「if... at all」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(20ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

(4) For a Company with Class Shares, if some or all classes of the shares underlying the Share Options for Subscription are Shares with Restriction on Transfer, the determination of the Subscription Requirements regarding such Share Options for Subscription shall not become effective without a resolution of the relevant Class Meeting, except in cases where there is a provision in the articles of incorporation to the effect that, with respect to the solicitation of subscribers for Share Options for Subscription for which the underlying shares are such class shares, a resolution of the Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of such class is not required; provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder who can exercise his/her voting right at such Class Meeting. 例文帳に追加

４　種類株式発行会社において、募集新株予約権の目的である株式の種類の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式であるときは、当該募集新株予約権に関する募集事項の決定は、当該種類の株式を目的とする募集新株予約権を引き受ける者の募集について当該種類の株式の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会の決議を要しない旨の定款の定めがある場合を除き、当該種類株主総会の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる種類株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) If a party to proceedings before the Office, in spite of all due care required by the circumstances having been taken, was unable to comply with the time limit where the consequence of failure to perform this act is proceedings termination or forfeiture of other right, it is entitled to request the Office for restitutio in integrum and at the same time to carry out the omitted act. The application must be filed within two months from removal of the obstacle to compliance with the time limit and not later then within twelve months immediately following the expiry of the unobserved time limit and in the case of nonsubmission of the request for renewal of registration, within the further period of six months following the expiry of the additional time limit provided in Section 22(4).例文帳に追加

(1) 庁における手続の当事者が事情により要求される当然の注意をすべて払ったにも拘らず期限を遵守することができなかった場合において，当該行為の不履行の効果が手続の終了又は他の権利の喪失であるときは，当該人は，庁に対し原状回復を請求すると共に当該不履行行為を履行することができる。出願は，期限遵守の障害が除去されてから2月以内に，かつ，遅くとも当該不遵守期限の経過に引き続く12月以内に，また，登録更新請求の不提出の場合は第22条(4)に規定する追加期限の経過に引き続く6月の追加期間内に，行わなければならない。 - 特許庁

(4) In cases where a Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon a Consolidation-Type Merger is a company with class shares, if all or part of shares of the Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Established by a Consolidation-Type Merger to be delivered to shareholders of the Stock Company-Type Financial Instruments Exchange Extinguished upon a Consolidation-Type Merger are shares with restriction on transfer, the Consolidation-Type Merger shall not come into effect without a resolution of a class shareholders meeting consisting of class shareholders of the class of shares subject to the allotment of the shares with restriction on transfer (excluding the shares with restriction on transfer) (if there are two or more classes of shares pertaining to such class shareholders, the respective class shareholders meeting consisting of class shareholders categorized by each class of said two or more classes of shares); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there are no shareholders who are entitled to exercise their voting rights at said class shareholders meeting. 例文帳に追加

４　新設合併消滅株式会社金融商品取引所が種類株式発行会社である場合において、新設合併消滅株式会社金融商品取引所の株主に対して交付する新設合併設立株式会社金融商品取引所の株式の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式であるときは、当該新設合併は、当該譲渡制限株式の割当てを受ける種類の株式（譲渡制限株式を除く。）の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあつては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) In addition to a creditor who holds a claim pertaining to an obligation covered by the trust property, where a trust has been created by the method set forth in Article 3, item (iii), if the settlor has created the trust with the knowledge that it would harm settlor's creditor(s), notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding paragraph, a person who holds a claim against the settlor (limited to cases where the settlor is a trustee) which has arisen prior to the creation of the trust may commence a execution, provisional seizure, provisional disposition or exercise of a security interest, or an auction, or may commence collection proceedings for delinquent national tax against property that belongs to the trust property; provided, however, that this shall not apply where there are beneficiaries at the time in question, and when all or some of those beneficiaries did not know, at the time when they became aware that they had been designated as beneficiaries or when they acquired beneficial interests, of the fact that the creditor would be harmed. 例文帳に追加

２　第三条第三号に掲げる方法によって信託がされた場合において、委託者がその債権者を害することを知って当該信託をしたときは、前項の規定にかかわらず、信託財産責任負担債務に係る債権を有する債権者のほか、当該委託者（受託者であるものに限る。）に対する債権で信託前に生じたものを有する者は、信託財産に属する財産に対し、強制執行、仮差押え、仮処分若しくは担保権の実行若しくは競売又は国税滞納処分をすることができる。ただし、受益者が現に存する場合において、その受益者の全部又は一部が、受益者としての指定を受けたことを知った時又は受益権を譲り受けた時において債権者を害すべき事実を知らなかったときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) The provisions of Article 512 to Article 518 inclusive (Order to Suspend Other Procedures; Restrictions on Withdrawal of Petition for Commencement of Special Liquidation; Order to Commence Special Liquidation; Suspension of Other Procedures; Order to Suspend Procedures to Enforce Security Interest; Prohibition of Set-offs); the provisions of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2, Subsection 2 to Subsection 10 inclusive (excluding Article 522(3), Article 530(2), and Article 536) (Supervision and Investigation by the Court; Liquidators; Supervisor; Investigators; Restrictions on Acts of Liquidating Stock Companies; Dispositions Necessary); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4 (Action Concerning Special Liquidation); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 1 (excluding Article 868(2) to (5) inclusive and Article 870 to Article 874 inclusive) (General Provisions); the provisions of Part VII, Chapter III, Section 3 (excluding Article 879, Article 882(2), and Article 896) (Special Provisions on the Procedures of Special Liquidation); and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) (Commissioning of Registration by a Juridical Decision Concerning Special Liquidation) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of a Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation. In this case, the phrase "procedures to enforce the security interest that exists in the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company, procedures to enforce charge on whole company assets or compulsory execution procedures based on the general liens and other claims that have general priority that have already been enforced against the assets of the Liquidating Stock Company" in Article 516 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "procedures to exercise the security interest that exists in the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation or compulsory execution procedures based on claims for which there exists a general statutory lien or any other general priority that have already been enforced against the property of the Specific Purpose Company in Liquidation," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522(1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of the voting rights of all Specified Equity Members (excluding Specified Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a period) not less than three-hundredths of the voting rights (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of all Preferred Equity Members (excluding Preferred Equity Members who may not exercise their voting rights on all matters on which a resolution may be effected at a general meeting of members), or Specified Equity Members who hold not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the total number of units of Specified Equity (excluding the Company's Own Specified Equity) or Preferred Equity Members who have continuously held for the preceding six months or longer (if a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period) not less than three-hundredths (if a smaller proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such a proportion) of the units of issued Preferred Equity (excluding the Company's Own Preferred Equity)," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで（他の手続の中止命令、特別清算開始の申立ての取下げの制限、特別清算開始の命令、他の手続の中止等、担保権の実行の手続等の中止命令、相殺の禁止）、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項、第五百三十条第二項及び第五百三十六条を除く。）（裁判所による監督及び調査、清算人、監督委員、調査委員、清算株式会社の行為の制限等、清算の監督上必要な処分等、債権者集会、協定、特別清算の終了）、第七編第二章第四節（特別清算に関する訴え）、同編第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）（総則）、同章第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条を除く。）（特別清算の手続に関する特則）及び第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）（特別清算に関する裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は、清算特定目的会社の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百十六条中「担保権の実行の手続、企業担保権の実行の手続又は清算株式会社の財産」とあるのは「担保権の実行の手続又は清算特定目的会社の財産」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「総特定社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない特定社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を有する特定社員若しくは総優先出資社員（社員総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない優先出資社員を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員又は特定出資（自己特定出資を除く。）の総口数の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の特定出資を有する特定社員又は発行済優先出資（自己優先出資を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の優先出資を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する優先出資社員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In addition to distribution of funds prescribed in the preceding paragraph, if the General Partner reasonably determines that it is beneficial for the Partners to receive an in kind distribution of Portfolio Securities (including non-money consideration acquired by the Partnership from the Disposition of Portfolio Securities, in kind dividends or share splits) (the day of such determination being referred to as the “Reference Date”), the General Partner may, promptly after the Reference Date, distribute in kind to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners their respective pro rata shares of the Portfolio Securities equivalent to the balance of the total amount of Value at the Time of Distribution of the Portfolio Securities after the deduction of (x) the total amount of costs and expenses, if any, and taxes and other public duties, if any, required for the distribution and (y) the amount of any incentive fee, if any, pursuant to paragraph (4) of this Article (which is, in the case where such incentive fee is paid in kind by the Portfolio Securities, the total amount of the Value at the Time of Distribution of such Portfolio Securities), in proportion to (a) in the case of a Partner, their respective Interest Amount or (b) in the case of a Withdrawing Partner, their respective Interest Amount at the time of the withdrawal of such Withdrawing Partner, to the extent allowed by Article 30. The General Partner may sell a portion of the Portfolio Securities that are to be distributed in order to pay costs, expenses, taxes and other public duties required for such distribution and to pay such incentive fee. In such case, the General Partner shall distribute to the Partners and any Withdrawing Partners the Portfolio Securities remaining after deducting the Portfolio Securities so sold or to be so sold. If the Portfolio Securities are not Marketable Securities, the General Partner shall send a document stating (i) the proposed in kind distribution and the reason therefor, (ii) a statement of Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind, (iii) an assessment of the Value at the Time of Distribution as of the Reference Date and(iv) other matters as required to determine the appropriateness of the proposed distribution in kind, and shall be required to obtain an approval of the Limited Partners holding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [ ]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners. Article 49(1) shall apply mutatis mutandis to distribution by the General Partner pursuant to this paragraph. 例文帳に追加

3. 前項に規定する金銭の分配のほか、無限責任組合員は、投資証券等（投資証券等に係る処分等、現物配当、株式分割等により本組合が取得したもののうち金銭以外のものを含む。）を現物で分配することが組合員の利益に適うと合理的に判断する場合（かかる判断がなされた日を「現物分配基準日」という。）、組合員及び脱退組合員に対し、現物分配基準日後速やかに、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額から、分配に要する諸費用（もしあれば）及び公租公課（もしあれば）の合計額を控除した上、本条第4 項に従い成功報酬（もしあれば）の額（成功報酬を投資証券等の現物で支払う場合には、当該投資証券等の分配時評価額の総額）を控除した残額に相当する当該投資証券等を、第30 条により認められる範囲において、組合員についてはその持分金額、脱退組合員については当該脱退組合員の脱退当時の持分金額の各金額に応じ按分をした上、それぞれ現物により分配することができるものとする。無限責任組合員は、分配に要する諸費用及び公租公課並びに成功報酬の支払いにあてるため、分配される投資証券等の一部を売却することができるものとし、かかる場合、当該売却に係る投資証券等を控除した後の当該投資証券等を組合員及び脱退組合員に対し分配するものとする。当該投資証券等が市場性のある有価証券ではない場合、無限責任組合員は、(ⅰ)現物分配を行う旨及びその理由、(ⅱ)現物分配する投資証券等の明細、(ⅲ)その現物分配基準日における分配時評価額の案、並びに(ⅳ)その他その適否を判断する上で必要な事項を記載した書面を送付した上、総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員の承認を取得しなければならないものとする。なお、第49 条第1 項は、本項に基づき無限責任組合員が行う分配に準用する。 - 経済産業省

If I may elaborate a little more, the percentage of loans that a bank is allowed to make relative to the total amount of deposits is also called LDR in Japan. Currently, domestic banks in China are actually required to maintain this ratio at or below 75 percent but foreign banks are exempted from this requirement until, I believe, next year. Currently, a total of approximately 26,000 Japanese companies are operating in China. As all of you know, those Japanese companies that entered the Chinese market each do business with Japanese banks, many of which have in turn set up branches in China but have difficulty attracting deposits in China in the same way that Chinese banks do. 例文帳に追加

これは少し説明を申し上げますと、預金額の何％を貸し出ししていいかということを日本でも預貸率と申しますけれども、今、中国の国内銀行は実は75％（以下）でございまして、外国の銀行につきましては、今はたしか来年までだと思いますが例外を設けていただいています。日本と中国とは、日本の企業が約2万6,000社ですね、中国に今進出いたしておりますが、皆様方ご存じのように、日本から進出した企業が日本との銀行との取引がそれぞれあるわけでございますし、日本の銀行も中国にいろいろな支店を開設いたしておりますが、やはり日本の銀行ですから、中国において中国の銀行と同じように、なかなか預金が集まらないのですね、ご存じのように。 - 金融庁

2. Where a final judgment establishes that the right to registration of a mark belongs to a person other than the applicant, such other person shall be entitled, if the registration has not yet been granted and within three months from the final judgment, at his own discretion, to: (a) take over the application for registration in his own name and assume the capacity of applicant in all respects; (b) file a new application for registration which, provided the mark it contains is substantially identical with that of the original application, shall have effect from the filing or priority date of the original application, which in any case shall cease to be effective; (c) obtain the rejection of the application.例文帳に追加

(2) 終局判決により，標章の登録に対する権利が出願人以外の者に属することが立証された場合には，登録が未だ与えられていないときであって，その終局判決から 3月以内に，その者は，自己の裁量により次のことをすることができる。 (a) 自己の名義で登録出願を引き継ぎ，すべての点において出願人の資格を引き受けること (b) 新たな登録出願をすること。その出願は，当該新たな出願に含まれる標章が最初の出願のそれと実質的に同一である場合に限り，最初の出願が効力を有さないことに関係なくその出願日又は優先日から効力を有するものとする。 (c) 当該出願の拒絶を受けること - 特許庁

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 59(3)(ii) and (4) and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "rehabilitation case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 127-2(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a rehabilitation case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of rehabilitation proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the rehabilitation case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending. 例文帳に追加

３　前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第五十九条第三項第二号及び第四項並びに第百二十七条の二第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「再生事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百二十七条の二第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての再生手続開始の申立ては、親法人の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について再生事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての再生手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の再生事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding two paragraphs, where a juridical person holds the majority of voting rights (excluding the voting rights of the shares of stock which may not be exercised for all matters that may be resolved at a shareholders meeting, and including the voting rights of the shares of stock for which the shareholder is deemed to have voting rights pursuant to the provision of Article 879(3) of the Companies Act (Act No. 86 of 2005); hereinafter the same shall apply in the following paragraph, Article 83(2)(ii) and (3) and Article 161(2)(ii)(a) and (b)) of all shareholders of a stock company, if a bankruptcy case, rehabilitation case or reorganization case (hereinafter referred to as a "bankruptcy case, etc." in this Article) is pending against said juridical person (hereinafter referred to as a "parent juridical person" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)), a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against said stock company (hereinafter referred to as a "subsidiary stock company" in this Article and Article 161(2)(ii)(b)) may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the parent juridical person is pending, and if a bankruptcy case, etc. is pending against the subsidiary stock company, a petition for commencement of bankruptcy proceedings against the parent juridical person may also be filed with the district court before which the bankruptcy case, etc. against the subsidiary stock company is pending. 例文帳に追加

３　前二項の規定にかかわらず、法人が株式会社の総株主の議決権（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株式についての議決権を除き、会社法（平成十七年法律第八十六号）第八百七十九条第三項の規定により議決権を有するものとみなされる株式についての議決権を含む。次項、第八十三条第二項第二号及び第三項並びに第百六十一条第二項第二号イ及びロにおいて同じ。）の過半数を有する場合には、当該法人（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「親法人」という。）について破産事件、再生事件又は更生事件（以下この条において「破産事件等」という。）が係属しているときにおける当該株式会社（以下この条及び第百六十一条第二項第二号ロにおいて「子株式会社」という。）についての破産手続開始の申立ては、親法人の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができ、子株式会社について破産事件等が係属しているときにおける親法人についての破産手続開始の申立ては、子株式会社の破産事件等が係属している地方裁判所にもすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(2) Where the facts mentioned in clause (a) or clause (b) of the proviso to sub-section (1) are proved with respect to any words, then, - (a) for the purposes of any proceedings under section 51- (i) if the trademark consists solely of such word or words, the registration of the trademark, so far as regards registration in respect of the article or substance or service in question or any goods or services of the same description, shall be deemed to be an entry wrongly remaining in the Register; (ii) if the trademark contains such word or words and other matter, the Tribunal, in deciding whether the trademark shall remain on the Register, so far as regards registration in respect of the article or substance or service in question of any goods or services of the same description, may, in case of a decision in favour of its remaining on the Register, require as a condition thereof that the proprietor shall disclaim any right to the exclusive use in relation to that article or substance or service and any goods or services of the same description, of such word or words : Provided that no disclaimer shall affect any rights of the proprietor of a trade except such as arise out of the registration of the trademark in respect of which the declaimer is made : (b) for the purposes of any other legal proceedings relating to the trademarks- (i) if the trademark consists solely of such word or words, all rights of the proprietor under this Act or any other law to the exclusive use of the trademark in relation to the article or substance or service in question or to any goods or services of the same description, or 29 (ii) if the trademark contains such word or words and other matters, all such rights of the proprietor to the exclusive use of such word or words, in such relation as aforesaid, shall be deemed to have ceased on the date at which the use mentioned in clause (a) of sub-section (1) first become well-known and established, or at the expiration of the period of 2(two) years mentioned in clause (b) of sub-section (1). 例文帳に追加

(2)本条第(1)項但し書きの(a)又は(b)に述べる事実が任意の単語について立証された場合、そのときは次に掲げるとおりとする。(a)第51条に基づく手続きの目的上、(i)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語のみで構成される場合、当該商標の登録が問題の物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に関する登録に関する限りにおいて、過誤により登録簿上に残存する記載とみなされる。(ii)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語及びその他の要素から構成される場合、審判機関は、当該商標を登録に残すべきかどうかの判断に際し、当該商標の登録が問題の物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に関する登録に関する限りにおいて、登録簿にそれを残すことを支持する判断の場合、その条件として、所有者がその物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は、表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に関して1個又は数個の当該単語に係る排他的使用権を放棄するよう求めることができる。ただし、当該権利放棄は、当該権利放棄がなされた当該商標登録に起因して生ずる取引を除き、所有者の取引に係る権利に何ら影響を与えない。(b)当該商標に関するその他の法的手続きの目的上、(i)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語のみで構成される場合、本法、又は問題の物品若しくは物質又は役務、又は表示が同一である商品若しくは役務に係る商標の排他的使用に関するその他の法律に基づき、当該所有者のすべての権利、又は(ii)当該商標がかかる1個又は数個の単語及びその他の要素から構成される場合、かかる単語の排他的使用に関する所有者のすべての当該権利は、前述のような関係において、本条第(1)項の(a)に述べる使用が最初に周知となり定着するようになる日に、又は本条第(1)項の(b)に述べる2年の期間満了時に消滅するとみなされる。 - 特許庁

A resident of a Contracting State shall be a qualified person for a taxable year only if such resident is either: a) an individual; b) a qualified governmental entity; c) a company (including a company participating in a dual listed company arrangement), if its principal class of shares is listed or registered on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph d) of paragraph 6 and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges; d) a person other than an individual or a company, if the principal class of units in that person is listed or admitted to dealings on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph d) of paragraph 6 and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges; e) a pension fund, provided that as of the end of the prior taxable year more than 50 per cent of its beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals who are residents of either Contracting State; f) an organisation established under the law of that Contracting State and operated exclusively for a religious, charitable, educational, scientific, artistic, cultural or public purposes, provided that all or part of its income, profits or gains may be exempt from tax under the domestic law of that Contracting State; or g) a person other than an individual, if residents of either Contracting State that are qualified persons by reason of the provisions of subparagraphs a) to f) of this paragraph own, directly or indirectly, at least 50 per cent of the aggregate vote and value of the shares of the person, or at least 50 per cent of the beneficial interests in the person. 例文帳に追加

一方の締約国の居住者が次の(a)から(g)までに掲げる者のいずれかに該当する場合には、当該一方の締約国の居住者は、各課税年度において適格者とする。(a)個人(b)適格政府機関(c)法人（二元上場法人に関する取決めに参加する法人を含むものとし、その主たる種類の株式が、６(d)(i)又は(ii)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は登録され、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるものに限る。）(d)個人又は法人以外の者（その主たる種類の持分証券が、６(d)(i)又は(ii)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は当該公認の有価証券市場において取引が認められ、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるものに限る。）(e)年金基金（当該課税年度の直前の課税年度の終了の日においてその受益者、構成員又は参加者の五十パーセントを超えるものがいずれかの締約国の居住者である個人であるものに限る。）(f)当該一方の締約国の法令に基づいて設立された団体であって、専ら宗教、慈善、教育、科学、芸術、文化その他公の目的のために運営されるもの（当該一方の締約国の法令において所得、利得又は収益の全部又は一部に対する租税が免除されるものに限る。）(g)個人以外の者（その者の株式の議決権及び価値の五十パーセント以上又はその者の受益に関する持分の五十パーセント以上を(a)から(f)までに掲げる適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が直接又は間接に所有する場合に限る。） - 財務省

qualified person, in relation to a deceased owner, means a person who satisfies the Commissioner that he or she has obtained or is entitled to obtain probate of the will of the deceased owner or letters of administration in his or her estate in the place where the deceased owner was domiciled at his or her death, or that he or she is the legal representative of the deceased owner in that place: that probate of the will of the deceased owner or letters of administration in his or her estate have not been granted or resealed in New Zealand: that the interests of the creditors of the deceased owner, and of all persons beneficially interested under his or her will or on his or her intestacy, will be adequately safeguarded if the Commissioner registers the qualified person as the owner of the trade mark例文帳に追加

「有資格者」とは，死亡した所有者の関連においては，次に掲げる事項を局長に認めさせた者をいう。当人が，死亡した所有者がその死亡時に本居(ドミサイル)としていた場所にある地所において，死亡した所有者の遺言検認書若しくは遺産管理状を入手したか若しくは入手する権利を有する者であること，又は当人が死亡した所有者の当該場所における法定代理人であること死亡した所有者の，その地所における遺言検認書若しくは遺産管理状がニュージーランドにおいて付与されていなかったか，又は再捺印されていなかったこと局長が有資格者を商標の所有者として登録した場合，死亡した所有者に係る債権者及びその遺言又は無遺言に基づくすべての受益者の利益が適切に保護されること - 特許庁

When Portia parted with her husband, she spoke cheeringly to him, and bade him bring his dear friend along with him when he returned;yet she feared it would go hard with Anthonio, and when she was left one, she began to think and consider within herself, if she could byany means be instrumental in saving the life of her dear Bassanio'sfriend; and notwithstanding, when she wished to honour her Bassanio,she had said to him with such a meek and wife-like grace, that shewould submit in all things to be governed by his superior wisdom,yet being now called forth into action by the peril of her honouredhusband's friend, she did nothing doubt her own powers, and by thesole guidance of her own true and perfect judgment, at once resolved to go herself to Venice, and speak in Anthonio's defence. 例文帳に追加

ポーシャが夫と別れるとき、明るく夫に話しかけ、帰ってくるときに親友を一緒に連れてきてほしいと頼んだ。それでもポーシャは、アントニオはつらい目にあうなと心配しており、１人になったときに心の中でいろいろ思いめぐらしはじめた。愛するバサーニオの友だちを救うために、自分がどうにかして役に立てないだろうか、考えることにしたのだ。ポーシャがバサーニオに敬意を表そうとしたときには、大変おとなしく、妻としての従順さをもって、何事もあなたの優れた知恵に従いますと言ったのであるが、今や尊敬する夫の友だちが危機に陥っているのだからみずから行動に移さねばならなくなっていたし、ポーシャは自分の力を信じ切っていたから、真実にして完全なる自分自身の判断だけに従い、すぐに自分がヴェニスに行き、アントニオの弁護をしようと決心した。 - Shakespeare『ヴェニスの商人』

Shylock finding himself defeated in his cruel intent, said with a disappointed look, that he would take the money; and Bassanio, rejoiced beyond measure at Anthonio's unexpected deliverance, cried out, "Here is the money!" But Portia stopped him, saying, "Softly; there is no haste; the Jew shall have nothing but the penalty: therefore prepare, Shylock, to cut off the flesh; but mind you shed no blood; nor do not cut off more nor less than just a pound; be it more or less by one poor scruple, nay if the scale turn but by the weight of a single hair, you are condemned by the laws of Venice to die, and all your wealth is forfeited to the senate. 例文帳に追加

シャイロックは、自分の残酷なもくろみが実行できなくなったことに気がついて、がっかりした顔つきで、お金を頂くことにいたしますと言った。バサーニオは、アントニオが思いがけず救出されたことをこの上なく喜び、こう叫んだ。「ここにそのお金がありますよ！」だがポーシャはこう言ってシャイロックを止めた。「ちょっと待て、何も急ぐことはない。このユダヤ人にはあの罰金以外の何物も与えてはならぬ。それゆえ、準備しなさい、シャイロック。肉を切り取るのだ。だが、血を一滴も流さないように気をつけるのだ。また、ちょうど１ポンドより多くも少なくも切り取ってはならぬぞ。それよりわずか１スクループル［＃注９］多くても少なくても、いや、もしそのはかりが髪の毛一本分でも余分に回ったら、お前はヴェニスの法律によって死刑を宣告されるのだ。そしてお前の財産はすべて元老院に没収されるのだ。」 - Shakespeare『ヴェニスの商人』

This shall not apply to registration of deposit account names in cases where there are constraints on the information system, etc., for example, where deposit account names can be registered only in the Latin alphabet at foreign banks, etc. In addition, where deposit account names cannot be registered in the Latin alphabet due to constraints in the information system, etc., the institution is not necessarily required to review the information system, etc. if it is possible to check that there is no relevant deposit account at the institution in cases where those subject to regulations are expanded and changed (for example, where those subject to economic sanctions such as asset freeze are added by a public notice) by extracting information about holders of Non-Residents’ Deposit Accounts, etc. from information about all deposit account names through complete enumeration and preparing a list that is searchable by an electromagnetic means. In this case, it is necessary to set the provisions on administrative work with regard to management procedures, etc. of the list as it is necessary to make additions, etc. to the information about holders of Non-Residents’ Deposit Accounts, etc. in the list in a timely and appropriate manner. 例文帳に追加

外国銀行など預金口座名義をアルファベット名しか登録できないなど情報システム等に制約がある場合における預金口座名義の登録についてはこの限りではない。また、情報システム等の制約により、アルファベット名での預金口座名義の登録ができない場合においては、非居住者等預金口座の名義人情報を全預金口座名義情報から悉皆調査により抽出して、電磁的な方法により検索できるリストを作成し、告示により資産凍結等経済制裁対象者が追加される等、規制の対象が拡大、変更された場合に、該当する預金口座がないことを照合することができれば、必ずしも当該情報システム等の見直しを求めるものではない。この場合において、当該リストの非居住者等預金口座の名義人情報の追加等については、適時適切に行う必要があることから、当該リストの管理手順等について事務規定を定める必要がある。 - 財務省

Sec.151 Cancellation 151.1. A petition to cancel a registration of a mark under this Act may be filed with the Bureau of Legal Affairs by any person who believes that he is or will be damaged by the registration of a mark under this Act, as follows: (a) Within five years from the date of the registration of the mark under this Act. (b) At any time, if the registered mark becomes the generic name for the goods or services, or a portion thereof, for which it is registered, or has been abandoned, or its registration was obtained fraudulently or contrary to the provisions of this Act, or if the registered mark is being used by, or with the permission of, the registrant so as to misrepresent the source of the goods or services on or in connection with which the mark is used. If the registered mark becomes the generic name for less than all of the goods or services for which it is registered, a petition to cancel the registration for only those goods or services may be filed. A registered mark shall not be deemed to be the generic name of goods or services solely because such mark is also used as a name of or to identify a unique product or service. The primary significance of the registered mark to the relevant public rather than purchaser motivation shall be the test for determining whether the registered mark has become the generic name of goods or services on or in connection with which it has been used. (c) At any time, if the registered owner of the mark without legitimate reason fails to use the mark within the Philippines, or to cause it to be used in the Philippines by virtue of a license during an uninterrupted period of three years or longer.例文帳に追加

第151条 取消 151.1本法による標章の登録により損害を受けている又は損害を受けるであろうと考える者は，法律局に対して当該標章登録の取消の請求をすることができる。ただし，次の条件に従う。 (a)取消の請求は，本法に基づく当該標章の登録日から5年以内にしなければならない。 (b)取消の請求は，当該登録標章が登録に係る商品若しくはサ－ビス若しくはその一部について一般名称になっているか若しくは放棄されている場合，当該登録が不正に得られたか若しくは本法の規定に反してなされた場合，又は権利者により若しくは権利者の承認のもとに当該登録標章が商品若しくはサ－ビスの出所を偽って表示するように使用されている場合は，いつでもすることができる。登録標章が登録に係る商品又はサ－ビスの一部について一般名称になっている場合は，当該一部の商品又はサ－ビスについてのみ取消の請求をすることができる。登録標章は，当該標章がある独特の商品若しくはサ－ビスの名称としても又はある独特の商品若しくはサ－ビスを特定するためにも使用されているということのみを理由としては，商品又はサ－ビスの一般名称であるとはみなさない。登録標章が当該標章を使用している商品又はサ－ビスの一般名称になっているか否かを決定するに当たっては，購入者の購入の動機ではなく，関連する公衆にとっての当該標章の主要な意味が基準になる。 (c)取消の請求は，権利者が正当な理由なくして3年以上継続してフィリピンにおいて当該標章を使用しなかったか又はライセンスによりフィリピンにおいて使用させることをしなかった場合は，いつでもすることができる。 - 特許庁

An applicant who is not a resident of the Philippines must appoint and maintain a resident agent or representative in the Philippines upon whom notice or process for judicial or administrative procedure relating to the application for patent or the patent may be served. (a) If there are two or more agents appointed by the applicant, the Office shall forward all actions to the last agent appointed. A substitute or associate attorney may be appointed by an attorney only upon the written authorization of his principal; but a third attorney appointed by the second will not be recognized. (b) Revocation of Power of Attorney. -- A power of attorney or authorization may be revoked at any stage in the proceedings of a case upon proper notification to the Director General, and, when revoked, the Office will notify the attorney or agent of such revocation and shall communicate directly with the applicant or with such other attorney or agent as he may later appoint.例文帳に追加

フィリピンの居住者でない出願人は，特許出願又は特許に関する司法上又は行政上の手続に係る通知又は処分の送達を受けるフィリピンに居住する代理人を指名し，かつ，維持しなければならない。 (a)出願人が2以上の代理人を指名した場合は，庁は，最後に指名された代理人にすべての処分を送達する。代理人は，本人の書面による授権がある場合にのみ，復代理人又は準代理人を指名することができる。復代理人が復々代理人を指名することは認められない。 (b)委任状の取消 委任状又は授権状は，長官への適切な届出があったときは，事件の手続の如何なる段階においても取り消すことができ，取消があったときは，庁は，当該取消を代理人に通知し，出願人又は出願人が後に指名する代理人に直接知らせるものとする。 - 特許庁

(1) Notwithstanding anything in any rule of law, an invention made by an employee shall, as between him and his employer, be taken to belong to his employer for the purposes of this Act and all other purposes if -- (a) the invention was made in the course of the normal duties of the employee or in the course of duties falling outside his normal duties, but specifically assigned to him, and the circumstances in either case were such that an invention might reasonably be expected to result from the carrying out of his duties; or (b) the invention was made in the course of the duties of the employee and, at the time of making the invention, because of the nature of his duties and the particular responsibilities arising from the nature of his duties he had a special obligation to further the interests of the employer's undertaking.例文帳に追加

(1) 如何なる法規の如何なる規定にも拘らず，従業者により行われる発明は，同人とその使用者との間では，次の場合は，本法の適用上及び他のすべての目的で，当該使用者に帰属すると解される。 (a) 当該発明が当該従業者の通常の職務の過程又は同人の通常の職務外であるが特別に同人に割り当てられた職務の過程で行われ，かつ，何れの場合の状況も同人の職務遂行の結果として発明が期待されて当然であった場合，又は (b) 当該発明が当該従業者の職務の過程で行われ，かつ，当該発明が行われた時点で，当該従業者の職務の性質上及び同人の職務の性質から生じる特定の責任により，同人に当該使用者の事業の利益を促進する特別の義務があった場合 - 特許庁

(11) The Registrar shall consider the application with regard to the following matters, that is to say . (a) whether the applicant is competent to certify the goods or services in respect of which the mark is to be registered; (b) whether the draft rules are satisfactory; and (c) whether in all the circumstances the registrations applied for would be to the public advantage, and may either - (i) refuse to accept the application; or (ii) accept the application and approve the rules, either without modification and unconditionally or subject to any conditions, amendments, modifications or limitations of the application or of the rules, which he may think requisite, but except in the case of acceptance and approval without modification and unconditionally, the Registrar shall not decide the matter without giving to the applicant an opportunity of being heard and the Registrar may, at the request of the applicant, consider the application before authorisation to proceed with the application has been given, so that he shall be at liberty to reconsider any matter on which he has given a decision if any amendment or modification is thereafter made in the application or in the draft rules.例文帳に追加

(11) 登録官は，次の事項について出願を検討する。すなわち， (a) 出願人が商標登録に係る商品又はサービスを証明する上で適格であるか否か (b) 規約が十分なものか否か，及び (c) 一切の事情に照らし，出願された登録を行うことが公共の利益に適うか否か また，次の何れかの対応を行うことができる。 (i) 出願を拒絶すること，又は (ii) 無修正かつ無条件で，又は自己が必要と判断する条件，補正，修正又は制限を出願又は規約案に付して，出願を受理し規約案を承認すること ただし，無修正かつ無条件で受理及び承認を行う場合を除いて，登録官は，出願人に聴聞を受ける機会を与えることなく決定を行なってはならず，また，登録官は，出願人の請求があった場合は，出願の続行を許可する前に出願についての判断を行うことができ，一旦決定を行なった事項についても，その後出願又は規約案に補正又は修正がなされたときは，裁量によりその事項を再検討することができる。 - 特許庁

If a person sells, or exposes for sale, or has in his possession for sale or for any purpose of trade or manufacturer any goods or things to which a false trademark or a false trade description is applied or which, being required under section 108 to have applied to them an indication of the country or place in which they were made or produced or the name and address of the manufacturer or producer or the person for whom the goods are manufactured or produced are without the indication so require, he shall, unless the proves (a) that, having taken all reasonable precautions against committing an offence against this section, he had at the time of the commission of the alleged offence no reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description or that any offence had been committed in respect of the goods; and (b) that, on demand by or on behalf of the prosecutor he gave all the information in his power with respect to the person from whom he obtained such goods or things; or (c) that otherwise he acted innocently, be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 2 (two) years, or with fine, or with both, and in case of a second or subsequent conviction, with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to 3 (three) years, or with fine, or with both. 例文帳に追加

不正な商標若しくは虚偽の商品表示を付して、又は、第108条の規定により付すことが求められる製造若しくは生産される国若しくは地域、又は製造者若しくは生産者又は商品がその者のために製造若しくは生産される者の名称及び住所を表示することなく、商品又は物品を販売する者、又は販売用の展示を行う者、又は販売目的、取引若しくは製造の目的で所持する者は、次に掲げる事項が証明されない限り、2年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科、再犯若しくは累犯はいずれの場合も3年以下の禁固又は罰金若しくはこれを併科する。(a)本条に定める侵害に対して合理的なすべての予防措置を講じており、侵害があったとされる時点で、当該商標若しくは商品表示の真実性を疑う、又は当該商品に関して何らかの違反があったことを疑う、どのような理由もなかったこと。(b)検察官の要求に応じて、又は検察官のために、当該商品又は物品の入手先である者について自己の権限が及ぶ限りすべての情報を提供したこと。(c)その他の点においても正直に行動したこと。 - 特許庁

Article 522 (1) If the court finds it necessary after the commencement of special liquidation considering the status of the assets of a Liquidating Stock Company, it may effect the disposition ordering that the matters listed below be investigated by investigators (hereinafter in Article 533 referred to as "Investigation Order") in response to a petition by liquidators, Company Auditors, creditors who have claims equivalent to one tenth or more of the total amount of the claims of creditors that have stated their claims and other creditors known to the Liquidating Stock Company, or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or ex officio: 例文帳に追加

第五百二十二条　裁判所は、特別清算開始後において、清算株式会社の財産の状況を考慮して必要があると認めるときは、清算人、監査役、債権の申出をした債権者その他清算株式会社に知れている債権者の債権の総額の十分の一以上に当たる債権を有する債権者若しくは総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主の申立てにより又は職権で、次に掲げる事項について、調査委員による調査を命ずる処分（第五百三十三条において「調査命令」という。）をすることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Another point that I would like to make is closer to home. In my opinion, it is critical for a politician to have a bird's eye and an insect's eye – both of these. Having been a politician for 25 years, I feel that it is imperative that politics in a democratic nation have an insect's eye to really look at things up close. I might get a disapproving look if I use the expression "an insect's eye" in this context but, right after the Amended Money Lending Business Act came into full force, we established the Amended Money Lending Business Act Follow-Up Team, which was in all likelihood an unprecedented move since the Meiji era. While 15 million people use services of the money lending industry, we enacted, with unanimous support, a law designed to prevent multiple debtors from being generated. As the level of per-household income dropped by one million yen amid deflation notably in the past ten years, we hear, and really hear, suffering voices and sighs of people in various forms of livelihood hardships attributable to those difficult times. 例文帳に追加

それからもう1点は身近な話でございますけれども、私は政治家というのは鳥の目と虫の目が大事だと思っております。両方です。やはり本当に身近な虫の目もないと、民主主義国家において政治は駄目だと、私は25年させていただいて、そう思っておりまして。「虫の目」と言ったらおしかりいただくかもしれませんけれども、やはり改正貸金業法の（完全施行）後、こんなことは明治以来、多分、例がないと思うのですが、施行したすぐ後に改正貸金業法フォローアップチームを作りました。これは1,500万人の方が貸金業を利用しておられる中で、全会一致で多重債務者を防ごうという法律を作ったわけでございます。特にこの10年間、デフレの中で1世帯当たり100万円、所得が減ったわけでございますから、そういった時代において、現実に色々な一人一人の生活の本当にうめき声やため息が聞こえてくるわけでございます。 - 金融庁

(3) In the cases where the Stock Company Absorbed in Absorption-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Exchange is a Company with Classes of Shares, if all or part of the Consideration for the Merger, etc. are Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc. (meaning Shares with a Restriction on Transfer and those prescribed by the applicable Ordinance of the Ministry of Justice as being equivalent thereto; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Chapter), the Absorption-type Merger or the Share Exchange shall not become effective without a resolution of a Class Meeting constituted by the Class Shareholders of the class of shares subject to the allotment of the Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc. (excluding Shares with a Restriction on Transfer) (in cases where there are two or more classes of shares relating to such Class Shareholders, the respective Class Meetings constituted by Class Shareholders categorized by the class of such two or more classes of shares); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder who is able to exercise a voting right at such Class Meeting. 例文帳に追加

３　吸収合併消滅株式会社又は株式交換完全子会社が種類株式発行会社である場合において、合併対価等の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式等（譲渡制限株式その他これに準ずるものとして法務省令で定めるものをいう。以下この章において同じ。）であるときは、吸収合併又は株式交換は、当該譲渡制限株式等の割当てを受ける種類の株式（譲渡制限株式を除く。）の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあっては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. 例文帳に追加

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

Article 844 (1) In cases where a judgment upholding a claim relating to an action seeking invalidation of a Share Exchange or Share Transfer of a Stock Company has become final and binding, if the Stock Company acquiring all of the Issued Shares (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Wholly Owning Parent Company" in this Article) of the Stock Company effecting the Share Exchange or Share Transfer (hereinafter referred to as the "Former Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company" in this Article) has delivered the shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company (hereinafter referred to as the "Shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company" in this Article) at the time of the Share Exchange or Share Transfer, the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company shall deliver to shareholders pertaining to the Shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company as of the time such judgment became final and conclusive the shares of the Former Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company (hereinafter referred to as the "Shares of the Former Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company" in this Article) that had been held, at the time of the Share Exchange or Share Transfer, by the persons who received delivery of the Shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company. In such cases, when such Former Wholly Owning Parent Company is a Company Issuing Share Certificates, the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company may request such shareholders to return the old share certificates representing such Shares of the Former Wholly Owning Parent Company in exchange for the delivery of such Shares of the Former Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company. 例文帳に追加

第八百四十四条　株式会社の株式交換又は株式移転の無効の訴えに係る請求を認容する判決が確定した場合において、株式交換又は株式移転をする株式会社（以下この条において「旧完全子会社」という。）の発行済株式の全部を取得する株式会社（以下この条において「旧完全親会社」という。）が当該株式交換又は株式移転に際して当該旧完全親会社の株式（以下この条において「旧完全親会社株式」という。）を交付したときは、当該旧完全親会社は、当該判決の確定時における当該旧完全親会社株式に係る株主に対し、当該株式交換又は株式移転の際に当該旧完全親会社株式の交付を受けた者が有していた旧完全子会社の株式（以下この条において「旧完全子会社株式」という。）を交付しなければならない。この場合において、旧完全親会社が株券発行会社であるときは、当該旧完全親会社は、当該株主に対し、当該旧完全子会社株式を交付するのと引換えに、当該旧完全親会社株式に係る旧株券を返還することを請求することができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(3) In the cases where the Stock Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Transfer is a Company with Classes of Shares, if all or part of the shares, etc. of the Stock Company Incorporated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owning Parent Stock Company Incorporated through Share Transfer to be delivered to shareholders of the Stock Company(ies) Consolidated through Consolidation-type Merger or the Wholly Owned Subsidiary Company in Share Transfer are Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc., the Consolidation-type Merger or the Share Transfer shall not become effective without a resolution of a Class Meeting constituted by Class Shareholders of the class of shares subject to the allotment of the Shares with a Restriction on Transfer, etc. (excluding Shares with a Restriction on Transfer) (in cases where there are two or more classes of shares relating to such Class Shareholders, the respective Class Meetings constituted by Class Shareholders categorized by the class of such two or more classes of shares); provided, however, that this shall not apply to cases where there is no Class Shareholder able to exercise a voting right at such Class Meeting. 例文帳に追加

３　新設合併消滅株式会社又は株式移転完全子会社が種類株式発行会社である場合において、新設合併消滅株式会社又は株式移転完全子会社の株主に対して交付する新設合併設立株式会社又は株式移転設立完全親株式会社の株式等の全部又は一部が譲渡制限株式等であるときは、当該新設合併又は株式移転は、当該譲渡制限株式等の割当てを受ける種類の株式（譲渡制限株式を除く。）の種類株主を構成員とする種類株主総会（当該種類株主に係る株式の種類が二以上ある場合にあっては、当該二以上の株式の種類別に区分された種類株主を構成員とする各種類株主総会）の決議がなければ、その効力を生じない。ただし、当該種類株主総会において議決権を行使することができる株主が存しない場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 58-6 (1) Mayors of municipalities shall, if it is deemed that land (excluding land pertaining to notification pursuant to the provision of Article 28 paragraph (1) of the National Land Utilization Act (Act No. 92 of l974) and land owned by the State, local governments and port authorities) belonging to owners of land within the relevant unused land use promotional areas conforms to the following conditions after two years elapse counting from the day after public notice is given pursuant to the provision of Article 20 paragraph (1) concerning city plans relating to unused land use promotion areas(including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 21 paragraph (2)), notify the relevant landowners (when surface rights and/or other rights aimed at securing the use or appropriation of all or part of the said land as specified by Cabinet Order are fixed, then these right holders and the relevant landowners) that the relevant land is unused land pursuant to the provision of the Ordinance of the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure, Transport and Tourism: 例文帳に追加

第五十八条の六　市町村長は、遊休土地転換利用促進地区に関する都市計画についての第二十条第一項（第二十一条第二項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定による告示の日の翌日から起算して二年を経過した後において、当該遊休土地転換利用促進地区内の土地を所有している者のその所有に係る土地（国土利用計画法（昭和四十九年法律第九十二号）第二十八条第一項の規定による通知に係る土地及び国又は地方公共団体若しくは港務局の所有する土地を除く。）が次に掲げる要件に該当すると認めるときは、国土交通省令で定めるところにより、当該土地の所有者（当該土地の全部又は一部について地上権その他の政令で定める使用又は収益を目的とする権利が設定されているときは、当該権利を有している者及び当該土地の所有者）に当該土地が遊休土地である旨を通知するものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(1) At the end of each business year, with respect to gains and losses resulting from the business of the Partnership, (i) the following shall be allocated to each Partner who participates in each respective Portfolio Investment in proportion to its Percentage Interest concerning such Portfolio Investment: (a) gains and losses resulting from a disposition of such Portfolio Investment, (b) expenses related to such Portfolio Investment and (c) other gains and losses attributable to such Portfolio Investment; and (ii) gains and losses that are not attributable to any Portfolio Investment shall be allocated to each Partner in proportion to its Capital Commitment (or, in the case of management fees as set forth in Article 33(2)(iii), its Capital Contribution); provided, however, that, if such allocation would result in the Interest Amount of any Limited Partner being less than zero (the Interest Amount calculated without application of this proviso clause is hereinafter referred to as the “Provisional Interest Amount”), the Interest Amount of such Limited Partner shall be zero and all excess losses shall be allocated to the General Partner. 例文帳に追加

1. 各事業年度末において、本組合の事業に関する損益については、(ⅰ)各ポートフォリオ投資の処分からの損益、各ポートフォリオ投資に係る費用その他各ポートフォリオ投資に帰せられる損益は当該各ポートフォリオ投資に参加した各組合員の当該各ポートフォリオ投資に係る対象持分割合に応じて各組合員に帰属し、(ⅱ)いずれのポートフォリオ投資にも帰せられない損益は各組合員の出資約束金額（但し、第33 条第2 項第③号に規定する管理報酬については出資履行金額）の割合に応じて各組合員に帰属するものとする。但し、これによりいずれかの有限責任組合員の持分金額が零を下回ることとなる場合（かかる本項但書きを適用せずに計算した持分金額を「仮持分金額」という。）には、当該有限責任組合員の持分金額は零とし、当該零を下回る部分に相当する損失は全て無限責任組合員に帰属するものとする。 - 経済産業省

(4) In the case where a Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations which has prepared an authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan intends to issue a resolution on a change to a Fishery Right Exercise Rule or a Piscary Exercise Rule as provided in paragraph (1) of this Article at a general meeting (including a representatives' meeting), to conform to the contents of the matter provided in Article 4, paragraph (2), item (iii) of this Act in order to make the members of the Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations comply with the contents of the authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 50 of the Aquatic Industry Cooperative Association Act (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 52, paragraph (6) of the same Act which is then applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 92, paragraph (3) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply elsewhere in this paragraph) applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 92 of the same Act, the Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations shall not be required to issue a resolution pursuant to the provisions of Article 50 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 92 of the same Act, if the consent of all of the member Fisheries Cooperative Associations respectively, directly or indirectly consisting of the specific members (hereinafter referred to as "Specific Members' Associations") is obtained pursuant to ordinance of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 例文帳に追加

４　認定漁場改善計画を作成した漁業協同組合連合会が、認定漁場改善計画の内容を遵守させるために、総会（総代会を含む。）で、第四条第二項第三号に掲げる事項の内容に適合するように行う第一項に規定する漁業権行使規則又は入漁権行使規則の変更の議決を行おうとする場合において、特定組合員を直接又は間接の構成員とする会員たる漁業協同組合（以下「特定組合員所属組合」という。）のすべての同意を農林水産省令で定めるところにより得ているときは、水産業協同組合法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十条（同法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十二条第六項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定にかかわらず、同法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十条の規定による議決によることを要しないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 41 (1) The provisions of Article 296 (Calling of Shareholders Meeting), Article 298 (excluding the proviso to paragraphs (2) and (3)) (Determination to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 299 (excluding items of paragraph (2)) (Notice of Calling of Shareholders' Meetings), Article 300 to 302 inclusive (Omission of Calling Procedures, Giving of Reference Documents for Shareholders Meeting and Voting Forms), Article 310 to 312 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Method), Article 314 to 317 inclusive (Accountability of Directors, etc., Authority of Chairperson, Investigation of Materials Submitted to the Shareholders Meeting, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), Article 318 (excluding paragraph (5)) (Minutes), Article 319 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Omission of Resolution of Shareholders Meetings) and Article 320 (Omission of Reports to Shareholders Meetings) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the general meeting of members of a Mutual Company. In this case, the terms "Stock Company" and "company with board of directors" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "Mutual Company"; the term "head office" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "principal office"; the term "operating hours" in those provisions shall be deemed to be replaced with "business hours"; the term "Annual shareholders meeting" in Article 296, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Annual general meeting of members"; the term "paragraph (4) of the following Article" in Article 296, paragraph (3), and the term "paragraph (4) of the preceding Article" in Article 298, paragraphs (1) and (4) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38, paragraph (2) and Article 50, paragraph (2) of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "(excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at a shareholders meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 302 inclusive)" in Article 298, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company is a Stock Company other than the Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 299, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks"; the term "in the following cases" in Article 299, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be deleted; the term "Reference Document for Shareholders Meeting" in Articles 301 and 302 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "reference document for general meeting of members"; the term "shareholders (excluding the shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at the shareholders meeting under the preceding paragraph. The same shall apply hereinafter in paragraph (4) of the following Article and in Article 312, paragraph (5))" in Article 310, paragraph (7) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members"; the term "Article 297" in Article 316, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 38 of the Insurance Business Act"; the term "branch offices" in Article 318, paragraph (3) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "secondary offices"; and the term "all shareholders (limited to those who may exercise their votes with respect to such matter)" in Article 319, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all members"; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第四十一条　会社法第二百九十六条（株主総会の招集）、第二百九十八条（第二項ただし書及び第三項を除く。）（株主総会の招集の決定）、第二百九十九条（第二項各号を除く。）（株主総会の招集の通知）、第三百条から第三百二条まで（招集手続の省略、株主総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第三百十条から第三百十二条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第三百十四条から第三百十七条まで（取締役等の説明義務、議長の権限、株主総会に提出された資料等の調査、延期又は続行の決議）、第三百十八条（第五項を除く。）（議事録）、第三百十九条（第四項を除く。）（株主総会の決議の省略）及び第三百二十条（株主総会への報告の省略）の規定は、相互会社の社員総会について準用する。この場合において、これらの規定中「株式会社」とあり、及び「取締役会設置会社」とあるのは「相互会社」と、「株主」とあるのは「社員」と、「本店」とあるのは「主たる事務所」と、「営業時間」とあるのは「事業時間」と、同法第二百九十六条第一項中「定時株主総会」とあるのは「定時社員総会」と、同条第三項中「次条第四項」とあり、並びに同法第二百九十八条第一項及び第四項中「前条第四項」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条第二項又は第五十条第二項」と、同条第二項中「（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条から第三百二条までにおいて同じ。）の数」とあるのは「の数」と、同法第二百九十九条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、公開会社でない株式会社にあっては、一週間（当該株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同法第三百一条及び第三百二条中「株主総会参考書類」とあるのは「社員総会参考書類」と、同法第三百十条第七項中「株主（前項の株主総会において決議をした事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。次条第四項及び第三百十二条第五項において同じ。）」とあるのは「社員」と、同法第三百十六条第二項中「第二百九十七条」とあるのは「保険業法第三十八条」と、同法第三百十八条第三項中「支店」とあるのは「従たる事務所」と、同法第三百十九条第一項中「株主（当該事項について議決権を行使することができるものに限る。）の全員」とあるのは「社員の全員」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(6) The provisions of Article 67 (Determinations to Call Organizational Meetings), Article 68 (excluding items in paragraph (2)) (Notices of Calling of Organizational Meetings), Articles 70 and Article 71 (Giving of Organizational Meeting Reference Documents and Voting Forms), Article 73, paragraph (4) (Resolutions of Organizational Meetings), Article 74 to 76 inclusive (Proxy Voting, Voting in Writing, Voting by Electromagnetic Means), Article 78 to 80 inclusive (Accountability of Incorporators, Authority of Chairperson, Resolution for Postponement or Adjournment), and Article 81 (excluding paragraph (4)) (Minutes) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the Organizational Meeting of a Mutual Company; and the provisions of Article 830 (Action for Declaratory Judgment on Nonexistence or Nullity of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 831 (Lawsuit for Rescission of Resolution of Shareholders Meeting, etc.), Article 834 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (xvi) and (xvii)) (Defendant), Article 835, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Claim), Article 836, paragraphs (1) and (3) (Order to Furnish Security), Article 837 (Compulsory Consolidation of Oral Arguments, etc.), Article 838 (Scope of Effect of Judgment in Favor of Claim), Article 846 (Liability for Damages in Case of Defeat of Plaintiff), and Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (i), (g)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to an action for a declaratory judgment on nonexistence or nullity of, or rescission of a resolution of a Mutual Company's Organizational Meeting, respectively. In this case, the terms "Shareholders at Incorporation" in those provisions (excluding Article 67, paragraph (2) and Article 831, paragraph (1) of that Act), and "Shareholders at Incorporation (excluding Shareholders at Incorporation who may not exercise votes on all matters which may be resolved at Organizational Meetings. The same shall apply in the following Article to Article 71 inclusive.)" in Article 67, paragraph (2) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "prospective members;" the term "two weeks (or one week if the Stock Company to be incorporated is not a Public Company, except in cases where the matters listed in paragraph (1), item (iii) or (iv) of the preceding Article are decided, (or if a shorter period of time is provided for in the articles of incorporation in cases where the Stock Company to be incorporated is a Stock Company other than a Company with Board of Directors, such shorter period of time))" in Article 68, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "two weeks;" the term "shall be in writing in the following cases" in Article 68, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "shall be in writing;" the term "Article 27, item (v), or Article 59, paragraph (3), item (i)" in Article 68, paragraph (5) shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 30-7, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Insurance Business Act;" the term "shareholders, etc. (or, shareholders, etc., shareholders at incorporation, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the shareholder meeting, etc. set forth in the relevant item is an Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in Article 831, paragraph (1) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members, directors, auditors or liquidators (or, members, directors, executive officers or liquidators in a company with Committees), or prospective members, directors at incorporation (referring to the directors at incorporation set forth in Article 30-10, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) or company auditors at incorporation (referring to the company auditors at incorporation set forth in paragraph (1) of that Article; hereinafter the same shall apply in this paragraph) of a Mutual Company;" and the term" directors, company auditors or liquidators (including a person who has the rights and obligations of a director, company auditor or liquidator pursuant to the provision of Article 346, paragraph (1) (including the cases where it is applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479, paragraph (4)) where the resolution is a resolution of the shareholders meeting or class meeting, and including directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation where the resolution is a resolution of the Organizational Meeting or class Organizational Meeting" in the same paragraph of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "directors, company auditors, liquidators, directors at incorporation or company auditors at incorporation;", and any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

６　会社法第六十七条（創立総会の招集の決定）、第六十八条（第二項各号を除く。）（創立総会の招集の通知）、第七十条、第七十一条（創立総会参考書類及び議決権行使書面の交付等）、第七十三条第四項（創立総会の決議）、第七十四条から第七十六条まで（議決権の代理行使、書面による議決権の行使、電磁的方法による議決権の行使）、第七十八条から第八十条まで（発起人の説明義務、議長の権限、延期又は続行の決議）及び第八十一条（第四項を除く。）（議事録）の規定は相互会社の創立総会について、同法第八百三十条（株主総会等の決議の不存在又は無効の確認の訴え）、第八百三十一条（株主総会等の決議の取消しの訴え）、第八百三十四条（第十六号及び第十七号に係る部分に限る。）（被告）、第八百三十五条第一項（訴えの管轄）、第八百三十六条第一項及び第三項（担保提供命令）、第八百三十七条（弁論等の必要的併合）、第八百三十八条（認容判決の効力が及ぶ者の範囲）、第八百四十六条（原告が敗訴した場合の損害賠償責任）並びに第九百三十七条第一項（第一号トに係る部分に限る。）（裁判による登記の嘱託）の規定は相互会社の創立総会の決議の不存在若しくは無効の確認又は取消しの訴えについて、それぞれ準用する。この場合において、これらの規定（同法第六十七条第二項及び第八百三十一条第一項を除く。）中「設立時株主」とあり、及び同法第六十七条第二項中「設立時株主（創立総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない設立時株主を除く。次条から第七十一条までにおいて同じ。）」とあるのは「社員になろうとする者」と、同法第六十八条第一項中「二週間（前条第一項第三号又は第四号に掲げる事項を定めたときを除き、設立しようとする株式会社が公開会社でない場合にあっては、一週間（当該設立しようとする株式会社が取締役会設置会社以外の株式会社である場合において、これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間））」とあるのは「二週間」と、同条第二項中「次に掲げる場合には、前項」とあるのは「前項」と、同条第五項中「第二十七条第五号又は第五十九条第三項第一号」とあるのは「保険業法第三十条の七第二項第一号」と、同法第八百三十一条第一項中「株主等（当該各号の株主総会等が創立総会又は種類創立総会である場合にあっては、株主等、設立時株主、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役）」とあるのは「相互会社の社員、取締役、監査役若しくは清算人（委員会設置会社にあっては、社員、取締役、執行役又は清算人）又は社員になろうとする者、設立時取締役（保険業法第三十条の十第一項に規定する設立時取締役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）若しくは設立時監査役（同条第一項に規定する設立時監査役をいう。以下この項において同じ。）」と、「取締役、監査役又は清算人（当該決議が株主総会又は種類株主総会の決議である場合にあっては第三百四十六条第一項（第四百七十九条第四項において準用する場合を含む。）の規定により取締役、監査役又は清算人としての権利義務を有する者を含み、当該決議が創立総会又は種類創立総会の決議である場合にあっては設立時取締役又は設立時監査役を含む。）」とあるのは「取締役、監査役、清算人、設立時取締役又は設立時監査役」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(7) "trade description" means any description, statement or other direct or indirect indication as to- (a) the number, quantity, measure, gauge or weight of any goods or services; or (b) the standard of quality of any goods or services, according to a classification commonly used or recognized in the trade; or (c) the strength, performance or qualities of any goods, if it is 'drug' as defined in the Drugs Act, 1940 or "food" as defined in the Pure Food Ordinance, 1959; or (d) the place or country in which or the time at which any goods or services were made or produced; or (e) the name and address or other indication of the identity of the manufacturer or of the person for whom the goods or services are manufactured; or (f) the mode of the manufacture or producing any goods or services; or (g) the material of which any goods or services are composed; or (h) any existing patent, privilege or copyright relating to any goods or services and includes,- (i) any description as to the use of any mark which according to the custom of the trade is commonly taken to be an indication of any of the matters referred to in clause (a) to (g) as trade description; (ii) the description as to any imported goods contained in a bill of entry or shipping bill; (iii) any other description which is likely to be misunderstood or mistaken for all or any of the said matters; 例文帳に追加

(7)「商品表示」とは、次に掲げるものに関する表示、記述又はその他直接若しくは間接の標識をいう。(a)商品又は役務の個数、数量、度量、ゲージ又は重量(b)取引で一般に使用又は認識される分類による商品又は役務の品質基準(c)1940年薬品法に定義する「薬品」又は1959年純正食品条例に定義する「食品」の場合は商品の強度、性能又は品質(d)商品又は役務が製造若しくは生産された場所若しくは国又は時間(e)製造者又は商品若しくは役務の製造や提供が向けられた者の名称及び住所、又は同一性に関するその他の指標(f)商品又は役務の製造又は生産の方式(g)商品又は役務を構成する材料(h)商品又は役務に関する一切の既存の特許、特権又は著作権。これらは次に掲げる表示を含む。(i)商慣習に従い一般的に(a)節から(g)節までにいう事項の商品表示として扱われる標章の使用に関する表示(ii)通関申告書又は積荷送り状に記載される輸入商品に関する表示(iii)その他上記事項の一切について誤解又は誤認のおそれのある表示 - 特許庁

(5) If the General Partner makes a distribution in kind pursuant to paragraph (3) of this Article, the General Partner shall request the Partners who are entitled to such distribution in kind to elect to either (A) receive the Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind or (B) request to the General Partner the disposition of all or part of such Portfolio Securities and to receive the proceeds of such disposition, no later than [_] days prior to the Reference Date. With respect to any Partners who communicate their intention to receive the proceeds of disposition in accordance with (B) within [_] days from such request, the General Partner shall deliver such disposition proceeds by the date of the distribution in kind after the disposition of the Portfolio Securities at such time and price as the General Partners determines in its discretion (provided that, as a general rule, such price shall be the closing price (or an equivalent price) on any day during the period from the date such communication has been made through the date of distribution in kind). In any other case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities in kind. The expenses incurred in connection with the General Partner’s disposition of Portfolio Securities pursuant to this paragraph shall be borne by the Partners who desire such disposition. 例文帳に追加

5. 無限責任組合員は、本条第3 項に基づき現物による分配を行う場合、現物分配基準日の少なくとも［ ］日前までに、当該現物分配の対象である組合員に対し、(A)分配の対象となる投資証券等を現物で受け取る方法、又は(B)当該投資証券等の全部若しくは一部の処分を無限責任組合員に依頼し、当該処分に係る処分代金を受け取る方法のいずれかを選択するよう申し出るものとする。無限責任組合員は、かかる申出から［ ］日以内に(B)の方法による処分代金の受領を希望する旨の連絡があった組合員については、無限責任組合員がその裁量により判断する時期及び価格（但し、当該連絡のあった日から現物分配を行う日までの任意の日における最終価格又はこれに準ずる価格を原則とする。）によって当該投資証券等を処分の上、現物分配を行う日にその処分代金を交付するものとし、その他の場合については、当該投資証券等の現物を交付するものとする。本項に基づく無限責任組合員による投資証券等の処分に関して発生した費用は処分を希望した組合員が負担する。 - 経済産業省

Two policemen testified that about eight o'clock on the night of Thursday they had noticed the prisoner slip into the gate of Nina San Croix's residence and go down to the side of the house, where he was admitted; that his appearance and seeming haste had attracted their attention; that they had concluded that it was some clandestine amour, and out of curiosity had both slipped down to the house and endeavored to find a position from which they could see into the room, but were unable to do so, and were about to go back to the street when they heard a woman's voice cry out in, great anger: "I know that you love her and that you want to get rid of me, but you shall not do it! You murdered him, but you shall not murder me! I have all the evidence to convict you of murdering him! The Archbishop will have it to- morrow! They shall hang you! Do you hear me? They shall hang you for this murder!" that thereupon one of the policemen proposed that they should break into the house and see what was wrong, but the other had urged that it was only the usual lovers' quarrel and if they should interfere they would find nothing upon which a charge could be based and would only be laughed at by the chief; that they had waited and listened for a time, but hearing nothing further had gone back to the street and contented themselves with keeping a strict watch on the house. 例文帳に追加

警官二人は次のように証言した。木曜日夜八時くらいに、ニーナ・サン・クロワの住居に被告人がやってきて、入り口から家の横手まで侵入し、家に招き入れられたのを見かけた。その外見やそわそわした挙動から、これは怪しいと思った。その時は、被告人が女主人の秘密の愛人なんだろうと思い、好奇心も手伝って、自分たちが屋敷に入り、なんとか部屋の中を見れるよう努力した。しかし中を見ることはできず、大通りに戻ろうとしたところ、女主人が大声で誰かをののしっている声が聞こえてきた。「あの女が好きだって事、私をのけ者にしたいんだって事は分かってるわ。でもね、言うとおりにしてもらいますから！　あなたは私の夫を殺した！　でも、私は殺されるいわれはないわ！　夫殺しの証拠はすべてそろっているのよ。大司教様には明日お見せします。あなたは縛り首間違いなしよ！　いいこと？　夫殺しは縛り首よ！」これを聞いた警官の一人は、家の中に踏み込んでなにが起こっているのか確かめなければならないと同僚に言った。だが、もう一人は単なる痴話喧嘩にすぎんと言い、もし踏み込んだとしても逮捕できるような事はなにも発見できない、署長に笑われるのがオチだと主張した。二人はしばらくその場所にとどまって耳を澄ましていたが、もうなにも聞こえてはこなかった。それで大通りに戻り、屋敷を厳重に見張ることにした。 - Melville Davisson Post『罪体』

The number specified by an ordinance of the competent ministry set forth in Article 144-7, paragraph 2 of the Act shall be the smallest number among those listed as follows: (i) the number adding one to the number obtained by multiplying 1/3 (in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for concluding a resolution of a general meeting of shareholders, that a majority of more than a certain rate of the total voting rights held by specified shareholders [which means shareholders of specified shares of stock (which means shares of stock with the contents that a shareholder can exercise voting rights at a general meeting of shareholders pertaining to actions prescribed in Article 144-7, paragraph 2 of the Act; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article); hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article] who attend said general meeting of shareholders must agree to the resolution, the rate obtained by subtracting said certain rate from one) by the number obtained by multiplying 1/2 (in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for concluding a resolution of said general meeting of shareholders, that shareholders who have more than a certain rate of the total voting rights must attend said general meeting of shareholders, said certain rate) by the total number of specified shares of stock; (ii) in the case where the articles of incorporation define, as a requirement for - 102 - concluding a resolution pertaining to actions prescribed in Article 144-7, paragraph 2 of the Act, that more than a certain number of specified shareholders must agree to the resolution, and when the number obtained by subtracting the number of specified shareholders, who had notified to a Member Commodity Exchange Surviving an Absorption-Type Merger that they would disagree with said action, from the total number of specified shareholders is less than said certain number, the number of specified shares of stock held by said specified shareholders who had notified that they would disagree with said action; (iii) in the case where the articles of incorporation have provisions other than those set forth in the preceding two items as a requirement for concluding a resolution pertaining to actions prescribed in Article 144-7, paragraph 2 of the Act, and when said resolution is not concluded if all the specified shareholders who had notified that they would disagree with said action disagree with the resolution at a general meeting of shareholders prescribed in the same paragraph, the number of specified shares of stock held by specified shareholders who had notified that they would disagree with said action; (iv) the number specified by the articles of incorporation. 例文帳に追加

法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する主務省令で定める数は、次に掲げる数のうちいず れか小さい数とする。 一特定株式（法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する行為に係る株主総会において議決 権を行使することができることを内容とする株式をいう。以下この条において同じ。） の総数に二分の一（当該株主総会の決議が成立するための要件として当該特定株式の 議決権の総数の一定の割合以上の議決権を有する株主が出席しなければならない旨の 定款の定めがある場合にあっては、当該一定の割合）を乗じて得た数に三分の一（当 該株主総会の決議が成立するための要件として当該株主総会に出席した当該特定株主 （特定株式の株主をいう。以下この条において同じ。）の有する議決権の総数の一定 の割合以上の多数が賛成しなければならない旨の定款の定めがある場合にあっては、 一から当該一定の割合を減じて得た割合）を乗じて得た数に一を加えた数 二法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する行為に係る決議が成立するための要件として 一定の数以上の特定株主の賛成を要する旨の定款の定めがある場合において、特定株 主の総数から吸収合併存続株式会社商品取引所に対して当該行為に反対する旨の通知 をした特定株主の数を減じて得た数が当該一定の数未満となるときにおける当該行為 に反対する旨の通知をした特定株主の有する特定株式の数 三法第百四十四条の七第二項に規定する行為に係る決議が成立するための要件として 前二号の定款の定め以外の定款の定めがある場合において、当該行為に反対する旨の 通知をした特定株主の全部が同項に規定する株主総会において反対したとすれば当該 決議が成立しないときは、当該行為に反対する旨の通知をした特定株主の有する特定 株式の数 - 経済産業省

The ban was fully lifted in December 2007, with the sales of all insurance products approved as a result and, now that roughly three years have passed, the steps for prevention of harmful practices are slated to be changed as necessary on the basis of monitoring results and other information from the perspective of the protection and convenience of insurance policyholders, etc. However, I do not feel it appropriate to make a definite statement about any future orientation now. From what I heard, however, over-the-counter sales make up 1 percent of non-life insurance sales and approximately 6 percent of life insurance sales, which are the figures that I believe have been reported to me. Judging from those, it seems to me that the firewall or information on financing deals is protected fairly strictly. I recall the debate that took place in the past about the possible highly negative impact of the insurance sales by banks on the livelihood of sales agents marketing life insurance products but some regional banks are actually not engaged in life insurance sales. In the meantime, I hear that the three mega-banks are selling life insurance, but my guess is that it rather reflects their effort to have a full line of products, so to speak. The possibility of the insurance sales by banks posing a real threat to the life insurance industry, particularly the livelihood of life insurance sales agents, was a subject of a heated debate in the LDP as well. It turns out that more liberalization does help add more convenience for the people, as the results show: the over-the-counter sales by banks make up 6 percent of life insurance sales and 1 percent in non-life insurance sales. Let me also point out that it is extremely important to protect life insurance policyholders and that the greater the convenience for prospective policyholders, the more accessible life insurance becomes. I cannot give any definite word at this point in time – if I may be a little daring, however, I would say on the issue of the scheduled review after three years that the statistics look acceptable to me, but that is just my personal opinion. 例文帳に追加

平成19年12月、すべての保険商品の取扱いが認められて全面解禁したわけでございますが、弊害防止措置についてはモニタリング結果等を踏まえ、保険契約者等の保護や利便性の観点から概ね3年間経過しまして、所要の見直しを行うことにしておりますが、現在の方向性については、現在確たることは申し上げられないというふうに思っておりますが、たしか私が聞くところによりますと、窓口販売は損害保険だとたしか1％、それから生命保険だと6％ぐらいの数字ということをたしか報告いただいておりますので、ファイアーウォールといいますか、融資に関する情報がかなりきちんと私は厳格に守られているのではないかということを思っておりますし、一時こんなものを銀行で売られたら、生命保険を売って回る生保の募集員の方々の生活を非常に圧迫するというような論議も当時あったやに私は覚えておりますけれども、現実には地方銀行でも生命保険を売っていないところもございますし、それから、3メガバンクは売っているようでございますが、それもどちらかというと商品を揃えるというか、そういう色彩が強いのではないかというふうに私は思っておりまして、当時、銀行で窓販されるともう生命保険業界、特に生命保険の勧誘員の方の生活が本当に脅かされるというようなことを大変自由民主党でも当時議論の過程では噴出したのですが、結果としては、この生命保険が窓販6％、損保1％ということを見れば、この辺はやはりできるだけ自由にした方が国民の利便になるわけですから、それから、生命保険に入った人の保護というのは非常に大事でございまして、生命保険に入る人の利便性というか、便利な方がより生命保険に接することができるわけですから、そういったところを考えたら、まだ今の時点では確たることは申し上げられませんけれども、しかし、3年後に見直しを行うということでございますが、こういうことは少し一歩踏み込んだ発言になるのかもしれませんけれども、出てきた数字を見ると、妥当なところではないかなというふうに私は、ここは個人的意見ですけれども、思いますね。 - 金融庁

(4) The provisions of Article 512 through Article 518, the provisions of Subsection 2 through Subsection 10 of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) through Article 536, paragraph (3)), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4, the provisions of Chapter III, Section 1 of that Part (excluding Article 870, paragraph (2) through paragraph (5) and Article 870 through Article 874), the provisions of Section 3 of that Chapter (excluding Article 879, Article 880, Article 882, paragraph (2), and Article 896, paragraph (2)), and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation. In this case, the term "paragraph (3) of Article 492" in Article 521 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 155, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Investors who have held, for a consecutive period of the past six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity," the term "liquidators" in Article 523 and Article 526, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors," the term "liquidators" in Article 524 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) or liquidation supervisors," the terms "liquidators" and "liquidators' agent" in Article 525, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidators" and "executive liquidators' agent" respectively, the phrase "liquidators and Company Auditors of a Liquidating Stock Company and employees, including managers," in Article 530, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation as well as the Administrative Agent, Asset Management Company, and Asset Custody Company," the phrase "directors upon incorporation, Company Auditors upon incorporation, Qualified Officers provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 423 or liquidators" in Article 542, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment, Supervisory Officers at Establishment, Officers, etc. specified in Article 115-6, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act, executive liquidator(s), or liquidation supervisors," the phrases "the liquidators provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 492" and "that paragraph" in Article 562 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the executive liquidator(s)" and "Article 155, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "the head office (or, in cases set forth in item (iii), if a ruling to conclude special liquidation is made due to completion of a special liquidation, the head office and branch office(s))" in Article 938, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office," the phrase "Article 351(2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 346(2) or Article 483(6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)" in Article 938, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 108, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 153, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百三十六条第三項を除く。）、第七編第二章第四節並びに第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条第二項を除く。）並びに第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）の規定は、清算投資法人の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十一条中「第四百九十二条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第三項」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の三（これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する投資主」と、同法第五百二十三条及び第五百二十六条第一項中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十四条中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十五条第一項中「清算人は」とあるのは「清算執行人は」と、「清算人代理」とあるのは「清算執行人代理」と、同法第五百三十条第一項中「清算人及び監査役並びに支配人その他の使用人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人並びに一般事務受託者、資産運用会社及び資産保管会社」と、同法第五百四十二条第一項中「設立時取締役、設立時監査役、第四百二十三条第一項に規定する役員等又は清算人」とあるのは「設立時執行役員、設立時監督役員、投資法人法第百十五条の六第一項に規定する役員等、清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百六十二条中「第四百九十二条第一項に規定する清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人」と、「同項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第一項」と、同法第九百三十八条第一項中「本店（第三号に掲げる場合であって特別清算の結了により特別清算終結の決定がされたときにあっては、本店及び支店）」とあるのは「本店」と、同条第二項第一号中「第四百七十九条第四項において準用する第三百四十六条第二項又は第四百八十三条第六項において準用する第三百五十一条第二項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十三条第二項において読み替えて準用する投資法人法第百八条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム