「立てふだ」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(73ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

８　会社法第七百三条（社債管理者の資格）、第七百四条（社債管理者の義務）、第七百七条から第七百十四条まで（特別代理人の選任、社債管理者等の行為の方式、二以上の社債管理者がある場合の特則、社債管理者の責任、社債管理者の辞任、社債管理者が辞任した場合の責任、社債管理者の解任、社債管理者の事務の承継）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第三号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、社債管理者について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「社債を発行した相互会社」と、同法第七百十条第一項中「この法律」とあるのは「保険業法」と、同法第七百十一条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「保険業法第六十一条の六」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 703 (Qualifications of Bond Managers), Article 704 (Obligations of Bond Managers), Article 707 to 714 inclusive (Appointment of Special Agent, Method of Acts of Bond Managers, Special Provisions for Multiple Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Manager, Resignation of Bond Managers, Liability of Bond Managers after Resignation, Dismissal of Bond Managers, Succession to Bond Manager's Administration of Bonds), Article 868, paragraph (3) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a bond administrator. In this case, the term "bond-issuing company" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "bond-issuing mutual company"; the term "this Act" in Article 710, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 702" in Article 711, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 61-6 of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

私は大変時宜を得た質問だと思っています。私もこの前、先週申し上げたように、やはり少額、無担保、無保証と、この消費者金融の市場というのはご存じのようにあるのです。やはり社会的に必要な部分だと私は思っていまして、そういった意味で、今度、武富士の会社更生手続開始の申し立てにより、貸金業法の見直しが直ちに必要になるとは考えていませんけれども、今申し上げましたようなマーケットがあるのは事実でございますし、そういった意味で、今度の改正貸金業法というのは、上限金利もご存じのように引き下げやら、総量規制の導入など、多重債務問題ということが大変大きな問題になりまして、これは全党一致でこの法律ができ上がって、抜本的かつ総合的な対策を講じたわけでございますが、私になって、当庁としては、改正貸金業法フォローアップチームを中心に、貸金業者の動向を含めた改正貸金法の完全施行後の状況をフォローアップしてまいっております。例文帳に追加

As I commented last week, a consumer loan market that offers small, unsecured, unguaranteed loans is, in my view, something that society needs after all. In that sense, I do not think that there will be any urgent need to review the Money Lending Act as a result of Takefuji's filing for the commencement of corporate reorganization proceedings. However, given the existence of a market that I have just mentioned, and the fact that the multiple-debt problem developed into a very serious problem, the recent revision to the Money Lending Act, which represents a fundamental and comprehensive step to address the issue that includes lowering upper interest-rate limits and introducing a cap on the total amount of borrowing, was enacted with unanimous support from all parties. After I assumed office, the FSA has been working, mainly in its Revised Money Lending Act Follow-Up Team, to follow up on the situation after the revised Money Lending Act took full effect, including any moves made by money lending businesses.  - 金融庁

第五十三条の二十一　会社法第二編第四章第八節第二款（運営）の規定は相互会社の監査役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第三百九十四条第二項（同条第三項において準用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百九十四条第二項（議事録）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同条第三項中「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「役員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第四項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-21 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 8, Subsection 2 (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of company auditors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 394, paragraph (2) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 394, paragraph (3); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 394, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)"; the term "and to the cases where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 394, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be deleted; and the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 394, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　会社法第三十三条第二項から第十一項まで（第十項第二号を除く。）（定款の記載又は記録事項に関する検査役の選任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、前項の場合について準用する。この場合において、同法第三十三条第七項及び第八項中「第二十八条各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項各号」と、同項中「設立時発行株式」とあるのは「設立時発行特定出資」と、同条第十項中「前各項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十八条第一項及び同条第二項において準用する第三十三条第二項から第九項まで」と、同項第一号中「第二十八条第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号及び第二号」と、同項第三号中「第二十八条第一号又は第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第一号又は第二号」と、同条第十一項第二号中「第二十八条第二号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第十六条第三項第二号」と、同項第三号中「第三十八条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二十一条第一項」と、「同条第二項第二号」とあるのは「同項」と読み替えるものとする。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Article 33(2) to (11) inclusive (excluding paragraph (10)(ii)) (Election of Inspector of Matters Specified or Recorded in the Articles of Incorporation), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (v)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a case as set forth in the preceding paragraph. In this case, the term "each item of Article 28" in Article 33(7) and (8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "each item of Article 16(3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Shares Issued at Incorporation" in Article 33(8) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Issued at Incorporation," the term "the preceding nine paragraphs" in paragraph (10) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 33(2) to (9) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 18(1) of the Asset Securitization Act and pursuant to paragraph (2) of that Article," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) and (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (i) and item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(10)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(i) or (ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "item (ii) of Article 28" in Article 33(11)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 16(3)(ii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "paragraph (1) of Article 38" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and the term "item (ii), paragraph (2) of such Article" in Article 33(11)(iii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph."  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

イ　この法律、出資の受入れ、預り金及び金利等の取締りに関する法律、旧貸金業者の自主規制の助長に関する法律若しくは暴力団員による不当な行為の防止等に関する法律の規定（同法第三十二条の二第七項の規定を除く。）に違反し、又は貸付けの契約の締結若しくは当該契約に基づく債権の取立てに当たり、物価統制令第十二条の規定に違反し、若しくは刑法若しくは暴力行為等処罰に関する法律の罪を犯し、罰金以上の刑に処せられた者で、その刑の執行を終わり、又は刑の執行を受けることがなくなつた日から五年を経過しない者例文帳に追加

(a) An officer who has been sentenced to a fine or a severer punishment for having violated the provisions of this Act, the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates, the Former Act on Facilitating Self-Regulation by Money Lenders or the Act on the Prevention of Unjust Acts by Organized Crime Group Members (excluding the provision of Article 32-2, paragraph (7) of that Act) or for having violated the provision of Article 12 of the Price Control Ordinance or committed a crime prescribed in the Penal Code or the Act on Punishment of Violence and Other Acts in concluding a Contract for a Loan or collecting claims thereunder, and for whom five years have not elapsed since the day on which execution of the sentence was completed or since the day on which said person ceased to be subject to execution of the sentence; or  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

五　この法律、出資の受入れ、預り金及び金利等の取締りに関する法律、旧貸金業者の自主規制の助長に関する法律若しくは暴力団員による不当な行為の防止等に関する法律の規定（同法第三十二条の二第七項の規定を除く。）に違反し、又は貸付けの契約の締結若しくは当該契約に基づく債権の取立てに当たり、物価統制令第十二条の規定に違反し、若しくは刑法若しくは暴力行為等処罰に関する法律の罪を犯し、罰金の刑に処せられ、その刑の執行を終わり、又は刑の執行を受けることがなくなつた日から五年を経過しない者例文帳に追加

(v) A person who has been sentenced to a fine for having violated the provisions of this Act, the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates, the Former Act on Facilitating Self-Regulation by Money Lenders, or the Act on the Prevention of Unjust Acts by Organized Crime Group Members (excluding the provisions of Article 32-2, paragraph (7) of that Act), or for having violated the provisions of Article 12 of the Price Control Ordinance or committed a crime prescribed in the Penal Code or the Act on Punishment of Violence and Other Acts in the course of concluding a Contract for a Loan or collecting a claim under such contract, and for whom five years have not elapsed since the day on which execution of the sentence was completed or since the day on which said person ceased to be subject to execution of the sentence;  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

一　この法律、出資の受入れ、預り金及び金利等の取締りに関する法律、旧貸金業者の自主規制の助長に関する法律若しくは暴力団員による不当な行為の防止等に関する法律の規定（同法第三十二条の二第七項の規定を除く。）に違反し、又は貸付けの契約の締結若しくは当該契約に基づく債権の取立てに当たり、物価統制令第十二条の規定に違反し、若しくは刑法若しくは暴力行為等処罰に関する法律の罪を犯し、罰金以上の刑に処せられ、その刑の執行を終わり、又は刑の執行を受けることがなくなつた日から二年を経過しない者例文帳に追加

(i) A person who has been sentenced to a fine or severer punishment for having violated the provisions of this Act, the Act Regulating the Receipt of Contributions, Receipt of Deposits and Interest Rates, the Former Act on Facilitating Self-Regulation by Money Lenders, or the Act on the Prevention of Unjust Acts by Organized Crime Group Members (excluding the provisions of Article 32-2, paragraph (7) of that Act), or having violated the provisions of Article 12 of the Price Control Ordinance or committed a crime prescribed in the Penal Code or the Act on Punishment of Violence and Other Acts in the course of concluding a Contract for a Loan or collecting a claim under such contract, and for whom two years have not elapsed since the day on which execution of the sentence was completed or since the day on which said person ceased to be subject to execution of the sentence;  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

特許の取消しを求める請願書は次に掲げる者が提出することができる。法務長官又は法務長官が授権する者。何人であれ次に掲げる事由を申し立てる者。その特許は申立人の権利、又は当該申立人がなす主張につき指示している者、若しくは当該申立人が代理している者の権利を詐害する目的で取得されたこと。申立人又は当該申立人なす主張につき指示している者、若しくは当該代理人が代理している者が、その特許権者の請求項に含まれるいずれの発明であれ、その真正かつ最先の発明者であったこと。申立人又は申立人がなす、何らかの取引、事業若しくは製造における利益の主張につき指示する者若しくは申立人が代理する者が、当該特許の日以前に、特許権者が自己の発明として請求するものをバングラデシュ国内で公に製造、使用又は販売していた。例文帳に追加

A petition for revocation of a patent may be presented? by the 14[ Attorney General] or any person authorized by him; or by any person alleging- that the patent was obtained in fraud of his rights, or of the rights of any person under or through whom he claims; or that he, or any person under or through whom he claims, was the true and first inventor of any invention included in the claim of the patentee; or that he, or any person under or through whom he claims an interest in any trade, business or manufacture, had publicly manufactured, used or sold, within Bangladesh, before the date of the patent, anything claimed by the patentee as his invention.  - 特許庁

６　会社法第二編第四章第十節第三款（委員会の運営）の規定は委員会設置会社の委員会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第四百十三条第三項（同条第四項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第三項（議事録）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同条第四項中「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき及び親会社社員がその権利を行使するため必要があるとき」とあるのは「委員の責任を追及するため必要があるとき」と、同条第五項中「又はその親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「又はその保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 10, Subsection 3 (Operation of Committees) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the Committees of a company with Committees; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application for permission under Article 413, paragraph (3) of that Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 413, paragraph (4); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 413, paragraph (3) (Minutes) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative"; the term "and where it is necessary for the purpose of exercising the rights of a Member of the Parent Company" in Article 413, paragraph (4) shall be deemed to be deleted;" and the term "or its Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 413, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or its de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

標章権又は登録された地理的表示に係る権利が侵害されている場合，又はそのような侵害が生じる若しくはいくつかの証拠が喪失，破棄若しくは削除されると考えられる十分な理由がある場合は，当該権利の所有者又は排他的ライセンスによる使用権者は，他方当事者に通知することなく，裁判所に対し，次の仮の救済の何れかを許可するよう請求することができる: 申立によれば，標章又は地理的表示の非合法使用を構成するか又は構成することになる行為の遂行を禁止すること, 登録された標章又は地理的表示が非合法に付されていると申し立てられている商品，及び侵害の証明にとって重要な他の証拠があるときはその証拠を，差し押さえること, 第73条(2)にいう材料又は手段を差し押さえること, 申立によれば，侵害が行われているか又は行われることになる建物を封鎖すること例文帳に追加

Where the right in a mark or registered geographical indication is infringed or there is good reason to believe that such an infringement will be made or some evidence will be lost, destroyed or suppressed, the holder of the right or the licensee of an exclusive license may request that the court allows some of the following provisional remedies as well, without notifying the other party thereof: (i) prohibition of the performance of activities that constitute or will constitute, as contended, illegal use of a mark or geographical indication; (ii) seizure of the goods that are contended to illegally bear a registered mark or geographical indication, as well as of any other evidence of importance for proving the infringement; (iii) seizure of the material or means referred to in Article 73(2); (iv) sealing of the premises where the infringement is or will be made, as contended.  - 特許庁

産業財産局が専門家を任命した後，当事者は，任命された専門家に次に掲げる1つ若しくは複数の事由が存在することを理由に(これらの理由に限定される)，任命決定から5日以内に当該任命に対する異議を申し立てることができる。 (a) 問題の事由について公に意見を発表していること (b) 当事者の何れかの関係者若しくは友人，又は当事者の何れかと明白な敵対関係にある者であること (c) 専門家としての意見を求められる事由に関して不適格若しくは能力を欠くこと，又は (d) 過去5年以内に当事者の何れかに対して従属的若しくは独立的立場において職業上の役務を提供したこと，又は同期間中に当事者の何れかとの間に商業上又は事業上の関係を保有したこと例文帳に追加

After the Head of the Department has appointed an expert, the parties thereto may object to his designation within five days from the resolution relative to his appointment, exclusively for one or more of the following grounds: a) by reason of having given a public opinion regarding the matter in question; b) by reason of relationship, friendship or overt enmity to one of the parties; c) on account of being unfit or incompetent in connection with the subject being put to his consideration; d) on account of having given professional services, in a dependent or independent capacity, to any of the parties in the last five years or of having maintained a commercial or business relationship with any of them during the same time period.  - 特許庁

(1) 本法に従い，裁判所は，不服申立人による申立てに基づき，次に掲げる理由により，商標が登録された商品のいずれについても，登録簿からの商標の削除を命ずることができる。 (a) 商標は，登録出願人側の善意で，それらの商品について自らが使用するという意図を持たず登録された場合、又は，第35条(1)に基づき関係会社もしくは関係登録使用者により登録された場合であって，当該出願の1月より前に，それらの商品に関して登録所有者若しくは当該商標の登録使用者による当該商標に関する善意の使用が相当期間ない場合，又は， (b) 当該出願の1月前まで当該商標が登録商標であった期間が連続3年以上経過しており，その期間それらの商品について，当該商標の登録所有者若しくは登録使用者による善意の使用がない場合例文帳に追加

(1) Subject to this Act, the Court may, on application by a person aggrieved, order that a trade mark be removed from the Register in respect of any of the goods in respect of which it is registered, on the ground - (a) that the trade mark was registered without an intention in good faith on the part of the applicant for registration that it should be used in relation to those goods by him or, if it was registered under Section 35(1) by the corporation or registered user concerned and that there has in fact been no use in good faith of the trade mark in relation to those goods by the registered proprietor or a registered user of the trade mark for the time being earlier than one month before the application; or (b) that, up to one month before the application, a continuous period of not less than three years had elapsed during which the trade mark was a registered trade mark and during which there was no use in good faith of the trade mark in relation to those goods by the registered proprietor or a registered user of the trade mark for the time being. - 特許庁

本法に基づき不服申立ての聴聞において，裁判所は次に掲げる各号を行うことができる。 (a) 口頭又は宣誓供述書であるか否かにかかわらず，追加の証拠を認めること (b) 登録官に対して口頭又は宣誓供述書であるか否かにかかわらず証言を行った証人を含めて証人の尋問及び反対尋問を認めること (c) 事実問題についての争点が裁判所の指示する方法で審理されるように命ずること (d) 上告された裁決，審判又は指示を支持，取消若しくは変更すること，及び (e) 諸般の事情一切を考慮して適切と考える判決若しくは命令を与える，又は命令することを拒否すること，及び (f) 他方当事者に費用を支払うことを当事者に命令すること例文帳に追加

On the hearing of an appeal under this Act, the Court may - (a) admit further evidence, either orally or on affidavit or otherwise; and (b) permit the examination and cross-examination of witnesses, including witnesses who gave evidence orally or on affidavit or otherwise to the Registrar; and (c) order an issue of fact to be tried in such manner as it directs; and (d) affirm, reverse or modify the decision, determination or direction appealed from; and (e) give such judgement, or make such order, as in all the circumstances it thinks fit, or refuse to make an order; and (f) order a party to pay costs to another party. - 特許庁

３　第一項本文に規定する場合において、被害者がその成年に達しない子（以下この項及び次項並びに第十二条第一項第三号において単に「子」という。）と同居しているときであって、配偶者が幼年の子を連れ戻すと疑うに足りる言動を行っていることその他の事情があることから被害者がその同居している子に関して配偶者と面会することを余儀なくされることを防止するため必要があると認めるときは、第一項第一号の規定による命令を発する裁判所又は発した裁判所は、被害者の申立てにより、その生命又は身体に危害が加えられることを防止するため、当該配偶者に対し、命令の効力が生じた日以後、同号の規定による命令の効力が生じた日から起算して六月を経過する日までの間、当該子の住居（当該配偶者と共に生活の本拠としている住居を除く。以下この項において同じ。）、就学する学校その他の場所において当該子の身辺につきまとい、又は当該子の住居、就学する学校その他その通常所在する場所の付近をはいかいしてはならないことを命ずるものとする。ただし、当該子が十五歳以上であるときは、その同意がある場合に限る。例文帳に追加

(3) In cases provided in the main clause of paragraph 1, when the victim lives with children who have not reached their majority (hereinafter referred to simply as "children" in this paragraph, the following paragraph and Article 12, paragraph 1, item 3), and when it is found necessary to prevent the victim from being obliged to meet the spouse with regard to the children who live with the victim, by taking into consideration the fact that the spouse uses or carries out words or deeds sufficient to lead to a suspicion that the spouse is likely to take any young children back, or other circumstances, the court that issues or has issued an order under paragraph 1, item 1 shall, upon a petition from the victim, find against the spouse and order the spouse to refrain from approaching the children at their domicile (except for the domicile that the children share as the main home with the said spouse; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), the school the children attend or any other place where the children are staying, or from loitering in the vicinity of the domicile, school, or any other locations normally frequented by the children during a period from the day the order comes into effect to the day after six months from the day the order came into effect, in order to prevent harm to the children's lives or bodies. However, if the children in question are 15 years of age or over, this provision shall only apply to cases where the court has obtained the children's consent.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第九十二条の規定による組織変更時発行株式の発行を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百四十四条（株式交換又は株式移転の無効判決の効力）の規定は組織変更株式交換又は組織変更株式移転を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the issue of shares on Entity Conversion under Article 92; the provision of Article 844 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Share Exchange or Share Transfer) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by a share exchange on Entity Conversion or share transfer on Entity Conversion; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　会社法第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）及び第九百三十七条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は組織変更の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百四十条（新株発行の無効判決の効力）の規定は第七十八条第一項の基金の募集を伴う組織変更の無効判決について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「株主」とあるのは「株主又は社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(4) The provisions of Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff) and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for nullification of an Entity Conversion; the provision of Article 840 (Effect of Judgment of Nullity of Issue of New Shares) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a judgment of nullity of an Entity Conversion accompanied by the solicitation of funds set forth in Article 78, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholder" in Article 878, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shareholder or member"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

２　差押債権者が、前項の規定による通知を受けた日から一週間以内に、優先債権がない場合にあつては手続費用の見込額を超える額、優先債権がある場合にあつては手続費用及び優先債権の見込額の合計額以上の額（以下この項において「申出額」という。）を定めて、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める申出及び保証の提供をしないときは、執行裁判所は、差押債権者の申立てに係る強制競売の手続を取り消さなければならない。ただし、差押債権者が、その期間内に、前項各号のいずれにも該当しないことを証明したとき、又は同項第二号に該当する場合であつて不動産の買受可能価額が手続費用の見込額を超える場合において、不動産の売却について優先債権を有する者（買受可能価額で自己の優先債権の全部の弁済を受けることができる見込みがある者を除く。）の同意を得たことを証明したときは、この限りでない。例文帳に追加

(2) When the obligee effecting a seizure fails to make an offer or to provide a guarantee, as provided in each of the following items for the cases set forth respectively therein, within one week from the day of receipt of a notice under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, by deciding, where there is no preferential claim, a price that exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses, or where there is a preferential claim, a price that is not less than the total of the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that of the preferential claim (such a price shall hereinafter be referred to as the "obligee's offered price" in this paragraph), the execution court shall rescind the procedure of a compulsory auction pertaining to the petition filed by the obligee effecting a seizure; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the obligee effecting a seizure has proved, within said period, that none of the items of the preceding paragraph apply, or that in the case set forth in item (ii) of said paragraph, the minimum purchase price of the real property exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that the consent has been obtained from the persons who have the preferential claim (excluding a person who is expected to be able to receive full performance of his/her preferential claim at the minimum purchase price) for the sale of the real property:  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二十九条　裁判所は、包括的禁止命令を発した場合において、再生債権に基づく強制執行等の申立人である再生債権者に不当な損害を及ぼすおそれがあると認めるときは、当該再生債権者の申立てにより、当該再生債権者に対しては包括的禁止命令を解除する旨の決定をすることができる。この場合において、当該再生債権者は、再生債務者の財産に対する再生債権に基づく強制執行等をすることができ、包括的禁止命令が発せられる前に当該再生債権者がした再生債権に基づく強制執行等の手続は、続行する。例文帳に追加

Article 29 (1) The court, when it finds, after issuing a comprehensive prohibition order, that the order is likely to cause undue damage to a rehabilitation creditor who filed a petition for compulsory execution based on a rehabilitation claim, etc., upon the petition of said rehabilitation creditor, may make a order that the comprehensive prohibition order shall be cancelled only with regard to said creditor. In this case, the creditor may enforce compulsory execution based on a rehabilitation claim, etc. against the debtor's property, and any procedure for compulsory execution, etc. initiated by said creditor prior to the issuance of the comprehensive prohibition order shall be continued.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五百十六条　裁判所は、特別清算開始の命令があった場合において、債権者の一般の利益に適合し、かつ、担保権の実行の手続等（清算株式会社の財産につき存する担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産に対して既にされている一般の先取特権その他一般の優先権がある債権に基づく強制執行の手続をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の申立人に不当な損害を及ぼすおそれがないものと認めるときは、清算人、監査役、債権者若しくは株主の申立てにより又は職権で、相当の期間を定めて、担保権の実行の手続等の中止を命ずることができる。例文帳に追加

Article 516 In cases where the court issues an order to commence special liquidation, the court may, in response to a petition by the liquidators, Company Auditors, creditors or shareholders or ex officio, prescribing a reasonable period of time, order the suspension of procedures to enforce a security interest if the court finds that it suits the general interests of the creditors and those who petitioned for the procedures to enforce the security interest (hereinafter in this article referring to procedures to enforce the security interest the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company) are not likely to suffer undue loss.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

又、童舞以外の殆どの装束は成人男性、又は女性用に仕立てられ、又、重量があること、仮面を付けた場合に視野が制約されること、長く伸びてる部分（裾、裳、等）があるため、振り付けに関しても伸びてる部分の捌き方等の難易度が高いこと、又、東日本においては伝承団体のメンバーの殆どが成人であることと財政に余裕がない場合が多いことから少年少女の育成に消極的な場合が多く、育成してる場合でも略式なら安価な装束で済む管弦と『浦安の舞』等にとどまり、舞楽は行わないか、行う場合でも成人に限られる場合が多い。例文帳に追加

Additionally, most costumes except for those of Dobu dance are made for adult men or women: they are heavy, the eyesight is limited when wearing a mask, the difficulty level in choreography such as handling the long part of the costume (hem, ancient skirt, etc.) is high; however, the traditional groups in East Japan have mostly adult members and cannot afford, so the development of children's participation is not active enough; even when developing them, it is limited to Kangen music or "Urayasu-no-mai Dance" for which reasonable costumes can be used in an informal style, and in most cases Bugaku is not performed or is limited to adults.  - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

第五十三条の十六　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条並びに第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項を除く。）（運営）の規定は相互会社の取締役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において読み替えて準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百七十一条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項及び第三項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十三第二項」と、同条第三項中「第四百十七条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第五項において準用する第四百十七条第四項」と、同法第三百七十三条第一項及び第二項（特別取締役による取締役会の決議）中「第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十四第四項第一号及び第二号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-16 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, and Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5)) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of directors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article with relevant changes in interpretation. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraphs (2) and (3) (Omission of Report to Board of Directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-13, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 417, paragraph (4)" in Article 372, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 417, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-30, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 362, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii)" in Article 373, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Resolution of board of directors by special directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-14, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

４　第一項本文に規定する場合において、配偶者が被害者の親族その他被害者と社会生活において密接な関係を有する者（被害者と同居している子及び配偶者と同居している者を除く。以下この項及び次項並びに第十二条第一項第四号において「親族等」という。）の住居に押し掛けて著しく粗野又は乱暴な言動を行っていることその他の事情があることから被害者がその親族等に関して配偶者と面会することを余儀なくされることを防止するため必要があると認めるときは、第一項第一号の規定による命令を発する裁判所又は発した裁判所は、被害者の申立てにより、その生命又は身体に危害が加えられることを防止するため、当該配偶者に対し、命令の効力が生じた日以後、同号の規定による命令の効力が生じた日から起算して六月を経過する日までの間、当該親族等の住居（当該配偶者と共に生活の本拠としている住居を除く。以下この項において同じ。）その他の場所において当該親族等の身辺につきまとい、又は当該親族等の住居、勤務先その他その通常所在する場所の付近をはいかいしてはならないことを命ずるものとする。例文帳に追加

(4) In cases prescribed in the main clause of paragraph 1, when there are certain circumstances such that the spouse visits the domicile of the victim's relative or other person with whom the victim has close relationships in his/her social life (except for children who live with the victim and persons who live with the spouse; hereinafter referred to as a "relative, etc." in this paragraph, the following paragraph, and Article 12, paragraph 1, item 4) and uses or carries out extremely rude or violent words or deeds and therefore it is found necessary to prevent the victim from being obliged to meet the spouse with regard to the relative, etc. in question, the court that issues or has issued an order under paragraph 1, item 1 shall, upon a petition from the victim, find against the spouse and order the spouse to refrain from approaching the relative, etc. at his/her domicile (except for a domicile that the relative, etc. shares as the main home with the said spouse; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or any other place where the relative, etc. is staying, or from loitering in the vicinity of the domicile, workplace, or any other location normally frequented by the relative, etc. during a period from the day the order comes into effect to the day after six months from the day the order came into effect, in order to prevent harm to the life or body of the relative, etc.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

株式公開の場合と異なり、社債は銀行借入と同様に負債であり、金利支払い負担も生じるが、中小企業の社債発行額がここ数年増加しているのは、〔1〕固定金利で比較的長期の調達ができることから、設備投資等の資金調達コストが確定でき、投資計画・事業計画が立てやすくなる面があること、〔2〕私募債の受託・引受は、投資家としての視点から行われるため、発行可能な企業は優良企業に限られる。したがって、中小企業においては私募債を発行することにより企業イメージが向上し、金融機関との金利交渉、貸出条件交渉が有利になるだけでなく、企業としての信用力向上にも寄与し、取引先へのアピールや人材確保の面からもメリットがあると考えられること（株式公開前の企業では、IRの観点から私募債発行を行うこともある）、〔3〕金融機関においても、社債発行に係る手数料を徴求できることから、非金利収入の増加という観点から力を入れていること、等が勘案されているのではないだろうか。例文帳に追加

Unlike in the case of share flotations, bonds are, like bank borrowing, liabilities ? they incur interest expenses, and the rise in the value of outstanding SME issues in the past few years has probably been prompted by factors such as the following: 1) Being able to raise comparatively long-term funds at fixed interest rates fixes the cost of raising funds for capital investment and other purposes, and so makes it easier to formulate investment and business plans. 2) Privately-placed bonds are placed and underwritten from an investor perspective, ensuring that only prime enterprises can issue bonds. Accordingly, issuing privately-placed bonds not only improves an SME’s image and strengthens its position when negotiating interest rates and loan terms with a financial institution, but can also contribute to improving creditworthiness as an enterprise, and assist in improving an enterprise’s appeal to business partners and attracting human resources. (Some prelisted enterprises issue privately-placed bonds to assist in investor relations.) 3) As they can charge fees for bond issues, financial institutions, too, are focusing on such issues as a means of increasing revenues from non-interest sources.  - 経済産業省

第百七十九条　会社法第四百九十九条から第五百三条まで（債権者に対する公告等、債務の弁済の制限、条件付債権等に係る債務の弁済、債務の弁済前における残余財産の分配の制限、清算からの除斥）、第五百七条第一項、第三項及び第四項（清算事務の終了等）、第五百八条（帳簿資料の保存）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号、第三号、第八号及び第九号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）、第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）、第九百二十八条第一項及び第三項（清算人の登記）並びに第九百二十九条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（清算結了の登記）の規定は、特定目的会社の清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百七条第三項中「決算報告（前項の規定の適用がある場合にあっては、同項の承認を受けたもの）を株主総会」とあるのは「決算報告（資産流動化法第百七十七条第二項に規定する監査を受けたもの）を社員総会」と、同法第五百八条第一項中「清算人（清算人会設置会社にあっては、第四百八十九条第七項各号に掲げる清算人）」とあるのは「清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 179 (1) The provisions of Article 499 to Article 503 inclusive (Public Notices to Creditors; Restrictions on Performance of Obligations; Performance of Obligations Relating to Conditional Claims; Restrictions on Distribution of Residual Assets Before Performance of Obligations; Exclusion from Liquidation), Article 507(1), (3), and (4) (Conclusion of Liquidation), Article 508 (Retention of Accounting Materials), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to items (ii), (iii), (viii), and (ix)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule), Article 928(1) and (3) (Registration of a liquidator), and Article 929 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Registration of Completion of Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company. In this case, the phrase "the settlement of accounts (or, in cases where the provisions of the preceding paragraph apply, the settlement of accounts approved under that paragraph) to the shareholders meeting" in Article 507(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the settlement of accounts (those audited as prescribed in Article 177(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) at the general meeting of members," the phrase "A Liquidator (or, for a Company with Board of Liquidators, the liquidators listed in each item of paragraph (7) of Article 489)" in Article 508(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "A liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

本法律において， 「物品」とは，手，道具又は機械によって作られた何らかのものをいう。 「意匠」又は「工業意匠」とは，完成品における形状，輪郭，模様若しくは装飾の特徴及びそれら特徴の組合せであって，視覚に訴え，かつ，視覚によってのみ判断されるものをいう。 「キット」とは，完成品を作るために組み立てることができる完全な又は実質的に完全な数の部品をいう。 「大臣」とは，本法律の適用上，総督により閣僚として指名された，カナダ枢密院顧問官をいう。 「所定の」とは，規則に規定されたという意味であり，手数料については，規則により規定された方法で決定されたものを含む。 「組物」とは，同一の包括的特性を備え，通常共に販売され又は共に使用されることを意図した多数の物品であって，その各個には同一の意匠又はその変形が適用されているものをいう。 「有用物品」とは，ある実用的機能を有する物品をいい，当該物品のひな形も含む。 「実用的機能」とは，物品に関して，単に美術品又は著作物の基質又は担体として役立つのみに止まらない機能をいう。「変形」とは，同一の物品又は組物に適用した意匠であって，互いに実質的な差異がないものをいう。例文帳に追加

In this Act, “article” means any thing that is made by hand, tool or machine; “design” or “industrial design” means features of shape, configuration, pattern or ornament and any combination of those features that, in a finished article, appeal to and are judged solely by the eye; “kit” means a complete or substantially complete number of parts that can be assembled to construct a finished article; “Minister” means such member of the Queen’s Privy Council for Canada as is designated by the Governor in Council as the Minister for the purposes of this Act; “prescribed” means prescribed by the regulations and, in relation to fees, includes determined in the manner prescribed by the regulations; “set” means a number of articles of the same general character ordinarily on sale together or intended to be used together, to each of which the same design or variants thereof are applied; “useful article” means an article that has a utilitarian function and includes a model of any such article; “utilitarian function”, in respect of an article, means a function other than merely serving as a substrate or carrier for artistic or literary matter; “variants” means designs applied to the same article or set and not differing substantially from one another.  - 特許庁

第百七十一条　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第七号及び第八号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条から第八百三十九条まで（担保提供命令、弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力）、第八百四十三条（第一項第三号及び第四号並びに第二項ただし書を除く。）（合併の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第三項（第二号及び第三号に係る部分に限る。）及び第四項（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は第百五十九条第一項の合併の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第五項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第十五号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において準用する同法第八百四十三条第四項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第七号及び第八号中「社員等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 171 The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (vii) and (viii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836 to 839 inclusive (Order to Furnish Security, Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission), Article 843 (excluding paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv), and the proviso to paragraph (2)) (Effect of Judgment Nullifying Merger), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (3) (limited to the segment pertaining to items (ii) and (iii)) and (4) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for the nullification of a merger under Article 159, paragraph (1); and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (5) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (xv)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Articles 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 843, paragraph (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article. In this case, the term "members, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), items (vii) and (viii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidator(s) (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidator(s)) of a Mutual Company"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第二百四十九条　信託法第百十四条（議決権の代理行使）、第百十七条（議決権の不統一行使）、第百十八条第二項（受託者の出席等）、第百十九条（延期又は続行の決議）及び第百二十条（議事録）並びに会社法第三百十四条（取締役等の説明義務）、第三百十五条（議長の権限）、第七百三十一条（第一項を除く。）（議事録）、第七百三十二条から第七百三十五条まで（社債権者集会の決議の認可の申立て、社債権者集会の決議の不認可、社債権者集会の決議の効力、社債権者集会の決議の認可又は不認可の決定の公告）及び第七百三十八条（代表社債権者等の解任等）の規定は、権利者集会について準用する。この場合において、信託法第百十九条中「第百八条及び第百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百四十二条」と、会社法第三百十四条中「取締役、会計参与、監査役及び執行役」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同法第七百三十一条第二項中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同条第三項中「社債管理者及び社債権者」とあるのは「代表権利者、特定信託管理者及び各受益証券の権利者」と、「社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条の募集」とあるのは「受益証券の募集」と、「当該社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同法第七百三十五条中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「受託信託会社等」と、同法第七百三十八条中「代表社債権者若しくは決議執行者」とあるのは「資産流動化法第二百四十六条第一項の決議により定めた者」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 249 (1) The provisions of Article 114 (Proxy Voting), Article 117 (Inconsistent Voting), Article 118(2) (Attendance of Beneficiaries, etc.), Article 119 (Resolutions for Postponement or Continuation), and Article 120 (Minutes of a Meeting) of the Trust Act and the provisions of Article 314 (Accountability of the Directors, etc.), Article 315 (Authority of the Chairperson), Article 731 (excluding paragraph (1)) (Minutes of a Meeting), Articles 732 to 735 inclusive (Petitions for Approval of Resolutions Made at Bondholders' Meetings; Rejection of Resolutions Made at Bondholders' Meetings; Effectiveness of Resolutions Made at Bondholders' Meetings; Public Notice of Rulings Approving or Rejecting Resolutions Made at Bondholders' Meetings), and Article 738 (Dismissal of Representative Bondholders) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Beneficiary Certificate Holders' Meetings. In this case, the phrase "Article 108 and Article 109" in Article 119 of the Trust Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 242 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "a director, an accounting advisor, a company auditor or an executive officer" in Article 314 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the term "bond-issuing Company" in Article 731(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the phrase "The bond manager and bondholders" in paragraph (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Representative Beneficiary Certificate Holder, the Specified Trust Administrator, and each Beneficiary Certificate Holder," the term "Bond-issuing Company" in that paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the phrase "the solicitation in Article 676" in Article 733(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the solicitation for Beneficiary Certificates," the term "such bond-issuing Company" in that item shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the term "bond-issuing Company" in Article 735 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Fiduciary Trust Company, etc.," the phrase "the representative bondholders or Resolution Administrator" in Article 738 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person specified by the resolution set forth in Article 246(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(a)特許の所有者は，庁の記録にある特許及び特許に係る発明における若しくはそれについての権利，ライセンスその他の権利，権原又は利益を有する者の全員が宣誓した合意書をもって，当該特許又はそのクレームを取消のために権利放棄することができる。取消の申請は，申請人が適正に宣誓した書面によるものとし，海外で作成された場合は，認証を受けなければならない。(IP法第56条) (b)何人も，特許の権利放棄について庁に対し異議を申し立てることができ，この場合は，局は，特許の所有者に通知し，その事項について決定をする。 (c)庁は，特許を適正に権利放棄することができると認めた場合は，その申出を受理することができ，当該特許は，その受理の通知がIPO公報に公告された日から効力を失う。ただし，この日より前の政府の役務のための当該特許発明の使用については，侵害訴訟を提起することができず，また，権利補償も生じない。(IP法第56条)例文帳に追加

(a) The owner of the patent, with the written and verified consent of all persons having grants or licenses or other right, title or interest in and to the patent and the invention covered thereby, which have been recorded in the Office, may surrender his patent, any claim or claims forming part thereof to the Office for cancellation. The petition for cancellation shall be in writing, duly verified by the petitioner and if executed abroad shall be authenticated. (Sec. 56, IP CODE) (b) Any person may give notice to the Office of his opposition to the surrender of a patent, and if he does so, the Bureau shall notify the proprietor of the patent and determine the question. (c) If the Office is satisfied that the patent may properly be surrendered, it may accept the offer and, as from the day when notice of his acceptance is published in the IPO Gazette, the patent shall cease to have effect, but no action for infringement shall lie and no right compensation shall accrue for any use of the patented invention before that day for the services of the government. (Sec. 56, IP CODE) - 特許庁

２　会社法第四編第三章（第七百十五条を除く。）（社債権者集会）、第七編第二章第七節（社債発行会社の弁済等の取消しの訴え）、第八百六十八条第三項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第十号から第十二号までに係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十四条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、特定目的会社が特定社債を発行する場合における特定社債、特定社債権者、特定社債券、特定社債管理者、特定社債原簿又は特定社債権者集会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「社債発行会社」とあるのは「特定社債発行会社」と、「無記名社債」とあるのは「無記名特定社債」と、「代表社債権者」とあるのは「代表特定社債権者」と、同法第七百十六条中「この法律」とあるのは「資産流動化法又は資産流動化計画」と、同法第七百二十条第五項中「電子公告」とあるのは「電子公告（資産流動化法第百九十四条第一項第三号に規定する電子公告をいう。）」と、同法第七百二十一条中「社債権者集会参考書類」とあるのは「特定社債権者集会参考書類」と、同法第七百二十四条第二項第一号中「第七百六条第一項各号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項各号」と、同項第二号中「第七百六条第一項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第四項」と、同法第七百二十九条第一項中「第七百七条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第八項において準用する第七百七条」と、同法第七百三十三条第一号中「第六百七十六条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十二条第一項」と、同法第七百三十七条第二項中「第七百五条第一項から第三項まで、第七百八条及び第七百九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項から第三項まで並びに同条第八項において準用する第七百八条及び第七百九条」と、同法第七百四十条第一項中「第四百四十九条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百十一条」と、同条第二項中「第七百二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十六条」と、同法第七百四十一条第三項中「第七百五条第一項（第七百三十七条第二項」とあるのは「資産流動化法第百二十七条第一項（資産流動化法第百二十九条第二項において準用する第七百三十七条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(2) The provisions of Part IV, Chapter III (excluding Article 715) (Bondholders' Meeting), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 7 (Action Seeking Rescission of Performance, etc. of a Bond-issuing Company), Article 868(3) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Prima Facie Showing), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (x) to item (xii) inclusive) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rule) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Specified Bonds, Specified Bondholders, Specified Bond Certificates, Specified Bond Administrators, Specified Bonds registries, and Specified Bondholders Meetings in cases where a Specific Purpose Company issues Specified Bonds. In this case, the terms "Bond-issuing Company," "bearer bonds," and "representative bondholder" in said provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Company Issuing Specified Bonds," "Specified Bonds in bearer form," and "representative Specified Bondholder," the phrase "this Act" in Article 716 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Asset Securitization Act or the Asset Securitization Plan," the term "electromagnetic public notice" in Article 720(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Electronic Public Notice (meaning electronic public notice as prescribed in Article 194(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "Bondholders' Meeting Reference Documents" in Article 721 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Reference Documents for a Specified Bondholders Meeting," the phrase "each item of Article 706(1)" in Article 724(2)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the items of Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 706" in Article 724(2)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(4) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 707" in Article 729(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 707 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 676" in Article 733(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 122(1) of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraphs (1) through (3) of Article 705, and under Articles 708 and 709" in Article 737(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) to (3) inclusive of the Asset Securitization Act and the provisions of Article 708 and Article 709 of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 127(8) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 449" in Article 740(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 111 of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 702" in Article 740(2) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 126 of the Asset Securitization Act," the phrase "paragraph (1) of Article 705 (including cases where that paragraph is applied mutatis mutandis under paragraph (2) of Article 737)" in Article 741(3) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 127(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 737(2) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 129(2) of the Asset Securitization Act) of the Asset Securitization Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1)登録商標は、不服を申し立てる何人によっても、次に掲げるいずれかの理由により、高等裁判所又は登録官に対して所定の方式で申請が行われると、登録されている商品又は役務について登録簿から削除することができる。(a)当該商標は当該商品又は役務(場合に応じ)につき出願人本人により又は第41条の規定が適用される場合は当該会社により使用されるべきとの登録出願人の誠実かつ真正の意図によらずして登録されたものであり、申請日1月以前までに、それらの商品又は役務に関する商標の所有者による当該商標の誠実かつ真正な使用が実際に存しないとき。(b)申請日1月前までに、当該商標が登録されて連続5年以上が経過しており、その間に現に当該商標を所有する者によるそれらの商品又は役務に関する当該商標の誠実かつ真正な使用がないとき。例文帳に追加

(1) A registered trademark may be taken off the Register in respect of any of the goods or services, in respect of which it is registered on application made in the prescribed manner by any person aggrieved to the High Court Division or the Registrar, on the ground either- (a) that the trademark was registered without any bona-fide intention on the part of the applicant for registration that it should be used in relation to those goods or services, as the case may be, by him or, in a case to which the provisions of section 41 apply, by the company concerned, and that there has in fact, been no bona-fide use of the trademark, in relation to those goods or services by any proprietor thereof for the time being up to a date one month before the date of the 35 application; or (b) that up to a date one month before the date of the application, a continuous period of 5 (five) years or longer elapsed during which the trademark was registered and during which there was no bona-fide use thereof in relation to those goods or services by any proprietor thereof for the time being (2) The Tribunal shall not refuse an application submitted under sub-section (1) except where- (a) the applicant has been permitted under section 10 to register an identical or nearly resembling trademark in respect of the goods or services; or (b) where the Tribunal is of opinion that there has been, before the relevant date or during the relevant period, bona-fide use of the trademark by any proprietor thereof for the time being in relation to goods or services.  - 特許庁

８　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の成立後における特定出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(8) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Specified Equity by a Specific Purpose Company after the formation thereof, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph (2)(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

６　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄及び移送）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は特定目的会社の優先出資の発行の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第一項第二号中「六箇月以内（公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、株式の発行の効力が生じた日から一年以内）」とあるのは「一年以内」と、同条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(6) The provisions of Article 828(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Actions Seeking Invalidation of Acts Concerning the Organization of a Company), Article 834 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835(1) (Jurisdiction over and Transfer of an Action), Article 836(1) and (3) (Order to Provide Security), Articles 837 to 840 inclusive (Mandatory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.; Persons Affected by an Upholding Judgment; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation, Revocation or Rescission; Effects of a Judgment of Invalidation of New Share Issue), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Cases Where the Plaintiff Is Defeated), and Article 937(1) (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)(b)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action seeking invalidation of issuance of Preferred Equity by a Specific Purpose Company, and the provisions of Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of the Judicial Decision of the Prior Instance), Articles 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act; Supreme Court Rules; Mandatory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.), and Article 878(1) (Effects of a Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a petition under Article 840(2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the phrase "within six months from the day on which the share issue became effective (or, for a Stock Company which is not a Public Company, within one year from the day on which the share issue became effective)" in Article 828(1)(ii) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "within one year," the term "Shareholder, etc." in paragraph 2(ii) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "member, director, company auditor, or liquidator," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第八百二十八条第一項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）及び第二項（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（会社の組織に関する行為の無効の訴え）、第八百三十四条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条から第八百四十条まで（弁論等の必要的併合、認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲、無効又は取消しの判決の効力、新株発行の無効判決の効力）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ロに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は前条第一項の基金の募集の無効の訴えについて、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条から第八百七十七条まで（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外、最高裁判所規則、審問等の必要的併合）及び第八百七十八条第一項（裁判の効力）の規定はこの項において準用する同法第八百四十条第二項の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百二十八条第二項第二号中「株主等」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役又は清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Article 828, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) and (2) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Claim Seeking Nullification of Acts Related to Organization of Company), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 to 840 inclusive (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc., Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim, Effect of Judgment of Nullity or Rescission, Effect of Judgment of Nullity on Issue of New Shares), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (b)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a claim for the nullification of a solicitation of additional funds under paragraph (1) of the preceding Article; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious cases), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 to 877 inclusive (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases, Supreme Court Rules, Compulsory Consolidation of Hearings, etc.) and Article 878, paragraph (1) (Effect of Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application under Article 840, paragraph (2) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this paragraph. In this case, the term "shareholders, etc." in Article 828, paragraph (2), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, company auditors or liquidators (or, in a company with Committees, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators) of a Mutual Company;" any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

第五十三条の十五　会社法第三百五十条（代表者の行為についての損害賠償責任）、第三百五十二条（取締役の職務を代行する者の権限）、第三百五十四条から第三百五十七条まで（表見代表取締役、忠実義務、競業及び利益相反取引の制限、取締役の報告義務）、第三百五十八条（第一項第二号を除く。）（業務の執行に関する検査役の選任）、第三百五十九条（裁判所による株主総会招集等の決定）、第三百六十条第一項（株主による取締役の行為の差止め）、第三百六十一条（取締役の報酬等）及び第三百六十五条第二項（競業及び取締役会設置会社との取引等の制限）の規定は相互会社の取締役について、同法第三百四十九条第四項及び第五項（株式会社の代表）並びに第三百五十一条（代表取締役に欠員を生じた場合の措置）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第二号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号及び第四号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は相互会社の取締役又は代表取締役について、同法第九百三十七条第一項（第二号イ及びハに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の代表取締役について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百五十六条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「取締役会」と、同法第三百五十八条第一項中「株主は」とあるのは「社員又は総代は」と、同項第一号中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する株主」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続いて社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と、同条第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第三百五十九条第一項第二号中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、同法第三百六十条第一項中「株式を有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「著しい損害」とあるのは「回復することができない損害」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

５　会社法第二百二条から第二百十三条まで（第二百二条第三項、第二百七条第九項第三号及び第五号並びに第二百十三条第一項第三号を除く。）（株主に株式の割当てを受ける権利を与える場合、募集株式の申込み、募集株式の割当て、募集株式の申込み及び割当てに関する特則、募集株式の引受け、金銭以外の財産の出資、出資の履行、株主となる時期、募集株式の発行等をやめることの請求、引受けの無効又は取消しの制限、不公正な払込金額で株式を引き受けた者等の責任、出資された財産等の価額が不足する場合の取締役等の責任）、第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百七十条（第二号及び第七号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十四条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（不服申立ての制限）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定は、第一項の特定目的会社の募集特定出資について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株主」とあるのは「特定社員」と、「株式」とあるのは「特定出資」と、「数」とあるのは「口数」と、「第百九十九条第一項第三号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第三号」と、「第百九十九条第一項第四号」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第一項第四号」と、同法第二百二条第一項中「募集事項」とあるのは「社員総会の決議により、募集事項」と、同条第二項中「一株」とあるのは「一口」と、同条第五項中「第百九十九条第二項から第四項まで及び前二条」とあるのは「資産流動化法第三十六条第二項及び第三項」と、同法第二百四条第二項中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と、同法第二百七条第九項第一号中「発行済株式の総数」とあるのは「特定出資の総口数」と、同法第二百十条中「自己株式」とあるのは「自己特定出資（資産流動化法第五十九条第二項に規定する自己特定出資をいう。）」と、同条第一号中「法令又は定款」とあるのは「法令、資産流動化計画又は定款」と、同法第二百十三条第一項第一号中「業務執行取締役（委員会設置会社にあっては、執行役。以下この号において同じ。）その他当該業務執行取締役」とあるのは「取締役その他当該取締役」と、同項第二号中「株主総会」とあるのは「社員総会」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。例文帳に追加

(5) The provisions of Articles 202 to 213 inclusive (excluding Article 202(3), Article 207(9)(iii) and (v) and Article 213(1)(iii)) (Cases Where Entitlement to Allotment of Shares Is Granted to Shareholders; Applications for Shares for Subscription; Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Special Provisions on Subscription and Allotment of Shares for Subscription; Subscription for Shares for Subscription; Contribution of Property Other Than Monies; Performance of Contributions; Timing of Shareholder Status; Demanding Cessation of Issue of Shares for Subscription; Restrictions on Invalidation or Rescission of Subscription; Liabilities of Persons Who Subscribed for Shares with Unfair Amount To Be Paid In; Liabilities of Directors in Case of Shortfall in Value of Property Contributed), Article 868(1) (Jurisdiction over Non-Contentious Cases), Article 870 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (ii) and item (vii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Appending of the Reason), Article 872 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal), Article 874 (limited to the portion pertaining to item (i)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of the Provisions of the Non-Contentious Cases Procedures Act), and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Specified Equity for Subscription of a Specific Purpose Company set forth in paragraph (1). In this case, the term "shareholder" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity Member," the term "shares" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Equity," the term "number" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "number of units," the term "Article 199(1)(iii)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iii) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Article 199(1)(iv)" in these provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(1)(iv) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "Subscription Requirements" in Article 202(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Subscription Requirements determined by resolution at a general meeting of members," the term "one share" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "one unit," the phrase "paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive of Article 199 and the preceding two Articles" in Article 202(5) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 36(2) and (3) of the Asset Securitization Act," the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 204(2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," the phrase "total number of Issued Shares" in Article 207(9)(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "total number of units of Specified Equity," the term "Treasury Shares" in Article 210 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "The Company's Own Specified Equity (meaning a Company's Own Specified Equity as defined in Article 59(2) of the Asset Securitization Act)," the phrase "laws and regulations or articles of incorporation" in Article 210(i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "laws and regulations, Asset Securitization Plan, or articles of incorporation," the phrase "Executive directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription (or, for a Company with Committees, executive officers; the same shall apply hereinafter in this item) and other persons prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such executive directors" in Article 213(1)(i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Directors who carried out duties regarding the solicitation of subscribers for such Shares for Subscription and other persons prescribed by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as persons who were involved, in the performance of their duties, in the execution of the business of such directors," the term "shareholders meeting" in item (ii) of said paragraph shall be deemed to be replaced with "general meeting of members," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order.  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) 図面は，次のように作成するものとする。 (a) 色彩を用いない，満足な複製が可能な，耐久性のある，黒色の，十分に濃く，暗い，均一の太さの，輪郭の明確な線及び筆法を用いる。 (b) 切断面はハッチングにより示し，その場合は，引用符号及び引出線がハッチングにより不明瞭になってはならない。 (c) 図面の大きさ及びその作図の明瞭性は，線縮尺3分の2の写真複製ですべての詳細を容易に識別することができるものでなければならない。例外的に図面上で縮尺を示す場合は，図で表示する。 (d) 図面に用いられるすべての数字，文字及び引用符号は簡単で明確でなければならず，また，数字及び文字に関連して括弧，丸及び引用符を使用してはならない。 (e) 同一の図の要素は，相互の間の比率が保たれていなければならない。ただし，図の明瞭性のために比率を異ならせることが不可欠である場合は，この限りでない。 (f) 数字及び文字の高さは0.32cm以上でなければならず，また，図面のレタリングには，ローマ字，及びそれが通例である場合はギリシャ文字を用いるものとする。 (g) 図面の同一紙面に複数の図を載せることができる。複数の紙面に描いた図により1の全体図を構成することが意図されている場合は，複数の紙面の図は，各部分図の如何なる部分も隠れることなしに全体図を組み立てることができるように配置しなければならない。各図は，場所を無駄に使うことなく，相互に明確に分離して配置する。各図は，紙面の番号付けとは無関係に，アラビア数字で連続番号を付す。 (h) 明細書又はクレームにおいて言及されていない引用符号を図面に用いてはならず，逆の場合も同じである。 (i) 図面に文言を記載してはならない。 (j) 図面の紙面には，第15条(7)に従って番号を付す。例文帳に追加

(3) Drawings shall be executed as follows:- (a) without coloring in durable, black sufficiently dense and dark, uniformly thick and well-defined lines and strokes to permit satisfactory reproduction; and (b) cross-sections shall be indicated by hatching, which does not impede the clear reading of the reference signs and leading lines; and (c) the scale of the drawings and the distinctness of their graphical execution shall be such that a photographic reproduction with a linear reduction in size to two-thirds would enable all details to be distinguished without difficulty. If, as an exception, the scale is given on a drawing it shall be represented graphically; and (d) all numbers, letters and reference signs appearing in the drawings shall be simple and clear and brackets, circles and inverted commas shall not be used in association with numbers and letters; and (e) elements of the same figure shall be in proportion to each other, unless a difference in proportion is indispensable for the clarity of the figure; (f) the height of the numbers and letters shall not be less than 0.32 cm and for the lettering of drawings, the Latin and, where customary, the Greek alphabet shall be used; and (g) the same sheet of drawings may contain several figures. Where figures drawn on two or more sheets are intended to form one whole figure, the figures on the several sheets shall be so arranged that the whole figure can be assembled without concealing any part of the partial figures. The different figures shall be arranged without wasting space, clearly separated from one another. The different figures shall be numbered consecutively in Arabic numerals, independently of the numbering of the sheets; and (h) reference signs not mentioned in the description or claims shall not appear in the drawings, and vice versa; (i) the drawings shall not contain textual matter; (j) the sheets of the drawings shall be numbered in accordance with Section 15(7) below. - 特許庁

216.1本法の規定により保護される権利を侵害する者は，次のことに対して応じる責任がある。 (a)その侵害を止めさせる差止命令。裁判所は，特に，侵害に係る輸入商品の取引の場への持込を防止するために，その商品の税関手続の直後に，被告に対して，侵害を止めることを命令することもできる。 (b)著作権者，その譲受人又はその相続人に対して，法的費用その他の支出を含み，それらの者が侵害により蒙った実際の損害，及び侵害者が侵害により得た利益を支払うこと利益を立証するに当たっては，原告は販売の事実を立証することのみ要求され，被告が要した費用の詳細を立証することを要求される。又は，実際の損害及び利益に代えて，裁判所にとって相応と認められ，かつ，罰金とはみなされない損害賠償を支払うこと (c)訴訟の係属の間における押収のために，裁判所が定める条件で，販売送り状その他販売を立証する文書，著作権を侵害すると申し立てられた物品及びその包装，並びにそれら物品を製作する器具を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (d)裁判所の命令に従い，補償しないで破棄するため，侵害する複製物又は装置，及び図版，鋳型その他侵害する複製物を製作する手段を，宣誓して引き渡すこと (e)刑事訴訟において無罪宣告があった場合であっても，裁判所が適切であり，賢明であり，かつ，衡平であるとみなすことができる教訓的かつ見せしめの損害賠償の支払，及び著作物を侵害する複製物の廃棄を含む，その他の条件例文帳に追加

Sec.216 Remedies for Infringement 216.1. Any person infringing a right protected under this law shall be liable: (a) To an injunction restraining such infringement. The court may also order the defendant to desist from an infringement, among others, to prevent the entry into the channels of commerce of imported goods that involve an infringement, immediately after customs clearance of such goods. (b) Pay to the copyright proprietor or his assigns or heirs such actual damages, including legal costs and other expenses, as he may have incurred due to the infringement as well as the profits the infringer may have made due to such infringement, and in proving profits the plaintiff shall be required to prove sales only and the defendant shall be required to prove every element of cost which he claims, or, in lieu of actual damages and profits, such damages which to the court shall appear to be just and shall not be regarded as penalty. (c) Deliver under oath, for impounding during the pendency of the action, upon such terms and conditions as the court may prescribe, sales invoices and other documents evidencing sales, all articles and their packaging alleged to infringe a copyright and implements for making them. (d) Deliver under oath for destruction without any compensation all infringing copies or devices, as well as all plates, molds, or other means for making such infringing copies as the court may order. (e) Such other terms and conditions, including the payment of moral and exemplary damages, which the court may deem proper, wise and equitable and the destruction of infringing copies of the work even in the event of acquittal in a criminal case. - 特許庁

パーネルは死んだ残忍な偽善者どもの手にかかり僕らの無冠の王は死んだ嘆く、嘆く、悲しみのエリン泥沼から引き上げてやった臆病な犬どもに彼は殺されたエリンの希望もエリンの夢もその君主の積みまきの上に滅びた御殿にあろうとも、小屋にあろうとも悲しみにひしがれるアイルランドの心その運命をもたらすはずの彼が逝ってしまったから彼あらば世界にエリンの名を知らしめ栄光の緑の旗をはためかせ政治家たち、詩人たち、戦士たちの立ち上がったものを彼は自由を夢見た悲しいかな、夢にすぎなかった偶像をつかもうとしたその時裏切りが彼と愛するものを引き離した恥を知れ、臆病者彼らの君主を襲い媚を売る聖職者衆に売り渡した卑劣漢ども永遠の恥辱よ、焼き尽くせ誇りをもって彼らをはねつけた人の高貴の名を汚し傷つけた者どもの記憶を最後まで気高く屈せずに倒れた強き人死が彼を今は亡きエリンの英雄たちと一つにした彼の眠りを乱す争いはなし！静かに彼は休む彼を栄光へと駆り立てる人としての苦悩も大望も今はない彼らは思い通り彼を殺したしかしエリンは望む、彼の魂よ炎から不死鳥のように舞い上がれとその日の夜の明ける時自由の御代が僕らにもたらされるその日、エリンよ、挙げよ喜びの杯を悲しみのためにパーネルの思い出のために例文帳に追加

O, Erin, mourn with grief and woeFor he lies dead whom the fell gangOf modern hypocrites laid low.He lies slain by the coward houndsHe raised to glory from the mire;And Erin's hopes and Erin's dreamsPerish upon her monarch's pyre.In palace, cabin or in cotThe Irish heart where'er it beIs bowed with woe--for he is goneWho would have wrought her destiny.He would have had his Erin famed,The green flag gloriously unfurled,Her statesmen, bards and warriors raisedBefore the nations of the World.He dreamed (alas, 'twas but a dream!)Of Liberty: but as he stroveTo clutch that idol, treacherySundered him from the thing he loved.Shame on the coward, caitiff handsThat smote their Lord or with a kissBetrayed him to the rabble-routOf fawning priests--no friends of his.May everlasting shame consumeThe memory of those who triedTo befoul and smear the exalted nameOf one who spurned them in his pride.He fell as fall the mighty ones,Nobly undaunted to the last,And death has now united himWith Erin's heroes of the past.No sound of strife disturb his sleep!Calmly he rests: no human painOr high ambition spurs him nowThe peaks of glory to attain.They had their way: they laid him low.But Erin, list, his spirit mayRise, like the Phoenix from the flames,When breaks the dawning of the day,The day that brings us Freedom's reign.And on that day may Erin wellPledge in the cup she lifts to JoyOne grief--the memory of Parnell.  - James Joyce『アイビーデイの委員会室』

(1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。例文帳に追加

(1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right. - 特許庁

イ　各事業年度における法第二条第八項第一号に規定する取引（自己の計算による取引及びホに掲げる取引を除く。）の取引金額に事故率（当該事業年度開始日前三年以内に開始した各事業年度における事故（第百十二条に規定する事故をいう。）による支払額（商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者（第百七条で定める者をいう。以下この条において同じ。）から商品市場における取引等（商品清算取引を除く。以下この条において同じ。）の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織（商品取引員の使用に係る電子計算機と、顧客の使用に係る電子計算機（入出力装置を含む。）とを電気通信回線で接続した電子情報処理組織をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引に係る支払額を除く。）の合計額の、法第二条第八項第一号から第三号に規定する取引の取引金額と同項第四号に規定する取引の対価の額の合計額（自己の計算による取引並びに商品取引員が、専門知識及び経験を有する者から商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合並びに電子情報処理組織を使用して勧誘を伴わずに商品市場における取引等の委託を受ける場合の取引金額及び取引の対価の額を除く。）に占める割合をいう。以下この条において同じ。）を乗じた金額と取引金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額（既に積み立てられた商品取引責任準備金の金額（法第二百二十一条第二項の規定により使用された金額がある場合には、当該金額を控除した金額。次号において同じ。）が千万円に満たない場合には、当該いずれか大きい金額に、千万円から当該商品取引責任準備金の金額、及びロからチまでに掲げる金額を控除した金額を事故率に二を乗じて得た率と百万分の二とのいずれか大きい率で除して計算した金額（当該計算した金額が当該事業年度の取引金額を超える場合には、当該事業年度の当該取引金額。以下この号において同じ。）に事故率を乗じた金額と当該除して計算した金額の百万分の一に相当する金額とのいずれか大きい金額を加算した金額）例文帳に追加

(a) the amount obtained by multiplying the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), item (i) of the Act (excluding transactions based on a person's own account and the transactions set forth in (e)) in each business year by the Problematic Conduct Rate -- which means the proportion of the total sum of the payments made as a result of any Problematic Conduct [which means the Problematic Conduct prescribed in Article 112] in each business year starting within three years prior to the commencement of the relevant business year [excluding payments pertaining to transactions in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market (excluding Commodity Clearing Transactions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience (which means a person specified in Article 107; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System (which means an Electronic Data Processing System connecting a computer used by the Futures Commodity Merchant and a computer [including the input/output devices] used by the customer through a telecommunications line; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) without carrying out solicitation]; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) to the total sum of the transaction amounts of the transactions prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (8), items (i) to (iii) of the Act and the amount of the consideration for the transactions prescribed in item (iv) of the same paragraph (excluding the transaction amounts and the amount of the consideration for transactions in cases of transactions based on a person's own account and in cases where a Futures Commission Merchant receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market from a Person With Specialized Knowledge and Experience or receives a consignment of transactions, etc. on the Commodity Market by using an Electronic Data Processing System without carrying out solicitation -- or the amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of the transaction amounts, whichever amount is greater (in cases where the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading that has already been accrued [in cases where a specific amount of money is used under the provisions of Article 221, paragraph (2) of the Act, the amount after deducting said amount; the same shall apply in the following item] is less than ten million yen, the amount obtained by adding, to such larger amount, an amount obtained by multiplying -- an amount calculated by dividing the amount that has been obtained by deducting the amount of liability reserve for commodity trading and the amounts listed in (b) to (h) from ten million yen by double the Problematic Conduct Rate, or by 0.0002 percent, whichever rate is higher (or, if said calculated amount exceeds the transaction amount in the relevant business year, such amount shall be the transaction amount in the relevant business year; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) -- by the Problematic Conduct Rate or an amount equivalent to 0.0001 percent of said calculated amount, whichever amount is greater);  - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム