「and all」に関連した英語例文の一覧と使い方(901ページ目) - Weblio英語例文検索

Tokyo District Court Judgment, May 26, 1977 (p.51 of Hanrei Jiho No. 832) "Judging from the fact that the use of the land constitutes an indispensable basis of the daily life of Y and his family. the bid is reasonably sufficient, even considering that the land has Y.s leasehold rights. In this context, X demanded Y to vacate the land immediately after X won the bid without negotiating with Y at all . it is assumed that, in this auction case, despite the fact that X had announced that the land is accompanied by the leasehold in accordance with which the lessee is supposed to own a building thereon, which could be perfected against the winning bidder, X was trying to obtain a huge amount of profits by winning the bid at an extremely low price, taking advantage of the lack of registry required for perfection of such leasehold. Considering the circumstances with respect to Y as recognized in the foregoing, X.s demand of the removal of and vacation of the building on the land shall not be accepted on the ground that it is an abuse of right." 例文帳に追加

東京地裁昭和５２年５月２６日判決・判例時報８３２号５１頁「本件土地の使用はYおよびその一家の生活の基盤として欠くべからざるものであること《中略》競売価格は本件土地にYの貸借権が設定されているものとして扱っても十分見合う金額であること、Xは右土地を競落するや直ちにYに本件土地の明渡を求め、話し合いには一切応じない態度を堅持していたこと《中略》これらの事実よりすれば、Xは右競売事件において本件土地に競落人に対抗しうる建物所有の目的の賃借権がある旨広告されていたが、その賃借権がたまたま対抗力に必要な登記を欠いていたことを奇貨として、極めて低廉な価額で競落したうえ巨額な利益をえようとしているものと推認できるので、前示認定のようなY側の事情等をも考慮すると、Xの本件建物収去・土地明渡の請求は権利の濫用として許されないものといわなければならない。」 - 経済産業省

(5) If the General Partner makes a distribution in kind pursuant to paragraph (3) of this Article, the General Partner shall request the Partners who are entitled to such distribution in kind to elect to either (A) receive the Portfolio Securities to be distributed in kind or (B) request to the General Partner the disposition of all or part of such Portfolio Securities and to receive the proceeds of such disposition, no later than [_] days prior to the Reference Date. With respect to any Partners who communicate their intention to receive the proceeds of disposition in accordance with (B) within [_] days from such request, the General Partner shall deliver such disposition proceeds by the date of the distribution in kind after the disposition of the Portfolio Securities at such time and price as the General Partners determines in its discretion (provided that, as a general rule, such price shall be the closing price (or an equivalent price) on any day during the period from the date such communication has been made through the date of distribution in kind). In any other case, the General Partner shall distribute the Portfolio Securities in kind. The expenses incurred in connection with the General Partner’s disposition of Portfolio Securities pursuant to this paragraph shall be borne by the Partners who desire such disposition. 例文帳に追加

5. 無限責任組合員は、本条第3 項に基づき現物による分配を行う場合、現物分配基準日の少なくとも［ ］日前までに、当該現物分配の対象である組合員に対し、(A)分配の対象となる投資証券等を現物で受け取る方法、又は(B)当該投資証券等の全部若しくは一部の処分を無限責任組合員に依頼し、当該処分に係る処分代金を受け取る方法のいずれかを選択するよう申し出るものとする。無限責任組合員は、かかる申出から［ ］日以内に(B)の方法による処分代金の受領を希望する旨の連絡があった組合員については、無限責任組合員がその裁量により判断する時期及び価格（但し、当該連絡のあった日から現物分配を行う日までの任意の日における最終価格又はこれに準ずる価格を原則とする。）によって当該投資証券等を処分の上、現物分配を行う日にその処分代金を交付するものとし、その他の場合については、当該投資証券等の現物を交付するものとする。本項に基づく無限責任組合員による投資証券等の処分に関して発生した費用は処分を希望した組合員が負担する。 - 経済産業省

Article 165-2 (1) With regard to Partnerships, etc. (meaning partnerships established based on partnership contract provided in Article 667(1) of the Civil Code, Investment LPS provided in Article 2(2) of the Limited Partnership Act for Investment (hereinafter referred to as "Investment LPS" in this Article) or a Limited Liability Partnership provided in Article 2 of the Limited Liability Partnership Act (hereinafter referred to as "Limited Liability Partnership" in this Article), or other similar organizations specified by a Cabinet Order; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) whose assets includes shares of a Listed Company, etc. which represent voting rights equal to or greater than 10 percent of the Voting Rights held by All of its Shareholders, etc. (hereinafter referred to as "Specified Partnerships, etc." in this Article), when one of the partners of Specified Partnerships, etc. (including persons specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as similar to a partner of Specified Partnerships, etc. under a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. in relation to the assets of the Specified Partnerships, etc. (including the cases where the trustee of a trust of which all of the partners of the Specified Partnerships, etc. are the settlor or beneficiary makes Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. of Specified Securities, etc. of the Listed Company, etc. as specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article), the partner having executed the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. (including a partner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance as equivalent to such a partner specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article) shall submit, pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance, a report on the Sales and Purchase, etc. to the Prime Minister on or before the 15th day of the month following the month which includes the day of the Sales and Purchase, etc.; provided, however, that this shall not apply to the cases so specified by a Cabinet Office Ordinance in consideration of the manner of the Purchase, etc. or Sales, etc. or other circumstances. 例文帳に追加

第百六十五条の二　組合等（民法第六百六十七条第一項に規定する組合契約によつて成立する組合、投資事業有限責任組合契約に関する法律第二条第二項に規定する投資事業有限責任組合（以下この条において「投資事業有限責任組合」という。）若しくは有限責任事業組合契約に関する法律第二条に規定する有限責任事業組合（以下この条において「有限責任事業組合」という。）又はこれらの組合に類似する団体で政令で定めるものをいう。以下この条において同じ。）のうち当該組合等の財産に属する株式に係る議決権が上場会社等の総株主等の議決権に占める割合が百分の十以上であるもの（以下この条において「特定組合等」という。）については、当該特定組合等の組合員（これに類するものとして内閣府令で定める者を含む。以下この条において同じ。）が当該特定組合等の財産に関して当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をした場合（当該特定組合等の組合員の全員が委託者又は受益者である信託の受託者が、当該上場会社等の特定有価証券等に係る買付け等又は売付け等をする場合であつて内閣府令で定める場合を含む。以下この条において同じ。）には、当該買付け等又は売付け等を執行した組合員（これに準ずるものとして内閣府令で定める組合員を含む。以下この条において同じ。）は、内閣府令で定めるところにより、その売買等に関する報告書を売買等があつた日の属する月の翌月十五日までに、内閣総理大臣に提出しなければならない。ただし、買付け等又は売付け等の態様その他の事情を勘案して内閣府令で定める場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

By way of supporting the development of the manufacturing industry, which is Japan's fundamental industry, core manufacturing technology has contributed to the development of all areas of the national economy such as expansion of production, promotion of trade, creation of new industries, and increase in employment, and has contributed to improving the lives of the citizenry. In addition, workers engaged in operations pertaining to core manufacturing technology have played an important role in maintaining and improving the level of the technology in their capacity as supporters of such core manufacturing technology. We believe that the economic and social role of such core manufacturing technology and workers who engage in operations pertaining thereto will continue to be an important element in the foundation of the existence of the State in the future. Recently, however, due to changes in the employment structure, changes in competitive conditions resulting from factors like the progress of industrialization overseas, and other diverse and structural changes in the economy, the share of the manufacturing industry in Japan's gross domestic product has fallen, and concerns about a decline in the industry have grown, and the smooth succession of core manufacturing technology is becoming difficult. In order to deal with such a situation and to maintain the sound development of Japan's national economy through the development of the manufacturing industry, which is a fundamental to the State, that the active promotion of core manufacturing technology is indispensable, while a social tendency to respect abilities related to core manufacturing technology is enhanced. We hereby establish this Act so as to drive forward measures for the promotion of core manufacturing technology in a comprehensive and organized manner. 例文帳に追加

ものづくり基盤技術は、我が国の基幹的な産業である製造業の発展を支えることにより、生産の拡大、貿易の振興、新産業の創出、雇用の増大等国民経済のあらゆる領域にわたりその発展に寄与するとともに、国民生活の向上に貢献してきた。また、ものづくり基盤技術に係る業務に従事する労働者は、このようなものづくり基盤技術の担い手として、その水準の維持及び向上のために重要な役割を果たしてきた。我らは、このようなものづくり基盤技術及びこれに係る業務に従事する労働者の果たす経済的社会的役割が、国の存立基盤を形成する重要な要素として、今後においても変わることのないことを確信する。しかるに、近時、就業構造の変化、海外の地域における工業化の進展等による競争条件の変化その他の経済の多様かつ構造的な変化による影響を受け、国内総生産に占める製造業の割合が低下し、その衰退が懸念されるとともに、ものづくり基盤技術の継承が困難になりつつある。このような事態に対処して、我が国の国民経済が国の基幹的な産業である製造業の発展を通じて今後とも健全に発展していくためには、ものづくり基盤技術に関する能力を尊重する社会的気運を醸成しつつ、ものづくり基盤技術の積極的な振興を図ることが不可欠である。ここに、ものづくり基盤技術の振興に関する施策を総合的かつ計画的に推進するため、この法律を制定する。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(4) In the case where a Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations which has prepared an authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan intends to issue a resolution on a change to a Fishery Right Exercise Rule or a Piscary Exercise Rule as provided in paragraph (1) of this Article at a general meeting (including a representatives' meeting), to conform to the contents of the matter provided in Article 4, paragraph (2), item (iii) of this Act in order to make the members of the Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations comply with the contents of the authorized Aquaculture Area Improvement Plan, notwithstanding the provisions of Article 50 of the Aquatic Industry Cooperative Association Act (including cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 52, paragraph (6) of the same Act which is then applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 92, paragraph (3) of the same Act; hereinafter the same shall apply elsewhere in this paragraph) applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 92 of the same Act, the Federation of Fisheries Cooperative Associations shall not be required to issue a resolution pursuant to the provisions of Article 50 of the same Act as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to paragraph (3) of Article 92 of the same Act, if the consent of all of the member Fisheries Cooperative Associations respectively, directly or indirectly consisting of the specific members (hereinafter referred to as "Specific Members' Associations") is obtained pursuant to ordinance of the Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries. 例文帳に追加

４　認定漁場改善計画を作成した漁業協同組合連合会が、認定漁場改善計画の内容を遵守させるために、総会（総代会を含む。）で、第四条第二項第三号に掲げる事項の内容に適合するように行う第一項に規定する漁業権行使規則又は入漁権行使規則の変更の議決を行おうとする場合において、特定組合員を直接又は間接の構成員とする会員たる漁業協同組合（以下「特定組合員所属組合」という。）のすべての同意を農林水産省令で定めるところにより得ているときは、水産業協同組合法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十条（同法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十二条第六項において準用する場合を含む。以下この項において同じ。）の規定にかかわらず、同法第九十二条第三項において準用する同法第五十条の規定による議決によることを要しないものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 24-3 (1) In a case where a certified public accountant has provided audit-related services concerning financial documents pertaining to all accounting periods (business years or other periods equivalent thereto; the same shall apply hereinafter) of consecutive accounting periods as specified by Cabinet Order (in the case of accounting periods as categorized by Cabinet Office Ordinance as those equivalent to said consecutive accounting periods, said accounting periods; hereinafter referred to as the "consecutive accounting periods") not exceeding seven accounting periods of a large company, etc., the certified public accountant shall not provide audit-related services concerning the financial documents of said large company, etc. pertaining to an accounting period specified by Cabinet Order which comes in or after the accounting period following said consecutive accounting periods; provided, however, that this shall not apply when an unavoidable circumstance as specified by Cabinet Office Ordinance is found for the provision of audit-related services by said certified public accountant (excluding one who is a partner of an audit corporation) concerning the financial documents of said large company, etc. in or after the accounting period following said consecutive accounting periods and where the approval of the Prime Minster has been gained for each accounting period pursuant to the provisions of a Cabinet Office Ordinance. 例文帳に追加

第二十四条の三　公認会計士は、大会社等の七会計期間（事業年度その他これらに準ずる期間をいう。以下同じ。）の範囲内で政令で定める連続する会計期間（当該連続する会計期間に準ずるものとして内閣府令で定める会計期間にあつては、当該会計期間。以下この項、第三十四条の十一の三及び第三十四条の十一の四第一項において「連続会計期間」という。）のすべての会計期間に係る財務書類について監査関連業務を行つた場合には、当該連続会計期間の翌会計期間以後の政令で定める会計期間に係る当該大会社等の財務書類について監査関連業務を行つてはならない。ただし、当該公認会計士（監査法人の社員である者を除く。）が当該連続会計期間の翌会計期間以後の会計期間に係る当該大会社等の財務書類について監査関連業務を行うことにつき、内閣府令で定めるやむを得ない事情があると認められる場合において、内閣府令で定めるところにより、会計期間ごとに内閣総理大臣の承認を得たときは、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 32-9 (1) A specified manufacturer, etc., in acquiring the owner information pertaining to the specified maintenance products that he/she manufactured or imported (if such specified manufacturer, etc. is a person who has acquired the whole of the business pertaining to the specified maintenance products from another specified manufacturer, etc. or is an heir (the heir selected to succeed to the business by the unanimous agreement of all other heirs, in cases where there are two or more heirs) in cases where an inheritance, merger or split occurred (limited to those cases that cause the succession of the whole of the business pertaining to the specified maintenance products; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Article and Article 32-11, paragraph (2)), or a juridical person surviving a merger or a juridical person incorporated by a merger or a juridical person succeeding to the whole of the business by a split (hereinafter referred to as "successor" in the following paragraph), the specified maintenance products manufactured or imported by the person who has transferred the whole of the business or the decedent, the juridical person ceasing to exist by the merger or the juridical person that has split shall be included; hereinafter the same shall apply in this Section) shall make the following matters public in advance; provided, however, that this shall not apply in cases where the provisions of the following paragraph apply: 例文帳に追加

第三十二条の九　特定製造事業者等は、その製造又は輸入に係る特定保守製品（その者が、他の特定製造事業者等からその特定保守製品に係る事業の全部を譲り受けた者又は他の特定製造事業者等について相続、合併若しくは分割（その特定保守製品に係る事業の全部を承継するものに限る。以下この条及び第三十二条の十一第二項において同じ。）があつた場合における相続人（相続人が二人以上ある場合において、その全員の同意により事業を承継すべき相続人を選定したときは、その者）、合併後存続する法人若しくは合併により設立された法人若しくは分割によりその事業の全部を承継した法人（次項において「承継人」という。）であるときは、その事業の全部を譲り渡した者又は被相続人、合併により消滅した法人若しくは分割をした法人の製造又は輸入に係る特定保守製品を含む。以下この節において同じ。）に係る所有者情報を取得するに当たつては、あらかじめ、次の事項を公表しなければならない。ただし、次項の規定の適用を受ける場合は、この限りでない。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

However, such dividends may also be taxed in the Contracting State of which the company paying the dividends is a resident and according to the laws of that Contracting State, but if the beneficial owner of the dividends is a resident of the other Contracting State, the tax so charged shall not exceed: (a) 5 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner is a company that has owned directly, for the period of six month sending on the date on which entitlement to the dividends is determined, at least 50 per cent of the voting shares of the company paying the dividends; (b) 7.5 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends if the beneficial owner is a company that has owned directly, for the period of six month sending on the date on which entitlement to the dividends is determined, at least 25 per cent of the voting shares of the company paying the dividends; (c) 10 per cent of the gross amount of the dividends in all other cases. 例文帳に追加

１に規定する配当に対しては、これを支払う法人が居住者とされる一方の締約国においても、当該一方の締約国の法令に従って租税を課することができる。その租税の額は、当該配当の受益者が他方の締約国の居住者である場合には、次の額を超えないものとする。(a)当該配当の受益者が、当該配当の支払を受ける者が特定される日をその末日とする六箇月の期間を通じ、当該配当を支払う法人の議決権のある株式の五十パーセント以上を直接に所有する法人である場合には、当該配当の額の五パーセント(b)当該配当の受益者が、当該配当の支払を受ける者が特定される日をその末日とする六箇月の期間を通じ、当該配当を支払う法人の議決権のある株式の二十五パーセント以上を直接に所有する法人である場合には、当該配当の額の七・五パーセント(c)その他のすべての場合には、当該配当の額の十パーセント - 財務省

Under the Arbitration Law enacted on March 1, 2004, an arbitration agreement must be made in writing (Paragraph 2, Article 13 of the Arbitration Law4). However, it also provides that an arbitration agreement completed by electromagnetic record shall be deemed to have been completed in writing (Paragraph 4 of said Article5). 4 Paragraph 2, Article 13 of the Arbitration Law: The arbitration agreement shall be in the form of a document signed by all the parties, (e.g.) letters, telegrams, or other types of document exchanged between the parties (including those sent by facsimile devices or other communication devices for communication between remote parties, which provide the recipient with a written record of the transmitted content). 5 Paragraph 4, Article 13 of the Arbitration Law: When an arbitration agreement is made by way of electromagnetic record (records produced by electronic, magnetic or any other means unrecognizable by natural sensory functions and used for data-processing by a computer) 6 Paragraph 2, Article 3 of Supplementary Provision of the Arbitration Law: Consumer may rescind an arbitration agreement based on his or her legal status as a consumer (translation omitted) Therefore, an arbitration agreement completed in an online electromagnetic record (e.g. exchanging e-mails), where no written form exists, is considered a valid online transaction. 例文帳に追加

平成１６年３月１日に施行された仲裁法においては、仲裁合意は書面によってなされなければならないが（仲裁法第１３条第２項 1）、電磁的記録によって仲裁合意がなされた場合も、書面によってなされたものとするという規定が置かれている（同条第４項2）。よって、オンライン上で、電子メール交換など電磁的記録の残る方式によってなされた合意も有効となる。なお、消費者契約法で定める消費者契約においてなされる仲裁合意については、消費者に解除権が付与されている（同法附則 3）。仲裁法第１３条第２項仲裁合意は、当事者の全部が署名した文書、当事者が交換した書簡又は電報（ファクシミリ装置その他の隔地者間の通信手段で文字による通信内容の記録が受信者に提供されるものを用いて送信されたものを含む。）その他の書面によってしなければならない。2同法第１３条第４項仲裁合意がその内容を記録した電磁的記録（電子的方式、磁気的方式その他人の知覚によっては認識することができない方式で作られる記録であって、電子計算機による情報処理の用に供されるものをいう）によってされたときは、その仲裁合意は、書面によってされたものとする。 - 経済産業省

(6) The General Partner may not engage in transactions with the Partnership for itself or any third party; provided, however, that [, (A)] the General Partner may engage in any transaction [as set forth in the following items] where such transaction is approved by (i) [___]% or more of the members of the Advisory Board or (ii) the Limited Partnersholding a Number of Partnership Units equal to [___]% or more of the aggregate Number of Partnership Units of all of the Limited Partners [and, (B) the General Partner may engage in any transaction other than those set forth in the following items where the General Partner may offer, in advance, to the Advisory Board or the Limited Partners an opportunity to express their opinions or provide advice]. If the General Partner requests for such an approval [or offers such an opportunity to express opinions or provide advice], the General Partner shall provide a prior written notice of details of the related transaction to the members of the Advisory Board or the Limited Partners. [The General Partner shall not be bound by any opinion or advice expressed or provided by any member of the Advisory Board or any Limited Partner under this paragraph.] 例文帳に追加

6. 無限責任組合員は、自己又は第三者のために本組合と取引をすることができない。但し、［次に掲げる取引については、］(ⅰ)諮問委員会の委員の［ ］分の［ ］以上がかかる取引を承認した場合又は(ⅱ)総有限責任組合員の出資口数の合計の［ ］分の［ ］以上に相当する出資口数を有する有限責任組合員がかかる取引を承認した場合［、また、次に掲げる取引以外の取引については、事前に諮問委員会又は有限責任組合員に意見陳述又は助言の提供の機会を与えた場合、］無限責任組合員は、自己又は第三者のために本組合と取引をすることができる。無限責任組合員は、かかる承認を求める場合［又は意見陳述若しくは助言の機会を与える場合]には、諮問委員会の委員又は有限責任組合員に対し、あらかじめ書面により当該取引の内容を通知するものとする。[なお、無限責任組合員は、本項に基づく諮問委員会の委員又は有限責任組合員の意見又は助言に拘束されるものではない。] - 経済産業省

(2) The conditions referred to in subsection (1)(a) are (a) that all the formal requirements have been complied with; (b) that the Registrar has received -- (i) the search report referred to in section 29(3) and the examination report referred to in section 29(5); (ii) the search and examination report referred to in section 29(6); (iii) the search report referred to in section 29(2)(c)(i), the examination report referred to in section 29(5) and, where the search report is not in English, an English translation of the search report (iv) the prescribed information referred to in section 29(2)(c)(ii) or (d)(ii) and, where the prescribed information includes any document that is not in English, an English translation of such document; (v) the international search report referred to in section 29(2)(d)(i) or (e)(i), the examination report referred to in section 29(5) and, where the international search report is not in English, an English translation of the international search report; or (vi) in the case of an international application for a patent (Singapore) which has entered the national phase in Singapore under section 86(3), as an alternative to the document or documents referred to in any of sub-paragraphs (ii), (iii), (iv) and (v) -- (A) the notice referred to in section 29(2)(e)(ii); (B) an international search report in respect of that application; (C) an international preliminary report on patentability in respect of that application; and (D) where any report referred to in sub-paragraph (B) or (C) is not in English, an English translation of that report; (c) that the prescribed documents for the grant of the patent have been filed; and (d) that the prescribed fee for the grant of the patent has been paid.例文帳に追加

(2)(1)(a)にいう条件は，次のとおりとする。(a)すべての方式要件が満たされていること(b)登録官が次の何れかを受領していること(i)第29条(3)にいう調査報告及び第29条(5)にいう審査報告(ii)第29条(6)にいう調査及び審査報告(iii)第29条(2)(c)(i)にいう調査報告，第29条(5)にいう審査報告，並びに当該調査報告が英語によるものでないときは当該調査報告の英語翻訳文(iv)第29条(2)(c)(ii)若しくは(d)(ii)にいう所定の情報及び所定の情報に英語によらない書類が含まれているときは当該書類の英語翻訳文(v)第29条(2)(d)(i)若しくは(e)(i)にいう国際調査報告，第29条(5)にいう審査報告及び当該国際調査報告が英語によるものでないときは当該国際調査報告の英語翻訳文，又は(vi)第86条(3)に基づいてシンガポールにおける国内段階に移行した国際特許出願(シンガポール)の場合は，(ii)，(iii)，(iv)及び(v)の何れかにいう書類に代わるものとして，(A)第29条(2)(e)(ii)にいう通知書(B)当該出願に関する国際調査報告(C)当該出願に関する特許性についての国際予備報告，並びに(D)(B)若しくは(C)にいう報告が英語によるものでないときは当該報告の英語翻訳文(c)当該特許付与のための所定の書類が提出されていること，並びに(d)当該特許付与のための所定の手数料が納付されていること - 特許庁

In that sense and others, striking a balance between all those factors is critical – while peace of mind and security do matter in financial services, adhering excessively to such qualities could, as I have just pointed out, result in a credit crunch or oppressive debt collection and thus create impediments to the growth of truly healthy companies or the growth of a healthy economy, which is why the financial sector is so vital. This time around, I reaffirmed in talks with people like Mr. Bernanke and Mr. Zhou Xiaochuan that harmony or a balance between those factors is extremely important. Having spoken with financial regulators in both the U.S. and China, I am now even more convinced of this idea. In any case, the Financial Services Agency (FSA) is aware of the importance of paying proper attention to any impact of the new requirements on the current situation and corporate reform efforts in Japan – a point that applies to not only Japan but also the G20 nations that each have their own lay of the land – while they will, put simply, contribute to a higher level of soundness of Japan's financial system over the medium to long term. From this viewpoint, I do see that Japan's argument has increasingly received global approval to a considerable extent, while I am committed to continuing to advocate Japan's position in a proactive and resolute fashion. 例文帳に追加

そういった意味で、そこら辺がまさにバランスでございまして、金融というのは安心だとか、あるいは非常に大丈夫だということと同時に、それがまた極端に行き過ぎますと、今度は今さっき言いましたように、貸し渋り、貸しはがしが起きて、本当に健全な企業の発展、あるいは健全な経済の発展の、逆に言うと阻害要因にもなるわけですから、そういった意味で金融業というのは大変重要でございますが、そこら辺の調和、バランスというのが非常に私は大事だということを、今度はバーナンキさん、あるいは周小川さんとも話を通じて再確認させていただいたわけでございますし、アメリカでも金融規制当局の方、中国でも金融規制当局の方とも話をしまして、そういった感を一層させていただいたわけでございまして、いずれにいたしましても、金融庁といたしましては、新規制が簡単に言えば、中長期的に我が国の金融システムを健全性の向上に資するものとなる一方、我が国の実情、それぞれの我が国の実情や経営改革に対する影響を配慮するということは、我が国のみならずＧ20はそれぞれの国の実情があるわけですから、そういうことにきちっと配慮する必要が重要だというふうに思っておりました。こういった観点から、引き続き積極的に日本の立場、かなり世界的に受け入れられてきたというふうに私は認識いたしておりますけれども、しっかり主張してまいりたいというふうに思っております。 - 金融庁

The application shall furthermore indicate: a request for priority under section 16 of the Designs Act and information in pursuance of sections 5 and 7 if the applicant claims priority, the name or company name of an agent and the agent's mailing address, if the applicant is represented by an agent, together with a power of attorney except where a power of attorney is unnecessary because the agent is a solicitor or a trademark or patent agent entitled to represent the applicant in relation to the Patent and Trademark Office, the name of the designer, including the design group or company, and the designer's mailing address, if a request is being made for registration of one or more designers in the design register, cf. section 13of the Designs Act, information as to who shall be authorized to receive notification from the Patent and Trademark Office on behalf of all applicants, if design registration is applied for by several persons acting jointly and they are not represented by an agent, a statement of the period for which publication of registration should be deferred, if the applicant requests deferment under section 18, last sentence, of the Designs Act, a statement to the effect that the design shall be registered in color if protection is to include the design in color. 例文帳に追加

出願には更に，次に掲げる事項を表示しなければならない。出願人が優先権を主張する場合は，意匠法第16条の規定に基づく優先権の請求並びに本規則第5条及び第7条の規定による情報，出願人が代理人によって代理されている場合は，代理人の名称又は会社名及び代理人の郵便宛先，並びに委任状。ただし，委任状については，代理人が特許商標庁に対して，出願人を代表する権限を有する弁護士(solicitor)又は商標代理人若しくは特許代理人であるという理由により，委任状が不要である場合を除く。1又は2以上のデザイナー(訳注：創作者と思われる)を意匠登録簿に登録することを請求する場合は(意匠法第13条(4)参照)，デザイナー(デザイン・グループ又はデザイン会社を含む。)の名称及びデザイナーの郵便宛先，意匠登録が，共同で行動する複数の者によって出願され，それらの者が1の代理人によって代理されていない場合は，特許商標庁からの通知を出願人全員を代表して受領する権限を付与されている者についての情報，出願人が，意匠法第18条最終文の規定に基づく延期を請求する場合は，登録に関する公告の延期を求める期間についての陳述，保護の対象が色彩付の意匠である場合は，その意匠が色彩付で登録されるべき旨の陳述。 - 特許庁

On the other hand, experts have pointed out various issues pertaining to the EU-ETS, including the following. ① Regarding the reduction targets of Phase I, there are problems in cap setting, such as moderate emissions allowances that lead to a price fall when the moderate allocation is realized. ② There are problems related to fairness and equity with respect to the cap. For example, during Phase I, in the process of creating national allocation plans that determine each country’s emissions cap, there were about 800 cases26 in all the EU countries wherein the companies sued their national governments over allocation methods and allocation amounts. Further, during Phase II, the former East European countries, such as Czech Republic, Latvia, Poland, Hungary, and Estonia, sued the European Commission over its strict demand on the allocation amount27. ③ There are concerns about “carbon leakage” and a loss of international competitiveness among the EU companies. For example, Jean-Louis Borloo, the French Minister of Ecology and Sustainable Development, expressed his concern about “carbon leakage,” which occurs when economic activities and plant locations move from the EU countries to countries with lesser or no environmental regulations. Secretary General Mr. Richmann of German Federation of Industry and Energy stated that in a situation wherein the competitors do not need to bear carbon costs, domestic industries cannot pass on the carbon costs to the international market. This would lead to not only loss of the labor market but also migration of the manufacturing bases, resulting in increased emissions outside of Europe.例文帳に追加

一方、EU-ETSに対しては、①第一約束期間の削減目標については、排出枠の設定が緩く、割当の緩さが判明した時点で価格が暴落するなど、キャップの設定に課題があったこと、②各国の排出上限量となる国別割当計画の策定過程において、割当方法及び割当量をめぐって、第一約束期間においては、企業が各国政府を提訴した事例がEU全体で800件程度あり、第二約束期間については、チェコ、ラトビア、ポーランド、ハンガリー、エストニア等旧東欧諸国が欧州委員会の要求する厳しい割当量を巡り、欧州委員会を相手に訴訟を起こしているなど、キャップの衡平性に課題があること、③フランスのボルローエコロジー・持続可能な開発整備相が、「EU域内から環境規制が緩いまたは無い他の地域に工場など移転する、いわゆる『炭素リーケージ』について懸念がある。」と表明し、ドイツの産業エネルギー連盟リヒマン事務総長が、「競争相手に炭素コストが生じなければ、産業界はこのコストを世界市場で転嫁できないので、労働市場が失われるだけではなく、生産拠点の移転もあり得るが、これは、欧州外での排出増加になる。」と発言しているなど、炭素リーケージ及び域内企業の国際競争力低下の懸念があること、等、様々な課題が指摘されている。 - 経済産業省

(ii) Where a single corporation or two or more corporations intervene(s) between a corporation which is a shareholder, etc. of a specially-related domestic corporation (excluding a foreign corporation which is a shareholder, etc. set forth in the preceding item falling under the case listed in the said item and a corporation falling under the category of a specially-related shareholder, etc.) and a specially-related shareholder, etc. and has(have) a linkage with them through holding the shares, etc. (where the said corporation which is a shareholder, etc. is a domestic corporation and the said intervening corporation(s) is a (are all) domestic corporation(s), excluding the said domestic corporation(s) and a corporation falling under the category of a specially-related shareholder, etc.; hereinafter referred to as a "capital contribution-related corporation(s)" in this item) (limited to the case where 80 percent or more of the number or the amount of the issued shares, etc. of each of a capital contribution-related corporation(s) and the said corporation which is a shareholder, etc. are held by a specially-related shareholder, etc. or a capital contribution-related corporation(s) (such specially-related shareholder, etc. or capital contribution-related foreign corporation(s) shall be limited to those 80 percent or more of the number or the amount of whose issued shares, etc. are held by a specially-related shareholder, etc. or other capital contribution-related corporation(s))): The ratio of the number or the amount of the shares, etc. of the specially-related domestic corporation held by the said corporation which is a shareholder, etc. out of the total issued shares, etc. of the said specially-related domestic corporation (where there are two or more such corporations which are shareholders, etc., the sum of the ratios calculated for each of them). 例文帳に追加

二　特殊関係内国法人の株主等である法人（前号に掲げる場合に該当する同号の株主等である外国法人及び特殊関係株主等に該当する法人を除く。）と特殊関係株主等との間にこれらの者と株式等の所有を通じて連鎖関係にある一又は二以上の法人（当該株主等である法人が内国法人であり、かつ、当該一又は二以上の法人のすべてが内国法人である場合の当該一又は二以上の内国法人及び特殊関係株主等に該当する法人を除く。以下この号において「出資関連法人」という。）が介在している場合（出資関連法人及び当該株主等である法人がそれぞれその発行済株式等の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等を特殊関係株主等又は出資関連法人（その発行済株式等の百分の八十以上の数又は金額の株式等が特殊関係株主等又は他の出資関連法人によつて所有されているものに限る。）によつて所有されている場合に限る。）　当該株主等である法人の有する特殊関係内国法人の株式等の数又は金額が当該特殊関係内国法人の発行済株式等のうちに占める割合（当該株主等である法人が二以上ある場合には、当該二以上の株主等である法人につきそれぞれ計算した割合の合計割合） - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

I have jurisdiction over private financial institutions, so the FSA has put into force the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, so as to ensure that finance firmly supports recovery efforts. Unusually for a financial act, this act provides a framework under which Deposit Insurance Corporation takes over non-performing loans that are held by Shinkin banks and credit cooperatives after the passage of a certain period of time. Therefore, this act naturally calls on the managers of financial institutions to build up capital based on their own judgment. We enacted the Act on Special Measures for Strengthening Financial Functions, which contains provisions for disaster-related special measures, with the support of all political parties and groups, and also drew up the Guidelines of Workout for Restructuring Debt Owed by Individual Debtors. In addition, prefectural industrial reconstruction organizations and Rehabilitation Support Organization for Companies Damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake were established in order to resolve the double loan problem, which has become a major issue in the Diet. Many members of the latter organization's secretariat come from the FSA. In that sense, I believe that the FSA is making every possible effort toward restoration and recovery. The FSA will continue to do its utmost to support the recovery of the disaster-stricken areas through such activities as encouraging the active and effective use of various recovery support measures. At the same time, I would like to stress that financial institutions have provided very vigorous cooperation. 例文帳に追加

特に私の場合は民間の金融機関を所掌しているわけでございますから、金融庁といたしましても、復興に向けた（取組みを）金融がしっかり下支えするべく、震災特例を設けた金融機能強化法、これは私は金融立法としては異例なことだと思っておりますが、信用金庫、信用組合を含め、しばらく経っても不良債権が残っていれば、預金保険機構で請け負いましょうという枠組みの法律でございますから、そういった意味では、当然、自己資本もしっかり経営者の判断で積んでいただきたいということも言っておりますので、そういった意味では、私はまさに震災特例の金融機能強化法を国会の全会派のご協力をいただきまして作らせていただきましたし、また、「個人債務者の私的整理（に関する）ガイドライン」、それから産業復興機構、東日本大震災（事業者）再生支援機構、これは国会で大きく問題が起きた二重ローンの問題、これは実は事務局（職員）の多くは金融庁から行かせていただいておりまして、そういったことで金融庁としては全力を挙げて復旧復興に努めさせていただいているつもりでございますが、各種の復興支援策の積極的かつ効果的な活用を促すなど、引き続き、被災地の復興支援に全力で取り組んでまいりたいと思うと同時に、ぜひ強調したいのは、金融機関も今回非常によく協力していただけたと思っております。 - 金融庁

Revocation of a patent in whole or in part may be obtained on petition to or on a counter claim in a suit for infringement before the High Court Division on all or any of the following grounds, namely:- that the invention has been the subject of a valid prior grant of a patent in Bangladesh; that the true and first inventor or his legal representative or assign was not the applicant or one of the applicants for the patent; that the patent was obtained in fraud of the rights of the person applying for the revocation or of any person under or through whom he claims; that the invention was not, at the date of the patent, a manner of new manufacture or improvement; that the invention does not involve any inventive step, having regard to what was known or used prior to the date of the patent; that the invention is of no utility; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and fairly describe and ascertain the nature of the invention and the manner in which the invention is to be performed; that the complete specification does not sufficiently and clearly ascertain the scope of the invention claimed; that the patent was obtained on a false suggestion or representation; that the primary or intended use or exercise of the invention is contrary to law; that the patentee has contravened, or has not complied with, the conditions contained in the patent; that the complete specification does not disclose the best method of performance of the invention known to the applicant for the patent at the time when the specification was left at the Department of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks. 例文帳に追加

特許の全部又は一部の取消しは、高等裁判所への請願書により、又は高等裁判所に係属している侵害訴訟中の反訴により、次の各号に掲げる事由のすべて又はいずれかを理由として得ることができる。すなわち、その発明はバングラデシュ国内において先願により有効に付与された特許の対象であること。真正かつ最先の発明者又はその法定代理人若しくは譲受人は当該特許出願人若しくは出願人の一人ではなかったこと。その特許は取消しを申請している者又は当該申請人がなす主張につき指示している者、若しくは当該申請人が代理している者の権利を詐害する目的で取得されたこと。その発明は特許された日において新規性を欠く製造方法又は改良であったこと。その発明は特許の日以前に知られていた又は使用されていたものに係るものであり、進歩性がないこと。その発明は有用性がないこと。完全な明細書は十分かつ正確に記載されておらず、発明の本質及び発明の実施方法が確認されないこと。完全な明細書から、請求する発明の範囲が十分かつ明瞭に確認されないこと。その特許は虚偽の示唆又は不実表示に基づいて取得されたこと。その発明の主な又は目的とする用途又は実施が法令に反すること。その特許権者が、当該特許に含まれる条件に違反し又は遵守していないこと。完全な明細書が、当該明細書が特許意匠商標庁に提出された当時に当該特許に係る出願人が知っていた、当該発明の最良の実施方法を開示していない。 - 特許庁

(1) A trademark or application therefor may belong pro indiviso to two or more persons. The resulting common property shall be governed by the terms of agreement between the parties, failing that by the provisions of this section and, in the final instance, by the provisions of common law on common ownership of property. The granting of licenses and the independent use of the trademark by each participant shall be agreed in accordance with Article 398 of the Civil Code. Each participant may by his own means take civil and criminal action to protect a trademark but shall make appropriate notification to the other joint owners so that they may be party to such action and contribute to the payment of the expenses incurred. In the case of transfer of a trademark or a share, a participant may exercise his right of prior purchase within a period of one month from the time when he was notified of the purpose of and conditions for the implementation of the transfer. Where prior notification is not given or if a transfer is made in a manner different from that provided for in such notification, a participant may exercise his right to withhold his share, within the same period, from the time of publication of the recording of the transfer in the Register of Trademarks. Such absolute and unjustified opposition of a participant to the use of a trademark as might cause the trademark to be declared lapsed shall be deemed, for all purposes, to constitute renunciation of his right.例文帳に追加

(1) 商標又はその出願は，2以上の者に共通して帰属することができる。結果としての共通財産は，当事者間の契約条件により，また当該契約が存在しない場合は本項の規定に従い，かつ最終的には財産の共通所有に関するコモンローの規定に従い，管理される。各参加者による商標のライセンス付与及び個別使用は，民法第398条に従い合意されるものとする。各参加者は独自の手段によって，商標を保護するための民事訴訟及び刑事訴訟を提起することができるが，他の共同所有者に適切な通知を行って，それらの者が当該訴訟の当事者となり，被った費用の支払に寄与することができるようにする。商標又は持分の譲渡の場合は，参加者は，当該譲渡の目的及び実施条件について通知されたときから1月以内に自己の先買権を行使することができる。事前通知が行われなかった場合又は譲渡が当該通知に定めるものとは異なる態様で行われた場合は，参加者は，商標登録簿への譲渡の記録の公告時点から同一期間内に，自己の持分を保留する権利を行使することができる。ある参加者が商標の使用に対して，当該商標の失効宣言に至りかねない程絶対的かつ不当に異議を申し立てた場合は，すべての目的について自己の権利を放棄したとみなされる。 - 特許庁

Article 177 The provisions of Article 1-3 through Article 5, Article 7 through Article 15, Article 17, paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (4), Article 18 through Article 19-2, Article 20, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 21 through Article 27, Article 33, Article 34, Article 46, paragraph (1) and paragraph (2), Article 47, paragraph (1) and paragraph (3), Article 51 through Article 55, Article 64, Article 70, Article 71, Article 75, Article 79, Article 82, Article 83, Article 132 through Article 137, and Article 139 through Article 148 of the Commercial Registration Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the registration related to an Investment Corporation. In this case, the phrases "Article 17" and "Article 24, Article 48 to Article 50 inclusive (including the cases where applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 95, Article 111 and Article 118), Article 51, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 52, Article 78, paragraphs (1) and (3), Article 82, paragraphs (2) and (3), Article 83, Article 87, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 88, Article 91, paragraphs (1) and (2), Article 92" in Article 15 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 17, paragraph (1), paragraph (2), and paragraph (4) and Article 18" and "Article 24" respectively, the phrase "or, the matters to be specified in a written application pursuant to the provision of the preceding paragraph" in Article 17, paragraph (4) of that Act shall be deleted, the phrase "the preceding two paragraphs" in said provision shall be deemed to be replaced with "that paragraph," the phrase "Article 30(2) or" in Article 24, item (vii) of that Act shall be deleted, the phrases "all shareholders or class shareholders" and "directors or liquidators" in Article 46, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "all Investors" and "executive liquidator(s) or liquidation supervisors" respectively, the phrase "a shareholders meeting, class shareholders meeting, board of directors" in paragraph (2) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Investors' meeting, meeting of the board of officers," the phrase "a director, company auditor, representative director or special director (in the case of a company with committees, a director, committee member, executive officer or representative executive officer)" in Article 54, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "a corporate officer(s) or supervisory officers," the phrase "an accounting advisor or an accounting auditor" in paragraphs (2) and (3) of that Article shall be deemed to be replaced with "an accounting auditor," the phrase "Article 337, paragraph (1) of said Act" in Article 54, paragraph (2), item (iii) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 102, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "Article 346, paragraph (4) of the Companies Act" in Article 55, paragraph (1) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 108, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "an administrator of a shareholder registry" in Article 64 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "an Administrator of the Investors' Registry, etc. (meaning the Administrator of the Investors' Registry, etc. prescribed in Article 166, paragraph (2), item (viii) of the Investment Corporations Act)," the phrase "the articles of incorporation and" in said provision shall be deleted, the phrases "the amount of stated capital" and "Article 449, paragraph (2) of the Companies Act" in Article 70 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the Minimum Net Assets" and "Article 142, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act" respectively, the phrase "Article 478, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Companies Act" in Article 71, paragraph (3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 151, paragraph (1), item (i) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "approved under Article 507, paragraph (3) of the Companies Act" in Article 75 of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "approved under Article 159, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act (in the case referred to in paragraph (4) of that Article, the approval of an Investors' meeting under that paragraph)", the phrase "Article 80 or the preceding Article" in Article 82, paragraph (3) of the Commercial Registration Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 174 or Article 175 of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

第百七十七条　商業登記法第一条の三から第五条まで、第七条から第十五条まで、第十七条第一項、第二項及び第四項、第十八条から第十九条の二まで、第二十条第一項及び第二項、第二十一条から第二十七条まで、第三十三条、第三十四条、第四十六条第一項及び第二項、第四十七条第一項及び第三項、第五十一条から第五十五条まで、第六十四条、第七十条、第七十一条、第七十五条、第七十九条、第八十二条、第八十三条、第百三十二条から第百三十七条まで並びに第百三十九条から第百四十八条までの規定は、投資法人に関する登記について準用する。この場合において、同法第十五条中「第十七条」とあるのは「第十七条第一項、第二項及び第四項、第十八条」と、「第二十四条、第四十八条から第五十条まで（第九十五条、第百十一条及び第百十八条において準用する場合を含む。）、第五十一条第一項及び第二項、第五十二条、第七十八条第一項及び第三項、第八十二条第二項及び第三項、第八十三条、第八十七条第一項及び第二項、第八十八条、第九十一条第一項及び第二項、第九十二条」とあるのは「第二十四条」と、同法第十七条第四項中「事項又は前項の規定により申請書に記載すべき事項」とあるのは「事項」と、「前二項」とあるのは「同項」と、同法第二十四条第七号中「若しくは第三十条第二項若しくは」とあるのは「若しくは」と、同法第四十六条第一項中「株主全員若しくは種類株主全員」とあるのは「投資主全員」と、「取締役若しくは清算人」とあるのは「執行役員若しくは清算執行人」と、同条第二項中「株主総会若しくは種類株主総会、取締役会」とあるのは「投資主総会、役員会」と、同法第五十四条第一項中「取締役、監査役、代表取締役又は特別取締役（委員会設置会社にあつては、取締役、委員、執行役又は代表執行役）」とあるのは「執行役員又は監督役員」と、同条第二項及び第三項中「会計参与又は会計監査人」とあるのは「会計監査人」と、同条第二項第三号中「同法第三百三十七条第一項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百二条第一項」と、同法第五十五条第一項中「会社法第三百四十六条第四項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百八条第三項」と、同法第六十四条中「株主名簿管理人」とあるのは「投資主名簿等管理人（投資法人法第百六十六条第二項第八号に規定する投資主名簿等管理人をいう。）」と、「定款及びその者」とあるのは「その者」と、同法第七十条中「資本金の額」とあるのは「最低純資産額」と、「会社法第四百四十九条第二項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百四十二条第二項」と、同法第七十一条第三項中「会社法第四百七十八条第一項第一号」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十一条第一項第一号」と、同法第七十五条中「会社法第五百七条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十九条第三項」と、「承認」とあるのは「承認（同条第四項に規定する場合にあつては、同項の規定による投資主総会の承認）」と、同法第八十二条第三項中「第八十条又は前条」とあるのは「投資法人法第百七十四条又は第百七十五条」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 33 (1) The term "Multilevel Marketing" as used in this chapter and Articles 66 (1) and 67 (1) shall mean sales of articles (such articles include rights to use a facility or to receive offer of services; the same shall apply hereinafter) (including mediation of such sales) or offer of services for value (including mediation of such offers) where the seller, the service provider, or their mediator induces a person to conduct resale of the articles that are the subject matter of sales (such articles are hereinafter referred to as the "Goods" in this chapter) (such resale means that the counterparty purchases and sells the Goods; the same shall apply hereinafter), consignment sale of the Goods (which means that the counterparty sells the Goods on consignment; the same shall apply hereinafter), or mediation of sales of the Goods, or induces a person to conduct offer of the same kind of services (which means that the counterparty offers services that are of the same kind as such services; the same shall apply hereinafter), or mediation of offers of such services by telling said person that he/she may receive a specified profit (all or part of the transaction fee provided by another person engaged in the resale, consignment sale, or mediation of sales of the Goods or another person engaged in offering the same kind of services, or mediation of offers of such services, or other profits that satisfy the requirements specified by an Ordinance of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry; hereinafter the same shall apply in this chapter), and conducts with such person transactions pertaining to sales or mediation of sales of the Goods or offer or mediation of offers of the services that involve a specified burden (which means purchase of the Goods, payment of the consideration for the services, or provision of a transaction fee; hereinafter the same shall apply in this chapter) (such transactions include change in the terms of transactions; hereinafter referred to as the "Multilevel Marketing Transactions"). 例文帳に追加

