「There is a」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(815ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger is an Incorporated Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 143, paragraph 1, item 6 and item 7 of the Act; (ii) the following matters concerning another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding clearing corporations and Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item): (a) accounting documents or an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year, and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet (in the case where the final business year does not exist, a balance sheet as on the day of the - 94 - establishment of another Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. as deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) as an extraordinary closing day (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to a clearing corporation or Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act (including the case where it is applied - 95 - mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act); (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (excluding liabilities inherited from another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger on and after the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vi) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の三第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、新設合併設立商品取引所が株式 会社商品取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。 一法第百四十三条第一項第六号及び第七号に掲げる事項についての定めの相当性に関 する事項 二他の新設合併消滅商品取引所（清算株式会社及び清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下 この号において同じ。）についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る計算書類等又は財産目録、貸借対照表及び当該貸借対照表と ともに作成された損益計算書（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合 併消滅株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表）の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅商 品取引所の成立の日）後の日を臨時決算日（二以上の臨時決算日がある場合にあ っては、最も遅いもの）とする臨時計算書類等があるときは、当該臨時計算書類 等の内容 ハ他の新設合併消滅商品取引所において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない 場合にあっては、他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処 分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該他の新設合併消滅商品取引所の財産の状況に 重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の三第四項 の会員総会の日の十日前の日後新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日まで の間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終 事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に限る。） 三 他の新設合併消滅商品取引所（清算株式会社又は清算会員商品取引所に限る。）が 会社法第四百九十二条第一項（法第七十七条第一項において準用する場合を含む。） の規定により作成した貸借対照表 四当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。以下この号におい て同じ。）において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、当該 新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担 その他の当該新設合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が 生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後 新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存する こととなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事業の内容に 限る。） 五新設合併設立株式会社商品取引所の成立の日以後における当該新設合併設立株式会 社商品取引所の債務（他の新設合併消滅商品取引所から承継する債務を除く。）の履 行の見込みに関する事項 六法第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に 変更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

(2) When examining a witness, an expert witness, an interpreter or a translator, if the presiding judge finds that there is a risk that the body or property of these persons or their relatives may be harmed, threatened or confused and that the witness, expert witness, interpreter or translator will not be able to give full testimony if his/her address or work place or other matters specifying the ordinary whereabouts of these persons are disclosed, the presiding judge may place limitations on questions concerning these matters; provided, however, that this shall not apply when limitations on the public prosecutor's examination may interfere considerably with proving the case, or when limitations on the examination by the accused or his/her counsel may substantially harm the defense of the accused. 例文帳に追加

２　裁判長は、証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人を尋問する場合において、証人、鑑定人、通訳人若しくは翻訳人若しくはこれらの親族の身体若しくは財産に害を加え又はこれらの者を畏怖させ若しくは困惑させる行為がなされるおそれがあり、これらの者の住居、勤務先その他その通常所在する場所が特定される事項が明らかにされたならば証人、鑑定人、通訳人又は翻訳人が十分な供述をすることができないと認めるときは、当該事項についての尋問を制限することができる。ただし、検察官のする尋問を制限することにより犯罪の証明に重大な支障を生ずるおそれがあるとき、又は被告人若しくは弁護人のする尋問を制限することにより被告人の防御に実質的な不利益を生ずるおそれがあるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 16-5 (1) In addition to the cases specified in Article 16-3-2, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), when a municipal mayor, etc. finds it necessary for prevention of fire involving storage or handling of hazardous materials, he/she may order the owner, manager or possessor of every facility that is found to be storing or handling the designated quantity or a larger quantity of hazardous materials (hereinafter referred to as a "storage facility, etc." in this paragraph), to submit information materials or request such persons to make reports, or may have his/her official engaged in the fire service affairs enter the storage facility, etc., and inspect the position, structure or equipment of the facility and the storage or handling of hazardous materials conducted there, ask questions of any related person or take away hazardous materials or other materials suspected of being hazardous materials, limited to the maximum quantity required for testing. 例文帳に追加

第十六条の五　市町村長等は、第十六条の三の二第一項及び第二項に定めるもののほか、危険物の貯蔵又は取扱いに伴う火災の防止のため必要があると認めるときは、指定数量以上の危険物を貯蔵し、若しくは取り扱つていると認められるすべての場所（以下この項において「貯蔵所等」という。）の所有者、管理者若しくは占有者に対して資料の提出を命じ、若しくは報告を求め、又は当該消防事務に従事する職員に、貯蔵所等に立ち入り、これらの場所の位置、構造若しくは設備及び危険物の貯蔵若しくは取扱いについて検査させ、関係のある者に質問させ、若しくは試験のため必要な最少限度の数量に限り危険物若しくは危険物であることの疑いのある物を収去させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Unless otherwise provided by this Act, third parties may not use without the consent of the proprietor of the trade mark in the course of trade any sign which is identical with the trade mark for goods or services which are identical with those for which the trade mark is registered; any sign where because of its identity with or similarity to the trade mark and because of the identity or similarity of the goods or services to which the trade mark and that sign are affixed, there exists a likelihood of confusion on the part of the public, including the likelihood of association between the sign and the trade mark; any sign identical with or similar to the trade mark for goods or services which are not similar to those for which the trade mark is registered, where the trade mark has a good reputation in the Czech Republic and where the use of that sign would without due course take advantage of or be detrimental to the distinctive character or the good reputation of the trade mark. 例文帳に追加

本法に別段の規定がない限り，第三者は，商標所有者の同意を得ることなく，取引の過程で次に掲げる行為を行ってはならない。登録商標と同一の標識を当該登録商標の対象である商品又はサービスと同一の商品又はサービスについて使用すること，標識が登録商標と同一であるか若しくは類似しかつ両者の対象とする商品若しくはサービスが同一であるか若しくは類似する故に，公衆を誤認させる虞がある場合(公衆に登録出願された標識と登録商標との関係についての誤解を生じさせる虞がある場合を含む。)におけるかかる標識の使用，標識が対象とする商品若しくはサービスが当該標識と同一若しくは類似の商標の対象である商品若しくはサービスと類似していないものの，かかる商標がチェコ共和国において定評を得ており，標識の使用が正当な理由なしに当該商標の評判を利用するか又は先の商標の識別性を侵害するものであると認められる場合におけるかかる標識の使用。 - 特許庁

As for Hong Kong, I have had a long relationship with Hong Kong since I visited there two decades ago as Parliamentary Vice-Minister for International Trade and Industry. As you may be aware, Asia’s financial center is either Tokyo, Hong Kong or Singapore. Following my trip to the United States the other day, I will visit Hong Kong, one of the financial hubs in Asia, where I hope to exchange various opinions with the people there and gain a wide range of knowledge. 例文帳に追加

それからまた、今日から大変恐縮でございますけれども、中国・香港に出張させていただきまして、（本日の）閣議で了解をいただいたわけでございまして、今回の出張は北京ですね、第3回日中ハイレベル経済対話の経済閣僚の1人として出席をさせていただきまして、それから中国・香港、私は20年ぐらいに実は香港とは非常に色々友好関係をしておりまして、20年前に通産省の政務次官のときに香港に行かせていただきまして、それ以来ずっと超党派の日本香港友好議員連盟の会長の羽田孜さんが、総理大臣をされた方がずっとしておりますが、私が長い間、事務局長をいたしておりまして、今は海江田万里さんがまた（衆院選を）通ってこられましたので海江田万里さんが事務局長で、今、会長は羽田孜元総理大臣、私が会長代理ということでございまして、香港とは長い間お付き合いもございますし、ご存じのように金融センター・香港ということでして、アメリカに行ってアジアの金融センター、東京か香港かシンガポールかということは皆さん方よくご存じだと思いますけれども、香港に行って、これは当然金融のアジアの中心の1つでもございますから、そういった方々と色々意見を交換、あるいは色々勉強させていただきたいという思いでございます。 - 金融庁

