「One & Two」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(520ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

According to what I have heard from the administrative staff, the Incubator Bank of Japan was inspected twice before the latest inspection for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009, as I just mentioned: the previous inspection was for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2007 and the one before that was for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2005. My understanding is that as at the end of the fiscal year subject to each of the previous two inspections, the Bank’s financial position was assets in excess of liabilities according to the results of these inspections. Also, my understanding is that there were no material violations of laws and regulations, inadequacies in systems or other such problems in its business operations that would lead to administrative actions as found in the latest inspection. As I have repeatedly stated, at the time of the first inspection, the Bank engaged in operations allegedly based on a new business model targeted at small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). The Lehman Brothers shockwave that struck at the time may have been one of the factors. That said, then-Chairman Takeshi Kimura is an extremely capable person, who, according to what I have been told, had an authoritarian management style, so I suspect overambitious business expansions gave rise to the present outcome. 例文帳に追加

私は、事務方から聞いているところによりますと、日本振興銀行に対して、直近の21年3月期を基準日とする検査のほかに、過去、今さっき（申し上げた）ように19年３月期及び17年3月期を基準日とする前回及び前々回検査を実施しておりますが、上記検査の結果、同行は、前回及び前々回検査の検査基準日において、財務状況に関しては資産超過の状況にあったものと認識しておりますが、また業務運営に関しても、直近検査に認められたような行政処分につながる重大な法令違反や体制の不備等はなかったものと認識をしておりますが、私が何回も申しましたように、途中から無理な業容の拡大や経営陣による、率直に言えば無理な経営拡大を急ぎ過ぎたといいますか、最初は私も先週言いましたように、最初の1回目の検査のときには、非常に中小企業を対象とした新しいビジネスモデルだというようなことでやっておられたけれども、それからリーマン・ショックも重なったということもあるのかもしれませんけれども、非常に無理な業容の拡大を行い、当時の木村剛会長のもとで、非常にこの方は能力のある方で、しかし、悪く言えばワンマン経営だったというふうなことを漏れ聞いておりますけれども、業容拡大に非常に走ったということが、今日の結果を招いたのではないかなというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Article 14 (1) In the event of a transfer of a first class consigned freight forwarding business or merger, split or inheritance of the first class consigned freight forwarding business operator, the transferee of the said business, inheritor (if there are two or more inheritors, the one which has been decided to be the inheritor of the said first class consigned freight forwarding business operator upon consultation, with the same applying hereinafter in this paragraph) or the juridical person that would continue after the merger (excluding a juridical person that is a first class consigned freight forwarding business operator and a juridical person that is a first class consigned freight forwarding business operator and will continue after the merger with a juridical person that does not manage the first class consigned freight forwarding business) or the juridical person established by merger or the juridical person that has succeeded to the said business by split shall succeed to the status of the said first class consigned freight forwarding business operator; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the transferee of the said business or inheritor, the juridical person that will continue after the merger or the juridical person that has been established by the merger or the juridical person that has succeeded to the said business after a split falls under any of the items in paragraph (1) of Article 6. 例文帳に追加

第十四条　第一種貨物利用運送事業者がその事業を譲渡し、又は第一種貨物利用運送事業者について相続、合併若しくは分割があったときは、当該事業を譲り受けた者又は相続人（相続人が二人以上ある場合においてその協議により当該第一種貨物利用運送事業を承継すべき相続人を定めたときは、その者。以下この項において同じ。）、合併後存続する法人（第一種貨物利用運送事業者たる法人と第一種貨物利用運送事業を経営しない法人の合併後存続する第一種貨物利用運送事業者たる法人を除く。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは合併により設立された法人若しくは分割により当該事業を承継した法人は、当該第一種貨物利用運送事業者の地位を承継する。ただし、当該事業を譲り受けた者又は相続人、合併後存続する法人若しくは合併により設立された法人若しくは分割により当該事業を承継した法人が第六条第一項各号のいずれかに該当するときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 43 (1) The total sum of allowances that are paid monthly for In-Home Service pertaining to one classification of In-Home Service, etc., that an Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care during the period determined by Ordinance of Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare for each classification of In-Home Service, etc. (which means with regard to In-Home Service (including equivalent services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and Community-Based Service (including equivalent services except for Admission to a Community-Based Facility for Preventive Daily Long-Term Care of the Elderly Covered by Public Aid; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article) by categories of two or more types as determined by the Minister of Health, Labour, and Welfare, considering the inter-substitution by each type of category; the same shall apply hereinafter) shall not exceed the amount equivalent to 90 percent of the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare based on the base amount of maximum payment for each category of Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service, etc. The total sum of allowance is the total amount of Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service or Exceptional Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service, or the total amount of Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service to be paid for Community-Based Service or the total amount of Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service. 例文帳に追加

第四十三条　居宅要介護被保険者が居宅サービス等区分（居宅サービス（これに相当するサービスを含む。以下この条において同じ。）及び地域密着型サービス（これに相当するサービスを含み、地域密着型介護老人福祉施設入所者生活介護を除く。以下この条において同じ。）について、その種類ごとの相互の代替性の有無等を勘案して厚生労働大臣が定める二以上の種類からなる区分をいう。以下同じ。）ごとに月を単位として厚生労働省令で定める期間において受けた一の居宅サービス等区分に係る居宅サービスにつき支給する居宅介護サービス費の額の総額及び特例居宅介護サービス費の額の総額並びに地域密着型サービスにつき支給する地域密着型介護サービス費の額の総額及び特例地域密着型介護サービス費の額の総額の合計額は、居宅介護サービス費等区分支給限度基準額を基礎として、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定した額の百分の九十に相当する額を超えることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 49 (1) Where two or more buildings are combined into a single building, and if any of the following items applies, the person specified in each respective item shall, within one month from the date of such combination, file applications for a heading registration of a building relating to the building resulting from the combination and for cancellation of the registration of the heading section of a building relating to the buildings that existed prior to the combination (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "registration, etc. by reason of combination"). In this case, an application for a registration of ownership shall also be filed, while designating the owner of the building for which there is no heading registration in the case set forth in item (ii), the heading-section owner of the building for which there is a heading registration (excluding the building for which there is a registration of ownership; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) in the case set forth in item (iv), and the owner of the building for which there is no heading registration and the heading-section owner of the building for which there is a heading registration in the case set forth in item (vi), as the registered right holder for the building resulting from the combination, when each respective item applies: 例文帳に追加

第四十九条　二以上の建物が合体して一個の建物となった場合において、次の各号に掲げるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める者は、当該合体の日から一月以内に、合体後の建物についての建物の表題登記及び合体前の建物についての建物の表題部の登記の抹消（以下「合体による登記等」と総称する。）を申請しなければならない。この場合において、第二号に掲げる場合にあっては当該表題登記がない建物の所有者、第四号に掲げる場合にあっては当該表題登記がある建物（所有権の登記がある建物を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の表題部所有者、第六号に掲げる場合にあっては当該表題登記がない建物の所有者及び当該表題登記がある建物の表題部所有者をそれぞれ当該合体後の建物の登記名義人とする所有権の登記を併せて申請しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 7-2 (1) In case any entrepreneur effects an unreasonable restraint of trade or enters into an international agreement or an international contract containing such matters as fall under unreasonable restraint of trade, and such act falls under any of the following items, the Fair Trade Commission shall order the said entrepreneur, pursuant to the procedures as provided for in Section II of Chapter VIII, to pay to the national treasury a surcharge of an amount equivalent to an amount calculated by multiplying the sales amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order (in the case that the said act is pertaining to the receipt of supply of goods or services, the purchase amount of the relevant goods or services calculated pursuant to the method provided for by a Cabinet Order), for the period from the date on which the entrepreneur effected the business activities constituting the said act to the date on which the business activities constituting the said act were discontinued (in case such period exceeds three years, the period shall be the three years preceding the date on which the business activities constituting the said act were discontinued; hereinafter referred to as "period of implementation") by ten percent (three percent in case of retail business, or two percent in case of wholesale business); provided, however, that in case the amount thus calculated is less than one million yen, the Commission shall not order the payment of such a surcharge. 例文帳に追加

第七条の二　事業者が、不当な取引制限又は不当な取引制限に該当する事項を内容とする国際的協定若しくは国際的契約で次の各号のいずれかに該当するものをしたときは、公正取引委員会は、第八章第二節に規定する手続に従い、当該事業者に対し、当該行為の実行としての事業活動を行つた日から当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日までの期間（当該期間が三年を超えるときは、当該行為の実行としての事業活動がなくなる日からさかのぼつて三年間とする。以下「実行期間」という。）における当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した売上額（当該行為が商品又は役務の供給を受けることに係るものである場合は、当該商品又は役務の政令で定める方法により算定した購入額）に百分の十（小売業については百分の三、卸売業については百分の二とする。）を乗じて得た額に相当する額の課徴金を国庫に納付することを命じなければならない。ただし、その額が百万円未満であるときは、その納付を命ずることができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vi) Where domestic source income specified in each item of Article 180(1) of the Act for the category of corporation listed in the relevant item is paid to the corporation's head office or other office, place of business or any other place equivalent thereto located outside Japan, the corporation is expected to, for the purpose of filing a proper return pursuant to the provisions of the Corporation Tax Act with regard to the relevant domestic source income, notify the corporation's office, place of business or any other place equivalent thereto prescribed in Article 17(i) (Place for Tax Payment of Foreign Corporations) of the said Act (in the case where there are two or more such places, the principal one; hereinafter referred to as the "office, etc. at the place for tax payment" in this item, paragraph (1)(ii) of the next Article, and Article 306(1)(i) (Procedures Required Where Foreign Corporations No Longer Satisfy the Requirements under the Special Provisions for Taxation, etc.)) of the type, amount, the basis of calculation of the amount, date of payment and any other necessary matters of the said domestic source income, and record these matters in its books at the said office, etc. at the place for tax payment, without fail, on every occasion that it receives the said domestic source income. 例文帳に追加

六　法第百八十条第一項各号に掲げる法人の区分に応じ当該各号に定める国内源泉所得がその法人の国外にある本店又は事務所、事業所その他これらに準ずるものにあてて支払われる場合には、当該国内源泉所得について法人税法の規定による申告を適正に行うため、その法人が、当該国内源泉所得の支払を受ける都度、その法人の同法第十七条第一号（外国法人の納税地）に規定する事務所、事業所その他これらに準ずるもの（これらが二以上あるときは、そのうち主たるもの。以下この号、次条第一項第二号及び第三百六条第一項第一号（外国法人が課税の特例の要件に該当しなくなつた場合の手続等）において「納税地にある事務所等」という。）に対して当該国内源泉所得の種類、金額、計算の基礎、支払年月日その他必要な事項を通知し、かつ、当該納税地にある事務所等においてこれらの事項をその帳簿に記録することが確実であると見込まれること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(vii) Where domestic source income specified in each item of Article 214(1) of the Act for the category of person listed in the relevant item is paid to the nonresident's domicile, residence, or office, place of business or any other place equivalent thereto located outside Japan, the nonresident is expected to, for the purpose of filing a proper return pursuant to the provision of the Act with regard to the relevant domestic source income, notify the office, place of business or any other place equivalent thereto pertaining to the business conducted by the nonresident in Japan (in the case where there are two or more such places, the principal one; hereinafter referred to as the "office, etc. located in Japan" in this item, paragraph (1)(ii) of the next Article, and Article 333(1)(i) (Procedures Required Where Nonresidents No Longer Satisfy the Requirements for Eligibility for Exemption from Withholding at Source)) of the type, amount, the basis of calculation of the amount, date of payment and any other necessary matters concerning the said domestic source income, and record these matters in his/her books at the said office, etc. located in Japan, without fail, on every occasion that he/she receives the domestic source income. 例文帳に追加

七　法第二百十四条第一項各号に掲げる者の区分に応じ当該各号に定める国内源泉所得がその者の国外にある住所、居所又は事務所、事業所その他これらに準ずるものにあてて支払われる場合には、当該国内源泉所得について法の規定による申告を適正に行うため、その者が、当該国内源泉所得の支払を受ける都度、その者の国内において行う事業に係る事務所、事業所その他これらに準ずるもの（これらが二以上あるときは、そのうち主たるもの。以下この号、次条第一項第二号及び第三百三十三条第一項第一号（非居住者が源泉徴収の免除の要件に該当しなくなつた場合の手続等）において「国内にある事務所等」という。）に対して当該国内源泉所得の種類、金額、計算の基礎、支払年月日その他必要な事項を通知し、かつ、当該国内にある事務所等においてこれらの事項をその帳簿に記録することが確実であると見込まれること。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In particular, the fact that economic and financial fields have become highly globalized is common knowledge to all of you, so globalized that even 100 million dollars can be moved in a flash by means of computers. In times like this, it is, put simply and as far as I see it, a challenge to humanity in the 21st century to deal with the question of how to democratically control the advancement of financial engineering, or the economic globalization and financial globalization, and we are indeed in the process of tackling it, but imposing excessively harsh regulations on markets might cause them to shrink. Government control may pose another issue in that process, but the lack of it, which means applying a laissez-faire or no-restriction approach, might impose one negative effect after another on manufacturing and other industries, as was the case in the economic recession two years ago. In that sense, unlike the 1929 Great Depression, what I think the recent crisis is making us face is a challenge to human wisdom. 例文帳に追加

特に、経済・金融の分野は非常にグローバル化したということは皆さん方よくご存じでございまして、たちまち1億ドルの金でもコンピュータの中を動くわけでございますから、そういった時代に、簡単に言えばそういった金融工学の発展、あるいは経済のグローバル化、金融のグローバル化と基本的に民主主義社会でございまして、ある意味で私はこれを民主的なコントロールをいかにしていくかということは、21世紀の大変人類的課題だと思っていますが、今はその最中でございまして、ご存じのようにマーケットですからあんまり規制とか強化をしますとこれは縮んでしまいますし、また国の管理が出てきますし、それかといってご存じのように2年前の今、自由放任といいますか、自由にやってきますと、皆さんもご存じのようにこの前の経済不況のように製造業にもほかにもどんどん悪い影響が来たわけでございますから、そういった意味で非常に私は1929年の大恐慌とは違って、今回の恐慌はやっぱり人類の英知が試されているというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁

As for Hong Kong, I have had a long relationship with Hong Kong since I visited there two decades ago as Parliamentary Vice-Minister for International Trade and Industry. As you may be aware, Asia’s financial center is either Tokyo, Hong Kong or Singapore. Following my trip to the United States the other day, I will visit Hong Kong, one of the financial hubs in Asia, where I hope to exchange various opinions with the people there and gain a wide range of knowledge. 例文帳に追加

それからまた、今日から大変恐縮でございますけれども、中国・香港に出張させていただきまして、（本日の）閣議で了解をいただいたわけでございまして、今回の出張は北京ですね、第3回日中ハイレベル経済対話の経済閣僚の1人として出席をさせていただきまして、それから中国・香港、私は20年ぐらいに実は香港とは非常に色々友好関係をしておりまして、20年前に通産省の政務次官のときに香港に行かせていただきまして、それ以来ずっと超党派の日本香港友好議員連盟の会長の羽田孜さんが、総理大臣をされた方がずっとしておりますが、私が長い間、事務局長をいたしておりまして、今は海江田万里さんがまた（衆院選を）通ってこられましたので海江田万里さんが事務局長で、今、会長は羽田孜元総理大臣、私が会長代理ということでございまして、香港とは長い間お付き合いもございますし、ご存じのように金融センター・香港ということでして、アメリカに行ってアジアの金融センター、東京か香港かシンガポールかということは皆さん方よくご存じだと思いますけれども、香港に行って、これは当然金融のアジアの中心の1つでもございますから、そういった方々と色々意見を交換、あるいは色々勉強させていただきたいという思いでございます。 - 金融庁

I spoke with FRB (Federal Reserve Board) Chairman Bernanke two weeks ago and also had a chance to speak with People's Bank of China Governor Zhou Xiaochuan this week. Frankly speaking, this is, as a matter of fact, a kind of issue to be decided on by the global forum of the G20, as it relates to stability of financial institutions worldwide and, at the same time, the definition of capital adequacy, and the quality and quantity debate, among other things. A dozen years or so ago, Japan was hit by a financial crisis. When I was previously a minister, I witnessed something similar – the failure of the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank – which resulted in a credit crunch and credit withdrawal that, as many of you must remember, indeed caused a large number of companies to go under one after another. In that sense, it is not necessarily a positive thing to make a capital adequacy ratio higher and higher. 例文帳に追加

私は先々週でございますか、バーナンキＦＲＢ（連邦準備制度理事会）議長ともお話ししましたし、先週というか今週は周小川、中国の中央銀行の総裁とも話をさせていただきましたけれども、率直に言えば、こういった話も当然、非常に世界的なＧ20で決める話でございまして、非常に世界の金融機関の安定性と、それから同時に自己資本の定義、あるいは定義と申しますか、自己資本の定義、それから質と量、こういったことがまた同時に、皆様方ご存じのように十数年前、日本は大変金融ショックといいますか、金融危機に襲われまして、当時、私も与党の国会議員で閣僚をやめたすぐ後で、閣僚のときにも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産したということが起きましたので、本当にあのとき貸し渋り、貸しはがしになりまして、非常に皆さん方もご記憶のある方が多いと思いますが、本当にばたばた企業も倒産いたしまして、そういった意味で、要するに、自己資本の比率が高ければ高いほどいいというものでもございません。 - 金融庁

1. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term “resident of a Contracting Party” means: (a) in the case of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: (i) any individual who ordinarily resides in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, provided that the individual has a substantial presence, permanent home or habitual abode in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and that he has personal and economic relations with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; (ii) any individual who stays in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for more than 180 days during a year of assessment or for more than 300 days in two consecutive years of assessment one of which is the relevant year of assessment, provided that he has personal and economic relations with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; (iii) a company having a primary place of management and control in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; and (iv) any other person having a primary place of management and control in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; (b) in the case of Japan, any person who, under the laws of Japan, is liable to tax therein by reason of his domicile, residence, place of head or main office or any other criterion of a similar nature, except any person who is liable to tax in Japan in respect only of income from sources in Japan; and (c) the Government of a Contracting Party or apolitical subdivision or local authority thereof. 例文帳に追加

１この協定の適用上、「一方の締約者の居住者」とは、次の者をいう。(a)香港特別行政区については(i)香港特別行政区内に通常居住する個人（当該個人が、香港特別行政区内に実質的に所在し、又は恒久的住居若しくは常用の住居を有し、かつ、香港特別行政区に人的及び経済的関係を有する場合に限る。）(ii)香港特別行政区内に一賦課年度中に百八十日を超えて滞在し、又は連続する二賦課年度において三百日を超えて滞在する個人（当該個人が、香港特別行政区に人的及び経済的関係を有する場合に限る。）(iii)香港特別行政区内に事業の管理及び支配の主たる場所を有する法人(iv)香港特別行政区内に事業の管理及び支配の主たる場所を有するその他の者(b)日本国については、日本国の法令の下において、住所、居所、本店又は主たる事務所の所在地その他これらに類する基準により日本国において課税を受けるべきものとされる者（日本国内に源泉のある所得のみについて日本国において租税を課される者を除く。）(c)一方の締約者の政府及び一方の締約者の地方政府又は地方公共団体 - 財務省

For the purposes of subsection 28.4(2) of the Act, (a) a request for priority may be made in the petition or in a separate document; (b) where a request for priority is based on one previously regularly filed application, the request must be made, and the applicant must inform the Commissioner of the filing date, country of filing and application number of the previously regularly filed application, before the expiry of the sixteen-month period after the date of filing of that application; and (c) where a request for priority is based on two or more previously regularly filed applications, (i) the request must be made, and the applicant must inform the Commissioner of the filing date and country of filing of each previously regularly filed application on which the request for priority is based, before the expiry of the sixteen-month period after the earliest date of filing of those applications, and (ii) the applicant must, for each previously regularly filed application on which the request for priority is based, inform the Commissioner of its application number before the expiry of the twelve-month period after its date of filing or before the expiry of the period referred to in subparagraph (i), whichever is later. 例文帳に追加

法律第28.4条(2)の適用上，次の通りとする: (a) 優先権主張は，願書又は別の書類において行うことができる。 (b) 優先権主張が先に正規にされた1出願を基礎にしてされる場合は，当該出願の出願日の後16月の期間の満了前に，その主張をしなければならず，かつ，出願人は長官に対して当該先に正規にした出願の出願日，出願国及び出願番号を通知しなければならない。また (c) 優先権主張が先に正規にされた2以上の出願を基礎にしてされる場合は， (i) それらの出願のうち最先の出願日の後16月の期間の満了前に，その主張をしなければならず，かつ，出願人は長官に対して当該優先権主張の基礎となる当該先に正規にした各出願の出願日及び出願国を通知しなければならず，かつ (ii) 出願人は，当該優先権主張の基礎となる先に正規にされた各出願について，当該出願日の後12月の期間又は(i)にいう期間の何れか後に満了する期間の満了前に，その出願番号を長官に通知しなければならない。 - 特許庁

