、合併により消滅する商品取引所（以下この節において「吸収合併消滅商品取引所」という。）の権利義務の全部を合併後存続する商品取引所（以下この節において「吸収合併存続商品取引所」という。）に承継させるものをいう。以下同じ。）又は新設合併（二以上の商品取引所がする合併であつて、合併により消滅する商品取引所（以下この節において「新設合併消滅商品取引所」という。）の権利義務の全部を合併により設立する商品取引所（以下この節において「新設合併設立商品取引所」という。）に承継させるものをいう。以下同じ。）をする場合には、吸収合併存続商品取引所又は新設合併設立商品取引所は、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める者でなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 7 (1) When a prefectural governor finds that the existence of land falling under the criteria set forth by the Cabinet Order for the categories of land that causes harmful effects on human health or involves a threat of such effects, due to soil contamination by any Designated Hazardous Substance, he/she may order the Owner, etc. to take an action for removal of such contamination, prevention of dispersion of such contamination, or any other necessary measures (hereinafter referred to as an "Action for Removal, etc.") only to the extent necessary to prevent such damages, fixing a reasonable period of time; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where it is clear that a person other than the Owner, etc. of the said site has caused the contamination, and where it is appropriate to cause the person (hereinafter, including his successor by inheritance, merger, or split) to take an Action for Removal, etc. and the Owner, etc. has no objection to such action. 例文帳に追加

第七条　都道府県知事は、土壌の特定有害物質による汚染により、人の健康に係る被害が生じ、又は生ずるおそれがあるものとして政令で定める基準に該当する指定区域内の土地があると認めるときは、政令で定めるところにより、その被害を防止するため必要な限度において、当該土地の所有者等に対し、相当の期限を定めて、当該汚染の除去、当該汚染の拡散の防止その他必要な措置（以下「汚染の除去等の措置」という。）を講ずべきことを命ずることができる。ただし、当該土地の所有者等以外の者の行為によって当該土地の土壌の特定有害物質による汚染が生じたことが明らかな場合であって、その行為をした者（相続、合併又は分割によりその地位を承継した者を含む。以下同じ。）に汚染の除去等の措置を講じさせることが相当であると認められ、かつ、これを講じさせることについて当該土地の所有者等に異議がないときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 810 (excluding paragraph (1)(iii) and paragraph (2)(iii)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Membership Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger or a Splitting Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split, which is a Limited Liability Company (hereinafter referred to as the "Splitting Limited Liability Company in Incorporation-type Company Split" in this Section). In such cases, the phrase "Creditors of the Splitting Stock Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who are unable to request the Splitting Stock Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations (including performance of the guarantee obligations that the Splitting Stock Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split jointly and severally assumes with the Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split as a guarantor) (or, in the case where there are provisions on the matter set forth in Article 763(xii) or Article 765(1)(viii), creditors of the Splitting Stock Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split)" in paragraph (1)(ii) of Article 810 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Creditors of the Splitting Stock Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split who are unable to request the Splitting Stock Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split to perform the obligations (including performance of the guarantee obligations that the Splitting Stock Company(ies) in Incorporation-type Company Split jointly and severally assumes with the Company Incorporated through Incorporation-type Company Split as a guarantor)" and the term "Consolidated Stock Company, etc." in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Membership Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger (limited to a Limited Liability Company in the case where the Company Incorporated through Consolidation-type Merger is a Stock Company or a Limited Liability Company) or the Splitting Limited Liability Company in Incorporation-type Company Split." 例文帳に追加

２　第八百十条（第一項第三号及び第二項第三号を除く。）の規定は、新設合併消滅持分会社又は合同会社である新設分割会社（以下この節において「新設分割合同会社」という。）について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項第二号中「債権者（第七百六十三条第十二号又は第七百六十五条第一項第八号に掲げる事項についての定めがある場合にあっては、新設分割株式会社の債権者）」とあるのは「債権者」と、同条第三項中「消滅株式会社等」とあるのは「新設合併消滅持分会社（新設合併設立会社が株式会社又は合同会社である場合にあっては、合同会社に限る。）又は新設分割合同会社」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When a Member Commodity Exchange implements an Absorption-Type Merger (a merger of a Commodity Exchange with another Commodity Exchange where a Commodity Exchange surviving the merger [hereinafter referred to as the "Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger" in this section] succeeds to all of the rights and obligations of the Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of the merger [hereinafter referred to as the "Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger" in this Section]; the same shall apply hereinafter) or an Incorporation-Type Merger (a merger between two or more Commodity Exchanges where a Commodity Exchange established by the merger [hereinafter referred to as the "Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger" in this Section] succeeds to all of the rights and obligations of the Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of the merger [hereinafter referred to as the "Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger" in this Section]; the same shall apply hereinafter), the Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger or the Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger shall be an entity prescribed in the following items for the categories of cases set forth respectively therein: 例文帳に追加

２ 会員商品取引所が吸収合併（商品取引所が他の商品取引所とする合併であつて、合併により消滅する商品取引所（以下この節において「吸収合併消滅商品取引所」という。）の権利義務の全部を合併後存続する商品取引所（以下この節において「吸収合併存続商品取引所」という。）に承継させるものをいう。以下同じ。）又は新設合併（二以上の商品取引所がする合併であつて、合併により消滅する商品取引所（以下この節において「新設合併消滅商品取引所」という。）の権利義務の全部を合併により設立する商品取引所（以下この節において「新設合併設立商品取引所」という。）に承継させるものをいう。以下同じ。）をする場合には、吸収合併存続商品取引所又は新設合併設立商品取引所は、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ、当該各号に定める者でなければならない。 - 経済産業省

(2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases in which an entrepreneur effects private monopolization (limited to that arising from the control of the business activities of other entrepreneurs) that falls under any of the following items with respect to goods or services supplied by the said other entrepreneurs (hereinafter referred to as "controlled entrepreneurs" in this paragraph). In this case, the term "the sales amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order (in the case that the said act is pertaining to the receipt of supply of goods or services, the purchase amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order)" in the preceding paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the sales amount of the relevant goods or services supplied by the said entrepreneur to the controlled entrepreneurs (including goods or services necessary for supply by the said controlled entrepreneurs of the said goods or services in any particular field of trade pertaining to the said act) and of the said goods or services supplied by the said entrepreneur in the said particular field of trade (excluding those supplied to the said controlled entrepreneurs) calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order", and the term "(three percent in case of retail business, or two percent in case of wholesale business)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "(three percent in the case that the said entrepreneur engages in retail business or two percent in the case that the said entrepreneur engages in wholesale business)". 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定は、事業者が、私的独占（他の事業者の事業活動を支配することによるものに限る。）で、当該他の事業者（以下この項において「被支配事業者」という。）が供給する商品又は役務について、次の各号のいずれかに該当するものをした場合に準用する。この場合において、前項中「当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した売上額（当該行為が商品又は役務の供給を受けることに係るものである場合は、当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した購入額）」とあるのは「当該事業者が被支配事業者に供給した当該商品又は役務（当該被支配事業者が当該行為に係る一定の取引分野において当該商品又は役務を供給するために必要な商品又は役務を含む。）及び当該一定の取引分野において当該事業者が供給した当該商品又は役務（当該被支配事業者に供給したものを除く。）の政令で定める方法により算定した売上額」と、「（小売業については百分の三、卸売業については百分の二とする。）」とあるのは「（当該事業者が小売業を営む場合は百分の三、卸売業を営む場合は百分の二とする。）」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) in the case where the Tender Offer Purchaser makes Purchase, etc. of the Share Certificates, etc. using a method different from the method of proportional distribution stated in the Tender Offer Notification: the amount calculated by multiplying the difference between the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages under the preceding paragraph if the Tender Offer Purchaser uses the method of proportional distribution and the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. was actually made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages (in cases where the Tender Offer Purchaser did not make Purchase, etc. of any of Share Certificates, etc. from the person entitled to claim damages, the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages if the method of proportional distribution is used) by the difference between the Tender Offer Price (or the price paid by the Tender Offeror as specified in Article 27-17(2) in the case where paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is also applicable, the favorable price referred to in the preceding item in the case where the preceding item is also applicable, or the more favorable one between them in the case where both Article 27-17(1) and the preceding item are also applicable) and the market price of the Share Certificates, etc. at the time when the damages are claimed under the preceding paragraph (or estimated disposal price in the case where there is no market price for the Share Certificates, etc., or disposal price in the case where the Share Certificates, etc. was disposed of before the damages is claimed). 例文帳に追加

二　当該公開買付けをした者が公開買付届出書に記載されたあん分比例方式と異なる方式で株券等の買付け等をした場合　当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に前項の規定による請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数から当該公開買付けをした者が当該請求権者から買付け等をした株券等の数を控除した数（当該請求権者から買付け等をしなかつた場合には、当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に当該請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数とする。）に公開買付価格（前条第一項に該当する場合にあつては同条第二項に規定する公開買付者が支払つた価格、前号に掲げる場合に該当する場合にあつては同号に定める有利な価格とし、そのいずれにも該当する場合にあつてはそのいずれか有利な価格とする。）から前項の規定による損害賠償を請求する時における当該株券等の市場価格（市場価格がないときはその時における処分推定価格とし、当該請求時前に当該株券等を処分した場合においてはその処分価格とする。）を控除した金額を乗じた額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iii) Acquisition and holding of those securities prescribed in Article 2(1) of the Securities and Exchange Act (Act no. 25 of 1948) (excluding shares, Share Options and Bond with Share Options, Etc., but including rights that are to be represented by securities listed in items (i) to (v-iii) and (vii) to (x) of said provision (excluding Bond with Share Options, Etc.) and are deemed to be securities by the provisions set forth in Article 2(2) of said Act) and which are bonds (excluding Bond with Share Options, Etc.) or other fund raising securities stipulated as such by Cabinet Order as contributing to the procuring of capital by an Enterprise (such bonds and other securities hereinafter, "Designated Securities")- but in the case of "Specified Designated Securities" (meaning such Designated Securities issued by an Enterprise other than (x) a business corporation of which issued shares, Share Options, and Bond with Share Options, Etc. are held by an Investment LPS (excluding (ix) below, hereinafter a "Partnership") or (y) a limited liability company or a company partnership of which equity shares are held by a Partnership, (such business corporation, limited liability company or corporate partnership hereinafter referred to as "Specified Company, Etc.") pursuant to preceding items (i) and (ii)), limited to cases of acquisition or holding where one of the general partners has promised that, if the period of holding by the Partnership of said Designated Securities that are Specified Designated Securities exceeds the period prescribed by Cabinet Order, the general partner will purchase said Specified Designated Securities, on the day of expiry of such period. 例文帳に追加

三　証券取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第二条第一項に規定する有価証券（株式、新株予約権及び新株予約権付社債等を除き、同項第一号から第五号の三まで及び第七号から第十号までに掲げる有価証券（新株予約権付社債等を除く。）に表示されるべき権利であって同条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされるものを含む。）のうち社債（新株予約権付社債等を除く。）その他の事業者の資金調達に資するものとして政令で定めるもの（以下「指定有価証券」という。）の取得及び保有（前二号の規定により投資事業有限責任組合（第九号を除き、以下「組合」という。）がその株式、新株予約権若しくは新株予約権付社債等を保有している株式会社又は組合がその持分を保有している有限会社若しくは企業組合（以下「特定会社等」と総称する。）以外の事業者の発行する指定有価証券（以下この号において「特定指定有価証券」という。）にあっては、特定指定有価証券である当該指定有価証券を組合が保有する期間が政令で定める期間を超えたときは、その日において、無限責任組合員のいずれかがこれを買い取る旨を約した場合における当該特定指定有価証券の取得及び保有に限る。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 213 With regard to a bankruptcy claim that was unable to enter into the procedure for an interim distribution by reason of the failure to prove the matter prescribed in Article 198(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 209(3), if the bankruptcy creditor who holds said bankruptcy claim has proven said matter within the period of exclusion concerning a final distribution or within the period of exclusion concerning any interim distribution that may be made after said interim distribution, said bankruptcy creditor, in said final distribution or any later interim distribution that may be made after the previous interim distribution, may receive a liquidating distribution at the amount that he/she could have received in the previous interim distribution, in preference to other bankruptcy creditors with the same priority. The same shall apply where a holder of a right of separate satisfaction (including a holder of a quasi-right of separate satisfaction) who was unable to participate in the procedure for an interim distribution by reason of the failure to show proof or make a prima facie showing of the matter prescribed in Article 210(1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of said Article) has shown proof and made a prima facie showing of said matter within the period of exclusion concerning any later interim distribution that may be made after said interim distribution. 例文帳に追加

第二百十三条　第二百九条第三項において準用する第百九十八条第一項に規定する事項につき証明をしなかったことにより中間配当の手続に参加することができなかった破産債権について、当該破産債権を有する破産債権者が最後配当に関する除斥期間又はその中間配当の後に行われることがある中間配当に関する除斥期間内に当該事項につき証明をしたときは、その中間配当において受けることができた額について、当該最後配当又はその中間配当の後に行われることがある中間配当において、他の同順位の破産債権者に先立って配当を受けることができる。第二百十条第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する事項につき証明又は疎明をしなかったことにより中間配当の手続に参加することができなかった別除権者（準別除権者を含む。）がその中間配当の後に行われることがある中間配当に関する除斥期間内に当該事項につき証明及び疎明をしたときも、同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 163 (1) When an Officer or a Major Shareholder (meaning a shareholder who holds voting rights (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of acquisition or holding thereof or other circumstances) exceeding 10 percent of the Voting Rights Held by All the Shareholders, etc. in the name of him/herself or another person (or under a fictitious name); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article to Article 166) of the Issuer of Securities specified in Article 2(1)(v), (vii) or (ix) which are listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange or falling under the category of Over-the-Counter Traded Securities or Securities Handled (except those specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Securities designated by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter the Issuer is referred to as a "Listed Company, etc." in this Article to Article 166) makes Purchase, etc. of Securities issued by the Listed Company, etc. which fall under any of the categories of Securities specified in Article 2(1)(v), (vii) or (ix) (excluding those specified by a Cabinet Order) or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter such Securities are referred to as "Specified Securities" in this Article to Article 166) or Securities specified in Article 2(1)(xix) which indicate Options pertaining to Specified Securities of the Listed Company, etc. or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order (hereinafter such Securities are referred to as "Related Securities" in this paragraph) (the term "Purchase, etc." means purchase of Specified Securities and Related Securities (hereinafter these Securities are collectively referred to as "Specified Securities, etc." in this Article to Article 166) and other transaction specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, the following Article and Article 165-2) or makes Sales, etc. thereof (meaning sales of Specified Securities, etc. and other transaction specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article to Article 165-2), for his/her own account (including the cases where the trustee of a trust of which said Officer or said Major Shareholder is the settlor or beneficiary makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and the following Article), said Officer or said Major Shareholder shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, a report on such sales or purchase or other transaction (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase, etc." in this paragraph, the following Article or Article 165-2) to the Prime Minister on or before the 15th day of the month following the month which includes the day of such Sales and Purchase, etc.; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. or other circumstances. 例文帳に追加

第百六十三条　第二条第一項第五号、第七号又は第九号に掲げる有価証券（政令で定めるものを除く。）で金融商品取引所に上場されているもの、店頭売買有価証券又は取扱有価証券に該当するものその他の政令で定める有価証券の発行者（以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて「上場会社等」という。）の役員及び主要株主（自己又は他人（仮設人を含む。）の名義をもつて総株主等の議決権の百分の十以上の議決権（取得又は保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定めるものを除く。）を保有している株主をいう。以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて同じ。）は、自己の計算において当該上場会社等の同項第五号、第七号若しくは第九号に掲げる有価証券（政令で定めるものを除く。）その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて「特定有価証券」という。）又は当該上場会社等の特定有価証券に係るオプションを表示する同項第十九号に掲げる有価証券その他の政令で定める有価証券（以下この項において「関連有価証券」という。）に係る買付け等（特定有価証券又は関連有価証券（以下この条から第百六十六条までにおいて「特定有価証券等」という。）の買付けその他の取引で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条、次条及び第百六十五条の二において同じ。）又は売付け等（特定有価証券等の売付けその他の取引で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条から第百六十五条の二までにおいて同じ。）をした場合（当該役員又は主要株主が委託者又は受益者である信託の受託者が当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をする場合であつて内閣府令で定める場合を含む。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、その売買その他の取引（以下この項、次条及び第百六十五条の二において「売買等」という。）に関する報告書を売買等があつた日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、買付け等又は売付け等の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Articles 824, 826, 868 (1), 870 (limited to portions pertaining to item (xiii)), main text of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to portions pertaining to item (iv)), main text of Article 873, Articles 875, 876, 904 and 937 (1) (limited to portions pertaining to item (iii) (b)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to orders to dissolve patent professional corporations; and the provisions of Articles 825, 868 (1), 870 (limited to portions pertaining to item (ii)), 871, 872 (limited to portions pertaining to items (i) and (iv)), 873, 874 (limited to portions pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)), 875, 876, 905 and 906 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the preservation of assets of patent professional corporations in cases where a petition set forth in Article 824 (1) of the same Act, as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph, has been filed. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第八百二十四条、第八百二十六条、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百七十条（第十三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条、第八百七十六条、第九百四条及び第九百三十七条第一項（第三号ロに係る部分に限る。）の規定は特許業務法人の解散の命令について、同法第八百二十五条、第八百六十八条第一項、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十一条、第八百七十二条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十三条、第八百七十四条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）、第八百七十五条、第八百七十六条、第九百五条及び第九百六条の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百二十四条第一項の申立てがあった場合における特許業務法人の財産の保全について、それぞれ準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In the case of the preceding paragraph, when a Membership-Type Financial Instruments Exchange implements an Absorption-Type Merger (meaning a merger of a Financial Instruments Exchange with another Financial Instruments Exchange where a Financial Instruments Exchange surviving the merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Financial Instruments Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger" in this Subsection) succeeds to all of the rights and obligations of the Financial Instruments Exchange extinguished as a result of the merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon an Absorption-Type Merger" in this Subsection); the same shall apply hereinafter), or a Consolidation-Type Merger (meaning a merger between two or more Financial Instruments Exchanges where a Financial Instruments Exchange established by the merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Financial Instruments Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger" in this Subsection) succeeds to all of the rights and obligations of the Financial Instruments Exchange extinguished as a result of the merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon Consolidation-Type Merger" in this Subsection); the same shall apply hereinafter), the Financial Instruments Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger or the Financial Instruments Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger shall be the person prescribed in the following items for the categories of cases set forth respectively therein: 例文帳に追加

