「One Time」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(372ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(iii) in the case where an officer or employee of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange has acquired the shares of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange (limited to those conducted according to a certain plan, without depending on an individual investment decision, on an on-going basis, for which each officer or employee contributes less than one million yen at a time) jointly with another officer or employee of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange (when said Incorporated Commodity Exchange has acquired the shares other than those acquired based on the provisions of Article 156, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act [including cases where it is applied by replacing the terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 165, paragraph (3) of the same Act], limited to the case where the acquisition was consigned to a Financial Instruments Business Operator [which means the Financial Instruments Business Operator prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (9) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (Act No. 25 of 1948) (limited to one who is engaged in the Type I Financial Instruments Business prescribed in Article 28, paragraph (1) of the same Act); the same shall apply in the following Article and the Appended Table 4]), voting rights pertaining to the shares of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange acquired or held by a person who has deposited the shares of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange which conducted said acquisition (excluding those that are deemed to be the voting rights personally acquired or held by said person who has deposited the shares, pursuant to the provisions of Article 86, paragraph (3) [limited to the part pertaining to item (i)] of the Act); 例文帳に追加

三　株式会社商品取引所の役員又は従業員が当該株式会社商品取引所の他の役員又は従業員と共同して当該株式会社商品取引所の株式の取得（一定の計画に従い、個別の投資判断に基づかず、継続的に行われ、各役員又は従業員の一回当たりの拠出金額が百万円に満たないものに限る。）をした場合（当該株式会社商品取引所が会社法第百五十六条第一項（同法第百六十五条第三項の規定により読み替えて適用する場合を含む。）の規定に基づき取得した株式以外の株式を取得したときは、金融商品取引業者（金融商品取引法（昭和二十三年法律第二十五号）第二条第九項に規定する金融商品取引業者（同法第二十八条第一項に規定する第一種金融商品取引業を行う者に限る。）をいう。次条及び別表第四において同じ。）に委託して行った場合に限る。）において当該取得をした株式会社商品取引所の株式を信託された者が取得し、又は所有する当該株式会社商品取引所の株式に係る議決権（法第八十六条第三項（第一号に係る部分に限る。）の規定により当該信託された者が自ら取得し、又は保有する議決権とみなされるものを除く。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Where any person makes any claim, or threatens to bring or gives notice of his intention to bring any proceedings (other than criminal proceedings), against any other person in respect of any interest as owner, mortgagee, licensee, or otherwise in a patent, being an interest which is not registered under this Act and which is capable of being so registered, that other person may, at any time within one month thereafter by notice in writing given to the maker of the claim or threat or the giver of the notice of intention to bring the proceedings, require him to register under this Act the interest in respect of which the claim or threat is made or the notice of intention to bring the proceedings is given, and if he fails to do so within 6 months after the giving of the notice under this subsection he shall not thereafter be entitled to bring any proceedings in respect of the claim or interest against the person who has given the notice to register.例文帳に追加

(2) 何人かが特許の所有者，譲渡抵当権者，実施権者その他として有する権益であって本法に基づいて登録されていないが前記のとおり登録することができるものについて他人を相手方として主張をし，又は訴訟(刑事訴訟以外のもの)を提起する旨の脅迫をし若しくはその旨の自己の意思を通知するときは，当該他人は，その後1月以内にいつでも前記主張者又は訴訟提起の脅迫者若しくは訴訟提起の意図の通知者に対する催告書により，前記の主張若しくは訴訟を提起する旨の脅迫又は訴訟提起する旨の意思の通知が関係する権益を本法に基づいて登録するようその者に求めることができる。また，その者は，本項の規定による催告後6月以内に前記の手続をとらないときは，その後，登録を催告した者を相手方とした前記主張又は権益に関する如何なる訴訟も提起することができないものとする。 - 特許庁

(2) The applicant for a patent application in which the document and abstract in foreign language are attached to the application under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as "foreign language written application") shall submit to the Commissioner of the Patent Office Japanese translations of the document and the abstract in foreign language within one year and two months from the date of filing of the patent application; provided, however, that where the written application in foreign language is a new patent application arising from the division of a patent application under Article 44(1), or a patent application arising from the conversion of an application under Article 46(1) or (2), or a patent application based on a utility model registration under Article 46-2(1), the applicant may submit Japanese translations of the document and the abstract in foreign language even after the lapse of the time limit prescribed in the main clause, but not later than two months following the division of a patent application, conversion of application or filing of patent application based on a utility model registration. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定により外国語書面及び外国語要約書面を願書に添付した特許出願（以下「外国語書面出願」という。）の出願人は、その特許出願の日から一年二月以内に外国語書面及び外国語要約書面の日本語による翻訳文を、特許庁長官に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該外国語書面出願が第四十四条第一項の規定による特許出願の分割に係る新たな特許出願、第四十六条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による出願の変更に係る特許出願又は第四十六条の二第一項の規定による実用新案登録に基づく特許出願である場合にあつては、本文の期間の経過後であつても、その特許出願の分割、出願の変更又は実用新案登録に基づく特許出願の日から二月以内に限り、外国語書面及び外国語要約書面の日本語による翻訳文を提出することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Although assistance differs with the individual library, they typically: (1) Gather large volumes of printed material (publications, pamphlets, etc.) in a wide range of business areas, organize them into appropriate business categories and topics, and make the available to the public, including via electronic media, in databases and on the Internet all free of charge; (2) Offer the services of reference librarians skilled in finding desired information, for those not yet experienced enough to do so themselves; (3) Are open on Saturdays and Sundays, in addition to weekdays, allowing all members of the public, including those employed full-time, to use their facilities free of charge; (4) Cooperate with organizations with professional know-how and functions, including governmental bodies at all levels, Chamber of Commerce and Industry and universities; some libraries serve as one-stop access to information from multiple organizations; and (5) Proactively disseminate information by sponsoring seminars and the like on starting new businesses, etc. 例文帳に追加

支援に向けた取組は図書館により様々だが、代表的な機能としては、〔1〕図書館としての公共性を活かして大量に蓄積した幅広い分野のビジネスに役立つ文献・雑誌等紙媒体の情報を、ビジネスをキーワードに集め一覧できるようにして提供したり、インターネットやデータベースといった電子媒体を無料で提供していることや、〔2〕必要な情報へどのようにアクセスすればよいか分からなくとも、情報収集のノウハウを持つ司書によるレファレンスサービスを受けることができること、〔3〕平日のみならず土日も開館しているため、フルタイムの仕事を持つ者にも利用しやすく、無料であることと併せて、誰にとっても敷居が低く利用しやすい公共施設であること、〔4〕図書館によっては行政や商工会議所、大学等専門的なノウハウと機能を持つ機関と連携を図っており、情報へのワンストップ的なアクセス窓口となっていること、〔5〕開業セミナー等の開催による情報発信を挙げることができる。 - 経済産業省

I spoke with FRB (Federal Reserve Board) Chairman Bernanke two weeks ago and also had a chance to speak with People's Bank of China Governor Zhou Xiaochuan this week. Frankly speaking, this is, as a matter of fact, a kind of issue to be decided on by the global forum of the G20, as it relates to stability of financial institutions worldwide and, at the same time, the definition of capital adequacy, and the quality and quantity debate, among other things. A dozen years or so ago, Japan was hit by a financial crisis. When I was previously a minister, I witnessed something similar – the failure of the Hokkaido Takushoku Bank – which resulted in a credit crunch and credit withdrawal that, as many of you must remember, indeed caused a large number of companies to go under one after another. In that sense, it is not necessarily a positive thing to make a capital adequacy ratio higher and higher. 例文帳に追加

私は先々週でございますか、バーナンキＦＲＢ（連邦準備制度理事会）議長ともお話ししましたし、先週というか今週は周小川、中国の中央銀行の総裁とも話をさせていただきましたけれども、率直に言えば、こういった話も当然、非常に世界的なＧ20で決める話でございまして、非常に世界の金融機関の安定性と、それから同時に自己資本の定義、あるいは定義と申しますか、自己資本の定義、それから質と量、こういったことがまた同時に、皆様方ご存じのように十数年前、日本は大変金融ショックといいますか、金融危機に襲われまして、当時、私も与党の国会議員で閣僚をやめたすぐ後で、閣僚のときにも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産したということが起きましたので、本当にあのとき貸し渋り、貸しはがしになりまして、非常に皆さん方もご記憶のある方が多いと思いますが、本当にばたばた企業も倒産いたしまして、そういった意味で、要するに、自己資本の比率が高ければ高いほどいいというものでもございません。 - 金融庁

