「the reason that」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(55ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(1) Where the international depositary authority with which a deposit or a new deposit of a culture has been made under this Schedule -- (a) notifies the applicant or proprietor that it -- (i) cannot satisfy a request made in accordance with paragraph 2(1) or 3(4); or (ii) is not able lawfully, to satisfy such a request, for the culture to be made available; (b) ceases temporarily or permanently to carry out the functions of an international depositary authority; or (c) ceases for any reason to conduct its activities as an international depositary authority in an objective and impartial manner, subject to sub-paragraph (3), the applicant or proprietor may, unless the culture has been transferred to another international depositary authority which is able to make it available, make a new deposit of a culture of the micro-organism.例文帳に追加

(1) 本附則に基づいてある培養物の寄託又は再寄託が行われた国際寄託当局が，(a) 出願人又は所有者に対し，同当局は， (i) 第2項(1)若しくは第3項(4)に従って行われた請求を満たすことができない旨，若しくは (ii) 当該培養物の利用供与について，当該請求を満たすことが合法的にできない旨， を通知した場合， (b) 国際寄託当局の役割を果たすことを一時的に若しくは無期限に停止する場合，又は (c) 何らかの理由で，国際寄託当局としての活動を客観的かつ公平な方法で停止する場合は， (3)に従うことを条件として，出願人又は所有者は，当該培養物が，それを利用に供することができる他の国際寄託当局に移転されない限り，当該微生物の再寄託を行うことができる。 - 特許庁

1. For the purposes of this Agreement, the term “resident of a Contracting Party” means: (a) in the case of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region: (i) any individual who ordinarily resides in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, provided that the individual has a substantial presence, permanent home or habitual abode in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, and that he has personal and economic relations with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; (ii) any individual who stays in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region for more than 180 days during a year of assessment or for more than 300 days in two consecutive years of assessment one of which is the relevant year of assessment, provided that he has personal and economic relations with the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; (iii) a company having a primary place of management and control in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; and (iv) any other person having a primary place of management and control in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region; (b) in the case of Japan, any person who, under the laws of Japan, is liable to tax therein by reason of his domicile, residence, place of head or main office or any other criterion of a similar nature, except any person who is liable to tax in Japan in respect only of income from sources in Japan; and (c) the Government of a Contracting Party or apolitical subdivision or local authority thereof. 例文帳に追加

１この協定の適用上、「一方の締約者の居住者」とは、次の者をいう。(a)香港特別行政区については(i)香港特別行政区内に通常居住する個人（当該個人が、香港特別行政区内に実質的に所在し、又は恒久的住居若しくは常用の住居を有し、かつ、香港特別行政区に人的及び経済的関係を有する場合に限る。）(ii)香港特別行政区内に一賦課年度中に百八十日を超えて滞在し、又は連続する二賦課年度において三百日を超えて滞在する個人（当該個人が、香港特別行政区に人的及び経済的関係を有する場合に限る。）(iii)香港特別行政区内に事業の管理及び支配の主たる場所を有する法人(iv)香港特別行政区内に事業の管理及び支配の主たる場所を有するその他の者(b)日本国については、日本国の法令の下において、住所、居所、本店又は主たる事務所の所在地その他これらに類する基準により日本国において課税を受けるべきものとされる者（日本国内に源泉のある所得のみについて日本国において租税を課される者を除く。）(c)一方の締約者の政府及び一方の締約者の地方政府又は地方公共団体 - 財務省

(6) The provisions of subsection (5) shall cease to have effect with regard to any registered user of a trade mark . (a) if the trade mark ceases to be a registered trade mark for any reason; (b) if the goods or services for which the trade mark is registered are subsequently limited so as to exclude any or all of the goods or services in respect of which the registration of the registered user has been made; (c) if the registered proprietor ceases to exercise control over the use of the trade mark and over the quality of the goods or services provided by the registered user concerned in relation to that trade mark; (d) at the date of expiration of the last registration of the trade mark unless a fresh application under subsection (2) accompanies any application for renewal of the registration of that trade mark; (e) at the date of any assignment or transmission of the registered trade mark, unless and until the devolution of title is recorded on the Register in accordance with the provisions of this Act and the subsequent proprietor of the registered trade mark makes a fresh application under subsection (2).例文帳に追加

(6) (5)は，次の場合は，何れの商標の登録使用者についても効力を失う。 (a) 当該商標が何らかの理由で登録商標でなくなった場合 (b) 当該商標の登録に係る商品又はサービスが登録後に制限され，登録使用者の登録の対象であった商品又はサービスの全部又は一部が除外されることになった場合 (c) 登録所有者が，当該商標の使用について及び当該商標の登録使用者が提供する商品又はサービスの質について管理を行わなくなった場合 (d) 当該商標の最終登録満了日において，(2)に基づく新たな申請が当該商標の登録更新申請を伴っていない場合 (e) 当該登録商標の譲渡又は移転の日において，権原の移転が本法の規定に従って登録簿に登録されていない場合は，それが登録されるまで，また，当該登録商標の後の所有者が(2)に基づく新たな申請をしていない場合は，それがされるまで - 特許庁

A person commits an offence who, with a view to gain for himself or another, or with intent to cause loss to another, and without the consent of the proprietor ? makes an article specifically designed or adapted for making copies of a sign identical to, or likely to be mistaken for, a registered trade mark; or has such an article in his possession, custody or control in the course of a business, knowing or having reason to believe that it has been, or is to be, used to produce goods, or material for labelling or packaging goods, as a business paper in relation to goods, or for advertising goods. 例文帳に追加

商品のラベル付け又は包装のため，商品に関する営業書類として，又は商品の広告のために，商品又は素材を生産する目的で当該物品が使用されたこと，又は使用されるはずであることを知りながら，又はそのことを信じるに足る理由を有しながら，自己又は他人のために利益を得る目的で又は他人に損失を与えることを意図して，当該権利者の許諾を得ることなく次のことをする者は，犯罪をなしたものとする。登録商標と同一又は誤認される虞のある標識の複製を作るために特別に設計又は調整された物品を作成すること，又は，営業として当該物品を所有，保管又は管理すること。 - 特許庁

(7) When making a calculation set forth in paragraph (1)(i), if there is any amount to be included in deductible expenses in the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of Article 33 and Articles 42 to Article 53 of the Corporation Tax Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 67-12(2) and Article 67-13(2) of the Act, whose provisions shall be applicable under the provisions of the said item, the said amount shall be included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of adjusted income for the relevant business year, only when detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses are attached to a consolidated final return form for the relevant business year set forth in Article 68-90(5) of the Act; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the competent district director having jurisdiction over the consolidated parent corporation's place for tax payment finds that there was any compelling reason for the failure to attach detailed statements and the said detailed statements have been submitted. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項第一号の計算をする場合において、同号の規定によりその例に準ずるものとされる法人税法第三十三条及び第四十二条から第五十三条までの規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十七条の十二第二項及び第六十七条の十三第二項の規定により当該各事業年度において損金の額に算入されることとなる金額があるときは、当該各事業年度に係る法第六十八条の九十第五項の連結確定申告書に当該金額の損金算入に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、当該金額を当該各事業年度の調整所得金額の計算上、損金の額に算入する。ただし、その添付がなかつたことについて連結親法人の納税地の所轄税務署長がやむを得ない事情があると認める場合において、当該明細書の提出があつたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) When making a calculation set forth in paragraph (1)(i), if there is any amount to be included in deductible expenses in the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of Article 33 and Article 42 to Article 53 of the Corporation Tax Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 67-12(2) and Article 67-13(2) of the Act, whose provisions shall be applicable under the provisions of the said item, the said amount shall be included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of adjusted income for the relevant business year, only when detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses are attached to a final return form for the relevant business year set forth in Article 66-6(5) of the Act; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the district director finds that there was any compelling reason for the failure to attach detailed statements and the said detailed statements have been submitted. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項第一号の計算をする場合において、同号の規定によりその例に準ずるものとされる法人税法第三十三条及び第四十二条から第五十三条までの規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十七条の十二第二項及び第六十七条の十三第二項の規定により当該各事業年度において損金の額に算入されることとなる金額があるときは、当該各事業年度に係る法第六十六条の六第五項の確定申告書に当該金額の損金算入に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、当該金額を当該各事業年度の調整所得金額の計算上、損金の額に算入する。ただし、その添付がなかつたことについて税務署長がやむを得ない事情があると認める場合において、当該明細書の提出があつたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The word haikara I began to write has been used very often today in our society and the reason I wrote this word is to contrast it with a pistol in Verbeck's story, that is to say, I wrote in my Tosei Personal Criticism in the Yokohama Mainichi Shimbun that "Aritomo YAMAGATA, Koyata SHIMAO, Tateki TANI and so on belong to a conservative budanha (party of hawks), Nippon Party of Jyoiha (exclusionists sect), stubborn/unwise Party of hawks, Chiyomumage Party or Pistol Party, while Shigenobu OKUMA, Hirobumi ITO, Kinmochi SAIONJI and so on belong to a Liberal Party of doves, Oka (Westernization) Sect of Kaikoku (opening of Japan to western countries) party, free-spirited Haikara Party, Necktie Party or Cosmetic Party", which became the origin of the word haikara, and among them this word alone has become extremely popular, but today many people use it without knowing that I invented the word, which has become one important Japanese word, however, I originally wrote this word haikara (pp.18-19) in the newspaper five or six years after the interview with Mr.Verbeck. 例文帳に追加

我輩がハイカラと云ふ言葉を書き始めた為めに、今日では大変に世間に行はれて居るが、此のハイカラと云ふ言葉を書いたのは、全く此のフルベツキ先生の話のピストルに対照させる為めで有ッた、即ち横浜毎日新聞に掲げたる当世人物評中に、「山縣有朋、鳥尾小弥太、谷干城などは保守主義の武断派、攘夷党の日本党、頑冥不霊なるチヨム髷党、ピストル党であるが、大隈重信、伊藤博文、西園寺公望等は進歩主義の文治派で、開国党の欧化党、胸襟闊達なるハイカラ党、ネクタイ党、コスメチツク党で有る」と書いたのが起因で、外のチヨム髷党、ピストル党、コスメチツク党、ネクタイ党などは少しも流行しなかッたが、唯此のハイカラと云ふ一語だけが、馬鹿に大流行を来した、今日では最早や我輩が発明したと云ふ事を知らずに用ひて居る者も多く、一の重要なる日本語となッて仕舞ふたが、然るに実は我輩が此のハイカ（p18/p19）ラと云ふことを書いた起因を申すと、全く此の時のフルベッキ先生の話を胸中に蓄えて居て、それを五六年の後に至って新聞の上に現はした結果で有る。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

(2) if the mark has become misleading or contrary to law and order or morality since it was registered or became established. A trademark registration shall be invalidated if the trademark has not been used for the last five years and the proprietor is unable to give a proper reason for the non-use. Use of a trademark with the proprietor’s consent shall be considered equivalent to use by the proprietor. Invalidation of a registration may not be sought, however, if the trademark has been used after the expiry of a five-year period of non-use but before the request for invalidation. In such case any use of the trademark that occurred during the three months preceding the request for invalidation shall not be considered if the preparations for use commenced only after the proprietor became aware that a request for invalidation might be filed. If the ground for invalidation of a registration concerns only some of the goods for which the trademark has been registered, the registration will be invalidated only in respect of those goods. 例文帳に追加

(2) 商標がその登録時又は確立時から後に誤認を生じさせるようになったか又は法律若しくは公序良俗に反するものとなった場合 登録商標が過去5年間使用されておらず，かつ，所有者がその不使用について正当な理由を提示することができない場合は，当該商標の登録は無効とされる。所有者の同意を得た上での商標の使用は，所有者自身による使用と同等であるとみなされる。ただし，5年間の不使用期間が経過したが登録無効の請求がある前に当該商標が使用された場合は，登録無効を請求することはできない。無効の請求前3月以内に行われた当該商標の使用は，当該使用の準備が無効請求の行われることを所有者が知った後に開始された場合は，考慮されないものとする。 登録無効の理由が，商標が登録された商品の一部について存在するに過ぎない場合は，登録は，それらの商品についてのみ無効とされる。 - 特許庁

Article 85 The provisions of Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)(a) and (c)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Director of a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an acting representative for a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 354 (Apparent Representative Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 355 (Duty of Loyalty) and Article 357(1) (Director's Duty to Report) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "laws and regulations, the articles of incorporation" and "shareholders meeting" in Article 355 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, the articles of incorporation" and "general meeting of members," respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第八十五条　会社法第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の代表取締役について、同法第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は特定目的会社の職務代行者について、同法第三百五十四条（表見代表取締役）の規定は特定目的会社について、同法第三百五十五条（忠実義務）及び第三百五十七条第一項（取締役の報告義務）の規定は特定目的会社の取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十五条中「法令及び定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画及び定款」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 9, Paragraph 1, Article 12, Article 12-2, Paragraph 2, Article 16-2, Paragraphs 1 and 2, Article 16-5, and Paragraphs 2 and 4, Article 16-9 of the Worker's Accident Insurance Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special survivor pension. In such case, "the month when the reason for payment occurs" in Paragraph 1, Article 9 of the Worker's Accident Insurance Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the month including the day when the payment is requested;" the term "the insurance benefit to be paid" in Article 12-1 of the Worker's Accident Insurance Act, with "the special survivor benefit to be paid;" the term "the said insurance benefit", with "the said special survivor benefit;" the term "a worker" in Paragraph 2, Article 16-2 of the Worker's Accident Insurance Act, with "a deceased worker, etc.;" the term "the preceding term," with "Paragraph 1, Article 60 of the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief;" the term "a worker" in Paragraph 2, Article 16-9 of the Worker's Accident Insurance Act, with "a deceased worker, etc.;" and the term "extinguishes" in Paragraph 4 of the same article, with "extinguishes, and in the event that there is a next survivor without any equally entitled survivor, the special survivor pension shall be paid to the next survivor." 例文帳に追加

２　労災保険法第九条、第十二条第一項、第十二条の二、第十六条の二第二項、第十六条の五第一項及び第二項並びに第十六条の九第二項及び第四項の規定は、特別遺族年金について準用する。この場合において、労災保険法第九条第一項中「支給すべき事由が生じた月」とあるのは「支給の請求をした日の属する月」と、労災保険法第十二条の二中「支払うべき保険給付」とあるのは「支払うべき特別遺族給付金」と、「当該保険給付」とあるのは「当該特別遺族給付金」と、労災保険法第十六条の二第二項中「労働者」とあるのは「死亡労働者等」と、「前項」とあるのは「石綿による健康被害の救済に関する法律第六十条第一項」と、労災保険法第十六条の九第二項中「労働者」とあるのは「死亡労働者等」と、同条第四項中「消滅する」とあるのは「消滅し、同順位者がなくて後順位者があるときは、次順位者に特別遺族年金を支給する」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In the case of an invention which has fallen under any of the items of Article 29(1) by reason of the fact that the person having the right to obtain a patent has exhibited the invention at an exhibition held by the Government or a local public entity (hereinafter referred to as the "Government, etc."), an exhibition held by those who are not the Government, etc. where such exhibition has been designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office, an international exhibition held in the territory of a country of the Union of the Paris Convention or a member of the World Trade Organization by its Government, etc. or those who are authorized thereby to hold such an exhibition, or an international exhibition held in the territory of a state which is neither of a country of the Union of the Paris Convention nor a member of the World Trade Organization by its Government, etc. or those who are authorized thereby where such exhibition has been designated by the Commissioner of the Patent Office, paragraph (1) shall also apply for the purposes of Article 29(1) and (2) to the invention claimed in the patent application which has been filed by the said person within six months from the date on which the invention first fell under any of those items. 例文帳に追加

３　特許を受ける権利を有する者が政府若しくは地方公共団体（以下「政府等」という。）が開設する博覧会若しくは政府等以外の者が開設する博覧会であつて特許庁長官が指定するものに、パリ条約の同盟国若しくは世界貿易機関の加盟国の領域内でその政府等若しくはその許可を受けた者が開設する国際的な博覧会に、又はパリ条約の同盟国若しくは世界貿易機関の加盟国のいずれにも該当しない国の領域内でその政府等若しくはその許可を受けた者が開設する国際的な博覧会であつて特許庁長官が指定するものに出品することにより、第二十九条第一項各号の一に該当するに至つた発明も、その該当するに至つた日から六月以内にその者がした特許出願に係る発明についての同条第一項及び第二項の規定の適用については、第一項と同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 116(3), (4), (6), and (7) (Dissenting Shareholders' Share Purchase Demand), Article 117(2) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Price of Shares), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of a Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Demands for the Purchase of Preferred Equity made by the Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "act in any item of paragraph (1)" in Article 116(3) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "change to the Asset Securitization Plan," the phrases "the day when such act becomes effective," "of the shares provided for in each item of that paragraph," and "such act" in Article 116(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day of the Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 153(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," "thereof," and "changes to the Asset Securitization Plan," respectively, the phrases "of the shares" in Article 117(2) and (6) of the Companies Act and "for such shares" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Preferred Equity," the term "share certificates" in Article 117(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Securities," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第百十六条第三項、第四項、第六項及び第七項（反対株主の株式買取請求）、第百十七条第二項から第六項まで（株式の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資社員による優先出資買取請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百十六条第三項及び第七項中「第一項各号の行為」とあるのは「資産流動化計画の変更」と、同条第三項中「当該行為が効力を生ずる日」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百五十三条第二項に規定する計画変更決議の日」と、「同項各号に定める株式の」とあるのは「その」と、「当該行為を」とあるのは「当該資産流動化計画の変更を」と、同法第百十七条第二項、第五項及び第六項中「株式の」とあるのは「優先出資の」と、同項中「、株券」とあるのは「、優先出資証券」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 49 (1) Where two or more buildings are combined into a single building, and if any of the following items applies, the person specified in each respective item shall, within one month from the date of such combination, file applications for a heading registration of a building relating to the building resulting from the combination and for cancellation of the registration of the heading section of a building relating to the buildings that existed prior to the combination (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "registration, etc. by reason of combination"). In this case, an application for a registration of ownership shall also be filed, while designating the owner of the building for which there is no heading registration in the case set forth in item (ii), the heading-section owner of the building for which there is a heading registration (excluding the building for which there is a registration of ownership; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) in the case set forth in item (iv), and the owner of the building for which there is no heading registration and the heading-section owner of the building for which there is a heading registration in the case set forth in item (vi), as the registered right holder for the building resulting from the combination, when each respective item applies: 例文帳に追加

第四十九条　二以上の建物が合体して一個の建物となった場合において、次の各号に掲げるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める者は、当該合体の日から一月以内に、合体後の建物についての建物の表題登記及び合体前の建物についての建物の表題部の登記の抹消（以下「合体による登記等」と総称する。）を申請しなければならない。この場合において、第二号に掲げる場合にあっては当該表題登記がない建物の所有者、第四号に掲げる場合にあっては当該表題登記がある建物（所有権の登記がある建物を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の表題部所有者、第六号に掲げる場合にあっては当該表題登記がない建物の所有者及び当該表題登記がある建物の表題部所有者をそれぞれ当該合体後の建物の登記名義人とする所有権の登記を併せて申請しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) When forfeiture is directed on a conviction the Court, before whom the person convicted, may order any forfeited article to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Court thinks fit. Where a person is accused of an offence under section 73 of this Act and proves. (a) that in the ordinary course of his business he is employed on behalf of other persons to apply trademarks or trade descriptions, or, as the case may be, to make dies, blocks, machines, plates, or other instruments for making, or being used in making, trademarks; (b) that in the case which is the subject of the charge he was so employed, 58 and was not interested in the goods or service or other thing by way of profit or commission dependent on the sale of such goods or services or other things, as the case may be; (c) that the took reasonable precautions against committing the offence charged; (d) that he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, on reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description; and (e) that on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons on whose behalf the mark or description was applied; the Court may discharge the person from the complaint. 例文帳に追加

(4)没収が有罪判決について命令された場合、裁判所は、有罪を宣告された者に、没収が命じられたいかなる物品についても廃棄又は裁判所が適切と考えるその他の処分を命ずることができる。本法第73条に定める違反に係る被疑者が次に掲げる事項を立証した場合、裁判所は訴追を取り下げることができる。(a)自己の事業の通常の過程において、他の者に代わり、商標若しくは商品表示を付するために、又は(場合に応じ)、商標の制作用若しくは当該制作に使用される金型、版、機器、板材又はその他の器具を製作するために、当該他の者に雇用されていること。(b)容疑の対象となる事件において、そのように雇用されていた事実、及び、かかる商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の販売によって決まる利益若しくは手数料のを得る手段としての当該商品若しくは役務又はその他の物品に関与していなかったこと。(c)容疑の対象となった違反を犯さないよう合理的予防措置を講じていたこと。(d)違反行為を実行したとされる時点において、当該商標又は商品表示の真実性を疑う理由があったこと。(e)検察官により、又は検察官に代わって行われた要求に応じて、当該標章又は表示をその者のために付した者に関し、自らの権能が及ぶすべての情報を提出したこと。 - 特許庁

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

A resident of a Contracting State is a qualified person for a taxable year or chargeable period only if such resident is either: (a) an individual; (b) a qualified governmental entity; (c) a company if the principal class of its shares is listed, registered or admitted to dealings on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (c) of paragraph 7 of this Article and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges; (d) a person other than an individual or a company if the principal class of units in that person is listed, registered or admitted to dealings on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph (c) of paragraph 7 of this Article and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges; (e) a person described in subparagraph (b) or (c) of paragraph 1 of Article 4 of this Convention, provided that in the case of a person described in subparagraph (b) of that paragraph as of the end of the prior taxable year or chargeable period more than 50 per cent of the person’s beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals who are residents of either Contracting State; (f) a person other than an individual if residents of either Contracting State that are qualified persons by reason of subparagraphs (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) of this paragraph own, directly or indirectly, shares or other beneficial interests representing at least 50 per cent of the voting power of the person; or (g) a trust or trustee of a trust in their capacity as such if at least 50 per cent of the beneficial interests in the trust is held, directly or indirectly, by persons who are either: (i) qualified persons by reason of subparagraphs(a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) of this paragraph; or (ii) equivalent beneficiaries as defined in clause (i) of subparagraph (e) of paragraph7 of this Article. 例文帳に追加

一方の締約国の居住者が次の(a)から(g)までに掲げる者のいずれかに該当する場合には、当該一方の締約国の居住者は、各課税年度又は賦課年度において適格者とする。(a)個人(b)適格政府機関(c)法人（その主たる種類の株式が、７(c)(i)又は(ii)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され若しくは登 録され、又は当該公認の有価証券市場において取引が認められ、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるものに限る。）(d)個人又は法人以外の者（その主たる種類の持分証券が、７(c)(i)又は(ii)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され若しくは登録され、又は当該公認の有価証券市場において取引が認められ、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるものに限る。）(e)第四条１(b)又は(c)に規定する者（同条１(b)に規定する者にあっては、当該課税年度又は賦課年度の直前の課税年度又は賦課年度の終了の日においてその受益者、構成員又は参加者の五十パーセントを超えるものがいずれかの締約国の居住者である個人である年金基金又は年金計画に限る。）(f)個人以外の者（(a)から(e)までに掲げる適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が、議決権の五十パーセント以上に相当する株式その他の受益に関する持分を直接又は間接に所有する場合に限る。）(g)信託財産又は信託財産の受託者（次の(i)又は(ii)に掲げる者が、当該信託財産の受益に関する持分の五十パーセント以上を直接又は間接に所有する場合に限る。）(i)(a)から(e)までに掲げる適格者(ii)７(e)(i)に規定する同等受益者 - 財務省

A resident of a Contracting State shall be a qualified person for a taxable year only if such resident is either: a) an individual; b) a qualified governmental entity; c) a company (including a company participating in a dual listed company arrangement), if its principal class of shares is listed or registered on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph d) of paragraph 6 and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges; d) a person other than an individual or a company, if the principal class of units in that person is listed or admitted to dealings on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph d) of paragraph 6 and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges; e) a pension fund, provided that as of the end of the prior taxable year more than 50 per cent of its beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals who are residents of either Contracting State; f) an organisation established under the law of that Contracting State and operated exclusively for a religious, charitable, educational, scientific, artistic, cultural or public purposes, provided that all or part of its income, profits or gains may be exempt from tax under the domestic law of that Contracting State; or g) a person other than an individual, if residents of either Contracting State that are qualified persons by reason of the provisions of subparagraphs a) to f) of this paragraph own, directly or indirectly, at least 50 per cent of the aggregate vote and value of the shares of the person, or at least 50 per cent of the beneficial interests in the person. 例文帳に追加

一方の締約国の居住者が次の(a)から(g)までに掲げる者のいずれかに該当する場合には、当該一方の締約国の居住者は、各課税年度において適格者とする。(a)個人(b)適格政府機関(c)法人（二元上場法人に関する取決めに参加する法人を含むものとし、その主たる種類の株式が、６(d)(i)又は(ii)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は登録され、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるものに限る。）(d)個人又は法人以外の者（その主たる種類の持分証券が、６(d)(i)又は(ii)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は当該公認の有価証券市場において取引が認められ、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるものに限る。）(e)年金基金（当該課税年度の直前の課税年度の終了の日においてその受益者、構成員又は参加者の五十パーセントを超えるものがいずれかの締約国の居住者である個人であるものに限る。）(f)当該一方の締約国の法令に基づいて設立された団体であって、専ら宗教、慈善、教育、科学、芸術、文化その他公の目的のために運営されるもの（当該一方の締約国の法令において所得、利得又は収益の全部又は一部に対する租税が免除されるものに限る。）(g)個人以外の者（その者の株式の議決権及び価値の五十パーセント以上又はその者の受益に関する持分の五十パーセント以上を(a)から(f)までに掲げる適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が直接又は間接に所有する場合に限る。） - 財務省

He became the new chairman of the General Insurance Association of Japan – well, being a non-life insurer naturally comes with the corresponding social role and, for that reason, the FSA is also eager to maintain close mutual contact. In the non-life insurance industry, participating businesses (non-life insurers) are all experiencing the severe economic conditions that have hit Japan. On an international front, the global financial market has also posed difficulties since the Lehman crisis two years ago. Domestically, we are also faced with grim employment conditions reflected in the fact that the unemployment rate is 5.2% and one million people are receiving the Employment Adjustment Subsidy. Although there are some signs that a path toward economic recovery is appearing, to a modest degree, we are still on a seesaw ride. As you know, events like the Greek crisis have made it necessary to seek international policy coordination in the G7 and G20 forums. Among other domains, the financial area particularly has a strong cross-border nature. On the other hand, the way a country's economy is run differs from one country to the next. I hope that he, in his capacity of chairman of the General Insurance Association of Japan, will properly fulfill his responsibility for what non-life insurers have as their mission, with the points I've just made in mind. 例文帳に追加

新しく日本損害保険協会の会長になられたということでございますが、当然、損保でございますからそれ相応の社会的役割があるわけでございますし、そういったことでやはり金融庁としても密接に連絡をとりながら、それぞれの損保各企業の業界の会長でございますから、それぞれこういった厳しい経済環境の中であるし、また国際的にも非常に2年前のリーマンショック以来、国際的な金融市場というのはなかなか一筋縄でいかないところがございまして、国内にも失業率5.2％、雇用調整助成金をもらっている人が100万人という厳しい雇用情勢があるし、一方、少し景気回復の足腰が少し整ってきたよという雰囲気もありますけれども、まだまだ一進一退でございますし、しかしご存じのようにギリシャショックなどが起きまして、G7あるいはG20で国際的な協調政策、その中でまた各国のそれぞれの経済のあり方というのはそれぞれの国によって当然違うわけでございますから、そういったことをG20の中でも共通の、特に金融でございますから国際性が非常に強い分野でもございますから、そういったことを勘案しながらきちっと損保会社を損保協会の会長さんとしてきちっと与えられた使命に責任を果たしていっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

(2) With regard to Securities for which a Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. falling under any of the following categories was made (in cases where the Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. having been made for these Securities falls under the category set forth in item (i) below, limited to Securities acquired by Qualified Institutional Investors who are excluded under the provision of Article 2(3)(i) from the number of persons to which the Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was made), a Solicitation for Delivery of Existing Securities, etc. (meaning a solicitation of an application to sell or purchase already-issued Securities and Procedures Relating to Securities Delivery for Reorganization; the same shall apply hereinafter) which are made by a Qualified Institutional Investor to persons other than Qualified Institutional Investors (hereinafter referred to as a "General Solicitation for Securities Acquired by Qualified Institutional Investor") may not be made unless the Issuer of the Securities has made a notification of the General Solicitation for Securities Acquired by Qualified Institutional Investor to the Prime Minister; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where disclosures have been made with regard to the Securities and to the cases where the General Solicitation for Securities Acquired by Qualified Institutional Investor is to be made for a compelling reason as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance or otherwise satisfies the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance: 例文帳に追加

２　その有価証券発行勧誘等が次に掲げる場合に該当するものであつた有価証券（第一号に掲げる場合にあつては、第二条第三項第一号の規定により当該有価証券発行勧誘等の相手方から除かれた適格機関投資家が取得した有価証券に限る。）の有価証券交付勧誘等（既に発行された有価証券の売付けの申込み又はその買付けの申込みの勧誘及び組織再編成交付手続をいう。以下同じ。）で、適格機関投資家が適格機関投資家以外の者に対して行うもの（以下「適格機関投資家取得有価証券一般勧誘」という。）は、発行者が当該適格機関投資家取得有価証券一般勧誘に関し内閣総理大臣に届出をしているものでなければ、することができない。ただし、当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合及び内閣府令で定めるやむを得ない理由により行われることその他の内閣府令で定める要件を満たす場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provisions of Article 234(2) and Article 235(1) (Treatment of Fractions), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the cancellation and consolidation of a Specific Purpose Company's Preferred Equity. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 234(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 235(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 50(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "one share in the number" in Article 235(1) of Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit in the number of units," the term "shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

３　会社法第二百三十四条第二項及び第二百三十五条第一項（一に満たない端数の処理）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資の消却及び併合について準用する。この場合において、同法第二百三十四条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十条第三項において準用する第二百三十五条第一項」と、同法第二百三十五条第一項中「数に一株」とあるのは「口数に一口」と、「合計数」とあるのは「合計口数」と、「株主」とあるのは「優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) An application for conversion shall be considered filed on the filing date granted to it as a Community trademark application and, if it claimed priority or age, it shall benefit from these rights. Moreover, the application for conversion shall be processed in the same way as a national trademark application. Nevertheless, if the application for conversion refers to a Community trademark already registered, it shall be granted the status of a national trademark without further procedure, and the provisions of Article 22(4) shall apply, apart from the fact that, owing to renunciation, failure to renew or any other cause attributable to its owner, a pronouncement has been pending as regards the substance of any reason for invalidity or lapse capable of affecting the protection of the trademark in Spain, in which case it shall be processed as a national trademark application. No appeal based on the existence of absolute or relative prohibitions may be lodged against the direct grant agreement provided for in this paragraph, but such an appeal may be based on failure to satisfy the requirements for the valid conversion or direct grant of the Community trademark applied for.例文帳に追加

(4) 変更請求は，共同体商標出願として付与された出願日に提出されたとみなされ，優先権又は経過年数が主張されている場合は，これらの権利を享受するものとする。更に，変更請求は国内商標出願と同様に処理される。ただし，変更の請求対象が既に登録された共同体商標に言及する場合は，更なる手続なく，国内商標の地位が付与され，第22条(4)の規定が適用されるが，放棄，不更新又は商標所有者に起因するその他の理由により，決定がスペインにおける保護に影響を与える可能性のある無効又は失効の理由の実質に関して係属しているという事実は除くものとし，この場合は，当該請求は国内商標出願として処理される。本項に定める直接付与の合意に対しては，絶対的又は相対的禁止事由の存在を根拠として審判請求することができないが，当該審判請求は，有効な変更の要件又は申請した共同体商標を直接付与する要件を充足しないことを根拠として行うことができる。 - 特許庁

Sec.188 Reprographic Reproduction by Libraries 188.1. Notwithstanding the provisions of Subsection 177.6, any library or archive whose activities are not for profit may, without the authorization of the author of copyright owner, make a single copy of the work by reprographic reproduction: (a) Where the work by reason of its fragile character or rarity cannot be lent to user in its original form; (b) Where the works are isolated articles contained in composite works or brief portions of other published works and the reproduction is necessary to supply them; when this is considered expedient, to person requesting their loan for purposes of research or study instead of lending the volumes or booklets which contain them; and (c) Where the making of such a copy is in order to preserve and, if necessary in the event that it is lost, destroyed or rendered unusable, replace a copy, or to replace, in the permanent collection of another similar library or archive, a copy which has been lost, destroyed or rendered unusable and copies are not available with the publisher.例文帳に追加

第188条 図書館における写真複製 188.1177.6の規定に拘らず，営利活動をしない図書館又は公文書館は，次の場合は，著作権を有する著作者の許諾を得ることなく，写真複製により，当該著作物の1個の複製物を製作することができる。 (a)当該著作物が，その破損しやすい性質又は珍奇性のため，原形式で使用のために貸与することができないものである場合 (b)当該著作物が複数の部分で公正された著作物に含まれる独立した論文又はその他公表された著作物の短い部分であり，それを提供するために複製が必要であって，複製することが研究又は学習のためにその貸出を要求する者にとって，それらを含む書物又は小冊子を貸し出すに代えて適切である場合 (c)複製物の作成が，保存するためのものであり，複製物が失われ，破損され，若しくは使用に耐えなくされて必要である場合に複製物と取り替えるため，又は他の同様な図書館若しくは公文書館の永久的収集において，失われ，破損され，若しくは使用に耐えなくされた複製物と取り替えるためのものであり，かつ，発行者から複製物を入手することができない場合 - 特許庁

Article 163 The provisions of Article 824 (Dissolution Order for a Company), Article 826 (Duty of a Government Agency, etc. to Give Notice to the Minister of Justice), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xiii)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 904 (Participation of the Minister of Justice), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iii)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by Juridical Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dissolution order for a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 825 (Temporary Restraining Order Concerning Property of a Company), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i) and item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 905 (Special Provisions on a Temporary Restraining Order Concerning Property of a Company), and Article 906 of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the preservation of properties of a Specific Purpose Company in cases where a petition under Article 824(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article has been filed. In this case, any necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百六十三条　会社法第八百二十四条（会社の解散命令）、第八百二十六条（官庁等の法務大臣に対する通知義務）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）、第九百四条（法務大臣の関与）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第三号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の解散の命令について、同法第八百二十五条（会社の財産に関する保全処分）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）並びに第九百五条及び第九百六条（会社の財産に関する保全処分についての特則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百二十四条第一項の申立てがあった場合における特定目的会社の財産の保全について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a) After the action of the Examiner, if the same be adverse in any respect, the applicant, if he persists in his application for a patent, must reply thereto and may request re-examination or reconsideration, with or without amendment. (b) In order to be entitled to re-examination or reconsideration, the applicant must make a request therefor in writing, and he must distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the Examiner’s action; the applicant must respond to every ground of objection and rejection in the prior Examiner’s action (except that request may be made that objections or requirements as to form, not necessary to further consideration of the claims, be held in abeyance until a claim is allowed), and the applicant’s action must appear throughout to be a bona fide attempt to advance the case to final action. The mere allegation that the Examiner has erred will not be received as a proper reason for such reexamination or reconsideration. (c) In amending an application in response to a rejection, the applicant must clearly point out the patentable inventiveness and novelty which he thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections.例文帳に追加

(a)審査官による処分後，その処分が何れかの点において出願人に不利であった場合において，出願人がその特許出願を続行しようとするときは，出願人は，当該処分に応答した上で，補正して又は補正することなく再審査又は再審理を請求することができる。 (b)再審査又は再審理の権利を得るためには，出願人は，書面によりこれを請求しなければならず，審査官による処分の過誤と考えられる点を明瞭かつ詳細に指摘しなければならない。出願人は，審査官による以前の処分における異論及び拒絶の理由の何れにも応答しなければならない(ただし，クレームの更なる検討には関係しない方式についての異論又は要求を，クレームが許容されるまで保留にするように求める請求をすることができる)。また，出願人の行為は，一貫して，出願を最終処分まで進めるための善意の試みであることを示すものでなければならない。審査官が過誤を犯した旨の単なる主張は，再審査又は再審理の適切な理由として認められない。 (c)拒絶に応答して出願を補正するに際し，出願人は，引例によって開示された技術水準又は申し立てられた異論を考慮して，クレームが提示していると考える特許可能な発明性及び新規性を明瞭に指摘しなければならない。出願人は，当該補正が当該引例又は異論をどのように回避するかも示さなければならない。 - 特許庁

Article 38 The provisions of Article 180 (excluding paragraph (2)(iii) and paragraph (3)) (Consolidation of Shares), Article 181 (Notices to Shareholders), Article 182 (Effectuation), Article 234(2) and Article 235(1) (Treatment of Fractions), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to consolidation of a Specific Purpose Company's Specified Equity. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 180(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the term "Registered Pledgees of the Shares" in Article 181 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Registered Pledgees of Specified Equity," the term "shareholders" in Article 182 and Article 235(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Members," the term "number" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 234(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 235(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38 of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第三十八条　会社法第百八十条（第二項第三号及び第三項を除く。）（株式の併合）、第百八十一条（株主に対する通知等）、第百八十二条（効力の発生）、第二百三十四条第二項及び第二百三十五条第一項（一に満たない端数の処理）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の特定出資の併合について準用する。この場合において、同法第百八十条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第百八十一条中「登録株式質権者」とあるのは「登録特定出資質権者」と、同法第百八十二条及び第二百三十五条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、同法第二百三十四条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十八条において準用する第二百三十五条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provisions of Article 64, the first sentence of paragraph (1) and paragraph (3) of Article 73, Article 74, the main clause of paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) (which shall be limited to the part relating to subpoenas) of Article 76 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Act No. 131 of 1948) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the warrant of arrest under paragraph (2) or (3) and the apprehending of the probationers and parolees pursuant to the provisions of these paragraphs. In this case, the terms "the crime, a summary of the charged facts" in paragraph (1) of Article 64 of said Code, "a summary of the charged facts" in paragraph (3) of Article 73 of said Code, and "a summary of the charged facts, that he/she has the right to appoint counsel, and that, when he/she is unable to appoint counsel him/herself because of indigence or other reasons, he/she is entitled to request the court to appoint counsel instead" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the reason for apprehending", the terms "the presiding judge or the commissioned judge" in paragraph (1) of Article 64 of said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "the judge", the term "penal institution" in Article 74 of said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "penal institution or juvenile classification home", the term "a judge of a collegiate panel or a court clerk" in paragraph (2) of Article 76 of said Code shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Board member or a probation officer if apprehended by the Regional Parole Board or a probation officer if apprehended by the director of the probation office". 例文帳に追加

７　刑事訴訟法（昭和二十三年法律第百三十一号）第六十四条、第七十三条第一項前段及び第三項、第七十四条並びに第七十六条第一項本文及び第二項の規定（勾引に関する部分に限る。）は、第二項又は第三項の引致状及びこれらの規定による保護観察対象者の引致について準用する。この場合において、同法第六十四条第一項中「罪名、公訴事実の要旨」とあり、同法第七十三条第三項中「公訴事実の要旨」とあり、及び同法第七十六条第一項本文中「公訴事実の要旨及び弁護人を選任することができる旨並びに貧困その他の事由により自ら弁護人を選任することができないときは弁護人の選任を請求することができる旨」とあるのは「引致の理由」と、同法第六十四条第一項中「裁判長又は受命裁判官」とあるのは「裁判官」と、同法第七十四条中「刑事施設」とあるのは「刑事施設又は少年鑑別所」と、同法第七十六条第二項中「合議体の構成員又は裁判所書記」とあるのは「地方更生保護委員会が引致した場合においては委員又は保護観察官、保護観察所の長が引致した場合においては保護観察官」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) If (i) any Interested Partner fails to pay its taxes and other public duties in connection with the business of the Partnership without any justifiable reason, or (ii) the General Partner reasonably determines that the General Partner or the Partnership is required by applicable laws to withhold taxes with respect to any Interested Partner or pay any taxes and other public duties (including tax payments required by an amendment notice, determination notice, tax payment notice and any other tax assessment issued by a Japanese tax authority) on behalf of or with respect to any Interested Partner, the General Partner may, in making a distribution pursuant to Article 29, in its discretion, (x) deduct cash or property that is to be distributed to such Interested Partner by an amount equal to such unpaid amount or amount paid from the Partnership Assets to be distributed to such Interested Partner and (y) sell such property in such a manner as the General Partner in its discretion deems appropriate, and pay such taxes and other public duties. In such case, the General Partner may make such withholding or payment of taxes or other public duties and collect cash or property in the same manner. Upon request of the General Partner, the Interested Partner shall immediately pay to the General Partner (a) the amount necessary for payment of such taxes or other public duties or (b) if the General Partner has already made such payment, the amount paid by the General Partner, together with interest at [__]% per annum for the period from the date of payment by the General Partner until the date of actual payment by the Interested Partner prorated on the basis of a 365-day year. These payments shall not be treated as part of any contribution to the Partnership. The General Partner shall not be liable for its determinations under this paragraph (including the determination, manner or results of any sale). 例文帳に追加

3. 組合員等が正当な事由なく本組合の事業に関し各自が負担すべき公租公課を滞納した場合、又は無限責任組合員若しくは本組合が適用法令上組合員等に関連して源泉徴収を行い若しくは組合員等に代わり若しくは組合員等に関連して公租公課の納付（更正通知、決定通知、納税告知その他日本の税務当局によりなされた課税査定により必要とされる納税を含む。）を行うことが必要とされるものと無限責任組合員が合理的に判断する場合、無限責任組合員は、その裁量により、第29 条に基づく分配を行うに際し、当該組合員等に分配すべき組合財産の中から当該滞納額又は納付額に相当する現金又は現物を控除し、現物についてはその裁量により適切と認める方法によりこれを売却した上、当該公租公課を支払うことができるものとする。この場合、無限責任組合員は、かかる源泉徴収又は公租公課の納付を行った上で、かかる方法により現金又は現物を収受することもできる。組合員等は、かかる支払いに必要な金額又は支払った金額につき、無限責任組合員から請求があれば、無限責任組合員において既にかかる支払いを行った後であればかかる支払いの日から組合員等による現実の支払いがなされた日までの期間につき年［ ］%（年365 日の日割り計算とする。）の利息を付して、無限責任組合員に対し直ちにこれを支払うものとする。かかる支払いは本組合への出資とはみなされない。なお、無限責任組合員は、本項の判断（売却の決定、方法及び結果を含む。）につき、いかなる責任も負わないものとする。 - 経済産業省

(7) When calculating the amount listed in Article 39-15(1)(i) with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), if there is any amount to be included in deductible expenses in the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of Article 33 and Article 42 to Article 53 of the Corporation Tax Act and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 67-12(2) and Article 67-13(2) of the Act, whose provisions shall be applicable under the provisions of the said item, the said amount shall be included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of adjusted income for the relevant business year, only when detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses are attached to a final return form; provided, however, that when a final return form has not been submitted or a final return form has been submitted without detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses, the district director shall, when he/she finds that there was any compelling reason therefor, apply the provisions of the main clause of this paragraph, only when the said detailed statements have been submitted. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項の規定により特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額に係る第三十九条の十五第一項第一号に掲げる金額の計算をする場合において、同号の規定によりその例に準ずるものとされる法人税法第三十三条及び第四十二条から第五十三条までの規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十七条の十二第二項及び第六十七条の十三第二項の規定により当該各事業年度において損金の額に算入されることとなる金額があるときは、確定申告書に、当該金額の損金算入に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、当該金額を当該各事業年度の調整所得金額の計算上、損金の額に算入する。ただし、税務署長は、確定申告書の提出がなかつた場合又は当該損金算入に関する明細書の添付がない確定申告書の提出があつた場合において、その提出又は添付がなかつたことについてやむを得ない事情があると認めるときは、当該明細書の提出があつた場合に限り、この項本文の規定を適用することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 5-4 (1) In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment find sufficient reason to suspect that any single Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of paragraph (2) of Article 2, if they have found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph since said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing environmental pollution if said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph, in view of the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing of said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who has been operating such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on human health or on the life and/or growth of animals at the top of the food chain if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof. 例文帳に追加

第五条の四　厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第一種監視化学物質につき、第二条第二項各号のいずれかに該当すると疑うに足りる理由があると認める場合であつて、その製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第一種監視化学物質が同項各号のいずれかに該当するものであるとすれば、当該第一種監視化学物質による環境の汚染が生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第一種監視化学物質について同項各号のいずれかに該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第一種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（当該化学物質が継続的に摂取される場合における人の健康又は高次捕食動物の生息若しくは生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2. A resident of a Contracting State is a qualified person for a taxable year only if such resident is either: a) an individual; b) the Government of a Contracting State, any political subdivision or local authority thereof, the Bank of Japan, the Central Bank of the Netherlands or a person that is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Government of a Contracting State or a political subdivision or local authority thereof; c) a company, if the principal class of its shares is listed or registered on a recognised stock exchange and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges, provided that, if the shares are listed or registered on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (iii) or (iv) of subparagraph c) of paragraph 8, the primary place of management and control of the company is in the Contracting State of which it is a resident; d) a person that is either: (i) a person as described in subparagraph b) or c) of paragraph 1 of Article 4, provided that in the case of a person described in subparagraph b) of that paragraph: (aa) as of the end of the prior taxable year more than 50 per cent of the person’s beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals who are residents of either Contracting State; or (bb) more than 75 per cent of the contributions made to the person is derived from residents of either Contracting State which are qualified persons; or (ii) a bank, an insurance company or a securities company that is established and regulated as such under the laws of the Contracting State of which it is a resident; or e) a person other than an individual, if residents of either Contracting State that are qualified persons by reason of subparagraph a), b), c) or d) of this paragraph own, directly or indirectly, shares or other beneficial interests representing at least 50 per cent of the voting power of the person.例文帳に追加

２一方の締約国の居住者が次の(a)から(e)までに掲げる者のいずれかに該当する場合には、当該一方の締約国の居住者は、各課税年度において適格者とする。(a)個人(b)一方の締約国の政府、一方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、日本銀行、オランダ中央銀行又は一方の締約国の政府若しくは一方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体が直接若しくは間接に所有する者(c)法人であって、その主たる種類の株式が、公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は登録され、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるもの（当該株式が８(c)(iii)又は(iv)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は登録されるものである場合には、当該法人の事業の管理及び支配の主たる場所が、当該法人が居住者とされる締約国内にあるときに限る。）(d)次の(i)又(ii)はに規定する者のいずれかに該当する者(i)第四条１(b)又は(c)に規定する者（同条１(b)に規定する者にあっては、次の(aa)又は(bb)に規定する者のいずれかに該当する者に限る。）(aa)当該課税年度の直前の課税年度の終了の日においてその受益者、構成員又は参加者の五十パーセントを超えるものがいずれかの締約国の居住者である個人である年金基金(bb)その基金の七十五パーセントを超えるものが、適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が拠出した基金である年金基金(ii)銀行、保険会社又は証券会社（その者が居住者とされる締約国の法令に基づいて設立され、かつ、規制されるものに限る。）(e)個人以外の者（(a)から(d)までに掲げる適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が、議決権の五十パーセント以上に相当する株式その他の受益に関する持分を直接又は間接に所有する場合に限る。） - 財務省

(8) The provisions of Article 142(1) and (2) (Designated Purchaser's Notice to Purchase) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Designated Purchaser, the provisions of Article 143(2) (Withdrawal of Requests for Approval of Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Requester for Approval of Transfer who makes the request set forth in paragraph (4)(i)(c) or paragraph (4)(ii)(c), and the provisions of Article 144(1) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Sale Price), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (vi)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a notice has been given under the provisions of Article 142(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Article 140(4)" in Article 142(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act," the terms "per share" and "Stock Company" in Article 142(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit" and "Specific Purpose Company," respectively, the terms "Subject Shares" and "Article 140(1)(ii)" in Article 144(1) and (4) to (6) inclusive of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity prescribed in Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 142(1)(ii)," respectively, the term "Stock Company" in Article 144(1), (2), and (6) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Designated Purchaser," the term "per share" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit," the term "Article 141(2)" in Article 144(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 142(2)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

８　会社法第百四十二条第一項及び第二項（指定買取人による買取りの通知）の規定は指定買取人について、同法第百四十三条第二項（譲渡等承認請求の撤回）の規定は第四項第一号ハ又は第二号ハの請求をした譲渡等承認請求者について、同法第百四十四条第一項から第六項まで（売買価格の決定）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第六号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百四十二条第一項の規定による通知があった場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百四十二条第一項中「第百四十条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第百四十四条第一項及び第四項から第六項までの規定中「対象株式」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項に規定する特定出資」と、「第百四十条第一項第二号」とあるのは「第百四十二条第一項第二号」と、同条第一項、第二項及び第六項中「株式会社」とあるのは「指定買取人」と、同条第五項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第六項中「第百四十一条第二項」とあるのは「第百四十二条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners who have made contributions with respect to a Portfolio Investment to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities in respect of such Portfolio Investment (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from a Disposition of, in kind dividends with respect to or share splits of Portfolio Securities) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Participating Interested Partners in respect of such Portfolio Investment their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the totalamount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to their respective Percentage Interests (provided that, for a Withdrawing Partner, the distribution shall be based on its Percentage Interest at the time of its withdrawal), to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and (iv) other matters as required for determination of appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding interests equal to [ ]% or more of the total Percentage Interests of the Limited Partners who have made contributions to the Portfolio Investment. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、あるポートフォリオ投資に係る投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、当該ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象組合員等に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、対象持分割合（但し、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時を基準とする。）に応じ按分をした割合により、それぞれ現物により分配するとができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を対象組合員等に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、当該ポートフォリオ投資に関し出資をした有限責任組合員の対象持割合の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する持分を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項の規定に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of Article 33(2) to (11) inclusive (excluding paragraph (10)(ii)) (Election of Inspector of Matters Specified or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a case as set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "each item of Article 28" in Article 33(7) and (8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "each item of Article 16(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33(8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Issued at Incorporation," the term "the preceding nine paragraphs" in paragraph (10) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33(2) to (9) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18(1) of the Asset Securitization Act and pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) and (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) or (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(11)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "paragraph (1) of Article 38" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and the term "item (ii), paragraph (2) of such Article" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph." 例文帳に追加

２　会社法第三十三条第二項から第十一項まで（第十項第二号を除く。）（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第七項及び第八項中「第二十八条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項各号」と、同項中「設立時発行株式」とあるのは「設立時発行特定出資」と、同条第十項中「前各項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十八条第一項及び同条第二項において準用する第三十三条第二項から第九項まで」と、同項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号及び第二号」と、同項第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号又は第二号」と、同条第十一項第二号中「第二十八条第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第二号」と、同項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十一条第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from the Disposition of Portfolio Securities, in kind dividends or share splits) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the total amount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (which is, in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to (a) in the case of a Partner, their respective Interest Amount or (b) in the case of a Withdrawing Partner, their respective Interest Amount at the time of the withdrawal of such Withdrawing Partner, to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and(iv) other matters as required to determine the appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [ ]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、組合員及び脱退組合員に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、組合員についてはその持分金額、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時の持分金額の各金額に応じ按分をした上、それぞれ現物により分配することができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券等の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を組合員及び脱退組合員に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

(6) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.), and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph 2(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

8. For the purposes of this Article: a) the term “principal class of shares” means the class or classes of shares of a company which in the aggregate represent a majority of the voting power of the company; b) the term “shares” shall include depository receipts of shares or trust certificates of shares; c) the term “recognised stock exchange” means: (i) any stock exchange established by a Financial Instruments Exchange or an approved-type financial instruments firms association under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Law (Law No. 25 of 1948) of Japan; (ii) any regulated market established in the Netherlands subject to regulation by the Authority for the Financial Markets (or its successor) under a license as meant in paragraph 1 of Article 5:26 of the Act on Financial Supervision (or its successor) of the Netherlands; (iii) the Irish Stock Exchange, the London Stock Exchange, the Swiss Stock Exchange and the stock exchanges of Brussels, Dusseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Johannesburg, Lisbon, Luxembourg, Madrid, Mexico, Milan, New York, Paris, Seoul, Singapore, Stockholm, Sydney, Toronto and Vienna and the NASDAQ System; and (iv) any other stock exchange which the competent authorities of the Contracting States agree to recognise for the purposes of this Article; d) the term “equivalent beneficiary” means: (i) a resident of a state that has a convention for the avoidance of double taxation and the prevention of fiscal evasion between that state and the Contracting State from which the benefits of this Convention are claimed such that: (aa) that convention contains provisions for effective exchange of information; (bb) that resident is a qualified person under the limitation on benefits provisions in that convention or, when there are no such provisions in that convention, would be a qualified person when that convention is read as including provisions corresponding to paragraph 2; and (cc) with respect to an item of income referred to in paragraph 3 of Article 10, paragraph 3 of Article 11 or Article 12, 13 or 20 that resident would be entitled under that convention to a rate of tax with respect to the particular class of income for which the benefits are being claimed under this Convention that is at least as low as the rate applicable under this Convention; or (ii) a qualified person by reason of subparagraph a), b), c) or d) of paragraph 2; e) the term “associated enterprises” means enterprises which have a relationship with each other as described in subparagraph a) or b) of paragraph 1 of Article 9; and f) the term “gross income” means the total revenues derived by an enterprise from its business, less the direct costs of obtaining such revenues.例文帳に追加