| 意味 | 例文 (999件) |
うりかけの部分一致の例文一覧と使い方
該当件数 : 11139件
まず1点、この日本振興銀行は、今、少し私は内輪のような話をいたしましたが、平成20年以降、急速に貸金業者からの債権買い取りビジネス、それから平成21年以降に特に増加傾向が顕著となった大口融資に対して、任意のヒアリング、あるいは報告徴求命令、立入検査等を通じて、経営管理体制やリスク管理の整備状況について検証を行ってきたところでございまして、そういった中で平成21年6月開始の立入検査の結果において、大口融資者あるいは債権買取業務に関する信用リスク管理体制に関して重大な問題が認められたため、先般5月27日に業務停止命令及び業務改善命令を発出し、対応を示したものでございまして、この大口融資先の自己査定見直し結果が、ご存じのように新しい経営陣になりまして、大幅に変更したということがあるのではないかと思っております。例文帳に追加
First, what I just said about the Incubator Bank of Japan may have sounded a bit like an inside story, but it is based on the findings of our work – we examined the bank's corporate management structure and the status of its risk management system development through noncompulsory hearings, orders to submit a report, on-site inspections and other means to look into its business of purchasing loan claims from money lending businesses, which suddenly picked up in and after 2008, and of making large loans, which started showing a remarkable increase in 2009. As, in so doing, we detected a serious problem with respect to its credit risk management system concerning major borrowers and its loan claim purchase business in the results of our on-site inspection that was begun in June 2009, we recently issued a business suspension order and business improvement order on May 27 to show it a direction. My guess is that following the subsequent replacement of the bank's management, which you surely know about, the results of reassessment conducted by the new management concerning those major borrowers led to the significant change in numbers. - 金融庁
大変きちんと時宜を得たご質問、またご意見でございまして、日本振興銀行に関しては、平成20年以降急増した貸金業者からの債権、買い取りビジネスや21年以降急に増加傾向が顕著だった大口融資に関して任意のヒアリング、報告徴求命令、立入検査等を通じて経営管理体制やリスク管理体制の状況について検証を行ってきたところでございますし、そうした中、平成21年6月開始の立入検査の結果において、大口融資や債権買取業務に関する信用リスク管理体制等に関して重大な問題が認められたため、先般5月27日に業務停止命令及び業務改善命令を発出し、対応を行ったものである。そういうことでございますけれども、今質問のことはよく分かっていますし、ペイオフをさせていただいたというのは、私は善良な預金者もおられたと思いまして、本当に担当大臣として、その人たちに対しては申しわけないというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加
We examined the governance system and the risk management system of the Incubator Bank of Japan through voluntary interviews, reporting orders, on-site inspections and other activities in relation to its business of purchasing debts from money lenders which had increased rapidly since 2008 and large loans which soared sharply since 2009. As the results of the on-site inspection launched in June 2009 identified serious problems including those in the credit risk management system relating to large loans and debt factoring operations, we issued a business suspension order and a business improvement order on May 27 and took action accordingly. That is what happened, and I do understand what have asked. As the Minister for Financial Services, I truly feel sorry for honest depositors for having had the “pay-off” scheme implemented. - 金融庁
それから、これはあまり（新聞に）書いていただけなかったのですけれども、中堅・中小企業のアジア地域への進出等の整備・強化を盛り込んだ金融資本市場及び金融活性化のためのアクションプラン、これはJBIC（国際協力銀行）だとか、経産省が所管しているJETRO（日本貿易振興機構）、昔は輸出促進で一時輸入を増やすことに変えた有名なJETROとJBIC活用した方法でして、これは皆さん方にも地域の商工会、商工会議所にぜひこういった特集でも組んでいただきたいと思います。これは日本の戦後65年の経済財政、金融政策の中でこんなことをしたことはなく、多分かなり革命的なことです。例文帳に追加
We also had the "Development and Strengthening of A System of Support for Mid-sized to Large Companies' and Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises' Entry into the Asian Region, etc. under A Partnership between Japanese Financial Institutions, the Japan Bank for International Cooperation (JBIC), the Japanese External Trade Organization (JETRO) and Others," which was not written up much (in newspapers and other media). This represents an approach of utilizing JBIC (Japan Bank for International Cooperation) and JETRO (Japan External Trade Organization), which is overseen by the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), and this is a quite revolutionary initiative unprecedented in the history of economic and fiscal policies and financial policies in the 65 years in post-war Japan. - 金融庁
なお、金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律（以下「兼営法」という。）第１条第１項の認可を受けた金融機関（以下「信託兼営金融機関」という。）の検査を行う際には、兼営法により金融機関が信託業務の兼営を認められた趣旨を踏まえ、銀行業務と信託業務の区分を明確に意識し、銀行業務に関しては本マニュアルに基づき、また、信託業務や信託兼営金融機関特有の問題に関しては信託検査マニュアル（金融検査マニュアル別編〔信託業務編〕）に基づき、検査を実施する必要があることに留意する。また、金融機関とその業務に関して取引する者又は当該金融機関を子会社とする持株会社に対して検査を行う場合も、本マニュアルの該当部分に準じて、所要の検証を行うものとする。例文帳に追加
It should be noted that when inspecting financial institutions that have obtained approval under Paragraph 1, Article 1 of the Law concerning Financial Institutions' Concurrent Undertaking of Banking and Trust Business (hereinafter referred to as "Concurrent Business Law"), inspectors should conduct examination of banking business in accordance with this manual and examination of trust business and issues specific to banking-trust institutions in accordance with the Inspection Manual for Trust and Banking Companies (Supplement of the Financial Inspection Manual for Trust Business) , while considering the purpose of the approval of concurrent undertaking of banking and trust business by financial institutions under the Concurrent Business Law and clearly bearing in mind the separation of the banking and trust business. - 金融庁
この一定割合については、当該事業拠点が前年度に重要な事業拠点として評価範囲に入っており、イ）前年度の当該拠点に係る内部統制の評価結果が有効であること、ロ）当該拠点の内部統制の整備状況に重要な変更がないこと、ハ）重要な事業拠点の中でも、グループ内での中核会社でないなど特に重要な事業拠点でないことを確認できた場合には、当該事業拠点を本年度の評価対象としないことができると考えられる。その場合、結果として、売上高等の概ね２／３を相当程度下回ることがあり得る。例文帳に追加
In addition, individual business processes that have a high degree of materiality (as described below) may be included in the scope. Instead of two-thirds of total sales on a consolidation basis, a certain ratio may be applied to aggregated sales (before elimination of inter-company transactions). For this certain ratio, if that location or business unit was in the assessment scope as a material location or business unit in the previous fiscal year, and if it is confirmed that a) the assessment result indicated effective internal control over that location in the previous fiscal year, b) there were no material changes in the design of internal controls over that location or business unit, c) among the material locations and business units, it is not a particularly material location or business unit, e.g. it is not a core company in the group, then that location or business unit could be excluded from the assessment scope. In that case, as a result, the certain ratio may be less than 2/3 of consolidated sales, etc. to some extent (Note 3) As sales amounts of affiliated companies are not included in a company's consolidated sales, the management cannot use the certain ratio of consolidated sales for affiliates. Instead, the management should evaluate the degree of the affiliate's impact on the company's financial statements and determine whether the affiliate should be deemed to be in the scope or not based on its financial statement. - 金融庁
(3) 当事者間に契約が存在しない場合，産業財産登録庁は，一方の当事者の書面による請求により，かつ，両当事者を審理した後，実施権者が支払うべき妥当な対価の額を決定するものとし，又はその結果，決定した金額が明らかに不適当であることを示す事実が生じた若しくは生じることを知る場合は，当該金額を変更するものとする。また，産業財産登録庁が決定した対価を変更する請求は，以前に対価の額を決定してから1年の期間後に限り実施することができる。対価の額を決定し又は変更する請求は，相当する手数料を納付した場合に限り検討される。例文帳に追加
(3) In the absence of agreement between the parties, the Registry of Industrial Property, at the written request of one of the parties and after having heard both parties, shall fix a reasonable amount for the remuneration to be paid by the licensee or shall modify it if subsequent facts have occurred or have become known which show that the amount fixed is obviously insufficient. Requests for modification of the remuneration fixed by the Registry of Industrial Property may only be made after a period of one year has elapsed since it was previously fixed. Any request to fix or modify the remuneration shall only be taken into consideration if the corresponding fee has been paid. - 特許庁
次の場合は，標識は商標保護の対象から除外される。(a) 当該標識が識別性に欠けている場合，特に，当該標識が，専ら，取引において種類，品質，数量，意図した目的，価格，原産地,又は商品の生産若しくはサービスの提供の時期，又は商品若しくはサービスのその他の特徴を示すのに役立つことができ，又は現用の言語若しくは商慣習において慣行となった標識若しくは表示から成る場合(b) 当該標識が，専ら，商品自体の性質に起因する形状，技術的結果を得るために必要な形状又は商品に実質的な価値を与える形状から成る場合例文帳に追加
A sign shall be excluded from trademark protection if: (a) it is devoid of any distinctive character, in particular if it consists exclusively of signs or indications which may serve, in trade, to designate the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin or the time of production of the goods or of rendering of the service, or other characteristics of the goods or services, or which have become customary in the current language or in the practices of trade; (b) it consists exclusively of a shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves or which is necessary to obtain a technical result or which gives substantial value to the goods. - 特許庁
第146条 更新 146.1登録証は，所定の手数料を付して願書を提出することにより，期間の満了の時に10年の期間について更新することができる。願書には，次の事項を含まなければならない。 (a)更新を求める旨の表示 (b)権利者又はその承継人(以下「権利者」という)の名称及び住所又は居所 (c)当該登録の登録番号 (d)更新すべき登録のためにした出願の出願日 (e)権利者が代表者を有する場合は，当該代表者の名称及び住所又は居所 (f)更新を求める記録された商品若しくはサ－ビスの名称又は更新を求めない記録された商品若しくはサ－ビスの名称。ただし，ニ－ス分類の類に従って商品又はサ－ビスを群に纏め，各群を同分類の類の順に従って記載する。 (g)権利者又は代表者の署名例文帳に追加
Sec.146 Renewal 146.1. A certificate of registration may be renewed for periods of ten years at its expiration upon payment of the prescribed fee and upon filing of a request. The request shall contain the following indications: (a) An indication that renewal is sought; (b) The name and address of the registrant or his successor-in-interest, hereafter referred to as the “right holder”; (c) The registration number of the registration concerned; (d) The filing date of the application which resulted in the registration concerned to be renewed; (e) Where the right holder has a representative, the name and address of that representative; (f) The names of the recorded goods or services for which the renewal is requested or the names of the recorded goods or services for which the renewal is not requested, grouped according to the classes of the Nice Classification to which that group of goods or services belongs and presented in the order of the classes of the said Classification; and (g) A signature by the right holder or his representative. - 特許庁