(1) An applicant, a patentee or the successor in title thereof who, as a result of an order under Section 50(1), refrains from using or ceases to use an invention patentable under Sections 1 to 5 for peaceful purposes shall have a claim to compensation, owing to the damages thereby incurred, against the Federal Republic if and to the extent that said party cannot reasonably be expected to bear the damages itself. When determining the extent to which said party can reasonably be expected to do so, account shall be taken, in particular, of the financial position of the injured party, the amount of expenditure incurred by said party for the invention or for acquiring title thereto, the degree of probability that the invention might have to be kept secret that could have been recognized by said party at the time the expenditure was incurred, and the profit derived by the injured party from another exploitation of the invention. The claim cannot be asserted until after a patent has been granted. Compensation may be claimed only after it has become due and for periods which shall not be shorter than one year. 例文帳に追加

(1) 出願人，特許所有者又はこれらの権原承継人が第 1条から第 5条までに基づいて特許を受けることができる発明を，第 50条(1)に基づく命令の結果として，平和目的で実施することを差し控え又は実施を停止した場合は，同人は，それによって同人に生じた損害に起因する補償を連邦に対して請求する権利を有するものとするが，ただし，当該当事者に対し，その損害自体を負担させることが合理的に見て期待できないことを条件とし，かつ，その程度に限る。その程度を判断するときは，特に，被害者の財務状況，発明のために又は発明に対する権原を取得するために当該当事者によって行われた支出の額，その支出が生じたときに，当該当事者によって認識されていた，発明の秘密保持が義務付けられる可能性の程度，及び被害者がその発明に係る他の実施から取得した利益が考慮される。この請求権は，特許が付与されるまでは主張することができない。補償は，支払うべきものとなった後，かつ，1年より短くない期間についてのみ請求することができる。 - 特許庁

Article 271-5 (1) Notwithstanding the provisions of Article 271-3, paragraph (1), A Written Notice of Holding the Bank's Voting Rights pertaining to voting rights held by a Bank, Financial Instruments Business Operator (limited to one that conducts Securities-Related Business), trust company, or any other person specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance who has notified the Prime Minister of a Reference date, where the purpose of holding such voting rights is not for controlling the business activities of the Insurance Company or Insurance Holding Company that has issued the shares relating to that voting rights (excluding the case where the Proportion of Voting Rights Held has exceeded the number specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance and any case specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance by taking into consideration the manner in which they are held and other circumstances; hereinafter referred to as "Voting Rights Subject to Special Provisions" in this Act) shall be submitted to the Prime Minister by stating matters that relate to the status of holding that voting rights as of the Reference Date on which the Proportion of Voting Rights Held exceeded five hundredths for the first time and that are specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, by the fifteenth day of the month following the month containing said Reference Date, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二百七十一条の五　銀行、金融商品取引業者（有価証券関連業を行う者に限る。）、信託会社その他の内閣府令で定める者のうち基準日を内閣総理大臣に届け出た者が保有する議決権で当該議決権に係る株式の発行者である保険会社又は保険持株会社の事業活動を支配することを保有の目的としないもの（議決権保有割合が内閣府令で定める数を超えた場合及び保有の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合を除く。以下この条において「特例対象議決権」という。）に係る保険議決権保有届出書は、第二百七十一条の三第一項の規定にかかわらず、議決権保有割合が初めて百分の五を超える数となった基準日における当該議決権の保有状況に関する事項であって、内閣府令で定めるものを記載したものを、内閣府令で定めるところにより、当該基準日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph (1) of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph (1) of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision. 例文帳に追加

２　この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(9) Where, with respect to government or company bonds issued by means of a discount on or after April 1, 1999, that are listed in the following (including those specified by a Cabinet Order as being similar thereto), for which a period from the date of issue to the redemption date is not more than one year (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "short-term government or company bonds"), specified entries or records under the book-entry transfer system (meaning entries or records in a transfer account book set forth in the Act on Book-Entry Transfer of Company Bonds, etc. which are made pursuant to the provisions of the said Act; hereinafter referred to in this Article as "entries or records under the book-entry transfer system"), which are specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) are made together with all other short-term government or company bonds that have the same brand at the time of issue, such short-term government or company bonds for which the said specified entries or records under the book-entry transfer system are made (limited to those that satisfy the requirements specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance for bonds held by a specified person; hereinafter referred to in this Article as "specified short-term government or company bonds") shall not fall under the category of discount bonds prescribed in paragraph (1) to paragraph (6): 例文帳に追加

９　平成十一年四月一日以後に割引の方法により発行される公社債で次に掲げるもの（これらに類するものとして政令で定めるものを含む。）のうち、その発行の日から償還期限までの期間が一年以下であるもの（以下この項において「短期公社債」という。）が、その発行の際にその銘柄が同一である他の短期公社債のすべてとともに特定振替記載等（社債等の振替に関する法律に定めるところにより行われる同法の振替口座簿への記載又は記録（以下この条において「振替記載等」という。）のうち政令で定めるものをいう。以下この項において同じ。）がされる場合には、当該特定振替記載等がされる短期公社債（特定の者によつて所有されるものとして財務省令で定める要件を満たすものに限る。以下この条において「特定短期公社債」という。）は、第一項から第六項までに規定する割引債に該当しないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 38 (1) A person who has manufactured or imported specified machines, etc., or who is to install specified machines, etc., which have not been installed for the period provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, or who is to reinstall or to resume the use of specified machines, etc., the use of which has been discontinued, shall, as provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, have the said specified machines, etc., and the matters provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare in relation thereto inspected by one of the following (a) or (b): (a) the Director of the Prefectural Labor Bureau, if the said specified machines, etc., do not belong to specially specified machines, etc., (meaning those designated among specified machines, etc., by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, hereinafter the same). (b) those who were registered by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafter referred to as a "registered manufacturing inspection, etc., agency"), if the said specified machines, etc., belong to specially specified machines, etc. However, this does not apply when a manufacturer in a foreign country has received an inspection of the said specified machines, etc., under the provisions of the following paragraph for the imported specified machines, etc., and other related matters covered by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (referred to as "machines, etc., to be inspected at the time of import, etc." in the following paragraph). 例文帳に追加

第三十八条　特定機械等を製造し、若しくは輸入した者、特定機械等で厚生労働省令で定める期間設置されなかつたものを設置しようとする者又は特定機械等で使用を廃止したものを再び設置し、若しくは使用しようとする者は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより、当該特定機械等及びこれに係る厚生労働省令で定める事項について、当該特定機械等が、特別特定機械等（特定機械等のうち厚生労働省令で定めるものをいう。以下同じ。）以外のものであるときは都道府県労働局長の、特別特定機械等であるときは厚生労働大臣の登録を受けた者（以下「登録製造時等検査機関」という。）の検査を受けなければならない。ただし、輸入された特定機械等及びこれに係る厚生労働省令で定める事項（次項において「輸入時等検査対象機械等」という。）について当該特定機械等を外国において製造した者が次項の規定による検査を受けた場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 39 (1) Where a Supervisor violates any of the provisions of Article 33-2, Article 34 (1), (3), or (4), Article 35, Article 36, Article 36-3, or Article 37 or conducts any of the acts listed in the respective items of Article 38 (1), or where a solicitor violates any of the provisions of Article 33-2, Article 34 (1), (3), or (4), Article 35, Article 36, or Article 36-3 or conducts any of the acts listed in Article 38 (1) (ii) to (iv), if the competent minister finds the act to involve the risk of impairing the fairness of the Multilevel Marketing Transactions or harming the interests of the counterparty of the Multilevel Marketing Transactions or if the Supervisor does not follow the order under the provision of Article 38 (1), he/she may order the Supervisor to suspend from soliciting or having a solicitor solicit said Multilevel Marketing Transactions pertaining to Multilevel Marketing or to suspend the Supervisor's Multilevel Marketing Transactions in whole or in part by specifying a time limit of no longer than one year. 例文帳に追加

第三十九条　主務大臣は、統括者が第三十三条の二、第三十四条第一項、第三項若しくは第四項、第三十五条、第三十六条、第三十六条の三若しくは第三十七条の規定に違反し若しくは前条第一項各号に掲げる行為をした場合若しくは勧誘者が第三十三条の二、第三十四条第一項、第三項若しくは第四項、第三十五条、第三十六条若しくは第三十六条の三の規定に違反し若しくは前条第一項第二号から第四号までに掲げる行為をした場合において連鎖販売取引の公正及び連鎖販売取引の相手方の利益が著しく害されるおそれがあると認めるとき又は統括者が同項の規定による指示に従わないときは、その統括者に対し、一年以内の期間を限り、当該連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売取引について勧誘を行い若しくは勧誘者に行わせることを停止し、又はその行う連鎖販売取引の全部若しくは一部を停止すべきことを命ずることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

With regard to a Futures Commission Merchant who has received a license under Article 41, paragraph 1 of the Commodity Exchange Act at the time of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, in the case where the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets) exceeds the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision (in the case where a person has received a license under the same paragraph with regard to Listed Commodities on two or more Commodity Markets, the total of the amount prescribed in the same Article with regard to these Listed Commodities on the Commodity Markets), the standard amount prescribed in Article 49, paragraph 1 of the same Act for said Futures Commission Merchant shall be the amount prescribed in Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act prior to the revision, for one year from the day of the enforcement of this Cabinet Order, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 5 of the Order for Enforcement of the Commodity Exchange Act after the revision. 例文帳に追加

この政令の施行の際現に商品取引所法第四十一条第一項の許可を受けている商品取引員について、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）が改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額（その者が二以上の商品市場における上場商品について同項の許可を受けている場合にあつては、これらの商品市場における上場商品について同条に定める額を合算した額）を超えている場合には、当該商品取引員の同法第四十九条第一項に規定する基準額は、この政令の施行の日から一年間は、改正後の商品取引所法施行令第五条の規定にかかわらず、改正前の商品取引所法施行令第五条に定める額とする。 - 経済産業省

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. 例文帳に追加

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

Article 13 (1) An Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location of one of the following facilities (herein referred to as "Facility Subject to Domicile Exception") and is located by admission or residence (herein referred to as "Admission, etc.") in said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception (an Insured Person for whom it is determined that his or her domicile has changed to a location where said Facility is located by moving into said Facility as listed in item (iii) is limited to a person for whom the admission measures are pursuant to the provisions of Article 11, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Public Aid for the Aged Act; hereinafter referred to as "Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception" in this Article) and for whom it is determined to have had domicile in another Municipality (a Municipality other than the Municipality where said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception is located) at the time of moving in for Admission, etc., at said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, shall be an Insured Person of Long-Term Care Insurance provided by said other Municipality of prior domicile, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 9; however, provided that this provision shall not apply to an Insured Person Subject to Domicile Exception who moved in for Admission, etc., into two or more of a said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception, and said Person is determined to have moved consecutively from one said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person was admitted immediately prior to the said Facility Subject to Domicile Exception where said Insured Person is currently residing for Admission, etc. (herein referred to as the "Facility of First Prior Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph) into a Facility Subject to Domicile Exception in which said Insured Person is currently residing (herein referred to as the "Facility of Current Admission of an Insured Person" in this paragraph and the following paragraph) (collectively herein referred to as "Specified Continuous Admission of an Insured Person" in the following paragraph): 例文帳に追加

第十三条　次に掲げる施設（以下「住所地特例対象施設」という。）に入所又は入居（以下この条において「入所等」という。）をすることにより当該住所地特例対象施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者（第三号に掲げる施設に入所することにより当該施設の所在する場所に住所を変更したと認められる被保険者にあっては、老人福祉法第十一条第一項第一号の規定による入所措置がとられた者に限る。以下この条において「住所地特例対象被保険者」という。）であって、当該住所地特例対象施設に入所等をした際他の市町村（当該住所地特例対象施設が所在する市町村以外の市町村をいう。）の区域内に住所を有していたと認められるものは、第九条の規定にかかわらず、当該他の市町村が行う介護保険の被保険者とする。ただし、二以上の住所地特例対象施設に継続して入所等をしている住所地特例対象被保険者であって、現に入所等をしている住所地特例対象施設（以下この項及び次項において「現入所施設」という。）に入所等をする直前に入所等をしていた住所地特例対象施設（以下この項において「直前入所施設」という。）及び現入所施設のそれぞれに入所等をすることにより直前入所施設及び現入所施設のそれぞれの所在する場所に順次住所を変更したと認められるもの（次項において「特定継続入所被保険者」という。）については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provision of Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the ownership of Shares, etc. (referring to Shares, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (12) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by an Insurance Company or any of its Subsidiary Companies in a domestic company (referring to a domestic company as defined in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the Insurance Company or the Subsidiary Company owns, at the time when this Act enters into force, Shares, etc. in the domestic company in a total number that exceeds its shareholding threshold, etc. (referring to the shareholding threshold, etc. prescribed in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. In this case, for the purpose of applying the provision of that Article to the ownership of Shares, etc. in the domestic company on and subsequent to the date, the Insurance Company or its Subsidiary Company shall be deemed to have acquired as at the date the Shares, etc. of the domestic company in excess of the shareholding threshold, etc. following the events prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (2) of that Article. 例文帳に追加

７　新保険業法第百七条第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新保険業法第二条第十二項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新保険業法第百七条第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している保険会社又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In the case where a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. has been subject to two or more foreign corporation taxes or to a foreign corporation tax twice or more on its income for a taxable business year, when a consolidated corporation related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. seeks the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or Article 66-7(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the Act in two or more business years or consolidated business years; with respect to the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act for a consolidated business year following the first one of the said two or more consolidated business years or business years, the amount obtained by deducting the amount listed in item (ii) (the amount listed in item (iii), when seeking the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act for the first time after receiving the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act) from the amount listed in item (i) shall be deemed to be the calculated amount prescribed in the preceding paragraph: 例文帳に追加

２　特定外国子会社等につきその課税対象年度の所得に対して二以上の外国法人税が課され、又は二回以上にわたつて外国法人税が課された場合において、当該特定外国子会社等に係る連結法人がその二以上の連結事業年度又は事業年度において法第六十八条の九十一第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）又は第六十六条の七第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定の適用を受けるときは、当該二以上の連結事業年度又は事業年度のうち最初の連結事業年度又は事業年度後の連結事業年度に係る法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用については、第一号に掲げる金額から第二号に掲げる金額（法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用を受けた場合で、その適用を受けた後最初に法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用を受けるときは、第三号に掲げる金額）を控除した金額をもつて前項に規定する計算した金額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) When providing credit to a small- or medium-size company, does the institution conduct credit management operations including credit rating management with due consideration for the overall status of the company's corporate management in light of the nature of small- and medium-size companies in general, such as their vulnerability to the economic cycle and their liability to fall into the status of having excess debt due to one-time factors.例文帳に追加

（ⅱ）中小・零細企業等に対する与信に関しては、総じて景気の影響を受けやすく、一時的な要因により債務超過に陥りやすいといった中小・零細企業等の経営・財務面の特性を踏まえ、与信先の経営実態を総合的に勘案した信用格付等の与信管理を行っているか。（ⅲ）スコアリング・モデルを用いたビジネスローン等について延滞が発生した場合に、経営改善の方策に係る協議に応じることなく、機械的に債権回収や債権売却を行っていないか。また、ビジネスローン等からの撤退等に当たっては、債務者の置かれた状況を斟酌し、必要に応じて代替的な資金供給手段を検討しているか。（ⅳ）担保割れが生じた際に、合理的な理由なく、直ちに回収や金利の引上げを行っていないか。（ⅴ）経営改善支援先については、経営改善計画の進捗状況を適切に把握し、必要に応じて経営相談・経営指導等を行う等、経営改善に向けた働きかけを行っているか。（ⅵ）短期貸付の更新継続をしている貸出金（手形貸付を含む。）について、更なる借換えを行えば貸出条件緩和債権に該当する場合、安易に顧客の要望を謝絶することなく、適切に経営改善計画等の策定支援等を行っているか。（ⅶ）債務者が大部で精緻な経営改善計画等を策定していないことを理由に、貸付条件の変更等の申込みを謝絶していないか。 - 金融庁

(1) Where any person has applied for protection of any trade mark in a Convention country or prescribed foreign country, such person or his legal representative or assignee, after furnishing a declaration within the prescribed time indicating the date of the application and the country in which it was made, shall in respect of the application for registration of his trade mark, be entitled to a right of priority and such application in Malaysia shall have the same date as the date of the application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be, subject to the following: (a) that the application for registration is made within six months from the date of application for protection in the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and where an application for protection is made in more than one Convention country or prescribed foreign country, the period of six months referred to herein shall be reckoned from the date on which the earlier or earliest of those applications is made; (b) that the applicant shall be either a national or resident of, or a body corporate incorporated under the laws of, the Convention country or prescribed foreign country concerned, as the case may be; and (c) that nothing in this section shall entitle the proprietor of a trade mark to recover damages for infringements or any happening prior to the date on which the application for protection of the trade mark is made in Malaysia.例文帳に追加

(1) 何人かがある条約国又は所定の外国において商標の保護出願をした場合は，その者若しくはその者の法律上の代表者又は譲受人は，当該出願の出願日及び出願を行った国を明記した書面を所定期間内に提出した後，自己の商標に関する当該登録出願に関して優先権を享受する権限を有し，当該商標のマレーシアでの登録出願について，前記条約国又は場合により所定の外国における保護出願日と同一の出願日が付与されるものとする。ただし，次に従うことを条件とする。 (a) 登録出願が，当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国での保護出願の日から6月以内に行われること。保護出願が2以上の条約国又は所定の外国でなされた場合は，前記の6月の期間は，それら複数出願中の最先のものがなされた日から起算するものとする。 (b) 出願人が，当該条約国又は場合により所定の外国の国民若しくは住民又は法律に基づき設立された一般法人であること，及び (c) 本条の如何なる規定も，当該商標の保護出願がマレーシアで行われた日より前に生じた当該商標の侵害行為その他の事由による損害について賠償を求める権利を当該商標の所有者に与えるものではないこと - 特許庁

(ii) in the case where the Tender Offer Purchaser makes Purchase, etc. of the Share Certificates, etc. using a method different from the method of proportional distribution stated in the Tender Offer Notification: the amount calculated by multiplying the difference between the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages under the preceding paragraph if the Tender Offer Purchaser uses the method of proportional distribution and the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. was actually made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages (in cases where the Tender Offer Purchaser did not make Purchase, etc. of any of Share Certificates, etc. from the person entitled to claim damages, the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages if the method of proportional distribution is used) by the difference between the Tender Offer Price (or the price paid by the Tender Offeror as specified in Article 27-17(2) in the case where paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is also applicable, the favorable price referred to in the preceding item in the case where the preceding item is also applicable, or the more favorable one between them in the case where both Article 27-17(1) and the preceding item are also applicable) and the market price of the Share Certificates, etc. at the time when the damages are claimed under the preceding paragraph (or estimated disposal price in the case where there is no market price for the Share Certificates, etc., or disposal price in the case where the Share Certificates, etc. was disposed of before the damages is claimed). 例文帳に追加

二　当該公開買付けをした者が公開買付届出書に記載されたあん分比例方式と異なる方式で株券等の買付け等をした場合　当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に前項の規定による請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数から当該公開買付けをした者が当該請求権者から買付け等をした株券等の数を控除した数（当該請求権者から買付け等をしなかつた場合には、当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に当該請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数とする。）に公開買付価格（前条第一項に該当する場合にあつては同条第二項に規定する公開買付者が支払つた価格、前号に掲げる場合に該当する場合にあつては同号に定める有利な価格とし、そのいずれにも該当する場合にあつてはそのいずれか有利な価格とする。）から前項の規定による損害賠償を請求する時における当該株券等の市場価格（市場価格がないときはその時における処分推定価格とし、当該請求時前に当該株券等を処分した場合においてはその処分価格とする。）を控除した金額を乗じた額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The name shall be removed from the Register of Professional Representatives of any person who: is deceased or subject to an incapacity under Article 69; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 63, no longer fulfills the conditions required by Article 60 and or may no longer rely on the provisions of an international convention or on reciprocity under paragraph 2 of that Article; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 is no longer resident in Belgium or in a Member State of the European Communities or has been prohibited or placed under guardianship; having been entered in the Register of Professional Representatives under Article 64 has been removed ex officio from the list of professional representatives before the European Patent Office for one of the reasons listed in Rule 102 to of the Implementing Regulations to the Convention on the Grant of European Patents or for having been subject to a disciplinary measure taken under Article 134 of that Convention; at the time of the request for entry or of a request for amendment of the entry, intentionally submitted documents or made declarations the content of which did not correspond to reality; has been convicted or has been subject to a prohibition referred to in Article 60; has committed a serious offense in the exercise of his patent representation activities before the Office. 例文帳に追加

次に掲げる者は職業的代理人登録簿から抹消される。死亡した者，又は第69条の規定による無能力者となった者，第63条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，もはや第60条及びの条件を満たしていない者，又は国際条約の規定若しくは第60条の下での相互主義に依存することができない者，第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，もはやベルギー若しくは欧州共同体の居住者ではない者，又は禁止され若しくは保護の下におかれるようになった者，第64条の規定により職業的代理人登録簿に登録されたが，欧州特許の付与に関する条約についての施行規則の中の規則第102(a)から(c)までに掲げる理由の1つに基づき，又は同条約第134条(c)の下でとられた制裁措置に服させられたという理由で，職権により欧州特許庁に対する職業的代理人名簿から抹消された者，登録請求又は登録補正請求のとき，故意に真実ではない文書又は申立を提出した者，有罪の判決を受け，又は第60条にいう禁止に服させられた者，庁に対する特許代理人としての職務の遂行において，重大な罪を犯した者。 - 特許庁

(2) In the case where a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. has been subject to two or more foreign corporation taxes or to a foreign corporation tax twice or more on its income for a taxable business year, when a domestic corporation related to the said specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. seeks the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) or Article 68-91(1) (including the cases where it is applied pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article by deeming the amount to be as specified therein; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) of the Act, regarding the amount of the said foreign corporation taxes in two or more business years or consolidated business years; with respect to the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act for a business year following the first one of the said two or more business years or consolidated business years, the amount obtained by deducting the amount listed in item (ii) (the amount listed in item (iii), when seeking the application of the provisions of Article 66-7(1) of the Act for the first time after receiving the application of the provisions of Article 68-91(1) of the Act) from the amount listed in item (i) shall be deemed to be the calculated amount prescribed in the preceding paragraph: 例文帳に追加

２　特定外国子会社等につきその課税対象年度の所得に対して二以上の外国法人税が課され、又は二回以上にわたつて外国法人税が課された場合において、当該特定外国子会社等に係る内国法人がその二以上の事業年度又は連結事業年度において当該外国法人税の額につき法第六十六条の七第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）又は第六十八条の九十一第一項（同条第二項の規定によりみなして適用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）の規定の適用を受けるときは、当該二以上の事業年度又は連結事業年度のうち最初の事業年度又は連結事業年度後の事業年度に係る法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用については、第一号に掲げる金額から第二号に掲げる金額（法第六十八条の九十一第一項の規定の適用を受けた場合で、その適用を受けた後最初に法第六十六条の七第一項の規定の適用を受けるときは、第三号に掲げる金額）を控除した金額をもつて前項に規定する計算した金額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The Registrar shall refer to an examiner every application in respect of which a complete specification has been filed and if satisfied on the report of the examiner that- the nature of the invention or the manner in which it is to be performed is not particularly described and ascertained in the complete specification, or the application, specification and drawings have not been prepared in the prescribed manner, or the title of the specification does not sufficiently indicate the subject-matter of the invention, or the statement of claim does not sufficiently define the invention, or where a complete specification has been left after a provisional specification, the invention particularly described in the complete specification is not substantially the same as that which is described in the provisional specification, or the invention as described and claimed is prima facie not a manner of new manufacture or improvement, or the specification relates to more than one invention, or in the case of an application claiming priority under section 78A, the specification describes and claims an invention substantially larger than or substantially different from the invention disclosed in the specification field with the application made outside Bangladesh by virtue of which priority is claimed, or in the case of an application for a patent of addition under section 15A, the invention describe and claimed in the specification is not an improvement or modification of that described and claimed in the original specification, he may refuse to accept the application or require that the application, specification or drawings be amended before he proceeds with the application; and in the later case the application shall, if the Registrar so directs, bear date as from the time when the requirement is complied with: Provided that, when a specification comprises more than one invention, the application shall, if the Registrar or the applicant so requires, be restricted to one invention and the other inventions may he made the subject-matter of fresh applications; and any such fresh application shall be proceeded with as a substantive application, but the Registrar may, in his discretion, direct that any such fresh application made before the acceptance of the original application shall bear the date of the original application or such later date as he may fix, and the fresh application shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to have been made on the date which it bears in accordance with such direction: Provided further that where a complete specification is left after a provisional specification, the Registrar may, if the applicant so requests, cancel the provisional specification and direct that the application shall be deemed to have been made on the date on which the complete specification was left, and proceed with the application accordingly. 例文帳に追加

登録官は、完全な明細書が提出されたあらゆる出願につき審査官へ付託するものとし、次に掲げる(a)から(h)の各号に該当する旨が審査官報告書において報告される場合、登録官は、出願の受理を拒否すること、又は、出願審査を行う前に、願書、明細書若しくは図面の補正を求めることができ、後者の場合、登録官がそのように命ずるとき、出願の日付は当該補正の要件が満たされた日とする。発明の本質又は実施方法が、完全な明細書中に具体的に記述されておらず、確認されないとき。願書、明細書及び図面が所定の方式で作成されていないとき。明細書の名称は発明の要旨を十分に示していないとき。請求項の記載は発明を十分に定義していないとき。又は、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、完全な明細書に具体的に記載された発明が仮明細書の記載と本質的に同一ではないとき。記載され請求されている発明が一見して新規の製造又は改良の方法ではない。明細書が2 以上の発明に係わるものであるとき。又は、第78A 条により優先権を主張する出願の場合、優先権主張の基礎とされているバングラデシュ国外で行われた出願において提出された明細書で開示されている発明より本質的に広い、又は本質的に異なる発明が明細書に記載され請求されているとき。又は、第15A 条による特許追加出願の場合、明細書に記載され請求される発明が原明細書に記載され請求される発明の改良又は修正ではないとき。ただし、明細書が2 以上の発明から成る場合、当該出願は、登録官又は出願人がそのように求めるとき、1 発明に限定されるものとし、その他の発明は新規出願の対象とすることができる。当該新規出願は実質的な出願として手続きを進め、原出願が受理される前に行われるこのような新規出願につき、原出願の日又は自己が定めるそれ以降の日付を付すよう登録官は自己の裁量において指示することができ、当該新規出願は、本法の適用上、当該指示に従い付与された日付に出願されたものとみなされる。ただし、さらに、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、登録官は、出願人がそのように求めれば、仮明細書を取り消し、出願は完全な明細書が提出された日付に行われたとみなすよう命じることができ、そのように当該出願の手続きを進めることができる。 - 特許庁

Simultaneously, how should insurance be regulated and supervised from now on? I believe insurance in China is not as advanced as in Japan yet. But then again, Japan’s insurance industry has experienced falling stock prices and interest rates over the past decade and suffered a long period of winter-like hardship: the insurance sector, where they have something called “expense profits”, “interest gain” and “mortality profits”, the interest gain was so squeezed that at one point, negative carry was more than 1 trillion yen. In the United States, the federal government will be establishing a division in charge of insurance for the first time within the federal government organization under the financial reform legislation. As you know, basic supervision of insurance in the United States is conducted on a state-by-state basis. Despite the fact that AIU—the world’s biggest private insurance company—was effectively nationalized in the United States, the insurance industry has been a bit of a blind spot in that any attempts in the past to negotiate with the central government often resulted in being told that it was a matter for the state government. The United States is a federal republic comprised of states, so in that sense, insurance varies from state to state in tax and other aspects. 例文帳に追加

しかし、同時にそれでは今から保険の行政に関してどういう点をやっているのか。まだ日本ほど保険が進んでいるとは思っておりませんけれども、しかし同時に、日本の保険業界もご存じのように大変ここ10年間株価は下がる、あるいは金利が下がるということで、費差益・利差益・死差益というのが保険業にはございますが、本当に利差益が少なくて大変一時は末端逆ざやが1兆円余の保険業界でもあるというような冬の時代が長く続きましたけれども、多くのかなりの、我々が27年前に通ったころは、日本の名前がついた生命保険会社法だったのですけれども、今色々な外資からも変わったところもありますので、そんなことを含めて今度アメリカでも保険ということが、ご存じのようにアメリカは保険の基本的監督は州単位なんですよ、アメリカの政府は。州単位で保険をやっていまして、連邦政府というのは、金融規制改革法で初めて連邦政府の中に保険担当の部署をつくるんですよ、今度初めて。しかしながら、AIUなんていう世界で一番大きな民間保険会社をアメリカは実質国営化しましたけれども、そこら辺で保険業界というのはちょっと穴と言ったらおかしいけれども、中央政府と今まで交渉しましても、これは中央政府の話だということもしばしばございまして、そういった意味で保険というのはなかなか、アメリカは合衆国ですから、税金なんかも州によって違いますね。 - 金融庁

Article 212 (1) A person who pays a nonresident, in Japan, domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-2 to (xii) (in the case where the nonresident falls under the category listed in Article 164(1)(iv) (Nonresidents Having No Permanent Establishments in Japan): limited to domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-3 to (xii), and excluding that specified by a Cabinet Order) or a person who pays a foreign corporation, in Japan, domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-2 to (vii) or (ix) to (xii) (in the case where the foreign corporation falls under the category listed in Article 141(iv) of the Corporation Tax Act (Foreign Corporations Having No Permanent Establishments in Japan): limited to domestic source income listed in Article 161(i)-3 to (vii) or (ix) to (xii), and excluding the one that falls under the provision of Article 180(1) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Domestic Source Income Received by Foreign Corporations Having Permanent Establishments in Japan) or Article 180-2(1) or (2) (Special Provisions for Taxation on Interest, etc. on Trust Property) and that specified by a Cabinet Order) shall, at the time of payment, collect income tax with respect to the said domestic source income, and pay it to the State no later than the tenth day of the month following the month that includes the date of collection. 例文帳に追加

第二百十二条　非居住者に対し国内において第百六十一条第一号の二から第十二号まで（国内源泉所得）に掲げる国内源泉所得（その非居住者が第百六十四条第一項第四号（国内に恒久的施設を有しない非居住者）に掲げる者である場合には第百六十一条第一号の三から第十二号までに掲げるものに限るものとし、政令で定めるものを除く。）の支払をする者又は外国法人に対し国内において同条第一号の二から第七号まで若しくは第九号から第十二号までに掲げる国内源泉所得（その外国法人が法人税法第百四十一条第四号（国内に恒久的施設を有しない外国法人）に掲げる者である場合には第百六十一条第一号の三から第七号まで又は第九号から第十二号までに掲げるものに限るものとし、第百八十条第一項（国内に恒久的施設を有する外国法人の受ける国内源泉所得に係る課税の特例）又は第百八十条の二第一項若しくは第二項（信託財産に係る利子等の課税の特例）の規定に該当するもの及び政令で定めるものを除く。）の支払をする者は、その支払の際、これらの国内源泉所得について所得税を徴収し、その徴収の日の属する月の翌月十日までに、これを国に納付しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Two policemen testified that about eight o'clock on the night of Thursday they had noticed the prisoner slip into the gate of Nina San Croix's residence and go down to the side of the house, where he was admitted; that his appearance and seeming haste had attracted their attention; that they had concluded that it was some clandestine amour, and out of curiosity had both slipped down to the house and endeavored to find a position from which they could see into the room, but were unable to do so, and were about to go back to the street when they heard a woman's voice cry out in, great anger: "I know that you love her and that you want to get rid of me, but you shall not do it! You murdered him, but you shall not murder me! I have all the evidence to convict you of murdering him! The Archbishop will have it to- morrow! They shall hang you! Do you hear me? They shall hang you for this murder!" that thereupon one of the policemen proposed that they should break into the house and see what was wrong, but the other had urged that it was only the usual lovers' quarrel and if they should interfere they would find nothing upon which a charge could be based and would only be laughed at by the chief; that they had waited and listened for a time, but hearing nothing further had gone back to the street and contented themselves with keeping a strict watch on the house. 例文帳に追加

警官二人は次のように証言した。木曜日夜八時くらいに、ニーナ・サン・クロワの住居に被告人がやってきて、入り口から家の横手まで侵入し、家に招き入れられたのを見かけた。その外見やそわそわした挙動から、これは怪しいと思った。その時は、被告人が女主人の秘密の愛人なんだろうと思い、好奇心も手伝って、自分たちが屋敷に入り、なんとか部屋の中を見れるよう努力した。しかし中を見ることはできず、大通りに戻ろうとしたところ、女主人が大声で誰かをののしっている声が聞こえてきた。「あの女が好きだって事、私をのけ者にしたいんだって事は分かってるわ。でもね、言うとおりにしてもらいますから！　あなたは私の夫を殺した！　でも、私は殺されるいわれはないわ！　夫殺しの証拠はすべてそろっているのよ。大司教様には明日お見せします。あなたは縛り首間違いなしよ！　いいこと？　夫殺しは縛り首よ！」これを聞いた警官の一人は、家の中に踏み込んでなにが起こっているのか確かめなければならないと同僚に言った。だが、もう一人は単なる痴話喧嘩にすぎんと言い、もし踏み込んだとしても逮捕できるような事はなにも発見できない、署長に笑われるのがオチだと主張した。二人はしばらくその場所にとどまって耳を澄ましていたが、もうなにも聞こえてはこなかった。それで大通りに戻り、屋敷を厳重に見張ることにした。 - Melville Davisson Post『罪体』

Without limiting subsection (1), that subsection includes the power to make regulations: requiring persons to give statutory declarations in relation to applications under the Act or regulations, or in relation to proceedings under the Act (other than court proceedings); and making provision for and in relation to the making of a declaration, or the doing of an act, under this Act on behalf of a person who, because of infancy or physical or mental disability, is unable to make the declaration or do the act; and providing for the refund, in the whole or part of a fee paid under the Act; and providing for the waiver, in whole or part, of a fee that would otherwise be payable under the Act; and making provision for and in relation to the amendment of an entry in the Register to correct a clerical error or an obvious mistake, or for any other purpose; and empowering the Registrar to require a person to inform the Registrar, within the period prescribed by the regulations, whether or not the person wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act; and empowering the Registrar to require a person who wishes to be heard for the purposes of a provision of the Act to appear on a day, and at a place and time, specified by the Registrar; and providing for the contents of design applications in which one or more designs are disclosed, including, but not limited to, requirements as to common ownership of the designs; and empowering the Registrar to direct an applicant for registration or publication of a design to do such things as are necessary to ensure that the application is in accordance with the requirements of the regulations for filing and: providing for the lapsing of the application if such a direction is not complied with within the period specified in the regulations; and providing for the restoration of an application that has so lapsed; and providing for appeals against decisions of the Registrar made under the regulations; and making provision for and in relation to the practice and procedure of prescribed courts in proceedings under this Act, including provision prescribing the time within which any proceeding may be started or anything else may be done, and providing for the extension of any such time; and making transitional or consequential provisions as necessary or convenient because of the repeal of the Designs Act 1906 and the enactment of this Act; and provide for regulations under the Designs Act 1906 to continue to have effect (with any prescribed alterations) for specified purposes of this Act; and providing for things to be done for the purposes of this Act or the regulations by means of electronic equipment or communication; and empowering the Registrar to prepare, publish and sell such documents relating to designs as the Registrar thinks fit; and making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents. 例文帳に追加

(1)を制限することなく，同項は次の諸規則を制定する権限を含む。ある者に対し，本法若しくは規則に基づく申請に関して，又は本法に基づく手続(裁判所手続を除く)に関して，制定法上の宣言(司法手続外誓約)を提出するよう要求すること，及び未成年又は身体的若しくは精神的障害を理由に，宣言の作成又は行為の実行ができない者の代理として，本法に基づいて，宣言の作成又は行為の実行のために，かつ，それに関して規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき納付した手数料の全部又は一部における返還についての規定を制定すること，及び本法に基づき別途納付すべき手数料の全部又は一部における請求権の放棄についての規定を制定すること，及び誤記又は明白な誤りを訂正するため又はその他の目的で，登録簿への記入の補正のために，かつ，その補正に関連して規定を制定すること，及びある者に対し，本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望するか否かを所定の期間内に登録官に通知するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び本法の規定の適用による聴聞を受けることを希望する者に，登録官が指定した日時及び場所に出頭するよう要求する権限を，登録官に付与すること，及び意匠の共通所有権についての要件を含むがそれに限らず，1又は2以上の意匠が開示される意匠出願の内容を定めること，及び意匠の登録又は公告を求める出願人に対し，出願が提出及び次についての規則の要件に従うようにするために必要な事柄を行うよう指示する権限を，登録官に付与すること，規則が指定する期間内に指示が守られない場合に出願が失効することについて規定すること，及びかく失効した出願の回復について定めること，及び規則に基づいて行った登録官の決定に対する上訴について定めること，及び手続を開始することができる又はその他の事柄をなすことができる期間を定める規定を含め，本法に基づく手続における所定の裁判所の実務及び手続のために，かつ，それに関連して規定を制定すること，及び当該期間の延長について定めること，及び1906年意匠法の廃止及び本法の施行を理由に，必要な又は便宜な経過規定又は派生規定を作成すること，及び本法の明記された目的のために引き続き有効であるように(所定の変更を加えて)，1906年意匠法に基づく規則を制定すること，及び本法又は規則の適用上，電子装置又は通信の方法によって行われるべき事柄についての規則を制定すること，及び登録官に対し，登録官が適切と考える意匠に関する書類を準備する，公告する及び販売する権限を付与すること，及び書類の廃棄のため及びそれに関する規定を作成すること - 特許庁

I made a comment at the informal ministerial gathering today, which was obviously not a comment from the head of the administration, but I am Vice-Chief of the People's New Party (PNP), and the current government is, as you know, a coalition of the Democratic Party of Japan (DPJ) and the PNP. Accordingly, Prime Minister Kan, right after he assumed office, met with (PNP) Chief Shizuka Kamei to discuss how the two parties would cooperate in policymaking, at which meeting I was also present as the PNP Secretary-General at that time. Under the three-party coalition that preceded the current one, there was a committee called the Ministerial Committee on Basic Policies, which was set up as a forum for the parties to coordinate or match their policies, but then the Social Democratic Party left the coalition. That is why how the remaining parties should cooperate in policymaking afterwards was a subject of discussion at the party leader meeting right after Prime Minister Kan became the new Prime Minister, during which both leaders agreed to go about it properly. Then as it turned out, as you know, we had a House of Councilors election and the same subject also just came up again during the recent meeting of the two party leaders, who supposedly agreed to "do it (policy cooperation)." That is why I decided to make an elaborate comment on this subject to Prime Minister Kan at today's informal ministerial gathering, to which Prime Minister Kan responded by telling Mr. Gemba, who is a state minister and is also DPJ's Policy Research Committee Chair, to work on policy cooperation with the PNP in the proper way - therefore, Policy Research Committee Chair Gemba and I proceeded to discuss how it should be done, a task that I presume will basically be handled mainly by policy research committee chairs. 例文帳に追加

今日、閣僚懇で、私はこれは行政の長としての発言ではございませんけれども、国民新党の副代表でもございますし、両党、民主党と国民新党のご存じのように連立内閣でございますから、両党間の政策協議をどうするのかということは、実は菅総理がなられた後、すぐ亀井静香（国民新党）代表と話をされまして、当時私は幹事長でございましたから、同席をいたしまして、前の3党連立内閣のときは、基本政策閣僚委員会というのがございまして、ここで政策を整合性を図る、あるいはすり合わせをするということでございましたが、社民党さんが連立を離脱されましたので、その後の政策協力をどうするかということが当時菅総理が実現した後のすぐの党首会談でのテーマで、しっかりやりましょうという話でございましたが、ご存じのように参議院選挙になりましたので、またこの前も両党首会談でそのことが議題になって、「（政策協力を）やろう」ということでございましたから、今日閣僚懇で菅総理に相当申し上げまして、ちょうど玄葉さんが民主党の国務大臣兼政調会長でございますから、菅総理からもきちっと国民新党のほうとの政策協議をするようにということでございまして、玄葉政調会長と私ともどういうふうにするのかと、基本的に政調会長中心だというふうに思いますけれども、そのことを打ち合わせをさせていただいたわけでございます。 - 金融庁

Regrettably, more than 5,000 people are still missing, and one year is too long a time to wait for the adjudication of disappearance due to emergency. Therefore, the FSA's director-general in charge held very tough negotiations with the Ministry of Justice, which is responsible for matters related to the certification of the death of missing people. As a result, it has been agreed to allow the death of missing people to be certified three months after their disappearance based on a notification submitted to municipal governments through a simplified procedure. While an arrangement like that is made behind the scenes, life insurance sales women are going from mortuary to mortuary with the relatives of missing people. As I am a doctor by profession, I know well what a great mental shock it is for ordinary people to see the body of a person killed in a disaster like that, but insurance sales women are going as far as to do that. As I told you previously, Ishinomaki Shoko Shinkumi, which could not be contacted for four days after the earthquake, continued to provide loans, with employees working by candle light. In that sense, I am very grateful to various people in the financial sector, including financial institutions, life and non-life insurance companies and securities companies, for dealing with the unprecedented earthquake and tsunami disaster through private-public collaboration. However, I am not so complacent as to believe that we have done enough. 例文帳に追加

しかし、危難失踪で1年間といったら、5千人以上の方が本当に胸の痛む思いでございますが、今まだ行方不明でございまして、それで危難失踪で1年というのはちょっと長すぎますので、これは金融庁の局長が非常に頑張っていただきまして、法務省、これは生きるか死ぬかという生死は法務省ですから、法務省と大変激しい交渉をやらせていただきまして、これは3か月だったかな、3か月で簡素な市町村に対する届出によって、死亡の確認ができるというふうになりまして、そんなことを目に見えないことでございますが、いわゆる生保のセールスレディの方もご遺族と一緒にご遺体安置所なんかをどんどん回っていただいておりまして、私は医者ですから、よくああいうご遺体にお会いするという、普通慣れてない方といいますか、我々は本職が医者でございますけれども、いかに精神的ショックを受けられるかということは、私はよく分かりますので、そこまでしてセールスレディの方がやっていただいているという話をよく聞きますので、そういった意味で、私は金融の分野はまさに金融機関、いつかお話ししたと思いますが、宮城県石巻商工信用組合、4日間、連絡が付かなかったのですけれども、ろうそくをつけながら、きちっと人にお金を貸したということをやっていただいておりまして、そういう意味では私は本当に各金融機関、生損保、あるいは証券会社、あるいはそういったいろいろな各関係、金融関係の方に本当に官民一体で未曾有の震災に取り組んでいただいたということは感謝いたしておりますけれども、まだまだ、十分と、そんなに決してのぼせ上がっておりません。 - 金融庁

Article 68-88-2 (1) Where a consolidated parent corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency, the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the consolidated corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the consolidated corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十八条の八十八の二　連結親法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、当該申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（当該申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、当該申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In this context, the financial sector has ballooned more than the real economy, and risks can no longer be contained within the risks of one financial institution. The Lehman Brothers shockwave was a typical example of this. It has a broad impact on the national economy and the global economy. Back in 1929, economies were organized into economic blocks, which became a remote cause of the Second World War according to some people. Having learned a bitter lesson from the War, G8 and G20 mobilized their wisdom and reached a consensus on Basel III as well. I am looking forward to seeing an accord reached on Basel III at the upcoming Seoul Summit. I believe that the human race has learned a few lessons since the Great Depression after 1929 in conjunction with the globalization of economies around the world. With this in mind, the general rule is to facilitate the financial sector that supports companies, as well as the yen, and properly execute risk management. As relationship of trust is fundamental to financial businesses, financial institutions do not function properly if customers lack confidence in financial institutions, as you are well aware. Taking this into account, we are steering the financial sector at an extremely difficult time. Even at times like this when the financial sector is undergoing dramatic change on a global scale, we are committed to fulfilling our responsibilities properly while seeking your wisdom and people’s opinions, bearing in mind that Japan’s economy is not isolated but interlinked with American and Chinese economies as well due to globalization. 例文帳に追加

また、そういった意味で、非常に金融が実体経済以上にふくらむ、それがなおかつ、一つの金融機関のリスクの中で、リスクはもうおさまらなくなった、リーマン・ショックなんか典型ですね。国全体の経済、あるいは世界全体の経済に広範な影響を与えるというようなことでございますから、そういった中で、1929年はそれぞれの経済がブロック化しまして、それが第二次世界大戦の遠因だという方もおられますけれども、その辺の苦しい反省を踏まえて、Ｇ８、Ｇ20ということで、何とか英知を集めて、今度のバーゼルもまとまったし、今度はぜひ、これがソウルサミットでまとまっていただきたいと思いますけれども、世界の経済のグローバル化と同時に、やっぱり人類は1929年の後の世界大恐慌よりは、少し学習をしたと私は思っていますし、そういうことも視野に入れつつ、企業を支える金融、あるいは円の円滑化、あるいはリスク管理をきちっとやるというようなことは、これは原則でございますし、なおかつ金融業というのは、この前も申しましたように、基本的には信頼関係でございますから、顧客の方だとか、あるいは金融機関に関する信頼がないと、金融機関というのはうまく機能しないというのはもう皆様方、専門家でございますからよくご存じでございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、非常に難しい時代の金融の舵取りでございます。世界が今非常に金融も変動しておりまして、しかし、そういったときでも、皆様の知恵もかりながら、国民の声もかりながら、そして日本一国の経済ではございませんから、まさに非常に経済のグローバル化、アメリカの経済も中国の経済も、まさに結びついているわけでございますから、そういったことも視野に入れつつ、しっかり責任を果たしていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the following acts do not constitute an infringement of the right to the use of a registered 26 trademark- (a) where a trademark is registered subject to any conditions or limitations, the use of the trademark in any manner in relation to goods or services, as the case may be, to be sold or otherwise traded in, in any place, or in relation to goods or services to be exported to any market, or in any other circumstances, to which, having regard to those conditions or limitations, the registration does not extend; (b) by being permitted to use those goods or a bulk of which they form part or services, or a bulk of which they form part by the proprietor of the trademark or any person related to the trade of goods or services in relation with the registered user or to use within the limit of permitted use of the registered proprietor or user, the use of such trademark, unless the registered proprietor or the user subsequently has removed or obliterated it, or has at any time expressly or impliedly consented to the use of the trademark; (c) by registration under this Act- (i) the use of a trademark is within established right by a person in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of, or to be accessory to, other goods or services; (ii) the use of a registered trademark, being one of two or more trademarks registered under this Act which are identical or nearly resemble each other, is in exercise of the right to the use of the trademarks given by registration under this Act. 例文帳に追加

(1)本法のいかなる規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる行為は登録商標の使用権の侵害に該当しない。(a)商標が何らかの条件又は制限を付して登録されている場合、それらの条件又は制限を考慮して、当該登録の効力が及ばない場所で商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)について販売若しくは取引するため、商品若しくは役務に関しかかる効力の範囲外にある市場へ輸出するため、又はかかる効力の範囲外にあるその他の環境において、いかなる態様であれ当該商標を使用する場合。(b)当該商標の所有者又は登録使用権者に関連する商品若しくは役務の取引に係わる者によってそれらの商品、それらの商品から構成される大量品(バルク)、又は役務、若しくはそれらの役務の集合の利用を許諾受けた使用、又は、登録所有者又は利用権者から許諾を受けた使用の範囲内における当該商標の使用である場合。ただし、登録所有者又は使用権者が後にそれを解消又は抹消しない限り、又はどの時点においても明示黙示を問わず当該商標の使用を承諾している限りにおいてとする。(c)本法に基づく登録により、(i)他の商品若しくは役務の一部を構成するように、又は他の商品若しくは役務に随伴するものとして認められた商品又は役務に関連してある者により設定された範囲内における商標の使用である場合。(ii)登録商標の使用が、本法に基づき登録された2以上の互いに同一又は非常に似ている商標の一つとして、本法に基づき登録により付与された商標の使用権の行使である場合。 - 特許庁

Revocation of a patent in whole or in part may be obtained on petition to or on a counter claim in a suit for infringement before the High Court Division on all or any of the following grounds, namely:- that the invention has been the subject of a valid prior grant of a patent in Bangladesh; that the true and first inventor or his legal representative or assign was not the applicant or one of the applicants for the patent; that the patent was obtained in fraud of the rights of the person applying for the revocation or of any person under or through whom he claims; that the invention was not, at the date of the patent, a manner of new manufacture or improvement; that the invention does not involve any inventive step, having regard to what was known or used prior to the date of the patent; that the invention is of no utility; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and fairly describe and ascertain the nature of the invention and the manner in which the invention is to be performed; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and clearly ascertain the scope of the invention claimed; that the patent was obtained on a false suggestion or representation; that the primary or intended use or exercise of the invention is contrary to law; that the patentee has contravened, or has not complied with, the conditions contained in the patent; that the complete specification does not disclose the best method of performance of the invention known to the applicant for the patent at the time when the specification was left at the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. 例文帳に追加

特許の全部又は一部の取消しは、高等裁判所への請願書により、又は高等裁判所に係属している侵害訴訟中の反訴により、次の各号に掲げる事由のすべて又はいずれかを理由として得ることができる。すなわち、その発明はバングラデシュ国内において先願により有効に付与された特許の対象であること。真正かつ最先の発明者又はその法定代理人若しくは譲受人は当該特許出願人若しくは出願人の一人ではなかったこと。その特許は取消しを申請している者又は当該申請人がなす主張につき指示している者、若しくは当該申請人が代理している者の権利を詐害する目的で取得されたこと。その発明は特許された日において新規性を欠く製造方法又は改良であったこと。その発明は特許の日以前に知られていた又は使用されていたものに係るものであり、進歩性がないこと。その発明は有用性がないこと。完全な明細書は十分かつ正確に記載されておらず、発明の本質及び発明の実施方法が確認されないこと。完全な明細書から、請求する発明の範囲が十分かつ明瞭に確認されないこと。その特許は虚偽の示唆又は不実表示に基づいて取得されたこと。その発明の主な又は目的とする用途又は実施が法令に反すること。その特許権者が、当該特許に含まれる条件に違反し又は遵守していないこと。完全な明細書が、当該明細書が特許意匠商標庁に提出された当時に当該特許に係る出願人が知っていた、当該発明の最良の実施方法を開示していない。 - 特許庁

Article 66-4-2 (1) Where a domestic corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the Commissioner of the National Tax Agency (including the cases where a foreign corporation has, pursuant to the provisions of a tax convention, filed an objection prescribed in the said tax convention with the competent authority of the other Contracting State which is related to the foreign corporation), the district director, etc. (meaning the district director, etc. prescribed in Article 46(1) of the Act on General Rules for National Taxes; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) may, upon application by the corporation that has filed the objection, grant a grace of tax payment, up to the amount calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of corporation tax payable based on the reassessment or determination listed in paragraph (16)(i) of the preceding Article which pertains to the objection (limited to the amount to be covered by the consultation prescribed in the tax convention with the other Contracting State which pertains to the objection), including the amount of additional tax prescribed in Article 69 of the said Act with regard to the said amount of corporation tax, for the period from the due date for tax payment (meaning the due date for tax payment prescribed in Article 37(1) of the said Act; in the case where the application has been filed after the due date for tax payment, the period shall start from the date of the filing of the said application) until the day on which one month has elapsed since the day following the day on which a reassessment has been made pursuant to the provision of Article 26 of the said Act based on an agreement with the competent authority of the other Contracting State (in the case where there is no such agreement or in any other case specified by a Cabinet Order: the date specified by a Cabinet Order) (this period shall be referred to as the "grace period for tax payment" in paragraph (7)); provided, however, that this shall not apply where the corporation that has filed the application has been, at the time of filing the application, delinquent in payment of national tax other than the said amount of corporation tax. 例文帳に追加

第六十六条の四の二　内国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき国税庁長官に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合（外国法人が租税条約の規定に基づき当該外国法人に係る条約相手国の権限ある当局に対し当該租税条約に規定する申立てをした場合を含む。）には、税務署長等（国税通則法第四十六条第一項に規定する税務署長等をいう。以下この条において同じ。）は、これらの申立てに係る前条第十六項第一号に掲げる更正決定により納付すべき法人税の額（これらの申立てに係る条約相手国との間の租税条約に規定する協議の対象となるものに限る。）及び当該法人税の額に係る同法第六十九条に規定する加算税の額として政令で定めるところにより計算した金額を限度として、これらの申立てをした者の申請に基づき、その納期限（同法第三十七条第一項に規定する納期限をいい、当該申請が当該納期限後であるときは当該申請の日とする。）から当該条約相手国の権限ある当局との間の合意に基づく同法第二十六条の規定による更正があつた日（当該合意がない場合その他の政令で定める場合にあつては、政令で定める日）の翌日から一月を経過する日までの期間（第七項において「納税の猶予期間」という。）に限り、その納税を猶予することができる。ただし、当該申請を行う者につき当該申請の時において当該法人税の額以外の国税の滞納がある場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 49 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding paragraph (2), items (i) and (ii)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 (Omission of Calling Procedures), Article 311 (Voting in Writing), Article 312 (Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment) and Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the General Meeting of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "shareholder" in those provisions (excluding Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding items), Article 298, paragraph (4), Article 311, paragraph (4), Article 312, paragraph (5), Article 314 and Article 318, paragraph (4)) shall be deemed to be replaced with "general representative"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the terms "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" and "shareholder" in Article 298, paragraph (1) (excluding the items) and Article 298, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act" and "member or general representative," respectively; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), items (iii) and (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "shareholders" in Article 311, paragraph (4) and Article 312, paragraph (5) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the terms "by the shareholders" and "common interest of the shareholders" in Article 314 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "by the general representatives" and "common interest of the general representatives," respectively; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 45 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "shareholders" in Article 318, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第四十九条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条（招集手続の省略）、第三百十一条（書面による議決権の行使）、第三百十二条（電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）及び第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は、相互会社の総代会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、これらの規定（同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項、第三百十一条第四項、第三百十二条第五項、第三百十四条並びに第三百十八条第四項を除く。）中「株主」とあるのは「総代」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時総代会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、同法第二百九十八条第一項（各号を除く。）及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条第二項」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員又は総代」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百十一条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十四条中「株主から」とあるのは「総代から」と、「株主の共同」とあるのは「社員の共同」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第四十五条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同条第四項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well. 例文帳に追加

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁

Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第四十一条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条から第三百二条まで（招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）、第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）、第三百十九条（第四項を除く。）（株主総会の決議の省略）及び第三百二十条（株主総会への報告の省略）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。）の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主（当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。）の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The documents specified by an ordinance set forth in Article 145, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as listed in the following (in case of documents certified by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document recording the reasons for the merger; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act; (b) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act; (c) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b) of the Act; and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval; (iv) minutes of the general meeting of shareholders approving the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of Members prescribed in Article 144, paragraph 4, Article 144-2, paragraph 2, or Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of shareholders prescribed in Article 144-6, paragraph 1 and Article 144-13, paragraph 1 of the Act, and Article 783, paragraph 1, Article 795, paragraph 1, or Article 804, paragraph 1 of the Company Act) of each Commodity Exchange which carries out the merger, or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for the merger have been followed; (v) a document stating the status of the property, income and expenditure of each Commodity Exchange that carries out the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, the settlement related statements, etc. of the preceding business year; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the financial documents, etc. of the preceding business year and detailed statements thereof); (vi) in the case where a public notice or demand (in cases where the public notice is made through an official gazette, a daily newspaper which publishes matters of current events, or an Electronic Public Notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 3 or Article 144-10, paragraph 3 of the Act [including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17), or Article 789, paragraph 3; Article 799, paragraph 3; or Article 810, paragraph 3 of the Company Act, a public notice by such method) is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5; Article 144-2, paragraph 3; and Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act, or Article 144-10, paragraph 2 of the Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act); Article 789, paragraph 2; Article 799, paragraph 2; or Article 810, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; and in cases where a creditor has made an objection, a document certifying that the liabilities have been paid or reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor, reasonable property has been deposited for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said merger is not likely to harm said creditor; (vii) a document stating a method for business succession pertaining to transactions on a Commodity Market which has been opened by a Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of a merger; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees (limited to a case where a Commodity Exchange subsequent to a merger becomes an Incorporated Commodity Exchange); (ix) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the merger on the Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (x) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed - 113 - Commodity at the time of a merger, a document stating that it is appropriate to conduct transactions of Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (xi) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market at the time of a merger by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another. 例文帳に追加