「conditions.」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(835ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(1) If during an examination under section 29(5) or (6), the Examiner is of the opinion that -- (a) the description, claims, or drawings are so unclear, or the claims are so inadequately supported by the description, that no meaningful opinion can be formed on -- (i) the novelty or inventive step of the claimed invention; or (ii) whether the claimed invention is capable of industrial application; (b) the invention defined in any claim -- (i) does not appear novel; (ii) does not appear to involve an inventive step; or (iii) does not appear to be capable of industrial application; (c) the conditions specified in sections 13 and 25(4) and (5) have not been complied with; (d) the application discloses -- (i) any additional matter referred to in section 84(1); or (ii) any matter extending beyond that disclosed in the application for the patent as filed; or (e) a claim relates to an invention in respect of which no search has been completed, and he has decided not to carry out the examination in respect of that claim, the Examiner shall notify the Registrar in writing of that opinion and shall state fully the reasons for his opinion.例文帳に追加

(1) 第29条(5)又は(6)に基づく審査中に，審査官が次の意見の何れかを有するに至った場合は，審査官は，当該意見を書面で登録官に通知するとともに，当該意見を有するに至った理由を詳細に述べなければならない。 (a) 発明の説明，クレーム若しくは図面が極めて不明瞭であるか，又はクレームを裏付ける発明の説明が極めて不十分であるために， (i) クレームされた発明の新規性若しくは進歩性，又は (ii) クレームされた発明が産業上利用可能であるか否か， について有意義な意見を形成することが不可能である。 (b) クレームにおいて限定された発明は， (i) 新規でないと認められ， (ii) 進歩性を有していないと認められ，又は (iii) 産業上利用可能でないと認められる。 (c) 第13条並びに第25条(4)及び(5)に定める条件が満たされていない。 (d) 当該出願は，次の事項を開示している。 (i) 第84条(1)にいう追加の事項，又は (ii) 出願時での当該特許出願において開示していた事項を超える事項 (e) クレームが調査の完了していない発明に関するものであることから，審査官が当該クレームに関して審査を実行しない旨を決定した。 - 特許庁

(6) Where the applicant has filed a request and paid the fee for a search and examination report under subsection (2)(b), the Registrar shall -- (a) cause the application to be subjected to -- (i) a search by an Examiner to discover the relevant prior art contained in -- (A) such documentation as may be prescribed; and (B) any additional documentation that the Examiner is aware of and considers to be relevant; and (ii) an examination by an Examiner to determine -- (A) whether the conditions specified in sections 13 and 25(4) and (5) have been complied with; (B) whether the application discloses any additional matter referred to in section 84(1); and (C) whether the application discloses any matter extending beyond that disclosed in the application as filed, taking into consideration all the relevant prior art, if any, that the Examiner is aware of or that has been discovered in the search; and (b) upon receiving the search and examination report prepared by the Examiner, send the applicant a notification and a copy of the search and examination report.例文帳に追加

(6)出願人が(2)(b)に基づいて調査及び審査報告を求める請求書を提出し，手数料を納付した場合は，登録官は，(a)審査官が認識しているか又は調査において発見されたすべての関連性のある先行技術を考慮に入れて，(i)(A)所定の資料，及び(B)関連性があると審査官が認識し考える追加資料，に含まれている関連性のある先行技術を発見するために当該出願を審査官に調査させ，かつ(ii)(A)第13条並びに第25条(4)及び(5)に定める条件が満たされているか否か，(B)当該出願が第84条(1)にいう追加の事項の何れかを開示するものであるか否か，並びに(C)当該出願が，出願時での出願において開示された事項を越える事項を開示するものであるか否か，を決定するために当該出願を審査官に審査させ，かつ(b)審査官が作成した調査及び審査報告を受領したときは，通知並びに当該調査及び審査報告の写しを出願人に送付する。 - 特許庁

(a) an existing trade or industry in Australia, or the establishment of a new trade or industry in Australia, is unfairly prejudiced, or the demand in Australia for the patented product, or for a product resulting from the patented process, is not reasonably met, because of the patentee's failure: (i) to manufacture the patented product to an adequate extent, and supply it on reasonable terms; or (ii) to manufacture, to an adequate extent, a part of the patented product that is necessary for the efficient working of the product, and supply the part on reasonable terms; or (iii) to carry on the patented process to a reasonable extent; or (iv) to grant licenses on reasonable terms; or (b) a trade or industry in Australia is unfairly prejudiced by the conditions attached by the patentee (whether before or after the commencing day) to the purchase, hire or use of the patented product, the use or working of the patented process; or (c) if the patented invention is not being worked in Australia on a commercial scale, but is capable of being worked in Australia. 例文帳に追加

(a) オーストラリアにおける既存の商業若しくは工業又はオーストラリアにおける新規の商業若しくは工業の設立が不当に不利益を被っているか，又は特許製品若しくは特許方法から生じる製品に対するオーストラリアにおける需要が合理的な程度に満たされておらず，その理由が，特許権者が次の事項を行わないことにある場合 (i) 特許製品を十分な量で製造し，合理的な条件で供給すること，又は (ii) 特許製品を有効に実施するために必要な特許製品の一部を十分な量で製造し，合理的な条件で供給すること，又は (iii) 合理的な程度に特許方法を実行すること，又は (iv) 合理的な条件でライセンスを付与すること，又は (b) オーストラリアにおける商業若しくは工業が，特許製品の購入，賃貸又は使用，特許方法の使用又は実施に関し，(本法施行日の前後を問わず)特許権者が課す付帯条件によって不当な不利益を被っている場合，又は (c) 特許発明がオーストラリアにおいて商業規模では実施されていないが，オーストラリアにおいて実施することが可能である場合 - 特許庁

(3) Where in relation to goods in respect of which a trade mark is registered - (a) the matters referred to in paragraph (b) of subsection (1) are shown as far as regards failure to use the trade mark in relation to goods to be sold or otherwise traded in a particular place in Malaysia (otherwise than for export from Malaysia) or in relation to goods to be exported to a particular market outside Malaysia; and (b) a person has been permitted under section 20 to register an identical or nearly resembling trade mark in respect of those goods under a registration extending to the use in relation to goods to be sold or otherwise traded in that place (otherwise than for export from Malaysia) or in relation to goods to be exported to that market, or the Court is of the opinion that that person might properly be permitted to register the trade mark, [Am. Act A881] the Court may, on application by that person, direct that the registration of the first-mentioned trade mark shall be subject to such conditions, amendments, modifications or limitations as the Court thinks proper for securing that that registration shall cease to extend to use of the trade mark in relation to goods to be sold or otherwise traded in that place (otherwise than for export from Malaysia) or in relation to goods to be exported to that market. [Am. Act A881]例文帳に追加

(3) ある商標の登録に係る商品について， (a) (1)(b)に述べる事項が，マレーシアの特定の場所で販売若しくはその他取引される商品(マレーシアから輸出される商品は除く。)又はマレーシア国外の特定市場へ輸出される商品に関する当該商標の不使用に関して明らかにされ，かつ (b) ある者が，当該場所で販売若しくはその他取引される商品(マレーシアから輸出される商品は除く。)又は当該外国市場へ輸出される商品に関する使用に及ぶ登録に基づいてそれら商品についての同一若しくは類似の商標の登録を第20条に基づいて認められているか，又は裁判所がある者に対してそのような商標登録を認めるのが適当と判断する場合は，［法律A881による改正］ 裁判所は，その者の申請により，前記の不使用商標の登録の効力が，当該場所で販売若しくはその他取引される商品(マレーシアから輸出される商品は除く。)又は当該外国市場へ輸出される商品に関する商標の使用に及ぶことのないようするために，裁判所が適当と判断する条件，補正，修正又は制限を最初に言及した商標の登録に付すべき旨の指示を発することができる。［法律A881による改正］ - 特許庁

(11) The Registrar shall consider the application with regard to the following matters, that is to say . (a) whether the applicant is competent to certify the goods or services in respect of which the mark is to be registered; (b) whether the draft rules are satisfactory; and (c) whether in all the circumstances the registrations applied for would be to the public advantage, and may either - (i) refuse to accept the application; or (ii) accept the application and approve the rules, either without modification and unconditionally or subject to any conditions, amendments, modifications or limitations of the application or of the rules, which he may think requisite, but except in the case of acceptance and approval without modification and unconditionally, the Registrar shall not decide the matter without giving to the applicant an opportunity of being heard and the Registrar may, at the request of the applicant, consider the application before authorisation to proceed with the application has been given, so that he shall be at liberty to reconsider any matter on which he has given a decision if any amendment or modification is thereafter made in the application or in the draft rules.例文帳に追加

(11) 登録官は，次の事項について出願を検討する。すなわち， (a) 出願人が商標登録に係る商品又はサービスを証明する上で適格であるか否か (b) 規約が十分なものか否か，及び (c) 一切の事情に照らし，出願された登録を行うことが公共の利益に適うか否か また，次の何れかの対応を行うことができる。 (i) 出願を拒絶すること，又は (ii) 無修正かつ無条件で，又は自己が必要と判断する条件，補正，修正又は制限を出願又は規約案に付して，出願を受理し規約案を承認すること ただし，無修正かつ無条件で受理及び承認を行う場合を除いて，登録官は，出願人に聴聞を受ける機会を与えることなく決定を行なってはならず，また，登録官は，出願人の請求があった場合は，出願の続行を許可する前に出願についての判断を行うことができ，一旦決定を行なった事項についても，その後出願又は規約案に補正又は修正がなされたときは，裁量によりその事項を再検討することができる。 - 特許庁

(3) Where, in relation to goods in respect of which a trade mark is registered - (a) the matters referred to in Subsection (1)(b) are shown as far as regards failure to use the trade mark in relation to goods to be sold, or otherwise traded in, in a particular place in Papua New Guinea (otherwise than for export from Papua New Guinea), or in relation to goods to be exported to a particular market outside Papua New Guinea; and (b) a person has been permitted under Section 26 to register a substantially identical or deceptively similar trade mark in respect of those goods under a registration extending to use in relation to goods to be sold, or otherwise traded in, in that place (otherwise than for export from Papua New Guinea), or in relation to goods to be exported to that market, or the Court is of the opinion that that person might properly be permitted to register such a trade mark, the court may, on application by that person, direct that the registration of the first-mentioned trade mark shall be subject to such conditions or limitations as the Court thinks proper for ensuring that the registration shall cease to extend to use of the trade mark in relation to goods to be sold, or otherwise traded in, in that place (otherwise than for export from Papua New Guinea), or in relation to goods to be exported to that market.例文帳に追加

(3) 商標が登録されている商品について次の場合，その者による出願があれば，商標の登録がその地域において販売若しくは取引される(パプアニューギニアからの輸出目的を除く)商品について，又はその市場に輸出される商品についての使用にまで及ばないことを確実にするため，当該登録が，裁判所が適切と考える条件若しくは制約に従うように指示することができる。 (a) 本条(1)(b)に言及されている事項が，パプアニューギニアの特定地域において販売若しくは取引される(パプアニューギニアからの輸出目的を除く)商品について，又はパプアニューギニア領域外の特定市場へ輸出される商品について商標の使用が無かったことに関する限り示されている場合，及び (b) ある者が第26条により，その地域において販売若しくは取引される(パプアニューギニアからの輸出目的を除く)商品について，又はその市場へ輸出される商品についての使用にまで及ぶ登録に従って，それらの商品についてほぼ同一の若しくは混同するほど類似する商標を登録することが認められた，又は，裁判所がその者はこのような商標の登録を適性に認められるとする意見である場合 - 特許庁

(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, the following acts shall not constitute an infringement of the right to the use of a registered certification trademark- (a) where a certification trademark is registered subject to any conditions or limitation, to which having regard to any such limitations, the registration does not extend; (b) the use of the certification trademark in relation to goods or services certified by the proprietor of the mark; (c) where- (i) the use of the certification trademark in relation to goods or services adapted to form part of or to be accessory to, other goods or services, as the case may be, in relation to which the mark has been used without infringement of right given as aforesaid or might for the being so used; and (ii) if the use of the mark is reasonably necessary in order to indicate that the goods or services are so adapted and neither the purpose nor the effect of the mark is to indicate otherwise than in accordance with the fact that the goods or services are certified by the proprietor. 例文帳に追加

(1)本法の規定にかかわらず、次に掲げる行為は登録された証明商標の使用権の侵害に該当しないものとする。(a)証明商標が、何らかの条件又は制限を付して登録されており、当該登録が及ばない当該制限のすべてを考慮すること。(b)当該標章の所有者により証明された商品又は役務に関連する証明商標の使用。(c)次に掲げる各号の場合。(i)他の商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の一部を形成する、又はその付属品を構成している商品又は役務に係る証明商標の使用であって、当該商品又は役務との関連において、当該標章が前述の権利を侵害することなく使用され、又はそのように使用されるであろう場合(ii)当該標章の使用が、当該商品又は役務がそのように適合していることを示すために合理的に必要であって、当該標章の目的も効果も、当該商品又は役務が所有者により証明されている事実に従って示すこと以外にはない場合 - 特許庁

We welcome the endorsement of the Kazan Declaration on APEC Food Security at the Second Ministerial Meeting on Food Security held in May 2012 in Kazan, Russia and reaffirm the APEC Ministers Responsible for Food Security’s commitment to strengthen food security through promoting open and transparent markets, increasing sustainable agricultural production and productivity, considering the diversity of environmental conditions world-wide and positive externalities of agriculture, conducting joint research and development, supporting agricultural technology dissemination, enhancing food safety and quality, facilitating market oriented trade and developing food markets and related infrastructure, reducing post-harvest losses along the entire food supply chain, improving access to food for vulnerable groups of the population, including those facing an emergency due to natural and anthropogenic disasters, and working towards sustainable management of ocean and marine ecosystems and combating illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing and associated trade.例文帳に追加

我々は，２０１２年５月にロシアのカザンで開催された第２回食料安全保障担当大臣会合における，ＡＰＥＣの食料安全保障に関するカザン宣言の承認を歓迎し，開かれた透明な市場の促進，持続可能な農業生産の増大及び生産性の向上，世界の環境条件の多様性及び農業の正の外部経済の考慮，共同の研究及び開発の実施，農業技術普及の支援，食品の安全性及び質の向上，市場を志向した貿易の円滑化，食料市場及び関連インフラの開発，食料サプライチェーン全体を通じた収穫後ロスの削減，自然災害及び人為的災害により緊急事態に直面する人々を含む，脆弱層における食料へのアクセス向上，海洋生態系の持続可能な管理に向けた作業，違法・無報告・無規制（ＩＵＵ）漁業及びそれに関連する貿易の阻止を通じて，食料安全保障を強化するＡＰＥＣ食料安全保障担当大臣によりなされたコミットメントを再確認する。 - 経済産業省

A person who, at the time of the enforcement of this Act, has been an official (excluding a chairperson and a member of councils, etc. set forth in Article 8 of the National Government Organization Act [Act No. 120 of 1948], a member of the Central Disaster Prevention Council, a chairperson and a member of the Japanese Industrial Standards Committee, and those specified as similar persons by a Cabinet Order) of the prior and existing Prime Minister’s Office, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Education, the Ministry of Health and Welfare, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of International Trade and Industry, the Ministry of Transport, the Ministry of Posts and Telecommunications, the Ministry of Labor, the Ministry of Construction or the Ministry of Home Affairs (hereinafter referred to as a "Prior and Existing Ministry or Agency" in this Article) shall, unless an appointment is announced separately, become a relevant official of the Cabinet Office, the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications, the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Finance, the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport, or the Ministry of the Environment after the enforcement of this Act (hereinafter referred to as a "New Ministry or Agency" in this Article), or a department or organization established thereunder, which is specified by a Cabinet Order as the New Office or Ministry or the department or organization established thereunder that corresponds to the Former Office or Ministry or the department or organization established thereunder to which said official belongs at the time of the enforcement of this Act, with the same working conditions. 例文帳に追加

この法律の施行の際現に従前の総理府、法務省、外務省、大蔵省、文部省、厚生省、農林水産省、通商産業省、運輸省、郵政省、労働省、建設省又は自治省（以下この条において「従前の府省」という。）の職員（国家行政組織法（昭和二十三年法律第百二十号）第八条の審議会等の会長又は委員長及び委員、中央防災会議の委員、日本工業標準調査会の会長及び委員並びに これらに類する者として政令で定めるものを除く。）である者は、別に辞令を発せられない限り、同一の勤務条件をもって、この法律の施行後の内閣府、総務省、法務省、外務省、財務省、文部科学省、厚生労働省、農林水産省、経済産業省、国土交通省若しくは環境省（以下この条において「新府省」という。）又はこれに置かれる部局若しくは機関のうち、この法律の施行の際現に当該職員が属する従前の府省又はこれに置かれる部局若しくは機関の相当の新府省又はこれに置かれる部局若しくは機関として政令で定めるものの相当の職員となるものとする。 - 経済産業省

Concretely, the following analyses and discussions are made in the White Paper. (1) In Chapter 1, the globalization of the economy, mainly by increased international capital movement, was described by surveying the trend in the international economy and analyzing the expansion of international current account imbalances, together with the new trend in petromoney caused by higher crude oil prices. (2) In Chapter 2, after surveying the dynamism of Asia, an analysis was made from multilayered points of view, including macro and micro perspectives on the formation of international business networks by Japanese companies, which are creating a “horizontal” Asia in terms of both division of labor and trade. Conditions in China and ASEAN, which have become important business partners in the process of the formation of international business networks, were also analyzed. (3) Based upon the results of these researches and analyses, in Chapter 3, discussions were made about four issues: promoting the improvement of the international business environment through the liberalization, harmonization and stabilization of fields for corporate activities; shortening “business cost distance” between business bases; expanding inward direct investment in Japan which will be accompanied by improved productivity, and realizing an “investment powerhouse” through fostering and utilizing human resources with a “dual-track” structure.例文帳に追加

具体的には、①　第１章において、国際経済の動向を概観した上で、国際的な経常収支不均衡の拡大や原油価格上昇に伴う新たなオイルマネーの動向の分析等を通じて、国際資本移動の活発化を中心とした経済のグローバル化の姿を描き、②　第２章において、アジアのダイナミズムを概観した上で、日本企業による国際事業ネットワーク形成が分業面・貿易面において、いわば「水平的」なアジアを創出しつつある状況をミクロからマクロにわたる複層的な視点から分析するとともに、国際事業ネットワーク形成に際して重要な進出先となっている中国とASEANの状況を分析し、③　第３章において、以上の調査分析を踏まえて、企業活動の場（フィールド）の自由化・調和・安定化と事業拠点間を結ぶ「ビジネスコスト距離」の短縮等を通じた国際事業環境整備の推進、生産性向上を伴う我が国への対内直接投資の拡大、人的資本の育成・活用、「複線的」構造に立脚した「投資立国」の実現、という４つの取組について論じた。 - 経済産業省

In light of actual conditions of the foods, etc. imported into Japan (hereinafter referred to as“the imported foods”), in FY 2007, the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (hereinafterreferred to as “the MHLW”) and quarantine stations reinforced the import inspections such asmonitoring inspection based on the provision of Article 28 of the Food Sanitation Law (Law No.233 of 1947; hereinafter referred to as “the Law”), or inspection orders based on the provisionof Article 26 of the Law by means of expanding the inspection items, etc. for the steadyimplementation of the so-called “Positive List system” that prohibits in principle sales of foodscontaining agricultural chemicals, veterinary drugs or feedstuff additives (hereinafter referred toas “the agricultural chemicals, etc.”) that have no established residual standards over theamounts defined as posing no potential risks to human health.They also requested thepromotion of sanitation measures to be taken by the exporting countries that were mainlyresponsible for cases that violated Article 11 of the Law concerning residual agriculturalchemicals, etc. in order to prompt exporting countries to take appropriate sanitation measures.Moreover, they conducted on-site inspections on sanitation control in exporting countries withrelation to bovine spongiform encephalopathy (hereinafter referred to as “BSE”), etc.例文帳に追加

これら我が国に輸入される食品等（以下「輸入食品等」という。）の現状を踏まえ、平成19年度において、厚生労働省本省（以下「本省」という。）及び検疫所は、残留基準が設定されていない農薬、動物用医薬品又は飼料添加物（以下「農薬等」という。）が、人の健康を損なうおそれのない量として定められる量を超えて残留する食品の販売等が原則禁止されるいわゆるポジティブリスト制度(以下「ポジティブリスト制度」という。）の着実な施行のため、輸入時の検査項目の拡充を図るなど、食品衛生法（昭和22年法律第233号。以下「法」という。）第28条の規定に基づくモニタリング検査や法第26条の規定に基づく検査命令等の輸入時における監視指導を強化するとともに、輸出国における衛生対策の適正化を推進するため、残留農薬等に係る法第11条違反等の事例が多い輸出国を中心に衛生対策の推進を求めたほか、牛海綿状脳症（以下「BSE」という。）等に係る輸出国の衛生管理についても現地調査を行った。 - 厚生労働省

(iii) A person who has been sentenced to a penalty for having violated the provisions of this Act, the Companies Act or the Act on General Incorporated Association and General Incorporated Foundation (Act No. 48 of 2006), or for having committed: a crime under Article 197 (Crime of False Statement in Securities Registration Report, etc.), Article 197-2, items (i) to (x) inclusive or (xiii) (Crime of Solicitation of Securities by Unregistered Agents. etc.), Article 198, item (viii) (Crime of Violating Prohibition Order or Order for Suspension by Court), Article 199 (Crime of Refusal of Reporting, etc.), Article 200, items (i) to (xii) inclusive or item (xxi) (Crime of Non-Submission of Correction Report, etc.), Article 203, paragraph (3) (Bribery of Officer or Staff of Financial Instruments Business Operators, etc.) or Article 205, items (i) to (vi) inclusive, item (xvi) or (xx) (Crime of Non-Submission of Written Notice, etc. on Specified Solicitation, etc.) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act; a crime under Article 549 (Crime of Fraudulent Reorganization), Article 550 (Crime of Giving Security, etc. to Specific Creditor, etc.), Article 552 to 555 inclusive (Crime of Refusal to Report or Undergo Investigation, etc., Crime of Destruction of Materials Regarding Conditions of Business and Property, etc., Crime of Obstruction of Duties Against Trustee in Bankruptcy, etc.) or Article 557 (Bribery) of the Act on Special Measures, etc. concerning Reorganization Proceedings for Financial Institutions, etc. (Act No. 95 of 1996); a crime under Article 255 (Crime of Fraudulent Rehabilitation), Article 256 (Crime of Giving Security to Specific Creditor, etc.), Article 258 to 260 inclusive (Crime of Refusal to Report or Undergo Investigation, etc., Crime of Destruction of Materials Regarding Conditions of Business and Property, etc., Crime of Obstruction of Duties Against Supervising Commissioner, etc.) or Article 262 (Bribery) of the Civil Rehabilitation Act (Act No. 225 of 1999); a crime under Article 65 (Crime of Refusal of Reporting or Investigation, etc.), Article 66 (Crime of Obstruction of Duties Against Recognition Trustee, etc.), Article 68 (Bribery) or Article 69 (Crime of Disposition or Export of Property without Permission) of the Act on Recognition and Assistance for Foreign Insolvency Procedures (Act No. 129 of 2000); a crime under Article 265 (Crime of Fraudulent Bankruptcy), Article 266 (Crime of Giving Security to Specific Creditor, etc.), Article 268 to 272 inclusive (Crime of Refusal of Explanation or Investigation, etc., Crime of Refusing to Disclose Important Property, etc., Crime of Destruction of Materials Regarding Conditions of Business and Property, etc., Crime of Refusal of Explanation in Hearing, etc., Crime of Obstruction of Duties Against Bankruptcy Trustee, etc.), or Article 274 (Bribery) of the Bankruptcy Act (Act No. 75 of 2004), for whom two years have not elapsed since the day on which the execution of the sentence was completed or the sentence ceased to be applied; or 例文帳に追加

三　この法律、会社法若しくは一般社団法人及び一般財団法人に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四十八号）の規定に違反し、又は金融商品取引法第百九十七条（有価証券届出書虚偽記載等の罪）、第百九十七条の二第一号から第十号まで若しくは第十三号（有価証券の無届募集等の罪）、第百九十八条第八号（裁判所の禁止又は停止命令違反の罪）、第百九十九条（報告拒絶等の罪）、第二百条第一号から第十二号まで、第二十号若しくは第二十一号（訂正届出書の不提出等の罪）、第二百三条第三項（金融商品取引業者等の役職員に対する贈賄罪）若しくは第二百五条第一号から第六号まで、第十九号若しくは第二十号（特定募集等の通知書の不提出等の罪）の罪、金融機関等の更生手続の特例等に関する法律（平成八年法律第九十五号）第五百四十九条（詐欺更生罪）、第五百五十条（特定の債権者等に対する担保の供与等の罪）、第五百五十二条から第五百五十五条まで（報告及び検査の拒絶等の罪、業務及び財産の状況に関する物件の隠滅等の罪、管財人等に対する職務妨害の罪）若しくは第五百五十七条（贈賄罪）の罪、民事再生法（平成十一年法律第二百二十五号）第二百五十五条（詐欺再生罪）、第二百五十六条（特定の債権者に対する担保の供与等の罪）、第二百五十八条から第二百六十条まで（報告及び検査の拒絶等の罪、業務及び財産の状況に関する物件の隠滅等の罪、監督委員等に対する職務妨害の罪）若しくは第二百六十二条（贈賄罪）の罪、外国倒産処理手続の承認援助に関する法律（平成十二年法律第百二十九号）第六十五条（報告及び検査の拒絶等の罪）、第六十六条（承認管財人等に対する職務妨害の罪）、第六十八条（贈賄罪）若しくは第六十九条（財産の無許可処分及び国外への持出しの罪）の罪若しくは破産法（平成十六年法律第七十五号）第二百六十五条（詐欺破産罪）、第二百六十六条（特定の債権者に対する担保の供与等の罪）、第二百六十八条から第二百七十二条まで（説明及び検査の拒絶等の罪、重要財産開示拒絶等の罪、業務及び財産の状況に関する物件の隠滅等の罪、審尋における説明拒絶等の罪、破産管財人等に対する職務妨害の罪）若しくは第二百七十四条（贈賄罪）の罪を犯し、刑に処せられ、その執行を終わり、又はその執行を受けることがなくなった日から二年を経過しない者 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

5. For the purposes of applying this Convention: a) an item of income: (i) derived from a Contracting State through an entity that is organised in the other Contracting State; and (ii) treated as the income of the beneficiaries, members or participants of that entity under the tax laws of that other Contracting State; shall be eligible for the benefits of the Convention that would be granted if it were directly derived by a beneficiary, member or participant of that entity who is a resident of that other Contracting State, to the extent that such beneficiaries, members or participants are residents of that other Contracting State and satisfy any other conditions specified in the Convention, without regard to whether the income is treated as the income of such beneficiaries, members or participants under the tax laws of the first-mentioned Contracting State; b) an item of income: (i) derived from a Contracting State through an entity that is organised in the other Contracting State; and (ii) treated as the income of that entity under the tax laws of that other Contracting State; shall be eligible for the benefits of the Convention that would be granted to a resident of that other Contracting State, without regard to whether the income is treated as the income of the entity under the tax laws of the first-mentioned Contracting State, if such entity is a resident of that other Contracting State and satisfies any other conditions specified in the Convention; c) an item of income: (i) derived from a Contracting State through an entity that is organised in a state other than the Contracting States; and (ii) treated as the income of the beneficiaries, members or participants of that entity under the tax laws of the other Contracting State and under the tax laws of the state where the entity is organised; shall be eligible for the benefits of the Convention that would be granted if it were directly derived by a beneficiary, member or participant of that entity who is a resident of that other Contracting State, to the extent that such beneficiaries, members or participants are residents of that other Contracting State and satisfy any other conditions specified in the Convention, without regard to whether the income is treated as the income of such beneficiaries, members or participants under the tax laws of the first-mentioned Contracting State, provided that the state where the entity is organised has concluded with the first-mentioned Contracting State a convention which contains provisions for effective exchange of information on tax matters; d) an item of income: (i) derived from a Contracting State through an entity that is organised in a state other than the Contracting States; and (ii) treated as the income of that entity under the tax laws of the other Contracting State; shall not be eligible for the benefits of the Convention; and e) an item of income: (i) derived from a Contracting State through an entity that is organised in that Contracting State; and (ii) treated as the income of that entity under the tax laws of the other Contracting State; shall not be eligible for the benefits of the Convention. 例文帳に追加

５この条約の適用上、(a)一方の締約国内から取得される所得であって、(i)他方の締約国において組織された団体を通じて取得され、かつ、(ii)当該他方の締約国の租税に関する法令に基づき当該団体の受益者、構成員又は参加者の所得として取り扱われるものに対しては、当該一方の締約国の租税に関する法令に基づき当該受益者、構成員又は参加者の所得として取り扱われるか否かにかかわらず、当該他方の締約国の居住者である当該受益者、構成員又は参加者（この条約に別に定める要件を満たすものに限る。）の所得として取り扱われる部分についてのみ、この条約の特典（当該受益者、構成員又は参加者が直接に取得したものとした場合に認められる特典に限る。）が与えられる。(b)一方の締約国内から取得される所得であって、(i)他方の締約国において組織された団体を通じて取得され、かつ、(ii)当該他方の締約国の租税に関する法令に基づき当該団体の所得として取り扱われるものに対しては、当該一方の締約国の租税に関する法令に基づき当該団体の所得として取り扱われるか否かにかかわらず、当該団体が当該他方の締約国の居住者であり、かつ、この条約に別に定める要件を満たす場合にのみ、この条約の特典（当該他方の締約国の居住者が取得したものとした場合に認められる特典に限る。）が与えられる。(c)一方の締約国内から取得される所得であって、(i)両締約国以外の国において組織された団体を通じて取得され、かつ、(ii)他方の締約国及び当該団体が組織された国の租税に関する法令に基づき当該団体の受益者、構成員又は参加者の所得として取り扱われるものに対しては、当該一方の締約国の租税に関する法令に基づき当該受益者、構成員又は参加者の所得として取り扱われるか否かにかかわらず、当該他方の締約国の居住者である当該受益者、構成員又は参加者（この条約に別に定める要件を満たすものに限る。）の所得として取り扱われる部分についてのみ、この条約の特典（当該受益者、構成員又は参加者が直接に取得したものとした場合に認められる特典に限る。）が与えられる。ただし、当該団体が組織された国が当該一方の締約国と租税に係る実効的な情報の交換に関する規定を有する条約を締結している場合に限る。(d)一方の締約国内から取得される所得であって、(i)両締約国以外の国において組織された団体を通じて取得され、かつ、(ii)他方の締約国の租税に関する法令に基づき当該団体の所得として取り扱われるものに対しては、この条約の特典は与えられない。(e)一方の締約国内から取得される所得であって、(i)当該一方の締約国において組織された団体を通じて取得され、かつ、(ii)他方の締約国の租税に関する法令に基づき当該団体の所得として取り扱われるものに対しては、この条約の特典は与えられない。 - 財務省

Article 250 (1) In addition to the minor modifications prescribed in Article 135, paragraph (4) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 210, paragraph (1) and Article 272-29) made to the contract set forth in Article 135, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 210, paragraph (1) and Article 272-29), an Insurance Company, etc., or Foreign Insurance Company, etc., may, in the cases that fall under the following listed cases, prescribe a reduction in the amount of insurance claims and any other modifications to contract clauses with regard to insurance contracts (excluding specified contracts) that will be transferred pursuant to that contract (excluding said minor modifications, that reduce the policy reserves that should be reserved from Insurance Premiums received after the time of the public notice, etc., prescribed in paragraph (3), item (i) with regard to Covered Insurance Contracts other than specified Covered Insurance Contracts (referred to as Covered Insurance Contracts prescribed in Article 270, paragraph (3), item (i)), and modifications that will establish disadvantageous content relating to cancellation refunds or any other similar benefits specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance or Ordinance of the Ministry of Finance that accrue after the time of the public notice, etc., prescribed in that item with regard to specified Covered Insurance Contracts compared to other insurance claims or any other benefits pertaining to said specified Covered Insurance Contracts; hereinafter referred to in this Subsection as "Modifications to Contract Conditions"): 例文帳に追加

第二百五十条　保険会社等又は外国保険会社等は、次に掲げる場合に該当する場合には、第百三十五条第一項（第二百十条第一項及び第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する場合を含む。）の契約において、第百三十五条第四項（第二百十条第一項及び第二百七十二条の二十九において準用する場合を含む。）に規定する軽微な変更のほか、当該契約により移転するものとされる保険契約（特定契約を除く。）について保険金額の削減その他の契約条項の変更（当該軽微な変更、特定補償対象契約以外の補償対象契約（第二百七十条の三第二項第一号に規定する補償対象契約をいう。）について第三項第一号に規定する公告等の時以後に収受した保険料により積み立てるべき責任準備金を減額する変更及び特定補償対象契約について同号に規定する公告等の時以後に発生する解約返戻金その他これに類するものとして内閣府令・財務省令で定める給付金に関しこれら以外の当該特定補償対象契約に係る保険金その他の給付金に比して不利な内容を定める変更を除く。以下この款において「契約条件の変更」という。）を定めることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1-2-13 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation (referring to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation set forth in Article 265-37, paragraph (1); the same shall apply hereafter in this Article, as well as in the following Article and Article 1-2-15 of the Supplementary Provisions) was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) by 31 March 2003 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Specified Members" in Article 1-2-15, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing unexpected disruptions in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the total amount of such costs exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the activities to be specified by a Cabinet Order (referred to as "Specified Activities" in the following paragraph, the following Article and Article 1-2-15 of the Supplementary Provisions) within the amount prescribed by the budget. 例文帳に追加

第一条の二の十三　政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構（第二百六十五条の三十七第一項に規定する生命保険契約者保護機構をいう。以下この条、次条及び附則第一条の二の十五において同じ。）がその会員（平成十五年三月三十一日までに第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。附則第一条の二の十五第一項において「特定会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に不測の混乱を生じさせるおそれがあると認める場合（当該費用の合計額が政令で定める額を超えた場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（政令で定める業務（次項、次条及び附則第一条の二の十五において「特定業務」という。）に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 1-2-14 (1) The Government may, when it finds that if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation was to cover the costs of Financial Assistance and other activities pertaining to its members (limited to those subject to the disposition ordering administration under Article 242, paragraph (1) between 1 April 2006 and 31 March 2009 and any other members to be specified by a Cabinet Order; referred to as "Members under Special Provisions" in paragraph (3) of the following Article) solely with the assessments paid by the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation pursuant to the provision of Article 265-33, paragraph (1), the financial conditions of the members of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation would deteriorate significantly, making it difficult to maintain the credibility of the insurance industry and hence posing the risk of causing serious consequences in the lives of the citizenry and the financial market (limited to the cases where the sum total of the amount of outstanding debts of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation as of the date specified by a Cabinet Order and the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order as the amount of additional debts to be incurred if the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation should have to finance such costs through borrowings exceeds the amount to be specified by a Cabinet Order taking into consideration the long-term balance of payments of the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation), provide assistance to the Life Insurance Policyholders Protection Corporation in an amount corresponding to the whole or part of such costs (limited to those required for the Specified Activities) within the amount prescribed by the budget. 例文帳に追加

第一条の二の十四　政府は、生命保険契約者保護機構がその会員（平成十八年四月一日から平成二十一年三月三十一日までの間に第二百四十二条第一項に規定する管理を命ずる処分を受けたものその他政令で定めるものに限る。次条第三項において「特例会員」という。）に係る資金援助その他の業務に要した費用を第二百六十五条の三十三第一項の規定により当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員が納付する負担金のみで賄うとしたならば、当該生命保険契約者保護機構の会員の財務の状況を著しく悪化させることにより保険業に対する信頼性の維持が困難となり、ひいては国民生活又は金融市場に極めて重大な支障が生じるおそれがあると認める場合（政令で定める日における当該生命保険契約者保護機構の借入残高に、当該生命保険契約者保護機構が当該費用を借入れにより賄うとした場合の当該借入れの額として政令で定める額を加えた額が当該生命保険契約者保護機構の長期的な収支を勘案して政令で定める額を超える場合に限る。）には、予算で定める金額の範囲内において、当該生命保険契約者保護機構に対し、当該費用（特定業務に要したものに限る。）の全部又は一部に相当する金額を補助することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(18) For the purpose of applying the provision of Part II, Chapter X, Section 2 of the New Insurance Business Act to the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, the term "In the case set forth in paragraph (1), an Insurance Company, etc." and the term "a Foreign Insurance Company, etc.," in Article 250, paragraph (4) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case of paragraph (1), an Insurance Company, etc. (excluding the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act on Partial Revision of the Insurance Business Act, etc. (Act No. 38 of 2005).)" and "a Foreign Insurance Company, etc. (including the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of that Act.)," respectively; the term "The Insurance Company, etc., set forth in paragraph (1)" and the term "the purpose of the meeting" in Article 254, paragraph (3) of the New Insurance Business Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "In the case of paragraph (1), the Insurance Company, etc. (excluding the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider (referring to the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider prescribed in Article 15, paragraph (3) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act on Partial Revision of the Insurance Business Act, etc.; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph.).)" and "the purpose of the meeting; the Specified Small Amount and Short Term Insurance Provider, etc. shall, on the date of issue of the merger agreements, make public notice to the effect that contracts that contain said Modifications of Contract Conditions have been issued." 例文帳に追加

１８　特定少額短期保険業者に対する新保険業法第二編第十章第二節の規定の適用については、新保険業法第二百五十条第四項中「第一項の場合において、保険会社等」とあるのは「第一項の場合において、保険会社等（保険業法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十七年法律第三十八号）附則第十五条第三項に規定する特定少額短期保険業者を除く。）」と、「外国保険会社等」とあるのは「外国保険会社等（同法附則第十五条第三項に規定する特定少額短期保険業者を含む。）」と、新保険業法第二百五十四条第三項中「第一項の保険会社等は、」とあるのは「第一項の場合において、保険会社等（特定少額短期保険業者（保険業法等の一部を改正する法律附則第十五条第三項に規定する特定少額短期保険業者をいう。以下この項において同じ。）を除く。）にあっては」と、「目的となっている旨を」とあるのは「目的となっている旨を、特定少額短期保険業者にあっては合併契約書の作成日において、当該契約条件の変更を含む合併契約書が作成された旨を、それぞれ」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 3 Concerning the payment of patent fees to be paid pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 107 of the Patent Act, the fees to be paid pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1 or paragraph 2 of Article 195 of the same Act, or the fees to be paid pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 1 of Article 40 of the Act on Special Provisions of Procedures, etc. concerning Industrial Property Rights, with respect to patent rights or the right to receive a patent (limited to those listed in the items of paragraph 1 of Article 3 of the Supplementary Provisions of Industrial Technology Enhancement Act (Act No. 44 of 2000)) or to patent rights obtained based on the right to receive said patent (limited to those pertaining to patent application filed on or before March 31, 2007 (excluding those filed on or after April 1 of the same year, but deemed, pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 44 of the Patent Act (including those cases that paragraph 5 of Article 46 of the same Act apply mutatis mutandis thereto), to have been filed on or before March 31 of the same year)), the assignment of which rights having been received by an Accredited TLO from a National University Corporation (referring to a National University Corporation provided in paragraph 1 of Article 2 of the National University Corporation Act), an Inter-University Research Institute Corporation (referring to an Inter-University Research Institute Corporation provided in paragraph 3 of the same Article), or from a Institute of National Colleges of Technology [Incorporated Administrative Agency], and said rights belonging to the Accredited TLO, under these conditions the Accredited TLO shall be deemed to be the State and the provisions of paragraph 2 of Article 107, paragraph 4 and paragraph 5 of Article 195 of the Patent Act as well as paragraph 3 and paragraph 4 of Article 40 of the Act on Special Provisions for Procedures, etc. concerning Industrial Property Rights shall be applied. 例文帳に追加

第三条　承認事業者が国立大学法人（国立大学法人法第二条第一項に規定する国立大学法人をいう。）、大学共同利用機関法人（同条第三項に規定する大学共同利用機関法人をいう。）又は独立行政法人国立高等専門学校機構から譲渡を受けた特許権若しくは特許を受ける権利（産業技術力強化法（平成十二年法律第四十四号）附則第三条第一項各号に掲げるものに限る。）又は当該特許を受ける権利に基づいて取得した特許権（平成十九年三月三十一日までにされた特許出願（同年四月一日以後にする特許出願であって、特許法第四十四条第二項（同法第四十六条第五項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により同年三月三十一日までにしたものとみなされるものを除く。）に係るものに限る。）であって承認事業者に属するものについて特許法第百七条第一項の規定により納付すべき特許料、同法第百九十五条第一項若しくは第二項の規定により納付すべき手数料又は工業所有権に関する手続等の特例に関する法律第四十条第一項の規定により納付すべき手数料の納付については、承認事業者を国とみなして特許法第百七条第二項、第百九十五条第四項及び第五項並びに工業所有権に関する手続等の特例に関する法律第四十条第三項及び第四項の規定を適用する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

By way of supporting the development of the manufacturing industry, which is Japan's fundamental industry, core manufacturing technology has contributed to the development of all areas of the national economy such as expansion of production, promotion of trade, creation of new industries, and increase in employment, and has contributed to improving the lives of the citizenry. In addition, workers engaged in operations pertaining to core manufacturing technology have played an important role in maintaining and improving the level of the technology in their capacity as supporters of such core manufacturing technology. We believe that the economic and social role of such core manufacturing technology and workers who engage in operations pertaining thereto will continue to be an important element in the foundation of the existence of the State in the future. Recently, however, due to changes in the employment structure, changes in competitive conditions resulting from factors like the progress of industrialization overseas, and other diverse and structural changes in the economy, the share of the manufacturing industry in Japan's gross domestic product has fallen, and concerns about a decline in the industry have grown, and the smooth succession of core manufacturing technology is becoming difficult. In order to deal with such a situation and to maintain the sound development of Japan's national economy through the development of the manufacturing industry, which is a fundamental to the State, that the active promotion of core manufacturing technology is indispensable, while a social tendency to respect abilities related to core manufacturing technology is enhanced. We hereby establish this Act so as to drive forward measures for the promotion of core manufacturing technology in a comprehensive and organized manner. 例文帳に追加

ものづくり基盤技術は、我が国の基幹的な産業である製造業の発展を支えることにより、生産の拡大、貿易の振興、新産業の創出、雇用の増大等国民経済のあらゆる領域にわたりその発展に寄与するとともに、国民生活の向上に貢献してきた。また、ものづくり基盤技術に係る業務に従事する労働者は、このようなものづくり基盤技術の担い手として、その水準の維持及び向上のために重要な役割を果たしてきた。我らは、このようなものづくり基盤技術及びこれに係る業務に従事する労働者の果たす経済的社会的役割が、国の存立基盤を形成する重要な要素として、今後においても変わることのないことを確信する。しかるに、近時、就業構造の変化、海外の地域における工業化の進展等による競争条件の変化その他の経済の多様かつ構造的な変化による影響を受け、国内総生産に占める製造業の割合が低下し、その衰退が懸念されるとともに、ものづくり基盤技術の継承が困難になりつつある。このような事態に対処して、我が国の国民経済が国の基幹的な産業である製造業の発展を通じて今後とも健全に発展していくためには、ものづくり基盤技術に関する能力を尊重する社会的気運を醸成しつつ、ものづくり基盤技術の積極的な振興を図ることが不可欠である。ここに、ものづくり基盤技術の振興に関する施策を総合的かつ計画的に推進するため、この法律を制定する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 63 (1) With respect to the permission or the approval on business commencement for a designated fishery, the provisions of paragraph (1), Article 34 (Restrictions or Conditions of Fishery Right), Article 35 (Notification of Absence from Work), paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of Article 37, paragraph (1), paragraph (2), paragraph (6) through paragraph (10) and paragraph (13) through paragraph (15) of Article 39 (Rescission of Fishery Right) and Article 12 (Measures for Fishery Employees) of the Aquatic Resources Conservation Act (Act No. 313 of 1951) shall apply mutatis mutandis. In this case, "the Governor concerned" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister"; "when granting a license, if he/she finds it necessary for ... other public interest" in paragraph (1), Article 34, with "when he/she finds it necessary for ...other public interest"; "fisheries adjustment" in paragraph (1), Article 39, with "the protection of reproduction of aquatic animals and plants, fisheries adjustment"; "the prefectural government concerned" in paragraph (6), paragraph (10) and paragraph (13) of the same Article, with "the national government"; "the Governor concerned, after he/she hears the opinions of the Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission concerned" in paragraph (8) of the same Article, with "the Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries Minister"; "paragraph (10), paragraph (2), Article 34 (Consultation with the Sea-area Fisheries Adjustment Commission) and paragraph (4), Article 37 (Hearing of Opinions)" in paragraph (14) of the same Article, with "paragraph (10)"; "the disposition for nonpayment of local tax" in paragraph (15) of the same Article, with "the disposition for nonpayment of national tax"; "paragraph (5), Article 10" in Article 12 of the same Act, with "paragraph (1), Article 39 of the Fisheries Act applied mutatis mutandis in Article 63 of the same Act"; and "the day of the public notice of paragraph (4) of the same Article," with "the day when the permission is rescinded." 例文帳に追加

第六十三条　指定漁業の許可又は起業の認可に関しては、第三十四条第一項（漁業権の制限又は条件）、第三十五条（休業の届出）、第三十七条第一項及び第二項、第三十九条第一項、第二項、第六項から第十項まで及び第十三項から第十五項まで（漁業権の取消し）並びに水産資源保護法（昭和二十六年法律第三百十三号）第十二条（漁業従事者に対する措置）の規定を準用する。この場合において、「都道府県知事」とあるのは「農林水産大臣」と、第三十四条第一項中「公益上必要があると認めるときは、免許をするにあたり、」とあるのは「公益上必要があると認めるときは、」と、第三十九条第一項中「漁業調整」とあるのは「水産動植物の繁殖保護、漁業調整」と、同条第六項、第十項及び第十三項中「都道府県」とあるのは「国」と、同条第八項中「都道府県知事が海区漁業調整委員会の意見を聴いて」とあるのは「農林水産大臣が」と、同条第十四項中「第十項、第三十四条第二項（海区漁業調整委員会への諮問）並びに第三十七条第四項（意見の聴取）」とあるのは「第十項」と、同条第十五項中「地方税の滞納処分」とあるのは「国税滞納処分」と、同法第十二条中「第十条第五項」とあるのは「漁業法第六十三条において準用する同法第三十九条第一項」と、「同条第四項の告示の日」とあるのは「その許可の取消しの日」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) With regard to the application of the provisions of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution, in cases where a Financial Institution Engaged in Trust Business invests the trust property of an Investment Trust Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor, the phrase "and the provisions Article 42-2 and Article 44-3, paragraph (2) (excluding item (ii)) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall apply mutatis mutandis to business for investing the trust property of an Investment Trust Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor as prescribed in Article 2, paragraph (2) of the Act on Investment Trusts and Investment Corporations operated by a financial institution, respectively" shall be added after the term "(meaning the Specific Trust Agreement prescribed in Article 24-2 of the Trust Business Act)" in Article 2-2 of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution, the phrases "in these provisions," "Article 34 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act," and "in Article 39, paragraph (4) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act" in Article 2-2 of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution shall be deemed to be replaced with "in these provisions (excluding the provisions of Article 42-2 of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act)," "Article 34 of the Trust Business Act" and "in Article 39, paragraph (4) and Article 42-2, item (vi) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act" respectively, and the phrase ", the term 'giving advice to conduct a transaction that is unnecessary in light of the transaction policy, the amount of the transaction, or the market conditions regarding the Investment Advisory Business, or the Investment Management Business that does so' in Article 44-3, paragraph (2), item (iii) of the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act shall be deemed to be replaced with 'or making an investment to conduct a transaction with regard to business for conducting investment of the trust property of an Investment Trust Managed Without Instructions from the Settlor' " shall be added after the phrase "a Financial Institution (meaning a Financial Institution as prescribed in Article 1, paragraph (1) of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution)" in Article 2-2 of the Act on Concurrent Operation of Trust Business by a Financial Institution. 例文帳に追加

６　信託業務を営む金融機関が委託者非指図型投資信託の信託財産の運用を行う場合における金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律の規定の適用については、同法第二条の二中「、金融機関」とあるのは「金融機関」と、「準用する。」とあるのは「、金融商品取引法第四十二条の二及び第四十四条の三第二項（第二号を除く。）の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則を含む。）は金融機関が行う投資信託及び投資法人に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する委託者非指図型投資信託の信託財産の運用を行う業務について、それぞれ準用する。」と、「これらの規定中」とあるのは「これらの規定（金融商品取引法第四十二条の二の規定を除く。）中」と、「金融商品取引法第三十四条」とあるのは「同法第三十四条」と、「同条第四項中」とあるのは「同条第四項及び同法第四十二条の二第六号中」と、「「金融機関（金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項に規定する金融機関をいう。）の責めに帰すべき事故」」とあるのは「「金融機関（金融機関の信託業務の兼営等に関する法律第一条第一項に規定する金融機関をいう。）の責めに帰すべき事故」と、同法第四十四条の三第二項第三号中「投資助言業務に関して取引の方針、取引の額若しくは市場の状況に照らして不必要な取引を行うことを内容とした助言を行い、又はその行う投資運用業」とあるのは「委託者非指図型投資信託の信託財産の運用を行う業務」」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 9 (1) Where a seller or a Service Provider receives an application for entering into a sales contract for Designated Goods (excluding Designated Goods specified by a Cabinet Order as goods that are normally transacted by negotiating the conditions of sale between the seller and the purchaser over a reasonable period; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or Designated Rights or a Service Contract for Designated Services at a place other than its Place of Business, or where a seller or a Service Provider receives an application for entering into a sales contract for Designated Goods or Designated Rights or a Service Contract for Designated Services from a Specified Customer at its Place of Business, or where a seller or a Service Provider concludes a sales contract for Designated Goods or Designated Rights or a Service Contract for Designated Services at a place other than its Place of Business (except where the seller or the Service Provider has received an application at its Place of Business and concludes a sales contract or a Service Contract at a place other than its Place of Business) or where a seller or a Service Provider concludes a sales contract for Designated Goods or Designated Rights or a Service Contract for Designated Services with a Specified Customer at its Place of Business, the person who made such an application or the purchaser or the service recipient (hereinafter referred to as the "Purchasing Party" in this article and the following article) may withdraw such application for a sales contract or a Service Contract or rescind such sales contract or Service Contract (hereinafter referred to as the "Withdrawal/Rescission" in this article) in writing, except when: 例文帳に追加

第九条　販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が営業所等以外の場所において指定商品（その販売条件についての交渉が販売業者と購入者との間で相当の期間にわたり行われることが通常の取引の態様である商品として政令で定める指定商品を除く。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは指定権利若しくは指定役務につき売買契約若しくは役務提供契約の申込みを受けた場合若しくは販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が営業所等において特定顧客から指定商品若しくは指定権利若しくは指定役務につき売買契約若しくは役務提供契約の申込みを受けた場合におけるその申込みをした者又は販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が営業所等以外の場所において指定商品若しくは指定権利若しくは指定役務につき売買契約若しくは役務提供契約を締結した場合（営業所等において申込みを受け、営業所等以外の場所において売買契約又は役務提供契約を締結した場合を除く。）若しくは販売業者若しくは役務提供事業者が営業所等において特定顧客と指定商品若しくは指定権利若しくは指定役務につき売買契約若しくは役務提供契約を締結した場合におけるその購入者若しくは役務の提供を受ける者（以下この条及び次条において「申込者等」という。）は、次に掲げる場合を除き、書面によりその売買契約若しくは役務提供契約の申込みの撤回又はその売買契約若しくは役務提供契約の解除（以下この条において「申込みの撤回等」という。）を行うことができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24 The provisions of Article 20 of the Employment Security Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to Worker Dispatching Undertakings. In this case, in paragraph (1) of said Article, the term "The Public Employment Security Offices" shall be deemed to be replaced with "The dispatching business operator prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 23 of the Act for Securing the Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter simply referred to as a "dispatching business operator")" and the term "shall not introduce job seekers to a place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall not carry out Worker Dispatching prescribed in item (i) of Article 2 of the Worker Dispatching Act (hereinafter simply referred to as "Worker Dispatching") (where Worker Dispatching is actually carried out for the place of business at the time of said strike or lock-out, excluding said Worker Dispatching and arrangements equivalent thereto)"; in paragraph (2) of said Article, the term "unlimited introduction of job seekers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "unlimited Worker Dispatching", the term "the Public Employment Security Office shall not introduce job seekers to that place of business" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Public Employment Security Office shall notify the dispatching business operator to that effect, and the dispatching business operator, having received the notification, shall not carry out Worker Dispatching for the place of business concerned (where Worker Dispatching is actually carried out for the place of business at the time of the notification, excluding said Worker Dispatching and arrangements equivalent thereto)", the term "workers normally employed" shall be deemed to be replaced with "workers (including workers having been engaged in work under Worker Dispatching arrangements) normally employed", and the term "the introduction of workers" shall be deemed to be replaced with "the provision of Worker Dispatching services". 例文帳に追加

第二十四条　職業安定法第二十条の規定は、労働者派遣事業について準用する。この場合において、同条第一項中「公共職業安定所」とあるのは「労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第二十三条第一項に規定する派遣元事業主（以下単に「派遣元事業主」という。）」と、「事業所に、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「事業所に関し、労働者派遣法第二条第一号に規定する労働者派遣（以下単に「労働者派遣」という。）（当該同盟罷業又は作業所閉鎖の行われる際現に当該事業所に関し労働者派遣をしている場合にあつては、当該労働者派遣及びこれに相当するものを除く。）をしてはならない」と、同条第二項中「求職者を無制限に紹介する」とあるのは「無制限に労働者派遣がされる」と、「公共職業安定所は当該事業所に対し、求職者を紹介してはならない」とあるのは「公共職業安定所は、その旨を派遣元事業主に通報するものとし、当該通報を受けた派遣元事業主は、当該事業所に関し、労働者派遣（当該通報の際現に当該事業所に関し労働者派遣をしている場合にあつては、当該労働者派遣及びこれに相当するものを除く。）をしてはならない」と、「使用されていた労働者」とあるのは「使用されていた労働者（労働者派遣に係る労働に従事していた労働者を含む。）」と、「労働者を紹介する」とあるのは「労働者派遣をする」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 46 (1) With regard to a client undertaking involving dust work prescribed in item (iii) of paragraph (1) of Article 2 of the Pneumoconiosis Act (Act No. 30 of 1960) (hereinafter such work shall be referred to as "dust work" in this Article), to which workers are dispatched for dispatch work in said undertaking, the provisions of Articles 5 to 9-2 inclusive, Articles 11 to 14 inclusive, paragraph (3) of Article 15, Articles 16 to 17 inclusive and Article 35-2 of said Act (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall be applied to such undertaking, by deeming the person carrying out the client undertaking to be the business operator, as prescribed in item (v) of paragraph (1) of Article 2 of said Act, employing the workers under dispatching (limited to those who are or have been regularly engaged in dust work; hereinafter the same shall apply up to paragraph (4) and in paragraph (7)) (hereinafter such business operator shall be referred to simply as a "business operator" in this Article), and by deeming the workers under dispatching to be workers employed by the person carrying out the client undertaking concerned. In this case, the term "separation from employment" in paragraph (1) of Article 9-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "separation from employment (with regard to a worker under dispatching prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 46 of the Act for Securing Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act"), the termination of the provision of Worker Dispatching services, as prescribed in item (i) of Article 2 of the Worker Dispatching Act, pertaining to the worker under dispatching concerned; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph);" and the term "this Act" in Article 35-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "this Act (including the provisions of Article 46 of the Worker Dispatching Act)". 例文帳に追加

第四十六条　労働者がその事業における派遣就業のために派遣されている派遣先の事業で、じん肺法（昭和三十五年法律第三十号）第二条第一項第三号に規定する粉じん作業（以下この条において単に「粉じん作業」という。）に係るものに関しては、当該派遣先の事業を行う者を当該派遣中の労働者（当該派遣先の事業において、常時粉じん作業に従事している者及び常時粉じん作業に従業したことのある者に限る。以下第四項まで及び第七項において同じ。）を使用する同法第二条第一項第五号に規定する事業者（以下この条において単に「事業者」という。）と、当該派遣中の労働者を当該派遣先の事業を行う者に使用される労働者とみなして、同法第五条から第九条の二まで、第十一条から第十四条まで、第十五条第三項、第十六条から第十七条まで及び第三十五条の二の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則の規定を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第九条の二第一項中「、離職」とあるのは「、離職（労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十六条第一項に規定する派遣中の労働者については、当該派遣中の労働者に係る労働者派遣法第二条第一号に規定する労働者派遣の役務の提供の終了。以下この項において同じ。）」と、同法第三十五条の二中「この法律」とあるのは「この法律（労働者派遣法第四十六条の規定を含む。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) With regard to persons other than workers regularly engaged in dust work (excluding persons regularly engaged in work other than dust work in the client undertaking concerned), among those workers actually employed by a person carrying out a dispatching undertaking who have been regularly engaged in dust work in the client undertaking, the provisions of Articles 8 to 14 inclusive, paragraph (3) of Article 15, Articles 16 to 17 inclusive, Article 20-2, Article 22-2, and Article 35-2 of the Pneumoconiosis Act (including penal provisions pertaining to these provisions) shall apply, by deeming the person carrying out the dispatching undertaking to be the business operator. In this case, in Article 10 of the same Act, the term "A business operator may, where he or she has conducted a pneumoconiosis examination" shall be deemed to be replaced with "A person carrying out a dispatching undertaking prescribed in paragraph (3) of Article 44 of the Act for Securing Proper Operation of Worker Dispatching Undertakings and Improved Working Conditions for Dispatched Workers (hereinafter referred to as "the Worker Dispatching Act") (hereinafter such undertaking shall be referred to simply as a "dispatching undertaking") may, where he/she has conducted a pneumoconiosis examination for workers under dispatching prescribed in paragraph (1) of the same Article or for those who have been such workers under dispatching prescribed in the same paragraph" and the term "in paragraph (1) or (2) of Article 66 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act" shall be deemed to be replaced with "in paragraph (1) or (2) of Article 66 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act in the case of a person carrying out a dispatching undertaking and in paragraph (2) of Article 66 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act in the case of a person carrying out a client undertaking prescribed in paragraph (1) of Article 44 of the Worker Dispatching Act"; and the term "this Act" in Article 35-2 shall be deemed to be replaced with "this Act (including the provisions of Article 46 of the Worker Dispatching Act)". 例文帳に追加

６　派遣先の事業において常時粉じん作業に従事したことのある労働者であつて現に派遣元の事業を行う者に雇用されるもののうち、常時粉じん作業に従事する労働者以外の者（当該派遣先の事業において現に粉じん作業以外の作業に常時従事している者を除く。）については、当該派遣元の事業を行う者を事業者とみなして、じん肺法第八条から第十四条まで、第十五条第三項、第十六条から第十七条まで、第二十条の二、第二十二条の二及び第三十五条の二の規定（これらの規定に係る罰則の規定を含む。）を適用する。この場合において、同法第十条中「事業者は、じん肺健康診断を」とあるのは「労働者派遣事業の適正な運営の確保及び派遣労働者の就業条件の整備等に関する法律（以下「労働者派遣法」という。）第四十四条第三項に規定する派遣元の事業（以下単に「派遣元の事業」という。）を行う者が同条第一項に規定する派遣中の労働者又は同項に規定する派遣中の労働者であつた者に対してじん肺健康診断を」と、「労働安全衛生法第六十六条第一項又は第二項の」とあるのは「派遣元の事業を行う者にあつては労働安全衛生法第六十六条第一項又は第二項の、労働者派遣法第四十四条第一項に規定する派遣先の事業を行う者にあつては労働安全衛生法第六十六条第二項の」と、同法第三十五条の二中「この法律」とあるのは「この法律（労働者派遣法第四十六条の規定を含む。）」とする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Our teacher dedicated his life to the study requiring great pains; as to "Koshi-den", at the end of the Bunka era (1804-1818), he began to write the draft, and by the early Bunsei era (1818-1830), about 12 volumes had been completed; however, by that time, he had also gradually gained an insight into the study and understood the teachings of the master of Suzunoya (Norinaga MOTOORI), then he realized that this world was the product of our great gods of Japan, so he decided to suspend "Koshi-den" temporarily, and first explore and read through all the past annotations of the histories of our country as well as those of India and Europe to use new knowledge to his advantage in writing "Koshi-den"; therefore, since the middle of the Bunsei era, he intensly studied foreign literature and culture mainly, and during a period of over 20 years, he completed almost all his works, which he left for us, including "Sekiken Taiko-den" (Japanese Early History); although he was never satisfied with his works, his students, of course, including myself, with a feeling of gratitude, thought that our master had succeeded in completing most his researches and studies, and were concerned about the delay in completing "Koshi-den" and because of our master's age, we repeatedly begged him to restart the writing, then thankfully at about the 10th year of the Tenpo era (1839), he restarted; however, he was requested to write on linguistic methods so he began to write "Goju Ongi" (Pronunciation and Meaning of 50 Kana) and suspended "Koshi-den" again; after a year, he was banished to Akita Province by order of the former bakufu (Japanese feudal government headed by a shogun), fortunately since Akita was his hometown and there were many relatives of his, besides the former load treated him very kindly, they relieved him off poor living, although under those conditions, he had no time to finish the remaining works; he was always concerned about those unfinished works, and after only a few years, he became sick and regrettably died. 例文帳に追加

生涯苦心致され候中にも、古史伝は最初文化の末頃より草稿取り掛かり、文政の始め頃に、成文一二巻程は、ざっと稿本成り候ところ、段々見識博くあいなり、殊に故鈴屋大人の御遺教をも相伺れ候て、いよいよ以って、世界悉く我が皇大神達の御鎔造（ツクリカタメ）なされたる事を感得致され候に付、古史伝は先ず差し置き、赤縣州を始め、印度及び西洋の古伝をも悉く皆探索網羅して、其の上にて、充分に古史の註解をと存し込まれ候て、文政の半ば頃より、専ら外国の学に困苦致され、凡そ廿余年も歳月を過ごされ候て、赤縣太古傳を初め、即ち今此れある丈の著述は出来候へ共、中々もって先人の心底に叶ひ候事には此れ無く候へ共、大抵は見当も付き候に依っては、私を始め門人の中の所存にも、段々時節後れ、先人も老年に成られ候に付き、先ず先ず外国の所は大抵にして差し置かれ、古史伝の清撰をしきりて、相願い催促致し候て、天保10年頃より、漸々と其の方にも趣かれ候所、言語規則の書之無きに付き、余儀なく五十音義の撰にかかり、凡そ一ヵ年ほど打ち過ぎられ候所、旧幕府の命に依って秋田へ放逐、尤も同所は本国の事、親族共も少なからず、第一旧君侯より厚く恩遇も之有りて会計の辛苦は薄らぎ候へ共、著述致す可き遑なく、此処両三年心配致され候内に病を発し入幽致され候次第にて残念至極にて御座候。 - Wikipedia日英京都関連文書対訳コーパス

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. 例文帳に追加

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

an equivalent beneficiary is: (i) a resident of a state that has a convention for the avoidance of double taxation between that state and the Contracting State from which the benefits of this Convention are claimed such that: (aa) that convention contains provisions for effective exchange of information;(bb) that resident is a qualified person under limitation on benefits provisions(Tokuten Joko) in that convention or, where there are no such provisions in that convention, would be a qualified person when that convention is read as including provisions corresponding to paragraph 2 of this Article (or for the purposes of subparagraph (g) of paragraph 2 of this Article, provision corresponding to clause (i) of that subparagraph); and(cc) with respect to an item of income, profit or gain referred to in Article7; in paragraph 3 of Article 10 or paragraph 3 of Article 11; or in Articles 12, 13 or 21 of this Convention that resident would be entitled under that convention to a rate of tax with respect to the particular class of income, profit or gain in for which the benefits are being claimed under this Convention that is at least as low as the rate applicable under this Convention, under conditions in that convention which are no less restrictive than those in this Convention; or (ii) a qualified person by reason of subparagraphs (a), (b), (c), (d) or (e) of paragraph 2 of this Article. 例文帳に追加

「同等受益者」とは、次の(i)又は(ii)のいずれかの者をいう。(i)この条約の特典が要求される締約国との間に租税に関する二重課税の回避のための条約（以下「租税条約」という。）を有している国の居住者であって、次の(aa)から(cc)までに掲げる要件を満たすもの(aa)租税条約が実効的な情報交換に関する規定を有すること。(bb)当該居住者が、租税条約の特典条項に基づき適格者に該当すること又は租税条約にそのような規定がない場合には、租税条約に２の規定に相当する規定が含まれているとしたならば、当該居住者がその規定により適格者に該当するであろうとみられること（租税条約の規定が２(g)の規定に相当する規定である場合には、２(g)(i)の規定に相当する規定により適格者に該当することとなるときに限る。）。(cc)第七条、第十条３、第十一条３、第十二条、第十三条又は前条に定める所得、利得又は収益に関し、当該居住者が、この条約の特典が要求されるこれらの規定に定める種類の所得、利得又は収益について租税条約の適用を受けたとしたならば、この条約に規定する税率以下の税率の適用を受けるであろうとみられること（租税条約に規定する要件がこの条約に規定する要件よりも制限的でない場合に限る。）。(ii)２(a)から(e)までに掲げる適格者 - 財務省

Subject to subsection (2), the Governor in Council may make regulations (a) specifying the information and documents that shall be provided to the Board under subsection 80(1) or (2) or 88(1); (b) respecting the form and manner in which and times at which such information and documents shall be provided to the Board and imposing conditions respecting the provision of such information and documents; (c) specifying a period for the purposes of subsection 80(2); (d) specifying factors for the purposes of subsection 85(1) or (2), including factors relating to the introductory price of any medicine to which a patented invention pertains; (e) designating a Minister for the purposes of subsection 86(2) or paragraph 87(2)(a); (f) defining, for the purposes of sections 88 and 89, the expression “research and development”; (g) requiring fees to be paid before the issue of any certificate referred to in subsection 98(4) and specifying those fees or the manner of determining those fees; (h) requiring or authorizing the Board to perform such duties, in addition to those provided for in this Act, as are specified in the regulations, including duties to be performed by the Board in relation to the introductory price of any medicine to which a patented invention pertains; and (i) conferring on the Board such powers, in addition to those provided for in this Act, as will, in the opinion of the Governor in Council, enable the Board to perform any duties required or authorized to be performed by it by any regulations made under paragraph (h). 例文帳に追加

(2)に従うことを条件として，総督は，次の事項に関する規則を制定することができる: (a) 第80条(1)若しくは(2)又は第88条(1)に基づいて機関に提供すべき情報及び書類を特定すること (b) 機関に提出すべき情報及び書類の様式及び方法並びに時期に関すること，並びにかかる情報及び書類の提出に関する条件を課すること (c) 第80条(2)の適用上の期間を特定すること (d) 第85条(1)又は(2)の適用上の要素を特定すること。これには，特許発明が関係する医薬の当初の価格に関する要素を含むものとする。 (e) 第86条(2)又は第87条(2)(a)の適用上，大臣を指定すること (f) 第88条及び第89条の適用上，「研究開発」という表現の定義をすること (g) 第98条(4)にいう証明書を発行する前に手数料を納付させること，及びそれらの手数料又はそれらの手数料決定の方法を特定すること (h) 本法律で定められたものに加え，規則で特定された職務を実施することを機関に要求し又は権限を付与すること。当該職務には，特許発明に係わる医薬の当初の価格に関して機関が行うものを含むものとする。また (i) 本法律で定められた権限に加えて，(h)に基づく規則により機関が行うことを要求され又は権限を付与された職務について，総督の見解では機関が実施することを可能にする権限を機関に対し付与すること - 特許庁

Subject to section 13, a trade-mark is registrable if it is not (a) a word that is primarily merely the name or the surname of an individual who is living or has died within the preceding thirty years. (b) whether depicted, written or sounded, either clearly descriptive or deceptively misdescriptive in the English or French language of the character or quality of the wares or services in association with which it is used or proposed to be used or of the conditions of or the persons employed in their production or of their place of origin. (c) the name in any language of any of the wares or services in connection with which it is used or proposed to be used. (d) confusing with a registered trade-mark. (e) a mark of which the adoption is prohibited by section 9 or 10. (f) a denomination the adoption of which is prohibited by section 10.1. (g) in whole or in part a protected geographical indication, where the trade-mark is to be registered in association with a wine not originating in a territory indicated by the geographical indication. (h) in whole or in part a protected geographical indication, where the trade-mark is to be registered in association with a spirit not originating in a territory indicated by the geographical indication. and (i) subject to subsection 3(3) and paragraph 3(4)(a) of the Olympic and Paralympic Marks Act, a mark the adoption of which is prohibited by subsection 3(1) of that Act. 例文帳に追加

第13条に従うことを条件として，商標は次のものを除き，登録することができる。 (a) 現存する個人又は過去30年以内に死亡した個人の姓名に過ぎない語 (b) 商品又はサービスに付随して使用され若しくは使用される予定のある記述であって，商品又はサービスの特性若しくは品質，又は生産及び提供の条件若しくは生産及び提供に従事する者，又はそれらの出所について，描写，手書き又は発音の何れによるかを問わず，英語又はフランス語で明示した記述又はそれらと誤認を生じさせる不備な記述 (c) 何れかの言語での商品又はサービスの名称であって，その商品又はサービスに付随して使用され，若しくは使用される予定のあるもの (d) 登録商標と混同を生じるもの (e) 第9条又は第10条により採用が禁止されている標章 (f) 第10.1条により採用が禁止されている名称 (g) 保護された地理的表示の全体又は一部であって，商標が地理的表示により示された地域を原産地としないぶどう酒について登録されようとしている場合のもの (h) 保護される地理的表示の全体又は一部であって，商標が地理的表示により示された領域を原産地としない蒸留酒について登録されようとしている場合のもの，及び (i) オリンピック及びパラリンピック標章法第3条(3)及び第3条(4)(a)に従うことを条件として，同法第3条(1)により採用が禁止されている標章。 - 特許庁

Revocation of a patent in whole or in part may be obtained on petition to or on a counter claim in a suit for infringement before the High Court Division on all or any of the following grounds, namely:- that the invention has been the subject of a valid prior grant of a patent in Bangladesh; that the true and first inventor or his legal representative or assign was not the applicant or one of the applicants for the patent; that the patent was obtained in fraud of the rights of the person applying for the revocation or of any person under or through whom he claims; that the invention was not, at the date of the patent, a manner of new manufacture or improvement; that the invention does not involve any inventive step, having regard to what was known or used prior to the date of the patent; that the invention is of no utility; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and fairly describe and ascertain the nature of the invention and the manner in which the invention is to be performed; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and clearly ascertain the scope of the invention claimed; that the patent was obtained on a false suggestion or representation; that the primary or intended use or exercise of the invention is contrary to law; that the patentee has contravened, or has not complied with, the conditions contained in the patent; that the complete specification does not disclose the best method of performance of the invention known to the applicant for the patent at the time when the specification was left at the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. 例文帳に追加

特許の全部又は一部の取消しは、高等裁判所への請願書により、又は高等裁判所に係属している侵害訴訟中の反訴により、次の各号に掲げる事由のすべて又はいずれかを理由として得ることができる。すなわち、その発明はバングラデシュ国内において先願により有効に付与された特許の対象であること。真正かつ最先の発明者又はその法定代理人若しくは譲受人は当該特許出願人若しくは出願人の一人ではなかったこと。その特許は取消しを申請している者又は当該申請人がなす主張につき指示している者、若しくは当該申請人が代理している者の権利を詐害する目的で取得されたこと。その発明は特許された日において新規性を欠く製造方法又は改良であったこと。その発明は特許の日以前に知られていた又は使用されていたものに係るものであり、進歩性がないこと。その発明は有用性がないこと。完全な明細書は十分かつ正確に記載されておらず、発明の本質及び発明の実施方法が確認されないこと。完全な明細書から、請求する発明の範囲が十分かつ明瞭に確認されないこと。その特許は虚偽の示唆又は不実表示に基づいて取得されたこと。その発明の主な又は目的とする用途又は実施が法令に反すること。その特許権者が、当該特許に含まれる条件に違反し又は遵守していないこと。完全な明細書が、当該明細書が特許意匠商標庁に提出された当時に当該特許に係る出願人が知っていた、当該発明の最良の実施方法を開示していない。 - 特許庁

(2) The conditions referred to in subsection (1)(a) are (a) that all the formal requirements have been complied with; (b) that the Registrar has received -- (i) the search report referred to in section 29(3) and the examination report referred to in section 29(5); (ii) the search and examination report referred to in section 29(6); (iii) the search report referred to in section 29(2)(c)(i), the examination report referred to in section 29(5) and, where the search report is not in English, an English translation of the search report (iv) the prescribed information referred to in section 29(2)(c)(ii) or (d)(ii) and, where the prescribed information includes any document that is not in English, an English translation of such document; (v) the international search report referred to in section 29(2)(d)(i) or (e)(i), the examination report referred to in section 29(5) and, where the international search report is not in English, an English translation of the international search report; or (vi) in the case of an international application for a patent (Singapore) which has entered the national phase in Singapore under section 86(3), as an alternative to the document or documents referred to in any of sub-paragraphs (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) -- (A) the notice referred to in section 29(2)(e)(ii); (B) an international search report in respect of that application; (C) an international preliminary report on patentability in respect of that application; and (D) where any report referred to in sub-paragraph (B) or (C) is not in English, an English translation of that report; (c) that the prescribed documents for the grant of the patent have been filed; and (d) that the prescribed fee for the grant of the patent has been paid.例文帳に追加

(2)(1)(a)にいう条件は，次のとおりとする。(a)すべての方式要件が満たされていること(b)登録官が次の何れかを受領していること(i)第29条(3)にいう調査報告及び第29条(5)にいう審査報告(ii)第29条(6)にいう調査及び審査報告(iii)第29条(2)(c)(i)にいう調査報告，第29条(5)にいう審査報告，並びに当該調査報告が英語によるものでないときは当該調査報告の英語翻訳文(iv)第29条(2)(c)(ii)若しくは(d)(ii)にいう所定の情報及び所定の情報に英語によらない書類が含まれているときは当該書類の英語翻訳文(v)第29条(2)(d)(i)若しくは(e)(i)にいう国際調査報告，第29条(5)にいう審査報告及び当該国際調査報告が英語によるものでないときは当該国際調査報告の英語翻訳文，又は(vi)第86条(3)に基づいてシンガポールにおける国内段階に移行した国際特許出願(シンガポール)の場合は，(ii)，(iii)，(iv)及び(v)の何れかにいう書類に代わるものとして，(A)第29条(2)(e)(ii)にいう通知書(B)当該出願に関する国際調査報告(C)当該出願に関する特許性についての国際予備報告，並びに(D)(B)若しくは(C)にいう報告が英語によるものでないときは当該報告の英語翻訳文(c)当該特許付与のための所定の書類が提出されていること，並びに(d)当該特許付与のための所定の手数料が納付されていること - 特許庁

(1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.例文帳に追加

(1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁

(1) Without affecting the operation of Section 13, the registration of a person as a registered user - (a) may be varied by the Registrar, on the application of the registered proprietor and the registered user, with respect to the goods for which, or any conditions or restrictions subject to which, the registration has effect; or (b) may be extended by the Registrar, on the application of the registered proprietor and the registered user, for such period not exceeding three years, as the Registrar thinks fit, but such period shall not extend beyond the date of expiration of the current registration of the trade mark; or (c) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application of the registered proprietor or of the registered user; or (d) may be cancelled by the Registrar on the application of a person on the ground - (i) that the registered user has used the trade mark otherwise than by way of the permitted use, or in such a way as to cause, or to be likely to cause, deception or confusion; or (ii) that the registered proprietor or the registered user misrepresented, or failed to disclose, some fact material to the application for the registration or that the circumstances have materially changed since the date of the registration; or (iii) that the registration ought not to have been effected having regard to rights vested in the applicant by virtue of a contract in the performance of which he is interested.例文帳に追加

(1) 第13条の運用に影響を与えることなく，登録使用者としての人の登録は次に掲げることができる。 (a) 登録官は，登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき，当該登録が効力を有する商品，当該登録が効力を有するための条件又は制約について，変更することができる。又は， (b) 登録官は，登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき，登録官として適切と考える3年を超えない期間で延長することできるが，その期間は当該商標の現在の登録期間の満了日を超えて延長してはならない。又は (c) 登録官は，登録所有者及び登録使用者の申請に基づき，登録を抹消することができる。又は， (d) 登録官は，次に掲げる理由に基づき，ある者の申請を抹消することができる。 (i) 登録使用者が許可された使用方法以外の方法で，若しくは誤認又は混同を招く，又はそのおそれのある方法で商標を使用したこと，又は， (ii) 登録所有者又は登録使用者が登録出願にとって重要な事実を偽って伝えた又は開示しなかった，若しくは事情が登録の日から著しく変化したこと，又は， (iii) 当該登録は，出願人がその履行に利害関係を有する契約により出願人に付与される権利を考慮して登録は認められるべきではなかったこと - 特許庁

(1) Where it is proposed that a person should be registered as a registered user of a trademark, the registered proprietor and the proposed registered users shall jointly apply in writing to the registrar in the prescribed manner, and every such application shall be accompanied by- (a) the agreement in writing or a duly authenticated copy thereof, entered into between the registered proprietor and the proposed registered user with respect to the permitted use of the trademark; and (b) an affidavit made by the registered proprietor or by some person authorized to Act on his behalf, which shall include- (i) particulars of the relationship, existing or proposed, between the proprietor and the proposed registered user, including particulars showing the degree of control by the proprietor over the permitted use which their relationship will confer; (ii) whether it is a term of their relationship that the proposed registered user shall be the sole registered user or that there shall be any other restriction as to persons for whose registrations as Registered user application may be made; (iii) stating the goods or services in respect of which registration is proposed; (iv) stating the conditions or restrictions, if any, proposed with respect to the characteristics of the goods or services, as the case may be, to the mode or place of permitted use, or to any other matter; (v) stating whether the permitted use is to be for a period, or without limit of period, and, if for a period, the duration thereof; and (c) such further documents, information or other evidence as may be required by the Registrar or as may be prescribed. 例文帳に追加

(1)商標の登録使用権者として登録すべきことを要望する場合、登録所有者及び登録予定使用権者は共同で所定の方式で登録官に書面で出願するものとし、かかる出願にはすべて次に掲げるものを添付する。(a)当該商標の許可された使用について登録所有者と登録予定使用権者との間で締結された契約書又はその適式に公証された写し、及び(b)登録所有者による、又は、その者を代理して行為することを授権された者による、次に掲げる事項を含む宣誓供述書。(i)所有者と登録予定使用権者との間の既存の又は予定される関係の詳細。両者の関係がもたらす許諾された使用に及ぶ所有者による支配の程度を示す詳細を含む。(ii)登録予定使用権者は唯一の登録使用権者となること、又は、登録使用権者としての登録出願ができる者につき何らかの制限があることは、両者の関係の条件であるか否か。(iii)登録が予定される商品又は役務の記載。(iv)該当する場合、当該商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の特性に関して、許諾された使用の態様又は地域に関して、又はその他の事項に関して予定される条件若しくは制限の記載。(v)許諾された使用につき期限の定めの有無、及び、期限の定めがある場合はその期間の記載。(c)登録官の求めに応じて、又は所定の追加文書、情報又はその他の証拠。 - 特許庁

In the City Bus case the Tokyo District Court July 25, 2001 ruled that "whether or not Article 46, Item 4 is applicable should depend on whether the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or the reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. In order to determine this, circumstances such as the formalities, the contents, the manner and method of use of the publication should be objectively examined." In light of these criteria, the judgment further held that "the Defendant's book is a publication edited for the purpose of explaining to children various types of vehicles running on the street by using their photographs. It provides an explanation on the exterior and role of each of the 24 types of vehicles in total. This book is edited from the viewpoint of pre-school education in that children are expected to develop their observation skills as well as curiosity, which will in the future become a basis for learning. The method of inserting the picture in the cover page and page 14 is not unnatural in light of the purpose of this publication. Considering that the viewers of this book will have the impression that the photograph of the bus is placed on various pages as an the example of the diverse vehicles referred to in the body text of the book, the act of selling a book which includes a photograph of the bus with the plaintiff's work shall not fall under the relevant criteria as previously descirbed; the copyrighted artistic work is reproduced "exclusively" for marketing or such reproduced work is actually sold to third parties. Therefore, such act does not fulfill the conditions required under Article 46, Item 4 of the Copyright Law. 例文帳に追加

前掲東京地裁平成１３年７月２５日判決は、「法４６条４号に該当するか否かについては、著作物を利用した書籍等の体裁及び内容、著作物の利用態様、利用目的などを客観的に考慮して、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する例外的な場合に当たるといえるか否か検討すべきことになる。」とし、「被告書籍は、幼児向けに、写真を用いて、町を走る各種自動車を解説する目的で作られた書籍であり、合計２４種類の自動車について、その外観及び役割などが説明されていること、各種自動車の写真を幼児が見ることを通じて、観察力を養い、勉強の基礎になる好奇心を高めるとの幼児教育的観点から監修されていると解されること、表紙及び本文１４頁の掲載方法は、右の目的に照らして、格別不自然な態様とはいえないので、本件書籍を見る者は、本文で紹介されている各種自動車の一例として、本件バスが掲載されているとの印象を受けると考えられること等の事情を総合すると、原告作品が描かれた本件バスの写真を被告書籍に掲載し、これを販売することは、「専ら」美術の著作物の複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売する行為には、該当しないというべきである。」として著作権法第46条第４号の要件を充たさないとした。 - 経済産業省

People employed by enterprises have thus generally grown more risk averse in recent years. Regarding the relationship between the decline in the prospective entry rate and recent changes in the labor market such as those described in Chapter 2, attention may be drawn to the following: (1) the seniority-based pay systems found primarily at large enterprises up to the 1990s were recognized as having become entrenched as "Japanesestyle employment practices," and the future wages expected by people rose; (2) the negative effects of the deflationary economy in the 1990s first manifested themselves in the form of an increase in bankruptcies and exits among small enterprises such as the selfemployed, and there was a conspicuous decrease in the incomes and a conspicuous increase in the risks of selfemployment expected by people; (3) as full-fledged employment adjustment did not really impact on employees of large enterprises until the latter half of the 1990s, it took considerable time for future expected wages to fall; and (4) the instability of income after mandatory retirement even with "Japanese-style employment practices" has long been recognized, enterprises restructured their middle-aged and older workers in the 1990s, conditions in the elderly reemployment market remained severe, and wages of employees in their fifties underwent adjustment from a comparatively early stage, creating the possibility that for the middle-aged and elderly, the opportunity cost of entry compared with changing jobs has fallen, in addition to which people in this age group were comparatively less affected by the effects of the collapse of the bubble, such as the decline in home prices.例文帳に追加

このように、近年、企業に雇用される人々の意識が一般的にはリスク回避的になり、開業希望率が減少していることと、第2章で述べたような、近年の労働市場の変化等との関係については、〔1〕1990年代まで大企業を中心とする年功賃金制が「日本的雇用慣行」として定着していると認識され、人々の予想する将来賃金が上昇してきたこと、〔2〕1990年代のデフレ経済の悪影響がまず自営業等の小規模な企業から破産・廃業の増加等の形で現れ、人々の予想する自営業の所得が顕著に低下しリスクが顕著に増加したこと、〔3〕大企業の被雇用者に本格的な雇用調整が及んだのは1990年代後半であったことから、将来の予想賃金が低下するにはかなり時間がかかったこと、〔4〕定年退職後の収入については、「日本的雇用慣行」の下でも不安定性があることが早くから認識され、また、1990年代に企業が中高齢層のリストラを進め高齢者の転職市場は厳しい状況が続き、50歳代の賃金については大企業でも比較的早くから調整が進んだことから、中高齢者にとっては転職と比較して開業することの機会費用が下がった可能性があること、また、この年代の人々はバブル崩壊による持ち家価格の低下等の影響を被ることが比較的少なかったこと等が指摘できる。 - 経済産業省

Members, Recognizing the growing importance of trade in services for the growth and development of the world economy; Wishing to establish a multilateral framework of principles and rules for trade in services with a view to the expansion of such trade under conditions of transparency and progressive liberalization and as a means of promoting the economic growth of all trading partners and the development of developing countries; Desiring the early achievement of progressively higher levels of liberalization of trade in services through successive rounds of multilateral negotiations aimed at promoting the interests of all participants on a mutually advantageous basis and at securing an overall balance of rights and obligations, while giving due respect to national policy objectives; Recognizing the right of Members to regulate, and to introduce new regulations, on the supply of services within their territories in order to meet national policy objectives and, given asymmetries existing with respect to the degree of development of services regulations in different countries, the particular need of developing countries to exercise this right; Desiring to facilitate the increasing participation of developing countries in trade in services and the expansion of their service exports including, inter alia, through the strengthening of their domestic services capacity and its efficiency and competitiveness; Taking particular account of the serious difficulty of the least-developed countries in view of their special economic situation and their development, trade and financial needs; Hereby agree as follows:例文帳に追加

加盟国は、世界経済の成長及び発展にとってサービスの貿易の重要性が増大していることを認め、透明性及び漸進的な自由化を確保しつつサービスの貿易を拡大することを目的として、また、すべての参加国の経済成長及び開発途上国の発展を促進する手段として、サービスの貿易に関する原則及び規則の多角的枠組みを設定することを希望し、すべての参加国の利益を互恵的な基礎の上に増進し、かつ、権利及び義務の全体的な均衡を確保することを目的として引き続き行われる多角的交渉のラウンドを通じ、国家の政策目的に十分な考慮を払いつつ、漸進的かつ早期に一層高い水準のサービスの貿易の自由化を達成することを希望し、国家の政策目的を実現するため自国の領域内におけるサービスの提供に関して規制を行い又は新たな規制を導入する権利を有すること及びサービスの規制に係る発展の程度に関して国の間に存在する不均衡にかんがみ開発途上国にはこの権利を行使する必要が特にあることを認め、特に開発途上国の国内のサービスに関する能力並びにその効率性及び競争力を強化することにより、開発途上国のサービスの貿易への参加の増大及びサービスの輸出の拡大を促進することを希望し、後発開発途上国の特別な経済的事情並びにこれらの国の開発上、貿易上及び資金上のニーズにかんがみ、後発開発途上国が重大な困難を有することに特に留意して、ここに、次のとおり協定する。 - 経済産業省

(5) The provisions of the preceding paragraphs shall apply mutatis mutandis to cases where Regulated Securities issued by a company fall under any of the categories specified in the items of paragraph (1). In this case, the term "excluding Regulated Securities" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "limited to Regulated Securities"; the term "the company shall" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the company (if said Securities are so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, excluding persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance) shall"; the terms "the trade name of the company, financial conditions of the Corporate Group to which the company belongs and of the company, other important matters concerning the company's business" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "financial conditions of asset investment or other similar businesses conducted by the company, other important matters concerning the company's assets"; the term "for each business year" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "for each of the periods of time specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance for the Regulated Securities (hereinafter referred to as the "Specified Period" in this Article)"; the term "that business year" in the main clause of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "that Specified Period"; the part "the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iii) below (limited to share certificates and other Securities specified by a Cabinet Order) and the numbers of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year and on the last days of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began are fewer than the number calculated pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Order, if the Prime Minister approves pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance that even if the company does not submit Annual Securities Reports, the public interest or protection of investors would not be impaired (limited to the company for which five years have already passed after the end of the Starting Year of Report Submission (meaning the business year that includes the day on which the main clause of Article 4(1) or (2) or the main clause of Article 23-8(1) or (2) became applicable to the Public Offering or Secondary Distribution of the Securities, or, the latest one of such business years); where the Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below" in the proviso to paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Regulated Securities issued by the company fall under the category of Securities specified in item (iv) below"; the part "or if the number of holders of the Securities on the last day of that business year is fewer than the number specified by a Cabinet Order; and" in the proviso to paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "; and"; the part "share certificates, Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2)" in item (iv) of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2)"; the part "if the number of its holders on the last day of that business year or on the last day of any of the business years that began within four years before the day on which that business year began is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order (or, in case of Rights in Securities Investment Business, etc. that shall be deemed as Securities under Article 2(2), the number of its holders on the last day of that business year is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order)" in item (iv) of paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "if the number of its holders on the last day of the Specified Period is not less than the number specified by a Cabinet Order"; the term "issued Securities" in paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "issued Regulated Securities"; the term "Securities issued" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Regulated Securities issued"; the term "a company" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "a company (if said Regulated Securities are Securities so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance, excluding persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance)"; the term "the main clause of paragraph (1)" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the main clause of paragraph (1) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (5)"; the term "business year" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Specified Period"; the term "the day on which the Securities came" in paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the day on which the Regulated Securities came"; and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加