東京地裁平成１７年６月１４日判決・判時１９１７号１３５頁は、「しかしながら、実際に生じ得る個人の同一性に関する情報の使用の態様は千差万別であるから、権利侵害の成否及びその救済方法の検討に当たっては、人格権の支配権たる性格を過度に強調することなく、表現の自由や経済活動の自由などの対立利益をも考慮した個別的利益衡量が不可欠であり、使用された個人の同一性に関する情報の内容・性質、使用目的、使用態様、これにより個人に与える損害の程度等を総合的に勘案して判断する必要があるものと解される。」と述べ、パブリシティ権侵害の成否の判断において、キングクリムゾン高裁判決が「表現の自由」のみを対立利益としていたのに対し、表現の自由の場合に限定しない、より一般的な個別的な利益衡量が必要であることを認めている。例文帳に追加
Tokyo District Court judgment dated June 14, 2005 (p.135 of Hanrei Jiho No. 1917) states that, "However, the actual method of use of self-identifying information is diverse varies, for analysis of whether or not it should constitute an infringement of rights and remedies thereto, the interests of both parties must be specifically balanced in view of the conflicting interests such as the freedom of expression and commercial activities, and so emphasis should not be placed too much on the predominance of moral rights. More specifically, the contents and nature, the purpose and method of use of self-identifying information, and the significance of damages incurred by the individuals there from should be comprehensively examined." This case argues that, for determining whether or not the publicity rights have been infringed, such publicity rights should be specifically balanced with a broader range of rights, not limited to the freedom of expression, while the King Crimson Case focused solely on the "freedom of expression" as the only conflicting interest. - 経済産業省
次節以降では、この中小企業金融において存在する「情報の非対称性」を緩和し中小企業への円滑な資金調達が行われるための手法として、〔1〕長期の継続的な取引による定性情報（いわゆるソフトインフォメーション10）の収集により、情報の非対称性を緩和するリレーションシップレンディング、〔2〕借り手の質等を母集団となるデータから統計的に算出した倒産確率によって推定するクレジットスコアリングモデル、〔3〕借り手自体より、情報の非対称性の深刻でない売掛金、在庫といった資産の価値に基づいて融資を行う、アセットベーストレンディング（資産担保貸出）について検証していく11。例文帳に追加
In the following sections, we examine the following methods of reducing the asymmetry of information in SME finance and facilitating the provision of funds to SMEs: (1) relationship banking to ease the asymmetry of information by collecting qualitative information ("soft information")10) through continuing long-term business relations; (2) use of credit scoring models to estimate the probability of bankruptcy by calculating the "quality of a borrower" statistically from population data; and (3) asset-based lending (lending backed by assets) by lending according to the value of assets, such as accounts receivable and inventories, regarding which there is no serious asymmetry of information, where asymmetry of information is less serious than it is in simply assessing borrowers themselves. - 経済産業省
独立行政法人経済産業研究所「平成16年度地域経済における企業集積の実態に係る調査研究」5（以下、「企業集積の実態調査」という）では、製造業の産業集積が存在すると考えられる全国の市区（製造業の事業所数における特化係数が1以上であること等の要件を満たす市区）に立地する企業を対象として調査を行っているが、企業がこのような製造業の集積地に立地していることのメリット（集積地に立地している企業とは、同業・関連業種の集積地に立地すると認識している企業のことを指す）として、「同業・関連業者との近接性」を重要視する項目としてあげている企業の割合がもっとも高く、次いで、「質の高い労働力の供給」、「技術的な基盤・蓄積」を重要視している割合が高い（第2-3-6図）。例文帳に追加
In the Fiscal 2004 Survey of Business Clusters in Regional Economies5) (abbreviated below as the Business Cluster Survey), the Research Institute of Economy, Trade and Industry (RIETI) surveyed enterprises in municipalities throughout Japan expected to have manufacturing industry clusters (i.e. municipalities that meet certain requirements, such as having a specialization coefficient for number of manufacturing establishments of 1 or over), and this found that the factor emphasized the most by enterprises as a merit of locating in manufacturing industry clusters (enterprises locating in clusters are enterprises that regard themselves as being located in clusters of enterprises in the same or related industries) is "proximity to enterprises in same industry and related industries," followed by "supply of high-quality labor" and "technological base and buildup" (Fig. 2-3-6). - 経済産業省
ジョブ・カード制度は、こうした者を安定的な雇用へと導く制度として創設され、2011年4月には、労使団体や有識者等で構成されるジョブ・カード推進協議会において「新全国推進基本計画」が取りまとめられ、広く求職者等を対象に、①ジョブ・カードを活用した、きめ細かなキャリア・コンサルティングを通じた意識啓発やキャリア形成上の課題の明確化を行い、②企業実習と座学を組み合わせた訓練を含む実践的な職業訓練（職業能力形成プログラム）の機会を提供し、③訓練実施機関からの評価結果や職務経歴等をジョブ・カードに取りまとめることにより、正社員としての就職へと導く制度である。例文帳に追加
The Job-Card system was launched to guide these workers to stable job opportunities. In April 2011, Job Card Promotion Council, consisting of labor-management groups and experts, developed the “New National Promotion Basic Plan.” The program aims to help job seekers obtain a full-time job by (i) raising their awareness about work through comprehensive career counseling and identifying the issues they face in career formation, (ii) providing such people with an opportunity for practical vocational training comprising job training at companies and lectures (Vocational Ability Development Program) and (iii) summarizing training service providers’ evaluation of their job performance and their job experience in a Job-Card. - 経済産業省
我が国に輸入される食品等（以下「輸入食品等」という。）の安全性を確保するために国が行う監視指導については、「平成 18 年度輸入食品監視指導計画」（以下「計画」という。）を食品衛生法（昭和 22 年法律第 233 号。以下「法」という。）第 23 条第 1 項の規定により、「食品衛生に関する監視指導の実施に関する指針」（平成 15 年厚生労働省告示第 301 号）に基づき、パブリックコメントの募集及びリスクコミュニケーションを実施して策定し、同条第 3 項の規定により官庁報告として官報に公表した上で、計画に基づいて実施したところです。例文帳に追加
With regard to the monitoring and guidance conducted by the national government for the purpose of ensuring the safety of foods imported into Japan (hereinafter referred to as “imported foods”), the Imported Foods Monitoring and Guidance Plan for FY2006 (hereinafter referred to as the “Plan”) was developed based on public comments obtained and risk communications conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for the Implementation of Monitoring and Guidance on Food Sanitation (Notification No. 301 of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2003) under Section 1, Article 23 of the Food Sanitation Law (Law No. 233 in 1947, hereinafter referred to as the “Law”), and was implemented based on the Plan after gazetting it as a government report in accordance with the provisions of Section 3, Article 23 of the Law. - 厚生労働省
これら我が国に輸入される食品等（以下「輸入食品等」という。）の現状を踏まえ、平成21年度において、厚生労働省本省（以下「本省」という。）及び検疫所は、全国の検疫所における食品衛生監視員の増員や検査機器の整備により輸入時の検査項目を拡充するとともに、食品衛生法（昭和22年法律第233号。以下「法」という。）第28条の規定に基づき多種多様な食品等について食品衛生の状況を幅広く監視することを目的として、年度ごとに計画的に実施するモニタリング検査（以下「モニタリング検査」という。）や法第26条の規定に基づき法違反の蓋然性が高いと見込まれる輸入食品等について、輸入者に対して輸入の都度の検査を命じる検査命令（以下「検査命令」という。）等の輸入時における監視指導の強化を行った。例文帳に追加
In light of actual conditions of the foods, etc. imported into Japan (hereinafter referred to as “the imported foods”), in FY 2009, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as “the MHLW”) and quarantine stations expanded the scope of items to be inspected at the time of importation by increasing the number of food sanitation inspectors and introducing testing equipment and reinforced import inspections, such as monitoring inspection that is systematically implemented every fiscal year (hereinafter referred to as “the monitoring inspection”) for the purpose of monitoring sanitary conditions of various foods based on the provision of Article 28 of the Food Sanitation Act (Act No. 233 of 1947; hereinafter referred to as “the Act”) and inspection orders requiring importers to have imported foods with a high probability of violating the Act inspected each time that the goods are imported (hereinafter referred to as “the inspection order”). - 厚生労働省
４ 会社法第百十六条第三項、第四項、第六項及び第七項（反対株主の株式買取請求）、第百十七条第二項から第六項まで（株式の価格の決定等）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）並びに第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社の優先出資社員による優先出資買取請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百十六条第三項及び第七項中「第一項各号の行為」とあるのは「資産流動化計画の変更」と、同条第三項中「当該行為が効力を生ずる日」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百五十三条第二項に規定する計画変更決議の日」と、「同項各号に定める株式の」とあるのは「その」と、「当該行為を」とあるのは「当該資産流動化計画の変更を」と、同法第百十七条第二項、第五項及び第六項中「株式の」とあるのは「優先出資の」と、同項中「、株券」とあるのは「、優先出資証券」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(4) The provisions of Article 116(3), (4), (6), and (7) (Dissenting Shareholders' Share Purchase Demand), Article 117(2) to (6) inclusive (Determination of Price of Shares), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of a Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Demands for the Purchase of Preferred Equity made by the Preferred Equity Members of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "act in any item of paragraph (1)" in Article 116(3) and (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "change to the Asset Securitization Plan," the phrases "the day when such act becomes effective," "of the shares provided for in each item of that paragraph," and "such act" in Article 116(3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day of the Resolution for Changing the Plan set forth in Article 153(2) of the Asset Securitization Act," "thereof," and "changes to the Asset Securitization Plan," respectively, the phrases "of the shares" in Article 117(2) and (6) of the Companies Act and "for such shares" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "of the Preferred Equity," the term "share certificates" in Article 117(6) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Preferred Equity Securities," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
４ 信託法第百三条第四項から第八項まで（受益権取得請求）、第百四条（受益権の価格の決定等）、第二百六十二条（第五項を除く。）（信託に関する非訟事件の管轄）、第二百六十三条（信託に関する非訟事件の手続の特例）及び第二百六十四条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の受益権の買取りの請求について準用する。この場合において、同法第百三条第四項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産の流動化に関する法律（以下「資産流動化法」という。）第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と、「受益者」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項に規定する受益証券の権利者」と、同条第五項中「官報による公告」とあるのは「公告」と、同条第六項中「第一項又は第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百七十一条第一項」と、「受益権の内容」とあるのは「元本持分（種類の異なる受益権を定めた場合にあっては、受益権の種類及び種類ごとの元本持分）」と、同条第八項中「重要な信託の変更等」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百六十九条第一項（第一号の場合に限る。）の規定により資産信託流動化計画に記載し、又は記録する事項に係る特定目的信託契約の変更」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(4) The provisions of Article 103(4) to (8) inclusive (Demand for the Acquisition of a Beneficial Interest), Article 104 (Valuation of a Beneficial Interest, etc.), Article 262 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), Article 263 (Special Provisions on Procedure in Non-Contentious Cases Concerning Trusts), and Article 264 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Trust Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the demand that a beneficial interest be purchased as set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in Article 103(4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Act on Securitization of Assets (hereinafter referred to as the "Asset Securitization Act")," the term "beneficiaries" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Beneficiary Certificate Holder prescribed in Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "public notice in an official gazette" in paragraph (5) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "public notice," the phrase "paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" in paragraph (6) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 271(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "details of the beneficial interest" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Share of Principal (in cases where multiple classes of beneficial interest are provided for, the classes of beneficial interest and the Share of Principal relating to each class)," the term "Material Change to the Trust, etc." in paragraph (8) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "a change to the Specific Purpose Trust Contract with regard to matters stated or recorded in the Asset Trust Securitization Plan pursuant to the provisions of Article 269(1) (limited to the case set forth in item (i)) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
これは要するに、その間に経営者は変わったわけでございますが、特に平成20年秋ぐらいから21年にかけて、それぞれの債権買い取りビジネス、これは旧商工ファンドということも先週申し上げたと思いますが、これから債権の買い取りビジネス、あるいは親密企業に対する大口融資等による業容の拡大が行われて、平成21年5月から3回目の検査に入ったわけでございますが、それまでの検査の結果、確かに今言われたように、表面的な検査の結果だけを見れば、そういうふうに思われるかもしれませんけれども、実は自己査定の正確なやり直しを命じたわけでございまして、その結果、簡単に言えば、これはやっぱり粉飾決算に近いものだったのですよ。そのことがきちっと発覚いたしまして、大変な検査妨害があったということは、もう皆様方ご存じでございます。2回から3回目のときも、法律には触れませんけれども、ほとんどこちらが行っても対応しないと、あるいは木村剛さん本人が出られるというような、本当に普通の金融機関で考えられないような検査に対する態度でございまして、そういった意味で、私もこの前申し上げましたが、3回目の検査のときは、同じ検査官が3回目に行きまして、これは9か月間も実は検査をさせていただいたのですが、もう皆様方よくご存じのように、大体普通、金融機関に対する検査は3か月か、長くて６か月なのですよ。そして、ご存じのように検査忌避ということが発覚したわけでございますし、同時に自己査定のやり直しということで、業務改善命令として出したわけでございます。例文帳に追加
As I explained the other day, the Incubator Bank of Japan has been inspected about three times in the past. In the course of inspecting large depositors in relation to the business improvement plan published on June 28, 2010, the Bank was requested to prepare financial data and other materials for properly identifying the credit status of the debtors and revise its self-assessment manual. - 金融庁
私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。例文帳に追加
I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. - 金融庁
二 経済産業省関係商品（商品のうち農林水産省関係商品以外のものをいう。以下同じ。）のみを上場商品とする商品市場若しくはその対象となる物品が経済産業省関係商品のみである商品指数を上場商品指数とする商品市場（以下「経済産業省関係商品市場」という。）のみを開設する商品取引所、経済産業省関係商品市場のみに係る商品取引債務引受業を行う商品取引清算機関、経済産業省関係商品のみ若しくはその対象となる物品が経済産業省関係商品のみである商品指数のみについて取引をするための第一種特定商品市場類似施設若しくは第二種特定商品市場類似施設の開設者又は経済産業省関係商品市場における相場のみを利用した店頭商品先物取引等に係る店頭商品先物取引業者については、経済産業大臣例文帳に追加
(ii) Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry: with regard to Commodity Exchanges which open only the Commodity Markets where Listed Commodities consist solely of Commodities related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (which refers to such Commodities other than Commodities related to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; the same shall apply hereinafter) or the Commodity Markets where Listed Commodities consist solely of Commodity Indices of which the sole target Goods are Commodities related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (hereinafter referred to as "Commodity Markets related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry"), Commodity Clearing Organizations which conduct Business of Assuming Commodity Transaction Debts solely pertaining to Commodity Markets related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, establishers of Facilities Similar to Type 1 Specified Commodity Market or Facilities Similar to Type 2 Specified Commodity Market for carrying out transactions solely for Commodities related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry or for Commodity Indices where the sole target Goods are Commodities related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, or Over-the-Counter Commodity Futures Transactions Dealers pertaining to Over-the-Counter Commodity Futures Transactions solely using quotations on the Commodity Markets related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
二 経済産業省関係商品（商品のうち農林水産省関係商品以外のものをいう。以下同じ。）のみを上場商品とする商品市場若しくはその対象となる物品が経済産業省関係商品のみである商品指数を上場商品指数とする商品市場（以下「経済産業省関係商品市場」という。）のみを開設する商品取引所、経済産業省関係商品市場のみに係る商品取引債務引受業を行う商品取引清算機関、経済産業省関係商品のみ若しくはその対象となる物品が経済産業省関係商品のみである商品指数のみについて取引をするための第一種特定商品市場類似施設若しくは第二種特定商品市場類似施設の開設者又は経済産業省関係商品市場における相場のみを利用した店頭商品先物取引等に係る店頭商品先物取引業者については、経済産業大臣例文帳に追加
(ii) Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry: with regard to Commodity Exchanges which open only the Commodity Markets where Listed Commodities consist solely of Commodities related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (which refers to such Commodities other than Commodities related to the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries; the same shall apply hereinafter) or the Commodity Markets where Listed Commodities consist solely of Commodity Indices of which the sole target Goods are Commodities related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (hereinafter referred to as "Commodity Markets related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry"), Commodity Clearing Organizations which conduct Business of Assuming Commidity Transaction Debts solely pertaining to Commodity Markets related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, establishers of Facilities Similar to Type 1 Specified Commodity Market or Facilities Similar to Type 2 Specified Commodity Market for carrying out transactions solely for Commodities related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry or for Commodity Indices where the sole target Goods are Commodities related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, or Over-the-Counter Commodity Futures Transactions Dealers pertaining to Over-the-Counter Commodity Futures Transactions solely using quotations on the Commodity Markets related to the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry - 経済産業省
ものづくり基盤技術は、我が国の基幹的な産業である製造業の発展を支えることにより、生産の拡大、貿易の振興、新産業の創出、雇用の増大等国民経済のあらゆる領域にわたりその発展に寄与するとともに、国民生活の向上に貢献してきた。また、ものづくり基盤技術に係る業務に従事する労働者は、このようなものづくり基盤技術の担い手として、その水準の維持及び向上のために重要な役割を果たしてきた。我らは、このようなものづくり基盤技術及びこれに係る業務に従事する労働者の果たす経済的社会的役割が、国の存立基盤を形成する重要な要素として、今後においても変わることのないことを確信する。しかるに、近時、就業構造の変化、海外の地域における工業化の進展等による競争条件の変化その他の経済の多様かつ構造的な変化による影響を受け、国内総生産に占める製造業の割合が低下し、その衰退が懸念されるとともに、ものづくり基盤技術の継承が困難になりつつある。このような事態に対処して、我が国の国民経済が国の基幹的な産業である製造業の発展を通じて今後とも健全に発展していくためには、ものづくり基盤技術に関する能力を尊重する社会的気運を醸成しつつ、ものづくり基盤技術の積極的な振興を図ることが不可欠である。ここに、ものづくり基盤技術の振興に関する施策を総合的かつ計画的に推進するため、この法律を制定する。例文帳に追加
By way of supporting the development of the manufacturing industry, which is Japan's fundamental industry, core manufacturing technology has contributed to the development of all areas of the national economy such as expansion of production, promotion of trade, creation of new industries, and increase in employment, and has contributed to improving the lives of the citizenry. In addition, workers engaged in operations pertaining to core manufacturing technology have played an important role in maintaining and improving the level of the technology in their capacity as supporters of such core manufacturing technology. We believe that the economic and social role of such core manufacturing technology and workers who engage in operations pertaining thereto will continue to be an important element in the foundation of the existence of the State in the future. Recently, however, due to changes in the employment structure, changes in competitive conditions resulting from factors like the progress of industrialization overseas, and other diverse and structural changes in the economy, the share of the manufacturing industry in Japan's gross domestic product has fallen, and concerns about a decline in the industry have grown, and the smooth succession of core manufacturing technology is becoming difficult. In order to deal with such a situation and to maintain the sound development of Japan's national economy through the development of the manufacturing industry, which is a fundamental to the State, that the active promotion of core manufacturing technology is indispensable, while a social tendency to respect abilities related to core manufacturing technology is enhanced. We hereby establish this Act so as to drive forward measures for the promotion of core manufacturing technology in a comprehensive and organized manner. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
アフリカの成長は引き続き堅調であるが、依然として食料やエネルギー価格の高騰を含むショック影響を受けやすい。これらの価格の高騰は、最も脆弱な人々にとって大きな問題。高く安定した成長が広範な基礎を有する開発及びミレニアム開発目標を達成するために不可欠であり、アフリカへの援助倍増する公約を踏まえつつ、我々は、アフリカ諸国と協働し、持続可能な民間セクター主導の成長を進していくことにコミット。我々は、各国の成長戦略を支援する際、「アフリカにおける民間セクター主導成長のためのＧ８アクションプラン」における二つの柱、すなわち、①投資環境の改善、②金融セクタの強化、に支援の焦点を当てることを提唱。この点に関し、我々は、国境を横断する運輸回廊等、信性のあるインフラ整備のための支援を拡大しつつある。中小企業の能力向上、及び貿易のための援等を通じてアフリカ諸国の貿易促進のための努力、を支援。資源国における長期の財政規律等の良財政ガバナンスや、採掘産業透明性イニシアティブ（EITI）をより多くの国が実施することの重要性を確認さらに、公式経済へのアクセス向上の必要性を強調。我々は、地場金融機関の能力強化、アフリカのり手に対する現地通貨建て資金供給の促進、アフリカ諸国における現地債券市場の育成、及び外国らの送金の円滑化を助けていく。例文帳に追加
Growth in Africa remains robust, though it is still susceptible to shocks, including rising food and energy prices, which pose great challenges to the most vulnerable populations. As high, stable growth is critical to attaining broad-based development and the Millennium Development Goals, we are committed to working together with African countries to foster sustainable, private sector led growth, building on our commitments to double aid to Africa. In support of country specific growth strategies, we propose to focus on two pillars in our ''G-8 Action Plan for Private Sector Led Growth in Africa'': improving the investment climate; and strengthening the financial sector. In this regard, we are increasing contributions for the development of reliable infrastructures, such as cross-border transport corridors. We will support capacity building of small- and medium-sized enterprises and help African countries' efforts to promote their capacity to trade including through Aid for Trade. We affirm the importance of good financial governance, including long-term fiscal discipline for resource rich countries, and of broader implementation of the Extractive Industries Transparency Initiative. Furthermore, we underline the necessity of enhancing a greater access to the formal economy. We will help strengthen local financial institutions, promote local currency financing for African borrowers, enhance local bond market development in African countries, and facilitate remittance flows. - 財務省
前掲東京地裁平成１３年７月２５日判決は、「法４６条４号に該当するか否かについては、著作物を利用した書籍等の体裁及び内容、著作物の利用態様、利用目的などを客観的に考慮して、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する例外的な場合に当たるといえるか否か検討すべきことになる。」とし、「被告書籍は、幼児向けに、写真を用いて、町を走る各種自動車を解説する目的で作られた書籍であり、合計２４種類の自動車について、その外観及び役割などが説明されていること、各種自動車の写真を幼児が見ることを通じて、観察力を養い、勉強の基礎になる好奇心を高めるとの幼児教育的観点から監修されていると解されること、表紙及び本文１４頁の掲載方法は、右の目的に照らして、格別不自然な態様とはいえないので、本件書籍を見る者は、本文で紹介されている各種自動車の一例として、本件バスが掲載されているとの印象を受けると考えられること等の事情を総合すると、原告作品が描かれた本件バスの写真を被告書籍に掲載し、これを販売することは、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する行為には、該当しないというべきである。」として著作権法第46条第４号の要件を充たさないとした。例文帳に追加
In the City Bus case the Tokyo District Court July 25, 2001 ruled that "whether or not Article 46, Item 4 is applicable should depend on whether the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or the reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. In order to determine this, circumstances such as the formalities, the contents, the manner and method of use of the publication should be objectively examined." In light of these criteria, the judgment further held that "the Defendant's book is a publication edited for the purpose of explaining to children various types of vehicles running on the street by using their photographs. It provides an explanation on the exterior and role of each of the 24 types of vehicles in total. This book is edited from the viewpoint of pre-school education in that children are expected to develop their observation skills as well as curiosity, which will in the future become a basis for learning. The method of inserting the picture in the cover page and page 14 is not unnatural in light of the purpose of this publication. Considering that the viewers of this book will have the impression that the photograph of the bus is placed on various pages as an the example of the diverse vehicles referred to in the body text of the book, the act of selling a book which includes a photograph of the bus with the plaintiff's work shall not fall under the relevant criteria as previously descirbed; the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or such reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. Therefore, such act does not fulfill the conditions required under Article 46, Item 4 of the Copyright Law. - 経済産業省
それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。例文帳に追加
I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well. - 金融庁
第二十四条 有価証券の発行者である会社は、その会社が発行者である有価証券（特定有価証券を除く。次の各号を除き、以下この条において同じ。）が次に掲げる有価証券のいずれかに該当する場合には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、事業年度ごとに、当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業の内容に関する重要な事項その他の公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書（以下「有価証券報告書」という。）を、当該事業年度経過後三月以内（当該会社が外国会社である場合には、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして政令で定める期間内）に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券が第三号に掲げる有価証券（株券その他の政令で定める有価証券に限る。）に該当する場合においてその発行者である会社（報告書提出開始年度（当該有価証券の募集又は売出しにつき第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文又は第二十三条の八第一項本文若しくは第二項の規定の適用を受けることとなつた日の属する事業年度をいい、当該報告書提出開始年度が複数あるときは、その直近のものをいう。）終了後五年を経過している場合に該当する会社に限る。）の当該事業年度の末日及び当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度すべての末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定めるところにより計算した数に満たない場合であつて有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたとき、当該有価証券が第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において、その発行者である会社の資本金の額が当該事業年度の末日において五億円未満（当該有価証券が第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等である場合にあつては、当該会社の資産の額として政令で定めるものの額が当該事業年度の末日において政令で定める額未満）であるとき、及び当該事業年度の末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定める数に満たないとき、並びに当該有価証券が第三号又は第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして政令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加
Article 24 (1) When Securities (excluding Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, except in the following items) issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the following items, the company shall submit, for each business year, a report stating the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (hereinafter referred to as an "Annual Securities Report") to the Prime Minister within three months after the end of that business year (or, in the case of a foreign company, within the period specified by a Cabinet Order as the period necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors) pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the respective last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of the Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below, if the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than 500 million yen (or if, in cases where the Securities are Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the amount that is specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Order on the last day of that business year) or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year are fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) or (iv) below, if the Prime Minister approves as specified by a Cabinet Order that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
４ 第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は四半期報告書について、第二十二条の規定は四半期報告書及びその訂正報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「四半期報告書（第二十四条の四の七第一項又は第二項（これらの規定を同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による四半期報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「四半期報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「四半期報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「四半期報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「四半期報告書又はその訂正報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の四の七第四項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(4) Articles 7, 9(1) and 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to Quarterly Securities Reports, and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Quarterly Securities Report and amendment report thereof contain fake statements on important matters or lack statements of important matters to be stated or of important matters necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "the statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6)" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Quarterly Securities Report (meaning a Quarterly Securities Report set forth in Article 24-4-7(1) or (2) (including the cases where they are applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-7(3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 11(1) and Article 22)"; the part "during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect," in Article 7 shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "the person making the notification" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report"; the term "the amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amendment report"; the terms "the person submitting them" and "the amendment " in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report"; the part "submit the amendment and may, when it is found necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "to submit an amendment report"; the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Quarterly Securities Report and amendment reports"; the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-4-7(4)"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
５ 第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は半期報告書及び臨時報告書について、第二十二条の規定は半期報告書及び臨時報告書並びにこれらの訂正報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「半期報告書（第二十四条の五第一項（同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する半期報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）又は臨時報告書（第二十四条の五第四項に規定する臨時報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「半期報告書又は臨時報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「半期報告書又は臨時報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「半期報告書又は臨時報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「半期報告書又は臨時報告書若しくはこれらの訂正報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の五第五項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
(5) Articles 7, 9(1) and 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to Semiannual Securities Reports and Extraordinary Reports, and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Semiannual Securities Report and Extraordinary Report thereof contain fake statements on important matters or lack statements of important matters or of important matters necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "the statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6)" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Semiannual Securities Report (meaning a Semiannual Securities Report set forth in Article 24-5(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-5(3)); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22) or an Extraordinary Report (meaning an Extraordinary Report set forth in Article 24-5(4); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22)"; the part "during the period on or after the day on which the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day on which the notification is to take effect," in Article 7 shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "the person making the notification" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Semiannual Securities Report or Extraordinary Report"; the term "the amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "an amendment report"; the terms "the person submitting them" and "the amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Semiannual Securities Report or Extraordinary Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the term "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Semiannual Securities Report or Extraordinary Report"; the part "submit the amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "to submit an amendment report"; the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Semiannual Securities Report or Extraordinary Report, or amendment reports therefor"; and the term "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-5(5)". - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
２ 第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書（以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。）について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書（第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加
(2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第二百四十一条 内閣総理大臣は、保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等の業務若しくは財産の状況に照らしてその保険業の継続が困難であると認めるとき、又はその業務（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本における業務。以下この条から第二百五十五条の二までにおいて同じ。）の運営が著しく不適切でありその保険業の継続が保険契約者等の保護に欠ける事態を招くおそれがあると認めるときは、当該保険会社等又は外国保険会社等に対し、業務の全部若しくは一部の停止、合併、保険契約の移転（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本における保険契約の移転）若しくは当該保険会社等若しくは外国保険会社等の株式の他の保険会社等、外国保険会社等若しくは保険持株会社等による取得（第二百四十七条第一項、第二百五十六条から第二百五十八条まで、第二百七十条の三の二第四項及び第五項並びに第二百七十条の四第四項及び第五項において「合併等」という。）の協議その他必要な措置を命じ、又は保険管理人による業務及び財産（外国保険会社等にあっては、日本に所在する財産。次条及び第二百四十六条の二から第二百四十七条の二までにおいて同じ。）の管理を命ずる処分をすることができる。例文帳に追加
Article 241 (1) The Prime Minister may, when he/she finds that the continuation of an Insurance Business will be difficult in light of the state of the business or property of an Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or when he/she finds that the operation of that business (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., business in Japan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article to Article 255-2 inclusive) is extremely inappropriate and that there is a risk that the continuation of that Insurance Business could bring about a situation that lacks protection for Insurance Policyholders, etc., order the whole or partial suspension of business, a merger, a transfer of insurance contracts (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., the transfer of insurance contracts in Japan) or agreement for the acquisition of the shares of that Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., by another Insurance Company, etc., Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or Insurance Holding Company, etc. (referred to as "Merger, etc." in Article 247, paragraph (1); Article 256 to Article 258 inclusive; Article 270-3-2, paragraph (4) and Article 270-3-2, paragraph (5); and Article 270-4, Article 270-4, paragraph (4) and Article 270-4, paragraph (5)) or any other necessary measure against that Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., or make a disposition ordering the business and property management (In the case of Foreign Insurance Companies, etc., property located in Japan. The same shall apply in the following Article and Article 246-2 to Article 247-2 inclusive.) by an Insurance Administrator. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第六十八条 市町村は、保険給付を受けることができる第二号被保険者である要介護被保険者等について、医療保険各法の定めるところにより当該要介護被保険者等が納付義務又は払込義務を負う保険料（地方税法（昭和二十五年法律第二百二十六号）の規定による国民健康保険税を含む。）又は掛金であってその納期限又は払込期限までに納付しなかったもの（以下この項及び次項において「未納医療保険料等」という。）がある場合においては、未納医療保険料等があることにつき災害その他の政令で定める特別の事情があると認める場合を除き、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該要介護被保険者等に対し被保険者証の提出を求め、当該被保険者証に、第四十一条第六項、第四十二条の二第六項、第四十六条第四項、第四十八条第四項、第五十一条の二第四項、第五十三条第四項、第五十四条の二第六項、第五十八条第四項及び第六十一条の二第四項の規定を適用しない旨並びに保険給付の全部又は一部の支払を差し止める旨の記載（以下この条において「保険給付差止の記載」という。）をすることができる。例文帳に追加
Article 68 (1) With regard to an Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., that is a Secondary Insured Person that can receive an insurance benefit, in a case when said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., has an obligatory insurance premium pursuant to the provisions of the Medical Insurance Acts (including national health insurance tax pursuant to the provisions of the Local Tax Act (Act No. 226 of 1950)) or when there is a remaining premium installments that was not paid by the deadline for payment (herein referred to as "Unpaid Medical Insurance Premium, etc." in this paragraph and the following paragraph), except for a case said Unpaid Medical Insurance Premium, etc., is due to a disaster or other special circumstance as determined by a Cabinet Order, a Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare, may request said Insured Person Requiring Long-Term Care, etc., to submit the Certificate of Insured Person and to enter on said Certificate of Insured Person that the provisions of Article 41, paragraph (6), Article 42-2, paragraph (6), Article 46, paragraph (4), Article 48, paragraph (4), Article 51-2, paragraph (4), Article 53, paragraph (4), Article 54-2, paragraph (6), Article 58, paragraph (4), and Article 61-2, paragraph (4) shall not apply and that the whole or a part of the payment of an insurance benefit shall be suspended (herein referred to as "Entry of Suspension of Insurance Benefit" in this Article). - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
各国、やはり金融機関のあり方、あるいはこの実態が違うわけでございますけれども、そういったことにも十分な経過期間を設けるなど、実体経済への影響に十分配慮する必要があると、特に日本国は、国際会議でもこういうことを強く主張させていただいておりまして、十数年前に金融危機がございましたから、そういったことを踏まえて、私がよく言っておりますように、銀行を例にとれば、自己資本比率が高ければ高いほど安定した金融機関でございますけれども、それを短期間に強要しますと、これは貸し渋り、貸し剥がしが起きまして、実体経済が非常に収縮する、萎縮するということを、我々は経験済みでございますから、そういった意味で、やはり銀行の健全性と実体経済に対する影響というのを、きちんとバランスをとって、自由主義社会、民主主義社会ではなかなか難しいのでございますけれども、その辺をきちんと引き続き、我が国といたしましては、1997年から始まった金融危機、本当に苦しい経験がございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、色々な金融機関が破綻し、法制が98年の金融国会と言われたときに整備されたわけでございますけれども、そういう本当に苦しい経験を活かしてできた法律でございますが、そういった観点からも、しっかり国際的な論議に参画してまいりたいと思っております。例文帳に追加
The situations and circumstances of financial institutions differ from country to country, so we need to give due consideration to the potential impact on the real economy, for example by providing a sufficient transition period. In particular, Japan has strongly made such an argument at international conferences. As Japan experienced a financial crisis a little more than a decade ago, we should bear its lessons in mind. For example, the higher a bank's capital adequacy ratio, the sounder it is. However, if banks are forced to raise their capital adequacy ratios in a short period of time, they will excessively tighten their lending stance, leading to severe contraction of the real economy. That is what we experienced. We must keep the right balance between the soundness of banks and the impact on the real economy, although that is rather difficult in a liberal, democratic society. However, Japan has endured the bitter experience of the financial crisis that started in 1997, so we will participate in international debates with that in mind. After various financial institutions failed, a legal framework was developed in the Diet session of 1998 that focused on the financial crisis. - 金融庁
ただし、これからは私のコメントですが、税制でございますが、できるだけ今度の成長分野でも金融機関そのものの成長ということをうたっておりますし、できるだけ証券はじめ、証券税制についてもできるだけいろいろな金融が活発化することが非常に大事でございますが、それに与える税制の影響も非常に大きいわけでございますが、同時に税制というのは私も長い間税制の実務を与党のときにやらせていただきましたが、簡素・公平・中立というのもございまして、そういったことを踏まえつつ、特にこういう分野は昔から一般的に金持ち優遇税制だと、こういうご批判を受ける部分でもございますけれども、しかし同時に金融の活性化、経済の活性化をどういうふうにきちっと、民主国家でございますから、そしてなおかつ各国がリーマンショックの後それぞれの経済あるいは金融、財政政策、非常にある意味でいろいろな問題点を持ちながら各国、この前の大きな問題を抱えながら国際協調をしていこうというようなところでございますし、各国にはそれぞれの経済のやっぱり歴史と伝統もあるわけでございますから、そういったことも勘案しつつ、きちっと最終的にはいろんな人の意見を聞きながら判断をさせていただきたいというふうに思っております。例文帳に追加
I might add my personal comment, though – the action plan for the New Growth Strategy, which we developed recently, advocates growth of financial institutions themselves and it is therefore quite critical for various financial segments, including securities, to have as many trading activities as possible, which makes any potential impact on them from taxation quite significant. At the same time, there are the principles of simplicity, fairness and neutrality in taxation that we should bear in mind as I realize, from many years of my involvement in the area of taxation when I was with the ruling party, that this is the kind of area in taxation that is traditionally prone to general criticism as a tax break for the rich. That being the case, in the context of a growing consensus on international cooperation between nations – each of which has its own economic, financial, and fiscal policies and is faced with its own challenges in the wake of the Lehman crisis, and is also founded on its own economic, historical, and traditional qualities – we are hoping to ultimately make a decision on how to add more vitality to financial and economic activities, bearing in mind the points that I have just made and incorporating, as a democratic nation, inputs from various people. - 金融庁
第八十五条 会社法第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）及び第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の代表取締役について、同法第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は特定目的会社の職務代行者について、同法第三百五十四条（表見代表取締役）の規定は特定目的会社について、同法第三百五十五条（忠実義務）及び第三百五十七条第一項（取締役の報告義務）の規定は特定目的会社の取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十五条中「法令及び定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画及び定款」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
Article 85 The provisions of Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)(a) and (c)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Representative Director of a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an acting representative for a Specific Purpose Company, the provisions of Article 354 (Apparent Representative Directors) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 355 (Duty of Loyalty) and Article 357(1) (Director's Duty to Report) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrases "laws and regulations, the articles of incorporation" and "shareholders meeting" in Article 355 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, the articles of incorporation" and "general meeting of members," respectively, and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
第二十四条の七 第二十四条第一項の規定により有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない会社（同項第一号又は第二号に掲げる有価証券の発行者であるものに限る。第四項、次条第五項及び第二十七条の三十の十において「提出子会社」という。）の議決権の過半数を所有している会社その他の当該有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない会社と密接な関係を有するものとして政令で定めるもの（第二十四条第一項（同条第五項において準用する場合を含む。第四項各号において同じ。）の規定により有価証券報告書を提出しなければならない会社（第二十三条の三第四項の規定により有価証券報告書を提出した会社その他内閣府令で定めるものを含む。）を除く。以下この条並びに次条第二項、第四項及び第五項において「親会社等」という。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該親会社等の事業年度（当該親会社等が特定有価証券の発行者である場合には、内閣府令で定める期間。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）ごとに、当該親会社等の株式を所有する者に関する事項その他の公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書（以下「親会社等状況報告書」という。）を、当該事業年度経過後三月以内（当該親会社等が外国会社である場合には、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして政令で定める期間内）に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、親会社等状況報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして政令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加
Article 24-7 (1) A company which holds the majority of voting rights of another company being required to submit Annual Securities Reports under Article 24(1) (limited to those which have issued Securities listed in Article 24(1)(i) or (ii); such a company is referred to as "Subsidiary Company Submitting Annual Securities Reports" in paragraph (4) of this Article, paragraph (5) of the following Article and Article 27-30-10) or otherwise has a close relationship as specified by a Cabinet Order with another company being required to submit Annual Securities Reports (excluding companies which are required to submit Annual Securities Reports under Article 24(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24(5); the same shall apply in the items of paragraph (4) of this Article) (including those which submitted Annual Securities Reports under Article 23-3(4) or specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance); hereinafter referred to as a "Parent Company, etc." in this Article and paragraph (2) of the following Article, (4) and (5)) shall submit a report which, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, specifies matters pertaining to persons who hold shares of the Parent Company, etc. and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors for each business year of the Parent Company, etc. (or the period specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in cases where the Parent Company, etc. is the Issuer of Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the following paragraph) (hereinafter referred to as the "Status Report of Parent Company, etc.") to the Prime Minister within three months after the end of each business year (or, in cases where the Parent Company, etc. is a foreign company, within the period specified by a Cabinet Order as the period necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order that even if the company does not submit Status Report of Parent Company, etc., the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
3. 我々は、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長を達成するための全ての G20 メンバーによる協調した政策措置へのコミットメントを再確認する。我々の主要な優先的政策措置は、トロントでのコミットメントに沿った、各国の状況によって差別化された中期財健全化計画の実施、適切な金融政策の実現、根底にある経済のファンダメンタルズをよりよく反映した、為替レートの柔軟性の向上及び世界需要を維持し、潜在成長を増大させ、雇用創出を助け、世界的なリバランスに貢献する構造改革を含む。我々は、ソウル・サミット以降の進捗を議論し、多角的協調を強化することにより、過度の不均衡を縮小し経常収支を持続可能な水準で維持することの必要性を強調した。我々は、統合された 2 段階のプロセスを通じて、政策措置を必要とするような継続した大規模な不均衡に焦点を当てることを可能にする一連の項目に合意した。第 1段階に必要な作業を完了するため、我々の目標は、大規模な一次産品生産者を含む、国及び地域の状況を考慮する必要性を認識しつつ、4 月の次回会合までに、これらの項目それぞれを評価する参考となるガイドラインに合意することである。これらの参考となるガイドラインは、目標となるものではないが、以下の項目を評価するのに使用される： (i)公的債務と財政赤字、民間貯蓄率と民間債務、(ii)為替・財政・金融・その他の政策を十分に考慮しつつ、貿易収支、投資所得及び対外移転のネットフローから構成される対外バランス。我々はまた、強固で持続可能かつ均衡ある成長のための枠組みを実施し、既に行ったコミットメントをモニターする 2011 年版の行動計画の策定へ向けた予定表を採択した。ソウルで合意したように、我々は、IMF に対し、相互評価プロセスの一部として、対外的な持続可能性と政策の一貫性確保に向けた進捗についての評価を 10 月の会合において提供することを求める。その際、我々はまた、合意されたガイドラインに基づく継続した大規模な不均衡の原因に関する分析によって情報を得て、行動計画を含む MAP に関する報告のレビューを行う。我々はまた、ソウルでのコミットメントを達成するためになされた進捗の評価をレビューする。例文帳に追加
3. We reaffirm our commitment to coordinated policy action by all G20 members to achieve strong, sustainable and balanced growth. Our main priority actions include implementing medium term fiscal consolidation plans differentiated according to national circumstances in line with our Toronto commitment, pursuing appropriate monetary policy, enhancing exchange rate flexibility to better reflect underlying economic fundamentals and structural reforms, to sustain global demand, increase potential growth, foster job creation and contribute to global rebalancing. We discussed progress made since the Seoul Summit and stressed the need to reduce excessive imbalances and maintain current account imbalances at sustainable levels by strengthening multilateral cooperation. We agreed on a set of indicators that will allow us to focus, through an integrated two-step process, on those persistently large imbalances which require policy actions. To complete the work required for the first step, our aim is to agree, by our next meeting in April, on indicative guidelines against which each of these indicators will be assessed, recognizing the need to take into account national or regional circumstances, including large commodity producers. While not targets, these indicative guidelines will be used to assess the following indicators: (i) public debt and fiscal deficits; and private savings rate and private debt (ii) and the external imbalance composed of the trade balance and net investment income flows and transfers, taking due consideration of exchange rate, fiscal, monetary and other policies. We also adopted a timetable for developing the 2011 action plan that will implement our Framework for Strong, Sustainable and Balanced Growth and monitor the commitments already made. As agreed in Seoul, we call on the IMF to provide an assessment as part of the Mutual Assessment Process on progress towards external sustainability and consistency of policies at our October meeting. At that time, we will also review a report on the MAP including an action plan informed by the analysis on the root causes of persistently large imbalances based on the agreed guidelines. We will also review an assessment of progress made in meeting commitments made in Seoul. - 財務省
５ 前各項の規定は、特定有価証券が第一項各号に掲げる有価証券のいずれかに該当する場合について準用する。この場合において、同項本文中「有価証券の発行者である会社」とあるのは「有価証券の発行者である会社（内閣府令で定める有価証券については、内閣府令で定める者を除く。）」と、「特定有価証券を除く」とあるのは「特定有価証券に限る」と、「事業年度ごと」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券につき、内閣府令で定める期間（以下この条において「特定期間」という。）ごと」と、「当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業」とあるのは「当該会社が行う資産の運用その他これに類似する事業に係る資産の経理の状況その他資産」と、「当該事業年度」とあるのは「当該特定期間」と、同項ただし書中「当該有価証券が第三号に掲げる有価証券（株券その他の政令で定める有価証券に限る。）に該当する場合においてその発行者である会社（報告書提出開始年度（当該有価証券の募集又は売出しにつき第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文又は第二十三条の八第一項本文若しくは第二項の規定の適用を受けることとなつた日の属する事業年度をいい、当該報告書提出開始年度が複数あるときは、その直近のものをいう。）終了後五年を経過している場合に該当する会社に限る。）の当該事業年度の末日及び当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度すべての末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定めるところにより計算した数に満たない場合であつて有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたとき、当該有価証券が第四号」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券が第四号」と、「及び当該事業年度の末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定める数に満たないとき、並びに」とあるのは「及び」と、同項第四号中「株券、第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等」とあるのは「第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等」と、「当該事業年度又は当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度のいずれかの末日におけるその所有者の数が政令で定める数以上（当該有価証券が同項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等である場合にあつては、当該事業年度の末日におけるその所有者の数が政令で定める数以上）」とあるのは「当該特定期間の末日におけるその所有者の数が政令で定める数以上」と、第二項中「有価証券の」とあるのは「特定有価証券の」と、第三項中「第一項本文」とあるのは「第五項において準用する第一項本文」と、「発行者」とあるのは「発行者（内閣府令で定める有価証券については、内閣府令で定める者を除く。）」と、「有価証券が」とあるのは「特定有価証券が」と、「その該当することとなつた日」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券につき、その該当することとなつた日」と、「事業年度」とあるのは「特定期間」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(5) The provisions of the preceding paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where Regulated Securities issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the items of paragraph (1). In this case, the term "excluding Regulated Securities" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "limited to Regulated Securities"; the term "the company shall" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the company (if said Securities are so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, excluding persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) shall"; the terms "the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "financial conditions of asset investment or other similar businesses conducted by the company, other important matters concerning the company's assets"; the term "for each business year" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each of the periods of time specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance for the Regulated Securities (hereinafter referred to as the "Specified Period" in this Article)"; the term "that business year" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that Specified Period"; the part "the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below" in the proviso to paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Regulated Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below"; the part "or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year is fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and" in the proviso to paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "; and"; the part "share certificates, Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2)" in item (iv) of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2)"; the part "if the number of its holders on the last day of that business year or on the last day of any of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order (or, in case of Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the number of its holders on the last day of that business year is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order)" in item (iv) of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "if the number of its holders on the last day of the Specified Period is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order"; the term "issued Securities" in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "issued Regulated Securities"; the term "Securities issued" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Regulated Securities issued"; the term "a company" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a company (if said Regulated Securities are Securities so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, excluding persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance)"; the term "the main clause of paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the main clause of paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5)"; the term "business year" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Period"; the term "the day on which the Securities came" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day on which the Regulated Securities came"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
３ 金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第三章第一節第五款（第三十四条の二第六項から第八項まで並びに第三十四条の三第五項及び第六項を除く。）（特定投資家）及び第四十五条（第三号及び第四号を除く。）（雑則）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合が行う特定共済契約（金利、通貨の価格、同法第二条第十四項に規定する金融商品市場における相場その他の指標に係る変動により損失が生ずるおそれ（当該共済契約が締結されることにより利用者の支払うこととなる共済掛金の合計額が、当該共済契約が締結されることにより当該利用者の取得することとなる第五十八条第六項に規定する共済金等の合計額を上回ることとなるおそれをいう。）がある共済契約として主務省令で定めるものをいう。以下この項において同じ。）の締結について、同章第二節第一款（第三十五条から第三十六条の四まで、第三十七条第一項第二号、第三十七条の二、第三十七条の三第一項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項、第三十七条の五、第三十七条の六、第三十八条第一号及び第二号、第三十八条の二、第三十九条第三項ただし書及び第五項、第四十条の二並びに第四十条の三を除く。）（通則）の規定は共済事業を行う協同組合又は共済代理店が行う特定共済契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「金融商品取引契約」とあるのは「特定共済契約」と、「金融商品取引業」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結又はその代理若しくは媒介の事業」と、これらの規定（同法第三十九条第三項本文の規定を除く。）中「内閣府令」とあるのは「主務省令」と、これらの規定（同法第三十四条の規定を除く。）中「金融商品取引行為」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結」と、同法第三十四条中「顧客を相手方とし、又は顧客のために金融商品取引行為（第二条第八項各号に掲げる行為をいう。以下同じ。）を行うことを内容とする契約」とあるのは「中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項に規定する特定共済契約」と、同法第三十七条の三第一項中「締結しようとするとき」とあるのは「締結しようとするとき、又はその締結の代理若しくは媒介を行うとき」と、「次に掲げる事項」とあるのは「次に掲げる事項その他中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第二項において読み替えて準用する保険業法第三百条第一項第一号に規定する共済契約の契約条項のうち重要な事項」と、同項第一号中「金融商品取引業者等」とあるのは「共済事業を行う協同組合（中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第一項に規定する共済事業を行う協同組合をいう。以下この号において同じ。）又は当該共済代理店（同条第二項に規定する共済代理店をいう。）がその委託を受けた共済事業を行う協同組合」と、同法第三十九条第一項第一号中「有価証券の売買その他の取引（買戻価格があらかじめ定められている買戻条件付売買その他の政令で定める取引を除く。）又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券売買取引等」という。）」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結」と、「有価証券又はデリバティブ取引（以下この条において「有価証券等」という。）」とあるのは「特定共済契約」と、「顧客（信託会社等（信託会社又は金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項の認可を受けた金融機関をいう。以下同じ。）が、信託契約に基づいて信託をする者の計算において、有価証券の売買又はデリバティブ取引を行う場合にあつては、当該信託をする者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）」とあるのは「利用者」と、「損失」とあるのは「損失（当該特定共済契約が締結されることにより利用者の支払う共済掛金の合計額が当該特定共済契約が締結されることにより当該利用者の取得する共済金等（中小企業等協同組合法第五十八条第六項に規定する共済金等をいう。以下この号において同じ。）の合計額を上回る場合における当該共済掛金の合計額から当該共済金等の合計額を控除した金額をいう。以下この条において同じ。）」と、「補足するため」とあるのは「補足するため、当該特定共済契約によらないで」と、同項第二号及び第三号中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結」と、「有価証券等」とあるのは「特定共済契約」と、同項第二号中「追加するため」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定共済契約によらないで」と、同項第三号中「追加するため、」とあるのは「追加するため、当該特定共済契約によらないで」と、同条第二項中「有価証券売買取引等」とあるのは「特定共済契約の締結」と、同条第三項中「原因となるものとして内閣府令で定めるもの」とあるのは「原因となるもの」と、同法第四十五条第二号中「第三十七条の二から第三十七条の六まで、第四十条の二第四項及び第四十三条の四」とあるのは「第三十七条の三（第一項各号に掲げる事項に係る部分に限り、同項第二号及び第六号並びに第三項を除く。）及び第三十七条の四」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(3) The provisions of Chapter III, Section 1, Subsection 5 (excluding Article 34-2, paragraphs (6) to (8) and Article 34-3, paragraph (5) and paragraph (6)) (Professional Investors) and Article 45 (excluding item (iii) and item (iv)) (Miscellaneous Provisions) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract (which means a mutual aid contract specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry as one which carries the risk of incurring a loss [which means the risk that the total amount of mutual aid premiums to be paid by the user as a result of the conclusion of said mutual aid contract would exceed the total amount of mutual aid money, etc. prescribed in Article 58, paragraph (6) to be acquired by said user as a result of the conclusion of said mutual aid contract] due to fluctuations in the money rate, value of currencies, quotations on the financial instruments market prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (14) of the same Act, and other indicators; hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph) by a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities; and the provisions of Section 1, Subsection 1 of the same Chapter (excluding Articles 35 to 36-4, Article 37, paragraph (1), item (ii), Article 37-2, Article 37-3, paragraph (1), item (ii) and item (vi) and paragraph (3), Article 37-5, Article 37-6, Article 38, item (i) and item (ii), Article 38-2, the proviso to Article 39, paragraph (3), Article 39, paragraph (5), Article 40-2, and Article 40-3) (General Rules) shall apply mutatis mutandis to the conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract by a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities or a mutual aid agent or to acting as an agent or intermediary therefor. In this case, the term "contract for a financial instruments transaction" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract"; the term "financial instruments business" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract or acting as an agent or intermediary therefor"; the term "Cabinet Office Ordinance" in these provisions (excluding the provisions of the main clause of Article 39, paragraph (3) of the same Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "ordinance of the competent ministry"; the term "financial instruments business act" in these provisions (excluding the provisions of Article 34 of the same Act) shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "contract to conduct financial instruments business acts (meaning acts listed in each item of Article 2, paragraph (8); the same shall apply hereinafter) with a customer as the other party or on behalf of a customer" in Article 34 of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the phrase "intends to conclude a contract for a financial instruments transaction" in Article 37-3, paragraph (1) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "intends to conclude a contract for a financial instruments transaction, or acts as an agent or intermediary for such conclusion"; the term "the following matters" in the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the following matters and other important matters out of the provisions of the mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 300, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing terms pursuant to Article 9-7-5, paragraph (2) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act"; the term "financial instruments business operator, etc." in item (i) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities (which means a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (1) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act; hereinafter the same shall apply) or the cooperative for which said mutual aid agent (which means a mutual aid agent prescribed in paragraph (2) of the same Article) carries out mutual aid activities under entrustment"; the phrase "sales and purchase or any other transaction of securities (excluding sales and purchase on condition of repurchase for which the repurchase price is set in advance or other transactions designated by a Cabinet Order) or transaction of derivatives (hereinafter referred to as 'sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc.' in this Article)" in Article 39, paragraph (1), item (i) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "securities or transaction of derivatives (hereinafter referred to as 'securities, etc.' in this Article)" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "customer (in the case where a trust company, etc. [meaning a trust company or financial institution that has obtained approval under Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions; the same shall apply hereinafter] conducts the sales and purchase of securities or transaction of derivatives for the account of the person who sets up a trust under a trust contract, including such person who sets up the trust; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "user"; the term "loss" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "loss (which means, in the case where the total amount of mutual aid premiums to be paid by the user as a result of the conclusion of said specified mutual aid contract exceeds the total amount of mutual aid money, etc. [which means mutual aid money, etc. prescribed in Article 58, paragraph (6) of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be acquired by said user as a result of the conclusion of said specified mutual aid contract, the amount obtained by deducting the total amount of said mutual aid money, etc. from the total amount of said mutual aid premiums; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article)"; the phrase "property benefit will be provided to the customer or such third party in order for the financial instruments business operator, etc. or the third party to compensate or make up for" in the same item shall be deemed to be replaced with "property benefit will be provided to the customer or such third party, separately from said specified mutual aid contract, in order for the financial instruments business operator, etc. or the third party to compensate or make up for"; the term "sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc." in item (ii) and item (iii) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract"; the term "securities, etc." in the same provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "property benefit will be provided to the customer in order for the financial instruments business operator, etc. or such third party to compensate for the whole or part of a loss incurred by the customer from the relevant securities, etc. or make an addition to" in item (ii) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "property benefit will be provided to the customer, separately from said specified mutual aid contract, in order for the financial instruments business operator, etc. or such third party to compensate for the whole or part of a loss incurred by the customer from the relevant securities, etc. or make an addition to"; the phrase "providing property benefit to a customer or a third party or having a third party provide it to a customer, with regard to the sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc., in order to compensate for the whole or part of a loss incurred by the customer from the relevant securities, etc. or make an addition to" in item (iii) of the same paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "providing property benefit to a customer or a third party, separately from said specified mutual aid contract, or having a third party provide it to a customer, with regard to the sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc., in order to compensate for the whole or part of a loss incurred by the customer from the relevant securities, etc. or make an addition to"; the term "sales and purchase or transaction of securities, etc." in paragraph (2) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "conclusion of a specified mutual aid contract"; the phrase "that is designated by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as a potential cause" in paragraph (3) of the same Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "that is a potential cause"; the phrase "Articles 37-2 to 37-6, Article 40-2, paragraph (4), and Article 43-4" in Article 45, item (ii) of the same Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 37-3 (limited to the portions pertaining to the matters listed in the items of paragraph (1), and excluding item (ii) and item (vi) of the same paragraph and paragraph (3)) and Article 37-4"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
２ 会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券、特定社債管理者、特定社債原簿又は特定社債権者集会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「特定社債発行会社」と、「無記名社債」とあるのは「無記名特定社債」と、「代表社債権者」とあるのは「代表特定社債権者」と、同法第七百十六条中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法又は資産流動化計画」と、同法第七百二十条第五項中「電子公告」とあるのは「電子公告（資産流動化法第百九十四条第一項第三号に規定する電子公告をいう。）」と、同法第七百二十一条中「社債権者集会参考書類」とあるのは「特定社債権者集会参考書類」と、同法第七百二十四条第二項第一号中「第七百六条第一項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項各号」と、同項第二号中「第七百六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項」と、同法第七百二十九条第一項中「第七百七条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第八項において準用する第七百七条」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項から第三項まで並びに同条第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項中「第四百四十九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十一条」と、同条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と、同法第七百四十一条第三項中「第七百五条第一項（第七百三十七条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項（資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百三十七条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715) (Bondholders' Meeting), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Action Seeking Rescission of Performance, etc. of a Bond-issuing Company), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x) to item (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, Specified Bond Administrators, Specified Bonds registries, and Specified Bondholders Meetings in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the terms "Bond-issuing Company," "bearer bonds," and "representative bondholder" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," "Specified Bonds in bearer form," and "representative Specified Bondholder," the phrase "this Act" in Article 716 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act or the Asset Securitization Plan," the term "electromagnetic public notice" in Article 720(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Electronic Public Notice (meaning electronic public notice as prescribed in Article 194(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "Bondholders' Meeting Reference Documents" in Article 721 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Reference Documents for a Specified Bondholders Meeting," the phrase "each item of Article 706(1)" in Article 724(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 706" in Article 724(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 707" in Article 729(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 707 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 676" in Article 733(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 705, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) to (3) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act and the provisions of Article 708 and Article 709 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 449" in Article 740(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111 of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 740(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 705 (including cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 737)" in Article 741(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 737(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
５ 会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで（第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。）（株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。）」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。）その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加
(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム
| 意味 | 例文 (999件) |
| Copyright © Japan Patent office. All Rights Reserved. |
 | ※この記事は「日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム」の2010年9月現在の情報を転載しております。 |
| Copyright Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry. All Rights Reserved. |
| Copyright(C) 財務省 ※この記事は財務省ホームページの情報を転載しております。内容には仮訳のものも含まれており、今後内容に変更がある可能性がございます。 財務省は利用者が当ホームページの情報を用いて行う一切の行為について、何ら責任を負うものではありません。 |
| Copyright © Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, All Right reserved. |
| Copyright(C) 2024 金融庁 All Rights Reserved. |
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
検索履歴を保存できる！|
ログイン |
Weblio会員(無料)になると
|