第三十三条　この章並びに第六十六条第一項及び第六十七条第一項において「連鎖販売業」とは、物品（施設を利用し又は役務の提供を受ける権利を含む。以下同じ。）の販売（そのあつせんを含む。）又は有償で行う役務の提供（そのあつせんを含む。）の事業であつて、販売の目的物たる物品（以下この章において「商品」という。）の再販売（販売の相手方が商品を買い受けて販売することをいう。以下同じ。）、受託販売（販売の委託を受けて商品を販売することをいう。以下同じ。）若しくは販売のあつせんをする者又は同種役務の提供（その役務と同一の種類の役務の提供をすることをいう。以下同じ。）若しくはその役務の提供のあつせんをする者を特定利益（その商品の再販売、受託販売若しくは販売のあつせんをする他の者又は同種役務の提供若しくはその役務の提供のあつせんをする他の者が提供する取引料その他の経済産業省令で定める要件に該当する利益の全部又は一部をいう。以下この章において同じ。）を収受し得ることをもつて誘引し、その者と特定負担（その商品の購入若しくはその役務の対価の支払又は取引料の提供をいう。以下この章において同じ。）を伴うその商品の販売若しくはそのあつせん又は同種役務の提供若しくはその役務の提供のあつせんに係る取引（その取引条件の変更を含む。以下「連鎖販売取引」という。）をするものをいう。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

6. We commit to pursuing the reform of the financial sector. Despite good progress, significant work remains. We will implement fully the Basel III new standards for banks within the agreed timelines while taking due account of the agreed observation periods and review clauses in respect of the liquidity standards. Likewise, we will implement in an internationally consistent and non-discriminatory way the FSB's recommendations on OTC derivatives and on reducing reliance on credit rating agencies' ratings. We look forward to the completion by the next Leaders' Summit of the following ongoing work on systemically important financial institutions as scheduled in the FSB work program for 2011: determination of Global-systemically important financial institutions by FSB and national authorities based on indicative criteria, a comprehensive multi-pronged framework with more intensive supervisory oversight; effective resolution capacity including in a cross-border context; higher loss absorbency measures through a menu of viable alternatives that may include, depending on national circumstances, capital surcharges, contingent capital and bail-in instruments ; and other supplementary requirements as determined by the national authorities including systemic levies. Once the framework initially applicable to G-SIFIs is agreed, we will move expeditiously to cover all SIFIs. We look forward to the reports to be finalized by the BIS, IMF and FSB on macro-prudential frameworks and by the FSB, IMF and World Bank with input of national authorities on financial stability issues in emerging market and developing economies by our October meeting. We look forward to the recommendations that the FSB will prepare by mid-2011 on regulation and oversight of the shadow banking system to efficiently address the risks, notably of arbitrage, associated with shadow banking and its interactions with the regulated banking system. We call on IOSCO to develop by mid-2011 recommendations to promote markets' integrity and efficiency notably to mitigate the risks created by the latest technological developments. We also call on the FSB to bring forward for our next meeting comprehensive proposals to strengthen its governance, resources and outreach. We urge all jurisdictions to fully implement the FSB principles and standards on sounder compensation practices agreed by the G20 Leaders in Pittsburgh and call on the FSB to undertake ongoing monitoring in this area and look forward to receiving the results of a second thorough FSB peer review midyear to identify remaining gaps. We call on the OECD, the FSB and other relevant international organizations to develop common principles on consumer protection in the field of financial services by our October meeting. We reaffirm our commitment to more effective oversight and supervision, including regular stress testing of banks building on the Basel committee's principles. 例文帳に追加

6. 我々は、金融セクター改革を続けることにコミットしている。良い進捗はあったものの、まだ多くの作業が残っている。我々は、流動性基準について合意した観察期間と見直し条項を十分に考慮しつつ、合意した期限内に銀行に対するバーゼルⅢの新たな基準を完全に実施する。同様に、我々は、国際的に整合的かつ無差別な方法で、店頭デリバティブや信用格付会社の格付への依存抑制に関する FSB 提言を実施する。我々は、2011 年の FSB 作業計画において予定されている、システム上重要な金融機関に関し進行中の以下の作業を次回のサミットまでに完了することを期待している：指標となる基準を基にした、FSB 及び各国当局によるグローバルなシステム上の重要性を有する金融機関の決定/より密度の高い監督・監視、クロスボーダーの文脈も含めた実効的な破綻処理能力、各国の状況に応じて追加的な資本賦課・コンティンジェントキャピタル・ベイルイン条項付き債務を含み得る実行可能な選択肢のメニューを通じたより高い損失吸収力のための措置、負担金を含めた各国当局が決定するその他の補完的な措置、を含む包括的かつ多角的な枠組み。当初 G-SIFIs に適用される枠組みに合意したところで、我々は全ての SIFIs をカバーすべく速やかに動く。我々は、BIS、IMF 及び FSB によるマクロ健全性の枠組みについての報告、FSB、IMF 及び世界銀行が各国当局からのインプットを受けてまとめる新興市場・途上国における金融の安定に関する課題についての報告、の 2 つの報告が 10 月の会合までに最終化されることを期待している。我々は、シャドーバンキング及びシャドーバンキングと規制された銀行システムとの相互関係に伴うリスク、とりわけ裁定行為のリスクに実効的に対処するため、FSB が 2011 年半ばまでに策定することになっているシャドーバンキングシステムの規制及び監視に関する提言に期待している。我々は、IOSCO に対し、特に最新の技術発展がもたらすリスクを抑制するために市場の健全性及び効率性を促進する提言を 2011 年半ばまでに策定するよう求める。我々はまた、FSB に対し、FSB のガバナンス、リソース、アウトリーチを強化するための包括的な提言を次回の会合のために提出するよう求める。我々は、ピッツバーグにおいて G20 首脳により合意されたより健全な報酬慣行に関する FSB 原則及び基準を全ての国・地域が完全に実施するよう促し、FSB にこの分野における継続的なモニタリングの実施を求め、残っているギャップを特定するための徹底した第 2 回 FSB ピア・レビューの結果を本年半ばまでに受け取ることを期待している。我々は、OECD、FSB 及びその他関係する国際機関に対し、金融サービス分野における消費者保護についての共通原則を 10 月の会合までに策定するよう求める。我々は、バーゼル委員会の原則に基づく銀行の定期的なストレステストを含む、より実効的な監視・監督にコミットすることを再確認する。 - 財務省

(vi) A person who holds voting rights in an Insurance Company, etc. (including a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items; hereinafter the same shall apply in this item) who is deemed to hold at least twenty hundredths of all shareholders' voting rights in the Insurance Company, etc., in terms of the number of voting rights held by said person in the Insurance Company, etc. (for a person falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items, the number specified in the relevant item) and the number of voting rights held in the same Insurance Company, etc. by his/her Joint Holder(s) (referring to any other holder(s) of voting rights in the Insurance Company, etc. (including those falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding times) who has (have) agreed with said person on concerted action in acquiring or transferring the shares pertaining to the voting rights, or in exercising the voting and other rights as shareholders of that Insurance Company, etc. (excluding, where the person who holds the voting rights is a company falling under the category listed in item (ii), any Company, etc. to be consolidated in the financial statements and other documents of said company; excluding, where the person who holds the voting rights is a Company, etc. falling under the category prescribed in item (iii) or (iv), any other Company, etc. in the Group of Companies, etc. to which said Company, etc. belongs; and excluding, where the person who holds the voting rights is an individual falling under the category listed in the preceding item, any Company, etc. in which the individual has majority voting rights; but including any person who has a special relationship as specified by a Cabinet Order with the person who holds the voting rights)) (for a Joint Holder falling under any of the categories listed in the preceding items, the number prescribed in the relevant item), taken together (the total number thus calculated is hereinafter referred to as the "Number of Voting Rights Jointly Held" in this item): the Number of Voting Rights Jointly Held. 例文帳に追加

六　保険会社等の議決権の保有者（前各号に掲げる者を含む。以下この号において同じ。）のうち、その保有する当該保険会社等の議決権の数（当該議決権の保有者が前各号に掲げる者であるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める数）とその共同保有者（保険会社等の議決権の保有者が、当該保険会社等の議決権の他の保有者（前各号に掲げる者を含む。）と共同して当該議決権に係る株式を取得し、若しくは譲渡し、又は当該保険会社等の株主としての議決権その他の権利を行使することを合意している場合における当該他の保有者（当該議決権の保有者が第二号に掲げる会社である場合においては当該会社の計算書類その他の書類に連結される会社等を、当該議決権の保有者が第三号又は第四号に掲げる会社等である場合においては当該会社等が属する会社等集団に属する当該会社等以外の会社等を、当該議決権の保有者が前号に掲げる個人である場合においては当該個人がその議決権の過半数の保有者である会社等を除き、当該議決権の保有者と政令で定める特別な関係を有する者を含む。）をいう。）の保有する当該保険会社等の議決権の数（当該共同保有者が前各号に掲げる者であるときは、それぞれ当該各号に定める数）を合算した数（以下この号において「共同保有議決権数」という。）が当該保険会社等の総株主の議決権の百分の二十以上の数である者　共同保有議決権数 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

(iii) with regard to a Place of Business, etc. where more than 50 dispatched workers are caused to be engaged in Manufacturing Services, when the number of dispatched workers caused to be engaged in Manufacturing Services is over 50 but 100 or less, one or more out of all responsible persons acting for the Client at said Place of Business, etc. shall be exclusively in charge of said dispatched workers; when the number is over 100 but 200 or less, two or more responsible persons shall be exclusively in charge of said dispatched workers; and when the number exceeds 200, the number of responsible persons to be exclusively in charge of said dispatched workers shall be over two plus one for each 100 said dispatched workers over 100 (hereinafter such responsible person shall be referred to as a "Responsible Person Acting for the Client Exclusively in Charge of Manufacturing Services"); provided, however, that one of the Responsible Persons Acting for the Client Exclusively in Charge of Manufacturing Services may also take charge of dispatched workers who are not caused to be engaged in Manufacturing Services, and when it is required that the same responsible person acting for the Client should take charge of both dispatched workers caused to be engaged in Manufacturing Services and dispatched workers caused to be engaged in other work incidental to Manufacturing Services (hereinafter referred to as "Work Incidental to Manufacturing Services") in order to ensure the safety and health of said dispatched workers caused to be engaged in work incidental to Manufacturing Services, a single responsible person acting for the Client may also take charge of dispatched workers caused to be engaged in work incidental to Manufacturing Services, only within the limit that the total number of both types of dispatched workers that he/she shall take charge of does not exceed 100. 例文帳に追加

三　製造業務に五十人を超える派遣労働者を従事させる事業所等にあつては、当該事業所等の派遣先責任者のうち、製造業務に従事させる派遣労働者の数が五十人を超え百人以下のときは一人以上の者を、百人を超え二百人以下のときは二人以上の者を、二百人を超えるときは、当該派遣労働者の数が百人を超える百人ごとに一人を二人に加えた数以上の者を、当該派遣労働者を専門に担当する者（以下「製造業務専門派遣先責任者」という。）とすること。ただし、製造業務専門派遣先責任者のうち一人は、製造業務に従事させない派遣労働者を併せて担当することができ、また、製造業務に従事させる派遣労働者と製造業務に付随する製造業務以外の業務（以下「製造付随業務」という。）に従事させる派遣労働者を、同一の派遣先責任者が担当することが、当該製造付随業務に従事させる派遣労働者の安全衛生の確保のために必要な場合においては、一人の製造業務専門派遣先責任者が担当する製造業務に従事させる派遣労働者と製造付随業務に従事させる派遣労働者の合計数が百人を超えない範囲内で、製造業務専門派遣先責任者に製造付随業務に従事させる派遣労働者を併せて担当させることができる。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

As we have done every year, we selected cases from the inspection results reported from July of last year to June of this year and published them in the form of the latest Compilation of Problem Cases Raised in Financial Inspections for the 2009 program year, as you've just pointed out, which I expect each financial institution to refer to when formulating its future internal control system. With the successful enactment of the SME Financing Facilitation Act when former Minister Kamei was in office, it is now ensured, as you know, that in times of an economic downturn like the one we currently find ourselves in, financial institutions should adequately address requests for easing lending terms or changing housing loan terms, etc. In a sense, this has achieved a substantial change, if not quite a sea change, from the way financial administration was run in the past, and we need to keep that in mind. I know an SME owner in my hometown who employs about 100 people, about 50 of them being permanent employees and the rest working on a non-permanent basis, and who says that he is able to barely survive thanks to the establishment of the SME Financing Facilitation Act but also speaks out, "Mr. Jimi, we are now desperate for more work." He also goes on to say that "I personally feel that I could close down the business, but I am hanging on, struggling with all my might - because every one of my 100 workers has a family." 例文帳に追加

今ご指摘のとおり、引き続き平成21年の事務年度においても昨年7月から今年6月までに通知された検査結果の中から事例を選定し、金融検査指摘事例集として公表しているところでありまして、各金融機関におかれましては本事例集を今後の内部管理の態勢構築の参考にしていただければと思っておりますが、中小企業金融円滑化法案を亀井大臣のときに成立させていただきまして、ご存じのように条件の緩和、あるいはこういった不況のときでございますから、あるいは住宅ローンの条件の変更等々にきちっと応じるようにと、かなりある意味で従来の金融行政から変革をある意味できちっと、コペルニクス的とは言いませんけれども、かなり大きな変化をしたわけでございますから、そういうことを拳拳服膺（けんけんふくよう）して、私がいつか申し上げましたように、私の地元の中小企業でも100人ぐらい従業員抱えているところ、これは50人ぐらい正規社員、50人ぐらい非正規社員で、この金融円滑化法案ができたので何とか生き延びているけれども、「自見さん、あとは仕事が何とか出てこないか」と、「今、必死で我慢して自分自身は廃業してもいいと思っているのだけれども、それに100人みんな家庭があるから一生懸命頑張っているのだ」と。 - 金融庁

I do not think there are any inconsistencies in the logic. If my memory serves me correctly, the “pay-off” scheme was established around 1971—back then, many banks went bankrupt. In my personal experience, while I served as Minister in the Second Hashimoto Cabinet from 1997 to 1998, Hokkaido Takushoku Bank went bankrupt, Yamaichi Securities collapsed, and dozens of financial institutions failed in Japan at the time. As depositors were extremely anxious back then due to the collapse of many financial institutions, the government decided not to implement the “pay-off” scheme between 1996 and March 2002 despite the existence of legal provisions. Today, financial conditions have somewhat settled since the collapse of Ashikaga Bank, and Japan’s financial climate is calm on the whole, notwithstanding the Lehman Brothers shockwave on a global scale. At the end of the day, I believe depositors need to choose banks based on the principle of self-responsibility. At the same time, there is one thing I would like to emphasize especially to top management executives—the borrowers. They should feel very sorry to depositors if the “pay-off” scheme is implemented. Individuals with 10 million yen in deposits plus interest who are entitled to receive provisional payback under the Deposit Insurance Act will ultimately have the amount reduced to a certain extent, thereby causing substantial trouble to depositors. In that sense, all top management executives and others involved in the management of Japanese financial institutions should re-acknowledge the gravity of their management responsibility for financial business. 例文帳に追加

私は、論理的に矛盾はしていないというふうに思っています。やはり、このペイオフというのは、たしか1971年ぐらいにこの制度ができたのだと思いますが、ペイオフはあのとき、たくさんの銀行がつぶれましたし、私自身も1997年から98年まで第二次橋本内閣の閣僚でございましたが、あのときも北海道拓殖銀行が倒産しまして、それから山一証券が破綻しまして、まさにあの時期、数十の金融機関が日本国で破綻したわけでございますからね。そのとき、ご存じのように、当時非常に預金者の不安があり、たくさんの金融機関が破綻いたしましたので、ペイオフは1996年から2002年３月まで、法律上は（記載が）あっても、ペイオフを実施はしないということを、政府として決定されたわけでございますが、今は金融状態もご存じのように、足利銀行以来、ある程度落ち着いておりますし、世界的にはリーマン・ショックというのがございましたが、日本は金融の全体的な情勢が落ち着いておるということは皆さんもご存知だと思いますので、やはり私は、預金する方もきちっと自己責任においてどういう銀行かというのを選ぶ必要があると。そして同時に、私は特に経営者の方にも強調したい。ペイオフになったら（預金者の方に対して）大変申しわけないわけですよ。1,000万円プラス利子以上の方が、この預金保険法によって概算払いができて、後から幾らかは減りますから、そういったことで非常に預金者の方にご迷惑をかけるわけですから、そういった意味でも、私は日本の金融機関のすべての経営者、経営に携わっている人に改めて、金融業はそれほど重たいものであるという経営責任をきちっと分かっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

I will look into the fine details later, but basically, government offices are financed by taxes, and have authority based on the Constitution and laws, as a matter of course. The Cabinet is formed as a result of election by the people; then the Prime Minister comes forth, who appoints the Minister for Financial Services according to the Constitution. As this is an extremely democratic government office, it is common sense from my point of view to properly keep or publicly disclose the minutes regarding financial regulation and supervision which have a huge impact in ordinary circumstances as a basic rule, given that an executive branch of government is basically in the public domain. From what I have heard, minutes of seven or eight meetings were disclosed to the public after it was said that this would be done initially, but information on the progress in the interim was not disclosed at all. I think this is extremely odd in view of the rules of the executive branch of government. Basically, from the viewpoint of common sense, it is odd as a government in an open democratic nation that there are no minutes, especially on such a matter that has later had a significant impact on banking regulation and supervision, given the rules of government offices. 例文帳に追加

私、より細かいことまでは後から勉強しますけれども、基本的にお役所というのは税金で成り立っておりまして、当然憲法、法律による権限がございまして、当然国民の選挙によって内閣ができて、総理大臣が出てきて、その総理大臣は憲法に従って金融担当大臣を任命するわけですから、これは極めて民主的な役所であるわけですから、私の常識としては、基本的にやはり行政というのは公のことですから、普通であれば非常に影響の大きい金融行政というのはきちんとやはり議事録を残す、あるいはきちんと皆様方に公表するということが基本的なルールだと思っておりますけれども、何か聞いたところによると、最初だけやりますといって、7、8回（議事録の公表を）やったのですか、途中の経過は一切公表しなかったという話を聞きますし、私自身、非常にこれは何か行政のルールとして大変おかしいことだなというふうに私は思っておりまして、もう一回きちんと、法律的な話等々はまた詰めて、私は法律家ではございませんけれども、基本的にごく常識的に考えて、本当に役所のルールとして、開かれた民主主義国家における政府として、ましてや非常に後から銀行行政に関して大きな影響を与えた話でございますから、私は（議事録がないという事は）いかがなものかなと思っております。 - 金融庁

A resident of a Contracting State shall be a qualified person for a taxable year only if such resident is either: a) an individual; b) a qualified governmental entity; c) a company (including a company participating in a dual listed company arrangement), if its principal class of shares is listed or registered on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph d) of paragraph 6 and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges; d) a person other than an individual or a company, if the principal class of units in that person is listed or admitted to dealings on a recognised stock exchange specified in clause (i) or (ii) of subparagraph d) of paragraph 6 and is regularly traded on one or more recognised stock exchanges; e) a pension fund, provided that as of the end of the prior taxable year more than 50 per cent of its beneficiaries, members or participants are individuals who are residents of either Contracting State; f) an organisation established under the law of that Contracting State and operated exclusively for a religious, charitable, educational, scientific, artistic, cultural or public purposes, provided that all or part of its income, profits or gains may be exempt from tax under the domestic law of that Contracting State; or g) a person other than an individual, if residents of either Contracting State that are qualified persons by reason of the provisions of subparagraphs a) to f) of this paragraph own, directly or indirectly, at least 50 per cent of the aggregate vote and value of the shares of the person, or at least 50 per cent of the beneficial interests in the person. 例文帳に追加

一方の締約国の居住者が次の(a)から(g)までに掲げる者のいずれかに該当する場合には、当該一方の締約国の居住者は、各課税年度において適格者とする。(a)個人(b)適格政府機関(c)法人（二元上場法人に関する取決めに参加する法人を含むものとし、その主たる種類の株式が、６(d)(i)又は(ii)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は登録され、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるものに限る。）(d)個人又は法人以外の者（その主たる種類の持分証券が、６(d)(i)又は(ii)に規定する公認の有価証券市場に上場され、又は当該公認の有価証券市場において取引が認められ、かつ、一又は二以上の公認の有価証券市場において通常取引されるものに限る。）(e)年金基金（当該課税年度の直前の課税年度の終了の日においてその受益者、構成員又は参加者の五十パーセントを超えるものがいずれかの締約国の居住者である個人であるものに限る。）(f)当該一方の締約国の法令に基づいて設立された団体であって、専ら宗教、慈善、教育、科学、芸術、文化その他公の目的のために運営されるもの（当該一方の締約国の法令において所得、利得又は収益の全部又は一部に対する租税が免除されるものに限る。）(g)個人以外の者（その者の株式の議決権及び価値の五十パーセント以上又はその者の受益に関する持分の五十パーセント以上を(a)から(f)までに掲げる適格者であるいずれかの締約国の居住者が直接又は間接に所有する場合に限る。） - 財務省

1. For the purposes of this Convention, unless the context otherwise requires: a) the term “Japan”, when used in a geographical sense, means all the territory of Japan, including its territorial sea, in which the laws relating to Japanese tax are in force, and all the area beyond its territorial sea, including the seabed and subsoil thereof, over which Japan has sovereign rights in accordance with international law and in which the laws relating to Japanese tax are in force; b) the term “the Netherlands” means the part of the Kingdom of the Netherlands that is situated in Europe, including its territorial sea and any area beyond the territorial sea within which the Netherlands, in accordance with international law, exercises jurisdiction or sovereign rights; c) the terms “a Contracting State” and “the other Contracting State” mean Japan or the Netherlands, as the context requires; d) the term “tax” means Japanese tax or Netherlands tax, as the context requires; e) the term “person” includes an individual, a company and any other body of persons; f) the term “company” means any body corporate or any entity that is treated as a body corporate for tax purposes; g) the term “enterprise” applies to the carrying on of any business; h) the terms “enterprise of a Contracting State” and “enterprise of the other Contracting State” mean respectively an enterprise carried on by a resident of a Contracting State and an enterprise carried on by a resident of the other Contracting State; i) the term “international traffic” means any transport by a ship or aircraft operated by an enterprise of a Contracting State, except when the ship or aircraft is operated solely between places in the other Contracting State; j) the term “competent authority” means: (i) in the case of Japan, the Minister of Finance or his authorised representative; and (ii) in the case of the Netherlands, the Minister of Finance or his authorised representative; k) the term “national” means: (i) in the case of Japan, any individual possessing the nationality of Japan, any juridical person created or organised under the laws of Japan and any organisation without juridical personality treated for the purposes of Japanese tax as a juridical person created or organised under the laws of Japan; and (ii) in the case of the Netherlands, any individual possessing the nationality of the Netherlands and any legal person, partnership or association deriving its status as such from the laws in force in the Netherlands; l) the term “business” includes the performance of professional services and of other activities of an independent character; and m) the term “pension fund” means any person that: (i) is established and regulated as such under the laws of a Contracting State; (ii) is operated principally to administer or provide old age, disability or survivor’s pensions, retirement benefits or other similar remuneration or to earn income for the benefit of other pension funds; and (iii) is exempt from tax in that Contracting State with respect to income derived from the activities described in clause (ii). 例文帳に追加

１この条約の適用上、文脈により別に解釈すべき場合を除くほか、(a)「日本国」とは、地理的意味で用いる場合には、日本国の租税に関する法令が施行されているすべての領域（領海を含む。）及びその領域の外側に位置する区域であって、日本国が国際法に基づき主権的権利を有し、かつ、日本国の租税に関する法令が施行されているすべての区域（海底及びその下を含む。）をいう。(b)「オランダ」とは、オランダ王国のうちヨーロッパに位置する部分（領海及びその領海の外側に位置する区域であって、オランダが国際法に基づき管轄権又は主権的権利を行使する区域を含む。）をいう。(c)「一方の締約国」及び「他方の締約国」とは、文脈により、日本国又はオランダをいう。(d)「租税」とは、文脈により、日本国の租税又はオランダの租税をいう。(e)「者」には、個人、法人及び法人以外の団体を含む。(f)「法人」とは、法人格を有する団体又は租税に関し法人格を有する団体として取り扱われる団体をいう。(g)「企業」は、あらゆる事業の遂行について用いる。(h)「一方の締約国の企業」及び「他方の締約国の企業」とは、それぞれ一方の締約国の居住者が営む企業及び他方の締約国の居住者が営む企業をいう。「国際運輸」とは、一方の締約国の企業が運用する船舶又は航空機による運送（他方の締約国内の地点の間においてのみ運用される船舶又は航空機による運送を除く。）をいう。(j)「権限のある当局」とは、次の者をいう。(i)日本国については、財務大臣又は権限を与えられたその代理者(ii)オランダについては、財務大臣又は権限を与えられたその代理者(k)「国民」とは、次の者をいう。(i)日本国については、日本国の国籍を有するすべての個人、日本国の法令に基づいて設立され、又は組織されたすべての法人及び法人格を有しないが日本国の租税に関し日本国の法令に基づいて設立され、又は組織された法人として取り扱われるすべての団体(ii)オランダについては、オランダの国籍を有するすべての個人及びオランダにおいて施行されている法令によってその地位を与えられたすべての法人、組合又は団体(l)「事業」には、自由職業その他の独立の性格を有する活動を含む。(m)「年金基金」とは、次の(i)から(iii)までに掲げる要件を満たす者をいう。(i)一方の締約国の法令に基づいて設立され、かつ、規制されること。(ii)主として、老齢年金、障害年金若しくは遺族年金、退職手当その他これらに類する報酬を管理し、若しくは給付すること又は他の年金基金の利益のために所得を取得することを目的として運営されること。(iii) (ii)に規定する活動に関して取得する所得につき当該一方の締約国において租税を免除されること。 - 財務省

(4) The provisions of Article 512 through Article 518, the provisions of Subsection 2 through Subsection 10 of Part II, Chapter IX, Section 2 (excluding Article 522, paragraph (3) through Article 536, paragraph (3)), the provisions of Part VII, Chapter II, Section 4, the provisions of Chapter III, Section 1 of that Part (excluding Article 870, paragraph (2) through paragraph (5) and Article 870 through Article 874), the provisions of Section 3 of that Chapter (excluding Article 879, Article 880, Article 882, paragraph (2), and Article 896, paragraph (2)), and Article 938 (excluding paragraph (6)) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the special liquidation of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation. In this case, the term "paragraph (3) of Article 492" in Article 521 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 155, paragraph (3) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the voting rights of all shareholders (excluding the shareholders that cannot exercise voting rights on all matters on which resolutions can be passed at the shareholders meeting; or, in cases where any proportion less than that is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) or shareholders who have held, for the consecutive period of past six months or more (or, in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (3/100) of the issued shares (excluding treasury shares; or, in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the articles of incorporation, such proportion)" in Article 522, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "or Investors who have held, for a consecutive period of the past six months or more (in cases where a shorter period is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such period), not less than three-hundredths (in cases where a lower proportion is provided for in the certificate of incorporation, such proportion) of the units of Issued Investment Equity," the term "liquidators" in Article 523 and Article 526, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors," the term "liquidators" in Article 524 of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) or liquidation supervisors," the terms "liquidators" and "liquidators' agent" in Article 525, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidators" and "executive liquidators' agent" respectively, the phrase "liquidators and Company Auditors of a Liquidating Stock Company and employees, including managers," in Article 530, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "executive liquidator(s) and liquidation supervisors of an Investment Corporation in Liquidation as well as the Administrative Agent, Asset Management Company, and Asset Custody Company," the phrase "directors upon incorporation, Company Auditors upon incorporation, Qualified Officers provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 423 or liquidators" in Article 542, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Corporate Officer(s) at Establishment, Supervisory Officers at Establishment, Officers, etc. specified in Article 115-6, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act, executive liquidator(s), or liquidation supervisors," the phrases "the liquidators provided for in paragraph (1) of Article 492" and "that paragraph" in Article 562 of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the executive liquidator(s)" and "Article 155, paragraph (1) of the Investment Corporations Act," the phrase "the head office (or, in cases set forth in item (iii), if a ruling to conclude special liquidation is made due to completion of a special liquidation, the head office and branch office(s))" in Article 938, paragraph (1) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the head office," the phrase "Article 351(2) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 346(2) or Article 483(6) as applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 479(4)" in Article 938, paragraph (2), item (i) of the Companies Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Article 108, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act as applied mutatis mutandis by replacing certain terms pursuant to Article 153, paragraph (2) of the Investment Corporations Act," and any other necessary technical replacement of terms shall be specified by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加

４　会社法第五百十二条から第五百十八条まで、第二編第九章第二節第二款から第十款まで（第五百二十二条第三項及び第五百三十六条第三項を除く。）、第七編第二章第四節並びに第三章第一節（第八百六十八条第二項から第五項まで及び第八百七十条から第八百七十四条までを除く。）及び第三節（第八百七十九条、第八百八十条、第八百八十二条第二項及び第八百九十六条第二項を除く。）並びに第九百三十八条（第六項を除く。）の規定は、清算投資法人の特別清算について準用する。この場合において、同法第五百二十一条中「第四百九十二条第三項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第三項」と、同法第五百二十二条第一項中「総株主（株主総会において決議をすることができる事項の全部につき議決権を行使することができない株主を除く。）の議決権の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の議決権を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主若しくは発行済株式（自己株式を除く。）の百分の三（これを下回る割合を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の数の株式を六箇月（これを下回る期間を定款で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する株主」とあるのは「発行済投資口の百分の三（これを下回る割合を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その割合）以上の口数の投資口を六箇月（これを下回る期間を規約で定めた場合にあっては、その期間）前から引き続き有する投資主」と、同法第五百二十三条及び第五百二十六条第一項中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十四条中「清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百二十五条第一項中「清算人は」とあるのは「清算執行人は」と、「清算人代理」とあるのは「清算執行人代理」と、同法第五百三十条第一項中「清算人及び監査役並びに支配人その他の使用人」とあるのは「清算執行人及び清算監督人並びに一般事務受託者、資産運用会社及び資産保管会社」と、同法第五百四十二条第一項中「設立時取締役、設立時監査役、第四百二十三条第一項に規定する役員等又は清算人」とあるのは「設立時執行役員、設立時監督役員、投資法人法第百十五条の六第一項に規定する役員等、清算執行人又は清算監督人」と、同法第五百六十二条中「第四百九十二条第一項に規定する清算人」とあるのは「清算執行人」と、「同項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十五条第一項」と、同法第九百三十八条第一項中「本店（第三号に掲げる場合であって特別清算の結了により特別清算終結の決定がされたときにあっては、本店及び支店）」とあるのは「本店」と、同条第二項第一号中「第四百七十九条第四項において準用する第三百四十六条第二項又は第四百八十三条第六項において準用する第三百五十一条第二項」とあるのは「投資法人法第百五十三条第二項において読み替えて準用する投資法人法第百八条第二項」と読み替えるものとするほか、必要な技術的読替えは、政令で定める。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

He became the new chairman of the General Insurance Association of Japan – well, being a non-life insurer naturally comes with the corresponding social role and, for that reason, the FSA is also eager to maintain close mutual contact. In the non-life insurance industry, participating businesses (non-life insurers) are all experiencing the severe economic conditions that have hit Japan. On an international front, the global financial market has also posed difficulties since the Lehman crisis two years ago. Domestically, we are also faced with grim employment conditions reflected in the fact that the unemployment rate is 5.2% and one million people are receiving the Employment Adjustment Subsidy. Although there are some signs that a path toward economic recovery is appearing, to a modest degree, we are still on a seesaw ride. As you know, events like the Greek crisis have made it necessary to seek international policy coordination in the G7 and G20 forums. Among other domains, the financial area particularly has a strong cross-border nature. On the other hand, the way a country's economy is run differs from one country to the next. I hope that he, in his capacity of chairman of the General Insurance Association of Japan, will properly fulfill his responsibility for what non-life insurers have as their mission, with the points I've just made in mind. 例文帳に追加

新しく日本損害保険協会の会長になられたということでございますが、当然、損保でございますからそれ相応の社会的役割があるわけでございますし、そういったことでやはり金融庁としても密接に連絡をとりながら、それぞれの損保各企業の業界の会長でございますから、それぞれこういった厳しい経済環境の中であるし、また国際的にも非常に2年前のリーマンショック以来、国際的な金融市場というのはなかなか一筋縄でいかないところがございまして、国内にも失業率5.2％、雇用調整助成金をもらっている人が100万人という厳しい雇用情勢があるし、一方、少し景気回復の足腰が少し整ってきたよという雰囲気もありますけれども、まだまだ一進一退でございますし、しかしご存じのようにギリシャショックなどが起きまして、G7あるいはG20で国際的な協調政策、その中でまた各国のそれぞれの経済のあり方というのはそれぞれの国によって当然違うわけでございますから、そういったことをG20の中でも共通の、特に金融でございますから国際性が非常に強い分野でもございますから、そういったことを勘案しながらきちっと損保会社を損保協会の会長さんとしてきちっと与えられた使命に責任を果たしていっていただきたい。 - 金融庁

(4) When forfeiture is directed on a conviction the Court, before whom the person convicted, may order any forfeited article to be destroyed or otherwise disposed of as the Court thinks fit. Where a person is accused of an offence under section 73 of this Act and proves. (a) that in the ordinary course of his business he is employed on behalf of other persons to apply trademarks or trade descriptions, or, as the case may be, to make dies, blocks, machines, plates, or other instruments for making, or being used in making, trademarks; (b) that in the case which is the subject of the charge he was so employed, 58 and was not interested in the goods or service or other thing by way of profit or commission dependent on the sale of such goods or services or other things, as the case may be; (c) that the took reasonable precautions against committing the offence charged; (d) that he had, at the time of the commission of the alleged offence, on reason to suspect the genuineness of the trademark or trade description; and (e) that on demand made by or on behalf of the prosecutor, he gave all the information in his power with respect to the persons on whose behalf the mark or description was applied; the Court may discharge the person from the complaint. 例文帳に追加

(4)没収が有罪判決について命令された場合、裁判所は、有罪を宣告された者に、没収が命じられたいかなる物品についても廃棄又は裁判所が適切と考えるその他の処分を命ずることができる。本法第73条に定める違反に係る被疑者が次に掲げる事項を立証した場合、裁判所は訴追を取り下げることができる。(a)自己の事業の通常の過程において、他の者に代わり、商標若しくは商品表示を付するために、又は(場合に応じ)、商標の制作用若しくは当該制作に使用される金型、版、機器、板材又はその他の器具を製作するために、当該他の者に雇用されていること。(b)容疑の対象となる事件において、そのように雇用されていた事実、及び、かかる商品若しくは役務(場合に応じ)の販売によって決まる利益若しくは手数料のを得る手段としての当該商品若しくは役務又はその他の物品に関与していなかったこと。(c)容疑の対象となった違反を犯さないよう合理的予防措置を講じていたこと。(d)違反行為を実行したとされる時点において、当該商標又は商品表示の真実性を疑う理由があったこと。(e)検察官により、又は検察官に代わって行われた要求に応じて、当該標章又は表示をその者のために付した者に関し、自らの権能が及ぶすべての情報を提出したこと。 - 特許庁

Article 53-4 If the employment insurance rate has been modified pursuant to the provision of Article 53-2, paragraph (1) of the Supplementary Provisions, with regard to the application of Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Act on Asbestos Health Damage Relief (Act No. 4 of 2006; hereinafter referred to as the "Asbestos Health Damage Relief Act" in this Article) to the business operators who are required to submit the notification pursuant to Article 19, paragraph (1) or (2) of the New Collection Act as replaced and applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Asbestos Health Damage Relief Act and required to pay the paragraph (1) general contributions pursuant to Article 19, paragraph (3) of the New Collection Act as replaced and applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Asbestos Health Damage Relief Act during the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007 (excluding the business operators in respect of which the cause of the submission of the notification pursuant to Article 19, paragraph (1) or (2) of the New Collection Act as replaced and applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Asbestos Health Damage Relief Act and the payment of the paragraph (1) general contributions pursuant to Article 19, paragraph (3) of the New Collection Act as replaced and applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Asbestos Health Damage Relief Act occurs on and after the date of modification), the term "every insurance year the declaration form...the following" in Article 19, paragraph (1) of the New Collection Act as replaced and applied mutatis mutandis pursuant to Article 38, paragraph (1) the Asbestos Health Damage Relief Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "the declaration form...the following", the term "the first day of such insurance year (or in case of extinction of the insurance relation in the midst of an insurance year" with "the first day of the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007 (or in case of extinction of the insurance relation in the midst of such insurance year, the first day of such insurance year", the term "within 50 days" with "within the number of days calculated by adding to 50 days the number of days from the first day of such insurance year to the day preceding the date of modification prescribed by Article 53-2, paragraph (2) of the Supplementary Provisions of the Act Revising a Portion of the Employment Insurance Act, etc. (Act No. 30 of 2007) (hereinafter referred to as the "date of modification" in this Article)", the term "Article 15, paragraph (1), item (i)" with "Article 15, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii)", the term "the insurance year immediately preceding such insurance year" with "the insurance year immediately preceding the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007", the term "all workers employed during such insurance year (...the midst of an insurance year" with "all workers employed during such insurance year (...the midst of the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007", the term "in case of establishment or extinction of the insurance relation in the midst of an insurance year" with "in case of extinction of the insurance relation in the midst of an insurance year, and if the notification is to be submitted within the number of days calculated by adding to 50 days the number of days from the first day of such insurance year to the day preceding the date of modification inclusive from the day of extinction of such insurance relation,", and the term "within 50 days" in the same Article, paragraph (2) shall be deemed to be replaced with "within the number of days calculated by adding to 50 days the number of days from the first day of the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007 to the day preceding the date of modification", the term "Article 15, paragraph (1), item (i)" with "Article 15, paragraph (1), items (i) and (ii)", and the term "the first day of such insurance year" in the same Article, paragraph (3) shall be deemed to be replaced with "the first day of the insurance year starting on April 1, 2007", the term "within 50 days" with "within the number of days calculated by adding to 50 days the number of days from the first day of such insurance year to the day preceding the date of modification". 例文帳に追加

第五十三条の四　附則第五十三条の二第一項の雇用保険率の変更があった場合において、平成十九年四月一日から始まる保険年度において石綿による健康被害の救済に関する法律（平成十八年法律第四号。以下この条において「石綿健康被害救済法」という。）第三十八条第一項において読み替えて準用する新徴収法第十九条第一項又は第二項の規定により申告書を提出し、石綿健康被害救済法第三十八条第一項において読み替えて準用する新徴収法第十九条第三項の規定により第一項一般拠出金を納付すべき事業主（変更日以後に石綿健康被害救済法第三十八条第一項において読み替えて準用する新徴収法第十九条第一項又は第二項の規定により申告書を提出し、石綿健康被害救済法第三十八条第一項において読み替えて準用する新徴収法第十九条第三項の規定により第一項一般拠出金を納付すべき事由が生じた事業主を除く。）に係る石綿健康被害救済法第三十八条第一項の規定の適用については、同項において読み替えて準用する新徴収法第十九条第一項中「保険年度ごとに、次に」とあるのは「次に」と、「その保険年度の初日（保険年度の中途に保険関係が消滅したものについては、」とあるのは「平成十九年四月一日から始まる保険年度の初日（その保険年度の中途に保険関係が消滅したものについては、その保険年度の初日及び」と、「五十日以内」とあるのは「五十日にその保険年度の初日から雇用保険法等の一部を改正する法律（平成十九年法律第三十号）附則第五十三条の二第二項に規定する変更日（以下この条において「変更日」という。）の前日までの日数を加えた日数以内」と、「第十五条第一項第一号」とあるのは「第十五条第一項第一号及び第二号」と、「その保険年度の直前の保険年度」とあるのは「平成十九年四月一日から始まる保険年度の直前の保険年度」と、「労働者（」とあるのは「労働者（平成十九年四月一日から始まる」と、「保険関係が成立し、又は消滅したものについて」とあるのは「保険関係が消滅した場合であつて、当該保険関係が消滅した日から五十日にその保険年度の初日から変更日の前日までの日数を加えた日数以内に申告書を提出するとき」と、同条第二項中「五十日以内」とあるのは「五十日に平成十九年四月一日から始まる保険年度の初日から変更日の前日までの日数を加えた日数以内」と、「第十五条第一項第一号」とあるのは「第十五条第一項第一号及び第二号」と、同条第三項中「その保険年度の初日」とあるのは「平成十九年四月一日から始まる保険年度の初日」と、「五十日以内」とあるのは「五十日にその保険年度の初日から変更日の前日までの日数を加えた日数以内」と読み替えるものとする。 - 日本法令外国語訳データベースシステム

Article 53-15 The provisions of Article 350 (Liability for Damages Caused by Acts of Directors), Article 352 (Authority of Persons Who Perform Duties on Behalf of Directors), Article 354 to 357 inclusive (Apparent Representative Directors, Duty of Loyalty, Restrictions on Competition and Conflict of Interest Transactions, Director's Duty to Report), Article 358 (excluding paragraph (1), item (ii)) (Election of Inspector of Execution of Operation), Article 359 (Decision by Court to Call Shareholders Meeting), Article 360, paragraph (1) (Enjoinment of Acts of Directors by Shareholders), Article 361 (Remuneration for Directors) and Article 365, paragraph (2) (Restrictions on Competition and Transactions with Companies with a Board of Directors) of the Companies Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 349, paragraphs (4) and (5) (Representatives of Companies), and Article 351 (Measures When Vacancy Arises in Office of Representative Director) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company; the provisions of Article 868, paragraph (1) (Jurisdiction of Non-Contentious Cases), Article 869 (Showing of Prima Facie Evidence), Article 870 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii)) (Hearing of Statements), Article 871 (Supplementary Note of Reasons), Article 872 (limited to the segment pertaining to item (iv)) (Immediate Appeal Against Ruling), Article 874 (limited to the segment pertaining to items (i) and (iv)) (Restrictions on Appeal), Article 875 (Exclusion from Application of Provisions of Act on Procedures for Non-Contentious Cases) and Article 876 (Supreme Court Rules) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the directors or representative director of a Mutual Company; and the provision of Article 937, paragraph (1) (limited to the segment pertaining to item (ii), (a) and (c)) (Commission of Registration by Judicial Decision) of that Act shall apply mutatis mutandis to the representative director of a Mutual Company. In this case, the term "shareholders meeting" in Article 356, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "board of directors"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "Shareholders who hold not less than three hundredths of the votes (or, in cases where a lesser proportion is prescribed in the articles of incorporation, such proportion) of all shareholders (excluding shareholders who may not exercise their votes on all matters which may be resolved at shareholders meetings)" in Article 358, paragraph (1), item (i) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "Members representing at least three thousandths (or any smaller proportion prescribed by the articles of incorporation) of the total membership, or three thousand (or any smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more members of a Mutual Company (or, in a Specified Mutual Company, members equal to or exceeding the number specified by a Cabinet Order set forth in Article 38, paragraph (1) of the Insurance Business Act), who have been members of the Mutual Company without interruption for the preceding six months (or any shorter period prescribed by the articles of incorporation) (or, where the company has a General Meeting, those persons, or nine (or any other smaller number prescribed by the articles of incorporation) or more general representatives)"; the term "shareholders" in Article 358, paragraph (7) shall be deemed to be replaced with "members or general representatives"; the term "shareholders" in Article 359, paragraph (1), item (ii) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "members (or, where the company has a General Meeting, general representatives)"; and the terms "shareholders having the shares" and "substantial detriment" in Article 360, paragraph (1) of that Act shall be deemed to be replaced with "persons who have been members" and "irreparable damages," respectively; any other necessary technical change in interpretation shall be prescribed by a Cabinet Order. 例文帳に追加