２　前項の場合において、吸収合併（金融商品取引所が他の金融商品取引所とする合併であつて、合併により消滅する金融商品取引所（以下この款において「吸収合併消滅金融商品取引所」という。）の権利義務の全部を合併後存続する金融商品取引所（以下この款において「吸収合併存続金融商品取引所」という。）に承継させるものをいう。以下同じ。）又は新設合併（二以上の金融商品取引所がする合併であつて、合併により消滅する金融商品取引所（以下この款において「新設合併消滅金融商品取引所」という。）の権利義務の全部を合併により設立する金融商品取引所（以下この款において「新設合併設立金融商品取引所」という。）に承継させるものをいう。以下同じ。）をする場合には、吸収合併存続金融商品取引所又は新設合併設立金融商品取引所は、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応じ当該各号に定める者でなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 171 Upon making Solicitation of Securities to Many and Unspecified Persons (excluding such solicitation to be made for Securities listed in Article 2(1)(i) to (vi) or other Securities specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), any person who makes Solicitation of Securities to Many and Unspecified Persons, or Officers, advisors, consultants, others at a position equivalent to these persons, agents, employees or other workers of such a person shall not make a indication to many and unspecified persons to the effect that a fixed amount (including an amount that may be calculated in advance by using a certain standard; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or higher amount of money (including things that would bring about a fixed amount or higher amount of money by disposing of them) will be provided for the Securities so solicited after a certain period (including a indication that is likely to be understood as meaning to that effect), irrespective of how such money is called, including dividend of profits or distribution of profits; provided however, that this shall not apply to cases where it is clearly indicated that such a indication only indicates an expectation. 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条　有価証券の不特定多数者向け勧誘等（第二条第一項第一号から第六号までに掲げる有価証券その他内閣府令で定める有価証券に係るものを除く。以下この条において同じ。）をする者又はこれらの者の役員、相談役、顧問その他これらに準ずる地位にある者若しくは代理人、使用人その他の従業者は、当該有価証券の不特定多数者向け勧誘等に際し、不特定かつ多数の者に対して、当該有価証券に関し一定の期間につき、利益の配当、収益の分配その他いかなる名称をもつてするを問わず、一定の額（一定の基準によりあらかじめ算出することができる額を含む。以下この条において同じ。）又はこれを超える額の金銭（処分することにより一定の額又はこれを超える額の金銭を得ることができるものを含む。）の供与が行われる旨の表示（当該表示と誤認されるおそれがある表示を含む。）をしてはならない。ただし、当該表示の内容が予想に基づくものである旨が明示されている場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24 (1) When Securities (excluding Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, except in the following items) issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the following items, the company shall submit, for each business year, a report stating the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (hereinafter referred to as an "Annual Securities Report") to the Prime Minister within three months after the end of that business year (or, in the case of a foreign company, within the period specified by a Cabinet Order as the period necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors) pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the respective last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of the Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below, if the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than 500 million yen (or if, in cases where the Securities are Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the amount that is specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Order on the last day of that business year) or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year are fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) or (iv) below, if the Prime Minister approves as specified by a Cabinet Order that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　有価証券の発行者である会社は、その会社が発行者である有価証券（特定有価証券を除く。次の各号を除き、以下この条において同じ。）が次に掲げる有価証券のいずれかに該当する場合には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、事業年度ごとに、当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業の内容に関する重要な事項その他の公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書（以下「有価証券報告書」という。）を、当該事業年度経過後三月以内（当該会社が外国会社である場合には、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして政令で定める期間内）に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券が第三号に掲げる有価証券（株券その他の政令で定める有価証券に限る。）に該当する場合においてその発行者である会社（報告書提出開始年度（当該有価証券の募集又は売出しにつき第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文又は第二十三条の八第一項本文若しくは第二項の規定の適用を受けることとなつた日の属する事業年度をいい、当該報告書提出開始年度が複数あるときは、その直近のものをいう。）終了後五年を経過している場合に該当する会社に限る。）の当該事業年度の末日及び当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度すべての末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定めるところにより計算した数に満たない場合であつて有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたとき、当該有価証券が第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において、その発行者である会社の資本金の額が当該事業年度の末日において五億円未満（当該有価証券が第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等である場合にあつては、当該会社の資産の額として政令で定めるものの額が当該事業年度の末日において政令で定める額未満）であるとき、及び当該事業年度の末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定める数に満たないとき、並びに当該有価証券が第三号又は第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして政令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) With regard to the application of the provisions of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution, in cases where a Financial Institution Engaged in Trust Business invests the trust property of an Investment Trust Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor, the phrase "and the provisions Article 42-2 and Article 44-3, paragraph (2) (excluding item (ii)) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall apply mutatis mutandis to business for investing the trust property of an Investment Trust Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations operated by a financial institution, respectively" shall be added after the term "(meaning the Specific Trust Agreement prescribed in Article 24-2 of the Trust Business Act)" in Article 2-2 of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution, the phrases "in these provisions," "Article 34 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act," and "in Article 39, paragraph (4) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act" in Article 2-2 of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution shall be deemed to be replaced with "in these provisions (excluding the provisions of Article 42-2 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act)," "Article 34 of the Trust Business Act" and "in Article 39, paragraph (4) and Article 42-2, item (vi) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act" respectively, and the phrase ", the term 'giving advice to conduct a transaction that is unnecessary in light of the transaction policy, the amount of the transaction, or the market conditions regarding the Investment Advisory Business, or the Investment Management Business that does so' in Article 44-3, paragraph (2), item (iii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with 'or making an investment to conduct a transaction with regard to business for conducting investment of the trust property of an Investment Trust Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor' " shall be added after the phrase "a Financial Institution (meaning a Financial Institution as prescribed in Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution)" in Article 2-2 of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution. 例文帳に追加

６　信託業務を営む金融機関が委託者非指図型投資信託の信託財産の運用を行う場合における金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律の規定の適用については、同法第二条の二中「、金融機関」とあるのは「金融機関」と、「準用する。」とあるのは「、金融商品取引法第四十二条の二及び第四十四条の三第二項（第二号を除く。）の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）は金融機関が行う投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する委託者非指図型投資信託の信託財産の運用を行う業務について、それぞれ準用する。」と、「これらの規定中」とあるのは「これらの規定（金融商品取引法第四十二条の二の規定を除く。）中」と、「金融商品取引法第三十四条」とあるのは「同法第三十四条」と、「同条第四項中」とあるのは「同条第四項及び同法第四十二条の二第六号中」と、「「金融機関（金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項に規定する金融機関をいう。）の責めに帰すべき事故」」とあるのは「「金融機関（金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項に規定する金融機関をいう。）の責めに帰すべき事故」と、同法第四十四条の三第二項第三号中「投資助言業務に関して取引の方針、取引の額若しくは市場の状況に照らして不必要な取引を行うことを内容とした助言を行い、又はその行う投資運用業」とあるのは「委託者非指図型投資信託の信託財産の運用を行う業務」」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

On the other hand, for a credit rating in which an unregistered business operator within the group is involved in its determination, in cases where: . the credit rating agency examines whether the business activity pertaining to the said credit rating has been conducted appropriately under an adequate operational control system and in accordance with the rating policy, etc. of the said credit rating agency; and . after having verified that there are no problems, the credit rating agency approves the determination of the said credit rating, or the credit rating committee passes a resolution (if the credit rating is found to have problems, then the approval of or resolution on the said credit rating is not conducted), it should be kept in mind that the said credit rating, which has either been approved by the credit rating agency or resolved by the credit rating committee, will be recognized as having been determined by the credit rating agency, and will not fall under the category of name lending to an unregistered business operator within the group. 例文帳に追加

一方、グループ内の無登録業者が付与に関与する信用格付であっても、信用格付業者において、・当該信用格付に関する業務遂行が、十分な業務管理体制の下で、当該信用格付業者の格付方針等に則って適正に行われているかを検証し、・問題がないことを確認した上で、当該信用格付の付与について決裁し、又は格付委員会の議決を行う（問題があると認められる場合には、当該信用格付についての決裁又は議決は行わない）こととされている場合には、信用格付業者が決裁し、又は格付委員会の議決が行われた当該信用格付は、信用格付業者が付与したものと認められ、グループ内の無登録業者への名義貸しに該当しないことに留意する。 - 金融庁

Article 27 (1) Where a business operator handling personal information is requested by a person to discontinue using or to erase such retained personal data as may lead to the identification of the person on the ground that the retained personal data is being handled in violation of Article 16 or has been acquired in violation of Article 17, and where it is found that the request has a reason, the business operator shall discontinue using or erase the retained personal data concerned without delay to the extent necessary for redressing the violation. However, this provision shall not apply to cases in which it costs large amount or otherwise difficult to discontinue using or to erase the retained personal data and in which the business operator takes necessary alternative measures to protect the rights and interests of the person. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条　個人情報取扱事業者は、本人から、当該本人が識別される保有個人データが第十六条の規定に違反して取り扱われているという理由又は第十七条の規定に違反して取得されたものであるという理由によって、当該保有個人データの利用の停止又は消去（以下この条において「利用停止等」という。）を求められた場合であって、その求めに理由があることが判明したときは、違反を是正するために必要な限度で、遅滞なく、当該保有個人データの利用停止等を行わなければならない。ただし、当該保有個人データの利用停止等に多額の費用を要する場合その他の利用停止等を行うことが困難な場合であって、本人の権利利益を保護するため必要なこれに代わるべき措置をとるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 23 (1) The provisions of this Act shall not apply to legitimate acts performed by an entrepreneur who produces or sells a commodity, which is designated by the Fair Trade Commission and the uniform quality of which is easily identifiable,, in order to fix and maintain the resale price thereof with another entrepreneur who purchases such commodity (this term "resale price" means the price at which the latter entrepreneur or an entrepreneur who purchases such commodity from the latter entrepreneur for sales sells it; the same shall apply hereinafter); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the said act tends to unreasonably harm the interests of general consumers, or where it is done by an entrepreneur who sells the said commodity against the will of the entrepreneur who produces the said commodity. 例文帳に追加

第二十三条　この法律の規定は、公正取引委員会の指定する商品であつて、その品質が一様であることを容易に識別することができるものを生産し、又は販売する事業者が、当該商品の販売の相手方たる事業者とその商品の再販売価格（その相手方たる事業者又はその相手方たる事業者の販売する当該商品を買い受けて販売する事業者がその商品を販売する価格をいう。以下同じ。）を決定し、これを維持するためにする正当な行為については、これを適用しない。ただし、当該行為が一般消費者の利益を不当に害することとなる場合及びその商品を販売する事業者がする行為にあつてはその商品を生産する事業者の意に反してする場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 157-2 Where a period for advancing allegations and evidence on a specific matter is specified pursuant to the provisions of Article 147-3(3) or Article 156-2 (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 170(5)), if the court, with regard to allegations or evidence that a party has advanced after the expiration of such period, finds that such allegations or evidence will be substantially detrimental to the progress of court proceedings based on the plan for trial, it may make an order of dismissal upon petition or by its own authority; provided, however, that this shall not apply where such party has made a prima facie showing to the effect that he/she has reasonable grounds for having been unable to advance the allegations or evidence within that period. 例文帳に追加

第百五十七条の二　第百四十七条の三第三項又は第百五十六条の二（第百七十条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により特定の事項についての攻撃又は防御の方法を提出すべき期間が定められている場合において、当事者がその期間の経過後に提出した攻撃又は防御の方法については、これにより審理の計画に従った訴訟手続の進行に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがあると認めたときは、裁判所は、申立てにより又は職権で、却下の決定をすることができる。ただし、その当事者がその期間内に当該攻撃又は防御の方法を提出することができなかったことについて相当の理由があることを疎明したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In order to promote the supply of emergency provisional housings, the following points were communicated and requested, by citing the actual cases: 1) Fees for borrowing land can be covered by the public funding as stipulated in the Disaster Relief Act, when it is difficult to secure construction sites for the housings; 2) The construction of the emergency provisional housings can be commissioned to municipalities, if no problem stands in the way; 3) When orders are placed, the specification standards can be made public, with the idea of concluding contracts with local construction companies; 4) Attention should be paid as much as possible to construct the emergency provisional housings to barrier-free specifications (e.g. setting up handrails); 5) "Welfare Provisional Housings" for the elderly can be constructed by setting up ramps and support staff rooms; and 6) the decision of moving in shall not be automatically made by lot so that the communities that existed before is maintained. Moreover, assuming that the life in the evacuation camps can be prolonged, attention should be paid so that the elderly and disabled are not concentrated in one place. (April 15, 2011)例文帳に追加