Article 205 With regard to a simplified distribution, the provisions of the preceding Section (excluding Article 195, Article 197, Article 200(3) and (4) and Article 201(7)) shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, the phrase "permission under the provision of paragraph (2) of the preceding Article" in Article 196(1) and (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "permission under the provision of Article 204(1)"; in Article 198(1), the phrase "the day on which the public notice made under the provision of paragraph (1) of the preceding Article becomes effective or the day on which the notification is made under the provision of paragraph (3) of said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day on which the notification is made under the provision of Article 204(4)," and the phrase "within two weeks" shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one week"; the phrase "after the proceedings of said objection have been closed" in Article 201(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "after an order on said objection is made"; the phrase "before giving a notice of the amount of distribution under the provision of the following paragraph" in Article 201(6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "within the period prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article"; the phrase "when a notice of the amount of distribution is given under the provision of paragraph (7) of the preceding Article" in Article 202(i) and (ii) and the phrase "when a notice of the amount of distribution under the provision of Article 201(7) is given" in Article 203 shall be deemed to be replaced with "when the period prescribed in Article 200(1) expires." 例文帳に追加

第二百五条　簡易配当については、前節（第百九十五条、第百九十七条、第二百条第三項及び第四項並びに第二百一条第七項を除く。）の規定を準用する。この場合において、第百九十六条第一項及び第三項中「前条第二項の規定による許可」とあるのは「第二百四条第一項の規定による許可」と、第百九十八条第一項中「前条第一項の規定による公告が効力を生じた日又は同条第三項」とあるのは「第二百四条第四項」と、「二週間以内に」とあるのは「一週間以内に」と、第二百一条第一項中「当該異議の申立てに係る手続が終了した後」とあるのは「当該異議の申立てについての決定があった後」と、同条第六項中「次項の規定による配当額の通知を発する前に」とあるのは「前条第一項に規定する期間内に」と、第二百二条第一号及び第二号中「前条第七項の規定による配当額の通知を発した時に」とあり、並びに第二百三条中「第二百一条第七項の規定による配当額の通知を発した時に」とあるのは「第二百条第一項に規定する期間を経過した時に」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 19-10 The provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 16, Article 17 to Article 17-11, paragraphs (4) to (6) of Article 17-12 and Article 17-13 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Registered Overseas Certifying Body. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" which appears in paragraph (2) of Article 16 shall be replaced with "Article 19-8", the term "each of the items of paragraph (1) of Article 17-2" in the same paragraph with "each of the items of paragraph (1) of Article 17-2 as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 19-10", the term "paragraph (1) of Article 16" which appears in paragraph (1) of Article 17-2 shall be replaced with "Article 19-8", the term "each item of paragraph (1) of Article 17-2" which appears in Article 17-10 shall be replaced with "each item of paragraph (1) of Article 17-2 as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 19-10", the term "order" in the same Article with "demand", the term "Article 17-5" which appears in Article 17-11 shall be replaced with "Article 17-5 as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 19-10", the term "order" in the same Article with "demand", the term "the preceding three paragraphs" which appears in paragraph (4) of Article 17-12 shall be replaced with "paragraphs (1) to (3) of Article 19-9", the term "one week prior to the date" in the same paragraph with "two weeks prior to the date" and the term "paragraphs (1) to (3)" which appears in paragraph (6) of the same Article shall be replaced with "paragraphs (1) to (3) of Article 19-9". 例文帳に追加

第十九条の十　第十六条第二項、第十七条から第十七条の十一まで、第十七条の十二第四項から第六項まで及び第十七条の十三の規定は、登録外国認定機関について準用する。この場合において、第十六条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「第十九条の八」と、「第十七条の二第一項各号」とあるのは「第十九条の十において準用する第十七条の二第一項各号」と、第十七条の二第一項中「第十六条第一項」とあるのは「第十九条の八」と、第十七条の十中「第十七条の二第一項各号」とあるのは「第十九条の十において準用する第十七条の二第一項各号」と、「命ずる」とあるのは「請求する」と、第十七条の十一中「第十七条の五」とあるのは「第十九条の十において準用する第十七条の五」と、「命ずる」とあるのは「請求する」と、第十七条の十二第四項中「前三項」とあるのは「第十九条の九第一項から第三項まで」と、「一週間前」とあるのは「二週間前」と、同条第六項中「第一項から第三項まで」とあるのは「第十九条の九第一項から第三項まで」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 17-3 An applicant for a patent may amend the abstract attached to the application within one year and three months (excluding the period after a request for laying open of application is filed) from the filing date of the patent application (or in the case of a patent application containing a priority claim under Article 41(1), the filing date of the earlier application provided for in the said paragraph, in the case of a patent application containing a priority claim under Article 43(1), 43-2(1) or 43-2(2), the filing date of the earliest application, a patent application that is deemed to be the earliest application under Article 4.C(4) of the Paris Convention (refers to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of March 20, 1883, as revised at Brussels on December 14, 1900, at Washington on June 2, 1911, at Hague on November 6, 1925, at London on June 2, 1934, at Lisbon on October 31, 1958, and at Stockholm on July 14, 1967, the same shall apply hereinafter) or a patent application that is recognized as the earliest application under Article 4.A(2) of the Paris Convention, and in the case of a patent application containing two or more priority claims under Article 41(1), 43(1), 43-2(1) or 43-2(2), the earliest day of the filing dates on which the said priority claims are based, the same shall apply to the main clause of Article 36-2(2) and Article 64(1)). 例文帳に追加

第十七条の三　特許出願人は、特許出願の日（第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願にあつては、同項に規定する先の出願の日、第四十三条第一項又は第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願にあつては、最初の出願若しくはパリ条約（千九百年十二月十四日にブラッセルで、千九百十一年六月二日にワシントンで、千九百二十五年十一月六日にヘーグで、千九百三十四年六月二日にロンドンで、千九百五十八年十月三十一日にリスボンで及び千九百六十七年七月十四日にストックホルムで改正された工業所有権の保護に関する千八百八十三年三月二十日のパリ条約をいう。以下同じ。）第四条Ｃ（４）の規定により最初の出願とみなされた出願又は同条Ａ（２）の規定により最初の出願と認められた出願の日、第四十一条第一項、第四十三条第一項又は第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項の規定による二以上の優先権の主張を伴う特許出願にあつては、当該優先権の主張の基礎とした出願の日のうち最先の日。第三十六条の二第二項本文及び第六十四条第一項において同じ。）から一年三月以内（出願公開の請求があつた後を除く。）に限り、願書に添付した要約書について補正をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.例文帳に追加

(1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁

Where the decision on the objection under Section 64 has not been made within six months from the date of filing, and where, after the expiry of this time limit, the person filing the objection has filed a request for decision, the appeal from a decision of the Trade Mark Section or Trade Mark Division is directly admissible, in derogation of subsection (1), sentence 1, if the decision on the objection is not made within a period of two months from the receipt of the request. If the person raising the objection is opposed by another party to the proceedings, sentence 1 shall be applicable provided that the period of six months after the objection was raised is replaced by a period of 10 months. If the other party has also raised an objection, the other party must give his consent to the appeal under sentence 2. The written declaration of consent shall be attached to the appeal. If the other party does not also lodge an appeal within one month after service of the appeal under subsection (4), sentence 2, his objection is deemed to have been withdrawn. The remaining periods of time under sentences 1 and 2 shall be interrupted if the proceedings are suspended or if, on request of a party to the proceedings, an extension of time has been granted. The remaining periods of time under sentences 1 and 2 shall recommence to run after the suspension of the proceedings has been terminated or the extension of time granted has expired. After a decision on the objection has been issued, an appeal under sentences 1 and 2 shall no longer be admissible. 例文帳に追加

第64条の規定に基づく不服申立に関する決定がその申立の日から6月以内に行われない場合，及び不服申立をした者がこの期間の満了後に決定の請求を行った場合には，商標課又は商標部門の決定に対する抗告は，不服申立に関する決定がその請求の受理から2月以内に行われないときは，[1]の第1文の規定は適用されず，直ちに認められる。不服申立をした者に対して，当該手続の他の当事者が対抗している場合には，第1文は，不服申立がなされた日から6月の期間を10月の期間と置き替えるという条件で適用されるものとする。手続における他の当事者も不服申立をしている場合には，当該他の当事者は，第2文に基づく抗告に対し同意しなければならない。書面による同意の宣言を抗告に添付しなければならない。手続における他の当事者が，[4]の第2文の規定に基づく抗告状の送達後1月以内に，抗告を提起しない場合は，その者がした不服申立は取り下げられたものとみなされる。第1文及び第2文の規定に基づく残存期間は，手続が中止されている場合又は手続における当事者の1人の請求により期間の延長が認められている場合は，進行が中断される。第1文及び第2文に規定する残存期間は，中止が終了した後又は与えられた期間が満了した後に進行を再開する。不服申立に関する決定が行われた後には，第1文及び第2文の規定に基づく抗告はもはや行うことができない。 - 特許庁

Prior art shall consist of: (a) Everything made available to the public by means of a written or oral disclosure, by use, or in any other way, before the filing date or the priority date of the application claiming the invention. Prior use which is not present in the Philippines, even if widespread in a foreign country, cannot form part of the prior art if such prior use is not disclosed in printed documents or in any tangible form. (b) The whole contents of an application for a patent, utility model, or industrial design registration, published under Sec. 44 of IP CODE, filed or effective in the Philippines, with a filing or priority date that is earlier than the filing or priority date of the application: Provided, That the application which has validly claimed the filing date of an earlier application under Section 31 of IP CODE, shall be prior art with effect as of the filing date of such earlier application: Provided further, That the applicant or the inventor identified in both applications are not one and the same, (Sec. 24, IP CODE): Where two or more applications are independently filed with respect to the same invention, and the later applications are filed before the first application or earlier application is published, the whole contents of the first or earliest filed application published in accordance with Sec. 44, IP CODE on or after the filing date or priority date of the later filed application shall be novelty destroying with respect to the later filed application.例文帳に追加

先行技術は，次のものからなる。 (a)書面又は口頭による開示により，実施により，又はその他の方法で，発明を主張する出願の出願日又は優先日の前に公衆の利用に供されているすべてのもの。フィリピンにおけるものでない先使用は，外国で普及していても，当該先使用が印刷文書又は有形の形式で開示されていない場合は，先行技術の一部を構成することができない。 (b)IP法第44条に基づき公開され，フィリピンにおいて出願され又は効力を有し，かつ，当該出願の出願日又は優先日より前の出願日又は優先日を有する特許出願，実用新案登録又は意匠登録の全内容。ただし，IP法第31条に基づいて先の出願の出願日を正当に主張する出願は，当該先の出願日において有効な先行技術であるものとし，かつ，双方の出願の出願人又は発明者が同一でないことを条件とする。(IP法第24条) 2以上の出願が同一の発明に関して独立して出願され，後の出願が最先の出願又は先の出願が公開される前に出願された場合は，後の出願の出願日又は優先日以後にIP法第44条に基づき公開された先の又は最先の出願の全内容は，後の出願の新規性を損なうものとする。 - 特許庁

An entitled person whose invention has been applied for by a person not entitled to do so, or a person injured by usurpation, may demand that the patent applicant surrenders to him the right to the grant of a patent. If the application has already resulted in a patent, the entitled person may demand that the patentee assigns the patent to him. This right may only be asserted, subject to sentences 4 and 5, by legal action within two years of publication of the grant of the patent (Section 58(1)). Should the injured person have filed an opposition on the grounds of usurpation (Section 21(1), no. 3), said injured person may bring the legal action within one year of the final conclusion of the opposition proceedings. The third and fourth sentences shall not apply if the patentee did not act in good faith when obtaining the patent.A patent shall have the effect that the patentee alone shall be authorized to use the patented invention within the applicable laws. A third party not having the consent of the patentee shall be prohibited 1. from making, offering, putting on the market or using a product which is the subject matter of the patent, or from importing or possessing said product for such purposes; 2. from using a process which is the subject matter of the patent, or, when said third party knows or it is obvious from the circumstances that use of the process without the consent of the patentee is prohibited, from offering the process for use within the territory to which this Act applies; 3. from offering, putting on the market or using or importing or possessing for such purposes the product produced directly by a process which is the subject matter of the patent. 例文帳に追加

権利者であって，その発明についての非権利者によって出願がされたもの，又は窃取による被害者は，特許出願人に対し，特許付与を受ける権利を同人に譲渡するよう要求することができる。出願が既に特許を生じさせている場合は，権利者は，特許所有者が同人にその特許を譲渡するよう要求することができる。この権利は，第 4文及び第 5文に従うことを条件として，特許付与の公告(第 58条(1))から 2年以内に，訴訟によって主張することができる。被害者が窃取(第21条(1)3.)に基づく異議申立を提起しているときは，当該被害者は，その異議申立手続に関する最終的決着から 1年以内において訴訟を提起することができる。第 3文及び第 4文は，特許所有者が，特許の取得にあたって善意で行動していなかったときは適用されない。1. 特許の対象である製品を生産し，提供し，市販し若しくは使用し，又は当該目的のためにこれらの製品を輸入し若しくは保持すること 2. 特許の対象である方法を使用すること，又は特許所有者の同意を得ないでその方法を使用することが禁止されていることを当該第三者が知っているか若しくはそれが状況からみて明らかである場合に，本法の施行領域内での使用のために，その方法を提供すること3. 特許の対象である方法によって直接に得られた製品を提供し，市販し若しくは使用し，又は当該目的のために輸入し若しくは保持すること - 特許庁

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the following acts do not constitute an infringement of the right to the use of a registered 26 trademark- (a) where a trademark is registered subject to any conditions or limitations, the use of the trademark in any manner in relation to goods or services, as the case may be, to be sold or otherwise traded in, in any place, or in relation to goods or services to be exported to any market, or in any other circumstances, to which, having regard to those conditions or limitations, the registration does not extend; (b) by being permitted to use those goods or a bulk of which they form part or services, or a bulk of which they form part by the proprietor of the trademark or any person related to the trade of goods or services in relation with the registered user or to use within the limit of permitted use of the registered proprietor or user, the use of such trademark, unless the registered proprietor or the user subsequently has removed or obliterated it, or has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trademark; (c) by registration under this Act- (i) the use of a trademark is within established right by a person in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of, or to be accessory to, other goods or services; (ii) the use of a registered trademark, being one of two or more trademarks registered under this Act which are identical or nearly resemble each other, is in exercise of the right to the use of the trademarks given by registration under this Act. 例文帳に追加

(1)本法のいかなる規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる行為は登録商標の使用権の侵害に該当しない。(a)商標が何らかの条件又は制限を付して登録されている場合、それらの条件又は制限を考慮して、当該登録の効力が及ばない場所で商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)について販売若しくは取引するため、商品若しくは役務に関しかかる効力の範囲外にある市場へ輸出するため、又はかかる効力の範囲外にあるその他の環境において、いかなる態様であれ当該商標を使用する場合。(b)当該商標の所有者又は登録使用権者に関連する商品若しくは役務の取引に係わる者によってそれらの商品、それらの商品から構成される大量品(バルク)、又は役務、若しくはそれらの役務の集合の利用を許諾受けた使用、又は、登録所有者又は利用権者から許諾を受けた使用の範囲内における当該商標の使用である場合。ただし、登録所有者又は使用権者が後にそれを解消又は抹消しない限り、又はどの時点においても明示黙示を問わず当該商標の使用を承諾している限りにおいてとする。(c)本法に基づく登録により、(i)他の商品若しくは役務の一部を構成するように、又は他の商品若しくは役務に随伴するものとして認められた商品又は役務に関連してある者により設定された範囲内における商標の使用である場合。(ii)登録商標の使用が、本法に基づき登録された2以上の互いに同一又は非常に似ている商標の一つとして、本法に基づき登録により付与された商標の使用権の行使である場合。 - 特許庁

(2) Every corporation whose total assets (meaning the amount of total assets appearing in the latest balance sheet; the same shall apply hereinafter) exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than two billion yen, and whose total assets, coupled with total assets of subsidiaries of the said corporation, and a corporation in Japan which holds majority of voting rights of all stockholders of the said corporation (hereinafter referred to as "sum of the total assets"), exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than ten billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "stockholding corporation" in this Article), in case that it acquires or holds the stocks (including the stocks held in monetary or security trust, where the stockholding corporation is a settlor or beneficiary and may exercise the voting rights or give instructions to the trustee regarding the exercise of such voting rights) of another corporation in Japan whose total assets exceed the amount provided for in a Cabinet Order, which shall not be less than one billion yen (hereinafter referred to as "issuing corporation" in this Article), so that the ratio of voting rights pertaining to the stocks acquired or held by the stockholding corporation to voting rights of all stockholders of the issuing corporation is to exceed the percentage figure provided for in a Cabinet Order (in the case that more than one percentage figures are provided for, any of such percentage figures pursuant to the provisions of such Cabinet Order), shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission, a written report on such stocks within thirty days from the date of the relevant exceeding; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the all the issued stocks of issuing corporation is acquired simultaneously with the incorporation, cases where a corporation engaged in banking or insurance business (excluding certain corporations engaged in insurance business as provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article) acquires or holds stocks of other corporations in Japan (excluding those engaged in banking or insurance business and those as otherwise provided for in the Rules of the Fair Trade Commission; the same shall apply in paragraphs 1 and 2 of the next Article), or cases where a corporation engaged in securities business (excluding securities brokers) acquires or holds stocks in the course of its business. 例文帳に追加

２　会社であつて、その総資産の額（最終の貸借対照表による資産の合計金額をいう。以下同じ。）が二十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超え、かつ、当該会社並びに当該会社の子会社及び当該会社の総株主の議決権の過半数を有する国内の会社の総資産の額を合計した額（以下「総資産合計額」という。）が百億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この条において「株式所有会社」という。）は、他の国内の会社であつてその総資産の額が十億円を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める金額を超えるもの（以下この項において「株式発行会社」という。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合（金銭又は有価証券の信託に係る株式について、自己が、委託者若しくは受益者となり議決権を行使することができる場合又は議決権の行使について受託者に指図を行うことができる場合を含む。）において、株式発行会社の総株主の議決権に占める株式所有会社の当該取得し、又は所有する株式に係る議決権の割合が、百分の十を下回らない範囲内において政令で定める数値（複数の数値を定めた場合にあつては、政令で定めるところにより、それぞれの数値）を超えることとなるときは、公正取引委員会規則で定めるところにより、その超えることとなつた日から三十日以内に、当該株式に関する報告書を公正取引委員会に提出しなければならない。ただし、株式発行会社の発行済の株式の全部をその設立と同時に取得する場合、銀行業又は保険業を営む会社が他の国内の会社（銀行業又は保険業を営む会社その他公正取引委員会規則で定める会社を除く。次条第一項及び第二項において同じ。）の株式を取得し、又は所有する場合及び証券業を営む会社（証券仲介業者を除く。）が業務として株式を取得し、又は所有する場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The number specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-7, paragraph 2 of the Act shall be the smallest number among those listed as follows: (i) the number adding one to the number obtained by multiplying 1/3 (in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for concluding a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders, that a majority of more than a certain rate of the total voting rights held by specified shareholders [which means shareholders of specified shares of stock (which means shares of stock with the contents that a shareholder can exercise voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders pertaining to actions prescribed in Article 144-7, paragraph 2 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article] who attend said general meeting of shareholders must agree to the resolution, the rate obtained by subtracting said certain rate from one) by the number obtained by multiplying 1/2 (in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for concluding a resolution of said general meeting of shareholders, that shareholders who have more than a certain rate of the total voting rights must attend said general meeting of shareholders, said certain rate) by the total number of specified shares of stock; (ii) in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for - 102 - concluding a resolution pertaining to actions prescribed in Article 144-7, paragraph 2 of the Act, that more than a certain number of specified shareholders must agree to the resolution, and when the number obtained by subtracting the number of specified shareholders, who had notified to a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger that they would disagree with said action, from the total number of specified shareholders is less than said certain number, the number of specified shares of stock held by said specified shareholders who had notified that they would disagree with said action; (iii) in the case where the articles of incorporation have provisions other than those set forth in the preceding two items as a requirement for concluding a resolution pertaining to actions prescribed in Article 144-7, paragraph 2 of the Act, and when said resolution is not concluded if all the specified shareholders who had notified that they would disagree with said action disagree with the resolution at a general meeting of shareholders prescribed in the same paragraph, the number of specified shares of stock held by specified shareholders who had notified that they would disagree with said action; (iv) the number specified by the articles of incorporation. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する主務省令で定める数は、次に掲げる数のうちいず れか小さい数とする。 一特定株式（法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する行為に係る株主総会において議決 権を行使することができることを内容とする株式をいう。以下この条において同じ。） の総数に二分の一（当該株主総会の決議が成立するための要件として当該特定株式の 議決権の総数の一定の割合以上の議決権を有する株主が出席しなければならない旨の 定款の定めがある場合にあっては、当該一定の割合）を乗じて得た数に三分の一（当 該株主総会の決議が成立するための要件として当該株主総会に出席した当該特定株主 （特定株式の株主をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の有する議決権の総数の一定 の割合以上の多数が賛成しなければならない旨の定款の定めがある場合にあっては、 一から当該一定の割合を減じて得た割合）を乗じて得た数に一を加えた数 二法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する行為に係る決議が成立するための要件として 一定の数以上の特定株主の賛成を要する旨の定款の定めがある場合において、特定株 主の総数から吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所に対して当該行為に反対する旨の通知 をした特定株主の数を減じて得た数が当該一定の数未満となるときにおける当該行為 に反対する旨の通知をした特定株主の有する特定株式の数 三法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する行為に係る決議が成立するための要件として 前二号の定款の定め以外の定款の定めがある場合において、当該行為に反対する旨の 通知をした特定株主の全部が同項に規定する株主総会において反対したとすれば当該 決議が成立しないときは、当該行為に反対する旨の通知をした特定株主の有する特定 株式の数 - 経済産業省

(3) If the ratio between the amount of the insurance benefits pertaining to employment injury provided for in the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (excluding the lump sum compensation for surviving family paid in case of Article 16-6, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a disease caused as a result of having been engaged in a specific job or occupation for a long period which is specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (limited to the persons specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for each type of the businesses specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, taking into consideration of the service period in respect of such business, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as the "insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease" in this paragraph and in Article 20, paragraph (1)), and the insurance benefits pertaining to persons deemed as entitled to receive the insurance benefit pursuant to the provision of Article 36, paragraph (1) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "insured of Class III special enrollment")) in respect of any business falling under any of the following items during each insurance year of three consecutive insurance years and in respect of which business three years or more have passed, since the establishment of the insurance relation of industrial accident insurance, as of March 31 of the last insurance year of such consecutive three insurance years (hereinafter referred to as the "reference date" in this paragraph), the payment of which has been made during such consecutive three insurance years (or, in case of insurance benefits paid as pension or otherwise specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the amount thereof shall be calculated pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; the same shall apply in Article 20, paragraph (1)), plus the amount of the payments made as the services listed in Article 29, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act which pertain to employment injury and which are specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (or, in case of payments other than those paid as lump sum payments, the amount thereof shall be calculated pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) on one hand, and the amount obtained by multiplying the aggregate of the amount of the general insurance premiums (or, in case of the businesses set forth in paragraph (1), item (i), the amount of the portion corresponding to the industrial accident insurance rate prescribed in the preceding paragraph (or, if such rate has been increased or decreased pursuant to the provision of such paragraph, such increased or decreased rate)) after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the off-the-job injury rate (meaning the rate prescribed by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare by taking into consideration of the injury rate pertaining to commuting injury and the amount of the costs required for the benefit for second medical examination, etc. during the past three years in respect of all businesses to which the Industrial Accident Insurance Act is applied, and other circumstances; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and in Article 20, paragraph (1)) plus the amount of the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the special enrollment off-the-job injury rate (meaning the off-the-job injury rate after deducting the rate determined by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 13; the same shall apply in each item of Article 20, paragraph (1) and in Article 20, paragraph (2)), by the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare by taking into consideration of the costs required for the insurance benefits paid as pension concerning employment injury, the costs required for the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease, and other circumstances (in Article 20, paragraph (1), item (i) referred to as the "Class I adjustment rate") on the other hand, exceeds eighty-five one-hundredth (85/100), or is seventy-five one-hundredth (75/100) or less, then the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may acknowledge the rate calculated by increasing or decreasing the industrial accident insurance rate prescribed in the preceding paragraph in respect of such business less the off-the-job injury rate, by the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare within the scope of forty one-hundredth (40/100), as the industrial accident insurance rate for the insurance year two years following the insurance year in which the reference date of such business is included. 例文帳に追加

３　厚生労働大臣は、連続する三保険年度中の各保険年度において次の各号のいずれかに該当する事業であつて当該連続する三保険年度中の最後の保険年度に属する三月三十一日（以下この項において「基準日」という。）において労災保険に係る保険関係が成立した後三年以上経過したものについての当該連続する三保険年度の間における労災保険法の規定による業務災害に関する保険給付（労災保険法第十六条の六第一項第二号の場合に支給される遺族補償一時金、特定の業務に長期間従事することにより発生する疾病であつて厚生労働省令で定めるものにかかつた者（厚生労働省令で定める事業の種類ごとに、当該事業における就労期間等を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める者に限る。）に係る保険給付（以下この項及び第二十条第一項において「特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付」という。）及び労災保険法第三十六条第一項の規定により保険給付を受けることができることとされた者（以下「第三種特別加入者」という。）に係る保険給付を除く。）の額（年金たる保険給付その他厚生労働省令で定める保険給付については、その額は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定するものとする。第二十条第一項において同じ。）に労災保険法第二十九条第一項第二号に掲げる事業として支給が行われた給付金のうち業務災害に係るもので厚生労働省令で定めるものの額（一時金として支給された給付金以外のものについては、その額は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定するものとする。）を加えた額と一般保険料の額（第一項第一号の事業については、前項の規定による労災保険率（その率がこの項の規定により引き上げ又は引き下げられたときは、その引き上げ又は引き下げられた率）に応ずる部分の額）から非業務災害率（労災保険法の適用を受けるすべての事業の過去三年間の通勤災害に係る災害率及び二次健康診断等給付に要した費用の額その他の事情を考慮して厚生労働大臣の定める率をいう。以下この項及び第二十条第一項において同じ。）に応ずる部分の額を減じた額に第一種特別加入保険料の額から特別加入非業務災害率（非業務災害率から第十三条の厚生労働大臣の定める率を減じた率をいう。第二十条第一項各号及び第二項において同じ。）に応ずる部分の額を減じた額を加えた額に業務災害に関する年金たる保険給付に要する費用、特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付に要する費用その他の事情を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める率（第二十条第一項第一号において「第一種調整率」という。）を乗じて得た額との割合が百分の八十五を超え、又は百分の七十五以下である場合には、当該事業についての前項の規定による労災保険率から非業務災害率を減じた率を百分の四十の範囲内において厚生労働省令で定める率だけ引き上げ又は引き下げた率に非業務災害率を加えた率を、当該事業についての基準日の属する保険年度の次の次の保険年度の労災保険率とすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第四十一条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条から第三百二条まで（招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）、第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）、第三百十九条（第四項を除く。）（株主総会の決議の省略）及び第三百二十条（株主総会への報告の省略）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。）の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主（当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。）の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第四十九条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条（招集手続の省略）、第三百十一条（書面による議決権の行使）、第三百十二条（電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）及び第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定（同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。）中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで（第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。）（株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。）」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。）その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The documents specified by an ordinance set forth in Article 145, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as listed in the following (in case of documents certified by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document recording the reasons for the merger; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act; (b) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act; (c) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b) of the Act; and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval; (iv) minutes of the general meeting of shareholders approving the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of Members prescribed in Article 144, paragraph 4, Article 144-2, paragraph 2, or Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of shareholders prescribed in Article 144-6, paragraph 1 and Article 144-13, paragraph 1 of the Act, and Article 783, paragraph 1, Article 795, paragraph 1, or Article 804, paragraph 1 of the Company Act) of each Commodity Exchange which carries out the merger, or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for the merger have been followed; (v) a document stating the status of the property, income and expenditure of each Commodity Exchange that carries out the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, the settlement related statements, etc. of the preceding business year; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the financial documents, etc. of the preceding business year and detailed statements thereof); (vi) in the case where a public notice or demand (in cases where the public notice is made through an official gazette, a daily newspaper which publishes matters of current events, or an Electronic Public Notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 3 or Article 144-10, paragraph 3 of the Act [including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17), or Article 789, paragraph 3; Article 799, paragraph 3; or Article 810, paragraph 3 of the Company Act, a public notice by such method) is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5; Article 144-2, paragraph 3; and Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act, or Article 144-10, paragraph 2 of the Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act); Article 789, paragraph 2; Article 799, paragraph 2; or Article 810, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; and in cases where a creditor has made an objection, a document certifying that the liabilities have been paid or reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor, reasonable property has been deposited for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said merger is not likely to harm said creditor; (vii) a document stating a method for business succession pertaining to transactions on a Commodity Market which has been opened by a Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of a merger; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees (limited to a case where a Commodity Exchange subsequent to a merger becomes an Incorporated Commodity Exchange); (ix) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the merger on the Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (x) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed - 113 - Commodity at the time of a merger, a document stating that it is appropriate to conduct transactions of Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (xi) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market at the time of a merger by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十五条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明す る書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。 一合併の理由を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人である場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二 項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が法人 である場合当該役員の登記事項証明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第 二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓約する書面 ハ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人又は法人でない場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五 条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しない旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号 ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 三会員等の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載した 書面、会員が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第三十条第一項各号のいずれかに該当す ることを誓約する書面又は取引参加者が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第八十二条第 一項第一号イからハまで若しくは同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当する ことを誓約する書面、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面並びに申請に係る商品取引所が開設しようとする一 以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を行う場合には 認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純資産額に関す る調書 四合併を行う各商品取引所の合併総会（会員商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条 第四項、第百四十四条の二第二項又は第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会をいい、 株式会社商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条の六第一項、第百四十四条の十三 第一項、会社法第七百八十三条第一項、第七百九十五条第一項又は第八百四条第一 項の株主総会をいう。）の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 五合併を行う各商品取引所の財産及び収支の状況を知ることができる書面（会員商品 取引所にあっては最終事業年度の決算関係書類等、株式会社商品取引所にあっては 最終事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属明細書）六法第百四十四条第五項、第百四十四条の二第三項及び第百四十四条の三第五項に おいて準用する法第百二十四条第二項、第百四十四条の十第二項（第百四十四条の 十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会社法第七百八十九条第二項 、第七百九十九 条第二項又は第八百十条第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第百二十四条第三項、 第百四十四条の十第三項（第百四十四条の十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会 社法第七百八十九条第三項、第七百九十九条第三項又は第八百十条第三項の規定に より公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によっ てした場合にあっては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた 債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しく は当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は - 112 - 当該合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 七合併により消滅する商品取引所の開設している商品市場における取引に関する業務 の承継の方法を記載した書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書面（合併後の商品取引所が株式会社商品取引所であ る場合に限る。九開設しようとする商品市場における合併後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見込みを記 載した書面 十合併に際して上場商品に係る商品市場を開設しようとする場合にあっては、上場商 品構成物品を一の商品市場で取引をすることが適当である旨を明らかにすることが できる書面 十一合併に際して二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数として商品市場を開設しよう とする場合にあっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通し ていることを明らかにすることができる書面 - 経済産業省

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 21 A person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in Article 16, paragraph (1), item (i) is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment with work is to be enforced; a person upon whom the assistance punishment prescribed in item (ii) of the same paragraph is to be enforced shall be regarded as a person upon whom imprisonment without work is to be enforced; the assistance punishment prescribed in item (i) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment with work; the assistance punishment in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be regarded as imprisonment without work; and the following provisions shall apply for the purpose of enforcing the assistance punishment: Article 22, Article 24, Article 28, Article 29, Articles 31 to 33 and Article 34, paragraph (1) of the Penal Code (Act No. 45 of 1907), Article 474, Articles 480 to 482, Articles 484 to 489, Articles 502 to 504 and Article 507 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 2, paragraph (1), Article 27, paragraph (1), Article 56, Article 57 and Article 61 of the Juvenile Act (Act No. 168 of 1948), Article 1, Article 2, Articles 4 to 9, Article 10, paragraph (1), Article 10-2, Article 13, Article 14, paragraphs (1), (4) and (5), Articles 14-2 to 16, Article 17, paragraph (2), Article 17-2 and Article 17-4 to Article 17-6 of the Juvenile Training Schools Act (Act No. 169 of 1948) and Article 3, Article 4, paragraph (2), Articles 11 to 14, Article 16, Articles 23 to 30, Article 33, Article 34, paragraph (1), Articles 35 to 40, Article 48, Article 49, paragraph (1), Article 50, Article 51, Article 52, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 53, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 54, paragraph (2), Articles 55 to 58, Articles 60 to 65, Articles 75 to 77, Article 82, Articles 84 to 88 and Articles 91 to 98 of the Offenders Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 88 of 2007). In such a case, the "one-third" in Article 28 of the Penal Code shall be, "one-third (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment as defined in Article 2, item (i) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "foreign punishment"), rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer as defined in Article 2, item (xi) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer") in a sentencing state as defined in Article 2, item (vii) of the same act (hereinafter referred to as the "sentencing state"))"; "10 years" shall be "10 years (including the number of days an incoming sentenced person has been detained in the enforcement of the foreign punishment rendered in the final and binding decision with regard to the offense that is the premise of the incoming transfer in the sentencing state)"; "after a sentence has become final and binding" in Article 32 of the same code shall be "after the surrender by a sentencing state in accordance with the order prescribed in Article 13 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons"; "two or more" and "the greatest among the punishments" in Article 474 of the Code of Criminal Procedure shall be "assistance punishment as defined in Article 2, item (ii) of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons (hereinafter referred to as the "assistance punishment")"; "the other punishment" in the same Article shall be "the principal punishment"; "the public prosecutors office responding to the court that has rendered the punishment" in Article 480 and Article 482 of the same code shall be "the Tokyo District Public Prosecutors Office"; "category of punishment" in Article 487 of the same code shall be "types of assistance punishment"; "a person upon whom a decision is to be enforced" in Article 502 in the same code shall be "a person upon whom the assistance punishment is to be enforced"; "the court that rendered such decision" in the same Article shall be "the Tokyo District Court"; and "a judgment of guilty has become final and binding against an individual in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 27, paragraph (1) of the Juvenile Act and "a sentence of imprisonment with or without work, or of penal detention has become final and binding in the course of enforcement of a protective measure" in Article 57 in the same code shall be "a person with regard to whom assistance punishment as defined in item (ii) of Article 2 of the Act on the Transnational Transfer of Sentenced Persons is to be enforced and who is currently undergoing a protective measure"; additional technicalities requiring alternative readings in connection with the application of these provisions shall be determined by a Cabinet order. 例文帳に追加