「From time to time」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(962ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

In that sense and others, striking a balance between all those factors is critical – while peace of mind and security do matter in financial services, adhering excessively to such qualities could, as I have just pointed out, result in a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection and thus create impediments to the growth of truly healthy companies or the growth of a healthy economy, which is why the financial sector is so vital. This time around, I reaffirmed in talks with people like Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Zhou Xiaochuan that harmony or a balance between those factors is extremely important. Having spoken with financial regulators in both the U.S. and China, I am now even more convinced of this idea. In any case, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) is aware of the importance of paying proper attention to any impact of the new requirements on the current situation and corporate reform efforts in Japan – a point that applies to not only Japan but also the G20 nations that each have their own lay of the land – while they will, put simply, contribute to a higher level of soundness of Japan's financial system over the medium to long term. From this viewpoint, I do see that Japan's argument has increasingly received global approval to a considerable extent, while I am committed to continuing to advocate Japan's position in a proactive and resolute fashion. 例文帳に追加

そういった意味で、そこら辺がまさにバランスでございまして、金融というのは安心だとか、あるいは非常に大丈夫だということと同時に、それがまた極端に行き過ぎますと、今度は今さっき言いましたように、貸し渋り、貸しはがしが起きて、本当に健全な企業の発展、あるいは健全な経済の発展の、逆に言うと阻害要因にもなるわけですから、そういった意味で金融業というのは大変重要でございますが、そこら辺の調和、バランスというのが非常に私は大事だということを、今度はバーナンキさん、あるいは周小川さんとも話を通じて再確認させていただいたわけでございますし、アメリカでも金融規制当局の方、中国でも金融規制当局の方とも話をしまして、そういった感を一層させていただいたわけでございまして、いずれにいたしましても、金融庁といたしましては、新規制が簡単に言えば、中長期的に我が国の金融システムを健全性の向上に資するものとなる一方、我が国の実情、それぞれの我が国の実情や経営改革に対する影響を配慮するということは、我が国のみならずＧ20はそれぞれの国の実情があるわけですから、そういうことにきちっと配慮する必要が重要だというふうに思っておりました。こういった観点から、引き続き積極的に日本の立場、かなり世界的に受け入れられてきたというふうに私は認識いたしておりますけれども、しっかり主張してまいりたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

We have already entered the home stretch in the study, and at today's cabinet meeting, the cabinet members were instructed to select truly priority items (bills), as the period of the upcoming extraordinary Diet session is short, and we have already notified the Cabinet Secretariat of our bill with its tentative name. What we can do to support SMEs within the authority of the FSA is limited, and as I have been saying, it is necessary to envision the prospect of the overall economy and set the broad course of government policy for economic growth, and the moratorium scheme alone would not provide a hopeful prospect for SMEs; it is also necessary to take concrete measures to increase the jobs and revenues of SMEs and small shops. Therefore, it is very important to implement measures other than those that can be taken within the small areas of the FSA's administrative jurisdiction. As basic polices are to be decided by the Basic Policy Cabinet Committee, which is comprised of the Prime Minister, Minister Fukushima and I, I am in a position to be involved in implementing measures outside the FSA's narrow areas of administrative jurisdiction as cabinet policy. While I do my best in this respect, I will ensure the drafting of a bill that can stand against your criticism as a measure to support SMEs within my area of jurisdiction, as we still have more time till we submit the bill. Senior Vice Minister Otsuka's working group has entered the home stretch in its study on the bill, and it will fix the details based on opinions collected from various sectors. 例文帳に追加

もう第4コーナーを回ってホームストレッチに入りましたから、今も閣議で、今度の臨時国会は期間が短いので、その中で各省庁と重点的なものを整理して出してくれという話がありまして、うちは既に（内閣）官房のほうに、「（仮称）」を付けて（法案名を）提出しておりますが、これも中小・零細企業対策として、金融庁の権限の中でやれることは限られるわけですけれども、これは前から言っているように、もう経済全体の展開をきっちりと構成していく、経済成長に向かっていくという大きなかじ取りがなければならないし、具体的にそうした中小・零細企業、商店等の仕事なり、売上げが増えるための具体的な施策がなされていかなければ、返済を猶予するというようなことだけで、中小・零細企業が「よし頑張るぞ」という気分になるはずはありませんから、そういう狭い金融庁の行政の範囲外の施策、これが極めて大事なことでして、我々としては、私の場合は、総理、私、福島大臣の閣僚の基本委員会、そこで基本的な政策等は決めていくという形にもなっているわけですから、そういう意味では、金融庁の狭い守備範囲だけではなくて、今言ったようなことも、私としては内閣の方針としてそれをやっていくことに関与できる立場におりますから、そういう面も、今後、全力を挙げてやっていきながら、私の守備範囲の中での中小・零細企業対策として、必ず、今、ホームストレッチに入っていますけれども、ちゃんとした法案が仕上げられると思いますから、あと、大塚副大臣のところで、最後の詰めを、今からいろいろな各界から話を更に聞きながら、まだ提出まで時間がありますから、皆さん方の批判にも耐えられるようなちゃんとしたものに仕上げてまいります - 金融庁

(i) the deposit for the purposes of this Act, the Budapest Treaty, or both, of micro-organisms with prescribed depositary institutions and the storage and testing of, and furnishing of samples of, micro-organisms by those institutions; and (ii) the charging of fees by prescribed depositary institutions situated in Australia in relation to the matters described in subparagraph (i); and (iii) the making of reports by prescribed depositary institutions situated in Australia in relation to those matters; and (iv) the powers and functions of the Commissioner in relation to prescribed depositary institutions with respect to those matters; and (t) modifying the operation of this Act in relation to PCT applications that are treated as patent applications under this Act by excluding, varying, or substituting different provisions for, specified provisions of this Act; and (u) making provision for and in relation to the destruction of documents relating to applications for patents filed not less than 25 years before the time of destruction; and (w) making provision for and in relation to the refund, in specified circumstances, of the whole or part of a fee paid in respect of the filing of a document; and (y) making provision for and in relation to the remission of, or the exemption of specified classes of persons from the payment of, the whole or part of a fee; and (z) prescribing penalties for offences against the regulations not exceeding a fine of $1,000; and (za) making such transitional and savings provisions as are necessary or convenient as a result of the repeal of the 1952 Act and the enactment of this Act. 例文帳に追加

(i) 本法，ブダペスト条約又はその両方の適用上，所定の寄託機関に対してする微生物の寄託及び当該機関による微生物の保管，検査又は試料の分譲，及び (ii) オーストラリアにある所定の寄託機関による，(i)に記載した事項に関連する費用の賦課，及び (iii) オーストラリアにある所定の寄託機関による，これらの事項に関連する報告書の作成，及び (iv) これらの事項に関連しての，所定の寄託機関に関する局長の権限及び機能，及び (t) 本法に基づく特許出願として取り扱われるPCT出願に関連し，本法の特定の規定を除外し，変更し，又は他の規定に代替することによって，本法の作用を修正すること，及び (u) 破棄時期の25年以上前にされた特許出願に関する書類の破棄についての及びそれに関連する規定を作成すること，及び (w) 書類の提出に関連して納付された手数料の全部又は一部を，特定の状況において返還することについての及びそれに関連する規定を制定すること，及び (y) 特定の種類の者に対して，手数料の全部又は一部の納付を猶予又は免除することについての及びそれに関連する規定を制定すること，及び (z) 規則違反に対し，罰金＄1,000以下の刑罰を定めること，及び (za) 1952年法の廃止及び本法の施行の結果として，必要であるか又は便宜である経過規定及び留保規定を制定すること - 特許庁

(3) The provision of Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) by a Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 2(11) of the New Banking Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc. (meaning Subsidiary Companies, etc. as defined by 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph), or by a Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 16-4(1) of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act (hereinafter referred to as a "Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company" in this paragraph) and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., to one person as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company as defined by Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank Holding Company or the Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company (hereinafter collectively referred to as a "Bank Holding Company, etc." in this paragraph and Article 105 of these Supplementary Provisions) notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission by the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., or Long-Term Credit Bank Holding Company and/or its Subsidiary Companies, etc., do not continue granting of credit, etc. of which the total amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. by Bank Holding Company to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other compelling reason, and when the Bank Holding Company, etc. obtains an approval from the Prime Minister before that day, the Bank Holding Company, etc. shall be deemed to have obtained the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 52-6(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

３　新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項（新長期信用銀行法第十七条において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）の額が合算して銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている新銀行法第二条第十一項に規定する銀行持株会社（以下この項において「銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等（新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項に規定する子会社等をいう。以下この項において同じ。）又は新長期信用銀行法第十六条の四第一項に規定する長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項において「長期信用銀行持株会社」という。）若しくはその子会社等の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行持株会社又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社（以下この項及び附則第百五条において「銀行持株会社等」という。）が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等又は当該長期信用銀行持株会社若しくはその子会社等が合算して当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き銀行持株会社に係る信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において当該銀行持株会社等が同日までに内閣総理大臣の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行持株会社等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第五十二条の六第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 186 In the case where a cooperative engaged in mutual aid activities (which means a cooperative prescribed in Article 3 of the Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act after the revision under the provisions of Article 10 [hereinafter referred to as the "New Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act" in this Article] engaged in mutual aid activities prescribed in Article 9-2, paragraph (7) of the New Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act) has received an offer for a specified mutual aid contract (which means a specific mutual aid contract prescribed in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the New Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act) from a user (limited to a person set forth in Article 2, paragraph (31), item (iv) of the New Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act) for the first time since the enforcement of this Act, if it has, prior to the enforcement of this Act, notified said user in accordance with Article 34 of the New Financial Instruments and Exchange Act as applied mutatis mutandis in Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the New Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act that he/she may make a offer under the provisions of Article 34-2, paragraph (1) of the New Financial Instruments and Exchange Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the New Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act (including the case where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9-9, paragraph (5) or paragraph (8) of the New Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) after the enforcement of this Act, it shall be deemed to have given the notice prescribed in Article 34 of the New Financial Instruments and Exchange Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 9-7-5, paragraph (3) of the New Small and Medium-Sized Enterprise Cooperatives Act to said user. 例文帳に追加