応急仮設住宅の供給促進のため、①用地確保が困難な場合には、土地の借料も災害救助法の国庫負担の対象となること、②弊害がない場合には、応急仮設住宅の建設を市町村に委任することも可、③地元建設業者の活用も念頭に、発注に当たり、仕様規格等の公表も可、④手すりを設置するなどバリアフリー仕様とするようできる限り配慮すること、⑤スロープ設置や支援員室設置などの高齢者等用の「福祉仮設住宅」の設置も可能、⑥入居決定に当たり、機械的な抽選等により行わず、従前のコミュニティの維持にも配慮し、また、生活の長期化も想定して高齢者障害者等が集中しないよう配慮すること等を、実例を引用し、周知要請（平成23年4月15日） - 厚生労働省

(3) The provisions of Article 34, Article 35 (excluding Paragraph 4) and Article 36 of the Collection Act, and the provisions of Article 23 of the Act on the Re-arrangement of Relevant Acts Necessitated by the Enforcement of the Unemployment Insurance Act, the Act for Partially Revising the Workmen's Accident Compensation Insurance Act and the Act on the Collection, etc. of the Insurance Premiums of Labor Insurance (Act No. 85 of 1969) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Paragraph 1 general contribution affairs and to the Paragraph 1 general contributions. In such case, the term "laws and regulations relevant to labor insurance" in Article 34 of the Collection Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief (hereinafter referred to as "the Asbestos Relief Act"), this Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 38 of the Asbestos Relief Act, and the orders based on these acts;" the term "laws and ordinances relevant to labor insurance" in Paragraphs 1 and 2, Article 35 of the Collection Act with "the Asbestos Relief Act, this Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 38 of the Asbestos Relief Act, and the orders based on these acts;" and the term "Paragraph 3, Article 26 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Paragraph 3, Article 12-3 and Paragraph 4, Article 31 of the Worker's Accident Insurance Act, and Paragraph 3, Article 10-4 of Employment Insurance Act)" in Paragraph 3 of the same article with "Paragraph 3, Article 26 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Paragraph 1, Article 38 of the Asbestos Relief Act." 例文帳に追加

３　徴収法第三十四条、第三十五条（第四項を除く。）及び第三十六条の規定並びに失業保険法及び労働者災害補償保険法の一部を改正する法律及び労働保険の保険料の徴収等に関する法律の施行に伴う関係法律の整備等に関する法律（昭和四十四年法律第八十五号）第二十三条の規定は、第一項一般拠出金事務及び第一項一般拠出金について準用する。この場合において、徴収法第三十四条中「労働保険関係法令」とあるのは「石綿による健康被害の救済に関する法律（以下「石綿健康被害救済法」という。）及び石綿健康被害救済法第三十八条第一項において準用するこの法律並びにこれらの法律に基づく命令」と、徴収法第三十五条第一項及び第二項中「労働保険関係法令」とあるのは「石綿健康被害救済法及び石綿健康被害救済法第三十八条第一項において準用するこの法律並びにこれらの法律に基づく命令」と、同条第三項中「第二十六条第三項（労災保険法第十二条の三第三項及び第三十一条第四項並びに雇用保険法第十条の四第三項において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「石綿健康被害救済法第三十八条第一項において準用する第二十六条第三項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1-2-14 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2009 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Members under Special Provisions" in paragraph (3) of the following Article) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing serious consequences in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the sum total of the amount of outstanding debts of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation as of the date specified by a Cabinet Order and the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of additional debts to be incurred if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation should have to finance such costs through borrowings exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order taking into consideration the long-term balance of payments of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the Specified Activities) within the amount prescribed by the budget. 例文帳に追加

第一条の二の十四　政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構がその会員（平成十八年四月一日から平成二十一年三月三十一日までの間に第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。次条第三項において「特例会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に極めて重大な支障が生じるおそれがあると認める場合（政令で定める日における当該生命保険契約者保護機構の借入残高に、当該生命保険契約者保護機構が当該費用を借入れにより賄うとした場合の当該借入れの額として政令で定める額を加えた額が当該生命保険契約者保護機構の長期的な収支を勘案して政令で定める額を超える場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（特定業務に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 30-30 (1) The provisions of Article 50 of the Civil Code (Act No. 89 of 1896) and Article 600, Articles 614 through 619, Article 621 and Article 622 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Legal Professional Corporations. The provisions of Articles 55 of the Civil Code and Article 581, Article 582, Article 585, paragraphs (1) and (4), Article 586, Article 593, Article 595, Article 596, Article 601, Article 605, Article 606, Article 609, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 611 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)) and Article 613 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a member of Legal Professional Corporations. The provisions of Articles 859 through 862 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an expulsion of a member of a Legal Professional Corporation or an action for nullifying the authority to execute activities for, or to represent, the Legal Professional Corporation. In such cases, "trade name" as used in Article 613 shall be read as "name" and "Article 594, paragraph (1) (including a case of mutatis mutandis application in Article 598, paragraph (2))" as used in Article 859, item (ii) shall be read as "Attorney Act (Act No. 205 of 1949) Article 30-19, paragraph (1) or (2)." 例文帳に追加

第三十条の三十　民法（明治二十九年法律第八十九号）第五十条並びに会社法第六百条、第六百十四条から第六百十九条まで、第六百二十一条及び第六百二十二条の規定は弁護士法人について、民法第五十五条並びに会社法第五百八十一条、第五百八十二条、第五百八十五条第一項及び第四項、第五百八十六条、第五百九十三条、第五百九十五条、第五百九十六条、第六百一条、第六百五条、第六百六条、第六百九条第一項及び第二項、第六百十一条（第一項ただし書を除く。）並びに第六百十三条の規定は弁護士法人の社員について、同法第八百五十九条から第八百六十二条までの規定は弁護士法人の社員の除名並びに業務を執行する権利及び代表権の消滅の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第六百十三条中「商号」とあるのは「名称」と、同法第八百五十九条第二号中「第五百九十四条第一項（第五百九十八条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）」とあるのは「弁護士法（昭和二十四年法律第二百五号）第三十条の十九第一項又は第二項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The presence of outside collaborators has been pointed out. From my 27 years of experience as a lawmaker, we are reminded of legal deficiencies when an inappropriate incident occurs. I have often witnessed cases in which loopholes of existing laws, if I may say so, have been exploited. In this case, too, from an objective standpoint, some professionals, who were probably operating outside Japan, who live or whose addresses are registered in a tax haven like the Cayman Islands, appear to have acted as outside collaborators, from what I know from reading newspapers. Therefore, we will consider the possibility of imposing fines. International investigation is in progress regarding LIBOR (London Interbank Offered Rate) and TIBOR (Tokyo Interbank Offered Rate). 例文帳に追加

この外部協力者の問題は存在が指摘されておりまして、やっぱり法律というのは、事件が起きると教えられることと言ったらおかしいですけれども、不備な点というのは教えられることが、率直に言えば私の27年間の経験を通じて、やっぱり何か起きますと、既存の法律の網の目をくぐると言ったら悪いけれども、そんなことがしばしばありまして、今回も冷静に見て、私はこの外部協力者はプロの強力な、多分、たしか日本にいなかった人だと思いますが、タックスヘブンのケイマン諸島に住んでいる方か、あるいはそこに住所を持っている方という、これは私のただ新聞を読んだ知識でございますが、そういった方も非常に大きな今度の事件に関して加担行為があったというふうに認識しておりまして、そういった意味で課徴金を課すことについて検討を行っていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

(2) When a fire chief or fire station chief is unable to identify the owner, manager or possessor, who holds title, of an object that is found to be dangerous from a fire prevention perspective or an object that is found to be likely to hinder fire extinguishing activities, evacuation and other fire defense activities, and therefore unable to order those persons to take any necessary measures under the provision of the preceding paragraph, he/she may have his/her fire defense personnel (in the case of a municipality which has no fire defense headquarters, a fire corps volunteer; the same shall apply in paragraph (4) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 5, paragraph (2) and Article 5-3, paragraph (5)) and Article 5-3, paragraph (2)) take the measures listed in item (iii) or item (iv) of the preceding paragraph with regard to said object, at the expense of said person. In this case, if the fire chief or fire station chief has had the object removed, he/she shall retain said object. 例文帳に追加

２　消防長又は消防署長は、火災の予防に危険であると認める物件又は消火、避難その他の消防の活動に支障になると認める物件の所有者、管理者又は占有者で権原を有するものを確知することができないため、これらの者に対し、前項の規定による必要な措置をとるべきことを命ずることができないときは、それらの者の負担において、当該消防職員（消防本部を置かない市町村においては、消防団員。第四項（第五条第二項及び第五条の三第五項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第五条の三第二項において同じ。）に、当該物件について前項第三号又は第四号に掲げる措置をとらせることができる。この場合において、物件を除去させたときは、消防長又は消防署長は、当該物件を保管しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 12-10 In district development plans when the construction of buildings with heights, arrangements and forms based on the qualities of the area (in redevelopment promotion districts and development improvement promotion districts, the qualities of the area after land use has changed in accordance with the basic policy for land use) is deemed especially necessary to promote reasonable land use, restrictions on the location of walls, (limited to restrictions including those on walls facing roads(including planned roads defined in city plans, facilities provided for in item (ii), paragraph (5), Article 12-5, or roads that are zone facilities), restrictions on the construction of the structures in the wall setback area (limited to restrictions including those cases when it is necessary to secure continuous, effective unused land in said setback area) and maximum building heights shall be stipulated. 例文帳に追加

第十二条の十　地区整備計画においては、当該地区整備計画の区域の特性（再開発等促進区及び開発整備促進区にあつては、土地利用に関する基本方針に従つて土地利用が変化した後の区域の特性）に応じた高さ、配列及び形態を備えた建築物を整備することが合理的な土地利用の促進を図るため特に必要であると認められるときは、壁面の位置の制限（道路（都市計画において定められた計画道路及び第十二条の五第五項第二号に規定する施設又は地区施設である道路を含む。）に面する壁面の位置を制限するものを含むものに限る。）、壁面後退区域における工作物の設置の制限（当該壁面後退区域において連続的に有効な空地を確保するため必要なものを含むものに限る。）及び建築物の高さの最高限度を定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In addition to a creditor who holds a claim pertaining to an obligation covered by the trust property, where a trust has been created by the method set forth in Article 3, item (iii), if the settlor has created the trust with the knowledge that it would harm settlor's creditor(s), notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a person who holds a claim against the settlor (limited to cases where the settlor is a trustee) which has arisen prior to the creation of the trust may commence a execution, provisional seizure, provisional disposition or exercise of a security interest, or an auction, or may commence collection proceedings for delinquent national tax against property that belongs to the trust property; provided, however, that this shall not apply where there are beneficiaries at the time in question, and when all or some of those beneficiaries did not know, at the time when they became aware that they had been designated as beneficiaries or when they acquired beneficial interests, of the fact that the creditor would be harmed. 例文帳に追加

２　第三条第三号に掲げる方法によって信託がされた場合において、委託者がその債権者を害することを知って当該信託をしたときは、前項の規定にかかわらず、信託財産責任負担債務に係る債権を有する債権者のほか、当該委託者（受託者であるものに限る。）に対する債権で信託前に生じたものを有する者は、信託財産に属する財産に対し、強制執行、仮差押え、仮処分若しくは担保権の実行若しくは競売又は国税滞納処分をすることができる。ただし、受益者が現に存する場合において、その受益者の全部又は一部が、受益者としての指定を受けたことを知った時又は受益権を譲り受けた時において債権者を害すべき事実を知らなかったときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Except for the cases specified by paragraph (1), when the Prime Minister finds it necessary and appropriate to secure the compliance with Article 31-4(1) or (2) or Article 44-3, he/she may order a Parent Bank, etc. (meaning a Parent Bank, etc. defined in Article 31-4(5); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or a Subsidiary Bank, etc. (meaning a Subsidiary Bank, etc. defined in Article 31-4(6); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Financial Instruments Business Operator to submit reports or materials that will be helpful for understanding the business or property of the Financial Instruments Business Operator and may also have the officials inspect the status of the business or property, or the books and documents or other articles of the Parent Bank, etc. or the Subsidiary Bank, etc. of the Financial Instruments Business Operator. 例文帳に追加

３　内閣総理大臣は、第一項の規定による場合を除き、第三十一条の四第一項若しくは第二項又は第四十四条の三の規定の遵守を確保するため必要かつ適当であると認めるときは、金融商品取引業者の親銀行等（第三十一条の四第五項に規定する親銀行等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは子銀行等（第三十一条の四第六項に規定する子銀行等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）に対し当該金融商品取引業者の業務若しくは財産に関し参考となるべき報告若しくは資料の提出を命じ、又は当該職員に当該金融商品取引業者の親銀行等若しくは子銀行等の業務若しくは財産の状況若しくは帳簿書類その他の物件の検査をさせることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) When an Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care is provided Designated In-Home Service (limited to a case when said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care has notified the Municipality to receive Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support pursuant to the provisions of Article 46, paragraph (4) in advance, that said Designated In-Home Service is subject to said Designated In-Home Long-Term Care Support and other cases as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare) by a Designated In-Home Service Provider, the Municipality may pay expenses required for said Designated In-Home Service that said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care should pay to said Designated In-Home Service Provider on behalf of said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care to said Designated In-Home Service Provider within the specified limit of the amount that shall be paid to said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care as Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service. 例文帳に追加

６　居宅要介護被保険者が指定居宅サービス事業者から指定居宅サービスを受けたとき（当該居宅要介護被保険者が第四十六条第四項の規定により指定居宅介護支援を受けることにつきあらかじめ市町村に届け出ている場合であって、当該指定居宅サービスが当該指定居宅介護支援の対象となっている場合その他の厚生労働省令で定める場合に限る。）は、市町村は、当該居宅要介護被保険者が当該指定居宅サービス事業者に支払うべき当該指定居宅サービスに要した費用について、居宅介護サービス費として当該居宅要介護被保険者に対し支給すべき額の限度において、当該居宅要介護被保険者に代わり、当該指定居宅サービス事業者に支払うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(8) With regard to a client undertaking to which workers are dispatched for dispatch work in said undertaking, in addition to what is prescribed in paragraphs (1), (3) and (4), the following provisions shall be applied to the client undertaking by replacing the following terms in the respective manners set forth below: in paragraph (1) of Article 5 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act, the term "business operators" shall be deemed to be replaced with "business operators (including a person carrying out a client undertaking prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 44 of the Act for Securing Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter such business operator shall be referred to as a "client business operator"))"; in paragraph (4) of the same Article, the term "the business operator in the said undertaking " shall be deemed to be replaced with "the business operator of the undertaking concerned or the person deemed to be the business operator of the undertaking concerned under the provisions of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act", the term "employed by the said representative alone" shall be deemed to be replaced with "employed by said representative and not employed by a person other than said representative out of the business operators of the undertakings concerned (including the client business operator)", and the term "this Act" shall be deemed to be replaced with "this Act (including cases where this Act is applied under the provisions of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act)"; in paragraph (1) of Article 16, the term "paragraph (1) or (3) of Article 15" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1) or (3) of Article 15 as applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3) of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act"; in Article 19 and in paragraph (4) of Article 17 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of Article 19, the term "the business operator" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the client business operator"; in paragraph (1) of Article 19, the term "Article 17 and the preceding Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17 and the preceding Article as applied pursuant to the provisions of Article 45 of the Worker Dispatching Act"; and in paragraphs (2) and (3) of Article 19 and in paragraphs (4) and (5) of Article 17 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of Article 19, the term "workers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "workers (including workers under dispatching prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 44 of the Worker Dispatching Act)". 例文帳に追加

８　第一項、第三項及び第四項に定めるもののほか、労働者がその事業における派遣就業のために派遣されている派遣先の事業に関しては、労働安全衛生法第五条第一項中「事業者」とあるのは「事業者（労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十四条第一項に規定する派遣先の事業を行う者（以下「派遣先の事業者」という。）を含む。）」と、同条第四項中「当該事業の事業者」とあるのは「当該事業の事業者又は労働者派遣法第四十五条の規定により当該事業の事業者とみなされる者」と、「当該代表者のみが使用する」とあるのは「当該代表者が使用し、かつ、当該事業の事業者（派遣先の事業者を含む。）のうち当該代表者以外の者が使用しない」と、「この法律」とあるのは「この法律（労働者派遣法第四十五条の規定により適用される場合を含む。）」と、同法第十六条第一項中「第十五条第一項又は第三項」とあるのは「労働者派遣法第四十五条第三項の規定により適用される第十五条第一項又は第三項」と、同法第十九条及び同条第四項において準用する同法第十七条第四項中「事業者」とあるのは「派遣先の事業者」と、同法第十九条第一項中「第十七条及び前条」とあるのは「労働者派遣法第四十五条の規定により適用される第十七条及び前条」と、同条第二項及び第三項並びに同条第四項において準用する同法第十七条第四項及び第五項中「労働者」とあるのは「労働者（労働者派遣法第四十四条第一項に規定する派遣中の労働者を含む。）」として、これらの規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 293 (1) In cases where a Stock Company carries out an act listed in the following items, if it has issued Share Option certificates representing the Share Options provided for in such items (if such Share Options are attached to Bonds with Share Option, hereinafter in this Subsection referring to the certificates of Bonds with Share Option representing such Bonds with Share Option), such Stock Company shall, more than one month prior to the day when such act takes effect, give public notice to the effect that such Share Option certificates shall be submitted to such Stock Company before such day, and a separate notice to such effect to each holder of such Share Options and each registered pledgee of such Share Options: 例文帳に追加

第二百九十三条　株式会社が次の各号に掲げる行為をする場合において、当該各号に定める新株予約権に係る新株予約権証券（当該新株予約権が新株予約権付社債に付されたものである場合にあっては、当該新株予約権付社債に係る新株予約権付社債券。以下この款において同じ。）を発行しているときは、当該株式会社は、当該行為の効力が生ずる日までに当該株式会社に対し当該新株予約権証券を提出しなければならない旨を当該日の一箇月前までに、公告し、かつ、当該新株予約権の新株予約権者及びその登録新株予約権質権者には、各別にこれを通知しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of paragraph (2) to the preceding paragraph shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where the remainder of the Securities referred to in paragraph (1) that is not acquired by any person through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution (excluding Securities that fall under any of the categories specified in Article 24(1)(i) and (ii)) is acquired by, or sold to, someone not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution within three months (excluding, where an order for suspension has been given under Article 10(1) or Article 11(1), the period from the day when the order was given to the day when the order was canceled) from the day when the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2) for the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution came into effect. 例文帳に追加

６　第二項から前項までの規定は、第一項に規定する有価証券の募集又は売出しに際してその全部を取得させることができなかつた場合におけるその残部（第二十四条第一項第一号及び第二号に掲げるものに該当するものを除く。）を、当該募集又は売出しに係る第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出がその効力を生じた日から三月（第十条第一項又は第十一条第一項の規定による停止命令があつた場合には、当該停止命令があつた日からその解除があつた日までの期間は、算入しない。）を経過する日までの間において、募集又は売出しによらないで取得させ、又は売り付ける場合について準用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム