「at one-time」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(163ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

The FSA will watch closely how the investigation proceeds and, having already issued a business improvement order against the Incubator Bank of Japan, we are also hoping to scrupulously follow up on the implementation status and effectiveness of its business improvement plan. On the subject of his involvement in Financial Inspection Manuals formulation that you mentioned, it is true that he participated in the deliberations on the development of our Financial Inspection Manuals and Financial Revitalization Program. That said, he was just "one of the team," so to speak, and our inspection manuals and the likes of them are products of the participation of and discussions by a large number of well-informed people from various quarters, and not only Mr. Kimura, against the backdrop of economic conditions and financial conditions that existed at the time. My understanding is that they were developed in a proper process, drawing on a broad range of views provided by all members. 例文帳に追加

当庁としては、捜査の進捗を見守るとともに、当庁の行政処分を受けた日本振興銀行における業務改善計画の実施状況とその実効性について、今さっき申し上げましたようにしっかりフォローアップしていきたいと思っておりまして、今さっき金融マニュアル策定に従事したのではないかということでございますが、まさに金融検査マニュアルや金融再生プログラム等の策定に関する検討に同氏が参加していたのは事実でございますが、この「ワン・オブ・ゼム」でございまして、検査マニュアル等については、当時の経済情勢、金融情勢を背景に木村氏のみならず、各界から多数の有識者が参加し、議論をしておられますので、メンバー全体の意見を幅広く参考にした上で適正な手続において策定したものであるというふうに私は承知いたしております。 - 金融庁

The interim report requires the decision to be made in 2012 at the earliest, so if we take a period of preparation into account, we have only around a year left. This has to do with corporate accounting, and companies have complained that one year is too short. Moreover, the economy is weak and the Great East Japan Earthquake and tsunami and the nuclear power plant accident occurred, greatly damaging the supply chains. In light of those circumstances, I believe that it is important to spend an appropriate amount of time on decision-making. 例文帳に追加

（中間報告では）一番早ければ、2012年だったと思いますが、そのときにはっきり決めると、こういうことでございますから、準備期間を入れますと、もう1年ぐらいしかないのですよね。そういった意味で、そこら辺はきちっと、これは企業の会計でございますから、企業はやっぱり1年しかないと非常に窮屈だということを言っておられるわけですから、なおかつ今は不況の中でございますし、それから東日本大震災、あるいは地震・津波・原子力発電所の災害が起きているわけでございますし、サプライチェーンが非常に障害を受けたというようなこともございますから、そういったことを勘案して、きちっと時間を置くことが私は大事ではないかというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

The Lehman shock occurred in a world where globalization has proceeded very much on the one hand and deregulation has gone too far on the other hand. In Europe, which I visited last week, the financial and economic markets are very unstable as a lingering consequence of the Lehman shock. In the 17-country euro zone - although there are a total of 27 EU countries - Slovakia's approval (of the plan to expand the European Financial Stability Facility) has apparently provided breathing space. Underlying that problem is the broad wave of economic globalization, and in particular, Japan's economic and financial situations are closely linked to the global economy, as shown by the yen's appreciation. Therefore, we must keep that in mind when making our arguments and at the same time, we must remember that in any country, some industries are competitive while others are not. 例文帳に追加

非常にグローバル化が進んでいる世界、しかし一方においては、非常に行き過ぎたグローバル化、規制緩和の中でリーマン・ショックというのは起きたわけでございますし、私も先週ヨーロッパに行ってまいりましたけれども、その中でリーマン・ショックの後遺症的な、まさにヨーロッパの金融市場、経済市場は非常に不安定でございまして、ＥＵ27か国ですが、ユーロ(圏)が17カ国で、スロバキアが賛成したということで一段落は着いたようですけれども、やはり底流には、こういった大きな経済のグローバル化、その中でまさに日本の金融経済情勢というのは、ご存じのように、円高を見ましても本当に密接に関連していますから、そこら辺を踏まえてきちっと発言すると同時に、どの国でも輸出競争力がある産業と、そうでないと産業とあるのです。 - 金融庁

On the topic of the Incubator Bank of Japan, a conference was established to prepare a financial reform program under (former) Minister Mr. Takenaka at the time when the Incubator Bank of Japan was given approval, and Mr. Kimura was one of several members of this conference. None of the meetings have been disclosed to the public. In these closed meetings, the topic of creating a new bank dedicated to SMEs had come up in discussions in the context of the program, and then, consequently, such a bank emerged. While Seven Bank existed before that, the FSA had established extremely tough guidelines for businesses in other industries to enter the banking business. However, from what I remember, not much work was done to establish proper guidelines for creating a completely different type of bank. 例文帳に追加

すみません、振興銀行なのですけれども、振興銀行を認可した当時は、たしか竹中（元）大臣で、その下に金融改革プログラムを作る会議か何かを設置して、委員の人、数人でそれをやった会議の中に木村剛さんが入っていて、その会議が一切非公開だったのですよね。非公開の中で、そのプログラムの中に中小企業専門の銀行を新設するみたいな話が出て、それがポッと、結果的には出てきたわけです。その前にあったのはセブン銀行、さっき大臣がおっしゃったように、そういう銀行だったのですが、そこら辺の異業種参入に関しては、非常に厳しい参入ガイドラインを金融庁が作ったのだけれども、全く違う形態の銀行ができることに関しては、そのガイドラインをきちんと作るという作業は、あまりなかったと僕は記憶しております。 - 金融庁

This was not hammered out by Mr. Kamei out of the blue; it was based on the common policies agreed upon by the three parties before the August 30 election was announced by the previous administration. It was one of those policies. As it was an extremely tough era back then, a similar bill that had in fact been passed in the House of Councillors by the DPJ, SDP and PNP was scrapped regrettably due to the lack of majority vote in the House of Representatives at the time. This bill, which had been actually submitted by, among others, former chairman of the Policy Research Council Masayuki Naoshima and myself and scrapped in the House of Representatives, basically became the foundations of the Act, so I hope you understand that. 例文帳に追加

この点については、何か亀井静香先生が突然打ち出したのではなくて、それは、それ以前の政権の8月30日の選挙の前に出した三党合意、確か6項目しかないのですよ、共通政策ですね。その中の一つにきちんと、当時大変厳しい時代でございましたから、それに似たような法律を実は民主党、社民党、国民新党で、参議院では通りましたけれども、残念ながら、衆議院は当時は過半数ございませんでしたので廃案になったのですが、当時、直嶋（元）政調会長だとか、私とかで法案を実は出しておりまして、当然衆議院では当時廃案になったのですけれども、基本的にそれを土台にしたことでございまして、そのことはぜひご理解しておいていただきたいと、こう思うわけでございます。 - 金融庁

Where an invention and a device claimed in applications for a patent and a utility model registration are identical (excluding the case where an invention claimed in a patent application based on a utility model registration under Article 46-2(1) (including a patent application that is deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the said patent application under Article 44(2) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 46(5)) and a device relating to the said utility model registration are identical) and the application for a patent and a utility model registration are filed on the same date, only one of the applicants, selected by consultations between the applicants, shall be entitled to obtain a patent or a utility model registration. 例文帳に追加

特許出願に係る発明と実用新案登録出願に係る考案とが同一である場合(第四十六条の二第一項の規定による実用新案登録に基づく特許出願(第四十四条第二項(第四十六条第五項において準用する場合を含む)の規定により当該特許出願の時にしたものとみなされるものを含む)に係る発明とその実用新案登録に係る考案とが同一である場合を除く)において、その特許出願及び実用新案登録出願が同日にされたものであるときは、出願人の協議により定めた一の出願人のみが特許又は実用新案登録を受けることができる。 - 特許庁

(1) If the Commissioner is satisfied, on a claim made in the prescribed manner at any time before a patent has been granted, that by virtue of any assignment or agreement made by the applicant or one of the applicants for the patent, or by operation of law, the claimant would, if the patent were then granted, be entitled thereto or to the interest of the applicant therein, or to an undivided share of the patent or of that interest, the Commissioner may, subject to the provisions of this section, direct that the application shall proceed in the name of the claimant or in the names of the claimant and the applicant or the other joint applicant or applicants, according as the case may require.例文帳に追加

