「have by one」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(38ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

As I said when I met with representatives of financial institutions the day before yesterday, I received a great number of various opinions after I suggested in a television program about two weeks ago - I made this suggestion because I heard that there were numerous complaints about curbs on loans - that opinions about curbs on loans be sent to me directly. I have to examine each and every one of them myself. However, as this is not a problem that does not concern only me, the FSA (Financial Services Agency) has set up a contact point through which opinions and complaints are accepted either via postal mail, e-mail or telephone. Details will be announced later by FSA staff. 例文帳に追加

私の方からは、一昨日の各金融機関の代表の方に集まっていただいた時に申し上げましたが、私が２週間程前にテレビに出た時に、貸し渋り等の苦情が非常に多いということだったもんですから、個人的に是非直接私にご意見を届けていただきたいと申し上げたら、大量のものが、色々なものが参りまして、これは一々私が全てを見なければいけないんですけれども、私だけで済まされる問題ではないだろうということで、金融庁の方に、貸し渋り・貸しはがし目安箱というのはちょっと言い過ぎなんで、金融庁大臣目安箱みたいなものを設置をいたしました。これは手紙でも、あるいはメールその他でも、電話でも結構だということで、細かい点につきましては後で、もう既にスタートしているもの、また今日スタートするものがございますので、具体的には後で事務方から発表させていただきたいと思います。 - 金融庁

The global economy, including the European economy, has been undergoing significant change, or has been growing unstable, since the Lehman shock. That is the greatest change. To be more specific, U.S. SEC (Securities and Exchange Commission) Chairwoman Schapiro said that calls for the application of IFRS from U.S. companies and investors are not very strong. According to a report recently issued by Keidanren, during the two years since the introduction of a voluntary application of IFRS, only three of the 3,600 eligible Japanese companies have applied it. That roughly means only one in 1,000 companies. 例文帳に追加

そういった意味で、やはり今、世界の経済は、ヨーロッパも含めて、リーマン・ショック以来、非常に変化しつつある、あるいは不安定になりつつあるところもありますから、そういったことが、実は、私が責任者としてお示しした変化の最大の点だと思っております。具体的に言えば、アメリカのSEC（証券取引委員会）のシャピロ委員長が、「（IFRS適用を求める）アメリカの企業と投資家の声はそれほど大きくない」と（おっしゃっておりました）。先日も経団連が報告書を出していましたが、2年間、IFRSの任意適用をしましたけれども、（日本では）3,600社のうち3社しか手を挙げていないのです。ということは、（割合で言えば）1,000社に1社ぐらいです。 - 金融庁

Many countries agree with this argument but think that the strengthening of regulation should be discussed after the global financial system has been normalized. We have to give consideration to two points. One is whether or not the strengthening of capital adequacy regulation will lead to a credit crunch. The other is whether we can secure an international agreement that suits the circumstances of the Japanese financial sector. As conclusions concerning these matters will be reached by December, Japan also wants to actively participate in the working-level debates — I understand that the FSA (Financial Services Agency) Commissioner will visit Basel soon — that are intended to lay down common global rules. 例文帳に追加

多くの国が、それはそうかもしれないけれども今の時期にどうかなと、まず世界的な金融が正常化した後にそういうことを議論すべきではないかと、多くの国がそういう意見でございまして、私ども２つ考えなきゃいけないことがあって、１つはそういうものをやることが信用収縮につながらないかということが１点、それからそういうものを国際会議で決めて日本の金融界の実情とマッチするような合意が得られるかどうか、両面を考えなければいけないわけですから、これは12月までの結論なので、金融庁長官もバーゼルに近々行かれるようですから、そういう事務的な話し合いも積み重ねながら、世界的な共通ルールを作る話ですから、日本としても積極的に参加したいということだろうと思っています - 金融庁

A resident of a Contracting State that is neither a qualified person nor entitled under paragraph 3 or 5 of this Article to the benefits granted by the provisions of Article 7; of paragraph 3 of Article 10 or paragraph 3 of Article 11; or of Articles 12, 13 or 21 of this Convention with respect to an item of income, profit or gain described in those paragraphs or Articles shall, nevertheless, be granted such benefits if the competent authority of the other Contracting State determines, in accordance with its domestic law or administrative practice, that the establishment, acquisition or maintenance of such resident and the conduct of its operations did not have as one of the principal purposes the obtaining of such benefits. 例文帳に追加

一方の締約国の居住者は、適格者に該当せず、かつ、３及び５の規定に基づき第七条、第十条３、第十一条３、第十二条、第十三条又は前条に定める所得、利得又は収益についてこれらの規定により認められる特典を受ける権利を有する場合に該当しないときにおいても、他方の締約国の権限のある当局が、当該締約国の法令又は行政上の慣行に従って、当該居住者の設立、取得又は維持及びその業務の遂行がこれらの規定により認められる特典を受けることをその主たる目的の一つとするものでないと認定するときは、これらの規定により認められる特典を受けることができる。 - 財務省

7. A resident of a Contracting State that is neither a qualified person nor entitled under paragraph 3, 5 or 6 to the benefits granted by the provisions of paragraph 3 of Article 10, paragraph 3 of Article 11 or Article 12,13 or 20 with respect to an item of income described in those paragraphs or Articles shall, nevertheless, be granted such benefits if the competent authority of the other Contracting State determines, in accordance with its laws or administrative practice, that the establishment, acquisition or maintenance of such resident and the conduct of its operations did not have as one of the principal purposes the obtaining of such benefits.例文帳に追加

７一方の締約国の居住者は、適格者に該当せず、かつ、３、５及び６の規定に基づき第十条３、第十一条３、第十二条、第十三条又は前条に定める所得についてこれらの規定により認められる特典を受ける権利を有する場合に該当しないときにおいても、他方の締約国の権限のある当局が、当該他方の締約国の法令又は行政上の慣行に従って、当該居住者の設立、取得又は維持及びその業務の遂行がこれらの規定により認められる特典を受けることをその主たる目的の一つとするものでないと認定するときは、これらの規定により認められる特典を受けることができる。 - 財務省

Where an invention and a device claimed in applications for a patent and a utility model registration are identical (excluding the case where an invention claimed in a patent application based on a utility model registration under Article 46-2(1) (including a patent application that is deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the said patent application under Article 44(2) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 46(5)) and a device relating to the said utility model registration are identical) and the application for a patent and a utility model registration are filed on the same date, only one of the applicants, selected by consultations between the applicants, shall be entitled to obtain a patent or a utility model registration. 例文帳に追加

特許出願に係る発明と実用新案登録出願に係る考案とが同一である場合(第四十六条の二第一項の規定による実用新案登録に基づく特許出願(第四十四条第二項(第四十六条第五項において準用する場合を含む)の規定により当該特許出願の時にしたものとみなされるものを含む)に係る発明とその実用新案登録に係る考案とが同一である場合を除く)において、その特許出願及び実用新案登録出願が同日にされたものであるときは、出願人の協議により定めた一の出願人のみが特許又は実用新案登録を受けることができる。 - 特許庁

Where an invention and a device claimed in applications for a patent and a utility model registration are identical (excluding the case where an invention claimed in a patent application based on a utility model registration under Article 46-2(1) (including a patent application that is deemed to have been filed at the time of filing of the said patent application under Article 44(2) (including its mutatis mutandis application under Article 46(5)) and a device relating to the said utility model registration are identical) and the application for a patent and a utility model registration are filed on the same date, only one of the applicants, selected by consultations between the applicants, shall be entitled to obtain a patent or a utility model registration. 例文帳に追加

特許出願に係る発明と実用新案登録出願に係る考案とが同一である場合(第四十六条の二第一項の規定による実用新案登録に基づく特許出願(第四十四条第二項(第四十六条第五項において準用する場合を含む。)の規定により当該特許出願の時にしたものとみなされるものを含む。)に係る発明とその実用新案登録に係る考案とが同一である場合を除く。)において、その特許出願及び実用新案登録出願が同日にされたものであるときは、出願人の協議により定めた一の出願人のみが特許又は実用新案登録を受けることができる。 - 特許庁

Every rule made by the Central Government under this Act shall be laid, as soon as may be after it is made, before each House of Parliament, while it is in session for a total period of thirty days which may be comprised in one session or in two or more successive session, and if, before the expiry of the session immediately following the session or the successive sessions aforesaid, both Houses agree in making any modification in the rule or both Houses agree that the rule should not be made, the rule shall thereafter have effect only in such modified form or be of no effect, as the case may be; so, however, that any such modification or annulment shall be without prejudice to the validity of anything previously done under that rule. 例文帳に追加

本法に基づき中央政府により制定される各規則は，その制定後できる限り速やかに，開会中の議会の各院に対して提出し，30日の期間審議を受けるものとし，当該期間は，1会期又は2以上の継続会期に渡ることができ，規則提出の会期直後の会期若しくは前記継続会期の満了前に，両院が当該規則に何らかの修正を加えること又は当該規則は制定すべきでないことに合意したときは，当該規則は以後そのように修正された態様においてのみ効力を有し，又は場合に応じて効力を有さない。ただし，如何なる当該修正又は無効化も当該規則により既にされた事項の効力を害さない。 - 特許庁

1. The owner of an earlier trademark within the meaning of paragraph 1(d), (e), (g) and (h) of Article 17 and the holder of a right of prior use that imparts not merely local notoriety who for five consecutive years have known of and condoned the use of a subsequently registered identical or similar trademark may not request that the subsequent trademark be declared invalid or oppose its use for the goods or services in respect of which it has been used by virtue of their own earlier trademark or prior use, except where the subsequent trademark was applied for in bad faith. The owner of the subsequent trademark may not oppose the use of the earlier one or the continuation of the prior use.例文帳に追加

(1) 第 17条(1)(d)，(e)，(g)及び(h)にいう先行商標の所有者及び単なる1地方でなく広く認識されている先使用権の所有者であって，後に登録された同一又は類似の商標の使用を知りながら，継続して 5年間それを黙認していた者は，自己の先行商標又は先使用に基づいてその商標が使用されている商品又はサービスについて，当該後発の商標の無効の宣言を請求することができず，かつ，当該後発商標の使用を阻止することができない。ただし，当該後発商標が悪意で出願されていた場合を除く。後発商標の所有者は，先行商標の使用又は先使用権による使用の継続を阻止することができない。 - 特許庁

Where a trade mark has been removed from the Register for non-payment of the fee for renewal, it shall, nevertheless, for the purpose of an application for the registration of a trade mark within one year from the date of expiration of the last registration be deemed to be a trade mark which is already on the Register except that this section shall not have effect when the Registrar is satisfied either - (a) that there has been no use in good faith of the trade mark which has been removed during the two years immediately preceding its removal; or (b) that no deception or confusion is likely to arise from the use of the trade mark which is the subject of the application for registration by reason of any previous use of the trade mark which has been removed.例文帳に追加

商標が更新手数料の不納の故に登録簿から抹消された場合においても，当該商標は，最終登録満了日から1年以内になされる商標登録出願の目的では，登録簿に存在する商標として扱われるものとする。ただし，本条は，登録官が次の何れかの事由を認定する場合は適用されない。 (a) 登録を抹消された商標の善意の使用が，その抹消の直前2年間になかったこと，又は (b) 抹消された商標の従前の使用を理由として，登録出願の対象である商標の使用が，何らの誤認若しくは混同も生じさせる虞がないこと - 特許庁

Where, as a result of a transfer, a registered trade-mark becomes the property of one person for use in association with some of the wares or services specified in the registration, and of another person for use in association with other such wares or services, and the transfer is registered by the Registrar, each person (a) for the purposes of the Act, is deemed to be a separate registered owner of the trade-mark for use in association with the wares and services in respect of which the person has acquired or retained ownership of the trade-mark; and (b) for the purposes of sections 43 to 46 of the Act, is deemed to have a separate registration of the trade-mark. 例文帳に追加

移転の結果，登録商標が，その登録に指定する一部の商品又はサービスに付随しての使用についてはある者の財産となるが，それ以外の商品又はサービスに付随しての使用については他の者の財産となり，かつ，登録官がその移転を認可する場合は，各人は， (a) 法律の適用上，その者が商標の所有権を取得しているか又は保持している商品及びサービスに付随して商標を使用するときは，その商標の個別に登録された所有者であるとみなし，かつ (b) 法律第43条から第46条までの適用上，その商標の個別の登録を有する者であるとみなす。 - 特許庁

The proprietor of a registered trademark may license another person to use it in his business without relinquishing property rights in the trademark. A license may concern the whole or part of the country, and it may cover either all or part of the goods protected by the registration. The number of licensees may be one or more. On request, such a license shall be entered in the Register. The registering authority may refuse entry, however, if use of the licensed trademark is clearly liable to mislead the public. When a license is proved to have expired, the entry shall be deleted from the Register. 例文帳に追加

登録商標の所有者は，当該商標における所有権を放棄することなく，当該商標を他人がその事業に使用するライセンスを許諾することができる。ライセンスは，フィンランドの全土又はその一部地域について与えることができ，また，当該登録商標により保護される商品の全部又は一部を対象とすることができる。ライセンシーの数は，1又は複数とすることができる。当該ライセンスは，請求に基づいて，登録簿に記載される。ただし，ライセンス許諾された商標の使用が明らかに公衆に誤認を生じさせる虞を伴う場合は，特許庁は，当該ライセンスの登録を拒絶することができる。ライセンス期間の満了が証明されたときは，その登録を登録簿から抹消する。 - 特許庁

Especially among venture capitals and start-ups, a majority say listing that examination has gotten much tougher than a few years ago. Issues that have gotten tougher include the internal control system checks, links for to antisocial organizations, and scrutiny of business plans. All these are important, but checking for relationships to antisocial groups is pointed out as an increasingly urgent problem and JASDAQ mentions it explicitly as one of its delisting criteria, and other exchanges are also putting forth more efforts to tackle the problem. Some say, on the other hand, there are cases where start-ups are required to develop a internal control system they are unable to put in effect, where an unclear definition or range of antisocial organizations to be examined, puts them to trouble in deciding specifically what they must do, or where an exchange that demands excessive feasibility in business plans refuses even a reasonable degree of future uncertainties about growth when such uncertainties are present for start-ups, by their very nature. 例文帳に追加

特に審査が強化されたと言われる項目としては、内部管理体制、反社会的勢力との関係、事業計画の合理性等が挙げられている。いずれも審査が重要な項目であることは事実であり、特に反社会的勢力との関係については、近年問題の深刻化が指摘されていることから、ＪＡＳＤＡＱにおいては上場廃止基準に明記する等、各取引所ともに一層重点的な取り組みがなされているところである。他方、こうした事項について、ベンチャー企業には事実上整備しえない内部管理組織の整備を求められる場合、調査対象となる反社会的勢力の定義・範囲がはっきりせず対応に苦慮する場合、事業計画の合理性を求める余り、ベンチャー企業の成長性に伴う将来の不確実性が十分に認められない場合等もあると言われている。 - 経済産業省

Article 8-2-2 (1) A person who holds the title to manage a property under fire prevention measures as set forth in Article 8, paragraph (1) specified by Cabinet Order as one for which inspection is necessary from a fire prevention perspective shall, as provided for by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, have a person who has expert knowledge on the prevention of fire within a property under fire prevention measures and has a qualification specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications (hereinafter referred to as a "qualified inspector of property under fire prevention measures" in the following paragraph, paragraph (1) of the following Article and Article 36, paragraph (3)) inspect, periodically, whether or not the operations necessary for fire prevention management within the property under fire prevention measures, the installation and maintenance of equipment used for fire defense, supply of water for fire defense or facilities necessary for fire extinguishing activities and other matters necessary for the prevention of fire (referred to as the "matters subject to inspection" in the following paragraph, paragraph (1) of the following Article and Article 36, paragraph (3)) conform to the standards specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications regarding the matters provided for in this Act or any order under this Act (referred to as the "inspection standards" in the following paragraph, paragraph (1) of the following Article and Article 36, paragraph (3)), and report the inspection results to a fire chief or fire station chief; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the matters subject to the inspection and reporting under the provision of Article 17-3-3. 例文帳に追加

第八条の二の二　第八条第一項の防火対象物のうち火災の予防上必要があるものとして政令で定めるものの管理について権原を有する者は、総務省令で定めるところにより、定期に、防火対象物における火災の予防に関する専門的知識を有する者で総務省令で定める資格を有するもの（次項、次条第一項及び第三十六条第三項において「防火対象物点検資格者」という。）に、当該防火対象物における防火管理上必要な業務、消防の用に供する設備、消防用水又は消火活動上必要な施設の設置及び維持その他火災の予防上必要な事項（次項、次条第一項及び第三十六条第三項において「点検対象事項」という。）がこの法律又はこの法律に基づく命令に規定する事項に関し総務省令で定める基準（次項、次条第一項及び第三十六条第三項において「点検基準」という。）に適合しているかどうかを点検させ、その結果を消防長又は消防署長に報告しなければならない。ただし、第十七条の三の三の規定による点検及び報告の対象となる事項については、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 A written application for registration of a change resulting from an absorption-type merger of a cooperative shall have attached, in addition to a document proving the change to matters listed in the items of Article 84, paragraph (2), a document proving that public notice or notice under the provisions of Article 56-2, paragraph (2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 63-4, paragraph (4) and to Article 63-5, paragraph (6) (in the case of a cooperative which has given public notice by the method of public notice set forth in Article 33, paragraph (4), item (ii) or item (iii) in accordance with the provisions of the articles of association under the provisions of the same paragraph, in addition to giving public notice in an official gazette, pursuant to the provisions of Article 56-2, paragraph (3) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 63-4, paragraph (4) and to Article 63-5, paragraph (6), public notice by these methods) has been given, and, if any obligee has stated an objection, the fact that a payment has been made or equivalent security has been provided to said obligee or equivalent property has been entrusted for the purpose of having such obligee receive the payment, or the fact that the absorption-type merger carries no risk of harming said obligee, and a certificate of the registered matters of the cooperative dissolved as a result of the absorption-type merger (excluding one whose principal office is located within the jurisdictional district of the relevant registry office). 例文帳に追加

第百二条　組合の吸収合併による変更の登記の申請書には、第八十四条第二項各号に掲げる事項の変更を証する書面のほか、第六十三条の四第四項及び第六十三条の五第六項において準用する第五十六条の二第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第六十三条の四第四項及び第六十三条の五第六項において準用する第五十六条の二第三項の規定により公告を官報のほか第三十三条第四項の規定による定款の定めに従い同項第二号又は第三号に掲げる公告方法によつてした組合にあつては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し、弁済し、若しくは相当の担保を提供し、若しくは当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は当該吸収合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面並びに吸収合併により消滅する組合（当該登記所の管轄区域内に主たる事務所があるものを除く。）の登記事項証明書を添付しなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) When the obligee effecting a seizure fails to make an offer or to provide a guarantee, as provided in each of the following items for the cases set forth respectively therein, within one week from the day of receipt of a notice under the provisions of the preceding paragraph, by deciding, where there is no preferential claim, a price that exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses, or where there is a preferential claim, a price that is not less than the total of the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that of the preferential claim (such a price shall hereinafter be referred to as the "obligee's offered price" in this paragraph), the execution court shall rescind the procedure of a compulsory auction pertaining to the petition filed by the obligee effecting a seizure; provided, however, that this shall not apply when the obligee effecting a seizure has proved, within said period, that none of the items of the preceding paragraph apply, or that in the case set forth in item (ii) of said paragraph, the minimum purchase price of the real property exceeds the estimated amount of procedural expenses and that the consent has been obtained from the persons who have the preferential claim (excluding a person who is expected to be able to receive full performance of his/her preferential claim at the minimum purchase price) for the sale of the real property: 例文帳に追加

２　差押債権者が、前項の規定による通知を受けた日から一週間以内に、優先債権がない場合にあつては手続費用の見込額を超える額、優先債権がある場合にあつては手続費用及び優先債権の見込額の合計額以上の額（以下この項において「申出額」という。）を定めて、次の各号に掲げる区分に応じ、それぞれ当該各号に定める申出及び保証の提供をしないときは、執行裁判所は、差押債権者の申立てに係る強制競売の手続を取り消さなければならない。ただし、差押債権者が、その期間内に、前項各号のいずれにも該当しないことを証明したとき、又は同項第二号に該当する場合であつて不動産の買受可能価額が手続費用の見込額を超える場合において、不動産の売却について優先債権を有する者（買受可能価額で自己の優先債権の全部の弁済を受けることができる見込みがある者を除く。）の同意を得たことを証明したときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Among the G-20 and G-7 countries, and even in the United States, the need for regulation has been recognized, as indicated by the enactment of the Dodd-Frank Act, which strengthens financial regulations, as opposed to neo-conservatism, which basically pursues the thorough deregulation of the financial sector and the minimization of government involvement. Following the enactment of that act, the United States is working out the details of regulations, including the Volcker Rule. As for European banks, U.K. banks are rather closer to the U.S. style of finance as you know, while Germany and France have continental financial systems, which are conservative, like the Japanese financial system. As to the first question, which concerned neo-conservatism, the mood around the world some time ago was such as to encourage financial institutions to create any type of financial product in exchange for accepting full self-responsibility, and Japan was no exception. However, now, the mood has changed very much even on Wall Street. In that sense, I think that countries have a feeling of contrition about the wave of neo-conservatism that swept through the world at one time. 例文帳に追加

G20でもG7でも、ご存じのように、アメリカでもドット・フランク法というのは、金融の規制を強化するという法律でございまして、基本的に金融の分野で極限までの規制緩和、そしてできるだけ政府の関与を少なくするのがよいというのが新保守主義でございましたから、私は世界の大宗において、アメリカのドット・フランク法が証明しているように、金融というのは、非常に影響が大きいですから、やはり必要な規制は必要なのだというのが、アメリカですら法律が通って、今、ドット・フランク法も、初めボルカー・ルールの細則を詰めているところでございまして、ヨーロッパの銀行も、イギリスはどちらかというと、ご存じのようにアメリカ型の金融に近いのですけれども、ドイツ、フランスはどちらかというと大陸型でございまして、手堅いと言ったらおかしいけれども、日本に似たような金融システムを持っておりますので、私は1点目の質問、新保守主義をという話でしたけれども、世界的にはかつての自由な、どんどん規制緩和で、もうどんな金融商品でもつくってもよい、そのかわり自分の会社で全部自己責任を持ちなさいよということが、一時代前は非常に世界を覆い尽くしまして、日本もそれに巻き込まれたところはあるのでございますけれども、やはり今、アメリカのウォール街ですら、非常にその辺が変わってきていると思っておりまして、そういう意味では、やはり一時の新保守主義の勢いに対する反省が各国であると思っております。 - 金融庁

O, Erin, mourn with grief and woeFor he lies dead whom the fell gangOf modern hypocrites laid low.He lies slain by the coward houndsHe raised to glory from the mire;And Erin's hopes and Erin's dreamsPerish upon her monarch's pyre.In palace, cabin or in cotThe Irish heart where'er it beIs bowed with woe--for he is goneWho would have wrought her destiny.He would have had his Erin famed,The green flag gloriously unfurled,Her statesmen, bards and warriors raisedBefore the nations of the World.He dreamed (alas, 'twas but a dream!)Of Liberty: but as he stroveTo clutch that idol, treacherySundered him from the thing he loved.Shame on the coward, caitiff handsThat smote their Lord or with a kissBetrayed him to the rabble-routOf fawning priests--no friends of his.May everlasting shame consumeThe memory of those who triedTo befoul and smear the exalted nameOf one who spurned them in his pride.He fell as fall the mighty ones,Nobly undaunted to the last,And death has now united himWith Erin's heroes of the past.No sound of strife disturb his sleep!Calmly he rests: no human painOr high ambition spurs him nowThe peaks of glory to attain.They had their way: they laid him low.But Erin, list, his spirit mayRise, like the Phoenix from the flames,When breaks the dawning of the day,The day that brings us Freedom's reign.And on that day may Erin wellPledge in the cup she lifts to JoyOne grief--the memory of Parnell. 例文帳に追加

パーネルは死んだ残忍な偽善者どもの手にかかり僕らの無冠の王は死んだ嘆く、嘆く、悲しみのエリン泥沼から引き上げてやった臆病な犬どもに彼は殺されたエリンの希望もエリンの夢もその君主の積みまきの上に滅びた御殿にあろうとも、小屋にあろうとも悲しみにひしがれるアイルランドの心その運命をもたらすはずの彼が逝ってしまったから彼あらば世界にエリンの名を知らしめ栄光の緑の旗をはためかせ政治家たち、詩人たち、戦士たちの立ち上がったものを彼は自由を夢見た悲しいかな、夢にすぎなかった偶像をつかもうとしたその時裏切りが彼と愛するものを引き離した恥を知れ、臆病者彼らの君主を襲い媚を売る聖職者衆に売り渡した卑劣漢ども永遠の恥辱よ、焼き尽くせ誇りをもって彼らをはねつけた人の高貴の名を汚し傷つけた者どもの記憶を最後まで気高く屈せずに倒れた強き人死が彼を今は亡きエリンの英雄たちと一つにした彼の眠りを乱す争いはなし！静かに彼は休む彼を栄光へと駆り立てる人としての苦悩も大望も今はない彼らは思い通り彼を殺したしかしエリンは望む、彼の魂よ炎から不死鳥のように舞い上がれとその日の夜の明ける時自由の御代が僕らにもたらされるその日、エリンよ、挙げよ喜びの杯を悲しみのためにパーネルの思い出のために - James Joyce『アイビーデイの委員会室』

Article 53-37 The provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 2 (excluding Article 847, paragraph (2), Article 849, paragraph (5), Article 851, paragraph (1), item (i) and Article 851, paragraph (2)) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc. in Stock Company) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for accountability in a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Section 3 of said Chapter (excluding Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i), (a) and Article 854, paragraphs (2) to (4) inclusive) (Lawsuit for Dismissal of Officer in Stock Company) and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (j)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to a lawsuit for dismissal of an officer in a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "shareholders having the shares (excluding the holders of shares less than one unit who may not exercise their rights pursuant to the provisions of the articles of incorporation under Article 189, paragraph (2)" and "Article 423, paragraph (1)" in Article 847, paragraph (1) (Lawsuit for Accountability, etc.) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "Article 53-33, paragraph (1) of Insurance Business Act," respectively; the term "shareholder" in Article 847, paragraphs (3) to (5) inclusive and (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "member"; and the provision of Article 854, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those members or nine (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の三十七　会社法第七編第二章第二節（第八百四十七条第二項、第八百四十九条第五項並びに第八百五十一条第一項第一号及び第二項を除く。）（株式会社における責任追及等の訴え）の規定は相互会社における責任を追及する訴えについて、同章第三節（第八百五十四条第一項第一号イ及び第二号並びに第二項から第四項までを除く。）（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）及び同法第九百三十七条第一項（第一号ヌに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の役員の解任の訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第八百四十七条第一項（責任追及等の訴え）中「株式を有する株主（第百八十九条第二項の定款の定めによりその権利を行使することができない単元未満株主を除く。）」とあるのは「社員である者」と、「第四百二十三条第一項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十三第一項」と、同条第三項から第五項まで及び第七項中「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第八百五十四条第一項第一号（株式会社の役員の解任の訴え）中「総株主（次に掲げる株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を」とあるのは「社員総数の千分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上に相当する数の社員又は三千名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の社員（特定相互会社にあっては、保険業法第三十八条第一項に規定する政令で定める数以上の社員）で」と、「有する株主」とあるのは「社員である者（総代会を設けているときは、これらの者又は九名（これを下回る数を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その数）以上の総代）」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) The provision of Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act shall not apply, for a period of one year counting from the Effective Date, to the ownership of Shares, etc. (referring to Shares, etc. as defined in Article 2, paragraph (12) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by an Insurance Company or any of its Subsidiary Companies in a domestic company (referring to a domestic company as defined in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), where the Insurance Company or the Subsidiary Company owns, at the time when this Act enters into force, Shares, etc. in the domestic company in a total number that exceeds its shareholding threshold, etc. (referring to the shareholding threshold, etc. prescribed in Article 107, paragraph (1) of the Current Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), provided that the Insurance Company notify thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission within three months from the Effective Date. In this case, for the purpose of applying the provision of that Article to the ownership of Shares, etc. in the domestic company on and subsequent to the date, the Insurance Company or its Subsidiary Company shall be deemed to have acquired as at the date the Shares, etc. of the domestic company in excess of the shareholding threshold, etc. following the events prescribed in the main clause of paragraph (2) of that Article. 例文帳に追加

７　新保険業法第百七条第一項の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に国内の会社（同項に規定する国内の会社をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の株式等（新保険業法第二条第十二項に規定する株式等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を合算してその基準株式数等（新保険業法第百七条第一項に規定する基準株式数等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えて所有している保険会社又はその子会社による当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、同日後は、当該国内の会社の株式等の所有については、当該保険会社又はその子会社が同日において同条第二項本文に規定する事由により当該国内の会社の株式等を合算してその基準株式数等を超えて取得したものとみなして、同条の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iv) Revised provision in Article 27-23 of the Securities and Exchange Act in Article 2 (excluding the segment which adds "and Article 27-26" under "Article 27-25, paragraph (1)"); revised provision in Article 27-24 of the same Act; revised provision in Article 27-25 of the same Act; revised provision in Article 27-26 of the same Act (excluding the segment which revises "control business activities of a company, an issuer of share certificate etc." to "perform what is specified for in a Cabinet Order as acts that make a significant change in and have a significant impact on business activities of an issuer of share certificates etc.(referred to as an "Conduct of Important Proposal, etc." in paragraphs (4) and (5)) and the segment which adds paragraph (3) in the same Article"; revised provision in Article 27-27 of the same Act and revised provision in Article 27-30, item (ii) of the same Act (excluding the segment which revises "Article 27-10, paragraph (2)" to "Article 27-10, paragraphs (8) and (12)" and the segment that adds "or (xi)" under "Article 27-10, paragraph (1)"); and provisions from Article 9 to Article 11 and 13 of the Supplementary Provisions: the day specified by a Cabinet Order within a period not exceeding one year from the day of promulgation. 例文帳に追加

四　第二条中証券取引法第二十七条の二十三の改正規定（「第二十七条の二十五第一項」の下に「及び第二十七条の二十六」を加える部分を除く。）、同法第二十七条の二十四の改正規定、同法第二十七条の二十五の改正規定、同法第二十七条の二十六の改正規定（「株券等の発行者である会社の事業活動を支配する」を「株券等の発行者の事業活動に重大な変更を加え、又は重大な影響を及ぼす行為として政令で定めるもの（第四項及び第五項において「重要提案行為等」という。）を行う」に改める部分及び同条に三項を加える部分を除く。）、同法第二十七条の二十七の改正規定及び同法第二十七条の三十の二の改正規定（「第二十七条の十第二項」を「第二十七条の十第八項及び第十二項」に改める部分及び「第二十七条の十第一項」の下に「若しくは第十一項」を加える部分を除く。）並びに附則第九条から第十一条まで及び第十三条の規定　公布の日から起算して一年を超えない範囲内において政令で定める日 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In particular, the fact that economic and financial fields have become highly globalized is common knowledge to all of you, so globalized that even 100 million dollars can be moved in a flash by means of computers. In times like this, it is, put simply and as far as I see it, a challenge to humanity in the 21st century to deal with the question of how to democratically control the advancement of financial engineering, or the economic globalization and financial globalization, and we are indeed in the process of tackling it, but imposing excessively harsh regulations on markets might cause them to shrink. Government control may pose another issue in that process, but the lack of it, which means applying a laissez-faire or no-restriction approach, might impose one negative effect after another on manufacturing and other industries, as was the case in the economic recession two years ago. In that sense, unlike the 1929 Great Depression, what I think the recent crisis is making us face is a challenge to human wisdom. 例文帳に追加

特に、経済・金融の分野は非常にグローバル化したということは皆さん方よくご存じでございまして、たちまち1億ドルの金でもコンピュータの中を動くわけでございますから、そういった時代に、簡単に言えばそういった金融工学の発展、あるいは経済のグローバル化、金融のグローバル化と基本的に民主主義社会でございまして、ある意味で私はこれを民主的なコントロールをいかにしていくかということは、21世紀の大変人類的課題だと思っていますが、今はその最中でございまして、ご存じのようにマーケットですからあんまり規制とか強化をしますとこれは縮んでしまいますし、また国の管理が出てきますし、それかといってご存じのように2年前の今、自由放任といいますか、自由にやってきますと、皆さんもご存じのようにこの前の経済不況のように製造業にもほかにもどんどん悪い影響が来たわけでございますから、そういった意味で非常に私は1929年の大恐慌とは違って、今回の恐慌はやっぱり人類の英知が試されているというふうに思っています。 - 金融庁

Publication of a design registration in pursuance of section 18, second sentence, of the Designs Act shall include: the name or company name of the proprietor of the design and the proprietor's mailing address, the name or company name of an agent and the agent's mailing address, if the applicant is represented by an agent, reproductions illustrating the design, product specification, the class or classes in which the product is categorized under the Locarno Agreement of international classification of industrial designs, cf. Appendix 1, application number and application date, registration number, priority date and information on the country in which the original application was filed and the number of the application, if priority has been granted pursuant to section 16 of the Designs Act, priority date and information on the exhibition at which the design was displayed, if priority has been granted in pursuance of section 16of the Designs Act, the name of the designer, including the design group or company, and the designer's mailing address, if a request is being made for registration of one or more designers in the design register, cf. section 13of the Designs Act, information, if applicable, on a model of the design which may have been filed, and information to the effect that the design is registered in color, if this is the case. 例文帳に追加

意匠法第18条第2文の規定による意匠登録の公告には，次に掲げる事項を含めなければならない。意匠の所有者の名称又は会社名及び当該所有者の郵便宛先，出願人が代理人によって代理されている場合は，当該代理人の名称又は会社名及び当該代理人の郵便宛先，意匠を表す複製，製品明細，意匠の国際分類に関するロカルノ協定に基づいて分類された製品に係わるクラス(附則1参照)，出願番号及び出願日，登録番号，意匠法第16条(1)から(3)までの規定に従って優先権が与えられている場合は，優先日並びに元の出願がされた国及び出願番号に関する情報，意匠法第16条(4)の規定に従って優先権が与えられている場合は，優先日及びその意匠が展示された博覧会に関する情報，意匠登録簿に1又は2以上のデザイナーを登録するよう請求されている場合は(意匠法第13条(4)参照)，デザインに係わるグループ又は会社を含むデザイナーの名称及びデザイナーの郵便宛先，該当する場合は，提出されているひな形に関する情報，該当する場合は，意匠が色彩を付して登録されている旨の情報。 - 特許庁

(3) If the ratio between the amount of the insurance benefits pertaining to employment injury provided for in the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (excluding the lump sum compensation for surviving family paid in case of Article 16-6, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act, the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a disease caused as a result of having been engaged in a specific job or occupation for a long period which is specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (limited to the persons specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for each type of the businesses specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, taking into consideration of the service period in respect of such business, etc.) (hereinafter referred to as the "insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease" in this paragraph and in Article 20, paragraph (1)), and the insurance benefits pertaining to persons deemed as entitled to receive the insurance benefit pursuant to the provision of Article 36, paragraph (1) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act (hereinafter referred to as the "insured of Class III special enrollment")) in respect of any business falling under any of the following items during each insurance year of three consecutive insurance years and in respect of which business three years or more have passed, since the establishment of the insurance relation of industrial accident insurance, as of March 31 of the last insurance year of such consecutive three insurance years (hereinafter referred to as the "reference date" in this paragraph), the payment of which has been made during such consecutive three insurance years (or, in case of insurance benefits paid as pension or otherwise specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the amount thereof shall be calculated pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; the same shall apply in Article 20, paragraph (1)), plus the amount of the payments made as the services listed in Article 29, paragraph (1), item (ii) of the Industrial Accident Insurance Act which pertain to employment injury and which are specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (or, in case of payments other than those paid as lump sum payments, the amount thereof shall be calculated pursuant to the provisions of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare) on one hand, and the amount obtained by multiplying the aggregate of the amount of the general insurance premiums (or, in case of the businesses set forth in paragraph (1), item (i), the amount of the portion corresponding to the industrial accident insurance rate prescribed in the preceding paragraph (or, if such rate has been increased or decreased pursuant to the provision of such paragraph, such increased or decreased rate)) after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the off-the-job injury rate (meaning the rate prescribed by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare by taking into consideration of the injury rate pertaining to commuting injury and the amount of the costs required for the benefit for second medical examination, etc. during the past three years in respect of all businesses to which the Industrial Accident Insurance Act is applied, and other circumstances; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph and in Article 20, paragraph (1)) plus the amount of the Class I special enrollment insurance premiums after deducting the amount of the portion corresponding to the special enrollment off-the-job injury rate (meaning the off-the-job injury rate after deducting the rate determined by the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare set forth in Article 13; the same shall apply in each item of Article 20, paragraph (1) and in Article 20, paragraph (2)), by the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare by taking into consideration of the costs required for the insurance benefits paid as pension concerning employment injury, the costs required for the insurance benefits pertaining to persons afflicted with a specific disease, and other circumstances (in Article 20, paragraph (1), item (i) referred to as the "Class I adjustment rate") on the other hand, exceeds eighty-five one-hundredth (85/100), or is seventy-five one-hundredth (75/100) or less, then the Minister of Health, Labour and Welfare may acknowledge the rate calculated by increasing or decreasing the industrial accident insurance rate prescribed in the preceding paragraph in respect of such business less the off-the-job injury rate, by the rate specified by the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare within the scope of forty one-hundredth (40/100), as the industrial accident insurance rate for the insurance year two years following the insurance year in which the reference date of such business is included. 例文帳に追加

３　厚生労働大臣は、連続する三保険年度中の各保険年度において次の各号のいずれかに該当する事業であつて当該連続する三保険年度中の最後の保険年度に属する三月三十一日（以下この項において「基準日」という。）において労災保険に係る保険関係が成立した後三年以上経過したものについての当該連続する三保険年度の間における労災保険法の規定による業務災害に関する保険給付（労災保険法第十六条の六第一項第二号の場合に支給される遺族補償一時金、特定の業務に長期間従事することにより発生する疾病であつて厚生労働省令で定めるものにかかつた者（厚生労働省令で定める事業の種類ごとに、当該事業における就労期間等を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める者に限る。）に係る保険給付（以下この項及び第二十条第一項において「特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付」という。）及び労災保険法第三十六条第一項の規定により保険給付を受けることができることとされた者（以下「第三種特別加入者」という。）に係る保険給付を除く。）の額（年金たる保険給付その他厚生労働省令で定める保険給付については、その額は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定するものとする。第二十条第一項において同じ。）に労災保険法第二十九条第一項第二号に掲げる事業として支給が行われた給付金のうち業務災害に係るもので厚生労働省令で定めるものの額（一時金として支給された給付金以外のものについては、その額は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定するものとする。）を加えた額と一般保険料の額（第一項第一号の事業については、前項の規定による労災保険率（その率がこの項の規定により引き上げ又は引き下げられたときは、その引き上げ又は引き下げられた率）に応ずる部分の額）から非業務災害率（労災保険法の適用を受けるすべての事業の過去三年間の通勤災害に係る災害率及び二次健康診断等給付に要した費用の額その他の事情を考慮して厚生労働大臣の定める率をいう。以下この項及び第二十条第一項において同じ。）に応ずる部分の額を減じた額に第一種特別加入保険料の額から特別加入非業務災害率（非業務災害率から第十三条の厚生労働大臣の定める率を減じた率をいう。第二十条第一項各号及び第二項において同じ。）に応ずる部分の額を減じた額を加えた額に業務災害に関する年金たる保険給付に要する費用、特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付に要する費用その他の事情を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める率（第二十条第一項第一号において「第一種調整率」という。）を乗じて得た額との割合が百分の八十五を超え、又は百分の七十五以下である場合には、当該事業についての前項の規定による労災保険率から非業務災害率を減じた率を百分の四十の範囲内において厚生労働省令で定める率だけ引き上げ又は引き下げた率に非業務災害率を加えた率を、当該事業についての基準日の属する保険年度の次の次の保険年度の労災保険率とすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) A Tender Offeror shall conduct transfer of Share Certificates, etc. and other settlement procedures with regard to all of the Share Certificates, etc. Offered to Sell pursuant to the Terms of Purchase, etc. stated in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification (or, if the Terms of Purchase, etc. have been changed by the public notice under Article 27-6(2) or the public announcement and public notice under Article 27-6(3), the Terms of Purchase, etc. after the change), except in cases where the Tender Offeror makes Withdrawal, etc. of Tender Offer with regard to all of the Share Certificates, etc. Offered to Sell during the Tender Offer Period under the proviso to Article 27-11(1) or where the Tender Offeror states any of the following as one of the Terms of Purchase, etc. in the Public Notice for Commencing Tender Offer and Tender Offer Notification (with regard to the term specified in item (ii), limited to cases where the Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate (meaning Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate as defined in Article 27-2(8)) of Share Certificates, etc. in possession by the Tender Offeror after the Tender Offer, or, in cases where there are Persons in Special Relationship as specified in Article 27-2(1)(i) with the Tender Offeror, the Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate calculated by adding the Share Certificates, etc. Holding Rate of the Persons in Special Relationship as defined in Article 27-2(8) to that for the person who conducted the Purchase, etc.) will not exceed the rate specified by a Cabinet Order): 例文帳に追加

４　公開買付者は、公開買付期間中における応募株券等の全部について第二十七条の十一第一項ただし書の規定により公開買付けの撤回等を行う場合並びに公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書において次に掲げる条件を付した場合（第二号の条件を付す場合にあつては、当該公開買付けの後における公開買付者の所有に係る株券等の株券等所有割合（第二十七条の二第八項に規定する株券等所有割合をいい、当該公開買付者に同条第一項第一号に規定する特別関係者がある場合にあつては、当該特別関係者の所有に係る株券等の同条第八項に規定する株券等所有割合を加算したものをいう。）が政令で定める割合を下回る場合に限る。）を除き、応募株券等の全部について、公開買付開始公告及び公開買付届出書に記載した買付条件等（第二十七条の六第二項の規定による公告又は同条第三項の規定による公表及び公告により買付条件等を変更したときは、当該変更後の買付条件等）により、買付け等に係る受渡しその他の決済を行わなければならない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The documents specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 155, paragraph 2 of the Act shall be as listed in the corresponding categories set forth in the following items and as specified in such items, respectively: (i) in the case where the application for amendment pertains to the establishment of a Commodity Market, the documents set forth in the following: (a) a document recording the reasons for the amendment; (b) a comparative table of the prior and amended article provisions; (c) minutes of a general meeting of Members or a general meeting of shareholders or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for approval have been followed; (d) a document certifying that the total number of persons who are Members, etc. of the Commodity Exchange intending to establish a Commodity Market for each Commodity Market which is planned to be newly established and who intend to start transactions on such Commodity Market, and who intend to become Members, etc. of said Commodity Exchange intending to start transactions on such Commodity Market (with regard to a Member Commodity Exchange, limited to persons who have completed payment of the full amount of the contribution) are 20 or more; (e) among persons who are or intend to become Members, etc. prescribed in (d), with regard to a person who is or intends to become a member of a Member Commodity Exchange, a sworn, written statement that such person is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act regarding said Commodity Market; with regard to a person who is or intends to become a trading participant of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, a sworn, written statement that such person is subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph; (f) a sworn, written document stating that the majority of persons who are or intend to become Members, etc. prescribed in (d) are subject to such persons as specified in the respective items of Article 10, paragraph 2, and Article 28, paragraph 1, item 5, (a) and (b) of the Act, with regard to such Commodity Market; (g) a sworn, written document stating that the person who intends to become a - 134 - Member, etc. of said Commodity Exchange and intends to start transactions on said Commodity Market is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; (h) in the case of carrying out settlements by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act at one or more Commodity Markets which are planned to be newly established, a record prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of filing the application and pertaining to the amount of the net assets of a person who is or intends to become a Member, etc. as prescribed in (d); (i) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the opening on a Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (j) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed Commodity, a document stating that it is appropriate to trade Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (k) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another; (ii) in the case where the application for amendment is pertaining to a change to the scope of a Listed Commodity or Listed Commodity Index on a Commodity Market (excluding the abolishment or narrowing of such scope; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) or a change to the type of transaction, the documents set forth in the following: (a) a document recording the reasons for the amendment; (b) a comparative table of the prior and amended article provisions; (c) minutes of a general meeting of Members or a general meeting of shareholders or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for approval have been followed; (d) in cases where making a settlement on a Commodity Market pertaining to said amendment by a method set forth in Article 105, item 1 of the Act and where changing the minimum amount of the net assets of Members, etc. who trade on said Commodity Market, a record pertaining to the amount of the net assets of Members, etc., which is prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the filing of the application; (e) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the amendment on the Commodity Market pertaining to said amendment; (f) in the case of changing the scope of a Listed Commodity, a document stating that it is appropriate that two or more Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. are traded on a single Commodity Market; (g) in the case of changing the scope of a Listed Commodity Index which sets two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices are common to one another; 例文帳に追加

法第百五十五条第二項の主務省令で定める書類は、次の各号に掲げる場合の区分に応 じ、当該各号に定めるものとする。 一変更の申請が商品市場の開設に係る場合次に掲げる書面 イ変更の理由を記載した書面 ロ新旧条文の対照表 ハ会員総会又は株主総会の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 ニ新たに開設しようとする商品市場ごとに当該商品市場を開設しようとする商品取 引所の会員等であって当該商品市場において取引をしようとするもの及び当該商品 取引所の会員等になろうとする者であって当該商品市場において取引をしようとす るもの（会員商品取引所にあっては、その出資の全額の払込みが終了した者に限る。） の合計数が二十人以上であることを証する書面 ホニに規定する会員等及び会員等になろうとする者のうち、会員商品取引所の会員 及び会員になろうとする者にあっては当該商品市場について法第三十条第一項各 号のいずれかに該当することを誓約する書面、株式会社商品取引所の取引参加者及 び取引参加者になろうとする者にあっては法第八十二条第一項第一号イからハま で又は同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当することを誓約する書面 ヘニに規定する会員等及び会員等になろうとする者の過半数の者が当該商品市場に ついて法第十条第二項各号並びに第二十八条第一項第五号イ及びロに定める者に 該当することを誓約する書面 ト当該商品取引所の会員等になろうとする者であって当該商品市場において取引を しようとするものが法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも該当しな いことを誓約する書面 チ新たに開設しようとする一以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる 方法により決済を行う場合にあっては、認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号 により作成したニに規定する会員等及び会員等になろうとする者の純資産額に関す る調書 リ新たに開設しようとする商品市場における開設後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見 込みを記載した書面 ル二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数として商品市場を開設しようとする場合に あっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通していることを 明らかにすることができる書面 二変更の申請が商品市場における上場商品若しくは上場商品指数の範囲の変更（廃止 又は範囲の縮小を除く。以下この号において同じ。）又は取引の種類の変更に係る場 合次に掲げる書面 イ変更の理由を記載した書面 ハ会員総会又は株主総会の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 ニ当該変更に係る商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を 行っている場合であって、当該商品市場において取引をする会員等の純資産額の最 低額を変更した場合にあっては、認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により 作成した会員等の純資産額に関する調書 ホ当該変更に係る商品市場における変更後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見込みを記 載した書面 ヘ上場商品の範囲の変更の場合にあっては、二以上の上場商品構成物品を一の商品 市場で取引をすることが適当である旨を明らかにすることができる書面 ト二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数とする上場商品指数の範囲の変更の場合に あっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通している旨を明 らかにすることができる書面 - 経済産業省

The Registrar shall refer to an examiner every application in respect of which a complete specification has been filed and if satisfied on the report of the examiner that- the nature of the invention or the manner in which it is to be performed is not particularly described and ascertained in the complete specification, or the application, specification and drawings have not been prepared in the prescribed manner, or the title of the specification does not sufficiently indicate the subject-matter of the invention, or the statement of claim does not sufficiently define the invention, or where a complete specification has been left after a provisional specification, the invention particularly described in the complete specification is not substantially the same as that which is described in the provisional specification, or the invention as described and claimed is prima facie not a manner of new manufacture or improvement, or the specification relates to more than one invention, or in the case of an application claiming priority under section 78A, the specification describes and claims an invention substantially larger than or substantially different from the invention disclosed in the specification field with the application made outside Bangladesh by virtue of which priority is claimed, or in the case of an application for a patent of addition under section 15A, the invention describe and claimed in the specification is not an improvement or modification of that described and claimed in the original specification, he may refuse to accept the application or require that the application, specification or drawings be amended before he proceeds with the application; and in the later case the application shall, if the Registrar so directs, bear date as from the time when the requirement is complied with: Provided that, when a specification comprises more than one invention, the application shall, if the Registrar or the applicant so requires, be restricted to one invention and the other inventions may he made the subject-matter of fresh applications; and any such fresh application shall be proceeded with as a substantive application, but the Registrar may, in his discretion, direct that any such fresh application made before the acceptance of the original application shall bear the date of the original application or such later date as he may fix, and the fresh application shall be deemed, for the purposes of this Act, to have been made on the date which it bears in accordance with such direction: Provided further that where a complete specification is left after a provisional specification, the Registrar may, if the applicant so requests, cancel the provisional specification and direct that the application shall be deemed to have been made on the date on which the complete specification was left, and proceed with the application accordingly. 例文帳に追加

登録官は、完全な明細書が提出されたあらゆる出願につき審査官へ付託するものとし、次に掲げる(a)から(h)の各号に該当する旨が審査官報告書において報告される場合、登録官は、出願の受理を拒否すること、又は、出願審査を行う前に、願書、明細書若しくは図面の補正を求めることができ、後者の場合、登録官がそのように命ずるとき、出願の日付は当該補正の要件が満たされた日とする。発明の本質又は実施方法が、完全な明細書中に具体的に記述されておらず、確認されないとき。願書、明細書及び図面が所定の方式で作成されていないとき。明細書の名称は発明の要旨を十分に示していないとき。請求項の記載は発明を十分に定義していないとき。又は、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、完全な明細書に具体的に記載された発明が仮明細書の記載と本質的に同一ではないとき。記載され請求されている発明が一見して新規の製造又は改良の方法ではない。明細書が2 以上の発明に係わるものであるとき。又は、第78A 条により優先権を主張する出願の場合、優先権主張の基礎とされているバングラデシュ国外で行われた出願において提出された明細書で開示されている発明より本質的に広い、又は本質的に異なる発明が明細書に記載され請求されているとき。又は、第15A 条による特許追加出願の場合、明細書に記載され請求される発明が原明細書に記載され請求される発明の改良又は修正ではないとき。ただし、明細書が2 以上の発明から成る場合、当該出願は、登録官又は出願人がそのように求めるとき、1 発明に限定されるものとし、その他の発明は新規出願の対象とすることができる。当該新規出願は実質的な出願として手続きを進め、原出願が受理される前に行われるこのような新規出願につき、原出願の日又は自己が定めるそれ以降の日付を付すよう登録官は自己の裁量において指示することができ、当該新規出願は、本法の適用上、当該指示に従い付与された日付に出願されたものとみなされる。ただし、さらに、完全な明細書が仮明細書の後に提出された場合、登録官は、出願人がそのように求めれば、仮明細書を取り消し、出願は完全な明細書が提出された日付に行われたとみなすよう命じることができ、そのように当該出願の手続きを進めることができる。 - 特許庁

(v) a stock company for which the renewal of a registration under Article 7(3) has been refused pursuant to the provisions of Article 10(1), whose license under Article 3 has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 44(1), whose registration under Article 7(1), Article 50-2(1), or Article 52(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 45(1), for which the renewal of a registration under Article 7(3), as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 50-2(2), has been refused pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (6) of that Article, whose registration under Article 67(1) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 82(1), whose license under Article 3 of the Secured Bonds Trust Act (Act No. 52 of 1905) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 12 of that Act, whose authorization under Article 1(1) of the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions (Act No. 43 of 1943) has been rescinded pursuant to the provisions of Article 10 of that Act, or a stock company whose license, registration, or authorization of the same kind (including permission or any other administrative disposition similar to said license, registration, or authorization; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item, item (viii)(d), and item (x)(a)) which was obtained in a foreign state has been rescinded or one for which the renewal of said license, registration, or authorization has been refused pursuant to the provisions of laws and regulations of the foreign state that are equivalent to this Act, the Secured Bonds Trust Act, or the Act on Provision, etc. of Trust Business by Financial Institutions, and where five years have yet to elapse since the date of rescission (in the case that a renewal is refused, the day on which a disposition for said refusal to renew was made; the same shall apply in item (viii)(d), (e), and (f) and item (x)(a)); 例文帳に追加

五　第十条第一項の規定により第七条第三項の登録の更新を拒否され、第四十四条第一項の規定により第三条の免許を取り消され、第四十五条第一項の規定により第七条第一項の登録、第五十条の二第一項の登録若しくは第五十二条第一項の登録を取り消され、第五十条の二第六項の規定により同条第二項において準用する第七条第三項の登録の更新を拒否され、第八十二条第一項の規定により第六十七条第一項の登録を取り消され、担保付社債信託法（明治三十八年法律第五十二号）第十二条の規定により同法第三条の免許を取り消され、若しくは金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律（昭和十八年法律第四十三号）第十条の規定により同法第一条第一項の認可を取り消され、又はこの法律、担保付社債信託法若しくは金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律に相当する外国の法令の規定により当該外国において受けている同種類の免許、登録若しくは認可（当該免許、登録若しくは認可に類する許可その他の行政処分を含む。以下この号、第八号ニ及び第十号イにおいて同じ。）を取り消され、若しくは当該免許、登録若しくは認可の更新を拒否され、その取消しの日（更新の拒否の場合にあっては、当該更新の拒否の処分がなされた日。第八号ニ、ホ及びヘ並びに第十号イにおいて同じ。）から五年を経過しない株式会社 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Regrettably, more than 5,000 people are still missing, and one year is too long a time to wait for the adjudication of disappearance due to emergency. Therefore, the FSA's director-general in charge held very tough negotiations with the Ministry of Justice, which is responsible for matters related to the certification of the death of missing people. As a result, it has been agreed to allow the death of missing people to be certified three months after their disappearance based on a notification submitted to municipal governments through a simplified procedure. While an arrangement like that is made behind the scenes, life insurance sales women are going from mortuary to mortuary with the relatives of missing people. As I am a doctor by profession, I know well what a great mental shock it is for ordinary people to see the body of a person killed in a disaster like that, but insurance sales women are going as far as to do that. As I told you previously, Ishinomaki Shoko Shinkumi, which could not be contacted for four days after the earthquake, continued to provide loans, with employees working by candle light. In that sense, I am very grateful to various people in the financial sector, including financial institutions, life and non-life insurance companies and securities companies, for dealing with the unprecedented earthquake and tsunami disaster through private-public collaboration. However, I am not so complacent as to believe that we have done enough. 例文帳に追加

しかし、危難失踪で1年間といったら、5千人以上の方が本当に胸の痛む思いでございますが、今まだ行方不明でございまして、それで危難失踪で1年というのはちょっと長すぎますので、これは金融庁の局長が非常に頑張っていただきまして、法務省、これは生きるか死ぬかという生死は法務省ですから、法務省と大変激しい交渉をやらせていただきまして、これは3か月だったかな、3か月で簡素な市町村に対する届出によって、死亡の確認ができるというふうになりまして、そんなことを目に見えないことでございますが、いわゆる生保のセールスレディの方もご遺族と一緒にご遺体安置所なんかをどんどん回っていただいておりまして、私は医者ですから、よくああいうご遺体にお会いするという、普通慣れてない方といいますか、我々は本職が医者でございますけれども、いかに精神的ショックを受けられるかということは、私はよく分かりますので、そこまでしてセールスレディの方がやっていただいているという話をよく聞きますので、そういった意味で、私は金融の分野はまさに金融機関、いつかお話ししたと思いますが、宮城県石巻商工信用組合、4日間、連絡が付かなかったのですけれども、ろうそくをつけながら、きちっと人にお金を貸したということをやっていただいておりまして、そういう意味では私は本当に各金融機関、生損保、あるいは証券会社、あるいはそういったいろいろな各関係、金融関係の方に本当に官民一体で未曾有の震災に取り組んでいただいたということは感謝いたしておりますけれども、まだまだ、十分と、そんなに決してのぼせ上がっておりません。 - 金融庁

Where the decision on the objection under Section 64 has not been made within six months from the date of filing, and where, after the expiry of this time limit, the person filing the objection has filed a request for decision, the appeal from a decision of the Trade Mark Section or Trade Mark Division is directly admissible, in derogation of subsection (1), sentence 1, if the decision on the objection is not made within a period of two months from the receipt of the request. If the person raising the objection is opposed by another party to the proceedings, sentence 1 shall be applicable provided that the period of six months after the objection was raised is replaced by a period of 10 months. If the other party has also raised an objection, the other party must give his consent to the appeal under sentence 2. The written declaration of consent shall be attached to the appeal. If the other party does not also lodge an appeal within one month after service of the appeal under subsection (4), sentence 2, his objection is deemed to have been withdrawn. The remaining periods of time under sentences 1 and 2 shall be interrupted if the proceedings are suspended or if, on request of a party to the proceedings, an extension of time has been granted. The remaining periods of time under sentences 1 and 2 shall recommence to run after the suspension of the proceedings has been terminated or the extension of time granted has expired. After a decision on the objection has been issued, an appeal under sentences 1 and 2 shall no longer be admissible. 例文帳に追加

第64条の規定に基づく不服申立に関する決定がその申立の日から6月以内に行われない場合，及び不服申立をした者がこの期間の満了後に決定の請求を行った場合には，商標課又は商標部門の決定に対する抗告は，不服申立に関する決定がその請求の受理から2月以内に行われないときは，[1]の第1文の規定は適用されず，直ちに認められる。不服申立をした者に対して，当該手続の他の当事者が対抗している場合には，第1文は，不服申立がなされた日から6月の期間を10月の期間と置き替えるという条件で適用されるものとする。手続における他の当事者も不服申立をしている場合には，当該他の当事者は，第2文に基づく抗告に対し同意しなければならない。書面による同意の宣言を抗告に添付しなければならない。手続における他の当事者が，[4]の第2文の規定に基づく抗告状の送達後1月以内に，抗告を提起しない場合は，その者がした不服申立は取り下げられたものとみなされる。第1文及び第2文の規定に基づく残存期間は，手続が中止されている場合又は手続における当事者の1人の請求により期間の延長が認められている場合は，進行が中断される。第1文及び第2文に規定する残存期間は，中止が終了した後又は与えられた期間が満了した後に進行を再開する。不服申立に関する決定が行われた後には，第1文及び第2文の規定に基づく抗告はもはや行うことができない。 - 特許庁

Article 252 (1) In the following cases concerning the rehabilitation debtor against whom bankruptcy proceedings have not yet been commenced, for the purpose of application of the relevant provisions of the Bankruptcy Act (meaning the provisions of the Bankruptcy Act, Article 71(1)(iv) and (2)(ii) and (iii), Article 72(1)(iv) and (2)(ii) and (iii), Article 160 (excluding paragraph (1)(i)), Article 162 (excluding paragraph (1)(ii)), Article 163(2), Article 164(1) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (2) of said Article), Article 166, and Article 167(2) (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 170(2) of said Act); the same shall apply in paragraph (3)), a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, etc. (in cases where an order of dismissal with prejudice on the merits of a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, an order of discontinuance of rehabilitation proceedings, an order of disconfirmation of the rehabilitation plan or an order of revocation of the rehabilitation plan (limited to one based on a petition filed prior to the close of rehabilitation proceedings) becomes final and binding, this phrase refers to a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, petition for commencement of special liquidation in the proceedings for special liquidation that have ceased to be effective as a result of the commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, or any act conducted by the rehabilitation debtor or his/her statutory agent or the rehabilitation debtor's director, executive officer or any other person equivalent thereto, which shall constitute the crime set forth in Article 265 of the Bankruptcy Act, and in cases where an order of revocation of the rehabilitation plan, which is not based on a petition filed prior to the close of rehabilitation proceedings, becomes final and binding, said phrase refers to a petition for revocation of the rehabilitation plan; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall be deemed to be a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings only where no petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings has been filed prior to said petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings, etc: 例文帳に追加

第二百五十二条　破産手続開始前の再生債務者に関する次に掲げる場合における破産法の関係規定（破産法第七十一条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第七十二条第一項第四号並びに第二項第二号及び第三号、第百六十条（第一項第一号を除く。）、第百六十二条（第一項第二号を除く。）、第百六十三条第二項、第百六十四条第一項（同条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）、第百六十六条並びに第百六十七条第二項（同法第百七十条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定をいう。第三項において同じ。）の適用については、再生手続開始の申立て等（再生手続開始の申立ての棄却、再生手続廃止若しくは再生計画不認可の決定又は再生計画取消しの決定（再生手続の終了前にされた申立てに基づくものに限る。）が確定した場合にあっては再生手続開始の申立て、再生手続開始によって効力を失った特別清算の手続における特別清算開始の申立て又は破産法第二百六十五条の罪に該当することとなる再生債務者、その法定代理人若しくは再生債務者の理事、取締役、執行役若しくはこれらに準ずる者の行為をいい、再生計画取消しの決定であって再生手続の終了前にされた申立てに基づくもの以外のものが確定した場合にあっては再生計画取消しの申立てをいう。以下この項において同じ。）は、当該再生手続開始の申立て等の前に破産手続開始の申立てがないときに限り、破産手続開始の申立てとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Simultaneously, how should insurance be regulated and supervised from now on? I believe insurance in China is not as advanced as in Japan yet. But then again, Japan’s insurance industry has experienced falling stock prices and interest rates over the past decade and suffered a long period of winter-like hardship: the insurance sector, where they have something called “expense profits”, “interest gain” and “mortality profits”, the interest gain was so squeezed that at one point, negative carry was more than 1 trillion yen. In the United States, the federal government will be establishing a division in charge of insurance for the first time within the federal government organization under the financial reform legislation. As you know, basic supervision of insurance in the United States is conducted on a state-by-state basis. Despite the fact that AIU—the world’s biggest private insurance company—was effectively nationalized in the United States, the insurance industry has been a bit of a blind spot in that any attempts in the past to negotiate with the central government often resulted in being told that it was a matter for the state government. The United States is a federal republic comprised of states, so in that sense, insurance varies from state to state in tax and other aspects. 例文帳に追加

しかし、同時にそれでは今から保険の行政に関してどういう点をやっているのか。まだ日本ほど保険が進んでいるとは思っておりませんけれども、しかし同時に、日本の保険業界もご存じのように大変ここ10年間株価は下がる、あるいは金利が下がるということで、費差益・利差益・死差益というのが保険業にはございますが、本当に利差益が少なくて大変一時は末端逆ざやが1兆円余の保険業界でもあるというような冬の時代が長く続きましたけれども、多くのかなりの、我々が27年前に通ったころは、日本の名前がついた生命保険会社法だったのですけれども、今色々な外資からも変わったところもありますので、そんなことを含めて今度アメリカでも保険ということが、ご存じのようにアメリカは保険の基本的監督は州単位なんですよ、アメリカの政府は。州単位で保険をやっていまして、連邦政府というのは、金融規制改革法で初めて連邦政府の中に保険担当の部署をつくるんですよ、今度初めて。しかしながら、AIUなんていう世界で一番大きな民間保険会社をアメリカは実質国営化しましたけれども、そこら辺で保険業界というのはちょっと穴と言ったらおかしいけれども、中央政府と今まで交渉しましても、これは中央政府の話だということもしばしばございまして、そういった意味で保険というのはなかなか、アメリカは合衆国ですから、税金なんかも州によって違いますね。 - 金融庁

Article 36 (1) The provisions of Article 8 to Article 8-2-3 shall apply mutatis mutandis to a building or another structure specified by Cabinet Order as one for which the respective measures set forth in these provisions are particularly necessary in order to mitigate any damage arising from disasters, other than fires, specified by Cabinet Order. In this case: in Article 8, paragraph (1) to paragraph (4), the term "fire prevention manager" shall be deemed to be replaced with "disaster prevention manager"; in Article 8, paragraph (1), the phrase "qualified persons specified by Cabinet Order" shall be deemed to be replaced with "qualified persons who have knowledge of the mitigation of the damage arising from fires and other disasters and who are specified by Cabinet Order," and the phrase "conduct drills for fire extinguishing activities, reporting and evacuation, inspect and improve the equipment used for fire defense, water supply for fire defense or facilities necessary for fire extinguishing activities, supervise the use or handling of fire, maintain and manage the structure and equipment necessary for evacuation or fire prevention, manage the capacity of the property at the appropriate level, and perform any other operations necessary for fire prevention management" shall be deemed to be replaced with "conduct drills for evacuation and perform any other operations necessary for disaster prevention management"; in Article 8, paragraph (4), Article 8-2, paragraph (1) and Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1), the phrase "for fire prevention management" shall be deemed to be replaced with "for disaster prevention management"; in Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1), the phrase "on the prevention of fire" shall be deemed to be replaced with "on the mitigation of the damage arising from disasters, other than fires, specified by Cabinet Order," and the phrase "the installation and maintenance of equipment used for fire defense, water supply for fire defense or facilities necessary for fire extinguishing activities and other matters necessary for prevention of fire" shall be deemed to be replaced with "and other matters necessary for the mitigation of the damage arising from disasters, other than fires, specified by Cabinet Order"; in Article 8-2-2, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) and Article 8-2-3, paragraph (1), item (ii)(d), the term "qualified inspector of property under fire prevention measures" shall be deemed to be replaced with "qualified inspector for disaster prevention management"; in Article 8-2-3, paragraph (1), item (ii)(a), and paragraph (6), item (ii) of said Article, the phrase "or Article 17-4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2)" shall be deemed to be replaced with ", Article 17-4, paragraph (1) or paragraph (2), or Article 8, paragraph (3) or paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 36, paragraph (1)." 例文帳に追加

第三十六条　第八条から第八条の二の三までの規定は、火災以外の災害で政令で定めるものによる被害の軽減のため特に必要がある建築物その他の工作物として政令で定めるものについて準用する。この場合において、第八条第一項から第四項までの規定中「防火管理者」とあるのは「防災管理者」と、同条第一項中、「政令」とあるのは、「火災その他の災害の被害の軽減に関する知識を有する者で政令」と、「消火、通報及び避難の訓練の実施、消防の用に供する設備、消防用水又は消火活動上必要な施設の点検及び整備、火気の使用又は取扱いに関する監督、避難又は防火上必要な構造及び設備の維持管理並びに収容人員の管理その他防火管理上」とあるのは「避難の訓練の実施その他防災管理上」と、同条第四項、第八条の二第一項及び第八条の二の二第一項中「防火管理上」とあるのは「防災管理上」と、同項中「火災の予防に」とあるのは「火災以外の災害で政令で定めるものによる被害の軽減に」と、「、消防の用に供する設備、消防用水又は消火活動上必要な施設の設置及び維持その他火災の予防上」とあるのは「その他火災以外の災害で政令で定めるものによる被害の軽減のために」と、同項、同条第二項及び第八条の二の三第一項第二号ニ中「防火対象物点検資格者」とあるのは「防災管理点検資格者」と、同号イ及び同条第六項第二号中「又は第十七条の四第一項若しくは第二項」とあるのは、「、第十七条の四第一項若しくは第二項又は第三十六条第一項において準用する第八条三項若しくは第四項」と読み替えるもとのする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The documents specified by an ordinance set forth in Article 145, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as listed in the following (in case of documents certified by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document recording the reasons for the merger; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act; (b) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act; (c) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b) of the Act; and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval; (iv) minutes of the general meeting of shareholders approving the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of Members prescribed in Article 144, paragraph 4, Article 144-2, paragraph 2, or Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of shareholders prescribed in Article 144-6, paragraph 1 and Article 144-13, paragraph 1 of the Act, and Article 783, paragraph 1, Article 795, paragraph 1, or Article 804, paragraph 1 of the Company Act) of each Commodity Exchange which carries out the merger, or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for the merger have been followed; (v) a document stating the status of the property, income and expenditure of each Commodity Exchange that carries out the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, the settlement related statements, etc. of the preceding business year; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the financial documents, etc. of the preceding business year and detailed statements thereof); (vi) in the case where a public notice or demand (in cases where the public notice is made through an official gazette, a daily newspaper which publishes matters of current events, or an Electronic Public Notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 3 or Article 144-10, paragraph 3 of the Act [including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17), or Article 789, paragraph 3; Article 799, paragraph 3; or Article 810, paragraph 3 of the Company Act, a public notice by such method) is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5; Article 144-2, paragraph 3; and Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act, or Article 144-10, paragraph 2 of the Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act); Article 789, paragraph 2; Article 799, paragraph 2; or Article 810, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; and in cases where a creditor has made an objection, a document certifying that the liabilities have been paid or reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor, reasonable property has been deposited for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said merger is not likely to harm said creditor; (vii) a document stating a method for business succession pertaining to transactions on a Commodity Market which has been opened by a Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of a merger; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees (limited to a case where a Commodity Exchange subsequent to a merger becomes an Incorporated Commodity Exchange); (ix) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the merger on the Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (x) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed - 113 - Commodity at the time of a merger, a document stating that it is appropriate to conduct transactions of Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (xi) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market at the time of a merger by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十五条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明す る書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。 一合併の理由を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人である場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二 項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が法人 である場合当該役員の登記事項証明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第 二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓約する書面 ハ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人又は法人でない場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五 条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しない旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号 ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 三会員等の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載した 書面、会員が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第三十条第一項各号のいずれかに該当す ることを誓約する書面又は取引参加者が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第八十二条第 一項第一号イからハまで若しくは同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当する ことを誓約する書面、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面並びに申請に係る商品取引所が開設しようとする一 以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を行う場合には 認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純資産額に関す る調書 四合併を行う各商品取引所の合併総会（会員商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条 第四項、第百四十四条の二第二項又は第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会をいい、 株式会社商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条の六第一項、第百四十四条の十三 第一項、会社法第七百八十三条第一項、第七百九十五条第一項又は第八百四条第一 項の株主総会をいう。）の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 五合併を行う各商品取引所の財産及び収支の状況を知ることができる書面（会員商品 取引所にあっては最終事業年度の決算関係書類等、株式会社商品取引所にあっては 最終事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属明細書）六法第百四十四条第五項、第百四十四条の二第三項及び第百四十四条の三第五項に おいて準用する法第百二十四条第二項、第百四十四条の十第二項（第百四十四条の 十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会社法第七百八十九条第二項 、第七百九十九 条第二項又は第八百十条第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第百二十四条第三項、 第百四十四条の十第三項（第百四十四条の十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会 社法第七百八十九条第三項、第七百九十九条第三項又は第八百十条第三項の規定に より公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によっ てした場合にあっては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた 債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しく は当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は - 112 - 当該合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 七合併により消滅する商品取引所の開設している商品市場における取引に関する業務 の承継の方法を記載した書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書面（合併後の商品取引所が株式会社商品取引所であ る場合に限る。九開設しようとする商品市場における合併後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見込みを記 載した書面 十合併に際して上場商品に係る商品市場を開設しようとする場合にあっては、上場商 品構成物品を一の商品市場で取引をすることが適当である旨を明らかにすることが できる書面 十一合併に際して二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数として商品市場を開設しよう とする場合にあっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通し ていることを明らかにすることができる書面 - 経済産業省

(5) The provisions of the preceding paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where Regulated Securities issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the items of paragraph (1). In this case, the term "excluding Regulated Securities" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "limited to Regulated Securities"; the term "the company shall" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the company (if said Securities are so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, excluding persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) shall"; the terms "the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "financial conditions of asset investment or other similar businesses conducted by the company, other important matters concerning the company's assets"; the term "for each business year" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each of the periods of time specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance for the Regulated Securities (hereinafter referred to as the "Specified Period" in this Article)"; the term "that business year" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that Specified Period"; the part "the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below" in the proviso to paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Regulated Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below"; the part "or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year is fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and" in the proviso to paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "; and"; the part "share certificates, Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2)" in item (iv) of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2)"; the part "if the number of its holders on the last day of that business year or on the last day of any of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order (or, in case of Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the number of its holders on the last day of that business year is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order)" in item (iv) of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "if the number of its holders on the last day of the Specified Period is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order"; the term "issued Securities" in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "issued Regulated Securities"; the term "Securities issued" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Regulated Securities issued"; the term "a company" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a company (if said Regulated Securities are Securities so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, excluding persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance)"; the term "the main clause of paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the main clause of paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5)"; the term "business year" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Period"; the term "the day on which the Securities came" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day on which the Regulated Securities came"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

５　前各項の規定は、特定有価証券が第一項各号に掲げる有価証券のいずれかに該当する場合について準用する。この場合において、同項本文中「有価証券の発行者である会社」とあるのは「有価証券の発行者である会社（内閣府令で定める有価証券については、内閣府令で定める者を除く。）」と、「特定有価証券を除く」とあるのは「特定有価証券に限る」と、「事業年度ごと」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券につき、内閣府令で定める期間（以下この条において「特定期間」という。）ごと」と、「当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業」とあるのは「当該会社が行う資産の運用その他これに類似する事業に係る資産の経理の状況その他資産」と、「当該事業年度」とあるのは「当該特定期間」と、同項ただし書中「当該有価証券が第三号に掲げる有価証券（株券その他の政令で定める有価証券に限る。）に該当する場合においてその発行者である会社（報告書提出開始年度（当該有価証券の募集又は売出しにつき第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文又は第二十三条の八第一項本文若しくは第二項の規定の適用を受けることとなつた日の属する事業年度をいい、当該報告書提出開始年度が複数あるときは、その直近のものをいう。）終了後五年を経過している場合に該当する会社に限る。）の当該事業年度の末日及び当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度すべての末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定めるところにより計算した数に満たない場合であつて有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたとき、当該有価証券が第四号」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券が第四号」と、「及び当該事業年度の末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定める数に満たないとき、並びに」とあるのは「及び」と、同項第四号中「株券、第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等」とあるのは「第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等」と、「当該事業年度又は当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度のいずれかの末日におけるその所有者の数が政令で定める数以上（当該有価証券が同項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等である場合にあつては、当該事業年度の末日におけるその所有者の数が政令で定める数以上）」とあるのは「当該特定期間の末日におけるその所有者の数が政令で定める数以上」と、第二項中「有価証券の」とあるのは「特定有価証券の」と、第三項中「第一項本文」とあるのは「第五項において準用する第一項本文」と、「発行者」とあるのは「発行者（内閣府令で定める有価証券については、内閣府令で定める者を除く。）」と、「有価証券が」とあるのは「特定有価証券が」と、「その該当することとなつた日」とあるのは「当該特定有価証券につき、その該当することとなつた日」と、「事業年度」とあるのは「特定期間」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24 (1) When Securities (excluding Regulated Securities; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, except in the following items) issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the following items, the company shall submit, for each business year, a report stating the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business and other matters specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors (hereinafter referred to as an "Annual Securities Report") to the Prime Minister within three months after the end of that business year (or, in the case of a foreign company, within the period specified by a Cabinet Order as the period necessary and appropriate for the public interest or protection of investors) pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance; provided however, that this shall not apply to cases where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the respective last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of the Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below, if the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than 500 million yen (or if, in cases where the Securities are Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the amount that is specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of the stated capital of the company is less than the amount specified by a Cabinet Order on the last day of that business year) or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year are fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) or (iv) below, if the Prime Minister approves as specified by a Cabinet Order that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　有価証券の発行者である会社は、その会社が発行者である有価証券（特定有価証券を除く。次の各号を除き、以下この条において同じ。）が次に掲げる有価証券のいずれかに該当する場合には、内閣府令で定めるところにより、事業年度ごとに、当該会社の商号、当該会社の属する企業集団及び当該会社の経理の状況その他事業の内容に関する重要な事項その他の公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして内閣府令で定める事項を記載した報告書（以下「有価証券報告書」という。）を、当該事業年度経過後三月以内（当該会社が外国会社である場合には、公益又は投資者保護のため必要かつ適当なものとして政令で定める期間内）に、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、当該有価証券が第三号に掲げる有価証券（株券その他の政令で定める有価証券に限る。）に該当する場合においてその発行者である会社（報告書提出開始年度（当該有価証券の募集又は売出しにつき第四条第一項本文若しくは第二項本文又は第二十三条の八第一項本文若しくは第二項の規定の適用を受けることとなつた日の属する事業年度をいい、当該報告書提出開始年度が複数あるときは、その直近のものをいう。）終了後五年を経過している場合に該当する会社に限る。）の当該事業年度の末日及び当該事業年度の開始の日前四年以内に開始した事業年度すべての末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定めるところにより計算した数に満たない場合であつて有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして内閣府令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたとき、当該有価証券が第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において、その発行者である会社の資本金の額が当該事業年度の末日において五億円未満（当該有価証券が第二条第二項の規定により有価証券とみなされる有価証券投資事業権利等である場合にあつては、当該会社の資産の額として政令で定めるものの額が当該事業年度の末日において政令で定める額未満）であるとき、及び当該事業年度の末日における当該有価証券の所有者の数が政令で定める数に満たないとき、並びに当該有価証券が第三号又は第四号に掲げる有価証券に該当する場合において有価証券報告書を提出しなくても公益又は投資者保護に欠けることがないものとして政令で定めるところにより内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The matters specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 1 of the Act shall be as follows in the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger is an Incorporated Commodity Exchange: (i) matters concerning the appropriateness of the provisions on matters listed in Article 143, paragraph 1, item 6 and item 7 of the Act; (ii) the following matters concerning another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (excluding clearing corporations and Clearing Member Commodity Exchanges; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item): (a) accounting documents or an inventory of property and a balance sheet pertaining to the final business year, and the contents of a profit and loss statement prepared along with said balance sheet (in the case where the final business year does not exist, a balance sheet as on the day of the - 94 - establishment of another Incorporated Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger); (b) when there are extraordinary accounting documents, etc. as deeming a day after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) as an extraordinary closing day (in the case where there are two or more extraordinary closing days, the last one), the contents of said extraordinary accounting documents, etc.; (c) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said other Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (iii) a balance sheet which another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger (limited to a clearing corporation or Clearing Member Commodity Exchange) prepared pursuant to the provisions of Article 492, paragraph 1 of the Company Act (including the case where it is applied - 95 - mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 77, paragraph 1 of the Act); (iv) when there has occurred an event that has a significant influence on the status of the property of the Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, such as the disposition of important property and the share of significant liabilities after the last day of the final business year (in the case where the final business year does not exist, the day of the establishment of said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) at said Member Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger, the contents thereof (in the case where a new final business year emerges during the period between 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act and the day of the establishment of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger, limited to the contents of an event which occurred after the last day of said new final business year); (v) matters concerning estimates of the performance of liabilities (excluding liabilities inherited from another Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Incorporation-Type Merger) of the Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger on and after the day of the establishment of said Incorporated Commodity Exchange Established by an Incorporation-Type Merger; (vi) when there have been changes to the matters listed in the preceding items after 10 days prior to a general meeting of members set forth in Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act, said new matters. 例文帳に追加