「二度」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(291ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

さらに公的年金については、昨今、年金財政の健全化とともに、将来の年金受給額の向上や負担の軽減の観点から、世界最大級の年金基金にふさわしい運用を図るため、積立金の運用の自由度を高め、オルタナティブ投資も投資対象とするべきとの議論（経済財政諮問会議グローバル化改革専門調査会金融・資本市場ワーキンググループ第二次報告「公的年金基金運用の改革に向けて」平成２０年４月）もなされており、ベンチャーキャピタルへの出資がそもそも不可能である現状を早期に解消するべきである。例文帳に追加

In terms of public pension funds, a recommendation has been made recently that they should be allowed more discretion in management of their reserves and be authorized to invest in alternative assets, so that they are managed in a way suitable for one of the largest pension funds in the world with the view to keeping pension financing in a sound condition, as well as granting more to future pensioners and reducing the burdens of present contributors (“For Reform of Management of Public Pension Funds,” Second Report of the Working Group on Financial and Capital Markets, Expert Committee on Reforms Addressing Globalization, Council on Economic and Fiscal Policy, April 2008). Present obstacles that outright prohibit pension funds from investing in venture capitals should be removed soon.  - 経済産業省

２ 犯罪の国際化及び組織化並びに情報処理の高度化に対処するための刑法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十八年法律第号）の施行の日が施行日後となる場合には、施行日から同法の施行の日の前日までの間における組織的な犯罪の処罰及び犯罪収益の規制等に関する法律（平成十一年法律第百三十六号。次項において「組織的犯罪処罰法」という。）別表第六十二号の規定の適用については、同号中「中間法人法（平成十三年法律第四十九号）第百五十七条（理事等の特別背任）の罪」とあるのは、「一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四十八号）第三百三十四条（理事等の特別背任）の罪」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) In the case where the effective date of the Act for Partial Revision of the Penal Code, etc. for Coping with Internationalization and Organization of Crimes and Advancement of Information Processing (Act No. of 2006) comes after the Effective Date, with regard to the application of the provisions of item 62 of the appended table of the Act on Punishment of Organized Crimes and Control of Crime Proceeds (Act No. 136 of 1999; referred to as the "Organized Crime Punishment Act" in the following paragraph) during the period between the Effective Date and the day preceding the effective date of the same Act, "the crime set forth in Article 157 (aggravated breach of trust of directors, etc.) of the Intermediate Corporation Act (Act No. 49 of 2001)" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the crime set forth in Article 334 (aggravated breach of trust of directors, etc.) of the Act Concerning General Corporations and General Foundations (Act No. 48 of 2006)."  - 経済産業省

商品取引清算機関は、法第百八十三条の規定による商品取引債務引受業の廃止又は解 散の決議の認可を受けようとするときは、認可申請書に次に掲げる書類を添付して主務大 臣に提出するものとする。 一廃止又は解散の理由を記載した書面 二株主総会（法第百七十三条第一項の規定に基づく承認を受けた会員商品取引所に あっては、会員総会）の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 三直前事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属明細書 四商品取引債務引受業の結了の方法を記載した書面例文帳に追加

When seeking to obtain approval for the abolishment of the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts or a resolution of dissolution prescribed in the provisions of Article 183 of the Act, a Commodity Clearing Organization shall attach the following documents to a written application for approval and submit them to the competent minister: (i) a document stating the reasons for the abolishment or dissolution; (ii) the minutes of a general meeting of shareholders (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange which is approved based on the provisions of Article 173, paragraph 1 of the Act, a general meeting of Members) or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for approval have been followed; (iii) accounting documents, etc. for the most recent business year and detailed statements thereof; (iv) a document stating the method of completion of the Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts.  - 経済産業省

法第百四十四条の三第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、新設合併設立商品取引所が会員 商品取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。一第五十七条各号に掲げる事項についての定めの相当性に関する事項 二他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下この号におい て同じ。）についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表とともに作成され た損益計算書の内容 ロ他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度が ない場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な 財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の 財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四 条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後新設合併設立会員商品取引所の成立 の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新 たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。） 三 他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が法第七十七条 第一項において準用する会社法第四百九十二条第一項の規定により作成した貸借対照 表 四当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下この号におい て同じ。）において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、当該 新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担 その他の当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が 生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後 新設合併設立会員商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存すること となる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限 る。） 五新設合併設立会員商品取引所の成立の日以後における当該新設合併設立会員商品取 引所の債務（他の新設合併消滅会員商品取引所から承継する債務を除く。）の履行の 見込みに関する事項 六法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に 変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項例文帳に追加

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger is a Member Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in respective items of Article 57; (ii) the following matters concerning another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; the same shall apply in this item): (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business - 92 - year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said other Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to a Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) has prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act; (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final - 93 - business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (excluding liabilities inherited from another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger on and after the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vi) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters.  - 経済産業省

第六十六条の六　次に掲げる内国法人に係る外国関係会社のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係会社に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国子会社等」という。）が、昭和五十三年四月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項及び次項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有する場合には、その適用対象留保金額のうちその内国法人の有する当該特定外国子会社等の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、その内国法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含むその内国法人の各事業年度の所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。例文帳に追加

Article 66-6 (1) Where an affiliated foreign company related to any of the following domestic corporations, which falls under the category of affiliated foreign company specified by a Cabinet Order as a company whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign subsidiary company, etc."), in each business year beginning on or after April 1, 1978, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. held by the domestic corporation through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) vested in such shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of the domestic corporation's profit, and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its income for the business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十条の十　特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項及び次項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係（次項において「特定関係」という。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度（第二条第二項第十九号に規定する事業年度をいう。以下この条において同じ。）において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（次条において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の雑所得に係る収入金額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日の属する年分の当該居住者の雑所得の金額の計算上、総収入金額に算入する。例文帳に追加

Article 40-10 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) that accounts for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "issued shares, etc.") (such relationship referred to in the next paragraph as a "specified relationship"), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year (meaning a business year prescribed in Article 2(2)(xix); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit) vested in such shares, etc. (such part of eligible retained income referred to in the next Article as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the income of the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. categorized as miscellaneous income, and included in his/her gross income in the calculation of the amount of his/her miscellaneous income for the year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十三条の三　有価証券の募集又は売出しを予定している当該有価証券の発行者で、第五条第四項に規定する者に該当するものは、当該募集又は売出しを予定している有価証券の発行価額又は売出価額の総額（以下「発行予定額」という。）が一億円以上の場合においては、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該募集又は売出しを予定している期間（以下「発行予定期間」という。）、当該有価証券の種類及び発行予定額又は発行若しくは売出しの限度額、当該有価証券について引受けを予定する金融商品取引業者又は登録金融機関のうち主たるものの名称その他の事項で公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定めるものを記載した書類（以下「発行登録書」という。）を内閣総理大臣に提出して、当該有価証券の募集又は売出しを登録することができる。ただし、その有価証券発行勧誘等が第二十三条の十三第一項に規定する適格機関投資家向け勧誘（同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。）に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し（当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。）及びその有価証券発行勧誘等が同条第三項に規定する少人数向け勧誘（同項本文の規定の適用を受けるものに限る。）に該当するものであつた有価証券の売出し（当該有価証券に関して開示が行われている場合を除く。）を予定している場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 23-3 (1) The Issuer of Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned may, if he/she satisfies requirements specified in Article 5(4) and the total issue price or the total distribution amount of the Securities of which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Amount of Issue") is 100 million yen or more, register Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities by submitting a document which, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, state the matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as those necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors, including the period in which Public Offerings or Secondary Distributions of the Securities are planned (hereinafter referred to as the "Planned Issue Period"), the kind of the Securities, the Planned Amount of Issue or the maximum amount of issue or distribution, and names of principal Financial Instruments Business Operators and/or Registered Financial Institutions which plan to underwrite the Securities (such document is hereinafter referred to as a "Shelf Registration Statement") to the Prime Minister; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors defined in Article 23-13(1) (limited to Solicitation Only for Qualified Institutional Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(1) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities) or where a second distribution is planned for the Securities of which Solicitation for Newly Issued Securities, etc. was conducted in a manner falling under the category of Solicitation for Small Number of Investors defined in Article 23-13(3) (limited to Solicitation for Small Number of Investors to which the main clause of Article 23-13(3) is applicable) (excluding the Case Where Disclosures Have Been Made with regard to the Securities).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十六条の四の二　内国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合（外国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき当該外国法人に係る条約相手国の権限ある当局に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合を含む。）には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、これらの申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（これらの申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、これらの申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 66-4-2 (1) Where a domestic corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency (including the cases where a foreign corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the competent authority of the other Contracting State which is related to the foreign corporation), the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十八条の八十八の二　連結親法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（当該申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、当該申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 68-88-2 (1) Where a consolidated parent corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the consolidated corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the consolidated corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　法第六十八条の九十第一項各号に掲げる連結法人は、前項の規定にかかわらず、特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額につき、当該特定外国子会社等の本店所在地国の法人所得税に関する法令（当該法人所得税に関する法令が二以上ある場合には、そのうち主たる法人所得税に関する法令をいう。以下この項において「本店所在地国の法令」という。）の規定により計算した所得の金額（当該特定外国子会社等と当該連結法人（当該連結法人との間に連結完全支配関係がある他の連結法人を含む。）又は法第六十六条の六第一項各号に掲げる内国法人との間の取引につき法第六十八条の八十八第一項又は第六十六条の四第一項の規定の適用がある場合には、当該取引が同項に規定する独立企業間価格で行われたものとして本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した場合に算出される所得の金額）に当該所得の金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額から当該所得の金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を控除した残額（本店所在地国の法令の規定により計算した金額が欠損の金額となる場合には、当該計算した金額に係る第一号から第十三号までに掲げる金額の合計額から当該欠損の金額に当該計算した金額に係る第十四号から第十六号までに掲げる金額の合計額を加算した金額を控除した残額）をもつて法第六十八条の九十第二項第二号に規定する政令で定める基準により計算した金額とすることができる。ただし、当該他の連結法人が当該特定外国子会社等に係る当該計算した金額につき前項の規定の適用を受けない場合に限る。例文帳に追加

(2) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a consolidated corporation listed in the items of Article 68-90(1) of the Act may deem that the amount obtained by adding the amount of income calculated, with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations concerning corporate income taxes of the state of the head office of the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. (where there are two or more laws and regulations concerning the said corporate income taxes, pursuant to the provisions of the principal ones; hereinafter referred to as the "laws and regulations of the state of the head office" in this paragraph), (where the provisions of Article 68-88(1) or Article 66-4(1) of the Act are applied to a transaction between the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. and the said consolidated corporation (including other consolidated corporations which have the consolidated full controlling interest with the said consolidated corporation) or domestic corporation listed in the items of Article 66-6(1) of the Act, the amount of income calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office by deeming that the transaction was carried out at the arm's length price prescribed in the said paragraph), and the sum of the amount listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income and then deducting therefrom the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount of income (where the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of the laws and regulations of the state of the head office proves to be a loss, the said amount shall be the remaining amount after deducting the sum of the said amount of loss and the amount listed in item (xiv) to item (xvi) pertaining to the said calculated amount from the sum of the amounts listed in item (i) to item (xiii) pertaining to the said calculated amount) shall be the amount calculated in accordance with the standards specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 68-90(2)(ii) of the Act; provided, however, that this shall apply only when the said other consolidated corporations are not subject to the provisions of the preceding paragraph with regard to the said calculated amount pertaining to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc.:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　当該連結法人の当該連結事業年度の法第六十八条の八十九第一項に規定する総負債に係る平均負債残高から当該連結法人の当該連結事業年度に係る自己資本の額（同条第四項第七号に規定する自己資本の額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）に三を乗じて得た金額を控除した残額が、当該連結法人の当該連結事業年度に係る平均負債残高超過額よりも少ない場合における前項の規定の適用については、同項第一号中「イに掲げる金額からロに掲げる金額を控除した残額がハに掲げる金額」とあるのは「当該連結法人の当該連結事業年度の法第六十八条の八十九第一項に規定する総負債に係る平均負債残高から当該連結法人の当該連結事業年度に係る同条第四項第七号に規定する自己資本の額に三を乗じて得た金額を控除した残額（以下この項において「総負債平均負債残高超過額」という。）がロに掲げる金額」と、「法第六十八条の八十九第四項第一号」とあるのは「同条第四項第一号」と、「イに掲げる金額からハに掲げる金額を控除した残額（次号及び次項において「平均負債残高超過額」という。）」とあるのは「総負債平均負債残高超過額」と、同項第二号中「前号イに掲げる金額から同号ロに掲げる金額を控除した残額が同号ハに掲げる金額」とあるのは「総負債平均負債残高超過額が前号ロに掲げる金額」と、「平均負債残高超過額」とあるのは「総負債平均負債残高超過額」とする。例文帳に追加

(2) With respect to the application of the provisions of the preceding paragraph where the remaining amount after deducting the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of equity capital (meaning the amount of equity capital prescribed in Article 68-89 (4)(vii) of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) for the relevant consolidated business year of the said consolidated corporation by three from the average balance of liabilities regarding the total liabilities prescribed in Article 68-89(1) of the Act for the relevant consolidated business year of the said consolidated corporation is less than the amount exceeding the average balance of liabilities for the relevant consolidated business year of the said consolidated corporation, in item (i) of the preceding paragraph, the term "the remaining amount after deducting the amount listed in (b) from the amount listed in (a) is equivalent to or less than the amount listed in (c)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the remaining amount after deducting the amount obtained by multiplying the amount of equity capital prescribed in Article 68-89(4)(vii) of the Act for the relevant consolidated business year of the said consolidated corporation by three from the average balance of liabilities regarding the total liabilities prescribed in Article 68-89(1) of the Act for the relevant consolidated business year of the said consolidated corporation (hereinafter such remaining amount shall be referred to as "the amount exceeding the average balance of the total liabilities" in this paragraph) is equivalent to or less than the amount listed in (c);" the term "Article 68-89(4)(i) of the Act" shall be deemed to be replaced with "paragraph (4)(i) of the said Article;" and the term "remaining amount after deducting the amount listed in (c) from the amount listed in (a) (such remaining amount shall be referred to as the "amount exceeding the average balance of liabilities" in the next item and the next paragraph)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount exceeding the average balance of the total liabilities;" and in item (ii) of the said paragraph, the term "the remaining amount after deducting the amount listed in (b) from the amount listed in (a) of the preceding item exceeds the amount listed in (c)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount exceeding the average balance of the total liabilities exceeds the amount listed in (c);" and the term "the amount exceeding the average balance of liabilities" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount exceeding the average balance of the total liabilities."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五条　第二条第一項第一号から第九号まで又は第十五号に掲げる不正競争（同項第四号から第九号までに掲げるものにあっては、技術上の秘密（秘密として管理されている生産方法その他の事業活動に有用な技術上の情報であって公然と知られていないものをいう。）に関するものに限る。）によって営業上の利益を侵害された者（以下この項において「被侵害者」という。）が故意又は過失により自己の営業上の利益を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、被侵害者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、被侵害者の当該物に係る販売その他の行為を行う能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、被侵害者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を被侵害者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 5 (1) Where a person whose business interests have been infringed by unfair competition listed in items 1 to 9 or item 15 of Article 2(1) (with regard to the unfair competition listed in items 4 to 9 of the same paragraph, only unfair competition that involves a technical secret [which means a manufacturing method or other technical information useful for business activities that is kept secret and not publicly known]) (hereinafter referred to as the "infringed person" in this paragraph) claims damages caused by such an infringement from a person who has intentionally or negligently infringed such business interests, and where the infringer has sold or otherwise transferred the articles constituting the act of infringement, the quantity of the articles sold or transferred (hereinafter referred to as the "transferred quantity" in this paragraph) multiplied by the amount of profit per unit of the articles that the infringed person could have sold in the absence of the infringement may be deemed as the amount of damages suffered by the infringed person, provided it does not exceed the amount attainable by the infringed person's capability to sell or conduct other acts concerning said articles. However, where there are any circumstances that would have prevented the infringed person from selling the quantity of articles equivalent to all or part of the transferred quantity, an amount corresponding to the quantity relevant to such circumstances shall be deducted.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第四十三条　居宅要介護被保険者が居宅サービス等区分（居宅サービス（これに相当するサービスを含む。以下この条において同じ。）及び地域密着型サービス（これに相当するサービスを含み、地域密着型介護老人福祉施設入所者生活介護を除く。以下この条において同じ。）について、その種類ごとの相互の代替性の有無等を勘案して厚生労働大臣が定める二以上の種類からなる区分をいう。以下同じ。）ごとに月を単位として厚生労働省令で定める期間において受けた一の居宅サービス等区分に係る居宅サービスにつき支給する居宅介護サービス費の額の総額及び特例居宅介護サービス費の額の総額並びに地域密着型サービスにつき支給する地域密着型介護サービス費の額の総額及び特例地域密着型介護サービス費の額の総額の合計額は、居宅介護サービス費等区分支給限度基準額を基礎として、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定した額の百分の九十に相当する額を超えることができない。例文帳に追加

Article 43 (1) The total sum of allowances that are paid monthly for In-Home Service pertaining to one classification of In-Home Service, etc., that an Insured In-Home Person Requiring Long-Term Care during the period determined by Ordinance of Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare for each classification of In-Home Service, etc. (which means with regard to In-Home Service (including equivalent services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) and Community-Based Service (including equivalent services except for Admission to a Community-Based Facility for Preventive Daily Long-Term Care of the Elderly Covered by Public Aid; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article) by categories of two or more types as determined by the Minister of Health, Labour, and Welfare, considering the inter-substitution by each type of category; the same shall apply hereinafter) shall not exceed the amount equivalent to 90 percent of the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare based on the base amount of maximum payment for each category of Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service, etc. The total sum of allowance is the total amount of Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service or Exceptional Allowance for In-Home Long-Term Care Service, or the total amount of Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service to be paid for Community-Based Service or the total amount of Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Long-Term Care Service.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十五条　居宅要支援被保険者が介護予防サービス等区分（介護予防サービス（これに相当するサービスを含む。以下この条において同じ。）及び地域密着型介護予防サービス（これに相当するサービスを含む。以下この条において同じ。）について、その種類ごとの相互の代替性の有無等を勘案して厚生労働大臣が定める二以上の種類からなる区分をいう。以下この条において同じ。）ごとに月を単位として厚生労働省令で定める期間において受けた一の介護予防サービス等区分に係る介護予防サービスにつき支給する介護予防サービス費の額の総額及び特例介護予防サービス費の額の総額並びに地域密着型介護予防サービスにつき支給する地域密着型介護予防サービス費の額の総額及び特例地域密着型介護予防サービス費の額の総額の合計額は、介護予防サービス費等区分支給限度基準額を基礎として、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定した額の百分の九十に相当する額を超えることができない。例文帳に追加

Article 55 (1) Total sum of the total amounts of the Allowance for Preventive Long-Term Care Service and Exceptional Allowance for Preventive Service of Long-Term Care that are paid for Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, and the Allowance for Community-Based Preventive Long-Term Care Service and Exceptional Allowance for Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care that are paid for Designated Provider of Community-Based Service for Preventive Long-Term Care, as pertaining to a single category of Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, etc., that an In-Home Person Requiring Support receives monthly by category of Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, etc. (which means categories of two or more types as determined by the Minister of Health, Labour, and Welfare, with regard to Preventive Service of Long-Term Care (including equivalent services; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article) and Community-Based Preventive Service of Long-Term Care (including equivalent services; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article), after considering the inter-substitution by type; the same shall apply hereinafter in this Article) during the period provided by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, shall not exceed the amount equivalent to 90 percent of the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare based on the base amount of maximum benefit for the payment categories of Preventive Service of Long-Term Care, etc.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　前二項に定めるもののほか、国は、前項の規定により行政財産である土地の貸付けを受けた者が特定建物のうち選定事業に係る公共施設等の部分以外の部分（以下この条において「特定民間施設」という。）を選定事業の終了（当該選定事業を行うため締結した契約の解除による終了を含む。以下この条及び次条において同じ。）の後においても引き続き所有しようとする場合において、必要があると認めるときは、国有財産法第十八条第一項の規定にかかわらず、当該行政財産である土地を、その用途又は目的を妨げない限度において、その者（当該選定事業を行うため締結した契約の解除による終了の場合にあっては、当該特定民間施設であった施設に係る公共施設等の管理者等が当該公共施設等の管理に関し適当と認める者に限る。第八項において同じ。）に貸し付けることができる。例文帳に追加

(3) In addition to the leases prescribed in to provisions of preceding two paragraphs, in the case where an Appointed Business Operator who has leased the land which is an administrative asset pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph is to continue to own the Specified Building (excluding the portion which is used as Public Facility etc. of the relevant Selected Project) (hereinafter referred to as the "Specified Private Facility" in this article) after the termination of the Selected Project (including the termination due to early termination of the contract which was entered into to implement the said Selected Project; hereinafter the same shall apply in this article and the following article), the national government may, when it finds necessary, continue to lease to the lessee the said land which is an administrative asset (provided that, in the case of early termination of the contract which was entered into to implement the said Selected Project, the lessee is a person who is recognized by the Administrator of Public Facility etc. to be appropriate for the administration of the said Public Facility etc. pertaining to the property that was the Specified Private Facility; hereinafter the same shall apply in paragraph (8)) notwithstanding the provision of paragraph (1) of Article 18 of the National Property Act to the extent that the lease does not prevent the original usage or purpose of the asset.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第三十二条　農林水産大臣、経済産業大臣又は厚生労働大臣は、前条第一項の場合において必要があると認めるときは、独立行政法人農林水産消費安全技術センター、独立行政法人種苗管理センター、独立行政法人家畜改良センター、独立行政法人水産総合研究センター、独立行政法人製品評価技術基盤機構又は独立行政法人医薬品医療機器総合機構（以下「センター等」という。）に対し、次に掲げるセンター等の区分に応じ、遺伝子組換え生物等の使用等をしている者、又はした者、遺伝子組換え生物等を譲渡し、又は提供した者、国内管理人、遺伝子組換え生物等を輸出した者その他の関係者がその行為を行う場所その他の場所に立ち入らせ、関係者に質問させ、遺伝子組換え生物等、施設等その他の物件を検査させ、又は検査に必要な最少限度の分量に限り遺伝子組換え生物等を無償で収去させることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 32 (1) The Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry or the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may, when recognizing it necessary in cases listed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center (Incorporated Administrative Agency), the National Center for Seeds and Seedlings (Incorporated Administrative Agency), the National Livestock Breeding Center (Incorporated Administrative Agency), the Fisheries Research Agency (Incorporated Administrative Agency), the National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (Incorporated Administrative Agency) or the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Device Agency (Incorporated Administrative Agency) (hereinafter referred to as "Centers"), in accordance with the categories of Centers listed below, to enter premises where a person who has used or is using living modified organisms, a person who has transferred or supplied living modified organisms, a Domestic Administrator, a person who has exported living modified organisms, or other relevant persons carry out such acts, or other places, and there to question relevant persons, inspect living modified organisms, Facilities, and other properties, or remove living modified organisms, at no cost, limited to the minimum amount necessary for inspection.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十四条の三　公認会計士は、大会社等の七会計期間（事業年度その他これらに準ずる期間をいう。以下同じ。）の範囲内で政令で定める連続する会計期間（当該連続する会計期間に準ずるものとして内閣府令で定める会計期間にあつては、当該会計期間。以下この項、第三十四条の十一の三及び第三十四条の十一の四第一項において「連続会計期間」という。）のすべての会計期間に係る財務書類について監査関連業務を行つた場合には、当該連続会計期間の翌会計期間以後の政令で定める会計期間に係る当該大会社等の財務書類について監査関連業務を行つてはならない。ただし、当該公認会計士（監査法人の社員である者を除く。）が当該連続会計期間の翌会計期間以後の会計期間に係る当該大会社等の財務書類について監査関連業務を行うことにつき、内閣府令で定めるやむを得ない事情があると認められる場合において、内閣府令で定めるところにより、会計期間ごとに内閣総理大臣の承認を得たときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

Article 24-3 (1) In a case where a certified public accountant has provided audit-related services concerning financial documents pertaining to all accounting periods (business years or other periods equivalent thereto; the same shall apply hereinafter) of consecutive accounting periods as specified by Cabinet Order (in the case of accounting periods as categorized by Cabinet Office Ordinance as those equivalent to said consecutive accounting periods, said accounting periods; hereinafter referred to as the "consecutive accounting periods") not exceeding seven accounting periods of a large company, etc., the certified public accountant shall not provide audit-related services concerning the financial documents of said large company, etc. pertaining to an accounting period specified by Cabinet Order which comes in or after the accounting period following said consecutive accounting periods; provided, however, that this shall not apply when an unavoidable circumstance as specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance is found for the provision of audit-related services by said certified public accountant (excluding one who is a partner of an audit corporation) concerning the financial documents of said large company, etc. in or after the accounting period following said consecutive accounting periods and where the approval of the Prime Minster has been gained for each accounting period pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

１０　法第六条第七項に規定する保管支払取扱者（以下第十五項までにおいて「保管支払取扱者」という。）は、その保管の委託を受けている特定民間国外債の利子の受領の媒介等に基づきその利子の交付を受ける都度、その交付を受けるべき日の前日までに、その交付を受ける利子に係る同条第七項に規定する利子受領者情報（以下第十六項までにおいて「利子受領者情報」という。）をその利子の支払をする者に対し（その利子の交付が、当該保管支払取扱者が保管の再委託をしている他の支払の取扱者を通じて行われる場合には、当該他の支払の取扱者を経由してその利子の支払をする者に対し）同条第七項の規定による通知（以下第十二項までにおいて「通知」という。）をしなければならない。この場合において、最初に当該特定民間国外債の利子の交付を受ける日が、当該特定民間国外債の発行をした日以後四十日を経過する日後であるときは、その交付を受ける利子に係る利子受領者情報の通知は、同日以後にしなければならない。例文帳に追加

(10) The person in charge of handling custody and payment prescribed in Article 6(7) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as the "person in charge of handling custody and payment" through to paragraph (15)) shall, on each occasion of receiving the delivery of interest on specified foreign-issued company bonds, of which the person is entrusted with custody, in the course of the intermediary services, etc. for the receipt of such interest, no later than the day preceding the day on which the person is to receive the delivery, give a notice pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (7) of the said Article (hereinafter referred to as a "notice" through to paragraph (12)) to provide interest recipient information prescribed in paragraph (7) of the said Article (hereinafter referred to as "interest recipient information" through to paragraph (16)) which pertains to the interest to be delivered thereto to the person who pays the interest (in the case where the interest is delivered via any other person in charge of handling payment with whom the said person in charge of handling custody and payment has further entrusted custody, a notice shall be given to the person who pays the interest via such other person in charge of handling payment). In this case, if the person in charge of handling custody and payment receives the delivery of interest on the said specified foreign-issued company bonds, for the first time, on or after the day on which 40 days have elapsed since the day on which the said specified foreign-issued company bonds were issued, the notice of interest recipient information pertaining to the interest to be delivered thereto shall be given on or after the said day on which the 40-day period has expired.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　法第六十六条の五第二項に規定する国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債に係る平均負債残高から控除する政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高は、当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債のうち、特定債券現先取引等（同条第四項第八号に規定する特定債券現先取引等をいう。次項及び第八項において同じ。）に係るものに係る平均負債残高（当該平均負債残高が当該特定債券現先取引等に係る資産に係る平均資産残高（当該事業年度の当該資産の帳簿価額の平均的な残高として合理的な方法により計算した金額をいう。次項において同じ。）を超える場合には、当該平均資産残高。第八項において「調整後平均負債残高」という。）とする。例文帳に追加

(5) The average balance of liabilities pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. which is calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order and is to be deducted from the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. prescribed in Article 66-5(2) of the Act shall be the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. related to the said domestic corporation which pertain to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. (meaning a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. prescribed in Article 66-5(4)(viii) of the Act; the same shall apply in the next paragraph and paragraph (8)) (where the said average balance of liabilities exceeds the average balance of assets regarding assets pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. (the average balance of assets shall mean the amount calculated by a reasonable method as the average balance of the said assets' book value for the relevant business year; the same shall apply in the next paragraph), such calculated average balance of liabilities shall be the said average balance of assets; such average balance of assets shall be referred to as the "average balance of liabilities after adjustment" in paragraph (8)).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

７　法第六十六条の五第二項に規定する政令で定めるところにより計算した国外支配株主等の資本持分に係る倍数は、同項に規定する国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債に係る平均負債残高から同項に規定する政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高を控除して計算した平均負債残高を当該内国法人に係る国外支配株主等の資本持分で除して計算した倍数とし、同項に規定する政令で定めるところにより計算した自己資本の額に係る倍数は、同項に規定する当該事業年度の総負債に係る平均負債残高から同項に規定する政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高を控除して計算した平均負債残高を当該内国法人の自己資本の額で除して計算した倍数とする。例文帳に追加

(7) The multiple number applicable to the equity interest held by a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. which is calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 66-5(2) of the Act shall be the multiple number obtained by calculating the average balance of liabilities by deducting the average balance of liabilities pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in the said paragraph from the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. prescribed in the said paragraph and then dividing the calculated average balance of liabilities by the equity interest held by the foreign controlling shareholder, etc. related to the said domestic corporation; and the multiple number applicable to the amount of equity capital which is calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in the said paragraph shall be the multiple number obtained by calculating the average balance of liabilities by deducting the average balance of liabilities pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in the said paragraph from the average balance of liabilities regarding the total liabilities for the relevant business year prescribed in the said paragraph and then dividing the calculated average balance of liabilities by the amount of equity capital of the said domestic corporation.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　法第六十八条の八十九第二項に規定する国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債に係る平均負債残高から控除する政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高は、当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債のうち、特定債券現先取引等（法第六十八条の八十九第四項第八号に規定する特定債券現先取引等をいう。次項及び第八項において同じ。）に係るものに係る平均負債残高（当該平均負債残高が当該特定債券現先取引等に係る資産に係る平均資産残高（当該連結事業年度の当該資産の帳簿価額の平均的な残高として合理的な方法により計算した金額をいう。次項において同じ。）を超える場合には、当該平均資産残高。第八項において「調整後平均負債残高」という。）とする。例文帳に追加

(5) The average balance of liabilities pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. which is calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order and is to be deducted from the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. prescribed in Article 68-89(2) of the Act shall be the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. related to the said consolidated corporation which pertain to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. (meaning a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. prescribed in Article 68-89(4)(viii) of the Act; the same shall apply in the next paragraph and paragraph (8)) (where the said average balance of liabilities exceeds the average balance of assets regarding assets pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. (the average balance of assets shall mean the amount calculated by a reasonable method as the average balance of the said assets' book value for the relevant consolidated business year; the same shall apply in the next paragraph), such calculated average balance of liabilities shall be the said average balance of assets; such average balance of assets shall be referred to as the "average balance of liabilities after adjustment" in paragraph (8)).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

７　法第六十八条の八十九第二項に規定する政令で定めるところにより計算した国外支配株主等の資本持分に係る倍数は、同項に規定する国外支配株主等及び資金供与者等に対する負債に係る平均負債残高から同項に規定する政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高を控除して計算した平均負債残高を当該連結法人に係る国外支配株主等の資本持分で除して計算した倍数とし、同項に規定する政令で定めるところにより計算した自己資本の額に係る倍数は、同項に規定する当該連結事業年度の総負債に係る平均負債残高から同項に規定する政令で定めるところにより計算した特定債券現先取引等に係る平均負債残高を控除して計算した平均負債残高を当該連結法人の自己資本の額で除して計算した倍数とする。例文帳に追加

(7) The multiple number applicable to the equity interest held by a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. which is calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in Article 68-89(2) of the Act shall be the multiple number obtained by calculating the average balance of liabilities by deducting the average balance of liabilities pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in the said paragraph from the average balance of liabilities regarding the liabilities owed to a foreign controlling shareholder, etc. and a fund provider, etc. prescribed in the said paragraph and then dividing the calculated average balance of liabilities by the equity interest held by the foreign controlling shareholder, etc. related to the said consolidated corporation; and the multiple number applicable to the amount of equity capital which is calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in the said paragraph shall be the multiple number obtained by calculating the average balance of liabilities by deducting the average balance of liabilities pertaining to a specified bond transaction with a repurchase/resale agreement, etc. calculated as specified by a Cabinet Order prescribed in the said paragraph from the average balance of liabilities regarding the total liabilities for the relevant consolidated business year prescribed in the said paragraph and then dividing the calculated average balance of liabilities by the amount of equity capital of the said consolidated corporation.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十九条　実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が故意又は過失により自己の実用新案権又は専用実施権を侵害した者に対しその侵害により自己が受けた損害の賠償を請求する場合において、その者がその侵害の行為を組成した物品を譲渡したときは、その譲渡した物品の数量（以下この項において「譲渡数量」という。）に、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者がその侵害の行為がなければ販売することができた物品の単位数量当たりの利益の額を乗じて得た額を、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者の実施の能力に応じた額を超えない限度において、実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が受けた損害の額とすることができる。ただし、譲渡数量の全部又は一部に相当する数量を実用新案権者又は専用実施権者が販売することができないとする事情があるときは、当該事情に相当する数量に応じた額を控除するものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 29 (1) Where a holder of a utility model right or an exclusive licensee claims against an infringer compensation for damage sustained as a result of the intentional or negligent infringement of said d utility model right or exclusive license, and the infringer assigned articles that constituted the act of infringement, the amount of damage sustained by the holder or the exclusive licensee may be presumed to be the amount of profit per unit of articles which would have been sold by the holder or the exclusive licensee if there had been no such act of infringement, multiplied by the quantity (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as the "Assigned Quantity") of articles assigned by the infringer, the maximum of which shall be the amount attainable by the holder or the exclusive licensee in light of the capability of the holder or the exclusive licensee to work such articles; provided, however, that if any circumstances exist under which the holder or the exclusive licensee would have been unable to sell the Assigned Quantity in whole or in part, the amount calculated as the number of articles not able to be sold due to such circumstances shall be deducted.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第十九条　経済産業大臣は、定型的な約款による契約に基づき、特定の商標、商号その他の表示を使用させ、商品の販売又は役務の提供に関する方法を指定し、かつ、継続的に経営に関する指導を行う事業であつて、当該約款に、当該事業に加盟する者（以下「加盟者」という。）が設置している工場等におけるエネルギーの使用の条件に関する事項であつて経済産業省令で定めるものに係る定めがあるもの（以下「連鎖化事業」という。）を行う者（以下「連鎖化事業者」という。）のうち、当該連鎖化事業者が設置しているすべての工場等及び当該加盟者が設置している当該連鎖化事業に係るすべての工場等における第七条第二項の政令で定めるところにより算定したエネルギーの年度の使用量の合計量が同条第一項の政令で定める数値以上であるものをエネルギーの使用の合理化を特に推進する必要がある者として指定するものとする。例文帳に追加

Article 19 (1) The Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry shall designate a business operator engaged in business in which the business operator authorizes the use of specified trademarks, trade names or other indications, specify the manner of selling goods or providing services and give guidance continuously on management, pursuant to a standard form contract that provides for the matters specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry with regard to the conditions of energy use in factories, etc. which belong to a business operator that participates in said business (hereinafter referred to as a "franchisee") (this type of business shall hereinafter be referred to as "chain business" and this type of business operator shall hereinafter be referred to as a "chain business operator"), for which the total energy consumption for a given business year in all factories, etc. which belong to said chain business operator and all factories, etc. pertaining to said chain business which belong to said franchisee as calculated pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order under Article 7, paragraph (2) is beyond the level specified by a Cabinet Order under paragraph (1) of the same Article, as a business operator especially required to promote the rational use of energy.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

３　主務大臣は、第三章第一節（第七条第一項及び第五項、第七条の二第一項、第七条の三第一項、第七条の四第一項及び第三項、第八条第一項、第十三条第一項、第十七条第一項及び第三項並びに第十九条第一項及び第四項を除く。）の規定の施行に必要な限度において、政令で定めるところにより、特定事業者又は特定連鎖化事業者に対し、その設置している工場等（特定連鎖化事業者にあつては、当該特定連鎖化事業者が行う連鎖化事業の加盟者が設置している当該連鎖化事業に係る工場等を含む。）における業務の状況に関し報告させ、又はその職員に、当該工場等に立ち入り、エネルギーを消費する設備、帳簿、書類その他の物件を検査させることができる。ただし、当該特定連鎖化事業者が行う連鎖化事業の加盟者が設置している当該連鎖化事業に係る工場等に立ち入る場合においては、あらかじめ、当該加盟者の承諾を得なければならない。例文帳に追加

(3) To the extent necessary for the enforcement of Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 7, paragraphs (1) and (5), Article 7-2, paragraph (1), Article 7-3, paragraph (1), Article 7-4, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 8, paragraph (1), Article 13, paragraph (1), Article 17, paragraphs (1) and (3) and Article 19, paragraphs (1) and (4)), the competent minister may, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, cause specified business operators or specified chain business operators to report the status of their business in their factories, etc. (or, for specified chain Business Operators, Factories, etc. including those pertaining to said Chain Business which belong to a franchisee of the chain business conducted by said specified chain business operators), or cause officials of the competent ministry to enter the factories, etc. and inspect energy-consuming facilities, books, documents and other objects; provided, however, that when the officials enter said factories, etc. pertaining to said chain business which belong to a franchisee of the chain business conducted by said specified chain business operator, they shall obtain the consent of said franchisee in advance.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一　毎日（当日が休日であるときは、その前日。以下この項において同じ。）の終業時における特別国際金融取引勘定からその他の勘定への資金の振替に係る金額は、その日の属する月の前月中の毎日の終業時において特別国際金融取引勘定に経理されている金額のうち法第二十一条第三項に規定する非居住者に対する資金の運用に係るもののその月中の合計額をその月の日数で除して得た金額（当該合計額をその月の日数で除して得た金額が財務大臣の定める金額以下の場合にあつては、財務大臣が定める金額）に財務大臣の定める率を乗じて算定した金額（特別国際金融取引勘定承認金融機関が特別国際金融取引勘定に関する経理を開始した日から同日の属する月の翌月の末日までの間においては、当該特別国際金融取引勘定承認金融機関の外国通貨による金銭の貸付けの状況その他の事情を勘案して財務大臣が指示する金額）を限度とする。例文帳に追加

(i) The amount pertaining to the transfer of funds from the special international financial transactions account to other accounts at the closing time of every day (if the current day is a holiday, the previous day thereof; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not exceed the amount calculated by multiplying the amount, which is obtained by dividing the monthly total of the amounts pertaining to the operation of funds to non-residents prescribed in Article 21, paragraph (3) of the Act, of which accounting is settled in the special international financial transactions account at the closing time of every day in the month previous to the month to which the said day belongs, by the number of days of the month (where the amount obtained by dividing the total amount by the number of days of the month is not more than the amount specified by the Minister of Finance, the amount specified by the Minister of Finance), by the rate specified by the Minister of Finance (for the period from the day when an approved financial institution for the special international financial transactions account started accounting related to the special international financial transactions account to the last day of the month following the month to which the said day belongs, the amount instructed by the Minister of Finance by considering the state of money loan in foreign currency provided by the approved financial institution for the special international financial transactions account or other circumstances).  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私はよく申しますけれども、1929年の後の世界と今度のリーマン・ショックの後の世界は、1929年のアメリカに始まった大恐慌の後は、世界の経済が非常にブロック化して、それが第二次世界大戦の遠因の一つだと、後世の歴史家から言われるわけでございますが、今回のリーマン・ショックの後は、やはり世界がG7、G20というように非常に協調して、色々な国益はあるわけですけれども、少なくともG20ということできちんと話合いをしているということは、私は人類の進歩だと思いますので、そういった意味で非常に私は、今言いましたこの国際金融規制改革も、何回も何回も中央銀行総裁、あるいは金融監督者の最高責任者の会議を事前に開かせて頂いて、国際的に合意をした内容でございますから、そういったことをカンヌ・サミットできちんと最後に取りまとめる、決定するということでございますから、私はそういう意味では1929年と、21世紀でございますが、かなり人類は進展をしたと、半歩でも進展したというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

As I frequently mention, after the Great Depression, which started in the United States in 1929, the world was divided into economic blocs, and that is regarded by historians of later generations as an indirect cause of World War II. It is a mark of human progress that after the Lehman Shock, countries around the world have actively cooperated, as shown by the discussions held at the G-7 and G-20 meetings, despite their divergent national interests. Regarding the international financial regulatory reform, which I mentioned now, central bank governors and the heads of financial supervisory organizations held numerous meetings and reached international agreements. The matters that have been agreed to will be finalized at the Cannes summit. In that sense, I feel that in the 21st century, mankind has made significant progress compared with 1929.  - 金融庁

それから、今の第二の柱との関係では、サブプライム・ローン問題に端を発するグローバルな金融危機への対応の中で、この問題の分析を早い段階で行い、この問題に対して重点的に行政資源の投入を行った、その中で、我が国金融システムへの影響を把握・分析する、あるいは、欧米で発生した大手金融機関の破綻など、そういった出来事に対しても、それが我が国の金融システムを不安定化させることがないように注意深い対応に努めた、さらには、金融セクターそのものは、我が国の場合相対的に健全ですけれども、実体経済が大きなダメージを受けていたという、この我が国特有の状況も踏まえまして、金融の円滑化、実体経済を支える金融と、そういう観点からの各般の措置を講じたといったこともございましたし、また国際的な広がりのある問題でございますので、海外当局との連携・意思疎通が格段に強化され、密度の高いものになった、その中で、監督カレッジの開催なども行われたといったことがあったかと思います。例文帳に追加

In relation to the second pillar, in order to deal with the global financial crisis triggered by the subprime mortgage problem, we analyzed this problem in an early stage and concentrate our administrative resources on tackling it. In doing so, we identified and analyzed its impact on Japan's financial system and acted carefully to prevent the system from being destabilized by the failures of major financial institutions in the United States and Europe. In addition, we took various measures to facilitate financing and support the real economy in light of Japan's unique situation; Japan's real economy was significantly damaged while its financial sector was relatively sound. Moreover, as the crisis was global, we substantially enhanced cooperation and communications with foreign authorities and held a supervisory college meeting.  - 金融庁

三つ目の捉え方のうちの3点目でありますが、今回の世界的な金融危機の教訓を踏まえまして、一つは、金融システム全体のリスクを迅速・的確に把握していきたいと考えております。かつ、日本銀行との連携・海外当局との連携に一層努めてまいりたいと考えております。この世界的な金融危機の教訓の二つ目でございますが、システミックなリスクへの対応につきまして、我が国は過去の経験のほか、ひとつには、制度面では、各般のセーフティネットが整備され、また、もうひとつには、システミックなリスクへの対応につきましては、体制面でも、金融サービスを一元的に監督する体制が整備されるなど、欧米に比べても進んでいるところがございます。運用面でも適切に対応してきたところであります。一方、今次の世界的な金融危機は業態を超えた横断的なものであり、かつ、複雑なものがございます。この観点から、国際的な動向も踏まえながら、先取り的な勉強もしてみたいと考えております。世界的な金融危機の教訓の中の3つ目でございますが、当然のことながら、国際的な議論への積極的参加と、国内外におけるバランスのとれた規制の構築に努めてまいりたいと考えております。例文帳に追加

Third, we will follow the lessons learned in the current global financial crisis. The first lesson is that we should quickly and accurately identify risks involved in the entire financial system. At the same time, we intend to strengthen cooperation with the Bank of Japan and overseas authorities. As for the second lesson, in addition to having experiences of dealing with a crisis, we are ahead of the United States and European countries in the development of institutional frameworks, including various safety net schemes and a supervisory framework that places various financial services under central supervision as a way to deal with systemic risks. We have also managed such frameworks appropriately. Meanwhile, the current global financial crisis has spread across various business sectors and is complicated in nature. Therefore, the second lesson is that we should conduct a forward-looking study in light of international developments. The third lesson is that we should actively participate in international debate and make efforts to establish a regulatory framework with balanced emphasis on domestic and foreign considerations.  - 金融庁

そのことから人類は学びまして、ご存じのようにＧ８、あるいはＧ20を頻回に開きまして、世界でみんなで経済の問題、金融の問題を何とか人類の英知を集めて解決しようということがご存じのように合意されまして、バーゼル III 、先般も申し上げましたように、やはり世界の銀行の安定性、そのためにはもう皆さんご専門でございますが、この自己資本の質と量という問題があるわけでございますが、できるだけ質の向上を図ろうというようなことで、この色々な数字が出てきたわけでございます。ご存じのように、この数字が高ければ高いほど一見銀行が安定している、確かに安定するわけでございますけれども、同時に10年前、我が国が金融危機、私もまさに何度も申し上げますけれども、1997年から1998年、第二次橋本改造内閣のときに郵政大臣をしておりまして、そのときに北海道拓殖銀行が倒産する、山一証券が倒産する、そういった時代を経験した閣僚でございましたから、そういったことを踏まえて、あのとき自己資本比率、当時も8％でございましたが、このことは非常に信用収縮といいますか、急激な貸し渋り貸しはがしに遭いまして、私の選挙区は北九州市でございますが、100年前に東洋で初めて近代的製鉄所ができる、中小企業の町でございました。例文帳に追加

People have learned a lesson from this: as you are aware, G8 and G20 meetings were frequently held, and an agreement was reached to resolve economic and financial problems with everyone around the world by mustering the wisdom of mankind, in pursuit of the highest quality of capital possible under Basel III. As there are issues in the stability of banks worldwide, namely, the quality and quantity of their capital, various figures were presented. As you know, banks appear to be more stable when these figures are higher-banks are indeed stable when the figures are high. But on the other hand, when Japan faced a financial crisis ten years ago, I experienced the bankruptcies of Hokkaido Takushoku Bank and Yamaichi Securities while I served as the Minister for Posts and Telecommunications in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998. At the time, we experienced credit contraction, rapid credit crunch and credit withdrawal. My constituency of Kitakyushu City is where Asia's first modern steel plant was built 100 years ago, and is home to many small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).  - 金融庁

それから、私でございますが、8月16日から21日まで米国に出張させていただきまして、今日の閣僚懇でもあらかたは報告をさせていただきましたが、ワシントンDC及びニューヨークを訪問して、バーナンキFRB（連邦準備制度理事会）議長、それからブレイナード財務次官、ボルカー大統領経済顧問、ご存じのようにこれは1970年代のFRBの議長でございますが、大変背の高い人でございますが、今度の金融規制改革法でいわゆるボルカールールというのをつくったオバマ大統領の経済顧問でございますが、こういった方ともお会いいたしました。米国ではもう皆さん方ご存じのように80年ぶり、まさに1929年に大恐慌がございましてね、それから色々あったわけでございますけれども、基本的にこの二、三十年、金融の規制緩和、あるいは経済のグローバル化、あるいは金融のグローバル化ということが非常に大きな潮流でございましたが、そういった中で80年ぶりの根本的な改革を、金融規制改革法が成立したばかりでございまして、私が向こうに行って、「コペルニクス的変化か」と言ったら、「いや、自見さん実はコペルニクス的変化だ」と、こう言ったアメリカの方もおられましたが、そういった大きな、皆さん方もボルカールールをはじめ世界の金融の潮流が非常に大きくアメリカを、まさに金融の本場であったアメリカで変わってきたわけでございまして、そういったところを金融（担当）大臣として実感としてアメリカの要人ともお会いしつつ、きちっと色々な意見を聞かせていただいたわけでございます。例文帳に追加

From August 16 to 21, I went on a business trip to the United States. As already reported in brief at the informal gathering with Cabinet ministers today, I visited Washington D.C. and New York, where I met with Federal Reserve Board (FRB) Chairman Ben Bernanke, Treasury Under Secretary Lael Brainard and the President’s economic advisor Paul Volcker, just to name a few. Paul Volcker, who served as FRB Chairman during the 1970s, is the economic advisor to President Barack Obama who created the so-called “Volcker Rule” in the recent financial reform legislation. In the United States, financial deregulation and economic and financial globalization had been a massive trend over the past two or three decades, basically, since the Great Depression in 1929. It was against such a backdrop in the United States that the first radical financial reform legislation in 80 years was established very recently. I asked others during my stay in the United States as to whether it amounted to a change comparable to the Copernican Revolution, and some Americans responded that it was indeed that kind of change. The major global financial trend is changing in the United States, the leading country of finance. I gained firsthand knowledge of this, having met with leading figures of the United States as the Minister for Financial Services and listened to their various opinions.  - 金融庁

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。例文帳に追加

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business.  - 金融庁

また、そういった意味で、非常に金融が実体経済以上にふくらむ、それがなおかつ、一つの金融機関のリスクの中で、リスクはもうおさまらなくなった、リーマン・ショックなんか典型ですね。国全体の経済、あるいは世界全体の経済に広範な影響を与えるというようなことでございますから、そういった中で、1929年はそれぞれの経済がブロック化しまして、それが第二次世界大戦の遠因だという方もおられますけれども、その辺の苦しい反省を踏まえて、Ｇ８、Ｇ20ということで、何とか英知を集めて、今度のバーゼルもまとまったし、今度はぜひ、これがソウルサミットでまとまっていただきたいと思いますけれども、世界の経済のグローバル化と同時に、やっぱり人類は1929年の後の世界大恐慌よりは、少し学習をしたと私は思っていますし、そういうことも視野に入れつつ、企業を支える金融、あるいは円の円滑化、あるいはリスク管理をきちっとやるというようなことは、これは原則でございますし、なおかつ金融業というのは、この前も申しましたように、基本的には信頼関係でございますから、顧客の方だとか、あるいは金融機関に関する信頼がないと、金融機関というのはうまく機能しないというのはもう皆様方、専門家でございますからよくご存じでございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、非常に難しい時代の金融の舵取りでございます。世界が今非常に金融も変動しておりまして、しかし、そういったときでも、皆様の知恵もかりながら、国民の声もかりながら、そして日本一国の経済ではございませんから、まさに非常に経済のグローバル化、アメリカの経済も中国の経済も、まさに結びついているわけでございますから、そういったことも視野に入れつつ、しっかり責任を果たしていきたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加

In this context, the financial sector has ballooned more than the real economy, and risks can no longer be contained within the risks of one financial institution. The Lehman Brothers shockwave was a typical example of this. It has a broad impact on the national economy and the global economy. Back in 1929, economies were organized into economic blocks, which became a remote cause of the Second World War according to some people. Having learned a bitter lesson from the War, G8 and G20 mobilized their wisdom and reached a consensus on Basel III as well. I am looking forward to seeing an accord reached on Basel III at the upcoming Seoul Summit. I believe that the human race has learned a few lessons since the Great Depression after 1929 in conjunction with the globalization of economies around the world. With this in mind, the general rule is to facilitate the financial sector that supports companies, as well as the yen, and properly execute risk management. As relationship of trust is fundamental to financial businesses, financial institutions do not function properly if customers lack confidence in financial institutions, as you are well aware. Taking this into account, we are steering the financial sector at an extremely difficult time. Even at times like this when the financial sector is undergoing dramatic change on a global scale, we are committed to fulfilling our responsibilities properly while seeking your wisdom and people’s opinions, bearing in mind that Japan’s economy is not isolated but interlinked with American and Chinese economies as well due to globalization.  - 金融庁

第六十六条の四　法人が、昭和六十一年四月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、当該法人に係る国外関連者（外国法人で、当該法人との間にいずれか一方の法人が他方の法人の発行済株式又は出資（当該他方の法人が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。）の総数又は総額の百分の五十以上の数又は金額の株式又は出資を直接又は間接に保有する関係その他の政令で定める特殊の関係（次項及び第六項において「特殊の関係」という。）のあるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）との間で資産の販売、資産の購入、役務の提供その他の取引を行つた場合に、当該取引（当該国外関連者が法人税法第百四十一条第一号から第三号までに掲げる外国法人のいずれに該当するかに応じ、当該国外関連者のこれらの号に掲げる国内源泉所得に係る取引のうち政令で定めるものを除く。以下この条において「国外関連取引」という。）につき、当該法人が当該国外関連者から支払を受ける対価の額が独立企業間価格に満たないとき、又は当該法人が当該国外関連者に支払う対価の額が独立企業間価格を超えるときは、当該法人の当該事業年度の所得及び解散（合併による解散を除く。以下この条において同じ。）による清算所得（清算所得に対する法人税を課される法人の清算中の事業年度の所得及び同法第百三条第一項第二号の規定により解散による清算所得とみなされる金額を含む。第七項において同じ。）に係る同法その他法人税に関する法令の規定の適用については、当該国外関連取引は、独立企業間価格で行われたものとみなす。例文帳に追加

Article 66-4 (1) Where a corporation has, in each business year beginning on or after April 1, 1986, conducted a transaction for the sale of assets, purchase of assets, provision of services or any other transaction with a foreign affiliated person related to the said corporation (meaning a foreign corporation that has a relationship with the said corporation whereby either corporation holds, directly or indirectly, shares or capital contributions that account for 50 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the other corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the other corporation) or any other special relationship specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to in the next paragraph and paragraph (6) as a "special relationship"); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), if the amount of the consideration received by the said corporation from the said foreign affiliated person with respect to the said transaction (excluding, depending on the category of foreign corporation listed in Article 141(i) to (iii) of the Corporation Tax Act corresponding to the said foreign affiliated person, a transaction from which the said foreign affiliated person earns the domestic source income listed in the relevant item, which is specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter referred to in this Article as a "foreign affiliated transaction") is below the arm's length price or if the amount of the consideration paid by the said corporation to the said foreign affiliated person with respect to the said transaction is over the arm's length price, with regard to the application of the provisions of the said Act and any other provisions concerning corporation tax on the said corporation's income for the said business year and its liquidation income due to dissolution (excluding dissolution as a result of a merger; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) (liquidation income shall include the income of a corporation that is liable for corporation tax on liquidation income for the business year when liquidation is in progress, and any amount that shall be deemed to be liquidation income due to dissolution pursuant to the provision of Article 103(1)(ii) of the said Act; the same shall apply in paragraph (7)), the said foreign affiliated transaction shall be deemed to have been conducted at the arm's length price.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２一方の締約国の居住者が次の(a)から(e)までに掲げる者のいずれかに該当する場合には、当該一方の締約国の居住者は、各課税年度において適格者とする。(a)個人(b)一方の締約国の政府、一方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体、日本銀行、オランダ中央銀行又は一方の締約国の政府若しくは一方の締約国の地方政府若しくは地方公共団体が直接若しくは間接に所有する者(c)法人であって、その主たる種類の株式が、公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は登録され、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるもの（当該株式が８(c)(iii)又は(iv)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は登録されるものである場合には、当該法人の事業の管理及び支配の主たる場所が、当該法人が居住者とされる締約国内にあるときに限る。）(d)次の(i)又(ii)はに規定する者のいずれかに該当する者(i)第四条１(b)又は(c)に規定する者（同条１(b)に規定する者にあっては、次の(aa)又は(bb)に規定する者のいずれかに該当する者に限る。）(aa)当該課税年度の直前の課税年度の終了の日においてその受益者、構成員又は参加者の五十パーセントを超えるものがいずれかの締約国の居住者である個人である年金基金(bb)その基金の七十五パーセントを超えるものが、適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が拠出した基金である年金基金(ii)銀行、保険会社又は証券会社（その者が居住者とされる締約国の法令に基づいて設立され、かつ、規制されるものに限る。）(e)個人以外の者（(a)から(d)までに掲げる適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が、議決権の五十パーセント以上に相当する株式その他の受益に関する持分を直接又は間接に所有する場合に限る。）例文帳に追加

2. A resident of a Contracting State is a qualified person for a taxable year only if such resident is either: a) an individual; b) the Government of a Contracting State, any political subdivision or local authority thereof, the Bank of Japan, the Central Bank of the Netherlands or a person that is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Government of a Contracting State or a political subdivision or local authority thereof; c) a company, if the principal class of its shares is listed or registered on a recognised stock exchange and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges, provided that, if the shares are listed or registered on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (iii) or (iv) of subparagraph c) of paragraph 8, the primary place of management and control of the company is in the Contracting State of which it is a resident; d) a person that is either: (i) a person as described in subparagraph b) or c) of paragraph 1 of Article 4, provided that in the case of a person described in subparagraph b) of that paragraph: (aa) as of the end of the prior taxable year more than 50 per cent of the person’s beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals who are residents of either Contracting State; or (bb) more than 75 per cent of the contributions made to the person is derived from residents of either Contracting State which are qualified persons; or (ii) a bank, an insurance company or a securities company that is established and regulated as such under the laws of the Contracting State of which it is a resident; or e) a person other than an individual, if residents of either Contracting State that are qualified persons by reason of subparagraph a), b), c) or d) of this paragraph own, directly or indirectly, shares or other beneficial interests representing at least 50 per cent of the voting power of the person. - 財務省

第六十六条の九の六　特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項及び次項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係（次項において「特定関係」という。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である内国法人の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である内国法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含む当該内国法人の各事業年度の所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。例文帳に追加

Article 66-9-6 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) that account for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "issued shares, etc.") (such relationship referred to in the next paragraph as a "specified relationship"), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the domestic corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit) vested in such shares, etc. (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of profit of the domestic corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc., and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its income for the business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第六十八条の九十三の六　特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に特定関係（当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式又は出資を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係をいう。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び剰余金の配当等（法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配をいう。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である連結法人の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式又は出資の第六十六条の九の六第一項に規定する請求権の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（以下この款において「個別課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である連結法人の収益の額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日を含む当該連結法人の各連結事業年度の連結所得の金額の計算上、益金の額に算入する。例文帳に追加

Article 68-93-6 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a special relationship (meaning a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares or capital contributions that account for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "issued shares, etc."), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than a tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, etc. (meaning dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act) (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the consolidated corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim prescribed in Article 66-9-6(1) vested in such shares or capital contributions (such part of eligible retained income hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "individually taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the amount of profit of the consolidated corporation that is the said specially-related shareholder, etc., and included in its gross profit in the calculation of the amount of its consolidated income for the consolidated business year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

１２　法第六十八条の九十二第一項に規定する連結法人に係る特定外国子会社等又は当該連結法人に係る外国関係会社につき同項各号に掲げる事実が生じた日を含む当該連結法人の連結事業年度において同項の規定により当該連結法人の当該連結事業年度の連結所得の金額の計算上損金の額に算入された同項に規定する個別課税済留保金額（同条第二項及び第三項の規定により当該個別課税済留保金額とみなされたものを含む。）がある場合において、その損金の額に算入された当該個別課税済留保金額のうちに法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定により当該連結法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第八十一条の十五第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているとき、又は法第六十六条の七第一項の規定により当該連結法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた当該特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額で同項の規定により法人税法第六十九条第一項から第三項までの規定による控除をされるべき金額の計算の基礎となつたものに係る課税対象留保金額から成る金額が含まれているときは、当該計算の基礎となつた当該連結法人が納付する個別控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該個別課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額又は当該計算の基礎となつた当該連結法人が納付する控除対象外国法人税の額とみなされた特定外国子会社等に係る外国法人税の額のうち当該課税対象留保金額から成る金額に対応する部分の金額は、当該連結事業年度終了の日において減額されたものとみなす。この場合において、同法第八十一条の十五第十項中「うち第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び租税特別措置法第六十八条の九十一第一項（連結法人における特定外国子会社等の個別課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「減額された場合（」とあるのは「減額された場合（租税特別措置法施行令第三十九条の百十八第十二項（特定外国子会社等の個別課税対象留保金額に係る外国法人税額の計算等）の規定により減額されたものとみなされた場合又は」と、「うち同条第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」とあるのは「うち同条第八項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額及び同法第六十六条の七第一項（内国法人における特定外国子会社等の課税対象留保金額に係る外国税額の控除）に規定する特定外国子会社等の所得に対して課される外国法人税の額のうち同項の規定により当該連結法人が納付するものとみなされる部分の金額」と、「同条第一項から第三項まで」とあるのは「第六十九条第一項から第三項まで」として、同項の規定を適用する。例文帳に追加

(12) In the case where there is any individually taxed amount of retained income prescribed in Article 68-92(1) of the Act (including the amount deemed to be the individually taxed amount of retained income pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of the said Article) that was included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of consolidated income for the relevant consolidated business year of a consolidated corporation prescribed in Article 68-92(1) of the Act, pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph, in the consolidated business year of the consolidated corporation including the day on which any of the events listed in the items of the said paragraph occurred with regard to a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. related to the said domestic corporation, or an affiliated foreign company related to the said consolidated corporation, when the said individually taxed amount of retained income included in deductible expenses includes the amount of foreign corporation tax on the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, and which consists of individually taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 81-15(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act, or that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, and which consists of taxable retained income pertaining to what was the basis for calculating the amount for which a deduction under the provisions of Article 69(1) to (3) of the Corporation Tax Act shall be made, pursuant to the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act, the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of individually creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said individually taxable retained income or the part of the amount corresponding to the amount of foreign corporation tax on the specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. that was deemed to be the amount of creditable foreign corporation tax payable by the said consolidated corporation, which was the basis for the said calculation, and which consists of the said taxable retained income shall be deemed to have been reduced on the final day of the relevant consolidated business year. In this case, the provisions of Article 81-15(10) of the said Act shall apply by replacing the terms in the said paragraph as follows: the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8)" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8), and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 68-91(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Individually Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Consolidated Corporations) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" the term "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (" shall be deemed to be replaced with "in the case where the said amount of foreign corporation tax was reduced (in the case where the reduction is deemed to have been made pursuant to the provisions of Article 39-118(12) (Calculation, etc. of Foreign Corporation Tax on Individually Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc.) of the Order for Enforcement of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation, or;" the term "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (8) of the said Article, and out of the amount of foreign corporation tax to be imposed on income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. prescribed in Article 66-7(1) (Credit for Foreign Tax on Taxable Retained Income of Specified Foreign Subsidiary Companies, etc. of Domestic Corporations) of the said Act, the part of the amount deemed to be payable by the said consolidated corporation pursuant to the provisions of the said paragraph;" and the term "paragraph (1) to paragraph (3) of the said Article" shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 69(1) to (3)."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム