「the three in one」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(63ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

In addition, as a result of deregulation due to the revisions of the Act on Worker Dispatching Undertaking and other labor-related laws that were implemented under the government of former Prime Minister Koizumi, the number of non-regular workers has increased to around 17.6 million, meaning that one in three workers is a non-regular worker. In light of this, Minister (for Government Revitalization) Renho will convene a meeting of the Council for Regulatory Reform today. Nowadays, it is in no way permissible for people to protect their own vested interests, for organizations to protect their interests, or for administrative agencies to protect their vested interests on the pretext of safety. However, as that is in their nature, at an informal meeting of cabinet ministers, I expressed hope that regulatory reforms satisfactory for the people will be implemented with due consideration given to the distinction between economic and social regulation. 例文帳に追加

それから、小泉さんの時代の、労働者派遣事業法、あるいは労働法の規制緩和で、非正規社員が今1,760万人ぐらいで、（労働者の）3人に1人おります。ですから、今日、蓮舫大臣が規制改革会議をやるということでございますが、特に私は医者ですから、今の時代、安全の名にかまけて既得権益を守るとか、あるいは既得団体の利益を守るとか、あるいは役所が既得権を守るということは絶対に許されることでありません。しかし、本質がありますから、その辺の経済的規制と社会的規制とを見分けて、国民の納得いくような規制改革をして頂きたいということを、一言、閣僚懇で申し上げてきました。 - 金融庁

In Japan, the Keihan Keishin Line is the only one that serves as three different types of tracks: a subway, a mountain railway and a tram; a vehicle consisting of four cars enters a subway (Tozai Line of the Kyoto Municipal Subway) in the central part of Kyoto City (not a mutual entry but a single entry of the Keihan Keishin Line), runs through a steep curve and slope like a mountain railway near Osakayama, which used to be the hilliest part of the Kyu-Tokaido (the former Tokaido) on the boundary of Kyoto Prefecture and Shiga Prefecture, and runs like a tram along National Route 161 in the central part of Otsu City, Shiga Prefecture (between Misasagi Station shared with the Tozai Line of the Kyoto Municipal Subway, and Kyu-Misasagi-fudo Fumikiri (Railroad Crossing at the former Kyoto Prefecture Route of Misasagi) (Sanjo-dori Street) runs a subway). 例文帳に追加

京阪京津線は、4両編成の車両が京都市中心部地域では地下鉄（京都市営地下鉄京都市営地下鉄東西線）に乗り入れ（相互乗り入れではなく、片乗り入れ）、京都府と滋賀県との府県境にあり、旧東海道の難所でもあった逢坂山付近では、登山電車並みの急曲線・急勾配を走り抜け、滋賀県大津市中心部地域では、路面電車のように国道161号線上の併用軌道を走るという日本で唯一、地下鉄・登山鉄道・路面電車という3つの顔（京都市営地下鉄東西線との共同駅である御陵駅と旧御陵府道踏切（三条通）との間は、地下線）を持つ路線である。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

Regarding my duties as the Minister for Financial Services, the basic missions of the Financial Services Agency (FSA) are to ensure the stability of the financial system, protect users, improve the convenience of users, and establish a fair and transparent market. However, the facilitation of financing, regarding which I received an instruction from the Prime Minister today, is also important. As the global recession has continued since the Lehman shock, which occurred three years ago, Mr. Kamei, my predecessor as the Minister for Financial Services, put into force the SME Financing Facilitation Act (Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc.). After holding hearings with four associations of small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) and regional financial institutions in various places across Japan, including Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya, Fukuoka, Kitakyushu and Sendai, I concluded that it would be the right decision to extend this act for one year as the head of the administrative agency in charge of financial affairs. We will submit a relevant bill to the next ordinary session of the Diet and do all we can to have it enacted at an early date. 例文帳に追加

まず郵政改革に関しましては、小泉構造改革により脆弱となった郵政を再生させるために、私も何度も申しますけれども、10年に3回ほど経営形態が変わりまして、10年前に260兆円あった郵便貯金が90兆円減少しまして、今170兆円になっております。１ヶ月（間）に１兆円郵便貯金が流出した月もございます。それから、簡易保険も全盛期で8,500万件ありましたが、4,000万件減って、今、大体4,500万件簡易保険の口数がございます。それから、12年前に、私が郵政大臣をさせていただいたときは、手紙、はがき、これは大体250億通あったのです。これが電子メールの進歩もあり、50億通減っておりまして、大体今年では200億通ぐらいに減少いたしております。 - 金融庁

The other issue is that documents which financial institutions are required to submit to the Financial Services Agency (FSA) have been increasing over the past decade. I discussed this issue yesterday with the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry to reduce the documents by 20 percent. In the organization of bureaucracy, there is no one but the Minister of State elected by the people who can make such a suggestion. Financial institutions cannot say that they would like to have the burden of paperwork reduced to the FSA, a regulatory authority, even if they want to. The three representatives I asked yesterday told me that their burden of paperwork is enormous. As this issue has been in my mind for some time, I told the FSA Commissioner, on their behalf, to look into specific ways of reducing the documents to be submitted by financial institutions to the FSA. I intend to work on this issue properly. 例文帳に追加

そして、この10年間各役所から金融機関に提出を求める書類が増えているのです。ですから、私は昨日、経済産業大臣とも話をしまして、書類を20％減らそうではないかという話をしました。こういう官僚機構には、国民から選ばれた国務大臣でないと、そんなことは言えないのです。金融庁は規制官庁ですから、（金融機関は事務負担を軽減して欲しいと）思っていても言えない。しかし、昨日は代表の中で、皆さんに聞いたら3人ぐらい事務負担が物凄く多いという話を言っていました。私も前々から考えておりましたので、（その意見を）代弁しまして、ぜひ金融庁長官にも金融機関が金融庁に出す書類を20％減らすようにということを具体的に考えてくれということを申し上げましたけれども、それはしっかりやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁

(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the Board of Appeal of the Federal Patent Court shall issue a decision 1. if a party requests the decision and no other party has filed an opposition within two months after service of the request, or 2. upon the request of only one party if at least 15 months have lapsed since expiry of the opposition time limit, or in the case of a request of an intervening party if at least 15 months have lapsed since declaration of intervention. This shall not apply if the Patent Division has served a summons to a hearing or the decision on the opposition within three months of receipt of the request for a decision by the Patent Court. In other respects, Sections 59 to 62, 69 to 71 and 86 to 99 shall apply mutandis mutandis. 例文帳に追加

(2) (1)に拘らず，連邦特許裁判所の審判部は，次の場合に決定を行う。 1. 1の当事者が決定を請求し，他の何れの当事者も，その請求の送達から 2月以内に，異議を唱えなかったとき，又は2. 一方の当事者のみからの請求があったとき。ただし，異議申立期限の到来から最低 15月が経過しているか，又は参加人からの請求の場合は，当該参加宣言から最低 15月が経過していることを条件とする。この規定は，特許部が，連邦特許裁判所による決定を求める請求を受領してから 3月以内に，聴聞への召喚状又は異議申立についての決定を送達している場合は，適用されない。それ以外には，第 59条から第 62条まで，第 69条から第 71条まで，及び第 86条から第 99条までが準用される。 - 特許庁

One of the positive effects of this act is that it promotes syndicated loans, as I mentioned previously. Various financial institutions, including megabanks in some cases, are providing syndicated loans. When the borrower is an SME, a regional bank and a Shinkin bank or credit cooperative may provide a syndicated loan. Previously, megabanks were reluctant to participate in such syndicated loans. However, I have heard from various quarters that since the enactment of this act, megabanks have made conscientious efforts to participate in syndicated loans. When I recently visited Osaka, the top officials of three regional financial institutions told me about the change in megabanks' stance. 例文帳に追加

それから、このメリットとしては、私はこの前も申し上げたと思いますが、協調融資です。色々な金融機関が協調して、メガバンクと協調融資するようなこともございますし、中小・零細企業の場合、地方銀行と信用金庫、信用組合が協調融資することもございます。その時に従来、メガバンクはあまり協調融資に乗り気でなかったところもあるのです。ところが、やはりこの法律ができて、メガバンクも協調融資の場合にきちんと誠意を持ってやってくれるということは、色々なところから聞きました。この前、大阪に行ったときも三つの地域の金融機関のトップの方が、そのことを言われました。 - 金融庁

In my view, politics must have a vision as to "whether to give short-term benefits or deliver a policy that will be beneficial over time." Currently, 16.5 million individuals, or one person in every three households, own stocks. As 70 percent of the Japanese people are making five million yen or less in annual income, this means that common people own stocks. We live in a capitalistic society, so the question is how great an effect can be expected from the movement of money and rises in stock prices that a policy entails – as stocks are capital, a stock tax break carries a meaning different from other tax breaks. 例文帳に追加

政治というのも、魚をやるのか、釣竿をやるのか、そのことをきちんと考えておかなければならないと私は思っていますので、証券税制というのは、キャピタル、キャピタリズムであり、資本主義なのです。1,650万人の個人、日本人の3所帯に1人が今株を持っております。（国民の）70％は年収500万以下の方ですから、ごく一般の国民に株を持っていただいているのです。それはキャピタリズムですから、そこに波及して、お金がいき、株が上がるとどういう効果があるのか、株というのはキャピタルで、少なくとも自由主義社会ですから、そこに対する優遇税制というのは、ほかの優遇税制と違うのです。 - 金融庁

In this context, if we are to proceed with postponing the expiration of the Act, we will properly request various organizations to submit data or conduct interviews with them. When I served as Parliamentary Vice-Minister of International Trade and Industry twenty years ago, I was in charge of SMEs as required as the Parliamentary Vice-Minister of International Trade and Industry appointed from the House of Representatives back then for one year and three months under (former) Minister of International Trade and Industry Eiichi Nakao. Based on such experience, I have been told by SMEs how extremely helpful the Act has been. I may have also told you previously that according to what I have been informed by bureaucrats, a megabank attended a gathering of various financial institutions-a gathering of shinkin banks and credit unions at one of the financial bureaus-for the first time ever since the establishment of the Act. In that sense, my intuition as a politician is that the Act is proving to be extremely effective against the backdrop of the strong yen at this stage when we are considering the possibility of postponing its expiration. 例文帳に追加

ですから、そういった意味では、当然延長ということであれば、きちんと色々な団体からデータも出す、あるいはお話を聞かせていただくということもしますけれども、我々やはり感覚的に、20年前、私、通産政務次官をしていまして、中小企業担当の、あれは衆議院から行った通産政務次官は当時中小企業担当でしたから、1年3か月、中尾栄一（元）通産大臣のもとでやらせていただきました。そんなことで、中小企業からの非常に助かっているという声を聞きますし、また、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、色々な金融の集まり、ある財務局での信用金庫・信用組合の集まりに、この法律ができて初めてメガバンクが来たという話も、これはきちんと官僚機構から聞いていますから、そういう意味では、私は非常に今の時代、データがあるかないかと言われたら今からそれをやるのですけれども、政治家の勘として、こういった円高の中でやはりこれは、まさに延長を視野に入れている今の段階で、非常によく効果をあらわしているなというふうに私は思っております。 - 金融庁

Article 222-15 With regard to a case other than one punishable by the death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment with or without work for more than three years, if a motion for an expedited trial procedure has been filed, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 177, the court shall, without delay, inform the accused to the effect that the accused may appoint defense counsel, and that he/she may file a request for defense counsel to be appointed if he/she is unable to do so due to indigence or on any other grounds, and that trial dates for carrying out the proceedings set forth in Article 350-8 of the Code and trial dates for the expedited trial procedure may not be held in the absence of defense counsel; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the accused has secured defense counsel. 例文帳に追加

第二百二十二条の十五　裁判所は、死刑又は無期若しくは長期三年を超える懲役若しくは禁錮に当たる事件以外の事件について、即決裁判手続の申立てがあつたときは、第百七十七条の規定にかかわらず、遅滞なく、被告人に対し、弁護人を選任することができる旨及び貧困その他の事由により弁護人を選任することができないときは弁護人の選任を請求することができる旨のほか、弁護人がなければ法第三百五十条の八の手続を行う公判期日及び即決裁判手続による公判期日を開くことができない旨をも知らせなければならない。ただし、被告人に弁護人があるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As for loans to SMEs, we made clear our stance regarding such loans in the section on the Basic Policy and Plan for Financial Inspections that concerns the exercising of the financial intermediary function. We have set forth three priority inspection items regarding loans to SMEs in light of the current difficult economic situation and based on our recognition that ensuring the smooth provision of funds to SMEs with sound business operations is one of the important roles that financial institutions should play. The first is whether financial institutions ensure smooth financing for SMEs and individuals, including housing loans, the second is whether they are providing financing arrangements suited to SMEs, and the third is whether they are making conscientious efforts to grasp the actual condition of SME borrowers and conducting appropriate risk management. 例文帳に追加

次に、お尋ねの中小企業向け融資につきましては、これは円滑な金融仲介機能の発揮というところで考え方を示しているものでございますが、健全な事業を営む中小企業等の融資先に対する円滑な資金供給は金融機関の最も重要な役割の一つであるとの認識の下、現下の厳しい経済情勢等を踏まえまして、一つは、中小企業・個人、これは住宅ローンを含みますが、こういったものに対する円滑な金融仲介への対応、2点目は、中小企業に相応しい金融手法の提供、3点目は、中小企業等の債務者に対するきめ細かい実態把握と適切なリスク管理、これを検査重点事項としているところでございます。 - 金融庁

(2) In the case where a Member, etc. or an Intermediary (which means a Member, etc. or an Intermediary prescribed in Article 103, paragraph 7 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) seeks to conclude a contract set forth in Article 103, paragraph 7 of the Act with a Bank, etc., he/she shall ensure that the contents thereof meet the following requirements: (i) on receipt of an instruction from a Commodity Exchange pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph 9, the amount of the clearing margin pertaining to said instruction will be deposited with said Commodity Exchange for said Member, etc. or Intermediary; (ii) it is prohibited to set off debts of a Bank, etc. or claims for said Member, etc. or Intermediary based on said contract; (iii) the contract is valid for the period of three months or longer; (iv) a Member, etc. or an Intermediary may not cancel the contract or change the contents of the contract, except when he/she had received approval from the competent minister and a Commodity Exchange (limited to a Commodity Exchange which received a notification pursuant to the provisions of Article 103, paragraph 7 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) in advance; (v) a Member, etc. or an Intermediary shall notify the termination of the contract to a Commodity Exchange by one month prior to the day of termination. 例文帳に追加

２ 会員等又は取次者（法第百三条第七項に規定する会員等又は取次者をいう。以下この 条において同じ。）は、銀行等と法第百三条第七項の契約を締結しようとする場合には、 その内容を次に掲げる要件に適合するものとしなければならない。 一法第百三条第九項の規定による商品取引所の指示を受けたときは、当該会員等又は 取次者のために当該指示に係る額の取引証拠金が遅滞なく当該商品取引所に預託され るものであること。 二当該契約に基づく銀行等の債務と当該会員等又は取次者に対する債権を相殺するこ とを禁止するものであること。三三月以上の期間にわたって有効な契約であること。四会員等又は取次者は、あらかじめ主務大臣及び商品取引所（法第百三条第七項の規 定による届出を受けた商品取引所に限る。以下この条において同じ。）の承認を受け た場合を除き、契約の解除又は契約の内容の変更をすることができないものであるこ と。 五会員等又は取次者は、契約が終了する日の一月前までに、その旨を商品取引所に通 知をするものとすること。 - 経済産業省

(3) Members representing at least one thousandth (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or one thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in paragraph (1)), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation), may demand the directors that, no later than eight weeks (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) prior to the date of the general meeting of members, members be notified of the outline of any proposal to be submitted by said member with respect to an agenda item of the meeting (or, where a notice is to be given under Article 299, paragraph (2) (excluding the items (i) and (ii)) or (3) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 41, paragraph (1), such outline be described in, or recorded on, that notice); provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases where the proposal is in violation of any applicable law or regulation or the articles of incorporation, or where three years have not elapsed since the day on which an essentially identical proposal was not approved by at least one tenth of the membership (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) in the general meeting of members. 例文帳に追加

３　社員総数の千分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者は、取締役に対し、社員総会の日の八週間（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前までに、社員総会の目的である事項につき当該社員が提出しようとする議案の要領を通知すること（第四十一条第一項において準用する会社法第二百九十九条第二項（各号を除く。）又は第三項の通知をする場合にあっては、その通知に記載し、又は記録すること）を請求することができる。ただし、当該議案が法令若しくは定款に違反する場合又は実質的に同一の議案につき社員総会において総社員の議決権の十分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の賛成を得られなかった日から三年を経過していない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

It is a document that lodged a very outright criticism against the fact that excessive competition policies implemented by Mr. Koizumi, or Mr. Takenaka, led to a considerable loss of Japan's social stability, including the so-called safety nets. As Policy Research Committee Chair (of the PNP), I wrote that point at the very beginning of the six items in the common policy platform, which was put together in the run-up to the election, and I also articulated in writing that even after the change of government, Mr. Koizumi's excessive competition policies had substantially damaged various social safety nets or regional economies. Further still, the three-party agreement spelled out that the per-household income level dropped by one million yen in the course of ten years during which the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) was in power. While I may not use expressions as sharp as those of (PNP) Chief Kamei, I am still intending to take a firm stance, keeping in mind the original intention behind the change of government, in addition to the points I've just made. 例文帳に追加

これは、民主党、当時社民党、国民新党でございまして、どちらにも小泉さん、あるいは竹中さんの行われた過度の競争政策によって、日本のいわゆるセーフティネットをはじめ、非常に社会の安定性が失われたということを、本当に真っ向から批判した文書でございまして、たまたま私は（国民新党の）政調会長でございましたから、選挙の前の6日間の当面の共通政策6つの中でも一番最初にそのことが書いてありまして、なおかつ政権が交代した後もそのことをきちっと小泉さんの過度の競争政策と申しますか、それが非常に社会のいろいろなセーフティネット、あるいは地域の経済、そういったことを傷めたということを明記してありますし、なおかつ当時自由民主党の政権でしたか、10年間で1世帯当たり100万円の所得が減ったということもきちっと3党合意には明記してありますし、そういったことを踏まえて、私も亀井（国民新党）党首ほど表現は厳しくはないかと思いますけれども、きちっとそういった原点を踏まえて政権交代の原点を踏まえてしっかりやっていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) A Specified Equity Member or Preferred Equity Member of a Type 2 Specific Purpose Company may, at a general meeting of members, submit a proposal with regard to a Matter to Be Voted Upon by Both Specified and Preferred Equity Members which is a subject for a general meeting of members; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where said proposal is in violation of laws and regulations, the Asset Securitization Plan, or the articles of incorporation, or cases where three years have yet to elapse from the date on which, with respect to a proposal which was essentially identical to such proposal, affirmative votes from members holding at least one-tenth of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all members (excluding members who could not exercise their voting rights on said proposal) were not obtained at a general meeting of members. 例文帳に追加

２　第二種特定目的会社の特定社員又は優先出資社員は、社員総会において、社員総会の目的である有議決権事項につき議案を提出することができる。ただし、当該議案が法令、資産流動化計画若しくは定款に違反する場合又は実質的に同一の議案につき社員総会において総社員（当該議案につき議決権を行使することができない社員を除く。）の議決権の十分の一（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の賛成を得られなかった日から三年を経過していない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The global economy, including the European economy, has been undergoing significant change, or has been growing unstable, since the Lehman shock. That is the greatest change. To be more specific, U.S. SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) Chairwoman Schapiro said that calls for the application of IFRS from U.S. companies and investors are not very strong. According to a report recently issued by Keidanren, during the two years since the introduction of a voluntary application of IFRS, only three of the 3,600 eligible Japanese companies have applied it. That roughly means only one in 1,000 companies. 例文帳に追加

そういった意味で、やはり今、世界の経済は、ヨーロッパも含めて、リーマン・ショック以来、非常に変化しつつある、あるいは不安定になりつつあるところもありますから、そういったことが、実は、私が責任者としてお示しした変化の最大の点だと思っております。具体的に言えば、アメリカのSEC（証券取引委員会）のシャピロ委員長が、「（IFRS適用を求める）アメリカの企業と投資家の声はそれほど大きくない」と（おっしゃっておりました）。先日も経団連が報告書を出していましたが、2年間、IFRSの任意適用をしましたけれども、（日本では）3,600社のうち3社しか手を挙げていないのです。ということは、（割合で言えば）1,000社に1社ぐらいです。 - 金融庁

5. If the deposited culture ceases to be available, either because it is no longer viable or because the authority of deposit is no longer in a position to deliver its sample, it is not considered to be the interruption of availability on the condition that: (a) a new deposit of the microorganism is made within a period of three months starting from the date on which the interruption was notified to the owner of the patent application or of the patent, either by the depositary authority or by the Service; (b) a copy of the receipt regarding the new deposit of the microorganism, accompanied with references to the patent application or to the patent, is sent to the Service within a period of four months starting from the date of the new deposit. If the interruption results from the non-viability of the culture, the new deposit shall be made with the authority that received the initial deposit; in other cases, it may be made with other empowered authority. A new deposit of the microorganism must be accompanied with a statement signed by the depositing party certifying that the microorganism subjected to the new deposit is the same as the one which was the object of the initial deposit.例文帳に追加

(5) 寄託培養試料が，もはや活性を有していないためか又は寄託機関がその試料をもはや交付できないための何れかによって，入手不能になった場合において，それが次のときは，入手可能性の中断とはみなさないものとする。 (a) 寄託機関又は庁の何れかによって特許出願人又は特許権者に対して当該中断が通知された日から起算して3月以内に，微生物の新規寄託が行われたとき (b) 特許出願又は特許についての明細資料を添付の上，微生物の新規寄託の受領書の写が新規寄託の日から起算して4月以内に，庁宛に送達されたとき 中断が培養試料の不活性化に起因した場合は，新規寄託については，原寄託を以前行った機関に対して，行わなければならない。その他の場合は，新規寄託を他の寄託機関に対して，行うことができる。 微生物の新規寄託には，新規に寄託される微生物が原寄託の対象のものと同じである旨証明した寄託当事者の署名入り宣誓書を添付しなければならない。 - 特許庁

Any person who - (a) refuses any authorized officer or police officer access to any place; (b) assaults, obstructs, hinders or delays any authorized officer or police officer in effecting any entrance which he is entitled to effect under this Act, or in the execution of any duty imposed or power conferred by this Act; or (c) refuses or neglects to give any information which may reasonably be required of him and which he has it in his power to give, commits an offence and is liable on conviction to a fine not exceeding three thousand ringgit or to imprisonment for a term not exceeding one year or to both.例文帳に追加

次に掲げる行為の何れかを行った者は，違法行為をしたものとし，有罪判決により3,000リンギット以下の罰金若しくは1年以下の拘禁，又はこれらを併科されるものとする。(a)受権公務員又は警察官に対し，何れかの場所への接近を拒絶すること(b)授権公務員又は警察官が，本法に基づいて，又は本法によって課せられた義務若しくは付与された権限の行使として行うことができる立入を実行するときに，それらに対して，暴行，妨害，阻止すること又は延滞させること(c)合理的にみて当該人に要求することができ，当該人が提供する権限を有する情報について，その提供を拒否するか履行しないこと - 特許庁

(a) The requirement of unity of invention shall be fulfilled only when there is a technical relationship among those inventions involving one or more of the same or corresponding special technical features. The expression “special technical features” shall mean those technical features that define a contribution which each of the claimed inventions, considered as a whole makes over the prior art. (b) The determination whether a group of inventions is so linked as to form a single general inventive concept shall be made without regard to whether the inventions are claimed in separate claims or as alternative within a single claim. (c) A plurality of independent claims in different categories may constitute a group of inventions linked to form a single general inventive concept, the link being e.g. that between a product and the process which produces it; or between a process and an apparatus for carrying out the process. (d) Three different specific combinations of claims in different categories which are permissible in any one application are the following: (1) In addition to an independent claim for a given product, an independent claim for a process specially adopted for the manufacture of the product, and an independent claim for a use of the product; or (2) In addition to an independent claim for a given process, an independent claim for an apparatus or means specifically designed for carrying out the process; or (3) In addition to an independent claim for a given product, an independent claim for a process specially adapted for the manufacture of the product, and an independent claim for apparatus or means specifically designed for carrying out the process.例文帳に追加

(a)発明の単一性の要件は，複数の発明が，1以上の同一の又は対応する特別な技術的特徴を伴った技術的関係を有する場合にのみ満たされるものとする。「特別な技術的特徴」という表現は，クレームされている各発明が全体として先行技術を改良する貢献度を定義する技術的特徴をいう。 (b)1群の発明が単一の包括的発明概念を形成するように結び付いているか否かの判定は，発明が別々のクレームにおいて主張されているか又は単一のクレーム内で択一的に主張されているかを考慮することなくされる。 (c)カテゴリーが異なる複数の独立クレームは，単一の発明概念を形成するように結び付いて1群の発明を構成することができる。結び付きとは，例えば，製品とその製法との間の結び付き，又は製法とその製法を実施するための装置との間の結び付きをいう。 (d)1の出願では，異なるカテゴリーのクレームからなる特徴を有する組み合わせは次の3通りが許される。 (1)ある製品に係る独立クレームに加えて，当該製品の製造のために特に採用された製法に係る独立クレーム，及び製品の使用に係る独立クレーム (2)ある製法に係る独立クレームに加えて，当該製法を実施するために特に設計された装置又は手段に係る独立クレーム，又は (3)ある製品に係る独立クレームに加えて，当該製品の製造のために特に適合させた製法に係る独立クレーム，及び当該製法を実施するために特に設計された装置又は手段に係る独立クレーム - 特許庁

(2) Railway fare and ship fare (including a lighterage and pierage) shall be calculated respectively as comprising [1] passenger fare (in the case of travel by a route or a ship for which there are fare classes, if the fare is categorized into three classes, the second- or third-class fare as considered reasonable by the court, and if the fare is categorized into two classes, the fare of the class as considered reasonable by the court) corresponding to the distance of the span traveled, [2] express charge (a limited express charge for travel of 100 kilometers or more one way between points where there is a railway on which a limited express train runs; an ordinary express charge or semi-express charge for travel of fewer than 100 kilometers and 50 kilometers or more one way between points where there is a railway on which an ordinary express train or semi-express train runs), [3] special compartment charge or special cabin charge, if the payment of which is considered reasonable by the court, and [4] seat reservation charge (limited to a seat reservation charge in the case of travel of 100 kilometers or more one way between points where there is a railway on which an ordinary express train requiring a seat reservation charge runs, or travel by ship between points where there is a route on which a ship requiring a seat reservation charge runs); a distance fare shall be calculated as the amount determined by the court within the range specified by the Supreme Court; and an airfare shall be calculated by the passenger fare actually paid. 例文帳に追加

２　鉄道賃及び船賃は旅行区間の路程に応ずる旅客運賃（はしけ賃及びさん橋賃を含むものとし、運賃に等級を設ける線路又は船舶による旅行の場合には、運賃の等級を三階級に区分するものについては中級以下で裁判所が相当と認める等級の、運賃の等級を二階級に区分するものについては裁判所が相当と認める等級の運賃）、急行料金（特別急行列車を運行する線路のある区間の旅行で片道百キロメートル以上のものには特別急行料金、普通急行列車又は準急行列車を運行する線路のある区間の旅行で片道五十キロメートル以上のものには普通急行料金又は準急行料金）並びに裁判所が支給を相当と認める特別車両料金及び特別船室料金並びに座席指定料金（座席指定料金を徴する普通急行列車を運行する線路のある区間の旅行で片道百キロメートル以上のもの又は座席指定料金を徴する船舶を運行する航路のある区間の旅行の場合の座席指定料金に限る。）によつて、路程賃は最高裁判所が定める額の範囲内において裁判所が定める額によつて、航空賃は現に支払つた旅客運賃によつて、それぞれ算定する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 19-10 The provisions of paragraph (2) of Article 16, Article 17 to Article 17-11, paragraphs (4) to (6) of Article 17-12 and Article 17-13 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a Registered Overseas Certifying Body. In this case, the term "the preceding paragraph" which appears in paragraph (2) of Article 16 shall be replaced with "Article 19-8", the term "each of the items of paragraph (1) of Article 17-2" in the same paragraph with "each of the items of paragraph (1) of Article 17-2 as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 19-10", the term "paragraph (1) of Article 16" which appears in paragraph (1) of Article 17-2 shall be replaced with "Article 19-8", the term "each item of paragraph (1) of Article 17-2" which appears in Article 17-10 shall be replaced with "each item of paragraph (1) of Article 17-2 as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 19-10", the term "order" in the same Article with "demand", the term "Article 17-5" which appears in Article 17-11 shall be replaced with "Article 17-5 as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 19-10", the term "order" in the same Article with "demand", the term "the preceding three paragraphs" which appears in paragraph (4) of Article 17-12 shall be replaced with "paragraphs (1) to (3) of Article 19-9", the term "one week prior to the date" in the same paragraph with "two weeks prior to the date" and the term "paragraphs (1) to (3)" which appears in paragraph (6) of the same Article shall be replaced with "paragraphs (1) to (3) of Article 19-9". 例文帳に追加

第十九条の十　第十六条第二項、第十七条から第十七条の十一まで、第十七条の十二第四項から第六項まで及び第十七条の十三の規定は、登録外国認定機関について準用する。この場合において、第十六条第二項中「前項」とあるのは「第十九条の八」と、「第十七条の二第一項各号」とあるのは「第十九条の十において準用する第十七条の二第一項各号」と、第十七条の二第一項中「第十六条第一項」とあるのは「第十九条の八」と、第十七条の十中「第十七条の二第一項各号」とあるのは「第十九条の十において準用する第十七条の二第一項各号」と、「命ずる」とあるのは「請求する」と、第十七条の十一中「第十七条の五」とあるのは「第十九条の十において準用する第十七条の五」と、「命ずる」とあるのは「請求する」と、第十七条の十二第四項中「前三項」とあるのは「第十九条の九第一項から第三項まで」と、「一週間前」とあるのは「二週間前」と、同条第六項中「第一項から第三項まで」とあるのは「第十九条の九第一項から第三項まで」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

One day Bassanio came to Anthonio, and told him that he wished to repair his fortune by a wealthy marriage with a lady whom he dearly loved, whose father, that was lately dead, had left her sole heiress to a large estate; and that in her father's lifetime he used to visit at her house, when he thought he had observed this lady had sometimes from her eyes sent speechless messages, that seemed to say he would be no unwelcome suitor; but not having money to furnish himself with an appearance befitting the lover of so rich an heiress, he besought Anthonio to add to the many favours he had shewn him, by lending him three thousand ducats. 例文帳に追加

ある日、バサーニオはアントニオを訪ねてこう言った。ぼくは財産を取り戻そうと考えている。愛する女《ひと》と富裕な結婚をしようと思うんだ。彼女のお父さんが最近亡くなってね、大きな財産をその人がたった１人で相続したんだ。お父さんがご存命だったころ、ぼくは彼女の家をよく訪ねていたんだ。そのとき彼女がぼくにときどきその目から無言の秋波を送っていたように思えてね、ぼくのことがまんざらでもないという感じだった。だがぼくには、大きな遺産を受け継いだあの女《ひと》の相手としてふさわしい風采を整えるだけの金がないんだ。ぼくに対して親切にしてもらえるなら、3000ドュカート用立ててくれないか。 - Shakespeare『ヴェニスの商人』

Article 49 With regard to Transferred Specified Electrical Appliances and Materials pertaining to a product type for which approval under Article 18 or Article 23, paragraph (1) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act or confirmation under Article 23-2, paragraph (1) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act had been obtained at the time of enforcement of Article 10, or with regard to Class-B Electrical Appliances and Materials as set forth in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act with structures pertaining to a notification under Article 26-2, paragraph (1) or Article 26-3, paragraph (1) of the Old Electrical Appliance and Material Control Act which fall into the category of Electrical Appliances and Materials set forth in Article 2, paragraph (1) of the Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Act, labeling under Article 25, paragraph (1) or Article 26-6, paragraph (1) may be affixed during the one year from the day of enforcement of Article 10 (with regard to those specified by Cabinet Order as Transferred Electrical Appliances and Materials that require a considerable period of time for the repair or alteration of manufacturing equipment accompanied with the change of labeling, the period specified by Cabinet Order for the relevant Transferred Electrical Appliances and Materials within a limit not exceeding three years from the day of the enforcement of Article 10), notwithstanding the provisions of Article 10, paragraph (2) of the Electrical Appliance and Material Safety Act. 例文帳に追加

第四十九条　第十条の規定の施行の際現に旧電気用品取締法第十八条若しくは第二十三条第一項の認可若しくは旧電気用品取締法第二十三条の二第一項の確認を受けている型式に係る移行特定電気用品又は旧電気用品取締法第二十六条の二第一項若しくは第二十六条の三第一項の規定による届出に係る構造の旧電気用品取締法第二条第二項の乙種電気用品であって電気用品安全法第二条第一項の電気用品であるものについては、電気用品安全法第十条第二項の規定にかかわらず、第十条の規定の施行の日から起算して一年間（表示の変更に伴う製造設備の修理又は改造に相当の期間を要する移行電気用品として政令で定めるものにあっては、第十条の規定の施行の日から起算して三年を超えない範囲内において移行電気用品ごとに政令で定める期間）は、旧電気用品取締法第二十五条第一項又は第二十六条の六第一項の規定の例による表示を付することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Regarding my duties as the Minister for Financial Services, the basic missions of the Financial Services Agency (FSA) are to ensure the stability of the financial system, protect users, improve the convenience of users, and establish a fair and transparent market. However, the facilitation of financing, regarding which I received an instruction from the Prime Minister today, is also important. As the global recession has continued since the Lehman shock, which occurred three years ago, Mr. Kamei, my predecessor as the Minister for Financial Services, put into force the SME Financing Facilitation Act (Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc.). After holding hearings with four associations of small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs) and regional financial institutions in various places across Japan, including Tokyo, Osaka, Nagoya, Fukuoka, Kitakyushu and Sendai, I concluded that it would be the right decision to extend this act for one year as the head of the administrative agency in charge of financial affairs. We will submit a relevant bill to the next ordinary session of the Diet and do all we can to have it enacted at an early date. 例文帳に追加

また、金融（担当）大臣としてでございますが、金融庁の任務としては金融システムの安定、それから利用者の保護、それから利用者利便の向上、それから公正・透明で活力あるマーケットの確立ということが、金融庁の大前提でございますが、今日、総理大臣から頂きました金融の円滑化ということもございまして、３年前のリーマン・ショック以来、大変世界的に不況でございまして、そういった中で中小企業金融円滑化法を亀井前大臣が作られたわけでございますけれども、これを先般皆様方にも発表させていただきましたように、1年間延長するということを、東京、大阪、名古屋、福岡、北九州、仙台と、色々な日本の地域に行って中小企業4団体あるは地域の金融機関から色々ヒアリングをさせていただいて、確かに金融の規律ということも一面にはありますけれども、今の状況において政策というのは、太陽があれば月があり、光があれば陰があるということを私は何回か申し上げましたように、やはり1年間延長することが、今の金融の行政（機関）の長としては、正しい決断だと思って判断させていただいたわけでございまして、次期通常国会に提出し、その早期成立に全力を挙げたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十七　会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節（第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。）（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）及び同法第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項（責任追及等の訴え）中「株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）中「総株主（次に掲げる株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 17-3 An applicant for a patent may amend the abstract attached to the application within one year and three months (excluding the period after a request for laying open of application is filed) from the filing date of the patent application (or in the case of a patent application containing a priority claim under Article 41(1), the filing date of the earlier application provided for in the said paragraph, in the case of a patent application containing a priority claim under Article 43(1), 43-2(1) or 43-2(2), the filing date of the earliest application, a patent application that is deemed to be the earliest application under Article 4.C(4) of the Paris Convention (refers to the Paris Convention for the Protection of Industrial Property of March 20, 1883, as revised at Brussels on December 14, 1900, at Washington on June 2, 1911, at Hague on November 6, 1925, at London on June 2, 1934, at Lisbon on October 31, 1958, and at Stockholm on July 14, 1967, the same shall apply hereinafter) or a patent application that is recognized as the earliest application under Article 4.A(2) of the Paris Convention, and in the case of a patent application containing two or more priority claims under Article 41(1), 43(1), 43-2(1) or 43-2(2), the earliest day of the filing dates on which the said priority claims are based, the same shall apply to the main clause of Article 36-2(2) and Article 64(1)). 例文帳に追加

第十七条の三　特許出願人は、特許出願の日（第四十一条第一項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願にあつては、同項に規定する先の出願の日、第四十三条第一項又は第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項の規定による優先権の主張を伴う特許出願にあつては、最初の出願若しくはパリ条約（千九百年十二月十四日にブラッセルで、千九百十一年六月二日にワシントンで、千九百二十五年十一月六日にヘーグで、千九百三十四年六月二日にロンドンで、千九百五十八年十月三十一日にリスボンで及び千九百六十七年七月十四日にストックホルムで改正された工業所有権の保護に関する千八百八十三年三月二十日のパリ条約をいう。以下同じ。）第四条Ｃ（４）の規定により最初の出願とみなされた出願又は同条Ａ（２）の規定により最初の出願と認められた出願の日、第四十一条第一項、第四十三条第一項又は第四十三条の二第一項若しくは第二項の規定による二以上の優先権の主張を伴う特許出願にあつては、当該優先権の主張の基礎とした出願の日のうち最先の日。第三十六条の二第二項本文及び第六十四条第一項において同じ。）から一年三月以内（出願公開の請求があつた後を除く。）に限り、願書に添付した要約書について補正をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I made a comment at the informal ministerial gathering today, which was obviously not a comment from the head of the administration, but I am Vice-Chief of the People's New Party (PNP), and the current government is, as you know, a coalition of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and the PNP. Accordingly, Prime Minister Kan, right after he assumed office, met with (PNP) Chief Shizuka Kamei to discuss how the two parties would cooperate in policymaking, at which meeting I was also present as the PNP Secretary-General at that time. Under the three-party coalition that preceded the current one, there was a committee called the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which was set up as a forum for the parties to coordinate or match their policies, but then the Social Democratic Party left the coalition. That is why how the remaining parties should cooperate in policymaking afterwards was a subject of discussion at the party leader meeting right after Prime Minister Kan became the new Prime Minister, during which both leaders agreed to go about it properly. Then as it turned out, as you know, we had a House of Councilors election and the same subject also just came up again during the recent meeting of the two party leaders, who supposedly agreed to "do it (policy cooperation)." That is why I decided to make an elaborate comment on this subject to Prime Minister Kan at today's informal ministerial gathering, to which Prime Minister Kan responded by telling Mr. Gemba, who is a state minister and is also DPJ's Policy Research Committee Chair, to work on policy cooperation with the PNP in the proper way - therefore, Policy Research Committee Chair Gemba and I proceeded to discuss how it should be done, a task that I presume will basically be handled mainly by policy research committee chairs. 例文帳に追加

今日、閣僚懇で、私はこれは行政の長としての発言ではございませんけれども、国民新党の副代表でもございますし、両党、民主党と国民新党のご存じのように連立内閣でございますから、両党間の政策協議をどうするのかということは、実は菅総理がなられた後、すぐ亀井静香（国民新党）代表と話をされまして、当時私は幹事長でございましたから、同席をいたしまして、前の3党連立内閣のときは、基本政策閣僚委員会というのがございまして、ここで政策を整合性を図る、あるいはすり合わせをするということでございましたが、社民党さんが連立を離脱されましたので、その後の政策協力をどうするかということが当時菅総理が実現した後のすぐの党首会談でのテーマで、しっかりやりましょうという話でございましたが、ご存じのように参議院選挙になりましたので、またこの前も両党首会談でそのことが議題になって、「（政策協力を）やろう」ということでございましたから、今日閣僚懇で菅総理に相当申し上げまして、ちょうど玄葉さんが民主党の国務大臣兼政調会長でございますから、菅総理からもきちっと国民新党のほうとの政策協議をするようにということでございまして、玄葉政調会長と私ともどういうふうにするのかと、基本的に政調会長中心だというふうに思いますけれども、そのことを打ち合わせをさせていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁

Regrettably, more than 5,000 people are still missing, and one year is too long a time to wait for the adjudication of disappearance due to emergency. Therefore, the FSA's director-general in charge held very tough negotiations with the Ministry of Justice, which is responsible for matters related to the certification of the death of missing people. As a result, it has been agreed to allow the death of missing people to be certified three months after their disappearance based on a notification submitted to municipal governments through a simplified procedure. While an arrangement like that is made behind the scenes, life insurance sales women are going from mortuary to mortuary with the relatives of missing people. As I am a doctor by profession, I know well what a great mental shock it is for ordinary people to see the body of a person killed in a disaster like that, but insurance sales women are going as far as to do that. As I told you previously, Ishinomaki Shoko Shinkumi, which could not be contacted for four days after the earthquake, continued to provide loans, with employees working by candle light. In that sense, I am very grateful to various people in the financial sector, including financial institutions, life and non-life insurance companies and securities companies, for dealing with the unprecedented earthquake and tsunami disaster through private-public collaboration. However, I am not so complacent as to believe that we have done enough. 例文帳に追加

しかし、危難失踪で1年間といったら、5千人以上の方が本当に胸の痛む思いでございますが、今まだ行方不明でございまして、それで危難失踪で1年というのはちょっと長すぎますので、これは金融庁の局長が非常に頑張っていただきまして、法務省、これは生きるか死ぬかという生死は法務省ですから、法務省と大変激しい交渉をやらせていただきまして、これは3か月だったかな、3か月で簡素な市町村に対する届出によって、死亡の確認ができるというふうになりまして、そんなことを目に見えないことでございますが、いわゆる生保のセールスレディの方もご遺族と一緒にご遺体安置所なんかをどんどん回っていただいておりまして、私は医者ですから、よくああいうご遺体にお会いするという、普通慣れてない方といいますか、我々は本職が医者でございますけれども、いかに精神的ショックを受けられるかということは、私はよく分かりますので、そこまでしてセールスレディの方がやっていただいているという話をよく聞きますので、そういった意味で、私は金融の分野はまさに金融機関、いつかお話ししたと思いますが、宮城県石巻商工信用組合、4日間、連絡が付かなかったのですけれども、ろうそくをつけながら、きちっと人にお金を貸したということをやっていただいておりまして、そういう意味では私は本当に各金融機関、生損保、あるいは証券会社、あるいはそういったいろいろな各関係、金融関係の方に本当に官民一体で未曾有の震災に取り組んでいただいたということは感謝いたしておりますけれども、まだまだ、十分と、そんなに決してのぼせ上がっておりません。 - 金融庁

As you know, DPJ President and Prime Minister Kan and (PNP) Chief Kamei had a leader meeting the day following the day Prime Minister Kan assumed office, I believe, during which a decision to form a coalition was made. As I happened to be the Secretary General back then, I was also present at this meeting to witness, as I have explained, President Kan and Chief Kamei reach an agreement on creating an alternative to the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which had been set up for the previous three-party coalition to coordinate their policies. This has not been done because everyone got a little busy in preparation for the election, as I have just talked about. Another point is that members of the PNP, being one of the parties in the coalition, have naturally raised voices requesting strongly that views of the party be reflected in the coalition. It is therefore not so much about the ceiling debate, although there are, of course, voices raised on the subject of ceilings, as it is simply natural that a coalition government should need to coordinate policies. That is what I reminded Prime Minister Kan of today, and he responded by saying that it is a matter of fact and telling Policy Research Committee Chair and Minister of State Gemba to create a proper system for it. While I did have a talk with Mr. Gemba later on, this is an issue between parties and I am sure that it will accordingly be handled properly, as it should be, by the Chief, or Secretary General or Policy Research Committee Chair of our party. 例文帳に追加

それはご存じのように、菅代表、総理と亀井（国民新党）代表との話し合いでも、これは総理大臣になった次の日でしたか、党首会談をやりましたね。そして、連立を組むということに決定したわけでございますが、そのとき私はたまたま幹事長でしたから、党首会談に同席させていただいておりまして、そのときも今さっき言いましたように、それまでは3党でしたから、基本政策閣僚会議というのが3党の政策のすり合わせでございましたが、そういったものにかわるものをつくろうということを菅代表と亀井代表と合意しておりまして、そういった意味で、これは今さっき話したような選挙で少しみんなお互いに忙しくなりましたので、やっておりませんし、また我が党内のこれはいろいろ当然連立政権でございますから、党内の意見も連立政権与党として反映したいという強い当然意見がございますので、そこら辺を踏まえてシーリングということよりも、シーリングにも当然意見があると思いますが、連立政権ですから、当然政策のすり合わせというのは、これは当然のことでございますから、そのことを改めて今日菅総裁に申し上げて、菅総理からも当然のことだし、きちっと玄葉政調会長、国務大臣にそのことをきちっとシステムをつくるようにということで、玄葉さんとあと話しましたけれども、党と党との話でもございますから、当然党首、あるいは幹事長、政調会長が我が党におりますから、そこら辺できちっとやっていこうといくというふうに思っていますよ。 - 金融庁

Article 199 In the case of failure to make a report or submit materials under Article 75, Article 79-4, Article 106-27, Article 151 (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 153-4), Article 155-9, Article 156-15, or Article 156-34, or making a false report or submitting false materials, a representative person, agent, employee, other worker, or a person who received entrustment of business of an Authorized Financial Instruments Firms Association, Public Interest Corporation-Type Financial Instruments Firms Association prescribed in Article 78(2), Financial Instruments Exchange, Self-Regulation Organization prescribed in Article 85(1), Financial Instruments Exchange Holding Company, Foreign Financial Instruments Exchange, Financial Instruments Clearing Organization, Securities Finance Company, Subsidiary Company of Financial Instruments Exchange (meaning Subsidiary Companies prescribed in Article 87-3(2)), Subsidiary Company of Financial Instruments Exchange Holding Company(meaning Subsidiary Companies prescribed in Article 106-10(1)), Issuer of Securities listed in a Financial Instruments Exchange or Over-the-Counter Traded Securities, or Participants of Foreign Financial Instruments Exchange that has committed such act shall be punished by imprisonment with work for not more than one year or by a fine of not more than three million yen, or both. 例文帳に追加

第百九十九条　第七十五条、第七十九条の四、第百六条の二十七、第百五十一条（第百五十三条の四において準用する場合を含む。）、第百五十五条の九、第百五十六条の十五又は第百五十六条の三十四の規定による報告若しくは資料を提出せず、又は虚偽の報告若しくは資料を提出した場合においては、その行為をした認可金融商品取引業協会若しくは第七十八条第二項に規定する公益法人金融商品取引業協会、金融商品取引所、第八十五条第一項に規定する自主規制法人、金融商品取引所持株会社、外国金融商品取引所、金融商品取引清算機関、証券金融会社、金融商品取引所の子会社（第八十七条の三第二項に規定する子会社をいう。）、金融商品取引所持株会社の子会社（第百六条の十第一項に規定する子会社をいう。）、金融商品取引所に上場されている有価証券若しくは店頭売買有価証券の発行者又は外国金融商品取引所の外国金融商品取引所参加者の代表者、代理人、使用人その他の従業者若しくは業務の委託を受けた者は、一年以下の懲役若しくは三百万円以下の罰金に処し、又はこれを併科する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The adjustment rate of insurance premiums as set forth in the preceding paragraph, if each Municipality that participates in said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Municipality" in this Article and paragraph (2) of the following Article) imposes upon each Primary Insured Person an insurance premium according to the amount of insurance premium that is calculated by using the rate of adjustment of insurance premiums, shall be the total amount of insurance premiums received during the project implementation period (which means a period that shall be deemed to be three years that is provided by a Specified Municipality pursuant to the provisions of the constitution referred to in the following paragraph as one period to implement said Municipal Mutual Fiscal Stabilization Project; the same shall apply hereinafter in this paragraph and paragraph (4)) for each said Specified Municipality to be able to maintain a balance of the total amount of the disbursements necessary to provide for Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Long-Term Care Benefits and Prevention Benefits, the amount defrayed or granted to a general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 121, paragraph (1), Article 122, paragraph (1), Article 123, paragraph (1), Article 124, paragraph (1) and Article 125, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for Community Support Projects (except with regard to the disbursements necessary for said Community Support Projects, the amount defrayed or granted to the general fund or Payment Fund by the national government, a prefecture, or Municipality, pursuant to the provisions of Article 122-2, Article 123, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 124, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), and Article 126, paragraph (1)), the disbursements necessary for payment of a Fiscal Stability Fund contribution, and the disbursements necessary for repayment of Borrowings for Fund Project during said project implementation period in said Municipality, and be determined by said Specified Municipality in accordance with the standards provided by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の調整保険料率は、市町村相互財政安定化事業を行う市町村（以下この条及び次条第二項において「特定市町村」という。）のそれぞれが、それぞれの第一号被保険者に対し、当該調整保険料率により算定した保険料額によって保険料を課するとしたならば、当該特定市町村につき事業実施期間（市町村相互財政安定化事業を実施する期間として特定市町村が次項の規約により定める三年を一期とする期間をいう。以下この項及び第四項において同じ。）において収納される保険料の額の合計額が、当該事業実施期間における当該特定市町村の介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額（当該介護給付及び予防給付に要する費用の額につき第百二十一条第一項、第百二十二条第一項、第百二十三条第一項、第百二十四条第一項及び第百二十五条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、地域支援事業に要する費用の額（当該地域支援事業に要する費用の額につき第百二十二条の二、第百二十三条第三項及び第四項、第百二十四条第三項及び第四項並びに第百二十六条第一項の規定により、国、都道府県、市町村の一般会計及び支払基金が負担し、又は交付する額を除く。）、財政安定化基金拠出金の納付に要する費用の額並びに基金事業借入金の償還に要する費用の額の合計額と均衡を保つことができるものであって、当該特定市町村が政令で定める基準に従い定めるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well. 例文帳に追加

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁

Article 94 (1) The provisions of the main clause of Article 300, Article 303, paragraph (2), Article 304, the main clause of Article 305, paragraph (1), Article 305, paragraph (4), Article 306 (excluding paragraph (2) and paragraph (4)), Article 307, Article 308 (excluding the proviso to paragraph (1)), Article 310, and Article 313 through Article 318 (excluding paragraph (3)) inclusive of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an Investors' meeting. In this case, the term "the preceding Article" in the main clause of Article 300 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, at a Company with a Board of Directors" in Article 303, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deleted, the phrase "the votes of all shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Issued Investment Equity," the phrase "or not less than three hundred (or, in cases where lesser number is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such number of) votes of all shareholder" in that paragraph shall be deleted, the phrase "only shareholders" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Investors," the term "Shareholders" in the main clause of Article 305, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Investors who continually held not less than one-hundredth (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity for the preceding six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period)," the phrase "shareholders be notified of" in that paragraph shall be deleted, the phrase "(or, in cases where a notice pursuant to paragraph (2) or paragraph (3) of Article 299 is to be given, such summary be specified or recorded in that notice)" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be stated or recorded in the notice under Article 91, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrases "who hold" and "the votes of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved in the shareholders meeting)" in Article 306, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "who continually held" and "the Issued Investment Equity for the preceding six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period)" respectively, the term "the court" in Article 306, paragraph (1), paragraph (3), paragraph (5), and paragraph (6), Article 307, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), and Article 318, paragraph (5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Prime Minister," the term "Article 299(3)" in Article 310, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 91, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 297, paragraph (1) and paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 90, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 298 and Article 299" in Article 317 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 90-2, paragraph (1) and Article 91, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第九十四条　会社法第三百条本文、第三百三条第二項、第三百四条、第三百五条第一項本文及び第四項、第三百六条（第二項及び第四項を除く。）、第三百七条、第三百八条（第一項ただし書を除く。）、第三百十条並びに第三百十三条から第三百十八条（第三項を除く。）までの規定は、投資主総会について準用する。この場合において、同法第三百条本文中「前条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と、同法第三百三条第二項中「前項の規定にかかわらず、取締役会設置会社においては、総株主の議決権」とあるのは「発行済投資口」と、「議決権又は三百個（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その個数）以上の議決権」とあるのは「口数の投資口」と、「株主に限り」とあるのは「投資主は」と、同法第三百五条第一項本文中「株主は」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の一（これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する投資主は」と、「株主に通知すること（第二百九十九条第二項又は第三項の通知をする場合にあっては、その通知に記載し、又は記録すること）」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第一項又は第二項の通知に記載し、又は記録すること」と、同法第三百六条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権」とあるのは「発行済投資口」と、「議決権を有する」とあるのは「口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する」と、同条第一項、第三項、第五項及び第六項並びに同法第三百七条第一項及び第二項並びに第三百十八条第五項中「裁判所」とあるのは「内閣総理大臣」と、同法第三百十条第四項中「第二百九十九条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十一条第二項」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十条第三項において準用する第二百九十七条第一項及び第四項」と、同法第三百十七条中「第二百九十八条及び第二百九十九条」とあるのは「投資法人法第九十条の二第一項及び第九十一条第一項から第三項まで」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24 (1) When Securities (excluding Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, except in the following items) issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the following items, the company shall submit, for each business year, a report stating the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (hereinafter referred to as an "Annual Securities Report") to the Prime Minister within three months after the end of that business year (or, in the case of a foreign company, within the period specified by a Cabinet Order as the period necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors) pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the respective last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of the Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below, if the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than 500 million yen (or if, in cases where the Securities are Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the amount that is specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Order on the last day of that business year) or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year are fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) or (iv) below, if the Prime Minister approves as specified by a Cabinet Order that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　有価証券の発行者である会社は、その会社が発行者である有価証券（特定有価証券を除く。次の各号を除き、以下この条において同じ。）が次に掲げる有価証券のいずれかに該当する場合には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、事業年度ごとに、当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業の内容に関する重要な事項その他の公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書（以下「有価証券報告書」という。）を、当該事業年度経過後三月以内（当該会社が外国会社である場合には、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして政令で定める期間内）に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券が第三号に掲げる有価証券（株券その他の政令で定める有価証券に限る。）に該当する場合においてその発行者である会社（報告書提出開始年度（当該有価証券の募集又は売出しにつき第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文又は第二十三条の八第一項本文若しくは第二項の規定の適用を受けることとなつた日の属する事業年度をいい、当該報告書提出開始年度が複数あるときは、その直近のものをいう。）終了後五年を経過している場合に該当する会社に限る。）の当該事業年度の末日及び当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度すべての末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定めるところにより計算した数に満たない場合であつて有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたとき、当該有価証券が第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において、その発行者である会社の資本金の額が当該事業年度の末日において五億円未満（当該有価証券が第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等である場合にあつては、当該会社の資産の額として政令で定めるものの額が当該事業年度の末日において政令で定める額未満）であるとき、及び当該事業年度の末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定める数に満たないとき、並びに当該有価証券が第三号又は第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして政令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The documents specified by an ordinance set forth in Article 145, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as listed in the following (in case of documents certified by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document recording the reasons for the merger; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act; (b) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act; (c) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b) of the Act; and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval; (iv) minutes of the general meeting of shareholders approving the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of Members prescribed in Article 144, paragraph 4, Article 144-2, paragraph 2, or Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of shareholders prescribed in Article 144-6, paragraph 1 and Article 144-13, paragraph 1 of the Act, and Article 783, paragraph 1, Article 795, paragraph 1, or Article 804, paragraph 1 of the Company Act) of each Commodity Exchange which carries out the merger, or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for the merger have been followed; (v) a document stating the status of the property, income and expenditure of each Commodity Exchange that carries out the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, the settlement related statements, etc. of the preceding business year; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the financial documents, etc. of the preceding business year and detailed statements thereof); (vi) in the case where a public notice or demand (in cases where the public notice is made through an official gazette, a daily newspaper which publishes matters of current events, or an Electronic Public Notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 3 or Article 144-10, paragraph 3 of the Act [including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17), or Article 789, paragraph 3; Article 799, paragraph 3; or Article 810, paragraph 3 of the Company Act, a public notice by such method) is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5; Article 144-2, paragraph 3; and Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act, or Article 144-10, paragraph 2 of the Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act); Article 789, paragraph 2; Article 799, paragraph 2; or Article 810, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; and in cases where a creditor has made an objection, a document certifying that the liabilities have been paid or reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor, reasonable property has been deposited for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said merger is not likely to harm said creditor; (vii) a document stating a method for business succession pertaining to transactions on a Commodity Market which has been opened by a Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of a merger; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees (limited to a case where a Commodity Exchange subsequent to a merger becomes an Incorporated Commodity Exchange); (ix) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the merger on the Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (x) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed - 113 - Commodity at the time of a merger, a document stating that it is appropriate to conduct transactions of Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (xi) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market at the time of a merger by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another. 例文帳に追加