第百八十六条　共済事業を行う組合（第十条の規定による改正後の中小企業等協同組合法（以下この条において「新中小企業等協同組合法」という。）第九条の二第七項に規定する共済事業を行う新中小企業等協同組合法第三条に規定する組合をいう。）は、この法律の施行後最初に特定共済契約（新中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項に規定する特定共済契約をいう。）の申込みを利用者（新金融商品取引法第二条第三十一項第四号に掲げる者に限る。）から受けた場合であって、この法律の施行前に、当該利用者に対し、この法律の施行後に当該利用者が新中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項（新中小企業等協同組合法第九条の九第五項又は第八項において準用する場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）において準用する新金融商品取引法第三十四条の二第一項の規定による申出ができる旨を新中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項において準用する新金融商品取引法第三十四条の例により告知しているときには、当該利用者に対し、新中小企業等協同組合法第九条の七の五第三項において準用する新金融商品取引法第三十四条に規定する告知をしたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The following shall not be registered: signs which are not marks within the meaning of Article 9(1) , marks which are devoid of any distinctive character; marks which consist exclusively of signs or indications that have become customary in the current language or in the established practices of the trade in the Republic of Bulgaria with respect to the goods or services filed for registration; marks which consist exclusively of signs designating the kind, quality, quantity, intended purpose, value, geographical origin, time or process of production of the goods or the manner of rendering of the services, or other characteristics of the goods or services; the shape which results from the nature of the goods themselves; the shape of goods which is necessary to obtain a technical result; the shape which gives substantial value to the goods; marks which are contrary to public policy or to accepted principles of morality; marks which may deceive the consumers as to the nature, quality or geographical origin of the goods or services; marks which consist of or include escutcheons, flags or other emblems of States party to the Paris Convention, or imitations thereof, as well as escutcheons, flags or other emblems or the full or abbreviated official names of international intergovernmental organizations; marks which consist of or include official control and warranty signs and stamps where such signs and stamps are used to mark identical or similar goods; marks which consist of or include the name or a representation of historical and cultural monuments of the Republic of Bulgaria, as specified by the Ministry of Culture; 例文帳に追加

次のものは，登録することができない：, 第9条(1)の意味での標章ではない標識 , 識別性を欠く標章 , 登録出願される商品又はサービスに関し，ブルガリア共和国における現行の言語又は確立された商慣行において慣習的となっている標識又は表示のみをもって構成される標章 , 標章であって，商品又はサービスに関する種類，品質，数量，用途，価額，原産地，商品生産の時期若しくは方法又はサービスの提供方法，又はその他の特徴を示す標識のみによって構成されるもの , 商品自体の性質に起因する形状 , 技術的効果を得るために必要な商品の形状 , 商品に対し実質的価値を与える形状 , 公の秩序及び承認された倫理基準に反する標章 , 商品又はサービスの内容，品質又は原産地について消費者に誤認させる虞がある標章 , 標章であって，パリ条約締約国の紋章，旗章若しくは他の記章又はそれらの模倣，並びに国際政府間機関の紋章，旗章その他の記章，完全な若しくは略式の公式名称によって構成されるか又はそれらを含むもの , 公的な管理及び保証のための標識及び証印から構成されるか又はそれらを含む標章であって，その標識及び証印が同一又は類似の商品を示すために使用されている場合 , 文化省によって指定されている，ブルガリア共和国の歴史的及び文化的記念物の名称又は表示によって構成されるか又はそれらを含む標章 - 特許庁

Simultaneously, how should insurance be regulated and supervised from now on? I believe insurance in China is not as advanced as in Japan yet. But then again, Japan’s insurance industry has experienced falling stock prices and interest rates over the past decade and suffered a long period of winter-like hardship: the insurance sector, where they have something called “expense profits”, “interest gain” and “mortality profits”, the interest gain was so squeezed that at one point, negative carry was more than 1 trillion yen. In the United States, the federal government will be establishing a division in charge of insurance for the first time within the federal government organization under the financial reform legislation. As you know, basic supervision of insurance in the United States is conducted on a state-by-state basis. Despite the fact that AIU—the world’s biggest private insurance company—was effectively nationalized in the United States, the insurance industry has been a bit of a blind spot in that any attempts in the past to negotiate with the central government often resulted in being told that it was a matter for the state government. The United States is a federal republic comprised of states, so in that sense, insurance varies from state to state in tax and other aspects. 例文帳に追加

しかし、同時にそれでは今から保険の行政に関してどういう点をやっているのか。まだ日本ほど保険が進んでいるとは思っておりませんけれども、しかし同時に、日本の保険業界もご存じのように大変ここ10年間株価は下がる、あるいは金利が下がるということで、費差益・利差益・死差益というのが保険業にはございますが、本当に利差益が少なくて大変一時は末端逆ざやが1兆円余の保険業界でもあるというような冬の時代が長く続きましたけれども、多くのかなりの、我々が27年前に通ったころは、日本の名前がついた生命保険会社法だったのですけれども、今色々な外資からも変わったところもありますので、そんなことを含めて今度アメリカでも保険ということが、ご存じのようにアメリカは保険の基本的監督は州単位なんですよ、アメリカの政府は。州単位で保険をやっていまして、連邦政府というのは、金融規制改革法で初めて連邦政府の中に保険担当の部署をつくるんですよ、今度初めて。しかしながら、AIUなんていう世界で一番大きな民間保険会社をアメリカは実質国営化しましたけれども、そこら辺で保険業界というのはちょっと穴と言ったらおかしいけれども、中央政府と今まで交渉しましても、これは中央政府の話だということもしばしばございまして、そういった意味で保険というのはなかなか、アメリカは合衆国ですから、税金なんかも州によって違いますね。 - 金融庁

(1) Regarding service of documents in proceedings before the Patent Office, the provisions of the Law on Service in Administrative 77 Procedures [Verwaltungszustellungsgesetz] shall apply, subject to the following: Procedures [Verwaltungszustellungsgesetz] shall apply, subject to the following: If acceptance of service by registered letter is refused without such grounds as are provided by law, service shall nevertheless be deemed to have been effected; 2. Service to an addressee who resides abroad and who has not, contrary to the requirement of Section 25, appointed a German representative may be effected by registered letter mailed from a post office. The same shall apply to addressees who are themselves German representatives within the terms of Section 25(2). Section 184(2), sentences 1 and 4, of the Code of Civil Procedure shall apply mutatis mutandis; 3. For the purposes of service upon holders of certificates of representation (Section 177 of the Patent Attorney Regulations [Patentanwaltsordnung]), Section 5(4) of the Law on Service in Administrative Procedures shall apply mutatis mutandis; 4. Documents may be served on addressees for whom a mail box has been installed at the Patent Office also by depositing the documents in the mail box of the addressee. A written statement regarding the deposit shall be made in the files of the case. The time of the deposit shall be recorded on the document. Service shall be deemed to have been effected on the third day after deposit in the mail box. 例文帳に追加

(1) 特許庁及び連邦特許裁判所に対する手続における書類の送達については，次の事項に従うことを条件として，行政訴訟における送達に関する法律の規定が適用される。1. 書留郵便による送達の受取が，法律によって定められている理由なしに拒絶された場合でも，送達は行われたものとみなされる2. 国外に居住しており，かつ，第 25条の要件に反して，ドイツにおける代理人を指名していない名宛人に対する送達は，郵便局から郵送される書留郵便をもって行うことができる。この規定は，名宛人であって，同人自身が第 25条(2)の意味においてドイツにおける代理人である者に対しても適用される。民事訴訟法第 184条(2)第 1文及び第 4文が準用される。 4. 特許庁に郵便私書箱が設置されている名宛人に対しては，書類の送達は，その郵便私書箱に投函することによっても行うことができる。投函に関する書面陳述が，その事件のファイルにおいて行われる。書類には，投函の日時が記録されなければならない。送達は，郵便私書箱への投函から 3日目に行われたものとみなされる。 4. 特許庁に郵便私書箱が設置されている名宛人に対しては，書類の送達は，その郵便私書箱に投函することによっても行うことができる。投函に関する書面陳述が，その事件のファイルにおいて行われる。書類には，投函の日時が記録されなければならない。送達は，郵便私書箱への投函から 3日目に行われたものとみなされる。 - 特許庁

(5) Articles 17 to 21, Article 22 and Article 23 shall apply mutatis mutandis to Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities for which Shelf Registration has been made. In this case, the term "Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1)" in Article 17 shall be deemed to be replaced with "Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23-12(2) (including Reference Documents referenced therein)"; the terms "a Securities Registration Statement contains" and "the Securities Registration Statement" in Article 18(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Shelf Registration Documents, an Amended Shelf Registration Statement submitted under Article 23-4, Article 23-9(1) or Article 23-10(1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 23-10(5)) (hereinafter referred to as an "Amended Shelf Registration Statement"), or Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached thereto or Reference Documents referenced in any of the foregoing (hereinafter referred to as "Shelf Registration Documents, etc.") contain" and "the Shelf Registration Documents, the Amended Shelf Registration Statement or Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached to the foregoing," respectively; the term "a Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) contains" in Article 18(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) (including Reference Documents referenced therein) contains"; the terms "the Securities Registration Statement" and "the Prospectus" in Article 19(2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Shelf Registration Documents" and "the Prospectus (including Reference Documents referenced therein)," respectively; the terms "the Securities Registration Statement," "the Prospectus contains" and "Article 10(1) or Article 11(1)" and the part "from the time when the notification made under Article 4(1) or (2) for Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities comes into effect" in Article 20 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Shelf Registration Documents," "the Prospectus (including Reference Documents referenced therein) contains," "Article 23-10(3) or Article 23-11(1)" and "from the time when the Shelf Registration Supplements relating to the Shelf Registration which was made for the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution and already came into effect are submitted," respectively; the term "a Securities Registration Statement contains" in the non-itemized part of Article 21(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Shelf Registration Documents contain"; the term "the Securities Registration Statement" in item (i) and (iii) of Article 21(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Shelf Registration Documents, the Amended Shelf Registration Statement or Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached to the foregoing"; the term "a Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) contains" of Article 21(3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Prospectus referred to in Article 13(1) (including Reference Documents referenced therein)"; the terms "a Securities Registration Statement" and "the Securities Registration Statement" of Article 22(1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Shelf Registration Documents contain" and "the Shelf Registration Documents, the Amended Shelf Registration Statement or Shelf Registration Supplements or the documents attached to the foregoing," respectively; the parts "a notification made under Article 4(1) or (2) for Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities was made and has come into effect," "Article 10(1) or Article 11(1)," "the Securities Registration Statement" and "the notification" of Article 23 shall be deemed to be replaced with "the fact that a Shelf Registration has come into effect and Shelf Registration Supplements relating thereto are submitted (in the case of Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of Securities referred to in Article 23-8(2), the fact that the Shelf Registration therefor has come into effect)," "Article 23-10(3) or Article 23-11(1)," "the Shelf Registration Documents" and "the Shelf Registration," respectively. 例文帳に追加

５　第十七条から第二十一条まで、第二十二条及び第二十三条の規定は、発行登録を行つた有価証券の募集又は売出しについて準用する。この場合において、第十七条中「第十三条第一項の目論見書」とあるのは「第二十三条の十二第二項において準用する第十三条第一項の目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）」と、第十八条第一項中「有価証券届出書のうちに」とあるのは「発行登録書類、第二十三条の四、第二十三条の九第一項若しくは第二十三条の十第一項（同条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による訂正発行登録書（以下「訂正発行登録書」という。）又は発行登録追補書類及びその添付書類並びにこれらの書類に係る参照書類（以下「発行登録書類等」という。）のうちに」と、「当該有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類、訂正発行登録書又は発行登録追補書類及びこれらの添付書類」と、同条第二項中「目論見書のうちに」とあるのは「目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）のうちに」と、第十九条第二項中「有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類等」と、「目論見書」とあるのは「目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）」と、第二十条中「有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類等」と、「目論見書のうちに」とあるのは「目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）のうちに」と、「第四条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による届出がその効力を生じた時」とあるのは「発行登録の効力が生じており、かつ、それに係る発行登録追補書類が提出された時」と、「第十条第一項又は第十一条第一項」とあるのは「第二十三条の十第三項又は第二十三条の十一第一項」と、第二十一条第一項各号列記以外の部分中「有価証券届出書のうちに」とあるのは「発行登録書類等のうちに」と、同項第一号及び第三号中「当該有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類、訂正発行登録書又は発行登録追補書類及びこれらの添付書類」と、同条第三項中「目論見書のうちに」とあるのは「目論見書（当該目論見書に係る参照書類を含む。）のうちに」と、第二十二条第一項中「有価証券届出書のうちに」とあるのは「発行登録書類等のうちに」と、「当該有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類、訂正発行登録書又は発行登録追補書類及びこれらの添付書類」と、第二十三条中「第四条第一項若しくは第二項の規定による届出があり、かつ、その効力が生じたこと」とあるのは「発行登録の効力が生じており、かつ、それに係る発行登録追補書類が提出されたこと（第二十三条の八第二項の有価証券の募集又は売出しにあつては、発行登録の効力が生じていること。）」と、「第十条第一項若しくは第十一条第一項」とあるのは「第二十三条の十第三項若しくは第二十三条の十一第一項」と、「当該届出」とあるのは「当該発行登録」と、「有価証券届出書」とあるのは「発行登録書類等」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The cases specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare as provided by Article 32-3, paragraph 2 of the Act shall be, for the time being, in addition to the cases provided by Article 20, paragraph 2, the cases under which the fee of 670 yen (or 650 yen in case of a tax exempt business provider) for accepting the job application is collected upon acceptance of the job application of a job seeker for occupations pertaining to the entertainer set forth in the same paragraph, domestic helper (a person who provides general housekeeping businesses (limited to those provided at a house of an individual, dormitory or other equivalent facilities)), care-giving or nursing-assisting businesses for patients, invalids, etc. (limited to those provided at a hospital or other equivalent facility), person in charge of serving food (a person who provides table-coordinating, food-serving or waiting businesses, etc. following proper manners at a hotel, restaurant, hall, etc. serving foods by following proper menu (including the businesses necessary for organizing and storing the tools such as the tableware associated with such businesses)), cook (a person having the expertise and skills concerning the cooking, nutrition and sanitation and providing cooking businesses), modeling in the same paragraph or mannequin (a person having the expertise and advertising skills concerning the goods and providing such advertising businesses as the explanation, demonstration, etc. of various goods for stimulating the willingness to spend of the customers over-the-counter or at the exhibition (including the sales businesses)); provided, however, the amount shall be equivalent to the fees for three such cases per month if the number of the job applications accepted from the same job seeker exceeds three per month. 例文帳に追加

４　法第三十二条の三第二項の厚生労働省令で定めるときは、当分の間、第二十条第二項に規定するほか、同項の芸能家、家政婦（家政一般の業務（個人の家庭又は寄宿舎その他これに準ずる施設において行われるものに限る。）、患者、病弱者等の付添いの業務又は看護の補助の業務（病院等の施設において行われるものに限る。）を行う者）、配ぜん人（正式の献立による食事を提供するホテル、料理店、会館等において、正式の作法による食卓の布設、配ぜん、給仕等の業務（これらの業務に付随した飲食器等の器具の整理及び保管に必要な業務を含む。）を行う者）、調理士（調理、栄養及び衛生に関する専門的な知識及び技能を有し、調理の業務を行う者）、同項のモデル又はマネキン（専門的な商品知識及び宣伝技能を有し、店頭、展示会等において相対する顧客の購買意欲をそそり、販売の促進に資するために各種商品の説明、実演等の宣伝の業務（この業務に付随した販売の業務を含む。）を行う者）の職業に係る求職者から求職の申込みを受理した時以降六百七十円（免税事業者にあつては、六百五十円）の求職受付手数料を徴収するときとする。ただし、同一の求職者に係る求職の申込みの受理が一箇月間に三件を超える場合にあつては、一箇月につき三件分に相当する額とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

In this context, the financial sector has ballooned more than the real economy, and risks can no longer be contained within the risks of one financial institution. The Lehman Brothers shockwave was a typical example of this. It has a broad impact on the national economy and the global economy. Back in 1929, economies were organized into economic blocks, which became a remote cause of the Second World War according to some people. Having learned a bitter lesson from the War, G8 and G20 mobilized their wisdom and reached a consensus on Basel III as well. I am looking forward to seeing an accord reached on Basel III at the upcoming Seoul Summit. I believe that the human race has learned a few lessons since the Great Depression after 1929 in conjunction with the globalization of economies around the world. With this in mind, the general rule is to facilitate the financial sector that supports companies, as well as the yen, and properly execute risk management. As relationship of trust is fundamental to financial businesses, financial institutions do not function properly if customers lack confidence in financial institutions, as you are well aware. Taking this into account, we are steering the financial sector at an extremely difficult time. Even at times like this when the financial sector is undergoing dramatic change on a global scale, we are committed to fulfilling our responsibilities properly while seeking your wisdom and people’s opinions, bearing in mind that Japan’s economy is not isolated but interlinked with American and Chinese economies as well due to globalization. 例文帳に追加

また、そういった意味で、非常に金融が実体経済以上にふくらむ、それがなおかつ、一つの金融機関のリスクの中で、リスクはもうおさまらなくなった、リーマン・ショックなんか典型ですね。国全体の経済、あるいは世界全体の経済に広範な影響を与えるというようなことでございますから、そういった中で、1929年はそれぞれの経済がブロック化しまして、それが第二次世界大戦の遠因だという方もおられますけれども、その辺の苦しい反省を踏まえて、Ｇ８、Ｇ20ということで、何とか英知を集めて、今度のバーゼルもまとまったし、今度はぜひ、これがソウルサミットでまとまっていただきたいと思いますけれども、世界の経済のグローバル化と同時に、やっぱり人類は1929年の後の世界大恐慌よりは、少し学習をしたと私は思っていますし、そういうことも視野に入れつつ、企業を支える金融、あるいは円の円滑化、あるいはリスク管理をきちっとやるというようなことは、これは原則でございますし、なおかつ金融業というのは、この前も申しましたように、基本的には信頼関係でございますから、顧客の方だとか、あるいは金融機関に関する信頼がないと、金融機関というのはうまく機能しないというのはもう皆様方、専門家でございますからよくご存じでございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、非常に難しい時代の金融の舵取りでございます。世界が今非常に金融も変動しておりまして、しかし、そういったときでも、皆様の知恵もかりながら、国民の声もかりながら、そして日本一国の経済ではございませんから、まさに非常に経済のグローバル化、アメリカの経済も中国の経済も、まさに結びついているわけでございますから、そういったことも視野に入れつつ、しっかり責任を果たしていきたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

They must satisfy the following conditions: they must be Belgian and must be resident in Belgium; they must be at least 25 years old; they must not be prohibited or placed under guardianship; they must neither be in a state of prohibition within the meaning of Articles 31 to 34 of the Penal Code nor have been convicted in Belgium or abroad of any of the offenses specified in Royal Decree No. 22 of October 24, 1934, prohibiting certain convicted persons and bankrupts from exercising certain offices, professions or activities and giving the commercial courts authority to pronounce on such prohibitions, as amended by the Laws of March 14, 1962, March 16, 1972, and August 4, 1978; they must hold a Belgian diploma of university education or a Belgian diploma of higher education of the long type issued after at least four years of study in a scientific, technical or legal discipline; Diplomas issued abroad after at least four years of study, in the same disciplines, shall be authorized subject to their equivalence having been recognized beforehand by the relevant Belgian authorities; they must have exercised an activity in the field of patents for a period of time and subject to conditions laid down by the King; they must have passed an examination before the Commission referred to in Article 61 on the subject of industrial property, principally as regards patents, within two years at the latest of terminating the activities referred to in of this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

これらの者は次に掲げる条件を満たしていなければならない。ベルギー人であり，ベルギーの居住者でなければならない。少なくとも年齢25歳以上でなければならない。禁止され又は保護の下にある者であってはならない。刑法第31条から第34条までの意味における禁止状態にあってはならず，また，有罪判決を受けた者及び破産者のうちの一定の者に対し，一定の職務，職業又は活動に従事することを禁じており，また，商業裁判所に当該禁止を宣告する権限を付与している1962年3月14日法律，1972年3月16日法律及び1978年8月4日法律で改正された1934年10月24日勅令第22号に規定されている犯罪について，ベルギー又は外国で有罪の判決を受けた者であってはならない。ベルギーの大学卒業証書又は少なくとも4年間，科学，技術若しくは法律を研究した後に交付されるベルギーの長期型高等教育の卒業証書を保有していなければならない。上記と同一の学科を最低4年間研究した後に外国で発行された卒業証書は，予めベルギーの関連機関によってその同等性が承認されていることを条件として，許可されるものとする。国王の定める期間及び条件の下で，特許の分野の活動に従事していなければならない。(6)にいう活動の終了後遅くとも2年以内に，工業所有権の科目，主として特許に関して，第61条に述べる委員会の試験を合格していなければならない。 - 特許庁

The situations and circumstances of financial institutions differ from country to country, so we need to give due consideration to the potential impact on the real economy, for example by providing a sufficient transition period. In particular, Japan has strongly made such an argument at international conferences. As Japan experienced a financial crisis a little more than a decade ago, we should bear its lessons in mind. For example, the higher a bank's capital adequacy ratio, the sounder it is. However, if banks are forced to raise their capital adequacy ratios in a short period of time, they will excessively tighten their lending stance, leading to severe contraction of the real economy. That is what we experienced. We must keep the right balance between the soundness of banks and the impact on the real economy, although that is rather difficult in a liberal, democratic society. However, Japan has endured the bitter experience of the financial crisis that started in 1997, so we will participate in international debates with that in mind. After various financial institutions failed, a legal framework was developed in the Diet session of 1998 that focused on the financial crisis. 例文帳に追加

各国、やはり金融機関のあり方、あるいはこの実態が違うわけでございますけれども、そういったことにも十分な経過期間を設けるなど、実体経済への影響に十分配慮する必要があると、特に日本国は、国際会議でもこういうことを強く主張させていただいておりまして、十数年前に金融危機がございましたから、そういったことを踏まえて、私がよく言っておりますように、銀行を例にとれば、自己資本比率が高ければ高いほど安定した金融機関でございますけれども、それを短期間に強要しますと、これは貸し渋り、貸し剥がしが起きまして、実体経済が非常に収縮する、萎縮するということを、我々は経験済みでございますから、そういった意味で、やはり銀行の健全性と実体経済に対する影響というのを、きちんとバランスをとって、自由主義社会、民主主義社会ではなかなか難しいのでございますけれども、その辺をきちんと引き続き、我が国といたしましては、1997年から始まった金融危機、本当に苦しい経験がございますから、そういったことを踏まえて、色々な金融機関が破綻し、法制が98年の金融国会と言われたときに整備されたわけでございますけれども、そういう本当に苦しい経験を活かしてできた法律でございますが、そういった観点からも、しっかり国際的な論議に参画してまいりたいと思っております。 - 金融庁

(4) When forfeiture is directed on a conviction the Court, before whom the person convicted, may order any forfeited article to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Court thinks fit. Where a person is accused of an offence under section 73 of this Act and proves. (a) that in the ordinary course of his business he is employed on behalf of other persons to apply trademarks or trade descriptions, or, as the case may be, to make dies, blocks, machines, plates, or other instruments for making, or being used in making, trademarks; (b) that in the case which is the subject of the charge he was so employed, 58 and was not interested in the goods or service or other thing by way of profit or commission dependent on the sale of such goods or services or other things, as the case may be; (c) that the took reasonable precautions against committing the offence charged; (d) that he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, on reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description; and (e) that on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons on whose behalf the mark or description was applied; the Court may discharge the person from the complaint. 例文帳に追加

(4)没収が有罪判決について命令された場合、裁判所は、有罪を宣告された者に、没収が命じられたいかなる物品についても廃棄又は裁判所が適切と考えるその他の処分を命ずることができる。本法第73条に定める違反に係る被疑者が次に掲げる事項を立証した場合、裁判所は訴追を取り下げることができる。(a)自己の事業の通常の過程において、他の者に代わり、商標若しくは商品表示を付するために、又は(場合に応じ)、商標の制作用若しくは当該制作に使用される金型、版、機器、板材又はその他の器具を製作するために、当該他の者に雇用されていること。(b)容疑の対象となる事件において、そのように雇用されていた事実、及び、かかる商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の販売によって決まる利益若しくは手数料のを得る手段としての当該商品若しくは役務又はその他の物品に関与していなかったこと。(c)容疑の対象となった違反を犯さないよう合理的予防措置を講じていたこと。(d)違反行為を実行したとされる時点において、当該商標又は商品表示の真実性を疑う理由があったこと。(e)検察官により、又は検察官に代わって行われた要求に応じて、当該標章又は表示をその者のために付した者に関し、自らの権能が及ぶすべての情報を提出したこと。 - 特許庁

Article 40 (1) Where a person conducting Multilevel Marketing concludes a Multilevel Marketing Contract pertaining to the Multilevel Marketing, the counterparty of such Multilevel Marketing Contract (limited to an individual who sells or mediates sales of Goods or offers or mediates offers of services pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing by means other than through a Store, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "New Multilevel Marketing Distributor") may rescind such Multilevel Marketing Contract in writing, except when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received the document referred to in Article 37 (2) (where the specified burden involved in such Multilevel Marketing Contract is the purchase of the Goods [excluding rights to use a facility or to receive offers of services; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item] to be resold and if the date of the first delivery of the Goods purchased based on such Multilevel Marketing Contract is after such date of receipt, it shall be such date of first delivery; the same shall apply in Article 41 (1)) (if the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor had not rescinded the Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to this paragraph by said time limit due to being misled by the Supervisor's or the solicitor's act, in violation of the provision of Article 34 (1), or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act, in violation of Article 34 (2), of misrepresenting information concerning rescission of Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph, or due to being disturbed by the Supervisor's, the solicitor's, or the general multilevel marketing distributor's act of intimidating the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor in violation of the provision of Article 34 (3), it shall be when 20 days have passed from the date on which the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor received a document, which has been issued by Supervisor, the solicitor, or the general multilevel marketing distributor pertaining to such Multilevel Marketing pursuant to an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry and contains a notice to the effect that the New Multilevel Marketing Distributor may rescind said Multilevel Marketing Contract pursuant to the provision of this paragraph). In this case, the person conducting such Multilevel Marketing may not claim damages or demand payment of a penalty pertaining to the rescission of such Multilevel Marketing Contract. 例文帳に追加

第四十条　連鎖販売業を行う者がその連鎖販売業に係る連鎖販売契約を締結した場合におけるその連鎖販売契約の相手方（その連鎖販売業に係る商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は役務の提供若しくはそのあつせんを店舗等によらないで行う個人に限る。以下この章において「連鎖販売加入者」という。）は、第三十七条第二項の書面を受領した日（その連鎖販売契約に係る特定負担が再販売をする商品（施設を利用し及び役務の提供を受ける権利を除く。以下この項において同じ。）の購入についてのものである場合において、その連鎖販売契約に基づき購入したその商品につき最初の引渡しを受けた日がその受領した日後であるときは、その引渡しを受けた日。次条第一項において同じ。）から起算して二十日を経過したとき（連鎖販売加入者が、統括者若しくは勧誘者が第三十四条第一項の規定に違反し若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第二項の規定に違反してこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除に関する事項につき不実のことを告げる行為をしたことにより当該告げられた内容が事実であるとの誤認をし、又は統括者、勧誘者若しくは一般連鎖販売業者が同条第三項の規定に違反して威迫したことにより困惑し、これらによつて当該期間を経過するまでにこの項の規定による連鎖販売契約の解除を行わなかつた場合には、当該連鎖販売加入者が、その連鎖販売業に係る統括者、勧誘者又は一般連鎖販売業者が経済産業省令で定めるところによりこの項の規定による当該連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる旨を記載して交付した書面を受領した日から起算して二十日を経過したとき）を除き、書面によりその連鎖販売契約の解除を行うことができる。この場合において、その連鎖販売業を行う者は、その連鎖販売契約の解除に伴う損害賠償又は違約金の支払を請求することができない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion. 例文帳に追加

平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1％、それから生命保険だと6％ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6％、損保1％ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。 - 金融庁

People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices.例文帳に追加

このように、近年、企業に雇用される人々の意識が一般的にはリスク回避的になり、開業希望率が減少していることと、第2章で述べたような、近年の労働市場の変化等との関係については、〔1〕1990年代まで大企業を中心とする年功賃金制が「日本的雇用慣行」として定着していると認識され、人々の予想する将来賃金が上昇してきたこと、〔2〕1990年代のデフレ経済の悪影響がまず自営業等の小規模な企業から破産・廃業の増加等の形で現れ、人々の予想する自営業の所得が顕著に低下しリスクが顕著に増加したこと、〔3〕大企業の被雇用者に本格的な雇用調整が及んだのは1990年代後半であったことから、将来の予想賃金が低下するにはかなり時間がかかったこと、〔4〕定年退職後の収入については、「日本的雇用慣行」の下でも不安定性があることが早くから認識され、また、1990年代に企業が中高齢層のリストラを進め高齢者の転職市場は厳しい状況が続き、50歳代の賃金については大企業でも比較的早くから調整が進んだことから、中高齢者にとっては転職と比較して開業することの機会費用が下がった可能性があること、また、この年代の人々はバブル崩壊による持ち家価格の低下等の影響を被ることが比較的少なかったこと等が指摘できる。 - 経済産業省

Article 26-11 (1) The amount of income tax to be credited against corporation tax out of the amount deemed to be income tax to be collected when receiving the redemption prescribed in Article 41-12, paragraph (4) of the Act pursuant to the provisions of said paragraph shall be the amount calculated, pursuant to the provisions of Article 140-2 of the Order for Enforcement of the Corporation Tax Act, with regard to the amount of said income tax (where the amount of said income tax is not clear, with regard to the amount obtained by deducting the issue price for the discount bonds (where said discount bonds are national bonds listed in Article 41-12, paragraph (9), items (i) to (viii) of the Act which are those falling under the category of short-term government or company bonds prescribed in said paragraph or other national bonds specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance (hereinafter referred to as "short-term national bonds, etc." in this paragraph) and are discount bonds other than those whose issue price is not clear, such issue price shall be the issue price on the final issue date for said discount bonds, and where said discount bonds are said short-term national bonds, etc., such issue price shall be the price specified by Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance as equivalent to said issue price for said discount bonds; such issue price shall be referred to as the "issue price, etc. on the final issue date" in Article 26-13, paragraph (1), item (i) and paragraph (5), item (ii)) from the face value of said discount bonds and then multiplying the remaining amount after deduction (where said discount bonds are issued outside Japan by a foreign corporation, the amount specified by Cabinet Order, prescribed in Article 41-12, paragraph (3) of the Act) by the rate of income tax on profit from redemption for said discount bonds collected at the time of issuance pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (3) of said Article, and where the discount bonds have been redeemed by bringing the redemption date forward or retired by purchase prior to the redemption date, with regard to the remaining amount after deducting the amount to be refunded that was calculated pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (1) of the following Article from the amount of the income tax). In this case, the term "interest" in Article 140-2, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Order for Enforcement of the Corporation Tax Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "profit from redemption (meaning profit from redemption as prescribed in Article 41-12, paragraph (7) (Separate Taxation, etc. on Profit from Redemption, etc.) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation; the same shall apply in the following paragraph and paragraph (3))"; the term "out of the number of months" in paragraph (2) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "out of the number of months (the number of days, where said dividend of interest, etc. is profit from redemption for short-term government or company bonds (meaning short-term government or company bonds prescribed in Article 41-12, paragraph (9) of the Act on Special Measures Concerning Taxation; the same shall apply in the following paragraph); hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph);" and the term "the amount of income prescribed in paragraph (1), item (i)" in paragraph (3) of said Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "the amount of income (excluding the amount of income tax on profit from redemption of short-term government or company bonds) prescribed in paragraph (1), item (i)." 例文帳に追加

第二十六条の十一　法第四十一条の十二第四項の規定により同項に規定する償還を受ける時に徴収される所得税とみなされたもののうち法人税の額から控除する所得税の額は、当該所得税の額（当該所得税の額が明らかでないときは、その割引債の券面金額から当該割引債に係る発行価額（当該割引債が同条第九項第一号から第八号までに掲げる国債で同項に規定する短期公社債に該当するものその他財務省令で定める国債（以下この項において「短期国債等」という。）でその発行価額が明らかでないもの以外の割引債であるときは当該割引債に係る最終発行日における発行価額とし、当該割引債が当該短期国債等であるときは当該割引債に係る当該発行価額に準ずるものとして財務省令で定める価額とする。第二十六条の十三第一項第一号及び第五項第二号において「最終発行日における発行価額等」という。）を控除した残額（当該割引債が外国法人が国外において発行したものであるときは、法第四十一条の十二第三項に規定する政令で定める金額）に、当該割引債の発行の際に同条第三項の規定により当該割引債に係る償還差益について徴収された所得税の税率を乗じて計算した金額とし、その割引債が償還期限を繰り上げて償還をされたもの又は当該期限前に買入消却をされたものであるときは、その所得税の額から次条第一項の規定により計算した還付する金額を控除した残額とする。）について、法人税法施行令第百四十条の二の規定により計算した金額とする。この場合において、同条第一項第一号中「の利子」とあるのは「の償還差益（租税特別措置法第四十一条の十二第七項（償還差益等に係る分離課税等）に規定する償還差益をいう。次項及び第三項において同じ。）」と、同条第二項中「月数のうち」とあるのは「月数（当該利子配当等が短期公社債（租税特別措置法第四十一条の十二第九項に規定する短期公社債をいう。次項において同じ。）に係る償還差益であるときは、日数。以下この項において同じ。）のうち」と、同条第三項中「所得税の額を前項」とあるのは「所得税の額（短期公社債の償還差益に対する所得税の額を除く。）を前項」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 10 (1) In cases where a victim (limited to a victim who has been subjected to bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. (intimidation through announcing an intention to inflict harm on the life or body of a victim; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter) by a spouse; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter) who has been subjected to bodily harm by a spouse is highly likely to receive serious harm on his/her life or body due to renewed bodily harm by the spouse (including cases where subsequent to being subjected to bodily harm by the spouse, the victim has obtained a divorce or annulment of the marriage but continues to be subjected to bodily harm by the former spouse; the same shall apply in Article 12, paragraph 1, item 2) or where a victim who has been subjected to life-threatening intimidation, etc. by a spouse is highly likely to receive serious harm on his/her life or body due to bodily harm by the spouse (including cases where subsequent to being subjected to life-threatening intimidation, etc. by the spouse, the victim has obtained a divorce or annulment of the marriage but continues to be subjected to bodily harm by the former spouse; the same shall apply in the same item), the court shall, upon a petition from the victim, find against the spouse (including the former spouse in cases where subsequent to being subjected to bodily harm or life threatening intimidation, etc. by the spouse, the victim has obtained a divorce or annulment of the marriage; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article, Article 12, paragraph 1, items 3 and 4, and Article 18, paragraph 1) and order the matters listed below the following items in order to prevent harm to the victim's life or body. The matters listed in item 2, however, shall only be applied to cases where the victim and the spouse in question are still living together at the time of the petition: 例文帳に追加

第十条　被害者（配偶者からの身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫（被害者の生命又は身体に対し害を加える旨を告知してする脅迫をいう。以下この章において同じ。）を受けた者に限る。以下この章において同じ。）が、配偶者からの身体に対する暴力を受けた者である場合にあっては配偶者からの更なる身体に対する暴力（配偶者からの身体に対する暴力を受けた後に、被害者が離婚をし、又はその婚姻が取り消された場合にあっては、当該配偶者であった者から引き続き受ける身体に対する暴力。第十二条第一項第二号において同じ。）により、配偶者からの生命等に対する脅迫を受けた者である場合にあっては配偶者から受ける身体に対する暴力（配偶者からの生命等に対する脅迫を受けた後に、被害者が離婚をし、又はその婚姻が取り消された場合にあっては、当該配偶者であった者から引き続き受ける身体に対する暴力。同号において同じ。）により、その生命又は身体に重大な危害を受けるおそれが大きいときは、裁判所は、被害者の申立てにより、その生命又は身体に危害が加えられることを防止するため、当該配偶者（配偶者からの身体に対する暴力又は生命等に対する脅迫を受けた後に、被害者が離婚をし、又はその婚姻が取り消された場合にあっては、当該配偶者であった者。以下この条、同項第三号及び第四号並びに第十八条第一項において同じ。）に対し、次の各号に掲げる事項を命ずるものとする。ただし、第二号に掲げる事項については、申立ての時において被害者及び当該配偶者が生活の本拠を共にする場合に限る。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Sec.190 Importation for Personal Purposes 190.1. Notwithstanding the provision of Subsection 177.6, but subject to the limitation under the Subsection 185.2, the importation of a copy of a work by an individual for his personal purposes shall be permitted without the authorization of the author of, or other owner of copyright in, the work under the following circumstances: (a) When copies of the work are not available in the Philippines and: (i) not more than one copy at one time is imported for strictly individual use only; or (ii) the importation is by authority of and for the use of the Philippine Government; or (iii) the importation, consisting of not more than three such copies or likenesses in any one invoice, is not for sale but for the use only of any religious, charitable, or educational society or institution duly incorporated or registered, or is for the encouragement of the fine arts, or for any State school, college, university, or free public library in the Philippines. (b) When such copies form parts of libraries and personal baggage belonging to persons or families arriving from foreign countries and are not intended for sale: Provided, that such copies do not exceed three.例文帳に追加

第190条 個人的目的のための輸入 190.1177.6の規定に拘らず，ただし，185.2に規定する条件に従い，個人による，その者の個人的目的のための著作物の複製物の輸入は，次の状況のもとにある著作物の場合にあっては，著作物の著作者又は同著作物におけるその他の著作権者の承諾を得ないで，これをすることができる。 (a)著作物の複製物をフィリピンにおいて入手することができず，かつ，次の何れかに該当する場合 (i)一時に1個の複製物が厳密に個人的使用のためにのみ輸入されること (ii)輸入が，フィリピン政府の権限により，フィリピン政府の使用のために行われること (iii)輸入が，1の送り状における2個以下の複製物又は類似物からなるものであって，販売のためのものではなく，正当に設立され若しくは登録された宗教，慈善若しくは教育に関する協会若しくは機構による使用のみのためのものであるか又はフィリピンにおける美術の奨励のため，若しくは国の学校，専門学校，大学若しくは無料の公共図書館のためのものであること (b)当該複製物が，外国から到着した者又は家族のものである蔵書及び個人的手荷物の部分であり，かつ，販売する意思のないものである場合 ただし，当該複製物の個数は3個を超えないことを条件とする。 - 特許庁

I assume you are asking what FSA’s economic policies would consist of. The FSA will continue to closely monitor the developments in markets including foreign exchange and stock markets, and respond properly according to the economic and financial climate from the viewpoint of sufficiently demonstrating financial intermediation functions. In fact, at today’s informal gathering with Cabinet ministers, financial measures for SMEs were brought up by the Minister of State for Economic and Fiscal Policy, if I am not mistaken. As you may already know, the Act concerning Temporary Measures to Facilitate Financing for SMEs, etc. was established based on the agreement among the three ruling parties when Shizuka Kamei served as Minister for Financial Services. I am paying very close attention to the Act, which covers a period of two years including two year ends and two fiscal year ends; I believe this is groundbreaking legislation in Japan. The perspectives of megabanks seems to have somewhat changed, as I have been told by a staff member at one of the local financial bureaus that a megabank started participating in conventions of shinkin banks and credit unions since the establishment of the Act for the first time ever. It may be common knowledge, but 99.7% of companies in Japan are SMEs, and 42 million people work for SMEs. SMEs are rather agile, flexible and extremely precious. As I may have mentioned previously, in my hometown Kitakyushu City, which is a city dominated by SMEs, I have been told by businesspeople that their companies have actually managed to survive due to the establishment of the Act. Then again, I have also heard cries from them that what they want now is work, so we intend to execute appropriate policies in a timely manner by taking these matters into consideration as well. 例文帳に追加

それから、金融庁の経済対策にどのような内容を盛り込むのかというご質問だと思いますが、金融庁といたしましては引き続き為替・株式市場等の動向を注視するとともに、金融仲介機能が十分に発揮されているとの観点から、経済・金融情勢に応じて適切に対応してまいりたいと思っておりまして、実は今日も閣僚懇で中小企業に対する金融の話が、たしか経済財政担当大臣からも出ておりまして、ご存じのように、この中小企業金融円滑化法案、これは3党合意に基づいてつくった法律でございますが、以前、亀井大臣のときにつくらせていただきまして、これは2年間ですから、2回年末と年度末を含む法律でございまして、これは私、今、非常に色々ずっと注視しておりますが、これは日本において私は非常に画期的な法律だと思っておりまして、メガバンクの視点が変わったというか、ある財務局の人に聞いたら、信金信組の大会なんかにメガバンクが来たことは一度もなかったんだけど、あの法律ができてから来だしたという話も聞きますので、やっぱり当たり前ですけれども、日本の企業は99.7％は中小企業ですし、4,200万人の方は中小企業で働いておられるわけですから、どちらかというと中小企業は機動的、弾力的に非常に貴重な存在でもございますから、そういったところに、いつかお話ししたかと思いますけれども、私も北九州市でございますから、中小企業の大変本場のようなところでございますし、経営者からも、「本当に中小企業円金融滑化法案ができて、何とか自見さん、生き延びていると。」しかし、今欲しいのは仕事だというようなことも、もうほんとに悲鳴に近いような声を経営者から聞いておりますので、そんなこともこれ勘案しながら、適時適切な政策をしてやっていきたいと思っています。 - 金融庁

Article 53-16 The provisions of Part II, Chapter IV, Section 5, Subsection 2 (excluding Article 367, and Article 371, paragraphs (3) and (5)) (Operations) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the operation of the board of directors of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i)) (Hearing of Statements), the main clause of Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), the main clause of Article 873 (Stay of Execution of Original Sentence), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an application for permission under Article 371, paragraph (2) or (4) of that Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to this Article with relevant changes in interpretation. In this case, the terms "shareholder" and "at any time during the business hours of a Stock Company" in Article 371, paragraph (2) (Minutes) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "member (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representative)" and "with the permission of the court," respectively; the term "Parent Company or Subsidiary" in Article 371, paragraph (6) shall be deemed to be replaced with "de facto Subsidiary Company as defined in Article 33-2, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 363, paragraph (2)" in Article 372, paragraphs (2) and (3) (Omission of Report to Board of Directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-13, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "Article 417, paragraph (4)" in Article 372, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 417, paragraph (4) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 53-30, paragraph (5) of the Insurance Business Act"; and the term "Article 362, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii)" in Article 373, paragraphs (1) and (2) (Resolution of board of directors by special directors) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 53-14, paragraph (4), items (i) and (ii) of the Insurance Business Act"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の十六　会社法第二編第四章第五節第二款（第三百六十七条並びに第三百七十一条第三項及び第五項を除く。）（運営）の規定は相互会社の取締役会の運営について、同法第八百六十八条第一項（非訟事件の管轄）、第八百六十九条（疎明）、第八百七十条（第一号に係る部分に限る。）（陳述の聴取）、第八百七十一条本文（理由の付記）、第八百七十二条（第四号に係る部分に限る。）（即時抗告）、第八百七十三条本文（原裁判の執行停止）、第八百七十五条（非訟事件手続法の規定の適用除外）及び第八百七十六条（最高裁判所規則）の規定はこの条において読み替えて準用する同法第三百七十一条第二項又は第四項の規定による許可の申立てについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、同法第三百七十一条第二項（議事録等）中「株主」とあるのは「社員（総代会を設けているときは、総代）」と、「株式会社の営業時間内は、いつでも」とあるのは「裁判所の許可を得て」と、同条第六項中「親会社若しくは子会社」とあるのは「保険業法第三十三条の二第一項に規定する実質子会社」と、同法第三百七十二条第二項及び第三項（取締役会への報告の省略）中「第三百六十三条第二項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十三第二項」と、同条第三項中「第四百十七条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の三十第五項において準用する第四百十七条第四項」と、同法第三百七十三条第一項及び第二項（特別取締役による取締役会の決議）中「第三百六十二条第四項第一号及び第二号」とあるのは「保険業法第五十三条の十四第四項第一号及び第二号」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) The provisions of the Collection Act (excluding the provisions of Article 4 and Articles 22 through 25) shall apply to the collection of the labor insurance premiums pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph. In such case, the term "and labor welfare services" in Paragraph 2, Article 12 of the Collection Act shall be deemed to be replaced with ", labor welfare services and the payment of the special survivor benefit set forth in Paragraph 1, Article 59 (hereinafter referred to as "the special survivor benefit") of the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief (hereinafter referred to as "the Asbestos Relief Act");" the term "the amount of the expense," with "the amount of the expense, the amount of the expense required for the payment of the special survivor benefit;" the term "shall be ... . The same shall apply in Paragraph 1, Article 20)" in Paragraph 3 of the same article, with "shall be ... . The same shall apply to Paragraph 1, Article 20) and the amount of the special survivor benefit (excluding the special survivor lump sum payment paid in the case of Item 2, Article 62 of the Asbestos Relief Act, the special survivor benefit pertaining to a person suffering from any of the diseases caused by engaging in specific activities for a long period of time and prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (limited to a person prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare for each business prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, considering the employment period, etc. in the said business) (this special survivor benefit shall be referred to as "the special survivor benefit pertaining to a person afflicted with a specified disease"), and the special survivor benefit pertaining to the class 3 special insured person) (The amount of the special survivor pension set forth in Paragraph 2, Article 59 of the Asbestos Relief Act shall be calculated as prescribed in the Ordinance of the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare);" and the term ", the expense required for the insurance benefit pertaining to a person afflicted with a specified disease," with ", the expense required for the insurance benefit pertaining to a person afflicted with a specified disease, the expense required for the payment of the special survivor pension of Particle 2, Article 59 of the Asbestos Relief Act, the expense required for the payment of the special survivor benefit pertaining to a person afflicted with a specified disease," and the other necessary replacement of technical terms shall be as prescribed in the Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

２　前項の規定による労働保険料の徴収については、徴収法の規定（第四条及び第二十二条から第二十五条までの規定を除く。）を適用する。この場合において、徴収法第十二条第二項中「及び労働福祉事業」とあるのは「、労働福祉事業及び石綿による健康被害の救済に関する法律（以下「石綿健康被害救済法」という。）第五十九条第一項の特別遺族給付金（以下「特別遺族給付金」という。）の支給」と、「費用の額」とあるのは「費用の額、特別遺族給付金の支給に要する費用の額」と、同条第三項中「とする。第二十条第一項において同じ。）」とあるのは「とする。第二十条第一項において同じ。）と特別遺族給付金（石綿健康被害救済法第六十二条第二号の場合に支給される特別遺族一時金、特定の業務に長期間従事することにより発生する疾病であつて厚生労働省令で定めるものにかかつた者（厚生労働省令で定める事業の種類ごとに、当該事業における就労期間等を考慮して厚生労働省令で定める者に限る。）に係る特別遺族給付金（以下この項において「特定疾病にかかつた者に係る特別遺族給付金」という。）及び第三種特別加入者に係る特別遺族給付金を除く。）の額（石綿健康被害救済法第五十九条第二項の特別遺族年金については、その額は、厚生労働省令で定めるところにより算定するものとする。）」と、「、特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付に要する費用」とあるのは「、特定疾病にかかつた者に係る保険給付に要する費用、石綿健康被害救済法第五十九条第二項の特別遺族年金の支給に要する費用、特定疾病にかかつた者に係る特別遺族給付金に要する費用」とするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 102 (1) The provision of Article 13(1) of the Banking Act after the revision by the provision of Article 10 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Banking Act") (including the Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the Long-Term Credit Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 11 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Long-Term Credit Bank Act"), Article 89 of the Shinkin Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 13 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Shinkin Bank Act"), Article 94 of the Labor Bank Act after the revision by the provision of Article 14 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Labor Bank Act") and Article 6 of the Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative after the revision by the provision of Article 16 (hereinafter referred to as the "New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative") (hereinafter referred to as the "Cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 17 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions); hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) shall not apply, until the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, to granting of credit, etc. (meaning granting of credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) by a Bank (meaning a Bank as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Long-Term Credit Bank (meaning a Long-Term Credit Bank as defined by Article 2 of the New Long-Term Credit Bank Act; hereinafter the same shall apply), Shinkin Bank or federation of Shinkin Banks, labor bank or federation of labor banks, or credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives (meaning Federation of Credit Cooperatives as defined by Article 2(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative; hereinafter the same shall apply) (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Bank, etc." in this Article to Article 105 inclusive of these Supplementary Provisions) to one person as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act of which the amount exceeds the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. (meaning Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. as defined by Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) at the time when this Act comes into effect, if the Bank, etc. notifies thereof to the Financial Reconstruction Commission (the Financial Reconstruction Commission or the Minister of Labor in the case of labor bank or federation of labor banks, or the administrative agency referred to in Article 7(1) of the New Act on Financial Businesses by Cooperative in the case of credit cooperatives or Federation of Credit Cooperatives; hereinafter the same shall apply in this and the following paragraph) until the day on which three months have elapsed from the Effective Date. In this case, where it is likely that if the Bank, etc. does not continue granting of credit, etc. in excess of the Limit of Granting of Credit, etc. to the one person even after the day on which one year has elapsed from the Effective Date, it would significantly hinder the continuation of the business of the one person, or where there is other unavoidable reason, and when the Bank, etc. obtains an approval from the Financial Reconstruction Commission before that day, the Bank, etc. shall be deemed to obtain the approval referred to in the proviso to Article 13(1) of the New Banking Act on the day after that day. 例文帳に追加

第百二条　第十条の規定による改正後の銀行法（以下「新銀行法」という。）第十三条第一項（第十一条の規定による改正後の長期信用銀行法（以下「新長期信用銀行法」という。）第十七条、第十三条の規定による改正後の信用金庫法（以下「新信用金庫法」という。）第八十九条、第十四条の規定による改正後の労働金庫法（以下「新労働金庫法」という。）第九十四条、及び第十六条の規定による改正後の協同組合による金融事業に関する法律（以下「新協金法」という。）第六条において準用する場合（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「新長期信用銀行法第十七条等において準用する場合」という。）を含む。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の規定は、この法律の施行の際現に新銀行法第十三条第一項に規定する同一人に対する信用の供与等（同項に規定する信用の供与等をいう。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）の額が信用供与等限度額（同条第一項に規定する信用供与等限度額をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を超えている銀行（新銀行法第二条第一項に規定する銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、長期信用銀行（新長期信用銀行法第二条に規定する長期信用銀行をいう。以下同じ。）、信用金庫若しくは信用金庫連合会、労働金庫若しくは労働金庫連合会又は信用協同組合若しくは信用協同組合連合会（新協金法第二条第一項に規定する信用協同組合連合会をいう。以下同じ。）（以下この条から附則第百五条までにおいて「銀行等」という。）の当該同一人に対する信用の供与等については、当該銀行等が施行日から起算して三月を経過する日までにその旨を金融再生委員会（労働金庫又は労働金庫連合会にあっては金融再生委員会及び労働大臣とし、信用協同組合又は信用協同組合連合会にあっては新協金法第七条第一項に規定する行政庁とする。以下この項及び次項において同じ。）に届け出たときは、施行日から起算して一年を経過する日までの間は、適用しない。この場合において、当該銀行等が、当該同一人に対して同日後も引き続き信用供与等限度額を超えて当該信用の供与等をしないこととすれば当該同一人の事業の継続に著しい支障を生ずるおそれがある場合その他のやむを得ない理由がある場合において同日までに金融再生委員会の承認を受けたときは、当該銀行等は、同日の翌日において新銀行法第十三条第一項ただし書の規定による承認を受けたものとみなす。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) In the case where a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger (which means an Absorption-Type Merger prescribed in Article 140 of the Act; the same shall apply hereinafter through Article 60-7) measures the acquisition cost of the entire property that a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger acquires by an Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Property subject to an Absorption-Type Merger") by a method of appropriately calculating the current market value of property delivered to Members of a Commodity Exchange Dissolved in an Absorption-Type Merger by the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Consideration of an Absorption-Type Merger") at the time of the merger and the current market value of other Property subject to an Absorption-Type Merger, the amount set forth in the following items of a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger shall be the amounts specified in said respective items: (i) the amount of the contribution of a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the “Amount of Contribution subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger”): the sum total of the following amounts: (a) the amount of the contribution of a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the “Amount of Contribution immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger”); (b) the amount determined by the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of an Absorption-Type Merger contract within the scope of the current market value of the Consideration of the Absorption-Type Merger (which means the current market value of the consideration of an Absorption-Type Merger and the value of other considerations for the entity conversion of an Absorption-Type Merger which were calculated by an appropriate method; limited to those cases pertaining to contributions of a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article); (ii) the amount of the membership fees of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the “Membership Fees subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger”): the sum total of the following amounts: (a) the amount of the membership fees of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the “Membership Fees immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger”); (b) the amount determined by the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger pursuant to the provisions of an Absorption-Type Merger contract within the scope of the amount obtained by deducting the amount set forth in (b) of the preceding item from the current market value of the Consideration of the Absorption-Type Merger; (iii) the amount of the capital surplus of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the “Capital Surplus subsequent to an Absorption-Type Merger”): the amount obtained by deducting the amount set forth in (c) below, from the sum total of the amounts set forth in (a) and (b); (a) the amount of the capital surplus of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as “Capital Surplus immediately prior to an Absorption-Type Merger”);(b) the current market value of the consideration for the Absorption-Type Merger; (c) the sum total of the amounts set forth in item 1, (b) and in the preceding item, (b); (iv) the amount of the statutory capital of the Member Commodity Exchange - 117 - Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the “Amount of Statutory Capital subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger"): the amount of the statutory capital of a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Amount of Statutory Capital immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger"); (v) the amount of the accumulated profit of a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Amount of Accumulated Profit subsequent to the Absorption-Type Merger"): the amount of the accumulated profit of the Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger (hereinafter referred to as the "Amount of Accumulated Profit immediately prior to the Absorption-Type Merger"). 例文帳に追加

１ 吸収合併（法第百四十条 の吸収合併をいう。以下第六十条の七までにおいて同じ。） により吸収合併存続会員商品取引所が承継する財産（以下「吸収合併対象財産」という。） の全部の取得原価を吸収合併に際して吸収合併存続会員商品取引所が吸収合併消滅会員 商品取引所の会員に対して交付する財産（以下「吸収合併対価」という。）の時価その 他当該吸収合併対象財産の時価を適切に算定する方法をもって測定することとすべき場 合において、吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の次の各号に掲げる額は、当該各号に定める 額とする。一吸収合併後の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の出資金の額（以下「吸収合併後出資金 額」という。） 次に掲げる額の合計額 イ吸収合併の直前の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の出資金の額（以下「吸収合併直 前出資金額」という。）ロ吸収合併対価時価（吸収合併対価の時価その他適切な方法により算定された吸収 合併再編対価の価額をいう。吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の出資に係るものに限る。 以下この条において同じ。）の範囲内で、吸収合併存続会員商品取引所が吸収合併 契約の定めに従い定めた額 二吸収合併後の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の加入金の額（以下「吸収合併後加入金 額」という。） 次に掲げる額の合計額 イ吸収合併の直前の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の加入金の額（以下「吸収合併直 前加入金額」という。） ロ吸収合併対価時価から前号ロに掲げる額を減じて得た額の範囲内で、吸収合併存 続会員商品取引所が吸収合併契約の定めに従い定めた額 三吸収合併後の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の資本剰余金の額（以下「吸収合併後資 本剰余金額」という。） イ及びロに掲げる額の合計額からハに掲げる額を減じて得 た額 イ吸収合併の直前の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の資本剰余金の額（以下「吸収合 併直前資本剰余金額」という。） ロ吸収合併対価時価 ハ第一号ロ及び前号ロに掲げる額の合計額 四吸収合併後の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の法定準備金の額（以下「吸収合併後法 定準備金額」という。） 吸収合併の直前の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の法定準備 金の額（以下「吸収合併直前法定準備金額」という。）五吸収合併後の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の利益剰余金の額（以下「吸収合併後利 益剰余金額」という。） 吸収合併の直前の吸収合併存続会員商品取引所の利益剰余 金の額（以下「吸収合併直前利益剰余金額」という。） - 経済産業省

The documents specified by an ordinance set forth in Article 145, paragraph 3 of the Act shall be as listed in the following (in case of documents certified by a public agency, limited to documents prepared within three months prior to the date of filing the application): (i) a document recording the reasons for the merger; (ii) a document specified as follows corresponding to each case: (a) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a foreign national: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., the curriculum vitae of said officer, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) through (k) of the Act; (b) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is a juridical person: a certificate of the registered matters of said officer, a document stating the corporate development, and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (l) of the Act; (c) in cases where an officer of a Commodity Exchange surviving a merger or a Commodity Exchange Resulting from a Merger is neither a foreign national nor a juridical person: a copy of the residence certificate, etc., and the curriculum vitae of said officer; a certification issued by a public agency that such person is not subject to the provisions of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1, (a) and (b) of the Act; and a sworn, written statement by that person that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (c) through (k) of the same item; (iii) a document stating the name or trade name of a Member, etc., and the address of the principal office or head office of the Member, etc.; a sworn, written statement that the Member, etc. is subject to any of the provisions of Article 30, paragraph 1 of the Act for each Commodity Market where transactions are conducted, or a sworn, written statement that trading participants are subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of Article 82, paragraph 1, item 1 of the Act, or any of the provisions of (a) through (c) of item 2 of the same paragraph by each Commodity Market where they conduct - 111 - transactions; a sworn, written statement that such person is not subject to any of the provisions of (a) through (l) of Article 15, paragraph 2, item 1 of the Act; and in the case where the Commodity Exchange specified in the application carries out settlement by the method set forth in Article 105, paragraph 1 of the Act on one or more Commodity Markets that the Commodity Exchange intends to open, a record pertaining to such person's net assets prepared according to Form No. 1 within 30 days prior to the date of application for approval; (iv) minutes of the general meeting of shareholders approving the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of Members prescribed in Article 144, paragraph 4, Article 144-2, paragraph 2, or Article 144-3, paragraph 4 of the Act; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, referring to the general meeting of shareholders prescribed in Article 144-6, paragraph 1 and Article 144-13, paragraph 1 of the Act, and Article 783, paragraph 1, Article 795, paragraph 1, or Article 804, paragraph 1 of the Company Act) of each Commodity Exchange which carries out the merger, or another document certifying that the necessary procedures for the merger have been followed; (v) a document stating the status of the property, income and expenditure of each Commodity Exchange that carries out the merger (in the case of a Member Commodity Exchange, the settlement related statements, etc. of the preceding business year; in the case of an Incorporated Commodity Exchange, the financial documents, etc. of the preceding business year and detailed statements thereof); (vi) in the case where a public notice or demand (in cases where the public notice is made through an official gazette, a daily newspaper which publishes matters of current events, or an Electronic Public Notice pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 3 or Article 144-10, paragraph 3 of the Act [including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17), or Article 789, paragraph 3; Article 799, paragraph 3; or Article 810, paragraph 3 of the Company Act, a public notice by such method) is made pursuant to the provisions of Article 124, paragraph 2 as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144, paragraph 5; Article 144-2, paragraph 3; and Article 144-3, paragraph 5 of the Act, or Article 144-10, paragraph 2 of the Act (including cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 144-17 of the Act); Article 789, paragraph 2; Article 799, paragraph 2; or Article 810, paragraph 2 of the Company Act; and in cases where a creditor has made an objection, a document certifying that the liabilities have been paid or reasonable collateral has been provided to said creditor, reasonable property has been deposited for the purpose of repaying the liabilities to said creditor, or that said merger is not likely to harm said creditor; (vii) a document stating a method for business succession pertaining to transactions on a Commodity Market which has been opened by a Commodity Exchange dissolved as a result of a merger; (viii) a document stating the status of securing employees who have the knowledge and experience pertaining to the business of a Commodity Exchange and the status of the assignment of such employees (limited to a case where a Commodity Exchange subsequent to a merger becomes an Incorporated Commodity Exchange); (ix) a document stating the estimated transaction volume of Futures Transactions for one year after the merger on the Commodity Market which he/she seeks to open; (x) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market pertaining to a Listed - 113 - Commodity at the time of a merger, a document stating that it is appropriate to conduct transactions of Listed Commodity Component Products, etc. on a single Commodity Market; (xi) in the case of seeking to open a Commodity Market at the time of a merger by specifying two or more Commodity Indices as a single Listed Commodity Index, a document stating that the majority of the goods subject to said two or more Commodity Indices shall be common to one another. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十五条第三項の主務省令で定める書面は、次に掲げる書面（官公署が証明す る書面の場合には、認可の申請の日前三月以内に作成されたものに限る。）とする。 一合併の理由を記載した書面 二次に掲げる場合に応じ、それぞれ次に定める書面 イ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人である場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書及びその者が法第十五条第二 項第一号イからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 ロ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が法人 である場合当該役員の登記事項証明書、沿革を記載した書面及び法第十五条第 二項第一号ヲに該当しないことを誓約する書面 ハ合併後存続する商品取引所又は合併により設立される商品取引所の役員が外国 人又は法人でない場合当該役員の住民票の写し等、履歴書、その者が法第十五 条第二項第一号イ及びロに該当しない旨の官公署の証明書並びにその者が同号 ハからルまでのいずれにも該当しないことを誓約する書面 三会員等の氏名又は商号若しくは名称及び主たる事務所又は本店の所在地を記載した 書面、会員が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第三十条第一項各号のいずれかに該当す ることを誓約する書面又は取引参加者が取引をする商品市場ごとに法第八十二条第 一項第一号イからハまで若しくは同項第二号イからハまでのいずれかに該当する ことを誓約する書面、その者が法第十五条第二項第一号イからヲまでのいずれにも 該当しないことを誓約する書面並びに申請に係る商品取引所が開設しようとする一 以上の商品市場において法第百五条第一号に掲げる方法により決済を行う場合には 認可の申請の日前三十日以内に様式第一号により作成したその者の純資産額に関す る調書 四合併を行う各商品取引所の合併総会（会員商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条 第四項、第百四十四条の二第二項又は第百四十四条の三第四項の会員総会をいい、 株式会社商品取引所にあっては、法第百四十四条の六第一項、第百四十四条の十三 第一項、会社法第七百八十三条第一項、第七百九十五条第一項又は第八百四条第一 項の株主総会をいう。）の議事録その他必要な手続があったことを証する書面 五合併を行う各商品取引所の財産及び収支の状況を知ることができる書面（会員商品 取引所にあっては最終事業年度の決算関係書類等、株式会社商品取引所にあっては 最終事業年度の計算書類等及びその附属明細書）六法第百四十四条第五項、第百四十四条の二第三項及び第百四十四条の三第五項に おいて準用する法第百二十四条第二項、第百四十四条の十第二項（第百四十四条の 十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会社法第七百八十九条第二項 、第七百九十九 条第二項又は第八百十条第二項の規定による公告及び催告（第百二十四条第三項、 第百四十四条の十第三項（第百四十四条の十七において準用する場合を含む。）、会 社法第七百八十九条第三項、第七百九十九条第三項又は第八百十条第三項の規定に より公告を官報のほか時事に関する事項を掲載する日刊新聞紙又は電子公告によっ てした場合にあっては、これらの方法による公告）をしたこと並びに異議を述べた 債権者があるときは、当該債権者に対し弁済し若しくは相当の担保を提供し若しく は当該債権者に弁済を受けさせることを目的として相当の財産を信託したこと又は - 112 - 当該合併をしても当該債権者を害するおそれがないことを証する書面 七合併により消滅する商品取引所の開設している商品市場における取引に関する業務 の承継の方法を記載した書面 八商品取引所の業務に関する知識及び経験を有する従業員の確保の状況並びに当該従 業員の配置の状況を記載した書面（合併後の商品取引所が株式会社商品取引所であ る場合に限る。九開設しようとする商品市場における合併後一年間の先物取引の取引量の見込みを記 載した書面 十合併に際して上場商品に係る商品市場を開設しようとする場合にあっては、上場商 品構成物品を一の商品市場で取引をすることが適当である旨を明らかにすることが できる書面 十一合併に際して二以上の商品指数を一の上場商品指数として商品市場を開設しよう とする場合にあっては、当該二以上の商品指数の対象となる物品の大部分が共通し ていることを明らかにすることができる書面 - 経済産業省

Article 94 The provisions of Article 8 (Exception concerning Specified Regions), paragraph (2), Article 10 (Method for Calculating the Age of a Person Eligible for Election), Article 17 (Voting Precincts), Article 18 (excluding the proviso of paragraph (1)) (Ballot Counting Districts), Article 23 through Article 25, Article 30 (Pollbook), Article 33, paragraph (1), paragraph (3), paragraph (4) and paragraph (6), Article 34 (Date of Election), Chapter XI (Voting) (excluding the provisions of Article 35, Article 36, paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 37, paragraph (4), Article 38, Article 40, Article 46, Article 46-2, paragraph (4) through paragraph (8), Article 49 and Article 49-2), Chapter VII (Ballot Counting) (excluding the provisions of paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 61, paragraph (3) through paragraph (5) and the proviso of paragraph (8), Article 62, Article 68 and paragraph (2), paragraph (3) and paragraph (5), Article 68-2), Chapter VIII (Electoral Committee and Electoral Subcommittees) (excluding the provisions of paragraph (2), Article 75, paragraph (2), Article 77 and Article 81), paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (5) and paragraph (9) through paragraph (11), Article 86, Article 86-8, Article 90, paragraph (2), Article 91 (Candidates), Chapter X (Elected Candidates) (excluding the provisions of Article 95-2 through Article 98, Article 99-2, paragraph (1) through paragraph (3), paragraph (7) and paragraph (8), Article 100, Article 101 through Article 101-2-2 and paragraph (2), Article 108), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 111 (Notice in Case of Vacancy), Article 116 (General Election in the Case Where None of Assemblymen or Elected Candidates Exists), Article 117 (Established Municipality Election), Article 129, Article 130, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 131, Article 132 through Article 137, Article 137-3, Article 138, Article 140-2, Article 148-2, paragraph (1), paragraph (3) and paragraph (4), Article 161, Article 164-6, Article 166, Article 178 (Election Campaign), Chapter XV (Lawsuits) (excluding the provisions of paragraph (2), Article 202, Article 204, paragraph (5), Article 205, paragraph (2), Article 206, Article 208, paragraph (2), Article 209-2, paragraph (2), Article 211, Article 216 and paragraph (4), Article 220), Chapter XVI (Penal Provisions) (excluding the provisions of Article 224-3, item (i) and item (ii), Article 235-2, Article 235-3, Article 235-4, Article 235-6, paragraph (2), Article 236, Article 236-2, Article 238-2, item (iv), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 239, paragraph (1), Article 239-2, paragraph (2), Article 240, paragraph (2), Article 242, Article 242-2, item (i) and item (ii) through item (ix), paragraph (1), and paragraph (2), Article 243 , item (i) through item (v)-2, item (7) and item (8), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 244, Article 246 through Article 250, paragraph (2), paragraph (3) and paragraph (5), Article 251-2, Article 251-3, Article 251-4, Article 252-2, Article 252-3, paragraph (3) through paragraph (5), Article 255, and Article 255-2 through Article 255-4), Article 264-2 (Exclusion from Application of Administrative Procedure Act), Main Clause, paragraph (1), Article 270 (Time of Notifications concerning Elections), Article 270-2 (Time of Absentee Voting), Article 270-3 (Deadlines of Notifications concerning Elections), Article 272 (Delegation to Orders) and paragraph (4) and paragraph (5) of Supplementary Provision of the Public Offices Election Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the elections of the members of Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commissions, except the portions concerning the elections of members of the House of Representatives, the members of the House of Councilors, the governors and mayors of local governments, and the members of the assemblies of municipalities. In this case, the respective phrasings in the middle column of the following table corresponding to the provisions of the Act stated in the left column of the table shall be deemed to be replaced with the corresponding phrasings in the right column of the table. 例文帳に追加