1016万例文収録!

「とかしき」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(440ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索


小窓モード

プレミアム

ログイン
設定

設定

Weblio 辞書 > 英和辞典・和英辞典 > とかしきに関連した英語例文

セーフサーチ:オン

不適切な検索結果を除外する

不適切な検索結果を除外しない

セーフサーチについて

とかしきの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方

該当件数 : 21986



例文

(1)本法51条の規定を妨げず、登録使用権者としての登録は次に掲げとおりとする。(a)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者が所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、関連の当該商品若しくは役務について、又はその前提となる条件又は制限が有効であれば当該条件についても変更することができる。(b)登録官は、当該商標登録の所有者若しくは登録使用権者又はその他任意の登録使用権者の所定の方式の書面による請求があれば、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(c)登録官は、次に掲げる理由のいずれかにより、何人であれ所定の方式で書面による請求を行った場合、当該登録を取り消すことができる。(i)登録使用権者が許諾された使用以外の方法で、又は誤認若しくは混同を招くかそのおそれのあるような方法で、当該商標を使用したこと(ii)所有者又は登録使用権者が登録出願にとって重要な事実、それが正確に表明又は開示されていれば当該登録使用権者の登録申請拒絶が正当とされたであろう事実を偽って表明し、又は開示しなかったこと(iii)当該登録は、出願人がその実施に利害を有する契約の観点から当該登録により出願人に付与される権利を考慮すると設定されるべきではなかったこと(iv)出願日であったら登録使用権者の登録を求める出願の拒絶が正当化されていたであろう態様で、登録日以後に事情の変更があったこと(d)登録官は、すでに商標が登録されていない商品又は役務(場合に応じ)につき取り消すことができる。(e)登録官は、職権により、又は何人かにより所定の方式で書面の請求があれば、当該商標が使用されるはずの商品若しくは役務の品質に関する登録所有者と登録使用権者間の合意規定が発効していない、又は遵守されていないことを理由として、取り消すことができる。例文帳に追加

(1) Without prejudice to the provision of section 51 of this Act. the registration of a person as a registered user- (a) may be varied by Registrar as regards the goods or services in respect of which, or any conditions or restrictions subject to which, if has effect, on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor of the trademark; (b) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of the registered proprietor or of the registered user or of any other registered user of the trademark; (c) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person on any of the following grounds, namely :- (i) that the Registered user has used the trademark otherwise than by way of the permitted use, or in such a way as to cause or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; (ii) that the proprietor or the Registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration, which if accurately represented or disclosed would have justified the refusal of the application for registration of the Registered user; (iii) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested; (iv) that the circumstances have changed since the date of registration in such a way that at the date of such application for cancellation they would have justified the refusal of an application for registration of the registered user; (d) may be cancelled by the Registrar in respect of any goods or services, as the case may be, in relation to which the trademark is no longer Registered; (e) may be cancelled by the Registrar of his own motion or on the application in writing in the prescribed manner of any person, on the ground that any stipulation in the agreement between the Registered proprietor and the registered user regarding the quality of the goods or services in relation to which the trademark is to be used is either no being enforced or is not being complied with.  - 特許庁

そういった意味で、そこら辺がまさにバランスでございまして、金融というのは安心だとか、あるいは非常に大丈夫だということと同時に、それがまた極端に行き過ぎますと、今度は今さっき言いましたように、貸し渋り、貸しはがしが起きて、本当に健全な企業の発展、あるいは健全な経済の発展の、逆に言うと阻害要因にもなるわけですから、そういった意味で金融業というのは大変重要でございますが、そこら辺の調和、バランスというのが非常に私は大事だということを、今度はバーナンキさん、あるいは周小川さんとも話を通じて再確認させていただいたわけでございますし、アメリカでも金融規制当局の方、中国でも金融規制当局の方とも話をしまして、そういった感を一層させていただいたわけでございまして、いずれにいたしましても、金融庁といたしましては、新規制が簡単に言えば、中長期的に我が国の金融システムを健全性の向上に資するものとなる一方、我が国の実情、それぞれの我が国の実情や経営改革に対する影響を配慮するということは、我が国のみならずG20はそれぞれの国の実情があるわけですから、そういうことにきちっと配慮する必要が重要だというふうに思っておりました。こういった観点から、引き続き積極的に日本の立場、かなり世界的に受け入れられてきたというふうに私は認識いたしておりますけれども、しっかり主張してまいりたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

In that sense and others, striking a balance between all those factors is criticalwhile peace of mind and security do matter in financial services, adhering excessively to such qualities could, as I have just pointed out, result in a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection and thus create impediments to the growth of truly healthy companies or the growth of a healthy economy, which is why the financial sector is so vital. This time around, I reaffirmed in talks with people like Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Zhou Xiaochuan that harmony or a balance between those factors is extremely important. Having spoken with financial regulators in both the U.S. and China, I am now even more convinced of this idea. In any case, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) is aware of the importance of paying proper attention to any impact of the new requirements on the current situation and corporate reform efforts in Japan – a point that applies to not only Japan but also the G20 nations that each have their own lay of the landwhile they will, put simply, contribute to a higher level of soundness of Japan's financial system over the medium to long term. From this viewpoint, I do see that Japan's argument has increasingly received global approval to a considerable extent, while I am committed to continuing to advocate Japan's position in a proactive and resolute fashion.  - 金融庁

チェコ共和国の欧州連合への加入前に誠実に登録出願がなされた又はかかる加入前の日付の優先権を有する国内登録商標の所有者は,次の何れかの事由が存在する場合,チェコ共和国の欧州連合への加入に基づき効力がチェコ共和国に拡張された共同体商標の使用を禁止する権利を有する。共同体商標が当該国内登録商標と同一であると共に,両商標が対象とする商品及びサービスが同一であること,当該の共同体商標と国内登録商標が同一若しくは類似しておりかつその両者の対象とする商品若しくはサービスも同一若しくは類似していることによって公衆を誤認させる虞があること。かかる誤認の虞には,国内商標との関連性の虞を含む。共同体商標が当該国内商標と同一若しくは類似しているが両者の対象とする商品若しくはサービスは同一でもなくまた類似もしていない場合において,当該国内商標がチェコ共和国内で定評を得ており当該共同体商標のチェコ共和国での使用がかかる国内商標の識別性若しくは評判を不当に利用するか又はこれを傷付けると認められること。例文帳に追加

The owner of a national trade mark the application of which was filed in good faith before or which has a right of priority dated before the accession to the European Union, has the right to prohibit the use of the Community trade mark the effects of which have been extended to the territory of the Czech Republic based on the accession of the Czech Republic to the European Union, if the Community trade mark is identical with the national trade mark and the goods and services covered by both trademarks are identical, or there is a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public because of the identity or similarity of the national trade mark and the Community trade mark and because of the identity or similarity of goods or services covered by the trademarks; the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the national trade mark, or the Community trade mark is identical with the national trade mark or it is similar to the national trade mark, where the goods or services covered those trademarks are not identical or similar, if the national trade mark has a good reputation in the Czech Republic and if use of the Community trade mark would take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or the good reputation of the national trade mark.  - 特許庁

(a)審査官による処分後,その処分が何れかの点において出願人に不利であった場合において,出願人がその特許出願を続行しようとするときは,出願人は,当該処分に応答した上で,補正して又は補正することなく再審査又は再審理を請求することができる。 (b)再審査又は再審理の権利を得るためには,出願人は,書面によりこれを請求しなければならず,審査官による処分の過誤と考えられる点を明瞭かつ詳細に指摘しなければならない。出願人は,審査官による以前の処分における異論及び拒絶の理由の何れにも応答しなければならない(ただし,クレームの更なる検討には関係しない方式についての異論又は要求を,クレームが許容されるまで保留にするように求める請求をすることができる)。また,出願人の行為は,一貫して,出願を最終処分まで進めるための善意の試みであることを示すものでなければならない。審査官が過誤を犯した旨の単なる主張は,再審査又は再審理の適切な理由として認められない。 (c)拒絶に応答して出願を補正するに際し,出願人は,引例によって開示された技術水準又は申し立てられた異論を考慮して,クレームが提示していると考える特許可能な発明性及び新規性を明瞭に指摘しなければならない。出願人は,当該補正が当該引例又は異論をどのように回避するかも示さなければならない。例文帳に追加

(a) After the action of the Examiner, if the same be adverse in any respect, the applicant, if he persists in his application for a patent, must reply thereto and may request re-examination or reconsideration, with or without amendment. (b) In order to be entitled to re-examination or reconsideration, the applicant must make a request therefor in writing, and he must distinctly and specifically point out the supposed errors in the Examiner’s action; the applicant must respond to every ground of objection and rejection in the prior Examiner’s action (except that request may be made that objections or requirements as to form, not necessary to further consideration of the claims, be held in abeyance until a claim is allowed), and the applicant’s action must appear throughout to be a bona fide attempt to advance the case to final action. The mere allegation that the Examiner has erred will not be received as a proper reason for such reexamination or reconsideration. (c) In amending an application in response to a rejection, the applicant must clearly point out the patentable inventiveness and novelty which he thinks the claims present, in view of the state of the art disclosed by the references cited or the objections made. He must also show how the amendments avoid such references or objections. - 特許庁

例文

第百五十三条 会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百三十四条(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十三条(第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。)、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)及び第四項の規定は第百三十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項、第八百七十条(第十五号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条及び第八百七十六条の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第九百三十七条第三項中「各会社の本店」とあるのは「各株式会社商品取引所の本店又は各会員商品取引所の主たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「第九百三十条第二項各号又は商品取引所法第二十四条第二項各号」と、「各会社の支店」とあるのは「各株式会社商品取引所の支店又は各会員商品取引所の従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 153 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)) and paragraph (2) (limited to the part pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item (vii) and item (viii)), Article 835, paragraph (1), Articles 836 to 839 inclusive, Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), item (iii) and item (iv) and the proviso of paragraph (2)), Article 846 and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the part pertaining to item (ii) and item (iii)) and paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for the nullity of a merger under Article 139, paragraph (1) and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5), Article 870 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xv)), the main clause of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the part pertaining to item (iv)), the main clause of Article 873, Article 875 and Article 876 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a motion under Article 843, paragraph (4) of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "the head office of each company" in Article 937, paragraph (3) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office of each Incorporated Commodity Exchange or the principal office of each Member Commodity Exchange," the term "the respective items of Article 930, paragraph (2)" in paragraph (4) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the respective items of Article 930, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act and the respective items of Article 24, paragraph (2) of the Commodity Exchange Act" and the term "the branch offices of each company" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the branch offices of each Incorporated Commodity Exchange and the secondary offices of each Member Commodity Exchange."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム


例文

24 当該内国法人と当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等との間に当該内国法人の株主等である他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人(当該内国法人と当該他の内国法人との間にこれらの者と株式等の保有を通じて連鎖関係にある一又は二以上の内国法人をいう。次項において同じ。)が介在している場合において、当該内国法人の当該事業年度終了の日における資本金等の額に当該他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人の当該内国法人に係る持株割合を乗じて計算した金額が当該他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人の同日における資本金等の額(法人税法第二条第十六号に規定する連結申告法人に該当する法人にあつては、第三十九条の百十三第二十項に規定する連結個別資本金等の額)を超えるときは、当該内国法人に係る自己資本の額は、当該自己資本の額から、その超える金額と当該他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人の同日における当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債の額とのいずれか少ない金額(次項において「控除対象金額」という。)を控除した残額とする。例文帳に追加

(24) Where any other domestic corporation which is a shareholder, etc. of the said domestic corporation or a capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) (meaning a single domestic corporation or two or more domestic corporations which have a linkage with the said domestic corporation and the said other domestic corporation through holding the shares, etc.; the same shall apply in the next paragraph) intervene(s) between the said domestic corporation and a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. related to the said domestic corporation, when the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of stated capital, etc. on the final day of the relevant business year of the said domestic corporation by the ratio of shareholding pertaining to the said domestic corporation of the said other domestic corporation or capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) exceeds the amount of stated capital, etc. of the said other domestic corporation or capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) on the same day (for a corporation falling under the category of a corporation subject to corporation tax on consolidated income prescribed in Article 2(xvi) of the Corporation Tax Act, when such amount exceeds the amount of consolidated individual stated capital, etc. prescribed in Article 39-113(20)), the amount of equity capital pertaining to the said domestic corporation shall be the remaining amount after deducting from the said amount of equity capital, either of the smaller amount of the said excess amount and the amount of liabilities owed by the said other domestic corporation or capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. related to the said domestic corporation on the same day (referred to as the "creditable amount" in the next paragraph).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

22 当該連結法人と当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等との間に当該連結法人の株主等である他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人(当該連結法人と当該他の内国法人との間にこれらの者と株式等の保有を通じて連鎖関係にある一又は二以上の内国法人をいう。次項において同じ。)が介在している場合において、当該連結法人の当該連結事業年度終了の日における連結個別資本金等の額に当該他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人の当該連結法人に係る持株割合を乗じて計算した金額が当該他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人の同日における第三十九条の十三第二十二項に規定する資本金等の額(法人税法第二条第十六号に規定する連結申告法人に該当する法人にあつては、連結個別資本金等の額)を超えるときは、当該連結法人に係る自己資本の額は、当該自己資本の額から、その超える金額と当該他の内国法人又は出資関連内国法人の同日における当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債の額とのいずれか少ない金額(次項において「控除対象金額」という。)を控除した残額とする。例文帳に追加

(22) Where any other domestic corporation which is a shareholder, etc. of the said consolidated corporation or a capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) (meaning a single domestic corporation or two or more domestic corporations which have a linkage with the said consolidated corporation and the said other domestic corporation through holding the shares, etc.; the same shall apply in the next paragraph) intervene(s) between the said consolidated corporation and a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. related to the said consolidated corporation, when the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of consolidated individual stated capital, etc. on the final day of the relevant consolidated business year of the said consolidated corporation by the ratio of shareholding pertaining to the said consolidated corporation of the said other domestic corporation or capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) exceeds the amount of stated capital, etc. prescribed in Article 39-13(22) of the said other domestic corporation or capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) on the same day (for a corporation falling under the category of a corporation subject to corporation tax on consolidated income prescribed in Article 2(xvi) of the Corporation Tax Act, when such amount exceeds the amount of consolidated individual stated capital, etc.), the amount of equity capital pertaining to the said consolidated corporation shall be the remaining amount after deducting from the said amount of equity capital, either of the smaller amount of the said excess amount and the amount of the liabilities owed by the said other domestic corporation or capital contribution-related domestic corporation(s) to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. related to the said consolidated corporation on the same day (referred to as the "creditable amount" in the next paragraph).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私、より細かいことまでは後から勉強しますけれども、基本的にお役所というのは税金で成り立っておりまして、当然憲法、法律による権限がございまして、当然国民の選挙によって内閣ができて、総理大臣が出てきて、その総理大臣は憲法に従って金融担当大臣を任命するわけですから、これは極めて民主的な役所であるわけですから、私の常識としては、基本的にやはり行政というのは公のことですから、普通であれば非常に影響の大きい金融行政というのはきちんとやはり議事録を残す、あるいはきちんと皆様方に公表するということが基本的なルールだと思っておりますけれども、何か聞いたところによると、最初だけやりますといって、7、8回(議事録の公表を)やったのですか、途中の経過は一切公表しなかったという話を聞きますし、私自身、非常にこれは何か行政のルールとして大変おかしいことだなというふうに私は思っておりまして、もう一回きちんと、法律的な話等々はまた詰めて、私は法律家ではございませんけれども、基本的にごく常識的に考えて、本当に役所のルールとして、開かれた民主主義国家における政府として、ましてや非常に後から銀行行政に関して大きな影響を与えた話でございますから、私は(議事録がないという事は)いかがなものかなと思っております。例文帳に追加

I will look into the fine details later, but basically, government offices are financed by taxes, and have authority based on the Constitution and laws, as a matter of course. The Cabinet is formed as a result of election by the people; then the Prime Minister comes forth, who appoints the Minister for Financial Services according to the Constitution. As this is an extremely democratic government office, it is common sense from my point of view to properly keep or publicly disclose the minutes regarding financial regulation and supervision which have a huge impact in ordinary circumstances as a basic rule, given that an executive branch of government is basically in the public domain. From what I have heard, minutes of seven or eight meetings were disclosed to the public after it was said that this would be done initially, but information on the progress in the interim was not disclosed at all. I think this is extremely odd in view of the rules of the executive branch of government. Basically, from the viewpoint of common sense, it is odd as a government in an open democratic nation that there are no minutes, especially on such a matter that has later had a significant impact on banking regulation and supervision, given the rules of government offices.  - 金融庁

会社法第八百二十八条第一項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)及び第二項(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百三十四条(第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百三十五条第一項、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで、第八百四十三条(第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。)、第八百四十六条並びに第九百三十七条第三項(第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。)及び第四項の規定は第百三十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項、第八百七十条(第十五号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十一条本文、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)、第八百七十三条本文、第八百七十五条及び第八百七十六条の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第九百三十七条第三項中「各会社の本店」とあるのは「各株式会社商品取引所の本店又は各会員商品取引所の主たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「第九百三十条第二項各号又は商品取引所法第二十四条第二項各号」と、「各会社の支店」とあるのは「各株式会社商品取引所の支店又は各会員商品取引所の従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

The provisions of Article 828, paragraph 1 (limited to the part pertaining to item 7 and item 8) and paragraph 2 (limited to the part pertaining to item 7 and item 8), Article 834 (limited to the part pertaining to item 7 and item 8), Article 835, paragraph 1, Articles 836 to 839 inclusive, Article 843 (excluding paragraph 1, item 3 and item 4 and the proviso of paragraph 2), Article 846 and Article 937, paragraph 3 (limited to the part pertaining to item 2 and item 3) and paragraph 4 of the Company Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for the nullity of a merger under Article 139, paragraph 1 and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph 5, Article 870 (limited to the part pertaining to item 15), the main clause of Article 871, Article 872 (limited to the part pertaining to item 4), the main clause of Article 873, Article 875 and Article 876 of the same Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a motion under Article 843, paragraph 4 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "the head office of each company" in Article 937, paragraph 3 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office of each Incorporated Commodity Exchange or the principal office of each Member Commodity Exchange," the term "the respective items of Article 930, paragraph 2" in paragraph 4 of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the respective items of Article 930, paragraph 2 of the Company Act and the respective items of Article 24, paragraph 2 of the Commodity Exchange Act" and the term "the branch offices of each company" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the branch offices of each Incorporated Commodity Exchange and the secondary offices of each Member Commodity Exchange."  - 経済産業省

例文

「Active Aging1」をテーマに2013年12月3日から5日まで東京において開催された第11回ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合で、ASEAN+3各国の保健、社会福祉及び労働分野の参加者は、今年がASEAN日本友好40周年であり、我が国とASEAN各国の間でこれまでの友好的な関係を想起し、今後のさらなる協力関係の強化と戦略的なパートナーシップを目指し、ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合を2003年より開催している日本政府のイニシアティブに感謝するとともに、第11回会合は、保健、社会福祉及び労働分野におけるActive Agingに関する情報共有と意見交換のための有効な場であることを認識し、また、本年11月に日本政府がジャカルタにおいてASEAN地域における高齢化に係る国際貢献に関する講演会(ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society)が行われたことを評価しつつ、地域協力に関する努力の継続とさらなる連携の促進を期待し、世界の高齢化は急速に進行しており、2050年には60歳以上の人口が20億人に達することを留意し、ASEAN諸国においては今後急速に高齢化が進み、高齢者の健康保持や、福祉及び社会保障ニーズへの対応、高齢者の孤立・貧困防止などの対策が急務であることを認識し、保健・福祉・労働分野における高齢化の現状及び対策の推進に際して、ASEAN諸国は多様であり、また、ASEAN諸国と日本では置かれている状況や文化・社会的背景が異なること、それゆえ現在直面している課題が異なることを考慮し、さらに、「国際的なActive Ageingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会」での議論成果に留意する。例文帳に追加

We, the participants representing health, social welfare and labour sectors of the ASEAN plus 3 countries at the 11th ASEAN & Japan High Level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies (hereafter referred to as the Meeting) held in Tokyo, Japan, on 3-5 December 2013, which carried the themeActive Aging”;Remembering that this year marks the 40th year since the relations between ASEAN and the Japanese Government began, and that we have kept cordial relationships throughout this time, aiming to further enhance our cooperations and build strategic partnerships in the future;Acknowledging with appreciation the initiative of the Government of Japan to convene the ASEAN-Japan High-level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies since 2003, particularly this 11th Meeting as an effective platform of information sharing and exchange of views on the health, social welfare and labour aspects ofActive Aging”;Also, acknowledging with appreciation the active initiatives by the Government of Japan for holding the “ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Societyin Jakarta this November, with hopes that these efforts will continue and promote further collaborations in the future;Noting that aging is progressing worldwide, and by 2050 the population of age 60 years and over will reach 2 billion;Recognizing that ASEAN countries will experience rapid aging in years to come, and face new challenges such as maintaining health, responding to welfare and social security needs, prevention of isolation and poverty of the elderly that require urgent attention;Considering that the current situation of aging in the health, labour and welfare sector and the promotion of measures related to aging in ASEAN countries vary, and that cultural and social backgrounds differ between ASEAN member states and Japan, therefore the current issues that are faced by each country may not be the same;Also, noting the results of the discussions made by the “Study Group for Japan’s International Contributions to Active Aging.” - 厚生労働省

例文

3 第二十七条の三第四項並びに第二十七条の八第一項から第六項までの規定は、公開買付報告書について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の三第四項中「発行者(当該公開買付届出書を提出した日において、既に当該発行者の株券等に係る公開買付届出書の提出をしている者がある場合には、当該提出をしている者を含む。)」とあるのは「発行者」と、第二十七条の八第一項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第二項中「当該公開買付期間の末日までの間において、買付条件等の変更(第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。)その他の公開買付届出書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更その他当該公開買付届出書の内容を訂正すべき内閣府令で定める事情がある」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第五項に規定するあん分比例方式により買付け等をする株券等の数が確定した」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第三項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、「買付条件等がこの節の規定」とあるのは「買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済が第二十七条の十三第四項及び第五項の規定」と、「買付条件等の変更が第二十七条の六第一項の規定」とあるのは「買付け等をする株券等の数の計算の結果が第二十七条の十三第五項に規定する内閣府令で定めるあん分比例方式」と、同条第四項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第五項中「第三項の規定による処分」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する第三項及び前項の規定による処分」と、「末日(当該末日後に提出される訂正届出書に係る処分にあつては、当該末日の翌日から起算して五年を経過した日)後は、することができないものとし、前項の規定による処分は、当該末日」とあるのは「末日」と、同条第六項中「第一項から第四項まで」とあるのは「第二十七条の十三第三項において準用する第一項から第四項まで」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(3) Article 27-3(4) and Article 27-8(1) to (6) inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Tender Offer Report. In this case, the part "the Issuer of the Share Certificates, etc. to which the Tender Offer is made (and the person who has already submitted a Tender Offer Notification with regard to any Share Certificates, etc. issued by the Issuer as of the day on which the Tender Offer Notification is submitted, if any)" in Article 27-3(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Issuer"; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the part "there occurs any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3)) or in the important matters to be stated in a Tender Offer Notification, or any other circumstance specified for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Tender Offer Notification," "submitted but before the last day of the Tender Offer Period" and the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made is fixed by the Method of Proportional Distribution set forth in Article 27-13(5)," "submitted" and "amendment report"; the terms "amendment," "the Terms of Purchase, etc.," "the provisions of this Section," "the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc.," and "violates Article 27-6(1)" in Article 27-8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report," "delivery and other settlement methods," "Article 27-13(4) and (5)," "the result of calculation for deciding the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made," and "contravenes the method of proportional distribution specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 27-13(5)," respectively; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the parts "disposition under paragraph (3)" and "the last day of the Tender Offer Period (including the period to be extended under paragraph (8); the same shall apply in paragraph (7)) (or, in the cases of the disposition resulting in the submission of an amendment report after the last day of the Tender Offer Period, after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day), and the disposition under the preceding paragraph may not be given after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day." in Article 27-8(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition under paragraph (3) and the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)" and "the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period," respectively; and the terms "amendment" and "paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report" and "paragraphs (1) to (4) inclusive as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-13(3)," respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

7 第二十七条の八第一項から第五項までの規定は、公開買付報告書について準用する。この場合において、第二十七条の八第一項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第二項中「当該公開買付期間の末日までの間において、買付条件等の変更(第二十七条の十第三項の規定による買付け等の期間の延長を除く。)その他の公開買付届出書に記載すべき重要な事項の変更その他当該公開買付届出書の内容を訂正すべき内閣府令で定める事情がある」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定するあん分比例方式により買付け等をする上場株券等の数が確定した」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第三項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、「買付条件等がこの節の規定」とあるのは「買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第四項(第一号を除く。)及び第二十七条の十三第五項の規定」と、「買付条件等の変更が第二十七条の六第一項の規定」とあるのは「買付け等をする上場株券等の数の計算の結果が第二十七条の二十二の二第二項において準用する第二十七条の十三第五項に規定する内閣府令で定めるあん分比例方式」と、同条第四項中「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、同条第五項中「第三項の規定による処分」とあるのは「第二十七条の二十二の二第七項において準用する第三項及び前項の規定による処分」と、「末日(当該末日後に提出される訂正届出書に係る処分にあつては、当該末日の翌日から起算して五年を経過した日)後は、することができないものとし、前項の規定による処分は、当該末日」とあるのは「末日」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(7) Article 27-8(1) to (5) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Tender Offer Report. In this case, the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the part "there occurs any change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. (excluding the extension of the period for Purchase, etc. made under Article 27-10(3)) or in the important matters to be stated in a Tender Offer Notification, or any other circumstance specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Tender Offer Notification, during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted but before the last day of the Tender Offer Period" and the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made is fixed by the Method of Proportional Distribution set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2) during the period after the day on which the Tender Offer Notification was submitted" and "amendment report," respectively; the term "amendment" and the parts "the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with the provisions of this Section" and "the change in the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the amendment violates Article 27-6(1)" in Article 27-8(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report," "the delivery and other settlement methods stated in the Tender Offer Notification do not comply with Article 27-13(4) (excluding 27-13(4)(i)) and Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)" and "the result of calculation for deciding the number of Listed Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. is to be made stated in the amendment contravenes the method of proportional distribution specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance set forth in Article 27-13(5) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22-2(2)"; the term "amendment" in Article 27-8(4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amendment report"; the term "disposition under paragraph (3)"; and the part "the last day of the Tender Offer Period (including the period to be extended under paragraph (8); the same shall apply in paragraph (7)) (or, in the cases of the disposition resulting in the submission of an amendment report after the last day of the Tender Offer Period, after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day), and the disposition under the preceding paragraph may not be given after the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day." in Article 27-8(5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "disposition under paragraph (3) and the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 27-22(7)" and "the day when five years have elapsed from the day following the last day of the Tender Offer Period," respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3 会社法第九百十五条第一項及び第二項(変更の登記)、第九百十六条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(他の登記所の管轄区域内への本店の移転の登記)、第九百十七条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(職務執行停止の仮処分等の登記)並びに第九百十八条(支配人の登記)の規定は、特定目的会社の本店の所在地における登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第九百十五条第一項中「第九百十一条第三項各号又は前三条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十二条第二項各号」と、同条第二項中「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、同法第九百十六条第一号中「第九百十一条第三項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十二条第二項各号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 915(1) and (2) (Registration of a Change), Article 916 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Registration of Relocation of the Head Office to the Jurisdictional District of Another Registry), Article 917 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Registration of a Provisional Disposition, etc. Suspending Execution of Duties) and Article 918 (Registration of a Manager) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to registration of a Specific Purpose Company at the location of its head office. In this case, the phrase "in the items of Article 911(3) or in the items of the preceding three Articles" in Article 915(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "in the items of Article 22(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" and the term "share" in Article 915(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Specified Equity," respectively, the term "the items of Article 911(3)" in Article 916(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 22(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3 会社法第百二十三条(株主名簿管理人)、第百二十四条第二項及び第三項(基準日)、第百二十五条第一項から第三項まで(株主名簿の備置き及び閲覧等)並びに第百二十六条(株主に対する通知等)の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資社員に係る優先出資社員名簿について、同法第百九十六条第一項及び第二項(株主に対する通知の省略)の規定は優先出資社員に対する通知について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主名簿管理人」とあるのは「優先出資社員名簿管理人」と、「基準日株主」とあるのは「基準日において優先出資社員名簿に記載され、又は記録されている優先出資社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「優先出資」と、同法第百二十五条第二項及び第三項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第百二十六条第五項中「第二百九十九条第一項(第三百二十五条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十六条第一項(第六十六条第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 123 (Administrator of Shareholder Registry), Article 124(2) and (3) (Record Date), Article 125(1) to (3) inclusive (Keeping and Making Available for Inspection of Shareholder Registry) and Article 126 (Notice to Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Preferred Equity Member Registry pertaining to Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 196(1) and (2) (Omission of Notices to Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a notice to a Preferred Equity Member. In this case, the term "Administrator of Shareholder Registry" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Administrator of the Preferred Equity Member Registry," the phrase "Shareholders as of the Record Date" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Members Stated or Recorded in the Preferred Equity Member Registry as of the Record Date," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity," the terms "shareholder" and "shareholders" in Article 125 (2) and (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member" and "members," respectively, the phrase "Article 299(1) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis in Article 325)" in Article 126(5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 56(1) of the Asset Securitization Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 66(3)) of that Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百五十九条 信託法第四十四条(受益者による受託者の行為の差止め)及び第八十五条第四項(受託者の責任等の特例)並びに会社法第三百八十五条第二項(監査役による取締役の行為の差止め)の規定は代表権利者の受託信託会社等に対する差止請求について、同法第七百七条(特別代理人の選任)、第七百八条(社債管理者等の行為の方式)及び第七百十条第一項(社債管理者の責任)の規定は代表権利者について、同法第七百三十八条(代表社債権者等の解任等)の規定は代表権利者の解任について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、信託法第四十四条第一項中「信託行為」とあるのは「特定目的信託契約」と、会社法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「この法律、特定目的信託契約」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 259 (1) The provisions of Article 44 (Cessation of Acts of the Trustee at the Demand of the Beneficiaries) and Article 85(4) (Special Provisions on Trustee Liability, etc.) of the Trust Act and the provisions of Article 385(2) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Company Auditors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to enjoinment against a Fiduciary Trust Company, etc., by a Representative Beneficiary Certificate Holder, the provisions of Article 707 (Appointment of Special Agent), Article 708 (Method of Acts of Bond Managers), and Article 710(1) (Liability of Bond Manager) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Representative Beneficiary Certificate Holder, and the provisions of Article 738 (Dismissal of Representative Bondholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the dismissal of a Representative Beneficiary Certificate Holder. In this case, the term "trust deed" in Article 44(1) of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Trust Contract," the term "this Act" in Article 710(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "this Act, the Specific Purpose Trust Contract," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第一条 この法律は、地球の広範な部分を占める海洋が人類をはじめとする生物の生命を維持する上で不可欠な要素であるとともに、海に囲まれた我が国において、海洋法に関する国際連合条約その他の国際約束に基づき、並びに海洋の持続可能な開発及び利用を実現するための国際的な取組の中で、我が国が国際的協調の下に、海洋の平和的かつ積極的な開発及び利用と海洋環境の保全との調和を図る新たな海洋立国を実現することが重要であることにかんがみ、海洋に関し、基本理念を定め、国、地方公共団体、事業者及び国民の責務を明らかにし、並びに海洋に関する基本的な計画の策定その他海洋に関する施策の基本となる事項を定めるとともに、総合海洋政策本部を設置することにより、海洋に関する施策を総合的かつ計画的に推進し、もって我が国の経済社会の健全な発展及び国民生活の安定向上を図るとともに、海洋と人類の共生に貢献することを目的とする。例文帳に追加

Article 1 The purpose of this Act is, with regard to the oceans, to stipulate the basic principles, to clarify the responsibilities of the State, the local governments, business operators and the citizens as well as to formulate the basic plan with regard to the oceans and other basic matters with regard to the measures on the oceans, by establishing the Headquarters for Ocean Policy in order to promote measures with regard to the oceans comprehensively and systematically, through contributing to the sound development of the economy and society of our State and to improve the stability of the lives of citizenry as well as to contribute to the coexistence of the oceans and mankind, in consideration of the fact that the oceans, occupying broad portion of the globe, is an indispensable factor for maintaining the lives of the living beings including mankind, and the fact that it is important to realize a new oceanic State in harmonization of the peaceful and positive development and use of the oceans with the conservation of the marine environment, under the international cooperation, as our State surrounded by the oceans, based on the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and other international agreements as well as on the international efforts on the realization of the sustainable development and use of the oceans.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

具体的には多分、アメリカのこの前の金融救済システムについてのまず説明を聞いて、その上で今お話があったように、これが果たしてアメリカの金融安定化策、あるいはABS(資産担保証券)等の債券の買い取り策、あるいは倫理、所得制限云々かんぬんということも含めてご説明があると思いますので、その時に先日の電話会談でもフランスのラガルドさん(仏経済産業雇用相)からバイアメリカン(条項)というか、保護主義について議題にしたいという話があって、みんなもアグリー(同意)しましたので、やはりその保護主義をどういうふうに、保護主義と国際協調というのは多分裏返しの関係になると思いますので、その辺のことも含めて話をして、日本としては幾つか具体的な提案をしたいというふうに思っておりますけれども、これが4月2日のG20に向かっていい方向性につなげられるようにしていくことと、目下の状況の認識と各国の対応策をみんなで意見交換をして、そして多分国際協調をしっかりやりましょう、保護主義を止めましょう、国内でやれることは出来るだけやっていきましょうということの確認になっていくんだろうというように思っております。例文帳に追加

Specifically, we will probably receive explanations about the U.S. financial rescue plan that was recently announced, and then there will probably be explanations about the U.S. Financial Stability Plan, a plan for the purchase of securities, including ABS (asset-backed securities), ethics and restrictions on income. In the recent telephone conference, Mme Lagarde (French Minister for the Economy, Industry and Employment) expressed hopes to put the “buy Americanprovision, or protectionism, on the agenda and everyone agreed to this, so there will be discussion on how to deal with protectionism, which is probably the opposite of international cooperation, and Japan intends to make some concrete proposals, including proposals on matters such as this one. As a result, it will be probably confirmed that a positive course of action should be taken leading up to the G-20 summit on April 2 and that international cooperation should be conducted properly, that protectionism should be avoided and that each country should do all it can domestically based on an exchange of opinions regarding recognition of the current situation and measures to be taken by individual countries.  - 金融庁

だから、いろいろ、これは一般投資家が、その商品にとって正確な知識を持ち得るかどうかというようなことも一つあるでしょうね。そういうことを含めての営業のやり方もあるだろうし、だから、全般について、今、検討しているところなので。だから、この世界は難しいのですよ。「虚」が「虚」を生んでいるような世界があるでしょう。簡単に言うと、言葉は悪いですけど、博打場みたいなところがありますね。実態的な取引と関係ない形で、こんなことを言ったらおかしいけれども、昔、電車が来たら、次に来るのが奇数番号か偶数かということで賭けていたでしょう。それと似たような、実態とは縁のない形での取引がされる危険性があるし、いろいろな、そういう物事を捕まえてはやる。これは、お互いだけだったら何ということはないかもしれない。それでも、やはり取引がでかくなってしまった場合、それが破裂してしまった場合は、経済全体に影響が起きる場合があるので、「相対取引で、お互い納得づくで勝手に商品を取引していたので、損しようが関係ない」といってしまえない面もあるわけでしょう。だから、そういうことを含めて、今、検討しているという最中です。例文帳に追加

This concerns the issue of whether you can expect ordinary investors to have accurate knowledge regarding such products. It also concerns how sales activity is conducted, so we are considering all these issues. This is a complicated field. Some derivatives are like creating something from nothing. To put it simply, it is like, if I may say so, gambling. This has nothing to do with trading actual goods. In a betting game that used to be popular, we placed a bet as to whether the serial number of the next train would be an odd or even number. This is somewhat like that game, and transactions could be made without any relation to the real economy. If the parties involved in such transactions alone are to be affected, it may not be so problematic. However, as the scale of transactions has grown, the entire economy could be affected if the deals implode. So, we cannot just say, “We don't care if you suffer losses, as you have done the OTC(over-the-counter) deal with each side understanding the risk.” Therefore, we are considering all these issues.  - 金融庁

いずれの特許の対象である発明も、特許付与日以前に、政府部門を管理する職員又は当局により、又はそれに代わって書面に適式に記録され、又は審理された(当該発明は、出願人又は特許権者から直接的であると間接的であるとを問わず開示されていない)場合、特許の存在にもかかわらず、当該職員若しくは当局又は代理人、請負人若しくは自ら書面で授権するその他の者は、出願人又は特許権者に通知を出した後、出願人又は特許権者に使用料等の支払いを行うことなく、そのように記録され又は審理された発明を政府の公務のため生産、使用又は実施することができる。その発明を記録する書類又は審理の証拠を出願人又は特許権者(場合に応じ)へ要請に応じ開示することが公共の利益を害すると当該職員又は当局が思料する場合、出願人若しくは特許権者を代理する弁護士、又は相互に合意する独立の専門家に対し内密に開示することができる。例文帳に追加

Where an invention which is the subject of any patent has, before the date of the patent, been duly recorded in a document by, or tried by or on behalf of, the officers or authorities administering any department of Government (such invention not having been communicated directly or indirectly by the applicant or patentee), such officers or authorities, or such of their agents, contractors, or others, as may be authorised in writing by them, may, after giving notice to the applicant or patentee, make, use or exercise the invention so recorded or tried for the service of the Government, free of any royalty or other payment to the applicant or patentee, notwithstanding the existence of the patent. If, in the opinion of such officers or authorities, the disclosure to the applicant or patentee, as the case may be, of the document recording the invention, or the evidence of the trial thereof, if required, would be detrimental to the public interest, it may be made confidentially to counsel on behalf of the applicant or patentee, or to any independent expert mutually agreed upon.  - 特許庁

(1) 出願人,特許所有者又はこれらの権原承継人が第 1条から第 5条までに基づいて特許を受けることができる発明を,第 50条(1)に基づく命令の結果として,平和目的で実施することを差し控え又は実施を停止した場合は,同人は,それによって同人に生じた損害に起因する補償を連邦に対して請求する権利を有するものとするが,ただし,当該当事者に対し,その損害自体を負担させることが合理的に見て期待できないことを条件とし,かつ,その程度に限る。その程度を判断するときは,特に,被害者の財務状況,発明のために又は発明に対する権原を取得するために当該当事者によって行われた支出の額,その支出が生じたときに,当該当事者によって認識されていた,発明の秘密保持が義務付けられる可能性の程度,及び被害者がその発明に係る他の実施から取得した利益が考慮される。この請求権は,特許が付与されるまでは主張することができない。補償は,支払うべきものとなった後,かつ,1年より短くない期間についてのみ請求することができる。例文帳に追加

(1) An applicant, a patentee or the successor in title thereof who, as a result of an order under Section 50(1), refrains from using or ceases to use an invention patentable under Sections 1 to 5 for peaceful purposes shall have a claim to compensation, owing to the damages thereby incurred, against the Federal Republic if and to the extent that said party cannot reasonably be expected to bear the damages itself. When determining the extent to which said party can reasonably be expected to do so, account shall be taken, in particular, of the financial position of the injured party, the amount of expenditure incurred by said party for the invention or for acquiring title thereto, the degree of probability that the invention might have to be kept secret that could have been recognized by said party at the time the expenditure was incurred, and the profit derived by the injured party from another exploitation of the invention. The claim cannot be asserted until after a patent has been granted. Compensation may be claimed only after it has become due and for periods which shall not be shorter than one year.  - 特許庁

支援に向けた取組は図書館により様々だが、代表的な機能としては、〔1〕図書館としての公共性を活かして大量に蓄積した幅広い分野のビジネスに役立つ文献・雑誌等紙媒体の情報を、ビジネスをキーワードに集め一覧できるようにして提供したり、インターネットやデータベースといった電子媒体を無料で提供していることや、〔2〕必要な情報へどのようにアクセスすればよいか分からなくとも、情報収集のノウハウを持つ司書によるレファレンスサービスを受けることができること、〔3〕平日のみならず土日も開館しているため、フルタイムの仕事を持つ者にも利用しやすく、無料であることと併せて、誰にとっても敷居が低く利用しやすい公共施設であること、〔4〕図書館によっては行政や商工会議所、大学等専門的なノウハウと機能を持つ機関と連携を図っており、情報へのワンストップ的なアクセス窓口となっていること、〔5〕開業セミナー等の開催による情報発信を挙げることができる。例文帳に追加

Although assistance differs with the individual library, they typically: (1) Gather large volumes of printed material (publications, pamphlets, etc.) in a wide range of business areas, organize them into appropriate business categories and topics, and make the available to the public, including via electronic media, in databases and on the Internet all free of charge; (2) Offer the services of reference librarians skilled in finding desired information, for those not yet experienced enough to do so themselves; (3) Are open on Saturdays and Sundays, in addition to weekdays, allowing all members of the public, including those employed full-time, to use their facilities free of charge; (4) Cooperate with organizations with professional know-how and functions, including governmental bodies at all levels, Chamber of Commerce and Industry and universities; some libraries serve as one-stop access to information from multiple organizations; and (5) Proactively disseminate information by sponsoring seminars and the like on starting new businesses, etc.  - 経済産業省

第四十九条 会社法第二百九十六条(株主総会の招集)、第二百九十八条(第二項及び第三項を除く。)(株主総会の招集の決定)、第二百九十九条(第二項各号を除く。)(株主総会の招集の通知)、第三百条(招集手続の省略)、第三百十一条(書面による議決権の行使)、第三百十二条(電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで(取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議)及び第三百十八条(第五項を除く。)(議事録)の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定(同法第二百九十八条第一項(各号を除く。)及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。)中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項(各号を除く。)及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間(当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

8 会社法第百四十二条第一項及び第二項(指定買取人による買取りの通知)の規定は指定買取人について、同法第百四十三条第二項(譲渡等承認請求の撤回)の規定は第四項第一号ハ又は第二号ハの請求をした譲渡等承認請求者について、同法第百四十四条第一項から第六項まで(売買価格の決定)、第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百七十条(第六号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの項において準用する同法第百四十二条第一項の規定による通知があった場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百四十二条第一項中「第百四十条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「特定目的会社」と、同法第百四十四条第一項及び第四項から第六項までの規定中「対象株式」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十一条第七項に規定する特定出資」と、「第百四十条第一項第二号」とあるのは「第百四十二条第一項第二号」と、同条第一項、第二項及び第六項中「株式会社」とあるのは「指定買取人」と、同条第五項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第六項中「第百四十一条第二項」とあるのは「第百四十二条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 142(1) and (2) (Designated Purchaser's Notice to Purchase) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Designated Purchaser, the provisions of Article 143(2) (Withdrawal of Requests for Approval of Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Requester for Approval of Transfer who makes the request set forth in paragraph (4)(i)(c) or paragraph (4)(ii)(c), and the provisions of Article 144(1) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Sale Price), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (vi)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a notice has been given under the provisions of Article 142(1) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "Article 140(4)" in Article 142(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act," the terms "per share" and "Stock Company" in Article 142(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit" and "Specific Purpose Company," respectively, the terms "Subject Shares" and "Article 140(1)(ii)" in Article 144(1) and (4) to (6) inclusive of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity prescribed in Article 31(7) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 142(1)(ii)," respectively, the term "Stock Company" in Article 144(1), (2), and (6) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Designated Purchaser," the term "per share" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "per unit," the term "Article 141(2)" in Article 144(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 142(2)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三百四十七条 第百八条第一項第九号に掲げる事項(取締役に関するものに限る。)についての定めがある種類の株式を発行している場合における第三百二十九条第一項、第三百三十二条第一項、第三百三十九条第一項及び第三百四十一条の規定の適用については、第三百二十九条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(取締役については、第百八条第二項第九号に定める事項についての定款の定めに従い、各種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会)」と、第三百三十二条第一項及び第三百三十九条第一項中「株主総会の決議」とあるのは「株主総会(第四十一条第一項の規定により又は第九十条第一項の種類創立総会若しくは第三百四十七条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項の種類株主総会において選任された取締役については、当該取締役の選任に係る種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会(定款に別段の定めがある場合又は当該取締役の任期満了前に当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存在しなくなった場合にあっては、株主総会))の決議」と、第三百四十一条中「第三百九条第一項」とあるのは「第三百九条第一項及び第三百二十四条」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(第三百四十七条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項及び第三百三十九条第一項の種類株主総会を含む。)」とする。例文帳に追加

Article 347 (1) For the purpose of the application of the provisions of Article 329(1), Article 332(1), Article 339(1) and Article 341 to the cases where it issues shares in a class for which there is the provision with respect to the matters listed in item (ix) of Article 108(1) (limited to those relating to directors), "shareholders meeting" in Article 329(1) shall be read as "shareholders meeting (or, for directors, Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of each class of shares in accordance with the applicable provisions of the articles of incorporation on the matters prescribed in item (ix) Article 108(2))"; "by resolution of a shareholders meeting" in Article 332(1) and Article 339(1) shall be read as "by resolution of a shareholders meeting (or, for directors elected pursuant to the provisions of Article 41(1), or at a Class Meeting under Article 90(1) or a Class Meeting under Article 329(1) applied by reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(1), Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of shares of the class relating to the election of such director (or shareholders meeting in cases where it is otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, or in cases where, before the expiration of the term of office of such director, there are no longer any shareholders entitled to exercise his/her votes at such Class Meeting))"; "Article 309(1)" in Article 341 shall be read as "Article 309(1) and Article 324"; and "shareholders meeting" in Article 341 shall be read as "shareholders meeting (including the Class Meeting under Article 329(1) and Article 339(1) applied by the reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(1))."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

2 第百八条第一項第九号に掲げる事項(監査役に関するものに限る。)についての定めがある種類の株式を発行している場合における第三百二十九条第一項、第三百三十九条第一項、第三百四十一条並びに第三百四十三条第一項及び第二項の規定の適用については、第三百二十九条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(監査役については、第百八条第二項第九号に定める事項についての定款の定めに従い、各種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会)」と、第三百三十九条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(第四十一条第三項において準用する同条第一項の規定により又は第九十条第二項において準用する同条第一項の種類創立総会若しくは第三百四十七条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項の種類株主総会において選任された監査役については、当該監査役の選任に係る種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会(定款に別段の定めがある場合又は当該監査役の任期満了前に当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存在しなくなった場合にあっては、株主総会))」と、第三百四十一条中「第三百九条第一項」とあるのは「第三百九条第一項及び第三百二十四条」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会(第三百四十七条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項の種類株主総会を含む。)」と、第三百四十三条第一項及び第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「第三百四十七条第二項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項の種類株主総会」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) For the purpose of the application of the provisions of Article 329(1), Article 339(1) and Article 341 to the cases where it issues shares in a class for which there is the provision with respect to the matters listed in item (ix) of Article 108(1) (limited to those relating to company auditors), "shareholders meeting" in Article 329(1) shall be read as "shareholders meeting (or, for company auditors, Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of each class of shares in accordance with the applicable provisions of the articles of incorporation on the matters prescribed in item (ix) Article 108(2))"; "the shareholders meeting" in Article 339(1) shall be read as "shareholders meeting (or, for company auditors elected pursuant to the provisions of Article 41(1) applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (3) of that article, or at a Class Meeting under Article 90(1) applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of that article or at a Class Meeting under 329(1) applied by the reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(2), Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of shares of the class relating to the election of such company auditor (or shareholders meeting in cases where it is otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, or in cases where, before the expiration of the term of office of such company auditor, there are no longer any shareholders entitled to exercise his/her votes at such Class Meeting))"; "Article 309(1)" in Article 341 shall be read as "Article 309(1) and Article 324"; and "shareholders meeting" in Article 341 shall be read as "shareholders meeting (including the Class Meeting under Article 329(1) applied by the reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(2))."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7%は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。例文帳に追加

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well.  - 金融庁

第百八十条の十五 会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款(第三百六十七条、第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項、第三百七十二条第三項並びに第三百七十三条を除く。)(運営)の規定は清算人会設置相互会社の清算人会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第二項(議事録等)中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項(取締役会への報告の省略)中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第百八十条の十四第八項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 180-15 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5), Article 372, paragraph (3), and Article 373) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operations of the board of liquidators of a Mutual Company with a board of liquidators; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence ), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or general representative, where the company has a General Meeting)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as set forth in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraph (2) (Omission of report to board of directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 180-14, paragraph (8) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

パーネルは死んだ残忍な偽善者どもの手にかかり僕らの無冠の王は死んだ嘆く、嘆く、悲しみのエリン泥沼から引き上げてやった臆病な犬どもに彼は殺されたエリンの希望もエリンの夢もその君主の積みまきの上に滅びた御殿にあろうとも、小屋にあろうとも悲しみにひしがれるアイルランドの心その運命をもたらすはずの彼が逝ってしまったから彼あらば世界にエリンの名を知らしめ栄光の緑の旗をはためかせ政治家たち、詩人たち、戦士たちの立ち上がったものを彼は自由を夢見た悲しいかな、夢にすぎなかった偶像をつかもうとしたその時裏切りが彼と愛するものを引き離した恥を知れ、臆病者彼らの君主を襲い媚を売る聖職者衆に売り渡した卑劣漢ども永遠の恥辱よ、焼き尽くせ誇りをもって彼らをはねつけた人の高貴の名を汚し傷つけた者どもの記憶を最後まで気高く屈せずに倒れた強き人死が彼を今は亡きエリンの英雄たちと一つにした彼の眠りを乱す争いはなし!静かに彼は休む彼を栄光へと駆り立てる人としての苦悩も大望も今はない彼らは思い通り彼を殺したしかしエリンは望む、彼の魂よ炎から不死鳥のように舞い上がれとその日の夜の明ける時自由の御代が僕らにもたらされるその日、エリンよ、挙げよ喜びの杯を悲しみのためにパーネルの思い出のために例文帳に追加

O, Erin, mourn with grief and woeFor he lies dead whom the fell gangOf modern hypocrites laid low.He lies slain by the coward houndsHe raised to glory from the mire;And Erin's hopes and Erin's dreamsPerish upon her monarch's pyre.In palace, cabin or in cotThe Irish heart where'er it beIs bowed with woe--for he is goneWho would have wrought her destiny.He would have had his Erin famed,The green flag gloriously unfurled,Her statesmen, bards and warriors raisedBefore the nations of the World.He dreamed (alas, 'twas but a dream!)Of Liberty: but as he stroveTo clutch that idol, treacherySundered him from the thing he loved.Shame on the coward, caitiff handsThat smote their Lord or with a kissBetrayed him to the rabble-routOf fawning priests--no friends of his.May everlasting shame consumeThe memory of those who triedTo befoul and smear the exalted nameOf one who spurned them in his pride.He fell as fall the mighty ones,Nobly undaunted to the last,And death has now united himWith Erin's heroes of the past.No sound of strife disturb his sleep!Calmly he rests: no human painOr high ambition spurs him nowThe peaks of glory to attain.They had their way: they laid him low.But Erin, list, his spirit mayRise, like the Phoenix from the flames,When breaks the dawning of the day,The day that brings us Freedom's reign.And on that day may Erin wellPledge in the cup she lifts to JoyOne grief--the memory of Parnell.  - James Joyce『アイビーデイの委員会室』

3 会社法第百二十二条(第四項を除く。)(株主名簿記載事項を記載した書面の交付等)、第百二十四条第二項及び第三項(基準日)、第百二十五条第一項から第三項まで(株主名簿の備置き及び閲覧等)並びに第百二十六条(株主に対する通知等)の規定は特定目的会社の特定社員に係る特定社員名簿について、同法第百二十三条(株主名簿管理人)の規定は特定目的会社の特定社員名簿管理人について、同法第百九十六条第一項及び第二項(株主に対する通知の省略)の規定は特定目的会社の特定社員に対する通知について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第百二十二条第一項中「前条第一号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十八条第一項第一号」と、「株主名簿記載事項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十八条第一項各号に掲げる事項」と、同法第百二十四条第二項中「基準日株主」とあるのは「基準日において特定社員名簿に記載され、又は記録されている特定社員」と、同法第百二十五条第一項中「株主名簿管理人」とあるのは「特定社員名簿管理人」と、同項並びに同条第三項第一号及び第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第百二十六条第三項中「株式が」とあるのは「特定出資が」と、同条第四項中「株式の」とあるのは「特定出資の」と、同条第五項中「第二百九十九条第一項(第三百二十五条において準用する場合を含む。)」とあるのは「資産流動化法第五十五条第一項又は第五十六条第一項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 122 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Delivery of Documents Stating Matters to be Stated in the Shareholder Registry), Article 124(2) and (3) (Record Date), Article 125(1) to (3) inclusive (Keeping and Making Available for Inspection of Shareholder Registry) and Article 126 (Notice to Shareholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity Member Registry pertaining to Specified Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 123 (Administrator of Shareholder Registry) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Administrator of a Specified Equity Member Registry of a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 196(1) and (2) (Omission of Notices to Shareholders) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a notice to a Specified Equity Member of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the terms "item (i) of the preceding article" and "Matters to be Stated in the Shareholder Registry" in Article 122(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 28(1)(i) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "matters listed in the items of Article 28(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Shareholders as of the Record Date" in Article 124(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Members stated or recorded in the Specified Equity Member Registry as of the Record Date," the term "Administrator of Shareholder Registry" in Article 125(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Administrator of the Specified Equity Member Registry," the terms "shareholder" and "shareholders" in paragraph (3)(i) and (ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member" and "members," respectively, the phrase "If a share" in Article 126(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "If Specified Equity," the phrase "of the share" in paragraph (4) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Specified Equity," the phrase "Article 299(1) (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis in Article 325)" in Article 126(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 55(1) or Article 56(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十一条 会社法第二百九十六条(株主総会の招集)、第二百九十八条(第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。)(株主総会の招集の決定)、第二百九十九条(第二項各号を除く。)(株主総会の招集の通知)、第三百条から第三百二条まで(招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで(取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議)、第三百十八条(第五項を除く。)(議事録)、第三百十九条(第四項を除く。)(株主総会の決議の省略)及び第三百二十条(株主総会への報告の省略)の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「(株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。)の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間(前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間(当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間))」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主(前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。)」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主(当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。)の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十七条 会社法第七編第四章第一節(第九百七条を除く。)(総則)の規定並びに商業登記法第一条の三から第五条まで(登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥)、第七条から第十五条まで(登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記)、第十七条から第二十七条まで(登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止)、第三十一条(営業又は事業の譲渡の際の免責の登記)、第三十三条(商号の登記の抹消)、第四十四条から第四十六条まで(会社の支配人の登記、添付書面の通則)、第四十七条第一項及び第三項(設立の登記)、第四十八条から第五十五条まで(支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記)並びに第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで(更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任)の規定は、相互会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第二十七条中「商号」とあるのは「商号又は名称」と、「営業所(会社にあつては、本店。以下この条において同じ。)」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「係る営業所」とあるのは「係る主たる事務所」と、同法第四十六条第二項中「株主総会若しくは種類株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会(総代会を設けているときは、総代会)」と、同条第三項中「会社法第三百十九条第一項(同法第三百二十五条において準用する場合を含む。)又は第三百七十条(同法第四百九十条第五項において準用する場合を含む。)」とあるのは「保険業法第四十一条第一項において準用する会社法第三百十九条第一項又は保険業法第五十三条の十六若しくは第百八十条の十五において準用する会社法第三百七十条」と、「株主総会若しくは種類株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同条第四項中「会社法第四百十六条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第四項」と、同法第四十八条から第五十三条までの規定中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 67 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter IV, Section 1 (excluding Article 907) (General provisions) of the Companies Act, and the provisions of Article 1-3 to 5 inclusive (Registry Office, Delegation of Duties, Suspension of Duties, Registrar, Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to 15 inclusive (Prohibition of Taking out Registry, etc., Loss and Restoration of Registry, Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc., Delivery, etc. of Certificate of Registered Matters,, Delivery of Document Containing Description of Registered Matters, Inspection of Annexed Documents, Seal Registration Certificate, Certification of Necessary Matters, etc. for Checking Measures to Indicate Preparer of Electromagnetic Record, Fees, Principle of Application by Party Concerned, Registration by Commission), Article 17 to 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration, Documents to Be Attached to Written Application, Electromagnetic Record to be Attached to Written Application, Submission of Seal, Reception, Receipt, Order of Registration, Identification by Registrar, Dismissal of Application, Registration After Expiration of Period for Filing Complaint, Modification of Administrative Boundaries, etc., Prohibition of Registration of Same Trade Name at Same Location), Article 31 (Registration of Discharge in Assigning Operation or business), Article 33 (Deletion of Registration of Trade Name), Article 44 to 46 inclusive (Registration of Company Managers, General Rules for Attached Documents), Article 47, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to 55 inclusive (Registration at Location of Branch Offices, Registration of Relocation of Head Office, Registration of Change of Directors, etc., Registration of Change of Persons to Temporarily Carry Out Duties of Accounting Auditor), and Article 132 to 148 inclusive (Correction, Application for Deletion, Deletion Without any Party's Request, Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act, Exclusion from Application of Act on Access to Information Held by Administrative Organs, Exclusion from Application of Act on Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs, Application for Examination, Treatment of Cases of Application for Examination, Exclusion from Application from Administrative Appeal Act, Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a registration regarding a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "trade name," "business office (or, in a company, head office; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" and "business office pertaining to" in Article 27 of the latter Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "trade name or name," "principal office" and "principal office pertaining to," respectively; the term "shareholders meeting or class shareholders meeting" in Article 46, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "General Meeting of members (or General Meeting, where the company has such meeting)"; the terms "Article 319, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 325 of the Companies Act) or Article 370 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 490, paragraph (5) of that Act) of the Companies Act" and "shareholders meeting or class shareholder meeting" in Article 46, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 319, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act, or Article 370 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-16 or 180-15 of the Insurance Business Act" and "General Meeting of members", respectively; the term "Article 416, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 46, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-30, paragraph (4) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the terms "head office" and "branch offices" in the provisions of Article 48 to 53 inclusive of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office" and "secondary offices," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

3 会社法第六十七条第一項(創立総会の招集の決定)、第六十八条(第二項各号及び第五項から第七項までを除く。)(創立総会の招集の通知)、第七十条、第七十一条(創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等)、第七十四条から第七十六条まで(議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使)、第七十八条から第八十条まで(発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議)、第八十一条第一項から第三項まで(議事録)及び第三百十六条第一項(株主総会に提出された資料等の調査)の規定は保険契約者総会について、同法第八百三十条(株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え)、第八百三十一条(株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え)、第八百三十四条(第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。)(被告)、第八百三十五条第一項(訴えの管轄)、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項(担保提供命令)、第八百三十七条(弁論等の必要的併合)、第八百三十八条(認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲)、第八百四十六条(原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任)並びに第九百三十七条第一項(第一号トに係る部分に限る。)(裁判による登記の嘱託)の規定は保険契約者総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「発起人」とあるのは「組織変更をする株式会社」と、「設立時株主」とあるのは「保険契約者」と、「株式会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、同法第六十八条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第七十四条第六項中「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等(当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役)」とあるのは「保険契約者、取締役、監査役又は清算人(委員会設置会社にあっては、保険契約者、取締役、執行役又は清算人)」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人(当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項(第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(3) The provisions of Article 67, paragraph (1) (Determination to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding the items in paragraph (2) and paragraphs (5) to (7) inclusive) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 81, paragraphs (1) to (3) inclusive (Minutes) and Article 316, paragraph (1) (Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the policyholders meeting; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of the policyholders meeting. In this case, the terms "incorporators", "shareholders at incorporation" and "Stock Company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "converting Stock Company," "policyholders" and "Mutual Company," respectively; the term "in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "head office" in Article 74, paragraph (6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "shareholders" in Article 74, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; and the terms "shareholders, etc. (or shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation, where the shareholders meeting, etc. in the relevant item is the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting)" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators (including, where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, a person assuming the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)), or, where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class organizational meeting, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation)" in Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "policyholders, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, Policyholders, directors, executive officers or liquidators" and "directors, company auditors or liquidators," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十六 会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款(第三百六十七条並びに第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項を除く。)(運営)の規定は相互会社の取締役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項(非訟事件の管轄)、第八百六十九条(疎明)、第八百七十条(第一号に係る部分に限る。)(陳述の聴取)、第八百七十一条本文(理由の付記)、第八百七十二条(第四号に係る部分に限る。)(即時抗告)、第八百七十三条本文(原裁判の執行停止)、第八百七十五条(非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外)及び第八百七十六条(最高裁判所規則)の規定はこの条において読み替えて準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百七十一条第二項(議事録等)中「株主」とあるのは「社員(総代会を設けているときは、総代)」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項及び第三項(取締役会への報告の省略)中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十三第二項」と、同条第三項中「第四百十七条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第五項において準用する第四百十七条第四項」と、同法第三百七十三条第一項及び第二項(特別取締役による取締役会の決議)中「第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十四第四項第一号及び第二号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-16 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, and Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5)) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of directors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article with relevant changes in interpretation. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraphs (2) and (3) (Omission of Report to Board of Directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-13, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 417, paragraph (4)" in Article 372, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 417, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-30, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 362, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii)" in Article 373, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Resolution of board of directors by special directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-14, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百十六条 商業登記法第一条の三から第五条まで(登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥)、第七条から第十五条まで(登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記)、第十七条第一項、第二項及び第四項(登記申請の方式)、第十八条から第十九条の二まで(申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録)、第二十条第一項及び第二項(印鑑の提出)、第二十一条から第二十三条の二まで(受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認)、第二十四条(第十一号及び第十二号を除く。)(申請の却下)、第二十五条から第二十七条まで(提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止)、第三十三条(商号の登記の抹消)、第四十四条、第四十五条(会社の支配人の登記)、第五十一条、第五十二条(本店移転の登記)、第百二十八条(申請人)、第百二十九条(外国会社の登記)、第百三十条第一項及び第三項(変更の登記)並びに第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで(更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任)の規定は、外国相互会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十七条第四項中「事項又は前項の規定により申請書に記載すべき事項」とあるのは「事項」と、「前二項」とあるのは「同項」と、同法第五十一条第一項中「本店」とあるのは「日本国内の事務所」と、同法第百二十九条第一項中「会社法第九百三十三条第一項の規定による外国会社」とあるのは「外国相互会社の事務所の設置」と、同条第三項中「日本における代表者を定めた旨又は日本に営業所」とあるのは「日本国内に事務所」と、同法第百三十条第三項中「前二項の登記の」とあるのは「第一項の登記の」と、「既に前二項」とあるのは「既に同項」と、「、前二項」とあるのは「、同項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 216 The provisions of Article 1-3 to 5 inclusive (Registry Office, Delegation of Duties, Suspension of Duties, Registrar, Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to 15 inclusive (Prohibition of Taking out Registry, Loss and Restoration of Registry, Prevention of Loss of Registry, Delivery of Certificate of Registered Matters, etc., Delivery of Document Containing Description of Registered Matters, Inspection of Annexed Documents, Seal Registration Certificate, Certification of Necessary Matters for Checking Measures to Indicate Preparer of Electromagnetic Record, Fees, Principle of Application by Party concerned, Registration by Commission), Article 17, paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) (Method of Application for Registration), Article 18 to 19-2 inclusive (Documents to be Attached to Written Application, Electromagnetic Record to be Attached to Written Application), Article 20, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Submission of Seal), Article 21 to 23-2 inclusive (Reception, Receipt, Order of Registration, Identification by Registrar), Article 24 (excluding items (xi) and (xii)) (Dismissal of Application), Article 25 to 27 inclusive (Registration after Expiration of Period for Filing Complaint, Modification of Administrative Boundaries, etc., Prohibition of Registration of Same Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Deletion of Registration of Trade Name), Articles 44 and 45 (Registration of Company Managers), Articles 51 and 52 (Registration of Relocation of Head Office), Article 128 (Applicant), Article 129 (Registration of Foreign Company), Article 130, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Registration of Change), and Article 132 to 148 inclusive (Correction, Application for Deletion, Deletion without any Party's Request, Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act, Exclusion from Application of Act on Access to Information Held by Administrative Organs, Application for Examination, Treatment of Cases of Application for Examination, Exclusion from Application from Administrative Appeal Act, Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a registration regarding a Foreign Mutual Company. In this case, the term "or the matters to be described in a written application pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph" in Article 17, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "preceding two paragraphs" in Article 17, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph"; the term "head office" in Article 51, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "office in Japan"; the term "a foreign company under Article 933, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" in Article 129, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the establishment of an office of a Foreign Mutual Company"; the term "the company has designated its representative person in Japan or established a business office in Japan" in Article 129, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the company has established an office in Japan"; and the terms "for registration under the preceding two paragraphs," "registration has been made under the preceding two paragraphs" and "documents set forth in the preceding two paragraphs" in Article 130, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "for registration under the preceding paragraph," "registration has been made under that paragraph" and "document set forth in that paragraph," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百九十九条 第九十七条、第九十七条の二第一項及び第二項、第九十八条、第九十九条第一項、第二項及び第四項から第六項まで、第百条並びに第百条の二の規定は外国保険会社等の支店等における業務について、第九十九条第三項及び第七項から第十項までの規定は外国生命保険会社等の支店等における業務について、第百一条から第百五条までの規定は外国損害保険会社等が他の損害保険会社(外国損害保険会社等を含む。)との間で行う共同行為について、第七条の二、第百九条、第百十条第一項及び第三項、第百十一条第一項及び第三項から第六項まで、第百十二条、第百十四条から第百十八条まで並びに第百二十条から第百二十二条までの規定は外国保険会社等について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第九十七条第一項中「第三条第二項」とあるのは「第百八十五条第二項」と、第九十九条第六項中「相互会社」とあるのは「外国相互会社」と、同条第八項中「第百三十三条若しくは第百三十四条の規定により同法第三条第一項の免許が取り消された場合若しくは同法第二百七十三条の規定により同法第三条第一項」とあるのは「第二百五条若しくは第二百六条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項の免許が取り消された場合若しくは同法第二百七十三条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項」と、「第百三十三条又は第百三十四条の規定により同法第三条第一項」とあるのは「第二百五条又は第二百六条の規定により同法第百八十五条第一項」と、同条第九項中「第百十一条第一項及び第二項」とあるのは「第百九十九条において準用する第百十一条第一項」と、第百九条中「事業年度」とあるのは「日本における事業年度」と、第百十条第一項中「事業年度ごとに、業務」とあるのは「日本における事業年度ごとに、日本における業務」と、第百十一条第一項中「事業年度ごとに、業務」とあるのは「日本における事業年度ごとに、日本における業務」と、同項及び同条第四項中「本店又は主たる事務所及び支店又は従たる事務所その他これらに準ずる場所として内閣府令で定める場所」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における支店その他これに準ずる場所として内閣府令で定める場所」と、同条第六項中「当該保険会社及びその子会社等の業務」とあるのは「当該外国保険会社等の日本における業務」と、第百十二条第一項中「所有する」とあるのは「日本において所有する」と、「内閣府令で定めるところにより、内閣総理大臣」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同条第二項中「内閣府令」とあるのは「日本において内閣府令」と、第百十四条第一項中「保険契約者」とあるのは「日本における保険契約者」と、第百十五条第一項中「所有する」とあるのは「日本において所有する」と、「価格変動準備金」とあるのは「日本において価格変動準備金」と、同条第二項中「株式等」とあるのは「日本における株式等」と、第百十六条第一項中「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、「責任準備金」とあるのは「日本において責任準備金」と、同条第二項中「長期の」とあるのは「日本における長期の」と、同条第三項中「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、第百十七条第一項中「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約」と、「支出として」とあるのは「支出として日本において」と、「支払備金」とあるのは「日本において支払備金」と、第百十八条第一項中「内閣府令で定める保険契約」とあるのは「日本における保険契約のうち内閣府令で定めるもの」と、「設けなければならない」とあるのは「日本において設けなければならない」と、第百二十条第一項中「生命保険会社及び内閣府令で定める要件に該当する損害保険会社」とあるのは「外国生命保険会社等及び内閣府令で定める要件に該当する外国損害保険会社等」と、「は、取締役会において保険計理人」とあるのは「の日本における代表者は、当該外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「保険料の算出方法」とあるのは「日本において締結する保険契約に係る保険料の算出方法」と、同条第二項及び第三項中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、第百二十一条中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「毎決算期」とあるのは「日本における事業年度に係る毎決算期」と、「取締役会」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における代表者」と、第百二十二条中「保険計理人」とあるのは「外国保険会社等の日本における保険計理人」と、「当該保険会社」とあるのは「当該外国保険会社等」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 199 The provisions of Article 97, Article 97-2, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 98, Article 99, paragraphs (1), (2) and (4) to (6), Article 100 and Article 100-2 shall apply mutatis mutandis to the business of the branch offices, etc. of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.; the provisions of Article 99, paragraphs (3) and (7) to (10) inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to the business of the branch offices, etc. of a Foreign Life Insurance Company, etc.; the provisions of Article 101 to 105 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a concerted activity carried out by a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc. with another Non-Life Insurance Company (including a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc.); and the provisions of Article 7-2, Article 109, Article 110, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 111, paragraph (1) and paragraphs (3) to (6) inclusive, Article 112, Article 114 to 118 inclusive, and Article 120 to 122 inclusive shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. In this case, the term "Article 3, paragraph (2)" in Article 97, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 185, paragraph (2)"; the term "Mutual Company" in Article 99, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Mutual Company"; the term "In the case where the license of Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act is cancelled pursuant to the provision of Article 133 or 134 of that Act, or in the case where the license of Article 3, paragraph (1) of that Act loses its effect pursuant to the provision of Article 273 of that Act" in Article 99, paragraph (8) shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case where the license of Article 185, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act is cancelled pursuant to the provision of Article 205 or 206 of that Act, or in the case where the license of Article 185, paragraph (1) of that Act loses its effect pursuant to the provision of Article 273 of that Act"; the term "Article 3, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act pursuant to the provision of Article 133 or 134 of that Act" in Article 99, paragraph (8) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 185, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act pursuant to the provision of Article 205 or 206 of that Act"; the term "Article 111, paragraphs (1) and (2)" in Article 99, paragraph (9) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111, paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 199"; the term "business year" in Article 109 shall be deemed to be replaced with "business year in Japan"; the term "for each business year, prepare an interim business report and business report describing the status of its business and property" in Article 110, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each business year in Japan, prepare an interim business report and business report describing the status of its business and property in Japan"; the term "for each business year, prepare explanatory documents describing the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as pertaining to the status of its business and property" in Article 111, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each business year in Japan, prepare explanatory documents describing the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as pertaining to the status of its business and property in Japan"; the term "its head office or principal office and its branch offices or secondary offices, or any other equivalent place specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 111, paragraphs (1) and (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the branch office of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan or any other equivalent place specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance"; the term "business and property of the Insurance Company and its Subsidiary Company, etc." in Article 111, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "business and property of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan"; the term "owns" in Article 112, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "owns in Japan"; the term ", pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance" in Article 112, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "set aside as a reserve" in Article 112, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "set aside in Japan as a reserve;" the term "Policyholders" in Article 114, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Policyholders in Japan"; the terms "within its portfolio" and "set aside as price fluctuation reserve" in Article 115, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "within its portfolio in Japan" and "set aside in Japan as price fluctuation reserve," respectively; the term "Shares, etc." in Article 115, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Shares, etc. in Japan"; the terms "each accounting period," "insurance contracts" and "set aside a certain amount of money" in Article 116, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "each accounting period of the business year in Japan," "insurance contracts in Japan" and "set aside in Japan a certain amount of money," respectively; the term "funding the policy reserve" in Article 116, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "funding in Japan the policy reserve"; the term "insurance contract" in Article 116, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance contract in Japan"; the terms "each accounting period," "insurance contracts," "as expenditure" and "reserve for outstanding claims" in Article 117, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "each accounting period of the business year in Japan," "insurance contracts in Japan," "in Japan as expenditure" and "reserve for outstanding claims in Japan," respectively; the terms "insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" and "create" in Article 118, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "insurance contract in Japan specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance" and "create in Japan," respectively; the terms "board of directors," "Life Insurance Company or a Non-Life Insurance Company meeting the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance," "actuary" and "method of calculating insurance premiums" in Article 120, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "representative person," "Foreign Life Insurance Company, etc. or a Foreign Non-Life Insurance Company, etc. meeting the requirements specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance," "actuary of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan" and "method of calculating the insurance premiums applicable to the insurance contracts concluded in Japan," respectively; the term "actuary" in Article 120, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "actuary of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan"; the terms "Insurance Company" and "actuary" in Article 120, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Insurance Company, etc." and "actuary in Japan" respectively; the terms "actuary," "each accounting period," and "board of directors" in Article 121 shall be deemed to be replaced with "actuary of a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan," "each accounting period of the business year in Japan" and "representative person of the Foreign Insurance Company, etc. in Japan," respectively; and the terms "Insurance Company" and "actuary" in Article 122 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Foreign Insurance Company, etc." and "actuary in Japan", respectively.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

例文

第百八十三条 商業登記法(昭和三十八年法律第百二十五号)第一条の三から第五条まで(登記所、事務の委任、事務の停止、登記官、登記官の除斥)、第七条から第十五条まで(登記簿等の持出禁止、登記簿の滅失と回復、登記簿等の滅失防止、登記事項証明書の交付等、登記事項の概要を記載した書面の交付、附属書類の閲覧、印鑑証明、電磁的記録の作成者を示す措置の確認に必要な事項等の証明、手数料、当事者申請主義、嘱託による登記)、第十七条から第二十七条まで(登記申請の方式、申請書の添付書面、申請書に添付すべき電磁的記録、印鑑の提出、受付、受領証、登記の順序、登記官による本人確認、申請の却下、提訴期間経過後の登記、行政区画等の変更、同一の所在場所における同一の商号の登記の禁止)、第三十三条(商号の登記の抹消)、第三十四条(会社の商号の登記)、第四十四条、第四十五条(会社の支配人の登記)、第四十六条(第四項を除く。)(添付書面の通則)、第四十七条第一項(設立の登記)、第四十八条から第五十五条まで(支店所在地における登記、本店移転の登記、取締役等の変更の登記、一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者の変更の登記)、第六十四条(株主名簿管理人の設置による変更の登記)、第七十一条(解散の登記)、第七十三条から第七十五条まで(清算人の登記、清算人に関する変更の登記、清算結了の登記)及び第百三十二条から第百四十八条まで(更正、抹消の申請、職権抹消、行政手続法の適用除外、行政機関の保有する情報の公開に関する法律の適用除外、行政機関の保有する個人情報の保護に関する法律の適用除外、審査請求、審査請求事件の処理、行政不服審査法の適用除外、省令への委任)の規定は、特定目的会社に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十五条中「第五十条まで(第九十五条、第百十一条及び第百十八条において準用する場合を含む。)」とあるのは「第五十条まで」と、「第五十一条第一項及び第二項、第五十二条、第七十八条第一項及び第三項、第八十二条第二項及び第三項、第八十三条、第八十七条第一項及び第二項、第八十八条、第九十一条第一項及び第二項、第九十二条、第百三十二条並びに」とあるのは「第百三十二条及び」と、同法第二十四条第七号中「書面若しくは第三十条第二項若しくは第三十一条第二項に規定する譲渡人の承諾書」とあるのは「書面」と、同法第三十四条第一項中「会社の登記簿」とあるのは「特定目的会社登記簿」と、同法第四十八条第二項中「会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律(以下「資産流動化法」という。)第二十二条第四項において準用する会社法第九百三十条第二項各号」と、同法第五十四条第一項中「取締役、監査役、代表取締役又は特別取締役(委員会設置会社にあつては、取締役、委員、執行役又は代表執行役)」とあるのは「取締役、監査役又は代表取締役」と、同条第二項第三号中「会社法第三百三十三条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十一条第一項」と、「同法第三百三十七条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十三条第一項」と、同法第五十五条第一項中「会社法第三百四十六条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第七十六条第四項」と、同法第七十一条第三項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第一号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第一号」と、「同法第四百八十三条第四項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十一条第四項」と、同法第七十三条第二項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第二号又は第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百六十七条第一項第二号又は第三号」と、同条第三項及び同法第七十四条第一項中「会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第九百二十八条第一項第二号」と、同法第七十五条中「会社法第五百七条第三項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百七十九条第一項において準用する会社法第五百七条第三項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 183 (1) The provisions of Article 1-3 to Article 5 inclusive (Registry Office; Delegation of Affairs; Suspension of Affairs; Registrar; Disqualification of Registrar), Article 7 to Article 15 inclusive (Prohibition on Carrying Out of Registries and Other Documents; Loss and Restoration of Registries; Prevention of Loss of Registry, etc.; Issuance of Certificate of Registered Matters; Issuance of Documents Specifying Extract of Matters Registered; Inspection of Annexed Documents; Certificate of Seal Impression; Certification of Matters Required for Verification of Measures to Identify the Creator of Electromagnetic Records and Other Matters; Fees; Registration Upon Application by Party; Registration upon Commission), Article 17 to Article 27 inclusive (Method of Application for Registration; Document to Be Attached to Written Application; Electromagnetic Records to be Attached to Written Application; Submission of Seal Impression; Acceptance of Applications; Receipt; Order of Registration; Identity Confirmation by Registrar; Dismissal of Application; Registration to Be Made After Lapse of Period for Filing Action; Change in Administrative Zone, etc.; Prohibition on Registration of Identical Trade Name at Same Location), Article 33 (Cancellation of Registration of Trade Name), Article 34 (Registration of Trade Name of Company), Article 44 and Article 45 (Registration of Company's Manager), Article 46 (excluding paragraph (4)) (General Rules on Documents to be Attached), Article 47(1) (Registration of Incorporation), Article 48 to Article 55 inclusive (Registration to Be Made at Location of Branch Office; Registration of Relocation of Head Office; Registration of Change of Directors and Other Officers; Registration of Change of Person Who is to Temporarily Perform Duties of Accounting Auditors), Article 64 (Registration of Change Due to Share Option Issue), Article 71 (Registration of Dissolution), Article 73 to Article 75 inclusive (Registration of Liquidator; Registration of Change Related to Liquidator; Registration of Completion of Liquidation), and Article 132 to Article 148 inclusive (Correction; Application for Cancellation; Ex Officio Cancellation; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Procedure Act; Exclusion from Application of the Act on Access Information Held by Administrative Organs; Exclusion from the Application of the Act on the Protection of Personal Information Held by Administrative Organs; Request for Review; Handling of Request for Review Case; Exclusion from Application of the Administrative Appeal Act; Delegation to Ordinance of the Ministry) of the Commercial Registration Act (Act No. 125 of 1963) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "to Article 50 inclusive (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95, Article 111 and Article 118)" and "Article 51, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 52, Article 78, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 82, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 83, Article 87, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 88, Article 91, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 92, Article 132" in Article 15 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "to Article 50 inclusive" and "Article 132," respectively, the phrase "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent or a transferor's written approval prescribed in Article 30, paragraph (2) or Article 31, paragraph (2)" in Article 24(vii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a document evidencing authority delegated to a privately appointed agent," the term "company registry" in Article 34(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Purpose Company Registry," the phrase "the items of Article 930, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act" in Article 48(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 930(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 22(4) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the 'Asset Securitization Act')," the phrase ", representative director or special director (in the case of a company with committees, a director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer)" in Article 54(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or representative director," the phrases "Article 333, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act" and "Article 337, paragraph (1) of said Act" in Article 54(2)(iii) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 71(1) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 73(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 346, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 55(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 76(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrases "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Companies Act" and "Article 483, paragraph (4) of said Act" in Article 71(3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(i) of the Asset Securitization Act" and "Article 171(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," respectively, the phrase "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (ii) or (iii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(2) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 167(1)(ii) or (iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 928, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Companies Act" in Article 73(3) and Article 74(1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 928(1)(ii) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "Article 507, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act" in Article 75 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 507(3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 179(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

索引トップ用語の索引



  
Copyright © Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, All Right reserved.
  
Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved.
  
Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved.
  
日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。
  
この対訳コーパスは独立行政法人情報通信研究機構の集積したものであり、Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unportedでライセンスされています。
  
原題:”Ivy Day in the Committee Room”

邦題:『アイビーデイの委員会室』
This work has been released into the public domain by the copyright holder. This applies worldwide.

Copyright(C)2005 coderati
本翻訳はこの版権表示を残す限り、訳者および著者にたいして許可をとったり使用料を支払ったりすることなく商業利用を含むあらゆる形で自由に利用・複製が認められます。
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する
英→日 日→英
こんにちは ゲスト さん

ログイン

Weblio会員(無料)になると

会員登録のメリット検索履歴を保存できる!

会員登録のメリット語彙力診断の実施回数増加!

無料会員に登録する

©2024 GRAS Group, Inc.RSS