「そんめい」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(249ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

説明でも述べているように, ppp はカーネルの tun デバイスを使います. 使っているカーネルがどれであっても, tun デバイスを設定しなければなりません.FreeBSDに付属しているデフォルトの GENERIC カーネルに合うようにtun デバイスは前もって設定されています. しかしながら,自分で修正したカーネルをインストールするのであれば, pppが正しく動くよう,カーネルが設定されているか確認しなくてはいけません.これを確認するには, カーネルコンパイルディレクトリ (/sys/i386/conf または /sys/pc98/conf)に移動して, カーネルコンフィグレーションファイルを調べます.以下の行がどこかに含まれている必要があります.この行がカーネルコンフィグレーションファイルに 含まれていない場合, この行を追加してカーネルの再コンパイルとインストールをおこなう必要があります. 元々の GENERIC カーネルは 標準でこれを含んでいますので,カスタムカーネルをインストールしているのではなかったり, /sysディレクトリが存在しないのであれば, 何も変更する必要はありません.カーネルコンフィグレーションの詳細については, FreeBSDカーネルのコンフィグレーション を参照してください.以下のコマンドを実行することで, 現在のカーネルにトンネルデバイスがいくつ組み込まれているかを調べることができます:#例文帳に追加

This feature depends on your ISPs PPP implementation supporting DNS negotiation. The following information may be supplied by your ISP, but is not completely necessary:  - FreeBSD

当然ですね。これは政治主導でございまして、農産品と申しますか、その取引については明治時代から（存在し）、米の相場を始めたのは江戸時代であると。それから一番古い先物取引は、大阪で始まったという話もあるわけでございます。穀物の取引というのは大変古い歴史と伝統がありまして、それは昔で言う農商務省、農林省がきちっと農業政策の一環としてやっており、それから、原油をはじめ鉱物資源につきましては、私も20年前、通産政務次官をしましたので、これはまた通商政策の一環としてやっているということです。しかし、一番大きな金融取引等々につきましては、（その）先物取引は金融庁の所管でございますから、これはやはり各省縦割りというのが今まであったことは、もう私も重々知っておりますし、また各省は、縦割りの中で来たというのが現実でございまして、そこはまさに私は政治主導の必要があるというふうに思っておりますので、きちっと3大臣で話をして、大所高所に立ってきちっと国際競争力もこれは大事なときでございまして、東京のマーケットそのものの地位を高めるということも、今の経済戦略の中で大事な課題でもございますから、やっていきたいというふうに強く思っております。例文帳に追加

Of course, I intend to do so. This is a matter of political leadership. Trade in agricultural goods has existed since the Meiji period; the rice market was opened in the Edo period. It is said that the first futures trading was conducted in Osaka. Grain trading has a very long history and tradition and it has been promoted by the former Ministry of Agriculture and Commerce and the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries as part of the agricultural policy. Trading in crude oil and other mineral resources has been promoted as part of the trade and commerce policy. For my part, I served as parliamentary secretary for international trade and industry 20 years ago. However, regarding financial products, which account for most of the trading, futures trading is under the jurisdiction of the FSA. I am well aware that ministerial sectionalism has existed until now. The reality is that individual ministries have been operating on the basis of sectionalism. In this respect, we must exercise political leadership. Under the current economic strategy, it is an important task to strengthen the Tokyo market’s international competitiveness and enhance its position from a broad perspective, so the three relevant ministers will discuss this matter and take necessary actions.  - 金融庁

同国は、①テロ資金供与の適切な犯罪化及び資金洗浄の犯罪化に関し残存する欠陥への対応（特別勧告Ⅱ及び勧告１）、②資金洗浄に関連する資金を没収するための適切な手続きの履行の構築及びテロリスト資産を特定し凍結するための適切な手続きの構築及び履行（勧告３及び特別勧告Ⅲ）、③金融の透明性の強化（勧告４）、④完全にかつ効果的に機能する金融情報機関の構築と、疑わしい取引の届出の提出要件の改善（勧告１３、特別勧告Ⅳ及び勧告２６）、⑤全ての金融セクターに対する、十分な資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策監督プログラムの履行（勧告１７、２３及び２９）、⑥非銀行業又は非外国為替業における顧客管理措置の改善及び拡大（勧告５）及び⑦国際協力のための適切なチャンネルの構築及び効果的な履行の確保（勧告３６、４０及び特別勧告Ⅴ）を含む、資金洗浄・テロ資金供与対策上の欠陥に対応するため、アクションプランの実施への取組みを継続すべきである。例文帳に追加

Argentina will work on implementing its action plan to address these deficiencies, including by: (1) adequately criminalising terrorist financing and addressing the remaining deficiencies with regard to the criminalisation of money laundering (Special Recommendation II and Recommendation 1); (2) establishing and implementing adequate procedures for the confiscation of funds related to money laundering and identifying and freezing terrorist assets (Recommendation 3 and Special Recommendation III); (3) enhancing financial transparency (Recommendation 4); (4) ensuring a fully operational and effectively functioning Financial Intelligence Unit and improving suspicious transaction reporting requirements (Recommendation 13, Special Recommendation IV and Recommendation 26); (5) implementing an adequate AML/CFT supervisory programme for all financial sectors (Recommendations 17, 23 and 29); (6) improving and broadening CDD measures for the non-banking or non-foreign exchange sectors (Recommendation 5); and (7) establishing appropriate channels for international co-operation and ensuring effective implementation (Recommendation 36, Recommendation 40 and Special Recommendation V).  - 財務省

庁は，次の何れかの場合，第三者の請求に基づき開始された手続において商標登録の取消決定を行うことができる。登録商標がその対象とする商品又はサービスについて過去5年内に適正に使用されておらずかつかかる不使用について正当な理由が存在しないこと。登録商標の不使用が5年間継続した後で取消請求の提起される前3月内に開始され又は再開された使用は，当該使用の開始若しくは再開の準備が当該登録商標の取消請求がなされるであろうことを商標所有者が知った後に始めてなされた場合は，なかったものとみなされる。登録商標の所有者による履行若しくは不履行の結果として，当該商標がその登録における対象である製品若しくはサービスについての一般名称となっている場合。登録日後に商標がその対象である商品若しくはサービスについて所有者により又は所有者の同意の下に使用された結果として，特にそれら商品若しくはサービスの性質，品質又は原産地に関して，公衆の誤解を生じさせる虞が生じていること。例文帳に追加

The Office shall revoke the trade mark in a proceeding started at the request of a third person - if the trade mark has not been properly used within the continuous period of 5 years for goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered, and there are no proper reasons for non-use; the use which commenced or which was resumed following 5 years of non-use of the trade mark within three months preceding the filing of the request for revocation shall be disregarded where the preparations for the commencement or the resumption of the use occurred only after the proprietor becomes aware that a request for revocation of the trade mark might be filed; if by the consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor the trade mark has become the common name in the trade for products or services for which it is registered; if the trade mark after the date of its registration in consequence of the use made of it by the proprietor or with his consent in respect of the goods or services for which it is registered, the trade mark is liable to mislead the public, particularly as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of those goods or services.  - 特許庁

(a) オーストラリアにおける既存の商業若しくは工業又はオーストラリアにおける新規の商業若しくは工業の設立が不当に不利益を被っているか，又は特許製品若しくは特許方法から生じる製品に対するオーストラリアにおける需要が合理的な程度に満たされておらず，その理由が，特許権者が次の事項を行わないことにある場合 (i) 特許製品を十分な量で製造し，合理的な条件で供給すること，又は (ii) 特許製品を有効に実施するために必要な特許製品の一部を十分な量で製造し，合理的な条件で供給すること，又は (iii) 合理的な程度に特許方法を実行すること，又は (iv) 合理的な条件でライセンスを付与すること，又は (b) オーストラリアにおける商業若しくは工業が，特許製品の購入，賃貸又は使用，特許方法の使用又は実施に関し，(本法施行日の前後を問わず)特許権者が課す付帯条件によって不当な不利益を被っている場合，又は (c) 特許発明がオーストラリアにおいて商業規模では実施されていないが，オーストラリアにおいて実施することが可能である場合例文帳に追加

(a) an existing trade or industry in Australia, or the establishment of a new trade or industry in Australia, is unfairly prejudiced, or the demand in Australia for the patented product, or for a product resulting from the patented process, is not reasonably met, because of the patentee's failure: (i) to manufacture the patented product to an adequate extent, and supply it on reasonable terms; or (ii) to manufacture, to an adequate extent, a part of the patented product that is necessary for the efficient working of the product, and supply the part on reasonable terms; or (iii) to carry on the patented process to a reasonable extent; or (iv) to grant licenses on reasonable terms; or (b) a trade or industry in Australia is unfairly prejudiced by the conditions attached by the patentee (whether before or after the commencing day) to the purchase, hire or use of the patented product, the use or working of the patented process; or (c) if the patented invention is not being worked in Australia on a commercial scale, but is capable of being worked in Australia.  - 特許庁

(1) 登録官は，次に掲げる標章若しくはそれらの標章のいずれかにほぼ類似しており，その標章と取られる可能性のある標章を含む又はそれらから構成される商標登録出願を拒絶することができる。 (a) 「特許」，「特許権取得済」，「王室特許状による」，「登録済」，「登録意匠」，「著作権」，「これを改ざんすることは偽造です」という言葉又は同じ効果を有する記号 (b) 国王若しくは王室の一員の表示 (c) 次に掲げるものの表示 (i) 王室紋章，クレスト，紋章，記章若しくは意匠 (ii) 王冠のすべて，又は (iii) 女王陛下の領土の一部の国旗，又は (d) 出願人が王室若しくは政府の任命権若しくは権限を有する若しくは有していたと人に思わせる可能性のある「ロイヤル」又はその他の言葉若しくは文字若しくは意匠 (e) 国旗，国章，国の標語若しくは国の印章の表示，又は地方の旗，章，標語若しくは印章の表示 (f) 市町村等の地方自治体の旗若しくは章の表示，又は国家機関若しくはパプアニューギニア国内の下部機関の旗若しくは章の表示 (g) 本条の適用上，禁止標章として規定された標章例文帳に追加

(1) The Registrar may refuse to accept an application for the registration of a trade mark which contains or consists of any of the following marks or a mark so nearly resembling any of those marks as to be likely to be taken for that mark: - (a) the word or words “Patent”, “Patented”, “By Royal Letters Patent”, “Registered”, “Registered Design”, “Copyright”, “To counterfeit this is a forgery”, or a word or words or symbol or symbols to the like effect; (b) a representation of the Sovereign or of a member of the Royal Family; (c) a representation of (i) the Royal Arms, crests, armorial bearings, insignia or devices; or (ii) any of the Royal crowns; or (iii) the national flag of a part of the Queen’s dominions; or (d) the word “Royal” or any other word, or any letters or device, likely to lead persons to think that the applicant has or has had Royal or Government patronage or authority; (e) a representation of the National Flag, National Emblem, National Motto or National Seal or of the flag, emblem, motto or seal of a province; (f) a representation of the flag or emblem of a city or town or Local-level Government or of a statutory body or instrumentality in Papua New Guinea; (g) a mark prescribed as being, for the purposes of this section, a prohibited mark. - 特許庁

(7)「商品表示」とは、次に掲げるものに関する表示、記述又はその他直接若しくは間接の標識をいう。(a)商品又は役務の個数、数量、度量、ゲージ又は重量(b)取引で一般に使用又は認識される分類による商品又は役務の品質基準(c)1940年薬品法に定義する「薬品」又は1959年純正食品条例に定義する「食品」の場合は商品の強度、性能又は品質(d)商品又は役務が製造若しくは生産された場所若しくは国又は時間(e)製造者又は商品若しくは役務の製造や提供が向けられた者の名称及び住所、又は同一性に関するその他の指標(f)商品又は役務の製造又は生産の方式(g)商品又は役務を構成する材料(h)商品又は役務に関する一切の既存の特許、特権又は著作権。これらは次に掲げる表示を含む。(i)商慣習に従い一般的に(a)節から(g)節までにいう事項の商品表示として扱われる標章の使用に関する表示(ii)通関申告書又は積荷送り状に記載される輸入商品に関する表示(iii)その他上記事項の一切について誤解又は誤認のおそれのある表示例文帳に追加

(7) "trade description" means any description, statement or other direct or indirect indication as to- (a) the number, quantity, measure, gauge or weight of any goods or services; or (b) the standard of quality of any goods or services, according to a classification commonly used or recognized in the trade; or (c) the strength, performance or qualities of any goods, if it is 'drug' as defined in the Drugs Act, 1940 or "food" as defined in the Pure Food Ordinance, 1959; or (d) the place or country in which or the time at which any goods or services were made or produced; or (e) the name and address or other indication of the identity of the manufacturer or of the person for whom the goods or services are manufactured; or (f) the mode of the manufacture or producing any goods or services; or (g) the material of which any goods or services are composed; or (h) any existing patent, privilege or copyright relating to any goods or services and includes,- (i) any description as to the use of any mark which according to the custom of the trade is commonly taken to be an indication of any of the matters referred to in clause (a) to (g) as trade description; (ii) the description as to any imported goods contained in a bill of entry or shipping bill; (iii) any other description which is likely to be misunderstood or mistaken for all or any of the said matters;  - 特許庁

パネルは2002年５月に報告書を提出し、①本規則はTBT 協定上の「強制規格」に該当する、②本規則とCodex 規格が共に缶詰イワシという同じ産品を扱い、本規則がCodex 規格に対応するラベリング要件を定めていること等から、Codex 規格はTBT 協定上の「関連する国際規格」に該当するが、Codex 規格は本規則の基礎として用いられていない、③提訴国側は、関連する国際規格が存在し、当該国際規格が問題となっている強制規格の基礎として用いられていないことを示せば足り、「関連する国際規格が、追求される正当な目的を達成する方法として効果的でなく又は適当でない場合」に該当するか否かの挙証責任は措置国側にあるとした上で、本件において、Codex 規格が本規則の追求する正当な目的を達成する方法として効果的でなく又は適当でないことはEU によって立証されておらず（加えて、ペルーはCodex 規格が正当な目的達成のために効果的で適当であることを示す十分な証拠と法的根拠を提示しているとの判断も示した。）、本規則はTBT 協定第２条４項に違反すると認定した。例文帳に追加

The Panel issued a report in May 2002, finding that: (i) the EU Regulation constitutes a "technical regulation" under the TBT Agreement; (ii) the Codex standard is a "relevant international standard" as defined in Article 2.4 because both the EU and the Codex standards refer to the same product (preserved sardines) and the EU Regulation sets forth labelling requirements that correspond to the Codex standard although the Codex standard was not used "as a basis for" the EU Regulation; and (iii) the complaining party only bears the burden of establishing a prima facie case by demonstrating that a relevant international standard exists and has not been used as a basis for the technical regulation in question, while the complainant bears the burden of demonstrating that the relevant international standards would be "an ineffective or inappropriate means for the fulfilment of the legitimate objectives." The Panel found that the EU failed to demonstrate that the Codex standard was an ineffective or inappropriate means for the fulfilment of the legitimate objectives (and conversely, Peru demonstrated that the Codex standard was an effective and appropriate means for such objectives). Therefore, the Panel concluded that the EU Regulation violates Article 2.4 of the TBT Agreement. - 経済産業省

今さっき言いましたように、私と日本銀行総裁の連名で、この関係金融機関に対して、被災者の便宜を考慮した適時適切な措置を講ずるように、金融上の措置を要請したわけでございますけれども、こうした要請も踏まえて、各金融機関においては、この前の日曜日、休日営業等に積極的に取り組んでいただきたいとお願いをしたら、9割弱の営業店がやっていただいたという話をしたわけでございます。そして、また今申し上げましたように、繰り返しになりますけれども、預金証書、通帳等を消失した場合でも、預金者であることを確認して、預金の支払いに応じていただいたわけでございます。またさらに、被災された顧客からの新規融資や既存の借入金等に関する相談に柔軟に対応している等、被災者の便宜を考慮した対応がなされているものと承知をいたしております。また金融機関におきましては、金曜日に（地震が）起きたわけでございますが、中小企業金融円滑化法案も出しましたし、それこそ1000年に一遍の津波でございますから、色々な地域の方々や与野党ともその辺は合意をして頂いたやには聞いております。こういった被害の復興に対して、また色々な適時適切な金融上の措置を、きちんと地域の声も聞きながら、また都道府県知事、あるいは市町村、それから特にこういうときは中小企業団体だとか、そういった声をしっかり聞きながら、各金融機関にも本当にご努力いただいておりますし、ご協力いただいておりますけれども、引き続き金融庁としても、しっかり適切な対応に努めてまいりたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

As I said earlier, I, together with the BOJ's Governor, have requested relevant financial institutions to take appropriate measures that take account of the convenience of the disaster victims in a timely manner. In response to our request that branches be kept open on holidays, nearly 90% of the branches were open last Sunday. Also, financial institutions have paid out deposits even in cases where depositors have lost their certificates of deposit and passbooks if identification can be made in some way or other. I am also aware that they have taken other measures that take account of the convenience of disaster victims, such as flexibly responding to customers' requests for consultation about new and existing loans. Moreover, we have submitted a bill to extend the SME Financing Facilitation Act (Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. I hear that as this was a once-in-a millennia tsunami disaster, various people in the region and the ruling and opposition parties have reached agreement. In order to ensure recovery from the disaster, financial institutions are making serious efforts to take various appropriate financial measures in a timely manner and are cooperating while listening to the voice of local communities, prefectural governors, municipalities, and associations of small and medium-size enterprises. The FSA will also continue efforts to take appropriate measures.  - 金融庁

しかし、同時にそれでは今から保険の行政に関してどういう点をやっているのか。まだ日本ほど保険が進んでいるとは思っておりませんけれども、しかし同時に、日本の保険業界もご存じのように大変ここ10年間株価は下がる、あるいは金利が下がるということで、費差益・利差益・死差益というのが保険業にはございますが、本当に利差益が少なくて大変一時は末端逆ざやが1兆円余の保険業界でもあるというような冬の時代が長く続きましたけれども、多くのかなりの、我々が27年前に通ったころは、日本の名前がついた生命保険会社法だったのですけれども、今色々な外資からも変わったところもありますので、そんなことを含めて今度アメリカでも保険ということが、ご存じのようにアメリカは保険の基本的監督は州単位なんですよ、アメリカの政府は。州単位で保険をやっていまして、連邦政府というのは、金融規制改革法で初めて連邦政府の中に保険担当の部署をつくるんですよ、今度初めて。しかしながら、AIUなんていう世界で一番大きな民間保険会社をアメリカは実質国営化しましたけれども、そこら辺で保険業界というのはちょっと穴と言ったらおかしいけれども、中央政府と今まで交渉しましても、これは中央政府の話だということもしばしばございまして、そういった意味で保険というのはなかなか、アメリカは合衆国ですから、税金なんかも州によって違いますね。例文帳に追加

Simultaneously, how should insurance be regulated and supervised from now on? I believe insurance in China is not as advanced as in Japan yet. But then again, Japan’s insurance industry has experienced falling stock prices and interest rates over the past decade and suffered a long period of winter-like hardship: the insurance sector, where they have something called “expense profits”, “interest gain” and “mortality profits”, the interest gain was so squeezed that at one point, negative carry was more than 1 trillion yen. In the United States, the federal government will be establishing a division in charge of insurance for the first time within the federal government organization under the financial reform legislation. As you know, basic supervision of insurance in the United States is conducted on a state-by-state basis. Despite the fact that AIU—the world’s biggest private insurance company—was effectively nationalized in the United States, the insurance industry has been a bit of a blind spot in that any attempts in the past to negotiate with the central government often resulted in being told that it was a matter for the state government. The United States is a federal republic comprised of states, so in that sense, insurance varies from state to state in tax and other aspects.  - 金融庁

法第百四十五条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明す る書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。 一合併の理由を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人である場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二 項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が法人 である場合当該役員の登記事項証明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第 二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓約する書面 ハ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人又は法人でない場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五 条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しない旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号 ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 三会員等の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載した 書面、会員が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第三十条第一項各号のいずれかに該当す ることを誓約する書面又は取引参加者が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第八十二条第 一項第一号イからハまで若しくは同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当する ことを誓約する書面、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面並びに申請に係る商品取引所が開設しようとする一 以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を行う場合には 認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純資産額に関す る調書 四合併を行う各商品取引所の合併総会（会員商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条 第四項、第百四十四条の二第二項又は第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会をいい、 株式会社商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条の六第一項、第百四十四条の十三 第一項、会社法第七百八十三条第一項、第七百九十五条第一項又は第八百四条第一 項の株主総会をいう。）の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 五合併を行う各商品取引所の財産及び収支の状況を知ることができる書面（会員商品 取引所にあっては最終事業年度の決算関係書類等、株式会社商品取引所にあっては 最終事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属明細書）六法第百四十四条第五項、第百四十四条の二第三項及び第百四十四条の三第五項に おいて準用する法第百二十四条第二項、第百四十四条の十第二項（第百四十四条の 十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会社法第七百八十九条第二項 、第七百九十九 条第二項又は第八百十条第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第百二十四条第三項、 第百四十四条の十第三項（第百四十四条の十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会 社法第七百八十九条第三項、第七百九十九条第三項又は第八百十条第三項の規定に より公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によっ てした場合にあっては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた 債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しく は当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は - 112 - 当該合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 七合併により消滅する商品取引所の開設している商品市場における取引に関する業務 の承継の方法を記載した書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書面（合併後の商品取引所が株式会社商品取引所であ る場合に限る。九開設しようとする商品市場における合併後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見込みを記 載した書面 十合併に際して上場商品に係る商品市場を開設しようとする場合にあっては、上場商 品構成物品を一の商品市場で取引をすることが適当である旨を明らかにすることが できる書面 十一合併に際して二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数として商品市場を開設しよう とする場合にあっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通し ていることを明らかにすることができる書面例文帳に追加

The documents specified by an ordinance set forth in Article 145, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as listed in the following (in case of documents certified by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document recording the reasons for the merger; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act; (b) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act; (c) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b) of the Act; and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval; (iv) minutes of the general meeting of shareholders approving the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of Members prescribed in Article 144, paragraph 4, Article 144-2, paragraph 2, or Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of shareholders prescribed in Article 144-6, paragraph 1 and Article 144-13, paragraph 1 of the Act, and Article 783, paragraph 1, Article 795, paragraph 1, or Article 804, paragraph 1 of the Company Act) of each Commodity Exchange which carries out the merger, or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for the merger have been followed; (v) a document stating the status of the property, income and expenditure of each Commodity Exchange that carries out the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, the settlement related statements, etc. of the preceding business year; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the financial documents, etc. of the preceding business year and detailed statements thereof); (vi) in the case where a public notice or demand (in cases where the public notice is made through an official gazette, a daily newspaper which publishes matters of current events, or an Electronic Public Notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 3 or Article 144-10, paragraph 3 of the Act [including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17), or Article 789, paragraph 3; Article 799, paragraph 3; or Article 810, paragraph 3 of the Company Act, a public notice by such method) is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5; Article 144-2, paragraph 3; and Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act, or Article 144-10, paragraph 2 of the Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act); Article 789, paragraph 2; Article 799, paragraph 2; or Article 810, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; and in cases where a creditor has made an objection, a document certifying that the liabilities have been paid or reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor, reasonable property has been deposited for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said merger is not likely to harm said creditor; (vii) a document stating a method for business succession pertaining to transactions on a Commodity Market which has been opened by a Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of a merger; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees (limited to a case where a Commodity Exchange subsequent to a merger becomes an Incorporated Commodity Exchange); (ix) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the merger on the Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (x) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed - 113 - Commodity at the time of a merger, a document stating that it is appropriate to conduct transactions of Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (xi) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market at the time of a merger by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another.  - 経済産業省

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Articles 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の総代会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（保険業法第五十三条の十二第一項（同法第百八十条の五第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 830 (Lawsuit for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity, or a lawsuit for rescission, of a resolution of the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators of a Mutual Company (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators)"; and the term "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), where the relevant resolution is that of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, or including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the relevant resolution is that of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" in the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who assumes the rights and obligations of a director, executive officer or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 53-12, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 180-5, paragraph (4) of that Act)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の社員総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人（資産流動化法第七十六条第一項（資産流動化法第百六十八条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含む。）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment of Non-existence or Invalidation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Action Seeking Revocation of a Resolution of a Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (xvi) and item (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment), Article 846 (Liability for Damage in Cases Where the Plaintiff is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i), sub-item (g)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment of the non-existence or invalidity of a resolution made at a general meeting of members of a Specific Purpose Company or an action seeking the rescission of such a resolution. In this case, the phrases "a Shareholder, etc. (or, in cases where the Shareholders Meeting, etc., set forth respectively in each such items is an Organizational Meeting or a Class Organizational Meeting, a Shareholder, etc., a Shareholder at Incorporation, a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" and "a director, company auditor or liquidator (or, in cases where such resolution is a resolution of shareholders meeting or Class Meeting, it shall include a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 346(1) (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)), and in cases where such resolution is a resolution of an Organizational Meeting or Class Organizational Meeting, it shall include a Director at Incorporation or a Company Auditor at Incorporation)" in Article 831(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors, and liquidators" and "a director, company auditor, or liquidator (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor, or liquidator pursuant to the provisions of Article 76(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 168(5) of the Asset Securitization Act))" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

総督は次の事項に関し規則を制定することができる: (a) 特許出願の様式及び記載事項 (b) 特許登録簿及びその索引の様式に関する事項 (c) 特許権に関する譲渡，移転，権利の部分放棄，判決又はその他の書類の登録に関する事項 (d) 本法律により発行する証明書の様式及びその記載事項 (e) 本法律又は本法律に基づいて制定された規則に従って特許出願の提出若しくは他の手続を取ることに関し，又は長官若しくは特許庁において雇用された者により提供される役務若しくは施設の利用に関し課される手数料又はその決定方法に関する事項 (f) 特許出願を維持するため若しくは特許付与により得られた権利を維持するための手数料又はその決定方法に関する事項 (g) 時期及び方法を含む所定の手数料の納付，かかる手数料の追納の場合に課する追加手数料，並びに既に納付した手数料の全部又は一部を還付する場合の状況に関する事項 (h) カナダと他の国との間に存在する条約，協定，取決め又は約定の条件の実施に関する事項 (i) 本法律中の如何なる規定にも拘らず，随時の改正，修正及び変更を含めて，1970年6月19日にワシントンで作成され，カナダが締約国である特許協力条約の実施に関する事項 (j) 特許代理人登録簿における個人及び事務所の名称の記入，維持，抹消に関する事項。これには登録簿に個人又は事務所の名称を記入し維持する前にその個人又は事務所が満たさなければならない資格及び条件に関する事項を含む。 (j.1) 第8.1条に基づく書類，情報又は手数料の提出に関する事項。これには次のものを含む。 (i) 同条に基づいて電子的又は他の方式で提出することができる書類，情報又は手数料 (ii) かかる提出をすることのできる者及びこれに類する者，及び (iii) 長官が受領したとみなす時点 (j.2) 第8.2条に基づいて書類又は情報を記入又は記録することに関する事項 (j.3) 特許出願を取り下げる方法を規定する事項，及び第10条(4)及び(5)の適用上，優先権主張若しくは特許出願の取下をその日以前に行うべき日又はその日を決定する方法を規定する事項 (j.4) 次のものを含む優先権主張に関する事項 (i) 優先権主張をすべき期間 (ii) 第28.4条(2)にいう事項を長官に届け出る方式及び期間 (iii) 優先権主張を支持するために提出すべき書類，及び (iv) 優先権主張の取下 (j.5) 第35条(1)に基づいて出願審査の請求及びその所定の手数料の納付をすべき時期に関する事項 (j.6) 第38.1条の適用上，生物材料の寄託に関する事項 (j.7) 特許出願の一部として提出された明細書又は図面の補正の方法に関する事項 (j.8) 状況により正当化されると長官が納得した場合は，所定の条件に従うことを条件として，本法律により又はそれに基づいて何らかの事柄をするために定められた時期を延長する権限を長官に付与することに関する事項 (k) 本法律の何れかの条項に従って規定すべきその他の事項を規定することに関する事項，及び (l) 本法律の目的を達成するため，又は長官及びその他の特許庁の職員が本法律を適切に施行するのを確保するために必要な一般的事項例文帳に追加

The Governor in Council may make rules or regulations (a) respecting the form and contents of applications for patents; (b) respecting the form of the Register of Patents and of the indexes thereto; (c) respecting the registration of assignments, transmissions, disclaimers, judgments or other documents relating to any patent; (d) respecting the form and contents of any certificate issued pursuant to this Act; (e) prescribing the fees or the manner of determining the fees that may be charged in respect of the filing of applications for patents or the taking of other proceedings under this Act or under any rule or regulation made pursuant to this Act, or in respect of any services or the use of any facilities provided thereunder by the Commissioner or any person employed in the Patent Office; (f) prescribing the fees or the manner of determining the fees that shall be paid to maintain in effect an application for a patent or to maintain the rights accorded by a patent; (g) respecting the payment of any prescribed fees including the time when and the manner in which such fees shall be paid, the additional fees that may be charged for the late payment of such fees and the circumstances in which any fees previously paid may be refunded in whole or in part; (h) for carrying into effect the terms of any treaty, convention, arrangement or engagement that subsists between Canada and any other country; (i) for carrying into effect, notwithstanding anything in this Act, the Patent Cooperation Treaty done at Washington on June 19, 1970, including any amendments, modifications and revisions made from time to time to which Canada is a party; (j) respecting the entry on, the maintenance of and the removal from the register of patent agents of the names of persons and firms, including the qualifications that must be met and the conditions that must be fulfilled by a person or firm before the name of the person or firm is entered thereon and to maintain the name of the person or firm on the register; (j.1) respecting the submission of documents, information or fees under section 8.1, including (i) the documents, information or fees that may be submitted in electronic or other form under that section, (ii) the persons or classes of persons by whom they may be submitted, and (iii) the time at which they are deemed to be received by the Commissioner; (j.2) respecting the entering or recording of any document or information under section 8.2; (j.3) prescribing the manner in which an application for a patent may be withdrawn and, for the purposes of subsections 10(4) and (5), prescribing the date, or the manner of determining the date, on or before which a request for priority or an application for a patent must be withdrawn; (j.4) respecting requests for priority, including (i) the period within which priority must be requested, (ii) the manner in which and period within which the Commissioner must be informed of the matters referred to in subsection 28.4(2), (iii) the documentation that must be filed in support of requests for priority, and (iv) the withdrawal of requests for priority; (j.5) respecting the time within which requests for examination must be made and prescribed fees must be paid under subsection 35(1); (j.6) respecting the deposit of biological material for the purposes of section 38.1; (j.7) respecting the manner in which amendments may be made to specifications or drawings furnished as part of an application for a patent; (j.8) authorizing the Commissioner to extend, subject to any prescribed terms and conditions, the time fixed by or under this Act for doing anything where the Commissioner is satisfied that the circumstances justify the extension; (k) prescribing any other matter that by any provision of this Act is to be prescribed; and (l) generally, for carrying into effect the objects and purposes of this Act or for ensuring the due administration thereof by the Commissioner and other officers and employees of the Patent Office.  - 特許庁

３　緑地面積率等条例の廃止若しくは失効、同意企業立地重点促進区域の廃止又は前条第一項の規定により経過措置を定める条例（以下この項において「経過措置条例」という。）の廃止若しくは失効により、当該緑地面積率等条例（経過措置条例が定められている場合にあっては、当該経過措置条例）で定めた準則の適用を受けないこととなった特定工場について、それぞれ当該緑地面積率等条例の廃止若しくは失効の日、当該同意企業立地重点促進区域の廃止の日又は当該経過措置条例の廃止若しくは失効の日前に当該緑地面積率等条例に係る同意企業立地重点促進区域に係る事務又は当該経過措置条例に係る同条第一項の特定工場に係る事務を行うものとされた市町村の長（地方自治法第二百五十二条の十九第一項の指定都市の長を除く。）にされた工場立地法第六条第一項、第七条第一項若しくは第八条第一項又は工場立地の調査等に関する法律の一部を改正する法律附則第三条第一項の規定による届出は、それぞれの廃止又は失効の日（以下この条において「特定日」という。）以後においては、当該緑地面積率等条例に係る同意企業立地重点促進区域に係る都道府県の知事にされたものとみなす。ただし、当該届出であって特定日において勧告、勧告に係る事項を変更すべき旨の命令又は実施の制限の期間の短縮の処理がされていないものについての勧告、勧告に係る事項を変更すべき旨の命令又は実施の制限の期間の短縮については、なお従前の例による。例文帳に追加

(3) Where a Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc. has been repealed or has become invalid, an agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities has been abolished, or a Municipal Ordinance that establishes transitional measures as prescribed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article (hereinafter referred to as the "Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures" in this paragraph) has been repealed or has become invalid, and as a result, a specified factory has ceased to be subject to the rules established by said Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc. (when a Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures has been established, said Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures), with regard to such specified factory, a notification which was made, under Article 6, paragraph (1), Article 7, paragraph (1), or Article 8, paragraph (1) of the Factory Location Act, or Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act for Partial Revision of the Act on Investigation of Factory Location, etc., to the head of a municipality who is specified to carry out affairs pertaining to the agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities related to said Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc. or affairs pertaining to a specified factory set forth in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article related to said Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures (excluding the head of a designated city set forth in Article 252-19, paragraph (1) of the Local Autonomy Act), prior to the date of repeal or invalidity of said Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc., the date of the abolition of said agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities, and the date of repeal or invalidity of said Municipal Ordinance on Transitional Measures, respectively, shall be deemed to have been made to the prefectural governor pertaining to the agreed zone for intensively promoting the establishment of new business facilities related to said Municipal Ordinance on Green Space-Area Ratios, etc., after the respective date of repeal, abolition, or invalidity (hereinafter referred to as the "specified date" in this Article); provided, however, that with regard to said notification, for which any disposition of a recommendation, an order to change matters related to a recommendation, or reduction of a period to restrict implementation has not been rendered as on the specified date, the provisions then in force shall remain applicable to such recommendation, order to change matters related to a recommendation, or reduction of a period to restrict implementation.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) 第37条(a)及び(b)，第40条(1)(a)から(c)まで並びにこの部に従うことを条件として，何らかの商品に関する証明商標の登録所有者としてある者を登録することにより，その登録が有効である限り，その者はそれら商品に関して当該商標を使用する排他的権利を取得する。前記規定の一般性を損うことなく，当該商標の登録所有者でもなく，規約に従いその登録所有者から自己に代わって当該商標を使用する権限を与えられた者でもない者が，登録に関係する商品に関して，当該商標と同一の又は誤認若しくは混同を生じさせる虞がある程に類似する標章を，その使用が次の何れかと受け取られる虞のある態様で業として使用するときは，当該商標についての権利は，侵害されたとみなされる。 (a) 商標としての使用であること (b) その使用が，当該商品若しくはサービスについての使用，それらとの物理的関係における使用，又は公衆に対する広告回状その他の広告においてなされる使用である場合において，当該商標の登録所有者若しくは当該商標の使用に関する規約に基づいて使用権限を与えられた者であること又は登録所有者が証明する商品若しくはサービスであることを意味していること (c) その使用が，当該サービスが提供され若しくは実行される場所若しくはその近辺における使用，又は公衆に対する広告回状その他の広告においてなされる使用である場合において，所有者若しくは登録使用者として当該商標を使用する権利を有する者であること又はそのような者が業として提供に係わっているサービスであることを意味していること［法律A881による挿入］例文帳に追加

(3) Subject to paragraphs (a) and (b) of section 37, paragraphs (a) to (c) of subsection (1) of section 40 and this Part, the registration of a person as registered proprietor of a certification trade mark in respect of any goods shall, if valid, give to that person the exclusive right to the use of the trade mark in relation to those goods, and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing words, that right shall be deemed to be infringed by any person who, not being the registered proprietor of the trade mark or a person authorised by him under the rules in that behalf to use it in accordance therewith, uses a mark identical with it or so nearly resembling it as is likely to deceive or cause confusion, in the course of trade, in relation to any goods in respect of which it is registered and in such manner as to render the use of the mark likely to be taken either . (a) as being use as a trade mark; (b) in the case in which the use is use upon the goods or services or in physical relation thereto or in an advertising circular, or other advertisement issued to the public, as importing a reference to some person having the right either as registered proprietor or by his authorisation under the relevant rules to use the trade mark or to goods or services certified by the registered proprietor; or (c) in a case in which the use is use at or near the place where the services are available or performed or in an advertising circular or other advertisement issued to the public, as importing a reference to a person having a right either as proprietor or as a registered user to use the trade mark or to services with the provision of which such person is connected in the course of trade. [Ins. Act A881] - 特許庁

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第六十七条第一項（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで（議事録）及び第三百十六条第一項（株主総会に提出された資料等の調査）の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十条の十五　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、相互会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 30-15 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Articles 837 to 839 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Recession), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (a)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim seeking nullification of the incorporation of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc. (referring to shareholders, directors or liquidators (or, shareholders, directors, auditors or liquidators in a company with auditors, or shareholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or members, directors, executive officers, or liquidators in a company with Committees)"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第九十二条の規定による組織変更時発行株式の発行を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百四十四条（株式交換又は株式移転の無効判決の効力）の規定は組織変更株式交換又は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the issue of shares on Entity Conversion under Article 92; the provision of Article 844 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Share Exchange or Share Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by a share exchange on Entity Conversion or share transfer on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百三十九条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号イに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、特定目的会社の設立の無効の訴えについて準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第一号中「株主等（株主、取締役又は清算人（監査役設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、監査役又は清算人、委員会設置会社にあっては株主、取締役、執行役又は清算人）をいう。以下この節において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Article 837 to Article 839 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(a)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of the incorporation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "Shareholder, etc. (meaning a shareholder, director or liquidator (or, for a Company with Company Auditors, it means a shareholder, director, company auditor or liquidator, and for a Company with Committees, it means a shareholder, director, executive officer or liquidator); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section)" in Article 828(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二条　この法律において「公益通報」とは、労働者（労働基準法（昭和二十二年法律第四十九号）第九条に規定する労働者をいう。以下同じ。）が、不正の利益を得る目的、他人に損害を加える目的その他の不正の目的でなく、その労務提供先（次のいずれかに掲げる事業者（法人その他の団体及び事業を行う個人をいう。以下同じ。）をいう。以下同じ。）又は当該労務提供先の事業に従事する場合におけるその役員、従業員、代理人その他の者について通報対象事実が生じ、又はまさに生じようとしている旨を、当該労務提供先若しくは当該労務提供先があらかじめ定めた者（以下「労務提供先等」という。）、当該通報対象事実について処分（命令、取消しその他公権力の行使に当たる行為をいう。以下同じ。）若しくは勧告等（勧告その他処分に当たらない行為をいう。以下同じ。）をする権限を有する行政機関又はその者に対し当該通報対象事実を通報することがその発生若しくはこれによる被害の拡大を防止するために必要であると認められる者（当該通報対象事実により被害を受け又は受けるおそれがある者を含み、当該労務提供先の競争上の地位その他正当な利益を害するおそれがある者を除く。次条第三号において同じ。）に通報することをいう。例文帳に追加

Article 2 (1) The term "Whistleblowing" as used in this Act shall mean whistleblowing made by a worker (which shall mean worker as provided for in Article 9 of the Labor Standards Act (Act No. 49 of 1947); the same shall apply hereinafter), without a purpose of obtaining an wrongful gain, a purpose of causing damages to others, or any other wrongful purpose, about Reportable Fact that has been occurred, is being occurred or is about to be occurred by "Business Operator" (which shall mean any of the following business operators (which shall mean juridical person, other organization and individual who operates a business)), or such persons as officer, employee or agent in the workplace where the worker is occupied in performing the Business Operator's business activities, to the said Business Operator or the person designated by the said Business Operator in advance (hereinafter referred to as "Business Operator, etc."), to an Administrative Organ with the authority to impose disposition (which shall mean an order, rescission, and other acts involving the exercise of public authority; the same shall apply hereinafter) or recommendation, etc. (which shall mean a recommendation and other acts which are not disposition; the same shall apply hereinafter) upon the said Reportable Fact, or to any person who are recognized to be necessary to do whistleblowing to the said Reportable Fact in order to prevent the occurrence thereof or the spread of damage caused thereby (including person who suffers or might suffer damage from the said Reportable Fact, but excluding any person who might cause damages to the competitive position or any other legitimate interests of the Business Operator; the same shall apply in Item (iii) of the following Article.).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十一条の二　監視化学物質、第二種特定化学物質、第四条第四項（第四条の二第九項において読み替えて準用する場合及び第五条の二第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により公示された化学物質又は附則第二条第四項の規定により通商産業大臣が公示した同条第一項に規定する既存化学物質名簿に記載されている化学物質（以下「報告対象物質」という。）の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者は、その製造し、又は輸入した報告対象物質について、第四条第七項に規定する試験の項目又は第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項若しくは第二十五条の三第一項に規定する有害性の調査の項目に係る試験を行つた場合（当該試験を行つたと同等の知見（公然と知られていないものに限る。）が得られた場合を含む。）であつて、報告対象物質が次に掲げる性状を有することを示す知見として厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるものが得られたときは、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、その旨及び当該知見の内容を厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣に報告しなければならない。ただし、第五条の四第一項、第二十四条第一項又は第二十五条の三第一項の規定による指示に係る有害性の調査により当該知見が得られた場合において、これらの規定によりその内容を報告するときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 31-2 (1) A person engaged in the business of manufacturing or importing any chemical substance subject to monitoring, any Class II Specified Chemical Substance, any chemical substance of which the public has been notified pursuant to the provisions of Article 4, paragraph (4) (including where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 4-2, paragraph (9) and pursuant to Article 5-2, paragraph (2)), or any chemical substance in the list of existing chemical substances prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions of which the public has been notified by the Minister of International Trade and Industry pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (4) of said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "substance subject to reporting") shall report to the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment when he/she has conducted tests with regard to the substance subject to reporting under the items prescribed in Article 4, paragraph (7) or studies of hazardous properties prescribed in Article 5-4, paragraph (1), Article 24, paragraph (1) or Article 25-3, paragraph (1) (including cases in which information equivalent to that which would be obtained from said tests (limited to information that is not publicly known) has been obtained). When, as a result of said tests, the person obtains information specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment indicating that the substance subject to reporting possesses the following properties, he/she shall report to that effect and give the details of such information, pursuant to the provisions of Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy; provided, however that this shall not apply where said person has obtained said information as a result of a study of hazardous properties to which an instruction under the provisions of Article 5-4, paragraph (1), Article 24, paragraph (1) or Article 25-3, paragraph (1) pertains, and where said person is reporting the details of said information pursuant to these provisions:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

生涯苦心致され候中にも、古史伝は最初文化の末頃より草稿取り掛かり、文政の始め頃に、成文一二巻程は、ざっと稿本成り候ところ、段々見識博くあいなり、殊に故鈴屋大人の御遺教をも相伺れ候て、いよいよ以って、世界悉く我が皇大神達の御鎔造（ツクリカタメ）なされたる事を感得致され候に付、古史伝は先ず差し置き、赤縣州を始め、印度及び西洋の古伝をも悉く皆探索網羅して、其の上にて、充分に古史の註解をと存し込まれ候て、文政の半ば頃より、専ら外国の学に困苦致され、凡そ廿余年も歳月を過ごされ候て、赤縣太古傳を初め、即ち今此れある丈の著述は出来候へ共、中々もって先人の心底に叶ひ候事には此れ無く候へ共、大抵は見当も付き候に依っては、私を始め門人の中の所存にも、段々時節後れ、先人も老年に成られ候に付き、先ず先ず外国の所は大抵にして差し置かれ、古史伝の清撰をしきりて、相願い催促致し候て、天保10年頃より、漸々と其の方にも趣かれ候所、言語規則の書之無きに付き、余儀なく五十音義の撰にかかり、凡そ一ヵ年ほど打ち過ぎられ候所、旧幕府の命に依って秋田へ放逐、尤も同所は本国の事、親族共も少なからず、第一旧君侯より厚く恩遇も之有りて会計の辛苦は薄らぎ候へ共、著述致す可き遑なく、此処両三年心配致され候内に病を発し入幽致され候次第にて残念至極にて御座候。例文帳に追加

Our teacher dedicated his life to the study requiring great pains; as to "Koshi-den", at the end of the Bunka era (1804-1818), he began to write the draft, and by the early Bunsei era (1818-1830), about 12 volumes had been completed; however, by that time, he had also gradually gained an insight into the study and understood the teachings of the master of Suzunoya (Norinaga MOTOORI), then he realized that this world was the product of our great gods of Japan, so he decided to suspend "Koshi-den" temporarily, and first explore and read through all the past annotations of the histories of our country as well as those of India and Europe to use new knowledge to his advantage in writing "Koshi-den"; therefore, since the middle of the Bunsei era, he intensly studied foreign literature and culture mainly, and during a period of over 20 years, he completed almost all his works, which he left for us, including "Sekiken Taiko-den" (Japanese Early History); although he was never satisfied with his works, his students, of course, including myself, with a feeling of gratitude, thought that our master had succeeded in completing most his researches and studies, and were concerned about the delay in completing "Koshi-den" and because of our master's age, we repeatedly begged him to restart the writing, then thankfully at about the 10th year of the Tenpo era (1839), he restarted; however, he was requested to write on linguistic methods so he began to write "Goju Ongi" (Pronunciation and Meaning of 50 Kana) and suspended "Koshi-den" again; after a year, he was banished to Akita Province by order of the former bakufu (Japanese feudal government headed by a shogun), fortunately since Akita was his hometown and there were many relatives of his, besides the former load treated him very kindly, they relieved him off poor living, although under those conditions, he had no time to finish the remaining works; he was always concerned about those unfinished works, and after only a few years, he became sick and regrettably died.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

(1) 何人かがある条約国又は所定の外国において商標の保護出願をした場合は，その者若しくはその者の法律上の代表者又は譲受人は，当該出願の出願日及び出願を行った国を明記した書面を所定期間内に提出した後，自己の商標に関する当該登録出願に関して優先権を享受する権限を有し，当該商標のマレーシアでの登録出願について，前記条約国又は場合により所定の外国における保護出願日と同一の出願日が付与されるものとする。ただし，次に従うことを条件とする。 (a) 登録出願が，当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国での保護出願の日から6月以内に行われること。保護出願が2以上の条約国又は所定の外国でなされた場合は，前記の6月の期間は，それら複数出願中の最先のものがなされた日から起算するものとする。 (b) 出願人が，当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国の国民若しくは住民又は法律に基づき設立された一般法人であること，及び (c) 本条の如何なる規定も，当該商標の保護出願がマレーシアで行われた日より前に生じた当該商標の侵害行為その他の事由による損害について賠償を求める権利を当該商標の所有者に与えるものではないこと例文帳に追加

(1) Where any person has applied for protection of any trade mark in a Convention country or prescribed foreign country, such person or his legal representative or assignee, after furnishing a declaration within the prescribed time indicating the date of the application and the country in which it was made, shall in respect of the application for registration of his trade mark, be entitled to a right of priority and such application in Malaysia shall have the same date as the date of the application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be, subject to the following: (a) that the application for registration is made within six months from the date of application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and where an application for protection is made in more than one Convention country or prescribed foreign country, the period of six months referred to herein shall be reckoned from the date on which the earlier or earliest of those applications is made; (b) that the applicant shall be either a national or resident of, or a body corporate incorporated under the laws of, the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and (c) that nothing in this section shall entitle the proprietor of a trade mark to recover damages for infringements or any happening prior to the date on which the application for protection of the trade mark is made in Malaysia. - 特許庁

当事者は，強制ライセンスのロイヤルティ料率を含む基本的条件について合意することができる。当事者間の合意がない場合は，局長が，次の条件に従って，強制ライセンスのロイヤルティ料率を含む基本的条件を定める。 (a)強制ライセンスの範囲及び期間は，許可された目的に限定される。 (b)強制ライセンスは，非排他的なものとする。 (c)強制ライセンスは，当該発明を実施している企業又は事業の一部とともにする場合を除き，譲渡することができない。 (d)強制ライセンスの対象の実施は，主としてフィリピン市場への供給のためにされなければならない。ただし，この制限は，当該ライセンスの付与が，司法上又は行政上の手続によって特許権者による当該特許の実施の態様が反競争的である旨が決定されたことに基づく場合は，適用しない。 (e)強制ライセンスは，その付与をもたらした状況が存在しなくなり，かつ，その状況が再発しそうにないことが適切に示されたときは，取り消すことができる。ただし，実施権者の正当な利益に対して適切な保護を与えるものとする。 (f) 特許権者は，付与又は許諾の経済的価値を考慮に入れて，適正な報酬を受ける。ただし，強制ライセンスが，司法上又は行政上の手続の結果反競争的と決定された行為を是正するために許諾された場合は，報酬の額の決定に当たり，反競争的な行為を是正する必要性を考慮に入れることができる。例文帳に追加

The parties may agree on the basic terms and conditions including the rate of royalties of a compulsory license. In the absence of agreement between the parties, the Director shall fix the terms and conditions including the rate of royalties of the compulsory license subject to the following conditions: (a) The scope and duration of such license shall be limited to the purpose for which it was authorized; (b) The license shall be non-exclusive; (c) The license shall be non-assignable, except with the part of the enterprise or business with which the invention is being exploited; (d) Use of the subject matter of the license shall be devoted predominantly for the supply of the Philippine market: Provided, that this limitation shall not apply where the grant of the license is based on the ground that the patentee’s manner of exploiting the patent is determined by judicial or administrative process to be anti-competitive. (e) The license may be terminated upon proper showing that circumstances which led to its grant have ceased to exist and are unlikely to recur: Provided, that adequate protection shall be afforded to the legitimate interest of the licensee; (f) The patentee shall be paid adequate remuneration taking into account the economic value of the grant or authorization, except that in cases where the license was granted to remedy a practice which was determined after judicial or administrative process, to be anti-competitive, the need to correct the anti-competitive practice may be taken into account in fixing the amount of remuneration. - 特許庁

第百九十九条　第九十七条、第九十七条の二第一項及び第二項、第九十八条、第九十九条第一項、第二項及び第四項から第六項まで、第百条並びに第百条の二の規定は外国保険会社等の支店等における業務について、第九十九条第三項及び第七項から第十項までの規定は外国生命保険会社等の支店等における業務について、第百一条から第百五条までの規定は外国損害保険会社等が他の損害保険会社（外国損害保険会社等を含む。）との間で行う共同行為について、第七条の二、第百九条、第百十条第一項及び第三項、第百十一条第一項及び第三項から第六項まで、第百十二条、第百十四条から第百十八条まで並びに第百二十条から第百二十二条までの規定は外国保険会社等について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十七条第一項中「第三条第二項」とあるのは「第百八十五条第二項」と、第九十九条第六項中「相互会社」とあるのは「外国相互会社」と、同条第八項中「第百三十三条若しくは第百三十四条の規定により同法第三条第一項の免許が取り消された場合若しくは同法第二百七十三条の規定により同法第三条第一項」とあるのは「第二百五条若しくは第二百六条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項の免許が取り消された場合若しくは同法第二百七十三条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項」と、「第百三十三条又は第百三十四条の規定により同法第三条第一項」とあるのは「第二百五条又は第二百六条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項」と、同条第九項中「第百十一条第一項及び第二項」とあるのは「第百九十九条において準用する第百十一条第一項」と、第百九条中「事業年度」とあるのは「日本における事業年度」と、第百十条第一項中「事業年度ごとに、業務」とあるのは「日本における事業年度ごとに、日本における業務」と、第百十一条第一項中「事業年度ごとに、業務」とあるのは「日本における事業年度ごとに、日本における業務」と、同項及び同条第四項中「本店又は主たる事務所及び支店又は従たる事務所その他これらに準ずる場所として内閣府令で定める場所」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における支店その他これに準ずる場所として内閣府令で定める場所」と、同条第六項中「当該保険会社及びその子会社等の業務」とあるのは「当該外国保険会社等の日本における業務」と、第百十二条第一項中「所有する」とあるのは「日本において所有する」と、「内閣府令で定めるところにより、内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同条第二項中「内閣府令」とあるのは「日本において内閣府令」と、第百十四条第一項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「日本における保険契約者」と、第百十五条第一項中「所有する」とあるのは「日本において所有する」と、「価格変動準備金」とあるのは「日本において価格変動準備金」と、同条第二項中「株式等」とあるのは「日本における株式等」と、第百十六条第一項中「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、「責任準備金」とあるのは「日本において責任準備金」と、同条第二項中「長期の」とあるのは「日本における長期の」と、同条第三項中「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、第百十七条第一項中「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、「支出として」とあるのは「支出として日本において」と、「支払備金」とあるのは「日本において支払備金」と、第百十八条第一項中「内閣府令で定める保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約のうち内閣府令で定めるもの」と、「設けなければならない」とあるのは「日本において設けなければならない」と、第百二十条第一項中「生命保険会社及び内閣府令で定める要件に該当する損害保険会社」とあるのは「外国生命保険会社等及び内閣府令で定める要件に該当する外国損害保険会社等」と、「は、取締役会において保険計理人」とあるのは「の日本における代表者は、当該外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「保険料の算出方法」とあるのは「日本において締結する保険契約に係る保険料の算出方法」と、同条第二項及び第三項中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、第百二十一条中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「取締役会」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における代表者」と、第百二十二条中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「当該保険会社」とあるのは「当該外国保険会社等」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 199 The provisions of Article 97, Article 97-2, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 98, Article 99, paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) to (6), Article 100 and Article 100-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the business of the branch offices, etc. of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.; the provisions of Article 99, paragraphs (3) and (7) to (10) inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the business of the branch offices, etc. of a Foreign Life Insurance Company, etc.; the provisions of Article 101 to 105 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a concerted activity carried out by a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc. with another Non-Life Insurance Company (including a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc.); and the provisions of Article 7-2, Article 109, Article 110, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 111, paragraph (1) and paragraphs (3) to (6) inclusive, Article 112, Article 114 to 118 inclusive, and Article 120 to 122 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. In this case, the term "Article 3, paragraph (2)" in Article 97, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 185, paragraph (2)"; the term "Mutual Company" in Article 99, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Mutual Company"; the term "In the case where the license of Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act is cancelled pursuant to the provision of Article 133 or 134 of that Act, or in the case where the license of Article 3, paragraph (1) of that Act loses its effect pursuant to the provision of Article 273 of that Act" in Article 99, paragraph (8) shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case where the license of Article 185, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act is cancelled pursuant to the provision of Article 205 or 206 of that Act, or in the case where the license of Article 185, paragraph (1) of that Act loses its effect pursuant to the provision of Article 273 of that Act"; the term "Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act pursuant to the provision of Article 133 or 134 of that Act" in Article 99, paragraph (8) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 185, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act pursuant to the provision of Article 205 or 206 of that Act"; the term "Article 111, paragraphs (1) and (2)" in Article 99, paragraph (9) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199"; the term "business year" in Article 109 shall be deemed to be replaced with "business year in Japan"; the term "for each business year, prepare an interim business report and business report describing the status of its business and property" in Article 110, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each business year in Japan, prepare an interim business report and business report describing the status of its business and property in Japan"; the term "for each business year, prepare explanatory documents describing the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as pertaining to the status of its business and property" in Article 111, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each business year in Japan, prepare explanatory documents describing the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as pertaining to the status of its business and property in Japan"; the term "its head office or principal office and its branch offices or secondary offices, or any other equivalent place specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 111, paragraphs (1) and (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the branch office of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan or any other equivalent place specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance"; the term "business and property of the Insurance Company and its Subsidiary Company, etc." in Article 111, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "business and property of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan"; the term "owns" in Article 112, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "owns in Japan"; the term ", pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 112, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "set aside as a reserve" in Article 112, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "set aside in Japan as a reserve;" the term "Policyholders" in Article 114, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders in Japan"; the terms "within its portfolio" and "set aside as price fluctuation reserve" in Article 115, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "within its portfolio in Japan" and "set aside in Japan as price fluctuation reserve," respectively; the term "Shares, etc." in Article 115, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Shares, etc. in Japan"; the terms "each accounting period," "insurance contracts" and "set aside a certain amount of money" in Article 116, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "each accounting period of the business year in Japan," "insurance contracts in Japan" and "set aside in Japan a certain amount of money," respectively; the term "funding the policy reserve" in Article 116, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "funding in Japan the policy reserve"; the term "insurance contract" in Article 116, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance contract in Japan"; the terms "each accounting period," "insurance contracts," "as expenditure" and "reserve for outstanding claims" in Article 117, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "each accounting period of the business year in Japan," "insurance contracts in Japan," "in Japan as expenditure" and "reserve for outstanding claims in Japan," respectively; the terms "insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" and "create" in Article 118, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance contract in Japan specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" and "create in Japan," respectively; the terms "board of directors," "Life Insurance Company or a Non-Life Insurance Company meeting the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance," "actuary" and "method of calculating insurance premiums" in Article 120, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "representative person," "Foreign Life Insurance Company, etc. or a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc. meeting the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance," "actuary of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan" and "method of calculating the insurance premiums applicable to the insurance contracts concluded in Japan," respectively; the term "actuary" in Article 120, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "actuary of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan"; the terms "Insurance Company" and "actuary" in Article 120, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Insurance Company, etc." and "actuary in Japan" respectively; the terms "actuary," "each accounting period," and "board of directors" in Article 121 shall be deemed to be replaced with "actuary of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan," "each accounting period of the business year in Japan" and "representative person of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan," respectively; and the terms "Insurance Company" and "actuary" in Article 122 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Insurance Company, etc." and "actuary in Japan", respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　保険業法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項（保険募集の制限）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百八十三条（所属保険会社等の賠償責任）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店（組合の委託を受けて、当該組合のために共済契約の締結の代理又は媒介を行う者であつて、当該組合の役員又は使用人でないものをいう。以下同じ。）並びにその役員及び使用人が行う当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済契約の募集について、同法第二百九十四条（顧客に対する説明）の規定は共済契約の募集を行う共済事業を行う協同組合の役員及び使用人並びに当該共済事業を行う協同組合の共済代理店並びにその役員及び使用人について、同法第二百九十五条（自己契約の禁止）の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百条（禁止行為）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合及びその共済代理店（これらの者の役員及び使用人を含む。）について、同法第三百五条（立入検査等）、第三百六条（業務改善命令）及び第三百七条第一項第三号（登録の取消し等）の規定は共済代理店について、同法第三百九条（保険契約の申込みの撤回等）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合に対し共済契約の申込みをした者又は共済契約者が行う共済契約の申込みの撤回又は解除について、同法第三百十一条（検査職員の証票の携帯及び提示等）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第三百五条の規定による立入り、質問又は検査をする職員について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号、第二百九十四条第三号、第二百九十五条第二項、第三百条第一項第七号及び第九号並びに第三百九条第一項第一号、第二項、第三項、第五項及び第六項中「内閣府令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、同法第二百七十五条第一項第二号及び第二項中「損害保険会社（外国損害保険会社等を含む。以下この編において同じ。）」とあるのは「共済事業を行う協同組合」と、「次条の登録を受けた損害保険代理店」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出がなされた共済代理店」と、「損害保険代理店である」とあるのは「共済代理店である」と、同条第二項中「次条又は第二百八十六条の登録を受けて」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第百六条の三第一号の届出を行って」と、同法第三百条第一項中「次条に規定する特定保険契約」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項に規定する特定共済契約」と、同項第八号中「特定関係者（第百条の三（第二百七十二条の十三第二項において準用する場合を含む。次条において同じ。）に規定する特定関係者及び第百九十四条に規定する特殊関係者のうち、当該保険会社等又は外国保険会社等を子会社とする保険持株会社及び少額短期保険持株会社（以下この条及び第三百一条の二において「保険持株会社等」という。）、当該保険持株会社等の子会社（保険会社等及び外国保険会社等を除く。）並びに保険業を行う者以外の者をいう。）」とあるのは「子会社等（中小企業等協同組合法第六十一条の二第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。）」と、同条第二項中「第四条第二項各号、第百八十七条第三項各号又は第二百七十二条の二第二項各号に掲げる書類」とあるのは「定款又は中小企業等協同組合法第九条の六の二第一項に規定する共済規程若しくは同法第二十七条の二第三項に規定する火災共済規程」と、同法第三百五条及び第三百六条中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、同法第三百七条第一項中「内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「行政庁」と、「次の各号のいずれかに該当するときは、第二百七十六条若しくは第二百八十六条の登録を取り消し、又は」とあるのは「第三号に該当するときは、」と、「業務の全部若しくは一部」とあるのは「共済契約の募集」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii) and paragraph (2) (Restriction on Insurance Solicitation) of the Insurance Business Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 283 (Liability for Compensation of the Insurance Company Concerned, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the solicitation of mutual aid contracts of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities carried out by officers or employees of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and by any mutual aid agent (which means a person who acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding mutual aid contracts for a cooperative under entrustment by said cooperative, and who is not an officer nor an employee of said cooperative; the same shall apply hereinafter) of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and officers or employees of said mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 294 (Explanations to Customers) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officers and employees of a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, any mutual aid agent of said cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities, and officers and employees of said mutual aid agent, carrying out solicitation of mutual aid contracts; the provisions of Article 295 (Prohibition of Self-Contract) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 300 (Prohibited Acts) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities and any mutual aid agent thereof (including their officers and employees) carrying out mutual aid activities; the provisions of Article 305 (On-Site Inspections, etc.), Article 306 (Order to Improve Business Operations), and Article 307, paragraph (1), item (iii) (Rescission of Registration, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a mutual aid agent; the provisions of Article 309 (Revocation of Applications for Insurance Contracts, etc.) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the revocation or cancellation of an offer for a mutual aid contract by a person who has filed an offer with a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or by a mutual aid contractor; and the provisions of Article 311 (Carrying and Presenting of Identification Cards by Inspection Officials) of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to officials who enter, question, and inspect pursuant to the provisions of Article 305 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), Article 294, item (iii), Article 295, paragraph (2), Article 300, paragraph (1), item (vii) and item (ix), and Article 309, paragraph (1), item (i), paragraph (2), paragraph (3), paragraph (5) and paragraph (6) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "ordinance of the competent ministry"; the phrase "a casualty insurance company (including a foreign casualty insurance company, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Part)" in Article 275, paragraph (1), item (ii), and paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities"; the phrase "a casualty insurance agent registered under the following Article" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "a mutual aid agent notified under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "which is a casualty insurance agent" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "which is a mutual aid agent"; the phrase "by obtaining registration under the following Article or Article 286" in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "by giving the notification under Article 106-3, item (i) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "provided insurance contract prescribed in the following Article" in Article 300, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "person having a specified relationship (which means any person having a specified relationship as prescribed in Article 103 [including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-13, paragraph (2); the same shall apply in the following Article] or any person having a special relationship as prescribed in Article 194, who is not an insurance holding company or a small-sum, short term insurance holding company (hereinafter referred to as an 'insurance holding company, etc.' in this Article and Article 301-2) for which said insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc. is a subsidiary company, nor a subsidiary company (excluding an insurance company, etc. or foreign insurance company, etc.) of said insurance holding company, etc., nor a person engaged in insurance business)" in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (viii) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "subsidiary company, etc. (which means a subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 61-2, paragraph (2) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act)"; the phrase "documents listed in the items of Article 4, paragraph (2), items of Article 187, paragraph (3) or items of Article 272-2, paragraph (2)" in Article 300, paragraph (2) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the articles of association, or mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 9-6-2, paragraph (1) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act, or fire mutual aid rules prescribed in Article 27-2, paragraph (3) of the same Act"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 305 and Article 306 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the term "Prime Minister" in Article 307, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "administrative agency"; the phrase "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under any of the following items, may rescind the registration set forth in Article 276 or Article 286, or may" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "when a specified insurance solicitor or an insurance broker falls under item (iii), may"; and the phrase "all or part of the operations" in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "solicitation of mutual aid contracts."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム