「Have at」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(331ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Article 41 (1) A Municipality, when an Insured Person that receives long-term care at his or her home (herein referred to as "Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care") among persons who have obtained a Certification of Needed Long-Term Care (herein referred to as "Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care") receives from a person designated by prefectural governor (hereinafter referred to as "Designated In-Home Service Provider") an In-Home Service provided by an appointed provider that performs In-Home Service Business pertaining to said specification (herein referred to as "Designated In-Home Service"), shall pay an Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service to said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care regarding expenses required for said Designated In-Home Service (except for expenses required for purchase of Specified Equipment Covered by Public Aid, and excluding the expenses necessary to provide meals, residence, and other expenses as determined by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare as necessary for daily life with regard to the expenses required for Outpatient Day Long-Term Care, Outpatient Rehabilitation, a Short-Term Admission for Daily Life Long-Term Care, Short-Term Admission for Recuperation, and Daily Life Long-Term Care Admitted to a Specified Facility; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Act), however, provided that this provision shall not apply to a case when said Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care is specified pursuant to the provisions of Article 37, paragraph (1) and the Person receives In-Home Service other than the type pertaining to said specification. 例文帳に追加

第四十一条　市町村は、要介護認定を受けた被保険者（以下「要介護被保険者」という。）のうち居宅において介護を受けるもの（以下「居宅要介護被保険者」という。）が、都道府県知事が指定する者（以下「指定居宅サービス事業者」という。）から当該指定に係る居宅サービス事業を行う事業所により行われる居宅サービス（以下「指定居宅サービス」という。）を受けたときは、当該居宅要介護被保険者に対し、当該指定居宅サービスに要した費用（特定福祉用具の購入に要した費用を除き、通所介護、通所リハビリテーション、短期入所生活介護、短期入所療養介護及び特定施設入居者生活介護に要した費用については、食事の提供に要する費用、滞在に要する費用その他の日常生活に要する費用として厚生労働省令で定める費用を除く。以下この条において同じ。）について、居宅介護サービス費を支給する。ただし、当該居宅要介護被保険者が、第三十七条第一項の規定による指定を受けている場合において、当該指定に係る種類以外の居宅サービスを受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 3 (1) With regard to inward direct investment, etc. pertaining to a notification prior to the enforcement date for which the period during which inward direct investment, etc. may not be made as prescribed in Article 27, paragraph (2) of the Act has not expired at the time of enforcement of this Order and which falls under inward direct investment, etc. that needs to be reported pursuant to the provisions of Article 55-5, paragraph (1) of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act after the revision by the Act for Partial Revision of the Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Act (said Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Act shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Act") due to its relevance to a business type specified by the Minister of Finance and the minister having jurisdiction over the business as prescribed in Article 3, paragraph (3) of the Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. after the revision by this Order (said Order on Inward Direct Investment, etc. shall be hereinafter referred to as the "New Order") or a country set forth in appended table 1 as prescribed in paragraph (4) of the same Article, the foreign investor who has given said notification may make said inward direct investment, etc. on or after the enforcement date by deeming said period to have expired on the day preceding the enforcement date. In this case, said notification shall be deemed to be a report which was made pursuant to the provisions of the main clause of the same paragraph on the day of making said inward direct investment, etc. 例文帳に追加

第三条　この命令の施行の際現に旧法第二十七条第二項に規定する対内直接投資等を行ってはならない期間が満了していない施行日前の届出に係る対内直接投資等で、この命令による改正後の対内直接投資等に関する命令（以下「新令」という。）第三条第三項に規定する大蔵大臣及び事業所管大臣が定める業種又は同条第四項に規定する別表第一に掲げる国に該当するため外国為替及び外国貿易管理法の一部を改正する法律による改正後の外国為替及び外国貿易法（以下「新法」という。）第五十五条の五第一項の規定により報告しなければならない対内直接投資等に該当するものについては、施行日の前日において当該期間が満了したものとみなして、当該届出をした外国投資家は、施行日以後当該対内直接投資等を行うことができる。この場合において、当該届出は、当該対内直接投資等が行われた日において同項本文の規定によりされた報告とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provision of Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to holding of Shares, etc. (meaning Shares, etc. as defined by Article 2(7) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a domestic company (meaning domestic company as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank and/or its Subsidiary Companies of which the total number exceeds the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. (meaning the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. as defined by Article 16-3(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, the provision of Article 16-3 of the New Banking Act shall apply to such holding of Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company by deeming that the Bank and/or the Subsidiary Companies acquire, on that day, the Shares, etc. in the Domestic Company in excess of the Threshold on Holding of Shares, etc. by a cause provided by the main clause of Article 16-3(2) of the New Banking Act. 例文帳に追加

７　新銀行法第十六条の三第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新銀行法第二条第七項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新銀行法第十六条の三第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している銀行又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該銀行又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 512 through Article 518, the provisions of Subsection 2 through Subsection 10 of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) through Article 536, paragraph (3)), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4, the provisions of Chapter III, Section 1 of that Part (excluding Article 870, paragraph (2) through paragraph (5) and Article 870 through Article 874), the provisions of Section 3 of that Chapter (excluding Article 879, Article 880, Article 882, paragraph (2), and Article 896, paragraph (2)), and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation. In this case, the term "paragraph (3) of Article 492" in Article 521 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 155, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Investors who have held, for a consecutive period of the past six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity," the term "liquidators" in Article 523 and Article 526, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors," the term "liquidators" in Article 524 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) or liquidation supervisors," the terms "liquidators" and "liquidators' agent" in Article 525, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidators" and "executive liquidators' agent" respectively, the phrase "liquidators and Company Auditors of a Liquidating Stock Company and employees, including managers," in Article 530, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation as well as the Administrative Agent, Asset Management Company, and Asset Custody Company," the phrase "directors upon incorporation, Company Auditors upon incorporation, Qualified Officers provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 423 or liquidators" in Article 542, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment, Supervisory Officers at Establishment, Officers, etc. specified in Article 115-6, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act, executive liquidator(s), or liquidation supervisors," the phrases "the liquidators provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 492" and "that paragraph" in Article 562 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the executive liquidator(s)" and "Article 155, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "the head office (or, in cases set forth in item (iii), if a ruling to conclude special liquidation is made due to completion of a special liquidation, the head office and branch office(s))" in Article 938, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office," the phrase "Article 351(2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 346(2) or Article 483(6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)" in Article 938, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 108, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 153, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百三十六条第三項を除く。）、第七編第二章第四節並びに第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条第二項を除く。）並びに第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）の規定は、清算投資法人の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十一条中「第四百九十二条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第三項」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の三（これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する投資主」と、同法第五百二十三条及び第五百二十六条第一項中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十四条中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十五条第一項中「清算人は」とあるのは「清算執行人は」と、「清算人代理」とあるのは「清算執行人代理」と、同法第五百三十条第一項中「清算人及び監査役並びに支配人その他の使用人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人並びに一般事務受託者、資産運用会社及び資産保管会社」と、同法第五百四十二条第一項中「設立時取締役、設立時監査役、第四百二十三条第一項に規定する役員等又は清算人」とあるのは「設立時執行役員、設立時監督役員、投資法人法第百十五条の六第一項に規定する役員等、清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百六十二条中「第四百九十二条第一項に規定する清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人」と、「同項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第一項」と、同法第九百三十八条第一項中「本店（第三号に掲げる場合であって特別清算の結了により特別清算終結の決定がされたときにあっては、本店及び支店）」とあるのは「本店」と、同条第二項第一号中「第四百七十九条第四項において準用する第三百四十六条第二項又は第四百八十三条第六項において準用する第三百五十一条第二項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十三条第二項において読み替えて準用する投資法人法第百八条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(5) The right to the use of a certification trade mark given by registration shall not be deemed to be infringed by the use of any such mark by a person . (a) in relation to goods certified by the registered proprietor of the trade mark if, as to those goods or a bulk of which they form part, the proprietor or another in accordance with his authorisation under the relevant rules has applied the trade mark and has not subsequently removed or obliterated it; (aa) where the registered proprietor has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trade mark; or [Ins. Act A881] (b) in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of, or to be accessory to, other goods or services in relation to which the trade mark has been used without infringement of the right given or might for the time being be so used, if the use of the mark is reasonably necessary in order to indicate that the goods or services are so adapted and neither the purpose nor the effect of the use of the mark is to indicate otherwise than in accordance with the fact that the goods or services are certified by the registered proprietor, except that paragraph (a) shall not have effect in the case of use consisting of the application of any such mark to any goods or services notwithstanding that they are such goods or services as are mentioned in that paragraph, if such application is contrary to the relevant rules.例文帳に追加

(5) 登録によって生じる証明商標の使用の権利は，次の場合は，ある者により当該標章が使用されても，それにより侵害されたとはみなされない。 (a) 当該商標の登録所有者が証明する商品又はそれら商品を含む一群の商品に関してその登録所有者又は関係規約に基づいてその登録所有者から授権された者が当該商標を使用し，その後これを除去又は消去していない場合 (aa) 登録所有者が何れかの時点でその商標の使用に明示的又は黙示的に同意を与えている場合，又は［法律A881による挿入］ (b) 当該商標が付与された権利を侵害することなく使用されており，又は現にそのように使用することができる別の商品又はサービスの構成部分又は付属要素となるよう改作された商品又はサービスについて，それら商品又はサービスがそのように改作されていることを示すために当該商標の使用が必要であると合理的に認められ，かつ，その使用の目的と効果が何れも，対象の商品又はサービスが登録所有者によって証明されていることを事実に従う以外の方法で示すものでない場合 ただし，(a)は，当該標章が使用される商品又はサービスが(a)に規定される商品又はサービスであっても，そのような使用が関係規約に反している場合は適用されない。 - 特許庁

(2) The Registrar shall issue notice in the prescribed manner of every application under this section to the registered proprietor and each registered user (not being the applicant) of the trademark. Nothing in this Act shall confer on a registered user of a trademark any assignable or transmissible right to the use thereof. The right of a registered user of a trade shall not be deemed to have been assigned or transmitted within the meaning of this section in the following cases, namely:- (a) Where the registered user being an individual enters into a ownership with any other person for carrying on the business concerned; but in any such case the firm may use the trademark, if otherwise in force, only for so long as the registered user is a member of the firm; (b) Where the registered user being a firm subsequently undergoes a change in its constitution; but in any such case the reconstituted firm may use the trademark, if otherwise in force, only for so long as any partner of the original firm at the time of its registration as registered user, continues to be a partner of the reconstituted firm. (c) For the purposes of this section, "firm'' has the same meaning as in the Partnership Act. 例文帳に追加

(2)登録官は、本条に基づくすべての請求について、当該商標の登録所有者及び各登録使用権者(請求人ではない)に対し所定の方式で通知を発行する。本法のいかなる規定も、商標の登録使用権者に、当該商標の使用につき譲渡可能な又は移転可能ないかなる権利も付与するものではない。登録使用権者の取引に関する権利は、次に掲げる場合において本条が定める意味では譲渡又は移転されたとみなされない。すなわち、(a)登録使用権者が個人であって関連する事業を営むために任意の他の者と共有の合意をする場合。ただし、かかるいずれの場合も、その他の点で有効な場合、企業は登録使用権者が同企業の構成員である限りにおいて当該商標を使用することができる。(b)登録使用権者が企業であって後にその組織に変更がなされる場合。ただし、かかるいずれの場合も、その他の点で有効な場合、再編後の企業は、登録使用権者として登録された時点における再編前の企業における共同事業者が引き続き再編後の企業の共同事業者である限りにおいて、当該商標を使用することができる。(c)本条項の目的上、「企業」とは1932年共同事業者法(1932年法律第9号)に定めると同一の意味を有する。 - 特許庁

People have learned a lesson from this: as you are aware, G8 and G20 meetings were frequently held, and an agreement was reached to resolve economic and financial problems with everyone around the world by mustering the wisdom of mankind, in pursuit of the highest quality of capital possible under Basel III. As there are issues in the stability of banks worldwide, namely, the quality and quantity of their capital, various figures were presented. As you know, banks appear to be more stable when these figures are higher-banks are indeed stable when the figures are high. But on the other hand, when Japan faced a financial crisis ten years ago, I experienced the bankruptcies of Hokkaido Takushoku Bank and Yamaichi Securities while I served as the Minister for Posts and Telecommunications in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998. At the time, we experienced credit contraction, rapid credit crunch and credit withdrawal. My constituency of Kitakyushu City is where Asia's first modern steel plant was built 100 years ago, and is home to many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). 例文帳に追加

そのことから人類は学びまして、ご存じのようにＧ８、あるいはＧ20を頻回に開きまして、世界でみんなで経済の問題、金融の問題を何とか人類の英知を集めて解決しようということがご存じのように合意されまして、バーゼル III 、先般も申し上げましたように、やはり世界の銀行の安定性、そのためにはもう皆さんご専門でございますが、この自己資本の質と量という問題があるわけでございますが、できるだけ質の向上を図ろうというようなことで、この色々な数字が出てきたわけでございます。ご存じのように、この数字が高ければ高いほど一見銀行が安定している、確かに安定するわけでございますけれども、同時に10年前、我が国が金融危機、私もまさに何度も申し上げますけれども、1997年から1998年、第二次橋本改造内閣のときに郵政大臣をしておりまして、そのときに北海道拓殖銀行が倒産する、山一証券が倒産する、そういった時代を経験した閣僚でございましたから、そういったことを踏まえて、あのとき自己資本比率、当時も8％でございましたが、このことは非常に信用収縮といいますか、急激な貸し渋り貸しはがしに遭いまして、私の選挙区は北九州市でございますが、100年前に東洋で初めて近代的製鉄所ができる、中小企業の町でございました。 - 金融庁

(11) Where the obligation to obtain permission from the Minister of Finance has been imposed pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of Article 21 in regard to outward direct investment that shall be notified pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1, a resident who makes the outward direct investment shall not be required to give notification, notwithstanding the provision of paragraph 1. In this case, when a notification pursuant to the said paragraph has already been given in regard to the outward direct investment, the notification (limited to those pertaining to outward direct investment (excluding those for which a notice of acceptance of the recommendation of discontinuance has been given pursuant to the provision of paragraph 6 and those of which discontinuation has been ordered pursuant to the provision of paragraph 9) which has not been actually made at the time of imposition of the obligation to obtain permission pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of the said article) shall be deemed to be an application pertaining to permission that the resident was obliged to obtain pursuant to the provision of paragraph 1 or 2 of the said article, which was filed on the day of the notification, and when a recommendation pursuant to the provision of paragraph 4, a notice pursuant to the provision of paragraph 6 (limited to those accepting the change of the content) or an order pursuant to paragraph 9 (limited to those pertaining to the change of the content) has been made in regard to outward direct investment pertaining to the notification, the recommendation, notice or order shall be deemed to have not been made. 例文帳に追加

１１　第一項の規定により届け出なければならないとされる対外直接投資について第二十一条第一項又は第二項の規定により財務大臣の許可を受ける義務が課された場合には、当該対外直接投資を行う居住者は、第一項の規定にかかわらず、その届出をすることを要しない。この場合において、当該対外直接投資について既に同項の規定による届出がされているときは、当該届出（同条第一項又は第二項の規定により許可を受ける義務が課された際現に行つていない対外直接投資（第六項の規定により中止の勧告を応諾する旨の通知がされたもの及び第九項の規定により中止を命ぜられたものを除く。）に係るものに限る。）については、これを当該届出のあつた日にされた同条第一項又は第二項の規定により受ける義務を課された許可に係る申請とみなし、当該届出に係る対外直接投資について第四項の規定による勧告、第六項の規定による通知（内容の変更を応諾する旨のものに限る。）又は第九項の規定による命令（内容の変更に係るものに限る。）があつたときは、当該勧告、通知又は命令については、これをなかつたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 144 The provisions of Article 68 (Credit for Income Tax in the case of Domestic Corporations) shall apply mutatis mutandis in the case where a foreign corporation receives, in each business year, payment of domestic source income listed in each item of Article 141 (Tax Base of Corporation Tax in the case of Foreign Corporations) for the category of foreign corporation listed in the relevant item, on which income tax shall be imposed pursuant to the provisions of the Income Tax Act (excluding a dividend, etc. listed in Article 161(v) of the said Act (Dividend, etc. Received from Domestic Corporations) and which is specified by a Cabinet Order). In this case, the phrase "amount of income tax" in Article 68(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "amount of income tax (in the case of income tax collected pursuant to the provision of Article 212(1) of the Income Tax Act (Withholding Liability Regarding Income of Nonresidents or Foreign Corporations) with respect to the consideration listed in Article 161(ii) of the said Act (Domestic Source Income), the amount equivalent to a salary, remuneration or pension listed in Article 161(viii) of the said Act that shall be deemed, pursuant to the provision of Article 215 of the said Act (Special Provisions for Withholding at Source of Salary, etc. Paid to Nonresidents for Providing Personal Services), to have been collected pursuant to the provision of Article 212(1) of the said Act shall be deducted)"; the phrase "interest and dividend, etc." in Article 68(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the relevant domestic source income." 例文帳に追加

第百四十四条　第六十八条（内国法人に係る所得税額の控除）の規定は、外国法人が各事業年度において第百四十一条各号（外国法人に係る法人税の課税標準）に掲げる外国法人の区分に応じ当該各号に掲げる国内源泉所得で所得税法　の規定により所得税を課されるもの（同法第百六十一条第五号　（内国法人から受ける配当等）に掲げる配当等で政令で定めるものを除く。）の支払を受ける場合について準用する。この場合において、第六十八条第一項中「所得税の額」とあるのは「所得税の額（所得税法第百六十一条第二号　（国内源泉所得）に掲げる対価につき同法第二百十二条第一項　（非居住者又は外国法人の所得に係る源泉徴収義務）の規定により徴収された所得税については、その額のうち、同法第二百十五条　（非居住者の人的役務の提供による給与等に係る源泉徴収の特例）の規定により同項　の規定による徴収が行われたものとみなされる同法第百六十一条第八号　に掲げる給与、報酬又は年金に対応する部分の金額を除く。）」と、同条第二項　中「利子及び配当等」とあるのは「当該国内源泉所得」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 5-4 (1) In the case where the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, and the Minister of the Environment find sufficient reason to suspect that any single Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of paragraph (2) of Article 2, if they have found it necessary to make a determination as to whether or not said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph since said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance poses a risk of causing environmental pollution if said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance falls under any of the items of said paragraph, in view of the state of its manufacture, import, use, etc., they may, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment, instruct a person operating the business of manufacturing or importing of said Type I Monitoring Chemical Substance (including a person who has been operating such business formerly and who is specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) to conduct a study of the hazardous properties specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, and Ordinance of the Ministry of the Environment (which means a study on the effects of said chemical substance on human health or on the life and/or growth of animals at the top of the food chain if ingested continuously; the same shall apply in paragraph (3)) and to report the results thereof. 例文帳に追加

第五条の四　厚生労働大臣、経済産業大臣及び環境大臣は、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定めるところにより、一の第一種監視化学物質につき、第二条第二項各号のいずれかに該当すると疑うに足りる理由があると認める場合であつて、その製造、輸入、使用等の状況からみて、当該第一種監視化学物質が同項各号のいずれかに該当するものであるとすれば、当該第一種監視化学物質による環境の汚染が生ずるおそれがあると見込まれるため、当該第一種監視化学物質について同項各号のいずれかに該当するかどうかを判定する必要があると認めるに至つたときは、当該第一種監視化学物質の製造又は輸入の事業を営む者（これらの事業を営んでいた者であつて経済産業省令で定めるものを含む。）に対し、厚生労働省令、経済産業省令、環境省令で定める有害性の調査（当該化学物質が継続的に摂取される場合における人の健康又は高次捕食動物の生息若しくは生育に及ぼす影響についての調査をいう。第三項において同じ。）を行い、その結果を報告すべきことを指示することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 59(3)(ii) and (4) and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "rehabilitation case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a rehabilitation case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending. 例文帳に追加

３　前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第五十九条第三項第二号及び第四項並びに第百二十七条の二第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「再生事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての再生手続開始の申立ては、親法人の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について再生事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての再生手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In cases provided in the main clause of paragraph 1, when the victim lives with children who have not reached their majority (hereinafter referred to simply as "children" in this paragraph, the following paragraph and Article 12, paragraph 1, item 3), and when it is found necessary to prevent the victim from being obliged to meet the spouse with regard to the children who live with the victim, by taking into consideration the fact that the spouse uses or carries out words or deeds sufficient to lead to a suspicion that the spouse is likely to take any young children back, or other circumstances, the court that issues or has issued an order under paragraph 1, item 1 shall, upon a petition from the victim, find against the spouse and order the spouse to refrain from approaching the children at their domicile (except for the domicile that the children share as the main home with the said spouse; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the school the children attend or any other place where the children are staying, or from loitering in the vicinity of the domicile, school, or any other locations normally frequented by the children during a period from the day the order comes into effect to the day after six months from the day the order came into effect, in order to prevent harm to the children's lives or bodies. However, if the children in question are 15 years of age or over, this provision shall only apply to cases where the court has obtained the children's consent. 例文帳に追加

３　第一項本文に規定する場合において、被害者がその成年に達しない子（以下この項及び次項並びに第十二条第一項第三号において単に「子」という。）と同居しているときであって、配偶者が幼年の子を連れ戻すと疑うに足りる言動を行っていることその他の事情があることから被害者がその同居している子に関して配偶者と面会することを余儀なくされることを防止するため必要があると認めるときは、第一項第一号の規定による命令を発する裁判所又は発した裁判所は、被害者の申立てにより、その生命又は身体に危害が加えられることを防止するため、当該配偶者に対し、命令の効力が生じた日以後、同号の規定による命令の効力が生じた日から起算して六月を経過する日までの間、当該子の住居（当該配偶者と共に生活の本拠としている住居を除く。以下この項において同じ。）、就学する学校その他の場所において当該子の身辺につきまとい、又は当該子の住居、就学する学校その他その通常所在する場所の付近をはいかいしてはならないことを命ずるものとする。ただし、当該子が十五歳以上であるときは、その同意がある場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 83(2)(ii) and (3) and Article 161(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a bankruptcy case, rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "bankruptcy case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a bankruptcy case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending. 例文帳に追加

３　前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第八十三条第二項第二号及び第三項並びに第百六十一条第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について破産事件、再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「破産事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての破産手続開始の申立ては、親法人の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について破産事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての破産手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十七　会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節（第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。）（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）及び同法第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項（責任追及等の訴え）中「株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）中「総株主（次に掲げる株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 189 When the Director of Regional Bureau of Economy, Trade and Industry notifies a disposition pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 21 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to paragraph (2) or Article 36, paragraph (3) of Article 45 or paragraph (3) of Article 50), Article 52, Article 55, paragraph (1) of Article 83 or Article 184, gives a notice pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 25, paragraph (2) of Article 40, paragraph (3) of Article 47 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to paragraph (2) of Article 64-ii or paragraph (5) of Article 66), paragraph (1) of Article 57, paragraph (2) of Article 91, paragraph (2) of Article 101 or paragraph (3) of Article 106, gives an order pursuant to the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 37, paragraph (1) of Article 38, paragraph (1) of Article 39, paragraph (1) of Article 48, paragraph (1) of Article 49, Article 182 or Article 183, or delivers transcripts of the written decision pursuant to the provision of paragraph (5) of Article 47 (including the case where it applies mutatis mutandis to paragraph (2) of Article 64-ii or paragraph (5) of Article 66) or paragraph (2) of Article 94, he/she shall post the description of such notice, such order and the transcripts of such written decision at the posting area of the offices of municipality or any facility equivalent to the above in the location of the address mentioned in the written application or mining registry in the case of mining applicant, holder of mining right or mortgagee or at the posting area of the offices of municipality or any facility equivalent to the above in the location of the digging application area in the case of land owner, if the other party or the location thereof is unknown, and publish such posting and the gist thereof in an official gazette. In this case, such notice, such order and the transcripts of such written decision shall be deemed to have reached the other party on the day 14 days after the day of commencement of posting or the day of publication in an official gazette, whichever is later. 例文帳に追加

第百八十九条　経済産業局長は、第二十一条第一項（第三十六条第二項、第四十五条第三項又は第五十条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）、第五十二条、第五十五条、第八十三条第一項若しくは第百八十四条の規定による処分の通知、第二十五条第一項、第四十条第二項、第四十七条第三項（第六十四条の二第二項又は第六十六条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）、第五十七条第一項、第九十一条第二項、第百一条第二項若しくは第百六条第三項の規定による通知、第三十七条第一項、第三十八条第一項、第三十九条第一項、第四十八条第一項、第四十九条第一項、第百八十二条若しくは第百八十三条の規定による命令又は第四十七条第五項（第六十四条の二第二項又は第六十六条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）若しくは第九十四条第二項の規定による決定書の謄本の交付をする場合において、相手方が知れないとき、又はその所在が不分明なときは、鉱業出願人、鉱業権者若しくは抵当権者にあつては願書若しくは鉱業原簿に記載された住所の所在地の、土地の所有者にあつては採掘出願地の所在地の市役所、町村役場又はこれに準ずるものの掲示場に、その通知若しくは命令又は決定書の謄本の内容を掲示するとともに、その掲示をした旨及びその要旨を官報に掲載しなければならない。この場合においては、掲示を始めた日又は官報に掲載した日のいずれか遅い日から十四日を経過した日に、その通知若しくは命令又は決定書の謄本は、相手方に到達したものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Simultaneously, how should insurance be regulated and supervised from now on? I believe insurance in China is not as advanced as in Japan yet. But then again, Japan’s insurance industry has experienced falling stock prices and interest rates over the past decade and suffered a long period of winter-like hardship: the insurance sector, where they have something called “expense profits”, “interest gain” and “mortality profits”, the interest gain was so squeezed that at one point, negative carry was more than 1 trillion yen. In the United States, the federal government will be establishing a division in charge of insurance for the first time within the federal government organization under the financial reform legislation. As you know, basic supervision of insurance in the United States is conducted on a state-by-state basis. Despite the fact that AIU—the world’s biggest private insurance company—was effectively nationalized in the United States, the insurance industry has been a bit of a blind spot in that any attempts in the past to negotiate with the central government often resulted in being told that it was a matter for the state government. The United States is a federal republic comprised of states, so in that sense, insurance varies from state to state in tax and other aspects. 例文帳に追加

しかし、同時にそれでは今から保険の行政に関してどういう点をやっているのか。まだ日本ほど保険が進んでいるとは思っておりませんけれども、しかし同時に、日本の保険業界もご存じのように大変ここ10年間株価は下がる、あるいは金利が下がるということで、費差益・利差益・死差益というのが保険業にはございますが、本当に利差益が少なくて大変一時は末端逆ざやが1兆円余の保険業界でもあるというような冬の時代が長く続きましたけれども、多くのかなりの、我々が27年前に通ったころは、日本の名前がついた生命保険会社法だったのですけれども、今色々な外資からも変わったところもありますので、そんなことを含めて今度アメリカでも保険ということが、ご存じのようにアメリカは保険の基本的監督は州単位なんですよ、アメリカの政府は。州単位で保険をやっていまして、連邦政府というのは、金融規制改革法で初めて連邦政府の中に保険担当の部署をつくるんですよ、今度初めて。しかしながら、AIUなんていう世界で一番大きな民間保険会社をアメリカは実質国営化しましたけれども、そこら辺で保険業界というのはちょっと穴と言ったらおかしいけれども、中央政府と今まで交渉しましても、これは中央政府の話だということもしばしばございまして、そういった意味で保険というのはなかなか、アメリカは合衆国ですから、税金なんかも州によって違いますね。 - 金融庁

Article 6 (1) Clearing margins (limited to those for transactions carried out based on a Commodity Exchange member's own account and except for those to be allocated for damages, for which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions) which have been deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 79, paragraph (1) of the Former Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed to be clearing margins (limited to those which a Member, etc. set forth in item (i) of the same paragraph deposits for Transactions on a Commodity Market carried out based on his/her own account in the case set forth in the same item) which are deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph (1) of the New Act in the case where said clearing margins are for transactions for which settlement is made by the method set forth in Article 105, item (i) of the New Act, and as clearing margins (limited to those, in the case set forth in item (i) of the same paragraph, which are deposited for Transactions on a Commodity Market carried out based on a Member, etc.'s own account set forth in (a) of the same item in the case set forth in (a) of the same item, and those, in the case set forth in item (ii) of the same paragraph, which are deposited for Commodity Clearing Transactions which a Member, etc. set forth in item (a) of the same item deposits with a Clearing Participant based on his/her own account in the case set forth in (a) of the same item) which are deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 179, paragraph (1) of the New Act in the case where said clearing margins are for transactions for which settlement is made by the method set forth in Article 105, item (ii) of the New Act. 例文帳に追加

第六条　この法律の施行の際現に旧法第七十九条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（商品取引所の会員の自己の計算による取引についてのものに限り、附則第九条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる損害の賠償に充てるべきものを除く。）は、当該取引証拠金が新法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法による決済が行われる取引についてのものである場合にあっては新法第百三条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（同項第一号に掲げる場合において同号の会員等が自己の計算において行う商品市場における取引について預託すべきものに限る。）と、当該取引証拠金が新法第百五条第二号に掲げる方法による決済が行われる取引についてのものである場合にあっては新法第百七十九条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（同項第一号に掲げる場合にあっては同号イに掲げる場合において同号イの会員等が自己の計算において行う商品市場における取引について預託すべきものに、同項第二号に掲げる場合にあっては同号イに掲げる場合において同号イの会員等が自己の計算において清算参加者に委託した商品清算取引について預託すべきものに限る。）とみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) Clearing margins (limited to those for transactions carried out based on a Commodity Exchange member’s own account and except for those to be allocated for damages, for which the provisions then in force shall remain applicable pursuant to the provisions of Article 9 of the Supplementary Provisions) which have been deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 79, paragraph 1 of the Old Act at the time of the enforcement of this Act shall be deemed to be clearing margins (limited to those which a Member, etc. set forth in item 1 of the same paragraph deposits for Transactions on a Commodity Market carried out based on his/her own account in the case set forth in the same item) which are deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph 1 of the New Act in the case where said clearing margins are for transactions for which settlement is made by the method set forth in Article 105, item 1 of the New Act, and as clearing margins (limited to those, in the case set forth in item 1 of the same paragraph, which are deposited for Transactions on a Commodity Market carried out based on a Member, etc.’s own account set forth in (a) of the same item in the case set forth in (a) of the same item, and those, in the case set forth in item 2 of the same paragraph, which are deposited for Commodity Clearing Transactions which a Member, etc. set forth in item (a) of the same item deposits with a Clearing Participant based on his/her own account in the case set forth in (a) of the same item) which are deposited pursuant to the provisions of Article 179, paragraph 1 of the New Act in the case where said clearing margins are for transactions for which settlement is made by the method set forth in Article 105, item 2 of the New Act. 例文帳に追加

１ この法律の施行の際現に旧法第七十九条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（商品取引所の会員の自己の計算による取引についてのものに限り、附則第九条の規定によりなお従前の例によることとされる損害の賠償に充てるべきものを除く。）は、当該取引証拠金が新法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法による決済が行われる取引についてのものである場合にあっては新法第百三条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（同項第一号に掲げる場合において同号の会員等が自己の計算において行う商品市場における取引について預託すべきものに限る。）と、当該取引証拠金が新法第百五条第二号に掲げる方法による決済が行われる取引についてのものである場合にあっては新法第百七十九条第一項の規定により預託されている取引証拠金（同項第一号に掲げる場合にあっては同号イに掲げる場合において同号イの会員等が自己の計算において行う商品市場における取引について預託すべきものに、同項第二号に掲げる場合にあっては同号イに掲げる場合において同号イの会員等が自己の計算において清算参加者に委託した商品清算取引について預託すべきものに限る。）とみなす。 - 経済産業省

People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices.例文帳に追加

このように、近年、企業に雇用される人々の意識が一般的にはリスク回避的になり、開業希望率が減少していることと、第2章で述べたような、近年の労働市場の変化等との関係については、〔1〕1990年代まで大企業を中心とする年功賃金制が「日本的雇用慣行」として定着していると認識され、人々の予想する将来賃金が上昇してきたこと、〔2〕1990年代のデフレ経済の悪影響がまず自営業等の小規模な企業から破産・廃業の増加等の形で現れ、人々の予想する自営業の所得が顕著に低下しリスクが顕著に増加したこと、〔3〕大企業の被雇用者に本格的な雇用調整が及んだのは1990年代後半であったことから、将来の予想賃金が低下するにはかなり時間がかかったこと、〔4〕定年退職後の収入については、「日本的雇用慣行」の下でも不安定性があることが早くから認識され、また、1990年代に企業が中高齢層のリストラを進め高齢者の転職市場は厳しい状況が続き、50歳代の賃金については大企業でも比較的早くから調整が進んだことから、中高齢者にとっては転職と比較して開業することの機会費用が下がった可能性があること、また、この年代の人々はバブル崩壊による持ち家価格の低下等の影響を被ることが比較的少なかったこと等が指摘できる。 - 経済産業省

(2) Where the facts mentioned in clause (a) or clause (b) of the proviso to sub-section (1) are proved with respect to any words, then, - (a) for the purposes of any proceedings under section 51- (i) if the trademark consists solely of such word or words, the registration of the trademark, so far as regards registration in respect of the article or substance or service in question or any goods or services of the same description, shall be deemed to be an entry wrongly remaining in the Register; (ii) if the trademark contains such word or words and other matter, the Tribunal, in deciding whether the trademark shall remain on the Register, so far as regards registration in respect of the article or substance or service in question of any goods or services of the same description, may, in case of a decision in favour of its remaining on the Register, require as a condition thereof that the proprietor shall disclaim any right to the exclusive use in relation to that article or substance or service and any goods or services of the same description, of such word or words : Provided that no disclaimer shall affect any rights of the proprietor of a trade except such as arise out of the registration of the trademark in respect of which the declaimer is made : (b) for the purposes of any other legal proceedings relating to the trademarks- (i) if the trademark consists solely of such word or words, all rights of the proprietor under this Act or any other law to the exclusive use of the trademark in relation to the article or substance or service in question or to any goods or services of the same description, or 29 (ii) if the trademark contains such word or words and other matters, all such rights of the proprietor to the exclusive use of such word or words, in such relation as aforesaid, shall be deemed to have ceased on the date at which the use mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (1) first become well-known and established, or at the expiration of the period of 2(two) years mentioned in clause (b) of sub-section (1). 例文帳に追加

(2)本条第(1)項但し書きの(a)又は(b)に述べる事実が任意の単語について立証された場合、そのときは次に掲げるとおりとする。(a)第51条に基づく手続きの目的上、(i)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語のみで構成される場合、当該商標の登録が問題の物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に関する登録に関する限りにおいて、過誤により登録簿上に残存する記載とみなされる。(ii)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語及びその他の要素から構成される場合、審判機関は、当該商標を登録に残すべきかどうかの判断に際し、当該商標の登録が問題の物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に関する登録に関する限りにおいて、登録簿にそれを残すことを支持する判断の場合、その条件として、所有者がその物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は、表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に関して1個又は数個の当該単語に係る排他的使用権を放棄するよう求めることができる。ただし、当該権利放棄は、当該権利放棄がなされた当該商標登録に起因して生ずる取引を除き、所有者の取引に係る権利に何ら影響を与えない。(b)当該商標に関するその他の法的手続きの目的上、(i)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語のみで構成される場合、本法、又は問題の物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に係る商標の排他的使用に関するその他の法律に基づき、当該所有者のすべての権利、又は(ii)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語及びその他の要素から構成される場合、かかる単語の排他的使用に関する所有者のすべての当該権利は、前述のような関係において、本条第(1)項の(a)に述べる使用が最初に周知となり定着するようになる日に、又は本条第(1)項の(b)に述べる2年の期間満了時に消滅するとみなされる。 - 特許庁

(2) For inventions among those claimed in a patent application containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are stated in the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings (in the case where the earlier application was a foreign language written application, foreign language documents) originally attached to the application of the earlier application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the earlier application contains a priority claim under that paragraph or Article 8(1) of the Utility Model Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including its mutatis mutandis Application under Article 11(1) of the Utility Model Act), excluding any inventions disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a patent or utility model registration or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the earlier application is based), the said patent application shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the earlier application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 29, the main clause of Article 29-2, Articles 30(1) to (3), 39(1) to (4), 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1), 104 (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 65(5) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 184-10(2)))and 126(5) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Articles 17-2(6) and 134-2(5)) of the Patent Act, Articles 7(3) and 17 of the Utility Model Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), and Article 29, 33-2(1) and 33-3(1) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act) of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959 ). 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願に係る発明のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、外国語書面）に記載された発明（当該先の出願が同項若しくは実用新案法第八条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（同法第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、特許請求の範囲若しくは実用新案登録請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された発明を除く。）についての第二十九条、第二十九条の二本文、第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第三十九条第一項から第四項まで、第六十九条第二項第二号、第七十二条、第七十九条、第八十一条、第八十二条第一項、第百四条（第六十五条第五項（第百八十四条の十第二項において準用する場合を含む。）において準用する場合を含む。）及び第百二十六条第五項（第十七条の二第六項及び第百三十四条の二第五項において準用する場合を含む。）、同法第七条第三項及び第十七条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第一項及び第三十三条の三第一項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該特許出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Among devices claimed in an application for a utility model registration containing a priority claim under paragraph (1), for those that are disclosed in the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings (in the case where the Earlier Application was a written application in foreign language prescribed in Article 36-2(2) of the Patent Act, the document in foreign language prescribed in paragraph (1) of the said Article) originally attached to the application of the Earlier Application on which the priority claim is based (in the case where the Earlier Application contains a priority claim under the preceding paragraph or Article 41(1) of the Patent Act, or Article 43(1) or 43-2(1) or (2) of the Patent Act (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 11(1) of this Act), excluding any device disclosed in any documents (limited to those equivalent to the description, scope of claims for a utility model registration or patent or drawings) submitted at the time of the filing of the application on which the priority claim in the Earlier Application is based), the said application for a utility model registration shall be deemed to have been filed at the time when the Earlier Application was filed, in the case of the application of Article 3, the main clause of Article 3-2, Article 7(1) to (3), Article 30(1) to (3) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 11(1), Article 17, Articles 69(2)(ii), 72, 79, 81, 82(1) of the Patent Act as applied mutatis mutandis under Article 26, Articles 39(3) and (4) and 72 of the Patent Act, Articles 26, 31(2) and 32(2) of the Design Act (Act No. 125 of 1959), Article 29 of the Trademark Act (Act No. 127 of 1959) and Articles 33-2(3) and 33-3(3) (including their mutatis mutandis application under Article 68(3) of the Trademark Act ) of the Trademark Act. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う実用新案登録出願に係る考案のうち、当該優先権の主張の基礎とされた先の出願の願書に最初に添付した明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面（当該先の出願が特許法第三十六条の二第二項の外国語書面出願である場合にあつては、同条第一項の外国語書面）に記載された考案（当該先の出願が前項若しくは同法第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張又は同法第四十三条第一項若しくは第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項（第十一条第一項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による優先権の主張を伴う出願である場合には、当該先の出願についての優先権の主張の基礎とされた出願に係る出願の際の書類（明細書、実用新案登録請求の範囲若しくは特許請求の範囲又は図面に相当するものに限る。）に記載された考案を除く。）についての第三条、第三条の二本文、前条第一項から第三項まで、第十一条第一項において準用する同法第三十条第一項から第三項まで、第十七条、第二十六条において準用する同法第六十九条第二項第二号、同法第七十九条、同法第八十一条及び同法第八十二条第一項並びに同法第三十九条第三項及び第四項並びに第七十二条、意匠法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十五号）第二十六条、第三十一条第二項及び第三十二条第二項並びに商標法（昭和三十四年法律第百二十七号）第二十九条並びに第三十三条の二第三項及び第三十三条の三第三項（同法第六十八条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定の適用については、当該実用新案登録出願は、当該先の出願の時にされたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively. 例文帳に追加

２　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書（以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。）について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書（第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

i) Where an event listed in Article 40-5(1)(i) of the Act has occurred with regard to a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to a resident prescribed in Article 40-5(1) of the Act (excluding the case where the said event occurred in a year preceding the year including the day on which two months have elapsed after the day following the final day of the business year including the base date for paying a dividend of surplus, etc. specified in Article 40-5(1)(i) of the Act of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (hereinafter such business year shall be referred to as the "base business year" in this item and the next paragraph and such year including the day on which two months have elapsed after the day following the final day of the base business year shall be referred to as the "applicable business year" in the next paragraph)) and when the said amount of dividend of surplus, etc. exceeds the amount of a dividend of surplus, etc. to be deducted for calculating the amount of eligible retained income prescribed in Article 40-4(1) for the said base business year of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc.: The amount obtained by multiplying the said excess amount by the ratio of the shares, etc. for considering the claims held by the said person of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 25-21(3)(i) out of the total issued shares, etc. of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. at the end of the base business year (where a dividend of surplus, etc. has been paid to an affiliated foreign company related to the said resident (excluding a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to the said resident; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item and the next item) whose tax burden imposed in the state of the head office on the amount of the dividend of surplus, etc. that it receives as specified in Article 40-5(1)(i) of the Act is below the low tax-burden base or to any other specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to the said resident, such shares, etc. for considering the claims held shall exclude the shares, etc. for considering the claims indirectly held (meaning the shares, etc. for considering the claims indirectly held prescribed in Article 25-21(3)(ii); the same shall apply in the next item and paragraph (4)) via the said affiliated foreign company and the said other specified foreign subsidiary company, etc.) (where there is any amount to be deducted, with regard to the amount of a dividend of surplus, etc. specified in Article 40-5(1)(i) of the Act, for calculating the amount of taxable retained income, pursuant to the provisions of Article 25-21(2), for the said base business year of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc., the remaining amount after deducting the said amount to be deducted from the said calculated amount 例文帳に追加

一　法第四十条の五第一項に規定する居住者に係る特定外国子会社等につき同項第一号に掲げる事実が生じた場合（当該事実が当該特定外国子会社等の同号に定める剰余金の配当等の支払に係る基準日の属する事業年度（以下この号及び次項において「基準事業年度」という。）終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日の属する年（次項において「適用年」という。）の前年以前の年に生じた場合を除く。）において当該剰余金の配当等の額が当該特定外国子会社等の当該基準事業年度に係る法第四十条の四第一項に規定する適用対象留保金額の計算上控除される剰余金の配当等の額を超えることとなるとき　当該超える部分の金額に、当該基準事業年度終了の時における当該特定外国子会社等の発行済株式等のうちに当該基準事業年度終了の時におけるその者の有する当該特定外国子会社等の第二十五条の二十一第三項第一号に規定する請求権勘案保有株式等（当該居住者に係る外国関係会社（当該居住者に係る特定外国子会社等を除く。以下この号及び次号において同じ。）でその受ける法第四十条の五第一項第一号に定める剰余金の配当等の額につきその本店所在地国において課される税の負担が軽課税基準以下のもの又は当該居住者に係る他の特定外国子会社等に支払われた場合における当該外国関係会社及び当該他の特定外国子会社等を通じて保有する請求権勘案間接保有株式等（第二十五条の二十一第三項第二号に規定する請求権勘案間接保有株式等をいう。次号及び第四項において同じ。）を除く。）の占める割合を乗じて計算した金額（法第四十条の五第一項第一号に定める剰余金の配当等の額につき当該特定外国子会社等の当該基準事業年度に係る第二十五条の二十一第二項の規定による課税対象留保金額の計算上控除される金額がある場合には、当該計算した金額から当該控除される金額を控除した残額） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 240-2 (1) The director of the Regional Civil Aviation Bureau shall have the director of airport administrative office exercise the authority pursuant to paragraph (1) item (viii) and (xx) of the preceding Article, authority pursuant to item (xxiv)-2 of the same paragraph (limited to cases pertaining to wireless telephone and air traffic control transponder), authority pursuant to item (xxv) of the same paragraph (excluding cases pertaining to aircraft provided for use in air transport service and rotorcraft that intends to take off from or land on a ship or building), authority pursuant to item (xxvii) of the same paragraph (excluding cases pertaining to aircraft provided for the purpose of air transport service, aircraft intending to fly under instrument flight rules or at night and rotorcraft intending to transport an object by attaching it to the exterior of the aircraft, suspending it or towing it), authority pursuant to item (xxvii)-2 and item (xxix) of the same paragraph, authority pursuant to item (xxxi) of the same paragraph (limited to cases pertaining to aircraft intending on conducting an aircraft test flight under visual flight rules within the air traffic control zone during daytime), authority pursuant to item (xxxii) of the same paragraph (limited to cases pertaining to aircraft intending on conducting a pilot training flight under visual flight rules within the air traffic control zone during daytime), authority pursuant to item (xxxvi) of the same paragraph (limited to cases pertaining to persons who intend to engage in an action pertaining to air traffic control zone and positive control airspace within the connected approach control area and air traffic information zone), and authority pursuant to items (xxxvi)-2, (xxxvii)-U, (xxxvii)-11, (xli) and (lxiv)-2-D of the same paragraph. 例文帳に追加

第二百四十条の二　地方航空局長は、前条第一項第八号及び第二十号の権限、同項第二十四号の二の権限（無線電話及び航空交通管制用自動応答装置に係るものに限る。）、同項第二十五号の権限（航空運送事業の用に供する航空機に係るもの及び船舶又は構築物において離陸し、又は着陸しようとする回転翼航空機に係るものを除く。）、同項第二十七号の権限（航空運送事業の用に供する航空機、計器飛行方式により、又は夜間において飛行しようとする航空機及び物件を機体の外に装着し、つり下げ、又は曳航して運送しようとする回転翼航空機に係るものを除く。）、同項第二十七号の二及び第二十九号の権限、同項第三十一号の権限（管制圏内において、有視界飛行方式により、かつ、昼間において航空機の試験をする飛行を行おうとする航空機に係るものに限る。）、同項第三十二号の権限（管制圏内において、有視界飛行方式により、かつ、昼間において航空機の操縦の練習のための飛行を行おうとする航空機に係るものに限る。）、同項第三十六号の権限（管制圏及びこれに接続する進入管制区内の特別管制空域並びに情報圏に係る行為を行おうとする者に係るものに限る。）並びに同項第三十六号の二、第三十七号ナ、第三十七号の十一、第四十一号及び第六十四号の二ニの権限を空港事務所長に行わせるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 68-88 (1) Where a consolidated corporation has, in each consolidated business year beginning on or after April 1, 2002, conducted a transaction for the sale of assets, purchase of assets, provision of services or any other transaction with a foreign affiliated person related to the said consolidated corporation (meaning a foreign corporation that has a relationship with the said consolidated corporation whereby either corporation holds, directly or indirectly, shares or capital contributions that account for 50 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the other corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the other corporation) or any other special relationship specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to in the next paragraph and paragraph (5) as a "special relationship"); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), if the amount of the consideration received by the said consolidated corporation from the said foreign affiliated person with respect to the said transaction (excluding, depending on the category of foreign corporation listed in Article 141(i) to (iii) of the Corporation Tax Act corresponding to the said foreign affiliated person, a transaction from which the said foreign affiliated person earns the domestic source income listed in the relevant item, which is specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 66-4(1); hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "foreign affiliated transaction") is below the arm's length price or if the amount of the consideration paid by the said consolidated corporation to the said foreign affiliated person with respect to the said transaction is over the arm's length price, with regard to the application of the provisions of the said Act and any other provisions concerning corporation tax on the said consolidated corporation's consolidated income for the said consolidated business year, the said foreign affiliated transaction shall be deemed to have been conducted at the arm's length price. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条の八十八　連結法人が、平成十四年四月一日以後に開始する各連結事業年度において、当該連結法人に係る国外関連者（外国法人で、当該連結法人との間にいずれか一方の法人が他方の法人の発行済株式又は出資（当該他方の法人が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。）の総数又は総額の百分の五十以上の数又は金額の株式又は出資を直接又は間接に保有する関係その他の政令で定める特殊の関係（次項及び第五項において「特殊の関係」という。）のあるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）との間で資産の販売、資産の購入、役務の提供その他の取引を行つた場合に、当該取引（当該国外関連者が法人税法第百四十一条第一号から第三号までに掲げる外国法人のいずれに該当するかに応じ、当該国外関連者のこれらの号に掲げる国内源泉所得に係る取引のうち第六十六条の四第一項に規定する政令で定めるものを除く。以下この条において「国外関連取引」という。）につき、当該連結法人が当該国外関連者から支払を受ける対価の額が独立企業間価格に満たないとき、又は当該連結法人が当該国外関連者に支払う対価の額が独立企業間価格を超えるときは、当該連結事業年度の連結所得に係る同法その他法人税に関する法令の規定の適用については、当該国外関連取引は、独立企業間価格で行われたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 3 From among persons who, at the time of establishment of the Institute, are actually employees of an agency or a department specified by Cabinet Order, as prescribed in the preceding Article, when there is any person who has proceeded to become an employee of the Institute on the day of establishment of the Institute (hereinafter referred to as a "successional employee" in the following Article) and who has obtained recognition pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) of the Child Allowance Act (Act No. 73 of 1971) (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6, paragraph (2), Article 7, paragraph (4), or Article 8, paragraph (4) of the supplementary provisions of said Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry, or when there is any person who has been delegated by the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry on the day preceding the date of establishment of the Institute and who falls under the payment requirements for child allowance or the benefits specified in Article 6, paragraph (1), Article 7, paragraph (1) or Article 8, paragraph (1) of the supplementary provisions of said Act (hereinafter referred to as "special benefits, etc." in this Article) on the day of establishment of the Institute, payment of child allowance or special benefits, etc. to said person shall be deemed as having been recognized by the mayor (including ward mayors of special wards) pursuant to the provisions of Article 7, paragraph (1) of said Act on the day of establishment of the Institute. In this case, payment of such child allowance or special benefits, etc. that were deemed to have been recognized shall begin the month after the month in which the day preceding the day of establishment of the Institute falls, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 8, paragraph (2) of said Act (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 6, paragraph (2), Article 7, paragraph (4), or Article 8, paragraph (4) of the supplementary provisions of said Act). 例文帳に追加

第三条　研究所の成立の際現に前条に規定する政令で定める部局又は機関の職員である者のうち、研究所の成立の日において引き続き研究所の職員となったもの（次条において「引継職員」という。）であって、研究所の成立の日の前日において経済産業大臣又はその委任を受けた者から児童手当法（昭和四十六年法律第七十三号）第七条第一項（同法附則第六条第二項、第七条第四項又は第八条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定による認定を受けているものが、研究所の成立の日において児童手当又は同法附則第六条第一項、第七条第一項若しくは第八条第一項の給付（以下この条において「特例給付等」という。）の支給要件に該当するときは、その者に対する児童手当又は特例給付等の支給に関しては、研究所の成立の日において同法第七条第一項の規定による市町村長（特別区の区長を含む。）の認定があったものとみなす。この場合において、その認定があったものとみなされた児童手当又は特例給付等の支給は、同法第八条第二項（同法附則第六条第二項、第七条第四項又は第八条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定にかかわらず、研究所の成立の日の前日の属する月の翌月から始める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provision of Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. by a Bank, etc. and its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or by its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(2) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. and the Subsidiary Companies, etc., or the Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Consolidated Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to the second sentence of Article 13(2) of that Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

２　新銀行法第十三条第二項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等の額が合算して合算信用供与等限度額（同条第二項に規定する合算信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等（同条第二項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は当該銀行等の子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等及び当該銀行等の子会社等又は当該銀行等の子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き合算信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行等が同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第二項後段において準用する同条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

We, the participants representing health, social welfare and labour sectors of the ASEAN plus 3 countries at the 11th ASEAN & Japan High Level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies (hereafter referred to as the Meeting) held in Tokyo, Japan, on 3-5 December 2013, which carried the theme “Active Aging”;Remembering that this year marks the 40th year since the relations between ASEAN and the Japanese Government began, and that we have kept cordial relationships throughout this time, aiming to further enhance our cooperations and build strategic partnerships in the future;Acknowledging with appreciation the initiative of the Government of Japan to convene the ASEAN-Japan High-level Officials Meeting on Caring Societies since 2003, particularly this 11th Meeting as an effective platform of information sharing and exchange of views on the health, social welfare and labour aspects of “Active Aging”;Also, acknowledging with appreciation the active initiatives by the Government of Japan for holding the “ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society” in Jakarta this November, with hopes that these efforts will continue and promote further collaborations in the future;Noting that aging is progressing worldwide, and by 2050 the population of age 60 years and over will reach 2 billion;Recognizing that ASEAN countries will experience rapid aging in years to come, and face new challenges such as maintaining health, responding to welfare and social security needs, prevention of isolation and poverty of the elderly that require urgent attention;Considering that the current situation of aging in the health, labour and welfare sector and the promotion of measures related to aging in ASEAN countries vary, and that cultural and social backgrounds differ between ASEAN member states and Japan, therefore the current issues that are faced by each country may not be the same;Also, noting the results of the discussions made by the “Study Group for Japan’s International Contributions to Active Aging.”例文帳に追加

「Active Aging1」をテーマに2013年12月3日から5日まで東京において開催された第11回ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合で、ASEAN+3各国の保健、社会福祉及び労働分野の参加者は、今年がASEAN日本友好40周年であり、我が国とASEAN各国の間でこれまでの友好的な関係を想起し、今後のさらなる協力関係の強化と戦略的なパートナーシップを目指し、ASEAN・日本社会保障ハイレベル会合を2003年より開催している日本政府のイニシアティブに感謝するとともに、第11回会合は、保健、社会福祉及び労働分野におけるActive Agingに関する情報共有と意見交換のための有効な場であることを認識し、また、本年11月に日本政府がジャカルタにおいてASEAN地域における高齢化に係る国際貢献に関する講演会（ASEAN-Japan Seminar, The Regional Cooperation for the Aging Society）が行われたことを評価しつつ、地域協力に関する努力の継続とさらなる連携の促進を期待し、世界の高齢化は急速に進行しており、2050年には60歳以上の人口が20億人に達することを留意し、ASEAN諸国においては今後急速に高齢化が進み、高齢者の健康保持や、福祉及び社会保障ニーズへの対応、高齢者の孤立・貧困防止などの対策が急務であることを認識し、保健・福祉・労働分野における高齢化の現状及び対策の推進に際して、ASEAN諸国は多様であり、また、ASEAN諸国と日本では置かれている状況や文化・社会的背景が異なること、それゆえ現在直面している課題が異なることを考慮し、さらに、｢国際的なActive Ageingにおける日本の貢献に関する検討会｣での議論成果に留意する。 - 厚生労働省

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

i) The amount of income or loss calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsections 2 to 10 of the Corporation Tax Act (excluding Article 23, Article 26(1) to (4), Article 28, Article 38 to Article 41, Article 55(3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Article 61-11 to Article 61-13 of the said Act) and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 66-4(3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of paragraph 68-88(1) or Article 66-4(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction with a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90(1) of the Act (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with the said consolidated corporation) or a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act that is related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc., the amount of income or loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions 例文帳に追加

一　当該各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、法人税法第二編第一章第一節第二款から第十款まで（同法第二十三条、第二十六条第一項から第四項まで、第二十八条、第三十八条から第四十一条まで、第五十五条第三項、第五十七条、第五十八条、第五十九条及び第六十一条の十一から第六十一条の十三までを除く。）の規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第五十七条の十、第六十一条の四、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十六条の四第三項、第六十七条の十二及び第六十七条の十三の規定（以下この号において「本邦法令の規定」という。）の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額（当該特定外国子会社等に係る法第六十八条の九十第一項各号に掲げる連結法人（当該連結法人との間に連結完全支配関係がある他の連結法人を含む。）又は法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十八条の八十八第一項又は第六十六条の四第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引がこれらの規定に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本邦法令の規定の例に準じて計算した場合に算出される所得の金額又は欠損の金額） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

i) The amount of income or loss calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, in accordance with the provisions of Part II, Chapter I, Section 1, Subsection 2 to Subsection 9 (excluding Article 23, Article 26, paragraphs (1) to (4), Article 28, Articles 38 to 41, Article 55, paragraph (3), Article 57, Article 58, Article 59, and Articles 61-11 to 61-13 of the Corporation Tax Act), and Subsection 11 of said Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 57-10, Article 61-4, Articles 65-7 to 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7, paragraph (1) of the Act), Article 66-4, paragraph (3), Article 67-12 and Article 67-13 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan" in this item) (where the provisions of Article 68-88, paragraph (1) or Article 66-4, paragraph (1) of the Act is applied to a transaction with a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90, paragraph (1) of the Act (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with said consolidated corporation) or a domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6, paragraph (1) of the Act that is the domestic corporation of said specified foreign subsidiary, etc., the amount of income or loss calculated in accordance with the provisions of the laws and regulations of Japan by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in these provisions 例文帳に追加