(7) When making a calculation set forth in paragraph (1)(i), if there is any amount to be included in deductible expenses in the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of Article 33 and Article 42 to Article 53 of the Corporation Tax Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 67-12(2) and Article 67-13(2) of the Act, whose provisions shall be applicable under the provisions of the said item, the said amount shall be included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of adjusted income for the relevant business year, only when detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses are attached to a final return form for the relevant business year set forth in Article 66-6(5) of the Act; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the district director finds that there was any compelling reason for the failure to attach detailed statements and the said detailed statements have been submitted. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項第一号の計算をする場合において、同号の規定によりその例に準ずるものとされる法人税法第三十三条及び第四十二条から第五十三条までの規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十七条の十二第二項及び第六十七条の十三第二項の規定により当該各事業年度において損金の額に算入されることとなる金額があるときは、当該各事業年度に係る法第六十六条の六第五項の確定申告書に当該金額の損金算入に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、当該金額を当該各事業年度の調整所得金額の計算上、損金の額に算入する。ただし、その添付がなかつたことについて税務署長がやむを得ない事情があると認める場合において、当該明細書の提出があつたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) When making a calculation set forth in paragraph (1)(i), if there is any amount to be included in deductible expenses in the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of Article 33 and Articles 42 to Article 53 of the Corporation Tax Act, and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 67-12(2) and Article 67-13(2) of the Act, whose provisions shall be applicable under the provisions of the said item, the said amount shall be included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of adjusted income for the relevant business year, only when detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses are attached to a consolidated final return form for the relevant business year set forth in Article 68-90(5) of the Act; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the competent district director having jurisdiction over the consolidated parent corporation's place for tax payment finds that there was any compelling reason for the failure to attach detailed statements and the said detailed statements have been submitted. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項第一号の計算をする場合において、同号の規定によりその例に準ずるものとされる法人税法第三十三条及び第四十二条から第五十三条までの規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十七条の十二第二項及び第六十七条の十三第二項の規定により当該各事業年度において損金の額に算入されることとなる金額があるときは、当該各事業年度に係る法第六十八条の九十第五項の連結確定申告書に当該金額の損金算入に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、当該金額を当該各事業年度の調整所得金額の計算上、損金の額に算入する。ただし、その添付がなかつたことについて連結親法人の納税地の所轄税務署長がやむを得ない事情があると認める場合において、当該明細書の提出があつたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40-10 (1) Where, between a specially-related shareholder, etc. (meaning a person who falls under the category of specified shareholder, etc. as well as an individual and a corporation having a special relationship therewith as specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Subsection) and a specially-related domestic corporation, there is a relationship specified by a Cabinet Order as a relationship whereby the said specially-related shareholder, etc. indirectly holds shares, etc. (meaning shares or capital contributions; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and the next paragraph) that accounts for 80 percent or more of the total number or total amount of issued shares of or capital contributions to the said specially-related domestic corporation (excluding the shares or capital contributions held by the corporation; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph and the next paragraph as "issued shares, etc.") (such relationship referred to in the next paragraph as a "specified relationship"), and a foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as acting as an intermediary between the said specially-related shareholder, etc. and the said specially-related domestic corporation by way of the holding of the issued shares, etc. (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as an "affiliated foreign corporation"), which falls under the category of affiliated foreign corporation specified by a Cabinet Order as a corporation whose tax burden to be imposed on its income earned in a state or territory where its head office or principal office is located is significantly lower than the tax burden to be imposed on the income of a corporation in Japan (hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as a "specified foreign corporation"), in each business year (meaning a business year prescribed in Article 2(2)(xix); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) beginning on or after October 1, 2007, retains as part of the amount of undistributed income, pursuant to the provision of a Cabinet Order, any amount that is adjusted, with respect to the said amount of undistributed income, based on the tax amount pertaining to the said amount of undistributed income and the amount of dividend of surplus, dividend of profit or distribution of surplus prescribed in Article 23(1)(i) of the Corporation Tax Act (hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "dividend of surplus, etc.") (such adjusted amount hereinafter referred to in this Article as "eligible retained income"), the amount equivalent to the part of eligible retained income which is calculated pursuant to the method specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of income corresponding to the number of shares, etc. of the said specified foreign corporation held by the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. through direct and/or indirect ownership, while taking into consideration the contents of the claim (meaning a claim to demand dividend of surplus, etc., distribution of property and any other economic benefit) vested in such shares, etc. (such part of eligible retained income referred to in the next Article as "taxable retained income") shall be deemed to be the income of the resident who is the said specially-related shareholder, etc. categorized as miscellaneous income, and included in his/her gross income in the calculation of the amount of his/her miscellaneous income for the year that includes the day on which two months have elapsed since the day following the last day of the relevant business year: 例文帳に追加

第四十条の十　特殊関係株主等（特定株主等に該当する者並びにこれらの者と政令で定める特殊の関係のある個人及び法人をいう。以下この款において同じ。）と特殊関係内国法人との間に当該特殊関係株主等が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式又は出資（自己が有する自己の株式又は出資を除く。以下この項及び次項において「発行済株式等」という。）の総数又は総額の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等（株式又は出資をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）を間接に保有する関係として政令で定める関係（次項において「特定関係」という。）がある場合において、当該特殊関係株主等と特殊関係内国法人との間に発行済株式等の保有を通じて介在するものとして政令で定める外国法人（以下この款において「外国関係法人」という。）のうち、本店又は主たる事務所の所在する国又は地域におけるその所得に対して課される税の負担が本邦における法人の所得に対して課される税の負担に比して著しく低いものとして政令で定める外国関係法人に該当するもの（以下この款において「特定外国法人」という。）が、平成十九年十月一日以後に開始する各事業年度（第二条第二項第十九号に規定する事業年度をいう。以下この条において同じ。）において、その未処分所得の金額から留保したものとして、政令で定めるところにより、当該未処分所得の金額につき当該未処分所得の金額に係る税額及び法人税法第二十三条第一項第一号に規定する剰余金の配当、利益の配当又は剰余金の分配（以下この項において「剰余金の配当等」という。）の額に関する調整を加えた金額（以下この条において「適用対象留保金額」という。）を有するときは、その適用対象留保金額のうち当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の有する当該特定外国法人の直接及び間接保有の株式等の数に対応するものとしてその株式等の請求権（剰余金の配当等、財産の分配その他の経済的な利益の給付を請求する権利をいう。）の内容を勘案して政令で定めるところにより計算した金額（次条において「課税対象留保金額」という。）に相当する金額は、当該特殊関係株主等である居住者の雑所得に係る収入金額とみなして当該各事業年度終了の日の翌日から二月を経過する日の属する年分の当該居住者の雑所得の金額の計算上、総収入金額に算入する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I am Nomura from Sekai Nippo. Although provisional remedial measures such as recapitalization and governmental capital injection are certainly necessary, will they resolve the European fiscal and financial crisis? Is there any fundamental solution? These questions are the cause of concern for international financial markets. The kind of policy centering on austerity and tax increase that has been adopted by Greece has created a very difficult situation, triggering large-scale demonstrations. The kind of policy centering on austerity and tax increase that has been adopted by Greece has created a very difficult situation, triggering large-scale demonstrations. Could you offer your thoughts on that? 例文帳に追加

世界日報社の野村でございますけれども、資本増強とか、政府による公的資金の注入とか、そういう痛み止めは打たなければいけないと思うのですけれども、しかし、それで欧州の財政・金融危機が解決されるのかどうか。抜本的な治療法があるかどうかということが、国際金融市場に不安を与えていると思うのですけれども、今のギリシャでやっているような緊縮・増税政策だけでは、大規模なデモが起きたりして極めて厳しい状況にあると思うのですけれども、そういう財政・金融危機の根本を改定するためには、その引き金になりましたアメリカ主導のネオリベラリズム、これを根本的に克服していくということで世界の首脳が知恵を出し合っていかなければいけないのではないかと思いますけれども、こうした点について大臣のご所見をいただければ幸いでございます。 - 金融庁

There shall be filed at the Trade Marks Registry in respect of every mark registered as a certification trade mark regulations for governing the use thereof, which shall include provisions as to the cases in which the proprietor is to certify goods or services and to authorize the use of the certification trade mark, and may contain any other provisions which the Registrar may by general or special order, require or permit to be inserted therein (including provisions conferring a right of appeal to the Registrar against any refusal of the proprietor to certify goods or to authorize the use of the certification trade mark in accordance with the regulations); and regulations so filed shall be open to inspection in like manner as the register as provided in section 148. 例文帳に追加

証明商標として登録された各標章について，その使用を規制する規約が商標登録局に対して提出されなければならない。この規約には，所有者が商品又はサービスについて証明する場合及び証明商標の使用を許諾する場合についての規定を設けなければならず，かつ，登録官が一般又は特別の命令によって挿入すべき旨を要求又は許可したその他の規定(所有者が規約に従い商品について証明をすること又は証明商標の使用を許諾することを拒絶した場合に，登録官に対して審判請求をする権利を付与する規定を含む。)を含めることができる。提出された規約は，第148条に規定された登録簿と同様の方法によって公衆の閲覧に供さなければならない。 - 特許庁

The Team, chaired by Mr. Ohtsuka, will first direct its efforts at thoroughly publicizing the system under the revised Money Lending Act. Although the FSA had worked strenuously to make the system widely known, we were told at this press conference that they were still inadequate. The Team will conduct fact-finding with respect to the implementation status and the impact of the amended Money Lending Act. As the revised Money Lending Act was passed unanimously by all the parties at the Diet with the aim of reducing multiple debtors, the Team will get a grasp of the actual situation as to whether the legislation is functioning as intended in reality, how it is being implemented and what kind of impact it has had, and then conduct a follow-up inspection of the system.In government administration, where I have spent 25 years of my career as mentioned before, the basic assumption of bureaucracy had long been to be “infallible”—that is, not to make any mistakes. However, there has been a change in government. 例文帳に追加

そういったことで、私がこの前申し上げましたように、大塚耕平（副大臣）座長に、（改正）貸金業法による制度の、まず周知徹底、一生懸命、金融庁としても徹底したつもりでございますけれども、まだまだ足らないというようなご指摘をこの記者会見でもいただいたと思っていまして、それを、さらに制度の周知徹底、そして（改正）貸金業法の施行状況、影響についての実態の把握、やはり（改正）貸金業法というのは「多重債務者を減らそう」と全党一致で国会を通過した法律でございますけれども、本当に、法の趣旨がきちんと、現実にどうなっているのかということを、その施行状況、影響についての実態を把握して、そういった意味で、改正貸金業法に係る制度のフォローアップ点検をさせていただいたのですけれども、私がこの前も申し上げましたように、私もこの世界に25年もおらせていただきますが、行政というのは、一切、無謬（むびゅう）性といいますか、間違わないということが長い間の官僚制度の基本でしたけれども、私は、やはり政権交代もしましたし、やはり、特に専業主婦（夫）、主婦（夫）には婦人も夫も入りますけれども、同意書が必要であると。 - 金融庁

Furthermore, in the inspection and supervision of financial institutions, we take action in a stringent manner as necessary based on the confirmed facts pursuant to laws and regulations if violations of laws and regulations or problems in user protection are found as a result of on-site inspections, day-to-day supervision and other such activities. Likewise, we have endeavored to inspect and supervise the Incubator Bank of Japan in a stringent manner. The FSA had to properly conduct the first inspection and, in particular, the second inspection, according to law as an executive branch of government. Unless there is an obvious violation of law, an executive branch of government cannot take any arbitrary action. The third inspection, however, clearly revealed a violation of law as you know—what I am trying to tell you is that our action must be based on laws and facts. That is how an executive branch of government works. In that sense, although I can see at the emotional level why we are being criticized for not taking action earlier from the start, I believe as the head of an executive branch of government that regulation and supervision involves giving guidance based on objective facts in accordance with law, and should have as little room as possible for demands based on likelihood and arbitrariness. I believe this is an important quality for a person in charge of regulation and supervision based on laws and facts. Nevertheless, given that the Bank consequently failed, the FSA shall learn a lesson from this and continue to endeavor to stabilize the financial system. 例文帳に追加

また、金融機関の検査・監督に当たっては、立ち入り検査や日常の監督等により、法令違反や利用者保護上の問題が判明した場合に確認された事実と法令に基づいて、必要に応じて厳正な対処を行っておりまして、日本振興銀行についても同様な厳正な検査・監督の実施に努めてきたわけでございますが、当庁としては1回目、特に2回目の検査、これは非常に行政でございますから、やっぱり法律に基づいてきちっと適正にやっていかなければならないと。明確な法律違反のことがない限り、行政というのは恣意的なことはできないわけですよ。しかし、３回目の時はもうご存じのように、明確な法律違反のことがございますから、法律に基づいて、それからやっぱり法律と事実に基づいてやっていかなければいけないというのは、行政というのはそういうものですから、そういった意味で、何で最初から早くやらなかったのかというおしかりをいただくというのも、気持ちとしてはよく分かりますけれども、私は行政というものは、きちっと法に基づいて、客観的な事実に基づいて、きちっと指導をしていくもので、見込みだとか、恣意的な要請というのはできるだけあってはならないというふうに、私は行政（機関）の長としては思っております。それが法によって、法と事実によってきちっと行政をあずかる者の一つの大事な点だと、こう思っておりますが、そういった意味で、しかし結果としては破綻をしたわけでございますから、当庁としては、今回の教訓を生かして、引き続き金融システムの安定化に努めていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger is an Incorporated Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in item 2 and item 3 of Article 142 of the Act (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof); (ii) when the whole or part of the shares of stock, etc. (which means shares of stock, etc. prescribed in Article 142, item 2 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) issued for a member of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger are shares of stock of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, the provisions of the articles of incorporation of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; (iii) the following matters concerning the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger: (a) the contents of accounting documents, etc. pertaining to the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the contents of a balance sheet as on the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. (which means extraordinary accounting documents, etc. set forth in Article 2, paragraph 3, item 13 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) as deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; the same shall apply in (c)) as an extraordinary closing day (which means an extraordinary closing day prescribed in Article 441, paragraph 1 of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter) (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 1 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (vi) when there were changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、吸収合併存続商品取引所が株式会社 商品取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。一法第百四十二条第二号及び三号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該定めがない場合 にあっては、当該定めがないこと）の相当性に関する事項 二吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の会員に対して交付する株式等（法第百四十二条第二 号に規定する株式等をいう。以下同じ。）の全部又は一部が吸収合併存続株式会社商 品取引所の株式であるときは、当該吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の定款の定め 三吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度に係る計算書類等の内容（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸 収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の成立の日における貸借対照表の内容）ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続株式会 社商品取引所の成立の日。ハにおいて同じ。）後の日を臨時決算日（会社法第四百 四十一条第一項に規定する臨時決算日をいう。以下同じ。）（二以上の臨時決算日 がある場合にあっては、最も遅いもの）とする臨時計算書類等（会社法施行規則 第二条第三項第十三号の臨時計算書類等をいう。以下同じ。）があるときは、当該 臨時計算書類等の内容 ハ最終事業年度の末日後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収 合併存続株式会社商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたと きは、その内容（法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併 の効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっ - 87 - ては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。）四 吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（清算会員商品取引所を除く。）において最終事業年 度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立 の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品 取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四 十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生ずる日までの間に新 たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末 日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。）五吸収合併が効力を生ずる日以後における吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所の債務 （法第百四十四条第五項において準用する法第百二十四条第一項の規定により吸収 合併について異議を述べることができる債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。）の履 行の見込みの有無に関する事項 六法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に変更 が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 130, paragraph 1, item 4 of the Act shall be as follows: (i) the total number of shares of stock which an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion can issue (in the case where an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a company issuing classified shares of stock, including the total number of the respective types of classified shares of stock that can be issued at the time of entity conversion); (ii) when the matters listed in the respective items of Article 107, paragraph 1 of the Company Act are specified as being the contents of Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion issued by an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion (excluding the case where an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a company issuing classified shares of stock), the contents of said shares of stock; (iii) when it is determined that an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion (limited to the case where an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a company issuing classified shares of stock) shall issue Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion with different contents with regard to the matters listed in the respective items of Article 108, paragraph 1 of the Company Act, the contents of the respective types of shares of stock (in the case where there are the provisions of the articles of incorporation set forth in paragraph 3 of the same Article with regard to a certain type of shares of stock, and when the contents of said type of shares of stock are not specified by an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion pursuant to said articles of incorporation, the outline of the contents of said type of shares of stock); (iv) when there are provisions of the articles of incorporation with regard to the number of shares per unit, said number of shares per unit (in the case where an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion is a company issuing classified shares of stock, the number of respective shares per unit); (v) when the articles of incorporation of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion have the following provisions, said provisions: (a) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 139, paragraph 1, Article 140, paragraph 5, or Article 145, item 1 or item 2 of the Company Act; (b) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 164, paragraph 1 of the Company Act; (c) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 167, paragraph 3 of the Company Act; (d) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 168, paragraph 1, or Article 169, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; (e) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 174 of the Company Act; (f) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 347 of the Company Act; (g) the provisions of the articles of incorporation prescribed in Article 26, item 1 or item 2 of the Ordinance for Enforcement of the Company Act; (vi) when there are provisions of the articles of incorporation to appoint an administrator of the shareholder register, the name and the address and the business office of that person; (vii) the matters specified by the articles of incorporation (excluding the matters listed in Article 203, paragraphs 1, items 1 to 3 inclusive of the Company Act and in the preceding items), and whose notification was requested by a person, who seeks to file an application to subscribe for the Shares of Stock Issued upon Entity Conversion to said Incorporated Commodity Exchange after Entity Conversion. 例文帳に追加

