「not good」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(102ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

The reasons for this follow; in the Edo period Tsunayoshi TOKUGAWA prohibited hunting and the possession of a gun by farmers in principle; that the transfer of a gun was limited; that, commonly believed, the technological advance of guns stagnated from the influence of the exclusion of foreigners (national isolation); that a flintlock gun (flintlock system) had a stronger spring than a hinawaju and when the gunlock operating the impact was big and after trigger was pulled, the ignition mechanism for the explosive charge momentarily wavered and the accuracy of fire was bad and thus Japanese who liked to 'ippatsu hicchu' (hit with one shot), disliked the flintlock gun; that good quality flints could not be found in Japan and could not be mass-produced; and that, as a big factor, the art of gun was inherited probably in the form of a school-style gun for competitions like all the martial arts and as a result, the improvement of the weapon was necessarily avoided. 例文帳に追加

その理由として、江戸時代に入って徳川綱吉によって諸国鉄砲改めによる百姓の狩猟及び銃の原則所持禁止、銃器の移動制限がなされたことや、鎖国の影響による技術進歩の停滞という通説、フリントロック式は火縄式に比べ強力なバネが装着されており、撃鉄作動時の衝撃が大きく、引金を引いてから一瞬遅れて装薬に着火する機構のため銃身がぶれ、火縄銃に比べ命中率が悪く「一発必中」を好む日本人から嫌われたらしいことのほかに、日本では良質の火打石が産出せず大量生産ができなかったこと、またおそらくはすべての武術と同じく鉄炮術も一種の競技的な要素を含んで流派形式で継承されたため、その結果必然的に器具類の改変は避けられた、という要素も大きかった。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

If the only issue remaining in an application based on foreign application claiming priority right is the submission of a certified copy of the foreign or home registration, the Examiner may provisionally allow the application and suspend the submission of the certified copy of the foreign or home registration for a period not exceeding twelve(12) months counted from allowance. On request of the applicant and subject to the approval of the Director and payment of the required fee, said twelve month period may be extended for good cause by an additional period not exceeding twelve (12) months. Should the applicant fail to submit the certified copy of the foreign or home registration within the maximum period of twenty-four months counted from allowance, the claim to priority right will be deemed waived. The application will thereafter be published for opposition upon payment of the required fees.例文帳に追加

優先権を主張する外国出願に基づく出願における問題が外国又は母国での登録の認証謄本の提出のみである場合は，審査官は，出願を暫定的に許可し，当該許可から起算して12月を超えない期間にわたって，外国又は母国での登録の認証謄本を提出保留とすることができる。出願人の請求があり，かつ，局長の承認及び所定の手数料の納付があることを条件として，当該12月の期間は，正当な理由があったときは，12月を超えない追加期間をもって延長することができる。出願人は，許可から起算して最長24月の期間内に外国又は母国での登録の認証謄本を提出することができない場合は，優先権に係る主張を放棄したものとみなされる。その後，所定の手数料の納付がされた場合，当該出願は，異議申立のため，公告される。 - 特許庁

Provided that they are acting in good faith and that the use does not constitute use as a trademark, third parties may, without the consent of the owner of the registered mark, make use of the following in market dealings: their own name, address or pseudonym, a geographical name or any other specific designation relating to the kind, quality, quantity, purpose, value, place of origin or time of production of goods or rendering of services or other characteristics thereof, provided that such use is confined to identification or information purposes and is not liable to mislead the public as to the source of the goods or services.例文帳に追加

その行為が誠実なものでありかつ商標として使用するものでない限り，第三者は次に掲げるものを市場取引において登録標章の所有者の同意を得ることなく使用することができる。自己固有の名称，住所若しくは雅号，地理的名称，商品又はサービスの種類，質，数量，目的，価値，原産地又は生産若しくは提供の時に関する表示，及び商品又はサービスに関するその他の特徴。ただし，そのような使用は同定若しくは情報提供目的のものに限られかつ商品又はサービスの出所に関して公衆の誤解を生じさせる虞がないことを条件とする。 - 特許庁

Registration of the mark shall not confer on the owner thereof the right to prohibit a third party from using the mark to advertise legitimately marked goods or services, offer them for sale or mention the existence or availability thereof, or from using the mark to indicate the compatibility or suitability of spare parts or accessories that can be used with goods bearing the registered mark, provided that such use is made in good faith, is confined to the purpose of informing the public and is not liable to mislead or confuse it as to the corporate origin of the goods concerned.例文帳に追加

標章の登録は標章所有者に対して，第三者が合法的に登録標章の付された商品又はサービスを宣伝し，販売の申出若しくはそれら商品又はサービスの存在又は利用可能性を知らせるためにそれら標章を使用すること及び登録標章の付された商品に使用できる部品や付属品の使用適性や互換性を知らせるためにそれら標章を使用することを禁止する権利を与えるものではない。ただし，そのような使用は誠実になされなければならず，かつ公衆への情報提供目的に限定され，かつ関係商品の製造企業に関して公衆の誤認若しくは混同を生じさせる可能性の高いものであってはならない。 - 特許庁

6. The registered European patent shall have the same legal force and the same provisions of the Law shall be applied thereto, which are applied to the national patent with the following exceptions: 1) exclusive rights which are granted by a patent shall come into force on the date when the Patent Office publishes the notification regarding the registration of the European patent and shall end not later than after 20 years from the date when the Patent Office has received a request regarding the registration of the European patent; 2) the provisions of Section 22 of this Law in relation to the registered European patent shall be applied, if before the receipt of the request regarding the registration of the European patent in Latvia at the Patent Office, a use of the invention has commenced or preparatory work necessary for such use has been carried out in good faith; and 3) The invalidation of the European patent or an early discontinuance of validity in another Contracting State of the European Patent Convention shall not be deemed as the basis for the declaration of the patent, registered in Latvia, as invalid.例文帳に追加

6. 登録欧州特許は，次の例外を除いて，国内特許に適用されるのと同等の法的効力を有し，かつ，本法の同一の規定が適用される。 1) 特許により付与される排他権は，欧州特許の登録に関する通知を特許庁が公告した日に効力を生じ，欧州特許の登録に関する請求を特許庁が受領した日から20年後までに終了する。 2) ラトビアにおける欧州特許の登録に関する請求を特許庁が受領する前に，善意で，発明の実施が開始されたか又は当該実施のために必要な準備作業が行われた場合は，第22条の規定を登録欧州特許に関して適用する。また 3) 欧州特許条約の他の締約国における欧州特許の無効又は効力の早期停止は，ラトビアにおいて登録された特許の無効宣言の基礎とはみなさない。 - 特許庁

(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), an assignment of a registered trade mark without goodwill whether before or after the commencement of this Act is invalid if the trade mark has not at any time before the assignment been in use in good faith in Malaysia by the assignor or his predecessor in title except that this subsection does not apply where - (a) the trade mark was registered with the intention that it shall be assignable to a body corporate yet to be formed and the trade mark has been assigned; or (b) the trade mark was registered with the intention that a person shall be permitted to use it as a registered user and such registered user has been registered in respect of the trade mark within six months after the registration of the trade mark and has used that trade mark within that period.例文帳に追加

(2) (1)に拘らず，本法施行の前後を問わず，営業権を伴わずになされる登録商標の譲渡は，当該商標が当該譲渡に先立つ何れかの時期に譲渡人又はその前権利者によってマレーシアで誠実に使用されたことがない場合は，効力を有さない。ただし，これは次の場合は適用されないものとする。 (a) 当該商標が，設立予定の一般法人に譲渡する意図をもって登録され，実際に当該一般法人に譲渡されている場合，又は (b) 当該商標が，ある者を登録使用者としてこれに使用させる意図をもって登録され，実際にその者が商標の登録から6月以内に当該商標の登録使用者として登録され，かつ，その期間内にその者が当該商標を使用している場合 - 特許庁

Then consider the matter in this way:--Imagine that I am about to play truant (you may call the proceeding by any name which you like), and the laws and the government come and interrogate me: 'Tell us, Socrates,' they say; 'what are you about? are you not going by an act of yours to overturn us--the laws, and the whole state, as far as in you lies? Do you imagine that a state can subsist and not be overthrown, in which the decisions of law have no power, but are set aside and trampled upon by individuals?' What will be our answer, Crito, to these and the like words? Any one, and especially a rhetorician, will have a good deal to say on behalf of the law which requires a sentence to be carried out. 例文帳に追加

だったらこう考えてくれ。今僕たちが、脱走―そう呼びたくなければ好きなように呼んでくれ―をしようとしているところに、国法が、政府とともにやってきて、僕にこう聞くんだ。「答えよ、ソクラテス。そなたは何をするつもりだ？ そなたがやろうとしているその行動は、我々を転覆させるものだ。国法と国全体とを、そなたに関係ある分に限ってだが、ひっくり返そうともくろむことになるのだ。それともなにかね、国家が転覆することなんてありえないとでも言うのか。法の決定が無力で、私人の手によって決定が覆《くつがえ》されるような国家が存続し続けられるとでも言うのか。」それに対して僕たちは、どんなふうな言葉で答えるんだろうね。というのは、特に雄弁家みたいな人は、一度下された判決は有効であるとする法律を守るために、力のかぎり言うべきことがあるはずだからね。 - Plato『クリトン』

As you may be aware, the BOJ is extremely independent. Nevertheless, the government and the BOJ need to communicate closely with each other in implementing monetary policies. The BOJ’s primary mission is, basically, to curb inflation while exercising its independence. At present, Japan is experiencing deflation, and the international community is becoming increasingly aware that it would be extremely difficult to break away from deflation. The soundness of banks will constantly be under the surveillance of the FSA, as a matter of course. Banks are businesses licensed by the Prime Minister, not to mention that they form the core of the economy, so in that sense, it is good that banks are making contributions to stimulate the economy by using the BOJ’s system. I hope they do a good job. 例文帳に追加

日本銀行はご存じのように非常に独立性が高いですね。法律の改正、日銀性の独立性を高める改正、私は政調会の副会長ぐらいでございましたが、山崎拓さんが政調会長のときにつくった法律でございまして、私も力仕事をさせていただいた記憶がございますが、やはり日本銀行は独立性というのがございますから。しかし、そうはいっても金融政策で政府と日銀というのはやっぱり密接な連絡をとってやる必要がございますが、日本銀行は日本銀行で独立性を持って、基本的にインフレを抑えるということが日本銀行の本来的な任務なのですね。今日本はデフレでございまして、デフレから脱却するということは極めて難しいことだというふうに今、かなり国際的な認識も高まっているようですが、銀行の健全性について、当然金融庁は常に注視しておく、銀行というのは総理大臣の免許事業でございますから、ましてや今さっきも言ったように、非常に経済の中核でございますから、そういった意味で銀行がこういった日銀の制度を使用して経済を活性化に貢献するということを私はいいことだと思っていますね。期待しています。 - 金融庁

The owner of a national trade mark the application of which was filed in good faith before or which has a right of priority dated before the accession to the European Union, has the right to prohibit the use of the Community trade mark the effects of which have been extended to the territory of the Czech Republic based on the accession of the Czech Republic to the European Union, if the Community trade mark is identical with the national trade mark and the goods and services covered by both trademarks are identical, or there is a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public because of the identity or similarity of the national trade mark and the Community trade mark and because of the identity or similarity of goods or services covered by the trademarks; the likelihood of confusion includes the likelihood of association with the national trade mark, or the Community trade mark is identical with the national trade mark or it is similar to the national trade mark, where the goods or services covered those trademarks are not identical or similar, if the national trade mark has a good reputation in the Czech Republic and if use of the Community trade mark would take unfair advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or the good reputation of the national trade mark. 例文帳に追加

チェコ共和国の欧州連合への加入前に誠実に登録出願がなされた又はかかる加入前の日付の優先権を有する国内登録商標の所有者は，次の何れかの事由が存在する場合，チェコ共和国の欧州連合への加入に基づき効力がチェコ共和国に拡張された共同体商標の使用を禁止する権利を有する。共同体商標が当該国内登録商標と同一であると共に，両商標が対象とする商品及びサービスが同一であること，当該の共同体商標と国内登録商標が同一若しくは類似しておりかつその両者の対象とする商品若しくはサービスも同一若しくは類似していることによって公衆を誤認させる虞があること。かかる誤認の虞には，国内商標との関連性の虞を含む。共同体商標が当該国内商標と同一若しくは類似しているが両者の対象とする商品若しくはサービスは同一でもなくまた類似もしていない場合において，当該国内商標がチェコ共和国内で定評を得ており当該共同体商標のチェコ共和国での使用がかかる国内商標の識別性若しくは評判を不当に利用するか又はこれを傷付けると認められること。 - 特許庁

218.2. In an action under this Chapter: (a) Copyright shall be presumed to subsist in the work or other subject matter to which the action relates if the defendant does not put in issue the question whether copyright subsists in the work or other subject matter; and (b) Where the subsistence of the copyright is established, the plaintiff shall be presumed to be the owner of the copyright if he claims to be the owner of the copyright and the defendant does not put in issue the question of his ownership. (c) Where the defendant, without good faith, puts in issue the questions of whether copyright subsists in a work or other subject matter to which the action relates, or the ownership of copyright in such work or subject matter, thereby occasioning unnecessary costs or delay in the proceedings, the court may direct that any costs to the defendant in respect of the action shall not be allowed by him and that any costs occasioned by the defendant to other parties shall be paid by him to such other parties.例文帳に追加

218.2本章の規定に基づく訴訟においては， (a)著作権は，被告が当該著作物その他の対象物に著作権が存続しているか否かについて争わない場合は，当該訴訟が関連する当該著作物その他の対象物に存続しているものと推定する。 (b)著作権の存続が立証される場合において，原告が当該著作権の権利者であることを主張し，かつ，被告がその主張について争わないときは，原告が当該著作権の権利者であるものと推定する。 (c)被告が，善意ではなく，訴訟に関連する著作物その他の対象物に著作権が存続しているか否かについて又はその著作物その他の対象物における著作権の権利者の問題について争い，それによって手続に不必要な費用又は遅延を生じさせる場合は，裁判所は，訴訟に関する被告のための費用は認められないこと及び被告が相手方に生じさせる費用は被告が相手方に支払うことを指示することができる。 - 特許庁

An entitled person whose invention has been applied for by a person not entitled to do so, or a person injured by usurpation, may demand that the patent applicant surrenders to him the right to the grant of a patent. If the application has already resulted in a patent, the entitled person may demand that the patentee assigns the patent to him. This right may only be asserted, subject to sentences 4 and 5, by legal action within two years of publication of the grant of the patent (Section 58(1)). Should the injured person have filed an opposition on the grounds of usurpation (Section 21(1), no. 3), said injured person may bring the legal action within one year of the final conclusion of the opposition proceedings. The third and fourth sentences shall not apply if the patentee did not act in good faith when obtaining the patent.A patent shall have the effect that the patentee alone shall be authorized to use the patented invention within the applicable laws. A third party not having the consent of the patentee shall be prohibited 1. from making, offering, putting on the market or using a product which is the subject matter of the patent, or from importing or possessing said product for such purposes; 2. from using a process which is the subject matter of the patent, or, when said third party knows or it is obvious from the circumstances that use of the process without the consent of the patentee is prohibited, from offering the process for use within the territory to which this Act applies; 3. from offering, putting on the market or using or importing or possessing for such purposes the product produced directly by a process which is the subject matter of the patent. 例文帳に追加

権利者であって，その発明についての非権利者によって出願がされたもの，又は窃取による被害者は，特許出願人に対し，特許付与を受ける権利を同人に譲渡するよう要求することができる。出願が既に特許を生じさせている場合は，権利者は，特許所有者が同人にその特許を譲渡するよう要求することができる。この権利は，第 4文及び第 5文に従うことを条件として，特許付与の公告(第 58条(1))から 2年以内に，訴訟によって主張することができる。被害者が窃取(第21条(1)3.)に基づく異議申立を提起しているときは，当該被害者は，その異議申立手続に関する最終的決着から 1年以内において訴訟を提起することができる。第 3文及び第 4文は，特許所有者が，特許の取得にあたって善意で行動していなかったときは適用されない。1. 特許の対象である製品を生産し，提供し，市販し若しくは使用し，又は当該目的のためにこれらの製品を輸入し若しくは保持すること 2. 特許の対象である方法を使用すること，又は特許所有者の同意を得ないでその方法を使用することが禁止されていることを当該第三者が知っているか若しくはそれが状況からみて明らかである場合に，本法の施行領域内での使用のために，その方法を提供すること3. 特許の対象である方法によって直接に得られた製品を提供し，市販し若しくは使用し，又は当該目的のために輸入し若しくは保持すること - 特許庁

It can also be assumed that Nobunaga could never divorce Nohime due to a dispute with the Saito clan led by Dosan's opposing older brother Yoshitatsu SAITO, because it was essential for Nobunaga to keep Nohime as his lawful wife, for he received the letter from Dosan in which Dosan appointed his son-in-law Nobunaga as successor of Mino Province, and in addition, it can be understood that Nohime did not die of sickness or some other reasons before the Capture of Mino Province, in view of the fact that Nohime encouraged the attack on Mino Province for she was the daughter of Dosan and was linked by blood to the Akechi clan, a branch of the Toki clan (however, she wouldn't be linked by blood to the Toki clan if Yoshitatsu was actually the son of Dosan), which could give her husband Nobunaga a good reason to be the legitimate successor of Mino Province, and also that the high-ranking officials of Mino Province were treated the same way as those of Owari Province. 例文帳に追加

また婿である信長を美濃国の後継者と定めた道三の国譲状がある以上は、濃姫を正室としておくことが信長にとっても必用不可欠であった事もあり、その道三と対立した、兄・斎藤義龍筋の斎藤氏との諍いにより離縁して実家に返したという可能性は考えられず、美濃攻略を推し進めて行った背景には道三息女であり、また土岐氏の傍流明智氏の血を引く濃姫の（義龍が道三実子であった場合、土岐氏と血縁関係はない事になる）、婿である信長こそ正統な美濃の後継者であるという大義名分があったためという推測も成り立つこと、美濃攻略後に美濃衆が尾張衆と同様に待遇されていることからも、濃姫が美濃攻略前に病気などで亡くなったという可能性もないと思われる。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Susanoo said, "There is gold and silver in the islands of Karakuni (considered to be a part of present-day Korea), so it is not good that the country controlled by my children doesn't have any ships." Then, he pulled out some hairs of his beard and scattered them, and then, they turned into cedars. He continued pulling out some hairs from parts of his body. The hairs he picked from his chest turned into hinoki (Japanese cypresses), the hairs he picked from his buttocks turned into maki (Japanese yew pines), and his plucked eyebrows turned into camphor trees. After that, he decided on the use of each tree and suggested, "Cedars and camphor trees should be used for making ships, Japanese cypresses should be used for constructing palaces, Japanese yew pines should be used for coffins when the body is buried. Everyone should join together to sow seeds of many trees used for these various purposes and grow many more trees." Around this time, he had a son, Isotakeru, and two daughters, Oyatsu-hime and Tsumatsu-hime. These three gods contributed to sowing seeds and growing trees all across the nation, and then they moved to Kii Province (the southern part of present-day Mie and Wakayama Prefectures) where they were enshrined. After that, Susanoo finally entered Ne-no-kuni (underworld) via Kumanarinotake. 例文帳に追加

一書曰素戔嗚尊曰韓郷之嶋是有金銀若使吾兒所御之國不有浮寶者未是佳也乃拔鬚髯散之即成杉又拔散胸毛是成檜尻毛是成柀眉毛是成櫲樟已而定其當用乃稱之曰杉及櫲樟此兩樹者可以爲浮寶檜可以爲瑞宮之材柀可以爲顯見蒼生奥津棄戸將臥之具夫須噉八十木種皆能播生于時素戔嗚尊之子號曰五十猛命妹大屋津姫命次枛津姫命凡此三神亦能分布木種即奉渡於紀伊國也然後素戔嗚尊居熊成峯而遂入於根國者矣棄戸此云須多杯柀此云磨紀 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

I think that it is absolutely inappropriate that the United State and Europe, which previously urged Japan to carry out liberalization, as well as other countries, employ practices that are problematic under WTO rules and engage in protectionism now that the situation has become like this, and I think we must stop this by all means. All countries, whether they are in the WTO or in the G-7, have been saying all along and will continue to say that protectionism is not good. However, if countries engage in protectionism regardless of what they say, I believe that Japan should take resolute actions. 例文帳に追加

ＷＴＯ的に見れば問題があるようなことをやっているということを、今まで日本に対して自由化、自由化と言っていたアメリカやヨーロッパが、あるいはほかの国々がこういう状況になると保護主義に走るというのは、これは絶対的に私は悪だと思っていますので、これは何としても阻止しなければいけませんし、各国とも多分言葉としてはみんなそうだと、ＷＴＯの世界でもＧ７の世界でも保護主義は良くないよねというのが今までの流れですし、これからもそうでしょうけれども、言葉は言葉として実際にそういうことをやるとすれば、日本としては断固たる対策、対応を取っていかなければいけないと思います。 - 金融庁

If those markets are going well every day, players can simply engage in an "I win, I lose" type of mutual transactions. If the transactions remain contained in a mutual setting, they are just like a game of gambling among the rich announcing their wins or losses and may therefore be nothing to be concerned about. The point, however, is that their impacts should not reach as far as general investors and the general public. That is where the FSA's responsibility lies, and we are struggling to determine how far our regulatory net should be extended. It is indeed a very nerve-racking question how to grasp the actual goings-on and how to determine ways to regulate them, as well as to guide and oversee them. I myself would like to hear any good ideas out there. I am sure the FSA Commissioner feels the same. 例文帳に追加

そういうものが、毎日、うまくいっていればお互いに「得した」、「損した」ということをやっている間で、お互いの間だったら、金持ち同士が「損した、負けた」と博打を打って、みたいな話ですから、なんということはないかもしれないですけれども、これが一般の投資家とか国民にまで影響が及ぶようなことがあってはならないということで、金融庁の責任みたいな、ではどこまで網をかけるのか、ということで苦労をしているのですけれども。では実態を捕捉して、それについてどう規制をかけて指導・監督していけば良いのか、ということは、本当に悩ましい問題なのです。私は、知恵があったら私自身が聞いて、金融庁長官も聞きたいと思いますよ。 - 金融庁

Lastly, I had a comment-for-the-Minister box set up. When I attended the National Securities Industry Convention yesterday, I took to marketing this initiative. As everyone asked me about this comment-for-the-Minister box, I answered, "Yes, I set it up. As the securities industry is working hard now amid the challenging recession, I would really encourage you not to hesitate to bring comments that come out of your sweat." To my surprise, a good number of people asked me about this. My decision to have the comment-for-the-Minister box set up is none other than my attempt to have a bird's eye in the sense that I have described, while I am also hoping to thoroughly take in unfiltered voices of each one of those people who are breathing in the securities industry. 例文帳に追加

それから最後に、大臣目安箱を作りまして、昨日、全国証券業大会に行ってきまして、このことをちゃんとPRしてきました。後からちょっと懇親会で歩きますと、結構みんなから「大臣目安箱って、自見さん、作ったんですか」と言うので、「いや、作りましたよ。もうまさに証券業界は、今、不況の中で厳しく頑張っておられますから、ぜひ何でも一人一人の汗のついたご意見を、本当に忌憚なくお寄せいただきたい」と。びっくりしたのですけれども、結構、人から聞かれたのです。ですから、そういった意味で大臣目安箱を作らせていただいたことも、まさに鳥の目でございますけれども、逆に一人一人の証券業界で生きておられる方の生きたご意見も、しっかり吸収させていただきたいと思っております。 - 金融庁

In particular, employees of regional banks, shinkin banks and credit unions have a close relationship with SMEs, so they have good knowledge of financial instruments that are selling well and other such information. Accordingly, one of the objectives of the SME Financing Facilitation Act is to have such consulting functions properly utilized. Unemployment is high at present, with total unemployment rate standing at 5.1 percent and the number of wholly-unemployed persons totaling 3.35 million: the economy has not recovered from the recession since the Lehman Brothers shockwave. 例文帳に追加

だから、今、こういうものが売れ筋だけど、これを売るならあそこの商店が今一生懸命やっているからあそこに持っていった方がいいとか、銀行員というのは、特に地方銀行あるいは信用金庫、信用組合というのはまさに中小企業の中に入り込んでいますから、その辺はよく知っています。ですから、そういったコンサルタント機能をしっかり活用していただきたいということが、この中小企業金融円滑化法案の一つでございますから、出来るだけ今は、（完全失業率が）5.1％、完全失業者が335万人と、失業も多いわけですし、リーマン・ショックの後のある意味で、社会的な不景気でございまして、まだ元には戻っておりません。 - 金融庁

Regarding the review of the postal businesses, as I told you the other day, we intend to draw up a bill to suspend the sale of shares and assets before the start of the extraordinary Diet session, and, if possible, we hope to enact a basic law, too. However, as the period of the session is very short, we must race against the clock if we are to enact the latter. Therefore, it is not clear whether we can fix the details of the basic law in the short period of time, so it may be better to listen to more opinions from various people. The Prime Minister also offered me a good idea (about business of the Japan Post) when I met him yesterday. As I told you over and over again, I have no intention of restoring the postal businesses, which have been broken up by Mr. Koizumi (former Prime Minister), to their status before the breakup 例文帳に追加

それと、ここは郵政見直しの方についても、この間も申し上げましたように、この臨時国会が始まる前に、きっちりと凍結法案、これは株と資産の凍結法案提出、できれば基本法をつくりたいと思っておりますが、会期が非常に短いものですから、基本法が上げられるかどうか、ちょっと時間との勝負みたいなところがありますので、基本法の中身まできちんと固めていけるか、非常に期間が短いですから、むしろもっといろいろな方の意見も聞いて、昨日だったか、総理にお会いした時も、総理もなかなかよいアイデア、意見も持っておられましたし、何度も言うように、純ちゃん（小泉純一郎元総理）がぐちゃぐちゃにしてしまった郵政事業を、その前の姿に戻すという気は、私にはありません - 金融庁

Where, in any proceedings respecting a registered trade-mark the registration of which is entitled to the protection of subsection 17(2), it is made to appear to the Federal Court that one of the parties to the proceedings, other than the registered owner of the trade-mark, had in good faith used a confusing trade-mark or trade-name in Canada before the date of filing of the application for that registration, and the Court considers that it is not contrary to the public interest that the continued use of the confusing trade-mark or trade-name should be permitted in a defined territorial area concurrently with the use of the registered trade-mark, the Court may, subject to such terms as it deems just, order that the other party may continue to use the confusing trade-mark or trade-name within that area with an adequate specified distinction from the registered trade-mark. 例文帳に追加

第17条(2)により保護される登録商標に関する訴訟において，訴訟の一方の当事者で登録商標の所有者以外の者が，登録商標の出願前にカナダでその登録商標と混同を生じる商標又は商号を善意に使用していたことがカナダ連邦裁判所で明らかにされ，かつ，その登録商標が使用されているときと同時にその混同を生じる商標又は商号を限定された地域内で継続的に使用することを許可しても公益に反さないと同裁判所が認める場合は，同裁判所は，同裁判所が公正とみなす条件に従うことを条件として，当該当事者が当該地域内で，その混同を生じる商標又は商号を，当該登録商標と識別するための十分な特定の表示と共に，継続して使用することができる旨を命令することができる。 - 特許庁

The Registrar may at any time and, at the written request made after three years from the date of the registration of a trade-mark by any person who pays the prescribed fee shall, unless the Registrar sees good reason to the contrary, give notice to the registered owner of the trade-mark requiring the registered owner to furnish within three months an affidavit or a statutory declaration showing, with respect to each of the wares or services specified in the registration, whether the trade-mark was in use in Canada at any time during the three year period immediately preceding the date of the notice and, if not, the date when it was last so in use and the reason for the absence of such use since that date. 例文帳に追加

登録官は，何時でも，登録官がこれに反する正当な理由を発見しない限り，その商標の登録名義人に通知を送付し，その登録において指定された各商品又はサービスに関し，当該通知の直前3年間の何れかの時において当該商標をカナダで使用したか否かについて，更に不使用の場合は，最後に使用された日及びその日以降の不使用の理由について示す宣誓供述書又は法定宣言書を3月以内に提出するよう求めることができ，かつ，商標の登録日から3年後に，何人かが所定の手数料を納付し書面で請求した場合は，そうしなければならない。 - 特許庁

Where an order is so made that a patent shall be transferred as mentioned in subsection (2) or that a person other than an old proprietor may make a new application for a patent and before the reference of the question under section 55 resulting in the making of any such order is registered, the old proprietor or proprietors or a licensee of the patent, acting in good faith, worked the invention in question in Hong Kong or made effective and serious preparations to do so, the old proprietor or proprietors or the licensee shall on making a request to the new proprietor or proprietors within the prescribed period be entitled to be granted a licence (but not an exclusive licence) to continue working or, as the case may be, to work the invention, so far as it is the subject of the new application. 例文帳に追加

特許が(2)にいうように移転されるべき旨，又は旧特許所有者を除く者が特許の新しい出願をすることができる旨の命令が発せられ，当該命令の発令に至った第55条に基づく疑義の付託が登録される前に，旧特許所有者又は特許実施権者が，善意で，香港において問題の発明を実施したか又はそのように実施するために有効かつ真摯な準備をした場合は，旧特許所有者又は特許実施権者は，所定の期間内に新特許所有者に対して請求することにより，発明が新しい出願の主題である限り，発明の実施を続行し，又は場合により，実施するためのライセンス(排他的ライセンスを除く)の許諾を受ける権利を有する。 - 特許庁

b) performing any of the acts referred to in Art. 32, paragraph 2 by a person who has applied the subject-matter of the patent or that of the patent application, as published, or has taken real and effective steps towards producing or exploiting said subject-matter in good faith on the territory of Romania, independently of the owner of the patent and before the regular national filing concerning the invention has been effected or before the recognized priority date; in that case the invention may continue to be exploited by that person to the same extent as on the date of the regular national filing or recognized priority, but the right of use may not be transferred otherwise than with the assets of that person or the part of the said assets assigned to the exploitation of the invention;例文帳に追加

(b) 第32 条第2 段落にいう行為の実行であって，特許又は公開された特許出願の主題を，ルーマニア領域において善意で，その特許の所有者からは独立して，かつ，その発明に係る正規の国内出願が行われる前又は承認された優先日前に，実施していた又はその製造若しくは使用に向けた現実かつ実効的な準備を行っていた者によるもの。この場合は，同人は正規の国内出願の出願日又は承認された優先日の時点において行っていた範囲においてその発明の実施を継続することができる。ただし，その実施の権利は，同人の財産又はその財産の内の，その発明の実施に係る部分と共にする場合を除き，移転することができない。 - 特許庁

If a person, in good faith, manufactures a product, utilizes an industrialprocess, manufactures an integrated circuit incorporating a layout designor a commodity including such a circuit, exploits a plant variety or makesserious arrangements, before the date of filing the patent application,or the priority application relating to that product or the process,design, plant variety, or the date of first commercial exploitation ofthe design anywhere in the world, such a party shall be entitled - despitethe issuance of the protection document - to continue to perform theseacts without expanding them.This right shall not be assigned ortransferred to others except with all parts of the firm or one of themincluding goodwill.例文帳に追加

ある者が，製品若しくは方法，設計，植物品種に関係する特許出願若しくは優先出願の出願日の前，又は設計が世界の何れかの場所において最初に商業利用される日の前に，誠実に製品を製造し，工業的方法を使用し，配置設計を組み入れた集積回路若しくは当該回路を含む商品を製造し，又は本格的な準備を行った場合は，その者は，保護書類の発行にも拘らず，当該行為を拡大することなく続行する権利を有する。この権利は，営業権を含む企業の全部又は一部と共にするのでなければ，他人に譲渡又は移転してはならない。 - 特許庁

(3) Where an order is so made that -- (a) a patent shall be transferred as mentioned in subsection (2); or (b) a person other than an old proprietor may make a new application for a patent, and before the reference of the question under that section resulting in the making of any such order is registered, the old proprietor or proprietors or a licensee of the patent, acting in good faith -- (i) worked the invention in question in Singapore; or (ii) made effective and serious preparations to do so, the old proprietor or proprietors or the licensee shall, on making a request to the new proprietor or proprietors within the prescribed period, be entitled to be granted a licence (but not an exclusive licence) to continue working or, as the case may be, to work the invention, so far as it is the subject of the new application.例文帳に追加

(3) (a) 特許が(2)に述べるように移転されるべき旨，又は (b) 旧所有者以外の者が新規に特許出願を行うことができる旨， の命令が行われ，かつ，当該命令がされる基礎となった同条に基づく問題の付託が登録される前に，当該特許の旧所有者又は実施権者が善意で， (i) 問題の当該発明をシンガポールにおいて実施したか，又は (ii) 実際上のかつ真摯な実施の準備をした場合は， 当該旧所有者又は実施権者は，所定の期間内に当該新所有者に請求することにより，当該発明が当該新規出願の主題である限り，当該発明の実施を継続するか又は場合により実施するためのライセンス(ただし，排他的ライセンスではない)の許諾を受けることができる。 - 特許庁

A party who, in good faith, has already manufactured or applied or commenced implementation of his intention to manufacture or apply, in or for his business, the subject matter in respect of which a European patent has been granted to another party before the date on which a notification of a corrected translation within the meaning of Article 52(7) has been entered in the patent register shall, notwithstanding the patent, continue to have the right to perform the acts referred to in Article 53(1) insofar as such acts do not infringe the patent holder’s exclusive right, which right in this case will be determined by the content of the claims in the patent specification and the description and drawings intended for the interpretation thereof contained in the earlier, defective translation into Dutch.例文帳に追加

何人かが，他人に付与された特許に係る主題を，第52条(7)の意味での訂正された翻訳文についての通告が特許登録簿に記入される前に，自己の事業において又はその事業のために誠実に既に製造若しくは利用しており，又はそれを製造若しくは利用する同人の意図の履行を開始しているときは，その特許に拘らず，当該人は引続き，第53条(1)にいう行為を履行する権利を有する。ただし，当該行為が特許所有者の排他権を侵害しないことを条件とし，その権利はこの場合は，先の欠陥のあるオランダ語翻訳文に含まれていた特許明細書のクレーム，その解釈のために使用される明細書及び図面の内容によって決定される。 - 特許庁

Where a trade mark has been removed from the Register for non-payment of the fee for renewal, it shall, nevertheless, for the purpose of an application for the registration of a trade mark within one year from the date of expiration of the last registration be deemed to be a trade mark which is already on the Register except that this section shall not have effect when the Registrar is satisfied either - (a) that there has been no use in good faith of the trade mark which has been removed during the two years immediately preceding its removal; or (b) that no deception or confusion is likely to arise from the use of the trade mark which is the subject of the application for registration by reason of any previous use of the trade mark which has been removed.例文帳に追加

商標が更新手数料の不納の故に登録簿から抹消された場合においても，当該商標は，最終登録満了日から1年以内になされる商標登録出願の目的では，登録簿に存在する商標として扱われるものとする。ただし，本条は，登録官が次の何れかの事由を認定する場合は適用されない。 (a) 登録を抹消された商標の善意の使用が，その抹消の直前2年間になかったこと，又は (b) 抹消された商標の従前の使用を理由として，登録出願の対象である商標の使用が，何らの誤認若しくは混同も生じさせる虞がないこと - 特許庁

(2) Subject to Subsections (3), (4) and (5) an assignment of a registered trade mark without goodwill is invalid if - (a) the trade mark was not at any time in use in good faith in Papua New Guinea by the assignor or his predecessor in title; or (b) a substantially identical or deceptively similar trade mark continues to be used by the assignor, after the assignment in relation to other goods, where - (i) there exists a connection in the course of trade between those goods and the assignor; and (ii) those goods are - (A) of the same description as those in respect of which the trade mark has been assigned; or (B) of such a description that the public is likely to be deceived by the use of the trade mark by the assignor and assignee on their respective goods.例文帳に追加

(2) 本条(3)，(4)及び(5)に基づいて，次に掲げる各号の場合，営業権を伴わない登録商標の譲渡は無効である。 (a) 当該商標がパプアニューギニア国内において譲渡人又は前権利者により善意に使用されたことがない場合，又は， (b) 実質的に同一の又は混同を生じるほど類似する商標が，譲渡後も譲渡人によりその他の商品に継続して使用され，かつ以下の条件をみたす場合 (i) それらの商品及び譲渡人との間に取引上の関係が存在すること，及び (ii) それらの商品が (A) 譲渡された商標に関する商品と同一の内容を有すること，又は (B) 譲渡人及び譲受人による各自の商品への当該商標の使用により，公衆が誤認混同するおそれがある内容を有すること - 特許庁

Sec.134 Opposition Any person who believes that he would be damaged by the registration of a mark may, upon payment of the required fee and within thirty days after the publication referred to in Subsection 133.2, file with the Office an opposition to the application. Such opposition shall be in writing and verified by the oppositor or by any person on his behalf who knows the facts, and shall specify the grounds on which it is based and include a statement of the facts relied upon. Copies of certificates of registration of marks registered in other countries or other supporting documents mentioned in the opposition shall be filed therewith, together with the translation in English, if not in the English language. For good cause shown and upon payment of the required surcharge, the time for filing an opposition may be extended by the Director of Legal Affairs, who shall notify the applicant of such extension. The Regulations shall fix the maximum period of time within which to file the opposition.例文帳に追加

第134条 異議申立 ある標章の登録により害される虞があると考える者は，133.2に規定する公告の後30日以内に，庁に対し，所定の手数料を納付して当該出願に対する異議申立をすることができる。異議申立は，書面で行わなければならない。異議申立人又は事実を知るその代理人が，異議申立の理由を述べ，かつ，依拠する事実について陳述することにより異議申立について宣誓しなければならない。異議申立において引用する他国において登録された標章の登録証その他の立証資料の写は，それらが英語でない場合は英語による翻訳文を添えて異議申立とともに提出しなければならない。正当な理由があり，かつ，所定の割増手数料を納付した場合は，法務局長は異議申立書の提出期間を延長することができ，延長について当該出願人に通知する。異議申立書を提出するための最長の期間については，規則に定める。 - 特許庁

Sec.140 Cancellation upon Application by Registrant; Amendment of Disclaimer of Registration Upon application of the registrant, the Office may permit any registration to be surrendered for cancellation, and upon cancellation the appropriate entry shall be made in the records of the Office. Upon application of the registrant and payment of the prescribed fee, the Office for good cause may permit any registration to be amended or to be disclaimed in part: Provided, that the amendment or disclaimer does not alter materially the character of the mark. Appropriate entry shall be made in the records of the Office upon the certificate of registration or, if said certificates is lost or destroyed, upon a certified copy thereof.例文帳に追加

第140条 権利者の申請に基づく取消及び登録の補正又は部分放棄 権利者の請求に基づいて，庁は，取消のための登録の放棄を認めることができ，取り消したときは，その旨を庁の記録に記入する。庁は，正当な理由があれば権利者の請求及び所定の手数料の納付に基づいて登録の訂正又は部分放棄を認めることができる。ただし，当該訂正又は部分放棄は，当該標章の特色を著しく変更するものであってはならない。登録証又は登録証を紛失若しくは破損した場合はその認証謄本に基づいて，庁の記録に適切な記入をする。 - 特許庁

The owner of the patent shall have the right to request the Bureau to make changes in the patent in order to: (a) Limit the extent of the protection conferred by it; (b) Correct obvious mistakes or to correct clerical errors; and (c) Correct mistakes or errors, other than those referred to in letter (b), made in good faith; Provided, That were the change would result in broadening of the extent of the protection conferred by the patent, no request may be made after the expiration of two years from the grant of a patent and the change shall not affect the rights of any third party which has relied on the patent, as published.例文帳に追加

特許の所有者は，次の目的で特許に変更を施すことを局に請求する権利を有する。 (a)当該特許により与えられている保護の範囲を限定すること (b)明白な錯誤を訂正し又は事務的な誤りを訂正すること，及び (c)(b)にいう錯誤又は誤りのほか，善意でした錯誤又は誤りを訂正すること。ただし，その変更によって当該特許による保護の範囲を拡張することになる場合は，その変更は，特許の付与から2年が経過した後は請求することができず，また，その変更は，公告当時の内容による特許に依拠していた第三者の権利に影響しないものとする。 - 特許庁

And where will be your fine sentiments about justice and virtue? Say that you wish to live for the sake of your children--you want to bring them up and educate them--will you take them into Thessaly and deprive them of Athenian citizenship? Is this the benefit which you will confer upon them? Or are you under the impression that they will be better cared for and educated here if you are still alive, although absent from them; for your friends will take care of them? Do you fancy that if you are an inhabitant of Thessaly they will take care of them, and if you are an inhabitant of the other world that they will not take care of them? Nay; but if they who call themselves friends are good for anything, they will--to be sure they will. 例文帳に追加

では、そなたが正義とか美徳とかについて語った、あのみごとな演説はどこに残るんだ。それともそなたは子供のために生きるというのかもな。彼らを育て、教育を受けさせたいと言うんだろう。そうして子供たちをテッサリアに連れていって、アテネの市民権を彼らから奪うというのか。それが子供に授ける利益なのか。それとも、そなたがアテネにいなくても、子供たちは立派に育ち、教育を受けられると思っているのか。友人たちが子供の面倒をみてくれるからか。そなたがテッサリアの住民であれば子供の世話をして、冥府の住民だったら世話をしないとでも思っているのか。そうではないだろう。彼らがそなたのよき友人と自称するなら、まちがいなく世話をしてくれるはずなのだ。」 - Plato『クリトン』

The government established one campus of Teikoku (Imperial) University in Kyoto. It had been decided that there would be two universities (in the east and west, respectively) as the center of the best education, and that the two universities would compete with each other as motivation for progress in education; and in Tokyo, several public and private schools as well as Teikoku （Imperial) University already began accepting various applicants; thus the students who had youthful resolution gathered, which is the center of education. However, there were many good, enthusiastic young students gathered at Teikoku (Imperial) University, which was newly established in Kyoto, but the university couldn't accept the applicants who had not graduated from high school, so there was no school to study high education without status as a university, which was the problem of greatest concern, so volunteers who were of the same mind gathered and established the Kyoto Hosei School, entrusting the lectures to the professors of Kyoto Imperial University and other well-known teachers; thus the institution could provide higher education in politics, law and economics to society. Certainly, a reason for that was to demonstrate the government's approval concerning the establishment of education in two places (east and west), and another reason was to make up for the flaw in the educational system whereby Teikoku (Imperial) University was not widely open to applicants who had not graduated from high school ('A Brief History of Ritsumeikan University,' "Ritsumeikan Gakuho," March 1915). 例文帳に追加

政府は曩に一の帝国大学を京都に新設し、天下学問の中心を東西二都に置くの制を採れり、蓋し東西二大学の競争をして学問進歩の動機たらしめんとするに在るべし、而して東京には帝国大学の外各種の官私学校ありて各般学生の志望に充つることを得、青年の志を立つる者此に集合し自ら既に天下学問の中心たり、然るに京都に在りては帝国大学新たに設置せられ関西の学術大に振るわんとし青年の志を有して京都に集まり来るもの頗る多きも、大学の門戸は未だ高等学校卒業生以外の志望者を迎ふるに至らず、大学以外に在りて高等の学術を修めんとするも其機関あることなし、是れ頗る恨事なり、爰に於てか有志の者相図り京都法政学校を新設し、講義を京都帝国大学教授及其他博学知名の諸氏に嘱託し、政治法律経済に関する高等の学術を広く社会に紹介するの一機関たらしめんとす、是れ蓋し、一は政府か学問の中心を東西の二都に置かんとするの趣意に賛同の意を表し、又一は帝国大学か広く門戸を開放して高等学校卒業生以外の志望者を迎ふる能はさるの欠点を補はんとするの微意に出つるものなり　（「立命館大学沿革略」『立命館学報』二　一九一五・大正4年3月） - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Infringement where non-compliance with certain contractual requirements A registered trade mark is infringed if a purchaser or owner of goods and the owner or licensee of the registered trade mark have entered into a written contract that requires the purchaser or owner of the goods not to do, in relation to the goods, any of the acts listed in subsection (2); and the owner, for the time being, of the goods has notice of the contractual requirement; and does or authorizes, in the course of trade, or with a view to dealing with the goods in the course of trade, any of those listed acts; and did not purchase the goods for value and in good faith before receiving notice of the contractual requirement; and is not a successor in title to an owner to whom subparagraph (iii) applies. The acts referred to in subsection (1) are the application of the trade mark on the goods after their condition, get-up, or packaging has been altered in any manner specified in the contract: if the trade mark is on the goods, the alteration, part removal, or part obliteration of the trade mark: the application of any other trade mark to the goods: the addition to the goods of any written material that is likely to damage the reputation of the trade mark: if the trade mark is on the goods, and there is something else on the goods that indicates a connection in the course of trade between the owner or licensee and the goods, the removal or obliteration, whether wholly or partly, of the trade mark.例文帳に追加

契約上の一定の義務を守らない場合の権利侵害次に掲げる事情においては，登録商標の権利が侵害される。商品の購入者又は所有者と登録商標の所有者又は使用権者とが，その商品の購入者又は所有者が，その商品に関し，(2)に記載する何れの行為も実行しないことを要求する書面による契約を締結しており，かつそのときの商品所有者が，契約義務を認知しており，かつ業として，又は業として当該商品を取り扱う目的で，それらの行為の何れかを実行するか又は許可し，かつ契約義務についての通知を受ける前に，有価かつ善意で当該商品を購入しておらず，かつ(iii)が適用される所有者の権原の承継人でない場合(1)において言及した行為とは，次のことである。商品の状態，外装，若しくは包装が契約に指定されている形で変更された後での，その商品への商標の利用商標が商品に付されている場合において，商標の変更，一部除去又は一部抹消その商品への他の商標の利用商品に対する，商標の評判に害を与える虞のある文面資料の追加商標が商品に付されており，かつ，所有者又は登録使用権者とその商品との間の業としての関連を示す他の事項もその商品に表示されている場合において，商標の除去又は抹消。その場合，それが，全部であるか一部であるかを問わない。 - 特許庁

(a) If an applicant fails to prosecute his application within the required time as provided in these Regulations, the application shall be deemed withdrawn. (b) The time for reply may be extended only for good and sufficient cause, and for a reasonable time specified. Any request for such extension must be filed on or before the day on which action by the applicant is due. The Examiner may grant a maximum of two extensions, provided that the aggregate period granted inclusive of the initial period allowed to file the response, shall not exceed six months from mailing date of the official action requiring such response. (c) Prosecution of an application to save it from withdrawal must include such complete and proper action as the condition of the case may require. Any amendment not responsive to the last official action shall not operate to save the application from being deemed withdrawn. (d) When action by the applicant is a bona fide attempt to advance the case to final action, and is substantially a complete response to the Examiner’s action, but consideration of some matter or compliance with some requirements has been inadvertently omitted, opportunity to explain and supply the omission may be given before the question of withdrawal is considered. (e) Prompt ratification or filing of a correctly signed copy may be accepted in case of an unsigned or improperly signed paper.例文帳に追加

(a)出願人が本規則に規定する期間内に出願を遂行しなかった場合は，当該出願は，取り下げられたものとみなされる。 (b)応答期間は，適切かつ十分な理由がある場合に限り，かつ，指定された合理的な期間にわたり，延長することができる。当該延長の請求は，出願人による応答の期限が到来する日以前にしなければならない。審査官は，最大2回まで延長を認めることができるが，ただし，応答書を提出するために認められた当初期間を含む合計期間は，当該応答を求める庁の処分書の郵送日から6月を超えないものとする。 (c)出願が取り下げられたとみなされないようにするための出願の遂行には，当該事案の事情から必要とされる完全かつ適切な行為を含むものとする。庁による最終処分に応答していない補正は，当該出願を取り下げたとみなされることを防ぐことができない。 (d)出願人による行為が，事案を最終処分に進めるための善意の試みであり，審査官の処分に対する実質的には完全な応答であるにも拘らず，ある事項の検討又はある要件の遵守を不注意により怠っている場合は，取下の問題を検討する前に，当該不作為を説明し，埋め合わせる機会を与えることができる。 (e)署名が脱落した又は署名が不適切な文書の場合においては，正しく署名された写しの速やかな追認又は提出が認められる。 - 特許庁

As I repeatedly say, it is true that a higher capital adequacy figure may appear to imply security at a glance, but it can also lead to a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection practices, as we experienced 10 years ago. Back then, even healthy companies went under. As a Diet member of the ruling party in a ministerial post, I was faced firsthand with the confusion that prevailed in the Japanese economy at that time. It was in 1997 that the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went under and Yamaichi Securities failed, soon ushering in what would be called the "Financial Diet Session." The Basel meeting is attended by 27 countries and, for all of them, a higher ratio figure, which does provide peace of mind and security, is at the same time not necessarily better in that light. As making a capital adequacy ratio too high can lead to a credit crunch and oppressive debt collection and hence a shrinking economy, we are hoping to maintain a good balance in view of all those factors. We are determined to make our point in the new requirement debate, keeping in mind where we stand as a country that actually experienced a financial crisis 10 years ago. 例文帳に追加

私は何回も申しますように、自己資本比率が高ければ高いほど確かに一見安全に見えますけれども、それだと、よく我々10年前に経験したように、貸し渋り・貸し剥がしが起こるわけでございますから、あのとき健全な企業まで、健全に近い企業まで倒産をしたというようなことがございますし、日本の経済が混乱したということは10年前私も、何度も申し上げます、与党の国会議員として、私が閣僚のときに、1997年か98年でございますが、北海道拓殖銀行が倒産する、山一證券が破綻するという時代で、その後が金融国会でございましたから、身をもって体験しておりますから、やはりそこら辺は安心・安定という、これはこの金融機関あるいは金融システム、基本的にG20の世界でございますし、このバーゼルの会議は27カ国出ていますけれども、そういった意味の安心・安全ということと同時に、余り数値だけ高ければ高いほどいいわけではない。そこは余り高くしますと、今さっき言ったように、今度は貸し渋り・貸し剥がしが起きて経済そのものが縮小するわけでございますから、そこら辺をきちんとバランスを持ってやっていきたいというふうに思っておりまして、そういった意味のことを、新規制が我々の立場、10年前に金融危機を実際に経験して、そういった立場もきちんと踏まえながら主張をしていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Subsection 1 of Section 2 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6(1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6 (4) and Article 37-6(5)(Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding Article 37-6(3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the terms "intends to conclude" in Article 37-3(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conducts agency service or intermediary service for conclusion of,"; the term "; provided" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Business Operator, etc." in Article 37-3(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2(16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2(15) of the Banking Act) is acting,"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount designated by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for financial instruments transaction (referred to as "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When he/she has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "sales and purchase or any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance or other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Securities Investment Trust and Securities Investment Corporations; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39(1)(i) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) and (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(ii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from Such Securities, etc." in Article 39(1)(iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition to the profit accrued to the customer from the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of a dispute" in Article 39(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may become a cause of dispute,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の四十五の二　金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 52-2-5 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Customer Other Than a Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person Who is a Customer Other than a Professional Investor will be Deemed to be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Section 2, Subsection 1 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business Activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business Activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) (Delivery of Documents Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Articles 37-5 to 37-7 inclusive (Delivery of Documents Pertaining to the Receipt of a Security Deposit, Cancellation by Means of a Document, Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and paragraph (5) of that Article (Prohibition on Compensation for Losses, etc.) and Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediation for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to the Foreign Bank Agency Services provided by a Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning a Bank which provides the Foreign Bank Agency Services after obtaining the authorization under Article 52-2, paragraph (1) or giving a notification under paragraph (2) of that Article; the same shall apply hereinafter). In this case, the terms "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction," "Financial Instruments Business," and "soliciting to conclude, or concluding" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," and "soliciting to conclude or providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion" respectively, the term "Acts of Financial Instruments Transactions" in these provisions (excluding Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrases "a contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer," "and has never concluded a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "concluding" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act," "and has never provided agency or intermediation for Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. belonging to those specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the same kind as the Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. pertaining to said application (hereinafter referred to as a "Kind of Contract" in this Subsection) with said Professional Investor" and "providing agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" respectively, the term "conclude" in Article 34-2, paragraph (5), item (ii) and Article 34-3, paragraph (4), item (ii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provide agency or intermediation for the conclusion of," the phrase "Subject Contract with" in Article 34-3, paragraph (2), item (iv), sub-item (a) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Subject Contract through agency or intermediation by," the phrases "wishes to conclude" and "deliver to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "provides agency or intermediation for the conclusion of" and "in addition to delivering to the customer a document containing the following matters in advance, provide information on the contents of contracts pertaining to the Deposits, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning the Depositors, etc. defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph)" respectively, the term "a Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Foreign Bank (meaning the Principal Foreign Bank defined in Article 52-2, paragraph (1) of the Banking Act) of the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank (meaning the Foreign Bank's Agent Bank defined in Article 52-2-5 of that Act)," the phrase "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter collectively referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in cases where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or a financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," "the customer" and "make up, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." respectively, the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the phrase "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for Specified Deposit, etc.," the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.," the phrase "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of," the phrases "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4), and Article 43-4" and "concluded" in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to the delivery of documents under paragraph (1), the provisions of paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and paragraph (3) shall be excluded) and Article 37-4" and "provided agency or intermediation for the conclusion thereof" respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の二の五　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五から第三十七条の七まで（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付、書面による解除、指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は、外国銀行代理銀行（第五十二条の二第一項の認可を受け、又は同条第二項の規定による届出をして外国銀行代理業務を営んでいる銀行をいう。以下同じ。）が行う外国銀行代理業務に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「締結の勧誘又は締結」とあるのは「締結の勧誘又は締結の代理若しくは媒介」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、「を過去に当該特定投資家との間で締結」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を過去に当該特定投資家との間で」と、「を締結する」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同法第三十四条の二第五項第二号及び第三十四条の三第四項第二号中「締結する」とあるのは「締結の代理又は媒介をする」と、同条第二項第四号イ中「と対象契約」とあるのは「による代理若しくは媒介により対象契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「外国銀行代理銀行（銀行法第五十二条の二の五に規定する外国銀行代理銀行をいう。）の所属外国銀行（同法第五十二条の二第一項に規定する所属外国銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と、「締結した」とあるのは「締結の代理若しくは媒介をした」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 52-45-2 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 2, Subsection 1 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business activities of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Services or Investment Management, Scope of Subsidiary Business activities of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Services or Investment Advisory and Agency Services, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, Prohibition of Administration of Corporate Bonds), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6, paragraphs (1) and (2), the proviso to Article 37-6, paragraph (4) and Article 37-6, paragraph (5) (Cancellation by Means of Document), Article 37-7 (Obligation to Conclude a Contract, etc. with a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Articles 40-2 to 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy, Prohibition of Purchase and Sale, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured, Limitation on Sale and Purchase, etc. of Securities for Professional Investors, Obligation of Notification in Relation to Securities for Professional Investors)) (General Rules) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to agency or intermediary for conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. by a Bank Agency. In this case, the term "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "agency or intermediation for the conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Act of Executing a Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in the aforementioned provisions (excluding Article 37-6, paragraph (3)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act"; the terms "wishes to conclude" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "engages in agency or intermediation for the conclusion of"; the term "; provided" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc. in advance, pursuant to the provisions of Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided"; the term "Financial Instruments Specialist, etc." in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Principal Bank (meaning an Principal Bank as defined in Article 2, paragraph (16) of the Banking Act) for which the Bank Agent (meaning a Bank Agent as defined in Article 2, paragraph (15) of the Banking Act) is acting"; the terms "Where a Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction has been cancelled" and "the customer to pay damages or penalty for the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction beyond the amount specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as the amount of fees, remuneration or any other Consideration payable by the customer with regard to that contract for Financial Instruments Transaction (referred to as a "Consideration" in the following paragraph) for the period until the cancellation of that Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in Article 37-6, paragraph (3) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "When a Financial Instruments Specialist has paid money to a Bank as damages or otherwise for cancellation of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. (meaning a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. as defined in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act; the same shall apply in Article 39) made" and "person who canceled the contract to pay money as damages or otherwise for the payment he/she has made to the Bank," respectively; the terms "purchase and sale or other transactions of Securities (excluding purchase and sale on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by Cabinet Order) or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)," "the customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Engagement in Trust Business by a Financial Institution; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts purchase and sale of Securities or Derivative Transactions on the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" and "make up" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," "the customer," "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "make up, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the terms "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." and "Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc." and "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.," respectively; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "make an addition" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (iii) shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, not through the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "Purchase and Sale or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc."; the term "that is specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that may be a potential cause of"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十二条の四十五の二　金融商品取引法第三章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十七条の六第一項、第二項、第四項ただし書及び第五項（書面による解除）、第三十七条の七（指定紛争解決機関との契約締結義務等）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）の規定は、銀行代理業者が行う銀行代理業に係る特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結の代理又は媒介の業務」と、「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約の締結」と、これらの規定（同法第三十七条の六第三項の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「を締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「の締結の代理又は媒介を行うとき」と、「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「銀行代理業者（銀行法第二条第十五項に規定する銀行代理業者をいう。）の所属銀行（同条第十六項に規定する所属銀行をいう。）」と、同法第三十七条の六第三項中「金融商品取引契約の解除があつた場合には」とあるのは「特定預金等契約（銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約をいう。第三十九条において同じ。）の解除に伴い銀行に損害賠償その他の金銭の支払をした場合において」と、「金融商品取引契約の解除までの期間に相当する手数料、報酬その他の当該金融商品取引契約に関して顧客が支払うべき対価（次項において「対価」という。）の額として内閣府令で定める金額を超えて当該金融商品取引契約の解除」とあるのは「支払」と、「又は違約金の支払を」とあるのは「その他の金銭の支払を、解除をした者に対し、」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-2 The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Professional Investors) (excluding Article 34-2(6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where Professional Investors Are Deemed to Be Customers Other Than Professional Investors) and Article 34-3(5) and (6) (Cases Where Juridical Persons Who Are Customers Other than Professional Investors Are Deemed to Be Professional Investors)), the provisions of Chapter III, Section 2, Subsection 1 of that Act (General Rules) (excluding Article 35 to Article 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business; Scope of Additional Business of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business; Duty of Good Faith to Customers; Posting of Signs; Prohibition on Name Lending; Prohibition on Administration of Bonds, etc.), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulations on Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) to (iv) inclusive and (vi) and 37-3(3) (Delivery of Documents Prior to the Conclusion of a Contract), Article 37-4 (Delivery of Documents upon Conclusion of a Contract, etc.), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Documents Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposits), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), Article 39(1), Article 39(2)(ii), Article 39(3) and (5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40(i) (Rule of Suitability), and Article 40-2 to Article 40-5 inclusive (Best Execution Policy; Prohibition of Sales and Purchases, etc. where Separate Management Is Not Maintained; Restriction on Sales, etc. of Securities to Professional Investors; Obligation to Provide Professional Investors with Information Regarding Securities)), and the provisions of Article 45 (Miscellaneous Provisions) of that Act (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to acceptance by a Trust Company of a trust under a trust agreement (meaning those that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as trust agreements with the risk of a trust principal loss caused by fluctuation in the interest rate, currency value, quotations on a Financial Instruments Market (meaning a Financial Instruments Market as prescribed in Article 2(14) of that Act), or any other index; hereinafter referred to as a "Specific Trust Agreement"). In this case, the term "Contract for a Financial Instruments Transaction" and "Financial Instruments Business" in these provisions shall respectively be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Trust Agreement" and "business for the conclusion of Specific Trust Agreements"; the term "Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Specific Trust Agreements"; the term "contract to carry out Acts for a Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2(8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specific Trust Agreements prescribed in Article 24-2 of the Trust Business Act"; the term "the trade name or name and address" in Article 37-3(1)(i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the address"; the term "Article 37-4(1)" in Article 37-6(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 26(1) of the Trust Business Act"; the terms "Sales and Purchases or Other Transactions of Securities, etc." and "item (i) of the preceding paragraph" in Article 39(2)(i) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall respectively be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Specific Trust Agreements" and "Compensation of Losses, etc. (meaning compensation for losses or supplementation of profit as prescribed in Article 24(1)(iv) of the Trust Business Act; the same shall apply in item (iii))"; the term "Sales and Purchases or Other Transactions of Securities, etc." and "provided under item (iii) of the preceding paragraph" in Article 39(2)(iii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall respectively be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Specific Trust Agreements" and "pertaining to compensation of losses, etc."; and the term "Problematic Conduct" in Article 39(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an accident imputable to a Trust Company." In addition, the necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の二　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止、社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号から第四号まで及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の四（契約締結時等の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第一項、第二項第二号、第三項及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条第一号（適合性の原則等）並びに第四十条の二から第四十条の五まで（最良執行方針等、分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止、特定投資家向け有価証券の売買等の制限、特定投資家向け有価証券に関する告知義務）を除く。）（通則）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は、信託会社が行う信託契約（金利、通貨の価格、金融商品市場（同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場をいう。）における相場その他の指標に係る変動により信託の元本について損失が生ずるおそれがある信託契約として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。以下「特定信託契約」という。）による信託の引受けについて準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定信託契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定信託契約の締結の業務」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定信託契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「信託業法第二十四条の二に規定する特定信託契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項第一号中「商号、名称又は氏名及び住所」とあるのは「住所」と、同法第三十七条の六第一項中「第三十七条の四第一項」とあるのは「信託業法第二十六条第一項」と、同法第三十九条第二項第一号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定信託契約の締結」と、「前項第一号」とあるのは「損失補てん等（信託業法第二十四条第一項第四号の損失の補てん又は利益の補足をいう。第三号において同じ。）」と、同項第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定信託契約の締結」と、「前項第三号の提供」とあるのは「損失補てん等」と、同条第四項中「事故」とあるのは「信託会社の責めに帰すべき事故」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 13-4 The provisions of Subsection 5 of Section 1 of Chapter III of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (excluding Article 34-2(6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3(5) and (6) inclusive (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investors), Subsection 1 of Section 2 of that Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4 inclusive (' Scope of Businesses of Persons Who Engage in Type I Financial Instruments Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name Lending, and Prohibition of Administration of Bonds), Article 37(1)(ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3(1)(ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3(3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 38(i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso to Article 39(3) and Article 39(5) (Prohibition of Compensation of Loss, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy) and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured)) (General Rules) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) shall apply mutatis mutandis to conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning contracts on acceptance of Specified Deposits, etc. (meaning those that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as deposits or Installment Savings, etc. with the risk of a principal loss caused by fluctuations pertaining to the interest rate, currency value, quotations on a financial instruments market prescribed in Article 2(14) of that Act, or any other index); the same shall apply hereinafter) by a Bank. In this case, the term "Contract for Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc.,"; the term "Financial Instruments Business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Business of Concluding Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the term "Act of Financial Instruments Transaction" in these provisions (excluding the provisions in Article 34 of that Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in each item of Article 2(8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" in Article 34 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc. as Prescribed in Article 13-4 of the Banking Act,"; the phrase "; provided" in Article 37-3(1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "and shall, in order to contribute to the protection of Depositors, etc. (meaning Depositors, etc. prescribed in Article 2(5) of the Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provide the customer in advance with information on the contents of the Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc. and other information that would be helpful for the Depositors, etc., pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided,"; the phrase "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" in Article 39(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "Securities or Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Securities, etc." in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including that person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "Customers,"; the phrase "make up for" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "make up, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., for,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in items (ii) and (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the term "Securities, etc." in those items shall be deemed to be replaced with "Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "make an addition to" in item (ii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., to,"; the term "make an addition to" in item (iii) of that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "make an addition, outside that Contract for a Specified Deposit, etc., to,"; the term "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Conclusion of Contracts for Specified Deposits, etc.,"; the phrase "that is specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause of" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "that is a potential cause of,"; the phrase "Articles 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2(4), and Article 43-4" in Article 45(ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the part pertaining to delivery of a document set forth in paragraph (1) and excluding items (ii) and (vi) of that paragraph and paragraph (3)), Article 37-4 and Article 37-6,"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第十三条の四　金融商品取引法第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで（特定投資家が特定投資家以外の顧客とみなされる場合）並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項（特定投資家以外の顧客である法人が特定投資家とみなされる場合）を除く。）（特定投資家）、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで（第一種金融商品取引業又は投資運用業を行う者の業務の範囲、第二種金融商品取引業又は投資助言・代理業のみを行う者の兼業の範囲、顧客に対する誠実義務、標識の掲示、名義貸しの禁止及び社債の管理の禁止等）、第三十七条第一項第二号（広告等の規制）、第三十七条の二（取引態様の事前明示義務）、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項（契約締結前の書面の交付）、第三十七条の五（保証金の受領に係る書面の交付）、第三十八条第一号及び第二号並びに第三十八条の二（禁止行為）、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項（損失補てん等の禁止）、第四十条の二（最良執行方針等）並びに第四十条の三（分別管理が確保されていない場合の売買等の禁止）を除く。）（通則）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は、銀行が行う特定預金等契約（特定預金等（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動によりその元本について損失が生ずるおそれがある預金又は定期積金等として内閣府令で定めるものをいう。）の受入れを内容とする契約をいう。以下同じ。）の締結について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結の業務」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「銀行法第十三条の四に規定する特定預金等契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「交付しなければならない」とあるのは「交付するほか、預金者等（銀行法第二条第五項に規定する預金者等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の保護に資するため、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該特定預金等契約の内容その他預金者等に参考となるべき情報の提供を行わなければならない」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「顧客」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定預金等契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定預金等契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項の書面の交付に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）、第三十七条の四及び第三十七条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 300-2 The provision of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) inclusive (Cases Where a Professional Investor Will be Deemed to be a Customer Other than Professional Investor) and Article 34-3, paragraphs (5) and (6) (Cases Where a Juridical Person who Is a Customer Other Than Professional Investor Will Be Deemed to Be a Professional Investor)) (Professional Investor) and Article 45 (excluding items (iii) and (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provision) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract (meaning an insurance contract specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as entailing the risk of loss due to any change in interest rates, currency values, financial instruments market prices as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (14) of that Act or any other indicator (meaning the risk that the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the insurance contract may exceed the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) effected by an Insurance Company, etc. or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or a contract stipulating any specific act as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract; the provision of Section 2, Subsection 1 of the same Chapter (excluding Article 35 to 36-4 inclusive (Scope of Business for Persons Who Engage in Type 1 Financial Instruments Transaction Business or Investment Management Business, Scope of Subsidiary Businesses of Persons Who Only Engage in Type II Financial Instruments Business or Investment Advisory and Agency Business, Duty of Good Faith to Customers, Posting of Signs, Prohibition of Name-Lending and Prohibition of Administration of Company Bonds, etc.), Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii) (Regulation of Advertising, etc.), Article 37-2 (Obligation to Clarify Conditions of Transactions in Advance), Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3) (Delivery of Document Prior to Conclusion of Contract), Article 37-5 (Delivery of Document Pertaining to Receipt of Security Deposit), Article 37-6 (Cancellation by a Written Statement), Article 38, items (i) and (ii) and Article 38-2 (Prohibited Acts), the proviso of Article 39, paragraph (3) and Article 39, paragraph (5) (Prohibition of Loss Compensation, etc.), Article 40-2 (Best Execution Policy, etc.), and Article 40-3 (Prohibition of Sales and Purchase, etc. Where Separate Management Is not Ensured) (General Rules)) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified insurance contract by an Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., Insurance Solicitor or Insurance Broker and related act as an agent or intermediary. In this case, the terms "financial instruments transaction contract" and "financial instruments transaction business" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract, etc.," and "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, or any related act as an agent or intermediary," respectively; in Article 34 of that Act, the term "contract to conduct Acts of Financial Instruments Transaction (meaning acts listed in the items of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" shall be deemed to be replaced with "effecting a specified insurance contract (meaning a specified insurance contract provided in Article 300-2 of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) or acting as an intermediary for the benefit of a customer in concluding a specified insurance contract"; in Article 37, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "carrying out Financial Instruments and Exchange Activities" shall be deemed to be replaced with "concluding specified insurance contracts"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract" shall be deemed to be replaced with "when it intends to conclude a financial instruments transaction contract or acts as an agent or intermediary in concluding a specified insurance contract" and the term "the following matters" with "the following matters and any other important matter stipulated by an insurance contract provided in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act"; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "Insurance Company, etc. (meaning an Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (meaning a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (7) of that Act) or Insurance Broker (meaning an Insurance Broker as defined in paragraph (25) of the same Article) concluding a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (v) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business carried out" shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified insurance contract concluded"; in Article 38, paragraph (1) of that Act, the term "employee" shall be deemed to be replaced with "employee (excluding an Insurance Solicitor as defined in Article 2, paragraph (23) of the Insurance Business Act; the same shall apply in Article 39, paragraph (3))"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act, the term "sales and purchase and any other transaction of Securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance and other transactions specified by a Cabinet Order) or of Derivative Transactions (hereinafter referred to as "Sales and Purchase or Other Transaction of Securities, etc." in this Article)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract", the term "securities or derivative transaction (hereinafter referred to as "securities, etc." in this Article)" with "specified insurance contract," the term "customer (in the case where a Trust Company, etc. (meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained authorization under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter) conducts sales and purchase of Securities or Derivative Transactions for the account of the person who sets a trust under a trust contract, including said person who sets the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" with "the customer," the term "loss" with "loss (meaning, where the total amount of insurance premiums to be paid by the customer following the conclusion of the specified insurance contract exceeds the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits to be paid out to the customer following the conclusion of the contract, the total amount of premium payment subtracted by the total amount of insurance claims, reimbursements and other benefits; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)," and the term "to supplement" with "to supplement, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (iii) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract," the term "securities, etc." with "specified insurance contract," and the term "to add to" with "to add to, outside the stipulations of the specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (2) of that Act, the term "securities sales transaction, etc." shall be deemed to be replaced with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract"; in Article 39, paragraph (3) of that Act, the term "determined by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause" shall be deemed to be replaced with "a potential cause"; in Article 40, item (i) of that Act, the term "financial instruments transaction business" with "the conclusion of a specified insurance contract, etc."; in Article 45, item (ii) of that Act, the term "Article 37-2 to 37-6 inclusive, Article 40-2, paragraph (4) and Article 43-4" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Articles 37-3 (as far as any of the matters listed in the items of Article 37-3, paragraph (1) is concerned, excluding Article 37-3, paragraph (1), items (ii) and (vi) and Article 37-3, paragraph (3)) and 37-4"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加