「may not」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(259ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

The registration of a trade mark may be revoked on any of the following grounds: that, up to the date 1 month before the date of the application for the revocation of the registration of the trade mark, a continuous period of 3 years or more elapsed following the actual date of registration during which the trade mark was not put to genuine use in the course of trade in New Zealand, by any owner for the time being, in relation to the goods or services in respect of which it is registered: except as provided in subsection (3), that the use of the trade mark has been suspended for an uninterrupted period of 3 years: that, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the owner, the trade mark has become a common name in general public use for a product or service in respect of which it is registered: that the article or substance was formerly manufactured under a patent or the service was formerly a patented process; and a period of 2 years or more has elapsed since the expiry of the patent; and the word is or the words are the only practicable name or description of the article, substance, or service: that, in consequence of the trade mark's use by the owner or with the owner's consent in relation to the goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered, the trade mark is likely to deceive or confuse the public, for instance as to the nature, quality, or geographical origin of those goods or services.例文帳に追加

商標登録は，次に掲げる理由の何れかを基にして取り消すことができる。商標登録に係る取消申請日の1月前までに，商標がそのときの所有者によりその登録に係る商品又はサービスについてニュージーランドにおいて業として真正の使用がされなかった期間が，実際の登録日後，連続して3年以上経過していること(3)に定める場合を除き，商標の使用が中断なく3年間停止していること所有者の行為又は無為の結果，商標がその登録に係る商品又はサービスについて一般公衆に使用される普通名称になっていること 次に掲げる事情があること，すなわち，それに係る物品若しくは物質が以前は特許に基づいて製造されていたか，又はそれに係るサービスが以前は特許方法であったこと，及び特許の満了から2年以上の期間が経過していること，及びそれに係る文言が物品，物質又はサービスについての単なる実用的な名称又は説明であること商標登録に係る商品又はサービスについての所有者による又は所有者の同意を得た商標の使用の結果，商標が例えば，その商品又はサービスの性質，品質又は原産地等に関して公衆に誤認又は混同を生じさせる虞があること - 特許庁

The name shall be removed from the Register of Professional Representatives of any person who: is deceased or subject to an incapacity under Article 69; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 63, no longer fulfills the conditions required by Article 60 and or may no longer rely on the provisions of an international convention or on reciprocity under paragraph 2 of that Article; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 is no longer resident in Belgium or in a Member State of the European Communities or has been prohibited or placed under guardianship; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 has been removed ex officio from the list of professional representatives before the European Patent Office for one of the reasons listed in Rule 102 to of the Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents or for having been subject to a disciplinary measure taken under Article 134 of that Convention; at the time of the request for entry or of a request for amendment of the entry, intentionally submitted documents or made declarations the content of which did not correspond to reality; has been convicted or has been subject to a prohibition referred to in Article 60; has committed a serious offense in the exercise of his patent representation activities before the Office. 例文帳に追加

次に掲げる者は職業的代理人登録簿から抹消される。死亡した者，又は第69条の規定による無能力者となった者，第63条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，もはや第60条及びの条件を満たしていない者，又は国際条約の規定若しくは第60条の下での相互主義に依存することができない者，第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，もはやベルギー若しくは欧州共同体の居住者ではない者，又は禁止され若しくは保護の下におかれるようになった者，第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，欧州特許の付与に関する条約についての施行規則の中の規則第102(a)から(c)までに掲げる理由の1つに基づき，又は同条約第134条(c)の下でとられた制裁措置に服させられたという理由で，職権により欧州特許庁に対する職業的代理人名簿から抹消された者，登録請求又は登録補正請求のとき，故意に真実ではない文書又は申立を提出した者，有罪の判決を受け，又は第60条にいう禁止に服させられた者，庁に対する特許代理人としての職務の遂行において，重大な罪を犯した者。 - 特許庁

Article 5-4 (1) In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment find sufficient reason to suspect that any single Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of paragraph (2) of Article 2, if they have found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph since said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing environmental pollution if said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph, in view of the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing of said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who has been operating such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on human health or on the life and/or growth of animals at the top of the food chain if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof. 例文帳に追加

第五条の四　厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第一種監視化学物質につき、第二条第二項各号のいずれかに該当すると疑うに足りる理由があると認める場合であつて、その製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第一種監視化学物質が同項各号のいずれかに該当するものであるとすれば、当該第一種監視化学物質による環境の汚染が生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第一種監視化学物質について同項各号のいずれかに該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第一種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（当該化学物質が継続的に摂取される場合における人の健康又は高次捕食動物の生息若しくは生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24 (1) In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment have, with regard to any single Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance, found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under item (i) of paragraph (3) of Article 2 since said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing damage to human health through environmental pollution if said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under said item, in view of the results of the tests under paragraph (8) of Article 2 and other available knowledge concerning said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance as well as the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing said Type II Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who has operated such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on human health if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第二種監視化学物質につき、第二条第八項の試験成績その他当該第二種監視化学物質に関して得られている知見及びその製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第二種監視化学物質が同条第三項第一号に該当するものであるとすれば、当該第二種監視化学物質による環境の汚染により人の健康に係る被害を生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第二種監視化学物質について同号に該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第二種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（当該化学物質が継続的に摂取される場合における人の健康に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 67-2 The provisions of Article 940, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Period of Public Notice, etc. for Electronic Public Notice, etc.), Article 941 (Investigation on Electronic Public Notice), Article 946 (Obligation of Investigation, etc.), Article 947 (Cases Where Investigation on Electronic Public Notice May Not Be Carried Out), Article 951, paragraph (2) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Financial Statements, etc.), Article 953 (Order for Improvement), and Article 955 (Entries, etc. in Investigation Registry, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cases where a Mutual Company gives public notice under this Act or any other Act in the form of electronic public notice. In this case, the terms "Article 440, paragraph (1)" and "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 940, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 54-7, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act" and "annual general meeting of members (or annual general meeting, where the company has such meeting)," respectively; the term "the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 940, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1)"; and the term "public notice under this Act or any other Act (excluding the public notice under Article 440, paragraph (1)" in Article 941 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice under the Insurance Business Act (excluding the public notice under Article 54-7, paragraph (1) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第六十七条の二　会社法第九百四十条第一項及び第三項（電子公告の公告期間等）、第九百四十一条（電子公告調査）、第九百四十六条（調査の義務等）、第九百四十七条（電子公告調査を行うことができない場合）、第九百五十一条第二項（財務諸表等の備置き及び閲覧等）、第九百五十三条（改善命令）並びに第九百五十五条（調査記録簿等の記載等）の規定は、相互会社が電子公告によりこの法律又は他の法律の規定による公告をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十条第一項第二号中「第四百四十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十四条の七第一項」と、「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会（総代会を設けているときは、定時総代会）」と、同条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「第一項」と、同法第九百四十一条中「この法律又は他の法律の規定による公告（第四百四十条第一項の規定による公告を除く」とあるのは「保険業法の規定による公告（同法第五十四条の七第一項の規定による公告を除く」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 940, paragraph (1) (excluding item (i)) and (3) (Period of Public Notice for Electronic Public Notice, etc.), Article 941 (Investigation of Electronic Public Notice), Article 946 (Obligation of Investigation, etc.), Article 947 (Cases Where Investigation on Electronic Public Notice may not be Carried out), Article 951, paragraph (2) (Keeping and Inspection, etc. of Financial Statements, etc.), Article 953 (Order for Improvement), and Article 955 (Entries, etc. in Investigation Registry, etc.) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis where a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. gives public notice under this Act or any other Act in the form of electronic public notice. In this case, the terms "Article 440, paragraph (1)" and "annual shareholders meeting" in Article 940, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 819, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "procedure" respectively; the term "the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 940, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (1)"; and the term "public notice under this Act or any other Act (excluding the public notice under Article 440, paragraph (1)" in Article 941 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice under the Insurance Business Act (excluding the public notice under Article 819, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 193, paragraph (2) of that Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第九百四十条第一項（第一号を除く。）及び第三項（電子公告の公告期間等）、第九百四十一条（電子公告調査）、第九百四十六条（調査の義務等）、第九百四十七条（電子公告調査を行うことができない場合）、第九百五十一条第二項（財務諸表等の備置き及び閲覧等）、第九百五十三条（改善命令）並びに第九百五十五条（調査記録簿等の記載等）の規定は、外国保険会社等が電子公告によりこの法律又は他の法律の規定による公告をする場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百四十条第一項第二号中「第四百四十条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第百九十三条第二項において準用する第八百十九条第一項」と、「定時株主総会」とあるのは「手続」と、同条第三項中「前二項」とあるのは「第一項」と、同法第九百四十一条中「この法律又は他の法律の規定による公告（第四百四十条第一項の規定による公告を除く」とあるのは「保険業法の規定による公告（同法第百九十三条第二項において準用する第八百十九条第一項の規定による公告を除く」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 132-10 (1) In the case of a petition or any other statement to be filed or made in the procedures for civil suits (hereinafter referred to as a "petition, etc."), which shall be filed or made, pursuant to the provisions of this Code or other laws and regulations concerning such petition, etc., by means of a document, etc. (meaning a document, a transcript, extract, authenticated copy or duplicate of a document or a duplicate of a bill or note, or any other paper or other tangible object on which information recognizable to human perception such as characters and shapes is stated; the same shall apply hereinafter) to the court specified by the Supreme Court (including one filed or made to the presiding judge, authorized judge, commissioned judge or court clerk of such court), notwithstanding the provisions of said laws and regulations, as provided for by the Rules of the Supreme Court, the petition, etc. may be filed or made by means of an electronic data processing system (meaning an electronic data processing system wherein the computer (including input-output devices; the same shall apply hereinafter) used in the court is connected, by way of telecommunication lines, to the computer used by the person who files or makes the petition, etc. or person who receives a notice of a disposition under the provision of Article 399(1); the same shall apply in Article 397 to Article 401); provided, however, that this shall not apply to a petition, etc. on the demand procedure where a petition for demand for payment is filed or made by means of a document. 例文帳に追加

第百三十二条の十　民事訴訟に関する手続における申立てその他の申述（以下「申立て等」という。）のうち、当該申立て等に関するこの法律その他の法令の規定により書面等（書面、書類、文書、謄本、抄本、正本、副本、複本その他文字、図形等人の知覚によって認識することができる情報が記載された紙その他の有体物をいう。以下同じ。）をもってするものとされているものであって、最高裁判所の定める裁判所に対してするもの（当該裁判所の裁判長、受命裁判官、受託裁判官又は裁判所書記官に対してするものを含む。）については、当該法令の規定にかかわらず、最高裁判所規則で定めるところにより、電子情報処理組織（裁判所の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。以下同じ。）と申立て等をする者又は第三百九十九条第一項の規定による処分の告知を受ける者の使用に係る電子計算機とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。第三百九十七条から第四百一条までにおいて同じ。）を用いてすることができる。ただし、督促手続に関する申立て等であって、支払督促の申立てが書面をもってされたものについては、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 44-2 (excluding the second sentence of paragraph (3)) and Article 73 to the preceding Article inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of Policyholders. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 310, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the first sentence of Article 44-2, paragraph (3) and the term "paragraph (1)" in Article 310, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 44-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 299, paragraph (3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 68, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders or members"; the term "Article 74 to 76 inclusive" in Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 75 and 76"; the term "Policyholder" in Article 74, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 74, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representatives, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, general representatives, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　第四十四条の二（第三項後段を除く。）及び第七十三条から前条までの規定は、保険契約者総代会について準用する。この場合において、第四十四条の二第三項前段において準用する会社法第三百十条第二項中「前項」とあり、及び同条第三項中「第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十四条の二第一項」と、同条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「保険業法第七十四条第三項において準用する第六十八条第三項」と、同条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「保険契約者又は社員」と、第七十四条第三項中「第七十四条から第七十六条まで」とあるのは「第七十五条及び第七十六条」と、同項及び同条第四項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「総代」と、同条第三項において準用する同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「総代、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、総代、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from the Disposition of Portfolio Securities, in kind dividends or share splits) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the total amount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (which is, in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to (a) in the case of a Partner, their respective Interest Amount or (b) in the case of a Withdrawing Partner, their respective Interest Amount at the time of the withdrawal of such Withdrawing Partner, to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and(iv) other matters as required to determine the appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [ ]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、組合員及び脱退組合員に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、組合員についてはその持分金額、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時の持分金額の各金額に応じ按分をした上、それぞれ現物により分配することができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券等の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を組合員及び脱退組合員に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

Article 25-3 (1) In the case that the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry and the Minister of the Environment have, with regard to any single Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance, found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under item (ii) of paragraph (3) of Article 2 since said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing damage to the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment through environmental pollution if said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under said item, in view of the results of the tests prescribed in paragraph (7) of Article 4 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (9) of Article 4-2) and any other available knowledge concerning said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance as well as the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing said Type III Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who operated such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on the inhabitation and/or growth of flora and fauna in the human living environment if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof. 例文帳に追加

第二十五条の三　経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第三種監視化学物質につき、第四条第七項（第四条の二第九項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する試験の試験成績その他当該第三種監視化学物質に関して得られている知見及びその製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第三種監視化学物質が第二条第三項第二号に該当するものであるとすれば、当該第三種監視化学物質による環境の汚染により生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に係る被害を生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第三種監視化学物質について同号に該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第三種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（継続的に当該化学物質が摂取され、又はこれにさらされる場合における生活環境動植物の生息又は生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices.例文帳に追加

このように、近年、企業に雇用される人々の意識が一般的にはリスク回避的になり、開業希望率が減少していることと、第2章で述べたような、近年の労働市場の変化等との関係については、〔1〕1990年代まで大企業を中心とする年功賃金制が「日本的雇用慣行」として定着していると認識され、人々の予想する将来賃金が上昇してきたこと、〔2〕1990年代のデフレ経済の悪影響がまず自営業等の小規模な企業から破産・廃業の増加等の形で現れ、人々の予想する自営業の所得が顕著に低下しリスクが顕著に増加したこと、〔3〕大企業の被雇用者に本格的な雇用調整が及んだのは1990年代後半であったことから、将来の予想賃金が低下するにはかなり時間がかかったこと、〔4〕定年退職後の収入については、「日本的雇用慣行」の下でも不安定性があることが早くから認識され、また、1990年代に企業が中高齢層のリストラを進め高齢者の転職市場は厳しい状況が続き、50歳代の賃金については大企業でも比較的早くから調整が進んだことから、中高齢者にとっては転職と比較して開業することの機会費用が下がった可能性があること、また、この年代の人々はバブル崩壊による持ち家価格の低下等の影響を被ることが比較的少なかったこと等が指摘できる。 - 経済産業省

The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion. 例文帳に追加

平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1％、それから生命保険だと6％ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6％、損保1％ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。 - 金融庁

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners who have made contributions with respect to a Portfolio Investment to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities in respect of such Portfolio Investment (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from a Disposition of, in kind dividends with respect to or share splits of Portfolio Securities) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Participating Interested Partners in respect of such Portfolio Investment their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the totalamount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests (provided that, for a Withdrawing Partner, the distribution shall be based on its Percentage Interest at the time of its withdrawal), to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and (iv) other matters as required for determination of appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding interests equal to [ ]% or more of the total Percentage Interests of the Limited Partners who have made contributions to the Portfolio Investment. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、あるポートフォリオ投資に係る投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象組合員等に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、対象持分割合（但し、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時を基準とする。）に応じ按分をした割合により、それぞれ現物により分配するとができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を対象組合員等に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした有限責任組合員の対象持割合の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する持分を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項の規定に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

Any person may, on payment of the prescribed fee, at any time within four months from the date of the advertisement of the acceptance of an application, give notice at the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks of opposition to the grant of the patent on any of the following grounds, namely:- that the applicant obtained the invention from him, or from a person of whom he is the legal representative or assign; or that the invention has been claimed in any specification filed in Bangladesh which is or will be of prior date to the patent, the grant of which is opposed; or that the nature of the invention or the manner in which it is to be performed is not sufficiently or fairly described and ascertained in the specifications; or that the invention has been publicly used in any part of Bangladesh or has been made publicly known in any part of Bangladesh; or that the complete specification describes or claims an invention other than that described in the provisional specification, and that such other invention either forms the subject of an application made by the opponent for a patent which if granted would bear a date in the interval between the date of the application and the leaving of the complete specification, or has been made available to the public by publication in any document published in Bangladesh in that interval; but on no other ground. Where such notice is given, the Registrar shall give notice of the opposition to the applicant, and shall, on the expiration of those four months, after hearing the applicant and the opponent, if desirous of being heard, decide on the case. 例文帳に追加

何人も、出願受理の公告日から4 月以内の何時でも、所定の手数料を支払い、次に掲げる事由により当該公告に係る特許を付与することに対する異義申立てを特許意匠商標庁に通知することができる。ただし、下記以外の申立て理由は認められない。出願人は当該発明を申立人から、又は申立人が法定代理人である者又は申立人が譲渡をなした者から取得したこと。又は、当該発明は、異義が申し立てられている当該特許の付与日以前にバングラデシュ国内で提出されたか、提出される明細書において請求されていること。発明の本質又は実施方法が十分に又は正確に記載されておらず、完全な明細書において確認されていないこと。又は、当該発明はバングラデシュ国内の領域において公に使用されているか、又はバングラデシュ国内の領域において公に知られていること。完全な明細書は仮明細書に記載された以外の発明を記載し又は請求していること、及び、当該その他の発明が、異議申立人が行った、付与されると当該出願の日と当該完全な明細書が提出された日との両日の間における日付が付される特許に係る出願の対象であるか、又は、当該両日の間にバングラデシュ国内で発行される何らかの刊行物により公衆に利用可能となっていること。前項の通知が行われた場合、登録官は出願人にその異議申立てを通知し、聴聞の希望があれば出願人と異義申立人を聴聞した後4 月満了時にその事案を査定する。 - 特許庁

Article 68-88-2 (1) Where a consolidated parent corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the consolidated corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the consolidated corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条の八十八の二　連結親法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（当該申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、当該申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 47-4 Works permitted to be reproduced pursuant to the provisions of Article 31, item (i), Article 32, Article 33, paragraph (1) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of the same Article), Article 33-2, paragraph (1), Article 34, paragraph (1), Article 35, paragraph (1), Article 36, paragraph (1), Article 37, paragraph (1) or (2), Article 39, paragraph (1), Article 40, paragraph (1) or (2), Article 4l, 42, 42-2, 46 or 47 (excluding, however, in cases involving the provisions of Article 31, item (i), Article 35, paragraph (1), Article 36, paragraph (1) or Article 42, reproductions of cinematographic works (including, in the case of works reproduced in cinematographic works, reproductions of such cinematographic works; the same shall apply below in this Article)) may be offered to the public by transferring ownership of the reproductions made pursuant to these provisions. The foregoing, however, shall not apply where the ownership of reproductions of Works made pursuant to the provisions of Article 31, item (i), Article 33-2, paragraph (1), Article 35, paragraph (1), Article 41, 42 or 42-2 (excluding, however, in cases involving the provisions of Article 3l, item (i), Article 33-2, paragraph (1), Article 35, paragraph (1) or Article 42, copies of cinematographic works) is transferred to the public for purposes other than those provided for in Article 31, item (i), Article 35, paragraph (1), Article 41, 42 or 42-2. 例文帳に追加

第四十七条の四　第三十一条第一号、第三十二条、第三十三条第一項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）、第三十三条の二第一項、第三十四条第一項、第三十五条第一項、第三十六条第一項、第三十七条第一項若しくは第二項、第三十九条第一項、第四十条第一項若しくは第二項、第四十一条、第四十二条、第四十二条の二、第四十六条又は第四十七条の規定により複製することができる著作物は、これらの規定の適用を受けて作成された複製物（第三十一条第一号、第三十五条第一項、第三十六条第一項又は第四十二条の規定に係る場合にあつては、映画の著作物の複製物（映画の著作物において複製されている著作物にあつては、当該映画の著作物の複製物を含む。以下この条において同じ。）を除く。）の譲渡により公衆に提供することができる。ただし、第三十一条第一号、第三十三条の二第一項、第三十五条第一項、第四十一条、第四十二条又は第四十二条の二の規定の適用を受けて作成された著作物の複製物（第三十一条第一号、第三十五条第一項又は第四十二条の規定に係る場合にあつては、映画の著作物の複製物を除く。）を、第三十一条第一号、第三十三条の二第一項、第三十五条第一項、第四十一条、第四十二条又は第四十二条の二に定める目的以外の目的のために公衆に譲渡する場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

We, the participants representing health, social welfare and labour sectors of the ASEAN plus 3 countries at the 11th ASEAN & Japan High Level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies (hereafter referred to as the Meeting) held in Tokyo, Japan, on 3-5 December 2013, which carried the theme “Active Aging”;Remembering that this year marks the 40th year since the relations between ASEAN and the Japanese Government began, and that we have kept cordial relationships throughout this time, aiming to further enhance our cooperations and build strategic partnerships in the future;Acknowledging with appreciation the initiative of the Government of Japan to convene the ASEAN-Japan High-level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies since 2003, particularly this 11th Meeting as an effective platform of information sharing and exchange of views on the health, social welfare and labour aspects of “Active Aging”;Also, acknowledging with appreciation the active initiatives by the Government of Japan for holding the “ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society” in Jakarta this November, with hopes that these efforts will continue and promote further collaborations in the future;Noting that aging is progressing worldwide, and by 2050 the population of age 60 years and over will reach 2 billion;Recognizing that ASEAN countries will experience rapid aging in years to come, and face new challenges such as maintaining health, responding to welfare and social security needs, prevention of isolation and poverty of the elderly that require urgent attention;Considering that the current situation of aging in the health, labour and welfare sector and the promotion of measures related to aging in ASEAN countries vary, and that cultural and social backgrounds differ between ASEAN member states and Japan, therefore the current issues that are faced by each country may not be the same;Also, noting the results of the discussions made by the “Study Group for Japan’s International Contributions to Active Aging.”例文帳に追加

「Active Aging1」をテーマに2013年12月3日から5日まで東京において開催された第11回ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合で、ASEAN+3各国の保健、社会福祉及び労働分野の参加者は、今年がASEAN日本友好40周年であり、我が国とASEAN各国の間でこれまでの友好的な関係を想起し、今後のさらなる協力関係の強化と戦略的なパートナーシップを目指し、ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合を2003年より開催している日本政府のイニシアティブに感謝するとともに、第11回会合は、保健、社会福祉及び労働分野におけるActive Agingに関する情報共有と意見交換のための有効な場であることを認識し、また、本年11月に日本政府がジャカルタにおいてASEAN地域における高齢化に係る国際貢献に関する講演会（ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society）が行われたことを評価しつつ、地域協力に関する努力の継続とさらなる連携の促進を期待し、世界の高齢化は急速に進行しており、2050年には60歳以上の人口が20億人に達することを留意し、ASEAN諸国においては今後急速に高齢化が進み、高齢者の健康保持や、福祉及び社会保障ニーズへの対応、高齢者の孤立・貧困防止などの対策が急務であることを認識し、保健・福祉・労働分野における高齢化の現状及び対策の推進に際して、ASEAN諸国は多様であり、また、ASEAN諸国と日本では置かれている状況や文化・社会的背景が異なること、それゆえ現在直面している課題が異なることを考慮し、さらに、｢国際的なActive Ageingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会｣での議論成果に留意する。 - 厚生労働省

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 23-3 (1) The Issuer of Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned may, if he/she satisfies requirements specified in Article 5(4) and the total issue price or the total distribution amount of the Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Amount of Issue") is 100 million yen or more, register Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities by submitting a document which, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, state the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, including the period in which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Issue Period"), the kind of the Securities, the Planned Amount of Issue or the maximum amount of issue or distribution, and names of principal Financial Instruments Business Operators and/or Registered Financial Institutions which plan to underwrite the Securities (such document is hereinafter referred to as a "Shelf Registration Statement") to the Prime Minister; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors defined in Article 23-13(1) (limited to Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(1) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities) or where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation for Small Number of Investors defined in Article 23-13(3) (limited to Solicitation for Small Number of Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(3) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities). 例文帳に追加

第二十三条の三　有価証券の募集又は売出しを予定している当該有価証券の発行者で、第五条第四項に規定する者に該当するものは、当該募集又は売出しを予定している有価証券の発行価額又は売出価額の総額（以下「発行予定額」という。）が一億円以上の場合においては、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該募集又は売出しを予定している期間（以下「発行予定期間」という。）、当該有価証券の種類及び発行予定額又は発行若しくは売出しの限度額、当該有価証券について引受けを予定する金融商品取引業者又は登録金融機関のうち主たるものの名称その他の事項で公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定めるものを記載した書類（以下「発行登録書」という。）を内閣総理大臣に提出して、当該有価証券の募集又は売出しを登録することができる。ただし、その有価証券発行勧誘等が第二十三条の十三第一項に規定する適格機関投資家向け勧誘（同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。）に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し（当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。）及びその有価証券発行勧誘等が同条第三項に規定する少人数向け勧誘（同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。）に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し（当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。）を予定している場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-30-10 A Subsidiary Company Submitting Annual Securities Reports of a person who has conducted Electronic Disclosure Procedures pertaining to the documents listed in Article 25(1), items (i) to (xi) inclusive (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) or a Subsidiary Company Submitting Annual Securities Reports of a person who has conducted Electronic Disclosure Procedures of the documents listed in Article 25(1)(xii) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27), or a person who has conducted Electronic Disclosure Procedures pertaining to the document prescribed in Article 27-14(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)) may, in lieu of the copies of the documents to be made available for public inspection under the provision of Article 25(2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) or Article 27-14(2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)), make available for public inspections the information (excluding the parts that shall not be made public for public inspection under the provision of Article 25(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27)) to be contained in the documents listed in each item of Article 25(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) or the documents prescribed in Article 27-14(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)) pertaining to copies of such documents by means of indicating said information on the screen of an output device or by any other methods specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, in the cases specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. In this case, the person who has made said information available for public inspection shall be deemed to have made the copies of said documents available for public inspection. 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の三十の十　第二十五条第一項第一号から第十一号まで（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる書類に係る電子開示手続を行つた者若しくは同項第十二号（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる書類に係る電子開示手続を行つた者の提出子会社又は第二十七条の十四第一項（第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する書類に係る電子開示手続を行つた者は、内閣府令で定める場合には、第二十五条第二項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二十七条の十四第二項（第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公衆の縦覧に供しなければならないものとされている書類の写しに代えて、当該書類の写しに係る第二十五条第一項各号（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる書類又は第二十七条の十四第一項（第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する書類に記載すべき事項（第二十五条第四項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公衆の縦覧に供しないものとされている部分を除く。）を出力装置の映像面に表示する方法その他の内閣府令で定める方法により公衆の縦覧に供することができる。この場合において、当該事項を公衆の縦覧に供した者は、当該書類の写しを公衆の縦覧に供したものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 66-4-2 (1) Where a domestic corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency (including the cases where a foreign corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the competent authority of the other Contracting State which is related to the foreign corporation), the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十六条の四の二　内国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合（外国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき当該外国法人に係る条約相手国の権限ある当局に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合を含む。）には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、これらの申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（これらの申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、これらの申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 27-30-6 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 6 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 12, Article 23-12(1), Article 24(7), Article 24-2(3), Article 24-4-2(5) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-8(1) and Article 24-5-2(1)), Article 24-4-3(2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-8(2) and Article 24-5-2(2)), Article 24-4-4(5), Article 24-4-5(2), Article 24-4-7(5) and Article 24-5(6) (including the cases where the provisions referred to above are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27), Article 24-6(3) and Article 27)), Article 24-7(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-7(6) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) and Article 27), Article 27-3(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-8(6) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)), Article 27-11(4), Article 27-13(3) and Article 27-22-2(2) and(3)), Article 27-10, paragraph (9) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10(10)) and paragraph (13) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-10(14)), Article 27-22-2(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(8)), or Article 27-27 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-29(2)), a person who conducts Electronic Disclosure Procedures or Discretionary Electronic Disclosure Procedures shall, when he/she has conducted said procedures by the use of the Electronic Data Processing System for Disclosure (including the cases where he/she has conducted said procedures by submission of Magnetic Disks), in lieu of copies of the documents which shall be submitted or sent to a Financial Instruments Exchange, or Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association specified by a Cabinet Order pursuant to the provisions referred to above, notify them of the information (excluding the parts that shall not be made available for public inspection under the provision of Article 27-28(3) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-29(2)) to be contained in the documents listed in each item of Article 25(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27) or the documents prescribed in Article 27-14(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)) or Article 27-27 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-29(2)), pertaining to the copies of said documents; provided, however, that the person may elect not to notify the part which shall not be made available for public inspection under the provision of Article 25(4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27). 例文帳に追加

第二十七条の三十の六　電子開示手続又は任意電子開示手続を行う者は、これらの手続を開示用電子情報処理組織を使用して行つた場合（磁気ディスクの提出によりこれらの手続を行つた場合を含む。）には、第六条（第十二条、第二十三条の十二第一項、第二十四条第七項、第二十四条の二第三項、第二十四条の四の二第五項（第二十四条の四の八第一項及び第二十四条の五の二第一項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十四条の四の三第二項（第二十四条の四の八第二項及び第二十四条の五の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十四条の四の四第五項、第二十四条の四の五第二項、第二十四条の四の七第五項及び第二十四条の五第六項（これらの規定を第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十四条の六第三項並びに第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十四条の七第四項（同条第六項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）及び第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の三第四項（第二十七条の八第六項（第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の十一第四項、第二十七条の十三第三項並びに第二十七条の二十二の二第二項及び第三項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の十第九項（同条第十項において準用する場合を含む。）及び第十三項（同条第十四項において準用する場合を含む。）、第二十七条の二十二の二第四項（同条第八項において準用する場合を含む。）又は第二十七条の二十七（第二十七条の二十九第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定にかかわらず、これらの規定により金融商品取引所又は政令で定める認可金融商品取引業協会に提出し、又は送付しなければならないものとされている書類の写しに代えて、当該書類の写しに係る第二十五条第一項各号（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）に掲げる書類又は第二十七条の十四第一項（第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）若しくは第二十七条の二十七（第二十七条の二十九第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する書類に記載すべき事項（第二十七条の二十八第三項（第二十七条の二十九第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公衆の縦覧に供しないものとされている部分を除く。）をこれらの者に通知するものとする。ただし、第二十五条第四項（第二十七条において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公衆の縦覧に供しないものとされている部分については、通知しないことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 142, item 2 and item 3 of the Act (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof); (ii) the following matters concerning a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges): (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in item 4), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (limited to a Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act; (a) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (b) when the final business year does not exist at the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 144-10, paragraph 1 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (vi) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items during the period between the earliest day among those listed in respective items of Article 144-5, paragraph 1 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の五第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げるものとする。一法第百四十二条第二号及び第三号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該定めがない場 - 97 - 合にあっては、当該定めがないこと）の相当性に関する事項 二 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。）についての次に掲げ る事項 イ最終事業年度に係る財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表とともに作成され た損益計算書の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商 品取引所の成立の日。第四号において同じ。）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務 の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与 える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の五第一項各号に掲げる日 のいずれか早い日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が 存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事 象の内容に限る。） 三 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が法第七十七条第一 項において準用する会社法第四百九十二条第一項の規定により作成した貸借対照表 四吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所において次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当 該吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生 じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の五第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早 い日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することと なる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限 る。）ロ吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所において最終事業年度がないときは、吸収合併 存続株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表 五吸収合併の効力が生ずる日以後における吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の債務 （法第百四十四条の十第一項の規定により吸収合併について異議を述べることができ る債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。）の履行の見込みに関する事項 六法第百四十四条の五第一項各号に掲げる日のいずれか早い日後吸収合併の効力が生 じた日までの間に、前各号に掲げる事項に変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

(2) The provisions of Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii) and paragraph (2) (Restriction on Insurance Solicitation) of the Insurance Business Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 283 (Liability for Compensation of the Insurance Company Concerned, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities carried out by officers or employees of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and by any mutual aid agent (which means a person who acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding mutual aid contracts for a cooperative under entrustment by said cooperative, and who is not an officer nor an employee of said cooperative; the same shall apply hereinafter) of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and officers or employees of said mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 294 (Explanations to Customers) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officers and employees of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, any mutual aid agent of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and officers and employees of said mutual aid agent, carrying out solicitation of mutual aid contracts; the provisions of Article 295 (Prohibition of Self-Contract) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 300 (Prohibited Acts) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and any mutual aid agent thereof (including their officers and employees) carrying out mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 305 (On-Site Inspections, etc.), Article 306 (Order to Improve Business Operations), and Article 307, paragraph (1), item (iii) (Rescission of Registration, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 309 (Revocation of Applications for Insurance Contracts, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the revocation or cancellation of an offer for a mutual aid contract by a person who has filed an offer with a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or by a mutual aid contractor; and the provisions of Article 311 (Carrying and Presenting of Identification Cards by Inspection Officials) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officials who enter, question, and inspect pursuant to the provisions of Article 305 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), Article 294, item (iii), Article 295, paragraph (2), Article 300, paragraph (1), item (vii) and item (ix), and Article 309, paragraph (1), item (i), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), paragraph (5) and paragraph (6) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "ordinance of the competent ministry"; the phrase "a casualty insurance company (including a foreign casualty insurance company, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Part)" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), and paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities"; the phrase "a casualty insurance agent registered under the following Article" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "a mutual aid agent notified under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "which is a casualty insurance agent" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "which is a mutual aid agent"; the phrase "by obtaining registration under the following Article or Article 286" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "by giving the notification under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "provided insurance contract prescribed in the following Article" in Article 300, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "person having a specified relationship (which means any person having a specified relationship as prescribed in Article 103 [including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-13, paragraph (2); the same shall apply in the following Article] or any person having a special relationship as prescribed in Article 194, who is not an insurance holding company or a small-sum, short term insurance holding company (hereinafter referred to as an 'insurance holding company, etc.' in this Article and Article 301-2) for which said insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc. is a subsidiary company, nor a subsidiary company (excluding an insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc.) of said insurance holding company, etc., nor a person engaged in insurance business)" in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (viii) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "subsidiary company, etc. (which means a subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 61-2, paragraph (2) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act)"; the phrase "documents listed in the items of Article 4, paragraph (2), items of Article 187, paragraph (3) or items of Article 272-2, paragraph (2)" in Article 300, paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the articles of association, or mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 9-6-2, paragraph (1) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act, or fire mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 27-2, paragraph (3) of the same Act"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 305 and Article 306 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 307, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the phrase "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under any of the following items, may rescind the registration set forth in Article 276 or Article 286, or may" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under item (iii), may"; and the phrase "all or part of the operations" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "solicitation of mutual aid contracts." 例文帳に追加

２　保険業法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項（保険募集の制限）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百八十三条（所属保険会社等の賠償責任）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店（組合の委託を受けて、当該組合のために共済契約の締結の代理又は媒介を行う者であつて、当該組合の役員又は使用人でないものをいう。以下同じ。）並びにその役員及び使用人が行う当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百九十四条（顧客に対する説明）の規定は共済契約の募集を行う共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店並びにその役員及び使用人について、同法第二百九十五条（自己契約の禁止）の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百条（禁止行為）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合及びその共済代理店（これらの者の役員及び使用人を含む。）について、同法第三百五条（立入検査等）、第三百六条（業務改善命令）及び第三百七条第一項第三号（登録の取消し等）の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百九条（保険契約の申込みの撤回等）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合に対し共済契約の申込みをした者又は共済契約者が行う共済契約の申込みの撤回又は解除について、同法第三百十一条（検査職員の証票の携帯及び提示等）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第三百五条の規定による立入り、質問又は検査をする職員について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号、第二百九十四条第三号、第二百九十五条第二項、第三百条第一項第七号及び第九号並びに第三百九条第一項第一号、第二項、第三項、第五項及び第六項中「内閣府令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項中「損害保険会社（外国損害保険会社等を含む。以下この編において同じ。）」とあるのは「共済事業を行う協同組合」と、「次条の登録を受けた損害保険代理店」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出がなされた共済代理店」と、「損害保険代理店である」とあるのは「共済代理店である」と、同条第二項中「次条又は第二百八十六条の登録を受けて」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出を行って」と、同法第三百条第一項中「次条に規定する特定保険契約」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項に規定する特定共済契約」と、同項第八号中「特定関係者（第百条の三（第二百七十二条の十三第二項において準用する場合を含む。次条において同じ。）に規定する特定関係者及び第百九十四条に規定する特殊関係者のうち、当該保険会社等又は外国保険会社等を子会社とする保険持株会社及び少額短期保険持株会社（以下この条及び第三百一条の二において「保険持株会社等」という。）、当該保険持株会社等の子会社（保険会社等及び外国保険会社等を除く。）並びに保険業を行う者以外の者をいう。）」とあるのは「子会社等（中小企業等協同組合法第六十一条の二第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。）」と、同条第二項中「第四条第二項各号、第百八十七条第三項各号又は第二百七十二条の二第二項各号に掲げる書類」とあるのは「定款又は中小企業等協同組合法第九条の六の二第一項に規定する共済規程若しくは同法第二十七条の二第三項に規定する火災共済規程」と、同法第三百五条及び第三百六条中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、同法第三百七条第一項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、「次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、第二百七十六条若しくは第二百八十六条の登録を取り消し、又は」とあるのは「第三号に該当するときは、」と、「業務の全部若しくは一部」とあるのは「共済契約の募集」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-2 paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in the respective items of Article 56-2 (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof);(ii) the following matters concerning the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges): (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an - 89 - Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in item 4), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 2 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (limited to a Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act; (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 2 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 1 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-2, paragraph 3 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type - 90 - Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (vi) when changes have taken place to the matters listed in the preceding items during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-2, paragraph 2 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の二第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げるものとする。 一 第五十六条の二各号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該定めがない場合にあっては、 当該定めがないこと）の相当性に関する事項 二 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。）についての次に掲げ る事項 イ最終事業年度に係る財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表とともに作成され た損益計算書の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商 品取引所の成立の日。第四号において同じ。）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務 の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与 える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の二第二項の会員総会の日 の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存す ることとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の 内容に限る。）三 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が法第七十七条第一 項において準用する会社法第四百九十二条第一項の規定により作成した貸借対照表 四吸収合併存続会員商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場 合にあっては、吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重 大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響 を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の二第二項の会員総会の日 の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生じた日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存するこ ととなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限 る。） 五吸収合併が効力を生じた日以後における吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の債務（法第 百四十四条の二第三項において準用する法第百二十四条第一項の規定により吸収合 併について異議を述べることができる債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。）の履行 の見込みに関する事項 六法第百四十四条の二第二項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生じた 日までの間に、前各号に掲げる事項に変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) Articles 7, 9(1) and 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to Quarterly Securities Reports, and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Quarterly Securities Report and amendment report thereof contain fake statements on important matters or lack statements of important matters to be stated or of important matters necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "the statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6)" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Quarterly Securities Report (meaning a Quarterly Securities Report set forth in Article 24-4-7(1) or (2) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-7(3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 11(1) and Article 22)"; the part "during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect," in Article 7 shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "the person making the notification" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report"; the term "the amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amendment report"; the terms "the person submitting them" and "the amendment " in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report"; the part "submit the amendment and may, when it is found necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "to submit an amendment report"; the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report and amendment reports"; the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-7(4)"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加