法第百三十条第一項第四号に規定する主務省令で定める事項は、次に掲げる事項とする。一組織変更後株式会社商品取引所が発行することができる株式の総数（組織変更後株 式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合にあっては、各種類の組織変更時発 行株式の発行可能種類株式総数を含む。）二組織変更後株式会社商品取引所（組織変更後株式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会 社である場合を除く。）が発行する組織変更時発行株式の内容として会社法第百七条 第一項各号に掲げる事項を定めているときは、当該株式の内容 三組織変更後株式会社商品取引所（組織変更後株式会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会 社である場合に限る。）が会社法第百八条第一項各号に掲げる事項につき内容の異な る組織変更時発行株式を発行することとしているときは、各種類の株式の内容（ある 種類の株式につき同条第三項の定款の定めがある場合において、当該定款の定めによ り組織変更後株式会社商品取引所が当該種類の株式の内容を定めていないときは、当 該種類の株式の内容の要綱） 四単元株式数についての定款の定めがあるときは、その単元株式数（組織変更後株式 会社商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合にあっては、各種類の株式の単元株式 数）五組織変更後株式会社商品取引所の定款に次に掲げる定めがあるときは、その規定 イ会社法第百三十九条第一項、第百四十条第五項又は第百四十五条第一号若しくは 第二号に規定する定款の定め ロ会社法第百六十四条第一項に規定する定款の定め ハ会社法第百六十七条第三項に規定する定款の定め ニ会社法第百六十八条第一項又は第百六十九条第二項に規定する定款の定め ホ会社法第百七十四条に規定する定款の定め ヘ会社法第三百四十七条に規定する定款の定め ト会社法施行規則第二十六条第一号又は第二号に規定する定款の定め 六株主名簿管理人を置く旨の定款の定めがあるときは、その氏名又は名称及び住所並 びに営業所 七定款に定められた事項（会社法第二百三条第一項第一号から第三号まで及び前各号 に掲げる事項を除く。）であって、当該組織変更後株式会社商品取引所に対して組織 - 77 - 変更時発行株式の引受けの申込みをしようとする者が当該者に対して通知することを 請求した事項 - 経済産業省

There are two types of risks: risks held directly by financial institutions themselves and risks that may arise from off-balance-sheet assets. Unless a certain degree of transparency is introduced with regard to the management of such risks, another incident like the Lehman shock could occur. As is often pointed out, the remuneration system of rewarding risk-taking with higher pay encourages unrestrained risk-taking, so this must be curbed under the financial regulatory framework. One year on from the outbreak of the crisis, some people in the financial industry may be saying that they should be free to do as they like as they have recovered, but I won't buy such an argument. According to one estimate, over the past year, governments in the United States and Europe may have used funds equivalent to 5% to 6% of GDP to bail out financial institutions and help them stay afloat. The financial industry must not simply continue “business as usual” in the hope that it will get limitless protection 例文帳に追加

これは二通りありまして、一つは本体の持っているリスク、それから簿外債務となり得るリスク、こういうものは一定の透明性を持ってやりませんとリーマンのようなことが起きますし、今しきりに議論されていますけれども、リスクを取った方が報酬が増えるというあの方式ですときりなくリスクを取ってしまうという、そういうもの全体を金融規制の中できちっとやらなければならないと思っていますけれども、１年経つと世界の金融界の一部の人は「もういいじゃないか、治ったから」、そうは思ってないのですけれども、この間各国政府が投入した救済の資金、つなぎの資金、アメリカ、ヨーロッパ、トータルするとＧＤＰのおよそ５～６％に及んでいるのではないかという説もありまして、金融界は際限なく守られるということを期待して金融証券業務をやっていただいては困る、そのように思っております - 金融庁

Article 38 (1) The Regional Board shall, as provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, hear the opinions or feelings of the victims (those persons who have suffered damage as a result of the crimes which are the grounds for the punishment rendered to the person subject to examination, hereinafter referred to as "victims", including their statutory agents or in the case of the victim's death or their suffering from severe mental or physical disorders, their spouse, lineal relatives or siblings) regarding the parole of the person subject to examination and regarding sentiment on damage by the crimes whenever, in its deliberation period, victims ask this of the Board. The Regional Board however has the discretion not to hear from victims when it finds that there is good reason to consider that hearing from them is not appropriate, in light of the nature of the case, the circumstances of the parole examinations and other related circumstances. 例文帳に追加

第三十八条　地方委員会は、仮釈放を許すか否かに関する審理を行うに当たり、法務省令で定めるところにより、被害者等（審理対象者が刑を言い渡される理由となった犯罪により害を被った者（以下この項において「被害者」という。）又はその法定代理人若しくは被害者が死亡した場合若しくはその心身に重大な故障がある場合におけるその配偶者、直系の親族若しくは兄弟姉妹をいう。次項において同じ。）から、審理対象者の仮釈放に関する意見及び被害に関する心情（以下この条において「意見等」という。）を述べたい旨の申出があったときは、当該意見等を聴取するものとする。ただし、当該被害に係る事件の性質、審理の状況その他の事情を考慮して相当でないと認めるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 26-14 (1) Where the provisions of Article 26-12(2) or paragraph (4) of the preceding Article shall apply, when there is any amount that an issuer prescribed in Article 41-12(5) or (6) of the Act (hereinafter referred to as an "issuer" in this Article) cannot deduct as prescribed in the second sentence of Article 26-12(2) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (4) of the preceding Article) in the month following the month including the day on which he/she shall make a refund pursuant to the provisions of Article 41-12(5) or (6) of the Act, the competent district director having jurisdiction over the place for tax payment prescribed in Article 26-10(2) for income tax pertaining to the profit from redemption for discount bonds prescribed in Article 41-12(5) or (6) of the Act shall refund the said amount that cannot be deducted to the said issuer. 例文帳に追加

第二十六条の十四　第二十六条の十二第二項又は前条第四項の規定を適用する場合において、法第四十一条の十二第五項又は第六項に規定する発行者（以下この条において「発行者」という。）が、法第四十一条の十二第五項又は第六項の規定による還付をすべきこととなつた日の属する月の翌月において第二十六条の十二第二項後段（前条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により控除することができない金額があるときは、法第四十一条の十二第五項又は第六項に規定する割引債の償還差益に係る所得税の第二十六条の十第二項に規定する納税地の所轄税務署長は、当該控除することができない金額を、当該発行者に還付する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The Tokyo High Court judgment of March 31, 2005 upheld the original decision ruling that the service provider had infringed the right to make the copyrighted work transmittable and that there is a concrete and realistic risk that that automatic public transmission services will, by nature, trigger certain types of copyright infringements by its users, which would be foreseeable for the service provider operating such service, who consequently induces such infringements. Moreover, where the service provider may procure certain economic benefits from operating such service, the service provider will be held responsible for the infringement, because such provider has caused damages from actions which are under his/her own control. In this case, it is natural that such service provider should be held liable for such infringement, in other words he/she would himself/herself be regarded as the infringer. 例文帳に追加

東京高裁平成１７年３月３１日判決は、当該サービスが、その性質上、具体的かつ現実的な蓋然性をもってサービス利用者による特定の類型の違法な著作権侵害行為を惹起するものであり、サービス提供者がそのことを予想しつつ当該サービスを提供して、そのような侵害行為を誘発し、しかもそれについてのサービス提供者の管理があり、サービス提供者がこれにより何らかの経済的利益を得る余地があるとみられる事実があるときは、サービス提供者はまさに自らコントロール可能な行為により侵害の結果を招いている者として、その責任を問われるべきことは当然であり、サービス提供者を侵害の主体と認めることができる、と述べて、サービス提供者を著作物の送信可能化権及び自動公衆送信権の侵害主体であると認定した原審の判断を支持した。 - 経済産業省

a) if the trade mark has not been properly used for goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is registered within the continuous period of five years in the territory of the Slovak Republic; unless proved otherwise by the proprietor of the trade mark or there are no legitimate reasons for non-use, the trade mark shall be considered not used in the territory of the Slovak Republic within the continuous period of five years. The Office shall not revoke the trade mark, if the use of the trade mark commenced or was resumed following five years of non use and filing the request for revocation of the trade mark; the use which commenced or which was resumed following five years of non-use of the trade mark within three months preceding the filing of the request for revocation shall be disregarded where the preparations for the commencement or the resumption of the use occurred only after the proprietor becomes aware that a request for revocation of the trade mark might be filed;territory of the Slovak Republic within the continuous period of five years. The Office shall not revoke the trade mark, if the use of the trade mark commenced or was resumed following five years of non use and filing the request for revocation of the trade mark; the use which commenced or which was resumed following five years of non-use of the trade mark within three months preceding the filing of the request for revocation shall be disregarded where the preparations for the commencement or the resumption of the use occurred only after the proprietor becomes aware that a request for revocation of the trade mark might be filed;例文帳に追加

(a) 商標が，スロバキア共和国の領域において，商標登録の対象である商品又はサービスについて，継続して5年間適正に使用されていない場合。商標の所有者が別段の証明を行わないとき又は不使用に正当な理由がないときは，商標は，スロバキア共和国の領域において継続して5年間使用されていないとみなされる。5年間の不使用及び商標の取消請求に引き続いて商標の使用が開始され又は再開された場合は，庁は，商標を取り消さないものとする。5年間の商標不使用に引き続いて取消請求に先立つ3月以内に開始され又は再開された使用は，商標の取消請求がなされる可能性があることを所有者が認識した後に使用の開始又は再開の準備がなされたときは無視される。 - 特許庁

(iii) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger (excluding Member Commodity Exchanges which is to be liquidated pursuant to the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item (i) and item (iii)) of the Companies Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph (1) of the Act) (hereinafter such Member Commodity Exchange shall be referred to as a "Liquidating Member Commodity Exchange"), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph (4) of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); 例文帳に追加

三　吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（法第七十七条第一項において準用する会社法第四百七十五条（第一号及び第三号を除く。）の規定により清算をする会員商品取引所（以下「清算会員商品取引所」という。）を除く。）において最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 40 (1) In litigation pertaining to the infringement of a breeder's right or an exclusive exploitation right, where there is prima-facie evidence of the fact that trade secrets (refers to trade secrets as provided in Article 2 (6) of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (Act No. 47 of 1993), the same shall apply hereinafter) possessed by a party satisfy all of the following conditions, the court may, upon the motion of the party, order by a ruling that the parties, etc., counsels or assistant in courts shall neither use the trade secrets for any purpose other than those for the proceedings of the litigation nor disclose the trade secrets to any person other than those who receive the order regarding the trade secrets under this provision. However, this shall not apply where the parties, etc., counsels or assistant in courts have, prior to the filing of the motion, already obtained or been in the possession of the trade secrets by a method other than by reading of the briefs under item (i) or through the examination or disclosure of evidence under the said item. 例文帳に追加

第四十条　裁判所は、育成者権又は専用利用権の侵害に係る訴訟において、その当事者が保有する営業秘密（不正競争防止法（平成五年法律第四十七号）第二条第六項に規定する営業秘密をいう。以下同じ。）について、次に掲げる事由のいずれにも該当することにつき疎明があった場合には、当事者の申立てにより、決定で、当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人に対し、当該営業秘密を当該訴訟の追行の目的以外の目的で使用し、又は当該営業秘密に係るこの項の規定による命令を受けた者以外の者に開示してはならない旨を命ずることができる。ただし、その申立ての時までに当事者等、訴訟代理人又は補佐人が第一号に規定する準備書面の閲読又は同号に規定する証拠の取調べ若しくは開示以外の方法により当該営業秘密を取得し、又は保有していた場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 13 (1) When the Fluorocarbons are recovered pursuant to the provisions of the preceding article, except for instances in which the Fluorocarbons themselves are to be recycled (used as a refrigerant and as raw material for other products or when bringing them to a condition whereby they are transferred gratuitously or for a fee to entities using them as a refrigerant or as raw material for other products; the same shall apply hereinafter), the Fluorocarbons Recovery Operator shall deliver the Fluorocarbons to Vehicle Manufacturers, etc. who shall collect the Parts Specified for Recycling, etc. pursuant to the provisions of Article 21 (when there are no Vehicle Manufacturers, etc. or when it is not possible to confirm any Vehicle Manufacturers, etc., the parties to whom they are to be delivered are Designated Recycling Organizations; the same shall apply hereinafter in this article; Article 16, Paragraph 3; and Article 18, Paragraph 6). In this case, when collection standards are specified by the Vehicle Manufacturers, etc. pursuant to the provisions of Article 22, Paragraph 1, and the Fluorocarbons shall be delivered pursuant to said collection standards. 例文帳に追加

第十三条　フロン類回収業者は、前条の規定によりフロン類を回収したときは、自ら当該フロン類の再利用（冷媒その他製品の原材料として自ら利用し、又は冷媒その他製品の原材料として利用する者に有償若しくは無償で譲渡し得る状態にすることをいう。以下同じ。）をする場合を除き、第二十一条の規定により特定再資源化等物品を引き取るべき自動車製造業者等（当該自動車製造業者等が存しないとき、又は当該自動車製造業者等を確知することができないときは、第百五条に規定する指定再資源化機関。以下この条、第十六条第三項及び第十八条第六項において同じ。）に当該フロン類を引き渡さなければならない。この場合において、当該自動車製造業者等が第二十二条第一項の規定により引取基準を定めているときは、当該引取基準に従い、これを引き渡さなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) When calculating the amount listed in Article 39-15(1)(i) with regard to the income of a specified foreign subsidiary company, etc. in its settlement of accounts for the relevant business year pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1), if there is any amount to be included in deductible expenses in the relevant business year, pursuant to the provisions of Article 33 and Article 42 to Article 53 of the Corporation Tax Act and the provisions of Article 43, Article 45-2, Article 52-2, Article 57-5, Article 57-6, Article 57-8, Article 65-7 to Article 65-9 (limited to the part pertaining to item (xix) of the table in Article 65-7(1) of the Act), Article 67-12(2) and Article 67-13(2) of the Act, whose provisions shall be applicable under the provisions of the said item, the said amount shall be included in deductible expenses for calculating the amount of adjusted income for the relevant business year, only when detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses are attached to a final return form; provided, however, that when a final return form has not been submitted or a final return form has been submitted without detailed statements concerning the inclusion of the said amount in deductible expenses, the district director shall, when he/she finds that there was any compelling reason therefor, apply the provisions of the main clause of this paragraph, only when the said detailed statements have been submitted. 例文帳に追加

７　第一項の規定により特定外国子会社等の各事業年度の決算に基づく所得の金額に係る第三十九条の十五第一項第一号に掲げる金額の計算をする場合において、同号の規定によりその例に準ずるものとされる法人税法第三十三条及び第四十二条から第五十三条までの規定並びに法第四十三条、第四十五条の二、第五十二条の二、第五十七条の五、第五十七条の六、第五十七条の八、第六十五条の七から第六十五条の九まで（法第六十五条の七第一項の表の第十九号に係る部分に限る。）、第六十七条の十二第二項及び第六十七条の十三第二項の規定により当該各事業年度において損金の額に算入されることとなる金額があるときは、確定申告書に、当該金額の損金算入に関する明細書の添付がある場合に限り、当該金額を当該各事業年度の調整所得金額の計算上、損金の額に算入する。ただし、税務署長は、確定申告書の提出がなかつた場合又は当該損金算入に関する明細書の添付がない確定申告書の提出があつた場合において、その提出又は添付がなかつたことについてやむを得ない事情があると認めるときは、当該明細書の提出があつた場合に限り、この項本文の規定を適用することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Article 7, Article 9(1) and Article 10(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to a report submitted under the preceding paragraph (hereinafter referred to as a "Share Buyback Report"), and Article 22 shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where a Share Buyback Report contains any fake statement on important matters or lacks a statement an important matters that should be stated or on a material fact that is necessary for avoiding misunderstanding. In this case, the part "a statement set forth in Article 5(1) or in other documents required under Article 5(6), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of such statement or such other documents for the public interest or protection of investors, during the period on or after the day when the notification was made under Article 4(1) or (2) but before the day when the notification is to take effect" and the terms "the person making the notification" and "an amendment" in Article 7 shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Share Buyback Report (meaning report to be submitted under Article 24-6(1); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 9(1), Article 10(1) and Article 22), or there occurs any other circumstance provided for by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as that which requires amendment of a Share Buyback Report for the public interest or protection of investors," "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting them" and "an amendment" in Article 9(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "an amendment report," respectively; the terms "the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement" and "to submit an amendment and may, when he/she finds it necessary, order the suspension of the effect of the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2)" in Article 10(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the person submitting the Share Buyback Report" and "to submit an amendment report," respectively; the term "persons specified in Article 21(1)(i) and (iii)" and the part "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Securities Registration Statement not through Public Offering or Secondary Distribution" in Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "person who, at the time of submission of the Share Buyback Report, is an Officer of the company having submitted the Share Buyback Report" and "persons who have acquired the Securities issued by the person submitting the Share Buyback Report," respectively; the terms "Article 21(2)(i) and (ii)" and "the preceding paragraph" in Article 22(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 21(2)(i)" and "the preceding paragraph as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 24-6(2)," respectively. 例文帳に追加

２　第七条、第九条第一項及び第十条第一項の規定は前項に規定する報告書（以下「自己株券買付状況報告書」という。）について、第二十二条の規定は自己株券買付状況報告書のうちに重要な事項について虚偽の記載があり、又は記載すべき重要な事項若しくは誤解を生じさせないために必要な重要な事実の記載が欠けている場合について、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、第七条中「第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の日以後当該届出がその効力を生ずることとなる日前において、第五条第一項及び第六項の規定による届出書類」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書（第二十四条の六第一項に規定する報告書をいう。以下この条、第九条第一項、第十条第一項及び第二十二条において同じ。）」と、「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第九条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書」とあるのは「訂正報告書」と、第十条第一項中「届出者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者」と、「訂正届出書の提出を命じ、必要があると認めるときは、第四条第一項又は第二項の規定による届出の効力の停止」とあるのは「訂正報告書の提出」と、第二十二条第一項中「第二十一条第一項第一号及び第三号に掲げる者」とあるのは「当該自己株券買付状況報告書を提出した会社のその提出の時における役員」と、「有価証券届出書の届出者が発行者である有価証券を募集又は売出しによらないで取得した者」とあるのは「自己株券買付状況報告書の提出者が発行者である有価証券を取得した者」と、同条第二項中「第二十一条第二項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「第二十一条第二項第一号」と、「前項」とあるのは「第二十四条の六第二項において準用する前項」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows, in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger is a Member Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in the respective items of Article 56-2 (in the case where there are no such provisions, the fact thereof); (ii) the following matters concerning the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger: (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business - 84 - year (for a Member Commodity Exchange, the final business year in the case where approval under Article 68 of the Act was received for Settlement Related Documents, etc. prescribed in Article 66, paragraph 1 of the Act pertaining to the respective business years, and for an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the final business year prescribed in Article 2, item 24 of the Company Act; the same shall apply hereinafter), and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the sharing of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger - 85 - (excluding Member Commodity Exchanges which clear the account pursuant to the provisions of Article 475 (excluding item 1 and item 3) of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act) (hereinafter such Member Commodity Exchange shall be referred to as a "Clearing Member Commodity Exchange"), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iv) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (limited to liabilities to be borne for creditors who may state objections against the Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 1 of the Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5 of the Act) of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger on and after the day when the Absorption-Type Merger came into effect; (v) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条第一項の主務省令で定める事項は、吸収合併存続商品取引所が会員商品 取引所である場合にあっては、次に掲げる事項とする。一 第五十六条の二各号に掲げる事項についての定め（当該定めがない場合にあっては、 当該定めがないこと）の相当性に関する事項 二吸収合併存続会員商品取引所についての次に掲げる事項 イ最終事業年度（会員商品取引所にあっては各事業年度に係る法第六十六条第一項 に規定する決算関係書類等につき法第六十八条の承認を受けた場合における当該 各事業年度のうち最も遅いものとし、株式会社商品取引所にあっては会社法第二 条第二十四号に規定する最終事業年度とする。以下同じ。）に係る財産目録、貸借 対照表及び当該貸借対照表とともに作成された損益計算書の内容 ロ最終事業年度の末日（最終事業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併存続会員商 品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸 収合併存続会員商品取引所の財産の状況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたとき は、その内容（法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の 効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度が存することとなる場合にあって は、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象の内容に限る。） 三吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所（法第七十七条第一項において準用する会社法第四百 七十五条（第一号及び第三号を除く。）の規定により清算をする会員商品取引所（以 下「清算会員商品取引所」という。）を除く。）において最終事業年度の末日（最終事 業年度がない場合にあっては、吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の成立の日）後に重要な 財産の処分、重大な債務の負担その他の当該吸収合併消滅会員商品取引所の財産の状 況に重要な影響を与える事象が生じたときは、その内容（法第百四十四条第四項の会 員総会の日の十日前の日後吸収合併の効力が生ずる日までの間に新たな最終事業年度 が存することとなる場合にあっては、当該新たな最終事業年度の末日後に生じた事象 の内容に限る。）四吸収合併が効力を生ずる日以後における吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の債務（法第 百四十四条第五項において準用する法第百二十四条第一項の規定により吸収合併につ いて異議を述べることができる債権者に対して負担する債務に限る。）の履行の見込 みに関する事項 五法第百四十四条第四項の会員総会の日の十日前の日後、前各号に掲げる事項に変 更が生じたときは、変更後の当該事項 - 経済産業省

As to the approaching end of the first half, I would like to refrain from making comments, as financial institutions have not yet announced their financial results for the first half of fiscal 2011. Regarding how I view the market conditions, the recent unstable market movements come against the background of growing risk-aversion moves around the world due to the fiscal and financial problems in Europe and the economic slowdown in the United States - there is a downside risk as indicated by the U.S. employment statistics announced the day before yesterday, which showed no increase in non-farm jobs contrary to expectations, among other data. 例文帳に追加

まず、今、中間決算が近づいているという話でございますが、（現時点において、各金融機関とも平成23年）中間決算については、まだ公表していませんから、コメントは差し控えさせていただきたいと思いますけれども、マーケットの動向に対する所見如何というところでございますが、このところ世界的にマーケットの不安定な動向が続いている背景としては、ヨーロッパの財政・金融問題や、米国の景気減速、下振れリスクと申しますか、先日雇用統計が出まして、非農業部門では予想に反して雇用が増えていないという発表がございましたが、それだけではございませんけれども、そういう統計が一昨日出てまいりまして、世界的にリスク回避の動きが強まっていると考えています。 - 金融庁

(2) The provisions of the preceding paragraph shall also apply in cases where the abolition of Dispute Resolution, etc. of a Designated Dispute Resolution Organization has been authorized under Article 52-83, paragraph (1) or the designation under Article 52-62, paragraph (1) has been rescinded under Article 52-84, paragraph (1) and there is a Dispute Related to Banking Services for which Dispute Resolution Procedures had been implemented as of the day of authorization or rescission, when the Party to the Dispute Related to Banking Services that had filed an application for Dispute Resolution Procedures files an action for the claims which were the subject matter of the Dispute Resolution Procedures within one month from the day on which said Party received the notice under Article 52-83, paragraph (3) or Article 52-84, paragraph (3) or the day on which the Party came to know of the authorization or rescission whichever comes earlier. 例文帳に追加

２　指定紛争解決機関の紛争解決等業務の廃止が第五十二条の八十三第一項の規定により認可され、又は第五十二条の六十二第一項の規定による指定が第五十二条の八十四第一項の規定により取り消され、かつ、その認可又は取消しの日に紛争解決手続が実施されていた銀行業務関連紛争がある場合において、当該紛争解決手続の申立てをした当該銀行業務関連紛争の当事者が第五十二条の八十三第三項若しくは第五十二条の八十四第三項の規定による通知を受けた日又は当該認可若しくは取消しを知つた日のいずれか早い日から一月以内に当該紛争解決手続の目的となつた請求について訴えを提起したときも、前項と同様とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 347 (1) For the purpose of the application of the provisions of Article 329(1), Article 332(1), Article 339(1) and Article 341 to the cases where it issues shares in a class for which there is the provision with respect to the matters listed in item (ix) of Article 108(1) (limited to those relating to directors), "shareholders meeting" in Article 329(1) shall be read as "shareholders meeting (or, for directors, Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of each class of shares in accordance with the applicable provisions of the articles of incorporation on the matters prescribed in item (ix) Article 108(2))"; "by resolution of a shareholders meeting" in Article 332(1) and Article 339(1) shall be read as "by resolution of a shareholders meeting (or, for directors elected pursuant to the provisions of Article 41(1), or at a Class Meeting under Article 90(1) or a Class Meeting under Article 329(1) applied by reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(1), Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of shares of the class relating to the election of such director (or shareholders meeting in cases where it is otherwise provided in the articles of incorporation, or in cases where, before the expiration of the term of office of such director, there are no longer any shareholders entitled to exercise his/her votes at such Class Meeting))"; "Article 309(1)" in Article 341 shall be read as "Article 309(1) and Article 324"; and "shareholders meeting" in Article 341 shall be read as "shareholders meeting (including the Class Meeting under Article 329(1) and Article 339(1) applied by the reading of terms pursuant to the provisions of Article 347(1))." 例文帳に追加

第三百四十七条　第百八条第一項第九号に掲げる事項（取締役に関するものに限る。）についての定めがある種類の株式を発行している場合における第三百二十九条第一項、第三百三十二条第一項、第三百三十九条第一項及び第三百四十一条の規定の適用については、第三百二十九条第一項中「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会（取締役については、第百八条第二項第九号に定める事項についての定款の定めに従い、各種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会）」と、第三百三十二条第一項及び第三百三十九条第一項中「株主総会の決議」とあるのは「株主総会（第四十一条第一項の規定により又は第九十条第一項の種類創立総会若しくは第三百四十七条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項の種類株主総会において選任された取締役については、当該取締役の選任に係る種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（定款に別段の定めがある場合又は当該取締役の任期満了前に当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存在しなくなった場合にあっては、株主総会））の決議」と、第三百四十一条中「第三百九条第一項」とあるのは「第三百九条第一項及び第三百二十四条」と、「株主総会」とあるのは「株主総会（第三百四十七条第一項の規定により読み替えて適用する第三百二十九条第一項及び第三百三十九条第一項の種類株主総会を含む。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 9 (1) In the event the volume of oil held by the Oil Refiner (means the volume of oil held by the Oil Refiner, in compliance with the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry as provided in paragraph (1) of Article 6; provided, however, that, in the event such Oil Refiner, holds crude oil in lieu of the Designated Oil Products pursuant the provisions of paragraph (2) of the said Article, such volume of oil means the volume of oil after the conversion of the volume of such crude oil into the volume of the Designated Oil Products in such a method as provided in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry set forth in the said paragraph. Hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) is less than the standard stockpiles and if the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry determines that there is no justifiable reason for such shortage, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry may recommend that such Oil Refiner, have oil complying with the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 6 within a set period of time; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the case where such Oil Refiner, obtains confirmation as set forth in paragraph (2) of the preceding Article, and the total volume of Oil held by such Oil Refiner, and other Oil Refiners, who also obtain such confirmation together with such Oil Refiner, is equal to or more than the total volume of their standard stockpiles. 例文帳に追加

第九条　経済産業大臣は、石油精製業者等の石油保有量（石油精製業者等が第六条第一項の経済産業省令で定めるところにより保有する石油の数量をいう。ただし、その石油精製業者等が同条第二項の規定により指定石油製品に代えて原油を保有する場合には、当該原油の数量を同項の経済産業省令で定める方式で指定石油製品の数量に換算した後の石油の数量をいう。以下この条において同じ。）が基準備蓄量に達していない場合において、その達していないことについて正当な理由がないと認めるときは、その石油精製業者等に対し、期限を定めて、第六条第一項の規定に従つて石油を保有すべきことを勧告することができる。ただし、その石油精製業者等が前条第二項の規定による確認を受けている場合において、その石油精製業者等及びその石油精製業者等とともにその確認を受けている他の石油精製業者等の石油保有量を合計した数量がこれらの者の基準備蓄量を合計した数量以上であるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 32 (1) The Minister of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry or the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may, when recognizing it necessary in cases listed in paragraph (1) of the preceding Article, Food and Agricultural Materials Inspection Center (Incorporated Administrative Agency), the National Center for Seeds and Seedlings (Incorporated Administrative Agency), the National Livestock Breeding Center (Incorporated Administrative Agency), the Fisheries Research Agency (Incorporated Administrative Agency), the National Institute of Technology and Evaluation (Incorporated Administrative Agency) or the Pharmaceuticals and Medical Device Agency (Incorporated Administrative Agency) (hereinafter referred to as "Centers"), in accordance with the categories of Centers listed below, to enter premises where a person who has used or is using living modified organisms, a person who has transferred or supplied living modified organisms, a Domestic Administrator, a person who has exported living modified organisms, or other relevant persons carry out such acts, or other places, and there to question relevant persons, inspect living modified organisms, Facilities, and other properties, or remove living modified organisms, at no cost, limited to the minimum amount necessary for inspection. 例文帳に追加

第三十二条　農林水産大臣、経済産業大臣又は厚生労働大臣は、前条第一項の場合において必要があると認めるときは、独立行政法人農林水産消費安全技術センター、独立行政法人種苗管理センター、独立行政法人家畜改良センター、独立行政法人水産総合研究センター、独立行政法人製品評価技術基盤機構又は独立行政法人医薬品医療機器総合機構（以下「センター等」という。）に対し、次に掲げるセンター等の区分に応じ、遺伝子組換え生物等の使用等をしている者、又はした者、遺伝子組換え生物等を譲渡し、又は提供した者、国内管理人、遺伝子組換え生物等を輸出した者その他の関係者がその行為を行う場所その他の場所に立ち入らせ、関係者に質問させ、遺伝子組換え生物等、施設等その他の物件を検査させ、又は検査に必要な最少限度の分量に限り遺伝子組換え生物等を無償で収去させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) When the applicable period referred to in item (ii) of paragraph (1) of Article 32-4 of the Act (hereinafter referred to as "the applicable period" in this Article) exceeds three months, annual working days stipulated by Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare referred to in paragraph (3) of Article 32-4 of the Act shall be limited to 280 days in the applicable period. However, in case where the applicable period exceeds three months and there had been the other agreement (including resolutions by a labor-management or resolutions by a working hours reduction task force committee) (if there had been more than one agreement, an agreement just before the new agreement shall be applicable; hereinafter referred to in this paragraph as "the former agreement") under the provisions of paragraph (1) of Article 32-4 of the Act with its applicable period exceeding three months and containing one year or less whose last day is followed by the first day of the applicable period, yearly working days shall be shorter one, either days determined by subtracting one day from the yearly working days in the applicable period stipulated under the former agreement or 280 days, if the daily limited working hours exceed longer one, either the daily limited working hours stipulated under the former agreement or nine hours, or the weekly limited working hours exceed longer one, either the weekly limited working hours stipulated under the former agreement or 48 hours. 例文帳に追加

３　法第三十二条の四第三項の厚生労働省令で定める労働日数の限度は、同条第一項第二号の対象期間（以下この条において「対象期間」という。）が三箇月を超える場合は対象期間について一年当たり二百八十日とする。ただし、対象期間が三箇月を超える場合において、当該対象期間の初日の前一年以内の日を含む三箇月を超える期間を対象期間として定める法第三十二条の四第一項の協定（労使委員会の決議及び労働時間短縮推進委員会の決議を含む。）（複数ある場合においては直近の協定（労使委員会の決議及び労働時間短縮推進委員会の決議を含む。）。以下この項において「旧協定」という。）があつた場合において、一日の労働時間のうち最も長いものが旧協定の定める一日の労働時間のうち最も長いもの若しくは九時間のいずれか長い時間を超え、又は一週間の労働時間のうち最も長いものが旧協定の定める一週間の労働時間のうち最も長いもの若しくは四十八時間のいずれか長い時間を超えるときは、旧協定の定める対象期間について一年当たりの労働日数から一日を減じた日数又は二百八十日のいずれか少ない日数とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. 例文帳に追加

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

Article 65 (1) The director of the probation office shall, as provided for by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice, hear the sentiments of the victims (including the victims' current situation and their opinion toward their offenders' life or behavior, hereinafter referred to as 'feelings'), whenever victims ask this of him/her, in the course of the relevant probationer's supervision period, and communicate such feelings to the probationers. The director of the probation office, however, has the discretion not to communicate the feelings to the probationers when he/she finds that there is a reasonable possibility that the communication may hinder the probationers from rehabilitation or it is not appropriate in light of the nature of the case or further administration of their supervision. The term 'victims' in this paragraph, includes their statutory agents or in the case of the victim's death or their suffering from a severe mental or physical disorder, their spouse, lineal relatives or siblings. 例文帳に追加

第六十五条　保護観察所の長は、法務省令で定めるところにより、保護観察対象者について、被害者等（当該保護観察対象者が刑若しくは保護処分を言い渡される理由となった犯罪若しくは刑罰法令に触れる行為により害を被った者（以下この項において「被害者」という。）又はその法定代理人若しくは被害者が死亡した場合若しくはその心身に重大な故障がある場合におけるその配偶者、直系の親族若しくは兄弟姉妹をいう。以下この条において同じ。）から、被害に関する心情、被害者等の置かれている状況又は保護観察対象者の生活若しくは行動に関する意見（以下この条において「心情等」という。）の伝達の申出があったときは、当該心情等を聴取し、当該保護観察対象者に伝達するものとする。ただし、その伝達をすることが当該保護観察対象者の改善更生を妨げるおそれがあり、又は当該被害に係る事件の性質、保護観察の実施状況その他の事情を考慮して相当でないと認めるときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