(1) 特許を付与する前のいつでも所定の方法による請求がされ，特許出願人若しくは特許出願人の1人により又は法の適用により譲渡若しくは契約がされた結果として，当該請求人が，特許が与えられた場合に当該特許若しくは出願人の当該特許に対する権益又は当該特許若しくは当該権益の不可分の持分に対し正当な権利を有する筈であることを局長が納得するときは，局長は，本条の規定に従うことを条件として，その出願を前記請求人の名義で又は前記請求人及び出願人若しくは場合に応じてその他共同出願人の名義により，処理するべきことを指示することができる。 - 特許庁

(2) Where any person makes any claim, or threatens to bring or gives notice of his intention to bring any proceedings (other than criminal proceedings), against any other person in respect of any interest as owner, mortgagee, licensee, or otherwise in a patent, being an interest which is not registered under this Act and which is capable of being so registered, that other person may, at any time within one month thereafter by notice in writing given to the maker of the claim or threat or the giver of the notice of intention to bring the proceedings, require him to register under this Act the interest in respect of which the claim or threat is made or the notice of intention to bring the proceedings is given, and if he fails to do so within 6 months after the giving of the notice under this subsection he shall not thereafter be entitled to bring any proceedings in respect of the claim or interest against the person who has given the notice to register.例文帳に追加

(2) 何人かが特許の所有者，譲渡抵当権者，実施権者その他として有する権益であって本法に基づいて登録されていないが前記のとおり登録することができるものについて他人を相手方として主張をし，又は訴訟(刑事訴訟以外のもの)を提起する旨の脅迫をし若しくはその旨の自己の意思を通知するときは，当該他人は，その後1月以内にいつでも前記主張者又は訴訟提起の脅迫者若しくは訴訟提起の意図の通知者に対する催告書により，前記の主張若しくは訴訟を提起する旨の脅迫又は訴訟提起する旨の意思の通知が関係する権益を本法に基づいて登録するようその者に求めることができる。また，その者は，本項の規定による催告後6月以内に前記の手続をとらないときは，その後，登録を催告した者を相手方とした前記主張又は権益に関する如何なる訴訟も提起することができないものとする。 - 特許庁

Where an invention and a device claimed in applications for a patent and a utility model registration are identical (excluding the case where an invention claimed in a patent application based on a utility model registration under Article 46-2(1) (including a patent application that is deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the said patent application under Article 44(2) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 46(5)) and a device relating to the said utility model registration are identical) and the application for a patent and a utility model registration are filed on the same date, only one of the applicants, selected by consultations between the applicants, shall be entitled to obtain a patent or a utility model registration. 例文帳に追加

特許出願に係る発明と実用新案登録出願に係る考案とが同一である場合(第四十六条の二第一項の規定による実用新案登録に基づく特許出願(第四十四条第二項(第四十六条第五項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により当該特許出願の時にしたものとみなされるものを含む。)に係る発明とその実用新案登録に係る考案とが同一である場合を除く。)において、その特許出願及び実用新案登録出願が同日にされたものであるときは、出願人の協議により定めた一の出願人のみが特許又は実用新案登録を受けることができる。 - 特許庁

The grounds on which a court may revoke the registration of the design are: that the design is not a registrable design; or that one or more of the original registered owners was not an entitled person in relation to the design when the design was first registered; or that each of the original registered owners was an entitled person in relation to the design when the design was first registered, but another person or persons were entitled persons in relation to the design at that time; or that the registration of the design was obtained by fraud, false suggestion or misrepresentation; or that the design is a corresponding design to an artistic work, and copyright in the artistic work has ceased. 例文帳に追加

裁判所が意匠登録を取り消すことができる理由は，次のとおりである。意匠が登録可能な意匠ではないこと，又は1又は2以上の原登録所有者が，意匠が最初に登録された時の意匠に関連して権原者でなかったこと，又は各原登録所有者が，意匠が最初に登録された時の意匠に関連する権原者であったが，その時点で別の者が意匠に関連する権原者であったこと，又は詐欺，虚偽の示唆又は不実表明によって意匠登録が取得されたこと，又は意匠が美術的著作物に対して対応する意匠であり，かつ，美術的著作物における著作権が停止したこと - 特許庁

(3) Where the condition of sub-paragraph (2)(a)(ii) is not satisfied at the time the application for a patent is filed, it shall be satisfied -- (a) within 16 months from -- (i) the declared priority date; or (ii) the date of filing the application where there is no declared priority date; (b) where, on a request made by the applicant, the Registrar publishes the application before the end of the period prescribed for the purposes of section 27(1), before the date of the request; or (c) where the Registrar sends notification to the applicant that, in accordance with section 108(4), he has received a request by any person for information and inspection of documents under subsection (1) of that section, before the end of one month after his sending to the applicant notification of his receipt of the request, whichever is the earliest.例文帳に追加

(3) 特許出願がされた時点で(2)(a)(ii)の条件が満たされていない場合は， (a)(i) 宣言された優先日，若しくは (ii) 宣言された優先日が存在しない場合は，当該出願の出願日， から16月， (b) 出願人からの請求に基づいて登録官が当該出願を第27条(1)適用上の所定の期間の終了前に公開する場合は，当該請求の日，又は (c) 登録官が第108条(4)に従って同条(1)に基づいて情報及び書類の閲覧を求める請求を何人からか受領した旨の通知を出願人に送付した場合は，登録官が当該請求の受領に係る通知を出願人に送付した後1月の終了時， の何れか最も早く到来するときまでに，当該条件が満たされなければならない。 - 特許庁

If the Controller is satisfied on a claim made in the prescribed manner at any time before a design has been registered that by virtue of any assignment or agreement in writing made by the applicant or one of the applicants for registration of the design or by operation of law, the claimant would, if the design were then registered, be entitled thereto or to the interest of the applicant therein, or to an undivided share of the design or of that interest, the Controller may, subject to the provisions of this section, direct that the application shall proceed in the names of the claimants or in the names of the claimants and the applicant or the other joint applicant or applicants, accordingly as the case may require.例文帳に追加

意匠の登録前にいつでも所定の方法でされた異議申立について，意匠登録の出願人若しくは複数の出願人の1人によりされた書面による譲渡若しくは契約により又は法律の適用により，異議申立人にとって，当該意匠がその後登録されれば権利を受け，又は出願人のそれによる権利又は当該意匠の若しくは当該権利の不可分の持分を受けることができる筈である旨を長官が納得するときは，長官は，当該出願を異議申立人の名義，又は場合に応じて，異議申立人及び出願人又は他の1人若しくは2人以上の共同出願人の名義で処理すべき旨を，本条に従うことを条件として，命令することができる。 - 特許庁

The electronic blood pressure monitor provides one hold button to save the pressure when the button is pressed and leaves the blood pressure at that time remains near the scale for the indicating bar as a marker whenever the hold button is depressed during the measurement of the blood pressure.例文帳に追加

腕用のカフと、前記カフに空気を圧入するための加圧ポンプ部と、前記カフ内に圧入された空気を排気するための排気弁と、前記カフ内の圧力を計測するための圧力センサーと、水銀柱類似の棒グラフ表示を電子的に行うインジケーターバー及び当該インジケーターバー用の目盛りを有するアナログ表示部と、前記圧力センサーによる計測結果を前記インジケーターバーに表示するためのプロセッサー部とを有する電子血圧計であって、押下時の圧力を記憶させるためのひとつのホールドボタンを備え、血圧測定中に前記ホールドボタンが押下されるたびに、その時点の血圧値を前記インジケーターバー用の目盛り近傍にマーカー表示として残すことを特徴とする電子血圧計。 - 特許庁

In the case of negative lists, two types of lists are generally prepared: lists “without standstill obligations” allow parties to “maintain” or “adopt” measures not conforming to NT, MFN and prohibition of PR obligations; and lists with “standstill and ratchet obligations” under which not only measures inconsistent with the agreement cannot be newly introduced, but also measures which do not conform to NT, MFN and PR obligations which exist at the time the agreement became effective may be “maintained,” but cannot be revised in a way that makes them more inconsistent with the agreement, and once the measures are revised in the direction to make them more consistent with the agreement, the measures cannot be made more inconsistent again (this is called as the “ratchet” obligation to indicate changes can only be made in one direction).例文帳に追加

ネガティブリストの場合、NT・MFN・PR 義務に適合しない措置を「維持」または「採用」できる「現状維持義務（「スタンドスティル」）なし」のリストと、協定発効時に存在する、NT・MFN・PR 義務に非整合的な措置を「維持」できるが、これを協定非整合的な方向に改訂することや、新たな協定非整合措置を採用することはできず、また一度措置を協定に整合的な方向に緩和した場合、再度措置の強化ができない（ラチェット義務。一方向にしか回転しない歯車Ratchet から由来）という「現状維持義務・ラチェットあり」のリストの２種類を作成することが一般的である。 - 経済産業省

With regard to a business office pertaining to a license under Article 41, paragraph 1 or Article 46, paragraph 1 of the Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of Article 97-2, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act based on the amount prescribed in the Article 7 of the New Order exceeds the amount calculated pursuant to the provisions of Article 97-2, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act based on the amount prescribed in Article 7 of the Old Order, the amount prescribed in Article 97-2, paragraph 2, item 1 shall be calculated based on the amount prescribed in the Article 7 of the Old Order with regard to said business office, for one year from the Effective Date. 例文帳に追加

この政令の施行の際現に法第四十一条第一項又は第四十六条第一項の許可に係る営業所である営業所について、新令第七条に定める額に基づいて法第九十七条の二第二項第一号の規定により算出する額が旧令第七条に定める額に基づいて法第九十七条の二第二項第一号の規定により算出する額を超える場合には、当該営業所については、施行日から一年間は、旧令第七条に定める額に基づいて法第九十七条の二第二項第一号に規定する額を算出するものとする。 - 経済産業省

I made a comment at the informal ministerial gathering today, which was obviously not a comment from the head of the administration, but I am Vice-Chief of the People's New Party (PNP), and the current government is, as you know, a coalition of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and the PNP. Accordingly, Prime Minister Kan, right after he assumed office, met with (PNP) Chief Shizuka Kamei to discuss how the two parties would cooperate in policymaking, at which meeting I was also present as the PNP Secretary-General at that time. Under the three-party coalition that preceded the current one, there was a committee called the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which was set up as a forum for the parties to coordinate or match their policies, but then the Social Democratic Party left the coalition. That is why how the remaining parties should cooperate in policymaking afterwards was a subject of discussion at the party leader meeting right after Prime Minister Kan became the new Prime Minister, during which both leaders agreed to go about it properly. Then as it turned out, as you know, we had a House of Councilors election and the same subject also just came up again during the recent meeting of the two party leaders, who supposedly agreed to "do it (policy cooperation)." That is why I decided to make an elaborate comment on this subject to Prime Minister Kan at today's informal ministerial gathering, to which Prime Minister Kan responded by telling Mr. Gemba, who is a state minister and is also DPJ's Policy Research Committee Chair, to work on policy cooperation with the PNP in the proper way - therefore, Policy Research Committee Chair Gemba and I proceeded to discuss how it should be done, a task that I presume will basically be handled mainly by policy research committee chairs. 例文帳に追加

今日、閣僚懇で、私はこれは行政の長としての発言ではございませんけれども、国民新党の副代表でもございますし、両党、民主党と国民新党のご存じのように連立内閣でございますから、両党間の政策協議をどうするのかということは、実は菅総理がなられた後、すぐ亀井静香（国民新党）代表と話をされまして、当時私は幹事長でございましたから、同席をいたしまして、前の3党連立内閣のときは、基本政策閣僚委員会というのがございまして、ここで政策を整合性を図る、あるいはすり合わせをするということでございましたが、社民党さんが連立を離脱されましたので、その後の政策協力をどうするかということが当時菅総理が実現した後のすぐの党首会談でのテーマで、しっかりやりましょうという話でございましたが、ご存じのように参議院選挙になりましたので、またこの前も両党首会談でそのことが議題になって、「（政策協力を）やろう」ということでございましたから、今日閣僚懇で菅総理に相当申し上げまして、ちょうど玄葉さんが民主党の国務大臣兼政調会長でございますから、菅総理からもきちっと国民新党のほうとの政策協議をするようにということでございまして、玄葉政調会長と私ともどういうふうにするのかと、基本的に政調会長中心だというふうに思いますけれども、そのことを打ち合わせをさせていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁

(7) The provision of Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the ownership of Shares, etc. (referring to Shares, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (12) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by an Insurance Company or any of its Subsidiary Companies in a domestic company (referring to a domestic company as defined in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the Insurance Company or the Subsidiary Company owns, at the time when this Act enters into force, Shares, etc. in the domestic company in a total number that exceeds its shareholding threshold, etc. (referring to the shareholding threshold, etc. prescribed in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. In this case, for the purpose of applying the provision of that Article to the ownership of Shares, etc. in the domestic company on and subsequent to the date, the Insurance Company or its Subsidiary Company shall be deemed to have acquired as at the date the Shares, etc. of the domestic company in excess of the shareholding threshold, etc. following the events prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (2) of that Article. 例文帳に追加

７　新保険業法第百七条第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新保険業法第二条第十二項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新保険業法第百七条第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している保険会社又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Sec.190 Importation for Personal Purposes 190.1. Notwithstanding the provision of Subsection 177.6, but subject to the limitation under the Subsection 185.2, the importation of a copy of a work by an individual for his personal purposes shall be permitted without the authorization of the author of, or other owner of copyright in, the work under the following circumstances: (a) When copies of the work are not available in the Philippines and: (i) not more than one copy at one time is imported for strictly individual use only; or (ii) the importation is by authority of and for the use of the Philippine Government; or (iii) the importation, consisting of not more than three such copies or likenesses in any one invoice, is not for sale but for the use only of any religious, charitable, or educational society or institution duly incorporated or registered, or is for the encouragement of the fine arts, or for any State school, college, university, or free public library in the Philippines. (b) When such copies form parts of libraries and personal baggage belonging to persons or families arriving from foreign countries and are not intended for sale: Provided, that such copies do not exceed three.例文帳に追加

第190条 個人的目的のための輸入 190.1177.6の規定に拘らず，ただし，185.2に規定する条件に従い，個人による，その者の個人的目的のための著作物の複製物の輸入は，次の状況のもとにある著作物の場合にあっては，著作物の著作者又は同著作物におけるその他の著作権者の承諾を得ないで，これをすることができる。 (a)著作物の複製物をフィリピンにおいて入手することができず，かつ，次の何れかに該当する場合 (i)一時に1個の複製物が厳密に個人的使用のためにのみ輸入されること (ii)輸入が，フィリピン政府の権限により，フィリピン政府の使用のために行われること (iii)輸入が，1の送り状における2個以下の複製物又は類似物からなるものであって，販売のためのものではなく，正当に設立され若しくは登録された宗教，慈善若しくは教育に関する協会若しくは機構による使用のみのためのものであるか又はフィリピンにおける美術の奨励のため，若しくは国の学校，専門学校，大学若しくは無料の公共図書館のためのものであること (b)当該複製物が，外国から到着した者又は家族のものである蔵書及び個人的手荷物の部分であり，かつ，販売する意思のないものである場合 ただし，当該複製物の個数は3個を超えないことを条件とする。 - 特許庁

Article 13 (1) An Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location of one of the following facilities (herein referred to as "Facility Subject to Domicile Exception") and is located by admission or residence (herein referred to as "Admission, etc.") in said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception (an Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location where said Facility is located by moving into said Facility as listed in item (iii) is limited to a person for whom the admission measures are pursuant to the provisions of Article 11, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Public Aid for the Aged Act; hereinafter referred to as "Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception" in this Article) and for whom it is determined to have had domicile in another Municipality (a Municipality other than the Municipality where said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception is located) at the time of moving in for Admission, etc., at said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, shall be an Insured Person of Long-Term Care Insurance provided by said other Municipality of prior domicile, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9; however, provided that this provision shall not apply to an Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception who moved in for Admission, etc., into two or more of a said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, and said Person is determined to have moved consecutively from one said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person was admitted immediately prior to the said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception where said Insured Person is currently residing for Admission, etc. (herein referred to as the "Facility of First Prior Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph) into a Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person is currently residing (herein referred to as the "Facility of Current Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) (collectively herein referred to as "Specified Continuous Admission of an Insured Person" in the following paragraph): 例文帳に追加

第十三条　次に掲げる施設（以下「住所地特例対象施設」という。）に入所又は入居（以下この条において「入所等」という。）をすることにより当該住所地特例対象施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者（第三号に掲げる施設に入所することにより当該施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者にあっては、老人福祉法第十一条第一項第一号の規定による入所措置がとられた者に限る。以下この条において「住所地特例対象被保険者」という。）であって、当該住所地特例対象施設に入所等をした際他の市町村（当該住所地特例対象施設が所在する市町村以外の市町村をいう。）の区域内に住所を有していたと認められるものは、第九条の規定にかかわらず、当該他の市町村が行う介護保険の被保険者とする。ただし、二以上の住所地特例対象施設に継続して入所等をしている住所地特例対象被保険者であって、現に入所等をしている住所地特例対象施設（以下この項及び次項において「現入所施設」という。）に入所等をする直前に入所等をしていた住所地特例対象施設（以下この項において「直前入所施設」という。）及び現入所施設のそれぞれに入所等をすることにより直前入所施設及び現入所施設のそれぞれの所在する場所に順次住所を変更したと認められるもの（次項において「特定継続入所被保険者」という。）については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In this context, the financial sector has ballooned more than the real economy, and risks can no longer be contained within the risks of one financial institution. The Lehman Brothers shockwave was a typical example of this. It has a broad impact on the national economy and the global economy. Back in 1929, economies were organized into economic blocks, which became a remote cause of the Second World War according to some people. Having learned a bitter lesson from the War, G8 and G20 mobilized their wisdom and reached a consensus on Basel III as well. I am looking forward to seeing an accord reached on Basel III at the upcoming Seoul Summit. I believe that the human race has learned a few lessons since the Great Depression after 1929 in conjunction with the globalization of economies around the world. With this in mind, the general rule is to facilitate the financial sector that supports companies, as well as the yen, and properly execute risk management. As relationship of trust is fundamental to financial businesses, financial institutions do not function properly if customers lack confidence in financial institutions, as you are well aware. Taking this into account, we are steering the financial sector at an extremely difficult time. Even at times like this when the financial sector is undergoing dramatic change on a global scale, we are committed to fulfilling our responsibilities properly while seeking your wisdom and people’s opinions, bearing in mind that Japan’s economy is not isolated but interlinked with American and Chinese economies as well due to globalization. 例文帳に追加

また、そういった意味で、非常に金融が実体経済以上にふくらむ、それがなおかつ、一つの金融機関のリスクの中で、リスクはもうおさまらなくなった、リーマン・ショックなんか典型ですね。国全体の経済、あるいは世界全体の経済に広範な影響を与えるというようなことでございますから、そういった中で、1929年はそれぞれの経済がブロック化しまして、それが第二次世界大戦の遠因だという方もおられますけれども、その辺の苦しい反省を踏まえて、Ｇ８、Ｇ20ということで、何とか英知を集めて、今度のバーゼルもまとまったし、今度はぜひ、これがソウルサミットでまとまっていただきたいと思いますけれども、世界の経済のグローバル化と同時に、やっぱり人類は1929年の後の世界大恐慌よりは、少し学習をしたと私は思っていますし、そういうことも視野に入れつつ、企業を支える金融、あるいは円の円滑化、あるいはリスク管理をきちっとやるというようなことは、これは原則でございますし、なおかつ金融業というのは、この前も申しましたように、基本的には信頼関係でございますから、顧客の方だとか、あるいは金融機関に関する信頼がないと、金融機関というのはうまく機能しないというのはもう皆様方、専門家でございますからよくご存じでございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、非常に難しい時代の金融の舵取りでございます。世界が今非常に金融も変動しておりまして、しかし、そういったときでも、皆様の知恵もかりながら、国民の声もかりながら、そして日本一国の経済ではございませんから、まさに非常に経済のグローバル化、アメリカの経済も中国の経済も、まさに結びついているわけでございますから、そういったことも視野に入れつつ、しっかり責任を果たしていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Revocation of a patent in whole or in part may be obtained on petition to or on a counter claim in a suit for infringement before the High Court Division on all or any of the following grounds, namely:- that the invention has been the subject of a valid prior grant of a patent in Bangladesh; that the true and first inventor or his legal representative or assign was not the applicant or one of the applicants for the patent; that the patent was obtained in fraud of the rights of the person applying for the revocation or of any person under or through whom he claims; that the invention was not, at the date of the patent, a manner of new manufacture or improvement; that the invention does not involve any inventive step, having regard to what was known or used prior to the date of the patent; that the invention is of no utility; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and fairly describe and ascertain the nature of the invention and the manner in which the invention is to be performed; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and clearly ascertain the scope of the invention claimed; that the patent was obtained on a false suggestion or representation; that the primary or intended use or exercise of the invention is contrary to law; that the patentee has contravened, or has not complied with, the conditions contained in the patent; that the complete specification does not disclose the best method of performance of the invention known to the applicant for the patent at the time when the specification was left at the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. 例文帳に追加

特許の全部又は一部の取消しは、高等裁判所への請願書により、又は高等裁判所に係属している侵害訴訟中の反訴により、次の各号に掲げる事由のすべて又はいずれかを理由として得ることができる。すなわち、その発明はバングラデシュ国内において先願により有効に付与された特許の対象であること。真正かつ最先の発明者又はその法定代理人若しくは譲受人は当該特許出願人若しくは出願人の一人ではなかったこと。その特許は取消しを申請している者又は当該申請人がなす主張につき指示している者、若しくは当該申請人が代理している者の権利を詐害する目的で取得されたこと。その発明は特許された日において新規性を欠く製造方法又は改良であったこと。その発明は特許の日以前に知られていた又は使用されていたものに係るものであり、進歩性がないこと。その発明は有用性がないこと。完全な明細書は十分かつ正確に記載されておらず、発明の本質及び発明の実施方法が確認されないこと。完全な明細書から、請求する発明の範囲が十分かつ明瞭に確認されないこと。その特許は虚偽の示唆又は不実表示に基づいて取得されたこと。その発明の主な又は目的とする用途又は実施が法令に反すること。その特許権者が、当該特許に含まれる条件に違反し又は遵守していないこと。完全な明細書が、当該明細書が特許意匠商標庁に提出された当時に当該特許に係る出願人が知っていた、当該発明の最良の実施方法を開示していない。 - 特許庁

(2) With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph (1) of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision. 例文帳に追加

２　この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(9) Where, with respect to government or company bonds issued by means of a discount on or after April 1, 1999, that are listed in the following (including those specified by a Cabinet Order as being similar thereto), for which a period from the date of issue to the redemption date is not more than one year (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "short-term government or company bonds"), specified entries or records under the book-entry transfer system (meaning entries or records in a transfer account book set forth in the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, etc. which are made pursuant to the provisions of the said Act; hereinafter referred to in this Article as "entries or records under the book-entry transfer system"), which are specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) are made together with all other short-term government or company bonds that have the same brand at the time of issue, such short-term government or company bonds for which the said specified entries or records under the book-entry transfer system are made (limited to those that satisfy the requirements specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance for bonds held by a specified person; hereinafter referred to in this Article as "specified short-term government or company bonds") shall not fall under the category of discount bonds prescribed in paragraph (1) to paragraph (6): 例文帳に追加

９　平成十一年四月一日以後に割引の方法により発行される公社債で次に掲げるもの（これらに類するものとして政令で定めるものを含む。）のうち、その発行の日から償還期限までの期間が一年以下であるもの（以下この項において「短期公社債」という。）が、その発行の際にその銘柄が同一である他の短期公社債のすべてとともに特定振替記載等（社債等の振替に関する法律に定めるところにより行われる同法の振替口座簿への記載又は記録（以下この条において「振替記載等」という。）のうち政令で定めるものをいう。以下この項において同じ。）がされる場合には、当該特定振替記載等がされる短期公社債（特定の者によつて所有されるものとして財務省令で定める要件を満たすものに限る。以下この条において「特定短期公社債」という。）は、第一項から第六項までに規定する割引債に該当しないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 38 (1) A person who has manufactured or imported specified machines, etc., or who is to install specified machines, etc., which have not been installed for the period provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or who is to reinstall or to resume the use of specified machines, etc., the use of which has been discontinued, shall, as provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, have the said specified machines, etc., and the matters provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in relation thereto inspected by one of the following (a) or (b): (a) the Director of the Prefectural Labor Bureau, if the said specified machines, etc., do not belong to specially specified machines, etc., (meaning those designated among specified machines, etc., by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, hereinafter the same). (b) those who were registered by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as a "registered manufacturing inspection, etc., agency"), if the said specified machines, etc., belong to specially specified machines, etc. However, this does not apply when a manufacturer in a foreign country has received an inspection of the said specified machines, etc., under the provisions of the following paragraph for the imported specified machines, etc., and other related matters covered by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (referred to as "machines, etc., to be inspected at the time of import, etc." in the following paragraph). 例文帳に追加

第三十八条　特定機械等を製造し、若しくは輸入した者、特定機械等で厚生労働省令で定める期間設置されなかつたものを設置しようとする者又は特定機械等で使用を廃止したものを再び設置し、若しくは使用しようとする者は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該特定機械等及びこれに係る厚生労働省令で定める事項について、当該特定機械等が、特別特定機械等（特定機械等のうち厚生労働省令で定めるものをいう。以下同じ。）以外のものであるときは都道府県労働局長の、特別特定機械等であるときは厚生労働大臣の登録を受けた者（以下「登録製造時等検査機関」という。）の検査を受けなければならない。ただし、輸入された特定機械等及びこれに係る厚生労働省令で定める事項（次項において「輸入時等検査対象機械等」という。）について当該特定機械等を外国において製造した者が次項の規定による検査を受けた場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I spoke with FRB (Federal Reserve Board) Chairman Bernanke two weeks ago and also had a chance to speak with People's Bank of China Governor Zhou Xiaochuan this week. Frankly speaking, this is, as a matter of fact, a kind of issue to be decided on by the global forum of the G20, as it relates to stability of financial institutions worldwide and, at the same time, the definition of capital adequacy, and the quality and quantity debate, among other things. A dozen years or so ago, Japan was hit by a financial crisis. When I was previously a minister, I witnessed something similar – the failure of the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank – which resulted in a credit crunch and credit withdrawal that, as many of you must remember, indeed caused a large number of companies to go under one after another. In that sense, it is not necessarily a positive thing to make a capital adequacy ratio higher and higher. 例文帳に追加

私は先々週でございますか、バーナンキＦＲＢ（連邦準備制度理事会）議長ともお話ししましたし、先週というか今週は周小川、中国の中央銀行の総裁とも話をさせていただきましたけれども、率直に言えば、こういった話も当然、非常に世界的なＧ20で決める話でございまして、非常に世界の金融機関の安定性と、それから同時に自己資本の定義、あるいは定義と申しますか、自己資本の定義、それから質と量、こういったことがまた同時に、皆様方ご存じのように十数年前、日本は大変金融ショックといいますか、金融危機に襲われまして、当時、私も与党の国会議員で閣僚をやめたすぐ後で、閣僚のときにも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産したということが起きましたので、本当にあのとき貸し渋り、貸しはがしになりまして、非常に皆さん方もご記憶のある方が多いと思いますが、本当にばたばた企業も倒産いたしまして、そういった意味で、要するに、自己資本の比率が高ければ高いほどいいというものでもございません。 - 金融庁

The name shall be removed from the Register of Professional Representatives of any person who: is deceased or subject to an incapacity under Article 69; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 63, no longer fulfills the conditions required by Article 60 and or may no longer rely on the provisions of an international convention or on reciprocity under paragraph 2 of that Article; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 is no longer resident in Belgium or in a Member State of the European Communities or has been prohibited or placed under guardianship; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 has been removed ex officio from the list of professional representatives before the European Patent Office for one of the reasons listed in Rule 102 to of the Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents or for having been subject to a disciplinary measure taken under Article 134 of that Convention; at the time of the request for entry or of a request for amendment of the entry, intentionally submitted documents or made declarations the content of which did not correspond to reality; has been convicted or has been subject to a prohibition referred to in Article 60; has committed a serious offense in the exercise of his patent representation activities before the Office. 例文帳に追加

次に掲げる者は職業的代理人登録簿から抹消される。死亡した者，又は第69条の規定による無能力者となった者，第63条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，もはや第60条及びの条件を満たしていない者，又は国際条約の規定若しくは第60条の下での相互主義に依存することができない者，第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，もはやベルギー若しくは欧州共同体の居住者ではない者，又は禁止され若しくは保護の下におかれるようになった者，第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，欧州特許の付与に関する条約についての施行規則の中の規則第102(a)から(c)までに掲げる理由の1つに基づき，又は同条約第134条(c)の下でとられた制裁措置に服させられたという理由で，職権により欧州特許庁に対する職業的代理人名簿から抹消された者，登録請求又は登録補正請求のとき，故意に真実ではない文書又は申立を提出した者，有罪の判決を受け，又は第60条にいう禁止に服させられた者，庁に対する特許代理人としての職務の遂行において，重大な罪を犯した者。 - 特許庁

(1) An applicant, a patentee or the successor in title thereof who, as a result of an order under Section 50(1), refrains from using or ceases to use an invention patentable under Sections 1 to 5 for peaceful purposes shall have a claim to compensation, owing to the damages thereby incurred, against the Federal Republic if and to the extent that said party cannot reasonably be expected to bear the damages itself. When determining the extent to which said party can reasonably be expected to do so, account shall be taken, in particular, of the financial position of the injured party, the amount of expenditure incurred by said party for the invention or for acquiring title thereto, the degree of probability that the invention might have to be kept secret that could have been recognized by said party at the time the expenditure was incurred, and the profit derived by the injured party from another exploitation of the invention. The claim cannot be asserted until after a patent has been granted. Compensation may be claimed only after it has become due and for periods which shall not be shorter than one year. 例文帳に追加

(1) 出願人，特許所有者又はこれらの権原承継人が第 1条から第 5条までに基づいて特許を受けることができる発明を，第 50条(1)に基づく命令の結果として，平和目的で実施することを差し控え又は実施を停止した場合は，同人は，それによって同人に生じた損害に起因する補償を連邦に対して請求する権利を有するものとするが，ただし，当該当事者に対し，その損害自体を負担させることが合理的に見て期待できないことを条件とし，かつ，その程度に限る。その程度を判断するときは，特に，被害者の財務状況，発明のために又は発明に対する権原を取得するために当該当事者によって行われた支出の額，その支出が生じたときに，当該当事者によって認識されていた，発明の秘密保持が義務付けられる可能性の程度，及び被害者がその発明に係る他の実施から取得した利益が考慮される。この請求権は，特許が付与されるまでは主張することができない。補償は，支払うべきものとなった後，かつ，1年より短くない期間についてのみ請求することができる。 - 特許庁

Although assistance differs with the individual library, they typically: (1) Gather large volumes of printed material (publications, pamphlets, etc.) in a wide range of business areas, organize them into appropriate business categories and topics, and make the available to the public, including via electronic media, in databases and on the Internet all free of charge; (2) Offer the services of reference librarians skilled in finding desired information, for those not yet experienced enough to do so themselves; (3) Are open on Saturdays and Sundays, in addition to weekdays, allowing all members of the public, including those employed full-time, to use their facilities free of charge; (4) Cooperate with organizations with professional know-how and functions, including governmental bodies at all levels, Chamber of Commerce and Industry and universities; some libraries serve as one-stop access to information from multiple organizations; and (5) Proactively disseminate information by sponsoring seminars and the like on starting new businesses, etc. 例文帳に追加

支援に向けた取組は図書館により様々だが、代表的な機能としては、〔1〕図書館としての公共性を活かして大量に蓄積した幅広い分野のビジネスに役立つ文献・雑誌等紙媒体の情報を、ビジネスをキーワードに集め一覧できるようにして提供したり、インターネットやデータベースといった電子媒体を無料で提供していることや、〔2〕必要な情報へどのようにアクセスすればよいか分からなくとも、情報収集のノウハウを持つ司書によるレファレンスサービスを受けることができること、〔3〕平日のみならず土日も開館しているため、フルタイムの仕事を持つ者にも利用しやすく、無料であることと併せて、誰にとっても敷居が低く利用しやすい公共施設であること、〔4〕図書館によっては行政や商工会議所、大学等専門的なノウハウと機能を持つ機関と連携を図っており、情報へのワンストップ的なアクセス窓口となっていること、〔5〕開業セミナー等の開催による情報発信を挙げることができる。 - 経済産業省

With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph 1 of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision. 例文帳に追加

この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 経済産業省

Among the G-20 and G-7 countries, and even in the United States, the need for regulation has been recognized, as indicated by the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, which strengthens financial regulations, as opposed to neo-conservatism, which basically pursues the thorough deregulation of the financial sector and the minimization of government involvement. Following the enactment of that act, the United States is working out the details of regulations, including the Volcker Rule. As for European banks, U.K. banks are rather closer to the U.S. style of finance as you know, while Germany and France have continental financial systems, which are conservative, like the Japanese financial system. As to the first question, which concerned neo-conservatism, the mood around the world some time ago was such as to encourage financial institutions to create any type of financial product in exchange for accepting full self-responsibility, and Japan was no exception. However, now, the mood has changed very much even on Wall Street. In that sense, I think that countries have a feeling of contrition about the wave of neo-conservatism that swept through the world at one time. 例文帳に追加

G20でもG7でも、ご存じのように、アメリカでもドット・フランク法というのは、金融の規制を強化するという法律でございまして、基本的に金融の分野で極限までの規制緩和、そしてできるだけ政府の関与を少なくするのがよいというのが新保守主義でございましたから、私は世界の大宗において、アメリカのドット・フランク法が証明しているように、金融というのは、非常に影響が大きいですから、やはり必要な規制は必要なのだというのが、アメリカですら法律が通って、今、ドット・フランク法も、初めボルカー・ルールの細則を詰めているところでございまして、ヨーロッパの銀行も、イギリスはどちらかというと、ご存じのようにアメリカ型の金融に近いのですけれども、ドイツ、フランスはどちらかというと大陸型でございまして、手堅いと言ったらおかしいけれども、日本に似たような金融システムを持っておりますので、私は1点目の質問、新保守主義をという話でしたけれども、世界的にはかつての自由な、どんどん規制緩和で、もうどんな金融商品でもつくってもよい、そのかわり自分の会社で全部自己責任を持ちなさいよということが、一時代前は非常に世界を覆い尽くしまして、日本もそれに巻き込まれたところはあるのでございますけれども、やはり今、アメリカのウォール街ですら、非常にその辺が変わってきていると思っておりまして、そういう意味では、やはり一時の新保守主義の勢いに対する反省が各国であると思っております。 - 金融庁

(iii) in the case where an officer or employee of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange has acquired the shares of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange (limited to those conducted according to a certain plan, without depending on an individual investment decision, on an on-going basis, for which each officer or employee contributes less than one million yen at a time) jointly with another officer or employee of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange (when said Incorporated Commodity Exchange has acquired the shares other than those acquired based on the provisions of Article 156, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act [including cases where it is applied by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 165, paragraph (3) of the same Act], limited to the case where the acquisition was consigned to a Financial Instruments Business Operator [which means the Financial Instruments Business Operator prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) (limited to one who is engaged in the Type I Financial Instruments Business prescribed in Article 28, paragraph (1) of the same Act); the same shall apply in the following Article and the Appended Table 4]), voting rights pertaining to the shares of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange acquired or held by a person who has deposited the shares of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange which conducted said acquisition (excluding those that are deemed to be the voting rights personally acquired or held by said person who has deposited the shares, pursuant to the provisions of Article 86, paragraph (3) [limited to the part pertaining to item (i)] of the Act); 例文帳に追加

三　株式会社商品取引所の役員又は従業員が当該株式会社商品取引所の他の役員又は従業員と共同して当該株式会社商品取引所の株式の取得（一定の計画に従い、個別の投資判断に基づかず、継続的に行われ、各役員又は従業員の一回当たりの拠出金額が百万円に満たないものに限る。）をした場合（当該株式会社商品取引所が会社法第百五十六条第一項（同法第百六十五条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合を含む。）の規定に基づき取得した株式以外の株式を取得したときは、金融商品取引業者（金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第二条第九項に規定する金融商品取引業者（同法第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者に限る。）をいう。次条及び別表第四において同じ。）に委託して行った場合に限る。）において当該取得をした株式会社商品取引所の株式を信託された者が取得し、又は所有する当該株式会社商品取引所の株式に係る議決権（法第八十六条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定により当該信託された者が自ら取得し、又は保有する議決権とみなされるものを除く。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) in the case where the Tender Offer Purchaser makes Purchase, etc. of the Share Certificates, etc. using a method different from the method of proportional distribution stated in the Tender Offer Notification: the amount calculated by multiplying the difference between the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages under the preceding paragraph if the Tender Offer Purchaser uses the method of proportional distribution and the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. was actually made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages (in cases where the Tender Offer Purchaser did not make Purchase, etc. of any of Share Certificates, etc. from the person entitled to claim damages, the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages if the method of proportional distribution is used) by the difference between the Tender Offer Price (or the price paid by the Tender Offeror as specified in Article 27-17(2) in the case where paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is also applicable, the favorable price referred to in the preceding item in the case where the preceding item is also applicable, or the more favorable one between them in the case where both Article 27-17(1) and the preceding item are also applicable) and the market price of the Share Certificates, etc. at the time when the damages are claimed under the preceding paragraph (or estimated disposal price in the case where there is no market price for the Share Certificates, etc., or disposal price in the case where the Share Certificates, etc. was disposed of before the damages is claimed). 例文帳に追加

二　当該公開買付けをした者が公開買付届出書に記載されたあん分比例方式と異なる方式で株券等の買付け等をした場合　当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に前項の規定による請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数から当該公開買付けをした者が当該請求権者から買付け等をした株券等の数を控除した数（当該請求権者から買付け等をしなかつた場合には、当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に当該請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数とする。）に公開買付価格（前条第一項に該当する場合にあつては同条第二項に規定する公開買付者が支払つた価格、前号に掲げる場合に該当する場合にあつては同号に定める有利な価格とし、そのいずれにも該当する場合にあつてはそのいずれか有利な価格とする。）から前項の規定による損害賠償を請求する時における当該株券等の市場価格（市場価格がないときはその時における処分推定価格とし、当該請求時前に当該株券等を処分した場合においてはその処分価格とする。）を控除した金額を乗じた額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 66-4-2 (1) Where a domestic corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency (including the cases where a foreign corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the competent authority of the other Contracting State which is related to the foreign corporation), the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十六条の四の二　内国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合（外国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき当該外国法人に係る条約相手国の権限ある当局に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合を含む。）には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、これらの申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（これらの申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、これらの申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 68-88-2 (1) Where a consolidated parent corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the consolidated corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the consolidated corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条の八十八の二　連結親法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（当該申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、当該申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 212 (1) A person who pays a nonresident, in Japan, domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-2 to (xii) (in the case where the nonresident falls under the category listed in Article 164(1)(iv) (Nonresidents Having No Permanent Establishments in Japan): limited to domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-3 to (xii), and excluding that specified by a Cabinet Order) or a person who pays a foreign corporation, in Japan, domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-2 to (vii) or (ix) to (xii) (in the case where the foreign corporation falls under the category listed in Article 141(iv) of the Corporation Tax Act (Foreign Corporations Having No Permanent Establishments in Japan): limited to domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-3 to (vii) or (ix) to (xii), and excluding the one that falls under the provision of Article 180(1) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Domestic Source Income Received by Foreign Corporations Having Permanent Establishments in Japan) or Article 180-2(1) or (2) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Interest, etc. on Trust Property) and that specified by a Cabinet Order) shall, at the time of payment, collect income tax with respect to the said domestic source income, and pay it to the State no later than the tenth day of the month following the month that includes the date of collection. 例文帳に追加

第二百十二条　非居住者に対し国内において第百六十一条第一号の二から第十二号まで（国内源泉所得）に掲げる国内源泉所得（その非居住者が第百六十四条第一項第四号（国内に恒久的施設を有しない非居住者）に掲げる者である場合には第百六十一条第一号の三から第十二号までに掲げるものに限るものとし、政令で定めるものを除く。）の支払をする者又は外国法人に対し国内において同条第一号の二から第七号まで若しくは第九号から第十二号までに掲げる国内源泉所得（その外国法人が法人税法第百四十一条第四号（国内に恒久的施設を有しない外国法人）に掲げる者である場合には第百六十一条第一号の三から第七号まで又は第九号から第十二号までに掲げるものに限るものとし、第百八十条第一項（国内に恒久的施設を有する外国法人の受ける国内源泉所得に係る課税の特例）又は第百八十条の二第一項若しくは第二項（信託財産に係る利子等の課税の特例）の規定に該当するもの及び政令で定めるものを除く。）の支払をする者は、その支払の際、これらの国内源泉所得について所得税を徴収し、その徴収の日の属する月の翌月十日までに、これを国に納付しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Simultaneously, how should insurance be regulated and supervised from now on? I believe insurance in China is not as advanced as in Japan yet. But then again, Japan’s insurance industry has experienced falling stock prices and interest rates over the past decade and suffered a long period of winter-like hardship: the insurance sector, where they have something called “expense profits”, “interest gain” and “mortality profits”, the interest gain was so squeezed that at one point, negative carry was more than 1 trillion yen. In the United States, the federal government will be establishing a division in charge of insurance for the first time within the federal government organization under the financial reform legislation. As you know, basic supervision of insurance in the United States is conducted on a state-by-state basis. Despite the fact that AIU—the world’s biggest private insurance company—was effectively nationalized in the United States, the insurance industry has been a bit of a blind spot in that any attempts in the past to negotiate with the central government often resulted in being told that it was a matter for the state government. The United States is a federal republic comprised of states, so in that sense, insurance varies from state to state in tax and other aspects. 例文帳に追加

しかし、同時にそれでは今から保険の行政に関してどういう点をやっているのか。まだ日本ほど保険が進んでいるとは思っておりませんけれども、しかし同時に、日本の保険業界もご存じのように大変ここ10年間株価は下がる、あるいは金利が下がるということで、費差益・利差益・死差益というのが保険業にはございますが、本当に利差益が少なくて大変一時は末端逆ざやが1兆円余の保険業界でもあるというような冬の時代が長く続きましたけれども、多くのかなりの、我々が27年前に通ったころは、日本の名前がついた生命保険会社法だったのですけれども、今色々な外資からも変わったところもありますので、そんなことを含めて今度アメリカでも保険ということが、ご存じのようにアメリカは保険の基本的監督は州単位なんですよ、アメリカの政府は。州単位で保険をやっていまして、連邦政府というのは、金融規制改革法で初めて連邦政府の中に保険担当の部署をつくるんですよ、今度初めて。しかしながら、AIUなんていう世界で一番大きな民間保険会社をアメリカは実質国営化しましたけれども、そこら辺で保険業界というのはちょっと穴と言ったらおかしいけれども、中央政府と今まで交渉しましても、これは中央政府の話だということもしばしばございまして、そういった意味で保険というのはなかなか、アメリカは合衆国ですから、税金なんかも州によって違いますね。 - 金融庁

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the following acts do not constitute an infringement of the right to the use of a registered 26 trademark- (a) where a trademark is registered subject to any conditions or limitations, the use of the trademark in any manner in relation to goods or services, as the case may be, to be sold or otherwise traded in, in any place, or in relation to goods or services to be exported to any market, or in any other circumstances, to which, having regard to those conditions or limitations, the registration does not extend; (b) by being permitted to use those goods or a bulk of which they form part or services, or a bulk of which they form part by the proprietor of the trademark or any person related to the trade of goods or services in relation with the registered user or to use within the limit of permitted use of the registered proprietor or user, the use of such trademark, unless the registered proprietor or the user subsequently has removed or obliterated it, or has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trademark; (c) by registration under this Act- (i) the use of a trademark is within established right by a person in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of, or to be accessory to, other goods or services; (ii) the use of a registered trademark, being one of two or more trademarks registered under this Act which are identical or nearly resemble each other, is in exercise of the right to the use of the trademarks given by registration under this Act. 例文帳に追加

(1)本法のいかなる規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる行為は登録商標の使用権の侵害に該当しない。(a)商標が何らかの条件又は制限を付して登録されている場合、それらの条件又は制限を考慮して、当該登録の効力が及ばない場所で商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)について販売若しくは取引するため、商品若しくは役務に関しかかる効力の範囲外にある市場へ輸出するため、又はかかる効力の範囲外にあるその他の環境において、いかなる態様であれ当該商標を使用する場合。(b)当該商標の所有者又は登録使用権者に関連する商品若しくは役務の取引に係わる者によってそれらの商品、それらの商品から構成される大量品(バルク)、又は役務、若しくはそれらの役務の集合の利用を許諾受けた使用、又は、登録所有者又は利用権者から許諾を受けた使用の範囲内における当該商標の使用である場合。ただし、登録所有者又は使用権者が後にそれを解消又は抹消しない限り、又はどの時点においても明示黙示を問わず当該商標の使用を承諾している限りにおいてとする。(c)本法に基づく登録により、(i)他の商品若しくは役務の一部を構成するように、又は他の商品若しくは役務に随伴するものとして認められた商品又は役務に関連してある者により設定された範囲内における商標の使用である場合。(ii)登録商標の使用が、本法に基づき登録された2以上の互いに同一又は非常に似ている商標の一つとして、本法に基づき登録により付与された商標の使用権の行使である場合。 - 特許庁

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well. 例文帳に追加

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁

Article 333 (1) In the case where an incorporator of an Insurance Company, etc., director at the time of its incorporation, executive officer at the time of its incorporation, company auditor at the time of its incorporation, director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, accounting auditor or a member who shall carry out its duties, liquidator, commissioned company prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 272-30, paragraph (2)), insurance administrator, insurance inspector, liquidator representative set forth in Article 525, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), supervising committee member set forth in Article 527, paragraph (1) of the same Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), examination committee member set forth in Article 533 of the same Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 184), acting director, executive officer, company auditor or liquidator who has been appointed pursuant to the provisional disposition order prescribed in Article 56 of the Civil Provisional Relief Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary director, accounting advisor, company auditor, representative director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer prescribed in Article 322, paragraph (1), item (vi) or Article 960, paragraph (1), item (v) of the Companies Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary liquidator or Representative Liquidator prescribed in Article 322, paragraph (2), item (iii) or Article 960, paragraph (2), item (iii) of the same Act, any person who shall carry out the duties of a temporary accounting auditor prescribed in Article 328, paragraph (1), item (iii) or Article 967, paragraph (1), item (iii) of the same Act, inspector, administrator of shareholder registry, administrator of bond registry, bond administrator, bond administrator who is succeeding the affairs, representative bondholder, resolution executor or manager, a Representative Person in Japan of a foreign Insurance Company, etc, liquidator, commissioned company prescribed in Article 144, paragraph (1), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 211, insurance administrator, insurance inspector or manager, any person who represents a license Specified Juridical Person and subscription member in Japan, any person who has concluded a contract set forth in Article 190, paragraph (3) with a Foreign Insurance Company, etc., any person who has concluded a contract set forth in Article 223, paragraph (3) with a license Specified Juridical Person or any person who has concluded a contract set forth in Article 272-5, paragraph (3) with a small sum short-term insurer, officer of Policyholders protection corporation, Large Holder of Insurance Voting Rights (when the Large Holder of Insurance Voting Rights is a juridical person (including organizations that are not juridical persons listed in Article 2-2, paragraph (1), item (i); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph except for items (lxv) and (lxxi)), its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, representative person, manager, member who executes the business, or liquidator, including former large holders of insurance voting rights in the case where large holders of insurance voting rights are no longer large holders of insurance voting rights), insurance major shareholder or Short Term Insurance Major Shareholder (when the insurance major shareholder or Short Term Insurance Major Shareholder is a juridical person, its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, representative person, manager, member who executes the business, or liquidator, including former insurance major shareholders or Major Shareholder of Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider in the case where Major Shareholders of Insurance Company or Short Term Insurance Major Shareholders are no longer Major Shareholders of Insurance Company or Major Shareholder of Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider), Specified Major Shareholder or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company (when the Specified Major Shareholder or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company is a juridical person, its director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, representative person, manager, member who executes the business, or liquidator, including former Specified Major Shareholders or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company in the case where Specified Major Shareholders or specified Major Shareholders of Insurance Company are no longer holders of the voting rights of an Insurance Company, etc. which amount to not less than the Major Shareholder Threshold), the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, manager or liquidator of an Insurance Holding Company or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company (including former insurance holding companies or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies in the case where insurance holding companies or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies are no longer insurance holding companies or Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies), or the director, executive officer, accounting advisor or a member who shall carry out its duties, company auditor, manager, member who executes the business or liquidator of a Specified Holding Company or specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Company (including former specified holding companies or specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies in the case where specified holding companies or specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Holding Companies are no longer holding companies of which an Insurance Company, etc. is a Subsidiary Company) falls under any of the following items, he/she shall be punished by a non-penal fine of not more than one million yen; provided, however, that this shall not apply when a punishment shall be given for the act: 例文帳に追加

第三百三十三条　保険会社等の発起人、設立時取締役、設立時執行役、設立時監査役、取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、会計監査人若しくはその職務を行う社員、清算人、第百四十四条第一項（第二百七十二条の三十第二項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する受託会社、保険管理人、保険調査人、会社法第五百二十五条第一項（第百八十四条において準用する場合を含む。）の清算人代理、同法第五百二十七条第一項（第百八十四条において準用する場合を含む。）の監督委員、同法第五百三十三条（第百八十四条において準用する場合を含む。）の調査委員、民事保全法第五十六条に規定する仮処分命令により選任された取締役、執行役、監査役若しくは清算人の職務を代行する者、第三百二十二条第一項第六号若しくは会社法第九百六十条第一項第五号に規定する一時取締役、会計参与、監査役、代表取締役、委員、執行役若しくは代表執行役の職務を行うべき者、第三百二十二条第二項第三号若しくは同法第九百六十条第二項第三号に規定する一時清算人若しくは代表清算人の職務を行うべき者、第三百二十八条第一項第三号若しくは同法第九百六十七条第一項第三号に規定する一時会計監査人の職務を行うべき者、検査役、株主名簿管理人、社債原簿管理人、社債管理者、事務を承継する社債管理者、代表社債権者、決議執行者若しくは支配人、外国保険会社等の日本における代表者、清算人、第二百十一条において準用する第百四十四条第一項に規定する受託会社、保険管理人、保険調査人若しくは支配人、免許特定法人及び引受社員を日本において代表する者、外国保険会社等と第百九十条第三項の契約を締結した者、免許特定法人と第二百二十三条第三項の契約を締結した者若しくは少額短期保険業者と第二百七十二条の五第三項の契約を締結した者、機構の役員、保険議決権大量保有者（保険議決権大量保有者が保険議決権大量保有者でなくなった場合における当該保険議決権大量保有者であった者を含み、保険議決権大量保有者が法人（第二条の二第一項第一号に掲げる法人でない団体を含む。第六十五号及び第七十一号を除き、以下この項において同じ。）であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）、保険主要株主若しくは少額短期保険主要株主（保険主要株主又は少額短期保険主要株主が保険主要株主又は少額短期保険主要株主でなくなった場合における当該保険主要株主又は少額短期保険主要株主であった者を含み、保険主要株主又は少額短期保険主要株主が法人であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）、特定主要株主若しくは特定少額短期主要株主（特定主要株主又は特定少額短期主要株主が保険会社等の主要株主基準値以上の数の議決権の保有者でなくなった場合における当該特定主要株主又は特定少額短期主要株主であった者を含み、特定主要株主又は特定少額短期主要株主が法人であるときは、その取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、代表者、支配人、業務を執行する社員又は清算人）、保険持株会社若しくは少額短期保険持株会社（保険持株会社又は少額短期保険持株会社が保険持株会社又は少額短期保険持株会社でなくなった場合における当該保険持株会社又は少額短期保険持株会社であった会社を含む。）の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人若しくは清算人又は特定持株会社若しくは特定少額短期持株会社（特定持株会社又は特定少額短期持株会社が保険会社等を子会社とする持株会社でなくなった場合における当該特定持株会社又は特定少額短期持株会社であった会社を含む。）の取締役、執行役、会計参与若しくはその職務を行うべき社員、監査役、支配人、業務を執行する社員若しくは清算人は、次の各号のいずれかに該当する場合には、百万円以下の過料に処する。ただし、その行為について刑を科すべきときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Without limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make regulations: requiring persons to give statutory declarations in relation to applications under the Act or regulations, or in relation to proceedings under the Act (other than court proceedings); and making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and providing for the refund, in the whole or part of a fee paid under the Act; and providing for the waiver, in whole or part, of a fee that would otherwise be payable under the Act; and making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and empowering the Registrar to require a person to inform the Registrar, within the period prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the person wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act; and empowering the Registrar to require a person who wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act to appear on a day, and at a place and time, specified by the Registrar; and providing for the contents of design applications in which one or more designs are disclosed, including, but not limited to, requirements as to common ownership of the designs; and empowering the Registrar to direct an applicant for registration or publication of a design to do such things as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the requirements of the regulations for filing and: providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within the period specified in the regulations; and providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and providing for appeals against decisions of the Registrar made under the regulations; and making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and making transitional or consequential provisions as necessary or convenient because of the repeal of the Designs Act 1906 and the enactment of this Act; and provide for regulations under the Designs Act 1906 to continue to have effect (with any prescribed alterations) for specified purposes of this Act; and providing for things to be done for the purposes of this Act or the regulations by means of electronic equipment or communication; and empowering the Registrar to prepare, publish and sell such documents relating to designs as the Registrar thinks fit; and making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents. 例文帳に追加

(1)を制限することなく，同項は次の諸規則を制定する権限を含む。ある者に対し，本法若しくは規則に基づく申請に関して，又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関して，制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を提出するよう要求すること，及び未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害を理由に，宣言の作成又は行為の実行ができない者の代理として，本法に基づいて，宣言の作成又は行為の実行のために，かつ，それに関して規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき納付した手数料の全部又は一部における返還についての規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき別途納付すべき手数料の全部又は一部における請求権の放棄についての規定を制定すること，及び誤記又は明白な誤りを訂正するため又はその他の目的で，登録簿への記入の補正のために，かつ，その補正に関連して規定を制定すること，及びある者に対し，本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望するか否かを所定の期間内に登録官に通知するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望する者に，登録官が指定した日時及び場所に出頭するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び意匠の共通所有権についての要件を含むがそれに限らず，1又は2以上の意匠が開示される意匠出願の内容を定めること，及び意匠の登録又は公告を求める出願人に対し，出願が提出及び次についての規則の要件に従うようにするために必要な事柄を行うよう指示する権限を，登録官に付与すること，規則が指定する期間内に指示が守られない場合に出願が失効することについて規定すること，及びかく失効した出願の回復について定めること，及び規則に基づいて行った登録官の決定に対する上訴について定めること，及び手続を開始することができる又はその他の事柄をなすことができる期間を定める規定を含め，本法に基づく手続における所定の裁判所の実務及び手続のために，かつ，それに関連して規定を制定すること，及び当該期間の延長について定めること，及び1906年意匠法の廃止及び本法の施行を理由に，必要な又は便宜な経過規定又は派生規定を作成すること，及び本法の明記された目的のために引き続き有効であるように(所定の変更を加えて)，1906年意匠法に基づく規則を制定すること，及び本法又は規則の適用上，電子装置又は通信の方法によって行われるべき事柄についての規則を制定すること，及び登録官に対し，登録官が適切と考える意匠に関する書類を準備する，公告する及び販売する権限を付与すること，及び書類の廃棄のため及びそれに関する規定を作成すること - 特許庁

Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加