With less than one month left until the expiry of the current Diet session, the mass media have expressed doubt over the fate of the bill. The postal reform bill is intended to ensure that postal services will continue to be universally provided comprehensively by post offices from the standpoint of users and the general public by resolving various problems arising from the postal privatization. The important thing is this. I recently visited Ishinomaki in Sendai City, and as reported by national newspapers over the past few years, I talked with Japan Post employees there and was told that the division into five companies created a difficult situation after the earthquake. For example, at the Ishinomaki post office, the chain of command was split between the postmaster and the branch manager of Japan Post Service Co., as I related to you previously. 例文帳に追加

それから、マスコミでも今度の法律（について）、あと会期末が1か月切ったから、如何にということであったと思いますが、郵政改革法案は郵政民営化によって生じた諸問題を克服して、郵政事業サービスや利用者の立場、国民の立場に立って郵便局一体で提供され、将来あまねく公平に利用できることを確保している法律、ここが大事でございますが、私はこの前、仙台・石巻にも行ってきたということもございますし、ここ２、３日、非常に全国紙にも色々書いていただいておりますが、今回の地震、それから津波災害において、現地で郵政関係の方々から、5分社化が実際、被災したときに、（例えば）石巻の郵便局長から石巻の一つの郵便局に郵便局長、郵便事業会社の支店長がいますし、指揮命令系統が5分社化していますから、非常に困ったという話を（聞いたと）、私はたしか皆さん方の前で発表させていただいたと思います。 - 金融庁

As for the business environment for regional banks in general, I presume that generally speaking, there are factors that could increase credit costs, as you pointed out, given the deterioration of the real economy and the slump of regional economies, although the situation may vary from region to region. The important thing is that individual banks manage loans properly through such measures as the provision of management advice to borrower companies while conducting risk management appropriately. It is also important to act in a timely manner while looking forward. In this sense, as I always say, I hope that financial institutions will make efforts to strike the right balance between the need to manage risks and maintain financial soundness and their functions of taking risks, exercising the financial intermediary function and supporting the real economy. 例文帳に追加

それから、地域銀行全般についての経営環境は、ご指摘のとおり実体経済の悪化、あるいは地域経済の疲弊、これは地域によってばらつきがある面もございますが、そういったことを要因として、一般的な傾向としては与信コストが上昇していく要因というのはあるということだろうと思います。そういう中で大切なことは、それぞれの銀行がリスク管理をしっかりと行いながら、債務者企業に対する様々な経営上のアドバイスなども含めて債権管理をしっかりと行っていく、またそういったことを行っていく中で先を見通しながら早目早目の対応をしていくということであろうかと思います。そういう意味ではいつも申し上げていることですが、リスク管理、財務の健全性の維持ということと、リスクテイク、金融仲介機能の発揮、実体経済を支えると、こういう役割とのバランスをしっかりととることに努めていっていただきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

Sec.147 Rights Conferred 147.1. Except in cases of importation of drugs and medicines allowed under Section 72.1 of this Act and of off-patent drugs and medicines, the owner of a registered mark shall have the exclusive right to prevent all third parties not having the owner’s consent from using in the course of trade identical or similar signs or containers for goods or services which are identical or similar to those in respect of which the trademark is registered where such use would result in a likelihood of confusion. In case of the use, of an identical sign for identical goods or services, a likelihood of confusion shall be presumed. There shall be no infringement of trademarks or tradenames of imported or sold patented drugs and medicines allowed under Section 72.1 of this Act, as well as imported or sold off-patent drugs and medicines: Provided, That, said drugs and medicines bear the registered marks that have not been tampered, unlawfully modified, or infringed upon, under Section 155 of this Code.例文帳に追加

第147条 与えられる権利 147.1登録された標章の権利者は，本法第72.1条に基づき許可された薬剤製品及び特許満了薬剤製品の輸入を除き，その同意を得ていないすべての第三者が，当該登録された商標に係る商品又はサ－ビスと同一又は類似の商品又はサ－ビスについて同一又は類似の標識又は容器を商業上使用することの結果として混同を生じさせる虞がある場合は，その使用を防止する排他的権利を有する。同一の商品又はサ－ビスについて同一の標識を使用する場合は，混同を生じさせる虞があるものと推定される。 本法第72.1条に基づき輸入と販売が許可された特許薬剤及び特許満了薬剤については，商標または商号を侵害していないものとする。この場合において，上記の薬剤には，本法第155条に基づき，変更，不法な修正または侵害が行われていない登録商標が付されていなければならない。 - 特許庁

Article 171 Where a nonresident prescribed in Article 169 (Tax Base) receives payment of a retirement allowance, etc. (meaning the retirement allowance, etc. prescribed in Article 30(1) (Retirement Income); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section) that falls under the provision of Article 161(viii)(c) (Retirement Allowance, etc. Arising from Work Carried out in the Capacity of Resident), the nonresident may, notwithstanding the provision of the preceding Article, opt for imposition of taxation on himself/herself of income tax based on the amount equivalent to the tax amount calculated by deeming that he/she has received, in the capacity of a resident, the total amount of the retirement allowance, etc. to be received within the relevant year by reason of the retirement causing the payment of the said retirement allowance, etc. (in the case where there is more than one retirement allowance, etc. to be received within the relevant year, by reason of the respective retirement causing the payment of each retirement allowance, etc.), and applying the provisions of Article 30 and Article 89 (Tax Rate) to the said total amount. 例文帳に追加

第百七十一条　第百六十九条（課税標準）に規定する非居住者が第百六十一条第八号ハ（居住者として行つた勤務に基因する退職手当等）の規定に該当する退職手当等（第三十条第一項（退職所得）に規定する退職手当等をいう。以下この節において同じ。）の支払を受ける場合には、その者は、前条の規定にかかわらず、当該退職手当等について、その支払の基因となつた退職（その年中に支払を受ける当該退職手当等が二以上ある場合には、それぞれの退職手当等の支払の基因となつた退職）を事由としてその年中に支払を受ける退職手当等の総額を居住者として受けたものとみなして、これに第三十条及び第八十九条（税率）の規定を適用するものとした場合の税額に相当する金額により所得税を課されることを選択することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(ii) in the case where the Tender Offer Purchaser makes Purchase, etc. of the Share Certificates, etc. using a method different from the method of proportional distribution stated in the Tender Offer Notification: the amount calculated by multiplying the difference between the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages under the preceding paragraph if the Tender Offer Purchaser uses the method of proportional distribution and the number of Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. was actually made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages (in cases where the Tender Offer Purchaser did not make Purchase, etc. of any of Share Certificates, etc. from the person entitled to claim damages, the number of the Share Certificates, etc. of which Purchase, etc. should be made by the Tender Offer Purchaser from the person entitled to claim damages if the method of proportional distribution is used) by the difference between the Tender Offer Price (or the price paid by the Tender Offeror as specified in Article 27-17(2) in the case where paragraph (1) of the preceding Article is also applicable, the favorable price referred to in the preceding item in the case where the preceding item is also applicable, or the more favorable one between them in the case where both Article 27-17(1) and the preceding item are also applicable) and the market price of the Share Certificates, etc. at the time when the damages are claimed under the preceding paragraph (or estimated disposal price in the case where there is no market price for the Share Certificates, etc., or disposal price in the case where the Share Certificates, etc. was disposed of before the damages is claimed). 例文帳に追加

二　当該公開買付けをした者が公開買付届出書に記載されたあん分比例方式と異なる方式で株券等の買付け等をした場合　当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に前項の規定による請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数から当該公開買付けをした者が当該請求権者から買付け等をした株券等の数を控除した数（当該請求権者から買付け等をしなかつた場合には、当該あん分比例方式で計算した場合に当該請求権者から買付け等がされるべき株券等の数とする。）に公開買付価格（前条第一項に該当する場合にあつては同条第二項に規定する公開買付者が支払つた価格、前号に掲げる場合に該当する場合にあつては同号に定める有利な価格とし、そのいずれにも該当する場合にあつてはそのいずれか有利な価格とする。）から前項の規定による損害賠償を請求する時における当該株券等の市場価格（市場価格がないときはその時における処分推定価格とし、当該請求時前に当該株券等を処分した場合においてはその処分価格とする。）を控除した金額を乗じた額 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger is a Member Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in respective items of Article 57; (ii) the following matters concerning another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; the same shall apply in this item): (a) an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet; (b) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business - 92 - year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said other Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to a Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) has prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act; (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item), the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final - 93 - business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (excluding liabilities inherited from another Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) of the Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger on and after the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vi) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加